[ Rules ] [ ot / g / m ] [ pt / snow / w ] [ meta ] [ Server Status ]

/pt/ - lolcow general

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File(20 MB max)
Video
Password
(For post deletion)

The site maintenance is completed but lingering issues are expected, please report any bugs here

File: 1425782938759.png (61.95 KB, 439x517, raleigh pt 2.png)

No. 58452

For those of you who still go to /cgl/ you might know about the current drama with Raleigh Wood, the old lady who was obsessed with posting irrelevant shitty patterns and whining about "brand addicts" who is now banned from Rufflechat. She's also the one who started complaining about her fat niece for no explicable reason.

I really think she has lolcow potential. From scanning the thread about her on RC: Uncensored, she seems highly unstable and entitled, for example:

https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/DWManor/conversations/topics/552

She is currently reporting people left and right to facebook for "harassing" her, and apparently she tried to sue a professor at NC state because he kicked her out of a class when she wasn't even a registered student in the class.

Her real name is Gigi Garnett
One of her screenames is blkrsenmaiden
She's in her 40s

She's batshit

No. 58476

Fucking Raleigh and her stupid pattern shit advice.

Any more caps?

No. 58479

File: 1425787134520.png (86.81 KB, 430x395, raleigh.png)

>>58476
More of her crazy rants

No. 58480

File: 1425787205664.png (125.88 KB, 442x553, raleighhh.png)

>>58479
Someone flat out asks her if she's a lolita and she basically refuses to answer

No. 58481

File: 1425787391235.png (459.75 KB, 1002x1626, bargain bin.png)

>>58480
Someone in the group asked for real lolita patterns and not "$1 bargain bin" shit that Raleigh kept posting, this was her response

someone was fed up with her and started going crazy in the comments it was nuts

No. 61281

She posted to a legal advice forum in 2008 asking if she could press charges against a professor for kicking her out of a class that she wasn't registered for

http://www.expertlaw.com/forums/showthread.php?t=50505

No. 61339

File: 1426213955537.png (576.09 KB, 2475x944, tmp_8804-142559289003566026462…)

This happened very recently.

No. 61356

>>61339
Waaaaaaaaaaay too small to read.

No. 61363

>>61339
text for ants

No. 61364

>>58480
I agree with her that it's dumb to talk down to others because they don't own brand. As for everything else she said I find it lulzy.

No. 61381

>>61364
no one has ever talked down to her for owning brand. she is upset because she got kicked out of rufflechat for spamming her group and has now convinced herself that everyone in rufflechat is an evil brandwhore and that's why she was kicked lol

No. 61383

>>61381
I thought she was referring to how bratty lolita girls think they are superior for owning brand and treat non-brand owners like filthy little peasants lol.

No. 61385

File: 1426218012786.jpg (87.2 KB, 540x960, raleigh peinoir.jpg)

In this image Raleigh demonstrates she doesn't know what a peignoir is, or even how to spell the word

>>61383
gah, meant to say "no one has ever talked down to her for NOT owning brand"

and tbh I've never met anyone like youre describing outside of 4chan so I'm not even sure they exist

No. 61386

File: 1426218149933.jpg (22.1 KB, 488x178, raleigh peinoir 2.jpg)

>>61385
Someone wrote a really helpful comment about what peignoirs actually are and raleigh instantly deleted it because her group is basically a giant ego trip and nothing more

No. 61397

>>61385
Ah ok.

Well I think they do exist. I heard that some lolitas fake niceness in real life then go to 4chan or some other similar place to unleash their irrational rage over someone not wearing the things they like or someone not wearing something properly. Kinda like how this board has PULL members who want a place to vent.

No. 61398

>>61356
>>61363
It shows fine on my screen.
It's basically a thread on fb discussing her "company" that apparently doesn't exist. People were fearing she was making money off of them although they were not sure how.

No. 61408

>>61339
I opened the image in a new tab, then clicked on it once to zoom in a bit

No. 61415

>>58452
Oh god I love crazy old arrogant cat ladies like this, please post more caps I'm not on rufflechat

No. 61613

This dramu is delicious

No. 61651

>>61364
>>61383
No one who has brand does this.

On the contrary, girls who can't afford brand pretend girls who have brand do this, in order to somehow justify why it's okay that they don't own brand.

No. 61820

>>61651 Ok. Do they do the "how dare you wear MY BRANDO DRESS" thing? or the "my poor dream dress!" thing or is it only on 4chan and similar places?

No. 61836

>>61820
Yes, that is done, and probably by nearly every lolita inwardly. It makes sense, if you have a dream dress that you cannot buy (especially when you have the money, you just can't find it) and you see someone wearing it horribly, it's hard to not feel bitter, as if they don't deserve it because they make it look like trash. But as for lolitas actually SAYING this to someone? Never. They either bitch on 4chan or keep it to themselves because most realize it is really petty to think that way, even if they can't help it.

There is a lot of victimizing done by itas and poorfags in this hobby unfortunately. If you are getting treated like crap, chances are you either deserve it or the people doing it to you are straight up bitches. But it never has to do with owning/not owning brand.

No. 61839

>>61820
I've seen people do that stupid shit here.

No. 61870

What groups is she posting in?

No. 61921

>>61839
Saw it too. I'm not sure if I've seen that level of stupidity with other fashion genres.
>>61836
I doubt anyone deserves to be treated like crap over not wearing something the way the other person wants. That's just dumb.

No. 61928

>>61386
Smell?

The fuck she going on about.

No. 61929

>>61921
Read my post again.

If you lack reading comprehension, I said plenty of lolitas think like that but don't say anything because they know it's a poor way of thinking. And if someone is treating someone badly, they are either a bitch or the person did do something wrong. There are no instances of any lolita treating another lolita like crap over wearing a dream dress in an ugly way without one of those points.

No. 61930

>>61397
Yeah I've seen it first hand.
A lot of comms are cracking down on that though.
Which is nice in a way but it can feel like a fucking hugbox cause you can't give an ita con-crit.

No. 61940

>>61929
There are no instances in real life of any lolita treating another lolita like crap over wearing a dream dress in an ugly way without one of those points.

No. 62205

File: 1426361859072.jpg (96.13 KB, 1062x649, raleigh disappears.jpg)

>>61870
She created her own group, "Lolita Sewing & Pattern Review" or something, but she just recently deleted it because she couldn't take being "gangbanged" or whatever. Most of the discussion about Raleigh is happening in RC Uncensored Lolita Debate"

She posted this comment on a girl's facebook status saying she deleted the group. The girl added her for shits and giggles I guess, and found this comment on one of her statuses.

No. 62421

>>61356
>>61363

Niggas, learn to right click and open in new tab if you can't see it. The image is huge!

Here is an imgur link for you PC illiterate's: http://imgur.com/TwaJp8v

No. 62433

>>62421
Different anon. Most of us who can't see it are on mobile which means the quality is crap regardless of which website or browser we're using. Perhaps you should think before acting like a cunt?

No. 62450

>>62433

You can do the same thing on mobile. Just hold down the picture and open the image on a new tab, then you can zoom in as much as you please.

Did that really hurt your feelings anon? Seriously? That was mostly sarcasm, thus why I even put it on imgur. If I felt like being a super cunt, I wouldn't have even done that.

No. 62475

>>62205
Further evidence that Raleigh is batshit.



Delete Post [ ]
[Return] [Catalog]
[ Rules ] [ ot / g / m ] [ pt / snow / w ] [ meta ] [ Server Status ]