[ Rules ] [ ot / g / m ] [ pt / snow / w ] [ meta ] [ Server Status ]

/m/ - media

File(20 MB max)
Password (For post deletion)

The site maintenance is completed but lingering issues are expected, please report any bugs here

File: 1596818179184.jpg (108.96 KB, 712x400, heatmap-2.jpg)

No. 103122

So I got the program that detects and unshops photos to work; aka the Adobe AI thing

The link to the github: https://github.com/PeterWang512/FALdetector

It takes a bit of things to setup but it is pretty cool.

No. 103123

File: 1596818213177.jpg (73.65 KB, 712x400, warped.jpg)

Samefag so sage

No. 103124

File: 1596818246675.jpg (74.21 KB, 712x400, cropped_input.jpg)

No. 103125

File: 1596818503382.jpg (47.8 KB, 400x400, heatmap-4.jpg)

No. 103126

File: 1596818543224.jpg (31.9 KB, 400x400, warped-3.jpg)

No. 103127

File: 1596818569347.jpg (31.91 KB, 400x400, cropped_input-3.jpg)

No. 103128

File: 1596818620935.jpg (57.91 KB, 536x400, cropped_input-2.jpg)

No. 103129

File: 1596818647509.jpg (81.15 KB, 536x400, heatmap-3.jpg)

No. 103130

File: 1596818673624.jpg (57.31 KB, 536x400, warped-2.jpg)

No. 103131

Looks like it only guesses warp, not the airbrushing of skin which is a pretty big key to making people look better.

No. 103132

is this the before or after? she looks rly pretty in this one

No. 103133

Shouldn't this be in /m/ if it's going to be a thread entirely centered around images?

No. 103134

It’s shit, go away

No. 103135

By heightening contrast, using ai image enhancers or forensically you can see what their facial details actually are.

No. 103136

I'm curious to understand why this tool was invented. Not against it by any means, just wondering what it'd be used to professionally.

No. 103137

Interesting but I would only trust RAW image files. It’s like those auto colorize software, the end result can be interesting but it’s just a guess and it’s useless with pictures that were initially taken with filters or beauty cameras.

No. 103270

Nothing. It's just there so petty bitches can shame more attractive petty bitches.

No. 103412

I think it's already been proven not everyone needs a lot of photoshop. I.e.: the kylie picture

Photo editing has been a thing since the 1800s, but it's not always necessary in the fact that people would edit their waists to the point of it being inhuman then.

No. 103431

People do that now as well, along with asses and hips.

No. 103485

How is this a response to what I said?

No. 103862

because I'm trying to say even though it uncovers photoshop or makes an estimation, it can show not everyone needs it.

Delete Post [ ]
[Return] [Catalog]
[ Rules ] [ ot / g / m ] [ pt / snow / w ] [ meta ] [ Server Status ]