No. 1183095
>>1183092OH MY GF[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[
she hung my puerto rican fateher in the backyeard after she found out he is not from COlumbia and then proceeded to tell me come tu culo but i dont speak isapnsi……
No. 1183103
>>1183100A
CERAMICA][[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[
No. 1183106
Lawyers drafting contracts have become ‘copy and paste monkeys’ without the time, authority or funds to revisit and check that what they are copying is correct.
That was the view of one lawyer during a panel discussion on contract drafting hosted by University College London yesterday.
Ken Adams, a US-based lawyer and adjunct professor at Notre Dame Law School, in Indiana, said a universal style guide should be put in place for firms to use as ‘building blocks’ for drafting contracts.
He added that automated templates, created through questionnaire answers, should also be considered.
During the event, lawyers from magic circle firm Clifford Chance and telecommunications giant BT, as well as High Court judge Mr Justice Flaux, criticised a tendency to use overly complicated language but denied that a dramatic change in culture was needed.
Kristin McFetridge, chief counsel for BT, said the company had already ‘re-drafted’ its terms and conditions so that ‘customers understand exactly what they are buying’.
Clifford Chance partner Kate Gibbons said there is ‘no one size fits all’ template but that they should not be ‘slavishly followed’.
The session was chaired by UCL visiting professor Mark Anderson, chair of the Law Society's IP law committee, who asked whether lawyers fully understood what they were writing and whether certain clauses could be left out of contracts to avoid litigation.
No. 1183108
File: 1615596878111.jpg (10.28 KB, 175x232, w57X3cm.jpg)
