[ Rules ] [ ot / g / m ] [ pt / snow / w ] [ meta ] [ Server Status ]

/ot/ - off-topic

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File(20 MB max)
Video
Password (For post deletion)

The site maintenance is completed but lingering issues are expected, please report any bugs here

File: 1698113508045.jpg (170.55 KB, 550x862, Report and ignore bait.jpg)

No. 1736744

>adhere to site and board rules
>do NOT respond to bait
>report and ignore trolls or obvious maleposters instead of replying like an idiot

Previous thread: >>>/ot/1731286

No. 1736748

First

No. 1736750

Second > First

No. 1736753

Hamburgers are gross, man.

No. 1736757

I don’t know the difference between hamburgers and cheeseburgers, except cheese.

No. 1736759

Humanitards are not that bad. I would rather hang out with humanitards than stemcels.

No. 1736762

>>1736759
Stemcels are the worst

No. 1736763

Thread pic is turning me on

No. 1736765

>>1736762
They really are. It's even more annoying when they're still just students because it's like come on, until the day you become a doctor, a scientist, and start saving lives or helping humanity with tech, you're still just a fucking nerd at the end of the day.

No. 1736772

>>1736765
Truly. My friend is a stemfem and her class is filled with autists (not the good kind), furries and troons.

No. 1736789

>>1736763
Kek same

No. 1736802

Why the hell does anyone go to college

No. 1736820

>>1736802
it's free here. us colleges sound terrible tho

No. 1736837

Blazers are fucking ugly and I hate them

No. 1736839

Your thread pics are lame and the guy is ugly as sin even with text covering his face

No. 1736842

I think the ability to create life is objectively our greatest skill and accomplishment. Feminists focus way too much on trying to outcompete men at their own game when it’s not necessary. Like that’s already more impressive than any kind of discovery or invention, we’re better by default.

No. 1736843

>>1736839
Not even unpopular. that thread pic sucks

No. 1736846

>>1736842
All women know this, but the problem is we have no even footing even if we work as hard or even harder than men. We are even trying to beat men at their 'own game.' we are just trying to get paid the same for jobs and considered for leadership roles. Women are usually more qualified, but still passed over because [insert whatever sexist reason here]

I dont like saying women's greatest skill is creating life because that just reduces a woman from a human being to an incubator imo. I dunno if those are the right words, but I hate hearing women can make babies, be happy, etc when the whole world is against us due to men being retards.

No. 1736848

>>1736820
Even when it’s free, why go when you could just go to work instead? I haven’t heard about any programs that pay students to go to college

No. 1736851

>>1736848
I think trade schools are neat. Sometimes people want to go to college to specialize more in a skill.

No. 1736853

>>1736848
i went because i like learning and reasearch and mu degree allows me to get research ficused jobs. and there's a lot you don't get taught in high school

No. 1736855

>>1736839
agreed. the threadpics are ugly as fuck and boring to look at

No. 1736866

As good medical suppliers can be, they are often greedy as fuck.
>would you like to fund the [medical device] project? With enough funds and research said item would greatly lessen the likely hood of infection and better the quality of life of a person that needs to use your [medical aid] product numerous times a day!
No, of course not! We'll lose our main stream of income and it's way to risky to fund some medical device that might not even work. Hahahahaa!

I feel sorry for the people that aren't medically insured. A person that I know has to use an intermittent catheter about five times a day and that would very quickly put said person in debt if not insured.

No. 1736868

>>1736842
Getting pregnant and giving birth is not a skill retard. Literal vegetables hooked on life support get raped into pregnancy and give birth unconsciously. You're a drooling retard who does males' work for them

No. 1736873

Euthanasia and assisted suicide aren't morally wrong. While yes in some cases when a patient is going through a difficult period of time and when said patient isn't clear of mind. However if one were to suffer the latter stages of parkinsons, alzheimer's, cancer and more low quality of life inducing illnesses. Let them die in the way they want.

No. 1736876

>>1736839
I love them. Love to see a girlboss choking a moid. Sidenote does anyone know where I can find some good smut like threadpic

No. 1736879

>>1736876
You're so based for this nonny you're so heckin sigma femdomstacy husbando yumepilled for this can you show me your self insert having sex with your husbando and then we can look for more stock photos of girlbosses choking scrotes on google images and then make out in the leftcows thread

No. 1736882

>>1736879
nta but that's kinda cute actually

No. 1736883

File: 1698128131444.gif (2.96 MB, 248x340, punch-girl.gif)


No. 1736888

>>1736879
You just know that dude has a boner while the based lady is strangling him

No. 1736895

>>1736879
this but unironically

No. 1736896

>>1736839
>>1736843
>>1736855
I will come to OPs defense and say it's actually pretty hard to find good pictures for this thread.

No. 1736913

Pardon my edge but we need to start gatekeeping the male abuse porn addiction. I do not care about your shiny new lolcow-induced cakefartingprince kaneoya sachiko fetish that makes you feel based as heck. You sound like former grooming victims with BPD.

No. 1736920

>>1736913
How do you gatekeep male abuse porn addiction?
Ask them to name their top five gyaku ryona doujins?

No. 1736924

>>1736913
lol wut

No. 1736929

>>1736924
I think she means stop posting porn.

No. 1736930

>>1736929
There isn't any porn. It's infighting bait because anon doesn't like the thread pic.

No. 1736933

>>1736930
weird. its basically incomprehensible to me

No. 1736936

>>1736913
no1currs go back to listen to lana del rey while hoping an older man picks you

No. 1736940

>>1736920
I'll do a quick hand jive in the hard drives like a glowie and if I retrieve less than 500mb of quad amputee anime boys on leashes you're going in the chokey

>>1736929
I'll take that over tryhard softcore from google images

>>1736936
Full force projection. That's exactly what I was talking about.

No. 1736941

>>1736940
I am making a reverse ryona game, kneel loser.

No. 1736944

File: 1698133318178.jpg (111.09 KB, 1300x744, 194661822-thumbs-up-emoji-emot…)

>>1736941
Of course you are!

No. 1736946

>>1736913
You are right and you should say it. At least, this isn't the thread for asking porn recommendation and telling everyone what you masturbate to unless it's to give an unpopular opinion withing that context.

No. 1736947

>>1736946
she's trying to gatekeep a cringe fetish though

No. 1736949

>>1736940
I don't really understand why this is so important to you but I admire your dedication.

No. 1736951

File: 1698133702447.jpg (51.71 KB, 450x318, 38500518.jpg)

>>1736842
Like the other anon said, getting pregnant is not a skill.
Women are not only better at retaining information and regulating their emotions during stressful times in a much healthier way than men (who like to argue that women are too emotional even though they will throw adult toddler tantrums, punch walls and even murder their family out of sheer anger), they are also better at managing people and make far better leaders than men. Like it's not even a contest actually, a team managed by a woman will outperform a male one every single time.
Reducing women to pregnancy and motherhood alone is such a disservice to women, especially since women are beloved and valued by their children far beyond their reproductive years. Men provide no value to anyone, on the contrary they are walking black holes that consume everything. They can't even keep themselves alive properly. Embarrassing, really.

No. 1736958

>>1736951
>better at managing people
>better at regulating their emotions
So you agree? Women's strengths are extensions of their role as mothers, and they aren't better at systematic or inventive tasks?

No. 1736959

>>1736958
are the same baiter handmaiden from yesterday? get a job

No. 1736968

>>1736848
To get a good job and earn more money. What kind of question is this?

No. 1736970

>>1736842
>>1736958
Respectfully, kill yourself

No. 1736981

>>1736842
if that's your only "ability", that's on you, but don't reduce every woman's ability to give birth. pretty telling when your only skills are being creampied and sitting while being an incubator. you should seek education tbh.

No. 1736995

I gained pretty privilege in college and i am absolutely addicted to the attention/lifestyle I get from it now. i was extremely overweight and had short dangerhair throughout middle/high school and was the butt of jokes/made fun of a lot and now that I am attractive enough to blend in with any social crowd I enjoy it so much. I no longer assume people I’ve just met are being backhanded when giving compliments, I don’t get anxious about people whispering in public because I know I don’t stand out and have no cause for ridicule. I have customers at work regularly call me pretty/beautiful and I’ve even been asked out a few times, always by men unfortunately but even though I reject them and are not interested whatsoever, I still feel a sense of pride that I’m doing well at seeming conventionally attractive. I also don’t feel embarrassed about having weird hobbies or habits because people think it’s quirky/fun instead of cringey.

No. 1737012

>>1736995
Anon while I relate to some of this, I have seen moids hit on people of all types, including finding the obese dangerhair cute. The reason they might say something now to you is simply because you don’t project that air of anxiety and self doubt you used to have. While there are men who prey on those that seem vulnerable, most are dumb monkeys who see a confident woman smiling and thats enough for them to act ungabunga. It’s not to disparage you, but that pride should be dealt with cause you most likely would have gotten that attention if you just had self confidence while looking outside of the norm cause moids have pea brains. You’re always gonna meet some form of resistance when you deviate from the norm but it has nothing to do with you being inherently “ugly” or undesirable.

No. 1737042

>>1736981
Literally, just because she likes being a barefoot and pregnant fucksock means she automatically assumes every single other woman out there is as retarded as she is, they should study her gray matter-decomposed brain in a lab.

No. 1737059

>>1736995
As a dangerhair fatty I don't have problems blending in any social circles and don't expect compliments from anyone (even though I receive them from time to time, if they're backhanded I don't mind) because obviously I dress and look out of the standard. I think your social anxiety stemmed from your lack of confidence more than your lack of beauty privilege tbh. Either way it's great that you got that sorted out and can enjoy socializing normally. I do recognise beauty privilege is a thing but sometimes a good personality and humor can carry your social interactions just fine regardless of how you look. The only people who are going to treat you like shit regardless of how good your disposition is, solely based on your looks are vapid and don't really deserve your consideration.

No. 1737088

>>1736995
Posts like yours are why this site is garbage now.

No. 1737093

>>1736995
I've sadly gotten worse at socializing once I got prettier. Mostly since girls in my circle used to ignore me when males made fun of my looks, so I wasn't a threat. About a year into my degree I became prettier over the summer and started dressing cuter and attracting male attention, so a few girls in the herd started lowkey ostracizing me and trying to flush me out of the circle by ignoring me, talking to everyone but me, and trying to get me kicked. This is a big college dorm and I was really scared of getting bullied again, this time by women, so I moved out.

No. 1737105

>>1736959
>>1736970
>>1736981
>>1737042
I see a lot of emotional repsonses but not a lot of people proving me wrong. My point is that it's more impressive than any other accomplishment, not that it's the only ability you have. Why are "feminists" using words like fucksock anyway?

No. 1737106

>>1737105
literally every woman who contributed to scientific progress proves you wrong, scrotoid.

No. 1737111

>>1737105
>impressive
kek, it's just biology. Do you think men cumming is absolutely mind blowing too?

No. 1737123

>>1737093
This shit is only happening in your head. You're insecure, and that doesn't go away with "becoming pretty". Stop internalizing MORE misogyny by assuming other women hate you because you're pretty and actually grow up? You're in college but you still think like a 15 year old. It's in your head, that is not reality, gain some self awareness and grow the fuck up.

No. 1737124

>>1737106
You don't need to qualify women's worth by saying shit like this, we don't need to justify our existence outside of giving birth. You're not helping yourself by scrambling to own the scrotes, you're making yourself look foolish by even thinking its necessary to defend yourself.

No. 1737127

>>1737106
>>1737111
Yes and it's impressive that our biology is capable of that. To me it's transcendent and more impressive and valuable than any scientific discovery regardless of who discovered it. Plus for someone to discover something, they had to be born, so it wouldn't have happened without women. I'm not saying it's the only thing we can do I'm saying it's a superpower basically.

No. 1737130

>>1737127
>I'm not saying it's the only thing we can do I'm saying it's a superpower basically
I agree

No. 1737132

I'm going to get my ass handed for this as usual, but if it not for schizos and autists this place wouldn't be any different to any other major social media site and y'all are desperately trying to drive exactly that type of user away by baiting them and making these weird ass call-out posts a la Twitter, what's the end goal? Purge this place of everything that makes it special? crazy or autistic female posters are fun because you don't really find them elsewhere but here, that's the point, why would you deliberately go to a niche website and then complain there are weird people here? You want everything to be sanitized to you and your politics, every user to act a certain way, while completely ignoring this is an imageboard. This place is so boring nowadays.

No. 1737134


No. 1737140

>>1737132
It's not about being weird, it's about being constantly negative, isolating ourselves further and further from other people by convincing ourselves that we're autistic weirdos with no hope in the world than to be on this website constantly spouting off about how much we hate this and how much we hate that. How about we actually talk about something interesting?? Instead of men, and whores, and calling other women fuck socks or whatever. Like do any of you have any real interests that aren't related to niche porn or how much you hate moids, where is the personality? You think this is fun? You think this is unique and special? It's a bunch of unhealthy screeching. I've spoken to at least 50 anons personally and all of them have cited detrimental effects to their mental wellbeing while being on this website but find it addictive, because anger is addictive, so they keep coming back. Why can't you post about something fucking interesting instead of screaming into the void with every post you make? How many times do you need to vent before you can post about some fucking poetry your writing or a piece of clothing you're making or sperg about your favorite movie or ANYTHING besides "SEND HIM COCK AND BALL TORTURE" "I'M AN UNHINGED TRIAD STACY AND MOIDS SHOULD ALL DIE" this place is no better than any other ib its not special its just as up it's own ass as any other site because so few posters have any fucking self awareness, just THINK for a second why this is how you want to spend your time constantly complaining and talking about how much you hate everything. Why can't you just crawl down out of whichever toxic asshole you're living in and make some worthwhile contributions to a unequivocally dying website.

No. 1737142

>>1737127
you know you need a man and a woman to form a baby right, or do you think every woman is the virgin mary?

No. 1737145

>>1737142
Oh Lordy be in heaven above please shut upppppppppppp

No. 1737147

File: 1698147831174.jpg (117.28 KB, 1000x796, dca621f6b8f7ac96b3_shutterstoc…)


No. 1737148

>>1737140
Ayrt and I'm not defending those type of anons, I despise them as much as you, I understand your rage. I'm talking about female anons with weird hobbies, ideas or fixations, they're usually harmless but get bullied anyways. I'd take Ronald McDonald extreme husbandofag instead of a random rage infighter any day

No. 1737150

>>1737145
i hate twitterfags so much, why do they come here to respond like pissed teenagers on twitter when they get called out in their bullshit?

No. 1737152

>>1737148
If only that was the discussions actually being had. And then they come at your with quirky chill pill posts when they're the ones shitting themselves all day because a moid looked at them.

No. 1737154

Most people here are newfags. I've been on here for 7 years.

No. 1737161

File: 1698148178598.jpeg (120.81 KB, 933x933, IMG_8493.jpeg)

>>1737148
Where is ronald mcdonald husbandofag I need to befriend her. I like him too and I need someone who understands

No. 1737162

>>1737123
Kek I knew I'd get a butthurt response like this because I said I was pretty. It's not "only in my head", my friends also noticed and encouraged me to move out. You don't know me or my life, shut the fuck up.

No. 1737163

>>1737154
I've been lurking since Venus Angelic "Korean" era, good times

No. 1737167

>>1737163
What is the Venus Angelic Korean era? I thought she only lived in Japan.
Tbh I'm only here for the coquette and Grimes/Musk threads, I don't think being new is a crime.

No. 1737169

>>1737162
You need to understand anon, when the average user is overweight, ugly and unapproachable on top of autistic it's easier to think you're simply lying about your beauty or happiness, they literally cannot relate to you or assume you're conceited if you ain't self loathing about your life and appearance like them

No. 1737170

>>1737162
Grow up

No. 1737172

>>1737154
I wish I wasn't an oldfag, this website keeps reeling me back in.

No. 1737177

It's D&D, not DnD. Dungeons AND dragons, not dungeonsndragons. Unsurprisingly every person who calls it DnD is shit at D&D.

No. 1737182

>>1737177
How can you be shit at DnD? It's a roleplaying game for nerdy babies and DMs are pussies who try to change the story to save everyone so that the players don't get mad and new players don't ragequit.

No. 1737188


No. 1737195

>>1737172
Use a website blocker nona

No. 1737200

File: 1698149303698.jpeg (33.07 KB, 500x460, IMG_8496.jpeg)

>>1737172
Same
I spent years being addicted to 4chan just because it makes me mad and now this place is making me mad too, I should leave for good

>picrel: me using any page on the internet

No. 1737204

>>1736995
good for you, no idea what does it have to do with unpopular opinions though

No. 1737207

>>1737182
unironically for the reasons in your post, and also not reading the fucking rules and just assuming the common way to play the game, i.e. podcast-wannabe babby's first improv theater fuckery, is the correct way

No. 1737259

>>1737172
I keep trying to leave. i stopped coming here for like 6 months but came back ugh

No. 1737282

Some people look better with dyed/unnaturally colored hair than natural.

No. 1737284

>>1737282
It’s true, sometimes nature gives people the shittiest natural hair colors that just don’t go with their skin color. I saw it once, she was a corworker of my mom, her natural hair color looked like shit on her, but she dyed it making it sightly lighter, nothing too crazy, and she stopped looking like someone wearing a Michael Jackson costume if Michael Jackson was part of the twilight movie.

No. 1737286

>>1737195
anon you think too highly of me

No. 1737301

>>1737284
Same here, I dye my hair about two shades lighter and it looks better on me.

No. 1737306

>>1737148
is the husbando fag the same as the anon who thought the grimace shake was a conspiracy against her?

No. 1737307

>>1736842
if this was the case the world wouldn't have hate boners for moms, especially single moms

No. 1737319

Women are more forgiving to men because they kind of expect them to be shit but they have harsher morality standards towards women. For example most women would dump a female friend for fucking their ex but would marry a man who cheats on them 24/7.

No. 1737324

>>1737150
I wish they would respectfully fuck off and leave lolcow alone. It's our only safe space on the internet at this point without retards like that thinking women are only good for making babies. fucking hell

No. 1737342

>>1736842
>>1736958
>>1737105
>>1737127
>>1737130
This kind of mentality is why so many girls are trooning out

No. 1737348

>>1736995
Based, be the Stacy you always were inside

No. 1737350

>>1737319
I think it's absolutely true, I'd add on patriarchal standards are often enforced by women, such as mother-in-laws in some oppressive countries. Also actually sorry for ot but can someone explain why it matters if your friend fucks your ex? Aren't they your ex…

No. 1737353

>>1737350
It’s the friend equivalent of being a scab. You’re crossing a sexual picket line.

No. 1737358

>>1737353
Um… I don't get it. Being a scab is when you work despite everyone being on strike, thus lowering the effectiveness of the strike for everyone. Isn't this more like going to work for a job someone else already quit?

No. 1737360

>>1737342
That makes no sense. Why is it wrong to acknowledge the strength of a woman during childbirth? Why would you shame a woman for something that is biological inherent to our species? You don't have to have kids anon. Women who chose to have kids aren't disgusting creatures. Child birth is absolutely grueling and imo horrific but that doesn't take away from the fact that women are capable of something so amazing and difficult and life changing. Your mentality is why women troon out, because every facet of our existence is apparently disgusting and being with a man is also disgusting everything we do is fucking wrong.

No. 1737363

>>1737348
What would be Stacy of her would be not assuming other women hate her because she looks nice.

No. 1737370

>>1736842
I think it's only an amazing thing when a woman chooses to get pregnant with a guy who is actually worth a damn. Too many women end up having accidental pregnancies with scrotes who become shitty fathers and abuse/neglect them and the children.

No. 1737371

>>1737370
I'm >>1737360 and I totally agree with this

No. 1737372

>>1737358
Nta but it's like when two people fight and the third person picks a side. So the friend is on the ex's side.

No. 1737379

>>1737360
No one is shaming a women for having kids. Your argument is:
>Sexually reproducing is the greatest thing any woman will ever do

Some people think there is more to life than doing what every single other organism ever has done.

No. 1737381

>>1737360
It's the other posts about how it's more impressive and valuable than any other accomplishment is why, it makes it sound like that's the best a woman can do and apparently her other accomplishments don't matter. If a young woman is told that's the best she can do it's kind of demoralizing imo.

No. 1737387

>>1737379
I'm not that anon.

No. 1737388

>>1737381
Being a woman is like being born demoralized if you ask me

No. 1737392

>>1737388
The sad truth…

No. 1737398

File: 1698159988549.png (365.53 KB, 564x705, 1687287531777.png)

>>1737392
Love you nonas

No. 1737404

>>1737200
I do this too kek It’s like I’m addicted to getting mad on the internet

No. 1737408

>>1737388
Better than being born a man.

No. 1737409

>>1736968
Oh my god. You can get a job without a degree. Unless you wanna be like a surgeon or some retarded shit which none of us are.

No. 1737410

>>1736958
Women shouldn’t be mothers

No. 1737413

>>1736968
Amerifags don’t know you can get a job without even going to public school

No. 1737414

>>1737388
it's true, no one is looking out for women and girls. even other women can view a woman as a waste of divine feminine energy or mentally ill if she doesn't want to reproduce or fall in line with the status quo of getting married to a scrote and popping out kids

No. 1737420

>>1737410
Don't be such a faggot

No. 1737421

>>1736744
Racemixing is wrong(racebait)

No. 1737422

>>1737414
>even other women can view a woman as a waste of divine feminine energy or mentally ill if she doesn't want to reproduce or fall in line with the status quo of getting married to a scrote and popping out kids
The same can go the other way, if you do want to be a mother other women here will treat you like you're a waste of space cum addled retard. How about just let women live how they want to live.

No. 1737430

>>1737409
>>1737413
Serious question, what kind of well paying jobs are people getting without a degree? People always mention learning a trade as if that doesn't involve an apprenticeship (i.e. higher education) and also destroying your body.

I don't think I'd be getting paid nearly as well as I do now without my higher education and the extracurricular opportunities it provided.

No. 1737433

>>1737422
99.9999% of the rest of the world worships mothers and women popping out babies nonstop, log off if it bothers you so much.

No. 1737439

>>1737430
An apprenticeship is not higher education, wtf? In my country it's basically an internship where you shadow an industry expert and help him out until you meet all the learning goals. You still get paid for your work.

No. 1737441

>>1737430
Nta. The only good jobs I've heard people undertaking without a degree IRL is men who build houses from scratch and sell them, but that obviously requires a lot of skill taught from childhood and investment money, and small businesses like photography (not sure if that counts as a 'good' job but it's sustainable I guess). Where I am it's pretty much impossible to get hired for any sort of skilled job without a paper, hell even older generations who have decades of work experience had to go get certifications and shit to prove themselves.

No. 1737449

>>1737433
No?I have kids, most of the world hates women and our bodily functions. When you have kids, majority of friends cut you off, if something happens to your relationship like your partner dies you'll immediately get slammed as an evil single mom for daring to ask for help, or even if you aren't single people claim you're retarded for asking for help at all even though that's been the standard since forever

No. 1737452

>>1737433
No, you can fuck off. Nobody worships mothers. You don't have to have children, anon. You not wanting or not liking children doesn't make mothers or motherhood evil and bad. You're so full of yourself you can't possibly imagine that a woman might actually be happy being a mother. Let women live how they want to live. If mothers were truly worshipped like you seem to imagine they are in your make believe world, that should be a good thing to you. Why do you hate other women just for being moms?

No. 1737453

>>1737439
>Spending 4 years learning how to do a trade before coming out with professional qualification isn't education because… it just isn't

Getting paid doesn't affect anything. Plenty of university students get paid to study.

No. 1737454

>>1737453
Where is that, I wanna go too? They get a full worker's salary per hour to study?

No. 1737457

>>1737452
NTA but there's this culture (maybe not everywhere, depends on where you live) that people have to love their parents just because they're their parents. Children can't cut their parents off if they're bad people without being scolded "they're your parents, forgive them uwu." And that's an example of people worshipping mothers.

No. 1737459

>>1737420
Don’t be such a gay man. Men shouldn’t be mothers either.

No. 1737460

>>1737454
Denmark pays you to get a bachelors degree. My friend studying for a PhD in Germany earns a solid 30K a year for being a student whilst PhD students in the UK get stipends equivalent to minimum wage. I know people who got grants at university for being poor.

No. 1737461

>>1737457
Nta but as someone who was subjected to that mentality, this is not even mother worship. You even said it yourself, this is for parents. Meaning that it also applies to men. It's just a "blood is thicker than water" mentality, nothing to do with "worshipping mothers"

No. 1737462

>>1737457
That has nothing to do with mother worship and you know it. That's about family in general, people would judge you for cutting off your brothers and father just as much as if you cut off your mother. I should know, I cut all of them off.

No. 1737463

>>1737459
What a loser.

No. 1737464

>>1737422
Is that really how they want to live though? Sometimes I wonder if so many women would choose to be mothers if it weren't so ingrained in society. I'm sure lots of people who you ask would say the whole marriage and motherhood lifestyle is something they just think they're supposed to do in life. I feel like more women and couples as a whole should think about that before having kids tbh. If they decide they want kids after that then by all means go ahead.

No. 1737467

>>1737460
Ok but are they getting paid that money personally or is that scholarship money that can only be spent on their tuition?

No. 1737468

>>1737463
Are you too autistic to realize that I’m just saying nobody should have more kids lmfao. Oh my god the levels of asp

No. 1737469

>>1737452
>let live women how they want to live
You’re clearly lost here with this libfem chant.

No. 1737472

>>1737469
>>1737464
>>1737468
Wow, is it really so hard to accept that women have autonomy and personal desires? Can't imagine having this level of internalized misogyny.

No. 1737473

>>1737460
Denmark doesn't "pay you" to get a Bachelor's, you get a student allowance from the government. It's not equivalent to a full-time job like an apprenticeship or salaried research position, it's just a bit of extra income. A PhD is practically a job, too. And grants aren't a job either, since you earn a limited amount of money that you can't spend on personal expenses. They usually cover tuition or course materials if you have that, you can't just spend it any way you like.

No. 1737475

Really proving my point today ladies.

No. 1737476

>>1737467
That's money that goes to their bank accounts. The whole point is that it pays for them to survive whilst they study.

What's the point of giving students money so they can then immediately give it to the institution instead of just paying the institution directly?

No. 1737477

I think choosing surrogacy as your career is retarded as all hell. Basically the same as prostitution. Neither are necessary to the survival of society. You can’t have a baby? It’s because you don’t fucking need one! And you wouldn’t be a good parent! So take the fucking L gracefully and enjoy your life of not having to get heavily pregnant just to shit out a baby and waste all your money on it, instead of hiring some 21 year old to do it for you! People who buy them and women who consent to being one are both equally retarded and shouldn’t be growing/caring for children. Anyone who tries to argue with this, fuck you. Buy an artificial womb and grow your baby in that instead of abusing the stupidity of younger women who aren’t capable of anticipating what will happen when they’re actually going through with the “job”.

No. 1737478

>>1737476
In America that’s what they do with student scholarships. They write you a check but it’s never given to you directly and it’s only applied to your school fees lol

No. 1737479

>>1737473
>denmark, the country, run by denmark government, doesn't "pay you" to get a degree, the government just gives you money if you're a student
anon pls

No. 1737481

>>1737472
I can’t imagine being so self important that you think your genetics just need to be recycled into another human being. That’s an embarrassing thing to admit. Men and women both who think that the genes they carry are just sewww special and they just need to have a baby together, vomit.

No. 1737484

>>1737479
Are you dumb? An allowance is not a job, so you are not PAID for the work you do. It is student benefits, just like unemployment benefits are not PAYMENTS. I would know because I receive them as a student.
They are also not a lot of money and not even close to a full time job's salary.

No. 1737485

>>1737472
>internalized misogyny is being able to understand that some people do not need to reproduce
I hope your womb shrivels up

No. 1737486

>>1737472
You’re just parroting libfem 'feminism is about choice foremostly!' rhetoric. No one says that motherhood is inherently bad, but it’s not profitable to women in a long run and currently doesn’t contribute anything to women’s liberation.

No. 1737487

>>1737484
Unemployment benefits are payments though. What. If they’re sending you money, they’re paying you. Why argue about it.

No. 1737489

>>1737486
Reproduction is inherently bad but that’s a conversation no one on this board is ready for, unfortunately.

No. 1737491

>>1737472
>women have autonomy and personal desires
Motherhood is the epitome of putting children BEFORE your every need also societal brainwashing for women to become mothers is constantly running at 100%. Mothers conform to the female stereotype more than anyone and are the most likely not to have minds of their own as they are seen as almost entirely only vessels to nurture other people, namely their children and husbands. So basically you're retarded

No. 1737492

>>1737487
Because you clearly aren't Danish and don't know shit about how the system works, thinking getting a student allowance is equal to being a researcher or apprentice in trades is ridiculous.

No. 1737495

>>1737492
>thinking getting a student allowance is equal to being a researcher or apprentice in trades is ridiculous
Not a single person said that though. Please take your meds you sound like a spergy r/IWantOut amerifag

No. 1737497

>>1737492
We aren’t talking about what “being a student” is equal to. If you’re getting paid, you’re getting paid. End of story.

No. 1737499

>>1737472
if internalized misogyny means thinking women and people in general should do more self-reflection before choosing to make big decisions and ask themselves if it's really what they want then sure kek you're a good example of when other women act like you're mentally ill for questioning motherhood

No. 1737505

>>1737489
>Reproduction is inherently bad
Wrong. Consensual reproduction between White adults is good.(USER HAS BEEN PUT OUT TO PASTURE)

No. 1737508

>>1737505
>White
Any reason you had to specify this..? (I think I know why)

No. 1737511

Momfags continue to prove motherhood is the single most retarded thing you can do with your life. Imagine not having aspirations beyond pregnancy, being an incubator other people sucking the life out of you and being an insufferable martyr about it.

No. 1737512

>>1737505
there’s no such thing as consensual reproduction

No. 1737513

>>1737489
>this board is not ready for my retarded cosmical antinatalism
good, keep that shit away

No. 1737516

>>1737473
>And grants aren't a job either, since you earn a limited amount of money that you can't spend on personal expenses. They usually cover tuition or course materials if you have that, you can't just spend it any way you like.
Except this is literally how it worked when I was a student. Tuition was free and there weren't course materials to pay for. The money was spent on rent and food.

No. 1737517

>>1737511
I hate it when tradmommies post romanticized stories about how giving birth for them was sooo beautiful, how the placenta just fell out right after, how the baby latched immediately, how they didn’t bleed out; then they go on a podcast and admit “Yeah my baby needed a huge oxygen mask and I hemorrhaged for like 30 minutes after giving birth on my living room floor”

No. 1737518

>>1737513
It’s not antinatalism, I’m not against babies. Babies are great! I’m against the retarded population of adults and teenagers reproducing.

No. 1737520

>>1737513
How pregnant are you rn on a scale of 1-10? Cause if it’s a 0 then you’re just as antinatalist as me kek. Go get knocked up if you’re so pro-life.

No. 1737521

>>1737518
>Antinatalism or anti-natalism is a family of philosophical views that are critical of reproduction — they consider coming into existence as bad or deem procreation as immoral. Antinatalists thus argue that humans should abstain from having children

>>1737520
>if you're not against reproduction you must be a prolife broodmare
take your meds

No. 1737529

>>1737521
I love how it’s the same all lowercase as prostitution-defensechan. Someone found a new hobby.

No. 1737530

>>1737529
prostitution is paid rape and therefore immoral, not every anon who types in all lowercase and has opinions you don't like is the same person

No. 1737532

>>1737521
Reddit ass definition, but really if you’re a lolcow user and think you should have a baby, don’t. Cause it’ll come out missing its palate or something random and inconvenient.

No. 1737533

>>1737529
It's okay, she's reproduction-positive which means she'll be a broodmare someday and we'll indirectly benefit from her retardation economically 40 years down the line. Really in a way I'm grateful retarded women like her exist so the rest of us can live stealth in peace kek

No. 1737534

this infight is based because it'll make the thread fill up faster so someone can make one with a better op picture. what are some other topics to infight about, nonnies?(USER HAS BEEN PUT OUT TO PASTURE)

No. 1737535


No. 1737540

Nobody should expect women to want to become mothers anymore. We’re capable of obtaining whatever we want now, literally. Unless you’re in like Israel or some shit which you’re probably not if you’re scrolling this thread right now. We can have jobs and live alone without having to answer to some snot nosed ugly kid or a smelly moid who only complains and dirties up the house, we can make our own money, make our own investments, start our own businesses, invent new tools and materials to better the world around us. Why would we get fat and squeeze out a baby for some retarded male when we could be doing anything else. It’s not 1960.

No. 1737542

>>1737532
it's the wikipedia definition, which you apparently weren't even aware of if you thought antinatalism was about babies specifically kek. and thinking the continuation of the human race is not a net negative is not the same as thinking you yourself should take on the burden of doing so, are you retarded?

No. 1737543

>>1737535
What exactly is yaoi. Is it anime child porn or anime regular porn why do I see so many people talking about it and then posting pics of manga children

No. 1737544

>>1737534
people who have flavour of the month husbandos

No. 1737547

i think feminists (or whoever defends this argument, i don't know) should stop treating women like gullible retards with zero personal hold of themselves nor personality, its condescending and offensive
>>1737543
kek

No. 1737548

>>1737542
Well we’re talking about babies and the creation of them specifically, so. Obviously I’m gonna continue talking about them because they’re the immediate product of reproduction.

No. 1737550

Not a single woman on this website cares if you think you’re giving a pure-hearted “b-but the continuation of the human race!” you sound like a handmaiden who wants to assure that your nigels “legacy” lives on kek

No. 1737556

>>1737464
You’re so right, even my sister who was always childfree but ended up having kids with her husband said she just felt like she had to because her husband always wanted a family. It’s not a simple personal choice when you’re battered over the head with propaganda and pressure to become a mother and start a family at every turn since being born a girl.

No. 1737558

>>1737556
>my sister who was always childfree but ended up having kids with her husband said she just felt like she had to because her husband always wanted a family
talk about spineless

No. 1737559

>>1737540
>Why would we get fat and squeeze out a baby for some retarded male when we could be doing anything else. It’s not 1960.
Because "muh greatest accomplishment better than every other accomplishment!", "it's a superpower" kek

No. 1737560

>>1737556
It’s high time we stop giving little girls fake babies and barbie houses to play mommy with. Let’s give ‘em some airsoft guns and tell them to run through the sprinkler fully dressed. Let the girlies cut loose!

No. 1737561

>>1737559
“It’s a superpower” why don’t we say this about pushing out a shit when you’re constipated

No. 1737562

File: 1698167552873.jpg (613.49 KB, 1608x1270, 20230927_124316.jpg)

>>1737543
this is yaoi

No. 1737563

File: 1698167577464.png (766.84 KB, 1998x1313, 1696830221378.png)


No. 1737564

>>1737562
Oh. It’s gay. Interesting

No. 1737565

>>1737560
As a libra with many Virgo traits i am utterly obsessed with human socialisation. I fucking loved my dolls, they were the vessels of my imagination. How a director hasn't sat down and had a bunch of kids play with dolls and make up an insane plot for a movie based on their playtime is beyond me.

No. 1737570

>>1737562
This made my stomach twist and I got my period immediately. Thanks for giving me a miscarriage
>>1737565
Ok i take back what I said about the barbies kek, she can stay

No. 1737572

File: 1698167886943.jpg (155.25 KB, 1200x1696, 20231016_120727.jpg)

>>1737564
gay but made by and for women. like how men watch lesbian porn but the genders are reversed and most of its not porn and its anime, 3d stuff isn't as popular.

No. 1737574

>>1737140
>this place is no better than any other ib its not special
If that's what you think then why are you here in particular instead of 4chan or something? I'm not against positive posts but honestly tell me where else am I supposed to go if I want to "all moids should die post" huh? This is the one place women can be unabashed about men and troons without them being able to openly come for our throats and you're upset that we're so angry or whatever. This place is special to me and I'm here and not 4chan because I'm here to post and seethe with other women and not have to see 4chan moids ree about evil roasties or something. If you don't like all the anger here, wtf are you doing in one of the consistently angriest threads? You want to just talk about interests without the anger why the hell aren't you in /g/ or /m/ instead? Anyway there's all sorts of other retarded angry infighting that happens on the site and in these threads, SUPER curious that what you're concerned about is just women being angry with men

No. 1737575

>>1737570
Barbie, baby born, beanie babies, action man and mad max all coexisted in peace until my brother would build horrible demonic creations pit of lego. He would wait until I had established a plot and utopia and the toys were starting to work towards a form of socialism. Then he would start humming and you'd hear the lego box tip over and him building. When his humming got more uptempo I knew I had to form some military defences before all hell broke loose. Once he took out my zoo in one swoop. I couldn't play anymore that day, war crime after war crime.

No. 1737577

>>1737560
in hs they gave us fake baby dolls to care for and it cried at random times. my friend had to take it using public transport and he was embarassed kek. i think i killed my baby

No. 1737578

do y'all have to post this yaoi stuff at every thread? i get it's shitpost but this is not the thread nor the time

No. 1737581

>>1737578
It's really just one annoying anon

No. 1737583

>>1737511
I don’t think I’ve ever met a mother who genuinely enjoyed being a parent. It’s always the just for their image, to keep a man or they just couldn’t afford an abortion or were just too dumb/broke to care. I think we need to cut the meme that women are just genuinely born to be parents because it’s bullshit.

No. 1737585

>>1737583
OK well that's really sad you know of so many people with mothers that can be clocked as being so uncaring and indifferent to their child.

No. 1737586

>>1737578
someone asked this time! come on, let me off the hook for this one

No. 1737593

>>1737585
I know parents love their children but I think most people just have kids because they want to “pass down their legacy” or they were just too dumb and poor to care if they have a bunch of kids running around. Most people aren’t genuinely interested in their children as people. I’ve never met a person who had kids because they want to get to know them or care about child development….it’s always “well I love this scrote and I like fucking him and I want to pop out this baby for him”.

No. 1737594

>>1737590
Some people just seem to like kids because they're cute. But kids don't stay like that forever.

No. 1737597

>>1737594
People who think that are so lobotomized. Thinking a screaming baby covered in blood after ripping your cervix and insides open, leaving you with a big empty plastic bag stomach is “cute”. Natural selection, really.

No. 1737600

>>1737597
>ripping your cervix and insides open, leaving you with a big empty plastic bag stomach
This says a lot on what kind of person you are.(infighting)

No. 1737601

>>1737600
Tell me how much fun it is when you give birth(infighting)

No. 1737603

File: 1698169433220.png (1.31 MB, 1500x1500, eb6b4071-91c4-4b23-9226-3f48a7…)

grape soda, grape juice, and other artificial grape flavored sweets are actually very delicious

No. 1737604

>>1737547
My unpopular opinion is that a lot of women who think their choices are purely their own are still operating mostly under female socialization and therefore not making choices in their best interest.

No. 1737605

>>1737593
Samefag but now I think about it maybe I have this mentality because I was raised by white trash. Most women didn’t have any interest in in their children at all and just dumped them off with grandma to run after scrotes but when I go to upper middle class white homes they have pictures of their kids all over etc.

No. 1737606

>>1737603
this is unpopular? i don't know if i wanna live in your world, fellow artificial grape loving nonnie

No. 1737609

>>1737597
I have to disagree. My nephews are adorable and I feel happy when I look at them. You shouldn't have kids based on that though. It's like people who get dogs based on puppy pictures they see on instagram and realize they won't be like that forever.

No. 1737611

>>1737154
This is true as another oldfag.

No. 1737612

File: 1698169822300.jpeg (Spoiler Image,988.76 KB, 2128x1752, IMG_6331.jpeg)

>>1737600
That’s what giving birth is like though. Spoilered for your virgin eyes but uh…might wanna do some research if you really think that is that unbelievable.

No. 1737614

>>1737609
>my nephews
So you aren’t a mother and aren’t seeing it through the eyes of a woman who’s been traumatized by pregnancy and giving birth

No. 1737618

>>1737605
Idk I'm middle class and my mom did the same thing with letting other relatives watch over me and rejecting me when I tried to play with her. Then there's those super wealthy families that let the nanny do all the work.

No. 1737619

>>1737597
>Thinking a screaming baby covered in blood after ripping your cervix and insides open
You should write death metal lyrics
>>1737604
you know that women are human beings with like, personality and stuff, right?
>>1737612
Don't open that spoiler anons

No. 1737620

It’s hard to find kids cute if you’ve ever been bullied as a child. I see them and I’m like yeah they’re cute but in reality they’re at school saying racial slurs, sexually assaulting people and making fun of people. They’re just little demons like adults.

No. 1737624

>>1737612
In shitty cases yeah. I personally like the appearance/feeling of my vagina after birth. Increased blood flow made it more sensitive and "puffed" out any wrinkles I had. I also have way regular and painless periods after birth

No. 1737626

>>1737603
Haven't had any sweets like that in a long time, but I definitely agreed with you when I was younger.

No. 1737633

>>1737624
>I like how my vagina feels after birth
Tranny hands wrote this post. This is some birth fetishism shit.

No. 1737635

>>1737604
My thoughts as well and like this >>1737556 nonny said, it's just because the idea is so pushed on women that even ones who originally say they don't want children they feel like they need to do it for no other reason other than "just because". I don't think it's wrong to say most people never bother to think about these kind of things more deeply until someone else points it out to them.

>>1737619
No one is saying they don't. You really don't think people aren't influenced to act or think a certain way about things? Especially with motherhood and it being pushed on girls as soon as possible?

No. 1737648

>>1737182
>DMs are pussies who try to change the story to save everyone so that the players don't get mad and new players don't ragequit.
nta but this is exactly the reason I don't like playing any rpg with strangers. Everyone is writing their badass fanfic self insert characters and the DMs allow them to bypass a ton shit of rules so they can be extra awesome like a marvel character or whatever. The gratification of achieving things and never failing is too alluring for them, but they don't understand how much this makes it bland and repetitive.

No. 1737650

>>1737619
>you know that women are human beings with like, personality and stuff, right?
Yes, but unless they're extremely self-aware, they're also a product of their experiences. Going along with what other people have told them to do their entire lives is the path of least resistance. Men do this too, except male socialization benefits them a lot fucking more than female socialization does for women.

No. 1737651

>>1737635
Sorry for this sperg, but I seriously don't understand the refusal to acknowledge socialization when analyzing things like women's choices. I view it something like this: the social framework around us is very hostile to women and thus what is presented to us and socially encouraged as being "good" for women is not so. Women often make choices without looking beyond the framework, and thus will say they are making their own choices in their best interest, because the interest she has is being "good" and "acceptable" in the society that's harmful to her. If you don't acknowledge social influence because it would be "infantilizing to women" or something, you just end up being stuck with no non-misogynistic answer to the question "why do men tend to make choices in the best interest of men as a whole while women makes choices that are bad for women as a whole?" Men are not any smarter or better at making decisions than women. Even less of them than women are aware of things like socialization influencing behavior and choices. They are able to be comfortable regardless though because society is built around benefiting them. Things that are good for men are "good", things that are bad for men are "bad". No one is ever encouraging them to make self destructive choices, and opposite to women, men are discouraged from making choices that would benefit him personally if they would also harm the power men hold as a collective

No. 1737680

File: 1698173330862.jpeg (452.48 KB, 888x928, IMG_6332.jpeg)

>kids are cute!

No. 1737694

>>1737593
I don't think my mom is a bad mother but I'm pretty sure she wanted children mostly for herself, she could be really nasty as soon as you strayed from her idealized vision, like mocking the things we liked she wasn't into or being pissed off at a bad grade. My dad is definitely one of those muh legacy types.

No. 1737708

>>1737694
The thing that kills me about the muh legacy types is they usually have no legacy and nothing of value to give or leave behind

No. 1737738

Pumpkin spice kinda gives me a headache

No. 1737764

>>1737633
What? There's literally multiple threads in mom groups and on TikTok of women saying the same thing

No. 1737770

>>1737633
https://www.thesun.co.uk/fabulous/7005605/my-vagina-is-better-than-ever-after-childbirth-and-my-husband-says-sex-is-amazing/

I remember when this story came out tons and tons of moms on FB agreed. Also trannies usually thrive in women being "ruined" after birth

No. 1737788

>>1737708
They think their retarded genetics is a “legacy”. This is why I constantly say that it’s always the most retarded annoying narcissè ass straggots that are reproducing their shitty subpar genes into children who turn out to be tableflipping helmet wearing autists

No. 1737809

>>1737764
Yeah definitely sounds real. “My vagina feels amazing after getting put through the paper shredder!”

No. 1737811

Pretty privilege is real but you need to be intelligent and self aware to benefit from it. A lot of pretty girls are in denial that pretty privilege exists because they are stupid and spend their prime chasing scrotes instead of using their looks to get ahead.

No. 1737818

>>1737809
why are you so upset women are able to be happy with themselves after childbirth? you're the one that sounds like a moid obsessed with "punishing" women for having sex with men who aren't you

No. 1737837

>>1737818
Nta but that's ridiculous. It's a straight up fact that vaginas go through extreme bodily trauma during childbirth. Saying that "actually it feels great" 100% sounds like a meme to make women believe giving birth isn't this agonizing experience other than "in shitty cases" like this anon >>1737624 said. Be happy with yourselves all you want but don't act like she's the crazy one for not believing it

No. 1737844

>>1737837
Women literally report all kinds of weird changes after birth, from hair going from straight to curly, some women even reported that their tilted uterus adjusted, hair color and skin color can change, even your taste buds can change but it's impossible to believe a small amount of women report liking their vagina better after birth and not bizarre 4th degree tear situations ?

No. 1737848

People who think every single facet of being a woman is awful are mentally ill and too self-loathing for their own good, there's a difference between recognizing your reality and being a doomer about things you cannot change or describing in graphic detail how much you hate your body

No. 1737853

>>1737848
Agree. I honestly don't think being a woman is that bad? At least living in a first-world country. Sometimes it upsets me that subtle misogyny seems to permeate everything, but it still doesn't make me hate being a woman. Not even close.

No. 1737862

>>1737811
I agree with this. I've noticed a few women I knew irl who were very pretty but ended up in shitty life situations because they made extremely dumb life decisions, normally centered around some loser. I also noticed quite a few seem to get knocked up very early in life, again normally by some pos loser.

The "be intelligent and self aware" is so key, it feels like a lot of pretty woman know they're pretty but don't learn how to benefit from it, so they waste a lot of potential in their youth due to idiotic life decisions. very sad.

No. 1737893

>>1737853
I'm a thirdie, and in fact my life has been miserable, but i know my body its not at fault but the way society reacts to it. Not to sound preachy i'm just expressing my perspective. I don't hate my height, my voice, my boobs or even my uterus, i see my body more of a companion through pain rather than an enemy, my body keeps me alive and healthy. Nonna (me) was born a woman, if i turned a male tomorrow it wouldn't be me anymore

No. 1737899

>>1737848
Being a woman would be a lot better if we weren’t seen as non-artificial wombs.

No. 1737909

>>1737848
You don’t have to live in a third world country to experience suffering due to being of female sex, anon.

No. 1737924

>>1737899
my unpopular opinion is we need artificial wombs to get scrotes the fuck off our backs about "muh birthrates", and no, even by the retarded moid standards it wouldn't make us "unneeded" because you still need the eggs and those are a hell of a lot more difficult to acquire than sperm

No. 1737945

>>1737924
To counter your opinion, this isn't a good idea because who exactly is looking after these babies? Sure as hell won't be scrotes.

No. 1737948

>>1737924
Why should Moids even be given the option to procreate lmao? They all need to become those devlvelvlev male enunchs

No. 1737960

>>1737924
Horrible idea. Women would be farmed for eggs and babies would be farmed for god knows what. Think harder dumbass. If artificial wombs become a reality it will be horrible and dystopian, you haven’t thought about this enough.

No. 1737973

>>1737924
Hell no, only rich people will be able to access them and there are far more male billionaires and millionaires than female. They’ll just use them to farm child sex slaves and the CP industry and child trafficking industry will skyrocket. Women will be killed and have their eggs stolen and harvested.

No. 1737976

>>1737924
I’m perfectly fine with that tbh. It’s the parents problem not mine!

No. 1737977

>>1737603
Japanese grape flavour everything slaps

No. 1737978

File: 1698186237226.jpeg (352.15 KB, 640x1078, IMG_6342.jpeg)

>>1737977
sakura grape elf bars mmmm

No. 1737982

>>1737960
I’m pretty sure the only women who would be farmed for eggs would be the rich/high IQ women. They’re gonna go through all the trouble of buying an artificial womb just to put impoverished retard eggs in them? Doubt

No. 1737988

>>1737945
True but presumably that'd mean they would have to hire women to look after them and then women would at least be getting paid for raising moid's babies
>>1737960
>>1737973
Dystopia this, dystopia that, why are they not already just enslaving women and creating breeding farms? Why the hell would having an artificial womb available inherently change anything other than the fact women would no longer need to gestate children? If the world is going to become a dystopian hellscape anyway then fuck it I would rather they take my eggs and kill me than keep me around to be a gestation slave or something

No. 1737989

>>1737982
>why would someone want to to harvest eggs from poor idiots?

People who want slaves, want to produce child porn, rich serial killers etc the list goes on and on

No. 1737992

>>1737982
Being poor doesn’t make you stupid on a genetic level you mouth breather. Jesus Christ.

No. 1737993

>>1737989
Along with the fact it would be significantly cheaper.

No. 1737994

>>1737989
Ok megamind but they’re already all doing that anyways with regular women

No. 1737996

>>1737988
You’re so cute and naive to think the men who would actually go through the effort of trying to get a child to raise on their own aren’t going to be doing it for sexual reasons

No. 1737997

>>1737992
Nobody said that. But I’m saying that the rich would probably want eggs from someone else who’s rich. I don’t really think they want gummo eggs.

No. 1737998

>>1737988
They already are though…what are you talking about? These are things women are going through anyways kek.

No. 1737999

>>1737994
Your plan is stupid because most normal men have no interest and finding a child to raise on their own. That’s a red flag.

No. 1738001

>>1737989
Oh yeah I bet the average person who wants a slave is going to spend their wagie check on an artificial womb, go through the trouble of going out and killing a woman, and then harvesting her eggs as soon as they possibly can. I’m shaking in my boots.

No. 1738003

>>1737996
I'm not saying they wouldn't do that, I'm saying they can (and some do) already do that now
>>1737998
if it's already happening then why is making women no longer have to gestate a problem?

No. 1738005

>>1738001
>why would a wagie do that?
Yes they would do that to get a undocumented child that they can abuse without interference

No. 1738007

>>1737999
Oh my god nobody cares. I don’t care about children. I don’t care about what happens to them. I think they don’t need to exist. How are you not getting that.
>>1738003
Because surrogacy/pregnancy prostitution/egg “sorting” (farming) is only available to the rich. There are surrogates who give birth once and are financially taken care of for the rest of their lives.

No. 1738009

>>1738003
Ok so what if they already do it? Your plan for artificial wombs makes no sense because most men have no interest in being single dads for just the fun of it

No. 1738012

>>1738007
>I don’t care about children I’m a feminist. I’m totally find with pedophiles getting easy access to little girls they can rape and murder!

See how slow you sound?

No. 1738013

>>1738005
Yeah I really bet they’re going to take care of a baby from the stage of being a fetus until it’s big enough to sexually abuse or until it’s old enough to sell into sexual slavery…

No. 1738014

>>1737948
KEK this is the right answer

No. 1738015

>>1738012
When did I say any of those things though. That’s not a verbatim quote lol you have no sense of nuance.

No. 1738016

>>1737997
>rich/high IQ women
>impoverished retard eggs
>>1737982

No. 1738017

>>1738016
Yeah I meant what I said both times

No. 1738018

>>1737997
Sorry but you’re crazy wrong about that. No idea how you came to that conclusion.

No. 1738019

>>1738009
Yeah that’s the point. Nobody will use them, no woman will be getting pregnant, no more children will exist - it’ll be paradise.

No. 1738020

>>1738009
there are fuck tons women who want to have kids who also don't want to experience pregnancy (or can't get pregnant), having artificial wombs would mean no need for human surrogacy

No. 1738021

>>1738015
You literally just responded to my post saying you don’t care about children. Do you understand that children can also be female?how the fuck do you expect women to exist if girls don’t?

No. 1738022

>>1738018
Provide an example of how I’m wrong. I’ll wait

No. 1738023

>>1738021
Oh my fucking lord. I’m saying that we need to stop creating children. The women and girls that currently exist and are already alive aren’t going to magically disappear just because reproduction no longer exists. There will just be no more of them being created. Is this really that hard for you to understand?

No. 1738024

>>1738020
Or we could not do surrogacy and we could not do artificial wombs and women could just adopt one of the billions of children that already exist?

No. 1738027

>>1738023
So you’re saying the human race needs to just go extinct?for what reason?

No. 1738028

>>1738021
>how the fuck do you expect women to exist
We won’t lol. Humanity will end. That’s a good thing.

No. 1738030

>>1738027
Hey listen if you wanna live and go into debt for the rest of your life be my guest. But the majority of this people on the earth are expected to be a wage slave, and then come right home to be abused by your fugly children. It’s not a fun existence. It’s not pretty. Lucky you if you’re rich or have an easy life with a family you love, but that’s not reality for most other people. We really don’t need to exist. I don’t need to, you don’t need to, lolcow doesn’t even need to! Nobody is going to be worse off for dying!

No. 1738031

>>1738022
Why would they want eggs from a rich person that would be expensive as hell when they could get cheaper eggs and put their sperm in them at a mass scale? Assuming the rich people are men which is how the world is currently.

No. 1738034

>>1738031
Because they have the money to afford it. Really simple. Flex culture will also influence it. “Spent over 750k on eggs for my new baby ” I can already see it(don't use emojis)

No. 1738037

>>1738030
Now you’re just talking out of your ass now that you’re confronted with how stupid your artificial womb idea is

No. 1738038

>>1738024
While it would be nice if adoptees would adopt older children, the vast vast majority want to adopt a baby and those are not easy or numerous to adopt. Anyway, we have discussions on this site all the goddamn time about how shitty pregnancy is, I think a whole lot of mothers would've loved being able to not actually be pregnant or give birth

No. 1738040

>>1738031
They could also buy a $50 fake croc Birkin off of Amazon, but choose to buy a real $20k one because they feel as though it makes them above others who can’t afford one. So why would they buy some gross nasty eggs from some girl crying for money on the side of the road when they could pay some rich girl they went to school with to have the eggs sucked out of her kek?

No. 1738041

>>1738037
Tell it to the guy who invented them

No. 1738044

>>1738034
I guess it would be a flex to other sickos that he has a lab grown sex slave at the house.

No. 1738045

>>1738037
Ok have fun giving birth on the farm like you’re Mother Mary

No. 1738048

>>1738040
There aren’t enough rich and intelligent women in the world for this type of situation work. Why would women who are attractive, wealthy and rich need to sell their eggs in The first place? Also, you assume that big corporations tell the truth…they could easily be farming those eggs from women and girls in 3rd world shit holes and lying about where they came from.

No. 1738049

>>1738044
>lab grown sex slave
You guys are giving males way too much credit. You think he wants to take care of a child for its whole life just so he can abuse it the whole time? First off, before you default to “he can have it raised by nannies” and then do what when the child tells the nanny about how she “plays with dad”? Second off, sure he could kill the nanny, but what about when her family finds out? What about when her landlord notices that rent hasn’t been paid, tries to contact her, finds nothing? I’m pretty sure these retards are gonna keep buying prostitutes or just abusing the children that are already alive. Saying that they’ll take care of a whole child without assistance from anyone is just false kek. Scrotes aren’t capable of it.

No. 1738051

>>1738048
Yeah that’s why they won’t be able to keep having children for very long, and eventually we’ll die out. I don’t really think these rich faggoty men want mixed mongol refugee babies.

No. 1738053

>>1738048
Nobody cares about 3rd world country women. Go work for the UN if you care so much about them instead of talking about how victimized they’ll be by the existence of artificial wombs on lolcow dot farm.

No. 1738057

>>1738049
Lol you’re very naive

No. 1738059

>>1738053
>Go work for the UN if you care so much about 3rd world country women.
KEK good one, nonnie, you almost got me.

No. 1738062

>>1738057
Yeah ok I’ll believe it when I see it

No. 1738064

>>1738048
Women ALREADY sell eggs and the companies they do them through are picky about the women who do so, having all sorts of physical and intellectual requirements. Women and children already suffer in countless ways, why is relieving women from the pains of birth and pregnancy somehow going to make things suddenly much worse? Just about everything moids theoretically could do with artificial wombs, they already do without them

No. 1738066

>>1738045
I don’t have kids and never well but I can still see how your artificial womb idea makes 0 sense if the goal is to protect women or some shit

No. 1738068

>>1738064
Just because these things already exist doesn’t make your idea any less stupid

No. 1738070

Here’s an idea, how about no artificial wombs, just stop fucking having sex with men. And if for some reason a random guy tries to impregnate you while you’re walking down the street, carry a fucking gun. Carry a kitchen knife. Overdose on fentanyl if you somehow magically wake up pregnant.

No. 1738075

I wish the SID’s rate would go up. These babies need to fucking die.(bait)

No. 1738079

>>1738070
Some women would rather go to extreme lengths like artificial wombs etc before they have to stop fucking men

No. 1738081

>>1738077
Old money doesn’t exist anymore

No. 1738088

Kid hate is trendy now but I just think people who hate children are just jealous of kids. They are jealous because kids have their whole future ahead of them and they are mad about their own shit child hoods. There are so many grown ass people in childrens hobbies etc and getting mad by kids “ruining it”….I understand that you’re at a theater with a crying baby and you’re pissed but the movie youre seeing is literally for babies!

No. 1738090

>>1738088
You think there are women who don’t like children because they’re jealous of them? It doesn’t really register that maybe they don’t love colicky screaming snot faced babies? Or little tiny 8 year old moids running around in public pulling up our skirts, shouting vulgarities at us before they can even drive? Or all the screaming, tantruming little girls laying on the floor of Walmart refusing to move until their parents get them the princess dress they want? But oh no, it’s because we’re upset that they can watch sailor moon and we can’t.

No. 1738092

>>1738090
There’s a difference between not wanting kids and hating kids. Most child haters just come off as bitter and jealous of youth and the fact that their childhood sucked ass. They see in children So many possibilities while there being none for them.

No. 1738093

>>1738088
Do people hate children or do they just not want to have children?

No. 1738094

>>1738093
I’ve seen people on TikTok get mad at children for crying on planes or being happy seeing a child get hurt. It really just comes off as jealousy but they don’t wanna admit that because they’d look stupid beefing newborns.

No. 1738095

>>1738088
>you’re at a theater with a crying baby
One time I was enjoying my dinner in public at a restaurant alone not saying a word to anyone, not upsetting or bothering anyone, and this little fucking child in the booth behind mine kept tapping on my head and pulling my hair. When I turned around and tried to speak with her parents they blatantly ignored me. So I tell the waiter like hey you need to get those fuckers to wrangle their kid because I’m not paying for this experience. He tried to speak with them and they said “you have no way of proving that she’s pulling on her hair”. They obviously had cameras in the restaurant so the little gay guy was like we actually can go back and look if we have to but instead of doing that can you just move her to the other side of the booth and they had no choice but to comply kek. It has nothing to do with activities, nonnie. It has to do with shitty, retarded people reproducing their retard inbred genes into their sped babies, then being horrible parents who never make their child take accountability for their actions. And then that sped baby grows up, produces another sped baby, the cycle continues.

No. 1738096

>>1738094
Wait why would anyone be jealous of a child for getting hurt. Or jealous of a crying baby?Your logic makes no sense.

No. 1738097

>>1738096
Go back and read

No. 1738099

>>1738097
>I’ve seen people on TikTok get mad at children for crying on planes or being happy seeing a child get hurt. It really just comes off as jealousy
Jealous of what though. Are you gonna articulate or just keep repeating the same words hoping that someone will agree with you?

No. 1738100

>>1738095
I’m not talking about situations like that. I’m talking about situations where adults put themselves in kids hobbies and get mad when they feel kids are “ruining it”.

No. 1738101

>>1738094
Adults are allowed to cry in public tho

No. 1738103

>>1738099
I didn’t say they were jealous of children for those reasons. I meant I see a lot of aggressive comments towards children in comment sections of videos like that and they come off as jealous to me.

No. 1738108

>>1738103
Samefag but when child haters make comments like this >>1738030 it just gives me jealousy vibes

No. 1738110

>>1738070
>>1738081
fuck off, I honestly don't give a shit if humanity goes extinct or whatever but this is the same brushing off of average everyday women's comfort and safety that you also do with abortion access or how absolutely garbage birth control options are. If women want to stop having kids and let humanity go extinct, based go ahead, but fuck off with refusing out of hand any measures that would allow women who want to have kids in some capacity control their reproduction and do so in ways that are safer and more comfortable just because "they shouldn't be doing those things because I said so"

No. 1738111

>>1738110
>I don’t like how women are exploited so I wish we could come up with new and fresher ways to do it since it already happens anyway!

That’s what you sound like right now with your artificial womb stance.

No. 1738115

>>1738110
Humanity should go extinct though, fuck an artificial womb

No. 1738116

>>1738115
If you were really about that life you would’ve killed yourself by now to speed up the process. All talk just to be edgy and you’ll probably grow up get married and have 5 kids when your scrote asks you to.

No. 1738118

>>1738108
Jealous of what though

No. 1738119

>>1738100
>I’m not talking about incredibly common situations
Of course you aren’t

No. 1738120

>>1738116
>You don’t really wanna kill yourself you wanna give birth
No I actually don’t…

No. 1738122

>>1738118
Jealous because their childhood was shit and they can never go back.

No. 1738125

File: 1698192468760.jpeg (34 KB, 638x359, IMG_6344.jpeg)

>>1738122
Or maybe kids are annoying.

No. 1738126

>>1738116
Why should I have to kill myself just because I think humanity should go extinct? I didn't ask to be born but I'm here so… I have to put myself through needless suffering just to leave? I don't even know what you're trying to argue for, you're acting like you care about women with your artificial womb idea, but when women itt tell you women will suffer the consequences of procreation no matter what and only human extinction is the real answer, you get triggered.

No. 1738130

>>1738116
Are you just upset that there are women who want to live their own lives and try to enjoy ourselves as much as possible without the burden of men and children

No. 1738132

>>1738116
ntayrt, some asshole made this same point to me and it doesn't make sense. one extra human, especially one who does not intend on reproducing, is not going to make or break the human species. and people have other concerns like not traumatizing loved ones. the motto of the voluntary human extinction movement is "may we live long and die out", and that sums it up, not automatically killing yourself.

No. 1738137

>>1738088
I’m jealous of kids and I love kids, I think it’s misogyny.
Hear me out: mothers love their kids so much and when they hear things like “I hate little shits” “cum trophies” and other dehumanizing things while it’s insulting the children it mostly stings the mom, maybe the dad but we know scrotes are not emotionally invested. Those anons hate women and being one

No. 1738140

>>1738137
Yeah it probably stings the mom because she’s upset that her precious little spawn is just as retarded as she is. Go figure.(retarded bait)

No. 1738143

>>1738140
Nta but not all kids act the same. What if someone said they hated all women just because some women are bitches?

No. 1738146

>>1738143
Don’t respond to him, he is ragebait replying in every thread.

No. 1738152

>>1738143
Maybe not all children are little spoiled assholes, but they do all cause suffering.

No. 1738153

>>1738146
>It’s not a woman a woman could never feel this way about children
This sounds way more scrotish than a comment I’ve posted kek

No. 1738154

>>1738126
NTA, but I am this >>1738110 anon, I am fine with people who want to live out their lives and not reproduce and be antinatalist and all. Yes women who are already in shitty situations getting exploited are not suddenly going to become free, things would be about the same in that regard, but average women in first world counties that aren't being forcibly impregnated or getting their eggs harvested, but just living their lives wanting to be mothers someday would benefit. I think the experience of motherhood should be made better and safer for women who would like to be mothers and I am tired of the antinatalist whining that things shouldn't be made better for them because no one should be having children in the first place. If no women wanted to have children I would be fine with that, but obviously many do. I want women to be safer and more comfortable in making the choices they are making. You want women to make different choices altogether

No. 1738157

>>1738154
>I think the experience of motherhood should be made better and safer
That’s not a realistic possibility, though. Motherhood is actively used against women. It deforms and harms not only our bodies, but our brains directly. Experiencing pregnancy, giving birth, becoming a mother deforms your literal brain. Part of growing up is going to fucking health class and becoming educated on this. Sorry that you had to realize it on lolcow.

No. 1738158

>>1738154
Many women want to have children because they’re either guilted into believing that they want them or manipulated into thinking that they only exist to reproduce.

No. 1738160

>>1738154
Something inside me is just giving me a little inclination that you’re not typing all of this out while burping a baby or changing its diarrhea filled diaper. If you wanna be a mother so badly, become one instead of bending over backwards to make excuses as to why women continue falling in line with being treated as walking wombs.

No. 1738167

I’m child free not by choice really but having kids seems so fun. Having a big family during the holidays, a house full of laughter during thanks giving and Christmas, being able to take my kids trick or treating and getting everyone all cozy and ready for bed at night. Being child free and unmarried just sucks ass unless you’re rich and hot as fuck because your only companionship is fake ass brunch friends and shitty scrotes. I kind of wish women had more time to make the decision to have kids so we don’t need to rush into it or end up not having kids at all. It’s hard to admit but for some women who aren’t super attractive, with a good family or rich their kids are really all their joy.

No. 1738168

>>1738157
Yeah that's kind of exactly why I want all the women who want to have kids to not have to experience pregnancy and birth? If you were to give women who want a baby the choice to have an artificial womb incubate it and never be pregnant or give birth, only a very strange and small percent wouldn't take it
>>1738158
That's a separate issue that I would like not to be the case. Artificial wombs wouldn't solve that, but oh no now those women who were guilted into having kids are having a somewhat better time because they at least didn't have to undergo birth and pregnancy?
>>1738160
I don't want to be a mother, I want to get my tubes tied. I'm advocating for a less shitty reproductive experience for women who don't want to get their tubes tied, just as I also support birth control and abortion. Please elaborate on "excuses as to why women continue falling in line with being treated as walking wombs", genuinely don't know what you're trying to imply

No. 1738170

>>1738167
>being child free and unmarried sucks ass
>not having your nipples tugged at and not having to answer to a scrote sucks ass
>not having to pay their college tuition sucks ass
>not having to pay for damages that they cause to your home/assets sucks ass
>not getting beaten up by their dad in front of them sucks ass
…poor attempt at ragebait kek just let it die already

No. 1738171

>>1738166
These things can be avoided by not popping out babies with bums and dead beats but I’m definitely jealous of the rare women who have the money to raise kids or their own or found one of the rare decent scrotes to help. In that situation having kids would for sure be fun I think.

No. 1738172

>>1738168
Did you miss the part of the conversation where everyone agreed that artificial wombs don’t need to exist women just need to stop answering to scrotes desires

No. 1738173

>>1738171
Oh my sweet summer child…thinking that there are men who aren’t deadbeats…

No. 1738174

Pizza is overrated, burgers are better, not only they’re healthy because you can add some vegetables, they’re tastier and more versatile than pizza.

No. 1738175

>>1738168
You’re kind of not picking up on the part where most women don’t actually feel a desire to have their own kids they’re just groomed into believing that they exist to be a mother since birth.

No. 1738176

>>1738173
I know some good fathers out there but they’re rare. The only people I ever see gushing about how great being child free is like super rich women traveling and shit and they’re also hot so they can still date. I’m child free and my life is boring and lonely as fuck. I literally have no family and can’t even make my own. It kind of sucks knowing I’ll probably have a stroke and die in this house one day and won’t be discovered for months.

No. 1738178

>>1738167
>It’s hard to admit but for some women who aren’t super attractive, with a good family or rich their kids are really all their joy.
This confirms my theory that tradthots are losers who try to compensate for being losers by becoming SAHMs.

No. 1738179

>>1738176
I’m pretty sure they’re all like 50+ and none of those acceptable men are part of the next generation that’s breeding their new little idiots

No. 1738180

>>1738176
The average woman doesn't need to be super attractive or rich to have friends or a good boyfriend. Sorry for the bad news but you're either clinically depressed or way more of a failure than you realize.

No. 1738182

>>1738172
>>1738175
And I am saying to work on convincing all the normie women planning to have children of this first and then yes of course, there would be no need for artificial wombs. But as long as these women that intend to be mothers exist, I am going to advocate for the scrote scientists working on dumb shit like putting wombs in trannies to just make artificial ones instead and benefit all the actual women planning to be mothers

No. 1738183

>>1738167
Honestly same all I've wanted is a loving family and just shit circumstances pushed everything back. I finally met the love of my life and were both mid late 30s and I wish we met earlier and could have that picture perfect life. I've an estranged dad and my step dad died last month. I feel so depressed that my mums widowed my brother lives abroad and I'm currently unemployed and my partner and I have a financial situation that won't be resolved until 2025 which is delaying us getting a house. I want that family life and I want my mum to be a loved grandma

No. 1738184

>>1738180
After 25 most of those best friends you spent so much time with will get married and of course pick the scrote over you and any new friends you make will just be brunch friends who act like you’re toxic and killing them if you talk about anything other than non surface level shit like tv shows and food
>>1738178
I definitely can see that some women have kids just to have companionship and love they never received. Take a look at boy moms.

No. 1738186

>>1738185
33

No. 1738192

>>1738183
I’m 31 and I highly doubt I’ll ever find a man I like enough and who likes me back to have babies. My future looks bleak as fuck.

No. 1738210

>>1738184
I’m begging you bitches to walk outside and talk to someone outside the internet. The bizarrely narrow worldview some of you develop is like something from a bad tv show monologue.

No. 1738211

>>1738192
What? Why? You can just do literally anything else.

No. 1738217

>>1738184
>get married and of course pick the scrote over you
From what I've seen when women get married or have kids their friends usually cut them off over stupid assumptions or because they're unable to get drunk every Friday and go on spontaneous road trips
>brunch friends who act like you’re toxic and killing them if you talk about anything other than non surface level shit like tv shows and food
you can thank cancel culture for that

No. 1738221

>>1738154
Artificial wombs would just be advanced surrogacy though, there’d still be repercussions even if women no longer have to give birth to children. Just look at the surrogacy system we have now, who do you think it’s benefiting? It’s mostly rich gay moids who want biological children or female celebrities who don’t want to ruin their bodies that use surrogates. The average woman isn’t using a surrogate, they ARE the surrogate. Only the rich and powerful would be able to afford artificial wombs, there’s no way that type of technology would be available to the average individual. Even if we pretend that artificial wombs could be available to every woman, they would still be easily exploited. Think of all the children that could be made without anyone knowing they exist, it would be like a human meat farm. Why would scientists bother trying to grow individual organs for organ transplants when they could cultivate as many humans as they want for the sole purpose of organ harvesting? It sounds far-fetched but I ultimately think something like artificial wombs would be used for more harm than good.

No. 1738222

>>1738221
Since you mention meat farms I realize they would definitely use it for animals first. At least we’ll get a warning before the human stuff starts.

No. 1738230

>>1738217
>you can thank cancel culture for that
Literally what

No. 1738238

an oversized $5 man shirt makes 10x comfier pajamas than any 100+ dollar fancy cotton fleece designer pajamas I ever brought and I hate it. It's also more flattering for covering up a bloated stomach

No. 1738242

>>1738192
You need to like go out of the country and experience some real life or something instead of obsessing over cock at your big ass age

No. 1738244

>>1738230
I think she means it’s harder to be honest about how you feel with your girlfriends and really have conversations where you’re able to share your true opinions 1:1 because of how women gang up on each other when they say something “problematic

No. 1738245

>>1738030
>Nobody is going to be worse off for dying!
if you really believed that…

No. 1738267

>>1738116
Artificial wombs will never be for women's use because half the gratification is making women suffer the whole ordeal mentally and physically
>You'll pop out five kids when your scrote asks you to
Kek we aren't as retarded as you anon.

No. 1738272

>>1738245
I am gonna kill myself soon don’t you worry babe

No. 1738308

>>1738244
That’s fair but that also has been a thing for a long time. Attributing it to cancel culture is dumb af.

No. 1738314

>>1738167
I fucking hated growing up in a big family it's not fun at all

No. 1738328

>>1738174
>not only they’re healthy because you can add some vegetables,
??? You can do the exact same thing with pizza what are talking about. Never heard of veggie pizzas? still, can do it with regular pizzas too.

No. 1738465

We should bring back executions and jail more men (with other men exclusively, but that’s a given) I’m fucking sick and tired of living in fear because violent men facing the consequences of their actions is “unfair”.

No. 1738473

Scenes in TV and Movies where a character tries to kill themselves are usually funny as hell. All I can think of whenever someone mentions suicide in a TV show is the scene in Glee where Karofsky puts on a suit just to kill himself after getting told to go back into the closet on facebook.

No. 1738474

>>1738167
>fake ass brunch friends and shitty scrotes
You sound like a 40-year old day-drinker. Get some hobbies, dude

No. 1738476

>>1738465
Agreed, death penalty for pedos when

No. 1738477

>>1738465
Violent criminal moids get so many chances nowadays it’s fucking insane. Males live on easy mode for real because they’re free to continue raping and murdering after failed attempts. Criminals shouldn’t get so much lenience, I know there’s pity stories for “muh poor drug addicts in jail for weed” but that’s no excuse for failing to lock up criminals who really hurt people. Consequences are light as is, it’s not that hard to just not try to murder or rape people if you think jail is so bad. But of course those poor wittle criminals always get sympathy because “dawwww think of their poor childhood when they didn’t get the toy they wanted for Christmas! No wonder he grew up that way.” People who think criminals can all be reformed out of kindness and nurturing are idiotic and delusional to a dangerous degree, having no real experience with these evil men.

No. 1738500

>>1738473
I always think of "I can't get the stupid cap off!!" from cyberbully kek

No. 1739007

asstarion is far too homosexual for any normal woman to find attractive and i automatically assume anybody simping for him is a larian shill

No. 1739025

Male moaning and whimpering audios are overrated, it sounds so fake especially when they start dirty talking for no reason—I don't know how people get turned on by them. They sound like it's some guys failed voice acting reel for a vtuber company KEK

No. 1739035

>>1739025
All “erotic” audios made by moids always sound fat, you can feel the fat seeping through your earphones.

No. 1739042

>>1739007
I think that's the point, women who are attracted to homosexuals don't find themselves attractive enough to pursue a man who will actually love them, so they go for a gay man. They also like his gay self because they're chronically insecure and thus jealous of other women and would prefer their man to lust after another moid rather than a woman

No. 1739045

>>1739035
KEK why is it so true??? I cannot even listen to those they are so embarrassing. Male ASMR with sexy stuff makes me want to drive off a cliff from the cringe

No. 1739050

IG ruins sound bites/songs. Because of Instagram, hearing that "Makeba" song on television programs sends me into a hard "nope" mode from how overused it's been.
Fucking hate "Makeba", "Flowers" and whatever other fucking songs/sound bites, I'd rather listen to someone having diarrhea emptying themselves in the toilet and making the most painful noises than any of those songs ever.

No. 1739068

>>1739025
I hate when they start using the "sexy voice" it just gives me hey baby girl vibes like this vid. If your normal voice can't sound hot enough you just straight up shouldn't record yourself. With that tryhard sexy intonation

No. 1739119

>>1739025
i don't know how anyone listens to most of them, they have the ugliest voices (or voices that are so deep it's just a bit cringe and over the top). i hate when they talk. i can only listen to audios where the guy is just making sounds every now and then while having a wank (or convincingly pretending to) but those are so hard to find

No. 1739163

Sexpat vloggers should be banned from YouTube and sexpats should be castrated. I’m sick of seeing some creepy white moid with a lewd thumbnail of some impoverished third world woman in a bikini and some lascivious title like ‘She showed me her WHAT?’or ‘I DIDNT KNOW SHE WAS UNDERAGE?!’ Actually not just white scrotes, black scrotes do this too, I saw them trying to pick up women in asia, it’s not sex tourism it’s paid rape and pedophilia, just euthanize all sexpats and passport bros, honestly.

No. 1739172

>>1739035
exactly, i can't help but think they're 30+ year old fat neckbeards who can't get a woman IRL so they have to settle for doing this because no sane chick would be thirsting over him if they saw what he's actually like

>>1739068
YES it's literally this but with them using their "sexy dom" voice that sounds like a burp kek

>>1739119
same, at least it sounds real and can get me horny vs the shitty voice acting where they're obviously trying too hard tbh the only good ones ive found like what you're describing are from japanese channels on porn sites. this one called mashasmr does pretty good videos that involve him fingering an onahole and doing some breathing and what not in the background. those are pretty hot and don't require me to look at some fugly scrote lmao but there are other channels like his that do videos meant for women so it's worth a look

No. 1739181

>>1739163
It’s not an unpopular opinion if it’s true and everyone agrees, nona.

No. 1739183

>>1739119
Oh god I know I tried listening to erotic or relationship roleplay male asmr videos and they always make my toes curl (not in the good way) they’re so tryhard and always have the ugliest voices, it’s at the point now I can only listen to ones that are in Russian or Korean or Japanese or something because you can’t quite tell how cringe someone sounds in another language, the English ones are always the absolute worst

No. 1739189

>>1739172
Just checked his videos out and damn they’re actually kinda nice, wish there was more ear whispering in them tho, thanks nona.

No. 1739190

>>1739042
When I was in Tokyo I went to a yaoi shop and all the women in there were model/idol tier in looks so idk

No. 1739193

>>1739190
What's a yaoi shop? Like a manga store just for yaoi?

No. 1739201


No. 1739209

>>1739190
Who said I was talking about the Japanese? They don't perceive homosexuals as western cultures do, fujos there don't even troon out at the same rates

No. 1739211

>>1739190
stacies…

No. 1739218

>>1739190
That’s some queen shit

No. 1739232

>>1739193
Yeah and they also sell boyband merch. All of the women there were nicely dressed and attractive so yaoi fans being ugly and weird might but be an American thing.

No. 1739236

File: 1698289005212.png (2.32 MB, 1153x1238, 237E104A-F81E-49D3-89DA-06AD40…)

>>1739232
That’s expected. Female fujos and fangirls are extremely common in Japan. They know Japanese women love fanservice so they always ham it up at the Tokyo shows.

No. 1739264

File: 1698291215881.jpg (56.46 KB, 675x499, 83v1rn.jpg)

>>1739190
love that for them

No. 1739647

File: 1698330748901.jpg (44.13 KB, 720x223, Screenshot_20231026_162942_Chr…)

Chilren can absolutely provoke a healthy dog into biting. I know of dogs that had to be put down for biting kids bc the kids has been shoving needles into the dog, beating a dog with sticks, throwing rocks at dogs, kicking the dog etc. Some kids are absolute sadists and have absolutely provoked an attack.

No. 1739650

>>1739232
It's a weird myth perpetuated by moids. American women into yaoi are usually attractive too

No. 1739652

More younger women can fix mechanical shit than younger men nowadays. Most moids I know just use triple A or take it to the shop where women try to fix the problem/ replace parts before anything else where as younger women just try to be financially smart and know that a 100 dollar part + a 10 minute video on how to replace it on YouTube is better than spending literally the exact same price as what you brought the car at the shop

No. 1739656

>>1739190
What do you mean? You went to a k-book or mandarake in Ikebukuro? I saw that too and I went to a few cafes that had collabs with some BL manga I liked this summer and the other customers looked like your average normies at worse or like super girly models or elegant, stylish middle aged women. I will never forget these Japenese ladies in their 30s and 40s talking abour Harada behind me in a cafe while dressed like they were invited to a wedding. My Japanese isn't very good so I have no clue if one of them was Harada just going to her own event to eat food or if they were just fans.

No. 1739664

Don't you guys have a fucking thread for this?

No. 1739665

>>1739647
Yeah this is rubbish. Children can be very cruel to animals. It’s not always a child’s fault if they get bitten of course but sometimes…the animal feels backed into a corner and afraid and the animal understands even less the consequences of its actions than the child. Even toddlers should be supervised around and taught how to interact with animals properly.

No. 1739681

>>1739664
Who are you talking to?

No. 1739703

>>1739236
Japanese and Chinese fujos are the best because they dont have to worry about 'problematic' bullshit like the west does. They simply dont care. I dont know where all the old fujos are, but when i grew up with BL stuff, no one gave a shit about 2d men's feelings in games and comics.

No. 1739716

>>1738167
Late and this is probably bait, but
>being childfree and unmarried
is what ALLOWS one to become rich and hot as fuck.

No. 1739719

>>1739647
the fact that so many on this website clearly have no idea how to interact with animals is fucking mindblowing

No. 1739726

>>1739042
moids aren't capable of love anon, and gay men are hot because they actually clean themselves and stay in shape

No. 1739727

>>1739647
is that screencap of one of the "dog hate" spergs? they're actually psychotic, of course some children provoke animals. even fucking colleen ballinger tried to make a "funny" story about deliberately abusing a dog constantly as a kid, said dog biting her after months of provocation, then lying to her parents that it happened at "random", resulting in the dog being put down. in general, kids just shouldn't be left unsupervised with animals IMO, unless they've proven to get along with each other time and time again.

No. 1739729

>>1739719
Outside this board too. I've met so many adults who can't tell the difference between a relaxed dog and a defensive dog and insist on getting in the dog's face when they're already stressed. Or the people I've seen grab a dog's muzzle and yank it around to "play". Like who tf plays with an animal like that? And ofc they get mad at you when you point out that they're antagonizing the dog and they probably wouldn't like it if someone was squeezing their mouth and jaw. No empathy or common sense whatsoever.

No. 1739775

>>1739656
I went to mandarake in Ikebukuro

No. 1739782

>>1739726
I don't find gay men attractive, the moment I realize a man is gay is a turn off idk about you tho

No. 1739790

>>1739726
Gay men are not hot. Most of them are on drugs and use drugs to have sex because anal sex is unnatural. They're also sexist af because they think they can get away with it.

No. 1739799

>>1739726
Fujos are so delusional

No. 1739805

i really like the new league of legends heartsteel song but i find it so fucking funny how ksante, the black character in the group, didn't get any screen time AT ALL during his singing parts, unlike the others that all got individual time during their parts… it's just so obvious they did that because a lot of the audience for this song is in asia, particularly s. korea and china, where they hate black people

No. 1739839

>>1739775
Yeah not surprised, it's the perfect place to meet other fujoshi in the wild. However for some reason the two times I went to Japan I had a way easier time finding the BL manga I was looking for in the Mandarake in Akihabara, but this one is huge.

No. 1739883

>>1739782
>>1739790
Ntayrt but while I agree, how come every time a man puts effort into his appearance he gets accused of being gay?

No. 1739922

I love living in the Information Age. I can read as many books as I want without spending a dime

No. 1739931

>>1739647
Funny how people will say this about dogs (because dog bad) but will disagree when it comes to cats, chickens, parrots, rabbits and any other pet. Of course children can provoke animals, most children will act unhinged and won't know when to leave an animal alone (and the animal does communicate most of the time, but children can't properly tell). Actually some children are downright sadistic little shits with no empathy when it comes to animals, I've seen kids yank cats around, pulling tails or whiskers, dropping or throwing small animals like turtles or kittens or just having fun seeing animals in distress.
My older brother straight up killed a turkey once as a child because he was being a little shit near them, one started chasing him and he kicked it hard in the head. Children aren't little soft angels Who can do no harm.

No. 1739959

>>1739727
It was from a thread where a moid brutally beat his dog slowly to death for biting his child, in front of said children

No. 1739968

>>1739726
most gay men are not attractive, at least for me a severe case of gay face is a huge turn off. that being sad, a lot of straight men aren't that attractive either so i guess it evens out. there are some gay men i find hot though, but i also find some straight men hot so their sexuality is irrelevant.

No. 1739970

File: 1698347305525.jpg (38.99 KB, 648x378, positive-neutral-negative-cant…)

Sleepy downturned eyes are nice, I saw some incel nonsense saying that they're "prey eyes" and thus undesirable because alphas have upturned "hunter eyes" that look fierce? Idk if normal people agree with this bull (they probably literally don't think about it) but I looked it up and saw some stupid women's magazine websites parroting the same thing about canthal tilt.
I love my bf's sleepy eyes and even though I have the upturned ones, I definitely don't look bold/fierce/etc. and have rather soft features

No. 1739973

>>1739970
Holy fuck, I knew a guy who had a big negative tilt, and it made him look like something went wrong while he was a fetus. It was like he was genetically crossed with a shark or something kek

No. 1739984

>>1739973
> It was like he was genetically crossed with a shark
anon kek

No. 1739992

>>1736759
>I would rather hang out with humanitards than stemcels.
Humanitards are significantly worse, they're the ones pretending men can be women.

No. 1739997

This thread is full of obvious self-hating troons that hate women for being able to have children. Misanthropic shut-ins that think everybody is as permanently unhappy as them. Not wanting kids is fine, calling for the extinction of our species because you hate yourself is some Grade-A moid shit.

No. 1740045

>>1739968
Nta but everytime I get a crush on a straight guy he turns out to be gay idk why, i'm not even intentionally seeking them out

No. 1740073

>>1739997
Exactly, they are anti-natalist retards who want to project their insecurities onto well adjusted women. They will never be happy

No. 1740153

>>1739992
>implying stem isn't full of programmer sock trannies
have fun

No. 1740156

>>1739997
>>1740073
The only moids here are you retards who keep insulting women for not wanting children.

No. 1740162

>>1740156
who insulted women for not wanting children?

No. 1740198

>>1739970
the attractive male eye thing for me has mostly to do with the brows and the eye not being round but slightly hooded or almond shaped.
people like timothee chamele-something have prey eyes, but his browbone and thick eyebrows look go very well with the hooded droopy eyes.
one thing is certain is that men with big round eyes look creepy

No. 1740208

My unpopular opinion is that having kids actually makes you less evolved human being not being able to resist instinct regardless of the facts and logic indicating that you should not in fact procreate.

No. 1740209

Another one, men should have bigger butts and tights. Men butlocks are extremelly hot, more than biceps or arms.

No. 1740210

>>1740208
okay ghandi.

No. 1740217

>>1740210
Stay unilluminated you simple creature.

No. 1740220

>>1740209
No, it looks ridiculous. I do not want a kardashian boyfriend.

No. 1740238

>>1740209
Agree. Men shouldn't have small or nonexistent butts. It looks weird and a sign they sit down all day and never exercise.

No. 1740263

>>1740208
please learn how to use punctuation

No. 1740270

>>1740209
It’s hot, my Nigel has a big muscular ass and I like to smack and punch it. Same with his pecs

No. 1740277

I don’t understand women who are young and pretty who let men dog them and treat them like shit. I have been told I was ugly since as far as I can remember and scrotes know not to play with me like that….Idg how women more attractive than me have even Lower standards.

No. 1740286

>>1740277
It’s all in the mind. Mind games are powerful. When you’re raised that way you’re almost always a goner, you have to have a childhood epiphany or a life altering event to break out of it if you were a woman raised to accept that shit, and even then there are ghosts in your brain telling you it’s normal. Mad respect for women who came from households trying to make them servants who could break out of it

No. 1740303

Most people prefer being in relationships with people who treat them like shit. That’s why you see women crying over men who treat them like they hate them and men giving all their money and attention to bpd types then pumping and dumping women who actually love them.

No. 1740308

>>1740263
no i will not

No. 1740325

>>1739970
Sorry anon but sleepy eyes do look ugly to me. Probably because live somewhere where everyone is mega ugly, inbred, malnourished and retarded so they all have that eye look and I ended up associating it with ugliness and I can never see it as attractive. But you like it because it's a novelty or unique feature to you probably. And I feel like if you had it yourself you wouldn't think it's pretty, since it can take away from the beauty of other features imo.

No. 1740329

File: 1698377993800.jpg (77.07 KB, 980x986, xke3ztod3iv71.jpg)

>>1740325
Ikr? Probably gonna go to hell for saying this, but noticeable negative tilt eyes make me think of those FAS diaphragms of how to look for the symptoms. A big negative tilt makes the eyes look like they're trying to slide off the face.

No. 1740341

>>1740325
>>1740329
Agreed. Negative canthal tilts are hideous to me and I think biologically they have always been seen as undesirable. Both men and women with them that I've met have been miserable people too so that doesn't help.

No. 1740352

>>1739045
I hate to admit it but this is the only one that does it for me and I have no regrets

No. 1740356

File: 1698382025856.jpeg (226.59 KB, 521x412, B0398B0C-7343-490A-9C3C-DDEE4E…)

>>1739973
It’s ugly on men but on women it’s pretty (I’m coping)

No. 1740359

>>1740356
That's not even a negative tilt.

No. 1740362

File: 1698382340756.jpeg (94.99 KB, 315x377, 878974B1-D4D2-4F79-9A2D-E30717…)

>>1740359
There you go ,

No. 1740364

>>1740362
The negative tilt is gonna look better on women, but women look better in general

No. 1740365

>>1740364
That’s good enough reassurance for me winks with my droopy eyes

No. 1740381

>>1740362
Those are a very mild case and the average person does not look like Anne Hathaway. She has other nice features that make her look good. Now go away.

No. 1740383

File: 1698383762101.jpg (34.23 KB, 480x720, 4ac259308051914d334b395e558eeb…)

>>1739970
negative canthal tilt are cute. the hunter eyes seems scary to me.

No. 1740384

File: 1698384121950.jpg (19.07 KB, 360x351, Fzo_Xu3akAEsWUl.jpg)

>>1739970
They can look attractive if styled correctly and if the rest of the face is good. Türkan Şoray's makeup made her downward eyes look sultry.

No. 1740389

File: 1698385192057.jpeg (59 KB, 764x1000, 7C1DC5A2-951F-4924-BCD7-23853D…)

>>1740381
Now go away? No! Droopy eye supremacy!

No. 1740392

>>1740389
damn he looks retarded

No. 1740413

"Autopedophilia" is the most retarded newspeak I've seen and the new way for people to shame women and our collective trauma of being sexualized since adolescence. Yeah DDLGfags are cringe and deserve to be called out for enabling actual pedos and creeps but calling them "autopedophilic" as if they were pedophiles getting off on themselves acting as children being molested and not people 99% likely to have been groomed and warped by the people around them is so ignorant and retarded and in my opinion has the connotation of implying once again that the issue is women being promiscuous or seductive, not that we're so likely to have been assaulted and traumatized as children that we start coming up with maladaptive copes that make the situation worse for everyone.

No. 1740414

>>1740198
>browbone and thick eyebrows
ayrt i think you're onto something, i never knew how to describe it but my bf has that exact combo. I was trying to think of the words for it recently since we were trying to make him as a character in a video game and they didn't have options that fit this

No. 1740417

>>1740413
i know it stings to get called something pedo-adjacent but is it really that hard to just put the diapers away?

No. 1740425

>>1740413
if I see women engaging in pedophilia that involves female children and self inserting (like collecting lolicon figures or cosplaying children in a sexualized way) I'm just going to call what I'm seeing.

No. 1740428

>>1740413
What's the difference between autopoedos and AGPs really? Think about it, an AGP gets off to himself while he imagines himself as a woman. The autopedo woman gets off to herself wwhile imagining herself as a kid/little girl. And the pedophile gets a pass…?

No. 1740429

>>1740428
some posters here are under the impression you get a pass with anything as long as you're a woman. in my books, if you're a pedophile, you're as good as a moid.

No. 1740430

>>1740428
If the woman is affected by trauma of being abused as a child or has been subjected to believing that she'll only be desirable and loved if she's posing as a child then she's not getting off on acting like a child but to being validated and loved in a way that's twisted and detrimental to her. Acting as if anything women do could rival moid AGP degeneracy is actual retardation.

No. 1740432

>>1740430
if you're affected by trauma you shouldn't keep relieving the same thing, you should get therapy for it. if your only way of healing is by becoming a pedophile yourself, maybe you should consider suicide.

No. 1740434

>>1740430
people excuse pedophile moids all the time saying they also got abused and they couldn't help it and that's how the cycle continues. I see no reason to use the same excuse with women.

No. 1740436

>>1740432
So do you think they should get therapy or kill themselves, which is it? They don't make a conscious decision one day to start larping as children to get beg for scrote attention instead of getting therapy, they have fucked up behavioral patterns broken by the constant stream of sexualization and abuse of little girls. And again we're talking about DDLG women and not women who actually abuse IRL children. But yeah rather than exploring how men groom and enable female delusions for their own cooming purposes we might as well tell them to just die.

No. 1740437

>>1740436
they should seek therapy but if they think the definite solution for their trauma is to become pedophiles, suicide is a good option. sorry I don't have empathy for pedos.

No. 1740441

>>1740436
>constant stream of sexualization and abuse of little girls
and what fucking exactly you think they are doing by sexualizing being a child for pedophile moid validation? you're just perpetuating the cycle of children being sexualized as well. because no actual regular scrote is going to want to have a relationship dynamic based on your partner roleplaying a child for validation (sexual or not). you're not only giving it to your trauma and making it your lifestyle but also dating a potential child rapist. please don't procreate.

No. 1740447

>>1740441
I'm not a DDLGfag and even said they deserve to be called out for enabling pedos you absolute fucking retard, stop projecting whichever coquette thot pissed you off into me and learn some reading comprehension. What I'm saying is that calling them "autopedophiles" is braindead and ignoring a larger issue around the effects of grooming and sexualization of little girls and shifting the blame from the men doing it to women victimized by it.

No. 1740449

>>1740447
it's not because they're literally projecting pedophilia onto their own sexuality. fucking cope you DDLG retard.

No. 1740479

>>1740436
>They don't make a conscious decision one day to start larping as children to get beg for scrote attention instead of getting therapy
except they do? wtf are you on about? non-actions don't require actions, meanwhile actions do require them. are you a troll or retarded, probably both. here's your (you)

No. 1740487

>>1740413
anon, i understand what you're saying, but i think you might have too much emotional investment in the term. it is a clinical descriptor, not a deliberate object of social shame. it's not implying you are a chomo, it's just naming the sexual interest (or "kink") in a direct way. it is inherently neutral. other anons seem to be making it a shame thing to disagree with you, but they're also misusing it and just proving your point IMO.
to be honest, i feel like this is the direct consequence of "pedophilia" becoming casual/newspeak for "child abuser" when it was originally intended to describe the paraphilia itself in a clinical or academic sense, even without actions or urges to act. it's a very heavy subject, so i understand why this happened, but it's still not great.

No. 1740566

>>1740447
If a woman gets molested and grows up to date pedophiles, make porn that sexualizes kids and have more children with pedophiles to be sexually abused she’s trash. Take the girl support girls mantra and shove it up your ass.

No. 1740570

>>1740487
please tell me how autopedophilia is not a shameful thing. also we should absolutely shame pedophiles too, it's not just a kink thing, it's a mental disorder, even if it's "just" autopedophilia.

No. 1740584

>>1740570
>please tell me how autopedophilia is not a shameful thing.
this isn't what my post is about. i'm stating that the psychs who coined the term (and all other current psychological terminology) did so in order to document and easily decribe something atypical that exists, not exert any particular value judgment on it. observing and noting something in itself isn't the same as saying it's bad. iirc it's also not classed as a mental disorder unless it becomes extreme or takes over a person's life. people outside of the clinical context apply the concept of "shameability" on their own and debate it back and forth, but the term itself wasn't invented to blame women for pedophiles.

No. 1740586

File: 1698405112484.png (145.56 KB, 562x466, Screenshots_2022-06-18-13-01-1…)

>>1740570
Lol when somebody tries to put "kink" onto straight up mental disorders to justify it, but the audience isn't buying it because the audience aren't libfems and scrotes. Spoiler alert, DDLG isn't a good cope. Therapy, self rope, either way people into this shit need to be isolated.

No. 1740593

As someone who has purchased a house I don’t feel bad for people who can’t sell their house. You want to sell a house you haven’t cleaned, looks like it’s falling apart and has water damaged for 100k and then act shocked that no one wants it.

No. 1740595

Skinny privilege isn’t really a thing for dark skin black women. I got treated worse when I was 125 and under but got treated better 125-140 but I also get sexualized 100x more. When I was thin people would say I look like a man, crack head etc and I’m sure many skinny dark women can relate. Skinny privilege is more of a white girl asian girl type thang.

No. 1740607

>>1740595
I think this mostly depends on your location, and how you carry weight. I personally get better treatment when I'm under 125lbs than at 140lbs. People are more polite, moids are nicer and I get complimented way more.

No. 1740610

>>1740595
I believe you because being thicc seems to be the standard for black women.

No. 1740612

>>1740593
the unfortunate thing is that a house in that state for that price would incite a bidding war where i live considering run down sheds go for $1,000,000+ because people want the land it's on so they can tear it down and build a mcmansion, beyond bleak kek

No. 1740613

>>1740584
it doesn't really matter how it was named, it's still a sickening way to deal with your trauma. get therapy or don't, I don't care, but don't act like perpetuating pedophilia is a valid way to cope. you're not even helping yourself if you do that.

No. 1740617

>>1740586
>Some pedophiles might act out their fantasies in legal ways by engaging in sexual activity with adults who look (small stature, no body hair, flat chest)…
I remember when I said moids who exclusively date women like this are pedophiles and the flat femlets got mad at me.

No. 1740618

Home cooked lunch and breakfast are better than bought lunch and breakfast. But, bought dinner tastes better than home cooked dinner.

No. 1740621

>>1740613
you really need to stop strawmanning and possibly projecting. i'm not a dd/lgfag, i'm explaining the point of the term to the OP because she thought it was newspeak designed to shame women. it just isn't.

>>1740586
in general, this thing anons do where they read posts that don't take any particular side, and immediately start thinking the poster must be their enemy trying to justify whatever they disagree with needs to stop, kek.
also, all kinks are atypical sexual interests and paraphilias by definition. the only way to read "kink" and think of it as "defense" of anything instead of a descriptive term is if you're already on some "all kink is ethical hehe" libfem shit. scientifically, it's neutral. the rest is up to you.

No. 1740628

>>1740621
>all kinks are atypical sexual interests and paraphilias by definition
people usually mean not harmful paraphilias by using the word kink. by grouping pedophilia with kinks you're grouping people engaging in consensual fetishes with people who are mentally ill and a danger to society.

No. 1740634

>DDLG is bad and should be judged but the women who partake in it are most likely victims being exploited for their trauma by men and calling them "autopedophilic" in a way to shame them is shifting the blame from pedo scrotes to the woman like always
>NU UH THEY'RE JUST DUMB PEDO SLUTS THAT SHOULD ROPE AND SO SHOULD YOU FOR BEING A PEDO DEFENDING DDLGFAG LIBFEM HANDMAIDEN
You can never have a conversation on this godforsaken site because newfags have the literacy level of a 12-year old and the argumentation skills to match.

No. 1740636

>>1740628
Nta, but “kinks” are an introduction to heavy fetishes, to me, being “kinky” means that you’re trying to meme yourself into liking something that you don’t truly like, which is insanely easy.
Just give it a try, convince someone to be into getting hurt, it’s the most meme’d “kink” (fetish) by society, it begins with getting “playfully” spanked and ends with someone getting actually hurt.

No. 1740643

>>1740634
Just because you’re a victim of something gives you no excuse to grow up and do it to other people. Yes they got molested as kids but as a grown woman they are now nasty to let pedophiles act out their fetishes on them. They are a danger to society and should be castrated.

No. 1740645

>>1740634
actually that's exactly what I mean. anyone engaging in DDLG should unironically rope.

No. 1740646

>>1740628
i'm using these terms specifically in the clinical context, and i never said "pedophilia is a kink". pedophiles sometimes choose to have sex with autopedophiles, or act out their desires with prostituted women, but literally no actual source on mental health presents them as the same thing, or describes autopedophilic women as a "danger to society". "autopedophilia" is an uncommon sexual fetish, or an atypical sexual interest, ie a kink. i feel like internet coomers, libfems and porn addicts have tricked even some self-proclaimed radfems online into treating the word "kink" like it's holy and must be defended or something. we can all feel however we want about any particular kinks, but they are what they are.

No. 1740648

>>1740636
as far as I'm concerned stuff like BDSM, feet, feederism, etc. are not considered a mental disorder by the DSM and are (most of the time) done by consenting adults so you can go eat shit and die if you're an "autopedophile".

No. 1740649

>>1740648
>BDSM
>consenting
NTA but you're as bad as any ddlgroid, fuck off

No. 1740651

if you get off on the notion of being a child and being raped, you're a pedophile, even if you're engaging in the fantasy you're the victim and not the perpetrator. because you're aroused by the thought of a child being sexualized. so the term "autopedophilia" is a moot because you're just a pedophile if you engage in DDLG or lolicon.

No. 1740655

>>1740649
just because you don't want to do anal with your Nigel and he keeps saying kinks are healthy and you don't buy it, it doesn't mean a woman can't enjoy beating the shit out of a man. d males are usually predatory, though.

No. 1740656

>>1740651
Anon talks as if these poor “victims” wouldn’t give birth and let their scrote sexually abuse their children

No. 1740659

>>1740655
sexual sadism and masochism are considered mental disorders in the DSM, and no one can "consent" to getting the shit beaten out of them. stop watching scrotey porn.

No. 1740660

>>1740656
these poor victims are free to get therapy and not engage in material or roleplay that involves reliving their trauma and live healthy lifes without pedophiliac scrotes in their lives. it's like actively choosing to get addicted to heavy drugs and trying it on purpose. you're being self destructive and you know it.

No. 1740662

>>1740659
That's why it's called BDSM

No. 1740664

>>1740651
is there any evidence to back this up though? i guess this is the unpopular opinions thread, regardless.

No. 1740665

>>1740659
fine, but they don't involve children so if a man wants to get his dick cut off by some dominatrix or if a woman wants to get tied up by some scrote I won't judge them too harshly even if they're dubious choices. I will definitely judge people who sexualize children in any possible way much harshly than any other people involved in kink. it's just not on the same level of degeneracy and pedophiles love advocating their "preference" is just a kink like any other and I won't have any of it.

No. 1740667

>>1740617
Don't let anyone convince you that pedos never date women like that to specifically to feel like they're dating a girl. It does happen, but I guess the "femlets" aren't ready to talk about that.

No. 1740668

>>1740648
But is it really done by someone that truly likes BDSM? That’s the true question, at what point are most people truly into BDSM (something that’s shoved down our throats by media of all kinds) and aren’t just trying to make themselves believe that they’re into it?
Most BDSMfags are into it for the community aspect of BDSM, before the internet, being into BDSM was quite rare, and with the internet it’s so easy to learn about paraphilias and fetishes that yeah, people can make themselves be into those, lots of people can easily get lost in the coom, you know, like the average DDLG retard.
I’m not justifying their behavior, I just think that women can get treated and that they need help to stop being into such harmful fetishes. Moids can die though.

No. 1740669

>>1740664
the criteria to get diagnosed as a pedophile:

>An individual who has had arousing fantasies about, urges for, or behaviors with a prepubescent child or children.

>The individual has acted out these sexual desires, or is experiencing significant distress or difficulty as a result of these desires.
https://www.theravive.com/therapedia/pedophilic-disorder-dsm--5-302.2-(f65.4)

I would say engaging in DDLG applies to both of these so yeah

No. 1740673

>>1740662
kek

>>1740665
dd/lg is literally a subgroup of BDSM. wherever you find dd/lg tards, you'll find BDSMfags and vice versa, and the entire kink community is rife with abuse.

No. 1740675

>>1740673
BDSM is abuse by default, the community isn’t rife with abuse, it’s just an abuser community, period lol

No. 1740681

>>1740669
this would be like considering masochism the same thing as sadism because the masochistic individual is aroused by someone being abused (even if it's themselves). IMO both are problematic, but not in the same way, and psychology separates the two for that reason.

No. 1740683

>>1740675
Intensely unpopular opinion here but I disagree and think it is fine with consenting adults. But I do think ddlg adult baby whatever gross stuff is.. something else entirely..

No. 1740685

>>1740683
nta
>haha it's ok officer my wife consented to being physically abused haha we're just kinky haha
you don't see how this shit is gross and self-destructive? they're all just fucked up dynamics with different coats of paint being defended with "muhhh kinkkkkkk".

No. 1740688

File: 1698412508266.jpeg (179.4 KB, 1080x1349, 7874434D-A8CE-4CCE-BBBC-1EE493…)

I believe rap music is a modern tool to keep black people brain washed and retarded. The people in power can’t do blatant shit like putting drugs in black neighborhoods and giving black people diseases under the guise of fake health care now, so they’re doing it with rap music. At first rap only was pushed on black men with acting like a thug, demoralizing their own women and killing each other but in mordern times they’re focusing on black women by pushing being slutty, being baby mommas and normalizing stds.(racebait)

No. 1740690

>>1740685
Not the anon you're replying to but if it's between consenting adults I don't see the problem. If grooming isn't involved.

No. 1740692

>>1740688
I 100% agree with you, but you should post this on the tinfoil thread.

No. 1740693

>>1740690
That's what I think too.

No. 1740694

>>1740688
for rich women in entertainment (and in general I suppose), being a "baby momma" and single mother is better than being tied down to some manwhore and sexually abusive scrote who's also in the entertainment industry.

No. 1740696

File: 1698412958080.jpeg (755.24 KB, 1284x1574, 6D6BF58D-2054-4F69-8366-48803A…)

Jeffree star hanging out with Eugenia cooney is a most likely going to be good for her. Jeffree is so narcissistic and manipulative and Eugenia cooney worships him. He’s probably going to convince her to recover so he can get the praise for it.

No. 1740697

>>1740690
you can't "consent" to physical abuse, lol.

No. 1740698

File: 1698413028007.jpg (2.61 MB, 2108x3000, NFXO5IKNCREI3F3NUJ2VMK2H4U.jpg)

>>1740688
This makes me think of old school Hollywood where black performers were being held to the same standard as white artists. Now it's almost as if the industry is imposing this standard on black people that they need to fill which is degrading. Cardi B comes to mind.

No. 1740700

>>1740688
agreed. there's no reason for those who control mainstream press to make these sorts of people famous. sadly, there are people whose only understanding of black culture is…that, and they will call you anti-black for pointing out it's destructive.

No. 1740701

>>1740681
sure retard just argue with the DSM then. it literally says fantasizing about it is enough to get a diagnosis but go off I guess if it makes you sleep better at night.

No. 1740704

>>1740701
?? you're literally the one arguing with the DSM and every psychologist on earth, but okay get well soon nonny lol

No. 1740706

>>1740688
>I believe rap music is a modern tool to keep black people brain washed and retarded
spoken like someone who only knows mainstream rap that talks about shaking ass and fucking hoes. a lot of rap talks about the struggles of black people, working class, even women (gonna have to dig on older rap for that, more on early 00s less nowadays I think). I guess that narrative works for you if you're racist.

No. 1740707

>>1740700
The creator of The Boondocks hated BET for that specific reason to. He even made an entire episode about BET wanting to destroy black people.

No. 1740708

>>1740704
your logic doesn't even make fucking sense because the criteria for pathological sadism/masochism are not even the same as the criteria for pedophilia.

No. 1740709

>>1740706
No offense, but it feels like you're putting words in her mouth. We all know that not all rap is the same, but let's be honest, "wholesome" rap is not as popular as the rap with degenerate lyrics.

No. 1740711

>>1740709
yeah because mainstream rock or pop are so wholesome. as if it doesn't talk about doing drugs, partying and fucking either. all mainstream music talks about the most crude shit you can possibly imagine and pointing out exclusively rap does it is blatantly racist.

No. 1740712

>>1740688
What are your thoughts on Afrobeats?

No. 1740713

>>1740708
this is such a non-sequitur, i can't help you. anyway, go look at the DSM yourself or question any psychologist on if autopedophilia is the same as pedophilia, they'll tell you it isn't. both are still not good, but live in reality ffs.

No. 1740715

I think the whole is kink eeeevil and instantly paraphilic conversation is dumb because it sounds too much like BPD black and white thinking. Life is not that black and white. Some people know how to keep healthy boundaries with kink and never go into the territory of actual pain or immoral acts like DDLG. The hc kinky degenerates would call those people with boundaries too vanilla but the actual vanillas would not, so it counts as kinky even if it's just light biting etc.

No. 1740717

>>1740713
>>An individual who has had arousing fantasies about, urges for, or behaviors with a prepubescent child or children.
>about, urges for, or behaviors with
the about or behaviors with don't specify anything about fantasizing being the victim or the perpetrator. it literally implies just fantasizing about the act sexually is enough. please go to therapy.

No. 1740719

>>1740715
I’m particularly not saying that it’s “eeeevil” I’m saying that it’s a slippery slope and that most people aren’t careful about what they get into because when sex is involved, most people don’t truly consider how far are they going with what they’re doing.
It’s literally like watching porn, at first you will watch a gif, then a video without audio, then a video with audio and after a while you will find yourself searching for the most random stuff, either out of morbid curiosity or because it’s just what it “feels” like it’s what you want to do.
The more you indulge in such behaviors, the more likely you will find them normal and the more you will want to do something less and less normal.

No. 1740720

>>1740706
Just because other types rap music exists doesn’t mean the type of rap music that is popular isn’t a brain washing tool

No. 1740721

>>1740720
by your logic any other type of music that is dumbed could be a brain washing tool but I find your focus on the black people part at least suspicious and biased.

No. 1740724

>>1740717
same site you linked says
>Pedophilic Disorder is a DSM-5 (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition), diagnosis assigned to adults ( defined as age 16 and up) who have sexual desire for prepubescent children (American Psychiatric Association, 2013a).
>The DSM-5 notes that males with Pedophilic Disorder begin to feel sexual attraction toward children about the time of puberty (American Psychiatric Association, 2013a).
i think you need to go to therapy and ask a professional about these things instead of trying to stretch clearly defined words and getting mad at people for not agreeing. pedophiles are perpetrators because they are attracted to children, not themselves.

No. 1740726

>>1740651
I would rather not muddy the water like this, it would weaken the severity of the term pedophile to suddenly loop in female autopedophiles
>>1740656
if it's a woman putting a child in danger like then then it's not "auto"pedophilia anymore it's just regular pedophilia yeah

No. 1740727

>>1740724
if you get aroused by the thought of a child getting raped, you're attracted to them, even if you're self inserting as one, you dumb retard.

No. 1740730

>>1740727
get help, you either can't read or have a fetish for acting like it.

No. 1740731

>>1740725
I'd argue modern country music is a tool for white americans by that logic. bible belt music is all about drinking, fucking, cheating on your wife or being miserable.
>>1740730
I don't get what you gain by defending people who perpetuate pedophilia even if it's "just a fantasy". do you feel the same towards shota/lolicons?

No. 1740733

>>1740721
> by your logic any other type of music that is dumbed could be a brain washing tool

It can be. There are other forms of brain washing tools the media uses to get people to act and do what they want. Rap music is the tool for black people. It’s not just rap that uses brain washing to get people to do what they want….for example if you listen to most Japanese female pop songs it’s all about being cute for a man and being submissive because that’s what they subliminally want to instill in them.

No. 1740735

>>1740733
I'd argue idol culture is vastly more brainwashing than rap. the parasocial relationship these people rein people in is seriously disturbing. also kpop (idk about jpop, probably the same) artists perpetuate a fucked up beauty standard.

No. 1740738

>>1740731
it's as >>1740726 said, muddying the waters to try and pwn ddlg fags is just weakening the term so that people will roll their eyes when you want to talk about actual pedophiles. you can say it's unhealthy without that.

No. 1740739

>>1740731
White people also have other forms of media that represents them. For most black Americans their only representation is rap and that’s what they follow and all of the popular rap artists are trashy and raunchy.

No. 1740740

>>1740737
black americans literally created jazz, blues. black caribbeans created reggae, ska and salsa. if you think those styles are not influential you're musically retarded.

No. 1740741

>>1740733
is it really subliminal though

No. 1740743

>>1740719
I would disagree. On the internet the idiots are just loud but it doesn't mean it's the majority, in real life you basically never meet the degenerates anyway because they're chronically online and don't leave their house. It's a pessimistic view to think everyone rots their brain, which is only remotely true to chronically online people.

No. 1740744

>>1740719
they don't realize they're just showing how far down the slope they already are by balking at the notion of BDSM being abusive.

No. 1740745

>>1740733
>subliminally want to instil in them
You can remove your tinfoil hat. Japanese men wanting women to be submissive isn't a subliminal message. That's what men want everywhere. What next? Capitalism is a conspiracy? There is nothing secret about moids exploiting women and nature.

No. 1740746

>>1740738
yeah, normalizing pedophilia is so much better nonny.

No. 1740747

>>1740740
And? That’s not what people in power want to popularize in current times because they want to feed negativity into the black community to keep them retarded and they’ve discovered music is an easier tool than the previous shit they’ve done in the past

No. 1740748

>>1740744
Because fuzzy handcuffs are literally not abusive kek. It's possible to not slippery slope into abyss with everything, to me it speaks more about you than me that you think it's impossible.

No. 1740749

>>1740733
It's not subliminal, it's simply what sells.

No. 1740750

>>1740721
anon, rap is significantly dumber and more destructive than pop music (which is already dumb). do you think that's natural and coincidental?

>>1740706
so, why do you think mainstream rap is about shaking ass, fucking hoes, drugs and violent crime, while the rap that isn't about that is old or underground? this is the problem. it's actually racist to think "my pussy pink my bootyhole brown" is the best and most marketable content that black people can make.

No. 1740751

>>1740747
I think you never talked to a black person in your entire life if you think all they listen to is mainstream rap kek stay sheltered nonny

No. 1740754

>>1740746
sure, knowing the definitions of words is definitely normalization, that's very logical kek

No. 1740755

>>1740733
Subliminal conspiracy aside, that's some annoying ass music

No. 1740756

>>1740748
>n-no u!!
sure jan. anyway, abusive porn is wrong.

No. 1740758

>>1740750
I literally don't listen to mainstream western music (or eastern if that matters) but whenever I do, the subject is literally any of those no matter what genre I'm listening to.

No. 1740759

>>1740754
really, what do you gain from treating people who engage in DDLG with respect? are you one of those freaks? if so, please kill yourself immediately.

No. 1740760

>>1740758
quickly, post the taylor swift lyrics about being a drug addicted convict or baby mama talking about her pussy. i don't listen to her either, before anyone tries it, but you're being so obtuse.

No. 1740763

>>1740756
We weren't talking about porn though, I would agree because I haven't consumed any porn in 5+ years. But you saying fuzzy handcuffs are somehow abusive is absurd to me, it's considered bdsm but it's clearly just lightly playful. It doesn't have to get any further from that, if you think it always automatically does get worse, isn't that saying something about you having an addictive personality? It certainly hasn't happened to me or anyone I know in real life.

No. 1740764

File: 1698415920588.jpeg (762.51 KB, 1284x658, ACE6E715-3C33-4DBD-9E95-C7BDB6…)

>>1740751
Want to know a little surprise? I am black lol. You’re never going to see black Olivia rodrigo or music like what a young Rihanna made ever again because the people in power have a narrative they want to push. In 10 years from now we will probably never have anymore Beyoncé’s, Whitney Houston’s etc and that will be replaced by over sexualized hood industry plants who get switched out with a new thot every 3 months.

No. 1740765

>>1740759
once again, knowing the definitions of words is not respecting unhealthy fetishes or having them. i'm very sorry you can't comprehend something this simple, but a professional can help you through it. no one's going to water down the meaning of pedophilia and shield rapist scrotes just because of some pickmes you hate.

No. 1740766

>>1740765
I'm sorry you're autistic and in your crusade to respect the meaning of words, you inevitably end up respecting people who are literally worse than trash.

No. 1740767

>>1740764
Let's just say we have a lot in common and I agree.

No. 1740768

>>1740760
taylor swift fans are insufferable. you can literally google her name +drug references and find a bunch of different songs.

No. 1740770

>>1740751
you are probably talking to a black person. you most likely think the way you do because you're either completely ignorant to the problem, a trashy person yourself, or an actual racist who thinks black people have some natural predilection to hypersexuality and violence that needs to be at the forefront of all our creativity, or else it's "antiblack", "inauthentic", etc. no sane person likes the disgusting shit pushed today, stop it.

No. 1740771

>>1740766
keep shielding pedo scrotes to attack women with shitty coping mechanisms, you will surely be rewarded

No. 1740773

>>1740771
I think they're both trash but go off.

No. 1740774

>>1740771
the only people respecting and catering to pedo scrotes are the ones doing DDLG with them and making sure their "needs" are met.

No. 1740775

>>1740771
Nta but why is it calling out women who are into age play means you’re defending male pedophiles? Why can’t we agree that both of them are garbage?

No. 1740776

>>1740767
It’s so funny people try to deny this but don’t see how young black males worship these rappers like they’re gods. Now I’m seeing a lot of black girls thinking being open about getting stds etc is “real” since sexy red got popular and has been doing it.

No. 1740777

>>1740773
sure you do. they're both fucked but they'll never be on the same level, go ask a therapist why.

>>1740775
calling them out is not the same as trying to change the definition of "pedophilia". you can do both without being a retard.

No. 1740780

>>1740777
ageplay is pedophiliac and there is nothing you can do about it. cry about it.

No. 1740781

>>1740775
NTA but holy shit that's what people have been saying here, the entire issue in the OP was that people shift the blame solely to the women instead of the pedo scrotes who exploit their mental illness

No. 1740783

>>1740774
women can be helped, rapist scrotes can't. end of story.

>>1740780
>source: my delusions

No. 1740785

>>1740781
people shift the blame because misogyny, no fucking shit. but let's not pretend coquettes, littles, lolicons and other gross beings are completely innocent.

No. 1740786

>>1740777
They are on the same level. The woman doesn’t mind throwing women under the bus so that she can cum and the man is using her because he wants to find someone who will help him get his needs met or help him find real child victims. Also claiming that these woman are like this because they were sexually abused is an assumption, you don’t know all of these women.

No. 1740787

>>1740783
if women can be helped they can get therapy and not perpetuate the trauma they went through. how fucking dense are you? I refuse to believe you're not one of those retards, the mental gymnastics here to defend their acts is out of this world.

No. 1740790

File: 1698416724573.png (115.82 KB, 1182x667, taylor.png)

>>1740768
https://tutortugas.com/taylor-swift-drug-references/
compare that to any mainstream rappers, including female ones. once again, i don't listen to her, but you just made my point for me. three references in her entire discography. if fucking only it was the same both ways, lmao.

No. 1740791

>>1740785
>I can only accept observations of misogyny if I can also blame the woman
This reminds me an awful lot about that one retard the other day who was sperging about female sex workers being the reason why human trafficking exists because "they provide the supply".

No. 1740793

>>1740790
okay, nonny, I get it, you think I'm racist for implying black people can do other music rather than mainstream rap that only talks about drugs and shaking ass, but at the same time just showed me that taylor swift is basically the second coming of christ and should be sanctified because of how clean her lyrics are.

No. 1740795

>>1740791
awful strawman. because I was reading that thread and disagreeing with that anon the entire time. you can't compare willingly participating in pedophiliac fantasies and prostituting yourself out of necessity/coercion.

No. 1740798

>>1740791
Radfems often blame sex workers though. I tried discussing this issue and a lot of radfems kept blaming OF sex workers or degrading them for being in the industry and sort of shifting the blame onto them and implying that they are grooming women instead of looking at the bigger picture. It doesn't actually allign with radfem rethoric

>>1740793
Degeneracy sells. It's not only rap people just look at what sort of message trappers are selling.

No. 1740799

File: 1698417099578.jpeg (32.36 KB, 165x220, 72A90CD5-3393-4655-B2A2-AC0E07…)

This is going to ruffle some feathers. Most women into ddlg were not child sex assault victims, they are just weeaboos. Most of them are just weeaboos who consumed too much aidoru and moe anime as a child and think it’s cute. Because of the media they consumed they find the little girl life style “cute” and want to be like those anime girls fucking old men. I don’t even think it’s inherently sexual for them, I just think they want the validation of being seen as moe and kawaii. Like yukapon for example and those other weeaboo net idols we used to have to deal with back in the 2010s.

No. 1740800

>>1740787
>if women can be helped they can get therapy and not perpetuate the trauma they went through
yes. now scroll up and remind yourself how braindead you are for saying dumb shit and yelling at people for noticing the definition of pedophilia isn't your dumbass headcanon instead of this very basic truth. keep screeching everyone ITT is a ddlgtard, maybe it'll stick someday.

>>1740786
by "women", you mean herself? unless she actually is involving child victims or forcing other women to participate, she is humiliating and mentally/physically harming herself at the end of the day. it has nothing to do with me or any othe woman or child any more than a masochist sucking some scrote's boot is. a pedopile is harming a mentally ill woman and/or a child, a misogynistic sadist is harming a mentally ill woman and/or a child. the victims are not the same.

>>1740785
you sound like the type who wants to bash women more than she even hates abusive moids.

No. 1740804

>>1740800
your post is one assumption after the other and I will just let you know you're retarded and I hope you stub your toe every single day until it realigns your neural pathways.

No. 1740805

>>1740793
i think you misread my post or replied to the wrong person. i've literally been saying mainstream rap is degenerate and it's racist to say it's just "normal" for black people, >>1740750 is my post. i made the comparison to taylor swift because >>1740758 says "the subject is literally any of those no matter what genre I'm listening to" (shaking ass, fucking hoes, drugs and violent crime). what the fuck is even going on anymore itt?

No. 1740808

File: 1698417356587.jpeg (Spoiler Image,170.34 KB, 1284x1410, 7B009FB4-813B-47B9-9423-DEB440…)

>>1740800
Most women into that stuff have never been sexually assaulted. They are just weeaboos. Women who have actually been sexually abused as children wouldn’t want to go around dressing like a child etc

No. 1740811

I’m actually tired seeing “lesbian representation” in media because 99% of the time it’s made by liberal coomer men with a fetish for conventionally attractive women kissing, or genderqueers making obnoxious they/them “lesbians”.

No. 1740812

>>1740804
and i hope your fingers break and you catch laryngitis the next time you "unintentionally" defend rapist moids and post 60 IQ schizo garbage that ends up making them look better because you just want to dunk on pickmes so bad.

No. 1740813

>>1740764
It's standardization which is based on the formula that sells the most. That's why we get these pre-packed thots of the week akin to kpop idols. They produce the culture that they use to justify their product. The problem also is that many kids grow up listen to the Ice Spices and Lil Nas Xs due to their catchy beat on Tiktok and grow used to listening to that as the standard, making it hard to appreciate better music. We kinda had something similar to these plants in the form of Nicki Minaj and other rappers but at least they had to put up a certain smount of effort. Now they don't even have to try because they know the kids will still consooms even if it is I'm that Bitch, I'm the Shit, I'm Miss Poopie.

No. 1740814

>>1740808
I've witnessed a woman saying that she enjoys lolicon media because she has been raped as a child. I don't agree with it and I think she should get help for it instead of engaging in material that sexualizes children. she had a doujin and figure collection of lolicon porn. I don't see how that's not literally perpetuating it.

No. 1740815

>>1740808
I can't even say if that makes it better or worse. It's just sad and bad.

No. 1740816

>>1740798
>Radfems often blame sex workers
Radical feminism is all about looking at the bigger picture. I have never heard someone irl interested by radical feminism blame women for the sex industry. Online radfem spaces are part of the few places where women who were abused by the sex industry openly speak about their experience. Just log off twitter. lol

No. 1740817

>>1740812
>hating female pedophiles as much as male pedophiles is defending moids
get help lmao

No. 1740819

>>1740799
You don’t have to be literally molested or sexually assaulted to get your mental state fucked by males and male culture. Most of these fetish loli idol e-girls are just pickmes who have (correctly) assumed most males are pedos and pander to them by presenting themselves as childlike. Most pickmes likely weren’t raped or assaulted but every woman is exposed to male degeneracy and male culture and it can certainly poison your mind.

No. 1740820

>>1740817
you're literally talking to yourself and making shit up atp, nonny. begging you to see a therapist and maybe get a tard wrangler

No. 1740822

>>1740819
and how is it bad thinking pandering to pedophiles is reprehensible? some of these women are not even aware they're doing it, but the ones engaging in blatant things like ageplay or lolicon are very aware of what they are doing. they're not being oppressed, they are degenerates.

No. 1740823

>>1740819
they weren’t traumatized they just saw that media and thought it was cute. We can blame men all day but they still saw this content and they liked it and decided to copy it then started opening their legs to neck beards because in the porn they watch that’s what turns them on.

No. 1740824

>>1740816
I'm not browsing Twitter. I've literally seen this rethoric on lolcow there are many posts because I've been in arguments regarding this. They are implying OF sex workers are luring in or grooming women into the industry. They are also basically saying those women are degrading themselves practcially denying the fact that they have autonomy over their own body. I'm just too lazy to link any of the arguments.

No. 1740826

>>1740799
>>1740808
yukapon was molested by her stepfather as a child, groomed online by a pedo scrote, and her mom let her go to japan to date another creepy middle aged moid who groomed her online at 16. she is a bad example. aminyan, i don't know her history but she's been selling nudes since 16 too and still defends age gap fetish shit, so i can't imagine her upbringing was safe.
anyway, a lot of pickmes were not raped. it doesn't mean they aren't brainwashed and can't be helped.

No. 1740827

I get women are oppressed by men but when will women stand up on their own feet and take control of their own minds/lives? Constantly bitching that you are the way you are because of men is like a black person trying to get a kkk member to not oppress them. Why do you expect your oppressor to care about you?when will women get it?

No. 1740828

>>1740824
Lolcow isn't a feminist imageboard. Are you lost?

No. 1740829

>>1740822
>>1740823
I don’t believe for a second every woman isn’t acutely aware that they are sexual beings in the eyes of men, especially when performing.

No. 1740830

>moid seething "Women have always been the ones who benefited from marriage"
Of course it benefits the women, it's set in place because men can simply leave to go impregnate someone else and not have to take care of any children if they didn't believe in actual marriage. Marriage was intended for a relationship to actually mean something and give structure to a society so there's no single moms roaming around having to work their ass off and somehow also manage raising a child at the same time. Modern interpretations of marriage just means you're signing a paper and that's it, no waiting until after marriage to live to gether or to finally be able to have sex.
Before the industrial revolution, men were forced to put in effort to prove to a woman he wanted to marry her and have children with her. Great men didn't participate in premarital cohabitation, nowadays it's even more common due to the costs of living.
Any nonnas reading this, do not live with a moid until you get engaged first, he will be content staying with you unmarried. You shouldn't risk living with a man who doesn't care about you for financial convenience. He sees a great benefit in sharing rent because he could slack off and continue doing stupid shit and spend more money on stupid shit instead of saving it.
Think of it this way, man moves in with his girlfriend, or she moves in, they're intimate. They could have unprotected sex at any time if they wanted. No need for marriage, the nest is made. What more should a man need to do? Absolutely nothing. He could have sex with her and have sex with someone else on the side. If you didn't live with him, you wouldn't be easily accessible to him and he would have to out in effort to see you face to face and eventually prove he wants to live in a house with you instead of begging for you to find an apartment to live together in. Doesn't that sound more promising for a loyal man?
To secure a well mannered man who will truthfully commit to you (this will be difficult, but worth it) do not have sex with a man until a few months into the relationship. You don't need to show love through sexual intercourse at this point of the relationship, ideally wait until you two are engaged or married, but realistically at the very least 3 months in but no less.

No. 1740832

>>1740828
>lolcow isn't a feminist imageboard

Read my post. I've never stated that lolcow is a feminist imageboard. However, a lot of users do consider themselves feminists. My argument was that I've seen radfems on lolcow blame OF sex workers. Which did happen.

No. 1740836

>>1740830
>do not have sex with a man until marriage and don’t live with him

I don’t agree with this. If a man likes you and is a good person he’s going to treat to like gold regardless if you fuck him in the first month or in a year. If you go by these rules what’s really going to happen is you’ll just end up with a love bomber who switch’s up on you after you own a house and youre legally bonded.

No. 1740838

>>1740836
Would a love bomber spend months of effort with someone who will not have sex with them right away?

No. 1740839

>>1740823
when do you think is the average age for a girl on the internet to be exposed to scrote shit, especially girls who like anime? it's not adulthood. even a ton of anons here and CC have stories about being groomed online as kids. it even happened to non-weeb girls. please face the absolute state of the culture we live under, because it's only getting worse with shit like tiktok and the tranny epidemic. you can reject all that shit without attacking the girls affected.
most of the libfems who are into dd/lg don't even know what radical feminism is. do you realize that? all the voices against that shit are drowned out. they're ignorant and fell for moid's lies and porn culture, not evil.

No. 1740840

>>1740830
>single moms roaming around having to work their ass off
Women never worked and never had to raise children on their own before the invention of girlbossing during the industrial revolution of the 19th century. Nice bait.

>>1740832
>lolcow, an anonymous imageboard
>trust me bro, those anons were radfems
Ok dude.

No. 1740841

>>1740838
Most women don’t even recognize what love bombing is so yes they would. Why would you want to buy a house with someone and you don’t even know their level of cleanliness, their annoying habits etc?

No. 1740844

>>1740842
are you the same anon who blames prostituetes for moid's consuming porn?

No. 1740846

>>1740839
Blah blah blah. Yukapon and and amina dujean are both almost 30 and still doing this lolicon shit. Maybe we should take away their rights to make adult decisions if they still can’t get it well into their 20s. If you can’t figure out at 30 that prancing around in mini school girl skirts and dating men into Lolis is a problem then therapy isn’t going to help you.

No. 1740848

>>1740841
You could easily walk into a moids living space to see his level of cleanliness. His car, his countertops, etc. wouldn't it be beneficial to inspect a moid's apartment and spend hours with him before you say yes to a ring? You act as if other women are low IQ

No. 1740852

>>1740844
No I just understand that women aren’t as stupid as you think we are. Not every bad thing women do is just because we are little girls too dumb to understand anything.

No. 1740853

>>1740842
>>1740846
if you really think brainwashed women can't be helped and just shouldn't have rights, then you're not a feminist, which is fine, but don't use feminist talking points or say you're all about protecting women and children lol

No. 1740856

>>1740853
I never said I was a feminist. If you’re too dumb to even make basic decisions for yourself and you want to play it like you’re a child just because you’re a woman then maybe you need to be under your parents guardianship again so that someone can make decisions on your behalf because you are a retard….

No. 1740860

>>1740856
>I never said I was a feminist.
this is good

No. 1740861

>>1740860
If being a feminist means I have to think that women are inherently retarded then I don’t want to be one

No. 1740863

>>1740861
no one in this thread said that

No. 1740866

>>1740863
If you are a grown woman and getting groomed by scrotes into toddler play during sex then you need to be back under your mothers care with a curfew that is 7pm. You aren’t mentally stable enough to take care of yourself yet. These women are in these situations not because men put them there, they put themselves there and they wanna be there.

No. 1740867

>>1740830
you're a fucking retard if you think men didn't cheat, have children with other women, bring home STDs, slacked off and leeched or any other trash before industrial era. also single women did exist before it too, they were usually lower class women impregnated by married men or a men of a higher class that wasn't allowed to marry. marriage was never a good deal for women.

No. 1740869

>>1740866
this just reads like libfem "muh choice, women are NEVER presured by society" BS, but in the victim blaming sense instead of fake empowerment

No. 1740870

>>1740866
it's almost like this scrote thinks women who have been molested are free from any self accountability and shouldn't heal from their trauma accordingly, but instead should make themselves disposable for men who are into ageplay.

No. 1740872

>>1740869
No one’s pressuring these women to put on a onesie and a diaper and role play during sex lol stfu

No. 1740873

>>1740870
how am i a scrote for saying female victims can be helped out of bad mindsets and should go to therapy? are you retarded or just samefagging?

No. 1740874

>>1740869
it's not impossible to recognise your trauma can cause you to have a self destructive response but also expect responsibility from someone who has been a victim of pedophilia. you're basically implying every victim can just engage in it unconsciously when it's pretty obvious it is a conscious choice to continue doing it once you recognise it's a sexual impulse.

No. 1740875

>>1740873
>they can be helped

You have to want help to receive it. You don’t think they know that dressing up as a toddler and sexualizing it is wrong? They know it’s wrong but they enjoy it.

No. 1740876

>>1740873
I never said they shouldn't, I've been saying the entire time therapy is the appropriate response, not ageplay.

No. 1740877

>>1740872
this bpd-tier overreaction lmao

>>1740874
>it's not impossible to recognise your trauma can cause you to have a self destructive response but also expect responsibility from someone who has been a victim of pedophilia.
who said they shouldn't have any responsibility? you can point out moid influence while still wanting them to get better and show them a different worldview.

No. 1740879

>>1740877
pointing out it's gross and degenerate is a normal response to it. just because they're uwu victims doesn't mean they can't act degenerate. a lot of traumatized people go off to become all sorts of criminal. doesn't mean they get a pass to do crimes because of trauma.

No. 1740880

File: 1698420481215.webm (Spoiler Image,2.6 MB, 640x1138, 155.webm)

>>1740743
>in real life you basically never meet the degenerates anyway because they're chronically online and don't leave their house.

No. 1740882

>>1740878
the key is that those people thrive on online validation of their "kinks" and use it as excuse to not seek help, because it's "valid" for them. DDLG literally think they're not doing anything wrong.

No. 1740883

>>1740877
>they just need to be shown another world view

You don’t think they are aware that wanting to have sex with children is bad?

No. 1740885

>>1740830
Men have always been the ones who benefitted from marriage. It was a way to guarantee even the lowest man a large chance of reproduction. It was also a way to displace parasitic male urges and give them a sandbox to rule over (rather than taking out their chimp urges on society at large). Maybe in some FDS-esque sugar baby situation you’re getting something out of it. And I don’t really see how the man couldn’t cheat in either situation.

No. 1740886

>>1740880
I'm gonna take a break from lolcow now.

No. 1740888

>>1740882
I don’t think people who are into ddlg are going it because of previous childhood abuse but they use the abuse as excuse not to get called out

No. 1740889

>>1740861
Feminists don't think women are inherently retarded, but feminism's goal is to help all women, and this includes the ones who are, sadly, retarded.

No. 1740890

>>1740889
I don’t think women who engage in ddlg deserve rights. They need to be locked up in a psych ward with the other nuts.

No. 1740892

>>1740880
i was going to respond to retard(s) in the thread, but this convinced me to stop. half likely want to defend this while still claiming anti degeneracy, too. enough.

No. 1740896

>>1740880
I’m genuinely curious what this clip is but I’m on a iPhone. What’s happening?

No. 1740897

>>1740840
I can’t tell if you’re joking. Women definitely worked before the Industrial Revolution. Please tell me you aren’t that retarded.

No. 1740899

>>1740896
a woman and her scrote engaging in "pupplay" at the mall, in public

No. 1740905

>>1740897
>retarded
>can't use the internet without tone indicators

No. 1740924

>>1740897
NTAYRT but that's clearly sarcasm kek. Are you autistic?

No. 1740941

>>1740924
I couldn’t tell because it has nothing to do with what the original anon posted. She was just pointing out that raising a kid with one income is harder than two, and that if a man fucks off when you’re married you will at least get half of his assets. Unless you fell for the prenup meme.

No. 1740946

You’re never going to meet a man who has enough money to support you and won’t cheat .(bait)

No. 1740968

>>1740946
Quit projecting, Edwin.

No. 1740973

>>1740968
I’m not a man but even stephen hawking cheated and he can’t even move. I can’t imagine a man who can afford to have Nannie’s, a stay at home wife etc being faithful forever.

No. 1740976

>>1740973
> I’m not a man but even stephen hawking cheated and he can’t even move
kek that made me laugh hard

No. 1740989

>>1740976
Me too, this is the first time I read about that

No. 1740990

>>1739970
i agree they look softer/gentler to me in a way, and more expressive. i won't post any examples though cause all the men I like get called ugly or weird at best…i'm surprised the internet even makes such a huge deal about it because it's always looked like normal round eyes to me
>>1740325
>And I feel like if you had it yourself you wouldn't think it's pretty, since it can take away from the beauty of other features imo.
nta but I have them too and don't really mind it

No. 1741019

>>1740880
I'm the anon you responded to. I live on the other side of the world, you'd never see that here. My point still stands where I'm from, I can't possibly know what it's like in the Burgerland. Even this case is an example of chronically online since they probably went outside just to take that video. Maybe you should go outside since your idea of the real world revolves around tiktok videos- Where did you even find that if you're not a degen aka a tiktok user?

No. 1741022

>>1740838
Yes. Yes they would. When pussy is the goal a moid will move mountains.

No. 1741033

>>1740885
How does marriage guarantee a man reproduction when he has the possibility of impregnation having sex with someone once and never again? It doesn't make any sense. Trailer trash have dozens of children out of wedlock.

No. 1741059

>>1740880
Wtf did I just watch…what even is the face she's making in the beginning. I feel so bad for the people around them who had to witness this. Just why

No. 1741080

>>1741033
NTA but maybe 'paternity' would be the better word? Historically, you could only be 100% certain of who the mother of a child was since, you know, it came out of her, and marriage theoretically limits the odds of a guy's kids being unrelated to him.

No. 1741399

>>1741080
Which in my case, would benefit the mother and their child. Because he's legally bonded to be present in child rearing and having to provide income to support his wife and their child.
That's only if he takes marriage as seriously as the woman. Obviously this is perfect world thinking. Things would be beneficial for many women in a relationship with a man to be married. And incorporating religious beliefs onto sex, adultery is sin and you'll be harshly looked down upon for breaking that bond.

No. 1741472

>>1740383
Guess I'm the only anon on this website who doesn't find this guy attractive. But I have the "scary" hunter eyes so I'm attracted to my kind I guess.

No. 1741493

>>1741019
I live in burger land and I’ve never seen anyone doing puppy play in public, but I probably could easily if I went to LA or NYC or Vegas

No. 1741497

>>1741493
I live in a relatively small city and definitely seen my fair share of weird fetish LARPers. People forget "chronically online" folks are still real life people and will do shit in public and you can and will encounter them

No. 1741501

>>1740973
He cheated because he's insecure. If anything men are more likely to cheat if you're 50/50 or financially supporting them

No. 1741502

>>1741497
Sure, they’re there in cities — I lived in Pittsburgh and Portland OR and saw some weirdos and some fetish outfits but never puppy play.

No. 1741508

grown men who watch girl's cartoons should be put on a watch list

No. 1741529

>>1741508
hows that unpopular. obviously they are pedophiles

No. 1741535

File: 1698458369946.png (325.63 KB, 863x537, 1665677498772877.png)

Synthetic fibers cause the bulk of the modern microplastic epidemic. Their production causes up to 10% of global greenhouse gas emissions. Polyester should be declared illegal.
>b-but we can't afford for EVERYONE to have clothes made from natural material
Unironically, it is healthier and more environmentally friendly to just go naked. Abandon your pathetic social stigmas against nudity.
>b-b-but we need protection from the sun!!!
Just use a parasol and/or wear sunscreen, retard. Naked with a parasol >>>>> Wearing shitty synthetic fiber clothing
>b-but what if we get cold?!
We'll exist.
>b-but I have sensitive skin
Polyester is still worse.

No. 1741537

>>1741535
I am not getting frostbite in single digit weather, gimme the polyester

No. 1741539


No. 1741540

>>1741535
I live in a warm and humid place and whenever I wear a polyester shirt, I stink so bad, if I wear natural fibers, I can sweat 10 times more and not stink as much

No. 1741541

File: 1698458660890.jpg (35.24 KB, 493x592, Side eye.jpg)

>>1741535
…Or you can just wear natural fibers, ya nasty.

No. 1741546

>>1741535
Nudist psyop kek

No. 1741556

>>1741535
I’m with you. We wear too many clothes. Hard to say that without sounding creepy but I would prefer acceptable nudity / partial nudity to the fast fashion polyester wasteland

No. 1741557

>>1741535
I wish we'd go back to growing linen for clothes. Cotton is better than polyester but it's so thirsty! Linen wicks sweat away and is great for temperature regulation.

No. 1741558

>>1741535
Naked with a parasol sounds like a band name kek

No. 1741561

>>1741556
But cotton and wool and hemp and so many beautiful, comfortable natural fibers that the earth has blessed us with exist. And growing more could also probably simultaneously help the earth. You people just want to see people naked.
You people are so disconnected from OUR EARTH! that you think the solution to combat synthetic fibers is so go naked instead of using what's on our land. And you wonder why climate change is fucking us over.

No. 1741562

>>1741546
As if clothes weren't a western colonizer psyop

No. 1741565

>>1741535
men are not normal people, otherwise i'd be fine with this

No. 1741569

>>1741562
being nude in public would be okay if there were no men, both because of the obvious reason but also because some naked male bodies are so horrendous… imagine having to look at one of those pot bellied 60 y/o trucker guys with hank hill ass naked

No. 1741570

I'm not going cold in -25 degree weather and I'm not letting bugs eat my pussy in the summer. NO

No. 1741575

>>1741535
nonna males don't wipe their butts and you want us to park our naked asses where they sat their shitstained ones?

No. 1741578

>>1741562
Lmao nona I was listening to Killers of the Flower Moon on audio today and they got to the part where the Osage chief shows up in DC with a loincloth and face paint where he says “I’m not ashamed of my body” and I was cheering him on, fuck clothes

No. 1741580

>>1741569
That’s why they want clothes!! To hide that shit. If they had to be naked they’d die of shame or never get fucked and die off

No. 1741584

>>1741569
I am not even a misandrist but the male form is literally so hideous, men need to have as much clothing on as possible

No. 1741586

>>1741584
Kekkkk

No. 1741676

>>1741561
There are literal places in Africa where they dress themselves up in a variety of fabrics and they're practically shirtless

No. 1741681

>>1741561
Then make a blanket out of it

No. 1741761

>>1741681
I'm confused, are you trying to imply you can't make a good blanket from natural fibers?

No. 1741791

File: 1698487091697.jpg (13.66 KB, 220x231, d5fafccf01d49da2c1326a191e33a4…)

i think it's patronising to act as though women cannot be truly evil. whenever i see anons on here say "a real woman would never do this", "mothers always inherently love their kids and care about them", "a woman could never do this" (especially in response to some heinous act committed by a moid), i think it is damaging. it's language that tries to uphold women as being supreme but actually pulls them away from being what they are - they're people. women are still only people. saying these things implies that women are not complex enough to be truly evil, to abuse and murder and sexually assault, to critically harm and traumatise children (even their own). and perpetuating this idea that any evil committed by a woman can be traced back to a moid is worse. as if women don't have brains of their own. as if any woman could be driven to doing sickening things by a moid. as if all women are that weak of the mind or sick in the head. how irritating

No. 1741792

>>1741791
>women are not complex enough to be evil
Males are retarded and have one dimensional thinking, that’s why anons here wouldn’t think of women as evil because women ARE complex. Men do evil shit for pride, greed, and coom meanwhile when women do evil shit its all an internal battle with how people view women and what is expected, what their relationships are like, and finally snapping or acting out.

No. 1741800

>>1741791
Yes, and this stereotype helps protect abusers, murderers and such.
>She's such a cute and sweet woman, she would never do that ♥

No. 1741816

>>1741792
Not all women think about this. And women can absolutely act in greedy, violent, sociopathic, impulsive, senseless ways. It happens way less often sure.

No. 1741817

>>1741791
The amount of users here who defended the baby killing nurse was very weird.

No. 1741818

>>1741817
>users actually defending the baby-killing nurse
This is what happens when anti-natalists get drunk on their own edginess.

No. 1741839


No. 1741863

>>1741791
this makes no sense because even though we commit little to no crime there are tons of men out there that hate our guts just from existing(there are way to many incel shooters to list) genuinely have no idea where you are coming from, sounds like ''not all men!!'' kinda retardation

No. 1741867

>>1741791
I think people like that are trying to be feminists but they still have that mindset that women are just more stupid than men therefore incapable of being able to do evil shit

No. 1741869

>>1741867
Why do you all insists on having to be not stupid to do evil shit? Dumb people can do evil shit too.

No. 1741873

>>1741867
intelligent people don't commit crimes, that's why moids commit 98% of them

No. 1741875

>>1741869

“She’s just a woman with a simple little brain! There is no way she could do that without a man making her do it!”

It’s kind of like how people don’t place blame on 8 year olds who act out but instead place the blame on their parents. People like that subconsciously feel women are too dumb and simple minded to be able do anything fucked up and just place the blame on their scrote for not training them right.

No. 1741876

Is this the same retard that says incredible sexist incel-coded shit but pretends its totes feminist by saying ''huh do you think women are too STUPID to do X?'' it's an incel baiting so you agree with incel shit ideas, they are also tradcath and spent an entire night arguing about how prostitues are worse than men that watch porn/hire prostitues and actually the men did nothing wrong it's the evil women's fault for prostituting herself!!1!. Ignore them.

No. 1741879

>>1741876
>everyone who doesn’t agree with me is a man

Come up with a new defense

No. 1741880

>>1741879
you are the same sperg as before, at least you admit it. go die incel-kun

No. 1741881

>>1741880
>everyone who doesn’t agree with me is a man or one singular anon

Come up with a new defense

No. 1741882

>>1741881
you use the same arguments, it is you

No. 1741885

>>1741882
>only one person on earth can have an opinion.

No. 1741886

>>1741885
you are the same breed of retarded lol

No. 1741887

>>1741873
Nta, but there have been a lot of serial killers with high IQs unfortunately.

No. 1741891

>>1741867
Not exactly more stupid than men, more like better than. I would call it overcorrection. Like I think they come at it from a feminist standpoint but take it too far, and the objective fact that "women commit far less crime than men" or "women are more empathetic than men" becomes "a woman would never be commit a violent crime or act cruel or greedy or impulsive on account of women's personal virtue". It is a bit patronizing and reminds me of scrotal accusations over the dumbest shit on this website, which unintentionally imply that women can't be blunt or logical or have an edgy sense of humour. It's sort of like that retarded Paglia quote about "no female Mozart and no female Jack the Ripper" when in reality exceptional women and evil women both exist, women are full humans and run the gamut of humanity, which necessarily includes human weaknesses as well as strengths. It's not antifeminist to admit this or point out a woman's wrongdoing- feminism isn't about all women being perfect.

No. 1741892

>>1741887
high IQ means shit, autistis with barely workable social skills that end up living in their mom's basement through all their life have ''high IQ''. I am so tired of the 'le misguided genius serial killer who raped and murdered 1000 kids'' trope. They are all retarded and that's why all of them are reminded for their crimes and not for winning a nobel prize.

No. 1741894

File: 1698498693587.jpg (1.26 MB, 1284x1859, female dahmer.jpg)

>>1741891
where's female jeffrey dahmer then?

No. 1741896

File: 1698498925715.jpeg (1.54 MB, 1284x1809, 20174F91-1F51-493B-93AE-943FB1…)

>>1741891
I think it’s also thinking we are stupid. That mindset is why Karla can work with children despite her past. People think she’s just a retarded woman who won’t offend again. Whose to say she won’t once she finds a man who is attracted to kids again?

No. 1741898

File: 1698499043058.png (855.53 KB, 617x929, 19998554652.PNG)


No. 1741899

>>1741896
Who said anything about "stupid"? Where is this mindset that baby killers and rapists are intelligent coming from?

No. 1741900

>>1741898
>accomplice of a man
not female jeffrey dahmer, cherry picker. Give me a woman, who's not the accomplice of a man, who kidnapped, raped and killed people.

No. 1741901

File: 1698499277538.jpg (91.41 KB, 440x808, 440px-Ping_Sien_Si_-_026_Daji_…)

>>1741894
I can't tell if this is a thirstpost but there have been numerous female serial killers throughout history.

>>1741896
>>1741899
Well they're deemed mentally fit to stand trial which means they realised what they were doing. The implication with Karla being let off is that she wouldn't have done it if the moid hadn't told her to do it. Some of them are intelligent, some of them aren't, there's not really a clear delineation on that front.

No. 1741902

File: 1698499426712.jpg (111.57 KB, 1400x1050, 1_L8zYIEflRwCQbsE0C298dA.jpg)

>>1741894
>A pair of employees at a Michigan nursing home, Gwendolyn Graham and Catherine Wood, included murder in their sexual games. They looked for ways to make sex more intense, including sexual asphyxia, and one day they decided to start killing patients. They identified vulnerable nursing home residents whose initials would help them to spell out M-U-R-D-E-R and then began picking them off. Within three months, they had killed five. At times, the act of killing so excited them that they went to an unoccupied room for a “quickie.”

No. 1741904

>>1741876
i'm the op, you're just schizoing out. idk what retard you're talking about and i think moids are worse than dogshit. crazy how when you don't explicitly say you hate men in a post demonstrating any critical thought about women, it's assumed that you're sucking men off all the time and think women are worse than them

No. 1741906

>>1741900
It was more the glasses and the 70s thing I was thinking of really

No. 1741913

>>1741876
Not to mention:
> at the same time they post a scrote is seething and posting cp and a totally real women is claiming she gets off to coomer rape shit

No. 1741920

>>1741876
It reminds me of when men seethe that feminist think men don't commit any crime ever when that's not what they say and instead they say something like 'men commit almost all violent crime so male violence is a problem in society that needs to be addressed and prevented' because female violence is rare and shocking but women are expected to see male violence as normal and pretend that women offend at the same rate as men and the same kind of crimes as men when they don't.

No. 1741921

>>1741876
>They immediately start doing what you mention
Kek.

No. 1741923

>>1741920
*think women don't ever commit a crime

No. 1741929

it is truly insane that making a nuanced point about women being complicated enough that they are capable of evil will get you accused of being a cp-posting incel and some coomer retard who's posting at the same time. maybe these kinds of discussions should be saved for non-anonymous spaces with people who've got better reading comprehension

No. 1741931

>>1741902
Lmao, men commit almost all violent crime. Women and mens crimes are rarely equal. One instance of a woman being evil doesn't mean they're as evil as men when 1 in a billion women is truly evil, while 1 in 100 men is truly evil. Men are way worse than women and way more fucked up than women and it's a cope to pretend otherwise when crime rates prove men being more unhinged than women. It's why people were so shocked with the ftm mass shooter. Or do you think recognising women are less likely to be deranged society ruining faggots than men means women think they can never do wrong? Are you the spammer?

No. 1741939

>>1741931
Did you mean to reply to my post? I didn't say any of that shit

No. 1741953

>>1741929
your post is fucking retarded, literally no one thinks women are less evil just from being women. People trust women more because we commit little to no crime.

No. 1741955

>>1741913
Samefag, another example of men being worse than women. It's rare for women to possess cp let alone spam it on websites. For men, it's much more common and par for the course.

No. 1741958

>>1741931
Nobody said any of that. The original post said women are capable of committing evil acts without being influenced by a moid. Nowhere did it say they commit these acts at the same rates or are ‘just as bad’.

No. 1741959

>>1741953
It reminds me of when men whine that male teachers are looked at with more distrust than women when men are like 99% of pedos. They did this to themselves and chimpout at any rules being put in place to prevent their predation.

No. 1741960

I'm tired of schizos infesting this thread and responding to neutral posts with aggression. You can post a Wikipedia article about beans with zero commentary, and some autist will appear out of nowhere and start accusing you of saying beans taste better with milk because they personally had an infight about it.

No. 1741962

>>1741959
s/he is going to sperg about how people dont think women are capable of heinous crimes because of their ''nurturing nature'' but that's utter bullshit, men are supposed to be the ''protectors'' yet commit 98% of crimes and people don't trust them due to the undeniable fact they are violent degenerate creatures. It has nothing to do with gender stereotypes, men are just fucked up evil defective creatures and people react accordingly.

No. 1741963

>>1741961
>comparing bullshit concepts like ''emotional incest'' to child rape

No. 1741964

>>1741961
> I don’t think most women are good
Nice bait.

No. 1741965

File: 1698502585587.png (305.52 KB, 601x470, jun.png)

>>1741920
"literally no one thinks that" is one of the worst, most unproductive phrases people use in arguments. obviously women commit far less crime, obviously women are not evil on a level anywhere even close to the level that men are. but i've seen way too many anons speak as though women are genuinely unable to do atrocious things and that when they do, it's always because of a moid. yes, it's a very small minority of women who have done genuinely terrible things compared to the massive majority of men, so i understand how it could be confusing that i even made a point about it ("barely any evil women exist so why talk about it?"). i am glad that people trust women more because they should. none of you are aware of the love i have for women and how vocal i am about feminism. for fuck's sake, next month i'm planning on watching entirely female-directed films and reading only female-written books. it's really fun btw, i'd recommend doing the same to other anons. i hate that it got assumed that i think women are worse than men and now that's what people are running with, what a fucking strawman. i'll go back to saying i think kiwis taste better with the skin on or something in these threads, it's more fun

No. 1741966

Women can be evil we just are evil in different ways. Like women arent going to just go shoot up a mall but women will abuse patients we take care of at work. We won’t watch child porn or fuck kids but a lot of moms will have emotionally incest relationships with their sons or let the husband rape our daughters aslong as he’s paying the bills. I think female evil just comes out in different ways.

No. 1741967

>>1741964
I don’t think most people are good. Most people suck ass. Including women.

No. 1741969

>deleting after 5 seconds and reposting
it's them lol, they are so clockable.

No. 1741970

>>1741965
>feminsm is when watching media made by women
keeeeeek go vonlunteer at a shelter if you are going to be so up your ass about how you are such a true and honest feminist

No. 1741973

>>1741967
>Wow SOCIETY is so fucked up.
>90% all violent crime is committed by men.
Yeah, society kek.

No. 1741976

>>1741965
People just run with shit here. I get you anon. To a lesser extent it’s like when people respond to a girl who’s been bullied by other girls with “mean girls isn’t real, that’s just a stereotype” like???

No. 1741979

>>1741962
It does though. Take men out of the equation for a second. Misogyny can be benevolent as well- part of it is refusing to see women as full, complex humans who are capable of violence and destruction without being influenced by a moid.

No. 1741980

>>1741970
how do you know i don't already donate to my local ones? volunteered for several women's charities? sorry i didn't mention every single thing i do to help women out. you're looking so hard for things to criticise me for. and yes engaging with art by women is important, barely anyone does it enough. do you know how different things would be if more films were directed by women, telling women's stories from their own perspective? how that would affect general attitudes towards women in the public? i have enough of a following that making my viewing of these films known and reposting art by women actually spreads awareness of it and gets others interested. there are thousands of films by women all over the world living in all kinds of class statuses that have flown under the radar and i try to bring attention to as much as i can. it's a small impact but it's not as offensively useless as you suggest.

No. 1741982

>>1741979
>recognising women almost never commit crimes at the same rate as men and usually the more violent crimes women commit include a male accomplish and are not women solely being dickheads by themselves most of the time is misogyny because we're not seeing them equal to men
Women and men aren't equal. Men are usually more violent. It reminds me of when men seethe that the courts favour women because more men are in prison than women, when the fact is women commit less crime.

No. 1741986

>>1741982
Samefag, but is this the guy who was posting in the reddit thread that women and men are assaulted at equal rates when that's not true? Like is it a guy who thinks women are just as bad as men but never caught and punished while men are because women are somehow better 'manipulators' and 'coniving' than men.

No. 1741988

>>1741980
I hate how art made by women is considered political thanks to retards like you. Watching female-made movies only for the sake of femism is patronising.

No. 1741991

>>1741982
Ok, again, yes, nobody is disputing that. Or saying that you can’t recognize that. And nobody is saying men and women are the same, equally violent, or commit crime at equal rates. What we are saying is women are capable of being evil and sadistic and it’s not helpful to pretend that every time a woman commits a crime it must be at the behest of a man. The original post was complaining about people saying “a woman could never do this” and “mothers always love their children” when both are, sadly, untrue.

No. 1741994

>>1741991
>when both are, sadly, untrue.
it's not utrue, yeah some women kill their children blah blah but they are the extreme minority, exception to the rule and all. Men on the other hand are inherently violent, women have to be extremely carefull about choosing a partner to have children because of how common rape ares to hurt children. Men don't think about ''what if my wife hurts my children?''

No. 1741995

>>1741988
you're making stuff up. i don't only watch them for the sake of feminism/politics, getting to spread awareness of them is a bonus to getting to watch more great films. it's not a crime to want people to watch more films by women and give women more room in the industry. sometimes i just want to see things made by a woman instead of a man, damn

No. 1741996

>>1741995
me too, but i don't pretend it's a feminist thing. otherwise shit like 50 shades would be considered feminist.

No. 1741999

>>1741996
except i'm not watching shit like 50 shades. jesus

No. 1742001

>>1741994
Well if there are exceptions to this rule then it is untrue. Lots of people have had abusive or cruel mothers. So obviously not all mothers are loving and would never hurt their children.
>men are inherently violent
What does this have to do with anons point? We all know this. It doesn’t prove her wrong.

No. 1742002

>>1741999
i know, my point it's that it shouldn't matter if it's made by a woman or not. I feel like that has lead to women mostly directing libfem garbage like barbie, when they we are good and capable at directing stuff not aimed at women, like American Psycho.

No. 1742006

>>1742001
your point makes no sense because you are compared male evilness aka commiting 98% of crimes and people not trusting them because of their proclivity to commit heinous crimes to one in a billion woman doing the same, normally extremely mentally ill. It makes no sense to shit on women just for one or two psychos, as it that means those expections to the rule mean the majority of women who dont commit crimes and aren't the exception to the rule are as evil as men.

No. 1742009

>>1742002
yes, i actually agree with you there. i don't think we differ too much in opinion on this anon, i don't think a film is inherently made better or "feminist" by it being directed by a woman. there are women directors i like whose films i wouldn't call feminist because they weren't intended to be and it is patronising to label them as such purely because they're female-directed. however, it's just the act of giving more attention to female directors than male that i encourage (and films outside hollywood). cinema is so highly saturated with men it makes me sick but hollywood's response to this is bringing attention to female directors who make the most libfem shit, which i do resent

No. 1742015

>>1742006
My point wasn’t mentioning males at all, you’re the one who keeps bringing them up. Her main point was that women aren’t afforded complexity or individuality. The original point wasn’t comparing men and women or “shitting on women”. It wasn’t even really about how much crime women commit but about people insisting a woman couldn’t be evil of her own volition. It simply said women are capable of evil and it’s silly to act like they aren’t, which is not an anti feminist statement. And yes, it’s rare- but that doesn’t mean anon can’t comment on it or make what she’s saying untrue.

No. 1742016

>>1742009
oh yeah, i can agree with that. I would actually love more female directors who do funny/interesting stuff, like ''i am a cheerleader''. I struggle a lot checking female directors because they normally make such depressing movies, when i am more of an action/horro/comedy fan. I would rather watch some female john wick self-indulgent action movie than another drama movie about female struggles just because it's directed by women. I think manga it's better at this, women can both make cutesy shojo romance garbage, more dramatic serious josei stuff, or straight up shonen.

No. 1742017

>>1742015
women have been attributed as the root of all evil since the bible, what are you talking about

No. 1742019

>>1742016
i love but i'm a cheerleader! i know what you mean and i'd be glad to come up with a list of film recs anon, i'll boot up my laptop in a sec

No. 1742022

>>1742017
I’m talking about people (mostly well meaning) who insist that no woman could ever be evil or that mothers always love their children no matter what even when it’s plainly untrue. I’m not talking about biblical misogyny.

No. 1742024

>>1742022
people say the same about fathers too, i genuinely don't get your point. Most people outside of this niche autism containment board are unaware as to why they seem more comfortable with female teachers than male ones, they are completly obvlious to the elephant in the room.

No. 1742029

>>1742024
Well I guess it’s a point specific to this autistic niche containment website, though I will say you have an entire board to sperg about how men are bad. If you’ve never encountered people acting like women are incapable of being sadistic or even just mean then I don’t know what to tell you, anons point resonated with me.

No. 1742033

>>1742029
on the opposite i have found way more people that think women are the root of all evil and use every instance of one single women doing something bad to say ''see??? women are as bad as men!!!'' even though men still commit 98% of crime

No. 1742034

>>1742033
Both can be true. Just because you haven’t personally seen what anon was describing, that doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist.

No. 1742035

File: 1698507241038.jpg (573.16 KB, 3000x2113, founder-ceo-of-theranos-elizab…)

>>1742033
I think more women would commit violent crimes if they had the physical strength to do so. Women, when they are evil, are more likely do commit white collar crimes or just anything non-violent.

No. 1742038

>>1742035
everyone can buy a gun in the states and i dont see many women being mass shooters, that's bullshit

No. 1742039

>>1742035
Not really, it’s not like there’s an absence of guns or knives or poison in this country. Women are just less impulsive and risk taking across the board. I agree though that if women had male levels of empathy there wouldn’t be a male left alive on the planet.

No. 1742040

>>1742016
>>1742019
>messiah of evil (1973)
co-directed by a man but a very cool horror flick
>mikey and nicky (1976)
crime drama
>day night day night (2006)
thriller
>a new leaf (1971)
dark romcom
>tremble all you want (2017)
romcom, very funny and relatable for any lonely woman…
>ghostwatch (1992)
horror
>fast color (2018)
superhero drama
>fatal frame (2014)
horror
>the company of strangers (1990)
really sweet drama, highly rec for any anon
>sway (2006)
psychological thriller
>d.e.b.s. (2004)
if you haven't seen it already! fun little action film

No. 1742041

>>1741676
Ok? There's also a bunch of places (probably more than whichever ones do what you're talking about) in Africa where they stay fully dressed, likely in mostly natural fibers.

No. 1742043

>>1742034
she's talking about a niche forum vs real people who think women are actually the root of evil unironically and have commited crimes targetting women because of this. Misandry, even though justified with several studies, is still way less common than misogyny. I have yet to heard of a blackpilled woman shooting moids, but there are tons of moids(there was that one on the engineering college, several incel moids, and a bunch of serial killers) who believe women are evil and deserve to be killed, and worst of all there are ''sane'' ''normal'' moids who agree with them, otherwise inceldom wouldn't be so popular right now. I genuinely don't know which alternative universe you live in, but in the one where i am from women are considered more evil than men.

No. 1742060

>>1742040
Nta but thanks for this. You should post this in the movie thread on /m/ too

No. 1742062

>>1742038
Exactly. You don't need strength to carry a gun and and the last 3 decades these mass shootings have happened, not one of them was a biological woman. Speaks volumes.

No. 1742064

>>1742062
actual only one was, and it was carried by a woman who was taking testosterone and identified as a man hmmm maeks one think

No. 1742065

>>1742064
>tranny
Even normies know trannies are mentally unstable.

No. 1742066

>>1742065
no, they don't. Otherwise they wouldn't allow all the insanity that's going on.

No. 1742085

>>1742066
I think you're overestimating "normies" say on the matter, most people will either dislike troons or have a maybe positive but lukewarm position, like believing the polite thing is to respect pronouns but at the same time being surprised and confused with men competing against women in sports

No. 1742099

>>1742085
I would probably divide that further. At least in my state (which is like dark blue), normies tend to be indifferent toward troons like you said and will respect their pronouns and will say that they are like everyone else, but are more reserved when it comes to bathrooms and sports teams. Probably there are more people with extremely negative opinions on troons than extremely positive opinions, but I wouldn't say most normies dislike troons.

No. 1742101

>>1742043
Women are evil in different ways. I woman isn’t going to rape you but if she doesn’t like you she will set your ass up to get raped.

No. 1742104

>>1742101
kek what the fuck, that would be so based if true. If women hired rapehitmans to butt-rape their annoying abusive ex bfs we would live in a better timeline

No. 1742107

>>1742104
She is probably talking about female targets.

No. 1742111

>>1742107
women don't do that anyway ''she'' is making shit up

No. 1742112

>>1742104
I remember one time I was at a hotel party and I laid down to just rest. I heard one of my “friends” talking to one of her scrote fuck buddies and he asked if he could feel me up and she said “I don’t give a fuck go ahead”. Now imagine if I was actually passed out what this hoe would’ve let go down. They thought I was passed out drunk. Women won’t do the raping but don’t put it past them to allow someone else to do it.

No. 1742114

>>1742112
your stupid friend isn't a representation of all women, normie women literally go together to the bathroom and take care of eachother during partis so they dont get ruffied. I am sorry you had a shitty friend but you sound like an incel using one bad expierience to shit on women as a whole

No. 1742119

>>1742114
Nta but you can't insist people are lying and making shit up, and then be upset when they give you a real life example

No. 1742120

>>1742114
>your friend isn’t a representation of all women

I never said she was. That was my example of how evil women are evil in different ways. Women who are bad people do not exhibit those traits the same way men do.

No. 1742129

>>1742119
one real life example isn't comparable to the objective percentage of men that commit rape, she was comparing the two as being the same. Plus, this is an imageboard, she could easily be lying. It's not ''proof''. Putting the blame on the woman is fucking retarded anyways, she could easily be either manipulated or fucking threatened to not say anything. It goes back to women being the scapegoats to moid's crimes, which is what these ''umm ackshually women are evil too'' discussions always lead to.

No. 1742132

>>1742129
>Putting the blame on the woman is fucking retarded anyways, she could easily be either manipulated or fucking threatened to not say anything
…You really think anon's friend was manipulated into saying "I don't care, go ahead"? Some of you literally think women are retarded babies, wtf.

No. 1742135

>>1742111
>women don't do that anyway
nta but i wish this were true

No. 1742140

>>1742132
why couldnt she? men threaten women all the time with violence and a 14yo built like a twig can break a grown woman in half. It's retarded to put the whole blame on her for ''allowing it'' we both know the moids would have done it anyways if he was ''allowed'' or not.

No. 1742144

>>1742140
you sound like you're 16

No. 1742146

>>1742129
>she could easily be
nta, she wasn't though. inb4 hurrr you weren't there you wouldn't know durrr

No. 1742151

>>1742146
are you new to the internet? people make shit up all the time, specially when they want to show ''proof'' for something extremely retarded they said

No. 1742152

>>1742144
lame comeback 2/10

No. 1742155

>>1742152
not a comeback, i wasn't in the conversation. you're just either young and/or very dumb, or a moid baiting to make farmers look like idiots. leave already

No. 1742161

>>1742155
literally no moid on earth would put the actual blame on the moid. A moid would side with the original anon making shit up about how it's not the male's fault but the female friend for ''allowing it''.

No. 1742164

>>1742161
they are both at fault. wtf?

No. 1742215

I just find it stupid when outsiders (myself included) have strong opinions about who's right or wrong in the Israel vs Hamas situation, like there's decades (if not centuries) of history behind that conflict, so much misinformation and other countries meddling in, how could you possibly have a well founded opinion about basically any of it if you haven't done extensive research into the matter? People watch a 20 minute video and think they know it all. Stupid, just focus on your own country's or continent's problems, plenty of those there.

No. 1742301

>>1742215
I'm tired of people acting like every random person SHOULD have a hard stance on the matter. I'm in university and there are people here who try to guilt trip you about needing to be involved in protests and "activism" and it's all so performative. I'm just a zoomer who knows nothing and can do nothing about international political conflict, and so are they; baby Americans whining in the streets of a globally insignificant flyover state isn't going to make anyone drop their guns. But people act like I'm "complacent with oppression" for saying that my position is simply that I don't like violence and hope world leaders can sort it out humanely.

No. 1742328

(sorry idk what thread to put this in) it feels like people are being even more weird and unhinged about the palestine vs israel conflict than when these things usually happen and i think it's fucking annoying. like people saying "i will NEVER forgive anyone who doesn't talk about palestine on their social media" …where's your energy for the sudanese war, girl? the nigerien coup de'tat? is ukraine too 2022 for you? prescription pill shortages? cost of living insanities? it reminds me of when americans screamed at non-american social media accounts for not talking about BLM. putting a palestinian flag on my account with 98 followers isn't going to do jack shit, fuck off.

No. 1742344

>>1742215
>>1742301
I see that online as well. I randomly saw some young JJK fan on twitter who just rt and posts about the show and some gay pairing I know nothing about since I've never read or watched that story, and she had the audacity of posting about how she doesn't plan on posting about the conflict on that twitter account because the account is about a specific topic already. She got insulted by a bunch of clueless zoomers for it. And from what I've read it seems like she's far from the only case of random people who can't do anything about it getting insulted or threatened online over this. Like, what are we supposed to do besides watching the news and maybe donating to victims, if they can even receive money, clothes or food anymore?

No. 1742346

Most peoples depression could be cured by being hot and rich. Its hard to be happy when you wake up everyday and see a fat ugly orge in the mirror and your gas tank is on E.

No. 1742357

>>1742346
I'd be ok with being hideous as long as I'm rich enough to do what I want on a daily basis tbh. Not being traumatized or panicking on a daily basis because of poverty sounds so good. If I weren't from a poor family I could have improved my looks and people would have treated me like a human being from the start and I'm sure that applies to many more people. I'm not talking about becoming pretty but about not looking like I was on the verge of homelessness.

No. 1742369

>>1742357
It's ok rich people dress like the homeless.

No. 1742375

>>1742369
Not the ones I was forced to interact with on a daily basis during my formative years kek but I'm sure you're talking about people who are even richer than them. Although I did have a classmate in uni whose father was a a CEO with several manors and she looked, dressed and acted very normally, but instead she spent her father's money on several huge TV sets for each of her rooms so she could watch more anime on giant screens. And on trips overseas which I want for myself. I guess she had different priorities than the crazy rich normies we knew.

No. 1742398

>>1742346
Just money would do it for me tbh all my problems are fixable with money

No. 1742404

>>1742398
Same. It's just that I've talked about being broke/poor before and I got harassed. Which is weird because a lot of people complain about money.

No. 1742420

i don't like silence of the lambs (except for the based twansphobia). it has weird vibes somehow. maybe scrotes ruined it by cooming to everything. but i also don't think it's as deep as people make it out to be. i much prefer the hannibal tv series.

No. 1742422

>>1742420
same i really didnt enjoy it. i also found the hole scene really upsetting. i actually looked it up and the actor that plays buffalo bill apparently got upset when the actress adlibed “I wanna see my mommy” ugh i love horror but i hated it

No. 1742429

Nonnas… please be gentle
I feel sorts bad for this I guess, but I genuinely don't believe that a ~16 yo dating a much older man is all that bad. I come from a villager background you could say, so it's pretty common. And I know that common =/= right, but here we are raised to be mature snd "ready" at 16. And it's really not as sinister as people make it out to be. Sure, it could be, but not always.
And why is 18 the acceptable number anyways? Cause the law states so? Not even 200 years ago the law said it was 8-13, so yeah.

No. 1742435

>>1742429
what do you mean by "much older man"

No. 1742436

>>1742429
are you male? even if a woman is 23, her dating a 30+ year old man is still predatory on his part. there are no non-sinister reasons why a man goes for a younger woman

No. 1742437

Don’t reply to it. Just report.

No. 1742438

>>1742437
>"Not even 200 years ago the law said it was 8-13, so yeah"
It HAS to be bait. You're right.

No. 1742440

>>1742435
Like a 30yo i guess? Any older and its not fair to her youth
>>1742436
No I'm a woman. I'm sorry I know online and especially in moderately progressive spaces this is taboo and all, but it's normal here and life just goes.
Also I disagree with that, but then again maybe in certain places like the US kids aren't raised to be independent adults and are instead babied too much.

No. 1742442

File: 1698533822401.jpg (19.23 KB, 563x553, 866f018e133dd2d9fa78b32b44b286…)

I think most bisexual women are BPD. Faking homosexuality allows them to claim victimhood witout having to upend their lifestyle.

No. 1742444

>>1742438
? I said nothing wrong
I genuinely don't get it. Explain plz

No. 1742445

File: 1698534003704.png (472.4 KB, 679x402, s.png)

>>1742440
>like a 30yo i guess

No. 1742448

File: 1698534139811.png (182.65 KB, 1083x580, R8a864a76c9cc1f1f80d4804158657…)

>>1742440
Go back to your village

No. 1742449

>>1742448
>raiden reaction pic
based!!!!

No. 1742451

>>1742445
ACK but srsly you're not refutin' nothin'.
>inb4 i dont wanna dignify what you said with a response
or something equally inane.
Idk, i know its weird to you but think of it like this, your 18 is our 16
But then again, you're having issues over the invisible 18 line too since somehow there are 25 year old women with the mentality of an 8 year old

No. 1742452

>>1742451
no i just dont care enough to argue, sorry. also why do you talk like an actual retard? learn to integrate

No. 1742453

>>1742440
>but then again maybe in certain places like the US kids aren't raised to be independent adults and are instead babied too much.
Which forces us to raise the question: is wherever you're from better off than the USA?

No. 1742454

>>1742451
how did a ''woman'' from a backwater town in bumfuck nowhere find out about lolcow?

No. 1742455

>>1742429
i also come from a villager background with similar values to what you mention, which i still keep close contact with and you need some waking up to do. it doesn't matter what is and isn't common because the world has advanced past the need for traditional backwards thinking, people have independant thought and morals have since developed. it's immoral and makes for unnecessary suffering on the girl. it makes me fucking sick when another one of my teenage cousins gets wed off to some moid much older than her i wish i could do something about it but i can't since the law doesn't care as long as there is parental consent. why does it matter how the girl looks or acts? it's this type of mindset that allows for victim blaming, i'm not saying that's what you're doing but it 100% is what it results in. i just want to cry and scream and kill those fucking scrotes but no one cares because theyre "developed" and "grown" meanwhile you know the moids don't give a shit about that and just want to aod eachother in having sex with young girls. why should they ? why is that right ? i want to throw up

No. 1742456

>>1742453
>Is wherever you're from better off than the USA?
Depends on your definition of better. But I would say yeah it's pretty cozy.
>>1742454
Kek you don't have to say all that, long story short my brother was a moid 4channer and one thing lead to another so here I am. Plus, most villages do have electricity and shit, come on now.
>>1742452
>learn to integrate
lol no lmao, keep seething at my verbiage

No. 1742457

>>1742451
There is no reason a young girl should be with a male much older than her, who is able to and will manipulate her. Tell me why you village fucks are so against girls pairing up with boys their own age? Are boys just allowed to live their lives without having to worry about being picked up by an old creep with the excuse of "well you're basically an adult at 16 so you can just be with any other adult of any other age" I doubt it. So why just girls?
>>1742456
>newfag whose "brother" uses 4chan.
You are the brother.

No. 1742458

>>1742429
>villager background
So, you come from a town full of inbred, uneducated hicks? Yeah that explains it.

No. 1742459

>>1742457
Ikr?
>brother uses 4chan
>using outdated age standards to justify teenage girls dating men twice their age
It's too obvious.

No. 1742460

>>1742456
>keep seething at my verbiage
i would not describe you as "verbose" lol

No. 1742461

>>1742455
samefag but this really cements it in that women are just cattle for men to pass around for their own benefit and they'll make up any excuse to justify it and people will believe them and defend them. it's fucking sick.

No. 1742462

>>1742455
>my teenage cousins gets wed off to some moid much older than her i wish i could do something about it but i can't since the law doesn't care as long as there is parental consent.
Well yeah no here it's a little different, we still have our own ethical code to abide by, with the help of good old religion of course.
I know you guys think that 16yos can't consent, but anyways she has to consent snd her parents, who are supposed to want only the best for her, have to consent too.
I'm sorry that happened to your cousin, having no choice is not what I'm trying to "preach".
I know this is hard to believe but good men exist out there, men who don't watch porn, men who are family oriented. It's such a low bar, it makes me sad.
>>1742457
>>1742459
>cannot fathom another woman having different views than them so they resort to calling her a male
Yeah real progressive guys.
And if you accept it then I'm just "brainwashed".
Billions must die, like actually what is this

No. 1742463

>>1742461
Yeah and it is always girls. 16 year old girls are considered grown up and mature and already adults, but 16 year old boys are not expected at all to pair with a 30 year old woman because they are still children!
>>1742462
Don't you have a 40 year old husband to cook for

No. 1742465

File: 1698534943882.jpeg (130.95 KB, 1300x818, banana.jpeg)

>>1742462
>I know this is hard to believe but good men exist out there, men who don't watch porn, men who are family oriented. It's such a low bar, it makes me sad.

No. 1742466

>>1742429
Ready for what?

No. 1742467

>>1742462
We think sixteen year olds can consent to sex, but only with males in their fucking age bracket. And your brother using 4chan and leading you here? Give me a break.

No. 1742468

Stop replying to it, retards

No. 1742470

>>1742462
it's not ''consent'' when she's basically been groomed to accept a decrepit moid and get guilt tripped into it. The moid gets a child bride he can rape at will and who will cook and clean for him but what does the 16 year old get in return basically? The chance to service a moid?

No. 1742471

File: 1698535156644.png (76.18 KB, 208x239, importantfacts.PNG)

>>1742422
>the actor that plays buffalo bill apparently got upset when the actress adlibed “I wanna see my mommy”
Ted Levine rejected a ton of psychopath/serial killer roles after that movie because he just wanted to play dads, and I find that very cute.

No. 1742473

>>1742468
You're right, I'm not gonna waste anymore of my time on that thing.

No. 1742474

>>1742462
first anon and it's the same here, but it's not that simple. due to "good old" religion daughters are socialized to be submissive to the patriarch first and mother second, and since like you said they'd only want the best for her why would she say no ? those girls truly believed that they were doing the right thing. honestly why stop at 16 ? why not 15 ? what's the difference ? why not 14 ? what differentiates those ages from one another ? we can keep going until its below the double digits like you already mentioned before with the excuse of puberty and being raised to be independant mature adults but what differentiates those ages from one another and why 16 specifically ? isn't it also an invisible line ? it's only a two year difference between 14 and 16, 12 too and so on. this is so retarded that it's coming off on me. you have a lot of thinking to do, independently.

No. 1742475

>>1742463
Well no, here whatever goes, goes
But there is a standard that the man has to be honorable enough and have achievements and all, for the good of family. So I guess they work harder for it, physically? But the women deffo do the heavy lifting, mentally. That's just how it goes
>>1742458
>what are village schools
also that's kinda racist and ignorant of you ngl, might lose your job if you're not careful
>>1742467
Well no, he didn't "lead me" per se, I just saw his monitor open and was like huh. Plus I use the internet, evidently. First I went on 4ch then I saw some anons complaining about you and crystalcafe (?), and that led me here
Nothing I'm saying is incomprehensible or unbelievable, why are you guys having such trouble accepting that I'm "real"

No. 1742478

>>1742475
post hands or gtfo

No. 1742479

Post the village communal latrine or gtfo

No. 1742480

>>1742478
I bite my nails… I'll post if you don't make fun of me for that

No. 1742482

File: 1698535497006.jpeg (3.31 MB, 4032x3024, IMG_4653.jpeg)

whatever man, lmao
you guys are cute
if anyone calls them manhands im you

No. 1742483

>>1742482
For fucks sake paki-chan

No. 1742484

>>1742482
I am telling your 40 year old husband you are exposing your hands to strangers online

No. 1742486

>>1742483
i didn't know her latest venture was grifting as a nglog tradthot

anon, if you're legit, i hope you poison whatever shitty husband and dad you have

No. 1742488

>>1742483
I should have known.

No. 1742490

>>1742482
i can see your wrist sister, astaghfirullah. cover up

No. 1742491

>>1742486
What do you mean, Paki-chan has always been a tradNLOG. She's the one who simps for Varg Vikernes for crying out loud

No. 1742494

>>1742483
B)
close enough
>>1742484
pls nonna dont :(((
Jesus Christ though, you guys have absolutely 0 knowledge on what villages are like. I mean it's not like you should, but have some imagination, don't just throw cliches at me

No. 1742495


No. 1742497

>>1742491
wasn't she into neotenous young blonde men? not defending her varg simping but it's obvious she liked for previously fitting in that category, same with bjorn.

No. 1742498

>>1742486
Idk if you're being /srs but I'm not this paki-chan feller you're talking about
And as for the second part, I appreciate your concern but it really isn't so bad. Like at all. I'm not saying it's not bad for some, but for me it isn't.

No. 1742499

>>1742497
Varg's not blonde he always had brown hair. He wishes he was blonde and so does his wife kek. That's the funniest part of his thread.

No. 1742500

>>1742497
No, she kept posting Bjorn everywhere during her schizospergs about how fujos are pedophiles because the shoujo anime bishounens of the 70s were according to the myth allegedly based on his looks.

No. 1742501

File: 1698536081677.png (3.88 KB, 511x51, cozystan.PNG)

>>1742483
I thought Pakichan hated Pakistan though

No. 1742502

>>1742498
>/srs
are you also a twitterfag? wow

No. 1742503

>>1742500
she definitely was into bjorn and projecting on fujos because who would get so defensive over a moid otherwise lmao

No. 1742507

>>1742502
n-no. Nah but like actually it's ironic. If you haven't noticed already, I talk in a lot of different dialects? I guess. Just because of the sheer amount of content I've consoomed, so forgive me for that.
i have to say tho, you guys oughta loosen up, dont take life so seriously.
>>1742501
I already said I'm not this paki-chan you're talking about, but now I feel like I stole her schtick. Thankfully though, I won't be talking about this subject ever again here.(USER HAS BEEN PUT OUT TO PASTURE)

No. 1742509

>>1742507
stop with this autism i cant take it any more

No. 1742510

>>1742482
Hope everyone realizes this is just pakichan paki'ing out again. She's posted her hand before and also claims her brother is an internet edgelord. I don't know why she's pretending to be new now, she's known for going on about how she wishes she lived in the west, but it'sclar she wants to turn the west into her village in some way because she constantly says stupid BS about how obese "trad" Nazis like Varg Vikernes are ideal husbands, western women deserve to lose their rights, certain races of women are "subhuman" and should be sterilized, etc.

My unpopular opinion is that third worlders who have backward mindsets (homophobia, religious zealotry, "trad" horseshit, insane levels of pickmeism, virulent racism, acid attacks, arranged/coerced marriage, honorkilling, normalized/repeated incest) shouldn't be allowed into first world countries. They always benefit from the progressive values of the host country, only toturn around and try to impose the shitty, regressive values that made them leave their home in the first place on everyone else. The worst is when they cry "racism" and -phobia if anyone tries to call them out (I am a pee oh see, I can say this).

No. 1742511

>>1742507
You're worse than Pakichan. At least Paki acknowledges her 3rd world village is bad.

No. 1742512

>>1742510
Exactly. This went on for too long kek

No. 1742513

>>1742507
I refuse to believe that we have two autistic hand-posting paki-chans unaware of each other

No. 1742516

File: 1698536525942.jpg (34.79 KB, 793x640, EiLpKx5UMAEX1uD.jpg)

>>1742510
you're right this is a waste of time

No. 1742517

File: 1698536528754.jpg (131.64 KB, 1080x1080, E7ENVxCWUAcQAr8.jpg_large.jpg)

>>1742513
Kek imagine if there really is two of them

No. 1742520

>>1742510
i agree with you on your second point. arab moids are a plague on europe. beheading teachers in broadlight for muh allah. the women are chill though it's obvious many of them are brainwashed and have internalized the idea that moids are superior to them

No. 1742522

>>1742511
I hope Paki-chan shows up and fights this newfag.

No. 1742526

>>1742522
if anything they're gonna lezz out together

No. 1742529

File: 1698537483985.jpg (97.57 KB, 750x745, flat,750x,075,f-pad,750x1000,f…)

>>1742526
The honeymoon.

No. 1742532

>>1742529
Paki-chan is still better than 40yo moid, I think not-Paki-chan should take the opportunity

No. 1742534

>>1742532
Maybe then they can post a pic of both of their hands holding

No. 1742538

>>1742534
remember japananon? the girl who spent tons of money to meet some ugly bri'ish moid in japan? i feel she should tag along

No. 1742539

File: 1698538163808.jpg (103.68 KB, 680x882, 30e.jpg)

>>1742537

No. 1742540

>>1742438
It 100% is but anons are too retarded to just report and ignore.

No. 1742542

>>1742538
Can romanianon come, she needs friends

No. 1742544

>>1742539
This made me laugh so hard, I'm exactly like this too

No. 1742549

>>1742544
i love pakichan, i think her autism is endearing

No. 1742550

File: 1698538616685.jpg (68.81 KB, 566x664, Msbv4b.jpg)

>>1742491
>>1742486
This isn't me
>>1742497
>>1742500
all I you said was you shouldn't sexulize a young child from a pedophilic film
>>1742501
>>1742510
again, that is not me.

btw, I don't support 16 year old's getting married to adult men.

No. 1742551

>>1742542
romanianon or a fan was tearing shit up in skribbl.io earlier

No. 1742552

>>1742550
>btw, I don't support 16 year old's getting married to adult men.

based alert

No. 1742553

File: 1698538722047.png (163.54 KB, 891x827, qkXhygA-1049368813.png)

>>1742550
>btw i dont support 16 year olds getting married to adult men
YESSSSSSS SLET'S FUCKING GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

No. 1742560

File: 1698539126131.jpg (763.17 KB, 3687x2453, 150311135708-tyson-beckford-ma…)

anyways, i don't think bald men are unattractive by default, some men do look cool or even better with no hair at all cause they got the right structure

No. 1742561

I think potatoes are overrated

No. 1742562

>>1742550
>btw, I don't support 16 year old's getting married to adult men
C c c Coward(USER HAS BEEN PUT OUT TO PASTURE)

No. 1742573

What's your opinion on anti natalists? on one hand they're all edgy annoying misogynistic depressed losers but the idea that not being born is the only foolproof way to prevent suffering is also true…

No. 1742579

>>1742573
same as yours. i think they make some good points but they are so autistic and edgy i cant take them seriously, they talk like fucking anime villains

No. 1742580

>>1742560
only black men can pull off being bald tbh

No. 1742587

>>1742573
they could literally say that same argument without added misogyny, its literally not necessary
>>1742580
true

No. 1742590

>>1742579
right, i think it allows them to express their hatred of society/women in a way that's not immediately identifiable as such kek. having a kid is inherently selfish but it's not like any parent is like ''oh i can't wait for this child to experience all misery earth has to offer''

No. 1742593

>>1742573
huge victim complex for days. Unless you're in some weird obscure cult majority of people in the West don't give a single fuck if you have kids or not

No. 1742598

Men only hate gold diggers because those are the women they want but can’t afford. Men don’t want the women they can have for free.

No. 1742600

>>1742598
all women should be golddiggers

No. 1742632

I like mary sue/gary stue kind of characters. It's so much more fun to watch a perfect character having everything they want and be happy because I want to be like them.

No. 1742635

>>1742632
Agreed but only the original classic type, the asshole sues (especially in shounen series) and waifubait ones make me want to a-log.

No. 1742665

File: 1698548923029.jpg (70.75 KB, 576x828, Tokuchi.Toua.full.604632.jpg)

>>1742632
Mary/Gary Stu characters are great if the tension revolves around how they win rather than if they will win. Like pic rel, I know he is going to succeed every time but the exciting part is seeing how it happens.

No. 1742674

File: 1698550446546.jpg (61.03 KB, 735x553, 2ee99a596d059aec31c05829aafa91…)

I'm going to get my ass beat for this but here I go: women (or at least a subset of us) ruined ASMR as a whole with the oversexualized stuff, it got cheap hella fast and it wasn't the same after that. And you could say this about several other content communities, like twitch, artstation and most notably onlyfans, which wasn't even for porn to begin with. You can blame scrotes all day for it and you would've a point, but it's just pathetic to see some women literally run to pollute normal sites with their stuff over and over again just to get a coin. The porn bait thumbnails, the spam, etc, it's annoying

No. 1742681

Scott Pilgrim has always been fucking trash

No. 1742685

>>1742674
>onlyfans
i'm sure the company saw the big bucks in porn and wanted to build a more legit seeming userbase before pivoting. any website that allows for porn is where the porn industry will flock because of the regular bans on other sites like patreon, and them being able to normalize it when there's inevitably going to be criminal material on the site is a slimy but genius branding and business move. getting mad at the women selling themselves is stupid.

No. 1742691

>>1742674
I agree both sides are the problem and those women always have some sort of extreme issues in their lives to feel the need to expose themselves like that. I mean it's the exact same thing as being a camwhore.

What was onlyfans supposed to be for originally? I just thought it was for porn because that's all anyone has ever talked about on it since it became a thing.

No. 1742697

>>1742685
>getting mad at the women selling themselves is stupid
Unless they're thirdies, poor or being trafficked I'm judging tbh. Their presence is still very aggravating they could just flip burgers instead of spamming their stuff everywhere and turning sites into something they weren't created for, y'know?

No. 1742707

>>1742674
I agree to an extent. Moids will sexualise every thing and will do so even to women who aren't making ASMR that isn't outright sexual, like scrotes who think whispering in someones ear is always sexual so all ASMR is sexual. However it is annoying when non-desperate women who do make lewd ASMR make everything lewd to make a quick buck of scrotes because they're completley soulless and only live to coom, ultimately ruining the image of it in the eyes of non-listeners.

No. 1742708

>>1742707
Samefag, it's sort of aiding scrotes in the debasement and sexualization of something innocent.

No. 1742710

>>1742697
IAWTC. I realized that I could probably easily pay for my medical bills by filming myself trying on little girl shoes at stores, and selling the videos on onlyfans. I usually have to wear kid shoes anyway, and there are definitely pedos who would pay to watch. But if I did that, I would also be a piece of shit.

No. 1742714

File: 1698555557243.jpg (83.43 KB, 880x682, a94d58abaa9bf74f3827229ba0a94f…)

>>1742510
fuck thirdies(racebait)

No. 1742717


No. 1742730

>>1742429
>And why is 18 the acceptable number anyways? Cause the law states so? Not even 200 years ago the law said it was 8-13, so yeah.
I call bullshit on the 200 years ago one, unless you live in a country of nonces. In the west it was done by nobles for alliance purposes, not by the commoners.
The average age of menarche 200 years age was 14 to 17, there would be no point in marrying a 13 year old.

No. 1742738

>>1742730
nta but the legal age of consent in America used to be 10 kek

No. 1742753

>>1742730
Dont bother, its a thirdworlder from a country where people marry off their children to their uncles.

No. 1742767

>>1742429
I disagree. This never benefits the teenage girls even if they consent because the men, being older, is more likely to manipulate and abuse them. And these men want to have a wife who they treat as both their mother (cooking, cleaning, raising the kids alone, doing all the paperwork and planning all the appointments) and their daughter (preventing them from having a job, their own money or bank account, stopping them from having friends or just a social life that could be eye opening for the girl/woman). And I'm saying this based on personal observation. My grandma was 16 or 17 when she got married to my grandpa who was 22 years older than her, they're also from a small village where arranged and forced marriage was the norm. Guess what? Islam says divorce is bad or some shit so she stayed with him until he died of old age so she never had a choice or the opportunity to change her mind. He was a violent pedo who gave mental issues to their kids with his expired sperm and domestic violence tendencies and now their genetically inferior kids are inflicting their mental illnesses on my generation. I'm sure he picked my grandma because she looked way younger than her age too, just thinking about it makes me sick. She never wanted to move to my country but was forced to back then, she never, ever applied to get the citizenship of the country my grandpa dragged her to even if she was more than qualified for it from the beginning. You said there are good men out there and I agree but they're rare and are into women their age by definition. Because they have much more in common with people in their age range. You're talking about how good it could be in theory but in practice it just doesn't work that way.

No. 1742818

>>1742462
>men who don't watch porn, men who are family oriented. It's such a low bar, it makes me sad.
and you think men like this want to date 16 year olds? cause usually it's the opposite

No. 1742918

File: 1698576525930.jpg (70.42 KB, 512x512, downloadfile.jpg)

I don't really get why people view going to a hairdresser as a necessity. Like sure, if you're trying to maintain a dye job or switch to a totally different style, go for it, but do you really need a pro just for a regular trim? I bought some hair cutting shears years ago and have been cutting my own hair no problem. People especially act like cutting bangs is some artisanal skill that you MUST get a professional to do but it's really not that deep.
I understand it as a luxury for the beauty-conscious but I just think it doesn't make sense when people are trying to be budget conscious yet still think it's an essential to spend $30+ getting a basic cut every few weeks or months. Particularly for men or little kids who don't even care about being especially stylish; it adds up when the whole family is doing it. Idk, is the average person just disastrously bad with a pair of shears? I just feel like figuring out how to give yourself a simple respectable haircut isn't some crazy skill.
maybe it's just the people i've known and it's more normalized to have home cuts in other places. It's just that people always act shocked when I say I do my own hair and complain about salon prices being too high

No. 1742921

>>1742429
you can tell this is a moid because it's specifically a teenage GIRL, no talk about teen moids being allowed to date 50yo men/women

No. 1742928

>>1742918
Agreed. I’ve had bangs for a few years and there’s no effective difference between a carefully done home trim, a 50€ stylist cut and a 5€ mall job when it comes to them, so you might as well go for the free one.

No. 1742930

I'm isolated from the whole structure of society and people constantly lie about me. I don't know if I can stay alive by myself. I think most humans are due to friendship or companionship.

No. 1742933

>>1742930
how can people lie about you if they don't know you

No. 1742942

>>1742930
Do they demonize you by any chance…

No. 1742944

>>1742930
Ok romanianon

No. 1742945

>>1742930
I can relate, I feel so much like a failed human being.

No. 1742954

>>1742930
>>1742945
The society isn't worth it though, you don't have anything to regret, embrace yourselves.

No. 1742966

>>1742945
This is not the vent thread.

No. 1742979

Some Ghibli films are nice but imo most of them are bad, boring and the drawings are ugly idk. The animations all have this wobbly thing to them and the creatures look gross. The "deep messages" are barely there and they're pretentious.

>>1742510
It's always like this, especially when it comes to third world moids. They decide to leave their country, come to first world countries, benefit from all the priviledges and rights and then turn around and go "b-but muh misogynistic culture! Muh rape religion! This country sucks my culture is better and I don't agree with this one, change it for me" how about you fucking LEAVE you waste of space. You already have your backward country where you're allowed to rape women, go back there if you love it so much. Fucking retards. If I go to third world countries and demand that they change everything about their ways for me they're going to rape and kill me, but oh no the moid who believes rape is his right is uncomfy uwu in this first world country!! Better make special laws for him so he can rape in peace uwu fuck off with this bullshit.

No. 1742984

>>1742918
My hair is long and curly, I don't want to risk ruining it myself. But since I keep it long I don't go to the hairdresser very often. Like once a year now, and even then it's more often than before.

No. 1742996

File: 1698583438859.jpeg (208.44 KB, 2000x1125, 68A4604C-3FF0-4E22-9DB0-269866…)

>>1742979
What’re your recommended best-made non-Ghibli 2D animated movies, nonnie? Always looking for more stuff not from Hollywood.

No. 1743004

I’m 31 and my bf is 20 and imma keep dating him because he buys me whatever I want and does whatever I say. I’m understanding the age gap scrotes now.

No. 1743010

>>1743004
anon if that was the other way round, you were 20 and your bf was 31, anons would be calling him a pedo kek

No. 1743013

>>1742918
it seems like drawing, where it's a simple task that most people act like is horribly difficult because we're not exposed or given any real chance to learn it. i'm talking about how plenty of normies say they can't even draw a bubble or basic diagram kind of thing.

No. 1743031

File: 1698584740461.jpg (61.16 KB, 960x928, 1692559979633.jpg)


No. 1743035

>>1742918
I don't trust myself enough to give me a decent haircut, especially in the back. However I only go to the hairdresser once or twice a year and I like to get something different every time, it's not a maintenance haircut.

No. 1743049

A lot of women call themselves lesbians because they hate moids, not because they are solely attracted to women. You see this all the time especially with kweerios who go on about how much they love women and hate men, but date nonbinary TIMs.

No. 1743060

File: 1698586232071.jpeg (99.42 KB, 828x266, IMG_0392.jpeg)

Uncritical support for gold diggers. Although it is prostitution (not the fault of the woman of course) - that money is earned

No. 1743074

>>1742979
I agree. Satishi Kon's movies and shows are better. Only good ghibli movie was a letter to momo.

No. 1743078

>>1743004
Alpha Stacy.

No. 1743079

>>1743004
>>1742930
These aren't even opinions

No. 1743086

>>1743074
I thought a letter to momo wasn't Ghibli?

No. 1743123

File: 1698590412258.gif (5.76 MB, 540x360, f88586854a854ae810d74ee625ed58…)

>>1742979
>>1742979
>the drawings are ugly idk. The animations all have this wobbly thing to them and the creatures look gross.
I have made a similar post on another thread and i agree so much. I can't stand how woobly ghibli characters moves. Stuff like picrel looks so weird. I really wanna like ghibli movies because they are pretty but the animation is so off putting. the pacing and storytelling in their movies are good but I suspect that most people who praise it exclusively watch capeshit and shounen anime because they act like not having constant one-liners and not having the MC screech about the power of friendship is groundbreaking. They also act like ghibli movies are the only movies that gives the viewers time to take in the scene and dialogue which isn't true.
I dont think the movies are pretentious but most of their reviews are. it's always something in the lines of "[ghibli movie] builds on the ancient sacred nipponese tradition of "living the moment" and "liking nature" which is deebly intergrated in nihon culture. No other country in the world has had art movements that criticize industrialisation and capturing the beauty in the mundane so your inferior non-nihongo brain can't comprehend how deep this is".

No. 1743127

>>1743060
Decriminalizing of prostitution is much better (as long as moids who pay can still be charged). The issue is that most women who get involved in some sort of prostitution, including being a sugar baby don't want to do that out of their own free will, it's typically a result of abusive homes + insane price of living plus no good paying jobs + no support/job security, etc. If there was a decent amount of jobs that are liveable with job security the amount of sex workers would decrease rapidly, which is why (outside of big cities) the most common place for prostitutes are shitty red states with no financial support, no good paying jobs and no good job security

No. 1743135

>>1743004
I just wanna know what "buying" power a 20 year old scrote actually has that a 30 year old would be interested in? Is his family well off?
How would he be able to afford things like expensive dates or trips? Most 20 year olds are broke.

But power to you, that's excellent.

No. 1743187

>>1743135
He’s Autistic with rich parents

No. 1743191

>>1743187
Kinda jelly

No. 1743198

>>1743187
then why not fuck the dad for direct access to that cash?

No. 1743201

File: 1698594007488.gif (78.47 KB, 566x458, 89e417eb617d20a094d1d6c4cd7766…)

>>1743198
Not this again…

No. 1743214

>>1743198
why dont you?

No. 1743215

>>1743198
I’ve never met his parents because his mom hates me for obvious reasons. Even though the daddy and her have the same age gap so…

No. 1743216

>>1743004
I'm almost 30 and easily found multiple scrotes to spoil me. If you make your age your novelty they'll just dump you when you age out of their preference

No. 1743218


No. 1743219

>>1743214
i'm not interested in pumping scrotes for cash but in being an emotional leech and traumatizing them

No. 1743223


No. 1743227

>>1743004
Paypal me some money nonny help a sister out

No. 1743229

>>1743219
being a gold digger is less pathetic

No. 1743250

>>1743229
you can get cash with plenty of jobs but finding someone to dump your trauma on is a special undertaking

No. 1743391

File: 1698601291874.jpg (41.8 KB, 720x707, download.jpg)

As an honest to God diagnosed autist, I couldn't give less of a shit about teenage girls on Tiktok faking autism for clout. It's cringe, but not worth commenting on. It doesnt effect me and I dont see it cause I refuse to use Tiktok. Same goes for other Tiktoktrends like 'girl dinner' or whatever

No. 1743449

>>1743250
men don't care about women's opinion's, if you wanna break a man you have to be their daddy or some other father figure they look up to

No. 1743683

File: 1698610428231.jpeg (329.21 KB, 619x1380, IMG_6674.jpeg)

These stupid little pajama sets are so fucking ugly I’ve never seen a single person that a collared pajama shirt looked good on

No. 1743690

>>1743683
Maybe scoop neck pjs look better on you but collared looks good on ME ok

No. 1743702

Truffles taste bad

No. 1743709

>>1742979
Spot on. Ghibli movies are the most boring shit I've ever watched and the art is hideous. I don't get the hype coming from adults.

No. 1743737

>>1743004
Age gaps will never ever be creepy if the woman is older because most women aren’t pedos they just prefer good young dick, and often times they are within the legal right snd dont groom men.

No. 1743751

File: 1698613694466.jpg (229.23 KB, 1242x1242, IMG_3685_Edited.jpg)

Giant diamond on a thin band looks extremely tacky and cheap despite being expensive as shit

No. 1743758

>>1743751
Thin bands are more flattering for shorter fingers. But I don't like huge karat diamonds myself on ANY band. It is gaudy. It's also not that expensive anymore due to lab diamonds.

No. 1743766

File: 1698614565002.jpg (59.9 KB, 736x736, download (6).jpg)

>>1743751
I agree, but I also hate thick bands. Tbh, I think a small diamond or multiple small/medium sized diamonds together is the best. I really just hate HUMUNGOUS diamonds. They look like superbowl rings, like a huge wrestlers belt on your finger.

No. 1743774

>>1743751
I find "classic" wedding diamond rings to be tacky in general

No. 1743779

>>1743774
Not all diamond rings are wedding rings. Unless you mean you just don't like solitaire diamond rings. People wear diamond rings because other jewels scratch easier and are harder to match with outfits.

No. 1743794

>>1743751
I find diamond rings tacky in general and decided to go for a platinum/gold band for my wedding ring.

No. 1743869

>>1743774
let me guess you like the pear moss agate rings on etsy

No. 1743892

>>1743869
KEKK NONA

No. 1743908

>>1743751
gemstones of any type look tacky and gaudy to me. i just wear a gold wedding band.

No. 1744004

File: 1698630514337.jpeg (24.92 KB, 268x188, IMG_6711.jpeg)

I don’t feel bad for any woman who suffers from birth injuries. That’s what you get for being retarded enough to let some scrote knock you up.(not again)

No. 1744009

File: 1698631279255.jpeg (255.56 KB, 500x450, E6F88973-DBF5-404E-93D5-E532F4…)

I’d rather hang out with a libfem than a blackpiller.

No. 1744010


No. 1744013

>>1744009
Just report it.

No. 1744016

>>1744009
they have an entire containment board and instead of using it they choose to prove everyone who says "containment doesn't work" right. it should be shut down and they should just be banned.

No. 1744017

>>1744009
It’s not blackpilling at all, it’s cause and effect. You play retarded games you win retarded prizes

No. 1744044

I think mentally ill people should not have biological children
t. child of mentally ill person who is, surprise, also afflicted with the same mental illnesses

No. 1744053

>>1744044
I heard that children raised by a parent with BPD will have around a 90% chance of developing BPD themselves. That's gotta suck, man.

No. 1744072

>>1744053
Something that really drives me insane when I think about it too much is just how far back you can be genetically predisposed to not only mental illness but also the effects of drug abuse. So even if your grandma is a BPD ass hoe and your mom is seemingly fine, you still were living as an ovum inside of your mother when your grandmother was gestating your fetal mom. The same goes for if grandma is doing drugs while pregnant. Her shooting up smack not only affects her immediate spawn but also her grandchildren/great grandchildren. This is why it’s so crucial that people don’t carelessly have a baby, because you’re fucking up a long line of people’s lives if you’re just not meant to be reproducing.

No. 1744077

>>1744072
>your grandma is a BPD ass hoe and your mom is seemingly fine
I think about this a lot since i would like to have children. My mother is incredibly mentally ill, and according to my grandma her grandma also had similar issues. A lot of things that affect a person spread through the mother's line. I realize that nature vs. nurture plays a big part in it and it could be a coincidence, but I do worry that I could pass on mental illness and it's just something that sometimes skips a few generations. None of my cousins/auntie's/uncle's kids have any issues afaik though.
I think all parents can do (regardless of if the mental illness is spread through your family) is try to be open about mental health with your children, pay attention to them and get them the help they need early, if needed. Sorry for the vent.

No. 1744093

>>1744072
Fuckkk I think my mom did meth while I was in utero or before I was fertilized by my dads gross old man nut and yes I am crazy but I’m getting better but still that woman and that man disgust me

No. 1744098

>>1744093
My parents have a large age gap (7 yrs) and I have tons of health issues because of it. Idk why women still bother reproducing with old men because it's basically a guarantee ticket your child will be fucked up
>Inb4 " but IIi know people who have a large age gap an-"
Literally women use these exact excuses to defend smoking while pregnant. Yes there's people some people who didn't suffer the effects of it but with modern research you don't just play Russian roulette on how fucked up you can make your kids life be

No. 1744101

>>1744098
Moids love to justify going after barely adult women who are young enough to be their daughters because "the eggs go bad with age", but not enough people talk about bad sperm because of a male's age. If only geriactric scrotes would look in the mirror and erase themselves from the dating pool to not spill their worthless, aged out genes.

No. 1744103

>>1744004
You sound like a scrote yourself

No. 1744105

>>1744103
Don't respond to it and risk making it come back, just report it

No. 1744107

>>1743683
Why are women's pajamas so shit? They pill easily when washed, they're always either too thick and uncomfortable to move in or they're basically made of sensory hell paper and freezing

No. 1744119

>>1744103
>You sound like a scrote for not wanting to let one get inside of your body
You need to think a little harder on the logic there

No. 1744121

>>1744107
Gotta buy real quality fabric, nonna.
I got myself a pair of PJ bottoms at a lingerie shop that was on sale made of a velvety fabric, and the thing is still as good as new more than a year later.
And as PJ tops I got myself two linen summer dresses at H&M, that and the PJ bottoms are the best investment I made for sleep wear.

No. 1744127

>>1742996
NTA but check out the Book of Kells and Song of the Sea, they're Irish and super beautiful
>>1743004
Based and Twink-pilled, I too have a twink age bf and the difference in skin texture alone between him and moids my age (30s) is staggering, I can never go back now

No. 1744129

Men are inherent aggressors. All “sex” is abusive and perverse.

No. 1744136

>>1744129
And nobody come in here with the whole “women are capable of consenting to well-informed sex with someone they trust” that is not guaranteeable for every woman who has a sexual encounter with a male in existence though. If this were true for all women then we wouldn’t have women who cry the next day with disgust and regret at how they let a man even breathe near them.

No. 1744149

>>1744004
They should invent a way for babies to come out really small

No. 1744151

>>1744121
>real quality fabric
>unidentified probably polyester velvet-like material
-linen from the zara
just because you got linen from zara doesn't make it quality. Any natural fiber fabric can be made shittyily and that's what you get when you purchase it at Zara. At least it's better that polyester I'll admit that.

Reminds me of people who insist that their luxury handbags are such ~high quality~ when in reality most brands use the lowest (cheapest) leather grade available.

No. 1744152

>>1744149
Better idea, no more babies

No. 1744153

>>1744149
they did but those babies are legally required to be baked into those mardi gras cakes

No. 1744154

>>1744004
I am on your side but for a different reason. For me it is that they know what a pregnancy can cause and still choose. Don't give me suprise Pikachu face after.
So many are so ignorant too: "Oh it won't happen to ME!" or "You are just thinking so negatively! It is not that bad!"
No I won't feel sorry that you piss yourself now.
Women who lack education and the ability to choose not to get pregnant are exceptions.

No. 1744156

>>1744152
Like yeah ok you can advocate for voluntary human extinction I suppose, but women are never going to give up having children en masse. It’s not really a solution. I guess you also think it’s okay to fire someone for getting pregnant?

No. 1744161

>>1744119
No you sound like a scrote for enjoying women being "punished" for having sex

No. 1744164

>>1744136
I understand where you're coming from but do you believe women are capable of wanting sex?

No. 1744167

>>1744164
Some feminists literally believe that yes. I get a lot of anons are sex repulsed but they’re also too autistic to imagine that someone else might not be.

No. 1744168

>>1744167
Kek this reminds me of the time I spotted a user saying that all women "must be lesbians" because they just couldn't believe women would ever be attracted to men LOL

No. 1744169

>>1744154
Why cant you go to Andrew Tate forums or some shit and you can circle jerk with all the other incels about evil women getting pregnant and getting their bodies destroyed? We as women get hate for almost every single thing women do, especially when it pertains to our own free will choices such as motherhood. Especially now that we literally just had our rights stripped from us for abortion and ofc you say nothing about the moids who get us pregnant other than "we should've just known". Do you hate all other female mammals for reproducing or..?

No. 1744171

>>1744161
When did anyone ever say anything about enjoying the deformation of women caused by their own stupidity? I simply said that if you choose to get knocked up, you’re walking into any other danger or harm that is coming your way.

No. 1744172

>>1744119
Girl that's not remotely close to what you said and you know it stfu

No. 1744174

>>1744171
You called women retarded for having sex then started claiming they deserve any sort of birth injuries just because they had sex. Incels would love you but not here

No. 1744175

>>1744169
ntaryt dumbo tate is fugly and knows nothing about female pain because he is a man. My opinions are borne from my experience as a woman. As a woman - why the fuck would I, in good conscience allow a natural aggressor anywhere near me, let alone inside of my body just so I can either die trying to keep it alive inside of my body or die shitting it out. What does any of that have to do with incels.

No. 1744177

>>1744174
If you’re conceited or retarded enough to believe that your genes are just soo important they need to be spread then by all means, croak yourself by rupturing your uterus.

No. 1744179

>>1744175
You know damn well no one cares what you do personally as long as if you don't start shitting on other women for having relationships and reproducing like we've been doing since forever

No. 1744180

File: 1698647248642.jpg (323.04 KB, 898x823, Screenshot_20231030_022548_Chr…)

Guys, stop taking the bait and just report. We all know the anti-natalists are getting drunk on their own edgelord feelings again, and one of them is probably ban evading so let the mods handle it.

No. 1744181

>>1744174
Calling someone retarded isn’t at all verbally the same as saying that you’d be taking pleasure in witnessing their demise. I’m not saying it makes me happy or brings me joy, I’m saying they’re doing it to themselves by consenting to pregnancy.

No. 1744182

>>1744177
Anti natalist try to form an argument without strawmanning challenge: impossible

No. 1744183

>>1744180
Oh right because it’s so antinatalist to state that letting greasy disgusting nigels do an extremely intimate (and very painfu)l act with you just so you can get preeclampsia and give birth to an asp is your own fault. Definitely.

No. 1744184

>>1744179
I’m not shitting on anyone I’m just saying if you put yourself in a dangerous position don’t be surprised if some unfavorable events occur, and don’t expect anyone to feel bad for you especially if you walked into this knowing that it could happen to you too.

No. 1744185

>>1744180
I wonder if it's a moid or woman who's bitter that she's infertile so she copes by having a hate boner for women who do reproduce
Irc I'm friends with a mom who had some lady flip out on her and dox her for hours because her BD died and the lady for some reason thought it was a case of the man getting milk(without asking ofc) She got spammed on her page about how shes a "stupid bitch who shouldn't have opened her legs and will face consequences"

Anyway I went to her page and it turned out she was a complete hamplanet with PCOS and couldn't get pregnant after multiple rounds of IVF and copes by being bitter towards mothers

No. 1744186

>>1744184
>>1744183
No1curr you can't try to gaslight your way out of arguments

No. 1744187

>>1744185
I wouldn't doubt that's what it is. Either a moid trying to make nonas more tense, or some really angry woman who things anyone who any decision different from her lifestyle is a "cocksucking pickme who deserves to burn in hell with all of the most evil moids in existence" kek. I wouldn't give them attention and I didnt even bother reading the one that replied to me, again just report.

No. 1744188

File: 1698647650347.jpeg (248.69 KB, 1170x800, IMG_6719.jpeg)

>>1744186
>gaslight
Here’s the definition because you apparently don’t know what that word means
if me saying that you’re retarded and knew what you were getting yourself into if you chose to get pregnant and give birth is making you question your sanity, log off.

No. 1744190

>>1744185
Or, maybe, I simply believe that there are no genetics that are special enough to be reproduced and that any woman who walks into pregnancy deserves whatever is coming to her. Not everything is some big drawn out charade.

No. 1744191

>>1744187
Oh definitely I'm not going to give it the attention it wants. If it's not a moid/bitter infertile woman it might be a pickme who goes after men with families because she thrives on "being better for having no birth injuries" or some weird shit. I can't imagine a non-psychotic reason why women who reproduce live rent free in their head and any sort of backlash is apparently us demanding she gets pregnant

No. 1744192

>>1744187
You’re on lolcow and you think that there aren’t women identical to the latter that make up the majority of this board? You can go back to worshipping cock if that’s what you love to do but the rest of us can stay rooted in reality

No. 1744193

>>1744190
>>1744188
No1curr. Take your victim complex and go somewhere I promise you no one gives a shit if you reproduce or not

No. 1744194

>>1744191
For real. I'm not wasting time on some freak who thinks women deserve to be severely injured or dead for becoming mothers. That's just sociopathy no matter how much they're chimping out rn lol

No. 1744195

File: 1698647964540.jpg (142.97 KB, 1300x1300, 26256856-portrait-of-happy-whi…)

>EBUL COCK WORSHIPPINT BITCH WHO RUINED HER PUSSY HOW DARE YOU

No. 1744196

>>1744191
>If it's not a moid/bitter infertile woman it might be a pickme who goes after men with families because she thrives on "being better for having no birth injuries" or some weird shit.
What is with all of this coming up with these weird fantasies instead of just reading what I’m saying. First of all, why would I ever go after a male. I just said, many times, that males are natural aggressors against women and all inherent predators. Second of all, anyone with children, including the children, deserve to be sent to Gaza for immediate extermination.

No. 1744198

>>1744193
>You have a victim complex even though I just said you’re gaslighting me
What

No. 1744201

>>1744195
“Ruined her pussy” see this is actually thoughts a fucking male would post. because when I typed out the term birth injuries I was thinking of broken pelvises, paralysis, losing your teeth, developing permanent memory loss or dementia from gestation. Saying I sound like a scrote for not verbatim pointing out that your child can die inside your womb and give you necrosis so you literally rot from the inside out

No. 1744203

>>1744195
Notice how there’s no father. Wonder why

No. 1744210

>>1744180
i wonder why antinatalists always dunk on women and their anatomy but you never see them go around calling men disgusting ejaculators..

No. 1744212

>>1744210
It can barely even understand a single post. Scizo sperging is real

No. 1744213

>>1744210
Anti-natalism often goes with misogyny like peanut butter and jelly.

No. 1744214

>>1744203
>If you're not glued to your husband you're an evil single mom!!

No. 1744221

My unpopular opinion: there needs to be more bans itt than any other thread. I'm not even talking about the current discussion but just in general. Back in my day things like handposting was a bannable offense at least in other threads, feels like the mods are dead lately.

No. 1744222

>>1744210
Literally this entire time I’ve been calling men abusive, predatory, and inherently perverse. Can you fucking read?

No. 1744224

>>1744214
Oh my god. How are none of you catching onto the rhetoric that the male is the problem. There is no “husband” figure because males are not faithful nor loving. They aren’t capable of caring for children. That’s what I meant when I said “wonder why” but of course you autistic fucks aren’t capable of nuance and never will be

No. 1744226

>>1744213
My post are riddled with my hatred for scrotes but of course you’re still trying to make it about yourself. Pathetic.

No. 1744227

>>1744222
This is literally incels defense too. They make 90% of the post screaming their damn head off about women being moms but think calling men abusive or something once makes up for it

Sorry you've been groomed by incels to hate mothers do
>Inb4 you're demanding me to be a mom!!!
No, no one cares if you reproduce or not. Please stop using this strawman when people call you out

No. 1744228

>>1744224
Or because moids sperg and laugh at women for being single moms? I even met moms who aren't even single that men sperg about because they posted a picture of them with their kids and their husband wasn't in that one picture. Bizarre

No. 1744230

>>1744227
I think that making the decision to be with a male when you have the ability to choose not to is retarded, and realistically that does not make me or anyone an incel just by having that belief because it just makes me a woman who’s grounded in reality. Also…when have I ever said “you’re demanding me to be a mom!1” in any prior post? How can you demand someone to be a mom who makes the choice to be distanced from men? Are you even reading what you’re saying?

No. 1744232

>>1744228
Women only end up being single mothers because of the degeneracy of males. I never once said “no father wonder why” as a dig on the woman. It’s a reference to males lack of presence and emotional intelligence. You really need to learn reading comprehension.

No. 1744233

>>1744230
Your biggest defense when people said it was retarded to have a hate boner for moms what that "how dare I not want to destroy my body for Nigel dick" or something along those lines as if it totally wasn't about your degeneracy and moid level sperging. You are projecting something, no one just comes to lolcow screaming about mothers being stupid without some other motive. You can literally do that on any other site and get asspats

No. 1744234

Maybe the US shouldn't have collaborated with Kuomintang.

No. 1744235

retards.

No. 1744236

>>1744233
you’re out to lunch

No. 1744237

>>1744233
There aren’t any mothered on lolcow tho what

No. 1744238

>>1744226
NTA but hating men doesn't make you inherently feminist. You might just be a misanthrope.

No. 1744239

>>1744227
>original post: I don’t feel bad for any woman who suffers from birth injuries. That’s what you get for being retarded enough to let some scrote knock you up
Don't give them a dignified response. How much this individual hates women is already transparent, so it's pointless to argue when this individual's mind is already set to pretty much have no empathy for women for empty reasons.

No. 1744240

>>1744232
I don't think you know what that word means, you used a typical incel buzzword when they laugh at single moms and are shocked people assumed you were hating on single moms? It's not even a reading comprehension thing, you just need to learn to stop sounding like an incel

No. 1744241

>>1744237
Wrong post?

No. 1744242

>>1744240
What typical incel buzzword. Do you really think the word “comprehension” is an incel buzzword? How chronically online must you be

No. 1744243

>>1744242
Yeah…you're the one who lacks reading comprehension if you think I meant "comprehension" was the incel buzzword

No. 1744244

>>1744239
It’s not an empty reason at all. There are millions of other women who are capable of using our cognition to know that it’s better than to reproduce with these disgusting men. So what’s your excuse?

No. 1744245

>>1744243
>I don't think you know what that word means, you used a typical incel buzzword when they laugh at single moms and are shocked people assumed you were hating on single moms? It's not even a reading comprehension thing, you just need to learn to stop sounding like an incel
all I said was that males are degenerates, don’t have any emotional intelligence, and lack physical/emotional presence. That’s how you responded to that. So do you even know what “incel buzzword” you’re referring to or

No. 1744247

>>1744239
There isn’t really a dignified response or dignified excuse to have sex with a creature that has dick cheese

No. 1744248

>>1744244
Majority of women here aren't even moms and the ones that are (telling from the baby thread) are usually lesbians using a sperm donor. If your only defense is assuming they're an "ebul breeder!!" You have nothing

No. 1744249

>>1744245
Come on now, rub your brain cells together then you can understand, you got this, I believe in you

No. 1744250

>>1744248
Where did I assume anything. All I said is “What is your excuse for believing that it’s acceptable to reproduce” and you don’t even have one. Using a sperm donor is still reproducing with a man, lassie.

No. 1744251

>>1744247
This is lolcow not a nunnery

No. 1744252

File: 1698652267557.jpg (284.68 KB, 933x631, Screenshot_20231030_024328_Chr…)

>>1744248
The bitter edgelord anti-natalists are trying to get a rise out of everyone. They have no empathy. They don't seem to be very grounded with how many humans work. Remember to report and to not let them get to you.

No. 1744253

Blackpill radfems should just kill themselves instead of wasting their time trying to convince normal women to do so for nefarious acts such as daring to let a moid deflower them

No. 1744254

>>1744249
The best part is that none of those words are incel buzzwords. They’re just words and all of them are true. Stay mad.

No. 1744257

>>1744251
Gross. Disgusting.

No. 1744258

>>1744253
>You should kill yourself for not being dumb enough to have sex…the way I was sniffle
Go back to throwing back that handle of vodka, faggot

No. 1744259

>>1744253
blackpill and radfem are mutually exclusive terms, retard

No. 1744260

File: 1698652487769.png (605.06 KB, 1075x1792, 1698422997039.png)


No. 1744261

>>1744252
You’re right I don’t have empathy for any grown adult woman who chooses to get pregnant because you think your genes are just so special and just need to be preserved and passed on soo bad. Don’t you have anything better to do

No. 1744262

>>1744254
If you can't figure out what I meant when I pointed out the incel buzzwords you're either trolling or literally retarded. There's no point in helping you and I know you're probably going to reply STILL misunderstanding what I meant by incel buzzwords. Thank God you don't reproduce so your retarded ass genes don't get passed on. The trash truly takes itself out sometimes

No. 1744263

>>1744260
Scrote behavior

No. 1744264

>>1744262
There is no incel buzzword present. If you think every word you see is an incel buzzword then you need to spend less time online and more time in real life around other people talking verbally out loud.

No. 1744265

>>1744261
If you didn't have empathy you'd just ignore it, you purposely have some weird hate boner against moms and can't find any other reason outside of "you did the nasty!!"like a fucking 12 yr old. Hell at least when those people reproduce they can pass down the maturity you lack

No. 1744266

>>1744264
Why can't you stop being stupid for 5 seconds?

No. 1744267

>>1744265
> at least when those people reproduce they can pass down the maturity you lack
NTAYRT but damn kek

No. 1744270

>>1744265
Ok I’ll make a list. 1) You’re reproducing a human who’s gonna be retarded and miserable 2) You think your genetics are so special they just need to be preserved which is pathetic and always false 3) your kids are gonna be broke 4) having kids does not guarantee that they inherit “maturity” or class. 5) most of the people who are reproducing, the largest populations having the most children are in areas where there’s less accessible education so actually no they don’t always inherit maturity they usually inherit retardation because their parents are cousins 6) men only want women to have children for them because it directly inflicts harm upon your body, from the very moment gestation begins
Want me to continue because I can

No. 1744273

>>1744266
>You’re the stupid one because I’m obsessed with “incel buzzwords”
Retardation

No. 1744275

>>1744270
Ok, if no one is so special they deserve to reproduce, and every woman is doing so to her own detriment, do you think the human race should die out?

No. 1744276

>>1744270
Okay you disagree with having children, big deal. Claiming people are retarded for not being as hateful as you is bizarre. You are just bitter, stop projecting

No. 1744277

>>1744267
Maturity isn’t passed down genetically

>>1744275
Not really any reason for it to continue we’ve already had our highs and lows

No. 1744278

>>1744273
Still being dumb and taking things out of context, as usual

No. 1744279

>>1744275
Honestly, the baity rant is designed like this emo, pessimistic, nihilist doomer mumbo jumbo that's very vague and does not apply to most people. That's why I'm calling them edgelords.

No. 1744280

>>1744270
Samefagging but I guess what I’m asking anon is if you believe reproduction of any kind is a woman ruining herself/passing on a man’s genes at no benefit to herself, would it be kinder to all future women if they never existed essentially, that would be a preferable fate?

No. 1744281

>>1744276
What is there to be bitter about though? My life is better than a woman who’s paralyzed because her nigel said he wanted a baby

No. 1744282

>>1744280
Yes. I think it actually would’ve been better if all of our grandmothers never reproduced our moms.

No. 1744284

>>1744279
It is very emo and nihilistic, I guess I’m giving it the benefit of the doubt because humanity feels hopeless sometimes. I don’t think anyone is going to give up on having children en masse and I think we should try to make mothers lives easier etc. I guess it’s naive but I try to hold out hope.

No. 1744285

>>1744279
You’d be surprised how many women that it does apply to though. The bulk of women on this planet would not be mothers would it not be for the intentional grooming and manipulation into believing that you only exist to give birth by men

No. 1744286

>>1744284
You can’t make mothers lives easier though. It’s not possible. When there’s a massive animal kicking you in the ribs there’s really not a lot that can make things easier.

No. 1744288

>>1744284
>I think we should try to make mothers lives easier etc. I guess it’s naive but I try to hold out hope.
I agree with you. Don't let them get to you, they think we should be executed kek

No. 1744289

>>1744286
I think partially medical science as a field is not interested in this issue at all or even considers it a problem. If other animals can do things like embryonic dialysis I think there could be a way.

No. 1744290

>>1744284
It’s not really nihilistic to be capable of understanding that there aren’t really any genetics that are overwhelmingly valuable and need to be preserved, and that the act of reproduction is just for the sake of vanity. Essentially like having a pet that looks like you.

No. 1744293

>>1744290
I guess you’re a professional misanthrope anon. Would you still feel this way if you were born male?

No. 1744294

>>1744293
Men aren’t capable of critical thought. They parrot the beliefs of women.

No. 1744295

>>1744293
The edgelords said they're happy with better lives, but I honestly doubt it. If they're here, being snarky about pregnant women being in pain, wishing death on anyone who doesn't agree with them, and etc, they're obviously not happy kek.

No. 1744296

>>1744270
>You’re reproducing a human who’s gonna be retarded and miserable
Doom thinking =\= reality
>You think your genetics are so special they just need to be preserved which is pathetic and always false
This can literally be applied to any animal reproduction on the planet. Unironically kys if existing is that bad
>your kids are gonna be broke
?? How did you come to this conclusion?
>having kids does not guarantee that they inherit “maturity” or class.
It's taught, something your mother should've taught you. Idk what that woman did to you that made you hate moms so much but shitting yourself on lolcow isn't a good coping mechanism
>most of the people who are reproducing, the largest populations having the most children are in areas where there’s less accessible education so actually no they don’t always inherit maturity they usually inherit retardation because their parents are cousins
If you cared about this you'd advocate for proper birth control in those areas instead of flipping out calling women retarded for having sex at all in the first place. Also I promise you the average lolcow mom isn't a thirdie poping out babies they can't take care of
>men only want women to have children for them because it directly inflicts harm upon your body, from the very moment gestation begins
If this was the case men would be out to lynch women who don't suffer any sort of effects of child birth/pregnancy. They'd also hate women with cryptic pregnancies who don't even know they're pregnant until they give birth

No. 1744297

>>1744296
Proper birth control is not having sex and sexual segregation between males and females. We stay separated.

No. 1744298

>>1744296
How happy are you right now as you’re sitting there trying to disprove my points, nonnie

No. 1744299

>>1744296
With how pessimistic and angsty the antinatalists are about life itself, it's probably a good thing they're not the ones raising the next generation.

No. 1744300

>>1744281
These are freak scenarios though, definitely not the majority, even then thinking she deserves it because she did the ~nasty~ is so fucking childish and like an overgrown gore addicted 14 yr old chan tard

No. 1744301

>>1744298
>Disprove
????

No. 1744302

>>1744296
Coping mechanism for what though? Everyone is claiming that I’m bitter and coping but what am I bitter over and coping about. What do y’all think happened

No. 1744304

>>1744300
They’re more common than you’d think

No. 1744306


No. 1744307

>>1744299
Yeah. The anons best defense is that it thinks the average mom lolcow user is some poor 3rd world woman having 10+ kids. Beyond delusional

No. 1744309

>>1744302
>Y'all
Go back to Twitter where your mom hate boner will be validated

No. 1744312

>>1744295
Idk really that much about whether one individual feels happy or not, im interested in her point of view because this is something I’ve grappled with a lot, feeling like you’re in debt but at the same time not asking to be born, the question of free will, how many women reproduce because they truly want to, whether a civilization that perpetuates itself on the backs of women deserves to live on, whether humans are redeemable, ‘just kys’ doesn’t really make sense because we’re already here now, the question is what to o do with our time here, there’s a lot and no straight answer for any of it you know?
>>1744294
I get you anon.

No. 1744313

>>1744309
Do you think everyone from the United States was born on twitter dot com

No. 1744314

NOTICE

Thread has reached 1100 posts. The thread will be locked and you will be unable to post in it shortly after it exceeds 1200 posts. Please begin preparing a new thread and post a link to it when it's created.

No. 1744315

>>1744306
You can't disprove or prove an opinion, especially since majority of your points were off color/out of context "predictions" for anons children, which makes no sense because most users here aren't even close to the bracket you're describing

No. 1744317

>>1744313
You certainly act like a resident Twitter user

No. 1744319

>>1744295
My life is better though because I’m not screaming in pain through contractions or losing all my money. So

No. 1744321

>>1744317
Elon Musk is a fucking breeder freak. I’m certain that if I walked into twitter with my rhetoric I’d be permabanned

No. 1744322

>>1744304
Ah yes. I just walk into mom groups with vegetable women because she was 2nd grade IQ stupid for having secks with a man

No. 1744323

>>1744322
So true I believe it. Tragic

No. 1744324

>>1744319
I'd rather have contractions or whatever instead of hating women for being humans

No. 1744325

>>1744322
They're chimping the fuck out and swearing that they're satisfied with their lives when they've spent hours justifying having no empathy for pregnant women and straight up wishing harm on mothers and children. Mental illness kek

No. 1744326

>>1744321
What? MGTOW/podcast Twitter is notorious for shitting on moms with this same level of doom thinking

No. 1744327

>>1744325
I think anon basically thinks it would be better if humanity never existed.

No. 1744328

>>1744325
Kek yes. If you have to ensure lolcow you're happy with your life over and over you're probably not happy

No. 1744329

>>1744324
>fer beeing hoomans!!1
We as humans have evolved enough to be capable of self awareness. Choosing to opt out of awareness and think life is all hunky dory and that you should push out a bunch of ugly babies for your scrote is not “part of being human” it’s part of giving up

No. 1744330

>>1744327
Sounds like a mighty projection for their hatred of their own lives

No. 1744331

>>1744327
Or any sort of animals that reproduce sexually for that matter it seems

No. 1744332

>>1744325
I don’t have empathy for pregnant women because women choose to get pregnant knowing that it’s not worth it

No. 1744334

>>1744329
>Le most intelligent breed ourselves out of existence
Cope harder infertile myrtle

No. 1744335

>>1744331
I don’t agree with anon but I don’t exactly disagree. Like how many animals basically reproduce through rape? Is that beautiful? Idk. If the only humans that existed were because their mothers really, really wanted them, that would probably be better for humanity. But the world would look very different.

No. 1744336

File: 1698654477865.jpg (82.36 KB, 915x283, Screenshot_20231030_042800_Chr…)

>>1744334
Just report, they're definitely misogynistic sociopaths.

No. 1744337

>>1744327
It doesn’t really need to
>>1744328
Usually it’s the handmaidens posting their little scrotelings online crying about how happy they are

No. 1744338

>>1744332
Not worth it for you but newsflash - pregnant women don't care about you and the entire world doesn't revolve around your wants

No. 1744339

>>1744337
The fuck are you talking about?

No. 1744341

>>1744334
Ew. What wouod be the favorable opposite, to you? “Fertile myrtle” you weird breeder fuck?

No. 1744345

>>1744338
And I don’t care about pregnant women or their desires or pain. But of course me saying “nobody cares about pregnants” is a pearl clutcher.

No. 1744347

>>1744335
I agree, but shitting on moms and calling them retarded, saying they deserve abuse and bodily harm, etc will just create a self hate complex in already existing moms and then remove proper support. Hence why family support in America is lowest of low because they actually believe women deserve literal hell for having sex

No. 1744348

>>1744347
Yeah and it should be lower because “families” don’t need to exist anymore. You’re almost getting it

No. 1744349

>>1744341
Is this a fetish or something? No one wants to touch you with a 10 foot pole. Why are you so convinced people want your retarded ass to breed?

No. 1744350

>>1744348
Anti family propaganda

No. 1744351

>>1744347
Thank you. Hating and getting off on women being hurt for being mothers is some moid shit, and these psychos are on the same level as the scrotes they say they hate: garbage.

No. 1744352

>>1744349
Where in that sentence did I say “you want me to breed”, you genuine literal fat retard? I just find it fucking gross and scrote-like that you used the term “infertile” as an insult. It’s some breeder nigel shit to favoritise fertility.

No. 1744354

>>1744351
It’s not getting off on anything to just state that if you’re stupid enough to think that you need to reproduce then you deserve whatever harm comes your way

No. 1744355

>>1744349
Why is that what you first assumed nonnie. Ew

No. 1744356

>>1744352
As the previous anon stated, bitter infertile women typically cope by hating women who are capable of reproducing. It's not unlikely you're just upset over your own personal problems

No. 1744357

>>1744352
I think you just didn’t sugar coat it enough for people here so people assume you must be unhappy or coping with infertility. As far as I can see you just don’t think humans are particularly special, probably shouldn’t exist, and don’t really care about what happens to pregnant women who got pregnant by choice. I guess it came off as cold and “antihumanist”.

No. 1744358

>>1744355
The weird reactions of it acting as if we were wanting her to get pregnant when people just wanted her to chill with the mom hate is very telling

No. 1744359

>>1744356
I’ve said multiple times that the human race doesn’t even need to exist because it causes more harm than good, mostly due to the behaviors of the little scrotes that these women just insist on continuing to create. Has nothing to do with my existence personally, I have no direct impact on society. If i found out I was infertile I’d be jumping up and down with joy.

No. 1744360

>>1744357
Anti humanists still don't act this retarded and have this bad of hate boners for moms kek. Hell even subreddits like antinatalism that was shut down would immediately shut down that anon for being hateful

No. 1744361

>>1744357
How is it coping to say that men are disgusting and choosing to reproduce with them is retarded

No. 1744362

>>1744358
Where does it say “why do you want me to get pregnant” though like where did you even get that idea. I think you’re reading a little too much into the response when she just called her a breeder

No. 1744363

>>1744359
>Acting as if you didn't just post like 50+ posts shitting yourself at the existence of moms

No. 1744364

>>1744363
Well yeah because moms are retarded for choosing to reproduce. Keep up

No. 1744365

>>1744362
Are you so fucking retarded you can't understand what implications are? Yeah don't reproduce

No. 1744366

>>1744365
Calling someone a breeder as an insult is not implying “AHH YOU WANT ME TO GET PREGNANT” do you have asperger’s?

No. 1744367

>>1744364
Majority of moms are smarter than you. At least they can understand basic forms of expressions

No. 1744369

>>1744366
?? What? I was referring to previous posts

No. 1744370

>>1744367
They’re actually not smarter because of that postpartum brain fog from gestation and giving birth, let alone the multiple IQ points dropping from breastfeeding

No. 1744371

>>1744361
I don’t think you are coping, I’m saying that’s how your post is being perceived. I often struggle with the question of is it even morally right to have children, if it’s a boy it’s a retarded scrotelet and if it’s a girl she will suffer the misogyny of this world.

No. 1744372

>>1744369
No you weren’t

No. 1744375

>is the stupidest person alive
>"B-but I'm so smart for not reproducing!!!"
Uh yeah.. keep it that way please

No. 1744376

>>1744370
I've talked to women who literally given birth hours ago who have better reading comprehension than you

No. 1744377

>>1744375
You can’t even name how I’m retarded though. Like do you even know?

No. 1744378

>>1744376
Coming up with fantasies about having friends doesn’t make them real

No. 1744379

>>1744375
I agree. It's not that maturity is genetic. It's that I'd rather children not be raised by sociopaths who want them executed all the time and sperg about it on lolcow.

No. 1744380

>>1744371
No, it’s not. So don’t. Save your money. Go do something else

No. 1744381

>>1744379
>I’d rather children not be raised
That’s a better start

No. 1744383

>>1744377
I guess the post hoc logic of ‘if you have kids that means you’re smart because survival of the fittest’ but that’s not really how it works anymore because there’s no barrier to entry.

No. 1744385

>>1744383
You think forgetting to wear a condom during sex is how survival of the fittest works. Yeah, you shouldn’t have kids either.

No. 1744386

>>1744379
I don’t think she literally sees children on the street and fantasizes about executing them (hopefully). I think she just wouldn’t feel too badly about it if we all got hit by an asteroid, including the children that are alive right now.

No. 1744387

>>1744385
I was explaining how other people think about it, not what I personally think.

No. 1744388

>>1744386
The children would literally be better off dead than in debt

No. 1744389

>>1744386
KEK the thing invading this thread probably wakes up everyday wishing it wasn't born for a projection to be that big.

No. 1744391

>>1744389
>The thing
I’m literally the only thing keeping this website alive. I create the majority of threads on this board.

No. 1744392

>>1744389
Maybe. But abstractly thinking it would be better if you and everyone else didn’t exist is a bit different to active suicidality or hating yourself. Like I don’t agree with antinatalism because I think humanity has achieved some amazing things. But most people probably don’t need to reproduce, and humanity does seem to be in decline.

No. 1744393

>it's that tranny
>again
>you all took his bait
>again

No. 1744394

>>1744391
which ones

No. 1744395

>>1744393
How is it troon like to think that women shouldn’t have to give birth anymore. Usually troons are the ones with the breeding obsessions.

No. 1744396

>>1744393
Don’t you think a man would want women to be forced to get pregnant though

No. 1744397

File: 1698656285310.gif (444.38 KB, 271x275, 1667800236964.gif)

>>1744393
>invading trannies in this thread hates mothers because their anatomy and physiology is the number one reminder of what trannies can't have
Ooooooooh it makes sense now. Yeah everybody report.

No. 1744399

Pets, pet food and related services should be aggressively taxed and regulated in order to discourage broke retards from acquiring them and thus abusing them, and to mitigate their massive environmental impact. Honestly, i think paying a 200 dollar tax stamp to the USDA per pet and having to fill a transfer form would be a good start.

No. 1744400

>>1744397
>writes paragraphs about how men are natural aggressors that want to harm women by forcing us to weaken our bodies and brains via reproduction
>oh it’s a tranny who’s angry at women

what the fuck kek

No. 1744401

>>1744397
Idk the focus on how it hurts the mother and IQ point loss sound like female neuroses to me. Usually when men obsess over it is ‘muh loose vagene’ ‘muh stretch marks’ etc. not to say women can’t be shallow. But not everyone is a tranny.

No. 1744402

>>1744396
he's the one who always screeches about how he's ~keeping the site alive~ with his batshit word salad. report and ignore.

No. 1744403

>>1744399
having a pet shouldn’t be allowed. What the fuck are you doing with it if he’s not eating the hay or herding the sheep

No. 1744405

>>1744402
Receipts of previous times?

No. 1744409

>>1744399
Pets are taxed in Currywurstland. 'didn't prevent people from getting pets in the pandemic when they had home office and having to drop em at the local shelters the last two years because they have to go back to their workplace, when the shelters are already oversaturated.
It's the same thing as having 5+ kids, getting muh benefits, and not doing shit to help them get good at learning at school, pursue a good career etc.
Shit people will be shit people.

No. 1744416

>>1743086
Oh? No wonder it's good kek

No. 1744418

>>1744409
>Currywurstland
My unpopular opinion is that it’s cringe when anons use euphemisms like this instead of their countries names. We know you mean Germany, just say that. Or at least come up with a funny nickname.

No. 1744439

>>1744399
Ironically this would just lead to people neglecting pets further. Like the other anon said, they do all of these things in my country plus raising the mandated vet prices to almost 50% in some cases, making bigger health complications basically so unaffordable for lower income people that they have to choose to put their pets down instead.

No. 1744441

>>1744400
There's troons on this board who do this to fit in and it's some twisted way for them to larp as biological women, because in their delusional heads they think shitting on men means they can't be one. When I checked for raids, I saw them once bragging on 4chan about it a year or two ago.

No. 1744449

>>1744423
sounds like you just want average.

No. 1744451

>>1744399
Does taxing ever do anything but fund the state's treasure chest? Tax on gas doesn't make people drive less, tax on sugar doesn't make people consume unhealthy foods less. Basically if you can already afford a luxury you can probably afford it with tax too.

No. 1744455

My unpopular opinion is it's ok to be shallow. More fun than feigning intelligence by trying to get "deep" when it's unrewarding or you can't figure it out and get upset you don't get it and missing out on something everyone seemingly understands. Being shallow can make one happier sometimes. This applies to anything btw, from looks to relationships to kinds of media you consume etc.

No. 1744462

>>1744399
People would find ways to acquire pets anyway. They would go into debt, buy them illegally or just pick them up from the street.

No. 1744645

>>1744451
In some rare cases, making things cost more through taxes can change consumer's actions, but it has to be something that there are alternatives to, and it has to be something that isn't necessary for life.
In Mexico in 2013, they added a 1 peso tax to non-dairy and non-alcoholic drinks with added sugar. On average there was a six per cent decline in the amount (ml) of taxed drinks bought during 2014 compared to pre-tax trends, and the downward trend reached 12% by December 2014. One of the major findings was that those from lower socio-economic households reduced the amount of taxed sugary drinks they bought more than any other group. On average they reduced their purchases by 9% during 2014, which by December 2014 reached a 17% reduction. The same study found a 4% increase in purchases of untaxed beverages, mainly bottled water, during 2014.
The soda industry funded two other studies which showed the exact same thing, but they claimed that the effects wore off by 2015. However, when those studies' results were analyzed again, researchers found that they had not adjusted for population growth and that when analyzed with population growth, that the decrease in sugary drink consumption continued as far as the study researched (2016). Inflation had decreased the power of the tax slightly, but it still showed effects.
On a personal note, I love driving around and looking at nature but when gas prices rise, I decrease driving for the sake of looking at things, but when prices fall I increase again. However, that's just an anecdote and so can't be applied to larger trends.
Once a tax appears, it never goes away, so I always hesitate to give the government any more money because one, they're just going to misuse it and start another war, and two, that status effect is permanent and cannot be removed. So good effects and bad effects.

No. 1744652

>>1744399
I disagree with a tax, but I think you should have to go to mandatory education courses on owning a pet before you're allowed to get one, and that animal's rights should be much stronger. No more of this getting a dog and locking it in a cage for eight to twelve hours while you're at work. Fuck you, I don't care if you think getting a pet is a human right, either treat it like a living being with feelings and needs, or don't get one.

No. 1744680

Compared to the sonic and 5 nights Freddy's… Super Mario's still stays being the best video game movie adaptation.

No. 1744837

>>1744652
this. also, background checks for people looking to get pets, tougher laws on puppy mills (and all sorts of abusive animal trade) to disincentivize them, and an animal abuser registry would help a lot IMO.

No. 1744860

>>1744441
>You must be a troon because you don’t think women should be retarded enough to have sex with men
Not everyone in this world is a troon? Especially because troons are usually the ones who wish they could give birth so

No. 1744861

>>1744652
Or why don’t we just not have babies or pets. Case closed, problem solved, go get a fucking job.

No. 1744865

>>1744441
If I’ve written over 1,000 posts on this board talking about how disgusting men are and you still think I’m a male then maybe you’re just flat out retarded? Someone sent the FBI to my house over some of my posts and they weren’t very surprised to see that I’m a female.

No. 1744867

>>1744861
I actually agree with not having pets or having way less of them, especially large ones. We kill too many animals to feed them

No. 1744869

>>1744867
And smaller animals exist to be food for larger animals, so keeping them alive just to pamper them the way that hets do with their babies is just weird and obsessive(USER HAS BEEN PUT OUT TO PASTURE)

No. 1744871

File: 1698691518659.png (68.79 KB, 243x275, 1686421807670.png)


No. 1744872

>>1744403
Keep coping allergyfag

No. 1744873

stop responding to the troon

if the FBI were called to his house, it is because he spams child pornography here and on many other websites

he is an attention whore. ignore him or else he'll never leave.

No. 1744881


No. 1744889

>>1744871
This is a male meme

No. 1744893

>>1744872
It’s not that I’m allergic it’s that I have a brain in my head not to waste money on a random animal that I don’t even know. What

No. 1744895

>>1744873
No they were actually called to my house for threats of treason. I have the recording of the full interview, if you really don’t believe me.

No. 1744896

LOCKING IMMINENT

Thread has exceeded 1200 posts and is about to be locked! Please create a new thread and post a link to it.

No. 1744899

>>1744895
And sorry for the immediate samefag but I’m absolutely not the first and won’t be the last oldfag on this site to get an FBI visit alllll because some little disgruntled 16 year old on here saw me say that someone should Steven Paddock the entirety of the United States.

No. 1744919

>>1744399
A tax wouldn't be effective for the reasons nonas already listed and more. Free spay and neuter programs would help alongside a program to catch and release the feral population for sterilizations (or catch and kill but that's pretty heartless). Vet bills for vaccinations and sterilization for one pet is hundreds of dollars, that's why broke ass people don't take their pets in. They find a stray cat or dog and adopt it and then the animal breeds and if they feed the kitten/puppies those animals breed and in a few years they're a certified cat or dog hoarder if they don't start drowning the animals a bag as soon as they're born. They start neglecting them because they can't afford to buy enough food for them and they tell themselves the animals will figure it out themselves so they turn them out in to the wild but the little bit of food they still put out "to help" just keeps the dogs/cats close and messes up the natural process completely so you wind up with these hotspots of neglected-pet/feral animal misery, it's really gross and sad. I don't know who you think is gonna go out the backwoods and shitty neighborhoods this happens in and force people to pay a $200 tax stamp for pets the owners will claim are strays.

No. 1744924

I think there should be a statue of limitations on murder in certain circumstances.

No. 1744933

>>1744924
You can’t put a statue on a murder scene it will cover the evidence that needs to be collected and is just kind of weird

No. 1745136

>>1742598
Agreed

No. 1745154

>>1742918
I agree. Piggybacking on this, my unpopular opinion is that box dye can be fine sometimes and I laugh when the hairdresser girlies scream and cry and piss at the mention of 'OmFg, BOXXXXXX DYYYYYYE?!?!?!"

No. 1745774

>>1742918
I agree with you nona! Most people are so dense about this. I cut me and my boyfriend's hair most of the time and the last time I went to the salon was 2 years ago to get a balayage. It cost me €200 and that was on the cheaper end. I was told to come back every three months and the touch up would cost €90 everytime. Since then I experimented with bleaching and doing highlights myself to touch up the roots and it turned out completely fine, people even complimented me even though everyone is always like OMG don't EVER bleach at home and especially don't use box dye, your hair will fall out/you'll be an orange mess!!! I think this must be some form of propaganda by hair stylists kek. If you research and practice a bit you can achieve good results. Of course it's a lot of work if you not only cut but dye your hair but you also save money and don't have to interact with hairdressers (I hate that).



Delete Post [ ]
[Return] [Catalog]
[ Rules ] [ ot / g / m ] [ pt / snow / w ] [ meta ] [ Server Status ]