File: 1588376793456.jpg (92.94 KB, 700x525, 90555419_3870152143024786_7688…)
No. 548400
>>548396because he was one of the very first widely known lolcows
>>548398like most of the people here, farmers and lolcows alike
No. 548436
File: 1588384253301.jpg (Spoiler Image,287.31 KB, 2418x2500, 20s10AmI94.jpg)
>>548432what are you trying to say
>>548421the blue haired chick was hot tho
No. 548442
>>548441what's the correlation between shoplifting and dumpster diving
>>548440i'm not into diapers, i just couldn't find a better pic of marie
No. 548444
File: 1588385540318.jpeg (165.02 KB, 1548x1024, F2B3EBE5-F8A2-4B4B-BA51-0DB4D4…)
I think he seems so smug and self righteous and has little talent to show for it. I feel like all his music is generic and uninspired which I wouldn’t even care about if he didn’t give off the vibe of thinking he was some kind of tortured genius for it. He just has such an off putting energy to me and I can’t believe so many people find him attractive.
No. 548477
>>548444He's just smiling,anon geez
If want to see someone smug and unlikeable,look at Elons musk's stupid punchable face
No. 548481
>>548478I would watch a movie starring her as the main antagonist though.
She has something I can't put my finger on, the way she talks, it's just evil but in an uncanny valley way. Like a character from Ex-Machina.
No. 548482
>>548479lmao @ these interactions
>>548475yeah ok she's hot i see what u mean
No. 548485
>>548475Fuck this stupid bitch. Telling poor people they should be working instead of doing what ever the fuck they want and trying to manipulate them into sending her money? She legitimately just said “doesn’t matter we’re you are $5 could be $10!” That’s a full meal to for people. I hope this skanky old bitch has to scrub horse shit off concrete for $1 an hour, talking about hard working people like that
>>548481She has no charisma imo, she had no ability to even slightly persuade me in to her bullshit ass manipulation. She pissed me off in the first 30 seconds
No. 548489
>>548487Yeah to me it sounded a bit like a fetish thing too, like for the guys that enjoy being dominated financially.
I just love it, she's like the evil niece of mePearl in the actress-y way she talks.
No. 548509
File: 1588391878224.jpeg (49.23 KB, 500x624, 0AF59648-ED02-4DD8-B55B-D67F5B…)
Big asses are overrated. I don’t mean naturally muscular or plump asses that are sizeable. I mean “baddie” bodies I see everywhere, this shit isn’t “body positive” like it claims to be. it’s just fake and just as harmful as several years ago when everyone wanted to be a stick thin model. Chubby girls are only praised if the weight goes to their ass and tits, if they’re shaped like a ball.
No. 548511
>>548509Samefag forgot to finish sorry.
if they’re shaped like a ball, it’s not the same as a pear shaped girl
No. 548541
>>548527>>548532Are we not on lolcow? Why the fuck are y’all on this site, OT is really a whole different planet sometimes. Neither of you even spelt misogyny right, are you sure you know the correct definition. /s
>>548534Twitch thots are literally just camgirls, what’s happening am I on the right website lmao I’m in the twilight zone
No. 548547
>>548544But you do see the irony of coming to a mostly radicalized female website that’s partially used to make fun of sex workers, trans people, etc. and calling someone a misogynist for not liking an e whore, right? It’s just kind of… out of place. Doesn’t connect but whatever dude, go ahead and Stan some stupid twitch thot.
>>54854399.99% literally yes, that’s the funniest part
No. 548562
>>548554Sit there with your tits out and mouth open, in front of a live camera feed, while men give you money to jerk off at you? Yeah, pretty much the same thing. Women on twitch know exactly what they are doing, they just don’t get fully undressed. If there are women just playing games and streaming, maybe making revenue, than there obviously not thots. Not ever female twitch streamer is a hoe. But every twitch thot is borderline cam girl, that’s just facts.
>>548550I was literally meaning lolcows when referring to those subtypes of people, either way it’s a site dedicated to ragging on people exactly like your precious who ever the fuck. Just because you couldn’t convert every person here doesn’t mean you need to continually defend her with your shiny white sword. You basically just re quoted my exact point, she’s a cow. 30 years old sitting in a pile of plushies begging for other people to fund her life.
No. 548567
>>548410lol why be moral about it? just admit you like having stuff for free.
the shoplifters who treat workers like fucking shit make my blood boil tho. You already had the gall to load up a backpack with random bullshit from the electronics section where like three people could see you and now you wanna shout at my 16-year-old coworker because she politely offered to ring you up? fuck off. some people are unbelievably entitled. So many times I've been fought with and screamed at by some bitch who knew fully well they were stealing and are just mad they got caught. That's not even getting into people who fill a cart with a fuckload of stuff to push out, only to ditch it at the last second right before we close. Thanks you broke fuck now I have even more work to do. Idk maybe I'm just an uppity bitch but if you steal anything other than food or medicine I'm just going to assume you're pathetic and materialistic lol.
No. 548585
File: 1588406244677.jpg (48.53 KB, 433x650, 11_433x650.jpg)
>>548581I think pigtails are perfectly acceptable on adults as long as they're low, especially if it's towards the back of your head. Something like pic related is just a more secure version of parting your hair and pulling it around your shoulders. If they're right up high on the sides of your head, it looks childish but I wish it didn't have that association because it's still cute.
No. 548587
>>548475She seems to have made some people angry, even in this thread, but I don't really see the big deal. It's not manipulative.
If you're the kind of person who financially supports streamers, you played a part in creating this mindset. You basically caused this by allowing this to turn into a "career", making these people think they're doing the internet some huge service by talking into a camera and/or playing video games.
Truth be told, if you're already that kind of person, why
shouldn't you pay that $5? If you don't have that kind of money, why are you wasting your time on Twitch streamers instead of improving your situation? Do you think the two might go hand in hand, even just a little bit? What do you actually gain from watching this woman ramble in thigh-highs? Are there no better hobbies?
I guarantee you that 60% of the streamers people love are probably thinking the same things she said, and talk about how cheap and entitled their audiences are with their close friends. Doubly so for the female ones who have to put up with shitty male comments all the time.
Maybe the angry coomers who got pissed at her over this will see the light. This should help them understand how ridiculous a pastime it is to subscribe to and/or financially support random people on the internet.
No. 548591
File: 1588407070721.jpg (16.42 KB, 665x103, Image1.jpg)
>>548589People should do whatever they want with their hair, just depends if they feel self conscious thinking people will judge them. I think people are way more likely to associate it with little kids than with porn. When I googled that picture I saw a reddit thread in /r/askwomen asking what they think, a lot did say it's childish.
But ugh, saw this absolute degenerate… imagine calling someone cringy for a hairstyle while admitting you let men facefuck you while holding said hairstyle in one breath. Not to mention thinking it's childish and then specifically using it for sex, pedophilic af.
No. 548600
>>548587And why shouldn’t her be improving her situation, instead of begging for $5? It’s not manipulative, it’s stupid, entitled and casts the worst light on girls.
Why should a person waste that money on someone who doesn’t even gives benefits by being a sub? it’s not like she’s making some kind of effort into convincing her watchers, she’s just humilating them and herself. Truth be told, if I were the kind of person on her twitch I’d jerk off to her and switch to a better channel once I’m done, maybe even subscribing with the $20 pack, kek.
No. 548608
>>548587I don't totally disagree with your sentiment, I think the thing about her situation that annoys me is that dudes absolutely LOVE throwing their money at streamers they like. If she's not making any money, it's because she sucks. she literally GETS a sub in the full clip and ignores it completely. Thanking your subs is streamer 101 she doesn't know how to do her own fucking job. It's like she thinks "I'm pretty and I play games why am I not rich yet?????" and thought shaming her audience was the right step. It's just so ungrateful. I wouldn't have hated it as much if she didn't make that stupid apology video, because that makes it clear she's not playing a character, she's just greedy and bad at her job and doesn't want to admit that her content is lacking. Obviously people who spend all their money on streamers are pathetic but she's not exposing them or anything she's just an idiot.
>Maybe the angry coomers who got pissed at her over this will see the light. This should help them understand how ridiculous a pastime it is to subscribe to and/or financially support random people on the internet.tbh I'd like to see that too but they'll just find a streamer who knows how to properly pander to her audience and throw their money at her instead.
No. 548682
>>548674Oh wow you know big words, I bet your big smart two, because we all know people on image boards have the mostest smartest /s/s/s
You’re not much better if you equate any intelligence to this website at all. Insults totally prove your point anon, now everyone wants to consider you’re perspective!!!!!
No. 548686
>>548600Only dumb coomers would unironically watch and spend money on her, so they should pay the toll. It should be one more reminder of how much time they're wasting.
If this reality enrages them, they should improve themselves so they don't have an emotional need to cling to random internet women they only sexualize/dehumanize anyway.
>casts the worst light on girlsLmao, anon. If someone hates girls/women because of a Twitch streamer, they're scum who was looking for an excuse, anyway.
>it’s not like she’s making some kind of effort into convincing her watchers, she’s just humilating them and herself.They should all be humiliated. There's nothing respectable about any of this, and no amount of "benefits for subs" will make it any less pathetic to pay someone money for playing games.
>if I were the kind of person on her twitch I’d jerk off to her and switch to a better channel once I’m done, maybe even subscribing with the $20 pack, kek.The solution to your internet simp-bait not being kind enough is not to go and simp for another. It's to stop being a disgusting neckbeard in the first place.
No. 548693
>>548666>she’s not a real life cow anonYou're spending way too much time on this website.
>>548682That's a lot of autism in one post.
>>548684Anon is talking about the feud happening ITT and it is not caused by a lack of muh integration.
>>548689Wow you're right anon! Teenage girls shouldn't wear pigtails! People might think they're depraved whores into DDLG!
No. 548697
>>548682nta but why the sudden impassioned spergfest and use of 2010 era redditor memes like /sarcasm
you really seem like a snowflake yourself
No. 548698
>>548656>If some of y’all don’t know it’s a sexualized thing, you probably live under rocks.Thinking it's too childish/cringe is one thing (I disagree, but different strokes), but I feel like it's low-IQ to avoid something that's inherently non-sexual (a hairstyle, especially one that's often culturally read as being for children) just because it's been sexualized by men.
In two more generations, women will probably be looked down on for wearing shoes that show their feet/toes because the internet will have normalized footfaggotry. I don't want to subscribe to stupid bullshit like that. Lending credibility to porn addicts' abnormal fetishism and cumbrain mentality by letting them claim things that were never meant for them is backward.
No. 548701
>>548697Oh wow I am so worried and will definitely consider your opinion hm yes much snowflake I am
>>548693By cow in real life I meant she seems like a dumb bitch in real life. 30 year old pigtailed no job loser. Seems like the only way some anons will understand you is if you only refer to things in LC terms. Sorry I didn’t type or phrase myself to your exact personal reference. Not everyone is going to use your personal repertoire
No. 548716
>>548392>>548693Why are you taking pigtails so seriously…lmao
It just looks juvenile and weeaboo-ish, stop making it weirdly sexual.
No. 548719
>>548716>>548656
>If some of y’all don’t know it’s a sexualized thing, you probably live under rocks.besides, aren't teenagers allowed to be juvenile? when do you have to stop wearing pigtails exactly? share some of your mighty wisdom with us plebs, anon
>>548718this is what happens when you allow a low life pickme to speak
No. 548728
>>548727if that's not their post, why didn't they say so? i can't read minds y'know. hey, aren't you the one pissed off because some e-thot is making money off of simps? lmao
>>548726lol you type exactly like vicky.
No. 548732
>>548729This.
A Gap year did me so much well, an 18 yo isn’t ready for college responsabilities.
No. 548821
File: 1588442146493.png (1.48 MB, 1440x1080, Rasengan.png)
Naruto steadily went to shit as soon as the Rasengan was introduced
No. 548867
File: 1588449804233.jpg (206.44 KB, 1200x1200, ESZqiNQUcAEsxyD.jpg)
I dont think jhene aiko is all that pretty. Shes blasian, specifically half Japanese….If she were a celebrity in Japan she would be considered ugly but shes famous within the rap/hiphop/r&b community so shes praised for being exotic/light skin.
No. 548868
File: 1588450003913.png (80.11 KB, 795x497, Hard-vs-soft-magic-feature.png)
>>548864Its a prime example of a Hard Magic based show devolving into Soft Magic
No. 548890
>>548867>If she were a celebrity in Japan she would be considered uglyDon't they have very specific beauty standards there? I can imagine most women who don't fit them would be considered ugly.
That being said I don't find her that pretty either and all her music sounds like the same song. She definitely benefits from that 'exotic' factor.
No. 548910
>>548867i don't know who this woman is but it would be a lie to say that she isn't conventionally attractive. and i'm not taking in account of her light skin
>If she were a celebrity in Japan…who gives a shit about their beauty standards
No. 548974
>>548867>>548903you 2 sound so fucking insecure
who gives a fuck if japanese people in japan think she's ugly or not, she doesnt even have a career in japan, shit like that doesnt matter
2.japan isnt korea, there are significantly more blasian celebrities there and their beauty standards are completely different
3. both of you are delusional for thinking males/black men are what put her on for being exotic when a majority of her longterm fanbase are women/black women due to her being a child r&b singer who shared a label with b2k, who were huge with black girls in the early 2000s, and got fucked over and never really debuted due to the label head being a fucking pedophile who molested multiple of his signed artists
No. 548991
>>548978im a fucking retard who doesnt know how to greentext, so im just going to copy and paste my original staement
"a majority of her longterm fanbase are women/black women due to her being a child r&b singer who shared a label with b2k, who WERE huge with black girls in the EARLY 2000s"
meaning it doesnt matter what black men think of her, theyre not the ones buying her music or seeing her shows, her fanbase has always been targeted towards black WOMEN
black mens opinions dont fucking matter in the long run at all either way
jhene is an american r&b artist, no shit foreigners dont know who she is, theyre not internationally promoted at all
as long as american people keep buying her shit, it wont matter if she's known worldwide anyways
(>>twitter) No. 548992
>>548910Right? Who gives a fuck about Japan in this context because unless you're a weeb, their opinions on American musicians and their attractiveness are irrelevant.
Jhene Aiko's music or image obviously aren't for a Japanese market. Regardless of her skin tone she would still be considered an attractive person.
No. 550001
I can't even tell if this is that unpopular of an opinion because lately half of this website seems to be insane radfems and the other half is annoying twitter-parroting sex worker-adjacents, but I really cannot bring myself to hate trans people or partake in exclusively calling them "trannies" on forums, even if it means I get yelled at for not assimilating with board culture. I've read pinkpill threads and tried to see it from their perspective, I understand that some have had negative experiences with fucked up people who also happened to be trans, I still can't get on board. Before anyone selectively misinerprets, you KNOW I'm not talking about 4chan traps and transtrenders.
I consider myself fairly traditional as far as values go (raised in a conservative immigrant family), I hate tumblr shit as much as anyone else, and I'm not trans or queer myself. It's just, trans-ness really does't click in my brain as something I should find weird and abhorrent.
Also, I wish I could incinerate the spergs who screech when you call a trans person by their preferred pronouns online. Who fucking cares, you're exhausting
No. 550005
>>550001Trannies were a harmless group for me too until I actually ended up interacting with them. Even "the sensible ones" ended up being extremely weird and had obvious mental issues when you got to know them better. One of my best friends was and still is an oldschool FTM and I've never seen anyone harbor so much internalized, and now externalized, misogyny and I highkey want to shake them every time it happens.
>Also, I wish I could incinerate the spergs who screech when you call a trans person by their preferred pronouns online. Who fucking cares, you're exhaustingI wouldn't call Pixyteri Japanese and play into her cow delusions just because the holy windchime told her she was one either. Would you?
No. 550009
>>549980There are people who will do it to pretty much everyone. I was raised by a single mom and still have had a few people treat me like I'm ~oh so privileged~ just because she got us by enough not to be on food stamps.
>>549988Who said anything about not respecting people who have accomplished things with fewer advantages? The point is it's highly annoying when people belittle the accomplishments of others because they didn't grow up in crippling poverty.
No. 550030
File: 1588629788673.jpg (65.76 KB, 949x449, pronoun.JPG)
>>550018NTA and I saw that too and it was nowhere near "pronoun sperging" described before. The original anon even laughed about it. You really do seem to take this awfully personal good
nonnie.
No. 550035
>>549978All I got was a lifetime of anger, resentment and bitterness because of stronger/more influential people constantly bullying me and taking advantage of me throughout my life.
When I moved to a rich Western country it only increased because I saw my life was even shittier than I originally thought, and people here thought only about their petty issues like which pronouns to use and they thought these problems were the hardest thing in the world to handle. On top of that they were both scared of me and disgusted by me because I was a "bad" foreigner, even though nobody will actually tell that to your face.
Knowing all this makes me really bitter and jaded. It shows in every conversation I have with another human being. Even people who love me say I'm a good person but really negative and unpleasant. I'm not mean or evil and I'm aware of this but faking positivity just makes me look unhinged, which makes people avoid me, which repeats the cycle, and it's extremely heartbreaking constantly hearing that "happy girls are the prettiest" or that someone is attracted to a girl because she has a "cute, bubbly personality". I don't think there's a single baby picture of me smiling even.
People think having a hard past and growing up in a shit environment is like in movies where the character mopes for 5 minutes and then gets over it and becomes a badass. In reality, people have lasting consequences from growing up in poor conditions and often become unstable and ostracized in some way because life isn't a DC comic book and you're not Batman.
No. 550056
>>550030I'm
>>550001 and yeah I meant
>>550011 and if you think the shit in your pic isn't annoying then you probably just don't browse much/often. Yeah, it's not "pronoun sperging" and it's totally harmless, but after seeing it repeatedly and consistently across many threads every single day, yes, it is really annoying and predictable. Especially because it sometimes derails the entire thread.
Again, I'm not trans or queer or a man in disguise, I don't bat an eye at people saying retard and fag and shit (typically nobody comes in flipping out about why you should or shouldn't say those), I completely understand some pinkpill points about internalized misogyny as
>>550005 pointed out. It's specifically people like
>>550019 >>550002 who get on my nerves, and not because I think I'm the sjw savior of all those precious trans people who can do no wrong. It's just really repetitive and sometimes unrelated to the topic. Was this clear enough for the speedreaders and cherrypickers?
No. 550106
>>550051I don't think physical punishment makes kids behave better. My cousin's kids are absolute brats sometimes and I know their dad spanks/yells at them a lot. I think it actually encourages their brattiness somehow. The older one will imitate the punishments from their dad onto the younger one, which is really fucking sad to me.
Punishment should be explaining why they're wrong and why their actions are hurtful, and taking away their privileges, like no more TV/iPad, going to bed early, no dessert after dinner, make them do extra chores, etc.
Most of my family uses physical punishment on their kids and laughs at the ~snowflakes~ who are against it, but I just plain don't think it works.
No. 550122
>>550055>old enough to know right from wrongthat's not a thing, you
teach kids right from wrong, humans aren't just born with morals and logic that grows with age. if you have to hit your kids you are a shit parent and raised them badly. period.
No. 550175
>>550005This. I was a TRA until I actually had the misfortune of interacting with AGPs personally.
>>550001I don't have the same level of autistic hatred for trannies that some people here do. Honestly my problem is more with the culture that enables trannies than trannies themselves. Like we literally live in a culture where people think it's logical to chemically castrate themselves simply because they act outside of gender stereotypes. That's pretty weird, and ironically, really conservative.
>>550016It does happen, but I've literally only seen it happen on imageboards and Kiwifarms. Everywhere else on the internet, people chimp out if you call a guy in a dress "he."
>>550039>Almost every woman in the world disagrees with you.Wrong. The vast majority of women don't care about tranny bullshit one way or the other because they have more important shit to worry about. Assuming that literally everyone on Earth agrees with you just because most clowns on Twitter do is absurd.
No. 550208
>>550106I've seen examples like you described, too.
I'm pretty sure being beaten as a child actually increases the chances of developing mental issues, and becoming a violent adult or criminal.
There are better ways to discipline children, like you said.
No. 550291
>>550253I couldn't sit through this man's voice for up to 5 minutes, let alone 13. The Sarah Jeong controversy is literally two years old now, too.
I don't understand how people like this have an audience, and how people who upload content like this don't hate themselves.
No. 550300
File: 1588672716366.png (1.98 MB, 1600x1600, callmecarson-katerino-fitz-dra…)
I never really felt that bad for callmecarson. These dorky streamers go for 10/10 girls they have absolutely nothing in common with and then it predictably goes horribly
No. 550336
File: 1588680546646.png (69.77 KB, 600x500, 15819639638221.png)
>>548392I think it's weird for lesbians to enjoy yaoi
No. 550337
>>550175>>550005I also used to be a TRA before having a lot of interaction with them. That seems to be somewhat common on here. The most disturbed close friend I ever had was a FTM who basically aspired to embody
toxic masculinity. She sexually harassed me in ways worse than any man ever has, was prone to extreme temper tantrums, would go on about wanting to commit mass shootings all the time, the list goes on. I ghosted her and haven't spoken to her in years, but I'm always waiting for the day she snaps and I find out about it in the news.
No. 550344
Jocks, “Chads”, athletes, alphas—whatever you want to call them, make the best boyfriends/are some of the safest men to be around. And NO just being violent doesn’t make a guy any of these things. I know that weaker/shyer guys probably do suffer a lot of problems that go unnoticed by the community at large, but honestly it doesn’t matter to me because any so called “nice guy” (though they never actually call themselves that, but by which I mean the typical perception of them) is usually insecure and dangerous, they have no understanding of what it means to be strong and they abuse the responsibility when they’re with their girlfriends (the one and often first occasion they’ve had to throw their weight around). I saw an anon on here saying that firefighters are the biggest red flag dating options but I CANNOT relate, my boyfriend is a firefighter who is friends with tradesmen, police officers and ex-military almost exclusively, they are all well put together and respectful and really really open minded. My advice would be to look for the upper/better versions of the stereotype e.g. Electricians, naval officers, detectives, degree qualified etc. I know this might sound really weird but I went to a really liberal art school where more typical males were really stigmatised but I’ve never felt safer than in my current circle of friends. My boyfriend said that physical strength comes with responsibility, which is what should empower men to do the right thing. He’s really interested in the principle behind civil service and treats it as something noble, I know it sounds silly but when in the right hands old school notions and traditions can be really powerful.
No. 550350
>>550344I believe this to an extent, traditionally masculine men have certain qualities that are favorable for many women but they don't exist in uniform
for e.g their are plenty of intellectual type males who are also muscular and traditionally masculine and certain jobs do bring out an innate nature in males that forces to become masculine
No. 550354
>>550344Sure, I agree with most of the groups you listed, but frat boys could be considered jocks or chads and I think they’d suck to be with.
My ideal man would be an engineer so I think we’re on the same page? When you mention ex-military and tradesmen, I get more of a “male version of a horse girl” vibe than a chad or jock. I think chads and jocks more so go on to become businessmen or lawyers
No. 550370
>>550321Lmao I agree with you anon but men rarely if not ever date down. Men these days even resent beautiful women out of their league if they feel their girlfriends or wives don't work enough and hand over an adequate amount money.
Unfortunately right now we are expected to be paragons of morality, and these hypothetical situations where women could hit back when men are the vulnerable ones don't really exist.
Even though I personally don't really care when women cheat on men (I believe half the time it's justified or circumstantially excusable), it's best they don't because it just solidifies male
victim complex and makes life more difficult for us all.
No. 550433
>>550365>there's plenty of women-written lesbian romances…Literally where? And no it can't be a virtue signaling empowering tumblr doodoo with intentionally unattractive characters, I don't want my romances and erotica being only about making a strong political stance on human rights, I read fiction solely for escapism. The only legitimately relatable and interesting one I've seen around that wasn't preachy as fuck is My Lesbian Experience With Loneliness and that was more of an autobiographical work than a fictional romance story. I also hate how if they're not straight out male sex fantasies, so many girl on girl stories play lesbians as some beautiful ethereal beings whose love making is more of an avant-garde art performance than sex. I don't find that relatable, I'm not a goddamn high elf or an arts student. Lesbians can be horny and vulgar too.
I'm so fucking sick of this "if you're a lesbian how come you like watching guys fucking huh???" narrative people constantly try to play as some sort of a retarded gotcha. First of all I'm not very comfortable with sexualizing female bodies in certain situations. Reading lesbian erotica always makes me think that some gross man is reading this and masturbating to it. That absolutely kills the mood for me and I can't help it. The BL community is like 99.9% female and I feel more comfortable in there without men around, and knowing that they hate gay shit and find it repulsive makes it a ~safe zone~. Because the characters are so female-coded I find them relatable and their relationship dynamics way more interesting. Like they don't act like real men at all. And that's the exact reason why I like it.
Excuse my spergout but this exact thing is like one of my top-5 pet peeves around and I'm one hundred percent tired of it.
No. 550586
>>550344yeah people rag on military types, and for good reason, but I know a lot of people who were genuinely set straight by their military experience, myself included. I had a friend in high school (typical three-sport jock who was kind of a jerk) who I recently reconnected with who had a stint in the Marines, and he's so incredibly open-minded and kind now compared to how he was before. It brings out either the best or worst in people, imo.
>>550354>male version of a horse girlfuckin kek anon this is so accurate
No. 550694
>>550692Not trying to racebait but there are a lot of Koreans who think not liking Korean food (especially kimchi) is a form of racism when it’s all about personal taste
I would never go out of my way to tell a Korean I don’t like the food, but even when they ask (and they do frequently) if you like it, you have to say yes or they’ll likely be personally offended
No. 550708
>>549961>I don't understand why so many people my age flex the fact they grew up dirt poor and belittle the accomplishments of those who didn'tUsually it's when people who succeed at what they do brag about it and think they're self-made. I know a lot of people who had a good life and accomplished a lot of things because they always had access to a lot of resources and nobody shit talk them, meanwhile I also know a lot of rich kids who were spoiled by mommy and daddy and think they're hot shit for doing the bare minimum and they're generally disliked by normal people.
Think of it as how people shit talked about Trump saying his father gave him a small loan of one million dollars, what made them angry isn't that his father helped him by itself but that he talked like that was a super normal thing and like one million dollars is a small sum of money when it's pretty huge to the majority of people.
No. 550715
>>549776>music from people like Billie Ellish doesn't take talent or skillIt very much does, it's just not
musical talent of skill. Few things that used to take technique do anymore, save for the small niche that is autistic enough
in a positive sense to care about technique. Saying Ellish can't make music for shit is like saying Stephanie Meyer can't write for shit - it's true, but no1curr
Sage for explaining the obvious
No. 550818
File: 1588746109393.jpg (1.71 MB, 3000x2000, home-family-papa-rellena-with-…)
>>550694Spicy kimchi
is really delicious, though. But yeah it is irritating when people take it personally when you don't like their favorite food. My mom is mildly lactose intolerant and people are so rude to her for not liking cheese.
What I don't understand is people who just hate an entire culture's food. There's got to be a least one dish they haven't tried yet that they'd like. It's irritating to be friends or family with someone who refuses to ever go to Mexican restaurants, for instance. Indian food is probably the type that has the most people who just refuse to try any of it, just because of the "spicy" and "indigestion" stereotypes. I understand disliking specific things, like curry or sushi, but most cultures have a huge variety of dishes.
As an aside, if any of you anons haven't tried it already, give Peruvian food (pic related) a try. Everything they do with potatoes is amazing.
No. 550858
>>550802>>550819I also read it, I even own 3 mangas of it and I still think it's bad.
So where's the difference? Still won't change my opinion.
No. 550917
>>550372>>550419>>550433I'd say fanfictions are the most prolific, there's many well written ones depending on the fandom.
There's VN apps like Lovestruck and Choices if you're more into light cheesy stuff.
There's interactive novels (choiceofgames), for example Wayhaven Chronicles.
On goodreads there are many lesbian book recs you can check out (esp the ones published by Bold Strokes).
As for manga, I know Their Story (it's a Chinese manga) whose writer is a woman and it's very non-male-gazey and nice.
No. 550927
>>550265Big kek
>>550291Agree, but that was an example, one of many. Point was double standards not how audible the scrote isn't.
No. 551053
File: 1588795819333.jpg (37.1 KB, 750x209, 95689439_1971680616296119_7826…)
What futility, unpopular opinion is next! Then vent and other complaint threads
Just because people geta little rowdy on imageboards we really shutting down replies in a place made for posting and replying lol
My unpopular opnion is females really can’t handle any discomfort or disagreement
Maybe women aren’t supposed to participate n chans after all(>>meta)
No. 551057
>>550959what really concerns me is how common / mainstream it's becoming to sell nude pictures or be a sugar baby.
i feel like we're nearing a time when people will tell unemployed women to just suck it up and be a prostitute because it's a job like any other.
and the way onlyfans and such websites are made to be enticing to naive young women looking for extra money is really gross.
No. 551087
>>551084just because you've only seen it here doesn't mean it's not true
go open twitter, they're everywhere
No. 551211
>>551053I don't know why you're bringing gender into this, that literally never goes well, but this is so weird. Anons will either post less confessions because everyone wants their (you), or it'll become normal to cross post commentary into another thread.
This is a gossip site, people are here to pass judgement.
No. 551224
>>551211The op actually says no judgements,
confess, confess, confess!.
>>551061It is pretty cringey when you can larp in a mmo or RPG.
>>551087Not just twitter, there are memes and jokes about it everywhere because even normies realize it's blowing up.
No. 551255
>>551245She’s not trad. she acts trad and doesn’t was makeup and such because of her newer fan base is full of redpill retards
>>551243I seen someone saying they agree with her or like her foranti porn shit, I just found out she follows that incel who sings the Scott pilgrim song
No. 551517
>>551377they'll never see it that way because most of them see themselves as the underdogs and think they're getting back at WOMEN by being misogynist. a lot of men see themselves as expendable and inherently worthless so they overcompensate by putting everything they have into being special and useful wrt their jobs and accomplishments. they think we have inherent worth and leverage over them even though we don't usually feel that way. all their chauvinist shit is basically a giant cope to make them feel more important. they're projecting when they call us useless and inferior, but we take it literally because we're insecure about being less strong and aggressive. they don't even take that into consideration because of their lower empathy. they just assume we live in their worldview.
i think they're generationally traumatized from dying en masse in battles or being at the mercy of natural selection so they degrade and devalue women to cope.
No. 551727
>>551566Seems like. If you pushback against them at all you get a ban for infighting or all commentary is banned. The site has become so homogenous and banning commentary will probably only make it worse.
Some degree of disagreement and infighting is probably good for the board but I guess it’s hard for mods to strike that balance.
No. 551766
>>551566Anyone can confess as they please, it just isn't the place for anons to
debate or
infight about confessions.
No. 551796
>>551392>Rejecting men tactfully so they won't destroy your self esteem, get scary, or just be a whiny mess is absolutely draining.Why would you let some retarded moid's obvious cope affect your self-esteem? Develop some self-esteem and learn to set boundaries like an emotionally healthy adult, and simply stop talking to men after you've rejected them. The "get scary" part is the only
valid thing you mentioned. I think a lot of anons have a lot of issues in life because they're doormats who never assert themselves.
No. 551812
File: 1588952798138.jpeg (104.24 KB, 717x630, 778A3AE8-8510-46F1-9944-DC03DF…)
>>551726Girls and women with with issues really should stay away from guys who are open about visiting hellholes like r9k. I could never do that myself after the tragedy that occurred with Bianca Devins and how the soulless users on there enabled that shit.
On a lighter note, I’m unsure how unpopular this opinion is on here but I feel meh towards JoJo’s Bizarre Adventure. I had to check it out after seeing the annoying fanbase shill it endlessly. The animation is great and it’s definitely fun to watch at times. My problem with it is that there are so many glaring inconsistencies with the plotlines, weak and downright condescendingly weird treatment of female characters (like Jotaro’s mom for example), some poorly-written make characters in general, and glorification of mindless violence/gore as a means of conflict resolution. I can see the appeal of it but I don’t get why it’s considered one of the best series of all-time like many of its annoying fans claim.
No. 551855
File: 1588960510253.jpg (28.35 KB, 600x468, 0c4.jpg)
>>551839I went on one date with a guy like this. I offered him a bite of my stir-fry (it was beef and generic veggies) and he said he doesn't eat vegetables at all. He also claimed to not drink water, only soda and juice.
No. 551908
>>551831>>551825Jotaro is definitely a fuckhead in part 3, but the thing that redeems him imo is that he does measurably grow as a person by the end of part 3 (there's a detail in the anime for part 4 where it shows him driving away from the mc's house, and he uses his turn signal which made me laugh when I first saw it), and even though he's a delinquent with an absentee dad trying very hard to be cool, he stands out by having a really strong sense of justice and never asking for recognition or praise for anything he does. He is explicitly NOT a kind or loving person, or a good guy, but he's still the hero because Dio is both a bad guy and actually evil. I used to hate him but he's my favorite jojo now tbh.
also you'd think he'd be a power fantasy character, and maybe he is in japan, but I usually see him ranking middle to low on popularity rankings on 4chan/reddit/other male-populated spaces. Joseph is far more desirable by male fans because he doesn't need a Stand. He actually probably has a worse sense of justice and morality than Jotaro does. People love the tommy gun scene in part ii but Jotaro would never do something like that.
All that aside though the characters are meant to be over-the-top. Jotaro yelling at his mom and calling her a bitch is supposed to be for comedy because she literally just broke him out of jail when he says it kek.
/end jojo sperging
No. 551913
>>551862>>551868Both true
>>551877How to scope good dick without having to fuck them. Can't we yelp those dick appointments or is that """sexist""" or whatever
No. 551914
>>551862I haven't personally seen casual sex causing it but with long term relationships I have. People stick around in bad relationships for too long thinking it'll all somehow work out.
I'm kind of babyfaced but I did have a bunch of health complaints slowly pile up in my last long term relationship. All went away within weeks of moving away from him. Glad I didn't spend a fortune on medical tests. Was all stress induced.
No. 552071
>>551953Huh, I can't recall a time when doing the right thing screwed me over. Sometimes you don't get anything back, but if you're 'doing the right thing' and expecting anything more than an internal moral payoff you're missing the point a bit.
I CAN think of plenty of times when being a total doormat screwed me over, maybe you're having trouble telling the difference? It's a thin line sometimes.
No. 552086
>>551953Being average, I only got satisfaction by doing the right thing, which is not necessarily the “nicest” thing. Sometimes it hurts, doing the right thing or even people think you’re not “nice” because you didn’t let them get what they wanted.
As Anon above said, there is difference between being nice and a doormat. One comes with respect for your feelings and others’. Being a doormat might seem respectful, but it really isn’t, not for you nor for others.
No. 552113
>>551908My unpopular Jojo opinion is that Giorno is criminally underrated. He was straight up considered "worst Jojo" until Vento Aureo got its anime adaptation (then he became more popular, it's almost as if some people didn't actually read the mango) but I never understood why. He's always been one of my favorites.
He's smart, calm but not stoic like Jotaro, he's kind and cares a lot about his friends and has no issue showing it. Shoutout to my boy Giorno
No. 552147
File: 1589041709543.jpg (131.6 KB, 768x768, 411cb3137f5b47601285907437463d…)
>>552105Who doesn't like Clannad? It's pretty highly rated on most websites (for good reason).
No. 552192
>>552177>crycore breeder propagandaFucking kek anon.
Still love me some Clannad tho.
No. 552209
>>552142That term became popular to due usage in stupied redpill/manosphere circles. It was never a term to punish horny men as much as it was an excuse to be misogynistic. It’s the mainstream 2020 equivalent of calling someone an orbiter or whiteknight.
I agree on you regarding how it’s being misuses nowadays. It’s like how incel gets casually thrown around by normies for any guy displaying even the slightest display of sexist behavior. Incels are sexists but not all sexists are incels, basically.
No. 552223
>>552177>crycore breeder propaganda to feel alive I guess? I honestly don’t think it’s good on any technical levelThis. Clannad is fucking trash and complete autoplagiarism. I loled so hard about people watching Air and Kanon and deciding that those are unoriginal when Clannad is ripping off those hard.
Also Clannad is too fucking long and unfunny as fuck.
I am not saying Air and Kanon were masterpieces, but at least those vns/anime were short and to the point and weren't reusing the same characters/tropes for the second or third time (depending how you look at it)
No. 552233
>>552215lmao this argument reminds me of how there are actually two meanings of the term hoe, and it actually used to be differentiated by different spellings. hoe = gardening tool, ho = rude word for a woman you don't like. but i guess nobody could remember this and now both are just spelled like h-o-e.
i feel like i'm the only one that recalls that there used to be two different spellings of this word and it makes me feel like i'm fucking insane.
No. 552241
>>552229Yeah I definitely think advertising yourself as sensitive and a 'helper' type can attract people who take advantage, but I don't like to conflate that with 'doing the right thing'. I think refusing to be manipulated by a person trying to use you IS doing the right thing, there's nothing moral about letting a terrible person be rewarded for manipulation. Or you know if you wanna be Jesus you could acknowledge within yourself that they're taking advantage and help them anyway with full self-awareness, but I think the common thread is acting with some sort of integrity.
In the church I grew up in people used to joke that even when you ask 'what would Jesus do?' you should remember that 'yell and flip tables' is among your recorded options.
No. 552247
File: 1589057858597.png (40.26 KB, 1244x476, rGNuyDJ.png)
>>552240Conspiracy theorists can be just as cruel with their words. Every conspiracy theorist I've come across has been mean as hell and the false information they spew is harmful.
No. 552256
>>552252I find body nitpicking retarded in general because if that makes a cow, then by all accounts this website should be swamped with ana and obese chans who have had the audacity to exist on the internet.
A lot of it is jealousy. A lot of it is just anons shitting their pants over someone else getting something that they don't deserve whether that thing is money, attention, or whatever.
No. 552264
>>552252honestly, there are so many threads on this board where this seems to constitute the majority of "milk" on the person.
on that note, here's another unpopular opinion: a lot of cows on this board aren't milky enough to warrant threads.
No. 552273
File: 1589064662876.jpeg (342.51 KB, 736x727, 1585511854635.jpeg)
>>552254Are you talking about this e-girl in particular? It's strange how so many people are wking her when she's obviously fat.
No. 552275
>>552267>a lot of people just can't accept that their cows aren't milky anymore because they've become weirdly attached to them. God, this.
The Momokun thread has been dead for like two years at this point. I think the Umineko CMV drama was the last actually interesting thing about her, even when she recently went fully topless and started showing her vagina topped with the assplug stuff it just didn't do it for me anymore, she had been old news for a good while. She went from one of the most milkiest and histrionic cows on the board to a basic e-thot flashing her goodies to grab neckbeard bucks, sometimes dressing up in a 100% commissioned costume. Yet anons can't let go and keep raking through her every instastory and repeat the same "lolol momo so fat she said she wasn't a sex worker" joke again and again. I knew the party was over when the thread started attracting spergs who straight out admitted they're "not interested in her boring cosplay drama" and how they just want to laugh at how fat and trashy she is.
Really miss the times when the focus was on her scamming people, continuously picking fights on Twitter, airing her dirty laundry for everyone to see, stealing character/costume designs, ghosting conventions, lying about getting liposuction, posting stupid faux spiritual stuff and making cosplays with the worst construction you've ever seen while claiming to have a real eye for detail. She's getting older though so I guess she gradually started growing up while her threads' demographic got younger and dumber.
No. 552283
same anon as
>>552274 and I wanna add, it bugs me when people say there shouldn’t be a thread for a fucked up person just because they haven’t hurt enough people or done enough wrong. Horrorcow trainwrecks are still cows.
No. 552296
>>552295>acting like an embarrassing edgy incel online>sperging out at any criticism Nah she deserves her thread as much as Erin Painter did, not my cup of tea for threads but you seem overly wk'y.
>>552279Pretty sure it was one of her orbiters or a troll.
No. 552316
File: 1589070568094.jpeg (55.92 KB, 565x182, 51C82593-0B45-41E0-B6F1-B4B13E…)
>>552279Even more annoying is the white knights who defend some fat ugly bitch who hates other women
No. 552447
>>552422The nitpicking in Twitch (Anisa's) thread is out of control, I hope mods get off their ass and correct it soon. Shouldn't this bitch be in cam hoe general anyway?? There are probably 3 different streamers grooming children in their discord right fucking now but I've read about Anisa's dirty carpet, feet, and fake tits for a month straight. They're reverse psyching me into thinking she is based for
triggering icuckz fanboys and girls this hard.
No. 552636
File: 1589165288380.jpg (97.7 KB, 940x683, tumblr_b59721c7450b044fd64ba1c…)
>>552627All asexuals have something that explains their so called asexuality.
Depression or other mental illness, hormone imbalances, malnutrition, medication, autism, trauma, all of these can cause your sex drive to be low or non-existant, and every asexual has one of those things going on, its pretty simple and explainable.
Taking medication for blood pressure? boom no sex drive.
Depressed? no sex drive.
good ole tism? no sex drive.
Non existant sex drive is a huge symptom that something is wrong with your body and people decided to make an identity out of it without tackling the real cause of it.
inb4 that whole "asexuals are not broken!!!" spiel, yes you are go see a doctor.
No. 552639
>>552636I don't think there's anything wrong with lacking an interest in sex, I think you can have a naturally low libido. But I just don't think most asexuals are genuinely completely disinterested in the first place. They're always coming up with retarded subdivisions of asexuality to justify their sexual desire, like ~grey asexuals~. And take someone like Kenna who would claim asexuality and simultaneously fawn over cute male anime characters - it's obvious she's attracted to them, but men irl just don't measure up to her fantasies so asexuality it is!
Anyway I don't take issue with the concept of asexuality (meaning low/no libido), but more whatever god awful personality someone would need to have to use 'asexual' to describe themselves, as if it's a sexual orientation or identity equivalent to being gay. Just say you have a low sex drive and move on, snowflake.
No. 552651
>>552645How would you know there are loads of them in certain professions but also say that they are non cringe and don't use labels? If they keep it to themselves you wouldn't know.
If asexuality was defined as a lack of attraction to either men or women that could be reasonable, too bad 99% of people who publicly claim asexuality also have a demonstrable preference for a certain gender. Usually men, because most asexuals are tumbrlinas who post about fictional male characters all the time and write gay porn.
No. 552654
>>552645>no attraction to either men and women>no sex driveyou realize in the end these are the same things right? You don't want to fuck either, you don't want to fuck anyone, wow no sex drive.
>there's lots of non-cringe ace people who never make a label out of it and are just single all their lives or fine with a dead bedroom,I live alright with hypoglicemia, that doesn't mean its not a health problem that I can get fixed.
>You find a lot of them in professions that require loads of dedication and time.workaholics also deal with a plentitude of issues,(stress, shitty diets, lack of exercise) that can cause low sex drive.
also typical holier than thou uwu proud asexy behavior lmao
No. 552665
>>552627They say asexuals aren’t real because they don’t like them. It’s that simple.
>>552636Just because someone’s asexuality might be
caused by something doesn’t mean that that person can’t use the “asexual” label. It’s a helpful label for those who don’t have sexual desire. An asexual is someone who doesn’t have any sexual desire. People who don’t have any sexual desire exist. Asexuals exist.
>>552651>too bad 99% of people who publicly claim asexuality also have a demonstrable preference for a certain gender. Which is perfectly reasonable, considering aesthetic attraction toward someone is not the same as wanting to fuck them. Plenty of asexuals still desire romantic relationships with a certain sex.
No. 552666
>>552651Because I ask them and they explain it like that without ever knowing what a tumblr is.
>>552654It's not the same thing, you can still get horny and want to masturbate without lusting after someone else.
Here's me unpopular opinion: people get so seething about asexuals since they're secretely jealous as their own sexuality has caused them more problems than positives in life and they wish it just wasn't there.
No. 552667
>>552665you're right anon but we live in 2020 and a woman who doesn't want casual sex is a prudish tradthot with internalized misogyny. you're just going to get
go back to tumblr responses
>>552666the last part makes sense. you can't deny that the world would be much better and easier to live in if most people were asexual
No. 552668
>>552666>secretly jealousJesus Christ the level of stuck upness is why people hate asexuals, they always act like they are better and above normal people for being oh so evolved and above carnal desires.
Oh the world would be so much better if people were like Me Me Me!!
>>552667And people wouldn’t hate asexuals so much if you didn’t act like people who have normal sex drives were retarded animals just like you’re doing right now.
No. 552684
>>552665No one gives a god damn that you don’t want to fuck. It’s the fact that you lot think “ace” is a sexual identity like being gay, which it isn’t, and you belong in LGB, which you don’t. The most oppressive thing you can experience is your mom telling you “Why haven’t you got a gf/bf yet” which, news flash, something all of us dirty sexuals also go through.
>>552666 is prime example of their stupidity
>their own sexuality has caused them more problems than positives in lifeOk true, no one has ever killed you for being asexual, we’re definitely jealous. Can you fuck off and go play with legos or whatever you do now.
No. 552686
>>552675i said that bc it came up in a previous discussion about asexuality here. there's a word in french that would describe the lots of you, complexées. kind weird that you assume that asexual people must be coping with their celibacy when we all know any woman can get laid whenever she wants but ok. you come off as a hardcore femcel, and it's not a word i usually use. beside the obnoxious danger hair special gender 'folks' on tumblr, i still don't understand why people deciding to not have sex makes you seethe so much. and i don't see why not wanting sex MUST be a health problem. you see many coomers around getting horny at the sight of a woman wearing leggings and no one says "ngeh, you should see a doctor". i know people irl who call themselves asexual, they have consulted multiple specialists and it has been confirmed that nothing is wrong with them. so what do you want? an asexual woman to date a non asexual man and sit there, being used as a cocksleeve, while she's reading a book? lol. i also didn't see someone say that having sex is wrong, but i see people saying that not having sex is unnatural. it's kinda like saying gay people are unnatural because they're not procreating. not that i am comparing our plights to asexuals because, well, they're not persecuted, just misunderstood.
>>552684…did an asexual person steal your bike or something lmao
No. 552687
>>552684>It’s the fact that you lot think “ace” is a sexual identity like being gay, which it isn’t, and you belong in LGB, which you don’t.There is no official council who determines who is, and who isn’t part of the LGBT community. No matter how much you seethe about this complete non-issue on your ace discourse tumblr blog, you aren’t going to stop asexuals from affiliating with the community, lol. Also, yes, being asexual is a sexual identity/orientation. Not sure how it isn’t.
>us dirty sexualsNo one has ever called you that lol
>The most oppressive thing you can experience is your mom telling you “Why haven’t you got a gf/bf yet” Who ever said that asexuals are systematically oppressed? Asexuality is a minority sexuality which is subject to stigmatism and ostracism, whether you want to admit it or not.
>>552686The anon you’re replying to is probably so enraged at the existence of asexuals because she has built a caricature of what an “asexual” is in her head from constantly hanging around internet echochambers.
No. 552696
>>552636This. The reason why people here can't stand asexuals is that they're claiming to be a sexuality on par with being gay. You will never face the same issues as gay people do when you openly identify as an "asexual".
>>552665It's true that I don't like asexuals. I don't like how they try to shoehorn themselves into the LGB community only due to having a niche "sexuality" that doesn't affect their life in a meaningful way. And yes, I'm also jealous that they get to be fucking smug about their super special sexuality because it never makes them face any consequences but gives you all the benefits of belonging into the super sekrit LGBTQA+++ club only because someone decided being pansexual was so 2015 and came up with the next trend. You won't be disowned by your parents for being asexual. You won't have a job denied for being asexual. You won't be beat up or hollered at on the street when walking with your significant other because you're asexual. They simply can't identify with the issues LGB people face. Just because it feels mildly uncomfortable telling your coworkers you don't have a partner doesn't mean you're oppressed. Even if we play by Tumblr rules that allow you to be "gay" and asexual, even then the discrimination you face would be due to your homosexuality, not your asexuality.
Honest to god seen 12-year olds identifying as "asexuals" and I'd me much more worried if a kid that age had an active sex drive than didn't. Good christ.
>>552667>you're right anon but we live in 2020 and a woman who doesn't want casual sex is a prudish tradthot with internalized misogyny. Despite your spergery you're on the right tract but not quite there. Asexuality is a direct derivation of the "sex-positive" culture where if you're not constantly horny and looking for hookups it implies there's something different about you and this is where asexuals latch onto the label.
>>552686See the thing is that a lot of these "asexual activists" are pushing the definition to be closer to "whatever you want it to be", meaning you can be a horny fucker who consumes porn like a true cumbrain but finds irl relations icky due to lacking experience or bad experiences. It's completely fair for someone to be sex-repulsed or have a nonexistent sex drive but even then they have no business in LGB or talking about being persecuted against when their only worry is that "someone recommended us couples' therapy because they heard I don't fuck my boyfriend" or because someone on twitter dot com told you that "asexuality isn't real".
No. 552718
>>552713not trying to be an SJW, but lesbians and gay people actually face issues like being correctively raped, or
victims of hate crimes and actual murders due to their sexualities. there have been entire hate crime laws passed in the states directly due to unspeakably violent murders which have targeted gay people, even as recently as the 90s and 2000s. i have no stake in the argument and i think it's rehashed a bit too often, but it's not petty or pathetic to be insulted or offended by people who will never be at risk for those sorts of things to act like it's a remotely similar issue or on a similar level in any way
No. 552722
>>552713Agreed. Whenever I see ace discourse, it just seems like privileged people having a catfight. LGBT people worldwide are going through far, far too much for this to even be approached as a serious issue IMO.
Personally, I don't care if "A" is added to the LGBT or not. "T" isn't even a sexuality (as they claim, it's an identity), and tons of people who fall under "T" or advocate for it are awful nuisances who actually believe in corrective rape and conversion therapy, but it's still there. What's one more letter in this sinking ship? At least the aces won't call people bigots and harass them for sexually rejecting them, lmao.
Honestly, is anyone outside of some parts of the internet even trying to force this "asexual people in the LGBT club" thing? I haven't seen it.
No. 552744
>>552713> Is the whole point of your community just being oppressed and "you can't sit with us"?The ignorance in this is so strong.
The point of our community is supposed to be some sort of "home" for people who are gay/lesbian and know that they're not alone in this and have the support and love they need. Homosexuals have been murdered and harassed for years and years. Asexuals who think they have every right to invade this community when there is nothing about them that makes them LGBT is annoying. If they're gay/lesbian despite being asexual, then sure they're LGBT I guess, but if they're none of that and only "ace" then they can fuck off forever.
> Bunch of snowflakes. This whole discussion is truly pathetic>as a straight personI'm not even surprised.
>>552722> tons of people who fall under "T" or advocate for it are awful nuisances who actually believe in corrective rape and conversion therapy, but it's still thereNo one says this. I'm not fond of the "trans" folk either, but the majority of them are some extremely liberal people and the worst case they'll do is scream at a lesbian or gay person as "transphobic" for not wanting to have sex with them and their not transitioned bodies. None of them advocate rape or therapy as horrible as that because majority of them are extremely "woke".
> At least the aces won't call people bigots and harass them for sexually rejecting them, lmao. Is that why they push that "hearts not pants" uwu comment so fucking hard at any chance they get and call people who participates in NSFW stuff things like "sinner", "dirty" and so on? So many of them think they're "pure" because they haven't fucked anyone and don't have the desire to do so, brand their entire personality around it and so on. I mean sure, if you think you're asexual then ok, you do you I don't care, but minding your own business is one thing and trying to invade spaces that aren't meant for you and claiming oppression is another.
>>552730> Saying you want sex in a relationship is acephobic. I've not heard this one specifically, but came across a lot of asexuals who were mad/pissed at their partner for masturbating.
No. 552758
>>552730God don't even let me get started on the "corrective rape" wolf they're crying. Lesbians have been through corrective rape over centuries and still do to this day, an act that is hugely traumatic not only because it's rape but also because it's based on punishing you for something that you shouldn't be punished for. And in come the ~aces~ who brand "I slept with my boyfriend despite feeling uncomfortable with sex" as "corrective rape". If your boyfriend forced and coerced you into having sex then that's called marital rape, an entirely different issue altogether and not an issue exclusive to asexuals but all women having to suffer of not having the right to control their own body.
And before anyone says "Asexuals literally never say that!!!!" here's a fucking collection straight out of the twitter oven full of this discourse:
https://twitter.com/search?q=asexuals%20corrective&src=typed_query&f=liveA lot of them also do the retarded "OP is aphobic" jig to hijack the discussion to become a pity party for them when someone talks about how important sexuality is to LGB people as they've been repressed and forced to internalize a heteronormative view of sex.
No. 552763
>>552758 > If your boyfriend forced and coerced you into having sex then that's called marital rape, an entirely different issue altogether and not an issue exclusive to asexuals but all women having to suffer of not having the right to control their own body.Nta, as someone with just a lowish libido I've had shitty relationships where out of fear of losing the guy I've been pressured into sex that I didn't really want, what I hate now is those asexual women who basically say
> I don't want or enjoy sex but I'm a champ so I do it for my man!It just seems fucked up to me. I'm not even asexual and I feel awful about the sex I had just to please highly sexed exes
No. 552764
File: 1589200011852.jpg (35.77 KB, 625x626, bait.jpg)
>>552730>Saying you want sex in a relationship is acephobic.Unpopular opinion is tomato juice is fucking great. It can't be the cheap stuff though.
No. 552767
>>552744>Is that why they push that "hearts not pants" uwu comment so fucking hard at any chance they get and call people who participates in NSFW stuff things like "sinner", "dirty" and so on?Where is this happening? Who does this and unironically believes it? I've seen "hearts not parts" before, but only from trans people and self-proclaimed genderqueers. It sounds like you're trying to insinuate that asexual people oppress and shame others, but they really don't have that kind of power. If they're recognized at all, they're pretty universally known as either autistic, traumatized, physically unhealthy, or just people with low sex drives making too much of a big deal out of it. Is there anyone who truly thinks of them as "pure" or superior?
Like, I'm sorry, this whole debate and the emotional energy some people place into it is ridiculous to me. If your only evidence for asexuals being a plague is the odd, unfunny Tumblr or Twitter shitpost from blue-haired teenagers, is it really worth all of this? People are still being killed, thrown into conversion camps, getting raped, being forced to change their sex, etc all for not being straight. I sure hope the whole world gets to the point where the big, hot button issue is "the aces are at it again, trying to be special", that'd unironically be great.
No. 552843
>>552818absolutely.
a lot of teachers get some power trip from the job and take advantage of their role by being unnecessarily harsh. it's so angering
No. 552868
>>552778relationships without sex can exist, and everyone wants and deserves to be loved
:-)>>552697>Nobody gives a fuck about you peopleobviously many people do, seeing this thread
>>552696yeah the meaning of asexual is very broad because nowadays, anything can mean anything. you can be straight and cis, and still call yourself queer. tbh, i used to find it cringey when asexuals tried to fit in the lgbt community but i don't really care for it anymore.
>they have no business […] talking about being persecuted againstyep, that's what i said. i just think it's weird that people complain about asexuals and not "asexual activists" like you say
>>552731they probably saw a tumblr post saying this and they assume that every asexual person thinks the same way. you know, like when people say they aren't/hate feminists because of that ONE ridiculous SJW tweet when it has nothing to do with the movement
>>552758>twitterwhat did you expect? common sense?
No. 552907
>>552818This seems to be the case a lot of the time with K-12 teachers. My high school teachers in particular were a joke and the turn-over rate was outrageous. I had teachers that regularly showed up drunk, or cried about their problems in class in the middle of lessons. I don't remember any of them being able to appropriately handle "problem" students, and would just fight back with them. My choir instructor regularly gossiped with all of us about all the drama she was involved with outside of class, usually with student's parents or other instructors. It was ridiculous.
My mom is an elementary school teacher, and she and her friends are no better, from what I can tell. My mom is an alcoholic who relapses every couple of years or so. She showed up to work drunk or hung over almost every day for all of 2016. She would tell me about how all of her friends are involved in bad relationships, or bad marriages, how they were constantly on edge and snapping at all the kids, etc. Apparently the principals for K-12 schools are usually pretty shitty people, too, which just makes for an even more
toxic working environment.
Getting a BA and teaching credentials isn't that hard, and K-12 teaching positions at public schools are always high in demand because it's such a shitty, thankless job with little pay. I honestly wouldn't be surprised if people who have unresolved trauma/issues are more likely to take those jobs because they don't expect anything better, and because they're too emotionally unstable to handle the heavier workload and higher expectations that come with teaching at a university level. Most of my professors have a Ph.D, even the ones that aren't full-time.
I've had some nutty college-level professors, but most of them seem like pretty level-headed and genuinely intelligent people. The competency of your average college professor vs. your average K-12 teacher, imo, is like night and day.
I often wonder if K-12 teachers at private schools are any better.
No. 552955
>>552907In my country teacher's degree takes actual dedicated effort to get and you have to get a master's degree both in your major and an extra degree in pedagogy in order to qualify, yet so many of them are bonkers. I have no idea why. I've met maybe one teacher who wasn't an egoistical piece of shit who thought they were much more intelligent than they actually were and became even more jaded and bitter when they didn't turn out to be the school's favourite teacher. Teachers are also often oddly competitive with each other when it comes to student attention.
>>552948NTA but same here. I was shocked to hear how many absolutely sociopathic people I knew went into nursing. It must be the power trip.
No. 552957
>>552955The two nurses I know who have been really successful at it have both straight up admitted to me that they don't give a crap about helping people and are mostly in it for the money.
Most professions in the medical industry involve constant high-pressure situations and a high salary. It's literally a sociopath's dream job.
No. 553015
>>552985I like his music, but I agree that his recent sadboy stuff does kinda all sound the same. His collabs in particular really don't grab me at all, and I hate that they're all with normie fuckboys, some of which are like 10 years younger than he is.
I think his music videos help to make it more unique. They're pretty creative imo, especially sanctuary and gimme love.
No. 553176
>>553169>nursing for the money and and statuswhat where do you live that nursing is worth getting into for the money and status
nursing (where I am) is a shitty, overworked, low-wage job.
No. 553178
Fire Emblem Echoes is a shitty game through and through, it's only tolerable at the beginning when there's no dungeon and no swamp/desert maps, and Berkut should have been in another, better game.
Fire Emblem Fates base game > Fire Emblem 3H. I'd rather have a good game with a bad story that only amounts to short and dumb cutscenes than a boring, kinda OK game that has an equally shitty story once you actually pay attention to it and with much longer cutscenes.
The original Final Fantasy 2 might be a shitty game, idk, but it's PSP remake is good and I had fun with it, if someone is complaining about it because "to increase your stats and weapon/spell ranks you have to hit yourself in the head xD" is a turbo retard, you never have to do anything specific to improve your stats besides pay attention during random encounters.
Turn based battles aren't bad by themselves.
There are way more fake gamer dudes than the stereotypical "fake gamer girls" it's insane. I keep seeing men irl bragging about being experts in Call of Duty and FIFA who know NOTHING about video games in general. Like, they've never heard of Resident Evil or Final Fantasy, which a lot of normies know about even if it's just thanks to movie adaptations or ads.
No. 553210
>>553176most actual RNs make a median of $67k a year, and nurses in general are treated like hardworking heroes b most of the public.
The ones that are underpaid are typically the CNAs and other assistant type positions but that's only because they're typically burnouts who did an 8 week course as a last resort to get any kind of steady job.
No. 553590
I don't think the vast majority of people claiming to have BPD actually have BPD. You tend to know almost immediately if someone you're dealing with has a full-blown personality disorder. They are incredibly draining, abusive, and almost impossible to deal with. It goes way beyond having abandonment trauma and intense mood swings. There is a reason why a lot of therapists won't work with BPD patients, and this really becomes an issue if there's a high likelihood for misdiagnosis within the disorder. This means that a lot of people now have limited resources due to a problem they may not even have.
I don't even care if they were diagnosed by a professional. Diagnoses exist for insurance purposes. Doctors often have a lot to gain by diagnosing patients with more severe disorders. In-patient settings in particular can use such a diagnosis to justify a longer hospital stay to the person's insurance provider, for example. I'd go as far as to say that the better your insurance is, the more likely you are to land a serious diagnosis, since it's assumed you can pay out the ass for treatment centers specializing in BPD.
Keep in mind that BPD is the ONLY personality disorder that the APA claims is actually treatable. DBT therapy was specifically tailored to treat BPD. I promise it is not an accident that almost nobody leaves a hospital or psychiatrist's office with a diagnosis of ASPD or NPD. Neither of these disorders is considered treatable, there's no treatment protocol for NPD or ASPD, so there's nothing for the industry to gain by diagnosing anyone with them.
I think the same goes for autism, too. There are way too many socially awkward women with "weird interests" running around claiming to be on the spectrum these days, and I find it extremely suspicious.
No. 553599
>>553593finding out that someone has a diagnosis doesn't actually explain why that person is a bitch. a diagnosis is just behavioral criteria. it says nothing about the actual person.
i can't see why finding out a person has a diagnosis in this context would matter, or be gratifying for any reason other than you already not liking them because they're a bitch.
the issue with this type of thinking is that people come to associate specific labels with specific behavior, which can work both ways. for example, you may not take issue with someone at all until you find out they have a bpd diagnosis.
No. 553605
>>553590On that note, I don't think personalty disorders aren't treatable. Like, wtf, I don't get it. You can make a good, stable dog out of most aggressive and otherwise not ok dogs. Why not humans?
Sure, it takes time and maybe a lot of babysteps.
I'm diagnosed with BPD and NPD (they told me I'm the vulnerable type, what ever that means kek). Anyway an acid trip kicked me out of this shite.
No. 553609
>>553605How can you be NPD and BPD at the same time……
Personality disorders are “untreatable” because they are extremely treatment resistant on the account that maladaptive personality traits are such a core part of a person it’s almost too hard wired to change. “Mitigated” may be a better word. At best a person with personality disorder can play the part of socially acceptable behaviors as long as possible. The impulses and faulty subconscious thought process will always be there. And that’s only if the patient had any drive to commit at all, which is often not the case because of their disorder.
No. 553615
>>553605
>BPD and NPDThat's impossible, they're fundamentally different. You're probably just run of the mill
abusive snowflake.
>You can make a good, stable dog out of most aggressive and otherwise not ok dogs. Why not humans?Because humans are not dogs? If people could be conditioned into being good puppers the world wouldn't be so shit
>acid trip kicked me out of this shiteOh ok you're just retarded druggie
No. 553632
>>553605>I don't think that personality disorders aren't treatable.People who truly have PDs don't typically have the insight and self-awareness to acknowledge that anything is wrong with them. They either externalize their issues on to others, or they simply don't care. This, imo, should be part of the criteria for a diagnosis: the person is unwilling to a.) accept their diagnosis, b.) acknowledge the harm it does to themselves and others, and c.) make any amount of noticeable effort to change.
If we're going to say that BPD is somehow different from other personality disorders, in that people can actually improve or even go into complete remission, then it shouldn't be classified as a personality disorder at all.
>I'm diagnosed with BPD and NPD (they told me I'm the vulnerable type, whatever that means kek)It means your psychologist is a moron. I'd recommend getting a second opinion. Hell, for something as serious as two personality disorder diagnoses, I'd recommend many different opinions, from many different specialists. Unless they're all telling you the same thing, I wouldn't worry about the diagnoses themselves and just continue to seek help for whatever specific emotional issues are causing you distress. Trauma-informed therapies tend to be good for this, and there's typically not much of a focus on diagnoses.
>an acid trip kicked me out of this shiteThis isn't how PDs work. The traits associated with PDs are stable across all contexts. They don't just come and go in response to environmental
triggers.
>>553622NTA, but I am the one who wrote the initial post you're responding to, and yes, for the record, I'm an American and I only know how it works here in the U.S. The DSM is primarily a tool for diagnosing and treating patients, and the treatment itself is typically paid for via that individual's insurance. You're more than welcome to discuss how BPD is diagnosed and treated elsewhere. I'm actually curious to know myself.
No. 553643
>>553632>They don't just come and go in response to environmental triggers.Are drugs considered environmental
triggers? Perhaps the drug itself but the effect of a drug can alter brain chemistry dramatically. Also I know LSD used to be used for psychotherapy and I've read of single DMT experiences fundamentally changing a person for life. Similar to a near death experiences that can truly change you.
No. 553644
>>553625Yes yes I've done healthy amount of recreational hallucinogens and been treated with clinical ket myself.
Anons on the streets sure af aren't taking them in clinical doses while having therapeutic break-through with their psychologist.
>>553641What does self-awareness have to do with actually not being a disordered piece of shit?
No. 553648
>>553641>you're talking out of your arse if you think everyone with a pd is completely unaware of it, especially bpdYou should re-read my post again, because I already addressed this.
>>553643To my understanding, environmental
triggers in regards to mental health can be classified as either external or internal. I'd consider drugs to be internal, in that it's altering your internal environment (your brain chemistry, nervous system, etc).
To be fair, LSD is a powerful drug and I'm sure someone with a PD would react to it to a certain a degree, but I highly doubt it would lead to the long-lasting personality changes that the OP with the NPD/BDP diagnosis was suggesting.
No. 553652
>>553649>But the truth is humans are creatures of habit, most revert back to their old sober way of thinking and living immediatelyYou're correct. Psychoactive drugs can be beneficial in that they can momentarily take a person out of a chronic negative state, like clinical depression, and allow them to see that life can be better, but it takes considerable effort afterwards to ensure that the person maintains that state. It's by no means a guarantee that the person will never have problems again, and to my understanding, most people don't achieve a complete remission after taking these drugs once.
The studies surrounding psychoactive drugs are interesting, but the fact of the matter still stands that that everyone is different, and there's just no guarantee that a person is going to have a favorable, long-lasting reaction to them, which to me sounds no more promising than your typical SSRI.
No. 553655
>>553650I have to agree with this. I've never met anyone in a poly relationship that wasn't either
toxic and manipulative as hell, or a total codependent doormat.
Poly relationships also seem to be really common in the LGBTQ community for some reason.
No. 553666
>>553615>That's impossible, they're fundamentally different. You're probably just run of the mill abusive snowflake.My psychiatrist told me that those PDs are actually very similar and that a lot of psychiatrist say that they may even be the same
If you also tell me that my psych is an moron, I can just tell you that I think so too, cause all of them are.
No. 553674
>>553666Do you mean psychologist? Psychiatrists don't diagnose people with PDs or make debate about them. They specialize in pharmaceutical treatments of mental illnesses.
Well whomever you're seeing IS a moron. BPD and NPD core drives and world perceptions are very different. BPDs may exhibit narcissistic traits and both frequently use similar manipulation tactics, so they can LOOK similar to an outsider. A trained professional would know that the inner workings are different, that's why BPD therapy like DBT is unsuccessful for NPD.
No. 553691
>>553674Here in the U.S., a psychiatrist is considered a medical doctor, and they absolutely can and do diagnose people in addition to prescribing medication. Psychologists that hold a doctorate (Psy.D) can also diagnose people.
Generally speaking, anyone in the psych field with a master's degree or higher is trained to recognize specific disorders in clients, but it's only psychiatrists and those with a Psy.D that are legally allowed to diagnose them.
No. 553701
>>553622Ayrt my reply to
>>553594 had nothing to do with bpd.. talking about insurance and diagnoses in general.
No. 553724
>>553605I agree, I feel like this with all mental illnesses actually, that in almost all cases it is possible for them to be cured, as is the case with physical illness but for some reason the narrative around them has become that it’s inherently a life time thing to the point where people seem resistant to getting treatment and even resentful of people who recommend it, but obviously any illness - physical or mental - would be lifelong if you never treat it.
Also I had a similar experience with LSD regarding severe, debilitating social anxiety and agoraphobia, I think the research being done into its therapeutic effects could definitely be promising
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339234169_LSD_Overdoses_Three_Case_ReportsAnyway my unpopular mental illness opinion is that almost everyone if not everyone has, does, or will suffer from mental illness to some degree in their life and that gate keeping it and romanticising it does huge societal harm to everyone, it should be treated as if it is as mundane as physical illness because it is and should be casually talked about without the secretism or melodrama it currently is, we should be as informed about it as we are common physical illness so there is less mystery and misinformation surrounding it
No. 553787
>>553777But you don't need religion or politics to instill basic virtues?
>The only thing that I view as harmful is stopping that kid from thinking for themselves Yeah which is like exactly what religions and political agendas thrive on…
On the topic of teaching kids morals, people are too stuck on assigning good vs bad, especially about divisive topics, I think it discourages critical thinking. Kids can understand nuance more than we give them credit for. It's likely harder for the adult to give an impartial answer than it is for a child to accept it.
No. 553817
File: 1589441378584.jpg (20.87 KB, 268x268, hamuko.jpg)
Persona 5 is overrated. The plot is generic and filled with water, character development is shit. Persona 5 royal's new girl is a copy of female MC of Persona 3 and it still bugs me.
No. 554086
File: 1589525387019.jpeg (131.94 KB, 801x1080, 9431414A-420C-48B8-91A8-5E3E90…)
My very unpopular opinion: Doja cat ain’t allat. I can’t find the post but I saw a meme comparing doja cat with other female rappers saying she isn’t that promiscuous or whatever like ??? Uhm yes she is how is she any different? Jiggling your ass in a cow suit is still jiggling your ass. And the whole “If Say so gets to #1, I’ll show you guys my boobs” thing just made me like her less, you shouldn’t even feel accomplished that the song hit #1 might as well be on pornhub instead of Spotify
She is hot like very hot tho
No. 554087
>>554086>she isn’t that promiscuous Kek how would anyone know that, it's not like female celebs openly admit to how many people they fuck.
Though if you mean just like slutty/sexualized, in terms of that she's like… indistinguishable from any other female rapper. Juicy is about her ass, Go to Town is song about getting eaten out, Mooo is t&a everywhere. I think she pulls it off in a cutesy kinda way so maybe that's why people think she's different?
No. 554089
File: 1589526871626.jpg (65.28 KB, 1080x1092, f221e35797374e5e5ad0ee8b77f3ac…)
This is gonna be a truly unpopular option, but I believe Ifunny can be more funnier then reddit, tumblr, twitter and 4chan, it removes all the shit and politics from those communities and leaves only funny shit
No. 554097
>>554086She’s homophobic, and ugly. Her Juicy MV is her pretty much naked shaking her ass. A lot of sexual mentions too. She’s not not any less promiscuous than the rest of them.
Can’t believe some shit ass video of hers blew up as a joke, and now she’s a huge star. I hate this world.
No. 554121
>>554087No obviously she could be a Virgin or sleep with 10+ people a week, idc it’s more going off of her image and it’s not really what she says it’s more her fans making her out to seem better than other female rappers because of her seemingly less sexiness but I don’t think she’s any special
>>554088Yeah, I can’t find it but it was floating around Facebook and it was like
My goofy ass vs. those other bitches or something like that.
>>554097>>554115>>554118I don’t think she should be cancelled over some shit like that because Tyler the Creator and Joji and a bunch of other male artists haven’t been cancelled over similar stuff.
I don’t hate her or think she’s ugly but like.. I don’t see the appeal other than her sexiness.
No. 554157
File: 1589545445121.jpg (287.26 KB, 2100x2100, VeganCelebration.jpg)
"Meat substitutes" for vegetarians and vegans are actually pretty delicious. I don't know where most people get off on shitting all over these things but they aren't necessarily bad. Agreed that they fall short to replicate meat, but judging only on the taste in their own little category, they're quite tasty. I love the smokey and mushroomy flavor that these products tend to have. Not all of them use tofu anymore either, for example a lot of these products utilize things like lentil flour.
More people should give alternatives a try, instead of trying a piece of uncooked unseasoned tofu and determining it's all bland garbage just because of that. I looooooove meat and seafood, but it might become a reality in the not so distant future that we won't have the same access to them anyway. It doesn't hurt to integrate other things, but too bad the majority of people are scared to change and hate anything different than what they're used to.
No. 554168
File: 1589547089611.jpg (19.96 KB, 360x360, Christian_Clarke.jpg)
Karlie Kloss looks like Chris from Eastenders.
No. 554179
>>554173Hard disagree, religion can keep smaller communities in line if they're all in equal positions but whenever there's any form of hierarchical authority there is eventually corruption.
From religious leaders getting rich from believers to zealots using their beliefs to persecute others, religion ain't shit. I agree people need something to keep them in line, but we can just use the threat of prison time in their current lives instead of their imaginary afterlives.
Inb4 someone points out the justice system is as corrupt as the church
No. 554180
>>554173The problem is people have no inner moral compass and personal convictions because they're fucking retards who can't think for themselves and need the authority figures to tell them how to behave. Intelligent people already realize that rules and civility keeps societies good, and that benefits everyone and especially themselves.
Religion is for simpletons.
No. 554192
File: 1589553254692.jpeg (149.51 KB, 540x810, 1589468383069.jpeg)
I genuinely don't mean to sound contrarian, but I think the woman in the Stacy thread looks very generic. I wish we focused more on our own style and aesthetics instead of male opinions. And, it doesn't seem healthy to base your self-worth on how attractive others find you. People who like you solely for your appearance are unlikely to be good partners anyway.
No. 554238
>>554194>subcultures are for ugly peopleOK. I have to disagree. I guess some subcultures are considered 'hotter' than others (eboys vs. nerds). Sure, you won't universally be found 'hot' if you stand out. I just personally don't like conformity.
>It can be uncomfortable for some to have different tastes than pic related.Why is that? It's possible to not fit in the 'blonde hair, blue eyes' category and still be considered beautiful. If I had to make a guess, the woman in pic related looks safe and fits a positive stereotype. She hasn't got bold or unusual features, so she appeals to a broad demographic.
(sorry for sperging)
No. 554294
File: 1589573241156.jpg (90.66 KB, 620x893, gayandlame.jpg)
I hated this film and I still can't believe that it won best picture. Emma Stone and Ryan Gosling have zero chemistry and the plot was incredibly boring and unrealistic.
No. 554386
File: 1589591495872.gif (2.29 MB, 275x180, 1515310459970.gif)
>>554089This screenshot is truly amazing.
No. 554396
>>554229personally, I think they should have gotten rid of all the nazis and hate speech on there too
but that's not an unpopular opinion so hey I'll see myself out
No. 554493
>>554473>>554477I will never understand why it's such a hard concept for some people to grasp. A lot of people just don't want to sexually commit to one person their entire life, but they want to emotionally commit to them as a life partner. Many people genuinely don't care if their partner is getting with other people. Hell, some people even get off on it.
Why would it feel like cheating if their partner is okay with it? That makes no sense. The entire reason why cheating is bad is because it hurts your partner. So, if your partner is alright with it… why should that feel like cheating?
No. 554575
>>554569>>554573>You should be giving all your time and devotion to one person you can’t share thatI'm not for polyamory, but I also don't believe people can necessarily say that one type of relationship is better than others
Better for you maybe, but not better for everyone
I mean–you can basically switch out everything you're saying and replace it with hetero/homo and you sound like a stuffy christian asshole
No. 554581
File: 1589650408862.jpg (102.45 KB, 800x535, 7c42d4f9fe0fe38051c5493b450c62…)
>>554575>comparing poly to homosexualitywow, you really went there
No. 554584
>>554544that's why poly "relationships" are so shitty. the people in them are always lazy, selfish and immature and just want a bunch of people they can fall back on emotionally without needing to be there for all of them. they also want the stability of a real relationship that they can just check out of with no consequences. it's barely about the sex or else just not be in any relationship. poly is just a cope.
>>554575>>554582trying to label your actually reasonable inclination to be a whore in such a way that it bars you from criticism is not the same as being hardwired to like the same sex. poly is cringy neckbeard shit.
No. 554603
>>554584Right on the head. Every poly relationship I've ever seen myself has had the emotionally immature, possessive main person who collects a harem around them because they want to use people as their emotional trashcans and attention dispensers. They can't deal with the fact that someone can't 100% fulfill all their demands around the clock so they gather up various lovers to leap between when one stops being interesting to them without ever having to compromise to answer to someone else's needs. It's all about selfishness, the poly circle is never in a balanced place where everyone works together to help each other out, they're constantly filled with jealousy and competition for one person's attention. Of course the main person flips their shit when one of their lovers attempts to get a second partner of their own. One of my friends was involved in a poly relationship because her husband fell in love with her best friend and she couldn't let go, of course it turned to be a huge shitshow leaving her emotionally scarred.
Humans are made to be emotionally intimate with only one person at a time. If you fall in love with another person you need to figure out if it's just a short-timed intensive crush that wouldn't carry through a long-term relationship and if it's worth leaving someone who might not excite you as much as they did before, but offers you safety and stability. Not cook up some retarded polyamory scheme because you're self-centered enough to put two people through emotional distress just so you can have your cake and eat it too. It usually ends up with you being alone.
No. 554604
>>554603>emotionally intimate with only one person at a timeemotional intimacy is important in most relationships
in fact, it's weird if you aren't emotionally intimate with multiple people in your life
Do you think your parents, friends, and children if you have them don't deserve emotional intimacy
Maybe for you, romantic/sexual love is with one person, but at the end of the day emotional intimacy is important to maintain important relationships
No. 554611
>>554473You know what I find disgusting, slimy and spineless? People acting like cheating is the worst thing you can do to your partner and yet:
>About one in five adults in monogamous relationships, or 22 percent, have cheated on their current partner. The rate is even higher among married men. And nearly half of people admit to being unfaithful at some point in their livesI'm not trying to defend poly relationships but strict monogamy obviously isn't ideal for us as a species.
No. 554613
>>554584This. Every polycule I've witnessed has gone down in flames in under a year. Most of them in less than six months. If one isn't opened up under the guise of (monkey)branching out, then they're almost always a way for one person to collect a harem of attention dispensers just like
>>554603 said.
I've also seen relationships form out of close knit friend groups on the internet. A bunch of sexually frustrated losers in the same discord group chat confuse intimacy with sharing fandoms and swapping porn/nudes and clump up unto ""poly"" situations. You could smell the lack of social skills and emotional intelligence from miles off.
No. 554649
>>554586Actually visit some online poly circles sometime. Almost everyone in "poly" relationships is dumpy and fat. That's just how it is.
>>554643Normal Mormons don't do polygamy– only the insane fundamentalists like FLDS do that (in addition to incest and child rape.)
No. 554687
>>554674I think the same should be applied to anyone who agrees with capitalism.
Join my fight against capitalism today, my dear sisters. Let the new dawn of womankind rise.
No. 554695
File: 1589665067264.jpg (89.33 KB, 1125x827, eu10fjfrgls41.jpg)
>>554603>Every poly relationship I've ever seen myself has had the emotionally immature, possessive main person who collects a harem around them because they want to use people as their emotional trashcans and attention dispensers>>554613>Every polycule I've witnessed has gone down in flames in under a year.Pic related.
No. 554729
>>554695I know it's probably not relevant, but KPRC is a super right-wing radio station in Houston, Texas. A cursory glance shows that they link to an alt-right news article written by Paul Joseph Watson that only has a deleted tweet as evidence.
I despise poly relationships, though.
No. 554765
>>554729Here is a less bias source:
https://www.jacksonville.com/news/20200325/jacksonville-man-jailed-in-abuse-of-5-week-old-baby.
One of the guys in the ~polycule~ actually did beat the girl's 5 week old baby (he was not the bio father).
No. 554770
>>554765samefag but I just realized that the abuser is the guy who looks like he doesn't want to be there in this pic
>>554695 and
>>554711 No. 554776
>>554765God, this is fucked. I'm glad the baby (reportedly) didn't suffer permanent damage.
I hope that kid gets taken away from this shitty "poly" household. Clearly, things are unstable, especially with all these weird-ass men living around.
No. 554852
>>554603My biggest regret ever is falling into the polymeme myself. I feel like I will never be the same again, at least it forced me to confront the shittier side of me.
I now want to be alone and have no faith in relationships.
No. 554935
>>554916>>554922as someone with digestive issues, veganism is pretty much a no-go for me, ever. like i get that it's mostly for personal/sustainability reasons that people do it, but it is absolutely not a safe diet for a lot of people, particularly if you already have health conditions.
vegans act like removing red meat and dairy from your diet is a major health benefit, but there's just as much shit in vegan diets that is still inflammatory and known to cause or exacerbate problems, like sugar and soy. even grains can be a problem for a lot of people and they may not even know it. a lot of the fake protein products that vegans eat are made exclusively out of wheat and soy.
istg, veganism is the only fad diet that people will defend to the death, and for reasons that are objectively not true (ie: it's healthy and everyone will benefit from it).
No. 554937
File: 1589741522963.jpg (82.34 KB, 679x382, free-stall-679x382.jpg)
>>554922Honestly it comes from first hand experience, my family works in industrial scale agriculture and I have spent way too many boring hours in meat and milk farms to look at vegan documentaries and see like every single standard hygiene rule being broken.
For example these are the norm for milking stalls, Free Stalls, plenty of space for the cow to move and lay down, floor cushioned with sawfust, no cages whatsoever and the cows are always relaxed and the cows have free space to walk around in those corridors and stretch their legs when they aren't being allowed outside, oh yeah they are allowed outside! Because they need vitamin D! For the Milk!
The industry norm is either Free Stalls or Compost Barn housing spaces, and thats what they are, HOUSING. The cows don't stay their sad little lifes stuck in a confined space, they sleep and eat there and are allowed to roam around like 8 hours a day.
No. 554940
Probably not that unpopular of an opinion here, but I don't understand why robots are always whining about girls not wanting to date them, going for assholes instead, and then after they've been fucked over enough times by said assholes, they finally learn their lesson and go back to wanting to date "nice" guys "like them." I literally don't see this as a problem at all. This seems like a good thing, if anything. Like, doesn't that insinuate that they still have a chance in the future, or do they on some unconscious level recognize that they may never get a shot at dating women like this because they're not actually nice?
I've tried to discuss this with robots before, and the answer is always something to the extent of "LDJFLDJFLKDS I'D NEVER WANT A ROASTIE AFTER SHE DATED CHADS UGGGHHH SHE'S SOILED FOREVER." Like buddy if you're too insecure to deal with the fact that your gf has had previous dating partners who haven't treated her well, that's 100% a personal problem, and you've already proven you're not a better choice by judging her so harshly for doing so.
Robot logic makes no sense.
No. 554942
>>554935Nut butters are absolutely the devil if you have any sort of digestive issues, literally the only acceptable vegan fat (as in cheap, non damaging to the environment and somewhat decent for your health) is margarine.
Most vegans end up spoops with brittle thin hair and hollow faces, its terrifying, how can they claim they are top notch face of health?
(Inb4 someone mentions him, Joaquin Phoenix is not a spoop because he gets all his calories from alcohol lol.)
Im personally very fiber sensitive, high fiber foods give me take-me-to-the-hospital level of cramps and i've found out that a high healthy fat diet works the best for me, seafood galore.
No. 554943
>>554937not vegan but the logic here isn't that good. because only some farms are bad and not all means that they should be okay with the ones that aren't? after the meat is packaged, most people can't trace where it came from.
its really hard in general to source meat and dairy products unless you're able to buy everything locally.
No. 554948
>>554943You can easily track where your meat came from, just ask the supermarket's butcher if its pre packaged in the freezer, they see the processing plant's truck every other day, just go to the counter and ask "hey which brand is this meat?"
Google them, they will usually have facility photos and reviews, alot of times you can also schedule a guided visit too.
>>554944Haha i think it has alot to do with ethnicity, my family comes from southern europe so lots of dairy meat and grains.
No. 555187
>>555085nta but this is how I understand the exposed logic : The nice guy tried to date the dumb roastie before she willingly chose to date one or several abusers before crawling back to the supreme prince of kindness who then refuse to be a plan B for a nasty girl who chose to ride the cock carousel.
Of course anyone not as brain-damaged as robots would agree this is some alternate twisted narrative to put the blame on someone else than themselves for being a failure, but I guess there still plenty of places in the *chan world where this kind of shit are rampant, so I get this can be perceived as unpopular by anon
No. 555328
>>555287>>555291>>555314this is why it's called the
unpopular opinion thread for a reason you faggots
No. 555548
>>555523I thought the same thing at first, but after reading that LSA thread, the stuff about the neckbeards mocking/ignoring her the whole time she was in tinychat with them (and openly talking about how she shoved a cucumber inside herself for them and "joking" about blackmailing her for money), and then her WKing herself in said LSA thread (followed by her alleged nudes getting leaked), I'm convinced she's extremely mentally ill and insecure. The whole "e-girl" thing isn't just an act at all, and I mean that in the most depressing way.
Even a #1 hit on the charts didn't boost her self-esteem enough to stop her from incel-pandering. She's just talented, lucky and conventionally attractive enough to not be permanently reduced to Twitch thot streaming and/or actual camgirl stuff.
It feels like no one really knows or cares, mostly because they just see her as a pretty, dancing clown. I really hope she gets help, it's a shitty place to be. It doesn't help that she's working with the known predator, Dr. Luke.
No. 555564
>>555553>>555555Thankfully, there's an archive of the thread here:
https://web.archive.org/web/20200517073942/https://www.lipstickalley.com/threads/come-get-your-girl-dojacat-shes-bored.3515261/30 pages of this got saved. Who knows if there was more before it all got deleted.
Also, someone saved all the screencaps/clips here. I saw this first, but didn't get the context until I read the thread for myself:
https://imgur.com/a/FdhU1us#danObdm No. 555584
File: 1589898720864.gif (482.52 KB, 275x92, 1564894189243.gif)
>>555545maybe i'm remembering wrong but I feel like farmers were really into mooo when it came out? I believe pic related is still in the banner rotation.
>>555574hard disagree, i'd miss you uwu.
No. 555637
>>555552it's really ironic to me how much this board complains about bpd, yet i see multiple posts daily from users claiming to be diagnosed with bpd themselves…projection?
also, let's be real here. this entire site is a bpdfag's wet dream. i honestly can't see how anyone without a history of chronically low self-esteem and defensive/combative behavior could stand more than five minutes here.
and yes, for the record, i am including myself in all this.
No. 555675
>>555637Suggesting everyone on this site has bpd is extremely not “real” and improbable js
See, I’m an autist, you can tell by my annoying need for logic
No. 555686
>>555644I used to check on her daily when her thread was blowing up in like 2017-18ish? It's crazy to me how everything has just sort of stagnated for her. She has been engaged for 2.5 years now, for anyone still counting.
Generally I don't buy the "what goes around comes around" meme (it's a comforting delusion that life is fair) but in this case it seems very appropro given her past.
No. 555746
File: 1589929040582.png (848.92 KB, 920x1048, 1585836357518.png)
Faggots who suicidebait on here aren't gonna do it. I'm glad they get ignored.
No. 555765
File: 1589930542708.png (9.41 KB, 441x114, images.png)
Venting since FDS has become increasingly popular:
r/femaledatingstrategy offers terrible advice. While it's rooted in come evolutionary psychology that makes sense (keyword: some), the problem with these subs (r/theredpill included) is that everyone on them really and truly believes they're at the top of the hierarchy and deserves the sort of partner that realistically only genuinely beautiful/handsome and highly intelligent people can obtain.
Just like redpillers think Mary Elizabeth Winstead is their looksmatch, FDSers believe they deserve an IBer making $400,000 a year who also looks like Christian Bale in his prime. In other words, it's a recipe for holding out for men sociopathic enough to use you over a long term period, or holding out for nothing at all. The only good advice they offer is to hold back on giving sex until he has proven himself a viable long-term partner, and really you could just ask your grandma to tell you that, you don't need damaged redditors on SSRIs to tell you.
I've noticed there's also this weird-as-fuck overlap between pinkpill communities and kpop fangroups. You'll often be reading a thread and some random no-value comment about how Asian/Korean "scrotes" are actually really great and everyone should be dating them instead because they're so much better than White/Black/Hispanic/etc ones. That or they're just Asian incels sockpuppeting. If it's the former I think the blind spot over how many women in the Korean entertainment have been killing themselves due to industrial-scale rape and abuse is kind of bizarre.
Finally, I'm tired of people who made bad decisions with prior partners (I swear half of the "ex boyfriend stories" here and on FDS are from people who dated random men they met on online games, interpals, 4chan or worse) projecting this onto others. Not everyone was dumb enough to date some disgusting /soc/ BDSM fetishist they met on a "kink thread".
tl;dr, don't take advice from damaged people online.
No. 555768
>>555765Can't speak for everyone but I find it really sad that you believe the majority of
toxic men come from online sources like fetlife. While dating apps are really popular right now I don't really believe it makes a difference. Abusers gonna abuse especially if it's someone they've previously known. The reality is that for women like me and others, we often meet our abusers and shitty partners through mutual friends, work, and school.
Agree with the rest of your post though. I started to notice the chronic FDS posters were just bitter and didn't have much to offer themselves–not that I think that qualifies anyone to only be able to date needy manchildren. They just shouldn't expect a hot man throwing millions at them. It's unrealistic.
No. 555770
>>555768>not that I think that qualifies anyone to only be able to date needy manchildren.Yeah, of course. It's not binary (which is of course what they claim it is). Something I think FDSers and MRAtards struggle with in general is that men and women are a reflection of each other. For every "slut" there's some man who lies and cheats his way into getting women into bed, end result being no one feels they owe anyone anything.
>Can't speak for everyone but I find it really sad that you believe the majority of toxic men come from online sources like fetlife.I'm being a bitch here, I know that's not true. But I do feel like a lot of people here and there do have this atypical dating pattern of meeting virtually all of their boyfriends on imageboards, forums or literal kink hookup sites.
No. 555776
>>555765FDS is
toxic, but not because of the women having higher standards. I don’t think anything bad can come from women raising their standards.
So much of the “advice” is about how to lie and pretend to snag a guy who is just as misogynist and douchey, only he makes more money or actually showers. What they could be doing is focusing on themselves and putting that energy into other women.
And yeah, so many of them are weebs and kboos.
No. 555777
>>555765>, FDSers believe they deserve an IBer making $400,000 a year who also looks like Christian Bale in his prime. ? WTAF are you reading?? It's literally nothing like this. They say over, and over, and over: money and looks don't make a man high value. Treating you well makes a man high value. And not everyone deserves Christian Bale, but everyone deserves someone they are attracted to and if they can't find that, it's better to be single than settle.
FDS might have started out about dating strategy but it's ultimately become focused on building women's self esteem, self respect and ability to enforce boundaries. I feel like I'm being gaslighted when I read posts like yours because it's the complete opposite of what I read on there every single day. 50% of the posts are about how degenerate men are, the other 50% are about not taking any shit from them. I almost never see any calculating plans for how to secure the bag, I don't even date so I don't read it for that. I read it because it's reassuring to see that not all women are willing to settle for the bare minimum.
No. 555779
>>555776But what you described is how they see standards. They're constantly performing these mental gymnastics with regards to those "standards". On one thread it's basically a man's salary, in another thread where a wealthy or respectable professional man is revealed to be a misogynist asshole, they backtrack and "standards" now become a more abstract "whether he appreciates women".
For the record, I actually used to like it as a sub before they formalized the handbook which included stuff like "lie to your boyfriend about how many men you've slept with". If you feel it's a big enough deal to him that he'd look at you in a different way as a result of your past, why do you even want to date him in the first place? There's plenty of people who are comfortable with promiscuous partners these days. Why lie to one who obviously isn't? I have to admit I feel personally aggrieved by this one because my ex pulled the exact same shit with me (he swore he wasn't a womanizer and then I found out through his friends that he hasn't been able to stick with a woman for more than six months).
>And yeah, so many of them are weebs and kboos.Why do you think this is, out of interest? Why is there that big overlap?
No. 555783
>>555781So you're just reading the handbook and not the actual posts?
As I said
>FDS might have started out about dating strategy but it's ultimately become focused on building women's self esteem, self respect and ability to enforce boundariesThe actual discussions about money tend to stop at 'men should pay for the first date' which is more about the gesture than the money. The only time I see men criticized for not paying majority share is when he has a significantly higher income than his partner and expects her to pay half. It's not unreasonable to expect a guy who isn't a total bum, and it's also worth acknowledging that they constantly advocate self improvement and making your own money so you don't rely on a man.
No. 555787
>>555776>What they could be doing is focusing on themselves and putting that energy into other women. They've been moaning about GC for not being intersectional enough recently.
>>555765>You'll often be reading a thread and some random no-value comment about how Asian/Korean "scrotes" are actually really great and everyone should be dating them instead because they're so much better than White/Black/Hispanic/etc ones. I never really knew whether the 'omg my asian boyfriend/husband is such a HVM! pls everyone find urself an asian dude!' ones are for real or they're just some dweeb from one of the asian incel subs to be honest (I remember when they were caught pretending to be women posting on r/ladyboners, that was hilarious). I would have guessed the latter, but after lurking PULL threads filled with: 'If he was MY asian bf I wouldn't treat him like SHE does, she doesn't respect his ancient culture!!' posts it seems being this delusional about asian men really is a thing among a lot of the woke/libfem contingent.
No. 555816
>>555808Being mexican means that I have refried beans with like every meal and I can't stand them.
The texture, the smell, disgusting.
No. 555902
>>555808>>555816Beans might be my favorite main ingredient, so cheap, so delish, so healthy, so nutritious, so easy to cook.
I walk around
With my hair all spiked
And I don't eat meat
Just beans and rice
Don't talk to me
Cause you don't understand
Can't you see
How truly punk rock I am?
Hey can you spare some change
Now?
Cause I ain't go no home
Now
All I've got to say
Is fuck the world today
And I don't want to be free
I'll be happy
When I die
I'll be dirty and poor
But I'll have my pride
Don't feel sorry for me
That's just how it goes
And like that song says
Nobody knows
No. 555957
>>555943I don't get why we turn a blind eye to it when we legally charge people for letting their animals become obese, but it's a complicated issue
The biggest causes of child obesity stem from poverty, so fining parents that have fat kids will just disproportionately affect the poor. I can also imagine actively
abusive parents would start starving their children to avoid it
IMHO the best option is to just not have drastically underfunded schools, so that children can have good quality healthy school lunches and breakfasts, solid education on nutrition and regularly scheduled exercise
No. 555966
>>555943>>555957>>555962I enjoy the idea of parental courses and parental licenses in order to be registered to have custody of children.
My problem with this is that 1)People are bound to find loopholes around it and 2)It would be awful hard to apply it in retrograde to shit parents who already have kids, and it wouldn't be fair to new parents who'd have to endure courses unless this would happen too. And what would the consequences be if these current parents failed their courses? State takes custody of kids? It would never happen.
It'll never happen, unfortunately.
No. 555989
>>555782Good points. I also feel like women who get heavily into idol culture end up missing the point. Chinese and Korean and Japanese women are into idols so much precisely because the average man around them is such an emotionless and misogynistic sack of shit (especially in Korea where you have this obsession with filming women without their consent). The non Asian idol fangirls end up extrapolating this highly sanitized image of idols to Korean/Asian men as a whole.
I mean even within the idol industry itself it's full of literal human trafficking rapists like Seungri so the delusions really strike me as insane. It would be like me liking all British men because of Colin Firth in Pride and Prejudice.
New feminist spaces need to be purged of K-pop fans and weebs in general.
No. 556063
File: 1589999697135.jpg (39.84 KB, 413x578, ingame.jpg)
I genuinely like 2B's design and think it's pretty.
No. 556117
>>556115that's not an unpopular opinion if you don't hang around tradfags
>>556109you saw my post in /m/ didn't you? i like the design, but not for the reasons as most of the players
No. 556141
>>556138Personally I wouldn't buy coffee every day but I'm sure I spend $35 a week on something other people wouldn't waste their money on. It doesn't automatically equate to spending outside your means.
Big money is saved in your big expenses - housing, food, transport, bills. Those are where you really need to cut costs if you want to save for a deposit on a house or retirement etc.
No. 556801
>>556794>AsianAre you sure about that? Very sure? Like 100% sure? Genuinely, seriously sure?
If anything, the majority are people who wish they were Asian. Just take a look at the confession thread, lmao.
No. 556868
>>548689I wear plaited or loose low pigtails occasionally and I'm 29. I also wear low pigtail buns sometimes to work and I've never had a snide comment.
I get what you mean, but I disagree that grown women can't pull them off. I've seen artsy looking women in their 30s wearing the space bun styled ones up high and depending on their outfit it can look nice.
No. 556918
>>556912can i give you my birth chart
do you wanna judge me
No. 557358
i don't get what's wrong with having a key part of who you are be your identity.
don't get me wrong, I'm also annoyed by people whose entire personality is based around being gay, trans, a certain race, etc. but i think it's important to recognize that for identities that impact your everyday life (like attraction, race, or gender), it's normal to have those be one of the key parts of someone's identity.
it's possible to be "that gay guy" while also being a complex person. Not everyone owes you their life story or philosophical insights when they're giving you a basic description/idea of what type of person they are. of course if a core part of someone is being trans, and they're treated/talked to a certain way everyday for being that way, they're going to view that as a key part of their identity. what someone is, likes, enjoys, does with their time, behaves, etc. is all a factor in someone's identity.
idk it just irritates me for people to have their entire lives/interests/identities written off simply because a key part of who they are as a person is overused, overdone, or the marginalized flavor of the week.
it's entirely possible for someone to have a key defining trait in their identity and still have interests and complexity in their personality beyond surface level labels, because that's what labels are meant to be, surface level.
No. 557406
>>557195If someone is telling you to unwillingly date outside of your race for PC points assume that they're creepy fuckers alongside those white purity idiots. Otherwise, I think interracial couples just don't want to be harassed anymore.
Date who you fucking want,there's no pressure either way other than from extremists. Also, genetics are not that simple anon.
No. 557426
>>557409I think part of it is the growing role of the internet. Social media is the result of the growing influence of tech companies, herding people onto a few sites and killing forums and personal websites.
The wealth inequality and state of education system (at least in Murica) plays a big role in this. It's is a shitshow, politically more right compared to Europe and bogged down with lobbying. And companies kill any real movements by coopting and finding ways to profit, like with girlboss "feminism" and mental health awareness ("self-care").
No. 557435
>>557409I feel like more teens identify as being somewhere in the lgbts now than those who don't, even if they're only bullshitting themselves they've really taken the minority aspect out of it. I feel old thinking of how my own teen years were nothing like todays.
Same with all the mental health awareness talk, an anxiety disorder was enough to get everyone whispering shit about you when I was growing up. Now it's a badge to wear on all your social media profiles.
No. 557763
>>557544> if you ask a ""weeb"" what anime they like they will mostly have a superficial like to it, they will quote memes and stuff like that but have no interest in discussing it further than "haha le jojo poses/anime gril ahegao". As an oldfag weeb of 20 years this
triggered a fight or flight response in my brain because it's fucking true
I actually just had this discussion regarding today's counter cultures but I still can't quite wrap my head around why they disappeared. During my teens there were goths, emos, metalheads, weebs, punks, nerds, rappers, hipsters and so forth but for whatever reason they all dried out. Like sure you see them every now and then but there's no real community around these subcultures anymore, most kids are just following the generic instathot/sadboy aesthetic which is more of an aesthetic than a community. I'm sure that social media played a part in destroying them but I can't figure out exactly how.
The online LGBT community, especially trannies, could be the only real subculture to exist at this point but like everyone knows they resemble a cult more than a culture. They give you the vibes that when the next comet passes you'll find them dead in a house wearing Nike sneakers so they'll ascend beyond gender. Whereas any old subculture was somewhat lacking of structure and based on the collective enjoyment of a certain aesthetic and lifestyle, the gendercult is a fascist movement.
But returning to the first point it does feel like nobody really cares anymore beyond superficial fascination. Being genuinely interested in something seems to be viewed as old-fashioned because in their lives everything passes so fast and zoomers legitimately have shorter attention spans than the preceding generations.
No. 557869
i have to agree with
>>557835 and i feel like it's a similar attitude even in online spaces like this and other forums
people who are interested or considered too passionate in their interests are seen as weird. it's much more digestible, especially online to be into things more superficially, especially if you're sharing your interests with someone you don't know well. maybe it's an age thing too since I'm a zoomer but I know for me and my friends we typically don't share obsessive interests/hobbies other than our main ones until we're at a certain level of friendship and understanding.
also relatability. people find someone who has 500 superficial interests easier to relate to than someone who has 10 niche interests they're immensely invested in.
No. 557921
>>557908I agree, but I don’t think you have anything to worry about unless you’re an actual cow. I don’t think mods care enough to take note of any particular anon’s post history unless it’s suspected they’re a self posting cow or something.
That being said, I have no idea exactly how they verify if a cow is posting on their own thread/how invasive the process is because idk how IPs work.
>>557915Right? By outing someone else as being an imageboard user, you’re most likely outing yourself as being one too.
No. 557973
File: 1590348760609.gif (898.48 KB, 487x560, 1577264193129.gif)
>>557970>>557968You both need to hold each other's hands and kiss. No fighting.
No. 558032
>>557970>>557970>>557948Just say you're a cow and posting here gives you anxiety because you've selfposted under the radar. If you're that scared just use a VPN and don't be an attention whoring retard. If you're a cow you're probably both though.
>>557987True.
No. 558114
>>558082Twitter is garbage. Tumblr at least had legitimate creators using it to balance out the sjw mess. Twitter has nothing but elitism and celebrity worship.
OT: Tumblr was a good site and it did not deserve to be abandoned.
No. 558373
>>558274Do I… smell.. jealousy?
/sIt's ok, anon. It's your opinion.
No. 558377
>>558026> It's at the point where some of the people on there are crueler than on imageboards.I was thinking about that yesterday, it seems even channers are having a hard time catching up with how creepy, immensely dumb and mean Twitter as a whole can be. Every time I follow a link to Twitter and get sucked into it's infinite scrolling trap I'm baffled by how rancid it is.
And it's here to stay, for years people used Myspace as an argument to predict how all big social media services eventually happen to die out but we live in different times now
No. 558424
>>558396Most men who outwardly make a show of calling themselves feminists without you asking are making up for something imo
Female feminists are just normal people though, some good, some bad. I can't get on with women who make a point of saying that they aren't feminists but what can you expect from women who don't want equal rights for themselves?
No. 558446
>>558396Being against social justice warriors isn't unpopular, you literally blend in with mainstream media and at least 90% of male internet users.
An actual unpopular opinion is believing that things like micro aggression is real. It's not the singular incident women have to worry about, but the cumulative effect of what happens to us as a whole when such disrespect against us goes unchecked. Women are labeled as 'naggers' because we're constantly having to remind mal-socialized people of this reality which threatens how they naturally want to go about things. Similar to how a teenager thinks their mom is a huge bitch for nagging to do the dishes when-in the grand scheme-doing dishes is just a basic responsibility and courtesy.
No. 558447
Lolcow is better for discussing topics rather than cows. There are a couple of decent cow threads but most are pretty boring or inactive.
>>558026>It's at the point where some of the people on there are crueler than on imageboards.YES. You'd think the normies on there would be more level headed but they're so much worse in comparison. I'd have to agree with other anons that Tumblr is actually better these days. It still has some of the leftover autism and trauma blog shit, but it's definitely quieter. Also, never thought twitter would surpass chans in the degenerate category but here we are.
Also this
>>558148 Tumblr had some of the funniest shit I'd ever encountered. Even the shit posts are great. Twitter is pretty luke warm and it's hard to joke on that site with everyone being constantly on edge and ready to fight.
>>558396I mean when men complain about being nagged it's hardly ever about sjw shit. At least in my experience.
No. 558453
>>558026I fucking hate that Twitter is the place for art now. It's the worst site for cataloguing art, plus the people there are just so often shit.
>>558447>Lolcow is better for discussing topics rather than cows. There are a couple of decent cow threads but most are pretty boring or inactive.Completely agree. It may have started as a site for laughing at dumb cows, but it's outgrown that.
No. 558475
>>558446I'm the anon you responded to. My unpopular opinion wasn't that sjws are annoying but that this type of trying to shape behaviour, including petty and unimportant stuff, through nagging is a common female trait. I used to think it's just sexism talking when people say that. And I know that's not an unpopular opinion in male dominated circles but I figured it might be unpopular on this forum that we're on so I posted it. And btw my mother is really good at nagging about unimportant shit, I'm quarantining with my family and I'm just about ready to leave this house and sleep in the woods.
>>558447When men complain about being nagged it's almost always by their partner. Of course they interact with their partner more than with some sjw, most men never interact with sjws at all so of course they don't talk about them often.
No. 558476
>>558396Even if you have a reasonable point, men are still going to think you nagging when ever you criticise them. Post what you said about men being dangerous on a mainstream subreddit and they would all be seething trying to put you in your place and act like
victims. Notice how they never go after level headed feminists, they completely focus on the crazies and ironically allow them to have more impact than they would otherwise. Feminists are not immune from being shitty people either, it's just a label at the end of the day. Also, never trust male feminists, they usually tend to be hiding something nefarious.
No. 558595
>>558588this but with the
kpop thread
Really something to witness
No. 558669
>>558396The most predatory / repulsive men I’ve been in contact with have been male feminists.
For example, one man said that if I wanted to truly liberate myself I would free my nipples (aka take my shirt off in front of him) and he was being totally serious.
The other man works for the DNC, and does local campaigning. He is 36 in love with a 16 year old.
Another one also works alongside the 36 year old male and watched one of his adult friends sleep with a minor at a party they had.
A lot of my reply guys on twitter act like feminists, but they sure do love to flirt for being married men.
I used to love feminism, and in a lot of aspects I appreciate it - but I think as a whole it’s turned into a cult of personality and something a lot of people utilize for woke points. It’s very transparent, and obnoxious to constantly read about boss babes who do x y and z.
I don’t care. Especially when none of them blink an eye at suicide rates in men, that they’re abused too, etc.
And there’s a growing issue with false allegations as well.
I am just tired of it all.
No. 558680
>>558669>Especially when none of them blink an eye at suicide rates in men, that they’re abused too, etcFeminists or women as a whole are not obliged to care about that, especially since when men usually like to drive down and toss aside any issues specific to women in favour of trying to paint themselves as the ultimate
victims, not to do anything about it, but as a way to shut down any argument and discussion that could be had because it makes them uncomfortable/offended.
I hate how unfocused and distorted feminism has become by social media. Stuff like mens rights and trans rights has absolutely nothing to do with feminism. Feminism is the discourse (a discourse that males don't belong in, not that they even care) into what defines female liberation and fighting for women across the world to have basic human rights. There's too many women who preach about being such a good feminist and then go around enabling horrible behaviour that completely goes against that, which i find even more
problematic. The label feminist has no real meaning anymore, I don't feel good about calling myself one even though I completely agree with many radfem talking points.
No. 558698
>>558680Agreed.
>Stuff like mens rights and trans rights has absolutely nothing to do with feminism.People took "intersectional" feminism and ran a thousand miles with it, and now this is what we got. Men were never meant to be a part of this and now there's undue butthurt that women aren't cleaning up house as if we're responsible to advocate for male problems and fix them.
The other issue is that despite groups of men coming together under the umbrella of wanting to promote their rights, they have proven unable to do so without women-hate, and many can't seem to take responsibility for their behaviors. Ever notice the reason why things don't change for men is because they fail to set up a discourse to change themselves?
For example they'll talk up and down about false rape accusations, but fail to address
toxic hookup culture promoted by men where consent tends to get lost in blurred lines. It's not that they want to stop the shitty things that they're doing, they just want women to shut up about the outcomes. They don't seem to really care about rape unless it's about the rare innocent man getting his life rekt by a scorned woman. The reality is that men benefit more often than not from risky sexual encounters and rape, so instead of changing their behavior they place all responsibility on women to prevent it. Which is impossible.
>>558692>If we don't care why should them?Because it's their own behaviors. It's immature to think one shouldn't have to personally grow and become a better person because someone else in the world doesn't care. That's not what accountability means.
No. 558705
>>558026Unironically this. I've been around since the early 2000's and while imageboards have been cruel they've also done good things and the mere act of staying anonymous is done out of "concern" that you know what you're doing is immoral and you shouldn't dot it while being identified. The psychos over at Twitter are doing the fucked up shit they do under their own names while posting selfies of their face to their account. They think what they're doing is so noble and righteous that they might as well attach their real name to it and promote their ko-fi account just to spit on the grave when they're essentially ruining someone's life for internet points.
Twitter really does bring out the worst in every person because when tweeting shit they don't realize they're not having an internal monologue with themselves, they're affecting real people in the real world.
No. 558707
>>558699Your point hasn't been demonstrated at all. A man didn't lead any movements regarding women's suffrage, reproductive rights, and so on. In fact men often tried to hinder equality for us, and they still do to this day.
What you're asking women to do is to drop our causes for our rights that are still under attack, to address a problem largely caused by other men for men on their behalf.
Just ask us to be your moms already, since that's basically what you expect us to be and what you feel you are owed.
No. 558737
>>558718It's called having an opinion, I'm sorry anybody who disagree with you is offensive. If anything, you are just as bad as any other twitterfag. If any anons here want to go marching in the streets for mens rights, they are free to do so, even if i personally believe it's completely useless.
>>558722It's not about identifying as a radfem, it's just about assessing the situation around you and having some common sense. Mentally ill men can only be helped by other men. Mens rights issues is a battle that can only be fought by men. It's up to them do something if they care enough.
No. 558749
>>558748This is the first time I posted in weeks, I don't need to be
called out to notice that most people here act like two-faced cunts
No. 558755
File: 1590506368796.gif (406.55 KB, 498x474, tenor (2).gif)
>>558749>called out>This is the first time I posted in weeksshut the fuck up and leave then, nobody cares whether you're here or not and i don't know what reaction you expect when you're directly insulting a site's userbase. you're retarded
No. 558766
>>558764Do you actually think I give a shit about being banned? You're on an imageboard and you don't know what a VPN is? Do you think that complaining about this place makes me
hesitant to leave? This is a nice look onto the people that usually post here. Complete retards
(USER HAS BEEN PUT OUT TO PASTURE) No. 558789
>>558446"Being against social justice warriors isn't unpopular, you literally blend in with mainstream media and at least 90% of male internet users."
yes, this x1000. i hope I'm not the only one with this opinion, but it seems like trying hard to be edgy/counterculture IS the new counterculture. ever since 2013-2015 when Tumblr became known and anti-SJW became a label people online started widely identifying with. Hell, there was a point where there were more "Tumblr Cringe" sockpuppets and meme pages than actual cringy content from Tumblr or SJWs. Nowadays everybody wants to talk about how "easily offended" everyone else is. People make up imaginary arguments to use against imaginary SJWs upset over imaginary problems. Even with the Dave Chapelle special that happened awhile ago, I saw more "anti-SJWs" foaming at the mouth about how upset and
triggered it made people, than actual
triggered or upset people who actually watched or gave a shit about Dave Chapelle.
I feel like it even gets to the point where being a tryhard edgelord / devils advocate / anti-sensitivity/PC is so mainstream nowadays to where someone even mentioning an actual
trigger, actual disability, actual social issue or using a word that's seen as a buzzword is automatically discredited. Topics like intersectionality, micro-aggressions, and gender/sexual diversity are deep and interesting topics to talk about, with a lot of different perspectives, but even mentioning those things will get you written off as an SJW or snowflake even if you haven't even presented your viewpoint yet.
No. 558907
>>558880>>558834NTA but honestly I think the word "deep" is so dumb. The whole concept of something being "deep" is dumb.
Anyway I think that it's good to have discussions about the injustices of the world and how to solve/prevent them. But it's not healthy to let those thoughts totally dominate your mind and all your conversations. Also I feel like a lot of people use those issues as tools to make themselves look more "righteous" and "aware" than others, and I think that needs to stop. Those dialogues need to come from a place of genuine concern instead.
No. 558916
>>558834samefag but when i use 'deep' it's not like "wow that's so deep", more like, "yeah there's a lot to be discussed here and the conversation would have to be a deep-dive in order to really reach the nuances".
>>558907what you said
No. 559522
File: 1590603836420.jpg (57.91 KB, 333x500, 51dfK6SEUCL.jpg)
Anyone into toilet bound hanako kun is a goddamn freak. anyone who can look at the art and not realize the weird undertones is deluding themselves and the fandom skeeves me the hell out.
No. 559587
>>559582I hate kids because they're too goddamn unpredictable and frail and I'm always scared I will hit someone's kid and get in trouble for not caring for their brat even if it's their job. I don't want mine because I just never liked them but I learned to hate them because of shitty parents.
I don't hate animals, I just hate dog owners who feel entitled to any space with their precious shitting machine, disregarding people with allergies. Most of these people don't train their dogs here so they usually lash at people who pass them on bikes or skates.
No. 559591
>>559582Ntayrt
Other kids and other animals are annoying. You may think
your kids are cute, but they're annoying inconveniences to me because they're not my kids. You may think
your dog is cute, but he's an annoying little shit to me and I prefer my own.
I think the other anon was giving you a polite and canned response. A lot of people just can't tolerate other peoples' bullshit.
No. 559629
>>559627It clashes with lolcow's intended purpose
>>559522Ty for making me rediscover this gem
No. 559699
>>559618i have been raised by racist grandparents and i have to extremely disagree. nobody should be excused in their behavior just because they "grew up in different times". they've lived decades through those racist horrible 'different times' and not once thought that it was fucked up? Or reconsidered their own biases and racist viewpoints? That seems like a life wasted being a racist instead of putting in the effort to actually die a decent human being and learn something from the world around you rather than be a product of the world around you.
Not only does it fuck them up but it fucks up the people around them. I wasn't socialized at all beyond what my grandparents taught me until around the age of 12, and since then I've had so much racist and sexist bullshit I've had to un-learn. It pisses me off that I was raised in a household where that was acceptable, so no, I don't think we should let people off the leash for horrible behavior just because they're old and it's "what they're used to".
No. 559917
>>559877If anything their desire to stay on lolcow is a big red flag. Why would any feminist community, much less a man-hating radical one, want to seek asylum on a chan dedicated to shitting on women for not following male-controlled beauty standards? We shit on women for being fat, skinny, ugly, botched, etc. You'd think radfems would be the first to avoid this site. Instead, they all foam at the mouth about how men control everything about women, then turn right around and say "hur dur momokun fat" with the rest of us.
Its hard to take them seriously when their whole thing is shitting on women and complaining about men shitting on them. Its fine to be mad at men but like, radfems really just are the classic bullies. They shit on other women in an attempt to make them selves feel about about their horrible sense of self worth. The world is out to get them and the only way to ease the pain is to blame it all on the girls who like makeup and don't want their male family members to die.
No. 559961
>>559949I think it's just that the middle ground doesn't get baited as much into these arguments because they're generally more moderate.
Even in the PP and GC threads there were people that didn't necessarily see themselves as radfems, and didn't call everyone a pickme. I think the people getting involved in these fights are bored quarantine posters, overenthusiastic new members from Twitter and a few turbo spergs.
People need to stop taking the bait
No. 559982
>>559977Pretty sure it was deleted, along with the person sperging out at the farmhand and calling her fat or something. This was from earlier in the day, and in the vent thread (I think), but then spilled out to /meta/. Any anons who saw it happening in real time can vouch. As for why "no radfems" came, I'm not sure if they didn't. Apart from "pick me" accusations, it didn't seem like a political argument.
They were boasting about how women were stupid, bans are pointless because of VPNs, etc.
Yungcynical isn't exactly deep Lolcow lore, her thread is one of the first when you visit /snow/. Now that I think about it, didn't we have some of her autistic orbiters invade that thread and call people "niggers" to defend her? I remember someone calling mods "mommy" and shit, too. That might literally be where the scrote shitposters spawned from. The "post puci" shit is peak TikTok/IG/Twitter moid culture.
"Radfem sperging" is more like the infighting that happened in the stupid questions thread, not male-brained spamming and vulgarity.
No. 559985
>>559982if it happened today, we might be talking about different incidents
>The "post puci" shit is peak TikTok/IG/Twitter moid culture.idk if you guys noticed but a lot of anons have been talking in a twitter like manner so i didn't notice it right away but yeah, maybe they were scrotes. the farmhands usually spot samefagging but who knows now that they're in hibernation
No. 559994
>>559961I'm this anon-
>>559917And I actually agree with them on quite a few things but I would never label myself as one. It's a shame because they do have some things right imo, they just fucking sperg and act vile towards any woman who doesn't conform to their standard of ~strong independant woman~ Which is ultimately ironic considering their whole selling point is that we shouldn't have to live up to anyone's standards. While I think some of their arguments are
valid, I have a hard time believing 98% of "radfems" as anything other than a bunch of self hating propagandists. Half the time it seems like they want to control what women are doing with their lives more than the men they complain about.
No. 560005
>>559972Honestly this. They're so obviously scrotes trying to stir shit with really low-grade bait and people take it and face value, assigning pretty any offensive replies to the evil radfems. I haven't seen "radfem sperging" around in the last two months but what I have seen is people continuously bringing up how much "radfems" derail threads, like every two days someone starts flipping their shit in one of the /ot/ threads or /meta/ without providing any examples besides a vague "one day I saw this" description. Usually it turns out that this "radfem infighting derailing spergery" was some anon using the word tranny, or telling anon her
abusive boyfriend is a piece of shit, or an obvious fucking troll. But even more often it's an anon who lost an argument in some other thread she was infighting in and is trying to get the radfem boogeyman silenced. Never forget how someone wanted the admin to ban the usage of the word "troon" because "it's always used for infighting".
(massive cope) No. 560021
>>560005Agreed. I wouldn't be surprised if it's just false-flagging. It's not too dissimilar from the way some people would post snarky bait to try and get radfems to argue with them, just so they'd have a reason to shout about "radfem sperging".
The radfem community has been banned, "hi scrote"/"hi troon" is banned, and they have their own site completely separate from here. About everything that can be done to curb the issue has been done.
What more do these people want? The only thing left is to try and ban anons from having opinions that don't match those of the people complaining. That, or /2X/, but for trannies and camgirls this time, I guess.
No. 560023
>>560013>My point mostly was that even women who share similar views with radfems hate radfems and want them gone from this site as much as everyone else.See that's the thing about it. Any time you have even the teeniest rad-leaning views you get accused of being a radfem sperg taking part in sinking the ship. Think trannies are nuts like any normal person does? Fuck off back to the gardens, terf. Think a lot of societal issues regarding women are based on centuries of misogyny? Radfem alert! Recognize how detrimental male socialization is? Admin ban this bitch. You don't even have to go the full female liberation war front route to be called muh pinkpill sperg anymore. Literally someone was calling it "radfem gc derailing" when someone was discussing how objectively crazy the Wachowskis are in the Celebrity thread. That's my issue with it, I don't want to spend my time at radfem spaces because they can be
toxic and autistic as hell (just like any political sphere) but I also want to be able to see issues as they are. A lot of the tumblr SJW bullshit here gets branded as radfem-leaning too when it's an entirely different issue altogether.
As a side note one thing I find funny though is that people keep smugly bringing up this "if you love women so much how come you're on a gossip site dedicated to nitpicking female appearances" gotcha when Admin herself was pitching a fit about how the /2X/ posters didn't visit /snow/ and /pt/ enough.
No. 560039
>>560023>Admin herself was pitching a fit about how the /2X/ posters didn't visit /snow/ and /pt/ enoughiirc didn't she use some bullshit poll question to determine this? The whole thing was kinda sus, by then the whole site started to get sick of radfems leaking out of their containment board. Seemed like admin just wanted em gone kek
>As a side note one thing I find funny though is that people keep smugly bringing up this "if you love women so much how come you're on a gossip site dedicated to nitpicking female appearances"imo if they cared so much about women and the way they are pressured to display a certain ideal, they wouldn't stand for 5 seconds being on the same site as /pt/ and /snow/. They claim they can't go to asherasgarden, or crystalcafe because its inhabited by other people that stand against their views: trannies and coomers. The truth is they like nitpicking women as much as everyone else they just can't admit it, or try to disguise it by calling everything "pick me" and "femcel" behavior. I've seen my fair share of blatant radfem derailing in /pt/ and /snow/. I do agree the "hi radfem/hi femcel" thing has gotten annoying though.
No. 560132
>>560130Then why are they so unempathetic with any woman that isn't at their level of sperg? Sex work isn't a political view, it's just a type of work women can do if
problematic, so why do they REEEEEEE every time they're brought up?
No. 560140
>>560132idk, maybe it's an attempt at tough love
>>560135i didn't mean it to be personal. i'm bad at phrasing things
No. 560141
File: 1590675987730.jpg (46.94 KB, 512x512, Time To Do This Shit Again.jpg)
>>560136
>The discussion up til now has been peaceful
Backread /ot/ from a few hours ago, especially stupid questions, and keep in mind that the worst of it has been deleted
No. 560143
>>560116You're the only one derailing and shitting up threads at this point. The discussion up til now has been peaceful, but then you barged in with allcaps screeching and telling people to kill themselves. Do you think that makes your side look reasonable?
Seriously, you can't even help yourself from flinging insults and accusations at anyone who doesn't agree with all the sperging about this imaginary, long-dead radfem bogeyman.
Just go to Crystal Cafe already. Lolcow has never been, and will never be a site of people who love trannies, or men, or whatever it is you want us to love. It's not a radfem site, either. There's a middle ground which you keep missing in your blind rage.
Calling literally everyone who doesn't think like you do a radfem just makes you a nuisance just as bad (if not worse) than the spergs you're complaining about. You are being a burden.
No. 560146
>>560141>>560142I was talking about this specific discussion when I mentioned it being peaceful, but even in that case, the farmhands are handling the infighting pretty diligently with bans and deletion. Really, what more do you want? I can't think of anything besides outright banning certain opinions, like I said, and that'd be fucked up.
Yelling at people and accusing them of being political extremists for disagreeing with you just adds to the infighting problem as a whole.
No. 560173
File: 1590677873965.png (125.64 KB, 722x196, c1bd3bad6e36c283a768e6e1875a54…)
Daily reminder that false-flagger moids are real and they come here to cause drama and infighting and that a KiwiFarms tranny tried to buy the site off the admin while charading as hateful radfems to burn her out and make her hand it over
No. 560186
>>560185…And looks like wax too
It's a win win situation for me
No. 560800
>>560787Lmao I'm not going to collect every post made by a radfem. If you stopped playing dumb, you'll see the spergouts happening
>>560789I thought it was male falseflaggers? Now it's mentally ill women? What a lesson! The enemy always turns out to be your fellow women
No. 560824
>>560809It's not unreasonable at all, anon, but it still isn't a catchall for every woman on this site who doesn't vibe with shitting on people just because they're fakebois or whatever.
Also, I guarantee you that most farmers are mentally ill in one way or another.
No. 560919
>>560913I'm eating straight from a can of whip cream rn and feel honestly kind of
triggered.
No. 561313
>>561258>>561258You guys want to talk about americentric politics and you don't even know the fucking
victims name or the fact he died over 20 dollars he didn't even know was counterfeit.
Delete your social media accounts if you're that ass blasted and stick to your own country retard. It's not that hard to not look at a trending tag.
No. 561450
File: 1590863347073.jpg (174.3 KB, 900x1197, cfc.jpg)
>>560730This is true, but many westerners don't like to admit it. It's like their designers are obsessed with one "rugged" kind of male. So diverse.
For some reason, people think the progressive solution to all this is to also make women ugly in games instead of improving the male designs.
Just, why does there seem to be a general obsession with playing as unattractive characters? It's not like they need to be super-attractive waifus/husbandos or whatever, but does pic related really add to the gameplay experience? Is it necessary? I'll never get it.
No. 561480
>>561471She does
>>561474 and I appreciate her for it. I would say something about incest but.. I'm kind of tired of this bait
No. 561553
File: 1590871408724.jpeg (86.58 KB, 750x563, 33770180-3FA6-486E-B4F6-598642…)
I don’t really mind ageing. It seems like many farmers are afraid of getting old and losing their looks.
I can’t wait when I can just be a cool old lady who wears colourful clothes and chills with her cats.
As a young woman I’m always valued by my looks and have social pressure to be pretty. Maybe it’s wishful thinking but I think people are not as interested in your looks.
No. 561592
>>561426It's not just Antifa, it's plain clothes officers as well as other actors of the State - agent provocateurs - this has happened before. Some people don't know the history of Cointelpro
https://originalpeople.org/cointelpro-the-fbis-war-on-black-america/Civil rights groups who were for the most part peaceful, making real tangible change in their communities (like the black panthers) were infiltrated, sabotaged by Hoovers FBI. Iterations of cointelpro still exist today. They tried to lie about civil rights activists like Viola Liuzzo, a white woman murdered by the KKK, one of the killers was an FBI informant. FBI tried to smear Dr. Martin Luther King too.
There are those in positions of power and authority who not only want to maintain the status quo but use this "perfect storm" to fulfill their personal agendas. Companies like Amazon (whose workers are still treated like trash) and Walmart get preferential treatment while small, indie businesses are put OUT of business by the State who selectively enforces arbitrary rules. Believe the corporate conglomerates are salivating over this.
No. 561641
>>561574>>561597Sanders had the DNC nomination literally
stolen from him in 2016 by Clinton, the nomination was rigged, and who was held accountable? No one. Nothing came of it, except for the guy who served the DNC with a subpoena for fraud, Shawn Lucas, he died not shortly afterwards, that was about it. The political process is a running joke. The left/right false paradigm is just more divide and conquer bs to keep the sheep asleep. Voting is a suggestion box for slaves.
"Forget the politicians. The politicians are put there to give you the idea you have freedom of choice. You don't. You have no choice. You have owners. They own you. They own everything. They own all the important land, they own and control the corporations that've long since bought and paid for, the senate, the congress, the state houses, the city halls, they got the judges in their back pocket, and they own all the big media companies so they control just about all of the news and the information you get to hear. They got you by the balls." - George Carlin
No. 561690
>>561594There's a wide range of western games, you can't just put them all in the same boat. Do you play games to feel the experience or to gush over kawaii guys?
No need to make the characters more attractive to ppl like you if you don't even play these games. As I said, stick to otoge.
No. 561982
>>561923 James Madison states:
>There are two methods of curing the mischiefs of faction: the one, by removing its causes; the other, by controlling its effects.Keep in mind that the cause of these riots is racial in nature.
Madison's first suggested method for removing a faction is:
>Destroying its liberty which is essential to its existence.Let that sink in.
He then proceeds to criticize said method:
>But it could not be less folly to abolish liberty, which is essential to political life, because it nourishes faction.The second method he suggests is:
>Giving to every citizen the same opinions, the same passions, and the same interests.Critique of the second method:
>The second expedient is as impracticable as the first would be unwise. As long as the reason of man continues fallible, and he is at liberty to exercise it, different opinions will be formed.
>The diversity in the faculties of men, from which the rights of property originate, is not less an insuperable obstacle to a uniformity of interests.>The most common and durable source of factions has been the various and unequal distribution of property.>propertyThat essay doesn't seem to be written with racial conflicts in mind.
He also states:
>The latent causes of faction are thus sown in the nature of man.>The inference to which we are brought is, that the CAUSES of faction cannot be removed.But we don't observe racial conflicts in segregated societies now do we?
That assay didn't exactly addressed my concerns over the never ending tension in american society, James Madison kinda just goes: shit will happen no matter what, YOLO, while calling himself enlightened. I couldn't finish reading it.
No. 562024
File: 1590943786901.jpeg (11.22 KB, 204x149, 1F62473E-0B12-4406-AECE-B5D66B…)
There’s no hollywood cultish cabal and most celebrities are normal, even quite boring, people.
Yes there are Uber Creeps like Epstein and Trump but they are as much creeps as that infamous kiddy diddler no one had the guts to call the cops to in your town but everyone knows he’s a creep, they just don’t want to get involved, rich pedos just have enough money to do it on private islands and pay the victims to keep shush, since instead of children they are actually just teen prostitutes.
No human sacrifice orgies or whatever the fuck, just big circlejerky parties where their jerk each other off figuratively and not, still awful, still fueling human trafficking (which also is less about cages and babies and more drug addiction, debt and violent coercion), and way less people involved than everyone assumes.
Hollywood and the Elite is just a mystified version of your neighborhood, what goes on there is way less interesting than it seems and you probably have it going on in front of you but in a 40 dollar version instead of millions.
No. 562089
>>562041I don't care as well. I'm annoyed by it on my feed. Its not like they care about my country so why should I.
and now for an unpopular opinion: I actually like cops. Sure there are some bad ones but most are nice.
No. 562105
>>548392I need to be able to write this somewhere gdi I'm so fucking fed up, I try to be neutral and objective, something that has caused me to receive multiple hate comments and hatred even from irl people when I just ignored their own stupidity because I'm not a fucking moron who can't tolerate other people's opinions
I think all those people who swear by they "goodness" with "blm" and "acab!11!" and riots and burning things are idiots who are part of an endless cicle of violence that will never stop, they are part of the problem and fail to see it
and don't even think about criticizing anything they say bc you immediately get "cancelled" and a hoard of "good people" will come to dox you, insult you and wish you "deactivate","die" and other nice things (because, you know, they are the good ones)
I hate people
No. 562124
>>562089I like some cops too.
Don't try to deceive yourself that POC are only mistreated by police in the US, Europe is not free of racism. However I respect the people who go into the police force to change things for the better and I think that the popularity of ACAB is going to reduce the amount of good people who want to go into the police and also ruin the relationships between communities and their police forces.
No. 562137
>>562037What I find super hypocritical are all those people, mostly not American ones, who never post or comment on anything political (especially not from their own country) have suddenly woken up and are retweeting on how to protest and stuff (like they'd ever get out of their houses). Ffs, there's this artist (European) who said "I want to open commissions to buy a new phone, but now is not the time", I don't get it, they are not going to stop their lives.
I genuinely don't have the energy to care about riots thousand kilometers away from my place, we have our own riots and problems here.
No. 562300
>>562261LMAO
I'm American, fuck off and stop crying, the country is shit anon. No one is falling for your global propaganda anymore, even people in 3rd world countries are seeing this shit.
No. 562377
>>562374Nta but a lot of both men and women lie/exaggerate about it to get pity. Reminds me of bully
victims who never ever ever bullied someone before.
No. 562394
>>562374No and I didn't even see your post before.
>>562381Well men don't talk as often about it. Now it's like everywhere in places like Twitter.
No. 562405
>>562404Women who have been truly abused seek court or the media while attention whores post about it online and do nothing else. That's what I think.
Are you going to reply with "Wow" something again? It's getting boring.
No. 562411
>>562408Don't pretend that plenty of people don't exploit social media for attention. Look at the Melanie martinez drama. Look at the attention whores involved in onion drama. Why do you feel threatened when other women call out an obvious problem?
t.
Victim who never disclosed. But never attention whored about it online either.
No. 562429
File: 1590975260340.jpg (958.58 KB, 1577x1024, d5544674a.jpg)
>>562422Because "Colored" was used like a slur. Especially during segregation in america so it has baggage.
No. 562433
>>562431Don't you know?
Victims of rape can tell if another person is a
victim as well just by text
No. 562481
>>562472Look, I'd rather believe somebody who turns out to be a liar than not believe somebody who turns out to be a real
victim.
You hurt
victims with that pick and choose mentality.
No. 562493
>>562479Lmfao I never said everybody was lying, don't project so much. Reading is essential.
>>562481Yikes, this mentality is sad. I'm never going to believe someone off word alone, it's just the truth. Sorry the justice system doesn't run off of he said she said.
No. 562508
>>562497And neither is Twitter or your feelings
>>562494Keep projecting, I'm not the OP.
No. 562511
>>562505Aw you really need to "hi newfag" because you have your feelings in a twist now? Read the context of the discussion you retard, we're talking about social media.
Sage your shit darling.
No. 562518
>>562494Didn't sage
>>562514 Keep calling me a newfag though.
No. 562600
>>562377>>562371>>562405You're either a shit troll or just a shit person.
I wish I could say that I hope nobody ever believes you about anything or that nobody ever helps you, but I can't, but that's what you deserve.
No. 562623
>>562501lmao what you think marina abramovic kill little kiddies? Grow up.
Making something that seems to far away from our reality in a fantasy far fetched cult bullshit is just a way for people to avoid seeing that its all the same issues that they have in their day to day lives.
Honestly people should stop pointing fingers at hollywood and start weeding out abusers in their own communities.
No. 563646
File: 1591101184730.jpeg (151.62 KB, 1047x1200, DB42CB09-9EF7-45DC-8A76-D6B8F2…)
Radkatherines art is painfully average, tumblr tier shit. If she didn’t get clout from radfems and the hate from TRAs, she would not have gotten half of the following(which is still fairly small) she has now.