[ Rules ] [ ot / g / m ] [ pt / snow / w ] [ meta ] [ Server Status ]

/ot/ - off-topic

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File(20 MB max)
Video
Password
 (For post deletion)
The site maintenance is completed but lingering issues are expected, please report any bugs here

File: 1629129411053.jpeg (272.17 KB, 828x965, EDB1AA7F-9B88-4268-93D4-2CDA74…)

No. 882895

https://igotstandardsbro.com/

I saw this and thought it was absolutely retard, then thought it would be perfect for nonnies to try it out.

Apparently I am a "cat enthusiast" and got a score of 4/5 on the delusion scale for wanting a man that is at least:
not married, white, 5'10+, not obese, earning $40,000+ per year (I am from Eastern Europe but I just did it according to American salary)(>>>personality quiz thread)

No. 882899

no thanks, let us know when moid delusion calculator goes live

No. 882902

File: 1629129981264.jpeg (131.76 KB, 752x486, 7CF3F39F-2988-4C21-9B7B-F05F97…)

the audacity of this app to even have "not married" as an option. who the fuck is gonna date a married man?

No. 882903

>>882895
The absolute state of americans kek.

No. 882909

File: 1629130593532.png (96.74 KB, 1440x698, Screenshot (41).png)

Actually proud of myself

No. 882911

Kek. This is like some sort of
>D-date me even if I’m a balding 40 years old obese midget man with a failed marriage and an income of 2K dollars a year or you’re a Crazy Cat Lady™

No. 882919

File: 1629130922853.jpeg (108.03 KB, 1242x753, 6973EB73-76A3-4104-A3BF-2824E4…)

>>882911
Samefag, but nonnies, get on my level. Funnily enough, I’m not asking for much, moids are pathetic

No. 882922

3/5 aspiring cat lady
I was curious what would it take to bring it down to 2/5 and it's either dating married men or removing any income expectations. So if I was an american woman, I'd be crazy to expect a 5'6ft man, not married, not obese to also be employed kek.

No. 882923

>>882899
>never married
>no kids
>not mentally ill unless in a "sexy freaky" way
>below 30 years old, preferably below 25
>white or maybe east asian
>below 55kg regardless of height
>hourglass figure
>virgin
>shares all opinions
>shares all hobbies
>shares all kinks
>never jealous or clingy
>accepts that she can be easily replaced with a "better" woman when no longer "perfect"
what a perfectly reasonable list of standards!

No. 882928

File: 1629131275319.png (115.44 KB, 724x729, Screen Shot 2021-08-16 at 9.26…)

>not married
>white
>at least 5' 4" tall
>not obese
>$70,000 (califag)

Lol this can not be accurate. Even gave a big age range.

No. 882931

At this point in life i just ask for a men that doesn't smell like sweaty balls and brush his teeths. I am 19 btw.

No. 882932

File: 1629131503071.jpg (63.76 KB, 753x650, eR2bW8g.jpg)

Tbf, I think I didn't get a 3/5 because I never liked the idea of having a boyfriend or husband with a higher paying than me.

No. 882933

Literally put that I'm fine with anything so long as he makes minimum wage and it gave me a 2/5. This calculator wants men to have second mothers, not wives.

No. 882934

> How did I come up with the Female Delusion Calculator idea?

During my "dating career" as a man living in North America I couldn't help noticing that women often have unrealistic expectations about the man they are looking for. Below average women expect their high quality men to stick around. They don't realize these guys are in high demand.

The stats can prove there're not enough high quality men for every girl out there.

The Female Delusion Calculator is a tool that can help women discern what is realistic from what is highly unlikely.

A literal incel made this

No. 882935

>>882911
Agreed, this is a really retarded cope, I'd like to see the statistic calculator for mens' standards for women

No. 882936

File: 1629131820707.jpeg (1.51 MB, 3464x3464, A36BFC05-AA64-43DF-9245-FA4475…)

>>882923
sorry nonny i had to copypaste this in /r9k/ because i knew it would make the moids seethe and this is what they said

No. 882938

>>882934
That is hilarious.

Moids still don't get we'd rather be alone than date most of them kek.

No. 882941

i just put my boyfriends info and got aspiring cat lady. it's true though cus he has 4 cats and one of them just had 4 kittens and i want to live with them

No. 882947

Now make the same but about women…

No. 882949

>>882935

It would always be at about 5/5 followed by a "she's not yours, it's just your turn"

No. 882950

>>882936
too male didn't read

No. 882960

File: 1629132989506.png (56.64 KB, 772x477, 5.PNG)

Why the fuck is "not married" an option, of course you want a single man. Jesus.
>not obese
not asking too much either

No. 882962

it's much too vague, would have been fun if precise relevant criteria like education level, drugs or not, languages spoken, hobbies etc had been added. i only got 2 cat litter bags even though i'm really selective

No. 882966

>>882960
Like 60% of the US adult population is obese, so of course it's going to factor in.

No. 882968

File: 1629133209230.jpg (82.42 KB, 1080x588, Screenshot_20210816_185453.jpg)

>age 20-25 (I'm 20)
>not married
>white
>at least 6' tall i am 6' tall myself
>not obese
>any income to include students
I'm not in the us anyway but my standards seem very reasonable to me kek, lmk when the moid delusion meter drops

No. 882971

>>882960
>Why the fuck is "not married" an option, of course you want a single man.
The Y chromosome is an intellectual disability.

No. 882973

Played around with it. Not wanting a man to be married and to be healthy (not obese) seem to pretty much always have you at 3/5 which is KEK The incel who made this is the delusional one

No. 882975

What skews the results so much is the "not married" option imo. Married men aren't in anyone's dating pool anyway, I suspect the guy who made this added that criterion because he was seething and wanted to make totally reasonable women like >>882928 look crazy

No. 882976

File: 1629133543796.jpg (174.47 KB, 720x1356, 20210816_140647.jpg)

kek

No. 882977

>>882976
>the possibility of meeting a man is 26.3%
God I wish

No. 882978

>>882934
>The stats can prove there're not enough high quality men for every girl out there.
You would think this would make inceloids become just a tad bit self-aware but nope.

No. 882983

>>882975
This should be such an obvious thing, I can't believe it wasn't done on purpose

No. 882990

File: 1629134411466.jpg (316.01 KB, 1080x1414, IMG_20210816_201811.jpg)

>tfw your standards:
>not married
>not obese
>not a hobo
>CHANCE OF FINDING THIS MAN IS 26℅
>withered_wojak.jpg

No. 882992

>>882976
Holy fuck.

No. 882993

>>882960
>>882971
>>882973
>>882975
>>882983
Excluding married men by default would make no difference to any statistical analysis.

No. 882998

File: 1629135056074.jpg (188.79 KB, 720x1374, 20210816_143040.jpg)

Seriously.

No. 882999

>>882998
So one can’t score 1/5 or even 0/5. R I G G E D

No. 883001

Is there even a way to get a 1/5?

>>882998
Kek!

No. 883004

>>882978
Exactly what I was thinking. Can’t change height or race but you most definitely can control your weight and overall appearance. So close yet so far away. Do better men.

No. 883007

>>882993
In this case, Yes it would

No. 883009

>>882999
I'm pretty sure this was done on purpose to neg women for having standards above fat, ugly, and broke incels.

No. 883017

Are all women sluts that get laid 10 times in one night on the pure basis of being female or are we picky to the point of femceldom? These types of guys have so much cognitive dissonance to think we simultaneously date too much and yet also have standards so high we will never find a partner. Which is it, moids?

No. 883018

>>883007
No it wouldn't. The unmarried male population doesn't increase in number if you exclude the married male population from the calculation. You don't make the likelihood of a man meeting the standard higher by excluding anybody.

No. 883019

>ages 20-55
>no married
>white
>at least 6’
>any weight
>$100K min

4/5 delusion with a 0.51% of finding someone like this.

No. 883021

File: 1629136196321.jpg (242.67 KB, 841x1582, c9bLmbW.jpg)

I tried, but I can't get a 1/5.

No. 883022

>>882998
I don't get it, I put in not obese and not married and it said 55%, 1/5

No. 883023

>>882936
>I don't care about anything, but she needs to be a bit open to my kinks
I don't think these people understand any relationship more serious than "discord e-dating". But I guess they're robots, so what do I expect.

No. 883025

>>882936
I’d like to remind men that they’re the ones who struggle to get a date and seethe when they can’t find a partner, and yet we’re the ones who need an attitude adjustment?

No. 883026

>>882934
lmaooo whatttt, I thought this shit was for shit and giggles, not to be actally taken seriously.

No. 883027

File: 1629136371021.jpg (237.7 KB, 972x1847, This is my limit.jpg)

>This is as low as I go bro…

The race option is kinda bs as it's based off the demographics of the US, so specifying race is always gonna lower the probability to an abyssmal percent even more so if you select anything other than white.

No. 883031

>>883021
"white" as the only standard gets you 1/5

No. 883036

>>883018
Yes you do. Having both the married and unmarried population of men counted would increase the number of males therefore increasing the chance of one fitting into whatever other criteria.

No. 883038

what if men and women are both kind of disconnected from reality because of what is displayed through all media ?

I would like to see the data that this thing uses to see if it's close to reality or statistically false (even if it seems to be false)

No. 883040

Wait I don't understand what this is trying to tell us. The possibility a man fulfills what I asked may be X%, but that does not mean I have a X% chance of finding a man in my life; just because there's maybe 1% of men that fulfill my standards that means there's tens or hundreds of thousands such men in the united states alone
>>882934
>Below average women expect their high quality men to stick around. They don't realize these guys are in high demand.
I don't know, a man who leaves his woman the second he finds another "more valuable" does not seem very high quality

No. 883043

>>883026
>shit and giggles
Incels aren't capable of joy, anon

No. 883045

>>883036
It would increase the percentage of men in the pool that meet the standard. It would not increase the probability that a man in the US population would meet that standard.

No. 883048

File: 1629137556585.jpg (164.64 KB, 720x1370, 20210816_151300.jpg)

Tough luck, kboos and weebs

No. 883053

>>883048
Lol yeah nope don't know where this incel is getting his "data" but that doesn't match the actual data of Asian men in the usa in that age range.

No. 883054

>>883045
Don't think this "calculator" is exactly properly using probability kek

No. 883055

>>883045
I understand what you are saying, but the way I understood it is "what are the chances of you coming accross a man that meets your standards?" and for practical effects married men might as well not exist, because they wouldn't be part of the dating pool (not to most people at least). Plus the calculator was created by a fucking incel, so it was made from the point of view from a single man. It's dumb anyway so whatever.

No. 883056

>>883040
You would think an autistic incel would be good enough at math to understand probability and percentages of large numbers, but the netflix specials have lied to you. The rage is blinding.

No. 883059

File: 1629138536523.jpg (413.8 KB, 1080x2005, Screenshot_20210816_202904.jpg)


No. 883062

>>883040
This doesn't try to tell us anything, this shit was made for the sole purpose of negging us by saying that our chance of finding our ideal man is 0.00005℅ (without even considering our own status when estimating it, mind you! If you are rich/young, you are more likely to meet rich/young people. Or if you are attractive you have the opportunity to date above your league and have higher standards. Everyone has their own chance of meeting/dating someone from a specific circle, pretending that it's equal for everyone is intellectually dishonest), so we stupid whores must lower our standards or else we will become a (((catlady))). Disregard this bullshit, seems like moids became completely insane if they think that this blatant projection (unable to find a date) will work on us.

No. 883064

>>883059
Ah yes. Women are delusional for not wanting to be homeless and starving with their partner.

No. 883065

>>883059
Are they recommending us to date married men? It just seems to increase the chance of "finding mr. right" the most.

No. 883066

>>882936
>reee 'females' being selectors of genes worthy of carrying over is suddenly bad, even though that's how it works in nature
Then perish. Fuckts don't care about your feefees

No. 883074

It is weird, I tried known statistics like just the men above 6' and the stat was right (~15%) https://static1.squarespace.com/static/585718168419c246cf6f204e/t/5ab7e2de70a6adbbb6bcf676/1522000606378/STATISTICS%2B-Dimensions%2B-%2B3-19-18%2B%281%29.pdf
I tried exclude obese and the stat was weird from what I found but not really off (it's like it took the stats for all adults not just men which is close to women tho)
https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/data/adult.html
For the earnings it said 16% for 100k and above which doesn't seems to be so off either (I couldn't find the stat back for this one)
Then if you put an age range it surely reduce the number of eligible men by a lot
So in the end it seems to be more accurate than what I thought. I find it scary that US men are like this (well mostly the obesity part)

No. 883077

>>883048
>delusional incel makes website with fake statistical data to try and get women to lower their standards and date morbidly obese, broke, old men with used, decrepit penises
Why do they want to lower the quality of the human race? Unironically, these men shouldn't even be on the internet. They should be doing labor and working in factories, no time to even waste trying to form opinions.
Men remind me every day that not all humans are born equal. 90% of them really are worthless and expendable. Their sperm should not be passed on.

No. 883083

>>882895
Can mods explain where they would like this to have been posted if it didn't warrant a separate thread? Can't have shit in Detroit

No. 883187

File: 1629149001882.png (88.64 KB, 1466x738, Screenshot 2021-08-17 at 00-16…)

>>882968
same, but 5'11 instead of 6'. if i change to 6'goes to 3/5
also, americans kinda have a lowish average height, im from a country with the tallest girls and the fourth tallest guys in the world, so the data is skewed if you arent american.

No. 883189

>>882998
technically, the grouping differs from age
ie youd probs get a 1/5 if you went for a lower age,because young people have a lower rate of marriage, but because you put the entire age range there are way more married guys

No. 883211

File: 1629150123938.jpeg (92.38 KB, 632x315, 4AF59358-940B-4272-8E86-6E17A5…)

I just described my long term boyfriend, how interesting…

No. 883212

>>883083
It literally says "personality quiz thread" you blind? catalog+ctrlf

No. 883239

>>883212
This isn't a personality quiz tho.

No. 883252

>here are my statistics that show 95% of men lack even the most basic desirable qualities
>in conclusion, woman bad

????

No. 883254

The attempt at negging is such a fail because most women are already aware of the low chance of finding a half decent scrote, and they know their reasonable standards aren’t to blame. Those who fear ending up alone are fearing not finding “the right man”. They don’t want some shit substitute scrote.

I had a pickme phase and had basically zero standards to the level of dating misogynistic abusers. Fuck that life, I would rather have 100 cats and I don’t even like them. My most important standards now are treat women like human beings and do a fair share of the housework. Apparently I’m still expecting too much lmao.

No. 883294

>>883252
>>883254
Yeah anons, that's the conclusions I drew too. Typical males blaming women for their own inadequacies as well as the simple fact that women want any sort of quality over fat ugly retards. Cry harder scrotes kek

No. 883308

File: 1629159756199.png (19.52 KB, 706x222, catlady.PNG)

>25-36
>not married
>white
>6'
>any weight
>50k min

wtf is wrong with men? these aren't unreasonable standards at all. A man that age should be making enough to support himself

No. 883326

>>882936
>has no opinions on politics
Fascinating

No. 883386

File: 1629167163569.jpeg (257.74 KB, 547x1114, 882642A6-C6BD-4A7E-A92A-DB0C27…)

oh they forgot to put certain things in this quiz such as

>personality
>will do the dishes, wash his ass and shower, takes cares and nurtures the kids, loves to read and write
>slender and tall
>won’t one day be awakened by their y chromosomal rage and kill himself, the wife and kids in a house fire because she told him to do something
>non-aggressive
>doesn’t come into the world with muh peepee phallocentric mindset (impossible challenge for men)

No. 883391

>any marital status
>24-41
>any race (wish I could exclude white)
>not obese
>at least 5'7
>makes <$65k

13.7% chance, 2/5 "Down to Earth"

No. 883401

>>883391
You can't exclude white? That's…actually pretty funny, lmao. Incel programming at work.

No. 883470

>>883401
You can't exclude any. You pick one or get all three.

No. 883528

File: 1629187015169.png (134.62 KB, 965x861, img.png)

I put my boyfriend's stats and still got this, when he's perfectly average, and with slightly less income than me. What a joke

No. 883569

>>883308
they just mad because women won't lower their standards even more, the bar is already on the floor.

No. 883655

File: 1629197753520.png (642.76 KB, 1022x731, It's_All_So_Tiresome.png)

>Women complaining about lack of good men
>Never once do they look into mirror and question whether there is an equal deficit of good women

No. 883660

File: 1629197880526.jpg (13.13 KB, 200x171, XYchromosome.jpg)

>>883655

No. 883661

File: 1629197961659.png (11.27 KB, 664x192, Screenshot 2021-08-17 at 14-58…)

>>883660

No. 883678

>>883661
>43% for men
So men are also fatter? Literally worse and inferior in every way lol

No. 883679

>>883655
I would rather be alone forever and become a cat lady (I hate cats) than be with an unattractive man

No. 883682

Why are the demographics for race so narrow if this is US based?
Aren't Hispanic/Latino men counted differently? A large segment of Latinos are absolutely not white. And does Asian include South and West Asian?

No. 883715

>>883661
did you mean to own yourself?

No. 883728

I got 4/5 lol. I don't mind since a I'm a lesbian but how excluding obese and much older men is delusional?

No. 883732

>>883660
everyone starts as female (the only correct and valid sex) in the womb and then some get diseased with the y chromosome

No. 883738

This quiz is so funny. It's designed to own women but all it does is reveal how awful US men are. I got 3/5 too. I want a 23-35 year old white single man, not obese, at least 5'9 earning $35k a year (a low salary in my country). "According to statistical data, the probability a guy of the U.S. male population ages 23 to 35 meets your standards is 3.1% that is 5.6% of all white men in that age range". I thought I was being extraordinarily fair, men in my country are much taller, slimmer and wealthier lmao. US nonnies just migrate already kek.

No. 883757

>>883732
Based

No. 883760

File: 1629206555110.jpeg (362.81 KB, 750x907, CB3D1C21-1167-4633-A3B9-BC83A9…)

>>883757
sage but anon look at this too KEK

No. 883763

>>883760
Hahhh cool I hope men die out and who is not a lesbian can receive a male shaped robot husband.

No. 883774

>>883655
The male shrivels in pain and is shocked that women are the building blocks of life, women are the passage of life and death itself. With his crippled semen container between his legs whimpering and whispering “where are the good women who can succ, fuck, and rear like a good domesticated animal while I go out and continue to destroy the world for everyone else?” Maleness is true projection, if all men are shit they think there’s a natural equation which means that women are also just as terrible and useless as them. Doesn’t matter we can farm your sperm, men are absolutely useless at creating or destroying life so they create artificial means at doing so.

No. 883782

>>883760
Needed those good news

No. 940072

Another male copium induced fantasy. I’m 21 a college student im not obese yet a 21-25 year old guy whos fit and makes decent income is “aspiring cat lady”? Lol. I’m not even offended because i’ probably will end up a cat lady since men repulse me. Cope, moid.

No. 940075

File: 1634367135805.jpg (439.68 KB, 1080x1880, Screenshot_20211016-084841_Chr…)

So having 0 standards makes you a man kek

No. 940077

I don't understand what incels tried to prove with this. That women are better off without a man because probability if finding someone normal is like 4.5%?

No. 940136

>>940077
That women are delusional and have insane standards, according to them.

No. 940155

>>940077
>I don't understand what incels tried to prove with this.
that you should never date a man who hates cats

No. 940172

>>940077
I'm from a European country and all it did was confirm American men are short, fat and poor. Self-own.

No. 940174

File: 1634385505054.jpg (303.06 KB, 1080x2052, Screenshot_20211016-090420_Chr…)

>>940172
lmfao same

I put in guy I am currently dating, and 2 exes before him and I get 1% chance that I would ever meet them lolwut

No. 940175

File: 1634385728926.jpg (512.15 KB, 1080x1754, Screenshot_20211016-090602_Chr…)

>tfw no rich and giant asian grandpa bf


Delete Post [ ]
[Return] [Catalog]
[ Rules ] [ ot / g / m ] [ pt / snow / w ] [ meta ] [ Server Status ]