File: 1688247289176.png (1.57 MB, 1122x1120, hellolcow.png)
No. 59152
Hellweek is now over.
LC moderation will revert to a more relaxed style. We appreciate all of the user feedback and wanted to address some hot topics here. Keep in mind moderation is often extremely subjective, although we conduct Hellweek to try and orient our moderation style around the most popular attitudes on LC. Let us know what you think about the following:
Multiple Hellweeks per year: Anons brought up potentially having December and summer Hellweeks. It will depend on when staff is available, and whether there seems to be a need come this December.
Reddit spacing rules: The image >>59256 attached needs line breaks, and those line breaks wouldn’t be considered Reddit spacing since the post is just so long. Shorter posts don’t require line breaks, although for mobile users these posts may look long like >>59260 says. >>59277 makes a good case against Reddit spacing. Line breaks for dramatic effect are a bit obnoxious, but if it’s funny or sarcastic it may be excused.
Line breaks after the post number you’re replying to is an identifiable typing style and will be temp banned. Minimodding about anything, including muh reddit spacing >>59320 should be reported and bans will be issued. Bullying new users into integrating is not minimodding. We would argue that it’s necessary.
Imageboard bans, attaching screenshots when linking outside websites or articles: When a link is posted with no screencap, the conversation often dies with that post. Whether that’s because the post failed to capture interest or anons didn’t click the link because they want a more cohesive scrolling experience or don’t trust links is ultimately irrelevant. We consider that a low quality post. So, when you post a link, attach a screenshot of what the link contains.
Male/troon accusations: Accusing other anons of being male/troon when it’s not immediately obvious often leads to witch hunts and infighting. Women have lots of different opinions. Women may hold misogynistic opinions. They are still women.
New redtext: sus, unalived, goated, and femcel will be added as new redtext!
Hellweek theme being usable after tomorrow: We will update the existing Hellweek theme to have the fire gif at the bottom.
Misuse of terminology, twitter/tiktok verbiage, “serving cunt” ban, “rapefugee” ban, other language:>>59342 brings up these points. Things like r*pe or sewerslide are always bannable. LC is free speech friendly and is in direct opposition to self-censoring speech. Things like “serving cunt” are up to mods discretion. It’s drag/twitter language that is better suited to other places online.
The term “rapefugee” sounds like its straight from /pol/ which is why those posts have resulted in temp bans. However, we understand that rape by refugees is suffered by women, so women here may feel that “rapefugee” is an accurate term that rapist refugees deserve to be called >>59479. Global Rule 7 states: Do not instigate or engage in race related arguments. (racebaiting). Clearly, we’ve allowed race related discussion, but please keep it civil between users.
Incorrect terminology like “LC is a forum” or “/m/ is my favorite imageboard” would be better combated by bullying letting anon know that LC is an imageboard and /m/ is a board and that anon is a newfag. Remember some anons are ESL.
Our original announcement can be found below.
Hellweek will begin July 2 and will end July 9 (at midnight EST in both cases). Posts made during this week will receive extra scrutiny and moderation will increase. However, this is not applicable to posts made before or after hellweek. Please post any questions, suggestions, or concerns in this thread. General complaints stay in the general complaints thread.
What is Hellweek?Hellweek is a period of time, typically a week, where moderation is strict. This hellweek, all boards will be participating and all bans will be redtexted in order to receive feedback from site users (use this thread for that feedback). Just because redtext is used does not mean a ban is permanent. Feel free to report posts, but if your reports are consistently frivolous or falsely accusing anons of being male, etc. expect a temporary ban for wasting time.
Why does Hellweek exist?LC’s first ever Hellweek was held December of 2015
>>1904
>The purpose of this will be to gauge community reaction to moderation actions, and help determine if permanent policy changes should be made. The secondary purpose will be to hopefully encourage people to improve their quality of posts in the long term, without moderators having to step in.Anons have stated that board culture has gone downhill since the coronavirus quarantine/lockdown of 2020. The drama forum Pretty Ugly Little Liars also closed in 2020. The farm has seen an influx of twitter and PULL refugees, as well as users immigrating from TikTok as LC has been mentioned on that platform. Users who violate the rules as outlined by lolcow.farm/rules and who do not conform to board culture will be the main targets of Hellweek’s heavy moderation, but the main goal is to integrate as many newfags as possible while improving the overall posting quality.
No. 59153
File: 1688248165802.jpeg (146.95 KB, 1448x2048, IMG_9976.jpeg)
How exciting.
No. 59165
File: 1688250772608.gif (952.27 KB, 499x374, 2f0.gif)
thank you based cerbmin
No. 59168
File: 1688254433250.jpg (8.06 KB, 194x260, images.jpeg-15.jpg)
Hell yes let's GO
May Mother Moo bless your efforts, cerbmin and farmhands.
No. 59169
File: 1688254753344.jpeg (467.69 KB, 828x823, 4EF3DE69-0231-476E-A3BE-31A235…)
Wow feels like Christmas in July….
No. 59191
File: 1688298978018.gif (3.96 MB, 540x224, tumblr_00164bf37210e526bb9ebc8…)
Hide your cows, hellweek is here
Kek i love the theme and read the rules rain
No. 59203
File: 1688313600532.gif (11.32 MB, 638x586, cow-wash-the-cow-wash.gif)
Just popped in to say I love how certain problem threads are dead the day hellweek starts kek
Although it IS Sunday…
No. 59207
File: 1688326689230.jpg (72.85 KB, 947x844, k43.jpg)
kek why am i excited for this
No. 59252
File: 1688416050902.jpeg (685.22 KB, 1179x1319, IMG_0086.jpeg)
Not debating this ban but wanted to ask is reddit spacing now a bannable offense? I like to line breaks sometimes but I can stop if it’s officially ruined by reddit for everyone. Is it more the combative smarmy nature of the post combined with line breaks that made it reddit spacing or just the literal spacing? The single sentences needlessly broken up? Pretty sure I’ve discussed this on /ot/ at some point but it remains unclear to me possibly because I don’t use reddit
No. 59253
>>59252Reddit spacing is just the space between the lines and has always been against the rules
Anons got away with it previously because there were few farmhands to dole out bans for things like that while the board's population kept growing in size. Hopefully it will encourage newfags to integrate
No. 59256
File: 1688418574010.png (121.12 KB, 1296x451, paragraph.PNG)
>>59252I agree with the anon above, we need clarification on what reddit spacing is because some anons get banned for spacing while others don't seem to. Plus admins literally reddit space themselves, and it literally hurts me when an anon post a super long post with no fucking paragraph breaks (see pic for example, no offense to this anon).
No. 59260
>>59252this specifically is reddit spacing because unlike
>>59256 it's not actually a wall of text, it just appears to be when typing the post. reddit spacing isn't just using spaces, it's using them to space out text that isn't a big chunk, mainly because it appears as a larger chunk of text to new anons who don't resize the commment box or are phone posting.
No. 59267
>>59260Might also have to do with the fact that
>>59252 is clearly on mobile so the screen size makes the text horizontally condensed
No. 59282
File: 1688439950235.png (19.34 KB, 1667x141, twf.png)
Glad for Hellweek, but can you please curb mods banning people based only on their personal hangups/opinions in an argument?
This isn't my ban, but it comes off as ridiculous (twitterfag how?) and seems obviously biased, since the bait-y OP wasn't redtexted.
No. 59284
File: 1688440312329.png (20.45 KB, 1672x166, twf2.png)
>>59282This is the OP in question, for reference. There was also another ban in the thread where the redtext was just "reeee lesbians":
>>>/ot/1623323 Even if you ignore that the anon outright said not all or even most lesbians make the weird seetheposts and bait about bisexual women, just a couple of anons here, sure, sperging about lesbians
is bad, and it is
also bad to sperg about bi women. Bans and redtexts should be sensible.
No. 59317
>>59306Nta, but admin has addressed the bad moderation. The wholepoint of this week is to find the issues. It's not every mod, it's been less than a handful we know of that have been rogue. The site is massive. You probably think you're replying to
>>59297 but you're not. Report the said shitposts, if they aren't banned, deal with it, but being mad that your replies get the redtext just shows who's not posting properly. All this week is just going to mostly be anons complaining about wanting to post in a
gossip site. This isn't FB or TMZ. We have rules.
No. 59326
>>59312I'm taking a wild guess here but maybe it's the "delulu". I'm not sure honestly the term became very popular all over the internet all of a sudden. Don't think it's really right to ban for it.
>>59324Shut up rancefag, they were kind enough to delete all of your rancid displays of mental illness when you were having your little episode, trannies and men wouldn't do that. The farmhands do seem like newfags sometimes you're right though
No. 59327
>>59326"Delulu" was first said by the person being replied to
>>59284, and the farmhand made a clear point of not redtexting them, though.
No. 59328
>>59320The only issue is that when anons have broken up long lines of sentences before, anons scream about the reddit spacing when it isn't, so it really is a case-by-case basis. Not every post needs 2617 spaces, but 3 paragraphs, based on what the discussion is, shouldn't be an issue. Most anons know how to separate the thoughts or continue on do the paragraph isn't crazy to read, there is a difference and IMO, mods have been good with understanding the difference.
>>59252This is definitely reddit space. The first two lines look like they could be two different posts, but anon added those in up top then just wrote whatever in the last two. The last 2 are acceptable, but the top half autism is what flagged it.
No. 59331
>>59317>You probably think you're replying to >>59297 but you're not.huh?
I linked to the post I was replying to. I haven't been banned either, I report violations as usual.
No. 59339
>>59338that makes sense to me, spacing after one or two sentences does feel off and unnecessary. thanks for clearing that part up.
>Now I know it wasn't even reddit spacing, kek,kek indeed, yeah hopefully after this hellweek maybe there will be a much clearer definition. thank you!
No. 59342
File: 1688506197300.png (144.59 KB, 1783x813, example.png)
>>59337picrel is what I call reddit spacing and the line break after you reply to an anon. in the current tinfoil thread you can see long posts without reddit spacing.
Will there be any bans for incorrect terminology or twitter/tiktok fags verbiage? for example
>lolcow.farm is a forum site>/m is my fave imageboard>Gonna kermit sewerslide>etc.Can't remember all the examples and I don't want to get into a debate how sewerslide is ackchyually from an obscure emo culture or that as an southerner I can use yall folks or whatever.
Would it be possible to force those who got banned to use the read the rules hellweek style for a period of time or would that be too cruel and unusual punishment?
No. 59344
>>59340cant blame you
nonnie, i think posts like that are interesting too
>>59342thank you for picrel examples, i appreciate it! it does make things a lot more clearer for me now.
No. 59349
File: 1688509729557.png (11.38 KB, 1320x112, post.PNG)
>>59342I would also like to add an example.
No. 59352
>>59350ok so:
this
is not reddit spacing
this
is reddit spacing
No. 59362
>>59355this exactly.
lolcow.farm/info
No. 59378
I assume it's best to put hellweek shit here?
>>>/w/302581baby comment was peak retard bait (which I reported too) but hi-cowing is OK during hellweek? A report should be enough. inb4 "you're kiki": I've posted in her thread in previous months, nothing remotely positive. She's absolutely batshit insane but also has shown zero interest in nitpicking babies, only in driving 4h to get crusty homeless STD dick.
In other threads, shouldn't "underrated post" and such be getting redtexted during hellweek even if they slip by normally?
>>>/w/302599 It's against the rules and I've reported it.
No. 59387
>>59350That's exactly what anons are sperging about but you're dismissing it because admin.
>>59383This is another example of how retarded the nitpicks are getting about 'board culture'. That shit has always been around but we used to just call it blogging. Especially if it was someone going on about muh bpd or something. Why are anons so obsessed with reddit the past couple of years? Did we get raided or something? It's confusing.
No. 59401
>>59345honestly, based on this thread alone it seems like no one can agree on it so i don't even see why it should exist as a rule
it feels way too specific and pointless
>>59358i second this
No. 59426
File: 1688607448538.png (239.73 KB, 1152x1028, exampl2.png)
>>59342Samefag, I wanted to clarify that I don't mind spacing like in picrel as it doesn't have any unnecessary spacing à la reddit spacing.
>>59399LSAfags often come in cow threads, Tiktokfags come from retards boasting about being a cow or "reading page 46", redditfags are a mixed bag honestly. They often come here to whiteknight, blog or gossip about certain cows but never lowering themself like filthy mean spirited cunts that festers in this hellhole of "forum".
Will admit that I used to lurk PULL before it shut down but I eventually just stuck to this place well before that time and can attest that pullfags or pulltards as you will are were spotted blogging, nitpicking, seething in jvloggers threads such as Mikan's thread when it went down.
No. 59430
File: 1688610307111.png (298.89 KB, 1794x992, Screenshot 2023-07-05 at 7.27.…)
>>59426lsafags are on /ot/ as well, they're the ones who start racebait by nitpicking over women being light skinned or having straight hair, things that most black anons here are not worried about. that's normie black culture stuff. the sperging over meghan markle from the covid era suspiciously coincided with the markle hate thread on lsa being taken down as well and a bunch of her most virulent haters being banned from lsa and twitter due to harassment. also, there was an influx of lsafags during the george flyod riots, though i am not entirely sure why that was. that was a weird time on the board and i don't miss it.
i feel like the hotep cringe thread in /snow/ has also attracted a lot of them, as there's a lot of tension in the black community between black nationalists and regular black people who are not interested in hearing about 'black' egypt, how jesus was actually nigerian, or how we all need to be living in polyamourous cults because apparently monogamous marriage is "white people stuff". there are a ton of hoteps on lsa who do not get on with black zoomers and think they've been brainwashed by "The Man" because they watch anime, dye their hair blue, and have piercings. so i can imagine many of them come to places like lolcow and kiwifarms to escape from all the fighting and bullying.
https://www.lipstickalley.com/threads/so-pull-forum-is-officially-closed-and-won’t-come-back.3737587/https://www.lipstickalley.com/threads/which-gossip-site-is-more-brutal.3834816/https://www.lipstickalley.com/threads/anyone-lurk-kiwifarms.1901356/ No. 59431
File: 1688614265942.png (149.1 KB, 921x351, possible faggot or edgy teengi…)
Should we moderate posts like this? The use of "cunt" is faggot/twitterbrainrot/misogyn lingo and the obsessive use of "bitch" that I've seen (without comedic purpose) is plain bad taste. I want the newfags to feel extremely alienated and chokeholded into integrating even if by petty means.
No. 59432
File: 1688617063203.png (5.77 KB, 457x146, tranny jannies.png)
why are the new jannies such newfags? since when do you have to sage in fucking /ot/? were they trying really hard to get a ''gotcha'' to be posted in the funny caps thread?
>>>/ot/1625023 No. 59436
>>59431What in fresh American hell. This isn't even how you use "cunt". I expected a bad taste obnoxious rant from an Australian or britbong not an edgy libfem brainrotted retard. I didn't realize Americans also claimed "cunt" in a misognistic brain-dead zoomer way just as "banger" and all other faghag yass queen slayy caved in skull liberal feminist zoomer lingo terms.
I second this, please moderate this and ban this shit. Even in retard spheres like /ot/ this is too retarded on the same level as emoticons and Reddit spacing. It's retard speak and speaks to a total lack of integration, that's not to mention the actual retardation of that post in picrel in itself.
No. 59449
File: 1688631069521.png (150.76 KB, 740x343, 545445786.png)
>>59445>>59447NTA but she doesn't mean the word cunt itself, but the way drag queens and literal fags use it, ie "serving cunt", "giving cunt", specifically
No. 59476
>>59472Anons who complain about "twitter/reddit/unintegrated etc lingo" but are ok with "kek" or "
nonny" are massive hypocrites.
No. 59480
File: 1688655592987.png (153.2 KB, 1806x356, mnbvcdrtyujmnb.png)
Damn Rancefag… you're a crazy bitch but you're growing on me with these random based takes
No. 59488
>>59431>plain bad tasteYeah, we
definitely need to moderate bad taste. Stop running to the jannies for every little thing ffs, this is an imageboard, just shit on it yourself until it becomes so frowned upon people stop doing it
No. 59490
>>59485the word is actually being used positively in this context, not as an insult. basically what
>>59487 said
No. 59496
>>59490>>59487Ah, yes. Let’s also all just call each other and everything hole, that’s so hole, we all are just a hole, front hole even. Kek.
Are you retards seriously justifying using “cunt” as some sort of sooper positive term that’s empowering? Just because a celebrity uses “cunt” daily doesn’t make it right or less retarded. Also
>>59485>queer codedWhat the fuck is this zoomer TikTok faggotry? Fuck off.
This is why 4chan moids and kiwifarm moids are always raiding us.
No. 59498
>>59496Im the second ayrt. Please can some of you learn how to fucking read? Anon said that the cunt isn't gay slang and that's it means douchebag, so I was clarifying that the way "serving cunt" and the post in question uses it is supposed to be positive and it is gay. I literally never said it is actually good or that we should but using it. I wasn't even trying to argue to be rude, it was just an explanation.
>Just because a celebrity uses “cunt” daily doesn’t make it right or less retarded. I cannot stand you illiterate retards. LEARN TO FUCKING READ.
No. 59501
>>59498Samefag but I even said it's meant to be positive. Not that it is, that it is meant to be. I hate that everything needs to be over explained because farmers can't use context clues and need to argue about every little thing.
Literally the entire point was that the post about the school shooter was using it in a gay, positive, twitterfag way, not to mean "douchebag" like that anon thought. There's literally no one way saying that cunt should be allowed or that it's a good word.
No. 59511
>>59507>>59505The post that started this was in the dumbass shit thread which i think should be considered.
my two cents: DragRace popularized gay slang to the point it's now basically mainstream so I think some of the words are just going to be in the common vernacular now whether anynonny likes it or not. You can't control slang on imageboards with bans or redtext if history is any indication. I personally think "kek" should be bannable but that's a war that is long lost.
No. 59516
>>59514then why not "kek" or "
nonny" too?
No. 59518
>>59517"kek" gained traction from world of warcraft and "
nonny" from tumblr and both were hated at first and were considered signs of unintegrated newfaggotry. "
nonny" is redtexted for a good reason, yet not banned.
No. 59519
>>59518Yes, exactly. you get it. the pushback to stupid slang is also natural. world turns. I can literally picture some future linguist writing her thesis on internet terminology whenever this shit comes up.
by the way I think word filters actually work because it shows who is a newfag when they're asking why soy filters to onions or whatever
No. 59536
File: 1688688649612.jpg (24.79 KB, 275x239, 1655207627264.jpg)
>>59401thirded, it'd be hilarious.
>>59512 No. 59539
File: 1688700106528.png (28.34 KB, 1847x252, ihjlk.png)
Reddit spacing statement from a farmhand for those that don't check cow boards.
>>59511>DragRace popularized gay slang to the point it's now basically mainstreamFor twitterfags it is. Why should we use
twitter mainstream slang that is disparaging towards women instead of men? I've seen anons on here complain about using newfag, fag, moid and scrote because it's so
degrading and dated while not minding the use of bitch, whore and now cunt apparently as it just means pussy power regardless of sex according to men who dresses up as a caricature of a woman
and twitterfags>>>/ot/1624241Honestly feel like discussion of Todokaras/Homunculus or whatever her name should be redirected to /snow/ as she's milky enough to have her own thread or just discussed in the transabled thread or TIF thread because anons are clearly interested enough to talk about her and ask to be spoonfed
or qrd as it is in twitter lingo. She has been mentioned over the last year and anons at this point are just repeating the same conversation again and again.
No. 59556
>>59543As I said I'd rather she'd
either get her own thread
or get discussed in the transabled thread or TIF thread in /snow/, we need more traffic in there instead of /ot/
She was already mentioned for a short while in the transabled thread before all of it migrated to /ot/
No. 59578
>>59576You've never browsed one of the cow boards have you.
What
I could do would be posting a link to the thread relevant to the cow, if further discussion of said cow in the wrong thread, I report it and move on. Farmhands have also redirected anons to the appropriate thread by posting in said thread themselves.
Ultimately it's on the anons that keep discussing about said cow to move to the appropriate thread or find the closest equivalent on /snow/ or /w/ as /ot/ is generally a off topic board with the exception of celebricows
which I feel like should be moved back to /snow/ but that's been discussed multiple times before and other cows that are generally just not milky.
No. 59592
>>59591some of those posts were barely a-logs imo, like this
>>>/g/337537feels like a PG-rated idea of what's a-logging
No. 59597
File: 1688789648551.jpeg (420.01 KB, 727x758, IMG_9130.jpeg)
You couldn't be any more triggered. At the end of the day both groups are demoralized mentally ill spergs with severe fetish problems. Troons are just
610 KB JPG the extreme depths of the fetish behavior. You're all a bunch of spergamons evolving into the end stage version that cuts it's body parts off before it kills itself.
This behavior used to be corrected by you bunch of faggots getting severe beatings in school until you became a semblance of a human being but now you're fully supported by hug box social media where it's tolerated and encouraged. The chans were never a bastion of speech they have always been sperg hideouts.
All of you neurodivergent filth needs to be gassed.(smile and nod, we're witnessing mental illness)
No. 59605
File: 1688833600521.png (335.28 KB, 636x599, ranceypoo.png)
>>59602If you think i am a troon you are a RETARD. Literally how i act is so feminine even on lc you can tell i'm a bio woman. What about me is tranny? That's right, absolutely nothing. You see a woman who acts a little unorthodox and assume it must be a tranny because your brain is hardwired to be frightened of anything remotely unfamiliar. Find a SINGLE male or tim that acts like me, i'm waiting. Next i'm gonna be accused of being a tranny because i have small boobs at this rate because of the unhinged misogyny of many users of the site.
>>59595This was ghostwritten by a janny btw, no one actually thinks this.
>>59593LC would be nothing without a-logging, you sound like a really boring person. Why are male imageboards allowed to be autistic and unhinged but lc isn't?
(USER HAS BEEN PUT OUT TO PASTURE) No. 59616
>>59580You mean getting them redtexted like
oof,
toxic,
victim and etc? Or text replacement like cytube? Would be funny if it was the latter.
No. 59624
Hellweek is now over, see edit to OP
>>59152. Discussion of Hellweek is welcome to continue in this thread.
No. 59629
>Line breaks after the post number you’re replying to is an identifiable typing styleBut it looks so cluttered.
>>59153To my half-blind ass anyway. This way of quoting people is ugly.
>>59191What if you're quoting more than two anons?
>>59328See how everything just becomes one hard to see blob? Surely it's not just me.
I think line breaks are also often used to cleanly signify a new idea.
I guess I could just do this, but it still looks bad and hard to read to me…mods pls
No. 59633
File: 1688893469853.jpeg (223.22 KB, 750x855, F263005D-7B29-4417-93E3-653CD7…)
Is there anything that can be done to help stop the disgusting CP spam?
No. 59639
>>59636Replying like this
>>59624Is also not proper formatting
>>59152And makes you stick out though. Also reddit spacing rules still should be added to the actual rules or info page and so should saging in the celebcow thread imo. Don't expect anons to magically know this.
No. 59647
The obsession with so-called
reddit spacing
is fucking retarded.
It's just a particular flavour of nitpicking that is for some reason becoming canon. And the so-called "strong arguments" presented sound a lot more like certain use-cases than a blanket reason. And it leads to autism like
>>59636 where some anons become obsessed with trying to pick out others from the crowd. You know, like an analogue to the everyone I don't like is a tranny / moid /whatever bullshit.
Of all the shit mods could be worrying about, this is considered an important discussion. Unreal.
No. 59655
All of the new decisions make sense and are what most of this site has been operating by already for a long time.
>>59651>admin edits OP instead of making a new threadWhy would they make a new thread when the topic is still about hellweek? The initial OP even discussed how changes would be made according to what happened this hellweek. Weird thing to shit your pants about.
>admin censors wordsWe have had red words for years. Like “
triggered” etc. They have now been updated to reflect modern changes in normie linguistic patterns, as has been sorely needed.
>anons thinking new admins aren't dogshit zoomers and tranniesKek what? The only people I’ve seen be unhappy with cerbmin’s decisions are unintegrated newfags who don’t like the rules they don’t understand.
No. 59660
Cerbmin, would you be willing to update the info page with this new posting etiquette and maybe make it a bit clearer on the /rules/ page where you can find it? Since there is admittedly a lot of anons that don't bother checking /meta/ or the info page unless slapped with a newfag ban.
With regards to personalityfagging can we report anons that have used a distinct word? E.g. faggette is a word I've seen pop up recently and I'm certain that the word is used by the same person. Another example would be when anon began signing off her posts with allah something, suprisingly it caught on by other anons before it got dropped because of pakichan.
>>59638Phoneposting doesn't add an automatic paragraph break after you clicked on a post number. If you were to reply/quote an anon in middle of a text like this
>>59638It will add a line break
move the text underneath the postnumber, however if I were to link and delete like this
, it will leave a gap unless I fix it myself. Another thing I've noticed regarding this if I were to add a paragraph break myself before a text I've written as a reply then it "adds a line break automatically" as you can see below
>>59655Nicely worded.
I had the text cursor in front of the text, line break>>59655Nicely worded.
I had the text cursor on the paragraph break that I made No. 59666
>>59665TAYRT both time as I deleted my post to fix it, What I meant with the allah thing was that it was a specific phrase instead of just allah like when a person e.g. uses god, my god, holy batman. The phrase had a meaning to it but I don't remember what it was and I had noted that anons had started to use it too. Also the person that uses faggette has been banned here before but her post got removed and you can often recognise which post is hers apart from the word faggette.
Also with the
nonny/nona that was a bit different in regards with faggette
No. 59682
How does admin feel about non-contributory posts like this?
>>>/ot/1629851This is basically chatroom talk and grammar correcting is right up the same alley. I don't give a fuck about troons. If anons want to be
femcels, they can go do it in the appropriate thread.
No. 59684
>>59682>correcting troons delusion pronouns makes you a femcelWat. But in any case, hey hey! First redtexted “”
femcel”” since the new rules! Cheers everyone!
No. 59686
>>59685I’m not agreeing or disagreeing but I still don’t understand how the term
femcel applies to that behavior kek
No. 59690
Ah, I see Gene survived hellweek fine:
>>>/pt/914105(Look at the bottom 50 posts, i mean god damn)
Thats just awesome, what an absolute shit show
No. 59731
>>59682A lot of newfags and twitter kids were attracted to that thread and the /snow/ thread recently. When you keep calling a person that we all know is female "they" and worse, "he", it could mean that you're one of those newfags. It would normally not be a big deal if it's your personal preference to keep calling her a they, but given what happened recently it makes you suspicious. So telling you to call her a she is a quick reminder for you to integrate. I'm not the only one who has told others to call that particular artist she, either. You can ignore it and keep using whatever pronouns you want, but don't be surprised if other anons remind you again that she's a woman.
That was my reasoning for making that post anyway.
Another thing that might indicate you're a newfag is you throwing the word "
femcel" around as an insult when people simply ask you to not indulge tranny nonsense. Last year no one here did that but you wouldn't know that because you're new and probably came from TikTok or something.
>>59685>They/Them is also just a neutral term when typing.That's true. You can use it to refer to people like her in general. At first, it might seem like that post I was replying to was referring solely to those kinds of people, but then I realized it shifted its focus to the female artist, but they/them was still being used. When you do that, you make it extra confusing to read your post because it's difficult to tell when you stopped talking about people in general and when you started to talk solely about one person. This is another reason why someone may not stand indiscriminate use of they pronouns, because it's annoying to read on top of potentially being tranny nonsense.
No. 59735
>>59629Sorry for being retarded but can I get clarification on this?
>identifiable typing styleThere’s 11 examples of it in this thread alone and I really don’t think they’re all the same anon? Unless you mean
>>59152Like this like other anon said.
No. 59737
>>59682The
femcel redtext is paying off already
No. 59745
>>59743Correcting grammar and pronouns is such moid behavior when it doesn't contribute at all. Sounds more like anon is an angry
TERF. They did this same thing in the actual artists thread too. Anons are going to refer to cows however they like, but using they/them and immediately sperging that its a trans reason and not just proper grammar, is never contributiory. Anons need to be 18 to post here.
No. 59747
>>59745Yeah, because only men can speak proper English. Totally.
You're so stupid.
No. 59910
>>59909It's bled to a lot of the site and it's made posting in some threads just annoying. Not everyone on this site is a
terf, but terfs, just like moids, completely fuck up certain threads and add no contribution when just posting to argue with your take. And they know this. They do this for fun.
No. 59920
>>59911No I know you agreed. I'm upthread too and honestly the way they derail should be modded a little more, like the whole
>she>heThat anons reply to other anons with, no other context, just because they didn't like the pronoun you used to talk about a cow. Non contributory posts I thought were always banned. Is this not the case in /ot/ regardless of it just shitting up threads? Figured this fell under rule 2 if anything. It's just bait.
No. 59939
>>59938This isn't just in the art thread, anon. They do it in /snow/ too.
>>>/snow/1862873 This shit is annoying. These aren't even my posts, but scrolling by and just seeing the thread get a tick because of this shit is a little infuriating. Now add that to other threads and other boards. Anons can calm down for just one second without screeching over something as dumb as a pronoun. Anons are right, terfs are annoying as hell and need to go back to their containments. If mods are fine with just random grammar-correcting posts, I guess anons can keep doing it, but it's not going to make anons change what they use in reference to cows anyway, so why the fuck bother to shitpost?
No. 59943
>>59942Anon, you can be annoyed by two things. Thoughts aren't linear, even though a lot of terfy women would like it to be. A lot of anons probably really don't give a fuck and from the sounds of this thread, multiple are annoyed by the overly tryhard heavy-handed
terf behavior. Like other anons said, I don't care about troons either, don't want them here, but going into random threads and telling anons they need to use the
right pronouns or arguing that you aren't being angry enough is fucking stupid. Not crazy to compare it to the incel raids except these anons never go away and are everywhere and not just the usual spam threads that the moids post cp in.
No. 60005
>>60002>30-40 shotafags They were probably 3-4 at maximum.
There is occassionally a lot of whining about terves/radfems/manhaters in /meta/ by people who are clearly personally offended by them. I remember how one was outed as a troon. So they definitely shold be ignored by the farmhands.
No. 60006
>>60001I don't even see what the problem is here. Infighting and low quality posts are against site rules, so just report for infighting/shitting up the thread when you see it. Cry in /meta/ if nothing is being done. There are anons who admit to baiting and infighting for fun all over the site, they just use radfem rhetoric bc you all get filtered by the lowest tier bait
TRA summerfags go back and cry about troon hate on 4chan already. Grown men wearing dresses and toddler makeup in their posts to lesbian subreddits will always be milky, why would it be hidden on 2X
>>60002>>60005Can you please shut the fuck up about this shit already you deranged shota obsessed faggots
No. 60013
>>60007I think they are scared about mods
possibly cracking down just because other anons are discussing it being irritating. Anons are being way over the top about the idea of this behavior actually being liked by every user on the site. Anons do report it,but the idea thats even happening is
triggering apparently. Don't shitpost and anons dont have to worry about reports. We're allowed to discuss being annoyed by it. Anons screeching over the discussion need to touch grass.
No. 60025
>>60007>>60013No, I'm just tired of constant derailing happening because anons want to moralfag over how disgusting nasty shotashit is and then call anybody a pedo when they get annoyed with the nonstop sperging. Like
>>60021 said, the mods already banned shota/loli, there's no "cracking down" happening because it's not allowed.
>>60005There was no shotafag troon, it was Blaine baiting by pretending to be against shota and arguing with anons in the thread. Anybody can read past /meta/ threads and see the redtext. This thread is already derailed to shit because nonas can't help themselves
No. 60049
>>60044its not to cape for troons, it's because female politics should be on the female politics board. unless it's a cow who happens to be a tranny, it should go in /2x/. like how celebricows went from /snow/ to /ot/. cows who happen to be trannies should stay on /snow/ so long as /2x/ anons happen to
not nitpick or shit them up, like the constant bullshit in the mtf and ftm threads. nobody cares if a troon is ugly, post actual milk. oh wait, it's few and far between because most truly milky troons get their own threads! thus tranny hate threads should go in /2x/, but the ftm and mtf threads should maintain saging as a requirement, like celebricows. if it gets enough pushback we should have a trooncow containment board like /w/ is a weeb containment board
No. 60060
>>60049moving the mtf thread to /2X/ would defeat the entire point of /2X/ being hidden imo. also
>making fun of troons being inherently politicaldon't think so
No. 60062
>>60044Nta. Those threads were banned for many years because they just bring trouble. Both the most unhinged and obsessive anons and moids or trannies from elsewhere. Moving them to 2x would stop a lot of raiding and other faggotry. And you could still have your hugbox to obsess over troons 24/7 while the rest of us go back to ignoring them. Even better, just ban that shit. Anons can do a crystal cafe 2 troon boogaloo.
And sorry to remind you that the "everybody I don't like is a tranny" shit doesn't work anymore.
No. 60064
>>60049it's not a female politics thread. it's a thread for laughing at cows that are trannies, and cringing at horrorcow troons. cow threads don't belong on 2X.
>>60062it doesn't bring more moids/raiders than any other thread does. ironmouse thread on /w/ constantly attracts scrotes, so do most camgirl cow threads, so does the tradthot thread and crimmy thread and whiteglove thread on /snow/, it's not some issue uniquely caused by the tranny cow threads. you can ignore the threads without them having to be moved to a board they don't belong on, simply just don't click on the thread.
No. 60065
>>60062>>60063this is seriously eerie how obsessed you guys are with this topic. unironically saying
>even better, just ban that shitabout tranny gawking threads on lolcow is such an insane sentence that I would call it bait if it weren't for the fact I know we are currently swimming in summerfags from tiktok and twitter. If you don't like it here you can leave or hide the eviw
terf thweads but board culture of 6+ years will not change for your feelings.
No. 60069
>>60062It's unfortunate but it's been proven time and time again that any feminist or GC discussion attracts newfags like flies to shit. The original Pink Pill and GC threads on /ot/ were banned because newfags refused to keep the discussion in the appropriate threads. /ot/ was becoming unusable because every thread was constant infighting. This is what caused burritomin to create /2X/. She then closed it because newfags wouldn't stop accusing her of being a troon and she had enough of trying to accommodate them. /2X/ was opened again before the hand over to Shaymin who then made the board unhidden before she left. The new admins then made /2X/ a hidden board again because it attracted newfags that spread across the site.
It's sad because we should be able to discuss political issues related to women without having to either moderate the threads to death or hide the discussion. However, it is what it is. Newfags don't seem to able to grasp the concept that while LC hosts feminist discussion, the site in it's entirety is not sperg box where it's acceptable to attack other anons for not agreeing with them. I really do wish we could just have normal threads for GC and feminism.
No. 60073
>>60062You want women to stop talking about trannies in a visible space so we stop being raided? Do you realize how retarded that sounds kek. Maybe we should move the whole imageboard away from the clearnet, maybe then less people will raid?
Get over yourself, we're going to get raided by seething men no matter what, because this is one of the rare female imageboards. We shouldn't cater to them, and we shouldn't adapt our content to them in order to please them and not incite male rage. Ridiculous.
No. 60102
>>60101The discussion is has the MTF thread on /snow/ become too political to be considered a cow thread? Is it causing issues on the rest of the board? If so, would the thread be better suited to /2X/?
For added context, the current reoccurring MTF threads on /snow/ were started by Burritomin after she banned the GC threads from /ot/ so farmers would still have a thread for laughing at trannies.
No. 60120
>>60099>>60105Kek the infestation of summerfags too retarded to follow basic flow of conversation on an imageboard pulling out the "retard" so we won't think they're newfags
>>60086>>60113This "discussion" alone makes it obvious you are all terminally online twitterfags who can't stand not being able to cancel someone for wrongthink. You're caping for troons on a site where "autism" is a bannable offense. Learn how to hide threads and suck it up when mods don't redtext meanie terfs, or go back
No. 60150
>>60065Because they are responding to one of the anons. I only said one that it needs better moderation because these anons bring their troon sperging into other threads. Idk what anon wants to me follow up with because I didn't even make any other points. I never said remove them? This is the type of derailing they do. Can't even bring up moderating their sperging without them sperging.
Maybe anons really do have a point. Anyway, admin or mods already saw our concerns, so these anons can stay pressed about it. Now that the idea is out there, maybe more moderation
will come from it.
>>60140>>60120>>60147 No. 60156
>>60105>Understanding trannies are not women is not a political stance, it's reality.It might be reality but we live in a clown world asylum where the insane are in charge. A balding fat man with a beard in a dress is now a woman and he must be allowed inside the woman's changing room to look at women and children while he has a raging erection and if you disagree you are fucking bigot, a nazi and a
TERF.
>Cope more, we aren't going to ban the threads.I didn't post an opinion of the issue so I'm not sure why I deserve the hostility or what I'm supposed to cope with. I answered a question regarding what the thread was discussing. This is exactly what the other anons were talking about, unwarranted hostility and anger towards anyone that isn't openly supportive of certain talking points becoming a target.
No. 60158
>>60156NTA, I'm
>>60150 but I absolutely agree. It's coming off as very tryhard.
No. 60235
>>60229Which threads are you seeing the derailing sperging? I'm all over /pt/, /snow/, and /ot/ (occasionally /w/ to catch up when things are slow), and I honestly don't see the
terf meltdowns being talked about. I've seen two instances of an anon saying "just say 'her'" lately, but the thread moved on.
Do you mean the tradthot and shayna threads? Because if we're being honest with ourselves, those are a completely different animal, raiding aside. There should be a dedicated mod for those.
>MtF/FtM is a lot of five year old reposts from ovarit or obvious rage-bait from RedditNonnies posting old milk is cringe and annoying, but
>rage-baitis stupid. Anons who post obvious bodychecking and retardation from cows in the ana-chan or tradthot threads aren't accused of posting rage-bait. We are here to look at milk. I don't want to see the "normie" troons, recovering anorexics, and humble modest cosplayers. I am here to gawk at degenerates and laugh at male retardation.
>Can’t really win in the way of “just report for derailing” when god knows the “tranny janny!!!!” shitstorm that’ll be spun upI've literally only seen "tranny janny" accusations in the mtf thread and maybe once more in celebricows, and they get banned half the time anyways. I think it's funny. Maybe you should try staying out of troon threads
No. 60236
>>60229AYRT.
>is a lot of five year old reposts from ovarit or obvious rage-bait from RedditThis is why I stopped regularly browsing the troon threads. It's extremely repetitive.
>>60235>and I honestly don't see the terf meltdowns being talked aboutIn
>>60168 I wasn't talking about
terf posting specifically. I looked through the tradthot thread and it mostly antinatalists arguing with other anons. The recent issue in the Shay thread was caused by arguing if teenagers should be allowed to have surgery to alter their bodies when an anon mentioned that she had a breast reduction in a post while discussing Shayna's surgery. The mtf thread has always been political because it essentially functions as a replacement for the GC threads on /ot/. The hotep thread also gets political sperging. All of it is off topic and has nothing to do with cows.
There is an entire board for female politics and it's dead because the subject matter gets posted all over the site to threads where it doesn't belong. I suspect because it's newfags that are too dumb to know how to access a hidden board.