File: 1744426224391.gif (3.34 MB, 265x231, sksks girlypopinions.gif)
No. 2484340
Are you a fat loser? Do you want to argue because that's how you learned to get attention in your dysfunctional household growing up? Do you have no friends? Well then, this is the thread for you!
Come here to bait and infight! Post something really stupid, and other anons will fight you about it! Prime topics are: abortion, clothing, eye colour, lesbianism, really anything that you can fight over!
Remember that everyone that disagrees with you is a man, so make sure you call them out for being men!Last thread
>>>/ot/2469121The "rules" are:
>no racebait You can still do it because jannies are absent for 12-14 hours a day!>no infightingThis one isn't a rule we only added this so we don't get put on autosage like our last thread, Dumbass Shit!>don't reply to bait This whole thread is bait so you can still reply to bait!>rest of /ot/ board rules applyThey should, but no, they dont>farmhands are always watchingThey only watch for 4-6 hours a day because they're lazyDO NOT ENTER THIS THREAD IF YOU HAVE AN IQ ABOVE 90!Remember that everyone that uses this thread is: fat, ugly, mentally challenged or otherwise low IQ, attention-starved, juvenile, and generally a loser! Have fun!!! No. 2484364
>>2484354This but "with" becoming "w/" or "w". It's a four-letter word you lazy internet goblin. Also alphoids using "ts" for "this", sooner or later every sentence will be consist of 2 letter words only
>>2484361Horrendous, even worse.
No. 2484370
>>2484354Always reminds me of
>no cap fr fr I feel like when we're conversing on a forum or imageboard we should all type out our whole words like you’re speaking during an actual conversation. Shortening your words or using an egregious amount of internet slang terms makes it obvious that you’re not engaged in the discussion and may as well not include yourself at all
No. 2484373
>>2484368I use cus kek
>>2484370In only 3 or 4 years the oldest alphoids will be 18 and we'll have skibidi ohio fortnite here probably. God I'm old
No. 2484626
>>2484482Learning how the ancient Japanese
and lbr, the modern Japanese are not much better in this regard treated disabled kids horrifically because they were 'karma children' as a weeby tween really opened my eyes to how fucked up this belief is. I believe in karma being dished out in the person's current life, not another potential life. Plus, the societies where a belief in karma is ingrained are some of the most horrendous and fucked up on Earth, everything gets a pass because teehee karma from another life!!!!! and it doesn't dissuade anyone from being vile, all it does is give the police an excuse to shrug and pretend it's beyond their power to help.
No. 2484788
File: 1744471704636.jpeg (248.21 KB, 890x463, IMG_8302.jpeg)
99% of women are not pretty/hot enough to not have to work. Anti feminists women are conceited parasites. If you were really that gorgeous, we would all know your name by now. Go get a goddamn job you goddamn parasite.
No. 2484842
>>2484807I agree, people who actually
want to work and enjoy their jobs are a minority, but the concept of a stay at home girlfriend/wife kinda irks me. like relying on a man who youre not even related to for everything is cringe and can lead to financial abuse and other control freak behavior from the moid. My little cousin is 17 and was talking about dropping out of highschool and marrying her boyfriend (who dumped her shortly after) like idk who is feeding girls and young women this backwards 1950s stay at home wife shit? Its just not healthy or sustainable 99% of the time
No. 2484913
>>2484903Returning your grocery cart is the bare minimum. It doesn't necessarily mean you're a good person if you do it, but if you don't, it
definitely means you're an asshole. It's like littering vs. throwing the trash in the trash can.
No. 2484973
>>2484807Most of the time it's pure luck like being born into a wealthy family or having a rich partner(most rich people only marry other rich people so this is also not the norm). If you're not wealthy then it's very very lenient parents who allowed you to live with them either rent free or very cheap while you save/go to school/get experience/ etc
The "kick you out at 18" parents literally cannot comprehend how badly they're messing up their children, especially daughters. You might as well buy them condoms and fishnets and heels and tell them to sell themselves if they don't end up doing that anyway
No. 2485022
File: 1744484791397.png (754.05 KB, 1080x1919, 1000001071.png)
>>2485019Bitch are you talking about the "cart attendant" position? Yeah they gather carts but that's not their -whole- job, it's mostly for pickup/delivery and such
No. 2485259
>>2484827damn i need to be like you. im in college full time, help around the house, and work maybe sometimes (a very small business, busy maybe 10/39 days a month working) and i debate killing myself everyday because im not doing more with my life, like saving or having a full time job. im happy for you
nonnie i admire your self love
No. 2485436
>>2485435And love is conditional, the only love that isn’t is the one towards your children, but even then it’s not always the case.
Seeing an adult woman or man , like me, who are supposed to be my equal and make my life easier, do the exact opposite, is just pathetic.
No. 2485482
>>2485445I don't understand why everyone is talking about neets lately, it's literal rent free behaviour.
Same with autistic people (I'm not autistic but I did notice).
No. 2485505
>>2485484My mom is pretty and she is 43. And so many women are kek.
It’s scrotes who are ugly, but I’ve seen some men who are still good looking though. I have a couple of professors who are good looking men and they are in their 50s, there’s one who is 60 who looks 45 kek, I think he colors his hair but he has a full head of hair and he’s tall and slim, I wonder what his secret is.
No. 2485510
File: 1744540184860.jpg (68.43 KB, 735x818, 1000019992.jpg)
>>2485484My uncle got married recently at 49. Yes, he and his wife are ugly and already have an eight-year-old son. My aunt was basically a fan girl for decades since high school who didn't mind him keeping her on the back burner for decades to come. My uncle apparently thought he could attract anyone that's more interested and patient with his looks and bullshit, but finally realized that his "fan girl" was the only one he could settle with right when he's pushing 50. He must've REALLY thought he could do better if he still wanted to wait eight more years for another woman after accidentally knocking up his "soulmate".
No. 2485535
>>2485517Because I don't know how old you are, but you are setting yourself up for having an age-crisis and it's going to happen far before you hit 40.
The persistent idea on this site that age=human value is going fuck over many nonnas on the long run, even if they insist that it's only for moids and women basically never age. That's my unpopular opinion.
No. 2485538
>>2485535I'm in my 30s and I just can't see myself falling in love with someone past 40, and if I never attracted anybody in my youth it sure isn't going to happen in middle age.
>inb4 date someone youngerI'm not interested in that.
No. 2485798
File: 1744566621144.jpg (89.38 KB, 736x736, 1000002530.jpg)
I'm not asian, but I think monolids are really pretty. I'm not sure why Asians hate them so much.
No. 2485930
File: 1744576212228.jpg (73.91 KB, 640x640, 1000017616.jpg)
I think the 3 healthy meals a day thing is a retarded psyop and I don't believe humans are meant to live like that. I would rather graze on food throughout the day or have a big meal (usually dinnertime) than constantly be checking what the time is, what I am hungry for and if it "fits" the mealtime. It's worse when you focus on making those meals healthy because science is everchanging and as we discover more and more about how the human body works, the things we may have thought were unhealthy/healthy may change too. I like it better my way because I feel more in tuned with my body and it's hunger cues than following a stranger's advice who likely has different needs and cultural norms than I do. I don't mind not paying attention to the health benefits or concerns of xyz food because it just seems like too much stress than it's worth.
I am also short so if I did follow that sort of diet I'd be a fatty chan in no time even with proper exercise kek
No. 2485960
File: 1744577518287.jpeg (127.98 KB, 782x1124, 1743871723199.jpeg)
>>2485938Me too but she was posted in celebricows recently and seems determined to change that. Acting and fillers don't mix
No. 2486307
File: 1744597818994.jpg (872.29 KB, 1080x2105, Screenshot_20250414_042623_You…)
i think sometimes the average indian man can be very attractive, but they are so rare it really does shock me when i see one pop up on youtube or something. i like to imagine some indian girl feeling so happy when she snatches up one that looks like this lmao.
No. 2486320
File: 1744598304913.webp (10.28 KB, 314x374, would.webp)
>>2486307The punjabi guy from 24 was super hot on that one season
No. 2486394
File: 1744606150695.jpg (55.9 KB, 736x736, 1000017621.jpg)
White chocolate is far too hated, it being "overly sweet" is what makes it my favourite. I like all types of chocolate but white is the best by a long shot.
No. 2486641
File: 1744636775237.jpg (696.78 KB, 1760x1177, 2023-10-12T212514Z_1212412353_…)
>>2486638>In recent months, France has weathered a wave of severe violence rooted in Islamic radicalization. The tentative and inconsistent government response has increased public outrage and strengthened the far-right parties. Mass demonstrations by Hamas supporters have triggered antisemitic violence, and the attempt to present a united front in the fight against antisemitism was met with President Macron’s indecisive stance and the left’s refusal to condemn Hamas. Domestic considerations have also influenced the President’s viewpoint on the war in Gaza, joined by efforts to appease Muslim immigrants and prevent escalation. The political dynamics in France are challenging and compel Israel to prepare for what lies ahead.
>Since October 2023, France has confronted a new wave of violence attributed to Islamic radicalization in the country. On October 13, a young Chechen Muslim murdered a literature teacher in the northern French city of Arras, three years after a similar attack shook the country. On December 2, a young man of Iranian descent murdered a tourist in central Paris, avenging the death of Muslims “from Gaza to Afghanistan.” The killers were known to the security forces as Islamic radicals and were branded as a threat. Government representatives claimed that one of the attackers had a psychiatric disorder, and this was perceived by the public as further proof of the government’s incompetence.>>2486640I don't use social media, my wonderful retarded friend
>https://www.inss.org.il/publication/france-islamic-radicalization/ No. 2486659
>>2486651Except I didn't say that it was under islamic "rule" and anyone can just scroll up slightly to verify that. "Siege" implicates what is actually happening, that most people in and outside of france are aware of
>France raised its national terror alert warning to the highest level in March 2024. Expect high-level security nationwide, including at schools, places of worship, shopping centres and landmarks.https://www.smartraveller.gov.au/destinations/europe/franceHere is a source from those dubious and money-grubbing australians, hope that's okay. Apparently it's still set at the highest possible level but okay
One more from canada
>France - Exercise a high degree of cautionExercise a high degree of caution in France due to the elevated threat of terrorism.
>There is a threat of terrorism in Europe. Terrorists have carried out attacks in several European cities.
>Over the past few years in France, several opportunistic and premeditated attacks have occurred. These have resulted in many deaths and injuries. Further attacks are likely.https://travel.gc.ca/destinations/france No. 2486666
>>2486651Nonnas we can relax because it's just been 'a few terrorist attacks' it's all good! Gosh we got some really brainwashed Islam cock sucking anons here apparently. Whole Europe is suffering from terrorist attacks and immigration of islamist moids is becoming a serious pest. It's true that all europe is side eyeing France for being so fucked and lost by Islam already, Sweden too.
>>2486644>>2486645Let me guess, you have watermelon emojis in your Twitter handle?
No. 2486672
File: 1744638229670.jpg (16.04 KB, 480x360, nooooooooooooooooooooooo.jpg)
>>2486666I love watermelon emojis, what have they done now
No. 2486707
File: 1744640086739.jpg (11.67 KB, 275x274, 1648171301432.jpg)
>>2486681What the fuck are you trying to even say, that Islamic terrorism isn't a problem because America has school and drive-by-shootings? That misogyny in Islam is not a problem because of some celebrity case?
No. 2486718
>>2486681>European moids reacted to the Connor McGregor caseEuropean moids are just as retarded as every other demographic of moid and don't care about women, I agree. We shouldn't put them on a pedestal.
>yts using Islamic terrorists to distract from their own problems yet again>using "yts" outside of twitterWhy do you retards always crawl out of the woodwork whenever Islamic violence is criticized? Yeah of course there's going to be more news about a culture that is vastly different to western culture and has absolutely no plans to integrate yet they leech from the system anyway. I swear this has been going on for well over a decade now that whenever someone is like "I think Islamic terrorism is bad ngl and they don't treat women and girls well" people try and throw out statistics on how European moids are violent too.
Yes, it's true. It's almost like there's a common denominator here and it's something to do with having an XY chromosome, yet that male capacity for violence is amplified when you're from a culture and religion that actively promotes it and is shielded from any sort of scrutiny in fear of being "Islamophobic" or "racist". Europe isn't perfect for women by any means however it's objectively better standards than anything relating to Islam so I've no idea why people try and ping-pong the argument back on Europeans. If you don't think their culture or religion isn't an issue then why don't you go and hop over to the middle east as a woman and see how that goes. There's an ex-Muslim women thread on this site for a reason.
No. 2486802
File: 1744645550037.webp (7.33 KB, 800x534, 87654654.webp)
>>2486791>ytsI'm old but want to seem like I am young!
No. 2486807
File: 1744646074986.jpg (192.9 KB, 1023x768, 1000001083.jpg)
>>2486753Most of it was all just performative too. I've seen people with my own eyes who would have meltdowns on each other or on social media, and then the next minute they would be partying. Dr Mike being one and I can guarantee that's not the only boat party he went to during COVID. There needs to be a psych study done on these people.
No. 2486858
>>2486816Unironically their thought process is just "islam makes old whiteys mad and therefore it's good", they don't understand
any ideology deep enough to know why some aren't compatible.
No. 2486908
File: 1744651517339.jpg (128.23 KB, 2138x2000, 71nrMzynU2L.jpg)
>>2486884It's fine in rough areas like trailer parks bc everyone reaches the same intelligence cap and you have to grow up fast to survive. Also everyone looks older. With educated people or people who have enough wealth/ambition to go through life phases, the differences are very noticeable
No. 2487080
File: 1744660711452.webp (39.64 KB, 612x459, okra-slices.webp)
Okra is godly
No. 2487093
>>2486884For me being in the US, drinking age plays a lot into it.
Your minor girlfriend can’t go into the same areas as you can, and all age gaps that were close but the older person was 21 were a shitshow because of the alcohol component.
No. 2487120
>>2487080How do you prepare it?
t. fellow okra lover
No. 2487227
>>2486884Because a lot of people in Gen Z are allergic to personal responsibility and think that they're still children as adults because of arrested development due to economic and sociological factors. They lack nuance and prefer to look at everything in black and white because they have under-developed critical thinking skills. When I say lacking nuance, I'm referring to people like the anons saying "but 17 year olds are in high school!" as if that's true for every 17 year old.
Just like
>>2487119 I was in my first year of university at age 17, I had my own apartment in a new city, and I had a part-time job too. I was dating a 20 year old at 17, it's not because I was "groomed" or that I was "preyed upon," but because I knew a lot of people aged 17-24 because I was an active member of the student body and because I met many people through work. Him and I liked each other, saw each other a lot through clubs, and had a lot in common, so we started seeing each other. The fact that he was 3 years older than me or that I was 3 years younger than him wasn't a factor in anything. The relationship never felt unequal, we only dated for a year but we had a lot of fun and by the time we ended the relationship I had grown a lot and learned a lot.
22 year olds today act more like 2010-era 16 year olds in terms of maturity and status. Like
>>2487085 said, it seems like 22 year olds (and young adults in general) today are very late to the game and starting life much much later than previous generations. Most people I knew growing up had part-time jobs by the time they were 15, and by the time they were 17 or 18 they were either full-time employees or university students.
I think this is all a consequence of the affordability crises in many Western countries, and the social stunting caused by social media addiction. I truly believe that living on your own is the biggest factor in the change between adolescence and adulthood, and because so many young adults can't move out of their parents' home in this economic climate, they're stuck in this state of perpetual adolescence and can't grow. I know of 18 year olds that live on their own that are much more mature and socially developed than 25 year olds that never moved out of mom an dad's house.
>inb4 "reee you support grooming!!"No, I don't. I just don't think that a 17 year old can be "groomed" in the same sense that a prepubescent child can be groomed. I think grooming is limited to children. I mean actual children, like ages 0-16, and not 17 or 18 year olds that stand on the precipice of adulthood. I think that there are a lot of young adults today that would prefer to say that they were groomed at 17 or 18 instead of admitting that they made a stupid choice in their youth because they were ignorant or irresponsible, because that involves self-reflection and taking accountability for their actions. I think that someone at 17 or 18 claiming they were "groomed" by a 22 year old is cheapening the word and concept and it's offensive to those that were actually exploited as children.
No. 2487349
>>2487227>I was dating a 20 year old at 17>it's not because I was "groomed" or that I was "preyed upon"You just posted a whole load of shit and still ignored the fact that it's extremely questionable for a 20 year old man to go after a 17 year old.
>The fact that he was 3 years older than me or that I was 3 years younger than him wasn't a factor in anything.Of course it wasn't, because he's a male and they have a tendency to go younger because they're degenerates and the younger girls are "easier" to date. There's a reason why he wasn't interested in someone his own age and it absolutely was not because you were ~so special and unique~.
You could carry on writing an entire novel about all these faggy complex reasons to defend disgusting age gaps but the reality is you too were a
victim of an older man's sick and strange advances and it doesn't matter if you had an apartment or a little job or not. I'm seeing so many women try and scrape together pathetic reasons towards their age gap relationships with moids yet conveniently float past the motives behind these men. Okay maybe you weren't molested or groomed but it's laughable you think the dynamic between a 17 year old girl and a 20 year old moid is anything but unequal. All I'm hearing is a convoluted version of the old "But I was mature for my age!!" and it's retarded.
I seriously side-eye any woman who wants to try and justify 17 and 20. It's all fun and games until it's your future daughter who's just started college, hit 17 and then comes home with a 20 year old boyfriend. Then it's clear how fucked up it actually is.
No. 2487353
>>2487227kek you typed all of that for what? to cope with the fact that your boyfriend was a weirdo?
>"but 17 year olds are in high school!" as if that's true for every 17 year old.are you mentally delayed?
No. 2487563
>>2487227except most of these men going after teens have more experience, resources, and independence, and went after them because of their lack of experience and age, not in any sort of organic "on the same page" way like allegedly you and your bf.
rhetoric like yours is designed to ignore that hundreds of millions of men would happily go after teenage girls if it wasn't totally taboo which would be horrible not just for those girls but all of society, so it's easy to cry about teenagers trying to escape accountability, I guess.
also I know the "discourse" sometimes make it seem like every 17 year old that dated a bit older wants to pretend they had 0 agency…but reality? most probably regret it and learned something from it even if a minority overuse the term "grooming." also your examples are weird. isn't your point personal responsibility? why are you insinuating young people are more immature partially due to reasons completely out of their control, then?
No. 2487748
>>2486884I'm OP and the things that bothered me about it was the claiming to be groomed part. You're not a "groomed child" if you're an already sexually active 17 year old who turns 18 in like a week (most girls I knew had already had plenty of sex with around-same-age partners at 17 for years already). You're a young adult who made questionable relationship choices, which comes with youth. But it's just not grooming of a child. It annoys me because I knew actual kids who were sexually abused from a young age so when I hear "I was groomed" I'm automatically very sympathetic, only for them to reveal it was by a fellow young adult they knowingly had experienced sex with.
It sounds ridiculous to me and like they're co-opting the conversation about actual child abuse and grooming. And even more so when the women in question were not actually harmed by it, but now at age 24 on tiktok they've been convinced they were actually poor
victims of awful grooming abuse because tiktok told them so a week ago. They're retroactively adopting trauma that never existed, it's harmful for them and real
victims of grooming. If they had never gone on tiktok, it would just have been their normal ex with no baggage attached.
No. 2487792
File: 1744715828031.jpg (44.18 KB, 537x655, 1000022947.jpg)
>>2487748So does what you're saying apply here? Yes, he hit on his student, the artist must've been young enough to be his daughter, and this professor and tried to cheat on his wife while he was doing it, however this is
college so isn't it a bit of a reach to call this "grooming"? People responded to criticism of this comic, saying that adults can be groomed too if they're young enough. To that, I'd say this is why parents need to get the fuck off their phones to raise and teach their kids how to recognize degenerate and manipulative scrotes by the time they turn eighteen so that we won't have as much problems like this.
No. 2487810
File: 1744717264725.jpg (65.93 KB, 677x1200, 95a55cc0c6545626e0921dfdbdd6be…)
>>2487739I've always been a morning person so I agree. There's nothing better than going for a walk when there's no one out yet. I hate night walks though, the streets are full of teenagers or drunk moids where I like at that time.
No. 2487907
>>2487748You're absolutely right, it's stupid and they are claiming it for attention and
victim points.
No. 2488113
File: 1744737366946.jpg (373.35 KB, 1080x1714, 1000153455.jpg)
I really love when there's a heroine that always manages to make all the women fall in love with her in those reincarnation Korean comics, it's funny because everyone wants to steal the main character from the main male love interest. It's like crack cocaine to me.
No. 2488238
File: 1744741352930.jpg (512.17 KB, 1200x1856, sonichu_15_cover.jpg)
>>2488225>Reading/watching stuff made by retarded males has unironically had more of a positive effect on me than interacting with most women online or irl.What do you think about Sonichu?
No. 2488571
>>2487227I don't think 17 and 20 is that big of a deal since you could have been together in hs but 17 year olds are still very stupid and naive and maybe you were fine or mature but to act like 17 is wise enough to not be taken advantage of by a older man is fucked up especially if they are escaping a
abusive home with no ability to see red flags.
No. 2488575
>>2488415also the
victim blaming mentality in that post is so gross. you can actually be groomed by people even as an adult. and it's still damaging.
>t. not a zoomer No. 2488762
File: 1744770715564.png (533.9 KB, 1206x1397, Whistleblower Says Meta Secret…)
>>2488755I don’t think this is unpopular. Also Zuckerberg is going on trial for compromising national security by aiding China. Your dream may be coming true
No. 2488765
File: 1744771094399.gif (349.42 KB, 473x473, 8425761_fa7c1.gif)
>>2488755>downfall of incel spacesThey will probably die off by summer imo
No. 2488767
>>2488762it would be incredible if this results in him losing all his licensure and facebook and instagram being shut down, this era needs to come to an end especially if these founders, CEO’s, and their employees are just using this shit to work against the U.S.
>>2488765that’s the cherry on top, kek
No. 2488778
>>2488773i’m not talking about normies realizing its gone or being affected by it kek, i’m talking about how it just randomly shut down one day. i’m hoping that starts happening with social media apps and other soul sucking websites
>>2488775i’ve always thought that having a blog instead of just writing a book or writing articles for a magazine is sorta stupid. if you’re gonna do something you may as well get paid for it
No. 2488793
>>2488789don’t worry nona i have faith, elon randomly shutting down twitter doesn’t sound
that out of this world kek
No. 2488830
>>2488808Youtube isn't annoying though. I never interact with shorts and the comments mean nothing to me.
Meta is in trouble because of a foreign government though so…
Messaging apps aren't as annoying as things like FB, twitter and Instagram and the whole grid, feeds bullshit although I've noticed WhatsApp has like broadcast things and stories. I can't fucking stand stories. Just fucking post whatever the fuck normally why is it behind another fucking wall of fuck all. It's such fucking brain rot. Social media needs decentralised. I wouldn't care if it's fractured online with different sites for different genres of interests. Like ye olde days of messageboards and a focus on discussing things based on merit rather than jumping on the next trend and a focus on viral. Then maybe when people actually meet in person they can share experiences everyone else hasn't already had hand fed to them by the algorithm.
I had bebo, MySpace and og Facebook no one used during my teen years and it felt more youth focused and expressive. I remember the cringe when the first parents started creeping up on fb and adding everyone. Then when workplaces started caring about fb and what people were posting and adults were trying to get other adults in trouble via hr for made up FB bullshit if you didn't add every dick from the office.
No. 2488873
>>2488859Using this as reference to the other posts, I was JUST thinking about how it’s been around 4 years from leaving my 17 girl-22 year old man relationship, and how these 4 years have been so long and I’ve done so much growing mentally and physically. My body is physically different. I look like a woman now, my mind, my morals, my personality. And he is still the same as he was because he was an adult. Yes, a young adult. But truly, 4 years is a long time to live through. So much change happens even as an adult in 4 years. I WAS a child, he was an adult, and he had no business doing things like giving me alcohol (murican) or taking me around people and parties his age range. So many arguments we went through just for me to realize now, it’s because he had an adults mind and I was still a kid. A bigger kid, but 17 is a fucking child. I look at 17 year olds now and I’m so disgusted that some man was controlling my whole life. I can not say this enough from personal experience, it’s been 4 years and I am baffled at how my family let this happen. His friends were even older than him, bullying me and cussing me out to my face because of my behavior (BPD ish but it was just puberty and loosing my virginity to him). Like why the fuck was a 26 year old man screaming in a 17 year olds face? That anon/anons are fucking retarded and have never experienced this, obviously.
No. 2489558
>>2489481It's not really African American culture nona. Africans in general are more enamoured with a woman's lower half. You can even see it from the way they dance. I've also seen in pulp covers from the 50s where they would highlight the woman's ass. And the dresses from idk where they would pad the back to make it look like they were fuller back there.
Moids have always liked ass but because it became associated with a particular group of women, it became a no no to express such. Same story with full lips. I'm not well versed in biology but if hips and ass are apart of sexual dimorphism then to me it would make sense for moids to like it. I like broad shoulders in a man which makes no sense for procreating but I'm assuming it's because of dimorphism or whatever. This isn't targeted at you in particular but I've noticed that the "moids shouldn't like ass" women seem to be ok with them liking boobs which is odd to me but not really
No. 2489636
File: 1744834782006.jpg (60.67 KB, 636x935, bustle.JPG)
>>2489558>And the dresses from idk where they would pad the back to make it look like they were fuller back there.Are you talking about bustle dresses, or something else?
No. 2489660
File: 1744835887870.jpg (158.36 KB, 960x1440, hthyFF9662mw1RFTR6loZZTN1Y2-20…)
>>2489481I like this opinion very much but don't know anything about africa and ass play tbh
No. 2489766
>>2489636Yes that's what I was talking about
>>2489706>they like the idea of pornified women.I agree. The x shape for women is the ideal but you only ever see moids fawn over them when it's shooped (or drawn) so small to the point where the person would not be able to hold themselves upright.
>>2489708Ik your response stems from whatever negative feelings you have from moids finding butts attractive, but men have always liked a shapely ass. When was the last time you've seen any moid from any time period say they liked a skinny flabby ass? Venus has always been depicted as curvy, sex icons have always had a larger than average lower half and the first thing that popped into euromoids mind when they saw a woman with a larger butt was sexsexsexsexsex. Even in Asia they have "Apple hip" to describe a woman with a nice derrière. I still remember how popular sohee was for being the only idol with a shapely ass. Idk why so many women find it upsetting (actually, I have an inkling as to why) because I find the butt thing to be one of the more attainable beauty standards. Just go to the gym. And this is coming from a tall, lanky, skinny girl so dont think I'm shilling myself kek
No. 2489784
>>2488755Sites like 4chan going down makes the Internet smaller.
The Internet being as small as possible is what social media corpo's want.
This benefits them.
No. 2489788
>>2486884Everyone wants to be a
victim these days
No. 2489801
>>2489749>clearly it's a sentiment everybody usually agrees with.Nta but that's only in recent years, they used to be considered ugly decades ago. Women who grew up in the 90s, 80s and before would probably be insulted if you said their butt was big kek. There was once some company that received complaints because their exercise equipment apparently made the complainers butts too big.
>>2489766>sex icons have always had a larger than average lower halfEh not necessarily, most of them had bigger boobs than butts and would probably get called "flat assed" by today's standards even if they weren't flat at all.
No. 2489839
>>2489801>they used to be considered ugly decades agoI agree with anachans being seen as desirable in the time period you mentioned but that was 100% a psyop. I'm not saying skinny women are ugly, I am one, but a healthy woman who takes care of herself will be "fleshy". I've never met a single woman my size that was in good health.
>probably get called "flat assed" by today's standardsI agree with this too. Imo the bbl diaper butt craze is also a psyop but my point was that the X shape is/was highly sought after and isn't just an internet fad of today. All moids like a shapely behind which the women of those times had even if it wasn't the same as the ones pushed today.
No. 2489866
>>2489749Because your brain has been ruined by porn. I bet you wouldn't say the same for scrotes
>>2489766>you don't like scrotes pornified standards? you're JEALOUS!Unlike you I'm not a pickme slut who feels the need to pornify her body for moids. Stop defending moids disgusting sexual preferences, I'm fucking sick of seeing gargantuan asses or defined asses for women in media. The oversexualization of women is disgusting, most straight woman don't wanna see that shit but since you're a moid cocksucker I don't expect you to degree. I don't care what scrotes like and their sexuality should be repressed at all costs.
>And this is coming from a tall, lanky, skinny girlThis was posted by a fatty
(infight/bait) No. 2489929
>>2489866It is a well known fact that certain clothing styles look better on certain shapes. Nothing to do with porn. I had a really cute outfit on the other day and yes, unfortunately my flat ass did ruin it but I looked cute from the front.
>I'm fucking sick of seeing gargantuan asses We all are, ur not special
>defined assWhy do you hate healthy bodies nona?
>The oversexualization of women is disgustingNobody said it isn't. But it's stupid to single out asses as if moids don't sexualise legs, hair, boobs, lips, waist literally anything.
>most straight woman don't wanna see that shitWhy would a STRAIGHT woman want to see anything of that sort. I'm not having sex with another woman so Idc.
>I don't care what scrotes likeWe're just having a discussion
nonnie>their sexuality should be repressed at all costs.Based but that's not the world we live in
>pickme slut, cocksucker, fattySo ur feminism only extends to flat women then? You don't like curvy or fat women and whatever woman is the object of ur ire MUST be above a certain weight in ur mind. I don't need u to believe me but wether I'm 60 or 600 pounds, my point remains the same. Ass and titty reigns supreme for moids
No. 2489964
File: 1744853809257.jpg (103.81 KB, 1280x721, wooohoo.jpg)
>>2489766Nta but do you mean big or wide (or both)? You keep mentioning hips, which are different from asses. Many people (including tall moids) have wide hips and no ass at all. Even the ~curvier Venus~ is all hips and thighs pretty much and has a flat ("flabby") ass too. On that note, how come only skinny women are ever called flabby? Most of the time there is just less flab on them than other women. Society is going through a weird hater boner for thin women atm, which is no better than fat-shaming and both sides of this are very cringe
No. 2489988
File: 1744855039261.jpg (88.89 KB, 1080x1453, 31dc2f3c31049d35b519f2bd808143…)
>>2489937Nta but there more than two body types, not just unrealistic cartoon type (picrel) and looking like men.
No. 2489995
File: 1744855451986.jpg (1.54 MB, 1921x1440, 1xx5j7597t6c1.jpg)
>>2489988Moids bodies look like picrel. I don't know why women have to look equestrian for them to understand we don't have the same body types
No. 2490014
File: 1744856213402.webp (14.13 KB, 187x269, IMG_5621.webp)
>>2489708>>2489933It’d be easier to stop ducking behind the curtain and just admit you have a hate boner for black women, or just any ethnic woman with a large ass. Also, if you’re the same anon who claimed “I’m pear shaped” in another comment, that doesn’t mean you can’t have some hate-boner for women with a large ass, probably motivated by racism or envy or some weird psychosexual mix of both.
Inb4
>of course you’d assume I was jealous you cuntDenying being jealous doesn’t disqualify you from being visibly jealous kek. Also pear shaped doesn’t mean you have a butt so it’s really telling that you chose to share that you’re “pear-shaped” and not that you “have a large butt.” Because you were hoping anons would somehow conflate those two things to validate your incapacity to be operating from envy or have a vendetta. You can be “pear shaped” with a hank hill crack in the middle for an ass and no actual cheeks. A pear shape doesn’t disqualify you from being assless, nor does it give you have a shapely ass. Squidward was also pear shaped in picrel, I bet if you turned him around it’d be more lumpy than focaccia bread. I feel like there’s no point anymore in attempting to shill these vendetta opinions as just neutral opinions. You’re clearly a hair
trigger away from adding a racial slur to the list of expletives you’ve been responding to anons with or saying something retarded like “ghetto hoodrat bodies.” We don’t have the IQ of middle schoolers so we can all see through this.
Anons can’t racebait in unpopular opinions anymore so they just start vendetta posting against a random trait. Next week we’ll see some anon saying men liking women with really curly hair is a sign of them being poor and having low IQ. And the week after that there’ll be an anon that says people who tan, rather than burn in the sun, are statistically more likely to be ugly according to right-wing xitter philosopher’s
(infighting) No. 2490022
File: 1744856581064.jpg (89.66 KB, 1800x900, 3078556683.jpg)
>>2489987>BBL surgery has the highest death rate of all cosmetic procedures. The main concern is that the injected fat can cause a blockage in a blood vessel in the lungs (pulmonary embolism), which can be fatal.They caused a pain killer shortage in the usa too. So yes, people are hyping up unnatural "thick" bodies too much and it's caused deaths and medical shortages. Now we're seeing everyone switch to ozempic and compression garments so imo it's stupid to sperg about either but the ~venus body type~ sperging caused a bunch of permanent damage to society recently, so it is more annoying in present day. I'm sure when everyone starts dying of the issues ozempic will cause, I will rant here about that too
No. 2490031
File: 1744857129233.jpg (211.38 KB, 1920x1080, anon_saddling_up_to_move_the_g…)
>>2490026>thinnessI just said ozempic. Of course I would be fine if people were thin and otherwise healthy, the same way I think non-bbl (usually ethnic, as this anon states
>>2490014 ) fatass people are fine the way they are. People with big asses still have those proportions at any weight, whereas the same isn't true of pear-shaped individuals kek
No. 2490083
>>2489937Pickme
>>2489987>fat shamingGo back to tumblr lardass
>>2490014>It’d be easier to stop ducking behind the curtain and just admit you have a hate boner for black women, or just any ethnic woman with a large assYes I do! Women with those body types are often ghetto hoodrats and I have no respect for pornified bodies. The ideal body will always be thin, curveless, and petite. The fact that only low income low IQ moids prefer “ethnic” bodies says it all.
>probably motivated by racism or envy or some weird psychosexual mix of both.You sound like a moid who can only interpret women from pornified interactions.
>Also pear shaped doesn’t mean you have a butt so it’s really telling that you chose to share that you’re “pear-shaped” and not that you “have a large butt.” I don’t care if I have an ass or not because my existence doesn’t revolve around scrotes, the only women with naturally large asses are black women with fake lashes and crusty fake nails and their Latino cousins, which you are probably one of. You can’t complain about bodyshaming then bodyshame me, it’s ironic isn’t it? Why do you care so much if I shit on scrotes for their preferences? Go ahead and bed Tyrone who’s the baby daddy of 5 women with a drug addiction on section 8 housing, or alternatively go to the gym and lose some weight, Lakeisha. I have no reason not to be racist if you’re misogynistic fuck.
(racebaiting) No. 2490093
File: 1744861206201.jpg (74.94 KB, 736x1177, 51fce91fbf8f4d87a28df504836c34…)
>>2490083This is a really obvious troll-bait and it's obvious you're trying to act like a ~white puritan lady~ to reverse-psychology whatever body type you're attracted to. I'm going to guess the type with wide hips who is active/goes to the gym to develop a healthy picrel body. Anyways it's called a "bubble butt" and petite white women you're pretending to stan can have them too. It truly takes all kinds anon
No. 2490098
>>2490093What do you hope to accomplish by sharing scrote softcore porn? Are you an troon? Anyway, I am a small white woman but I take pride in the fact I don’t have a pornified, disgusting body. Also once again, not every woman’s life revolves around makes themselves as palatable as possible for snow bunny catchers when moids can’t even do the bare minimum and sexify themselves for the pleasure of women
>insists that thin bodies aren’t healthy and if you don’t have a diaper ass porn hips and cottage cheese thighs you’re unhealthyNevermind, you’re just a pickme black woman who probably oversexualizes herself as you all do. Next time post a sexy ikemen instead of softcore porn
(Racebaiting) No. 2490121
>>2490107Next time just wait 5 minutes and read the op before replying and embarrassing yourself, especially the
>body shaming womenkek jfc, embarrassing
>>2490083>>2490113There's two videos about office chair ass on the internet that aren't selling ergonomic chairs anon. I will tell this information to anyone I know, see or who confesses (like bj-chan-grimes-anon) to have no ass bc it sounds uncomfortable and seems to be making these people very angry and disruptive to society in general, yw
No. 2490158
File: 1744864643561.gif (1.01 MB, 500x313, 1000022982.gif)
I agree with the bottom line that very big body parts on women shouldn't be held as a good standard for what makes women's bodies attractive. Personally, I think clear and healthy skin matters more than huge tits and ass. However, the way the sperg executed their opinion was really written like some angry white girl with an extremely flat ass. Seriously,
>the only women with naturally large asses are black women with fake lashes and crusty fake nails and their Latino cousins, which you are probably one of.
Embarrassing.
No. 2490208
>>2490158Kek it seemed more like jealousy than anything, it certainly didn’t seem like it came from a place of concern for the pornification of women and dangerous surgeries to fit the impossible beauty standards. You can’t help how you are born and nitpicking black women or women who have a certain body type for their naturally shaped bodies is embarrassing and reverse pick me behavior.
I’m black by the way and I do get enough shit from scrotes already that makes me feel fetished and overtly sexualized, it’s bleak to know that some women are just like men. when flat asses were in trend I felt ashamed and when bigger asses became trendy I just started to feel like a piece of meat and did everything to hide it under my clothes.
No. 2490273
>>2490260Proof of what? Outside of the age thing, everything else is public.
Literally all publications of her prior to her fame were claiming she was 24 when she married lucky and when she was big into bikini modeling and such. Also see her without filters when she was supposedly a teen her wrinkles are absolutely brutal
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-8031751/Lucky-Blue-Smith-married-Model-weds-best-friend-Nara-Pellman.htmlWhy is it almost everything of her showed she was 20-25, all the way up until 2022 when she magically became an 01 baby?
No. 2490302
Sorry for dragging this discussion out nonas
>>2490083
>The fact that only low income low IQ moids prefer “ethnic” bodies says it all.But it's not only black men that are into curvy bodies. That's the real reason you're upset. You saw one too many moids praise "lakeisha" and her butt, others trying to copy it/adopt it as their standard and it sends you spiralling. Feminism isn't about deluding urself into thinking moids don't like curves and then name calling women because of their body. So ig in ur mind, moids are the true and honest feminists for having a Madonna/whore complex.
>my existence doesn’t revolve around scrotesYet here you are, losing ur mind over what they find attractive
>ideal body will always be thin, curveless, and petiteIt has never been. Not saying you have a bad body but even in Asia where you're expected to be stick thin, moids ideal woman still has, you guessed it, curves. And don't moids get called pdf files for liking smaller women anyway? I can't keep up with this site kek
(don't self-censor) No. 2490312
File: 1744881783046.webp (46.86 KB, 996x1230, 67dbe9103a194.webp)
Life would be better if we treated everyone on the internet as if they have the intelligence of a 7yo.
No. 2490314
>>2490309There was literally a video
>>2490276Also is it not cow-ish to convert to Mormonism for an alt right moids? Nevermind making half naked cooking videos with heavy filters? And if you need proof for that, you're not even looking at her profile therefore shouldn't have a say
No. 2490319
>>2490307Yes I agree with everything you said.
For reference I'm a straight, flat, tall woman. My only saving grace is my waist to hip ratio which I reckon isn't even all that elite but it is quite nice. I have no problem admitting that curvy women are really attractive. Idk why saying moids are attracted to developed women is such a crime. They might not like the Kim k type body but from what I've noticed, a nice hourglass/pear shaped figure is loved universally
No. 2490321
File: 1744882729966.jpg (307.6 KB, 1168x1575, 1000001090.jpg)
>>2490318she's definitely wore lingerie in a few videos, and has posts of her completely topless, in bikinis, etc
No. 2490327
>>2490321>completely toplessShe has her tits out on tiktok ?
>In bikinisAre you amish or smth
No. 2490329
File: 1744883541787.jpg (7.38 KB, 276x183, 1000001095.jpg)
>>2490327Yes? She has multiple pictures like that
>Call the AmishThis just goes back to my original point, some cows have threads just for posting nudes alone, she's a well known influencer with lots of underage followers, is half naked and clearly making tradthot content while denying it, steals content, and uses filters and acts weirdly defensive when she's called out for lying
No. 2490363
>>2490158And your entire argument boils down to moid logic
>>2490208>AWWW SHIEEET MANE DEM CRACKAS ARE JEALOUS>>2490302The men I’ve seen who are into that kind of body are always low class apes who make under six figures. A nigger moid publicly humiliated me when I was 15 by declaring I have no ass despite the fact he doesn’t have a mom and was skinnyfat, also from the hood and had a criminal record. Bet some pickme is gonna try to defend that. Also that preference from Asian moids is a result of westernization and African American scrotes spreading their disgusting standards over here
>pdf fileRetard
>>2490307Maybe 3/10 SEA moids who grew up in shanties like that body type, sure.
>>2490319>im a flat tall womanI’m sorry you’re such a pathetic pickme bitch you feel the need to drag down body types that have more in common with your own rather than uplift them
(USER HAS BEEN PUT OUT TO PASTURE) No. 2490385
File: 1744888684295.png (1.1 MB, 1366x768, 1698304091359.png)
>>2490382I love you too,
nonnie.
No. 2490514
>>2490316That’s obviously not the part I meant you fucking moron. Is there proof that she’s lied about her age and is neglecting her kids?
Why don’t you show us some proof you’re sentient enough to post here?
No. 2490543
>>2490514Almost all the articles (posted earlier in this thread, just control f) pre 2020 referred to her as 24, and then when fans started questioning everything was mass deleted. The article of her being 24 at the age of marriage showed as well. Also she walked runways that didn't allow minors when she was supposedly a minor. Even her own fans that it was suspicious when everything previous to 2020 was wiped. Sure you can claim the journalist got her age wrong but why did they get luckies correct? And why did multiple journalists report the same age?
>Neglecting her kidsShe's Mormon, which should already be believable since Mormon nannies always speak up about how neglectful Mormon tradthots are, but if it's not enough there's multiple videos of her not gaf when her kids are clearly distressed. Also the insane amount of travel despite the fact she can afford to stay home and bond
>Neglecting her kids No. 2490555
>>2490543It's not unheard off for models to age themselves up in order to work while underaged
>She neglects her kid because a nanny said some other mormons influencers neglects their kidsRight …>>2490543
No. 2490572
>>2490543So she neglects her kids because she’s Mormon and travels a lot? You’re grasping at straws.
Also the “proof” you posted that she cooks in lingerie is just a normal top. So you were wrong about that as well. It looks like absolutely nothing you claimed is true has any substance whatsoever, except for the part about her lying about her age, which honestly? Who cares. You’re upset about her cooking in her own kitchen wearing inappropriate outfits like you’re some sort of health and safety manager. Get a fucking grip.
No. 2490577
>>2490572Let's be honest, if this was a blonde white influencer, she would have her own thread by now and no one would dare be this defensive
>>2490574Mods will remove threads that don't get a lot of traction dummy, pretty sure there's been attempts at her threads that get removed by mods
No. 2490581
>>2490577U failed to provide any actual milk then want to pull the race card. Some of u guys are so pathetic. I didn't understand why lc has the reputation it does but now I can see why. We don't care about Nara so can you go be a blonde
victim elsewhere.
No. 2490585
>>2490580How many have as big of a following as Nara ?
Also there's multiple mentions in here of white blonde women doing exactly that
>>>/snow/2011789Why do anons suddenly get defensive about Nara? It's fun to discuss ballerina farms and such but we draw the line at Nara?
No. 2490595
>>2490577And there’s a reason they remove her threads, it’s because there’s no fucking milk.
>>2490577>if this was a blonde white influencer, she would have her own thread by nowWaaaa the whole world hates me and is jealous of me because I willingly fry my scalp with peroxide :( get a grip
No. 2490659
>>2490652Ballerina farms, MMW and several other trad influencers never directly said those things either. Ofc they wouldn't be able to psyop our youth if they were openly misogynistic, would they? The point is seeming relatable/non
toxic, but sneakily pushing misogynistic narratives. If it worked that way then brainwashing would never exist, but these people aren't stupid and know damn well straight up saying "women shouldn't vote" would immediately get them cancelled and any sort of influencing would come to an end. Nara in particular however is pretty obvious propaganda and needs to be called out instead of "well she didn't mean it like that! And if she did it's not that bad! And if it is then you're the problem" as if lolcow became a trump rally
No. 2490660
>>2490641Mrs Midwest has definitely said some extremely misogynist and anti feminist things, and tries to portray being broke and shackled to an
abusive, misogynist porn addict cop as an ideal life for women. With ballerina farms, most people just felt sorry for her.
No. 2490668
File: 1744905674818.png (544.46 KB, 1079x1526, 1000001097.png)
>>2490660>extremely misogynist and anti feminist thingSuch as? From what I've seen she accepts women having careers and working and makes it clear all of her content is for women who choose to do such. Nara enables the whole "only old bitter childless women could be mad at me" thing even though multiple men have even called her out
No. 2490682
>>2490675The "innocent cooking videos" is clearly propaganda. Why is everyone else capable of spotting this except for anons?
Also I haven't seen mmw shit on women for not being feminine, she seems more frustrated she herself wasn't allowed to be feminine
No. 2490702
>>2490696>a random woman dressed in couture cooking for her husband and kids on tiktok should be concerning to you sorry
nonnie i don’t suffer from whatever aspergian mental illness is causing you to think this way
No. 2490706
>>2490700>media literacy it’s a tiktok video. if you think it’s propaganda for a model who has children and a husband (you know, the way most women on the planet do) to make videos of herself cooking then i think you need to cut back on the conspiracy theory content and subreddits
>>24907011. because they’re different people who choose to film their content differently 2. she’s a model kek, part of the video is the outfits she’s modeling. i think the only propaganda in the video is the clothing and jewelry ads anon
No. 2490707
>>2490704This. I find the defense on her so odd. I also notice anytime you say something about her on social media, newly made blank accounts will go out of their way to find you and keep insisting you're just jealous and wrong and "she's just cooking you're
triggered". I wonder if she's using the troll farms a lot of people admitted to
No. 2490719
>>2490708Anon be so fr she straight up posted topless photos, that one weird tube top where her tubular titty was practically visible and that dress
>>2490331 that was a fan away from a nip slip
No. 2490721
File: 1744906913545.jpg (138.87 KB, 736x981, 87b8456fa7f672259a6522d11c1f63…)
Balanced couples > couples made up of opposites.
I imagine this might be an unpopular opinion, since most of the couples we see in any kind of media are usually made up of a woman who plays a more submissive, passive, very feminine role, and a man who’s the complete opposite… Or, in more progressive circles, it’s the other way around.
Honestly, when I say this, I’m not entirely sure whether I’m placing more weight on looks or personality , i’d like to think it’s both.
It’s just always been hard for me to understand why so many people are drawn to that kind of contrast, and to the idea that the “ideal” couple should (in a very reductive way) be like yin and yang. But then, maybe this opinion just reflects my reality; a "masculine" woman into "masculine" men. Also, not saying Noi is masculine, but you can clearly tell there's not a hero and lady in distress dynamic.
No. 2490723
>>2490718The issue isn't her having kids or cooking, it's the fact her and other influencers like her are all married to high powered, alt right men who are voting to take our rights away and likely pushing their wives to make said propaganda.
Before we move on, let's make sure we're on the same page. It's not about cooking or having kids, it's more about how fast they rose and their connections to the alt right during a time of our rights being taking away. Do you understand that? Yes?
No. 2490727
>>2490714Ok if you truly believe this is a real problem and her “propaganda” is a threat to society then why are you crying about it on lolcow instead of..trying to put a stop to it? Go write an article about her MKUltra cooking video propaganda that’s made to turn children and teenagers into tradwives if that’s what you think is really happening,
nonny. Stop wasting time shitting up LC!
No. 2490731
File: 1744907139955.jpg (35.84 KB, 750x1000, bg,f8f8f8-flat,750x,075,f-pad,…)
>>2490718People insist the scraps late-stage media are desperately hoping we pay attention to are things we (the npcs) need to be discussing simultaneously. This is called a feedback loop and living in one like that is probably what hell would feel like imo
No. 2490744
>>2490735How is me suggesting you go write an article or make your own documentary about Nara’s propaganda sounding upset with you anon? The autism continues to shine.
>Why are anons pulling the “nuh uh she’s just cooking” excuse Cause it’s not really an excuse if it’s exactly what’s happening kek. She’s a model who’s modeling the clothes while cooking a meal, the propaganda is really the clothing ad. Not her happening to be religious, married, and have kids which most of her passing viewers likely don’t care about
No. 2490752
>>2490747"Just cooking, stop looking"
"Just cooking, stop looking"
"Just cooking, stop looking"
Find a new defense
No. 2490768
>>2490766Alt right moids. Social media algorithm. Mormon church known for doing shady shit and attempting to mass brainwash.
Let's start there
No. 2490773
>>2490760ok, so you consider a woman to be a tradthot if she’s married to a guy even if she’s clearly not a tradthot and has nannies raise her kids while she works?
>>2490764do you wanna greentext the bad faith responses so we can all understand what you’re referring to?
No. 2490783
File: 1744908109235.jpg (40.42 KB, 600x729, 1000035164.jpg)
>>2490775>if someone is catholic does that automatically mean they’ve raped little boys?Either that or repressed homosexual. There's no alternative.
No. 2490799
>>2490794People get mad if you say bad things about satanists. I've criticized all religions and the only people who have been
absolutely fucking butthurt (pun intended) were (and are always) satanists. No fun whatsoever
No. 2490805
>>2490795Tap it, I don’t understand.
Honestly it’s probably true all religious people are fucked up in some way. Catholics are all perverts. Mormons are all attention seekers with RAD. Don’t even get me started on Muslims. But that doesn’t mean they’re connected with all the fucked up stuff that happens among the higher ups in their churches. Maybe all religious people should just be stripped of their power since they’re all basically schizo to a degree.
No. 2490810
>>2490804i’m the anon, and no i’m not nara kek. so i’ll go ahead and list what you seem to think is suspicious about this woman
>makes cooking videos where the camera is pointed at her and not the food>has a religious husband>has kids anything i’m missing kek?
No. 2490817
File: 1744908696684.png (82.78 KB, 750x1148, bored_and_boring.png)
Can we demand these anons create a containment thread for this individual on meta? I'm already tired of seeing this controversial ~new brand~ repeatedly and it's only been a day
No. 2490824
>>2490810What
>>2490812 said, there's no point in repeating endlessly because you read "extreme conservative husband" and shorten it down to just "religious husband". You're arguing in bad faith, for what if you're not Nara yourself?
No. 2490833
File: 1744909001544.jpg (541.86 KB, 1440x809, ACCURATE.jpg)
>>2490811They always have greasy, long and stringy hair or go bald at age 17
No. 2490852
>>2490844That wasn't even the same anon you're referring to dummy. Just move on if you don't care, everyone else can continue having perfectly
valid suspicions though
No. 2490881
>>2490867I think a significant amount of munchies are addicts, but they could still get anxiety about their health and mistake their side effects or withdrawal symptoms for other health conditions, I suppose. I don't believe
every munchie is a manipulative bippie.
No. 2490884
File: 1744910010883.png (2.32 MB, 1170x1379, fendi.png)
>>2490877do i really need to post her magazine covers, spreads, and other ads or can you use google? ahh who cares i’ll do it anyways
No. 2490892
>>2490882>her being pushed heavily by trad influencers Trad influencers liking her media isn’t her fault
>doing everything expected of trad wives in a theatrical way isn't tradthottingI know a lot of younger posters don’t understand very clearly what a
tradwife is. A traditionalist wife isn’t going to be making videos of herself dressed in skimpy outfits on tiktok. An actual tradwife isn’t going to be modeling and making ads and phone cases for LA brands kek.
No. 2490898
>>2490894I like the way she keeps saying
>you all believe Jews control the media but can’t believe that the Mormons can control an algorithm!!Like…we do not fucking believe that?
No. 2490927
>>2490918Not necessarily that specific way, but that could happen. It's more so
Lucky has connections with LDS and is known to be alt right > lucky pushes Nara to make videos glamorizing staying at home and doing intricate cooking, having children (all natural homebirths without proper medical care) > it looks fun to girls > young girls see it and try to be like Nara, which is an indirect gateway to the tradthot community
No. 2490932
>>2490925It's more so the whole gaslighting routine of
>That's not happening >And if it is, you're taking it the wrong way>And if you're not, it's not that bad>And if it is, then just shut up and go somewhere else Like you can't even admit all of this combined was suspicious
No. 2490933
File: 1744911165093.png (55.67 KB, 1643x2050, I_want_to_believe.png)
>>2490908Sure anon. I've been looking at fashion ads since before I could speak so that's prob why her typical modelesque poses are so hilarious and stupid looking to me
No. 2490939
>>2490927>Lucky has connections with LDS and is known to be alt right Why do I get the feeling that simply being LDS and being a low D-list celebrity who’s mutuals on social media with some rightoid podcasters isn’t enough real world seniority to have your wife’s tiktok videos pushed to the fyp? It seems like an occam’s razor situation, it’s most likely she garnered a lot of views because she’s a gorgeous rich woman dressed in haute couture cooking messy food.
>lucky pushes Nara to make videos glamorizing staying at home and doing intricate cooking, having children (all natural homebirths without proper medical care)I kind of doubt that he pushed her into doing anything, if she didn’t want to be doing it she wouldn’t need to be. I don’t think she married Lucky for money or support or is financially dependent on him. Also why would Lucky have any influence on her birth plan? Giving birth at home isn’t uncommon in Los Angeles
>it looks fun to girls, young girls see it and try to be like Nara, which is an indirect gateway to the tradthot communityI think what looks fun to young girls is making scones once in a while and being rich enough to afford Valentino dresses
No. 2490964
File: 1744912065416.jpg (11.95 KB, 193x260, 1000001099.jpg)
>no WAY this is propaganda!! He's literally JUST wearing a hat and point! Take your meds schizos!!
No. 2490985
>>2490976Propaganda doesn't mean you're directly affected per se, as the example here
>>2490978 American women have lost the right to abortion, and now married women who have changed their last names can't vote, plus DEI and removing the executive order that prevented job discrimination by gender, race, etc was revoked. And similar to time periods of women's rights being removed, we're being shown ultra glamorized content of women cooking at home, raising kids, etc which is fine to do, but it's pretty obvious when it's just normal women being normal vs propaganda
No. 2490991
File: 1744912637166.jpg (45.26 KB, 500x329, 1000001101.jpg)
>>2490983The Nazis used these images to promote the idea of women birthing children, so yes
>>2490984Propaganda isn't really obvious without a bit of analysis (aka apparently tinfoiling) remind you, things like picrel was propaganda. Ofc if you have zero dept it just looks like someone being a family, but it's more so the message behind it
No. 2490998
File: 1744912738275.jpg (79.94 KB, 800x450, cdc.jpg)
>>2490990
Incoming abortion sperg in 3, 2, 1…
No. 2491002
>>2490985>American women have lost the right to abortionNo we haven’t? Roe v Wade being overturned just brings it back to the states. If you want to be able to fuck around and get abortions, move to Oregon or something
>now married women who have changed their last names can't voteAlso completely false, I changed my last name and still voted
>removing the executive order that prevented job discrimination by gender, race, etc was revoked. I don’t think they didn’t hire you because you’re a woman anon.
>And similar to time periods of women's rights being removed, we're being shown ultra glamorized content of women cooking at home, raising kids, etc which is fine to do, but it's pretty obvious when it's just normal women being normal vs propagandaIt’s not normal women being normal because Nara smith isn’t a normal woman, she’s like an upper 5% of the popularity.
>>2490995Sorry anon I had to add more thoughts, but that is being real. If you want to do PIV and be able to go get an abortion after, then you should live in a state where you can do that instead of expecting all of the separate, different states in America to all function the same.
No. 2491005
File: 1744912970839.jpeg (Spoiler Image,38.45 KB, 680x383, IMG_3255.jpeg)
>>2490990
if you don’t want an abortion don’t get one desu
No. 2491022
>>2491013>>2491013 /pol/ is gone so they had to find somewhere to shit up..
>>2491002have you considered reaching out to elon musk on twitter to be part of the harem? it sounds like you’d fit right in and you’d get picked!
No. 2491024
>>2491019I don’t know what state you’re living in where that’s a problem, but, I’ve made the wise decision to live in a state where that’s
not a problem. Pack your bags if you don’t agree with your states laws. Plain and simple.
(bait) No. 2491029
>>2491025>Moving is expensive, retard, Moving to a different state can actually be cheaper, depending on where you’re moving from
>and poor women are statistically more likely to have unwanted pregnancies.When I was poor I just didn’t have sex.
No. 2491043
>>2491021Retrace the conversation. An anon claimed that "they weren't affected by Naras videos" and an anon pointed out that promoting alt right beliefs to the younger generation is dangerous to women even though Naras videos aren't so direct but they're still contributing to regression of society and when an anon asked how it's pointed out the alt right is actively voting to remove our rights
>But but what does that have to do with NaraSimilar to WWII, it's propaganda to turn women into SAHMs. It may not be "direct", but if you need to straight up be told "if it doesn't say "I want to take your rights away women" in big bold letters than it's not propaganda then you should probably learn how propaganda works
No. 2491050
>>2491004>So what's the difference between using propaganda (glamorizing being a SAHM) in the 50s after the war to pressure women into being SAHMs and leave the factories The war ended in 1945. Why would there be propaganda ten years later involving the end of war?
>cope with the dropping birth rateHello? Birthrates were at a high during the 50s?
You don't know history, you only know how to repeat the same points other people have said. You're as bad as the "tradwives" themselves. They don't know history, they only look at a few advertisement illustrations and think that was ever reality, but you listen to liberal propaganda and think that
that was reality.
No. 2491067
>>2491055It was already the Korean War and the Cold War at that time and red scare shit. WWII was in the past.
>>2491059>sealioningmade up buzzword
No. 2491072
>>2491069But underage rape
victims are less than 4% of abortion receivers? The conversation we’re having is about moving to a different state if
you don’t appreciate their laws. Not basing your decision making off of a hypothetical underage rape
victim.
No. 2491076
>>2491072They still need care and can't just move. Sorry you feel the need to punish young rape
victims because "everyone else should just move", but I find it alarming to live in a country that even lets 1 child die by not accessing abortion
No. 2491077
File: 1744914487687.jpg (622.55 KB, 1532x2029, 1000035172.jpg)
>they're talking about abortions again
No. 2491081
>>2491046You are being deliberately obtuse. Corporations don’t want to pay for
any amount of time off if they can avoid it. Maternal leave is something that only women can get. Therefore the easiest solution is to hire fewer women. That is called discrimination. We used to have laws to stop that from happening.
Do you need me to draw you a picture too? Would some colors and stick figures help?
No. 2491082
>>2491076>Sorry you feel the need to punish young rape victims Are you actually blaming
me because of a child’s rape instead of, idk, their fucking rapist? You just want to argue
No. 2491092
>>2491089Can you tag which post i said those words in, verbatim? I said that’s not what the conversation we’re having is about. You’re attempting to change the topic from moving states because you don’t agree with the laws, to underage abortion
victims.
No. 2491095
File: 1744914738918.jpeg (822.83 KB, 1179x1701, IMG_4055.jpeg)
>>2491083Yes, but it's usually accused not for the purported defnition. I wasn't "pursuing people with relentless requests for evidence, often tangential or previously addressed, while maintaining a pretense of civility and sincerity".
No. 2491097
>>2491092When I pointed out that leaving abortion up to States is still concerning because underage
victims can't "just move", you claimed "they were only 4% of cases", aka implying that's it's not worrying
No. 2491101
>>2491097Yeah, you’re bringing up an incredibly slim portion of the population in an attempt to change the topic of discussion from
you moving if you don’t agree with the laws, to being about a hypothetical rape
victim. That’s not what the conversation we’re having is about.
No. 2491105
File: 1744914906295.jpg (31.61 KB, 487x487, FNy2bvwXoAA3t4X.jpg)
HasanAbi is kinda based actually, except for the troon shit
No. 2491124
File: 1744915241242.png (511.17 KB, 1000x1500, 1000001102.png)
>>2491116>You don't have a job and blame being a woman on your unemployment!>And if you do it's McDonald's!>And if it's a "real job" then it's wageslaving!You can't just say you're wrong?
No. 2491126
>>2491109I haven't watched every single stream of his (impossible) so I generally only know half of his takes.
>>2491121He didn't rape women in brothels. That would be antithetical to the concept of a brothel. But I would admit that using a brothel at all is generally scummy behavior.
No. 2491175
File: 1744917164145.jpg (13.43 KB, 268x188, chicken_ancestor.jpg)
>>2491077Wow what an ancient religion, I can't believe the earth is 8000 years old already
No. 2491182
File: 1744917312971.jpg (126.48 KB, 841x487, 150216.jpg)
>>2491125>>2491101I'm just going to drop this here…
>Most states with bans that contain a health exception permit abortion care when there is a serious risk of substantial and irreversible impairment of a major bodily function. These exceptions are limited by the lack of specific clinical definitions of the conditions qualifying for the exception. Only the Arizona 15-week LMP (last menstrual period) limit explicitly defines the bodily functions that may be considered “major.” The other states that use this language in their bans do not define what constitutes a “major bodily function,” nor what constitutes a “substantial impairment” to a major bodily function. This vague language puts physicians providing care to pregnant women in a difficult situation should their patients need an abortion to treat a condition jeopardizing their health and can leave the determination of whether an abortion can be legally provided to lawyers for the institution in which the clinician practices. For instance, in South Carolina where the 6-week LMP abortion limit has a health exception, the law lists a couple of conditions that may fall under this exception, such as severe pre-eclampsia and uterine rupture, but with no further detail. Using this language as guidance, it would be difficult for physicians to know if a significant health issue would fall under the exception. The difficulties presented by the simultaneous vagueness and narrowness of the exceptions are exacerbated by the lack of deference given to clinicians’ medical judgment under these bans.
>Some states’ abortion laws specify that care for ectopic pregnancies and pregnancy loss is not criminalized in its statutes. Most states with these provisions in their bans allow for the removal of a dead fetus or embryo, but not for miscarriage care, generally. This means that pregnant people who are actively miscarrying may be denied care if there is still detectable fetal cardiac activity. There have already been reports of such situations in Texas and Louisiana. In Louisiana, for example, a pregnant woman went to the hospital after experiencing sharp pain and bleeding. She was informed her fetus had likely stopped growing a few weeks prior, as its size did not correspond to the length of her pregnancy, and that it had very faint cardiac activity. Despite the pain and the blood loss she was experiencing, she could not receive the regimen of mifepristone and misoprostol commonly prescribed to pregnant patients who are miscarrying to ensure that the pregnancy is safely expelled from the body completely in a timely manner, thereby decreasing the risk of sepsis and infection. Instead, she had to wait for the miscarriage to progress without medical intervention, which would have expedited the process and reduced her medical risk. In states where the abortion bans do not clarify that miscarriage care is not criminalized – even when there is still detectable cardiac activity – pregnant people may not be able to receive care to manage their pregnancy loss unless and until it becomes a medical emergency.
>In deciding whether or not to provide abortion care to preserve the health of a pregnant patient, physicians now face the risk of a jury or the state disagreeing with their judgment about the gravity of the health risk the pregnant person was experiencing, and as a result, face prison time, monetary fines, and loss of professional license. Before the Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs, the decision to have an abortion pre-viability when facing a health risk was made by the pregnant person in consultation with medical professionals in consideration of the needs and overall health history of the pregnant patient. In states with abortion bans, when deciding whether or not to provide abortion care to preserve the health of a pregnant patient, physicians now face the risk of prosecution, prison time, monetary fines, and loss of professional license.
>In state court challenges against the bans, providers have argued that the vagueness of the bans is unconstitutional, since it places them in a situation where it is unclear how they might follow the law. As a result, physicians may be more reluctant to provide abortion care when pregnant patients present with serious medical conditions and may deny abortion care to pregnant women with conditions that threaten their health until their condition deteriorates and the narrow exceptions inarguably apply. This delay in care, however, creates greater and avoidable risks to the health of the pregnant person. Additionally, many conditions that threaten the health of pregnant people are not included in all or most health exceptions.
>The difficulties these bans and their unclear exceptions create may additionally deter physicians from practicing medicine in states that ban abortion. There have already been reports of physicians expressing reluctance or refusing to relocate to these states, as well as physicians leaving these states due to their restrictive laws and fewer medical school graduates applying for residencies in these states. A substantial portion of these states’ residents already live in maternity deserts – areas where there are no obstetric providers or birth centers – and studies have shown that maternal mortality rates are higher in states that restrict abortion. Physicians being deterred from practicing in states with restrictive abortion laws may exacerbate these disparities in access to obstetric care and health outcomes.https://www.kff.org/womens-health-policy/issue-brief/a-review-of-exceptions-in-state-abortions-bans-implications-for-the-provision-of-abortion-services/ No. 2491197
>>2491191It's not that people suck at telling trolling it's that there are unfortunately a lot of people in America exist with these beliefs, typically white people's conservative family members . So seeing someone recite something cousin Jim, Uncle John,aunt Candice and Grandma Bertha actually believe seems more like reality than a troll
Also politics shouldn't have became a trolling competition
No. 2491201
>>2491171It’s okay. Your bodytype is
valid and you don’t need to resent the sexualization of the bodies of another, kek.
Have you ever considered that the “latina-femme-fatale with a mommy body” is a problem for latina women? No need to be upset over moid retardation.
No. 2491212
>>2490564It’s partly because of her race (well-meaning non-racist people and black people want to believe in an aspirational black-ish person, like an Oprah. This is because it’s easier to unanimously love an enviable women when you think they started off as underdogs in some facet of life. Women can maintain a strong, strong adoration for a woman if there’s something “grounded” about them, it suppresses their need to envy them to the point of hate. But only sometimes though, this didn’t work with Meghan Markle). But another aspect is that she got a lot of hate in the beginning and the verdict is, that if any celebrity’s claim to fame is being vigorously hated for doing essentially nothing outright morally vulgar or bad, at the start of their climb to popularity, then they’re exalted for the rest of their career. A lot of that hate was rooted in racism though, and her bagging an Aryan Ubermensch man like Lucky. White girls and probably other
woc, cried and lashed out, and then people gave them lashings back for being so mentally demented they felt threatened by a tan woman having a more put together life than them. So now Nara smith hate is perceived as being weaved in with racism, largely because it actually was at the start of her rise in popularity on tiktok. The hate evolved to being mad at her for doing trad-wife content (which I agree with, it’s definitely trad propaganda.) But the very, very beginning of her hate train was racism. And premature racism can make people respond very defensively on someone else’s behalf, for a lifetime actually. Because they don’t trust that people won’t make criticism about this person with bias anymore. Introduce bias too early from too many people, and no one believes you when the person you dislike is
actually bad. Boy who cried wolf type of thing.
The whole premature hate train exalting a celebrity into “permanently unblemished” status was in ice spice experienced too. She was a nobody, who made a low-budget music video and just happened to have drake in her corner and everyone (men, women etc) despised her. In 2021 or 2022 you couldn’t see the words “ice spice” anywhere without someone calling her a dick sucking slut, ugly, poor looking. Now her fanbase is strong and she’s been boosted to a level of popularity that was born out of everyone’s initial hate. Now even stray hate comments are impenetrable to her career. A strange formula to securing life long fame is to be universally hated as you become popular. Because everyone feels bad and doesn’t see the point in hating you again, once they’ve changed their mind about you.
No. 2491251
>>24912381) you're also not exempt from proving you're not a bot, and no answering questions doesn't prove or disprove a bot. Also typically ignoring majority of posts (like the anons they seem to be more right winged did) is more bot behavior. Id even argue the stupid questions should raise bot suspicions more than someone not answering them
2) bots answering stupid questions you ask doesn't prove someone is a bot or not. If anything answering questions that are stupid makes someone more likely to be a bot because bots typically don't question why the user didn't have basic logic, where as bots are programmed to push propaganda
You are just using the "actually my stupid questions were testing to see if you're a bot!" Mind you, these are the same moids that think asking girls for nudes "proves they're not catfishes". Moids love the whole "prove you're real" thing by demanding you spoon-feed them their wishes and disguising it as worried about inauthenticity
No. 2491255
File: 1744921240575.jpg (15.82 KB, 750x250, 1000018778.jpg)
For example, a significant % of humans can't correctly pass this easy test. There's a reason people ask these "easy" questions: a lot of people are stupid and they don't want to waste time talking to you if you fall into this group
No. 2491273
File: 1744922479092.png (18.35 KB, 582x592, untitled (10).png)
>>2491255Is this a good answer?
No. 2491300
File: 1744923960502.jpg (108.26 KB, 855x900, 6363.jpg)
>>2490991My unpopular opinion is miserable people just can't admit that people were probably happier in the past. I see so many posts online "correcting" 1950s propaganda, making out the guys are secretly gay or the women is doing drugs or drinking to cope. It comes across as a total projection of their own shitty lifestyle.
It's like when I see on social media some post of a happy, rich white family, there's always some seething people in the comments talking about how the wife must be drinking to cope and the husband is cheating. Like where does that come from?
No. 2491311
File: 1744924509879.png (204.8 KB, 321x443, nowshecancope.png)
>>2491300Some of it is exaggeration, especially the "secretly gay" stuff, I've seen it too, but it's true that women (even well off women) were very depressed in the 1950's. You should look up ads for anti-depressants targeted towards housewives (or for the husbands of said housewives to see). They often had the message of "she can do household chores again". The 1950's sucked for women people forget lobotomies were a thing too, and were primarily done on "well off" women. Humans are happiest when recognized as autonomous beings. Ads aren't reality either.
Though my unpopular opinion is that we were happier in the past, just not the distant past. The 2020's suck, they suck in very unique ways due to the way that the internet works now. Especially after COVID, COVID fucked so many things up. And by the past I mean like 15-25 years ago kek. This generation (gen z and gen alpha) are incredibly isolated and it's sad to see because it's not really their fault.
No. 2491315
>>2491300It was great if you were a white man and wanted to be the breadwinner of the family. Not so great if you were a woman and wanted a form of independence without sex work
Although a lot of people who are all about the 50s don't have a grasp on them. Abortions were more frequent and easier to access, people were generally more democratic and minimum wage was made to live off of and support a family, college was affordable. Welfare reform became a thing and a good portion of people were on government assistance of some sort
>Inb4 but wimminz joining the workforce was what made it soooo hard!Almost all places were fully staffed with employees that were paid enough to support a family and buy a home with. Even restaurants and grocery shops had employees at every register, multiple employees for cleaning, and everything else. You're lucky if you can find a Walmart nowadays that isn't run by 8 boomers with dementia and 3 teenagers smoking weed, nevermind an employee at every register and multiple ones for specific jobs.
>But people don't want to workYes they do, almost every job seeker I know has complained about getting rejected by Walmart, dollar general, McDonald's etc yet somehow despite having so many applicants they're in places to reject mass amounts of people, these places stay understaffed
No. 2491316
>>2491300It's a mixed one for me. Society is far better now in terms of social progressiveness but I think people yearn for that time where you could have a simple job, for a long time, that paid enough for a house, car, food and family. We haven't had that for a long time for the most part.
But even if you went back to those times, the financially stable part only applies to men. If you're a woman you're fucked regardless. Stay with your
abusive husband and be addicted to mommy's little helpers, or divorce and be left with nothing. At least women can now be represented in society properly, the only downside is that it's now insanely difficult to own a home/afford the same standard of life in general.
No. 2491326
>>2491315Things were better for black families too actually. Like the high incarceration rates and social dysfunction of blacks comes from after the Civil Rights movement, funnily enough. The crack epidemic, collapse of black families and widespread black gang violence came in during the 1970s. The big paradox about the civil rights movement is how things just got so much worse for blacks afterwards.
>>2491316My family has always been poorish and women have worked in my family going back 200 years. 30% of women were still wagecucks back then. None of us ever really could afford the whole stay at home mom thing, which was always for the most part a luxury of the middle class and up. But the middle class and even upper middle class now struggle to afford the same luxury.
But even on lolcow just recently I seen someone bragging about being a NEET that gets an allowance from her working boyfriend and flexing about it. So there's still that desire.
No. 2491339
>>2491331I think nonna is trying to point out that police and the government systemically destroyed black communities, and it became especially directed and bad once black people got more rights. It’s not that it was better for black people before they had more rights, it’s that the community as a whole was targeted and still
victim to many things like redlining for decades and decades. The CIA literally started the crack epidemic to destabilize black communities. It’s more pointing to how bad systemic racism is and the horrible reactionary reactions to people getting more rights.
No. 2491422
>>2491405>>2491300Unfortunately marital rape was legal in the US until the 70s and women weren't allowed to have a bank account until at least the 60s. They had to rely on their fathers or their husband to live in the world, essentially making them the largest class of adult dependents in history. The valium wife stereotype stretches as far back as the 40s too which means even looking at the 50s is too late, women's rights were stripped as early as the 30s during the Great Depression.
>>2491416A suggestion is to use "nta" on an anonymous imageboard which means "not that anon" otherwise people may think you are the same anon they just spoke to.
No. 2491552
File: 1744941231100.gif (25.77 KB, 220x279, kanye-kanye-weat.gif)
I still don't buy Kanye's Nazi schtick. He's going as far as he thinks he can but I still won't believe it for real. This shit is obvious performance art and he hasn't had his ass beat because he has bodyguards. He's just saying some bullshit to keep eyes on him and piss off his ex wife.
When he made posts hating on fat women, it made me remember nobody hates in fat people more than people who are ex fatties like Kanye. He yelled at Harvey Levin (TMZ) over that.
The only way I will finally believe he is being for real with his Black Hitler act is if he puts all his children in the same swastika shirt he was wearing and send them to school or walk out in public with them wearing it. And that Vultures shirt with the Burzum beach doesn't count. Bet you won't Kanye.
No. 2491610
File: 1744946780454.jpeg (149.14 KB, 700x948, IMG_4093.jpeg)
>>2491311That advertisement's from 1964.
https://aihp.omeka.net/items/show/653Also check out this ad I found! This proves that the 50s were full of husbands addicted to anti-depressants!
No. 2491624
File: 1744948125976.jpeg (23.14 KB, 180x280, IMG_0603.jpeg)
>>2491610Drug abuse among housewives is still pretty common today, too
https://americanaddictioncenters.org/blog/painkiller-addiction-among-suburban-housewivesThere’s a reason why the whole wine mom thing exists.
(Apologies for shit quality picrel kek)
No. 2491663
File: 1744950875285.png (629.7 KB, 1200x800, IMG_4103.png)
>>2491624The drug that your link mentioned was used by men also.
And it was hardly ubiquitous. At its peak, only 5% of Americans had tried it. Less were using it regularly.
No. 2491785
File: 1744964324290.webp (71.01 KB, 775x775, 1906167188.webp)
Only women can be incels. Men can be hideous goblins and still find women out of their league who genuinely love them. If a man is ugly he can work on his personality or education and find a gf out of his league who loves him, hell, ugly men date out of their league already and have the personality of wet bread and are often freeloaders who pay 50/50 on dates. If you are a genuinely ugly woman there is 0 chance for you to find a man that loves you, let alone a genuinely attractive man. I am ugly as hell and i tried asking out 2 guys who i considered to be my looksmatch and i still got rejected. There genuinely is no hope for ugly women.
No. 2491948
File: 1744984576535.jpeg (1.09 MB, 1004x1963, IMG_6061.jpeg)
I don’t understand how white women are considered the standard of beauty but seem to have the lowest self esteem out of all the races. Some of the insecurities and surgeries white women get seem retarded to me.(racebait)
No. 2491966
>>2491615Having children isn’t a right, if you can’t have them you can’t have them. I feel like if you wanted a child that bad then you should just adopt, anything else is just selfishness and wanting to mend your relationship by using a baby as a patch. I honestly find IVF and surrogacy retarded and a waste of resources.
I’d also like to say that it’s telling that the medical world only focuses on women when it’s time for them to pop out a baby kek, nothing goes towards female research regarding female only disease or chronic and autoimmune disease (did you nonnas know that it’s majority of women who have them?).
No. 2491970
>>2491615>neurotypical babyI mean, are you aware that no one wants to have a baby with Down syndrome or autism or any other mentally impairing disease? No one gets pregnant and thinks “Oh god, I wish my baby wasn’t neurotypical”.
Anything else I agree with you.
No. 2491978
File: 1744986090095.jpg (229.58 KB, 1176x1920, 1000023008.jpg)
I'm a burger and I'm here to give an unpopular opinion based on my country. Americans can shit on the British for their teeth all they want, but the British actually keep their teeth healthy whereas Americans care more about keeping their teeth LOOKING healthy. British people may have their teeth looking "crooked as shit", but American teens will wear braces for a year or so but still have mouths filled with cavities. American parents would save so much more money if they stopped with the braces for every slightly crooked tooth in their kid's mouth and just made sure they brush and floss their teeth every day. But no, it's braces for the bottom canine being just slightly outwards, and retainers for the rest of your life because fuck letting your teeth grow in any natural way. I would be less annoyed with the braces if burger parents used them for legitimately fucked up teeth that get in the way of daily life, but it's not like that for most cases. Most of the time, American kids get braces for basically no reason. Americans need to be bullied for that more often.
>>2491948>white women>"the most insecure women">east Asian surgery statistics mogging everyone else in the worldanon, please.
No. 2491989
File: 1744986843249.jpg (247.24 KB, 1200x800, tall-poppy.jpg)
>>2491978Yeah tons of people are starting to prefer crooked/natural teeth to fake hollywood chiclets in the mainstream imo. That weird moid on white lotus is a great example or any of the celebrities who ruined the harmony of their face with oversized veneers (most recently selena gomez). I'm a leaf and people don't really care about teeth that much here either as long as they are clean and not dirty looking but that is bc we are all poor. So everyone just feels anxious about their own teeth, without really thinking about others. Until they get anything corrected
No. 2491994
>>2491992Agreed but pointing this out
triggers the “mothers should be centered in feminism” crowd.
No. 2492008
>>2491994It's definetely important to focus and give attention to pregnancy, birth, accessability to health care, hospital treatment, how mothers are perceived and treated socially when they're pregnant and after they have given birth, etc. However mothers shouldn't get any more attention than the rest of women. Because it's not a "mother" issue it's a woman, female issue. Many of these women seem to throw away their woman label, and put too much emotional baggage woo woo magical femininity into what being a mothers is and make it their sole identity from that point on, instead of being autonomous women who happens to have children, so then they get offended when you discuss pregnancy, birth and motherhood if it's not in a whimsical fantasy way.
No. 2492032
File: 1744989574197.jpg (247.88 KB, 1200x900, s-l1200.jpg)
>>2492015What if unlike elon musk's mother, that one read to her moidlet and he was able to figure out a way to get all three on the boat without submerging it?
No. 2492087
>>2491970I specified "neurological" and "looks like them" because if the father isn't a sex offender, then these people often refuse to adopt because most kids in the foster system are non-white, have mental health problems, or both. Saying "I want a kid that looks like me" is code for "I want a white baby." Being an orphan and going through the foster system is deeply traumatic, and most children take a long time to heal and adjust after being adopted. In some (but not all or even most) children, this manifests as ulta-turbulent teen years.
That said, all children are a gamble. A couple could have a biological kid who turns out to he a sociopathic, criminal, etc. At least when someone adopts a kid, they can prepare themselves for whatever that particular kid's needs are, and can foster them as a "trial period." I think it's very sad and ugly that people view orphans the same way they view used cars: as some kind of inferior, "damaged" product. But that's not how children or human beings work. Yes, some of these kids have developmental disorders because of exposure to drugs or alcohol in uterus. Some of them are special needs. But those kids are human beings who need support just as much as anyone else. Not to mention, not every kid in foster care is a sped, a crack baby, or a future criminal. By no means am I saying people
have to adopt, but it's clearly the more ethical choice than dumping hundreds of thousands for designer babies and uterus transplants. By the way, I do not endorse adoption tourism, I'm talking specifically about adoption within countries.
No. 2492142
>>2484482>>2484627 That's a westernly bastardized understanding of karma anyways.
Karma is not atonement, it's a lesson your own soul seeks in order to be able to grow. It's kinda pointless concept if you don't get the fundamental hinduistic stance that your material life just does not fucking matter and all of your suffering is a trivial farce for self entertainment of eternal whatever. It's not a punishment because a solution to all woes is not paradise, but not giving a fuck.