File: 1579129568145.gif (95.85 KB, 480x270, giphy.gif)
No. 13215
This is the thread where you voice your thoughts about the GC/PP changes that will occur in the near future.
I will post a list of new features along with the final board layout once I'm ready to deploy things.
What's new and confirmed? >watch thread>improved catalog>better filters to hide threads, and individual posts>ability to ban all TOR posters>integrated captcha options Clarification on the poll outcome for /2X/I see that many anons were confused about my two recent posts on the topic. /2X/ is not staying because of the number of anons who don't know what it is, and the potential for an increase in scrot bait and racebait if it's listed.
When the new server is deployed, or even after a much needed break, Pink Pill/ Man Hate can come back because it's more of a vent thread than a political thread like GC was.
You can mock mentally ill trannies in the following threads:
>>>/snow/867400>>>/snow/895014>you are derailing if you take the troon discussion outside of the subject or topic at handHow things will be until server migrationYou have /2X/ until I archive things. PP and GC threads will stay locked in /ot/ for now. Contrary to what anons believe, I did
not say that /2X/ would remain hidden. What I meant is that the board can stay until server migration.
Things that will earn you a ban>going to /ot/ to infight when you can use this thread>using the complaints thread to lose your shit over the GC verdict>pronoun derailing in any drama board (especially the onision thread)>infighting in /ot/ and screeching about handmaidens whenever there is a disagreement No. 13224
>>13218If you were posting from a friend's house, or used a VPN/TOR then that could have been a mistake.
I'm pretty sure that the posts anon had in the nikkitutorials thread is telling that that is indeed a radfem attempting to bait (off of the same IP range). I called out anti-PP anons for trying to bait a few weeks ago as well so take it or leave it I guess.
>>13222No that's not derailing. It's pronoun derailing to sperg if someone uses either pronoun for whatever reason, it clogs up the thread.
No. 13226
File: 1579131788439.jpg (26.87 KB, 564x564, 1578901123974.jpg)
Thank you for clarification admin! I'm glad that we can still keep man hate threads, I hope they won't get clogged up with political shit yet again.
But I have one more question, can posting misandrist/transphobic insults outside of man hate thread get you banned?
No. 13228
An anon on /2X/ asked these questions before
>>>/2X/1993. I'm just reiterating the ones that don't seem to have obvious answers:
>Case 3: Some anon unironically says she identifies as "nonbinary" and chimps out when anons laugh at her delusions.Do the offending anons get banned for "GC discussion"?
>Case 4: A very recent example: An anon posts about her abusive TiM boyfriend in the Vent thread, detailing how he uses his "transitioning" and "dysphoria" as an excuse to fuck her up.Will she be banned for "GC discussion" on your "apolitical site"?
>Case 5: An OBVIOUS assmad tranny is posting on the site, maybe even admitting to the fact. People tell him to fuck off and go dilate. Will anons be banned for "GC discussion"?
What is the line, and how would you differentiate complaints from autists fresh out of Tumblr/Twitter/Reddit who think that anything that's not tranny-positive is "TERF/GC sperging" from actual GC sperging?
No. 13229
>>13226No, why would it?
>>13228>Case 3: Some anon unironically says she identifies as "nonbinary" and chimps out when anons laugh at her delusions.No one would get banned, not even the cringeposter if they don't have a phallus. It could be amusing until it derails a thread I guess.
>>Case 4: A very recent example: An anon posts about her abusive TiM boyfriend in the Vent thread, detailing how he uses his "transitioning" and "dysphoria" as an excuse to fuck her up.Why would this be banned?
>Case 5: An OBVIOUS assmad tranny is posting on the site, maybe even admitting to the fact. People tell him to fuck off and go dilate. Why would this be banned?
Tumblr and reddit sperging
>I wanna respek krai's pronouns >stop being a meanie transphobe GC sperg
>you're a scrot/tranny reee>you're a handmaiden ree>you're just a pickmee ree >derailing a snow thread about anything that can go on r/GC No. 13234
Why were
>>>/snow/917725 and
>>>/snow/917677 labelled as GC? Are trans cows' meds/surgeries banned subjects?
No. 13239
>>13229>>13215Thank you for clarifying, this is much easier to understand. Not too happy about the captcha though..
>>13238I think the main point is to not derail the thread into actual gc discussion from a political point of view and to not cause infighting by calling other anons trannies/handmaidens/etc.
No. 13243
Admin, you said before (not even too long ago) that Tor posting would be allowed. Are you now banning it to disable people from attacking against you or out of actual concern for the post quality? I'm willing to deal with ban-evading scrotes tbh if people can keep posting anonymously.
>>13229>Why would this be banned? You already banned people for replying something along the lines of "fuck off tranny" so obviously it's considered a bannable offense. And someone got banned for "gc bait" for posting about being tired of genderspecial weebs forcing the "x-gender" tag, only saying something like "I'm too old for this", not even a wall of text sort of spergpost. It seems to be a line drawn in the water honestly, it's hard for people to figure out what's "GC sperging" and what's not. It's just like during one of the previous admin's meltdowns when you could get banned for whatever erratic reason while someone else would go unpunished for posting something identical.
>>13238>Obviously it's pretty hard to ignore when a good handful of influencers, cows, & celebs are coming out as trans or nonbinary lol.This. It's such a hot issue at the moment that it's pretty hard to refrain 100% from addressing any trans issues. A lot of my personal cows (some necessarily don't have a thread here) have come out as trans and a lot of it relates to their past behavior (such as the NLOG syndrome, sexual deviancy etc). It seems strange that we would be able to nitpick the cow's appearance and every other menial issue that encourages autistic behavior but discussing why they trooned out gets us banned.
No. 13244
>>13243I didn't mean to imply TOR posting would be banned, I mean we will have the capability for it. This applies to location flags and IDs as well, but I don't think we will be using any of that.
We have had bot spam in the past so I think it could be a useful tool during spam influxes when and if they occur. Tor is used for bots more than actual posting these days.
>You already banned people Stop assuming I make every ban. I'm drawing the line here so there is no confusion between anons and the mods.
[Not addressing the last point because it's been discussed to death.]
No. 13256
>>13255I was thinking about this but I didn't want to move it back yet so anons won't be confused. It can definitely go to /ot/.
>>13249I don't know if we would meet their ToS after looking into it. I don't know if anyone would prefer kofi or patreon either.
No. 13263
>>13256eh, that sucks. i like the fact that it's all fairly anonymous and easy, i just allocate my tips for my sites and then send it along.
why is lolcow not approved? kf can use BAT, wtf. can you take pre-paid cards?
No. 13266
>>13263>>13263Actually if kf hasn't had their ToS terminated then we'll probably be fine then. Thanks for letting me know, I'll look into it more.
I don't know if it would be wild to accept bitcoin donations but if anyone is interested then I can set that up.
No. 13268
>>13266love bitcoin, so there's that.
i think the way it works with brave and BAT is that you sign the site up to receive contributions/get verified by them, then ask users to install brave as their browser and slowly but surely you begin to generate some cash. i know KF couldn't take BAT for a while, but they're verified now. it's just a nice way for the site to collect revenue that's easy on the users, too.
hope it works out!
No. 13806
File: 1581314296492.png (75.43 KB, 657x315, you.png)
>>13774I tested it right now to confirm.
This is also a dark theme but it won't be the default site theme. I guess a re-invented version of the default staminarose theme is best unless anyone disagrees.
No. 13830
>>13215>>13243>>13244I didn't even know tor posting was allowed because it was never mentioned…
>Tor is used for bots more than actual posting these daysMaybe it because what I've mentioned above? There are tor-only IBs so I think your assumption might be wrong.
No. 16825
>>16820I mean I it does make sense that having a gender critical thread would attract unstable trannies and other kinds of hateful men but I guess men in general will always want to mess up women spaces so no win.
How many more farm hands do we need to deal with the raids? I'm thinking of applying.
No. 16827
>>16601They've been doing that anyway.
How many times do they have to raid and spam before you understand that they're going to do what they want BECAUSE this is a female chan? It has nothing to do with the content here, it's to do with anons having boobs and vagina giving attention to or being upset by those disruptions. They like that they're engaging with women, as pathetic and autistic that may be.
The only way proven to make angry boys give up is: Delete all their posts immediately. Even denoting a moid by giving his bait posting a robot badge and a ban is still rewarding that behavior by giving it platform. Not to mention some farmers can't resist replying even when they know it's bait which causes derailment.
Men are big time attention whores, take that ability to ho away and they've got little business here.
No. 16830
>>16827Seconded. They will raid no matter what we post, all the man critical threads were locked, so why the literal 5 day shut down of /ot now?
They're looking for attention doesn't matter if it's good or bad, delete all their shit and they will quickly see that there's no attention coming from their efforts.
No. 16963
File: 1603237068665.jpg (8.28 KB, 209x242, kek.jpg)
>>16952the funniest part of the whole thing is she posted it to prove she wasn't a tranny. We need a thread on admin.
No. 17209
File: 1603316152744.jpg (302.28 KB, 988x1144, 1600000359482.jpg)
>>16963this is the actual non-thumbnail pic
No. 17349
>>17347>>17347>>17209I might be falling for weird meme bait, but how does that make her mentally unwell? To me this looks like the arm of the average person who owns a cat.
Or is this some weird scrote tier meme where women who own cats are insane?
No. 17379
>>17360sorry i might be naive, but i have cats and my arm looks like that. i really dont get the tinfoil.
btw, how can you tell the difference? is it from experience?