[ Rules ] [ ot / g / m ] [ pt / snow / w ] [ meta ] [ Discord ]

/meta/ - site discussion

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Youtube
Password (For post deletion)

Welcome former PULL users!
Click here to start migrating to our sister forum

File: 1579126579990.jpg (43.48 KB, 900x450, EM8YQTZ.jpg)

No. 13204

Please post all general issues and complaints here. If you want mods to do something, or have some issue with or suggestion for site content, you should use this thread.

>>>/meta/6821 should only be used for technical issues and suggestions (can't load site, site slow, bugs, site feature requests). This thread is for non-technical issues.

No. 13205

stop talking about it. stop.

No. 13207

>>>/ot/504324
There were more but can anyone tell me if they also suspect there's a scrote invasion?

No. 13208

>>13207
I think it's those radfems pretending to be men so they can blame them for us not liking their gender critical spergs all over the website. Wouldn't be surprising knowing the other dumb things they have tried to pull in the past.

No. 13209

>>13208
Well in either case we're all gaslighting each other, I understand why admin hasn't responded.

No. 13210

>>13209
I feel bad for the admin. She is working so hard for us only to be insulted. Definitely should delete the 2X board

No. 13211

>>13208
Samefag anon here, the redtext on post i crosslinked is kinda creepy (lel I know it's just a website), I wonder if they ironically labeled it as radfem or blamed it as radfeminism sperging, or worse, it's indeed what you said.

No. 13212

>>13210
If it's indeed radfeminism sperging
>Definitely should delete the 2X board
then yes
If it's not, which I hope it isn't, then no, they need a containment board.

No. 13213

>>13211
I feel kinda honored and special rn

No. 13214

>>13208
…holy fuck. so when we blame the anti gc and pp anons for being scrotes, you tell us to stop tinfoiling but now you do this shit?

No. 13217

>>13211
The post history checks out.


Take the sperg here. Anyone derailing the complaints thread will be banned for now on.
>>>/meta/13215

No. 13219

>>13217
I am not allowed to use teary emoticons since you'll ban me, but I just hope you stay strong in this shitstorm.

No. 13220

>>13219
imagine being this much of a little bitch(derailing, not the right thread)

No. 13221

File: 1579130802343.png (55.95 KB, 1872x192, jnknknj.png)

>>>/ot/504305
I don't know if this is linked to the posts in the dumbass shit thread, but I hope it doesn't become a trend.

No. 13225

Wtf. I was siding with the admin when a radfem made a troll thread in /ot/ and i got this? I got banned for ban evasion too but that's fair
>This is an awful attempt to cause discord. Go back to kiwifarms, samefag.(ban evading radfem)

No. 13227

>>13221
You got to be fucking kidding me.
If this isn’t bait this got to be the most blatant scrot-self outing. Either one should be banned tbh.

No. 13230

>>13227
After further inspection it seems this is an actual GC anon who was shitting up the previous complaints thread. They are now VPN hopping after creating a fake scrot thread and replying to it with threats against radfems.
This is some next level shit. You be be permabanned for attempting to deceive the farms in any way. This goes for anti-pp/gc as well.

No. 13231

>>13230
I didn't make a thread and I never posted on 2X or said anything remotely similar to radfem ideology. I'm neither a scrote or a radfem but nice try. And now I know you can't actually trace posts.(sure thing, ham-chan)

No. 13232

>>13231
if this is true this is really sad

No. 13235

Can you at least tell me why you think I'm a scrote and or a radfem? Or show me my so called post history? I am so confused.

>ham-chan

Thanks for the laugh.

No. 13252

Can you please do something about the annoying idiot in the pro ana scumbag thread in /snow/?

No. 13258

I got a ban for comparing onion to trump the other day, is that a part of the whole 'no politics' rule? The reason was "enough of the trump comparisons" but that was the first in thread that it came up. Just wondering

No. 13260

Can something be done about the constant "Boomer Chris Hansen" talk? I just get so sick of what seems like the same few anon's from the snow thread coming over and bitching about it.

We know he's getting something out of it, fuck, who cares? It's annoying.

No. 13265

Assmad anon nitpicking and name fagging in Moo thread. Can a mod confirm ban evasion possibly? I know they aren't all red texted. Was assuming silent ban for titpicking.

No. 13267

is Anisa still a banned topic

No. 13269

Can there be a reminder made in the Onion thread to read the thread and stop repeating things that have already been stated. Newfags are spamming the thread for the sake of posting and decent posts are getting skimmed over or not read. It's becoming annoying.

No. 13270

Can a mod set rules in the cosplay cringe thread? It's clear it started as a vendetta thread and its just nitpicking and personal feelings towards what is and isn't allowed for cosplay.

Its fucking stupid.

No. 13271

>>13270
it should go on /ot/ or /m/ and not be in /w/ anyway at all since it's not really drama based. judging from some of the posts ITT, you need to stop being a whiny cunt.

No. 13272

>>13271
I dont even know why it was even made to begin with. Anyone anons don't like get thrown into the instathots thread anyways or have their own thread already and I'm not the one throwing fits in the thread. It's anons who are mad someone asked about rules for the thread since it's a clusterfuck of people just agreeing with each other and no real discussion happening besides nitpicking what you personally just dont like. The only thing actually worth talking about is the Hetalia thing. A better thread would be a General Cosplayers thread about weeby cosplayers. /OT/ is definitely where this needs to be relocated otherwise.

No. 13274

>>13270
>It's clear it started as a vendetta thread
Against who anon, who is it a vendetta against? I'm the op of the thread and I'm begging you to tell me who I specifically have a vendetta against because you keep repeating it over and over again.

>Can a mod set rules in the cosplay cringe thread?

There are rules, the rules were "talk about the cows/milk that don't fit in the costhot thread" (because costhot is a very specific category that doesn't apply to most of the cosplay cows/milk these days, and that thread stagnates because of it). You're the one trying to police what people are allowed to think is cringey. If any rule should be set there it should be this one /ot/ rule (which should be a global rule imo):
>Don’t go into a thread to complain about the exact same thread. Hide threads you don’t want to see and take topic complaints to /meta/
because there was zero mini-modding/infighting/derailing prior to the Disneyfags.

>its just nitpicking and personal feelings towards what is and isn't allowed for cosplay

No one said anything was or wasn't allowed, it's literally just people's opinions (yes….personal feelings, that's what opinions are) on what they dislike about cosplay(ers) right now. Multiple people saying "I find Disney cosplayers annoying for xyz reasons" and other people agreeing is not saying "Disney cosplay is now ILLEGAL and you should be banned from conventions and hunted and burned at the stake for their crimes!", so drop the victim complex. Again, the only people who have said what is or isn't allowed are the people who went in there and suddenly started trying to make up rules about what people are allowed to talk about. Why are you on this website or the internet at all if you cannot handle people having opinions different than yours?

Even if some dingbat on an anonymous internet forum said x thing isn't allowed for cosplay…..that's just an opinion and has absolutely no bearing on anything you do with your life? Why the fuck does it matter? Christ please love yourself anon and stop putting so much stock in people wanting to vent about what is undeniably at it's core a VERY stupid hobby we're all involved in, it's not that serious.

No. 13275

>>13272
>a clusterfuck of people just agreeing with each other and no real discussion happening besides nitpicking what you personally just dont like.
That's… basically every thread on this imageboard? If you can't handle people having different opinions you're probably better off in some tumblr hugbox where you'll never be challenged. Anons in that thread did pretty much nothing but call Disney cosplayers retarded attention whores and some sperg took it personally. God the newfags really do need to grow a pair and stop coming to /meta/ to baww about every small thing that hurts their feelings. You do know you don't need to react to every post that you don't agree with?

>>13274
Preach

No. 13276

Taylor Deans hairline is the new rosacea of Onision. The nitpicking from her latest vice video is unbearable now.
I get she looks bad, but it’s been every other goddamn post on the thread.
Can we implement some more rules on it?

Thank you.

No. 13277

>>13276
It's a video that shows her as she really looks. Of course people commented on it. It already died down, so?

No. 13278

>>13275
i got a ban cause of anons hurt feels that got revoked.

No. 13279

can we have the Anisa thread back?

No. 13280

>>13279
put it in thread requests. there needs to be actual milk though. no use making a new thread if it’s only gonna be nitpicking about her pear head and dora haircut.

No. 13281

Can the Raven thread be unpinned now that nothing has happened for days? Thanks!

No. 13282

>>13281
ya what the heck is up with that?

No. 13283

>>13204
more so a question and suggestion for mods: has there been any talk of a hell week at all? its been a while.

No. 13284

>>13282
to be fair anons have been begging for her to be tagged for a good while. its not like /pt/ moves pages like the other boards

No. 13285

There's some namefag spergfest going on in the ana thread, send the troops, thank you.

No. 13286

File: 1579829765526.jpg (329.1 KB, 1065x1421, 20200123_223220.jpg)

>>13204
Sorry to bother you mods, but why was I labeled a scrot and banned just for pointing out radfems cowish behaviour on meta? How can I appeal this, submitting proof I'm a female handmaiden or whatever?
I only got to see this ban now because I live in two cities and I barely post with this IP address. I've been posting with the other one and mods didn't seem to have a problem with my posting, except this one.

No. 13287

>>13286
someone may have just bounced an ip. just email admin. its happened in the past plenty

No. 13288

>>13287
Nah, the post was made by me but I don't see how it warrants a non expiring ban for being a scrot.
If it was the "you girls" that set the alarms off, I meant "you girls (in the radfem general I was posting)".
At most I could see it getting a short ban for infighting or bait, I would take the L and leave.
I just don't kmow how to appeal this ban, tho.

No. 13289

i just found out that we still have a 30 second wait between posts. that seems pretty long.

No. 13291

>>13286
I will ask about it but emailing me the original post and IPs can help me reverse it. Sorry about that happening.

Edit: another mod lifted your ban earlier, and the janitor who banned you hasn't been with us for a bit now

No. 13292

I always find interesting minor flakes online but I never know where to post them. Is there a thread on /snow/ for thread suggestions or a megathread for very minor flakes that don't have a theme (like art or soundclout)? I can't find one and I get scared of making threads because I feel like I'd waste board space or something.

No. 13293

>>13292
sorry for the double post but id also like to know is there anywhere on the site for discussing people who aren't really cows but just unique individuals

No. 13294

>>13292
There's a thread for thread requests on /pt/ and a personal lolcow thread on /snow/ where those unique individuals might fit in.

No. 13295

>>13291
Thanks! You guys are awesome.

No. 13299

Hi is there any way for me to be able to read the message for my ban again? I refreshed my page right away without realizing I got one and it was gone. I’m sorry, and thank you in advance.

No. 13300

>>13299
try posting again. unless you are no longer banned

No. 13301

>>13300
Thank you!

No. 13302

Will anything be done about the whiteknights in the Venus Angelic thread who are taking every chance they get to defend her and make her the victim.
Now there cant even be proper discussions in the thread because the whiteknights react to everything what is said.

No. 13303

>>13302
sorry you think any criticism of the insane nitpicking going on in there is whiteknighting

No. 13304

>>13302
The endless discussions about who's the biggest cow between Marge and Venus need to be a banable offense imo.

No. 13308

God there have been so many newfags here lately. They're so obvious. They never sage, they type in all lowercase, the double or triplepost.

I know everyone's blaming the Onion threads, but I think the TND threads are contributing to it, too. It seems like "household names" like those two draw in a lot of newfags simply through sheer popularity/infamy.

No. 13309

>>13308
people shamelessly namedrop this benghazian glass blowing forum every fucking chance they get in both of those cows’ mentions. also, PULLfags because their site is kill.

No. 13311

>>13308
I'm not new but sometimes I type in lowercase.

No. 13312

>>13308
>complaining about newfaggotry
>using reddit terms
good job.

No. 13313

Would really love some revision on Onision’s board. The need to visit different threads just to discuss what is relevant, even when it comes to those surrounding him (who are directly involved) has really turned the thread into a dump.
Need to talk about Kai? Go to the other thread. Need to talk about the drama lords surrounding Greg? Go to the other thread. Need to talk about something else? Find another thread.
Meanwhile his thread is literally comprised of shit memes, self posts, and think pieces from anons. That’s it.
So many integral parts to the story have been moved to other threads so we don’t get the full picture.
It was not the greatest thread, but it’s barely readable these days.

No. 13314

>>13312
>Reddit terms
I've never even used Reddit though.

No. 13318

>>13314
people on imageboards don't say "double/triple" posting, anon.

No. 13320

Hey MODs there's a Hitler poster at /m/ Dress Up Games Thread.
I already reported it but it has been there for 4h. Wouldn't that be considered political bait? How's that allowed?

No. 13321

>>13320
making hitler in dress up games isn't politics bait, lmfao. it's a joke.

No. 13322

>>13321
Oh sorry, I forgot that /m/ is now proto /pol/. One might as well start making jokes about Muslims and race I guess then.

No. 13323

>>13322
you need to be 18+ to use this site, anon. is it edgy? sure, but it's not against the rules any more than making kawaii trump or obama or something, not that you'd report that anyway.

No. 13325

>>13320
Same with someone who was going on about "white radfemcels" in the celebricows thread.

No. 13327

>>13318
People on Reddit don't say that, either. The only places I've heard people say "doublepost" are regular forums, like Kiwifarms, PULL, GuruGossip, etc. Some of you guys call it samefaggotry, which is also wrong. Samefaggotry is when someone replies to themself or posts more than once while pretending to be another person to push the conversation in a particular direction. If you're using it really charitably, it can also mean any time someone replies to themself.
I've used LCF for two years, and I'm not going to stop calling it doubleposting. I'm sorry that it's not adequately chanspeak for you, but I'd rather use a word from another site than misuse samefag, which does not refer only to when one person posts multiple times in a row. It refers to someone being deceptive. Samefagging is a bannable offense. Doubleposting is just newfaggotry. There needs to be two separate terms for these things.

No. 13328

>>13327
you sound fucking autistic

No. 13329

>>13320
That's not bait, that's just someone realizing they could create a known political figure in a dress up game. Like other anon said I doubt you'd report a Trump, Obama, or even a Stalin made in a dress up game.

No. 13330

>>13327
no it's not. it's already been discussed anyway.

No. 13331

Late to the party but why is there no new too poor thread?

No. 13332

>>13331
Because nobody made one? Make one yourself.. or do you think mods do that?

No. 13334

>>13332
she's probably making sure it didn't get banned or something, dumbass.

No. 13335

>>13334
What a retarded assumption

No. 13336

>>13335
nta but not really, IIRC her thread/the soundcloud threads actually were locked for a while a year or two ago

No. 13337

unpopular opinion has tons of retarded racebaiting

No. 13338

>>13331
study a few well-made ops here, research up any milk since the last thread closed and summarise it, link it to the last thread and post it in /snow/

No. 13339

PLEASE get rid of /ot/

No. 13340

Plz ban all Radfems, this place is not much fun like it used to.

No. 13341

can we finally get that stupid cow-photoshop thread so they stop shitting up shayna's thread saying "it's part of board culture".

No. 13342

>>13339
you gonna elaborate at all?

No. 13343

The A-logging about Kobe Bryant's death is in so many forums right now. Someone already bragged about cowtipping because some cow tried profiting off his death. Anons need to learn some self control.

No. 13344

>>13340
…Like it used to be when radfem topics weren't banned at all?

No. 13345

>>13344
Nta but it was fun back before the radfems even started invading this site. There obviously wasn't a need for them to be banned back then because… they weren't here. Now that they are, they need to get the boot. Ot has been an unreadable cesspool ever since.

No. 13346

>>13345
There was never any radfem invasion though, they were oldfag users that started developing radfem ideas after the PP/GC threads took traction.

No. 13347

>>13346
KEK No the fuck they are NOT. Now you sound completely delusional.

Let me go ahead and stop replying because I already know where this is headed

No. 13348

>>13345
>says they're NTA but they're the only ones bumping the thread within the past few hours

No. 13349

>>13346
uhhhh no i genuinely don’t believe this lol. i’ve been around since the site first existed and it definitely feels to me like the GC sperg shit came out of nowhere, from a mass Reddit migration or some shit. it honestly killed every fucking subject it was spread into and i couldn’t be more glad admin decided to kill it off with brute force outside its chernobyl exclusion zone. i don’t even have a problem with PP posters bc they usually stay in their lane but for some reason the GCs could not just calm the fuck down. i still see them leaking randomly.

No. 13350

>>13346
absolutely love when you guys try to push this narrative of you being oldfags who have always been here when i've been around since circa 2016 and there wasn't any radfem shit in sight. just people poking fun at freaky troons but no autistic politics behind it

No. 13351

>>13349
>>13350
Check /ot/'s catalog. We've been having GC shit since as early as 2016, while most standalone threads emerged around 2017. The first official GC thread was made because it was such a widely discussed topic.
I've been here since Ian was admin and Kiki was still relevant. I don't understand why you would lie about something we can double-check.
Just two examples:
>>>/ot/34124
>>>/ot/113748
If I went through the oldest vent threads, I'd probably find more examples of anons hating on troons and discussing feminism.

No. 13352

>>13351
Seriously, anon.. for real now.. real talk… did you read through the first thread? Did you read it? There's nothing radfem about this. The last one is also full of people disagreeing with you and it's hardly comparable to the GC/radfem threads that followed. The discussion back then was alright because it was just a one-off vent thread for people discussing the prevelant tumblritis but you all went full autism and made this your political hugbox because shocker people think retards are retarded and that was seen as an invitation by you and the reddit ilk that got linked lolcow on the GC subreddits (which is true, you can look that up)

No. 13353

>>13351
>A thread with like 30 posts
great evidence

Shitting on troons isn't gc, radfem, misandrist, or female exclusive. They're hated on every board they don't own like /lgbt/ /r9k/ or /cuteboys/. The real GC and radfem anons all either immigrated from reddit or facebook and a huge wave came after the Dec 2018 tumblr rule change. You can tell by the way they act alone. The results of that poll were telling.

No. 13354

>>13352
>>13353
>this backpedaling
We're talking about both GC and radfem shit, not just radfem. Follow along.
Besides, GC is considered synonymous to it. Who is the "real GC" exactly? Post proof.
Once more, I don't understand the motivation behind lying about this. Any actual oldfag knows we've never been a troon-friendly site, and we've always discussed politics freely. There was an entire feminism general where anons debated being libfem vs radfem.
You can claim it's a "mass reddit migration" all you like, but post history is stacking up against that theory, and so far, you've had nothing to back up the reddit claims. I'm not even a frequent poster in any of the feminism threads, but I'd be a lying retard to claim it's new.

No. 13355

dont reply to meta gcfags. or any gcfags. youre arguing with a bunch of mentally deranged brick walls. ironically, they act like fucking males.

No. 13356

>>13348
I wonder if it really is just like 3 people. It looks like they have the same typing style, and they reply within minutes of each other. I kind of regret engaging with them now, but it feels wrong to not question their BS.

No. 13357

>>13356
Will you just leave you absolute uber faggot. Even if your delusion of thinking this website was for you and your retarded politics, it's not anymore. It won't be ever again under the current Admin. Get used to it. Your whining won't do shit

No. 13358

>>13357
Are you going to take a break from trying to cause infighting? You say that the GC anons are the ones that act like men, but you're calling people faggots like a fresh /r9k/ plant. Take a nap, an imageboard isn't this deep.

No. 13359

>>13358
>Imageboards aren't that deep
>Wants to turn a gossip chan into a political hugbox
>Faggot is /r9k/ only and never gets used on here
Yeah you absolutely scream oldFAG

No. 13360


No. 13361

>>13359
>things no one ever said in greentext
>thinking "[adjective]fag" is the same as calling people "faggot" as an insult
>thinking most anons here use "faggot" as an insult in general
Only someone with high testosterone could be this aggressive and wrong at the same time. I hope you get the help you need. Continually sperging about some users who only exist in a containment board now is not the answer.

No. 13362

holy shit not again…

No. 13363

>>13362
it's only one anon >>13340, the same that was racebaiting yesterday. just ignore the retard

No. 13364

File: 1580252269013.jpg (27.03 KB, 300x240, again and again and again and …)

>>13362
it never fucking stops. someone goes around using the term 'radfem' as bait and like 3 people reply

No. 13365

>>13362
Radfems can never just take an L… they camp out itt and start writing essays and calling everyone a samefagging male the second someone complains about their screeching.

No. 13366

>>13355
>they act like males
even more than actual XYers sometimes

No. 13367

>>13366
after the admin of that radfem board turned out to be a self-hating man I wouldn't be shocked if some of them are XYers. there's something so uniquely masculine about the way they behave… like how they have THE absolute worst takes but still talk down to everybody as if they're always right? or how they think all real women subscribe to groupthink and berate the ones that don't. I defo get the vibe that some of them want to be men if they aren't already. it all feels like robot invasion 2.0

No. 13369

There is a lot of samefagging for sure. Why the hard on for the RadFems though?

No. 13370

>>13364
Isn't it weird that radfems have already "lost" (technically), but there are still some anons screeching about them daily here and in /ot/? I saw one randomly accuse a Courtney Love stan in the tinfoil thread of being a "radfem", even though said stan was shit-talking women in general, claiming that very few women are talented. It's tired, and this is tinfoil, but it really does seem like some shit a bunch of bored invading moids would do to cause chaos on a site they know is full of women.
>"Lmao so radfems are their big issue right now. Just call someone a radfem so the whole thread gets derailed, dumb bitches fall for it every time"
The bizarre aggression and insults both ITT and in /ot/ are very male-sounding, too. Aside from that whole possibility, though, what do these "anti-radfem" spergs writing novels about how their radfem boogeyman is literally ever-present and Satan-incarnated want? The whole website to be banned until their own special, specific opinions are the only ones allowed? Are they just doing this in hopes of convincing the admin to ban PP threads too?
I wish they'd just yell that they've had enough, bitch out the admin, and make their own sekrit anti-feminist imageboard or whatever where they chase their boogeyman away. Then we could all have peace.

No. 13371

>>13370
literally nobody in here is writing novels except for you

No. 13372

>>13371
Yeah, okay.

No. 13373

I know you guys are busy, but is the Hellweek still planned?

No. 13375

>>13367
lmao this one killed me

No. 13378

>>13373
I'll try to get on it as soon as possible, I've already hired more mods to help with the task.

Don't bring your GC related complaints here >>>/meta/13215

No. 13379

I don't care for erin, and she's mildly entertaining so I'll keep on lurking for her crazy ass, but is it just me or are the a-log tier posts on her thread absolutely cringe? Like why meme her mom (pic) even though she doesn't belong in the drama, for example? The nitpicking is ridiculous as fuck too. I thought they're against the rules. And I wonder what happened to the reveals of her posts?

No. 13380

>>13362
oh damn, i didn't check the thread here in ages (as in days), didn't realize it'd still go on.

No. 13381

>>13380
The post reveals are in thread number 2 anon

No. 13382

>>13381
sankyu, I guess she wasn't important enough to get her reveals announced

No. 13383

>>13378
Thanks, admin!

The Onision thread has gone down the shitter again with moralfaggers, derailing and people who can't take their Sarah shit to the anti-o thread. It's been going on for hours now and has turned into bickering back and forth.

No. 13384

>>13378
Can hell week be hard on the rad fems? They’re out of control and making the site unusable

No. 13385

>>13383
i agree about the bickering but since when is sarah anti-o? if that's the case i'd go there.

No. 13386

>>13382
Dont say sankyu, newfag. It points you out. Be normal. Save that shit for /w/ where weeb garbage like that goes.

No. 13387

>>13386
At least you saged your post….

No. 13388

Dear GC Bitches Who Couldn't Stay in Their Lane,

Thanks for fucking it up.

Sincerely,

OP of the GC threads

No. 13389

>>13384
In what thread?

No. 13390

>>13388
Oh, hi OP of the reddit GC threads. This is not reddit.

No. 13391

>>13388
why are you writing like a retard

No. 13393

>>13384
Please post an example, I would love to see this unusable site.

No. 13395

admin, rules say you won't remove anything but will you remove posts for $$$?

No. 13396

>>13395
Share the post and most likely they won't, but feel free to send them money anyway.

No. 13397

>>13395
based and desperatepilled

No. 13398

>>13385
The other girls are talked about in the anti-o thread so why wouldn't Sarah be? It's not directly Greg related and has the same retarded behavior the twitter/moralfags bring to that thread, which is the nonstop bickering. It just clogs the thread like the Shiloh talk did a day ago. A farmhand gave a warning when that happened and they switched it from Shiloh to Sarah. Didn't even heed the warning.

No. 13399

So, can we get some clarification? Because again, I find myself even more pissed off because a) onisions victims are very much apart of onisions threads but… it goes into the anti-o?
But the anti-o was originally for the twitters and anti-o group and not really the victims, right?

No. 13400

>>13399
>onisions victims are very much apart of onisions threads but… it goes into the anti-o?
They willingly associated themselves with anti-os so yes, it goes there.
>But the anti-o was originally for the twitters and anti-o group and not really the victims, right?
It's now a thread for onion side milk as well. Legal discussion and side discussion can go there.

No. 13403

>>13390

Readjust you radar. Fuck reddit.

But the drama on both sides has been such an embarrassing demonstration of stereotypical female catty bitchiness that I've stopped contributing my other thread OPs, resources I access through my employment, and gold star transcripts.

No. 13404

>>13395
admin, pls respond. i know you don't like dmcas. not trying to remove a cow thread, it's a photo of someone who knew a cow in a dead thread. i know you have to pay out of pocket for the site so let me help.

No. 13405


No. 13406

>>13405
not even for $1000? $10,000? seriously, name your price and it's yours. no will even notice it's gone

No. 13407

I’ve been on lolcow for a good part of a decade, seen some shitty times on it but I’ve been using it less and less and part of me feels as if it’s because of newfags making the site borderline unusable. Useless old threads get bumped for no reason, so many ops feel like vendettas and many of the threads are so obviously other cows nitpicking some girl they don’t like. The Cryaotic thread for instance is a cesspool, and there’s so many people who are obviously sex workers gossiping about other sex workers. There’s some legitimately interesting cows in /snow/ like Soren but people need to learn they don’t need to bump a thread to talk about some camwhore’s nipples. It’s pathetic

No. 13408

>>13407
the imageboard is led by imnotlikeothergirls koreaboos, what did you expect

No. 13409

>>13408
This isn't the thread for 2x butthurt

No. 13410

>>13409
stan loona

No. 13411

>>13407
I agree. Admin got triggered when she noticed that a big chunk of the users didn’t browse snow or pt and preferred ot. Honestly snow and pt have become so boring, nitpicky and autistic that I understand why anons stopped browsing those boards. Lolcow has genuinely become an edgy version of Pull.

No. 13412

>>13406
If its a dead thread why should it matter? No one will go look at the photo you want removed.

No. 13413

Can the autosage be lifted off the Anisa thread? There is new content but people aren’t notified

No. 13414

I'm sorry but I think it's about time to close all kpop related threads permanently. The autistic- refuse to integrate kpop stans can go back to the literally millions of other sites and sm that they've forcibly taken over and ruined.

No. 13415

>>13414
you can just hide the threads you know. it’s not like there’s anything actually interesting on /m/ or /g/ anyway, they’re basically filler at this point. if you avoid those boards the rest of the site is pretty free from kpop sperging on either side except for the occasional argument in OT or whatever. they seem to stick to their weeb containment zones fine.

No. 13416

telling people to "hide the thread" when the concern is over the annoying userbase should be ban worthy.

No. 13417

>>13416
lolno

No. 13418

>>13415
You assume I haven't hidden the the kpop threads.
I want them gone because they invade nonkpop threads. Why should they be allowed to make the entirety of /m/ and /g/ their playground of fail? Better they go back to twitter or wherever they came from.

No. 13419

>>13418
what? kpopfags never leave the kpop threads. using twitter lingo isnt just a kpopfag thing, retard.

No. 13420

>>13412
It still shows up in Google results for my name.

No. 13421

>>13414
>>13418
>it worked once so maybe I can do it with other threads and topics I don't like
Great. Looking forward to the next months full of this shit.

No. 13423

>>13420
you blew any semblance of a chance by asking publicly instead of in an email

No. 13427

>>13419
Not talking about twitter lingo.
>kpopfags never leave the kpop threads
If that were true then I wouldn't be here complaining.

No. 13428

some retard is going around the boards and posting unsaged pictures of a dead cat or something with an obvious and non-contributing caption. i'd report but it won't let me for some reason.

No. 13429

>>13423
Some mods are…let's just say "eh" (but that's not the admin's fault is it) but admin is nice to be fair. Desperate as fuck to pay $10,000 for a mug to get taken down tbh. But based.

No. 13430

>>13429
If I were admin I'd take that money t b h

No. 13431

>>13430
>>13429
if that bitch had 10k for that she'd be paying a lawyer.

No. 13432

>>13431
you get it lol its just someone saying dumb shit cus they found their picture and were upset. there is no 10k. frankly i want to know what picture lmao what is so pressing and why are they so embarrassed?

No. 13433

>>13432
admin needs to hide the post/picture (more like all of their threads that hve been going on for years lmfao and then permanently delete it off the servers when the 10kanon deposited 10k bucks…I just want the best for admin sama

No. 13434

>>13431
A lawyer or dmca means giving personal info and will be recorded somewhere. lolcow also doesn't like lawyers and draws attention to people which try to do this. I don't know lolcow's server status but they might not even have to comply. giving $$$ assumes no questions asked and no discussion.

No. 13435

>>13433
lol no

No. 13436

>>13434
Is that a threat anon?
I take donations only, not bribes.

No. 13438

If people can whinge until the GC threads are taken down, I don't see a reason not too beg for the kpop threads to be taken down to. It clearly works. Who cares if people use and enjoy the kpop threads? This doesn't even fucking function like a normal imageboard anymore so go for it kpop-hate anon.

No. 13439

>>13436
I was talking about my own personal info, not yours. the person asked why I didn't want to contact a lawyer. some sites have pay for removal and I wanted to know if this was one. if not, nevermind.

No. 13440

>>13438
Seconded, the K-pop threads bring in underage twitter spergs who at the same time moralfag and racebait around the board and then turn around to call anorexic k-idols fat whores and male idols ugly faggots.

No. 13441

>>13440
where are you seeing kpop users outside of the thread? I use /m/ apart from the kpop thread and the board seems pretty chill

No. 13442

hey mods, after the post that basically everyone being discussed who's not onision needs to gtfo to the snow thread, there have been a ton of posts that should probably be in the onion flakes thread. i started reporting them all but don't want to be aggravating, maybe a farmhand could take a look.

No. 13443

some dumbass keeps commenting "i am a pineapple" in french to bump threads in snow

No. 13444

>>13438
It would never work for one simple reason: admin and mods hated GC, but they're kpop stans. Don't worry, those threads aren't going away

No. 13445

>>13444
This is the truth, Kpop isn't going anywhere. I'm waiting for all feminist type topics to be banned from Lolcow because thats where it's going.

No. 13447

>>13444
The reason given for banning GC threads was because there was apparently too many but it's fine to have a million kpop, kpop critical, idol spam, idol boys, idol girls, kpop rant and jpop threads because each of those definitely warrants its own thread, right?

No. 13448

i’ve already reported many posts but there’s a ton of blogging and legalfagging in taylor’s thread, and a lot of it has shit all to even do with the state taylor’s living in or anything about her case. just a heads up

No. 13449

File: 1580693825220.gif (2.68 MB, 600x450, idubbbz gf.gif)

a request for the anisa thread autosage to be removed so people can see her pt level-tier modeling

No. 13455

File: 1580736359869.jpg (27.55 KB, 275x275, 1578842424256.jpg)

Can we please get a hellweek

No. 13457

this thread needs to be nuked in /g/ it's just one scrote posting gross fetish content and farmers arguing with him

>>>/g/63860

No. 13458


No. 13459

Have we totally let go of the saging in non-drama threads? No onr fucking reads the rules before posting, the nearly dead kpc is a hellhole.

No. 13460

>>13459
With the amount of nitpicking and newfags in that thread? Hell no.

No. 13461

someone linked to cp in the advice thread on /g/
i reported it but just a heads up

No. 13462

>>13460
Then do something about it, even if i hide all the unsaged posts to read it, it's full of autism

No. 13463

>>13462
Sincere question, why read it then?

No. 13464

>>13463
Didn't i just say i hit the hide unsaged thingy to read it? I want the milk every once in a while, years and years ago was into some groups and now see their cow-like bs. Sorry to sound snarky, anon.

No. 13465

File: 1580858132741.png (107.7 KB, 395x265, 00B6A348-2714-4683-9B45-79AE70…)

Can
>Don’t go into a thread to complain about the exact same thread. Hide threads you don’t want to see and take topic complaints to /meta/
please be implemented as a global rule? At the very least in the drama boards?

Reporting for whiteknighting/mini-modding/derailing never seems to make any difference when one anon is parked on and shitting up a thread and purposely disrupting actual milk discussion responding to every post with “you guys are obsessed! this isn’t milk! I don’t want to talk about this! post something else! this is vendetta!” and accusing everyone of being vendetta samefag. This feels particularly rampant in /w/.

We can’t ever call them out for blatantly being the cow themselves because we’ll get “hi cow”-d. If we respond to it we get redtexted for infighting. Doesn’t really fall under whiteknighting if they’re not actually defending the cow and only trying to staunch any convo by accusing anyone who posts of vendetta. Doesn’t fall under derailing either because accusing anyone who talks about a cow of being obsessed with said cow….is still technically talking about the cow. And an anon refusing to actually acknowledge the milk in front of them (being purposely obtuse) isn’t against the rules.

That or like, some kind of /w/ specific rule about not crying “vendetta” in every post when there’s clearly been multiple examples of milk posted? Idk, it’s just making the threads unbearable cause the cows are evolving and I see it happening in more and more threads.

No. 13466

can we have the female characters representation thread moved to /m? It's comfy and not exactly radfem.

No. 13467

Can a mod do something about the vendetta-chan sperg in the costhot thread? Completely derailing and bitching about people asking for proof about shit and then complaining about how they have to spoonfeed information because they aren't posting the information and keep posting iirelevant reaction images to anything anyone doesn't agree with along with huge novlla bullshit because no one else seems to have a hate boner for this nicole thot.

No. 13469

Can you do something about the pedo apologists in the art thread?

No. 13470

Can mods please do something about Nicole blatantly spiraling out in the costhot thread?
I've tagged them all (*suspected) in one post for easier reviewing.
>>>/w/81456

>>13467
Go home Nicole, you're not even trying anymore.

No. 13471

>>13470
NO ONE knows who this chick is, you dumbass. How are anons asking for proof =/= Nicole? Tinfoiling is against board rules. All the anons have done is complain about her making a patreon and tinfoil about whether she called the cops and bitch about her quitting 2 jobs. WHAT does she actually do thats milky. If you just hate her, say it. But dont try to push some weird nonexistent dialogue about her being toxic or scamming. Post this shit if she is and stop bitching about 'spoonfeeding'. POST the relevant shit anons are asking for.

No. 13472

>>13470
Stop 'hi cow' to anyone not dragging her.

No. 13473

>>13471
>>13467
>>13472
not any of the anons, but flakes, especially in shitty generals threads aren't going to be that milky.

No. 13474

>>13473
Anons are pissed other anons are asking what else has she done thats milky aside from 'hurr durr shes a thot".

No. 13475

>>13471
>Tinfoiling is against board rules
Tinfoiling is only when there's no basis to a claim. No one's even claimed anything other than "she's full of shit" which has already been backed up several times over. No one is going to break into the police station to see if she filed a police report, which is what you seem to be demanding us to do to be allowed to talk about her. It's not tinfoiling if you anon just refuse to read the numerous posts that are already there and demand people spoonfeed you milk from years ago and throw a tantrum when people won't repost the same shit over and over again.

>If you just hate her, say it.

You need to take a nap anon, seriously. Calm down. Nobody there hates her anymore than any of the other thots and ebeggars in that thread. You taking it personally doesn't make it true. Even if someone did hate her….so what? It wouldn't make her any less of a cow? We're on a website that is entirely for talking about people we think are stupid?

>WHAT does she actually do thats milky

She's a thot and she ebeggs…that's why we're talking about her in the thread for thots and ebeggars. It's not a hard concept, really. If you don't think thots and ebeggars and milky, then why are you hanging out in the thot/ebeggar thread?

>POST the relevant shit anons are asking for

It's already there, it's already posted. If you refuse to read it, there's nothing I can do. You're not even hiding your samefaggotry well, you keep screaming to POST things, then people tell you it's right there read it yourself and then you ignore that person and scream at the next person to POST things. It's just boring troll/whiteknight/selfpost bullshit.

>>13474
>what else has she done thats milky aside from 'hurr durr shes a thot"
Yeah, we're talking about a thot in the the thot thread. That's it, that's the milk, she doesn't need to have done anything else. Go to another thread if you don't find that interesting, no one's forcing you to stay.

No. 13476

>>13474
so? that thread is literally for any cosplayer that sells nudes or posts ahegao face. it has no standards.

No. 13477

>>13475
>You need to take a nap anon, seriously. Calm down

anyone that replies like you do shouldnt be giving out that kind of advice anon

No. 13478

>>13477
Seriously. All this anon is doing is sperging out in the thread with walls of text. This thot is the least milkiest snowflake in the thread. Idk why anon is flipping out that not every anon agrees and all they keep doing is posting the same shit over and over.

No. 13485

There was this pro-pedo defender sperg who was sperging in the pinkpill thread about hebephiles for the past two hours and is now sperging about other stuff.

Why are the anons doing nothing?

No. 13486

>>13485
sorry i meant why are the admins doing nothing?

No. 13487

>>13486
Probably busy, anon.

No. 13488

Is the "weight gain thread" on /g/ an inside joke at this point?
Jannies ban posters there for infight but never ban the OP who infights and constantly bumps the thread with her infighting and it's obviously the same person necroing it every time. It's been two years.

Just wondering why that thread and that anon get special treatment in particular.

No. 13489

Anons in the PNP thread are so bored they’re all just sperging the fuck out at this point plz send help

No. 13491

>>13457
>>13488
the admins simply don't care.

No. 13492

>>13491
It helps when you guys link to the threads or report the specific posts in question.

No. 13493

>>13492
I've reported it in the past, and I saw other anons complain about it before.
Look I'll just hide it, anon gets her special infight thread for unspecified reasons.

No. 13494

>>13493
OP hasn't posted in years. What's the actual issue?

No. 13495

So because of the way my wifi works (dynamic ip) I have no idea if my ban was lifted after first appeal or if my ip has updated. I'm using the exact same device and wifi I got banned on.
I was permanbanned from all boards with no given reason and no red text on any of my posts. I barely even post and I only use the skincare, haircare, confessions and advice threads anyway. Afaik I haven't broken any of the rules?
My last posts before the ban were on the relationship advice thread, not sure if they were from the same device but they were from the same wifi for sure:
>>132448
>>132444
>>132437
And before that I posted on the confessions thread days ago but it wasn't anything controversial either.
Is there any reason for this?

No. 13497

>>13496
To add, not all bans are red text.

No. 13498

>>13495
I believe you got an automatic system ban but I lifted it when you submitted your appeal. If you still have issues posting you can email me your IP so I can manually whitelist you.
Automatic system bans are inherited from previous bans and IPs. Sorry about that anon.

No. 13499

>>13498
>>13497
Got it, thanks!

No. 13500

File: 1581072054086.png (28.99 KB, 1705x224, whypipo.PNG)

I'm not a rich white bitch.

No. 13502

File: 1581072776446.png (33.32 KB, 817x383, pajeet.PNG)

>>13500

Tell farmers how you really feel about them!

No. 13503

File: 1581072812250.png (28.71 KB, 2359x138, INVALIDATED.PNG)


No. 13504


No. 13508

>>13500
>>13502
>>13503
What's the context of these? A janitor?
Also, mild nitpick, but
>cloudflare demographics posted 2 years ago
Those stats were obviously inaccurate, and I don't understand why anyone would take them seriously enough to remember them years later, even for this dumbass "Everyone I disagree with is a rich white racist" argument. Wealthy women in their 30s and up aren't hanging out on a fucking /cgl/ drama offshoot lol

No. 13509

Just a heads up, there’s someone (or several people?) in altcows 17 who I think may be blackface troll from the last thread.

Obviously this is just speculation, but it seems odd we get another vague “so and so was racist because!” post randomly like that, with no context. I don’t know if they’re doing it deliberately as some kind of weirdo litmus test, or trolling for lulz.

No. 13510

>>13500
is this a farmhands ? yikes if so

No. 13511

>>13500
>>13502
>>13503
Why don't you people ever post context? I swear everytime someone just drops a random screenshot it's just trying to stir up shit in the most confusing way possible.

No. 13512

>>13511
Yeah I want to know what the fuck is going on and I don't want to get banned assuming and making the admin/farmhand mad. Just post who it's about.

No. 13513


No. 13514

>>13513
What the actual fuck is wrong with femdom anons

No. 13515

>>13513
lmao thanks for the laughs

No. 13516

File: 1581109039838.png (39.64 KB, 964x285, Capture.PNG)

>>13513
>diarrhea
>from running an imageboard
I…
Also, am I the only who finds it weird that the person in the KF thread who posted the Twitter acc of the user who brought this milk is calling her a "crazy bpd femcel", "femoid", "femishit"? Sounding a whole lot like an angry, woman-hating tranny/moid. That person's only made like 4 posts, so you know it's an old account that was logged into specifically for this purpose.
So, a misogynistic tranny or scrote with insider knowledge on Lolcow's staff, and/or other people who would be able to "bring cream" on Admin. Certain radfem tinfoils about tranny jannies are starting to look just a bit more legit.
I'm not white btw, just a brownie like admin

No. 13517

>>13516
>>13516
Or then bringerofcream is a personal cow we don't know about. Looking at the sick fucks twitter makes me think it's some obscure cows twitter. No way in hell is that person not being milked by someone.

Probably bragged about their le epic leak to orbiters on discord or some shit, who just now realised their precious moon to orbit hates men. This femcels twitter is full of full cream milk, no way are they not a major cow. I've gotten more laughs out of that twitter than their shitty screenshots. Who the fuck care if janitors talk shit about femcels? They do it for free for fucks sake, let the hot pockets have their empty enjoyment to fill their autistic void.

No. 13518

>>13517
Nah, this person is an unrelated nobody to me. A random Twitter sperg like all the rest.
I find it way funnier to laugh at our admin's hijinks. Milk from home is always sweeter.

No. 13519

>>13518
how would bringerofcream even know this shit if she's not also "from home"

No. 13520

yo. /meta/ brings the best laffs lol

No. 13521

>>13519
She's presumably not the admin, so she's just not as interesting. Not that hard. If she is or was a janitor, we also don't know how involved she was in site decisions or what her bans were like. She just looks like a boring random.

No. 13522

File: 1581111767496.png (13.74 KB, 598x130, sterilesaint.png)


No. 13523

>>13518
>>13520
I don't see how random Twitter sperg and random milk bringer are related or how random discord caps are actually proof and not random caps.
>snail
That's crystal cafe's admin. Our admins discord is in the lolcow discord. Sorry if I'm not getting something here but this is confusing
>>13494
Thanks for locking that thread it reeked of anachans

No. 13524

>>13521
>boring
>beats the shit out of her boyfriend
your admin vendetta is clouding your milk judgment

No. 13525

>>13523
Regina and snail were on good terms, so it's not impossible one of Crystal Cafe's jannies would end up as Lolcow's admin after aussiechan stepped down.
If admin originally came from Crystal Cafe's mod team, everything that's happened makes more sense now.

No. 13526

>>13524
>dime a dozen russian anachan e-girl with a blood fetish on Twitter
I'm sorry, but this is just too common. I've seen too many of these types in the wild to care much.
I just want more admin milk and diarrhea tales.

No. 13527

>>13521
>Beats up her boyfriend
>Brags about being a mod
>Posts nonstop cringe about female power

Dunno anon, this is some major quality milk unlike some crusty screenshots.

No. 13528

File: 1581113002381.png (368.44 KB, 550x392, femcel?.png)

>>13522
>>13523
So is this an asherahsgarden mod a crystal cafe mod or a lolcow mod
>>13524
They initially didn't deliver milk except for receipts from the site itself so it's weird for random zero context receipts to get posted. Some highlights of what she said from the kiwi thread
>Her ethnicity makes her especially sensitive to criticism
>Ultimately, the reason the unlisted board on lolcow was deleted is because she was tired of being called a tranny.
I can still access lolcow.farm/2X with the capitial X
>There are rumors that she is anorexic because she really doesn't like being called fat and makes sure to remind everyone that she is a skelly
Isn't russian anon anachan ?

This reeks of some sort of vendetta and I'm living for it but I really hope this anon isn't a farmer or angry gc anon because fucking yikes

No. 13529

File: 1581113230907.png (14.96 KB, 598x197, Screenshot.png)


No. 13530

>>13526
the weakest attempt to divert attention from a cow of all time

where's the thread? I could go for a mystery.jpg style milking

No. 13531

>>13528
My money's on former Lolcow mod who was spurned after being removed from her position. How else would she have access to a mod Discord, if this is real? The ingenue account also looks very familiar for the Lolcow Discord scene, so I'm inclined to believe the screenshots are legit. The full context would be nice, so I'm hoping whoever this is dumps more shit so we can get a full picture.
I'm not shocked by the shit from the Twitter account, because this is kind of what I expected, anyway. I wouldn't be surprised if they're all mentally ill anachans, edgelords or other assorted spergs. It seems like people who run imageboards are always fucked up or cowlike.

No. 13532

>>13530
>voicing personal disinterest is now diversion
Take off the tinfoil hat.
Honestly, start a thread to talk about this Twitter person. We have massive threads on boring people like Shay and PnP, so it's not like quality is the big issue here. She'll probably freak out and lock or delete her account by the time she finds out she's being mocked here and KF, though.
I genuinely just only care about admin milk right now. This "sterilesaint" person isn't enticing enough for me to distract from it. If she turned out to be like Nemu or Chris-chan, maybe I'd be into it, but this half-assed shit? Not really.
The only thing that makes her interesting to me is her connection to Lolcow, and I want that to be expanded on.

No. 13533

>>13531
Admin is nippon weeb k-pop sperg according to my field notes from lurking in the lolcow discord. If the screens are legit then probably some crystal cafe mods fighting again. Anons suspected the crystal cafe mods were posting in the /ot/ thread when someone sperged about a love note to an incel.

No. 13534

>>13523
b im not even a part of whats all happening right now, i just love all the tinfoil and bitching at each other, you ladies are crazy

No. 13535

>>13532
there's 0 admin milk though aside from the rather weak screenshots and i doubt there will be posted more if this is all she was saving so you trying to ruin the fun here is quite frankly annoying

No. 13536

File: 1581114662487.png (21.01 KB, 598x130, Screenshot_2020-02-07 purgator…)

>>13532
Or it could be a deranged manhate anon. The 2x board was supposed to close on the 5th afterall and the pp thread has been awful to read through lately. Since admin moved the thread back to /ot/ there has been multiple femdom anons shitting up the thread and crying about their nigel fwb.

No. 13537

>>13535
How am I ruining the fun? No one is stopping you from digging through this account. I just hope that more mod discord leaks come as a result of this, because eastern euro BPD thots kind of lose their novelty fast.

No. 13538

>>13537
ok, we get it. stop shitting this thread up then if all you're waiting for is more discord leaks. bothering us about how irrelevant you think this mod is won't make the discord leak hopes come true

No. 13539

>>13538
Take your meds.

No. 13540

File: 1581115484574.png (Spoiler Image, 232.34 KB, 590x707, 2.png)

>this is who gets picked to be a mod
bruh

No. 13541

>>13540
We don't even know if that twitterfag is even a mod of lolcow or if this is beef between two mods
>>>/ot/386275 some nostalgia from the r9k drama from quartz.bistro
>townhall
>two mods beef at each other over shittalking
>mod reveals to entire userbase during townhall that other mod gave r9k robot her login
>anon finds a cringey love letter a moid posted on r9k
>anon loses her shit

No. 13542

>>13532
>sperging and infighting for hours
>still diverting attention from the cow
>…and onto the boring discord caps you keep trying to shill as ~real milk~
Hi cow

No. 13543

File: 1581117159381.png (309.49 KB, 598x613, femdom.png)


No. 13545

admin are u going to say something about all this?

No. 13546

>>13543
cringe. never bring back the 2x related thread topics.

No. 13547

>>13542
You really responded a full hour later with an unsaged post to "hi cow"?
Autism. Anyway, still waiting for real milk. You can keep obsessing over this Twitter chick if you want.

No. 13548

>>13546
Is femdom /2X/-related?

No. 13549

>>13500
>>13502
>>13503
Why did race become a part of the problem? Were people supposed to know Admin wasn't white or something? I don't really get it, and I'm not even white myself. It's weird that she was talking about being discriminated against, but then went on about "pajeet coons".
It seems like the person who shared this shit on KF was racist and guilty of a lot of the same things she accused admin of, too. Some interesting people involved with this site.

No. 13550

>>13547

hi casey

No. 13551

>>13550
Is that her name? Maybe if you've doxxed her, you can post something more interesting than Twitter screenshots.

No. 13552

>>13549
i 100% do not believe she's not white, considering she's a koreaboo who allegedly lives in the nihon.

No. 13553

>>13549
like >>13552 stated she is most likely asian/white and this anon is probably mexican so this seems like some massive false flagging or fake caps

No. 13554

I know you ladies are super mad but gotttdamn the autism is thru the roof holy shit. The majority of us want to talk shit about people but you idiots make it too personal. Find some lvl of chill Lord help your

No. 13556

>>13554
are you lost or something?
why are you fucking retards all fighting in the meta complaints thread? go to /ot/ or something

No. 13558

>>13500
Plot twist: admin was the person constantly race baiting and bitching about muh whypipo in PP threads. well, this cap finally explains why she hated GCs especially.

No. 13559

>>13558
I mean the current PP thread has quite a bit of racebait

No. 13560

>>13548
no but let's pretend it is

No. 13561

>>13513
>she took over lolcow at 19 and is now 20
Fucking called it. I knew she was really young and insecure which is why she took everything personally and was ready to ban any topic that made anons come to /meta/ to scream at her.

Admin, you really bit off more than you could chew. I appreciate the effort for wanting to help the board out but you got to know your limits. Also, word of advice - don't trust your mods. Never trust your mods with any amount of personal, possibly embarrassing information about your life. They're not your friends. They will rat you out at some point. It always happens.

No. 13562

>>13561

A better word of advice - never let batshit man-hating radfems mod or take over your site or else the second you do something they don't like they will chimp the fuck out and try to dox you. You can never win with them. Exterminate and move on.

No. 13563

I don't think the mods are radfems at all tbh. Im not the anon you are responding too tho

No. 13564

>>13563
The person who was posting discord leaks clearly was. had to be a mod if they're legit; how else would they have gotten access to the server in the first place?

The first kiwi post happened right around the time admin decided to get rid of 2x

No. 13565

>>13562
Who tried to doxx her? All anyone did was post Discord caps that may or may not even be real. If anything, someone tried to doxx the former mod or CC person who was mad at her.
Are you living in this reality?

No. 13566

>>13563
Look at the timing of this all. That anon started posting after admin announced nuking 2x and these random caps with zero context were posted right after admin locked all the 2x threads. I don't know if this is actually a mod or if it's a rando but one thing is sure, this is tied to the gc/pp sperg unless it's a random vendetta.

No. 13567

>>13566
Samefag but I also wanted to point out the amount of self admitted femdom anons in the pp thread right now.

No. 13568

>>13565
you need to take a break from meta and/or lc in general. everything you post just makes you sound crazy.

No. 13569

>>13568
>literally tried to dramatize screenshots into a doxxing attempt by The Radfems
>says others sound crazy
Ok

No. 13570

What? Is this just an elaborate falseflag? Where's the proof that this is the mod discord? What does the random twitter have to do with it? What cloudfare statistics? Why the sperging about radfems again, they are already banned what more do you want?

No. 13572

>>13570
I just tried to check the Twitter account, and it's been deleted. What the fuck even was all of this? I saw some anons try to relate it all back to PP, but PP anons don't even have anything to be disgruntled about, considering their thread is back on /ot/.
The fact that there's a focus on femdom and literally nothing about trannies makes me skeptical about pinning it on GC, either.

No. 13573

File: 1581129677970.png (6.79 KB, 56x56, 353061725198614531.png)

meta always has the best drama

No. 13574

>>13568
ok buddy retard

No. 13575

File: 1581135009554.gif (4.11 MB, 368x368, lizerd.gif)

I don’t know if this is related to the kf tranny who offered to buy the site off me, or the 2X situation. All I have to say is that I knew how the user base has historically treated its former administrators; even I have participated on shitting on my predecessors. What I underestimated was the lengths some people will go through to manufacture drama or conflict. However, this is thread consistently delivers pure cream and I can appreciate that. I do want to keep this thread on topic though, if anyone wants to continue the discussion I have zero issue with anyone going to kiwifarms. Sometimes I chuckle when I read that shit.
Onto other matters. Confirmed themes that will be coming back in an improved format:
• darkcow
• girltalk
• keekweek (obviously)
• default lolcow (Yes? no?)
I've also had multiple requests for more dark themes, if there is enough demand we can add more. If anyone wants improved variations of girltalk in different colors then that's also doable.

No. 13576

>>13575
Tell us more about the KF tranny, you can't leave us hanging like this

No. 13577

File: 1581173621801.png (81.9 KB, 597x780, therapist thirst.png)

I knew she'd lock down her twitter so I did some digging yesterday. Enjoy the milk.

No. 13578

File: 1581173729685.png (185.88 KB, 596x1692, anorexia.png)


No. 13579

>>13577
>>13578
i hope the recovery from your brain injury goes well anon!

No. 13580

File: 1581173860123.png (108.7 KB, 597x1116, cooom.png)


No. 13581

File: 1581173990060.png (196.36 KB, 597x1590, rambling.png)


No. 13582

>>13577
>>13580
>>13581
>"tried not to get hard, failed"
>"me jerking off 9 times out of 10"
>"does jerking off kill empathy cells"
>"Tfw no qt maido servant to rape you when you were a boy and corrupt you irreparably"
>"i like making women say sorry over literally nothing, basically apologising for their very existence because the weak should fear the strong"
Wait a second. Didn't this same person who dumped the apparent LC mod Discord caps brag about being a mod themselves here >>13522?

No. 13583

>>13580
>Tfw no qt maido servant to rape you when you were a boy and corrupt you irreparably
i'm sorry, what? and why does this person say "jerking off" like this, talks about "getting hard", etc??

No. 13584

File: 1581174416583.png (1.02 MB, 594x1381, hand.png)

>>13582
>>13583
If a hand specialist wants to analyse whether this is a man hand or not then go for it.

No. 13585

File: 1581174697899.png (317.75 KB, 598x678, hand 2.png)


No. 13586

File: 1581174918849.png (120.87 KB, 472x388, wtff.PNG)

>>13584
>>13584
hands don't really show anything, especially like this, but their steam profile names are very sus/creepy. the lalafell objectification gives me strong male vibes tbh, and if female, it's gross either way. tough to tell considering the imageboard environment, but it certainly would explain their racism. is this a self-hating male that is preoccupied with the role of a domme? this shit is so bizarre. anyways, would make sense as to why admin dislikes gc/pp if this is her idea of them. this person is completely wacked whether troon or female.

No. 13587

i hope this twitter anon commits no oxygen. this is retarded and unamusing

No. 13588

File: 1581174937135.gif (6.95 MB, 384x379, confused drake.gif)

>>13584
>>13583
>>13582
>>13585

Maybe this is the tranny mod radfems were sperging about? Even a broken clock is right twice a day.
>inb4 it turns out there actually was a tranny mod who admin ousted upon finding out
>inb4 this is the tranny mod who decided to "expose" admin by attempting to get radfems to go at her

I refuse to believe anyone but a tranny would be this mentally ill and unhinged.

No. 13589

File: 1581175311853.png (1.61 MB, 1682x1080, Untitled-1.png)

>>13586
I went through the twitter account before it got deleted and found these pictures. This looks like a woman to me, but honestly it's scrote-ish behaviour and embarrassing.

No. 13590

>>13584
>>13585
I just want to talk to whoever insisted this was a femcel or femoid. If they had enough access to the Twitter account to dig up screencaps from 2016, there's no way they didn't know this was a tranny.
There is no "fem" whatsoever going on here. This is a straight-up cumbrained incel scrote/troon, lmao.
What happened to the anons who all but jumped at the chance to turn this into a "When radfems and manhaters ATTACK" situation like >>13562, too, kek?

No. 13593

>>13591
This person outright referred to being male. I don't think it's much of a question anymore.
See the meido post in >>13580. Couple that with the post about punching walls, getting hard, and cringy coomer Steam usernames in >>13586. I'm going to be very surprised if this isn't a man.

No. 13594

File: 1581175907991.png (3.16 MB, 1682x1080, troon confirmed.png)

>>13589
>>13589
That fucking adams apple and quarterbacker shoulders. Even has the troon nose (tm). Troon confirmed. Why do troons always try to cause drama in female spaces?

No. 13595

>>13594
that's really not an adam's apple or linebacker shoulders but troons know their angles. nevertheless, this person looks like a gay male to me, facially. australia has a lot of young troons too so this makes sense tbh. i never bought a tranny mod theory but it was always possible. strange that they should be allegedly "manhate-y", didn't expect that, but i don't think they're genuinely man-hate-y as they display many of the cumbrained and predatory behaviors anons vocally complain about.

No. 13596

>>13594
That's not an adam's apple, jfc. You just need to accept that there are batshit insane pickme women who have marinated in porn and male-dominated spaces and thus internalized their mindset. If it was a tranny she would be posting upper face pictures and censoring her mouth/manjaw/nose, not the other way around.

No. 13597

File: 1581176364127.png (69.75 KB, 595x776, movie night.png)

Some additional caps but these are less interesting. And it's not like I had to look for these. Almost every tweet from that account was caption worthy.

No. 13598

>>13594
idk about it being a man or a woman but it's mad ugly

No. 13599

>>13596
NTA, but nope. No room for damage control here. He literally said he "was a boy".

No. 13600

File: 1581176552464.png (12.43 KB, 598x110, attractive.png)


No. 13601

File: 1581176696111.png (62.26 KB, 595x682, anadom.png)


No. 13602

File: 1581176869089.png (14.05 KB, 586x94, interesting.PNG)


No. 13603

>>13596
i agree that i don't see an adam's apple but he literally said he was a boy before and that he got "hard". Some troons pass, get over it.

No. 13604

>>13602
Could you please explain instead of spamming twitter caps? How is this twitter user the same that posted the (fake?) discordcaps on kiwi(that's what you want to say right?)? What do they have to do with lolcow and/or the staff? Why are you posting this on /meta/?
I'm so fucking confused lmao

No. 13605

>>13599
>>13603
A true and honest tranny wouldn't imply being a boy. I think we might be dealing with a severely mentally ill and porn sick woman.
>>13602
This seems like sarcasm.

No. 13607

>>13605
it's not sarcasm. that tweet alone can seem like sarcasm, but at this same time, he/she was spamming openly feminist gamer/gamer journalists telling them to kill themselves. i think in 2016 he was an antifeminist

No. 13608

>>13604
s/he made a kiwi account to talk shit about mods/admin and then a kiwi user who presumably knows him/her revealed his/her twitter. they ended up deleting immediately after that was revealed so it's pretty much confirmed it was them. bragged about being an imageboard mod as well so it's not a far stretch to assume they were a mod here considering their weird kiwi vendetta

No. 13609

>>13605
I've seen tons of AGP trannies refer to being a boy, talk about "boymoding", etc.
We have literally no reason to believe this isn't just a troon.

No. 13610

>>13608
The account only had 3 posts, how is that user supposed to know them and exactly pops up in the right moment when they are shitposting about admin in the kiwi thread? This just screams weird sockpuppet.

No. 13611

>>13610
no clue? the account seems old as well. maybe someone they bragged to about their mod privileges on discord or twitter? considering they bragged in the open that wouldn't be a far reach either

No. 13612

File: 1581178013327.png (177.47 KB, 1502x652, kf.png)

Wait a second, one thing I think is strange is how those posts on KF happened just after Admin posted her decision on 2X, just like >>13564 said.
Here's when Admin posted about getting rid of 2X >>12977, January 14. Bringerofcream posted this on KF on January 16. Is this someone who's unhappy with the 2X decision? Why would a scrote be upset about it? This whole thing is bizarre.

No. 13614

>>13612
bringer of cream appears to be american, "realize" and says "sjw talking points". idk, i dont get the impression they're a 2x user or sympathetic to their ideology unless they're just gender crit. manhate anons typically don't talk about "SJW" this and that

No. 13615

>>13612
Could be what >>13588 said. Tranny trying to turn all the women against each other after getting kicked out, either after being exposed or for some other argument with admin.
I kind of doubt anyone would foresee LC having a radfem board and make a Twitter account false-flagging as a tranny, become a mod, etc years in advance just to do all this.

No. 13617

File: 1581178568719.png (30.62 KB, 598x340, aussie.png)

>>13614
No, it's a second gen Russian immigrant.

No. 13618

>>13617
i'm talking about the kiwifarms user "bringerofcream". they type with american spelling. "sterilesaint" always uses "s" rather than "z" (realise vs realize, analyse vs analyze).

No. 13619

>>13618
i'm sure they did that to throw people like you off. seems to be working. it's a moot point to argue that bringerofcream and sterilesaint aren't the same person considering they deleted their account immediately after it was revealed on kiwi

No. 13620

>>13611
Where do you get from that they are a mod and the screens are real? Is there anything else?
And the person who claims to know that user with 3 posts and claims that it's some random twitter tranny literally just wrote "To nobody's surprise the bringerofcream is a mentally ill femoid. If you ever wanna see an example of why lolcow is full of crazy bpd femcels this is the one.
Meet Casey - an anorexic, unstable, cutting, pharmacy student from Australia who proudly posts on twitter about beating her boyfriend bloody. She also, of course, worships Russia in all its gulagging of the mentally ill glory, completely missing the irony in that.
Some examples of this special specimen:"
I swear I don't act stupid on purpose, this level of tusm is just way too high for me. Why would a scrote who calls women femoids and hates lolcow know that supposed twitter tranny feminist kiwi user who only posted 3 times enough to share all that weird data? He just states it as a fact without any proof and everyone believes it??

No. 13621

>>13620
eh if you looked through sterilesaint's twitter before they panic-deleted after being exposed on kiwi (which is why everyone believes it) you saw them talking to anti-feminist scrotes all the time

No. 13622

>>13620
NAYRT but the twitter screencaps are real. Archiving all of them would've been too slow but I did save some.
https://archive.li/eYec7
https://archive.li/KyNCh
https://archive.li/nrZ6i
https://archive.li/NVYMw
https://archive.li/6o9UE
https://archive.li/smz5p

No. 13623

Why are there users here so insistent that the twitter fag is a woman??
You look bad defending him.

No. 13624

>>13621
>>13620
mind you, there are A LOT of anti-feminist femdom enthusiasts on r9k. i dont know where s/he actually stands as of now politically, but trannies into femdom are not necessarily pro-feminist leftists or anything.

No. 13627

>>13621
There were several anons taking it for a fact before the deletion too and if the thing with the anti-feminist scrotes is real this makes even less sense. Why would they be angry about the closure of 2X then? Why are would they talk with scrotes like that anyway if they were a feminist or pp anon? It doesn't really add up.

>>13622
I don't care about the twitter cow, I want to know what they supposed to have to do with lolcow with proof and if the posted discord screenshots are real or not.

No. 13628

>>13620
The fact that the sterilesaint user talked about being a mod, and deleted their account after this whole thing went down makes things suspicious. We know they were a LC user because of >>13543, too.
The best case scenario is that sterilesaint is an angry former mod who orchestrated all of this.
The worst case scenario is that sterilesaint isn't bringerofcream, just a regular mod who may or may not still be on the team, making decisions while bragging about how much he loves making women apologize and wishes he had a MILF gf, lmao.
The painful/humorous part is that either way, the "tranny janny" conspiracy theory is lent a certain amount of cogency by all this shit. It's just too much all at once.

No. 13629

>>13627
What does it matter if it was taken as a fact before the deletion when the deletion confirmed it anyways? Good luck trying to get proof of anyone being on staff on any imageboard besides 4chan btw. No way staff is gonna confirm or deny any of this

No. 13630

>>13627
Probably just salty they got removed as a mod and want to blow up the site with manufactured drama. Plus they know how sensitive admin is and have probably been baiting both sides super hard.
Seems like they were opportunistic and took advantage of an already existing problem to stir shit even further.

No. 13631

>>13611
yeah i think this is what happened. since the account was old, i think its a lurkers account. some anons tinfoiled earlier in this thread that bringerofcream probably bragged about the so called leak on discord, since they bragged about mod status on twitter ((and clearly theyre an attention whore anyways)). prolly some scrot saw them bragging and decided to fuck with them by doxing them. pretty common for kiwifags to eat their own.

No. 13632

>>13631
posted too early
prolly the person who leaked this could have been found in the interactions of the twitter account tbh. sterilesaint interacted a lot with scrots and incels to the point a few orbited.

No. 13633

>>13632
One of the orbiters has made his twitter account private but I have 4 others.
>Patrick @showersalts
>Seraphqiel Tr @TheTrSeraphqiel
>𝌌 @TH0TBR34K3R
>tanbu @tanbu_gg

No. 13634

>>13631
lurker's account but they posted to their twitter "i'm a mod on an imageboard"?

No. 13635

>>13634
no, the account who doxed sterilesaint on kiwifarms is a lurker account who is probably also an orbiter of sterilesaint on twitter.

No. 13637

>>13635
OT but Pharmacy student Casey from Australia can hardly be classified as doxing.

No. 13638

>>13627
Are you joking? Did you not see all the mh and femdom shit on the account? She literally posted caps from the pp/mh thread

No. 13640

>>13639
double posting, sorry, but why is this in this thread?

No. 13642

>>13640
Why do you keep asking?

No. 13643

>>13638
this person's "manhate" was fully fetish related, anon.

No. 13644

>>13642
I literally just woke up and this is my first time commenting in here after seeing (47) on te tab. Thats why Im asking. I dont have any idea what is going on and from scanning the thread the admin seems cool with it, but whys it relevant to the thread.

No. 13645

>>13644
Probably because it pertains to the mods and admin.

No. 13646

>>13645
So, big mad male anons are trying to post personal stuff about admin because..?

No. 13648

>>13646
No clue, I'm just wondering where all this leads.
The tranny janny thing shocked me a lot. Also, I'm pretty sure the only male here is the Twitter user/mod who deleted his shit after getting revealed, and now he's having stuff exposed about him.

No. 13649

Fucked up if there was a male on staff and admin lost her shit for being called a tranny and deleted GC because of it.

That whole, "Trick question" poll made me side eye everything here even if I love the site. I also woke up to 45 new posts kek. I read all of them and STILL don't really know what to make of it.

No. 13650

Basically, the staff has been gaslighting us. Neat.

No. 13651

>>13650
shit no, seriously? Anyone could have seen this coming since the anti-radfem sperging started.

>>13562
>this amount of damage control
it's always you motherfucking troons. It's always you.(samefagging)

No. 13652

>>13643
right, ok retard

No. 13653

it is looking more and more like their was a transwoman on the modding team if you ask me, Ban me if you want, but this shit always happens. They are always worming their way into women's spaces, they do it on reddit so course they'd find a way to do it here.

All tinfoil of course. I don't know if this is a attempt to make anons go, "Look at this radfem starting shit!!" or if it's just some bullshit.

the way admin acted about 2x was NOT normal. It was personal and it sucks if there was an transwoman amongst us.

No. 13654

>>13652
it's pretty obvious.

No. 13655

>>13653
the way radfems act on here you would've been nuked on any other website way faster and sooner

No. 13656

I'm >>13650 and I wonder if the farmhands banned >>13651 for samefagging to make it seem like we are the same person. At this point, it wouldn't shock me.(USER HAS BEEN PUT OUT TO PASTURE)

No. 13657

>>13646
You say it as if men don't post negative stuff about women ever.

No. 13658

>>13655
women are silenced all the time, what's new?

No. 13660

>>13658
damn sure wish that silencing would work better because here you still are being annoying

No. 13661

>>13660
nta but the people bitching about radfems are not annoying but people who may or may not be rad fems are the issue?
So I guess people are only allowed to bitch about rad fems but not defend them/themselves?

There seems to be more people obessed with radfems then actual radfems.

No. 13662

>>13661
these delusions

No. 13663

>fake discord caps?

Admin did not outright deny their validity. I care less about the identity of who posted them than whether Admin really thinks farmers are rich white bitches and was seeking asspats for subjugating herself by coding for us.

No. 13664


No. 13665

Im really not getting why they are letting this shit go so far. I have a feeling everyone's going to get banned after the mod addresses this or just banned in general kek. Meta has been a mess but i'm not complaining.

No. 13666

>>13661
This

>>13660
2X is 'gone' but you are still bitching?

No. 13667

>>13666
same could be said about you but i know self-awareness isn't your strong suit. we've seen this by now

No. 13668

>>13667
>no u
why do i even bother lmao

No. 13669

>>13668
why DO you bother? why don't you just leave? you're insufferable in your stubborness and need to complain on here when all your complaining has brought you is the complete opposite of what you wanted and yet you STILL do it. boggles the mind

No. 13670

>>13669
Damn they really got you pressed huh

No. 13671

>>13661
>admin: You can have your threads but please don't shit up the rest of the site
>PP/GC: Accuses half of /ot/ of being male, pickmes, etc. Derails threads on /pt/ and /snow/ over pronouns.
>admin: There's too much infighting we need to do something about this
>PP/GC: We're being silenced oppressed! Spergs out all over /meta/
>admin: Have your own containment board
>PP/GC: Still shits up the rest of the site, still keeps calling admin a troon
>admin: I'm sick of this shit, fuck off to your own website
>PP/GC: No one can code so the only site they have is an instance of Lynxchan owned by an actual male
>admin: You can have a pink pill thread in /ot/. Inserts red text about calling other anons scrotes in the OP
>PP/GC: Still spergs all over /meta/, still keeps calling admin a troon, still keeps accusing other anons of being men and gets KF involved in the drama

No. 13672

lmao you faggots take this so seriously?? this is why there are threads made about people wtf. just talk some shit and leave why tf if matter holy shit i love /meta/

No. 13673

>>13669
You have whined for so long about non issues. Don't say you haven't. Your hate for women is abundantly clear. Why are you even on this site?

No. 13674

>>13671
you're really living in your own world

No. 13675

>>13673
>everyone who thinks i'm annoying is a woman hating man
and yet you wonder why you got btfo

No. 13676

>>13671
I don't really give a shit about radfems but why are the koreaboos and the scrote in /g/ still here?

No. 13677

>>13676
Admin's sleep or reading the shit show here I guess

No. 13678

File: 1581197893480.png (744.02 KB, 2276x868, UUWUU.png)

>>13675
enjoy crystal.cafe 2.0

No. 13679

>>13678
>being this autistic
my sides

No. 13680

>>13676
admin and her friends are koreaboos so they'll stay no matter what lbr, that's why there are a million kpop threads

No. 13681

>>13678
>ANIME REACTION IMAGES ARE ONLY USED BY SCROTES AND TRANNIES REEEEEEE
your autism isn't really doing us any favors here.

No. 13682

>>13681
>>512253

No. 13683

I would not be surpise if this was the mods going back & forth larping as angry anon's so they can shut down everything KEK, Meta drama is the best drama.

No. 13684

>>13678
Crystal.cafe is much nicer than here tbh I don't get the hate

No. 13685

>>13680
Not anymore, they got merged.

No. 13686

>>13675
Please learn to read comprehensively.

No. 13687

>>13679
sperging for a month on /meta/ is, however, not autistic at all. and shame on any woman who decides to use anime reaction pics, when we all know that anime promotes pedophilia and sexism

No. 13688

>>13687
are you a troll here to make radfems look even worse?

No. 13689

File: 1581198486327.gif (1.43 MB, 540x304, GK12391.gif)

>>13687
I will post as many cute anime girls as I want. Die mad

No. 13690

>>13688
Im not that anon but it seems it to me

No. 13691

>>13688
Seriously, I've been suspecting this for ages. I refuse to believe that someone is in all honesty so autistic they go on a full spergfit about anime reaction images.

No. 13692

>>13688
yes, when someone disagrees with you, they are immediately a troll

>>13689
no matter how much horse pee you drink, you will never become one

No. 13693

File: 1581198977471.gif (471.79 KB, 500x496, 8256DA0E96A.gif)

>>13688
Radfems don't need any help to look dumb af. Why are you still here? Don't you have an imageboard of your own now?

No. 13694

Stop replying to the sperging 'hello fellow females, feminazis btfo, women should be silenced more amirite?'s. You are wasting your time and you know it.

No. 13695

File: 1581200062975.jpg (292.35 KB, 543x685, 1566276556588.jpg)

>>13694
This. You guys are really going to let this anti-GC/PP sperging and infighting happen so the real meat of things can get drowned out and go unaddressed: Tranny janny confirmed.
There's no more bitching about radfems to be had if the crazy ones were literally right all this time. How are we supposed to trust the admin and mods were being honest about literally anything if the most obnoxious tinfoil turned out to be legit?

No. 13697

>>13666
we're still bitching because you're all still here and still shitting up the site, you complete and utter retards

you are all deranged

No. 13698

>>13676
I still wanna know why stan loona shit is ok by admins, gross and unwarranted

No. 13699

>>13693
>anime moe ugu reaction pic
cut the bullshit out already you fucking sociopath trannies pieces of shit, you've been outed. Cry us some more, your larping and attempts to turn out against each other have been blatant to anyone with half a brain cell since the /2X/ drama started.

>>13695 already said it. There is no turning back after this. Let's see how our always competent admin is going to cope with being exposed to her userbase as a liar, god this is karma coming back to fuck you in the butthole bitch.

No. 13700

File: 1581200749094.gif (92.57 KB, 340x340, PQ9243Xn.gif)

Radfems are currently losing their shit in /snow/, not that I am surprised.

>>13699
How misogynistic of you to assume that I am a scrote for enjoying anime. Women aren't a hivemind, you know

No. 13701

>>13699
Don't even respond to him or her, or any derivatives who want to sperg about radfems or post their favorite anime pictures.
They're just here to shit up the thread so that the mods can safely get away with pretending none of this ever happened.

No. 13702

>>13684
this went unnoticed for some reason but lol

No. 13704

>>13701
Yeah I can see admin going, "you know what fuck you guys" again, It's best to not interact with the Meta Cow

No. 13705

File: 1581201290181.jpg (153.55 KB, 476x514, ANIME REACTION IMAGE.jpg)

>>13701
Can you please explain why posting anime images on LC means someone is either a scrote or a troon?

I don't understand how anyone can know the origins of the site and be surprised by the occasional anime girl picture.

No. 13706

>>13699
holy shit lol close the website for a few days

No. 13707

>>13704
Exactly. Let's stick to the most important thing.
We literally had a tranny on the mod team since the beginning of 2019. See >>13522.
No word on if he's still a mod, what exactly happened, if he's the "bringerofcream" KF user, or anything at all. The mod team has gone completely dark.

No. 13709

>complains about being discriminated against
>uses words like "pajeet", "coon" and "retard"
>blames website problems on "rich white girls" and not her (his?) own incapability to separate the job from they're own political beliefs and hiring fucking mentally ill male friends as a mods

What a fucking shitty person through and through.

No. 13711

File: 1581202343377.gif (1.17 MB, 498x278, M1989a09Ko.gif)

>>13705
There is literally no reason for them to lose their shit over anime pics. But since they're radfems, it's probably because they're jealous of fictional characters stealing their men or some shit(ban evading radfem larping as a troon)

No. 13712

>>13707
Stop derailing this thread, it's gotten ridiculous. There hasn't been a tranny janny or male janny, ever. PP is back as promised and other threads were moved or merged as requested.
I have personal obligations to attend to but anyone who continues with this shit flinging spergfest is getting banned from posting on /meta/.
For the anon that asked earlier, the kf folks were not apart of the mod team, they contacted me through other people offering to buy the site (possibly related to Dyn) during the radfem meltdown for 1k.

Edit: Stop losing your shit over anime pics and gifs. This is an imageboard and if it isn't loli or suggestive then there's zero issue.

No. 13714

>>13713
Because their post histories are littered with man hate and gender critical post histories, and then they have a few random troon larping posts exclusively on /ot/.

No. 13716

>>13695
This is not what I meant we should do instead anon…
And how is it confirmed?

No. 13717

>>13714
Not that anon, but can you show their post history? There's been a rash of strange bans just like that one with no proof that it's radfems.
Please don't treat your userbase like we're stupid, all of this is so shady.

No. 13719

>>13717
I've noticed this as well.

No. 13720

>>13714
lmao i got banned for someone else's post twice so i don't believe y'all

No. 13721

>>13712
This is the one time an admin comes out and starts seething over "derailing"? The only derailing here is that your shit bucket needs to be emptied, you scat lagoon creature.
>No tranny janny or male janny.
Explain. I was only reading up to this point, but what does that mean exactly? Not even a "That wasn't our mod" or "It's all faked"? Who is that person, and why did they have Discord screencaps? You didn't even deny the "ingenue" caps were yourself, just made some half-assed comment about manufactured drama.
You can't ban literally all of us for questioning your actions.

No. 13723

>>13712
So during the radfem meltdown some KF tranny offered to buy the site? Just conveniently like that? During that spergout I saw a lot of posters who were very obviously samefagging and baitposting to cause everyone to lose their shit, both on the anti-radfem and pro-radfem sides. It really sounds like KF goonies intentionally trying to drive the mod team to a point they would be willing to get rid of the site and hand it over to whoever giving them acquittal. I'm not even trying to be a GC tinfoil here but this sounds like a very likely scenario, especially when we take into account how badly null wanted to have control over lolcow back in the day and had a temper tantrum when he couldn't achieve it.

No. 13724

>>13580
If this isn't a troon it proves correctly what I've always assumed - that femdom anons are cumbrained.

No. 13725

>>13720
I've been banned two different times for posts I was already banned for days before. Someone else in the last General thread was accused of something similar by the Admin and they never proved it.

I'd love to know what the fuck is going on because there's always Radfem hate in Meta and then it gets super fucking crazy on both sides.

No. 13727

>>13230
>>13231
>>13235


I'm talking about these posts where the admin went, "I checked their histories and they were this and that"

I'm not saying I don't believe them, I'm just saying, People would like to see proof. The admin's young and I know it's a lot of pressure but…

Im this >>13725 anon by the way. I'm pretty sure i'm going to catch a ban soon. I used to post in GC right before it was banned, maybe I'll be accused of larping.

No. 13728

Come on. I know you can do this! Show me the proof :-)

No. 13729

Show Me the Proof Or stop Lying You Fucking cunts :))))

No. 13730

You obviously don't know shit about how any of this works lmao so stop bullshitting

No. 13731

I'm going to post as much as I can since you guys like to delete what I say for no reason teehee

No. 13732

Post my POST HISTORY COME ON LET'S DO IT WOOHOO

No. 13733

No wonder people make fun of female programmers lmao YOU CAN'T DO SHITTT

No. 13734

You can't lie like this and expect Me To stay silent :)))

No. 13735

I know you're not busy you mentally ill losers show me the Proof

No. 13736

Where the Fuck is it? I've been waiting a long time Come Onnn!

No. 13737

Are you guys asleep? e_e

No. 13738

Actually I'm kinda bored right now so I will stop for a moment 8D

No. 13739

>>13737
Probably busy discussing this in their racist discord group. Because they're all racist.

No. 13740

>>13721
She made a post last night asking anons to stop derailing

No. 13741

>>13705
>>13711
It's probably more because a lot of them are from male-pandering anime, especially the dragon loli one.

No. 13742

>>13711
how do we know it's not a troon? Why is it a rad fem pretending to be a troon instead of a troon or just a asshole? This is weird as fuck LUL

No. 13743

Hello what is going on here

No. 13744

>>13743
Meta MilkMas 2020

No. 13745

File: 1581210807002.jpg (203.9 KB, 930x1200, 74358291_p0.jpg)

>>13743
I'm having a bitch fit because the farmhands tagged me as a radfem ^^

No. 13746

>>13699
This is so obviously someone larping as a radfem. Whichever "side" you're on, if you think this is legit you're fucking retarded.

No. 13747

why are meta anons fucking retards

No. 13748

>>13747
most anons are retarded and cowish tbh

No. 13749

>>13746

i bet half the fucking radfems are just hamplanets who want to fuck fit dudes so they cry oppreshun

No. 13750

>>13749
True that

No. 13751

>>13712

Since my earlier post >>13663 was apparently overlooked in the fray, I'll ask again.

Were the discord caps fake?

No. 13752

>>13751
At this point I'm convinced it was the same twitterfag larping based off the fact they are anachan and racist themselves. How do farmers project with zero self awareness lol

No. 13753

>>13752

How are farmers overlooking what is important here, ie is Amin resentful of coding for rich white bitches? She didn't actually comment on the veracity of the caps >>13575

No. 13754

>>13753
Resentful? What the fuck?

No. 13755

>>13753
Everything posted since then (hating on radfems, posting anime pictures and even focusing on the "tranny janny" shite) has been a pathetic attempt to distract from this. Don't let it be drowned out.

No. 13756

>>13753
If it wasn't real, I'm sure admin would've said that in any of her posts by now. It's a bad look and were it not true, I'm sure she'd say so. I don't even necessarily see a problem with being salty about putting in unpaid labor for people who are genuinely more privileged and better off than you are, but the assumptions are wild. The assumption that the people she specifically dislikes are white and rich is based on literally nothing.

No. 13757

the retardation is out of control i love this keep it up. i need more laffs.

No. 13758

>>13757
i gotchu fam

No. 13759

>>13758
sick! keep meta poppin

No. 13760

>Everyone I dont like is a rich white girl
Incel tier lmao

No. 13761

>>13712
Stop losing your shit about being called a tranny

No. 13763

Can a mod go into the altcows 17 thread (again so sorry!!!) and deal with this escalating moralfag? I think they are buttmad about Kaya being moved to another thread. Thank you!

>>>/snow/929983
>>>/snow/929720

No. 13764

>>13763
Reading the post, tp be honest, seems like the mad anon who was just throwing random people out in the cosplay thot thread with nothing to back the person posted besides 'they are a thot'. There is an anon going around, and you can tell who it is, who keeps posting and getting big mad when no one agrees with them.

No. 13767

>>13758
Be careful what you wish for. 

  • Global rule #8 Do not attempt to use lolcow.farm for attention or profit.
  • Global rule #9 Do not deceptively post about yourself in the third person for any reason.

For the reasons above I've decided to post your entire known post history. If anyone has ever doubted that there are falseflaggers then this is the proof you've been waiting for. We haven't forgotten about the ban evading sperg either, but since they're using a cheap proxy it's going to take some time to verify things to the best of my ability.
ham-chan, opera vpn is not going to save you. We know who you are, and it will rain cream.

>>13753

I can't drop my work and real life priorities to respond to random screenshots of a discord server that doesn't exist. We use tinyboard and telegram to communicate. I'm not sure if this is related to the situation on kf but the tranny who offered to buy the site off me is featured in a thread here, the former admin of freech.net (now shutdown).

In the future it would be wise to take tranny janny accusations to the proper thread here, it's a waste of time for staff to go through posts unrelated to spam, gore, cp, or janitorial issues.

 


No. 13768

File: 1581304134899.png (29.81 KB, 128x125, 387665167074197505.png)

>>13767
kek i love you admin

the cream truly is in /meta/

No. 13769

File: 1581307760815.png (31.7 KB, 1235x453, scrote thread.PNG)

>>13767
interesting… if true, people sure are strange. but out of curiosity, where are the fake scrote threads you guys say she posted in pic related, and the threats against radfems? those seemed to be the straw that broke the camel's back in determining that this person is a falseflagger, previous to these anime reaction pic posts, which aren't all that damning. the alleged thread and threats are a lot more milky, js.

No. 13770

>>13767
Thank you i always wanted my own post history lmao ily♡

No. 13771

>>13770
Btw will you keep updating it for me? And 190 posts? Nice

No. 13772

File: 1581308284757.png (176.09 KB, 1101x848, yikes.png)

>>13769
Maybe it will be the next reveal or who knows
>>13771
You're super cringe. Care to explain why you're making gc anons look like shite by acting like a child?

No. 13773

Uh just noticed some posts arent mine in /anon1 but the second one is pretty accurate so good job

No. 13775

File: 1581308744896.png (16.33 KB, 811x112, cringe.png)

>>13767
>this site has gone to shit it's crystal.cafe 2.0
>larps as scrote
What the fuck is wrong with some of y'all lmao

No. 13776

File: 1581308866052.png (16.14 KB, 1808x70, anonwhy.png)

>>13775
>radfems aren't the one's derailing on other boards

No. 13777

>>13773
so did you create fake scrote threads, threaten people and shit? then do this weird shit about the anime pics? that's fucked up and crazy-ass behavior if true. if you were out here falseflagging, seriously, seek treatment. this is shameful behavior.

No. 13778

File: 1581309160512.png (17.71 KB, 987x216, Screenshot_2020-02-09 Anon2's …)

>>13777
Imagine being proud of this behavior like a smug little shit. Bet it's a scrot tbh

No. 13779

>>13777
They missed some of my posts and added some i didnt do (like the ones in the gossip threads). I never created threads but i did post an answeer to do the odo to the one that had the ot was posted by an scrote? African americen people dancing and racebait i think. But i did say something, didnt create

No. 13780

>>13779
Oops. I mean I didnt make the racebaity thread but i answered and reported it ^^

No. 13781

>>13777
What threats?

No. 13782

>>13779
>>13780
>>13781
idk, admin said you made fake scrote threads and threatened radfems, upthread. here: >>13230

No. 13783

>>13780
>^^
>literally everything else

I’d say jfc maybe at least try to integrate to some extent but I doubt that’s even possible for someone as mentally deranged as you.
Wouldn’t be surprised if you turned out to be 13.

No. 13784

Too bad the thread i was banned for is gone. Should have screenshotted it lol. But i guess i cant prove it wasnt me so believe what you want -,-

No. 13785

File: 1581310180352.jpg (32.1 KB, 449x489, aadmin.jpg)

>>13773
>Uh just noticed some posts arent mine in /anon1
Never said they were but thank you for saving me the time and confirming that you are indeed the asherah's garden admin/former mod spamming a few days ago. You slipped up in your confirmed history but I was going to give you the benefit of the doubt.
You don't need to deceive farmers to have what you want. I'll shill for you https://asherahs.garden/

If you continue I will make sure to include your blogging and 2X "mod here" posts to a collage matching the listed proxy ranges. Pathetic to be quite honest.

No. 13786

>>13783
Whats the point if im gonna b deleted again and 2 lazy rn im sleepy XD

No. 13787

If youre going to make sich a big claim dont immediately ban me

No. 13788

>>13785
So, I'm posting now because staying quiet will be worse.
I'm the mod/admin of AG, and all my posts declaring myself as such were made using Opera VPN. I haven't "been spamming for the past few days". I don't know how I can prove it to you, but my virtual location on Opera is in Europe by default, and that has the "77.111." beginning.
I genuinely don't know what I can do or say to make my case, but I believe this is an honest mistake and not some huge malicious scheme on your part.

No. 13789

And did i just get doxxed by an admin? Aww lad

No. 13790


No. 13791

Im a newfag in the sense i havent been here for years so idk why u think im the fucking creator of an imagevoard lmao i struggle to use snapchat xdd

No. 13792

Can you guys see what im saying when i post on farm.lolcow?

No. 13793

>>13792
lol this cringe attempt at damage control. get off lolcow and lose some weight

No. 13794

Why is it damage control if im telli g the truth… and why call me fat? :/(USER HAS BEEN PUT OUT TO PASTURE)

No. 13795

>>13788
How did you appear so quickly?

No. 13796

File: 1581311088443.gif (436.57 KB, 400x225, giphy.gif)

>>13788
if this is really you care to explain why you popped up 2 minutes after admin's post if it totally isn't you and you already confirmed the posters information here >>13767

No. 13797

>>13790
Look, the false-flagging person was literally posting at the exact same time as me and spamming nonsense. Unless I was mentally destroyed beyond all repair, wouldn't it make sense for one persona to literally disappear for the benefit of the other?
I lurk very often, but I swear I'm not responsible for any Opera posts besides the ones that specifically highlight me as a mod.
If there's anything I can do or say to prove myself, I'll try.(stop)

No. 13799

>>13788
>>13787
This is a classic example of samefagging and it's painfully obvious. Typing liek randum xD is not going to make you look like any less of a trainwreck.
I just have one question, are you the male admin who made AG or are you just insane?

No. 13801

File: 1581311874034.jpg (28.72 KB, 382x403, dumpster.jpg)


No. 13803

File: 1581312921096.jpg (28.97 KB, 500x643, ITT.jpg)

fuck y'all and your GoT level weird-ass scheming

No. 13804

>begging for falseflagging proof for days
>gets it
>crickets
can't wait for the inveitable sperg delusions in here that will try to explain this one away

No. 13807

>>13767
>the former admin of freech.net
Holy shit. Do they think LC is part of /cow/ or something?

No. 13808

>>13807
Its funny because it always seems that when an admin or mod from a site leaves under anything, but their own terms, they spiral out. Ive been a mod on another site and this shit would happen all the fucking time. Unfortunately it seems they came here.

No. 13810

So what's up them discord screenshots. RE: rich white bitches?

No. 13811

>>13810
They're probably the twitteranon or troon I really doubt this is related to radfems >>13767

No. 13812

File: 1581331625081.jpg (206.74 KB, 1067x1717, Screenshot_20200210-024503_Chr…)

>>13807
This sick fuck has a spam bot directly linked to his github
Very fucking suspicious considering the increase in CP spam in /g/ lately

No. 13813

Do you actually believe your own lies? No crickets, just deleting. They used this opportunity to make him look suspicious. Bye bye radfems

No. 13815

not a complaint but if any if you just saw that revenge porn post i managed to cap it and send it to the girl so she can hopefully find out who did it and report them, the spineless pussy. on lolcow of all places as well, lmfao

No. 13816

>>13813
oh you can suddenly type like a normal person? also your posts are probably getting deleted because none of what you say makes sense anyways and you're just annoying. go away already retard

No. 13817

>>13811
>responding to that thing
even if admin said that, holy shit, it's not like farmers havent thought/posted worse things about the admins or other people here..

No. 13818

>>13816
I bet u r fat

No. 13819

>>13818
ok, edward sausage fingers

No. 13820

>>13819
I will start starving myself for my waifu ♡🌶😍

No. 13821

File: 1581368180082.jpg (55.35 KB, 646x431, billie-eilish-side-eye.jpg)

>>13820

just stop posting you bloatlord

No. 13822

>>13817

The difference is that Admin is in a position of power.

No. 13823

>>13822
Or dont bite the hand thats moderating. Mods and admins dont have to take the shit and if youre shit talking them, good. Get banned.

No. 13824

>>13823

When has having an admin with totalitarian power who is resentful or biased ever worked out?

Also, presumptuous much?

No. 13825

>>13824
>>13823
It's pretty weird that someone accusing admin of being an anachan is an anachan themselves.They're obviously incredibly racist calling people slurs on Twitter. Bringerofcreams first milk leak was a bunch of speculation like
>admins ethnicity clouds her judgement
How is this remotely milk, and if the screens are legit where is the proof? According to the kiwi thread some lurkers in the lolcow discord say admin is a weeb living in japan or a SEA girl.

No. 13826

>>13822
start paying for the website then if you want "power"

No. 13827

>>13823
this bootlicking is embarrassing. you honestly sound like you belong more on a forum, no offense. no one should be above constructive criticism and questioning.

>>13826
anon isn't saying she wants power. she's saying people who hold administrative positions are held to a higher standard of conduct. whether or not the discord caps are true, no idea, it's possible they are or aren't, but an admin's behavior should never be held to the standard of anonymous randos who aren't entrusted with responsibility.

No. 13828

>>13827
I agree but this is a site where anons proudly talk about picking their noses and eating their boogers like dessert.

No. 13829

>>13827
Anon refuses to see your point.

No. 13831

Can anyone help in the TND thread? There’s a bunch of morons arguing about whether or not a picture of Taylor’s snake is symbolic to Jonny Craig. I’m losing brain cells by the minute. I don’t care who helps. The crystal cafe mod, the ashneradjo whatever the fuck whoever the fuck. I’m just desperate, and trying to take the edge off in here too. Because it’s a mess in here.


Anyway
Godspeed

No. 13833

>>13827
>but an admin's behavior should never be held to the standard of anonymous randos who aren't entrusted with responsibility.

she's doing this for free, deal.

No. 13834

>>13827
This. >>13833
Lolcow isn't some big website like Reddit with execs. It's a tiny imageboard. She probably pays for this out of her own pocket.

No. 13835

>>13824
Do you run the site? No? Then sit your bitch ass down. They can literally run it, ban whoever, because its their site. If you dont like what an admin stands for, fuck off to another site. This isnt a democracy where anons opinions matter. The admin doesn't have to even make threads to interact and ask questions to site managers. Be fucking grateful or get off.

No. 13836

>>13767
Holy SHIT this same person is the deranged BPD-chan who was accusing victims of BPDs wanting to be abused by them and getting a kick out of it. Anon please get help

No. 13837

>>13824
Admin is letting this pointless, baseless discussion continue for the sake that you keep your right to blab, that’s not very “totalitarian” is it anon.

No. 13838

>>13835
If things were as you say they should be, this site would be a bigger mess than it already is, bootlicker.

No. 13839

>>13837
>>13836
This is true, this sped has been shitting up /ot/ since September. It's like watching BPD infect the board in live action.

No. 13840

File: 1581452373963.jpg (30.43 KB, 266x400, WhiteKnight.jpg)

A lot of whitekniting.>>13837
>>13835
>>13834
>>13833
>>13826
>>13823
>>13817

You are really taking this too seriously.

No. 13841

I still don't get where there being two shitposting anons fits in with the AG admin claim.
Especially since they probably aren't the same person, though the person said to be anon 2 claimed the anon 1 page had posts from her.
She selfposted her hand and turned out to be white, while anon 1 posted about being black a lot and said the mods called her a chimp.

No. 13842

>>13841
chimp was what that anon was referring to? is she sure they didnt say she was chimping out about something and she took it the wrong way? lol thats weird

No. 13843

>>13842
I'm just assuming because ham-chan was meant to be black and admitted it before, but the person who posted ITT said anon 1 and anon 2 pages were both themselves even though some anon 1 posts weren't right, but the only person who's selfposted is white.
You could be right about the chimp thing, I don't remember what she said about the mod exactly and cba to dig.

No. 13845

>>13842
She did say "chimping out" but it could have been a pun, so not a coincidence.

No. 13846

>>13836
ha! i argued with that sperg. way to validate everything we said in that thread, ham chan! i love our resident cow.

No. 13847

>>13842
I think it's the anon who said they were called a slur and someone told them to post proof kek

No. 13848

My secondhand embarrassment quota has been fulfilled for today. Thank you meta.

No. 13849

>>13841
this is a bpdchan who larps as a male though
I wonder if they were trying to hide being white with the smurf filter but who knows lol

No. 13851

So does hamchan/smurfchan still shitpost using vpn? I feel I'm still seeing their posting style on ot but that's just my tinfoil…

No. 13852

>>13851
Does it matter?

No. 13853

>>13851
Nah i'm just lurking, but I know which posts you mean.(USER HAS BEEN PUT OUT TO PASTURE)

No. 13854

People keep responding to the banned bait in Onion's thread like it's their first day on here and some of them aren't even bothering to sage. I've been reporting but more newfags keep popping up to reply despite the red text.

No. 13855

>>13204
>>13835
Don’t you think you’ll be happier on Reddit? Honestly you are fucking embarrassing. A petty little bootlicker. You have no fucking life off the internet, bet that’s why you care so much.

No. 13859

Can a mod go in and edit out the infighting instigation at the beginning of the OP? >>>/w/82304

No. 13860

File: 1581579569676.jpg (315.69 KB, 2205x1462, 1549731052754.jpg)

>>13855
>that's why you care so much
>writes this

No. 13861

>>13859
Can we do something about OP? No one can say anything in the thread without them trying to infight, complaining about people asking for proof, the OPs OP has infighting in the headline.

Im beginning to think OP is one of this chicks stalkers. They are trying reeeeeeally hard and its all just nitpick shit about photoshopping her face.

No. 13862

>>13859
>>13861
Can mods do something about this anon who demanded we leave the Costhot thread and make a separate Nicole thread numerous times, and then followed us to the Nicole thread to continue having a meltdown?

>Can a mod go in and edit out the infighting instigation at the beginning of the OP?

>No one can say anything in the thread without them trying to infight, complaining about people asking for proof, the OPs OP has infighting in the headline.
I'm the OP and I genuinely don't know what you're talking about here. What infighting instigation? Infighting is mentioned nowhere in the thread or the "headline", and it's also not happening in anywhere in the thread? What are you talking about? If mods look at the thread they'll see clearly none of what this anon is talking about is happening, and if it is by all means edit it. As far as I'm concerned I (and other anons) have backed up everything I've said in the OP with proof (which is what you've been sperging about this whole time in the first place). Either way, this is ridiculous. We've done everything you asked us to and you're still mad.

No. 13863

>>13862
When you spam another thread constantly with someone, yeah. Anons are going to ask you to take your spergfest hate boner for 1 person to a thread of just them. Youve been shitting up the costhot thread, pissed anons ask for proof and give run around images that prove nothing.

Stfu. You keep replying to yourself. And stop spamming uwu. You need to be 18 to post here.

No. 13864

>>13863
>Anons are going to ask you to take your spergfest hate boner for 1 person to a thread of just them
So we did. Why are you mad?

>pissed anons ask for proof and give run around images that prove nothing.

So we made a whole thread full of proof. Why are you mad?

No. 13865

>>13864
>>13864
You are literally saying what I said. Good. The reply is saying its good you made her, her own thread. Just stop sperging out and lowkey infighting. Like wtf did op need to infight in the first paragraph. Anons asked for her own thread. Stop fucking being mad anons here ask about this fucking cow. Holy shit. Youre so self important.

No. 13866

File: 1581627820162.gif (525.73 KB, 245x138, F4E23521-310C-4DA6-8D9C-2CC2AA…)

>>13865
> Like wtf did op need to infight in the first paragraph.

how is it possible for one person to infight with themself? the hell are you talking about? you are retarded as fuck

No. 13868

>>13866
The scariest monsters are the ones that lurk within our souls.

No. 13869

File: 1581677110004.png (74.49 KB, 211x238, C6269156-DADE-44BC-ACE0-7E3323…)


No. 13870

There’s plenty of new milk on the Blaire White front, got an event overtook by antifa and made a fake crying apology video, I’d be happy to make a post myself but I go on the thread and
>they have low hipbones!
this isn’t fucking milk? I feel like previous admin banned all the oldfags now this is what we got

No. 13871

>>13870
I think there's one person who likes to respond to every single post in the threads on kf and here and constantly reiterate that Blaire looks like a man. It's repetitive and drowns out the milk

No. 13872

>>13870

Just post the milk. Agree that the troon-spotters are annoying, but it's not going to get better by not posting milk.

No. 13876

Can mods please do something about the wk/tinfoil/vendetta-chan in the NED thread? They're just posting pics of some other girl's tweets going "PROOF THEY'RE SKINWALKING NICOLE!!!!" without actually posting anything that shows it has anything to do with Nicole. And they're all caps stolen from a blatant Vendetta/harassment twitter account
sauce: >>>/w/82736

I know I'll get red texted for "hi cow" but….honest to god who else could possibly be this obsessed with Nicole and relentlessly trying to derail the any discussion of her? If there's not an anon sperging about how Nicole is a victim and has no milk, it's an anon tinfoiling/vendetta-sperging about Addi.

It's reaching "but mina!!!1!!11!" levels at this point. inb4 they come to sperg at me here

No. 13877

was lolcow down for a second there or is my connection just retarded

No. 13878

>>13877
A discord notification told me the site was back up

No. 13880

>>13871
I agree, we know he's a man, he knows he's a man (his boyfriend may pretend he's "Straight' but he knows he's a man), that's the LEAST milkest thing about Blaire.
Esp. with all thats going on, but the best thing to do is post Milk, report and move on.

No. 13881

seems like you don't give a fuck about obvious larps when they are into the same retarded ugu shit you enjoy

No. 13882

I speculate there’s a few farmers in the Luna thread cowtipping. Somebody somehow got ahold of a video that is not public at any capacity of her higher than a kite, calling her dad, and then showing her pussy (it was obviously paid content from her sex work shit)

Can somebody address this?

No. 13883

thank you to farmhands or the admin, whoever ended the race-related sperging in the pnp thread. i appreciate you

No. 13884

>>13882
Literally no one knows who made her do the video and people are scaring away the milk with their moralfaggy autism. Maybe they did cowtip, maybe they didn't, but we have no idea at this point.

No. 13885

>>13882
>>13884
that's not even cowtipping. a lot of SW threads have someone who pays for the content and then posts it.

No. 13886

>>13882
i would check the KF threads to see if someone there fessed up to it. i don't know why people aren't taking this seriously. the girl is on a deadly cocktail of drugs and is suicidal to boot, this isn't funny or amusing whatsoever.

No. 13887

>>13885
I don't think they're regular farmers, just people who know or keep up with Tuna. But people are going full moralfag in Tuna's thread even though this same thing happens in other SW threads.

No. 13888

>>13887
i think it's different with luna. and why involve her dad?

No. 13889

>>13888
bruh…you serious rn?

No. 13890

>>13889
yes??? i don't have a shred of sympathy for luna herself but this is just unnecessary.

No. 13892

>>13888
It could have been someone with a fetish for it, but we literally have no idea who did it but people are running with their speculations and acting like faggots. Tuna isn't different than any other SW though and no one's clutching their pearls when their content gets posted. She's a junkie who uses people and now someone used her for entertainment. She is the one who involved her dad when she could have easily said no. We won't know if it's cowtipping until someone inevitably spills.

No. 13893

>>13890
she started doing SW, expect SW stuff. we know no one here posted it anyway, it's from kf from months ago.

No. 13894

More of a question for mods: is talking about Sarah in a way that depicts her as a cow in the Onion thread considered derailment? I feel like Sarah is a onion flake at best, if you wanted to consider her a cow, it's getting a bit annoying watching anons ripping on her while other anons wk her to compensate.

No. 13895

Sorry farmers, but are you fucking retarded? It’s one thing to pay for their content, and post it, and it’s another to specifically command her to do something just to push the limits so you can run to LC to post it. That is not raw milk, that is manufactured milk.
And yes, I do believe it should be considered cowtipping because you are directly engaging with her. I don’t give a flying fuck about the morality of it, I give a fuck about you weirdos trying to get her to preform for your thread.

No. 13896

>>13895
This cowtipping also hurt the onion and Erin threads.

No. 13897

>>13895
someone already mentioned that someone on kiwifarms did it a while ago so go yell at them

No. 13898

>>13895
You're not wrong, but you're running with your assumption that it came from here when we still have no idea who did it or where it came from. Take a break from the thread if it's getting you this mad.

No. 13899

>>13894
the thread before this one, farmers discussing sarah were told to take it to anti-o with the rest of the e-girls. so report i guess and move on? nothing she does anymore directly impacts greg so i can see the reason for moving her out.

No. 13900

>>13885
that's the literal definition of cowtipping.

No. 13901

>>13900
No it isn't. You can even double check the rules to see that.

No. 13902

>>13882
the op of the video at least deserves a ban for namefagging (yes I reported)

No. 13903

The Onion thread has gone full autistic and derailed a lot with infighting and off-topic Sarah shit.

Tuna's thread is getting a bit of derail too with people getting mad about the milk.

No. 13904

>>13903
the amount of autist newfaggotry in both those threads is insane.

No. 13905

question for admin since i saw you hop into luna's thread: what's your personal position on anons who get involved with cows for the purpose of producing milk? the site culture back in the day seemed to be a lot more positive about self-policing. telling anons to knock it off wasn't a problem back then but now that's seen as mini-modding.

in snow threads, though, and in some pt threads, we have anons do it almost constantly, whether it's posting their own tweets or dm's or whatever. it seems like this became more of a thing around the time of tempcow, but. are you more of an oldfag when it comes to this? or do you not think it has an impact on site culture?

also could we have a townhall to talk about some of this shit haha

No. 13906

>>13905
can we have a mini-townhall just on luna's thread???

No. 13907

>>13905
back in the day people knew what cowtipping actually was.

No. 13909

Thanks for stepping in, admin! And staff too if they're the ones cleaning up the Onion thread mess.

No. 13910

>>13905
We don't know whether or not a farmer requested the call. If a farmer did they touched the poo, if a farmer didn't it simply is what it is. There's no point in continuously moralfagging about it.
There should be much more outrage over the amount of cowtipping in the onision and TND threads, in my opinion. It's definitely increased over time with the twitter and Instagram newfag diaspora.

I need suggestions for a reasonable townhall date.

No. 13914

>>13910
maybe time for another poll?

also, when do the (You)s show up?

No. 13915

Since there is a discussion of cowtipping, I noticed there are lots of (No 1 curr) redtexts in recent posts on /pt/ over things like weight loss surgery…but no redtext on the people calling for Cowtipping in Moo's thread by vandalizing her con booth. Yes I reported.

Just would think that calls for illegal cowtipping is a bigger concern than "hi cow" or emoji use or no1curr.

No. 13916

>>13915

what are you talking about? I just saw three redtexts over cowtipping there over the banner?

No. 13918

>>13916
>>13916
I must be having cache issues, my bad. Thanks for your work mods!

No. 13921

a scrote is posting gross pics and the same message over and over again but you will probably not give a shit because it ain't a terf(ban evading sperg (hamchan))

No. 13922

>>13921
just report and move on

No. 13923

I keep wondering why that last post in the dasha thread is labelled as "absolutely no1curr" when the anon was taking the piss out of what dasha said by using actual things she dis? did the janitor who issued that think it was someone giving their opinion or something lmfao? just seemed out of place to me considering there have been a lot of stupid/pointless bans, that person even saged

No. 13924

Oh and why is there a ban on any post that is Repzilla related still? He is an admin or someone is his friend lol?

No. 13925

>>13924
there isn’t a ban on anything rep related, and no he’s not friends with the admin lmfao. the threads made about him were locked bc the person making them was an extremely dedicated sperg who refused to follow site rules and constantly accused admin of conspiring with this youtuber nobody truly gives a fuck about.

No. 13926

>>13924
Someone made like 20 repzilla threads with no milk.That's textbook vendetta.

No. 13927

There's more infighting in the onion thread

No. 13928

File: 1582629686543.jpg (62.19 KB, 1200x742, oldbessie.jpg)

A Polite Request. Would admin please consider locking the Aly Realrecovery and the Ashley Isaacs thread and allow these cows to be herded into the ana chan containment thread?

They're tough old steak these days yet still their udders leak the occasional droplets of milk. They don't need their own threads bumping but some anons are still curious what's going on with these two and are mentioned in the general proana thread.

End of request. Ta.

No. 13929

I know the anti o thread is basically a containment thread but can it actually be moderated properly? It sounds like a bunch of boomers mostly and the very focused hate against Shiloh is bizarre especially since the thread started about the twitter fags. I feel like the thread encourages shit posters that come into the main thread or around the site in general shitting up other threads.

No. 13930

some weirdo is posting tit revenge porn on Snow

No. 13931

>>13929
What? Shiloh's been acting like a retarded faggot on Twitter, of course the posts are going to be focused on her, she's being a mini-Onision lately. Won't say no to more moderation on the shitposts there, but it isn't because of the hate for Shiloh.

No. 13932

cat infighting in vent thread is ridiculous right now. endless samefag and trolling. i reported a lot already

No. 13933

There's a troll who goes by 6Jeff9 (he's baiting on kf too) who's baiting in Onion's thread and people keep taking the bait.

No. 13934

Can Shiloh get her own thread so Skye andAlicia can shout into the void there instead of hijacking the anti o thread?

No. 13935

>>13934
You know there is more than just those two talking about Shiloh in that thread, right? Staff already said that talk about the women go there. I agree though she should get her own thread, but it kind of seems like she's going to tuck tail and start running away soon after all the backlash.

No. 13936

Anisa deserves a spot in /snow/ because:

-has a history of shitting and making fun of sex workers- now that she clearly can’t make money off twitch she’s switching to onlyfans to make lewds
-preaches and makes content about self love and body acceptance- making fun of Jessica nigiri’s tits even -gets a boob job, making her a giant hypocrite
-claims to be a victim of sexual assault and has ptsd by people like grossgore, but she constantly goes out of her way to find his content and shit on him/his child


How is she any different on shoe0nhead, crys ex or the other flakes in snow? Locking the thread again so suddenly is premature. I’ve never seen admin locking threads except for gendercrit related ones. Please at least just autosage it if you think it’s an issue

No. 13937

A response to admin

>>938194

>I've decided to lock this thread again because anisia does not even meet one of the snow thread creation criteria.

Rules

>An unhealthy desire for attention

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_3te_AORAUs&ab_channel=Anisa
From Anisa's own mouth- she posts pictures on the internet because she wants validation from the internet(negative or positive, it doesn't matter). In her previous persona as raihnbowkidz, she admits to saying stupid shit for attention.

"I'm one of those people who pretend to dislike something to seem more interesting"
https://clips.twitch.tv/WealthyVastBisonDancingBaby


>Failure to accept criticism

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NzQk1lOgjek&ab_channel=VeganGains
Anisa challenges vegan gains to a debate because she listened to a Joe Rogan podcast and she took a nutrition class in college once. Gets destroyed because all she brought to a debate was anecdotal evidence. Instead of taking criticism she decides - veganism is stupid and vegangains is mean.


>A lack of self awareness

Claims to have BPD, BDD, Eating Disorders etc:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2V1ECSegn6c&ab_channel=Anisa

Immediately afterwards goes and makes fun of someone with an Eating Disorder
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Do-_CN2unU
(I know venus has become a cow again but it doesn't change the fact she has an eating disorder)


>Delusions related to their skill or self importance

When she started youtube she thought she was going to become popular because ian said so. Becomes extremely upset she doesn't immediately get 1mil subscribers.
https://imgur.com/a/MPZkl

She makes constant statements in her videos that stretch out the truth:
-"When I was a police officer" - she only took one police academy class
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kjlCqaWh60U&ab_channel=Anisa

-"I was so good at Lacross, I played on the men's team"
her parents bullied the lacross team into letting her play


>No willingness to improve upon their behavior

Multiple times has broken down in front of her live audience saying she's not making any money, that she needs to go back to school. Says she needs therapy for her PTSD, but when she went said it was too expensive(100$ per session).

>A documented history of bizarre behavior displayed online

https://www.twitch.tv/anisajomha/clip/RoundSpicyVampireFUNgineer


>Some sort of public presence outside of private circles, groups or irc channels

Her OnlyFans, Twitch, Twitter, YouTube


If these examples don't fit your rule criteria, I can bring plenty of more evidence.

No. 13938

Can Erin's thread be put on autosage or something until she actually returns? Peak autism from the DDLG girls.

No. 13939

>>13938
this, or lock the thread. if her thread is locked it might encourage her to return…

No. 13940

>>13936
Man, Pear is one crazy bitch.
She may be pretty irrelevant overall, but she's definitely a cow and could at least keep her snow thread.

She got a bad boob job and does everything wrong with it afterwards, ofc people are gonna talk about it because it's the most recent thing she's done.

No. 13941

>>13936
you must be really new then bc tons of shitty threads have been locked over the years from lack of milk. i actually want the anisa thread around because i find the irony in her actions deeply ironic, but i see why admin thinks she’s not milky enough for her own thread.

we could probably have a twitch streamer general (if there isn’t one already) and put her in there with permission maybe? what do you think of that instead, admin?

No. 13942

Could something be done with the newfags not saging or abiding by any lc rules in the godforsaken kpc/kpg thread, please? or better yet, a hellweek?

No. 13943

Everytime TND mentions that JC is a rapist and that she was "abused" and hints she was raped (which is at least once a week), the thread devolves into a discussion of what rape actually is, and infighting between uwu believe all victims, TND skeptics who know she lies about everything, and armchair psychologists.
Inb4 it gets bad with today's most recent mention, but one anon is already butt-hurt. A look at any past threads will show a pattern.
Would a mod notice be possible when a new thread starts? No rape spergs. Discussion of her details/lies is fine, but omg stfu rape spergs on both ends of the spectrum.

No. 13944

>>13934
>>13935
Shiloh had her own thread at one point. Was locked for “vendetta posting”, and people being spergs iirc.

If there’s enough new milk, and interest, I’d say just make one. Worst case it gets locked like last time.

No. 13945

>>13936
>>13937
Can an admin please comment?

No. 13946

>>13944
I remember that. She definitely has more milk now than she did when that thread was made. A bowie knife to the chest? Over an ex? I don't think that information would have even come out had she not sperged up a storm.

No. 13947

Shiloh doesn't have enough milk for her own thread, keep it where it's at.

No. 13948

I thought the anons who were tinfoiling about the admins favoring anisa were wild but it's looking true now

No. 13949

>>13948
I hate to say that I'm beginning to agree. It's been several days, anons have made their points and have made it vocal that they want the thread back. Anons in meta have been civil, the majority of our posts in the thread were saged. What's with the hypersensitive attitude towards the thread? Is it that much of a pain in the ass?

No. 13950

If we’re going to close the Anisa thread then why not close the Hyojin thread, they’re the same

>e beg for donations on twitch

>traces art
>fake woke and claim depression, then make fun of others for having mental illness
>literally only known because they dated a famous YouTuber (pyrocynical, punkduck)
>constant “nitpick” posts about their body and fashion
>made serious sexual abuse allegations(grossgore, slazo)
>used their boyfriend as a position of power to lead a hate train for petty reasons) tana mongeua, slazo)

would anyone give a fuck if she wasn't dating Pyrocynical?

No. 13951

>>13950
i mean, idc about anisa either way, but this can be said about most flakes on /snow/ and /w/. and isn't anisa using her relationship status as a platform to be a thot prime cow behavior?

No. 13952

>>13948
I'm also confused as to the wording in this locking post, about the admin unlocking the topic, here >>938194 but the thread was never unlocked from a previous locked one, somebody just made a the new anissa thread 21 days ago

No. 13953

>>13952
It was unlocked by an admin here
>>>/pt/750991

But the thread was stuck on autosage(admins would not reply) and OP was outdated. It was a year since the lockdown happened so a new thread with updated information was made

No. 13954

>>13953
Thanks for explaining anon

No. 13955

Unsaged posts in pt & snow are driving me up the wall, what's up? There have been multiple asks for a hellweek. This is coming from someone who was just banned for a
a minute, too. I'm over checking threads thst have been bumped for a garbage opinion. You waiting for some kpop holiday to do hellweek on or what? Maybe celebrate the anniversary of the plastic surgery of Loona's face so it can be sooner? Eh?

No. 13956

>>13955
I've been dealing with a personal emergency, and you're a stranger to whom I owe nothing.
>>13941
Sure, but it will probably devolve into nitpicking and a few vendettas like most general threads.

No. 13957

>>13956
….then give me an answer at a time when you are not dealing with a personal emergency? wtf?

No. 13958

>>13956
>you're a stranger to whom I owe nothing

Then why are you an admin??? It’s literally your job to moderate

No. 13959

The obvious males in FDS thread on /g/ are really annoying. Mods, pls, do something about them.

No. 13960

>>13958
She has other staff to do that too. It's not like it's her sole responsibility.

No. 13961

>>13960
NTA, but why did she even respond, then? A member of the staff easily could've done it for her.
Besides, no one forced her to be the admin.

No. 13962

>>13956
you're also a stranger who no1curr about, bitch.

No. 13963

>>13957
>>anons complaining that admin didn't respond as fast as they wanted
>>telling admin to reply later when they aren't having a personal emergency
Are ya'll retarded? What do you want from admin, do you guys forget she's a person? Seriously, admin and mods have lives that don't halt to lolcow. Have some damn patience, jeez. Ya'll are the real reason we would need a hellweek, this whining is cancer.

No. 13964

>>13963
I disagree. New admin has been nothing but shit.
>splitting the already slow as fuck boards into more, despite votes against the idea and then claiming it was "close enough"
>adding sage back on to /pt/ even though every other imageboard has done away with it
Not to mention her chimping out like a 5 year old ITT when she is criticized. She has less excuse to be shit because she's doing this for free, no one is making her be here. Obviously it's not a crime to have other matters to deal with, but at this point it's just an excuse. Her attitude and inconsistent response rate have been piss poor literally the entire time. She has literally put herself in this position, but she seems like one of those people who wanted the power without any responsibility.

Admin if you're reading this, realize right now, no one thinks of you as a person, your life doesn't really matter and you should get help for your clearly debilitating depression or pass the site to someone competent with a thick skin (despite it not being a cause of your bratty attitude).

No. 13965

File: 1583250251943.jpg (21.16 KB, 540x304, stare look away.jpg)

>>13964
>get help for your debilitating depression

yooo what anon lmao

No. 13966

>>13964
>>no one thinks of you as a person
Anon I think you need help. Admin has no responsibility to you, this site could get deleted any second, it’s meaningless and you are berating the person who owns it. Go outside

No. 13967

>>13966
>berating
Show me where anyone ITT thinks of her as a person.

No. 13968

>>13966
NTA but if we ban people for OT-ing with their own life story/32 waist channing, likewise I don’t give a shit to hear about admins personal life

No. 13969

>>13968
well yeah, but it's not like she really gave any details anon

No. 13970

>>13964
Actually multiple anons asked for sage back in /pt/ and sage was still on every other board

No. 13971

>>13970
Wasn't the lack of sage hardcoded into the board or something? I remember anons asking for it and it took so long to come back because of that. It's been a while though.

No. 13972

>>13971
Yup and in addition, it was voted to return sage to /pt/
>>8684

Anon is just cherrypicking what she wants changed on the site.

No. 13973

>>13970
>>13972
>>13971
I said that other sites don't have sage, not that people on here didn't want it back or not. Learn to read.

No. 13974

>>13973
why does it matter what other sites are doing?…

No. 13975

>>13974
because lolcow is notoriously antiquated compared to other imageboards. and adding sage back is just going backwards. 4channel doesn't even have sage anymore and /cgl/ is still pretty fast moving. we also still have archaic shit like flood detection despite being a tiny board of less than 1000 people. being on here is like being on /cgl/ 10 years ago, it's not good.

No. 13976

>>13975
you can sage in the options field on 4chan

No. 13977

File: 1583363454137.png (65.45 KB, 300x300, 1353713940491.png)

>>13975
Hiding sage was one of the most stupid things moot ever did. 4chan is worse for it. No one knows what sage is anymore or how to use it. The result is shit threads constantly get bumped. LC has preserved the original use and culture surrounding sage where other image boards failed.

No. 13978

>>13975
>less than a thousand people
this is definitely not true. are you new or just retarded.

No. 13979

5 days is way too long for a ban.
I apparently responded to bait in the onion thread by asking a question, the rest of the post wasn't even responding to said troll, it was an observation on something. Farmhard issued responding to bait warning way after my post.

I accept a ban, but 5 days? I would have even thought 2 days was a little excessive but 5 days is almost a week.

No. 13980

>>13977
>moot
moot isn't the one who did it.
>>13978
lmao you must be super new if you think this site has more than 1000 regular users. we only get like 20-50 in our town halls and about the same number for surveys. you'd have to be an idiot to think there is a higher number of consistent users or site traffic. 1000 was being generous.

No. 13981

>>13976
not what i meant, i mean that it's not a requirement. we went backwards on this site and are super anal about sageing fucking anything on most boards, which is insane and useless with how slow the site is barring one or two threads.

No. 13983

>>13980
engagement rate on stuff like polls is always going to be lower than the amount of people using site because some people just dont care about site issues. where are you getting 20-50 people though? i just checked and the 2x poll got 788 responses

No. 13984

>>13980
>moot isn't the one who did it.
moot is the one that decided to make sage hidden on 4chan. It was in the janiteam leak. I'm referring to sage being hidden on 4chan as an example of why hiding sage isn't a good idea.

No. 13985

>>13980
imagine being autismo enough to think every anon goes into townhalls

No. 13986

>>13985
nta but that's not what they said at all

No. 13987

>>13980
the LAST admin literally said the site got something like 2k dynamic users every day. that makes perfect sense considering 1. most people lurk and don’t constantly post, and probably stick to a handful of threads. 2. there are 930k posts in snow alone and you actually think that’s all been done by less than 1k people? impressive.

No. 13988

can a farmhand take a look at the TND thread and tamp down some of the celiac sperg? thanks.

No. 13989

That @ifyouneedtocatchup anon in the Nika thread posted child porn of her in the thread

No. 13990

There's literal cp in the nika thread

No. 13991

>>13990
it’s already been deleted. read the rules and learn to sage

No. 13992

>>13987
>2k dynamic users every day
lmao anon, dynamic doesn't mean unique. also those 930k posts are from the past 4+ years, they're not active posts.

No. 13993

>>13983
>the 2x poll got 788 responses
Anon, admin said the poll wasn't unique users which is why she disregarded the results. this isn't something you want to use as an example…

No. 13994

Why is the "males shilled as attractive that (You find) are ugly" thread in /g/ but the one for women is in /ot/ ??

No. 13995

>>13993
She didn't mention anything about unique users, just that there were obvious vote duplicate. She never explained how, but she did seem to use the results from that same survey to decide which board themes to keep in the new server, so kek.
I would think this site has a lot of lurkers who come for the Onision threads, at least. One of our past admins have said it's difficult to get accurate stats on how many unique users there are. One reason given was that people use mobile devices and can cycle through up to 30 IPs in a single year.

No. 13996

I hope mods are tracking posters in that anti o thread, vince posts when

No. 13997

>>13995
Tempcow was a good indicator how active the site was with the live typing. There were times there were over 700 active users in just the Onion thread.

Also a hell of a lot of people lurk and get her thru other links and can't navigate for shit. When I was newfag I can't remember how long it took me to actually post, and I spent days catching up on past threads. I think it took me months to even know what /meta was. Not everyone uses image boards. I would use forums now I solely use here, I much prefer the culture and female userbase

No. 13998

>>13995
IIRC is was a google survey that required a google log in. I'm guessing that she was able to see that people who had multiple google accounts filled out the survey more than once. I'm also guessing that she didn't post evidence of this because it could have potentially doxed someone that took part.

No. 13999

File: 1583593787045.png (60.86 KB, 678x448, google-forms-email-field.a1e1a…)

>>13997
What you said is probably the case for a lot of users. I think the actual community is small, but the people who come here just for cows like Onion is large

>>13998
I'm not sure that's possible. When you enable e-mail address collection, respondents see pic related. They have to enter their email themselves, and are notified that their info is saved.
The /meta/ survey only required users to be logged in, so they couldn't make multiple responses from the same account. It's most def. still possible people were just using multiple google accounts, but she wouldn't be able to see them.
Google also doesn't give form creators their responder's IP addresses, so if she could see, she wouldn't be able to match email addresses, unless the fakers were idiotic enough to just use the same username for all their accounts, like abc1@gmail.com, abc2@gmail.com, abc3@gmail.com. If the form had actually been embedded on the site, she could've used Google Analytics to track voters and get IPs, but she used an external link, so that's probably out.
The other way is if she was going by how many people followed the actual link to the survey from here. That would track visits alone, not votes. But if we actually only have maybe less than 100 people here max, including lurkers who only looked at the survey after seeing it linked at the top of the site, 788 responses really is way too much. I don't think the site is that small, though.
TL;DR We'll probably never know what really happened, but I'm a little sceptical.

No. 14000

>>13995
>She didn't mention anything about unique users, just that there were obvious vote duplicate

what the hell do you think unique users means? duplicate votes means all of the votes weren't submitted by unique users (different people).

No. 14001

>>14000
There is not even a way to see unique users on Google Forms, anon. If she actually verified there were vote duplicates, she must've used a different path.

No. 14002

>>13997
Well, newfags like yourself constantly reference tempcow like it was long ago when it wasn't. You yourself even admit to not being a imageboard regular user but you didn't really need to tell us that.

No. 14005

>>13938 Erin is back, any chance we could please get the thread off auto sage?

No. 14006

>>14005
Knew she'd be back the second newfags stopped giving her attention. DDLG girls confirmed unable to use the fucking catalogue.

No. 14007

What the fuck is with this Aly thread?
>>>/snow/740653

They were considered a cow when they were ana, but now they're completely normal. The thread is constant nitpicks about her food and making fun of her weight gain/loss. At one point there was a long thread investigating her food pics to see if the teeth marks are legitimate? How has this autism gone unchecked for so long?

It seems like the people posting about her are proana and getting off by putting her down wtf

No. 14008

So anisa has officially opened up her onlyfans. Is the thread staying locked? if so ill find somewhere else.

No. 14009

>>14008
Cant believe Anisa went from having a kotaku article denouncing titty streaming to just straight up selling nudes.

No. 14010

>>14009
Put it on twitch thot general

No. 14011

tfw your complaint is ignored bc of the arguing

No. 14012

Can anons stop bumping Raven's thread to ask for the next dump of her posts? As if Admin wouldn't post the link there.

Unless, of course, those anons are all Raven.

No. 14015

File: 1583924390938.png (147.49 KB, 553x538, 1439577186902.png)

>>13999

I appreciate your informative autism, anon.

>>14007

When has her thread been anything but? And besides, the real reason her thread persists is the hope of one day catching a glimpse of pic related again.

No. 14017

File: 1583935643637.jpg (30.12 KB, 1080x227, Screenshot_20200312-010000__01…)

So are we obligated to refer to all males as scrotes vs dude/male/guy because this post genuinely confused me when I saw it? Apologizes in advance for probable autism.

No. 14018

>>14017
I don't know what thread this is from, but I'm pretty sure that anon is correcting her for assuming males can post here.

No. 14020

File: 1583940214665.jpg (Spoiler Image, 154.61 KB, 1080x913, Screenshot_20200312-010000__01…)

>>14018
Ty for the response anon. It's just some infighting in the egirl thread as far as I can tell? I don't think the tagged post infers there was a male posting but idk lol I'm clearly a bit of a newfag…

No. 14021

>>14020
there are a lot of cocky anons on the site who think anyone who doesn't type a certain way or hold certain opinions is a man.

No. 14022

Why are there two active PnP threads?

No. 14023

>>14022
there isn't, a wk bumped the old one

No. 14024

>>14023

If only there was a way to prevent that, like I dunno, locking it…

No. 14025

>>14024
or you know… not making a new thread until the limit is reached

No. 14026

I'm curious if farmhands would be able to step into the Heather Sparkles thread? I'm not sure how much can be done but the quality of the thread has taken a pretty sharp nosedive. Most of the posting is done by Heather's boyfriend's jilted ex-girlfriend, who does nothing but speculate about his mental state nonstop while trying to cope that he isn't interested in her. She's already been warned by farmhands in the past to cut it out, but she ignored it and carried on.

No. 14029

>>14026
is that the same fag who’s been shitting up heather’s threads for literal years now or is that someone else? or you mean the one attention whore who constantly talks about that clay dude? i noticed that from the beginning theres been one or two super dedicated retards who refuse to assimilate into our rules and culture, never ever sage, and constantly compare themselves to heather. it’s so embarrassing i had to stop reading the thread altogether.

No. 14031

>>14021
Thanks anon, was worried I missed a rule or something.

No. 14033

File: 1583974780442.png (679.39 KB, 1316x1415, Screenshot_20200311-205557~2.p…)

People are freaking out on Twitter and reddit, but let me guess, this still isn't enough to qualify for a thread huh? No bias at all from mods lmao

No. 14034

>>14033
Wow.. how milky.. she's got an OnlyFans… just like every other twitch thot. Sound the alarms it's a milk tsunami

No. 14035

Anisafag plz go. The "content cop" was already bad enough. You're just as annoying as the anachans at this point.

Stay mad and stay on autosage.

No. 14036

File: 1584002719741.jpeg (164.63 KB, 828x361, 960B6187-AC3C-4BE5-83BB-17308B…)

>>14033
Fanbois in subreddit is imploding, and they made it to pol kek.

https://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/247632201#p247643528

No. 14037

Please autosage the egirl thread. It’s completely ruined by dedirl posting and newfagotry and emoji use.

No. 14038

>>14034
>>14035

oh okay lets go talk about momokun's rolls and butthole another 5 threads, because that's new milky content

No. 14039

>>14038
who said anything about momokun? you do know we have other threads on here right?

No. 14040

>>14039
read the quotes

people are making the point one thread shouldn't exist because it's not milky enough - there are only nitpicks etc Momokun is just an example.

we have plenty of other threads that do the same shit with no milk.

momokun threads are people posting pictures and then talking about her cooch, bleached butthole, and recent lipo etc

momo getting plastic surgery even though she preaches body positivity is milk, but Anisa getting plastic surgery even though she preaches body positivity is somehow not milk?

No. 14041

>>14040
momokun actually did milky shit before it devovled into that…. you anisfags are seriously delusional

No. 14042

The males won't leave the pp threads alone.

No. 14043

>>14041
i also don't get why she can't just be on /snow/ there are plenty of shit threads on there.

No. 14044

>>14041
Yeah so did anisa

No. 14045

There's a scrote crying his eyes out over the pp thread.

No. 14046

File: 1584061824354.jpg (22.23 KB, 275x275, 1583018169310.jpg)


No. 14047

>>14045
he always comes at this hour too lol

No. 14049

Someone is having a mental breakdown in /ot/

No. 14050

>>14049
I missed it, what happened?

No. 14051

>>14050
Just a scrote that spams at the same time every day

No. 14052

I feel like the radfem derailing/sperging about troons problem has not improved

No. 14053

>>14052
i don't know what you're talking about. there was a scrote losing its shit in blaire white's thread calling anons radfems and such, but i haven't seen a terf sperg anywhere. i also see people defending troons in the gossip boards.

No. 14054

>>14053
In the celebricows thread. And you still see a lot of radfem/pink pill derailing in ot daily

No. 14055

>>14054
>pink pill
Oh, so you're THAT guy.

No. 14056

>>14055
This is the kind of paranoia and derangement I mean like I genuinely don’t even know what you’re talking about, is that not what the thread is called..

No. 14057

>>14056
Go post pornhub links some more.

No. 14058

It helps when the posts or behaviors in question are reported. Coming here while complaining about x,y, or z with no links or examples isn't helpful.

Townhall this friday at GMT 2PM. Cytube link will be posted in this thread 1 hour before the townhall.

No. 14059

File: 1584412103157.png (13.55 KB, 719x335, Screenshot_2020-03-16 snow - …)

>>14052
>03/16/20 (Mon) 10:02:36 PM
I think it's kinda funny you're posting this 4 minutes after this post. Try harder next time luv

No. 14060

>>14058
There are examples in this thread alone that are pretty reflective of the board in general.

>>14059
>>14057
>>14055

No. 14061


No. 14062

>>14060
People calling out your unfounded claims isn't the same as derailing.(Ban evasion)

No. 14063

genuine question, i know its still new and relevant, but is racebait not banned in the corona thread or something because it seems like people keep infighting about /pol/ shit

No. 14064

>>14063
I came here for the same complaint. I knew…just knew race baiting was gonna happen in the covid19 thread.

No. 14065

Radfems sperging in the vent thread again.

No. 14066

The art salt thread is a clusterfuck. Tons of infighting and "hi cow". Why isn't there a thread for art cows in /snow/ and a separate thread to discuss art/being an artist on /ot/ or /m/?
There's also been a ton of drama threads on /ot/ that don't fucking go there. /ot/ is supposed to be less drama, and the celebrity threads and breadtube threads are only fucking drama about specific people.

No. 14067

>>14066
>Tons of infighting and "hi cow"
Racist Uncle is aware of the thread though, so it's fair to assume it might be her or her minions. And the infighting was caused by a scrote defending lolicon shit. I agree with the rest tho

No. 14068

>>14065
Was there actually any indication that the anon who was disagreeing with you was a radfem? Can we stop using that as a boogeyman when someone disagrees with you? Jeez.

No. 14069

>>14068
Somehow it's not considered as tinfoil, as opposed to >>14059

No. 14070

>>14068
Its been used for a while now, but as you said theres no indication of it being true, I guess its just an easy scapegoat for infighting.

No. 14071

>>14070
>>14068
From what I saw in the thread, it's because the conversation came over from the P.P thread.

>>14067
It's still fucking obnoxious to shut down someone by accusing them of being the cow. Also, no one was defending lolicon, one anon just said they don't care about cartoon rights in a response to someone asking if it's ok to post an example.

No. 14072

The infighting in the coronavirus thread is getting ridiculous.

>>14071
No, the conversation started in the same thread because of >>527344

No. 14073

>>14072
My bad. Either way it doesn't go there.

No. 14074

>>14070
Both sides of that conversation are fucking annoying.

No. 14075

>>14074
Yes and it would be nice if they didn't respond to obvious bait

No. 14076

>pregnancy sperg in the vent thread
>lolicon sperg in the art thread
>tsflip or some scrote in the art/pink pill thread
>some guy idk talking to himself in /snow/
>some cow defending herself in erin's thread

What's going on today

No. 14077

>>14076
and i forgot the infighting in the covid's thread, phew

No. 14078

>>14076
everyone's quarantined and has nothing better to do than shitpost

No. 14079

>>14078
Oh right, i'm so used to this lifestyle that i forgot lol(Ban evasion)

No. 14080

when you ban the erin/scarlet sperg in the erin thread can you please ban/warn the anon replying to bait too. jesus its so cringe.

No. 14081

>>14076
Maybe lots of trolls home now because of the virus and got time to kill.

No. 14082

>>14077
lol imagine actually unironically reading a covid 19 thread on fucking lolcow and expecting it to be anything but an absolute mess. idk why retards insist on having threads like that when the only thing that is ever accomplished is a bunch of conspiratards losing their mind and munchausen’s cases self diagnosing. it is p funny to watch tho

No. 14084

Having Fahr's thread in /pt is exhausting when looking for updates. How is Fahr different than /snow/ cows?
She doesn't even have multiple threads in a year like Shay. Her thread is 4 years old and I'm a 2.5 yr newfag so I may be missing something.

No. 14085

>>14084
/pt/ is for legacy cows, all of them did something ridiculous to get there. also she just fucking chopped her tits off to look like loki, that's enough to get her there regardless.

No. 14086

can you guys please ban the annoying attention whore in the corona threads? she got butthurt that people called her out for spending her money poorly and has done nothing but invent crazy situations to defend herself and keeps responding to "bait" and derailing. she's spoony level annoying in how she derails threads and responds to anyone that is talking about her.

No. 14087

>>14086
Seconding, because she doesn't even talk about the thread topic anymore, she just uses it as an excuse to blogposts walls of texts.

No. 14088

>>14086

I'm not a liar and can post proof of everything I've said, but the thread is not about me despite your baiting me to defend myself. But you and the other anon with the druggie ex (if you are not actually samefagging, interesting how you both have been commenting in close succession and call me a druggie), please go ahead and keep wasting your energy and posts a-logging me and calling me an "entitled mean deranged crazy druggie" and see where that gets you in life.

Imagine being so bothered by a post in /ot/ that you wait around for hours to attack anon again as soon as they post.

No. 14089

>>14087

>she doesn't even talk about the thread topic


You can see the ip's of posts? Puh-lease.

No. 14091

>>14089
>>14088
I'm not a fan of this annoying new spoony. Also, no one would know it was you if you didn't keep IDing yourself. You're practically namefagging at this point.

No. 14093

>>14091

New? Been here for years. At last count 18 months ago I had nearly 5K posts from only one of the IP's I have used.

With my health conditions and having Medicare I'll be dead soon enough. Have patience, anon.

No. 14094

>>14093
no one is saying you're new, we're saying you're spoony's replacement. a shitty wish.com tier replacement at that. if you don't know who spoony is i am not helping you.

No. 14095

>>14094

I thought you meant "spoony" as in munchie as you did not capitalize it. Get some proper grammar so that you're not misconstrued.

Like I said, I'll be dead soon. If you doubt me then you're not paying attention.

No. 14096

jesus fucking christ can accusing the entire thread of being samefag be a bannable offense in the nicole thread already? or can mods just make a post there confirming once and for all we’re not all samefag already so nicole and her gang of ban evading wks will shut the fuck up?

because we’ve been accused of being all samefag probably a dozen times now and they still won’t stop screaming about it

also i hope mods see that they’ve sicked the wks on us again by redtexting a perfectly reasonable post?? seriously, why did you guys do that?

they still haven’t gotten over the one redtext
from 9 months ago we’re never going to hear the end of it now

No. 14097

>>14095
What a faggot

No. 14098

>>14093
>>14095
Make a blog already jfc. Posting over 5k times on here in your 50s and arguing with anons about your financial woes is not something to be proud of and I'm saying that as a poorfag myself. Stop it and get a grip.

No. 14099

>>14098

>in your 50s


The fact that you repeatedly misquote me to justify your vendetta shows who the real cow is.

No. 14100

>>14099
no one is misquoting you, retard. you wrote in a thread something about you being homeless when you were age 49, and then went on to explain that it happened in 2011 (meaning you'd be in your 50s by your own admission). not anon's problem you can't fucking type or comprehend questions.

No. 14101

>>14098
>>14100
>>14097
imo, this is just mean. i just feel bad for anon. they're obviously not integrated but that's the least of their problems at this point.

No. 14102

>>14099
You never bothered to correct it and you're talking to multiple people. I neither called you a cow nor do I have a 'vendetta' against you, an anonymous stranger. Just stop with the blogposting and TMI in the corona thread if it's not related to the virus.

No. 14103

>>14100

The second post you're referring to was my correction. I'm 49 now.

>>14101

>not integrated


That must be why Admin emailed me asking if I would like to help compile the next drop of Raven posts.

No. 14104


No. 14105

File: 1584635397688.gif (921.42 KB, 200x152, burns_laugh.gif)


No. 14106

>>14096
You guys literally sperg out, but thinking complaining about a filter and cropping out the filter caption at the top left screen is milk. You keep bringing up dry 2014 and 2015 old milk claiming she still 'Googles herself all the time'. The thread is a nitpicking, vendetta disaster for anyone who actually looks at it. Stop being so samefagging and jacking each other off for all the 'Where'd you find this gem anon lol uwu'. We know who is posting. You literally spam UWU constantly when Nicole never even captions anything uwu on any of the posts and you add extra narritive to shit to try and make milk seem like it is there when it isn't.

The anon who called you guys out is right. You literally sound like the same 3 people obsessed with this chick. A mod needs to comb the thread and smell how bad of salty vendetta is it. Stop posting the same shit and people will stop calling you samefags.

No. 14107

>>14103
Anon, do you count your posts or how apparently do you know you have 5k in 18 months? We can't see IPs, so apparently you can? Stfu and get off the site.

No. 14109

>>14106
>>14096
We also know it is the same anons because you guys keep saying the same' Wow whered you find this!?' and the one anon who reees and their autism shows when they greentext paragraphs. That anon is the saddest.

No. 14110

File: 1584638403046.png (357.65 KB, 1781x630, cropped orner.png)

>>14096
>>14109
>>14106
The redtexted photo that's being defended as 'this is real milk'. This is all the thread is, every day. Old posts and nitpicking shit. Aside from when she posts about money or pateon or moving and suddenly the anons add extra context saying she's scamming [which she isn't], SHE USES FILTERS [so does every thot, that should be under nitpicking at this point in the thread], and 'She can't move she's UWU POOR SO SMOL' [which is constantly added to posts where none of that is being mentioned or insunated by Nicole]. Its a grab at straws that these anons are making posts. This is why people call you guys out and why your post was redtexted and deserved.

Thats all Im going to say on this because it seems like other anons are calling you guys out on your vendetta bullshit thread too. Post real milk without fake subtext and maybe you will have a viable thread.

No. 14111

File: 1584638730811.png (28.86 KB, 794x262, Screenshot_2018-10-22-22-15-09…)


No. 14113

>>14107

PS I declined as I don't use fb or ig but I gave her suggestions re how to find out her IPs. I do know when the drop will be.

>>14112


Have you not heard of appealing? Admin reversed it herself. I don't even use a VPN for this site. I cut my teeth on Usenet beginning in 1993. Trolling was birthed in the group for which I was the FAQ maintainer, and I was the target. Try harder.

No. 14114

File: 1584639370435.png (66.74 KB, 800x378, Screenshot_2020-03-19-10-34-12…)

>>14112

Coward smdh

No. 14115

>>14114
I deleted it because a mod will handle it. Why would they ban you forever, appeal it when they rarely appeal forever bans, you bragged about a new IP, and apparently you are buddy buddy with them enough that they reach out to you personally?

No. 14116

this is your brain on quarantine

No. 14117

>>14116
It's okay. The anon apparently invented trolling and know's Mr. Internet, but can't understand how to use a basic site layout that's been around since their beloved 1993.

No. 14118

File: 1584641232018.png (24.29 KB, 800x263, Screenshot_2020-03-17-02-05-56…)

>>14115

>bragged about a new IP


When? You are the living end!

My latest "forever" ban was lifted by I assume a farmhand upon appeal.

No. 14119

>>14118
>>14093
>one of the IP's I have used

So how many do you use for this site, anon, after one gets banned?

No. 14120

I really want to see the 5000 posts

No. 14122

>>14119

You're inferring that I used them to violate the terms being banned. If that were true I would be…wait for it…banned!

No. 14124

>>14122
Shut up now. No one care about how you being such a fantastic shitposter/poor/disabled/ oldfag (but don't know who Spoony is, right kek)/in a sooper sikreet club with Admin for Gravy's post reveal.
Shut up and leave already.

No. 14125

>>14058
link available yet?

No. 14126

Looks like I caught a cold (hopefully), I'll reschedule for tomorrow if I feel better. Sorry to anyone that waited!

No. 14127

>>14126
Get well soon! ♥

No. 14128

Can a farmhand please silence that weird detailing wk faggot in the vicky thread?

No. 14129

>>14126
be safe admin and get well soon!

No. 14130

>>14126
Almost put 'safe' in the email space. take your time to get better anon, get some coffee or tea or juice, watch something. Get better

No. 14131

>>14126
Get well soon, hope you and your family are all doing okay ♥

No. 14132

>>14126
get better, be safe!

No. 14133

hellweek cant come soon enough. it is fucking insane how many retards quarantine is attracting.

No. 14134

got banned on discord for no reason, I was very active here but after this bullshit fuck this site.

No. 14135

>>14134
No one gives a shit about the discord anyway. Bye.

No. 14136

File: 1584785223843.png (210.86 KB, 800x543, Screenshot_2020-03-21-03-02-07…)

I've been accused of being a lot of things I'm not on this board, but this takes the fucking cake!

>>>/ot/529409

No. 14137

>>14136
Are you the anon bragging about being banned all the time? Just get off the site. Clearly no one wants you here.

No. 14138

>>14133
let's do the opposite of a hellweek where farmhands only remove illegal and gross stuff

No. 14139

>>14138
rules exist for a reason. if you don’t like it, make your own imageboard.

oh wait.

No. 14140

Does anyone notice the extra amounts of asspats anons are giving each other lately? Its like they come in pairs or 3 at a time in threads and congratulate each other on finding the most mundane shit or nitpicking. >>14138 I hope they purge you all.

No. 14142

someone advertising "real rape porn" of european women on every board…

No. 14143

Mods where the hell are you??
There is this weirdo posting illegal rape links with viruses.
>>>/ot/530261

No. 14148

is the mod redtexting the nicole thread new? or have they just not read any of the thread at all? seriously they don’t seem like they know what they’re talking about or understand any of the context

> Tinfoiling with no basis to a claim

it’s speculation for sure but it’s not tinfoil, like one anon said we have more than enough ‘hard evidence’ of nicole’s self obsession and that she and her friends lurk here to believe it’s plausible

every cow on here gets accused of running their own fan pages and i’ve never seen a single one of them get redtexted before

mod is confusing ‘basis for claim’
with the ‘hard evidence’ wks keep sperging about. there was even already a
>where’s your hard evidence!!!!!!
proof-chan wk response. we have plenty of basis for claim, but that’s not something that we could ever concretely prove (because we can’t break into all of those instas)

> Do not post about someone who doesn't have any drama simply because you personally dislike them. (vendetta posting)

how is posting about the subject of a thread IN their thread that is FULL of milk/drama/proof of their bullshit ‘vendetta’?

normally i wouldn’t fight back against mod ruling but why do you guys keep letting her do this shit? any time you give her an inch the wks come barging in and this time will be no different

we have proof that she AND her friends are active in the thread and they’re desperate

the only people who would possibly be reporting those posts would be nicole and co because no one else would ever give a fuck, so why are you listening to her?

>>14106
>>14109
>>14110
even this is the exact same sperging almost word for word that’s been happening since day 1 when she was mentioned back in costhots
>multiple wk posts in short amount of time
>IT’S NOT MILK!!!!
>WHERE’S THE MILK!!!
>EVERY THOT DOES X IT’S NOT MILK!!!
>IT’S VENDETTA!!!!!
>UR ALL SAMEFAG!!!!
>NONE OF THIS IS MILK UR OBSESSED WITH HER
>(1 single redtext) SEE MODS AGREE WITH US!!!!! NICOLE CLEARED OF ALL CHARGES!!!!!
>WHERES UR PROOF!!!!
>(proof of lying) THIS IS OLD IT DOESN’T COUNT!!!!!!

just hide the fucking thread if you don’t want to see it! why the fuck are you STILL parked on there reading every single post to the point where you can come up with an analysis of the entirety of the thread AND all of the recent discussion if you don’t think any of it is milk? huh? explain why you STILL haven’t just hidden the thread and moved on with your life? why are you so obsessed with her?

> We also know it is the same anons

> We
ok where’s your hard evidence of this proof-chan? you’ve said this 1 million times in your whiteknighting and ban evading, so show us your proof since you keep demanding it. otherwise shut the fuck up with this paranoid tinfoiling

No. 14150

>>14148

>we have plenty of basis for claim, but that’s not something that we could ever concretely prove (because we can’t break into all of those instas)


Thats called tinfoiling, anon. If you dont have proof then stop dragging the discussion about it. Speculating is one thing, but half your thread is asserting she is all these people without, like you said, proof. Most threads have a quick discussion about tinfoil and let it to rest. You want tinfoil to be milk and make that half the thread. That's not what makes a cow and ebegging and thottery is basic level shit now. I've gone through the page, the reaches are atrocious, and your autistic samefagging ass keeps blowing it up with paragraphs responses that are greentexted usually with nothing to previous anon said because you just get ass blasted mad mods and anons are calling out your rock hard vendetta. Other posts about her have been banned for vendetta across the site. Take the cue from everyone and realize youre vendetta isn't cow material for her own thread.

No. 14151

File: 1585006812223.png (258.09 KB, 540x286, marina.png)

Just throwing out a question I think about that I’m not actually expecting an answer to but…..why are /g/ and /m/ so strictly SFW + no porn allowed?

Ever since Tumblr did their whole anti-porn bullshit, it feel like there’s no female driven porn space. Every thread on /g/ is already so horny (and shame based?) as it is
>Femdom General
>Masturbation thread
>Fetishes You're Ashamed Of
>Fetishes You're NOT Ashamed Of
>Attractive Men you want to fuck
>Turn ons (that you're unashamed of)
>Sex Advice Thread

Would one teeny tiny lil porn/gif thread really hurt?

Say what you want about Tumblr, but they had a real woman’s eye for porn. I’ll try 4chan every once in a while but /gif/ is alway so violent and male centric and it’s always webm which isn’t mobile friendly. It would just be nice to have an equivalent space somewhere on the internet.

No. 14152

>>14151
idk how other's feel, but would porn threads even from a women's gaze not just attract more scrots etc? there's so many sites for porn too, kind of weird to have lolcow as a place to come to masturbate.

No. 14153

>>14152
Yeah the lack of sex threads is what helps google from directing incels who type in sex into the search bar.

No. 14154

>>14153
lol wut

No. 14155

>>14151
it would probably be overwhelmed with male larpers

No. 14157

>>14153
they'll stick around for the porn and get off on the fact that they know women are probably getting turned on and masturbating to the same content they are, etc.

>>14151
noooo, absolutely not. it will 100% draw in more men. crystal cafe has porn shit, just go on there.

No. 14158

>>14151
No. It would attract larping trannies even more than before.

No. 14159

>>14148
I don't even follow the Nicole thread (because there's nothing interesting in there for one thing) but I remember your spergouts from the costhot thread and anon you need to calm your vendetta down. Tinfoiling shits up the thread quality immediately and instead of actual proven material you got a boatload of speculation based on assumptions, i.e. tinfoiling. It's annoying and doesn't contribute to the discussion. She's mostly guilty of e-begging, generic photoshop and general boring ass thottery so she should belong to the general costhot thread, not have her own thread until she has a Momokun tier blowout with drama. The thread is currently all nitpicking, tinfoiling and bitching about her selfie filters and nothing more, genuinely manure tier.

No. 14160

>>14159
Seriously. The rest of the thread, aside from speculation about everything, is the anon having a meltdown anytime someone mentions that the reaches have no hold, anytime anyone mentions someone else like Adi, literally not being allowed to point out the mundane shit or have a discussion unless its the samefagging anons who keep patting each other's asses for finding 2014-2015 shit. The whole thread is old milk and sperging out. Its a shitshow. Can a mod just lock the fucking thread already? The incesant 'hi cowing' is a joke .

No. 14162

>>14160
>>14159
Forgot to mention the editing photos to try and make it look like she is photoshopping as much as the anons are claiming. Other anons already pointed out that someone is deliberately editing her photos with other photos to make it look like before and after editing shots.

Hey anon, its obvious everything you are posting is shit, so just stop. Multiple anons calling you out isn't the same whiteknighting anon you would hope it would be. Anon keeps sayig Leda is being skinwalked, she was actual friends with Nicole and her scene look is the same as every bubblegum pop scene kid from the day, so nitpicking this 2014 shit is so pathetic every time it's brought up.

>we have proof that she AND her friends are active in the thread

Anon you havent posted once proof that she lurks. Lol. You just want anyone who reports your shit to be here and her groupies. You sound paranoid about your vendetta

No. 14163

>>14162
>editing photos to try and make it look like she is photoshopping as much as the anons are claiming
nta but sorry, what? 1. do you have pRoOfS of that (since you love cold and hard facts, right), because everything posted came straight from her instagram, fb, etc?
2. where is the horde of "other anons" "pointing it out"?
>Anon keeps sayig Leda is being skinwalked, she was actual friends with Nicole
I've been following her for a while and never found any indication that they even knew each other.

…could it be? nicole?

other threads are chock-full of nitpicking and actual tinfoiling, and no one does anything about it. this is damn fishy, and makes me think nicole is a mod or knows someone here.

>>14160
>anon having a meltdown anytime someone mentions that the reaches have no hold
why is this even happening tho, and so often? I don't see anyone defending a cow so much in other threads. If there is no milk, no one will read and contribute, and the thread will die a natural death. But it's not, and that's somehow bothering you. Why?
Not everyone discussed here is super milky (esp in /w), and not a single thread on this side is 100% pure facts and nothing else.

unless all of the the posts were actually made by the same 1 or 2 anons, there's not a single reason to interfere?

No. 14164

>>14163
>interfere

Anon, take the L.

No. 14165

>>14164
those were valid questions, and I'm confused.
look at taylors thread for example and tell me how this stale rich girl is somehow milkier than nicole, and mentioning her fillers or how she's soo old looking for the 100th time isn't nitpicking? or look at the other threads.
I just genuinely wanna know how photo-shopping, e-begging and badly lying nicole is different.

No. 14166

>>14165
You post photos and your context has nothing to do with what she is saying or doing in them half the time. Your redtexted posts were just that. Fake commentary isn't milk and spamming 'uwu im smol' when she doesn't even say that is something Im shocked youre not embarassed by. The thread is a joke, your extra commentary you wish was milk is a joke, the edited before and afters were already discussed from that obsessed H folder on Pintrest.. Stay mad. Your thread is bad.

No. 14167

>>14165
>photo-shopping, e-begging and badly lying
never seen a costhot do THAT before. milkiest cow of all time, get her in the lolcow awards this year

No. 14168

>>14167
And the ebegging as mostly before she started her patreon from the looks of their posts. Complaining she buys shit now when she's getting obvious beta bucks because you just don't think her patreon is worth it, too bad. People fucking giving her money are getting you this mad is hilarious.

No. 14169

>>14168
nigga are you retarted

No. 14170

Why does quick reply not work for me anymore? Is it because of my browser?

No. 14171

>>14170
It does that sometimes.

No. 14172

Hi sorry I've come here to ask about this, other anons have come here to ask about this. What's the point of telling people to come to /meta/ if all you do is continue to ignore everything we're asking about and just let the Nicolefags overrun this thread too? Literally every single complaint they've made here and in the Nicole thread could be solved by them just hiding the thread, you've specifically told them to hide the thread, and yet you let them sperg on. I genuinely don't understand why you let them keep saying it's samefag vendetta when you can see that it's not? It's not like this is just one post or a new occurrence, every single wk thread for months now says it's a samefag vendetta. Step in and tell them it's not so they'll shut the fuck up?
>>14159
>>14160
>>14162
>>14166
>>14168

>>14162
>Forgot to mention the editing photos to try and make it look like she is photoshopping as much as the anons are claiming. Other anons already pointed out that someone is deliberately editing her photos with other photos to make it look like before and after editing shots.
No, only the whiteknights were saying that, and that was weeks ago. For someone who doesn't think she's milky, you sure have been reading EVERY SINGLE POST in that thread. Except for the ones that have the actual proof somehow, weird.

Here's the proof she and her friends are in the thread
>>>/w/85232
>>>/w/86057
Or are you gonna sperg about how she must be talking about something else that's ruining her life that just so happened to start on the exact same day as the thread (which was also immediately filled with wks).

No. 14173

>>14172
>Here's the proof she and her friends are in the thread
>no actual proof she posts in thread

Anon you are fucking hilarious. I hope a mod locks the thread. You sound so fucking stupid.

No. 14174

accusing people of sounding like or being 'scrotes' should be a banable offence in OT, it's happening too often. You should be able to post a differing opinion without them immediately saying you must be a man

No. 14175

>>14174
well, last time that happened it was an actual man >>14136

No. 14176

>>14174
…that was not the last time it happened, it's happened multiple times to me just today and I'm not a man. It happens a lot and its derailing and annoying

No. 14177

>>14176
Do you mind linking your posts?(ban evading)

No. 14178

>>14177
yes I do mind. I hate whenever people complain about something like this you get a bunch of replies asking for proof and telling you it's not happening, you can look through any thread in OT you'll see so many 'sounds like a scrote', 'you must be a scrote' etc

No. 14179

>>14174
i agree here. incels do raid the board and sometimes post in threads that trigger them, but the general assumption is that there are not going to be men posting. so it's just a weak and dismissive insult.

No. 14180

at this point if there is any desire to retain the original culture of the board OT and maybe G should just be a separate website. Or just nuke them.

No. 14181

>>14180
Same anon but also I think the no men rule should be removed, not because I want men to use the site, but because I want to discourage women who would flock to a website that has banned men. It was not meant to last past the R9K raid, or there should at least be some kind of vote on these things

No. 14182

>>14181
>>14180
tbh that's a great idea. i try not to use the website but i always come back. if they do these changes, i would have no problem leaving for good

No. 14183

>>14174
Did you report it? Pretty sure that's an infighting ban.

No. 14184

>>14183
yes I did. I think it should be explicitly stated like for 'hi cow'

No. 14185

>>14181
This /meta/ complaining just keeps getting worse and worse tbh. Allowing men to post here is a terrible idea.

No. 14186

>>14185
Femanon and ntayrt, but how is it complaining? It's a general suggestion… Imho not letting men post makes LC look kinda dumb, all the other shitty image boards men skulk around on don't enforce rules on gender, kek. I get the whole necessarity after the r9k raid but it's lingering affects are shutting down discourse with "hi scrote" being regurgitated by tard anons who disagree at the drop of a hat. I'm definitely not saying LC would be better with men, I just think it's something that could easily be trialed and then fucked off if it sucks. Sincerely, anon who isn't yet disinfranchised by men.

No. 14187

>>14186

There are plenty of places for dudes to go.

No. 14188

>>14185
but the reality is not a lot of men if ever would post. We didn't have this rule for years and it has never been a problem that there has been a significant amount of men posting and to be real I wouldn't even care if there was as long as it wasn't derailing in the way radfem anons have been. I just think it would be more fair if there was some kind of vote on the direction the majority of the userbase want the site to go in

No. 14189

>>14187
literally no one is saying there isnt, but this idea that lolcow needs to be some kind of women's space refuge is stupid, if that's what you want make a space specifically for that

No. 14190

>>14189
Go somewhere else if you don't like it anon.

No. 14191

>>14190
…it's literally the point of this thread

No. 14192

>>14191
>this idea that lolcow needs to be some kind of women's space refuge is stupid, if that's what you want make a space specifically for that

You just described the point of lolcow basically.

No. 14193

>>14192
what!? the point of the site was a replacement for stamina rose to literally pick mentally ill women apart and immortalise their worst moments how is that a refuge for women. You can't just announce that that is the point of lolcow. I hate whenever people bring these points up in meta they get a bunch of replies trying to shut them up. People are allowed to make suggestions you don't agree with

No. 14194

>>14172
Anon…those links aren't proof of anything, is this a joke? She could be talking about absolutely anything else. You're gonna need something way more concrete than that. Embarrassing.

No. 14195

the leftist pick me thread doesn't belong in OT and also has no milk

No. 14196

>>14190
It personally doesn't bother me, I was just defending other anon's valid suggestion.

>Please post all general issues and complaints here. If you want mods to do something, or have some issue with or suggestion for site content, you should use this thread.


Read the thread description.

No. 14197

File: 1585110977576.png (32.63 KB, 1177x254, 1584575308503.png)

>>14194
>>14173
>>14168
>>14162
>>14160
>>14159
>>14150
>>14110
>>14109
>>14106
>>14166
How many times do we keep having to say this to you illiterate fucks?

No. 14198

>>14197
>>14197
>>14172
You're mentally unhinged. You're not better than the sensitive retards that can't hide the thread because you're sensitive about moderation and being called out for your obvious vendetta. Seek help.

No. 14199

>>14198
Based admin strikes again

No. 14200

>>14197
I don't even read the Nicole thread, I only went to look after the spergouts in here and because of the "proof". Sorry that even random anons think your thread is bad.

No. 14201

>>14198
>>14199
For real. I called out the vendetta the second it was posted in the costhot thread. Thank you admin.

No. 14202

File: 1585112029734.png (45.25 KB, 1738x177, Screenshot_2020-03-24 w - Nic…)

kek

No. 14203

>>14186
>Femanon here
I never thought I'd see someone say this on lolcow. Lmao. Anyway, OP was complaining about preserving board culture…by letting men post here. It's just a bad idea.

No. 14204

what do you guys exactly mean by preserving board culture? and what is the point of that anyway(ban evading)

No. 14205

>>14204
what's the point of banning me over and over again?

No. 14206

>>14203
kek yeah it's not a term I use often, just didn't want to get "REEEE scrote" as a response. Can you explain why it's not a good idea? It's my understanding there used to be no gender based rules, which I assumed was fine?

No. 14207

>>14206
Why do you want men to post here? Men already only spam /ot/ with /pol/ posting(see vegan wizard-kun), then post dick pics in /g/, and thirst-post nudes in the cow boards. They're the dumbasses who keep bumping random threads with "anymore of her??", not to mention the guy who randomly spams cp link and the notrious scat-kun.
Do you really want more of that? How would that preserve board culture?

No. 14208

>>14207
NTA but for the millionth time, I don't want or really not want, men posting, I don't care. But the reality is when there wasn't a no men rule, they didn't post. The site has always had a predominantly female userbase. All those behaviours you listed would still be against the rules if the no men rule was lifted. The no men rule if anything attracts men, and it also attracts a specific kind of female userbase that hasn't in my opinion been good for the board

No. 14209

>>14208
I'm pretty sure the rule was put into place to stop men from coming here and saying 'male btw' and advertising themselves. Mind you it doesn't say men aren't allowed it says "Any posters with a phallus, do not come here for validation or to announce yourselves.". Men still post, anon(obviously). Just don't make it obvious that you are a man and you won't get banned.

No. 14210

>>14209
It has been reiterated many times but if you genuinely dont know the rule was put in place in response to an R9K raid, it wasn't to stop men saying 'male, here' which basically never happened and wasn't meant to be permanent. I'm aware, but I'm saying having the rule at all, regardless of how it's phrased is doing nothing for the site but attract unfavourable users. It isn't even detracting men. Anyway I would rather admin just respond if it's something they are or aren't open to do than having debates with random anons.

No. 14211

>>14207
Ayrt, because I don't have a vendetta against the opposite sex? I think they have something to contribute (there's plenty of autistic post from females on here)… And for the last time I personally don't care if they can't post to LC, I just think it's a valid suggestion on the basis stated above. It doesn't personally affect me at all. But it's funny how heated you get over a question that involves the oh so dreaded male.

No. 14212

>>14211
i agree with you

(ban evading)

No. 14213

>>14180
M is worse with all the koreaboos

No. 14214

>>14211
Why do you think I'm heated? Because I don't see how it would help preserve board culture? At this point you can say anon spergouts calling randos scrotes is 'board culture', kek. I just don't see how removing that rule is going to randomly get rid of the crowd you want. Do you think they will just leave pick up and leave if the rule that isn't even advertised just disappears from the text?

No. 14215

>>14214
This
I mean they can already post here sans the gender attention whoring, and this rule only deters that which is a good thing

No. 14216

>>14214
People obviously mean the original board culture that they feel has been significantly changed for the negative in the past 12-18 months. I think it would change the atmosphere in a positive way, there would be less paranoia and calling people scrotes because it wouldn't matter if they were and it would at least stop attracting new users of that kind

>>14215
But it hasn't deterred it though, there was no gender attention whoring before the rule and if anything there has been an uptick in it since

No. 14217

>>14216
But then they wont get banned for it thus enabling it

No. 14218

>>14217
derailing, blogging etc will still all be bannable. I think you are really overestimating how many men have any desire to use this site, there wouldnt be anything to enable. This was never a problem before the rule and doubt it would be after. It could always be reinstated if the outcome is so horrible.

No. 14219

>>14218
Then why not just leave it as is if it doesn't matter to you which you keep repeating. You feel called out by it?

No. 14220

>>14218
Tbh I haven't been here long enough to know for sure, but just scrolling through old threads on /ot/ for example, I can clearly see robot posters advertising themselves.

No. 14221

>>14214
Because of how emphatically you're trying to explain your contention. If I misread I apologise. I'm just not here for all the uneccisarry man hating that's become the culture.

>>14216
>>14218
Agree.

>>14219
It doesn't expressly affect us but the amount of opposition towards men that has arisen on this site is frankly concerning. It's like LC is being moulded by mainstream divisive politics which is ultimately shutting down discussion. That's what bothers me and I'm sure many other anon's.

No. 14222

Admin, is Erin's thread permanently kill until we can get the sperg to stop posting? Are you planning to tag anything else in the thread? I feel like it would make it a lot easier to read if we could identify Erin again and this other DDLG fag. Maybe it's a reach but there's too much sperging going on in her thread for it to be milkless.

No. 14223

>>14222
I thought this too.

No. 14224

>>14221
Honestly anon, and I mean this in the kindest way possible, you seem too nice for imageboards. So what if women are mean to men here, people on other imageboards are mean to women. It's just board culture to be a huge cunt.

No. 14225

>>14224
Kek, thanks anon. People can hate on men, but it's usually to the point of derailment imo. I'm just not here for discussion being stifled because I've said something that implies to anons I'm male. I find it nitpicky, maybe I'm the only one?

No. 14226

>>14197
I hide threads that I don't care about but letting shit threads exist brings in unhinged spergs like the Nicole skinwalker who will leak over to ruin other threads.

No. 14227

>>14188
i personally don't want men to post cause we would just be /cgl/ again, and cow threads are already full of men reeing about anons being jelly uggos. but i also don't want people to think like >>14192 does. the amount of radfems/manhate on the site is annoying though and they're pretty aggressive. and they will come here because we advertise that we don't allow men. i wish anons would stop acting like the site is the same as it was 4 years ago. the misogyny thread was totally different than the dumpster fire PP thread that exists now, and that's because the general feel of the internet was different too.

No. 14228

>>14224
you are part of the problem.

No. 14229

Why the fuck are there people caping for men to be allowed to post here? Why? They can already post if they aren't obvious about their gender and probably do, but a lot of maleposters can't hide their male entitlement and want to shove their dick into everyone's faces at any given chance. You're doing all these retarded mental gymnastics about how "it would stop anons from accusing each other of being scrotes" that make absolutely no sense. Unless you're posting in the Pinkpill thread to deliberately whine about #notallmen or something you most likely won't be called a scrote unless you actually are one. And even if you are called one, who cares? Just move on with your life. I've been called tons of things posting on this board, including a scrote, and I don't give a shit. You faggots were here reeing about muh evil radfems and gendercrits for ages and when you got rid of them, you start talking about allowing men to post. Really makes one think doesn't it?

No. 14230

>>14229
This. Also lc isn't even that crazy when it comes to calling people scrotes, you guys should see cc kek

No. 14231

>>14227
Yeah agreed. You basically encapsulated my feelings perfectly.

>>14229
>Move on with your life
Coming from the anon that's reeeing for an entire paragraph filled with political generalisations. No one's shilling for men, we're having a discussion. The fact that you see it from that perspective "really makes one think", calm down we're all allowed to have input. LC didn't always have such rules so I'm not understanding why are you acting like our discussion is a new, unthinkable form of airborne cancer? Realistically, this shouldn't be such a contentious topic. We're all aware men are still able to post without flouting their masculinity, it's just the rule is attracting anons who're modifying the board culture for IMO the worse. If you disagree that's fine, but if anything you're the only one reeeing here.

>You faggots were here reeing about muh evil radfems and gendercrits for ages and when you got rid of them, you start talking about allowing men to post. Really makes one think doesn't it?


This is literally the first time I've posted in /meta/, but nice try anon. Broad generalisations really aren't helping your narrative.

No. 14234

>>14231
This is exactly how I feel. Men literally don’t even factor into my thought process, Its not that I ‘want men to post’, im not looking to be some martyr for the downtrodden men of lolcow as some people are choosing to interpret it, I’m not thinking about them at all, I’m thinking about the site and the culture of the board and all this ‘makes you think’, ‘are you complaining about the rule because you feel called out by it’ conspiracy bullshit is exactly what I’m talking about. We can’t even have a discussion about it.

>>14229
You can’t just tell people they don’t get called a scrote and it becomes reality. It happens all the time, look in any thread in OT. It happens multiple times a day to me and I’m just one person, and I’ve never even posted in the pink pill thread, even in this thread a few posts up people have implied it. ‘Just get over it’ is not a helpful response. That is the point of this thread, everytime anons complain about this they are told either it doesn’t happen or to stop complaining about it in the ‘general COMPLAINTS and ISSUES’ thread…

No. 14235

>>14231
The rule doesn't say that men can't post here, the rule says they can't announce their gender via "male here" or just generally being obnoxiously obvious about being a man. This is to prevent this place from turning into /cgl/ like >>14227 said, if you want to take a look what kind of a cesspit that place turned into then feel free to. Or just go to CC, they're chock full of men.

Even if maleposting was allowed Lolcow would still be regarded as a "girlchan" and we would be getting scrotes shitposting just the same. That's why they were initially banned. /cgl/ allows maleposting and it gets that on the daily - "tfw no cosplay gf", "ugly whores jealous of my patreon waifu", "why do you hate male cosplayers", tranny caping, /pol/ derailing etc. The much bigger problem is people on Twitter constantly cowtipping and breeding shit userbase like the assblasted Nicole sperg above, I have yet to see the downside of banning people who announce having a dick and the rule has been in effect for like 5 or 4 years. But only now we're suddenly having a problem with it? Even the hardcore normie radfems fucked off to the new site and I haven't seen them around anymore.

>>14232

>We can’t even have a discussion about it.
We can't because the reasoning makes no sense for the reasons above. In the light of recent happenings (such as the kiwifarms tranny trying to buy the site off the admin just as the GC drama was going down and ham-chan samefagging to cause false flag posts) it's reasonable to expect plants trying to steer the board culture whichever direction they want to.

>>14233

Honestly if you can't get over people calling you names on an anonymous imageboard then you would probably be better off on Reddit or Twitter. People here are extremely cordial compared to a lot of other places where the discussion revolves 100% around low quality, aggressive shitposting and infighting.

No. 14236

>>14235
… - exactly, that’s my point. Without the rule, we would still be getting men shit posting, so it doesn’t detract them at all. What it does is attract women who would be attracted to a site that has banned men or banned men who ‘make it known their men’ which is now being interpreted as anyone who disagrees with you

- I see plenty of unrelated radfem sperging still, as do other people who have posted in this thread.

- the site is barely 6 years old. We have not had the no men rule for 5 years

- we are not suddenly complaining about it, this has been an ongoing problem with the culture of lolcow

- regardless of any ‘happenings’ on a totally different website, it’s not reasonable to accuse people who have an opinion you dislike of being plants, and people who you disagree with have every right to have a discussion on what they think would better the site

- I don’t care about being ‘called names’. This is such a disingenuous argument. I’m clearly talking about a single specific example of people constantly calling people scrote and it’s not because I can’t get over it it’s because it derails and stifles discussion etc. The exact same reason ‘hi cow!’ Is banned.

No. 14237

>>14236
>it’s not reasonable to accuse people who have an opinion you dislike of being plants

THIS. this is my main issue. calling someone a handmaiden for their differing opinion just implies they have beliefs you don't agree with, which is fine. calling someone a scrote/tranny is just shutting down the conversation. it shows a huge lack of respect for the person you're talking to. implying they are someone who isn't supposed to be on the site, which is fucking stupid.

No. 14238

>>14236
This still makes no sense. You want men to be allowed to post BUT they would be bannable for exhibiting male behavior such as asking for cow nudes or "male here"ing? It's basically the same rule that's already in effect. Falsely accusing someone of being a scrote and derailing the discussion with it counts as infighting/derailing and it's already a bannable offense. Just report it if it pisses you off for god's sake.

No. 14239

>>14238
NTA but i think you're confused, anon is just pointing out what the rule is and why, namely that we got rid of maleposting because of their behaviors, not because the site is/was anti-men. the ones who aren't blithering morons are fine because you can't tell they're not women.

No. 14240

There seems to be a lot of misinformation about the rules regarding male posters.
The rule goes as following (retrieved from the global rules in lolcow.farm/rules),
>Any posters with a phallus, do not come here for validation or to announce yourselves.

This rule has been in effect for quite some time now. Generally speaking the mod team interprets this as the following:
>Don't thirstpost asking for nudes
>No one cares if you'd fuck a cow
>No one cares of your "as a male…" Opinion
>Do not post asking for advice with women
>Do not come on lolcow this is soc where you can pick up women
>Tldr no scrotes

If a poster has integrated well and isn't breaking any rules, there is zero reason for us to ban them. We have zero reason to ban a well integrated contributing poster for simply being male. We have however given, albeit rarely, warnings to posters announcing their phallus status. If we guess your gender to be male, we won't ban you on that suspicion. Only if you outright state being male we will ban you or give a warning, based on your previous post history.

No. 14241

>>14236
are people really going to discount the fact that men do wander in here with the specific intent of larping and redpilling us roasties into adopting their beliefs? they do it fairly often. i think there is reason for people to be a little suspicious considering lolcow and crystal.cafe are both on their radar. and there's no amount of getting called any name that "derails" unless you respond to it rather than offering solid reasoning and explanations for whatever you guys are discussing. you obviously choose to engage with the accusation rather than ignoring it and continuing the discussion.

No. 14242

>>14241
lol. even if that was the case do you really think people who can be so easily swayed then it barely matters. farmhand just clarified that the site bans maleposting and that's all.

No. 14245

>>14242
>even if that was the case do you really think people who can be so easily swayed then it barely matters.
what? i made no mention of people being easily swayed, nor is that a concern of mine. the point i'm trying to make is that there are ill-intentioned men on the site that don't necessarily go out posting their dicks and saying "male here", and per the rules, they're allowed. they have a specific purpose to try to popularize their views and convert farmers. they do it in every female based community. it makes no sense to be upset that farmers are suspicious of people they suspect to be doing just that. if they're allowed on here, then why can't women call out what appears to be astroturfing? i don't even understand why anyone should care if they're offhandedly called male. ignore the suspicion and move on. i've never seen it derail anything unless the anon gets hung up about it.

it makes no sense, if men are allowed on here, why can't anons ask or suggest that the anon they're speaking to is male? men are allowed on here, but no mention of the fact that they're possibly or likely male, would be allowed? how would that be the fault of people who suspect anons to be male? additionally, if they make no mention of being male and larp as female, farmhands would have no clue anyways, so they're just as blind as we are. so, to even have a problem with people being suspicious makes no sense because of the nature of imageboards and our specific rules. honestly, from what i've seen, much of the time they do turn out to be men. not every time, but much of the time.

No. 14246

>>14242
>>14236
>>14221
I don't get it. This seems to be going on circles. Why should the rule be removed? Seriously who is helped by that?
Unfounded male accusations already result in bans, so how will removing the rule against maleposting fix things?
If Lolcow remains a girlchan like you say it will, the community you want gone will still be here anyway because it's a girlchan.
The only way that won't happen is if we actually do get multiple maleposters running free, going unbanned and thinking it's okay for them to come out, since nothing in the rules will state they shouldn't make their phallus known. How will we remain a "girlchan" then?

>>14208
>>14188
>But the reality is when there wasn't a no men rule, they didn't post.
>but the reality is not a lot of men if ever would post. We didn't have this rule for years and it has never been a problem that there has been a significant amount of men posting
This isn't true at all. We had multiple robot containment threads always leaking and random males infiltrating constantly. The rule against maleposting was made in the first place because it was so bad.
I can link to threads from 4 years ago talking about that very problem.

No. 14247

>>14246
lbr, that anon just wants lolcow to become /soc/.

No. 14248

>>14159
>>14150
This. The thread looked promising at first but then it really seemed like it's mostly the same 2-3 anons vendetta-samefagging. The actual milk seems to be in the people surrounding nicole, like her batshit insane stalker.

No. 14249

>>14242
>farmhand just clarified that the site bans maleposting and that's all
NTAYRT but right, this is exactly everyone's point and why we don't need an explicit rule allowing or banning males. Because as long as they integrate and don't say misogynistic shit, we should be none the wiser. That's how that works. It's how I as a woman went on 4chan and evaded being bombarded with "TITSORGTFO" and other sperging because I never explicitly said I'm female and switched pronouns when I wanted to talk about something. The reason why anons ever get called out for being scrotes is because they frankly say or have awful fucked up views about other women. I rarely see scrote accusations that are entirely undeserved. All the scrotes would have to do to blend in here would be to remember this is the one imageboard that doesn't revolve around their phalluses, and have some empathy for posters here. It's not asking much.

No. 14250

>>14236
Are you a tranny?

No. 14251

>>14248
Thats who Im thinking it was tbh. Adi is unhinged looking at her past and shit. Comparing color matching outfits and demanding nicole stalks leda when they tagged each other,have photos together, and were friends makes zero sense that 'nicoke is the skinwalker'. Vendetta-chan got confirmed to IP hop before the mod deleted their comment.thats the second snarky comment from a mod about Vendetta-chan that I missed out on capping. The shit thread should be locked since its confirmed vendetta and throw her back to the costhot thread.

No. 14252

>>14250
No but since you bring it up speculating people are trans is also so annoying and paranoid and happening too often, it is the exact kind of people something should be done about and imo this is a direct result of us having the rule phrased the specific way it is and even having it in the first place. Plus why should I care if someone is trans or a trans person posts? I don’t think the majority of users do because any actual derailing or blogging would be banned anyway. This is only viewed as something to speculate and accuse people of because of the phrasing of the rule. Who else is that rule going to attract than radfems? The rule serves no purpose and is literally just a dog whistle if anything. It has created the kind of culture that brought an influx of people like you and it hasn’t been good for the board

No. 14253

File: 1585158569773.webm (2.95 MB, 700x394, Le reddit whiteknights on le w…)

>>14252
>>14252
>just a dog whistle if anything
>brought an influx of people like you and it hasn’t been good for the board
The rule has been there for years, and it says nothing about no male posters. Farmhand already explained that it's to keep scrotes away who cant stop talking about muh dick. Let me guess, you also report people for using any of the following words FAGGOT, NIGGER, SLUT, TROON, FATTY, WHORE and MUDSLIME?

Fuck off you faggot nigger slut troon fatty whore mudslime. webm related, you on your way whiteknighting other faggot nigger slut troon fatty whore mudslimes.

No. 14254

>>14252
>Plus why should I care if someone is trans or a trans person posts?
Because that would explain why they'd want men to be allowed to openly shit up the website that badly. A little hint, if so much anons tinfoil you as a tranny or man that it bothers you, the problem might be you and/or the content of your posts.

No. 14255

>>14186
LC has been a female board since it's conception. If you want to go stroke the egos of males post on kiwifarms.

No. 14256

>>14253
Edgy and embarassing to the point it's probably larping.

No. 14257

>>14253
This unironically but in a way that's less cringe. It's a little ridiculous the level of handholding some people are requesting on an imageboard. So someone called you a scrote or a tranny once, get over it. Why are people trying to make this into a safe-space for men? Next we're going to ban the term incel and tranny too because it hurts people's feelings? What is even going on on lolcow.farm/meta/

No. 14258

>>14231
Green text is such a scote behaviour too. Nigga I can follow the conversation just find, you're not power leveling you fuck

No. 14260

>>14258
ntayrt, I think men shouldn't be allowed here and I am not even sure if you're sarcastic at this point but greentexting is a part of normal imageboard culture and also a way of quoting, what the heck

No. 14261

File: 1585160173685.gif (969.85 KB, 424x251, 18.gif)

>>14211
>autistic post from females
>the oh so dreaded male

No. 14262

>>14260
It's gay and autistic af, nice deletion of your green text post tho lol.

If you tag the post you're replying too why are you writing it out again.

No. 14263

>>14257
>>14255
>>14254
>>14253
I don’t care about men at all. I also don’t care about being called names or being called a scrote ‘once’. People are referring to the fact that people are being called scrotes extremely frequently and any time they express a differing opinion. It is having the same impact as ‘hi cow’. This is very clear and has been repeated multiple times, you are not arguing in good faith.

No. 14264

>>14263
Grow a fucking spine, you're anonymous, stop acting like a faggot then

No. 14265

>>14263
Then shut the fuck up if you dont care so much in every post you make.

No. 14266

>>14262
That's not the issue here anon.
And I dropped my image kek.

No. 14268

>>14188
>I just think it would be more fair if there was some kind of vote on the direction the majority of the userbase want the site to go in
Oh what a nice idea, we sure never had that before.

No. 14269

>>14252
First time asking a poster if their trans, i dont give a fuck honestly, but i’m trying to figure out why your so assblasted about a rule that only has positive benefits to our boards, what does “male here” posts and men being allowed to post bring to the table? Nothing to do with “hating” the opposite sex because we dont want their useless shitposts to not be bannable

No. 14270

>>14263
It;s curious that you'd ignore:
>>14246
>>14249
to only reply to anon asking if you're a tranny. Like they've crossed a line or struck nerves or something. It looks like you have not been posting in good faith.

But anyway this is a reminder that what you've been complaining about is already against the rules. If someone is calling you a male and it's really unfounded, they'd be banned for derailing. If not, they probably actually had a quite good reason to call you one. Consider the things you do post and be fair about how reasonable they are. If it's happening to you literally all the time, maybe you are the problem (sorry).

You told some wild mistruths about what this site was like before the rule was added so we kind of know you're not the most reliable narrator

To be honest, there are lots of boards that are friendly and welcoming to male posters. You can go there instead. Let this place be a female chan in peace, it's not killing you lol

No. 14271

>>14252
Spotted the tranny.

>>14270
>to only reply to anon asking if you're a tranny. Like they've crossed a line or struck nerves or something. It looks like you have not been posting in good faith.
^This. It's so obvious that anon's definitely taking the issue personally.

No. 14272

Yeah there are butthurt anti-feminist trannies on here. That's not new. They always end up outing themselves. Removing radfem threads weren't good enough for them, there is always something to whine about on LC - they would feel more at home on a site surrounded by fellow males for sure.

No. 14273

>>14272
Seconded. Given the gore and CP crap that was spammed across the site for a while last yeah they have been here for some time, not sure why people are shocked not everyone who posts here is female.

No. 14275

>>14272
one anon is always crying here to nuke ot and g completely. i dont know if it's a male or just a retard, but it's incredibly annoying and i really feel like a number of anons that are just "contributing" their opinion are trojan horses.

No. 14276

>>14262
>nice deletion of your green text post tho lol
I didn't write that post.
>If you tag the post you're replying too why are you writing it out again
Because I can reply to your points more clearly and you don't have to scroll back up to see what you wrote. The feature is there for a reason.
Sheesh, I actually thought you were being sarcastic, hearing greentexting is a scrote thing is the first for me.

No. 14277

>>14276
Why are you responding to an infight shitpost from 3 hours ago?

Tons of on-topic posts that actually address your arguments have been posted. You did this before with the "are you a tranny" shitpost as well

No. 14278

yall better get rid of /m/ before anything else which will never happen bc the farmhands are koreaboos(koreaboo hamchan)

No. 14279

>>14277
we aren't the same person. There is not just one person in the thread posting about it.

No. 14280

File: 1585174193141.jpg (105.76 KB, 612x612, 1561518329140.jpg)

>>14277
>Why are you responding to an infight shitpost from 3 hours ago?
Sorry I watched a movie and went back to this because it really perplexes me. Greentexting is like quoting on regular forums, do you go around accusing people of being male for quoting there too?
>You did this before with the "are you a tranny" shitpost as well
This is my third post now, all about the greentext thing, I really don't know which side you're even on I'm just laughing my ass off at greentexting being called scrote behaviour

I'll leave you to your fighting, have a good night.

No. 14281

>>14280
>I didn't write that post.
Which post? >>14260? I wasn't the one who said greentexting is scrotish fyi

I don't really know what's going on at this point, but goodnight. I hope this thread can be filled with replies that aren't troll b8 or shitposts

>>14279
What do you mean by "it"?

No. 14282

>>14281
I said it was scrote like behaviour because there's a couple of regular autists that overuse greentext in certain threads and they may as well sign off all their posts since they samefag up threads. It also reminds me of /pol/ tards and redditfags on my twitter that tweet in greentree format. It's just queer and a pet peeve of mine and I've noticed it's prevalent with neckbeards etc. Also it was a joke lol

No. 14283

Did tearzah's thread get taken down? I think people know her parents in person and involving a entire family in edrama was the reason it was taken down? I dont know the true reason

No. 14284

>>14282
… it.. It’s common on all image boards, im so confused

No. 14285

>>14282
If your paranoia is tickled by greentexting perhaps the problem is you. Go fuck off to reddit.

No. 14286

>>14282
There won't be any changes to the rules regarding maleposting. If you think that greentexting or typing in a certain way that doesn't emulate a teenage girl reads automatically as "male", you're part of the problem.
>>14283
It was in the catalog in /snow/.
>>>/snow/314257
We will continue banning anons who derail with scrote and tranny accusations. It's the "hi cow" of /ot/ that had bled to the other boards. 2 years ago this issue originated from a particular thread that had severe issues with ignoring male bait. It's also nice to note that the majority of anons with this issue are actually not frequent posters on the drama boards (to no one's surprise).
Regarding last week's canceled townhall, I'm unsure if anons would prefer me to reschedule or prefer a hellweek.

No. 14287

>>14278
>no u
ok

No. 14288

>>14282
LOL, anon you know greentexting as a thing is not only on every imageboard but ">text" is what signified a quote on literally every CSS based board ever that's why it's on chan boards.

No. 14289

>>14286
hellweek instead pls

No. 14290

>>14286
hellweek is preferable. too many bored quarantined anons shitting it up. it was funny for a few days but its annoying now

No. 14291

>>14290
Hellweek please. Hope you're feeling better by the way.

No. 14292

>>14286
>It's also nice to note that the majority of anons with this issue are actually not frequent posters on the drama boards (to no one's surprise).
Not this shit again, there's a thing called lurking.

No. 14293

>>14286
>It's also nice to note that the majority of anons with this issue are actually not frequent posters on the drama boards (to no one's surprise).
It's an entirely different thing to post to drama boards and to /ot/. I lurk plenty of drama threads but don't post that often because I don't want to shit up the thread quality with baseless tinfoiling or repeating what other anons have already said. In /ot/ you can post with a bigger volume because most threads are just chatting about some general topic and not documenting someone's drama.

No. 14294

>>14293
agree also the majority of the posts about it have even specified that it happens mostly in threads in OT so why would whether they're frequent posters in the drama boards even mean anything in this context

No. 14295

>>14294
Or it could mean that the anons obsessed with talking about how much they hate men, don't like men, don't generally go to /pt/ calling anons scrotes over greentexting or differing opinions. I'm someone who actually doesn't want the maleposting rule removed but this is annoying as shit and it should be a bannable offense like hi cow.

No. 14296

>>14295
I don't think most of us want the maleposting rule removed, we've just been trying to reiterate what and why the rule exists. i can definitely tell from what anons are saying ITT that admin and mods get tons of reports of "scroteposting" when it's not merited.

No. 14297

Maleposting anons should be honest and say they want PP anons out. They alluded to it but never outright said it.

No. 14303

>>14297
I'm not male but I want the peepeefags out

No. 14304

>>14297
I'm not male but would like the thread closed. I wouldn't care if it had just stayed as a containment thread but it just has ultimately attracted a lot of users who have made it so almost every thread gets derailed with pink-pill related sperging.

I view a lot of the gender talk kind of how I view race related debate in that i'm sure there are many valid aspects of what people are saying and think these are important topics but its no less annoying to read about and have every conversation centre it. It will always cause infighting and derailing just because of the nature of the topic

No. 14305

I think it's still on auto-sage, so can a mod/Admin check out the >>>/snow/>>687916 thread? It looked like it was nonstop Brianna defending herself, but it was put on auto-sage before anyone actually looked into it.

No. 14306

>>14304
If you got rid of pp thread you can expect the other boards to include more of it as the containment would be gone. Also, unsure how anons complaining about usually one man in their life in vents, annoying, or relationship advice warrents a full deletion of pp. Pp is the dislike for men and a handful of political opinions that everything is man-centered as well as bad for women. There's a load of red and black pill communities for men out there. That doesn't mean all negative complaints about someone's gf, mom, coworker are on the same level.

Not pp: why are celebrity threads in ot if we have m? I'd assume the Manson thread would be m or pt, rockcows in m, breadtube is media, and celibricows are definitely part of the media. All of kpop is contained into m I dont see why western or European can't be as well.

No. 14307

>>14304
What threads have been derailed by pp "sperging"?

No. 14308

>>14306
I think because those threads are drama related not interest in that specific media related.

No. 14309

>>14304
>almost every thread gets derailed with pink-pill related sperging

What sorts of posts do you count as pp sperg because I have not seen anything like that.

No. 14310

>>14309
>>14307
you guys always claim that you never see it, but admin and mods always confirm it happens. just go on /ot/ and search threads for "manhate" and see the bans.

No. 14311

>>14309
idk about every thread but the reddit hate thread had a farmhand reopen it and say to keep pink pill related stuff in pink pill and it just turned into man-hate all over again.

No. 14312

>>14310
Either I'm technically illiterate or this is some mod-only feature because I can't find a "search from threads" function, only the generic google search that returns threads. And even those results are only the pp threads and the dead 2X thread migration post. Or you're straight out lying.

No. 14313

>>14311
i just checked, out of recent ones, there are a few posts about troons, a guy exploiting his dying wife. reddit is like 79% male and almost all of them are shitty people broadcasting how shitty they are for upboats or whatever. not surprising that people are posting about the posters who are almost all male.

No. 14314

>>14312
Ctrl+F, search manhate scrote or troon in OT and compare it to any other board. Bonus points when you do an advanced google search of "troon" "scrote" "handmaiden" and watch which board it appears in.

No. 14315

>>14314
>The same results of only PP threads
This is the most retarded reach I've ever seen, anon. I have no idea why you're insisting on something as autistic as this but if it's the hill you want to die on then go off I guess.

No. 14316

>>14311
i mean reddit posters are mostly men? whats ur point

No. 14317

>>14316
that you can't focus on reddit content without reeing about how much you hate men and troons, probably

No. 14319

>>14315
do you not know how to ctrl+f search in a thread?

No. 14320

>>14314
So using the word scrote or troon is "pinkpill shitting up the board" for you?

No. 14321

>>14317
NTA but Reddit is mostly just men and trannies. There's really no way of helping it.

No. 14322

>>14310
>you guys always claim that you never see it
If several of us are saying that then it sounds like the problem is with you.

No. 14323

Is anyone going to be making a new Venus angelic thread or….?

No. 14324

>>14323
make it yourself?…

No. 14325

Can someone lock this absolute garbage fest of an OP?
>>>/pt/766091

No. 14326

Where can the recent iDubbz/Anisa drama be discussed? Seems like Anisas theread was locked.

No. 14327

>>14326
it belongs in twitch general now
>>>/snow/497011

No. 14328

the blogging and moralfagging in tnd’s thread is getting bad again

No. 14329

>>14322
no. no it's not. like i said, despite you ignoring that, admin and mods notice the problem. the issue is you idiots pretending it doesn't exist to try to shut down discussion.

No. 14330

>>14329
Seriously. It's only this one person responding around the same hour every time lol

No. 14332

>>14330
if this was true why would the mods and admin repeatedly refer to there being a problem, why wouldnt they just say 'this doesn't happen, and it's just one person samefagging'

No. 14333

>>14332
Not everything they do requires a redtext or a verbal mention from them. Samefags usually get red texted only when its repeated to make a point. Otherwise mods have been less and less redtexting lately and unfortunately this thread is a wate of time for them to reply in because idiots derail when they get kicked out of their thread. Mods don't interact as much anymore because of idiots. That's basically it. Did you not see how long it took them to callout vendetta chan on the Nicole thread? Months and then the mod deleted their snarky reply about knowing that anon IP hops.

No. 14334

>>14333
or it's just genuinely a problem multiple people have noticed

No. 14335

While it does happen, i dont see the big issue, it gets banned when it needs to be and is irrelevant

Also it could be several anons from european countries, not everyone is a burger. I have been called a samefag a million times even when i know there are other posters than me.

No. 14336

>>14335
Just ignore and report anons derailing for calling out samefag id they are wrong. Don't bother trying to argue with them. Why get so assmad about anons calling you out unless you feel like its a justified callout?

No. 14337

>>14336
why do people always say this it's so stupid, people say it about scrote and troon accusations too…wouldn't it be more annoying if it's undeserved and baseless? Why would being annoyed indicate it's justified?

No. 14338

>>14329
You ignored quite a few posts yourself for some reason. 

>>14330
No. Maybe if the people making those claims for 3+ months now actually showed which posts they are talking about like everyone else making complains in these threads, other anons could see it too or at least understand. Unless you really count using the word troon or scrote as pinkpill leakage. Also, Reminder: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSf5PbEsi4RhoxPoXUfpBGBEGx75XE11UShQjIKvFPFMkBDTNw/viewanalytics

No. 14339

Please help us reach next month's server bill goal, anything helps. https://www.patreon.com/farmhand
It's going to be difficult for staff to fund server costs in the next following weeks.

No. 14340

>>14339
Is donating anonymous? I've never used Patreon myself so I have no idea. How much do you need? Please put up a sticky in every forum Farmhands.

No. 14341

>>14339
I can chip in if there is an anonymous way of donating.

No. 14342

>>14339
I would love to donate though, but yeah. Any anonymous way? What about a kofi or something? I feel like patreon is a bad place for this. A lot of cows will probably demand it be taken down if they find out and tbh they would win as a site like this is considered bullying and against ToS. I also request constant post showing that the money being withdrawn and put towards the site and no one's poockets. Basically proof of fund use which shouldn't be that much to ask.

No. 14343

>>14329
I said several because you keep responding to different people like we are all the same, the only idiot here is you.

No. 14344

Isn't patreon quite anonymous too? You only need a username and a credit card or paypal. I don't think the other info gets checked.

>>14342
Yeah, seconding ko-fi or other one-time payment options.

No. 14346

>>14343
This, the only samefag here is that anon. Oh the irony

No. 14347

>>14342
Ko-fi doxxes the creator, otherwise we would be using kofi. You can make a burner patreon account. Patreon doesn't show payment info on either end. The biggest downside would be having to unsubscribe for 1 time payments.
>>14342
This issue was considered 2 years ago by the previous Admin. The patreon is fine and up.
The server costs and additional info are on the patreon page. The patreon has been around discreetly for a while but if people want proof of payments or withdrawals it can definitely be provided.

No. 14348

>>14339
you bitches better donate especially when you want to scream about how the site needs to change for your own agenda. get your pocketbook out

No. 14349

>>14347
i just made my first patreon. im trying to donate but its blocking me from making the payment, saying i should reach out to you another way.
any tips? do i have to complete my profile first?

No. 14350

>>14349
Not currently at my PC but shoot me an email if you still have issues or errors.
To donate anonymously just make a burner email or use an email not tied to you in any way, make a username you never use anywhere else.

No. 14351

>>14346
>>14343
>n-not all manhaters!

if it doesn't apply to you, ignore it. i quoted two idiots saying the same thing, notice how i said "you guys" and not, "you specific anon" also you refers to collective people. your reading comprehension is about as bad as your shitty copes.

No. 14352

The Marilyn Manson thread needs to be placed in snow instead of offtopic.
>>>/ot/534211

No. 14354

Is it expensive to run this site? Is there a goal amount?

No. 14355

>>14350
i was brought up before but are you able to implement brave rewards? ill donate my bat monthly if so

No. 14356

Can we please clean up, autosage or straight up lock the Lillith thread? It's just a bunch of non integrated newfags posting memes and infighting with eachother, or nitpicking. It's been that way for months.

No. 14358

Can we unlock the Anisa Jomha thread? There's been a lot of milk lately with the idubbbz response.

>>>/snow/930390

No. 14359

There‘s one or several spergs in the Manson thread, can anything be done about it?

No. 14363

>>14351
Not as shitty as your attempt at a walkback kek.

No. 14364

>>14363
>walkback
Way to show off how ""integrated"" your kind is. And anon's point was that even admin has acknowledged that manhate/PP anons are shitting up the site, the only ones who refuse to acknowledge it are the manhaters themselves. Either your reading comprehension is shit, or you're ignoring that fact on purpose, and we all know which one it is.

No. 14366

>>14364
Kek so you've moved on from making out several anons are the same person to samefagging, not surprising. Do you have any actual complaints that havent already been aired to add or do you just want to keep flailing like a petulant child?

No. 14367

Can a farmhand clarify the warning in the Erin thread? It's not tinfoiling to post @nyabuns right? Because we have confirmed its her several times over in the thread.

No. 14368

>>14367
Also on that note I want to ask why there seems to be a clear double standard among some cows. For example legacy cow Dakota's thread is about 90% tinfoiling and speculating on whether or not she has a work visa/got married and it doesn't really seem to get banned. Just curious.

No. 14369

>>14364
You already got what you want, just hide the thread or leave if the words trigger you so much jfc.

No. 14370

>>14369
Can't have the wamenz talking bad about the glorious male half of the species, it hurts their feefees!

Hilarious that anon is offended by the word "scrote" or "troon" while conveniently ignoring a lot of GC/"pink pilled" women are traumatized women who don't have as many safe and accessible places to congregate and vent as the males who hate them do.

No. 14371

>>14369
>>14370
are you idiots ignoring the fact that admin made "hi scrote" a bannable offence for the hell week or..?

No. 14372

>>14371
it hasn't even started yet, calm down

No. 14373

>>14372
lol. the point is that admin clearly thinks it's a problem. give it up and stay in your shitty containment thread. hide this thread if it's triggering you so much to see how annoyed people are about you.

No. 14374

>>14373
>lol
absolutely seething

>stay in your shitty containment thread

i don't even post in the thread but ok dude

>hide this thread if it's triggering you so much

shouldn't you do the same?

No. 14375

>>14370
Is that what the anon meant by "PP sperging in other threads" because if so thats pretty stupid.

No. 14376

>>14375
Apparently, because they have ignored that specific question for 4 times now.

No. 14379

The host server is lagging

>>14371
That has been a bannable offense for a long time now. What was that about integration again?

>>14373
How about you contribute to the server cost since your demands are endless? Maybe admin will then ban all the meanie biological women for you. You can even DM them and ask directly.

No. 14380

>>14371
It's basically the same as saying "hi cow"

No. 14381

>>14379
>How about you contribute to the server cost since your demands are endless?
Lol rekt

No. 14382

>>14364
>your kind is
This anon be sounding like a karen who wants to speak to the manager, much like >>14373

>>14379
Kek exactly! Also true as >>14380 says saying hi [anyone/anything] is bannable, not the term in itself afaik. Also who throws a shitfit over a word ffs? Admin got enough to deal with.

No. 14384


No. 14385

>>14384
then why are y'all still bitching

No. 14386

>>14375
NTA but to the anons bitching about "PP sperging" they count anons venting about their straight out abusive husbands/boyfriends in the vent thread to be "PP sperging". Put the pieces together.

No. 14387

>>14386
not an anon that's been involved in this convo but this isnt what I consider pp sperging. I wish I could find the post, but a few months ago there was an anon in one of the vent/dumbass shit threads or whatever that made a post that had absolutely nothing to do with men. two anons replied to it MAKING it about men for absolutely no reason and started sperging about men for no reason in particular. thats the kind of thing I consider pp sperging

No. 14388

>>14384
See it yourself because I just reiterated whats in >>14286 so why are you replying to me dumbass.

>>14385
This.

>>14386
Ty anon then thats doubly stupid given its a vent thread.

>>14387
I will say last year there was an issue with the sperging, but I came back recently and browsing /ot/ there really isnt or at least, none that I saw. And when I asked in this thread got accused of being another anon. Go figure.

No. 14390

>>14388
I dont really read /ot/ anymore but I do see some pp sperging around in other places sometimes. Like here in the baby thread >>>/g/133698 which I have to say definitely has no place in that thread lol. But, maybe it's gotten better overall since pp came back by itself? As I said I dont really read /ot/ these days

No. 14391

>>14390
that read as bait to me anyway

No. 14393

Can mods link to the new Kelly Eden thread on her old thread? I tried to do it but kept getting a popup that says the max number of replies has been reached. Please and thanks!

Her old thread:
>>67849

New thread:
>>87873

No. 14394

admin sama can we have the anisa thread back plz can we at least have it on /ot/ we will take anything pls leafy did a response on her and she has been super milky as of late

No. 14395

>>14394
Give it up already

No. 14396

>>14395
yeh you're right lol rip

No. 14399

Vendetta-chan is back in the Nicole thread, mods. Dude doesn't think we can't tell their posting style and obvious 'uwu' posting and old milk again.

No. 14404

Persistent tard alert. Spamming the YT thread on ot.

No. 14405

Can one of you dear mods please finally ban the obnoxious ana-chan in the corona thread? She's been sperging about a dead nurse's weight since 2 days already and now she posts other stuff related to her eating disorder. Off topic and extremely immoral.

No. 14406

>>14405
>extremely immoral
Tsk tsk, well I never!

No. 14407

So I take it that you just don't give a fuck? Or was it one of the mod team sperging? Would make sense since that was also a weeb living in Japan. You have time to ban people for the harmless offense of not posting a pic because "this is an imageboard", but not this?

>>14406
Cunt.

No. 14408

>>14407
There was more than one sperg and they both got banned. Not every ban gets redtexted. We've said this many times before but I suppose we need to repeat this again.

No. 14409

>>14408
Why do you chose to redtext absolutely minor bans but not this? Had you redtexted the first sperg, this could have served as a warning for the others who followed. They continued for 2 days, how could I or we know that you actually already banned them?

No. 14412

>>14409
maybe don't reply to bait.

No. 14414

>>14409
>thinking redtext deters spergs

No. 14415

>>14407
>Cunt
banned and redtexted for being a weenie meanie

No. 14417

>>14409
Echoing others, you just gotta not reply to the bait.

HOWEVER, I think any kind of extreme sperging like anachan reees should just be deleted (I noticed a mod doing this to one sperg yesterday so thank you for that whoever you are). Like what happened to robot raid posters. Leaving the posts up just causes anons who haven't caught on or who just want to argue to reply and clog the threads up more. If the problem posts are simply deleted, then no one can split hairs over what's redtexted or what isn't because posters who obviously just want to break the rules just…won't be enabled with an audience anymore. Not suggesting immediate censorship, but I think you guys have the abilities to look into IP histories and see who's just having a sperg moment versus someone who just comes here to stir shit constantly. /2c

No. 14418

>>14417
deleting posts just because someone didnt like them would be going down a dangerous slope. theres a big difference between robot raids and an anachan having a anachan moment

No. 14419

>>14418
You new? The decision to outright delete r9k raid posts was made (gosh, has it been two years ago or more?) and it had a great effect of reducing the amount of raids when robots realized nothing they typed would stay up to be read by anyone. There's already precedent. It's not about deleting posts someone doesn't like. Which is why I brought up the ability to look at poster history to determine if they're shitposting assholes or if they just are saying something unpopular.
Why do anachans get to take out their shit across multiple threads when no other subcategory of anon posters are allowed to do the same? Kpop sperging stays in kpop, pinkpill sperging stays in pinkpill. Those are the terms a majority have agreed to on this website and there's nothing unreasonable about it.

No. 14420

>>14419
you sound new as fuck actually.

No. 14421

>>14420
that anon’s being completely reasonable in their assertions.

No. 14422

We delete posts/threads if it's spam, raid, continuous vendetta (in the case of Repzilla), or if the poster has exhausted ban evasion to the point their posts will just be deleted by staff. This is only done with 100% certainty, I've felt at times that someone was writing some sort of bait but if we aren't sure we just leave it. People eventually out themselves as trolls anyways, in the case of hamchan or necessarysped4.

No. 14423

>>14422
I gotcha, well good to know the worst do get addressed then. I saw it yesterday so kudos there at least.

No. 14425

I get she’s not milky but if pt is a legacy board would Kota not belong on pt?

No. 14426

>>14425
Imo Kota shouldn't even have a thread anymore. Her anti asian and lesbian scene queen drama was way over a decade ago, her going viral and moving to Japan also close to a decade, she hasn't produced real milk in years, she's no longer fat and lately she doesn't even shoop much anymore. She once was my favourite cow and the reason I even found lc, but now I think she grew up for real and should just be left alone. Being a weeb who lives in Japan, does low profile modelling work, who might or might not be married doesn't warrant a thread.
Unless there's soon a sudden turn in events like with Venus you should just autosage or close it.

No. 14427

>>14426
agreed. her threads have essentially been dead for at least 2 years now

No. 14428

I feel like the people on this site are just as freaky as the users they stalk and are either daily party goers desperate for attention or people who hate attention and intentionally harass others but hate attention(ban evasion)

No. 14429

>>14428
Is this a complaint or an issue or did you just come here when you could have posted this shit in another thread?

No.