File: 1682877356090.png (73.44 KB, 700x700, 1650964817920.png)
No. 1563535
You probably are not alone in your opinion.
Previous thread:
>>>/ot/1548948
>adhere to site and board rules>do not respond to bait>report and ignore trolls or obvious maleposters instead of replying like an idiot No. 1563540
File: 1682877599559.jpg (27.72 KB, 400x356, 1631289584797.jpg)
Who is making these threads with these images
No. 1563626
>>1563621>child rapists>"normies"Only the pedotroon would say this
and accuse others of being him at the same time
No. 1563658
File: 1682885298796.png (190.2 KB, 467x338, 9o8ej7buia451.png)
No. 1563692
>>1563688Isn't most shota fujo shit?
>>1563632 was talking about anorectal violence on 2D boys. Doesn't matter either way, though.
No. 1563737
>>1563734And you're saying it's healthier and more normal to get off to child rape drawings than experience real intimacy? What is wrong with
you?
No. 1563744
>>1563737Because moids actually harm people.
>>1563740You are the self-admitted pedo if you think drawings and rape are the same.
No. 1563753
>>1563749You're being dense on purpose, are you trolling or are you actually this delusional? She's making the point that you
can't post your disgusting CP drawing fetish because it will be removed and you will be banned, she's challenging you because you keep saying it's healthy to get off to drawings of children being raped.
No. 1563754
>>1563747i think she honestly believes the cope she's spewing like
>>1563744most pedophiles have some kind of justification for it, like "i was robbed of a childhood" or "i'm retarded and get along with kids better" or "i just really like kids media." "all real men are rapists" is probably the shittiest excuse i've ever heard of but here it is.
No. 1563756
>>1563752No one is even denying that you absolute piece of filth, we are saying that you ARE STILL A PEDOPHILE. And you are not SUPERIOR to a male who touches kids just because you are getting off to drawings. You ARE still producing harm because your consumption of the depiction of child rape contributes to the demand for that sickening content, and that sort of behaviour can and WILL escalate and for many of you sickos will lead to consumption of real CP or offending. You are on a slippery slope. You have not
currently caused any physical harm. You are
NOT innocent and you are
NOT better than a moid who consumes lolicon because you are a woman and you are
NOT better than other pedophiles because you consume shota. YOU GET OFF TO THE THOUGHT OF CHILD RAPE.
No. 1563770
>>1563765>>1563760Literally only a retard would respond with "kys" when their shitty self-contradicting logic is called out.
>>1563766How is it changing the subject? Read both posts.
No. 1563779
File: 1682888316750.jpg (111.07 KB, 750x896, 1682887669846.jpg)
No. 1563788
File: 1682888474513.png (Spoiler Image,508.86 KB, 2522x3272, husbando.png)
>>1563771Someone literally posted this in the husbando thread yesterday, and have you forgotten how many camgirl threads we have where their porn gets posted? Have you ever seen the type of porn that get's posted in the bad art thread? Perhaps you're just new, but I'm not sure why you're lying like this. Porn, drawn or real, has never been against the rules except under certain circumstances.
No. 1563789
File: 1682888483337.jpg (42.23 KB, 622x622, 7d4b866e3017dbf878d26c0c427d94…)
>>1563621Nevermind. You're right, it's him again. Also lol at him seething in cursives again and samefagging within seconds.
I sure am glad staff is so hesitant on banning him, so that he keeps shitting up threads like this.
No. 1563849
>>1563843No one denied that. No one denied that. No one denied that. How many times do you want me to say it? No one denied that. Actual offenders are of course
worse and more dangerous than someone who gets off the drawings. Both are pedophiles. Both contribute to the demand for explicit child abuse material whether it be real or depicted, both contribute to the mind rot and escalation of pedophilic behaviours. Obviously actual rapists are
worse, they're still both pedophiles.
No. 1563860
>>1563857This site is vehemently against any real life porn, many weeb anons consume hentai of their husbandos, but those are
adult depictions, not child bodies. You're not asking in good faith, you're asking because you have brain damage.
No. 1563877
>>1563876Yeah, perhaps, I don't see how this makes it less bad that a person regardless of their gender is sexually aroused by the depiction of child rape. Both are still bad, both are still evil. One is causing direct harm to people, one is contributing to the demand. One is worse,
obviously, that fact does not erase the other. Both are true at the same time.
No. 1563880
File: 1682891501522.jpg (102.67 KB, 640x853, z9fy37f24sb71.jpg)
>You either have no reading comp. or you're actually pulling mindgames. Anti moids = Moids who call themselves "antis" and obsess over drawings to "prove" they're no creepy
No. 1563911
>>1563907I can't believe the mind games you will play with your own self to defend
any sort of pedophilia because it's a woman consuming it and because men are obviously worse. You're so fucking stupid it's astounding.
No. 1563920
>>1563486Notice how the vast majority of them are male, and the few women either sound like they had serious issues other than being pedos (man, who even knows if they're all women and not just trannies), or just acted in dumb ways such as not properly censoring CSAM or questioning people about it in insensitive ways (irresponsibly handling the CSAM that they found unwillingly).
A couple of those tweets are about a company that censored pedoshit or went after pedos (PlayStation, CNN) and one of their male executives was outed as one. How is that proof that everyone who finds loli and shota disgusting is a secret pedo?
Several of those moids also seemed to like loli and shota or virtue-signal about 14 year olds being totally ok while hating on the pedos that like younger kids, it's typical degenerate scrote infighting about who's the most morally correct degenerate and what form of pedophilia is more correct. Pedo moids virtue-signalling to hide their actual degeneracy is common, yes, just like "male feminists" who are rapists. But how does that make women pedophiles when they think loli and shota is pedophilia? Moid-tier argument. You know moids are more tolerant to pedoshit in anime than women, why aren't there nearly as many female hypocrites as male ones?
And also, this list of hypocrite virtue signaling pedos doesn't make loli/shotafags pure and innocent angels either, plenty of pedos like both real and drawn CSAM. Tons of artists who draw it use real life children as reference. I remember one time many years ago I went on gelbooru (before pedoshit was filtered for non-users) and one of the recently uploaded pics that showed up in the first page was lolicon with disturbingly realistic and detailed anatomy. A few minutes later, it was gone from the first page. That's how I found out that they have a rule against highly realistic pedoshit drawings. Now imagine all such art that you don't see because it's quickly censored for being
too close to real children. Pixiv doesn't seem to censor it because I've accidentally gotten some of those results sometimes when looking through random tags with the R-18 filter off.
Also
>>redditThat's how I know you're either a scrote or have spent too much time around channer scrotes. We all hate Reddit for several reasons but that's a post about something real that's actually going on on Pixiv (I'm not even any of those other anons, just so you don't think it's something one person made up). It being reddit doesn't make us "automatically lose the argument", I could say the same thing about you posting Twitter threads as proof that hypocritical anti-loli pedos exist. And just because we've had enough of your shotafaggotry doesn't mean we love and respect lolifaggot scrotes either, but you already know this, yet you keep using it as an argument because you have nothing else.
No. 1563921
>>1563857Because one is normalized, a lot of anons won't say it here as they know it's wrong, but they really will defend the real life
abusive porn over the other and pretend not to see their scrotes get into it. That's just life, men decide what's accepted in the broader culture, and it's contradicting but whatever.
No. 1563942
>>1563930>antisWhat the fuck is this twitterfag language lmao
The fact is that women are more likely than men to find pedophilia and "hebephilia" disgusting in fiction, yet you don't hear about female pedophiles as often as men. And why the fuck are you talking about hypocrite scrotes to prove that women who hate shotafags are in the wrong?
>If a real child is traced or their photos are used in AI, that's not "just a drawing", that's literally just traced CP. How are you this dense?If your pedo drawings are not tied to real pedophilia just because they're more stylized than the photorealistic shit, why are they children? Why do you get off to representations of children at all? Child voice, young age, "innocence", extreme neoteny, it all screams pedophile to me and anyone with a normal brain. Stop making excuses
No. 1563970
>>1563957No offense but how many moids did you bone for this to become such a
triggering topic?
Oof No. 1563973
>>1563970I just don't carry as much internalized misogyny as you, didn't realize defending another woman's right to have sexual partners was me being
triggered. You are really embarrassing.
No. 1563977
File: 1682895748320.png (160.27 KB, 459x459, 1658806704224.png)
>but what about xxx ??
>checkmate antis, y-you are now the pedo troons, n-not me!!
No. 1564084
>>1564062It's almost as though women with "high body counts" have been indoctrinated and groomed their entire lives. Oh well, though, good thing
you aren't stupid enough to sleep with a man, right? Wow, these women really set us all back. Especially the ones who actually
choose to have sex with men. Absolutely disgusting. And they are so defensive about it, too, at least own up to your self degradation, am I right?
No. 1564117
>>1564115I don't consent,
nonnie will add herself to my body count
No. 1564628
File: 1682961978084.jpeg (27.2 KB, 475x240, 9A137E0C-DC5E-426C-B7B5-0C2B3C…)
>>1564613I’ve never encountered this myself but I immediately thought:
No. 1564648
>>1564625because I've only ever seen it occur with white woman.
>>1564628it's extremely prevalent in the k-pop community (not that I'm apart of it)
No. 1564704
>>1564685This sounds like you trying so, so hard to be True and
Valid and not like those other disgusting bihetties!!1
No. 1564745
I’m
>>1564685 and i didn’t expect so many of these replies shitting on me lol. i thought it was a relatively benign post but apparently not. I have never dated or been with a man otherwise so the replies saying i center men are kinda unnecessary. I feel like shit now and I’m sorry that I seemingly offended you guys. It wasn’t my intention. I wasn’t making fun of anyone liking straight girls I just said I don’t get it. I even made that clear at the end. #
Time to take a break from this hell site again
No. 1564951
File: 1682979841205.jpg (17.71 KB, 474x294, .jpg)
>>1564818Its a popular lifehack these days.
No. 1565144
File: 1682985505269.jpg (33.32 KB, 638x620, 54864.jpg)
I'm one of those "pickmes" that compliments women with her bf (I'm bisexual and he's not, it doesn't really happen the other way around). We don't sexually harass women in public or whatever but when a new song by our favorite shared artist drops we both say stuff like "I love her so much she's mine" etc., talk about actresses being hot, comments like that. I think it's because my bf and I started out as friends for a long time and I didn't like him romantically for a while – I wanted my ex from the moment I saw him and I was raving with jealousy when he so much as looked at another woman. I think the dynamic is just a little different when you have a history of platonic banter. And also I think the experience of being jealous and worried all the time in my last relationship changed me a little. My ex was so respectful, he never flirted with other women and treated them with respect, but I felt stressed all the same and he ended up cheating on me. If my current boyfriend is making me feel so at ease, there's probably a reason for that.
That being said I would never shame other women for having boundaries kek it makes me cringe when a woman goes out of her way to let everyone in the comment section know that she is very cool and oh so liberated. Women are allowed to have literally whatever boundary they want, they don't need some weirdo with an ulterior motive telling them to "lighten up".
No. 1565391
>>1565208i agree
>>1565194make it only for women. Scrotes are hideous past 25
No. 1565432
>>1565399good for you, go share your moldy scrote with all of the other low self steem pickmes.
>>1565408babifying moids is the most pathetic thing i have ever heard of. I understand not liking 20yo men but seeing them as babys is so retarded, i will never understand that mindset.
No. 1565560
File: 1683002912582.jpeg (103.86 KB, 666x1015, 6EA41117-DD3F-43F4-B027-631E3E…)
>>1565555So you’re telling me if I find this man attractive I’m a pedophile?hes 20 here. Such a small innocent child.
No. 1565570
File: 1683003273827.jpeg (49.54 KB, 500x658, C5421690-986A-4FB0-8AF1-B3CA11…)
>>1565565You’re not going to gas light me into thinking being attracted to adult men is pedophilia
No. 1565577
File: 1683003466349.jpeg (57.75 KB, 736x968, 2FCE6094-F55D-47DD-BF78-919CA0…)
>>1565573If you’d turn down a very attractive man because he’s in his early 20s you’re just stupid.
No. 1565803
>>1565576Anon you’re a retarded misogynist. A 22 year old woman finding her male peers attractive makes you feel like you’re reading about 45 year olds? That’s both delusional and hypocritical considering your literal fetish for old men. Stop trying to push some degenerate worldview onto the rest of us.
Men who created the law disagree with your opinion of their own cognitive development. Men who follow/study athletics disagree with your opinion on their physical peak. 20-23 year old men are not secretly 16, any random man will tell you that of his own experiences. You are spouting actual pedo propaganda.
>>1565579>anonymous poster doesn’t mind dating an undeniably adult 20 year old man>”raggedy old bitch”alright, you’re projecting something rank.
No. 1565804
>>1565576Anon you’re a retarded misogynist. A 22 year old woman finding her male peers attractive makes you feel like you’re reading about 45 year olds? That’s both delusional and hypocritical considering your literal fetish for old men. Stop trying to push some degenerate worldview onto the rest of us.
Men who created the law disagree with your opinion of their own cognitive development. Men who follow/study athletics disagree with your opinion on their physical peak. 20-23 year old men are not secretly 16, any random man will tell you that of his own experiences. You are spouting actual pedo propaganda.
>>1565579>anonymous poster doesn’t mind dating an undeniably adult 20 year old man>”raggedy old bitch”alright, you’re projecting something rank.
No. 1565806
>>1565576Anon you’re a retarded misogynist. A 22 year old woman finding her male peers attractive makes you feel like you’re reading about 45 year olds? That’s both delusional and hypocritical considering your literal fetish for old men. Stop trying to push some degenerate worldview onto the rest of us.
Men who created the law disagree with your opinion of their own cognitive development. Men who follow/study athletics disagree with your opinion on their physical peak. 20-23 year old men are not secretly 16, any random man will tell you that of his own experiences. You are spouting actual pedo propaganda.
>>1565579>anonymous poster doesn’t mind dating an undeniably adult 20 year old man>”raggedy old bitch”alright, you’re projecting something.
No. 1565832
File: 1683024212492.jpg (13.63 KB, 258x322, 1459070153262.jpg)
So many single, 30+ people in anime communities I have met are insufferable maladjusted manchildren/womanchildren. I don't judge everyone, but lately I had the unpleasant experience of meeting
>woman A - massive pick-me, plays loli VNs to seem retro and cool, secretly talks shit about others but pretends to be an uwu smol bean
>woman B - all she does all day on twitter is complain, complains about her job, complains about her super rare fibro-tier illness, complains about her favorite idol in a boy group getting less attention, complains about younger female fans
Nothing wrong with being single for life, but I don't know how to specifically name that group or reduce them to a single trait. They are immature adults yearning for attention and to fit in.
No. 1565838
File: 1683024474056.jpeg (52.7 KB, 638x705, AE35F939-14D6-4A51-AC29-6EA184…)
>>1565546I’m Gonna disagree with you slightly. the male wall is truly irrelevant not for what you said but because women by in large have made it so by hyping up the ugliest of men and continuously giving them the time of day/benefit of the doubt. That’s the true reason why the wall will never exist for men no matter how much they curdle by 25 nowadays. There will always be a woman gassing up a mid/unattractive man. To make himFeel uwu special and not Hurt his fragile little ego. Let’s be honest we all know a girl like that right now.
Straight Women give men too much power that is literally never reciprocated and then cry about it while continuing to coddle these same gremlins because you fucked them, you birthed them, you’re related to them, they acted good in a movie in 1982 once. The reasons are endless and all equally a depressing cope.
I would say about 55% of women are pick mes. Honestly it’s closer to 65-70% if we are being truthful. It’s really bleak I’m starting to notice. It’s so bleak now that you can’t even say you hate men anymore without a non binary girl correcting you. We are in hell. The males won and will continue to win because by in large women continue to give all their empathy to men and sage their contempt for other women. I hate it here. Please stop being empathetic to men I’m begging
No. 1565840
>>1565832Most self-identified weeaboos and people who have anime as a primary hobby are genuinely subhuman. Their whole identity is “cool, edgy, totally for adults” cartoons that are mostly just shallow run of the mill predictable shock value shit and coomerbait and cocomelon flashy colors and movement, collecting ugly mostly oversexualized plastic statues of the cartoons, and jerking off to said cartoons. No wonder they’re all socially maladjusted overgrown children who might as well be sucking their thumbs and drooling.
The worst is passing by them in Asian stores and markets and catching a whiff of their absolute reek. Weeaboos smell like literal garbage and they’re also ugly.
No. 1565852
>>1565840As someone who was a self proclaimed weeb for years and naturally fell off due to age and the community getting younger and more Insufferable I agree with what you said. Not the stinky and ugly part because I never knew those words even at peak weeb but the anime
Community is one of the worst communities I’ve ever had the displeasure of being a part of. They have the worst takes, the worst tastes and they are extremely ducking racist and misogynistic. I have no idea what it is about anime fans consuming content of literal underdogs being discriminated against for things they can’t change internalizing none of it and then come out a white supremacist. It blows my mind the older I get. But it also proves my theory that 99% of anime fans don’t even truly watch the anime they consume. They literally turn their brains off and just drool in front of a tv. They take 0 away from it aside from misogyny.
No. 1565853
File: 1683025501479.jpeg (36.6 KB, 637x478, 325E4FCA-CDEB-4C0F-A5D7-F8BD4F…)
>>1565848LMAO
nonnie said the call is coming from inside the house
No. 1565900
File: 1683030031286.png (356.12 KB, 644x461, 222.png)
not only women with masculine features have jawlines, most women do unless you're fat as shit. Seeing progress pics is always funny to me because when they lose weight they don't have a round face anymore. I never see skinny women without a jawline unless they have a crazy recessed chin.
No. 1565902
>>1565900>I never see skinny women without a jawline unless they have a crazy recessed chin.wait till you meet me.
t. has a double chin look even at 90 pounds
No. 1566018
>>1565900my face/head shape is so round with a really soft jawline and i'm 38 kilos ( granted i'm kind of short ) kek but tbf i have a slight overbite though never been a mouth breather. it helps that i have a flat face cause azn so it looks like i have cheeks when really i look like a russian sleep experiment
victim once i turn to 3/4th view kek what a blessing. the same goes for my family/parents. i feel like with a jawline i would look even more androgynous/masculine than i already am and i'm not into that for myself, i would look like a miniature skeletor
No. 1566220
File: 1683049263010.jpg (219.22 KB, 1209x1441, femskull.jpg)
>>1565900Wow women have jawlines i will not recover
No. 1566710
>>1565834Wanna know something sad nonnies
I'm late 20s and when doing online dating with people 25-30 range, if I go on their social media and see older pics of them from their early 20s they look so much hotter. Their hair is fuller, their body is fit, their skin looks nice, their style was better etc.
It happens 99% of the time. Even my last ex who was 30, I dated him in part because he was a gorgeous model in his early 20s but then became overweight and thinning hair by the time he had met me– of course during his prime hotness he was just pumping and dumping girls and not interested in settling down. I currently know a guy in his early 20s who is really hot but has mild acne, other than that he's like perfect aesthetically, jet black (still thick) hair, pretty yellow-blue eyes, obviously fit
But he left his gf whos in her early 30s bc he wasn't ready to settle down lol
By the time he's ready he's going to be ugly, its pretty rough
No. 1566811
>>1566710Not having dated as a teen/in my early 20s and at least once having got a cute chad makes me so sad.
Of course there are still some moids my age who are still attractive but their peak definitely happened earlier and you know that each passing year people just get worse and worse…
No. 1566826
File: 1683123960295.png (1.49 MB, 1461x2048, CH11P19-1461x2048.png)
After seeing so many panels and pages posted here, I finally read leasebound, and in my opinion, it's just not good. Aside from some off-topic pages, the actual relationship depicted is kind of cringe and boring, and And I don't wanna come across as a wokeoid or anything, but the way the black characters were portrayed felt a bit weird to me. I don't think the writer is racist or anything, but it feels like they're a fetishizing white liberal(the #thankablackwoman kind). For instance, the black and Samoan female characters are all strong and buff and easily beat men, and there's even a 10-year-old black girl who beats up a kid, which just felt strange and off-putting. some parts drag on for too long. Plus, I personally don't find the art style appealing. Just my two cents though, and it's possible that other people might have a different opinion on it.
No. 1566838
>>1566826agreed, it's really tryhard and unfunny. the antagonists are all ridiculous stawman caricatures that aren't even comical bc they're too forced. the protags are all pure smol beans. and of course all the protags are
woc and the bad guys are anglo; shalme that a lesbian
terf comic has he same issue as your average bloby-tier sjw comic
No. 1566840
>>1566826I respect the love she has for her ocs, if anything.
>>1566838Well most AGPs are "anglo" but it'd be interesting if she included a catty black HSTS kek. The art style may not be everyone's cup of tea but it is better than blobby. This comic definitely can be a bit on the nose like Blobby though, just look at those books in the background. Some Guy, Het Story, and Het Erotica. I like that she's picking out The Happy Potter though lawl
No. 1566979
File: 1683135464590.jpg (1.17 MB, 3024x4032, 7AMJBRH.jpg)
bumping
No. 1566997
File: 1683135998855.jpeg (123.15 KB, 990x1226, IMG_0992.jpeg)
Moids that are unattractive and not useful to society should be forced into labor camps. Instead of child laborers in foreign sweatshops we should have incel sweatshops in every country.
No. 1567192
File: 1683150899985.jpg (79.65 KB, 500x387, cXPJ8klb579hglg9FGzktvuk_500.p…)
Whomp's Fortress > Big Boo's Haunt > Cool, Cool Mountain > Tall, Tall Mountain > Bob-omb Battlefield >>> Tick Tock Clock >> Wet-Dry World >>>> Jolly Roger Bay > Snowman's Land > Rainbow Ride > Lethal Lava Land >>> Hazy Maze Cave > Dire, Dire Docks > Shifting Sand Land >>>>>>>>>> Tiny-Huge Island – generally speaking, the lower level levels are the worst, with the exception of Tiny-Huge Island which sucks ass, and Big Boo's Haunt, which is a honorary-ground floor level. The concept of the high level levels is the most fun, but sometimes they lack something in execution, which the ground levels do just right. This is also true for the Bowser levels, which is to say that the first Bowser stage is the most fun, the second one is the worst, and the third is just okay. Tiny-Huge Island sucks.
No. 1567642
>>1567184no it's the "all the
poc agree with my opinions that I'm very obviously pushing through my comics and everyone who disagrees with them is white" strawman that is reminiscent of typical gendie "sjw" comics
No. 1567823
>>1567296You're right, Dire, Dire Docks is okay, I'd actually put it above Lethal Lava Land. My only issue is that it's pretty forgettable to me, I only remember the first mission with the bigass submarine, and for some reason I hated it. But other than that, looking through the remaining missions again, it's pretty okay.
And while I'm already here again: Enemies to Lovers sucks too.
No. 1567829
>>1567700these female rappers are former sexworkers and strippers what do you expect, their way of earning a living is through pleasing and entertaining men. i have nothing against women in the sex industry but that's just the truth. women in the sex industry and in general who date
abusive males for money are being abused and cannot survive on their own or have a drug addiction, or worse have kids they need to worry about.
No. 1568030
File: 1683237313406.jpeg (42.74 KB, 549x536, IMG_3809.jpeg)
Most short people look deformed, the shorter they are the more deformed they look also.
No. 1568151
File: 1683247679419.gif (504.85 KB, 498x498, pikachu-pusheen.gif)
i love all the "pretentious snarky elitist academic enlightened pseudointellectual" (and so on) radfems on here! they motivate me to get back into reading feminist and socialist theory. people who complain about them are either moids, pakichan herself, or girls with huge complexes just like her.
No. 1568168
File: 1683251674935.jpg (28.93 KB, 550x545, b63db978b9db19dcad7e94226ff78d…)
>>1568161This is very Michiko Malandro, except she wouldn't let a man tell her what to say lol
No. 1568310
File: 1683274067542.png (38.06 KB, 566x840, Screenshot 5.png)
>>1566826someone commented on her portrayal of bw and this was her response.
No. 1568321
>>1568310>"Also, what kind of logic is this? Women shouldn't be strong and independent from men in media…Because men will use it to justify abusing women in real life?"She's trying so hard to defend her fetish for this very specific, damaging stereotype hypermasculising black women/little girls that was created by those same men. Like no shit men will use anything, but why is this made up shit what you choose tto operate from? Are there any normal or even femme black women in what you make, or are they all just tough and almost "inherently butch", even as children?
By her logic, someone might as well draw comics about tradwives sucking dicks being "empowering", and argue that since men will use anything to justify abuse, there's nothing questionable about it.
No. 1568400
File: 1683292016613.png (100.9 KB, 646x1034, Screenshot 3.png)
As an older sister taking care of my pre-teen brother I actually agree with this take, I'd 100% rather have boys and young men be listening to two minutes of "Joshua Graham/Batman gives you anger management advice" than 5 hours of Tate telling them rape is a fake crime or Vassh/Hasan Stream telling them that porn addiction is a rightwing conspiracy.
No. 1568481
File: 1683299680401.png (45.03 KB, 859x780, Screenshot_20230505_101517.png)
>>1568472if they are consistently violent and aggro, absolutely.
there is no place for this behavior in society and the fact it is accepted and encouraged is why women are attacked and harassed daily across the country
No. 1568665
>>1568472>Should all homeless people be killed?Yes. Most of them are violent drug addicted males anyway. Idk why people suddenly see them as poor
victims when they become homeless. They did this to themselves.
No. 1568813
>>1568462Why do you think the blonde guy is in the wrong? It's absolutely possible to accidentally strangle someone or crush their throat if they're on drugs and struggling and you don't really know how to old someone like that. The fact that nobody complained and two people calmly helped him restrain the guy suggests to me that it was indeed a kind of self defense, and calling it vigilantism is idiotic.
I'm going to go forward and say the Marine did the public a service by doing his best to restrain an unhinged violent criminal who has assaulted and harassed countless people before and I feel deep pity for him having lies ruined by retards spreading lies about him on social media and kangaroo court he will face. His life is ruined no matter what thanks to social media conmen, same as Rittenhouse.
No. 1568821
>>1568462I have friends' whose lives were ruined long term by diagnosed male schizos because of how violent they get, and in December I saw a homeless drugged out schizo trying to stab another guy unprompted in the subway on my way home from work. Thank god he failed and the guy pepper sprayed him in the eyes and kicked him out of the subway car but having pepper spray in my country is illegal so that was a miracle and the subway in my city isn't nearly as trashy as the one in NY seems to be. I have no pity for the guy who got killed, it was pre-emptive self-defence from the info we have. The only mentally ill homeless guy I ever slightly trusted was in my previous neighborhood, very nice to everyone, pretty chill, we always had completely normal small talk for years and he got brutally murdered by another homeless guy a few years ago, so fuck them.
>>1568472>Should all mentally ill poor/homeless people be killed?The men, yes absolutely if they're homeless because they're mentally ill. If they're traumatized by poverty and homelessness they can receive help. I actually think some of the crazy women also should, a little girl in my country got murdered, mutilated, raped and stuffed in a suitcase by a schizo young woman not that long ago so they're clearly not all harmless.
No. 1568895
>>1568813I agree. He attempted to kidnap a 7 year old and punched a 62 year old woman in the face, fracturing her orbital bone.
I feel like there's a difference between being homeless, and being a homeless, feral vagrant.
No. 1568920
>>1568813Didn't he choke him out for 15 minutes? That wasn't an accident, he could've incapacitated him instead. This wasn't a "public service". The scrote just wanted to kill, and he did it. Could've been someone helpless and innocent easily. He is feral and disgusting too.
>>1568895The marine didn't know about either of those things.
No. 1568925
>>1568918It doesn't need to be a massive thing, a choke hold can easily kill someone by accident. The fact that the feral psychotic didn't pass out after twenty seconds shows that the white guy didn't know how to apply it, meaning he didn't really know what he was doing and improvised. People were relaxed because someone was securing the violent homeless person.
The racism angle in particular is idiotic, any time a white man lay hands on a black one it's automatically a hate crime no matter what, ignoring that most violence against black men is perpetrated by other black men. How do the people who think this was a hate crime cope with the black man helping the white guy secure the homeless person? Was he acting on internalised racism? It's so retarded and the people pushing the lies about this situation should be investigated for inciting violence, because there is no other explanation for their actions. They try to rile up a hate mob with insane lies, simple as.
>>1568920> he could've incapacitated him insteadThat's exactly what he was doing, he didn't kneel on his chest with his hands around his throat, he was awkwardly lying on the ground underneath him with an arm around his neck. Do you want me to dig up videos or statements about homeless people assaulting random women? I wonder how you'd feel of the guy in the video tried to push you on the rails. Maybe you'd wish someone would hold him down.
>>1568924Lol ok you are severely mentally ill, never mind.
No. 1568928
>>1568925It wasn't an accident, that's the point. I don't know if you've ever restrained someone or been in a fight, but you don't "mistakenly" chokehold someone for 15 minutes. It's pathetic to try and baby a man this hard, get over it.
>Lol ok you are severely mentally ill, never mind.If your first thought upon reading an opinion you don't like is "They must be from a male board with a political leaning I disagree with" while on a woman's board, it is projection. If this observation
triggers you, you need to leave kek.
No. 1568944
>>1568940Yeah, that is such a retarded twitter talking point.
We do not know what made the marine intervene, but we do know that the guy has been arrested more than 40 times and several of those were for violent assaults, and he probably did a whole lot more he wasn't arrested for.
We also know that nobody objected to him being held and other passengers helped.
So it's reasonable to conclude that he probably tried to attack someone again and was stopped.
Or maybe this was the KKK car and the blonde guy decided to randomly kill a homeless person for no reason by lying underneath him and hugging him (imagine how disgusting that must have been) and several people spontaneously decided to help him and the rest watched with approval, probably sieg heiling each other in the meanwhile.
Yeah the second is totally what must have happened.
No. 1568958
File: 1683339705709.png (37.45 KB, 573x843, Article-35-NY-Penal-Law-Defens…)
See provisions 1 and 2. A choke hold is not a "hug" (kek). Murder is a crime, open and shut case. Anyone making heroes, martyrs and/or racebaiting out of this is retarded.
No. 1569035
>>1568960Same nona. Back when I was in the ghetto, homeless guys with bike chains broke into our apartment mailboxes and parking structure nightly. My dad came up with "homeless hunting" while drunk and learned wielding a fire axe and having a knife holster visible, even when empty, scared off this particular gaggle of hobos.
They have also threatened, watched, and stalked my family and I beforehand.
Homeless men, and some homeless women, are the worst human beings I've had the displeasure of coming across.
I feel like hobos are usually criminal creeps because they're trying to get a place to sleep at night, even if it's a cot in federal prison. But maybe I'm optimistic.
No. 1569048
>>1569042I did not do that anywhere, I was just recalling something that happened years ago. Nobody got hurt, but nothing got stolen for awhile, either.
I don't think it was smart nor moral, but it worked
No. 1569153
File: 1683359447653.jpg (14.83 KB, 300x225, 69fa9ac3e5f49beb1dafd70830a881…)
Brits are more annoying than Americans
No. 1569196
>>1569185I saw some guy nearly getting stabbed in the subway a few months ago and he only failed because the
victim illegally carried pepper spray. A normal homeless guy in my previous neighborhood was murdered by another crackhead homeless guy. I was followed or threatened several times by guys like this in the middle of the day, same with my sisters. It's not paranoia if the fear that things like this could happen actually happens. I don't care about that marine, I just say that homeless men are dangerous because they're often mentally ill and/or on drugs and especially target women because they have nothing to lose. I even remember a few years ago an anon saying a homeless guy climbed several floors of their building's walls and tried to go in her and her sister's apartment through the window and they panicked and pushed him through the window. I don't care about the marine, he fucked up but don't expect me to think homeless bums are harmless.
No. 1569303
>>1569185Not everyone is confronting homeless people recklessly like nona did. Most normal people avoid them.
>>1569189Same. It comes off as moral grandstanding.
No. 1569413
Every time an anon confuses me for someone I'm not I get the insatiable urge to break anonymity against all logic
I never do, but fuck, it bothers me.
No. 1569460
>>1569419AYRT, this is specifically about
>>1569063The irony is that that wasn't me, and I have no idea who she's talking about, because I was banned for a month due to self posting about how horrible I am, etc etc when I was having a panic attack kek. A deserved ban, but I've been here since 2021 and type in semi-proper English to preserve my identity, although before my month ban I was accused of being a personfag, which I cannot deny but I sure as hell am not that personalityfag
>>1569446Partially agree, although my personal favorite Vocaloid ship is Miki x whoever the hell her voice works with.
No. 1569465
>>1569422I hate how the fault is almost always on a woman, it’s always “guess he wasn’t getting enough at home” or “
she went after
him, it wasn’t his fault!” like it’s either on the mean shrill wife for not putting out enough or the vixen for seducing him. Hate it.
No. 1569476
>>1569460You're still going on about this? I really do not care if you were banned a month ago. I was referring to this
>>1568944 and other weirdly spaced posts. Derail some more about being a virgin lesbian(???) like in the first reply you gave and then deleted, I just said to stop putting racebait garbage here.
No. 1569543
>>1569422Men having affairs
> I'm practially already single, me and 'x' are dead, we just haven't made the break up official, we live together still for practical reasons. I might as well be single already. Its not reeally cheating because you see muh special circumstances > My gf/wife is such a terror, she's made my life a misery, she's so angry and manipulative and you can't talk to her and I wish I could get away from her but I need time.. did I mention she's a bitch??I think both women are lied to most of the time. Men make sure that they demonize the gf/wife so much that the other woman feels less remorse and never actually fact checks because all they know is "oh but she's such a psycho, don't go near her"
I've only ever been on the end of things where I was the one getting cheated on but men who lie their asses off to you about where they're going and what they're doing sure as hell aren't being honest with the mistress either. They compartmentalize. Feed different lies to each of you and in the end everyone just loses time from getting involved with a guy like that.
No. 1569596
>>1569407In my case they're not using me as a personal therapist and I was always supportive but sometimes their comments make me want to hurl. I've seen shit like friends being utterly shocked and disgusted that I wanted to read old manga I loved as a teenager because they assume I'm like them and do it because I'm too depressed to try anything new and want the comfort of something I already know. Like no dumbass, it's because I liked the manga a lot and read them at the library long ago so I forgot half of the story and characters. Or when a severely depressed friend of mine seemed to have progressively gotten her shit together thanks to antidepressants she stopped eating fastfood everyday and walked more to avoid paying for the bus for very short trips and she was glad it made her lose weight and my now morbidly obese friends projected their insecurity on her and thought she was lying to herself and had this sudden feeling of getting her shit together because she'll probably kill herself (and they were wrong). All because one of them had suicide ideation right before starting paying a gym subscription and she thought everyone had to be like her. I'm sick of that shit, I hang out with them way less often because they're really stressful and I feel a lot better.
>>1569435I honestly would be ready to not befriend anyone anymore if my current friends decided to drop me. As a child I attracted bullies and as a teenagers I made nice, friendly normies flee because I was still acting weird from the bullying and from my religious helicopter parents actively preventing me to have a social life just so I'd stay a virgin. Not sure how people can sometimes notice these things, I guess it's pure instinct, I can guess that too but it's hard to explain. I attract these people way less now that I'm a grown adult.
No. 1569726
File: 1683418125549.png (709.8 KB, 1200x838, Screenshot 2023-05-06 at 8.07.…)
This is so beyond retarded. They want another Floyd or Martin so bad. Cops are doing jack shit
No. 1569733
Almost anyone can learn something if they practice everyday, like for example art or languages or music, but also some things have to start young and many will still never excel at. And I think one of those things is figure skating. True you need to practice a lot but I've never seen someone starting late really master it,and I mean about 16 and up, I think it's one of those things, they fear the ice and never get used to the right feel. The best chance is hockey players, they are fearless and know the ice but just on different skates, but even gymnasts struggle and their sport is imo scarier, I have never done a backflip and never will most likely.
I started at two because my parents bought me skates and threw me onto a frozen lake every winter, I tried to walk and kept falling but the love for the ice was born. It's just not as far down when you are small. I see a lot of learners and mastering edges, body positioning and motions so unnatural, tension in the right places is hard.
No. 1569736
>>1569726Idk what happened but taking a guess someone was pushed again? But they have done jack shit about the people pushing, which are repeat offenders with criminal backgrounds in the 20s and up, and they are often mentally unstable. Never done shit about it. I saw two police come up the platform
laughing and what awaited me at the bottom was a schizo yelling in my face and following me, I walked way down to get away and he harassed everyone, and nearly everyone was against the wall to avoid getting pushed. The cops laughed and walked away. Jack fucking shit.
If that isn't the situation then this is just a rant I guess, every time I am in nyc some shit happens.
No. 1569964
>>1569733Maybe but things like athletics and figure skating are probably in the 5% of the most useless skills to have kek. What is it good for? Unless you're making a huge bank which most of figure skaters aren't and even those still have to retire at like 25.
It's only useful to have it as a hobby to relax and exercise and for that you can start at 45 and it doesn't really matter.
No. 1570021
>>1569733Yeah it's just one of those things that's easier to learn the smaller you are. I remember doing off ice rotations with a bunch of kids at a lower level than me and while I was struggling awkwardly, they just spin like a fucking top. Not very skilled on the ice, but just could pull off effortless rotation because of basic physics.
I skated a kid for a while and did a fair bit of ballet so when I started again as an adult I was never awkward or nervous on ice, but there was a hard limit when it came to jumps. I barely managed an axel and lost it super quickly, it's very demotivating… but skating is still fun regardless.
No. 1570063
File: 1683458407375.jpg (87.93 KB, 640x480, aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.jpg)
>>1569839Whose Love is War? Mikus?
No. 1570085
File: 1683463019388.jpg (11.6 KB, 198x275, 1676673740311.jpg)
I think Jordan Peterson is funny
No. 1570093
>>1569977Non-american here, you guys have been spamming about this situation nonstop, and as I deducted, there could be only
one reason why so many americans are rioting for a criminal, let me guess…
No. 1570101
>>1569977I've been following this case right from the start and the way they change the narrative and try to paint him as a massive
victim is so disturbing.
The guy who choked him for that long is wrong but the media went from calling him homeless, to calling him a Michael Jackson imitator/dancer who brought joy to all travelers (i even read something about him being a pastor???) and it's the same for the pics, at first it was his bearded dirty bum-self and now lots of pics when he was a young and happy kid while for the choker they use pics of him being shirtless and super muscular. How can people fall for that? And where were all those caring people when he was still alive, why did nobody help him back then?
No. 1570228
>>1570193Please point to where I was caping for the marine. I agree he probably killed him on purpose, I just don't care because homeless dudes kill people on purpose all the time and nobody gives a shit.
>men are really going to think its okay to do this to whoever they deem a threatThis is already the case lmao. Neely assaulted two old people and a little girl and was still running around free to assault more people. Fact is that if Neely had choked the marine to death these exact same protesters would consider it cruel and unusual punishment to lock up the sweet mentally ill baby.
No. 1570250
>>1570101>The guy who choked him for that long is wrongActually new information was released. He held him for 4 minutes total and released him about 50 seconds after he stopped struggling.
Absolutely nothing about this situation suggests that it was murder. It's disturbing to see the media at work with even people who don't believe it having compromise opinions like "the marine probably tried to kill him" even though those are contradicted by the evidence and supported by nothing at all.
No. 1570270
>>1570258You really think he walked into the subway, saw a random bum and decided to choke him to death while other random strangers assisted him by holding that random bum down…?
Americans really think every cop, nurse or soldier or whatever must be a sociopath huh?
No. 1570280
>>1570272On video are several people holding one man down, that's it, you can't see that he wanted to murder him.
If he wasn't a black and if this wasn't the us everybody would rightfully simply assume he must have been a threat to passengers. This is so ridiculous.
No. 1570292
>>1570257Yeah, the coroner ruled it homicide, meaning the death was caused by a human being, now the courts have to figure out whether it was self defense or manslaughter.
I hope they go for murder charges due to the public pressure, because that will be thrown out by any jury. With manslaughter the demented justice system might spin some horseshit about how civilians aren't allowed to protect each other by restraining violent criminals because that's vigilantism or something.
No. 1570298
>>1570281You really don't get it?
Multiple people holding him proves that he must have been very, very aggressive and crazy and dangerous prior to being restrained, meaning holding him down is self defense, not murder. All these other civilians wouldn't have helped the marine if they wouldn't have considered the bum a threat too.
Holding his neck too strongly and too long was a mistake, but putting violent crazies into a chokehold has been done many times by civilians and they were all labeled heroes.
https://youtu.be/U6xlvHM6jYY No. 1570304
>>1570293Lmao. The justice system and laws aren't perfect, they're obviously going to fail sometimes. He was a jobless drug addict who committed crimes and assaulted people. Sure, murder isn't legal, but I don't give a fuck if some other moid killed him. Good riddance, one less aggressive moid on the streets.
>>1570291Yeah, he's probably another aggressive moid with anger issues. Now he'll go to jail and it's 2 aggressive moids out of the streets. A win for everybody, can't believe some retards are complaining.
No. 1570331
>>1570320He's literally a marine. Causing harm to women is already something he's predisposed to do. If anything this incident will hurt his image if he ever puts his hands on a woman.
>>1570325Then he goes to jail.
No. 1570337
>>1570318I'm sure telling moids they can get away with murder even more if they gaslight the public into believing the
victims were bad people is a great thing, nonna.
No. 1570347
>>1570258you're right, I'm not sure why anons replying are caping for military moids. Don't get me wrong that homeless guy sounds like a huge piece of shit but I don't think the marine guy did it for a good reason (like to save people or anything). Scrotes in the military cannot be counted on to be good people and anyone who thinks otherwise is delusional (this goes for all soldiers regardless of country btw).
>>1570270kek why are you lumping nurses in with cops and soldiers?
No. 1570367
>>1570287This.
https://edition.cnn.com/2023/05/06/us/jordan-neely-subway-death-saturday/index.html>Neely […] had begun shouting at passengers that he was hungry, thirsty, and had little to live for before Penny forced him to the floor in a chokehold until he stopped breathing.>A witness told CNN although Neely was acting erratically, he did not harm anyone nor did they see him armed with a weapon.
>As soon as Neely got on the train, he started yelling about being “fed up and hungry” and “tired of having nothing,” Vazquez told CNN.
>Before he was killed, Neely said, “I don’t care if I die. I don’t care if I go to jail. I don’t have any food … I’m done,” according to Vazquez.
>As the yelling continued, many passengers became visibly uncomfortable and moved to other parts of the train car. Neely did not appear to be armed or looking to attack anyone, Vazquez told CNN.
>Then a rider – later identified as Penny – came behind Neely and put him in a chokehold, with the two eventually falling to the floor, Vazquez said. Neely did not interact with that passenger at all prior to the attack, Vazquez continued. No. 1570410
>>1570388I agree with her it is murder but i don't care about anyone involved, especially a man who harmed a woman. Also didn't Jordan's mother get killed? I think it was fucked up but…you won't catch my black ads marching or causing a fuss.
RIP
No. 1570468
>>1570455He was not just some random guy yelling, he was threatening people, they restrained him on self-defense, he was a confirmed menace with 40 felonies, how the fuck I'm supposed to think this was unjustified? It was a relief for the people in the train, he could've harmed anyone as he already did in the past
And yeah, your argument justifies the idiots running protests to get the other dude arrested, when in every other part of the world nobody wouldn't even bat an eye about someone killing a criminal if the authorities failed to contain the situation, you guys only give a shit because of the races involved
No. 1570472
File: 1683494913248.gif (3.29 MB, 498x452, mizuki-akiyama-dead-inside.gif)
Maybe not unpopular, but somewhere i can't share anywhere else. Fat men are inherently disgusting and should be sent to labor camps until they're fit or at least skinny. I'm not attracted to fat women either but at least they're fine to look at unless they're morbidly obese. And the way society downright accepts if not celebrates men being overweight (see: the whole dadbod shit) is even worse. The amount of skinny women i see with overweight moids who would treat her even worse if she was a pound overweight is so disgusting. We need to start shitting on fat scrotes even more than we do regular ones
No. 1570480
>>1570472There's no reason for scrotes to be fat. Fat men are the biggest bullies and act as if they are not fat. Even had the displeasure of listening to Kiwifarms owner? He's fat. But he's constantly shitting on fat men/women as of he's not a fatty and always on diets.
In my life fat men have been the most randomly cruel, colorist and just shitty towards me and other women for no reason. Them and very ugly men.
I remember some ugly scrote in hs. Was with a girl, he tried to impress her by going, "dumb bitch move away from the printer" to me. The amount of scrotes I've met who legit think shitting on random womam impresses the woman is crazy, oh and he and abnormally ugly. Everyone hates fat women. Men and women, but nobody hates fat men enough.
No. 1570519
>>1570480Ayrt and 100% agreed. They've always been particularly cruel to me about my body as well, and don't even get me started on fat trannies.
>>1570483While i'm still generally fatphobic i'm trying not to be fatphobic toward women anymore because they're already shit on enough and they're ultimately sisters too, regardless of what i think. Meanwhile fat moids can get fit easily, they just don't becauise they're lazy as shit.
No. 1570583
>>1570580Ntayrt
Popular doesn't equal good.
No. 1570585
>>1570580Don't even listen to kpop and what
>>1570583 said
No matter how hard you dickride this white woman, she'll never eat you out.
No. 1570592
File: 1683505987649.png (63.63 KB, 362x467, 1618179134190.png)
>>1570529the only people that accept dad bods are ugly/fat themselves. Also maybe this is unpopular but scrotes very much do shit on fat and skelly men too. Even gay scrotes are especially cruel to fat fags.
No. 1570702
File: 1683511185008.jpeg (17.93 KB, 275x239, 1672240718183.jpeg)
>>1570614I agree anon. A lot of fat women are just blessed with really good fat distribution too, I can't ignore it when they still have a pretty face and a hot body despite it all. No hate to skinny women of course, everyone is
valid.
No. 1570711
File: 1683511504637.png (27.83 KB, 1268x446, lame.png)
i hate this type of post, even if it's only the second one i think
will this be the next lolcor joke? like when anons call lc a "basket weaving forum" and change it up? i know it didn't start here. We're just gonna have some retard chime in random threads to write a cringe description of how totes epic they are and how much dick they get compared to other stupid silly bitches and then other anons are going to respond with "omg!!! kekekekekek nonna ur such a stacy!! sooo stacy pilled nonna!" terrible joke, i hate it
Sage for not being fun at parties kek
No. 1570728
>>1570642Yes because the chance of them being able to hurt me is low if they're unable to run and have no muscle. Also, being around them usually doesn't scare me like being around a muscular or skelly scrote.
But fat women are some of the nicest I've met.
No. 1571055
>>1571033Shut the fuck up and address your local
abusive scrotes and child abuse issues instead of seething at the world for noticing, fuckface
(infighting) No. 1571115
>>1571110>People have an innate desire to have "their own" kids that look like them… It's easier to raise and honestly just easier to love a kid who looks like you. I guess you're not a fan of interracial families then
But those families prove you're full of shit
No. 1571155
>>1571110Kids in foster care usually have mental illness and neurological damage from their shit upbringing and prenatal environment, and many people want a normal, sane, healthy child and not some burden that will probably never live a normal life, and that desire is completely
valid.
No. 1571160
>>1570711Isn't this a copy pasta?
>>1571110Antinatalists should adopt. Aren't they only child free because they're against bringing new kids to life? So they should actually want to support family-less children if their beliefs are genuine.
No. 1571163
>>1571155of course kids in foster care deserves to be loved but you have to be aware that those kids has trauma and you might not be equipped to deal with that. Adoption has it's own issues, it's a long process and some countries will only let you adopt if you are married, straight and part of a certain religion. Not to mention adaption is kinda dubious from an ethical point of view and it has received some criticism in the recent years. You could always adopt from your own country but at least in the country where I live, if you chose to do that the biological parents can claim their kid back at any point even if you where the one raising the child
>>1571157>Personality is also inherited to a degree.it isn't. The reason people start acting like their parents is because they copy their behaviour
No. 1571170
>>1571110Yeah, I find myself a rare breed in the childfree community because of my opinions. One, you truly should need a license to have a child. And I don't think it's eugenics to says that. If you can't answer simple true or false questions like "It is okay to shake to shake my infant to make her stop crying." then you don't get a child, end of story. And if you try to get around this by secretly getting pregnant, then forced abortion. We have gone beyond the point of just letting children happen to whoever can have unprotected sex, all children deserve to be born into a loving home where they won't be abused.
But two, it is also okay to want your own biological children over the children of some failure who couldn't do something that even chickens manage to figure out. Plus, epigeneics and pre-natal care are so vitally important to the success of your child, and that's if you're lucky enough to get a "healthy" newborn. Studies are showing that if the father smokes weed during his teenage years, that actually affects the child's development, let alone if the father was actively drinking when the child was conceived. And if you don't get a newborn? God help you. Many of these children can go on to become functioning members of society, but many cannot. You have until a girl is three or a boy is 18 months to get them out of an
abusive home where they witness violence, after that, the majority of them will continue to repeat their parent's patterns and will never reach their full potential.
So while people who adopt are morally superior, I don't blame people who can look at themselves and realize that they can't handle a child who is so messed up.
>>1571163>Personality isn't inheritedIt boggles my mind that some people actually think this. For example, you can easily look at dog breeds and how we've known for hundreds of years that personality is inheritable and that's why certain breeds will act in specific patterns even when nursed and raised by a different breed's mother, and we recognize this pattern across hundreds of mammals yet somehow think humans are uniquely different. I think it's a reminent from a strong religious background where they believe that people are not risen apes, but instead are fallen angels untainted by the animal world.
No. 1571213
>>1571206Yeah but I don't want a uterus or ovaries, or any risk of having kids and I will go to any length to 100% guarantee sterilization. If I ever got pregnant, I would kill the embryo and then myself. If I was forced through, I'd kill the child after birth and then myself. If I couldn't and I couldn't put it up for adoption, I'd be horrifically
abusive, be it due to psychosis/mania, depression, or pure anger from the horrible noise and bodily waste. I hate children. I find heterosexual sex a horrific act because it
creates children. I avoid children very obsessively until they're about 8 and I no longer get urges to get them to shut up in any way possible. I'm scared of the germs they produce and their bodily waste. I'd rather die than have the permanent body changes. I cannot tolerate noise any louder than a modern A/C on most days. I can't leave the house because I can't tolerate the noise outside it. I enjoy parties because at least then most people there are fully developed mentally and physically. And while yes, mass-neutering males would fix a lot of that, it doesn't stop period cramps so intense I have to lie in bed for a week or more once every 35-50 days because the pain is so severe I'm practically immobilized.
No. 1571277
>>1571270some of you really need to go outside and touch grass.
>>1571213>If I ever got pregnant, I would kill the embryo and then myself. If I was forced through, I'd kill the child after birth and then myself.Psychotic. Just get an abortion and then have your tubes tied like a normal person.
No. 1571310
>>1571200>If we were all just like our parentsYou're thinking about inherited traits as too pattern card of a behavior. While genes will still breed true, the results are also affected by society and culture. So while a male may have his grandfather's temper and violence, he doesn't beat his wife in public like he did, because that will get him sent to jail. So he beats her, but just in private. And if he ever does get caught, he'll go to jail, but that's unlikely to happen until after he's reproduced and passed on his aggressive genes.
>>1571204The uterus is a vital part of the human body. It keeps other organs in place while helping regulate and produces hormones. Taking it out without a dire medical need is very bad. If anything, you would only want a salpingectomy if you wanted mass sterilization. But I don't think there's a need to perform surgery on everyone, literally only on people who insist on keeping a baby when they think that raising it in a crack house is okay. People claim it's a slippery slope, but do people think that requiring driver licenses is a slippery slope? Because while the government has overreached itself in many other aspects, I don't requiring learning to drive before driving was one of them.
No. 1571311
>>1571213Get help.
And if hetero sex repulses you, don't have it. Problem avoided. If you do have sex get on some fucking birth control. Used correctly, chances are virtually nil. Add a condom (also used correctly, every time) and you'll be fine. If you're still paranoid, add some nfp charting and don't have sex at fertile times. Bc may also help with cramps etc.
Or, get everything yanked in a likely unnecessary operation involving general anesthesia, and enjoy your hrt.
No. 1571481
>>1571277Nearest place offering abortions is over 3 hours away and they offer hysterectomies, not anything else here except for birth control and that doesn't play well with my severe emotional and mental instability. Getting any medical care whatsoever takes months as well, and funnily enough, I ran out of my antipsychotics on Friday and will have them either tonight or tomorrow night if all goes well.
>>1571311When I was on birth control I had a psychotic episode and lunged at my dad with a ritual daggar at 16. I was taken off that shit and me acting on said thoughts dropped off dramatically, only being turned towards myself. And I'd glady take the hysterectomy and HRT over literally everything else because I've got actual, severe problems for my uterus and qualify for a mostly covered hysterectomy at 21 due to that. I also have no moral qualms with taking medication the rest of my life, as I've been on heavy psychiatric medication since I was 9.
No. 1571493
>>1571485 Thank you nonita. It's such a severe fear that I seldom leave the house unless I absolutely have to, because I'm scared of getting raped and getting pregnant. I already feel like my body is not my own so that sounds like hell, and I'd rather never leave the house and never risk it as a result. Sorry about the sudden vent, but it's a relief some of you are of the "I don't care what you do to your body" variety instead of larping as Regina George like in the confessions thread.
>>1571489 I'm legally incapable of driving or ever getting a license due to brain and eye problems, and the only people I know who are capable of doing so where I am are vehemently pro life and would sooner have me thrown into a ditch than get an abortion, so like I said, I refuse to risk it.
No. 1571689
File: 1683603183225.jpg (70.69 KB, 736x1145, 1674609403363.jpg)
real thrift girlies do NOT shop threadUP. IMAGINE paying more than $20 for a single clothing item! i refuse. give me savers/goodwill or give me death
No. 1571733
>>1571720reread my post slowly
>women who suck cockthat's not me (based)
No. 1571746
>>1571689They have to make up for the costs of being an online company some how
nonnie, but i agree with you. At least don't shop there without having access to good discount codes and the intent to do a haul.
No. 1571765
>>1571739i never said it wasn't an insult, it is. i've used it as an insult before. i said it wasn't misogynistic
>>1571745women on this site have admitted to enjoying sucking cock. i was thinking of how complaining about lc cocksuckers gets you called a misogynist, especially in the black pill thread
No. 1571783
>>1571765fair enough but imo it's still misogynistic because insults related to having sex are predominantly used against women. also, let's not pretend that women get called cocksuckers in the blackpill thread
only if they claim to love sucking dick, it's for any het women who isn't bp basically so it's not just "stating a fact". honestly it's even weird that they bring up the dick sucking so often, like, much more than random het women discussing their relationships
No. 1571812
>>1571710Calling a woman a bitch is not actually a big deal because it just means female dog, and dogs are cute! What's so bad about it?
Stop being retarded
No. 1571892
File: 1683625331241.jpg (259.35 KB, 1200x1200, groundhog-day.jpg)
>>1571710How many times is this going to get reposted in the same thread, just slightly reworded every time? Its cocksucker groundhog day. Get a new special interest.
No. 1571915
>>1571877Nta but I mean, sex with a man as a woman is inherently demeaning, and men see it this way too. A woman can enjoy doing oral and getting fucked and she'll somehow believe that she's getting all the pleasure and she's being loved (don't know how you can think that while a moid jackhammers your throat and suffocates you but still) but the man Will always think that he's "dominating" and demeaning her. Unfortunately men use sex as a way to subjugate and humiliate women and you can see it in how the average male doesn't want to pleasure a woman at all and how their most common fetishes revolve around causing pain and distress to women. So a woman who knows that a moid thinks of her as a thing to hurt and humiliate through sex but still chooses to engage in several sexual acts with said moid is demeaning herself.
On the other hand women don't see sex as a way to hurt others so things like eating pussy aren't considered demeaning. I'm ESL so I don't know if this makes sense.
No. 1572039
>>1572034Husbandofags are only on the same level of waifufags if you mean the lesbian ones.
Moid waifufags are often into underage loli shit, female ones aren't.
No. 1572057
Actual unpopular opinion here: radical feminism (including the self-described "blackpilled" ones) is woke idpol bullshit and and as cult-like as troonism, and is basically the equivalent of garveyism/NOI but in the feminist context. Also, most of the radfems I have interacted with were extremely NLOGs, competitive and misogynists, much worse than TIFs, who at least live in a hugbox when they are not arguing about truscum x tucute bullshit.
>>1571877They non-ironically believe that misogyny and even violence directed at women who are in relationships with men and/or are libfem or conservative is deserved. "It's your fault, after all you relate to men". I've seen tards say they don't understand why Roe vs Wade overturn is a problem, afterall "just be a separatist". I’ve seen a psychopath say to a libfem on Twitter that she should be raped in a bathroom for defending troons. They don't really care about women, they are just edgytards who grab the "radfem" label because being libfem/TIF is trendy nowadays and being trad is too basic and outdated, so it's the perfect way to be a NLOG ("i'm not like these pick-me cocksuckers bimbos i'm speshul and based").
No. 1572067
File: 1683641594898.png (33.9 KB, 487x723, sex without risk.png)
>>1571974NTA, but
nonnie, that's basic feminist theory under the patriarchy. Men conceptualize fucking as something you do to someone, not something you share with someone. That's why cultures that allow male homosexuality forbid men from being the receiver but not the giver.
No. 1572077
>>1572070It’s the whole concept of
>don’t feed stray dogs If he’s avoided by everyone else there’s a reason. Despite what the media pushes.
No. 1572078
>>1572067Go back to /r9k/, femcel-chan.
>>1572070Omg this is so true. Any cute virgin guy I pitied turned out to be literal psychos.
No. 1572087
>>1572057You're sadly right, at least when it comes to the current state of radical feminism on here. On LC I feel like I went from reading about female solidarity and actually radical feminist takes in 2019, which made me stop, think and reconsider things and ultimately even led me to join a great server with likeminded women which I'm still a part of today. Most of those women stopped using lc. In the meantime LC turned into this weird twitter brained black/white version of radical feminism and it came up to this point where I'm reading about women being slut cocksucker whores that deserve to burn in hell for wanting to be in a straight relationship.
It seems like no matter where you go, brainlets get easily identity poisoned and start to revolve their whole lives around an ideology, but online. They forget that the real world doesn't work the way they envisioned it to in their mind and that starts to reflect in more and more ridiculous takes.
No. 1572088
>>1572084Nta but any woman can get sex and it's simply because a man doesn't actively put himself in danger to sleep with a woman.
OP's theory about loser men is true because women usually avoid mentally ill men because we're scared they'll hurt us. The other way around doesn't really work because men can and do overpower and rape/kill women.
No. 1572103
>>1572075This
>>1572067 nonnie literally posted a TUMBLR screenshot problematizing straight sex, but sure as hell this isn't LibLeft woketardism. Want to talk about how drag shows are "cultural appropriation/womanface"?
No. 1572111
>>1572103Dragshows are subhuman.
>>1572108Go back to /r9k/.
No. 1572114
>>1572103>problematizing straight sex, but sure as hell this isn't LibLeft woketardismI don't understand what this means. Can you rephrase it?
What do you think cultural appropriation is? Do you consider it a harmful problem?
No. 1572119
>>1572112Exactly. Being an object is not something a woman inherently is, it's something that we are currently (and for a very long time have been) viewed as.
>>1572115I'm sorry to hear that. You should go walk in a forest. It's much healthier than in here.
No. 1572150
>>1572134You're neither pretty nor smart if you sleep with unattractive men willingly. I have pretty friends and average friends, none of my friends date loser ugly men because they have self worth. The only girls I know who willingly sleep with ugly men are mentally ill or ugly themselves.
>>1572141Being put in higher risk during casual sex isn't equal to every consenting heterosexual activity being derogatory for a woman which is what anon is arguing.
No. 1572166
>>1572155Every woman should date someone her league so a man with similar economic situation and views. You can't expect to find a very successful man as an average woman but you can find a good looking guy who earns as well as you, most anons here literally e-date discord mods or fuck around with bottom of the barrel men, that's the mentally ill ones.
It's so weird to be entitled to the best men when you're average, same logic as average incels being entitled to top %2 of women.
No. 1572172
>>1572150>which is what anon is arguing.I don't think it, she's kinda all over the place but the reoccurring theme is that seems to have shifted only towards being shamed for causal sex.
But I also disagree with you because under our current culture, with the way people view sex and women, there can't be true consent because we have been fed propaganda about the expectations of our sex since before we were born. Of course there are miles between consenting heterosexual activity and sexual assault, but ultimately they both fall under the umbrella of "what is informed sexual consent."
No. 1572179
>>1572171Femcels saying most men are ugly = incels saying most women are ugly
Both groups are ugly people who too high expectations about their partners caused by porn addictions. And don't say you femcels don't have porn addictions, the husbandothread is literally ss deranged as the average pornsick males mind. You have anons who eat yogurt and pretend it's their husbandos cum.
No. 1572220
>>1572114My point is that there is no intrinsic problem in straight relationships, just as there is no intrinsic problem in being male, “”cis””, white, able-bodied, neurotypical, etc. Also, I don't see a problem with people using/adapting/etc things from cultures they don't belong to if it's not intentionally offensive, depends on the context.
>>1572103They are, but it’s because they’re degen sex pests, not because they’re men “appropriating tools of female oppression" (makeup, high heels, etc) or whatever shit.
No. 1572372
>>1571985only women can have wombs or have periods though. as i said in my original post, men can also suck cock, it is a sex-neutral insult.
>>1571877>The idea that having sex with a man is inherently demeaninggo look at what the feminist movement in sk is accomplishing and get back to me
your desperation to keep sucking cock is pathetic i'm afraid
No. 1572410
>>1571939Hm idk anon, I'm not sure how to explain it well. The point is that men see women as lesser than then no matter what, even the good ones, and sex is the thing they use to "manifest" this feeling. Like another anon said, in their head it's always something they're doing to you, not with you, and to some extent they all see themselves as "dominant" while having sex because that's what the act of penetrating (violating, ruining from their pov, potentially hurting, and pleasuring for them) means to them. So, is it really different if he does it slowly instead of fast and rough? In his head you're still his submissive "thing" he gets to dominate and put in danger if he pleases. He has the power during the act, he knows he does, and that's what he thinks of while he does it.
The problem here isn't what the woman feels like. She can enjoy it, she can have sex as much as she likes with whoever she likes, but the problem is what men will always think of when having sex with (or to, in their eyes) women. They will always think they're dominating you and they'll always see you being the receiver as being submissive, which in their minds means you're weak and lesser than them, the "thing" they can be nice to IF they feel like it. So women can definitely think stuff like blowjobs feel nice, that's not a problem. The issue is that the man you're doing it to is getting off to the thought that he's humiliating you because that's what "servicing" someone and being the receiver (of dick) means in his language.
This is simply what I think as a straight woman (volcel you could say) after spending a lot of time among men and in male spaces where they freely express what sex means to them. The sex that often uses the act of sex for subjugation (and is wired to use it that way) will never be able to see sex as a loving act you share with your partner. Knowing that, how can a woman have a healthy relationship with any man?
No. 1572422
File: 1683663632374.jpg (150.42 KB, 640x640, 16442100.jpg)
No. 1572441
>>1572425>It's bait because I disagreeThere we go again.
>>1572438No, because I'm a trad for a damn anime character in fantasies, not a real man. I also can't mesh with normal people.
No. 1572443
>>1572416NTA but it's pretty obvious when you interact with most men as a woman. They'll always bring the conversation back to a sexual place, they'll make sex "jokes" and they love to mansplain and "debate" you if you dare have an opinion on anything. It's obvious with the way they consume media, even media meant for children. They can't enjoy it without sexualizing some aspect of it (unless that media already sexualized itself for them). It's why so many of them get mad when women say they don't want to be married or have kids. It's why they go ape mode over abortion and it's why they hate
whores (I'm not referring to FSSW, I'm referring to women who have casual sex). They view women as objects, like cars. Lots of men don't like women, they just like our bodies and the fact we can carry their kids (muh lineage) into a new generation.
No. 1572454
File: 1683665751865.jpg (94.68 KB, 2632x1542, msbait.jpg)
>>1572441>Look I'm sorry if a man diddled you,>basic female instincts>How is acting more like a man female empowerment? yawn
No. 1572577
>>1572094Not the anon, but yes? I just don't think one is called "femcel-chan" exactly, at least I wasn't. I'm usually just called by my online handle or some variant of it followed by "-chan" (on occasion "-kun" as a sarcastic joke, as I'm female) and one of those handles has people who twist the last word into "femcel," most referenced in the Tumblr thread, I believe?
>>1572419Probably replying to bait, but there are a
lot of TIFs and trads alike on here, we just don't announce ourselves unless it's inherently relevant to the conversation, and we don't shame women for disagreeing with us. I used to be actively anti radfem and well known for constantly shitting on and going after them on every site I used, someone mentioned it in Stupid Questions, but I warmed up to the others here, and found out we agree on a
lot. I can see why you get shat on.
No. 1572585
>>1572334> “Despite being X% of the population, they commit Y% of Z crimes”Literally the exact same kind of rhetoric white supremacists scrotes use to be racist, LMAO. I don't know if you are trolling/baiting, but if you really believe that men are innately/biologically predisposed rape apes, you must agree with
>>1572419 nonna “basic female instincts” bullshit.
No. 1572614
File: 1683673695261.png (444.78 KB, 500x500, 1646360735394.png)
>>1572585nta but the statistics on men are based on proven evidence, racism isnt.
No. 1572652
File: 1683676869616.png (60.37 KB, 566x681, right wing women.png)
>>1572419I do feel for you. Through your own lived experiences, you have come to a life view that you believe will lead you into a life you consider ideal. Except, as women more fiercely take sides over events that affect our lives, if you strongly hold ideas from both sides, it can feel like you're politically and ideologically homeless and you're getting harassed by both sides.
I know that it will be hard to read, because she's writing it from a radical feminist perspective, but I do encourage you to look more into Dworkin's Right Wing Women. In it, she lays out how women are not stupid, that we weigh up the pros and cons of joining ourselves to conservatives or liberals, and from there act according to our morals and ethics and self interests.
But what you are describing are not basic female instincts. Most women do long to have a partner and children, and for their children to grow up safe and protected, and for their partner to love them. But we do not long to be subjugated, to not be allowed to own the land our children grow on, or have a voice in how our country is run. That is the result of thousands of years of men's rule and it benefits them to continue it. If submission was natural, you wouldn't have women who demand to vote or who dress as men to join the military because they are forbidden to fight, they would just naturally obey men.
>unironically misogynisticJust because someone does something as a woman, doesn't mean the action is automatically not misogynistic. It is a known phenomena that a woman will use men's rules to pull down another woman in order to raise her own place within the hierarchy. You see this all the time in female news talking heads who call to repeal suffrage or say women shouldn't be allowed to have jobs, while holding high paying jobs themselves.
>How is acting more like a man female empowerment?What do you consider manly? There are several things that you do that were once only allowed to men. You wear pants, and have a bank account, are able to work a job or own a credit card, but all of those used to be illegal for women, and were "manly." And all of those actions empower you. But acting manly in other ways can dis-empower you because of the physically differences between men and women.
You might actually be happier on twitter than on here. The tradfem movement is much stronger on there, as well as there are also discord servers. If you should decide to be a SAHM, I strongly encourage you to keep a stash of cash hidden away from your husband. Our grandmas did it, and many women in loving relationships have found themselves having to pull from it years into an otherwise happy relationship.
No. 1572658
>>1572585>If you believe scientifically collected statistics, then you must also believe in religious teachings passed off as natural inclinationsThat's not how it works, lol. Also, I love how people like you always try to play the race card as a gotcha.
>If you believe men are more likely to rape than women, you must also believe that black men are more likely to rape!Why yes, yes I do nona. That's why I don't walk alone in a neighborhood at night where there are white men or black men.
No. 1572754
>>1572721>>1572725Yes; however I learned I love it here, and I love the women here. Most of you are very kind people and I've learned to blend, but if it's relevant I'll hint at who I am, but is it just me, or are you samefagging?
As I said in
>>1572600 ,
I'm surprised by how much I agree with everyone here and the amount of help I've gotten with female-only problems truly cannot be thanked enough. In fact, the women here have helped me with both my female health and coping with my GID when HRT was not an option. I have no ill will towards radical feminism now, between both that and finding out how much I agree with some parts of your views on women. On troons, we agree on some things, like female only spaces. However, I do not see eye to eye with female seperatists who think males should be culled, but they should be allowed to make areas where no males are permitted.
No. 1572763
>>1572754your only here because Kiwifarms is having issues/on tor/maybe hard for you to use.
or were you banned? I can't remember but you don't blend in. Caping for men constantly doesn't make you blend in. Telling women in a female space they can't say whatever about men isn't fitting in here. Do you tell scrotes not to talk shit about women? or white girls like they want?
Do you police their voices when they go in their 5 paragraph rants about women, or compare
WOC to animals? Or other shit?
I seriously doubt it.
So don't come on here whining about it to us. We don't care, it's interesting a lot of nona's use Kiwifarms but rarely do any of us go over there telling scrotes what they can or cannot say in their shithole, even if it's mixxed gender.
but scrotes , kiwimaidens cannot seem to respect that here. They always stick out.
No. 1572773
>>1572763You couldn't be more wrong kek. I quit Kiwi for two reasons; one, I was told by multiple people I had to for them to stay, and two, I promised the one who originally brought it up while he tried to guide me to not be a cow and get my threads killed. Which worked, may I add? It's simple, not sperging out has benefits.
Two, I came here primarily to watch my thread like a hawk out of paranoia (before it died) and stayed to get advice and vent.
Furthermore, I have never said that shit, nor have I defended it, and in fact I tried to kill my neighbor for saying that shit about women but was stopped by my dad. I still fantasize about his diabetes and heart issues catching up to him because he thinks keto cured him lmao. I've talked about this a lot. Another funny thing, is that schizotroon got my address wrong and sperged out because he didn't know sideblogs on Tumblr can be password-locked. I hope he reads this and spergs out again, since I know he's ITT, I don't think he's you, but I'd laugh if he was.
No. 1572837
File: 1683693282863.jpeg (14.95 KB, 678x452, images (4).jpeg)
Cannelloni is better than lasagna.
No. 1572868
>>1572859>judging your views on men based on a man who literally raped his mothergo outside. Stop interacting with autistic men on 4chan, stop following rapist men. If you think everyone is acts the same way as a man who raped his mother, there's something seriously wrong with you.
Uneducated men respecting women less is true but in my case I don't actively get disrespected as a woman because I'm in a good major in college and on to have a good career. I also don't interact with men like chrischan irl because I'm not a mentally ill autist.
No. 1572928
File: 1683702795903.jpg (127.66 KB, 1170x666, FuIuL8nXoAEbS.jpg)
>>1572652Nta but the writings of the great fatsoc(who would have supported troons) are not worth anyone's time.
No. 1573015
>>1572658> religious teachings passed off as natural inclinationsAre you one of those retards who believe that "huh duh ebil abrahamics killed the Goddess and the matriarchy" bullshit? Gender roles exist in all races and religions, obviously there are diferences between them but they are always there.
Most women in the world dates/marries/have sex with men and are/want to be mothers, even in woke developed countries like the nordics. Separatism/polilez rhetoric is extremely unpopular while libfems and handmaidens are in the majority. "But, but radfems are the majority in country X": when in fact they are the majority of FEMINISTS in these country, but the majority of women in there are actually trads.
The nonnas on the “Blackpilled” thread may be crazy af, but at least they recognize that if the issue is biology/human nature, it's means that it goes both ways: moids are sadists, women are masochists. Can’t cherry pick only the parts that are palatable to you.
No. 1573018
>>1572998A friend who works in a cinema was venting about this lately. They have spots for people in wheelchairs. There's enough demand for them especially during the week when they do cheap daytime tickets and people who are living on disability payments can avail of a pretty good rate on top of that. They have regulars who're in motorised wheelchairs where they have very limited movement or limbs that never fully developed.
Now they're suddenly getting calls from superobese people wanting to book the wheelchair spaces and asking that a special wide chair also be provided for them and placed in the space. Some tiktoker is spreading the word that stealing wheelchair spots is a cool life hack for fat folks and that you should threaten legal action if its not provided.
No. 1573072
I think the average person is emotionally crippled or that the average person has very low emotional intelligence. For example, I come from a really rough life situation and currently I am struggling. I have been abused horribly. I have no social status…pretty much nothing in my life and I've always wanted to be an artist. Actually make art or be an entertainer. Most people are allowed to pursue their dreams and are encouraged to do it. Now, because I am mentally fucking unwell due to all of the abuse I've been through I cannot properly present myself in public but I have nothing to lose.
It is insane how 99% of people have had no empathy towards me and now I have concluded that my entire life I've been held to a different standard and that I have been blamed even for the abuse others have inflicted onto me.
Literally, I have been harassed for being poor and mentally unwell and told that I am lying or making it up. I'm also convinced that lolcow or just people in general are incredibly unaware about mental health and abuse.
Also, people are so egocentric and insane that they will lose any empathy for you if you disagree with them on a certain topic. Like their empathy is literally conditioned by you being completely alligned with whatever they think and once you slightly disagree with them they just…leave. Literally I have been on the verge of suicide and I don't really have the power to argue and people just approach me to argue.
People on the internet have told me that I am lying about my situation and I have been blamed for the abuse that has been inflicted onto me.
Most women on lolcow suffer from sociopathy but it isn't lolcow, it is most of the internet.
Once you are actually disadvantaged, you will become undesirable and cranky or agressive and people will reject you. There are literal handful of trannies or privileged westerners on Twitter that live with their parents and have good living conditions and ask for hundreds of dollars for stupid shit and they get it with no work….and they are not even in need.
I was looking at Venus Angelic and have realized that literally people on the internet have no actual real consideration towards her and that nobody is trying to help her and even if she would ask for help nobody would help her. A couple of days ago she said that she would need money for rehab and that if she made a Gofundme nobody would help her.
Then I think of the hundreds of thousands of trannies that request huge chunks of money on Twitter, that are not even fucking working and they get that money.
While nobody would even try to help a woman that has actually been abused and is unwell. Venus has had narcissistic abuse inflicted onto her by her insane mom, she is also from a poor Hungarian background it seems like she has a lot of generational trauma. Her family in Europe is unstable. She's been abused to the point where she seems like she is too unwell to function, she was brought up being dependent on her mom, brought up being an entertainer. After she left her abusive mom she ended up in Japan with that autist Manaki got hooked to alcohol because she couldn't keep up with the expectations of being a YouTuber and also it is expected for someone that has been through abuse to end up being hooked to alcohol. This guy Ken seems to have gotten her into sex work which is just a pretty common occurrence for someone that has been through abuse. Now, she seems incapable of earning money. She seems broke as fuck and she is too unwell to produce content on YouTube. She is not earning money from OF.
People are telling her to get a job but she seems too mentally unwell for that plus working in Japan is hard. In Europe she doesn't have much going on for her.
There are countless of YouTubers milking her situation for money on YT.
The women on lolcow blame her. People in the comments offer her stupid advice or make unempathetic remarks.
Convinced 99% of people are emotionally crippled
No. 1573090
>>1573072>Also, people are so egocentric and insane that they will lose any empathy for you if you disagree with them on a certain topic. Like their empathy is literally conditioned by you being completely alligned with whatever they think and once you slightly disagree with them they just…leave. Literally I have been on the verge of suicide and I don't really have the power to argue and people just approach me to argue.This is so fucking true ams prevalent on lolcow
>Most women on lolcow suffer from sociopathy but it isn't lolcow, it is most of the internet.I wouldn't say sociopathy but it very well could be! Perhaps willful dissonance.
No. 1573098
>>1573072As usual you aren't entirely wrong, R-chan, but but you somehow manage to melt your correct points with lunatic takes into something virtually nobody can agree with.
Somewhat OT, but do you stream to discord? You seem to talk to people but I rarely see anyone in chat.
No. 1573438
File: 1683755915779.gif (3.2 MB, 640x640, awkward-side-eye.gif)
3 years ago or so, i got absolutely trashed for this opinion, i tried to change my mind on it, but something just felt wrong about it.
After watching this movie again, i still think Will, the guy from Me before you, is a very bad character: being mentally ill/disabled doesn't give you rights to abuse people, specially women. He negged the MC to hell and back and seriously disrespected her 24/7, treating her like shit, he should just have let her alone instead of keeping her around to unleash his misery on her, it was not her fault he was in that situation. I'm not even going to mention the way he mocked a seizure just to disturb her, i'm sorry, that just didn't sit right with me.
Watching this movie while being aware men statistically leave women to rot if they get disabled/ diagnosed with terminal illness makes it worse, knowing the opposite situation simply doesn't happen, that the same endless empathy women have towards men in the face of illness is not even reciprocated, its baffling. I don't know if I'm going to get my ass beat for this again, but yeah
No. 1573606
>>1573245>But it seems like you believe in God, that he's male, and that he made all women inherently submissive.Are you autistic, illiterate or deliberately distorting what I said? My entire point is precisely that biological determinism is retarded.
I'm just pointing out double standards: you can’t believe masculinity (being violent, hypersexual, etc) is intrinsic to men and they are programmed to be rape apes by their defective XY chromosomes and testosterone poisoning (i.e nature) but at same time believe that women are tabula rasa (which is just as stupid as strict determinism) and tradwife/libfem retardism are just a matter of socialization/religion brainwashing that can be deconstructed by embracing radfeminism™ (i.e nurture).
(infighting) No. 1573849
>>1573812I'm literally from LatAm (and we're "westerns", btw). The issue is that it depends on what you mean by "trad" and we are on a site where people will call you tradthot/libfem/handmaiden/pick-me/cockpandering for the most innocuous shit, so…
>>1573817>If you can't prove my personal thing, you can't prove any thing no matter how much evidence throughout the entire animal kingdom and across all cultures and societies!All this time and you still think I'm some tradtard trying to evangelize you? It's not a "personal thing" of mine the fact that most females “throughout the entire animal kingdom and across all cultures and societies” fuck with males and make babies (and New Mexico whiptails are basically the lesbian separatist version of the trannies’ infamous clownfish argument, just saying before someone uses it as “gotcha”). I'm not saying they MUST do this (what tradtards believe), just pointing out that most of them do. I'll get straight to the point now: Do you think they do this because they're genetically predestined to it (“blackpilled” fems), because they’re brainwashed by patriarchy (standard radfeminism), or a combination of both nature and nurture (reality)?
>>1573798Madams who hand over children to be raped are also
victims of patriarchy and just do it because they've been socialized to prioritize scrotes, nonna! They’re not really that evil, have some sorority! (sarcasm alert, since autie-chans can take it literally)
>>1573818> Rape really is a uniquely evil crime because there can never be any excuse for it. No one rapes to feed their hungry family, or to protect their family.I agree. But I think you are forgetting those who sexually traffic other women and children to be raped, those who side with their Nigel when he rapes her own daughters and even blame them and feel jealous, etc. I see women like Ghislaine Maxwell, Karla Homolka, etc on the same level as the scrotes they ally themselves with.
No. 1573914
>>1573896Where I live women only work places are considered absolute snakepits where everyone is always scheming and backstabbing everyone else while putting on a friendly façade. I had the displeasure of working in a female dominated field all my life and I absolutely prefer dealing with men. Some of them are spastic assholes, but if they are, they usually are so openly. Most just want to get the job done and get on with their life. Meanwhile it's safe to assume half my female coworkers are scheming against me while pretending to be my friend and will use anything I say or do against me in gossip, even if they do or say the same shit themselves.
I learned that I was passed over for promotion because someone I looked up to and who acted like a friendly mentor told my boss lies about my performance out of pure evilness (the position was not one she was eligible for or had any reason to care about who gets it and I was in the top 5% of employees and was friendly with her).
When I hear posters on here preach about how women are saints I wonder whether any of these people have actually interacted with women before. If a man spergs out he can get fired for being obviously aggressive, but women get to manipulate and bully people for decades without repercussions because it's so difficult to actually prove their emotional and psychological abuse.
No. 1573926
File: 1683819892442.png (146.17 KB, 1200x1200, IMG_1354.png)
Nobody over the age of 18 should be using a perfume/cologne that costs less than $75 for ~ 30 mL/1 oz
No. 1573941
>>1573896Because rape is THE most evil crime. You can steal to supply yourself with food or you can murder in self defense, but there is no situation in which rape is needed to save a life.
>>1573914So you're saying that gossip and rape are on the level? Damn pickme, you gotta stop sniffing glue. No one but you is saying women are saints, we're saying that if you had to leave a young girl alone with a random person off of the street, that it is statistically safer (by an extremely large margin) to pick a random woman than a random man. That men perpetuate and uphold the environment of violence that they inflict. They even have a name for the group bonding where they talk about how women are inferior and make rape jokes, it's called locker room talk.
No. 1573942
>>1573937Try spraying it on your skin and not your clothes, it will change the scent completely.
>>1573939The more expensive ones will have a more complex profile and smell less synthetic
No. 1573971
>>1573957It's less of a complaint and more like advice. If you wish to wear your Bath and Body Works potpourri out to events, by all means go ahead. But if you want to smell like a
woman, save up your money and invest in some
real perfume.
>>1573960I do get panic attacks, I prevent them by avoiding communities where the poors dwell
No. 1573979
>>1573975This, kek. If I want to smell like a woman I'll simply keep myself clean. Why is smelling like a
woman spending unreasonable amounts of money on something that is supposed to be appealing to men? Buy perfume if it makes you happy, but it has nothing to do with being a woman.
No. 1573982
I don't understand the misers here. Would you go to a courtroom or a philanthropic ball wearing sweatpants and an Aeropostale hoodie? Kek, it's the same thing.
>>1573975>Femininity is nothing but a capitalist grift.Keep telling yourself that, poorfag. It's only $75 and you won't need to smell like a girls' locker room.
>>1573978>UGHUSHSUH I-I CANT AFFORD $75 SO Y-YOU MUST BE A TROON!!!!1!1!!>>1573979Women don't date women? Kek. If you go on a date, regardless of the sex of your partner, you should smell like a
woman, yes. No Victoria's Secret body spray—you need to present as a mature adult.
>>1573981Good thing I can't smell it.
No. 1573989
>>1573984>You sound kinda retarded nglAnd you sound miserable. It's okay to treat yourself to luxury sometimes, no need to get fussy over it. $75 won't dent your pocket considering how much money you'll earn over a lifetime.
>>1573986You think scrotes care this much about perfume? Most of the time they walk around leaving behind a sweat trail, or worse yet,
Axe body spray! When was the last time you spent time around actual women?
No. 1573994
>>1573982You are cracked,
nonnie, just absolutely looney. You already smell like a woman naturally. Perfume is shilled to you by men to appeal to men, and you buy it because you think it makes you more attractive. You obviously are insecure about the way you smell if you feel the need to spend that much money on shitty chemicals to smell a certain way for a few hours.
No. 1573998
>>1573991>Nobody IRL gives a fuck about expensive perfumes unless you have literally nothing else going onJust because they aren't saying it aloud (as expected in polite company) doesn't mean they aren't thinking about it.
>>1573994Plenty of professional perfumers are women, anon. $75 really isn't that much, and what is
truly looney is that you project so much about insecurities that you can't even consider why such products are priced so highly. Scent is one of the first things people will notice about you when they approach you. I wear perfumes because they smell good, and if I am on a date with a man/woman I want them to smell good as well—I would not date a man wearing $15 body spray from Wal-Mart.
No. 1574004
>>1573999>stinky liquidClearly not so stinky if the houses which produce them remain in business
>you have something to prove either to yourself or to someone elseNo, we're just grown adults who are able to spend a little bit of money for a valuable investment.
>wasting your money on something that doesn't even make you smell goodKeep coping.
>Wear some antiperspirantWhat? Surely you don't think perfume is a replacement for deodorant? No wonder you think they smell terrible.
>>1574003>blah blah blah I live in a trailer park No. 1574007
>>1574005You're going to tear a muscle with that reach. Everyone knows that troons are poor and live on the streets selling their axe wounds for cash because that's what
they think real women do. What
real women do is wear $75 perfume.
No. 1574013
>>1574010>I never got the appeal of expensive perfumes.Have you ever smelled an expensive perfume worn on an actual human?
>>1574011>E-EVERYONE WHO DISAGREES WITH ME IS A TROON!!!!!This is the unpopular opinions thread, why are you getting so worked up if it doesn't affect you? I', starting to think that the anons with the real insecurities are the ones who obviously cannot afford a mild $75.
No. 1574015
>>1574012You ran out of arguments so you're nitpicking a mere four lines of greentext KEK
It will take you like 1 week max on minimum wage to save $75.
No. 1574018
>>1574014>they literally all smell to same to everyone else so what's the pointThey don't, and you're fooling yourself by thinking this. The hardest part about being a member of society, dear anon, is that the socially informed retain both spoken
and unspoken behaviors. Not everything will be stated aloud (or worse yet, they will be whispered behind your back).
No. 1574025
>>1574016If you work hard enough, maybe some day you'll be able to afford $75—or better yet, a house of your own!
>>1574017You can disagree, but disagreement does not entail
>UR A TROON!!!1!>UR INSECURE!!1!!1>NO U SMELL BAD!!!!1!1!>>1574022Then literally stop responding,
retard. The only person keeping you in this thread is yourself.
No. 1574027
>>1574018I can promise you, it all smells the same to the average person. No one notices your perfume, no one cares how much it costs and if they
did they would laugh at you. Maybe even behind your back, you know because of the unspoken behaviours.
No. 1574029
>>1574024Your synthetic fragrances are more liable to produce a headache, but whatever. As long as you don't have anywhere respectable to attend.
>>1574026Denial isn't just a river in Egypt.
>>1574027Imagine thinking that people laugh about $100 Chanel or Dior perfumes. Maybe in Bumfuck, Idaho, but certainly not in the higher echelons of society.
No. 1574039
>>1574029Higher echelons? Rich people are the
most retarded people of all. You base your whole life on how much money you spend. The richest people in the world are not the hardest workers or the smartest people anon, just the people who are most willing to step on others, this isn't news. I'm not impressed by your 30ml of cancer.
No. 1574040
>>1574035It's not a LARP. Higher echelons doesn't have to be the jet set, visit any high ranking academic institution and see how many individuals will laugh at you for investing in high quality perfume.
>>1574039How would you know what rich people base their whole lives around? Have you even met any rich people to make this assumption? You're just projecting your insecurities onto people with greater access to resources than you.
No. 1574050
>>1574049Adding that I am just being
nice, you ladies should treat yourselves every now and then to something exquisite! $75 is not a large investment.
No. 1574054
>>1574051Yeah because it was a joke. Maybe it's
you who doesn't interact regularly with people offline, because I can tell you that most people (there are some) will not genuinely say they get panic attacks because of grotty perfume kek
No. 1574071
>>1574027NTA, but I can always tell the difference between a cheap perfume and an expensive one. Cheap perfumes clash with the smell of your skin, they have a gross alcohol undersmell, and they fade instantly so people bathe in them and it makes other people wrinkle their nose when it hits them. An expensive perfume will be very subtle, won't have the alcohol undersmell, and will linger gently after a woman has left the room.
>>1574050There are great perfumes for women, but what's up with wealthier men and the current trend of whatever smell they're using? It smells like one step up from axe body spray. You get three golfing bros together in a room, and it basically drowns out the smell of everything else for the rest of the day.
No. 1574098
>>1574096Sandalwood is an
excellent perfume note.
No. 1574101
File: 1683828907740.jpg (36.38 KB, 563x554, e4b9b767fec74ef3e5ebd641b04ca4…)
I do not like eastern european men at all. I genuinely believe pedophilia is rampant in their cultures. I don't like moids in most cultures either, but most of the men who have defended pedophilia to me were either eastern european OR mexcian. The age of consent is low in most of their countries, and I have heard many stories of men in said so countries dating girls who were ~16. I don't like American men either, however, I have more disdain towards european men because they were the ones who offended me when I was younger, especially because I am asian. I know so many of them who have went into asian countries and took part of in sex trafficking, and I genuinely believe most people are not aware of it. It's sick. Sex trafficking has risen about 30% in the last decade, and a lot are underaged girls. Only reason I know this was because I was in this field with sex trafficking and had family who worked with these cases. It's grim, nonnas.. I feel as if there is no culture that isn't revolved around this shit.
No. 1574306
>>1574276Nothing fairytale-ish, but somewhere important. A mixer or cocktail party of sorts where networking is important. Anons probably wouldn't mind dating a man who sprays himself with Axe kek
>>1574284And you sound working class, but keep coping that certain places don't have certain expectations. Don't fall for the lie that the well-to-do aren't shelling out money for high quality goods like middle class + poors—they aren't going to Bath & Body Works for their fragrances kek
No. 1574312
>>1574307You can buy the vast majority of luxury perfumes at Ulta or related stores anon. This isn't the argument that you think it is. If anything, you should feel grateful that I posted a bottle that is readily accessible at one of these 'low-tier' stores—that way you have even
less of an excuse for not investing in good quality perfume, since you can literally walk across the street and buy a bottle of your own. Now imagine the fit that would be pitched if I had said 'No woman over the age of 18 should go into town without a purse from Hermès'
No. 1574322
File: 1683843677447.jpg (147.72 KB, 2388x1056, I1pRk9P.jpg)
>>1574320Here's a sample of what they offer—no I didn't pick out the catalogue this is the new-in for the women's prêt-à-porter section. I don't know why you (or you guys) are going through all of these mental gymnastics trying to prove that luxury houses are not actually luxury, that people can't tell the difference between cheap and luxury, and that the well-to-do are shopping at K-mart.
>>1574321Precisely.
No. 1574330
File: 1683844089693.jpg (277.2 KB, 1080x1634, 16r432.jpg)
while you're all busy perfuooooming, I want to suggest this as the next thread pic. I feel like it really captures the spirit of these threads.
No. 1574338
>>1574334Almost all luxury bags are mass produced as well, if they are prêt-à-porter. You can also walk into (almost) any luxury house still and purchase a bag then and there if you have enough money to afford it. This argument about the ease of purchasing something does not preclude a luxury house from being luxury. Anons are already coming at me for suggesting they square off $75 for some perfume, but you want me to be more exclusionary still? Then subsequently get mad because I am being exclusionary? Kek.
>Anyone with a stable job can afford to buy "luxury" mass produced perfume>It's not a sign of wealthTell that to the 30 anons who were frothing at the mouth before you.
No. 1574434
File: 1683853410017.jpg (191.71 KB, 1000x1238, image-40.jpg)
If I bit my tongue any harder I would've ended up like Swank's character in Million Dollar Baby.
No. 1574463
>>1574454You're being purposely obtuse
>>1574458In Brazil they have over 50 different ways to call yourself anything but Black so it's not a good example
No. 1574467
>>1574440>spend thousands on people who don’t want me aroundWhat the hell kind of travel are you talking about where someone spends money
on people? Are you trying to buy yourself a friend while you’re in Norway or something?
No. 1574528
>>1574526A $75 bottle perfume isn't a flex, it's an expectation.
And yes, for a formal event either wear flats or heels no higher than 3 inches.
No. 1574558
>>1574537>Price and brand name doesn't equal qualityCertainly more quality than a cheap $15 perfume. You'd be kidding yourself if you think there is no difference between that and a $75 fragrance. Maybe the differences become more nebulous after $75, but definitely not below that.
>L'interdit is an average perfume at bestStrictly your opinion. Many people say otherwise.
People are clowning on me because I struck a nerve with them. I honestly couldn't care less what they think of me. They can't afford $75 so they rather kick up a fuss over it. It's not even that big of a deal kek. More than likely they have shitty lives which explains the excessive anger and projection occurring in this thread à la
>>1574531 No. 1574606
>>1574598No, not to the same effect. I have perfumes made mostly of natural ingredients as well as those made of synthetic ingredients—the synthetics have farther reach in general after several hours of wear, while the naturals are normally skin scents after the first hour or so (as in, you'd need to lean in vvvvv close to smell it).
>cloying, soapy sweetness of L'Interdit/La Vie Est BelleYou've clearly never smelled l'Interdit if you call it a sweet fragrance or put it in the same scent category as La Vie est Belle. L'Interdit is a darkly feminine/mature (and I daresay it veers on being unisex) scent, LVEB is a softly feminine perfume.
>consoomerOpinion discarded.
No. 1574803
>>1574795I don't know her life but I think she's only 19 or 20 so it's not like it's weird if her parents support her (especially if she's a bit
delicate) but it does seem to torment her that she's not "financially independent". maybe she really is too mentally ill to get a job, I dunno. lot a mentally ill people out here with jobs though.
>>1574796>if you're whiteshe's romanian and she lives in romania, come on nonna why would you even say this shit lmao
No. 1574806
>>1574803NTA but if you're privileged enough to get by without working regardless of your race, you're much more privileged than most people and you should realize that. I know you're a butthurt whitie but race doesn't change a thing, anons still right.
Also if you don't interact with people irl, why are they supposed to care when you're sad? Autists usually fail to realize that for someone to care about you, you should care about them.
No. 1574813
>>1574810lmao
i was with her until she called us sociopaths and used fucking venus as example for a huge
victim just like herself kek
No. 1574818
>>1574813Yeah, I was the one who said she isn't entirely wrong, but she goes insane with her ideas, like using Venus of all people as an example or concluding that everyone is a sociopath except for her who is a pure empath. People who were in discord with her say that she constantly attacks people for no reason and if they say something back she plays the
victim and goes on tangents about how she wants to murder people and animals to take revenge on this cruel world for not appreciating her beauty and intellect.
But it's totally because the world is evil that she has no friends, it's not her fault, never.