File: 1608734699267.gif (1.43 MB, 500x287, FitLgTz.gif)
No. 700861
not everyone disagrees with you
previous:
>>>/ot/686078Farmhands' dumbass disclaimers:
>Reminder that if you are a radfem/pinkpill/Terf sperg/gendercrit, the "unpopular opinions thread" is not your reverse uno to continue the discourse. Nor is it your general place to try and fight people. Ignore posters you disagree with.If you are here to;
>sperg about trannies ruining your board, or your conspiracies that everyone who disagrees with you is a tranny - BAN.>explain in detail why every man is shit - BAN.>fight people who disagree with you - BAN.>post vaguely veiled gendercrit posts to try and evade the no gendersperg rule - BAN.>reply to someones personal experiences because you inherently disagree with their views - BAN.>discuss your views on racism - BAN.>have gender crit discussions - BAN.>try and score twitter cookie points by dunking on the "bigot" terfs - BAN.If you are here to;
>complain that your boyfriend did x/ you got cat called/ you had a bad day due to a man - NO BAN.>talk about your personal experience and opinions. - NO BAN.>HOWEVER, personal experiences and opinions do not devolve into long political discussions nor do they contain your tangent on how all men are scum or how you want to ethnically purge because once upon a time a (((man))) said you are fat.previous:
>>>/ot/673218 No. 700878
File: 1608735781185.jpeg (99.46 KB, 750x751, 9CE6D055-03D6-4086-BE8E-AF47ED…)
>>700869Don’t you dare shit talk my Girltalk.
No. 700882
File: 1608736228308.png (447.46 KB, 839x542, 44f61d.png)
>>700871My fellow dark theme sister…
No. 700891
>>700881Most people who commit suicide suffer from some sort of mental illness(es). I don't think you can call it selfish when they're literally ill in the head (sorry for the rude wording but that's what it is) and incapable of making choices like a healthy person would.
Saying a suicidal person is selfish for committing suicide is almost like saying a person with a broken leg who doesn't walk to get someone something is selfish.
No. 700894
>>700892Hard disagree you are wrong.
She should have killed far more men before getting caught.
No. 701011
File: 1608747111293.png (24.3 KB, 949x223, 20201223_181046.png)
>>701010And how did he abuse her?
No. 701015
>>701006Why didnt you just attach the video
Anyway, wasn't Stanley literally bullying her because he thought it would make her perform better? She's not overdramatic. That's not a normal thing to do, director or not.
No. 701431
>>701267agreed. people are perpetuating the system, which is definitely government encouragement. they make money off student debt by charging interest and even more by raising tuition prices every year.
they set you up to go to college in high school. trying to opt out from it, you get pestered by the school staff, who are also govt employees.
and i don't get why people fall for the delusions, i have watched many videos stating how long it takes to pay off school debt, it sounds like hell as someone who's witnessed financial struggle since i was a child.
when push came to shove and i realized in my first semester i simply cannot continue going to school unless i wanted to bankrupt our family because they already can't handle their finances and FAFSA gave me the bare minimum because i was too poor in the first place. might as well drop out and get a full time job.
i'm moved out now and i'm financially stable, still lower class, but no debts due whatsoever.
>readily available information in books and onlineyes, exactly this. especially the fact you can easily find college-course txtbooks for free and youtube has great resources as well. i've mentioned this and my friends who were in college at the time would seethe any time i remembered how much free and useful information is out there without having to fork over $28k a year. like, i am sorry i don't have the free time to be a student, i have to work too.
No. 701471
>>701267Sorry but this is a bad take.
A bachelor's degree is the zoomer high school diploma if you want a job with benefits and pay worth a damn anymore. That is if you don't want to be busting your back at a trade, retail, or on Onlyfans. Nepotism might save you, but other than that your prospects are bleak without a degree.
You absolutely should be angry at a system that indebts people for wanting to learn, but having an educated populace is actually a great service that should be encouraged.
No. 701568
File: 1608778541852.png (387.97 KB, 730x643, oeo72bt4tq701.png)
When Logan Paul posted that video of the dead body in the Japanese forest I thought it was gross and tasteless but not the biggest outrage of the decade. Maybe I have a weird way of looking at death but it didn't hit me the way it hit other people. It was just a dead body in a public space. I think Logan's content is trashy and the fact he has a young audience was the worst part, but the video itself was just poor taste and that's that. I felt like it was in the news for a long time considering it got taken down fairly quickly and if anything it just got amplified due to the Streisand effect(I would have never heard of Logan Paul to this day had it not been so viral) All I'm saying is people were 9/10 outraged and I was like 3/10 outraged. It's more of an outrage to me that kids watch his content and think he's funny or admirable.
No. 701619
>>701602Hard agree anon. I work in agriculture & there's a serious lack of women in this industry, plus it makes a
lot of money.
Get your damn hands dirty ladies, it's good for you.
Also for the more creative bitches out there, being a tattoo artist is the most profitable art job you can get without having to drag your ass thru art school. & It also is another field lacking in females.
No. 701620
File: 1608783866240.png (348.78 KB, 1280x720, 1555283085401.png)
Black girl wojaks are powerful as fuck I want whoever is making them to keep making them
No. 701629
File: 1608785927150.jpg (22.14 KB, 750x774, 132412260_407722710475009_5689…)
>>701620Hard agree, I saw this one and fucking lost it
No. 701641
File: 1608787243872.jpg (45.05 KB, 800x450, cover5.jpg)
>>701620I know this is unpopular opinions, but I'm surprised to see this here lmao. I thought farmers would think they're lame cause precious imageboard culture or whatever but, I think the black wojaks are really cute.
I don't think anons mind the doomer girl though so, it would be hypocritical if anyone had an issue with these.
No. 701644
File: 1608787271722.jpg (32.42 KB, 680x702, 8e5.jpg)
>>701641Also wanna know who decided to give these girls laid weave lmao
No. 701660
File: 1608789770806.jpeg (34.76 KB, 439x284, 4FE7E544-05E7-4929-879D-4EA8FF…)
>>701620I love them so much.
>tfw i will never be as pretty as femwojak No. 701699
File: 1608794597140.jpeg (97.27 KB, 950x585, F1EC8E13-8B11-4FE6-8201-706AF3…)
I like the black wojak memes like this one
No. 701708
File: 1608795400040.jpg (330.08 KB, 2048x2048, IMG_1196.JPG)
>>701699I like this one because it's literally what happened kek
No. 701740
>>701719Not really, this place has never been one of /pol/'s outposts. It's based on /cgl/.
They did try to colonize it, but they failed because they're vitriolic incels, lmao.
No. 701788
>>701568Isnt he like woke now or something, with the George Floyd protests he made about 3 podcast episodes about white privilege, police brutality, anti racism and gave some money to BLM, he went semi-viral on twitter for a while and most depressingly saw some woke
woc I follow actually Simping/Thirsting for him
No. 701806
>>701568I agree, it was in poor taste but not that shocking to me. I'm surprised that somebody didn't step in and tell him not to post the video beforehand. Don't large youtubers have managers who help them with their channel?
>>701699I find these cringe. Wojak is a dead meme. Should have stopped at the boomer/zoomer jokes because everything after that was terrible.
No. 701847
>>701711Yeah I think they're supposed to be in more of an ms paint style.
I don't like the weird connotations the wojack memes have though, like they've always been used for messed up shit just like pepe.
No. 701872
File: 1608812358222.jpg (78.08 KB, 1200x664, 1608805666728.jpg)
>>701641Decide to look them up, this was one of the first results…………. God I feel Black Incels who despise black Women don't get enough hate
No. 701873
File: 1608812379928.png (477.99 KB, 611x869, eu1kpia96n211.png)
I hate pitbulls
No. 701900
>>701873Pitbulls shouldn't be so heavily bred or they should mix with other breeds to "water down" the pit dog instincts. No matter how many pit bull owners love to say that their adorable dog nannies their baby, the truth is that they're just lucky the dog hasn't seen the baby as a prey to maul yet.
Also the beady eyes, huge skull and muscular short body are just… not very good.
No. 701928
>>701878>>701887Overzealous pitbull owners almost scare me more than pitbulls themselves. The way they go on about these dogs being harmless babies who wouldn't hurt a fly and are falsely stereotyped makes me feel like they'll take zero responsibility and blame the
victim if their dog does end up hurting someone. All dogs are capable of snapping and biting someone, and pitbulls are capable of doing far more damage than say, a pomeranian. Responsible dog owners need to acknowledge this.
No. 701942
File: 1608821529261.jpg (175.28 KB, 735x1003, ec3a1e1318f365b9cfb434df252386…)
I don't understand why Its gotten so unpopular to say that many times there isn't alwaays a clear good guy or bad guy in life and society, most of the time you're not gonna find an easy villain like Nazis irl
No. 701945
>>701942I agree a lot of situations are nuanced, but people who go on about "both sides" are obnoxious and usually looking to play devil's advocate to make themselves feel smarter. You can understand ~both sides~ while still having an opinion.
I feel like these types are just lazy and don't want to defend their opinion because they don't research the issues. Anyone with more than a cursory understanding of a subject usually has an opinion about it.
No. 701954
File: 1608825980270.jpg (440.96 KB, 525x700, Eastern_Barn_Owl_(Tyto_javanic…)
Owls are the ugliest birds (and I'm a bird lover)I can't like them
They look so strange it's just so damn repelling (yes I've seen all types of birds and frankly I love condors & vultures because they look goofy)
No. 701957
>>701955>5 year old videoThere are so many white people in that crowd, too.
>3d animationsAnon, what on earth is this channel? Who made this? They can't be serious kek
No. 701963
>>701958Not really, an able bodied man will always have the physical "power" in a relationship, most of the time men are the ones who ask for stuff to be inserted in their butts
No woman has ever gone " I'm gonna insert my fingers in a mans asshole which will be convered fecal matter of my own free will"
No. 701971
File: 1608827722350.png (328.34 KB, 415x628, ACBA1DDC-5ED7-4B85-B13C-8F9111…)
>>701954I think snowy owls are really cute though, anon… they look like if cats were birds, so fluffy. Plus their eyes are cute because they’re diurnal and not nocturnal so they’re not scary pits of ominous darkness like most owls
No. 701976
File: 1608828636829.jpg (103.83 KB, 1140x798, 20161026HOsaw-whetowl2-2-15736…)
>>701954Take this back anon or we're gonna have problems.
No. 702012
>>701998It’s okay, sorry I was so confrontational anon <3 I understand why you’d come to that conclusion though, a lot of people adopt the label
terf even though they’re only gencritt, makes the two terms seem more different than they are
No. 702198
>>702108I lived in a rural "city" growing up and my bullies (one of which confessed was jealous due to a guy) are underemployed drugheads who aren't cultured and don't take care of their looks.
I escaped and moved to a booming tech city after grad school. The jobs here are competitive, and people are super educated due to numerous opportunities. They live in a standard of wealth I've never seen before.
I can't imagine being bullied where I'd know my bullies were legitimately better than me. At least when I went to a depressed area's school I could cope that my bullies were frustrated losers. Here? Oh I'm definitely the mediocre freak.
No. 702219
>>702108I mean mine got cancer and died but that's probably an exception and not the rule
Also she 'gave her heart to Christ' while on chemo and I grew up in a very Southern Baptist/IBLP/Duggar-Bates area so I kept my views on karma to myself lol
No. 702282
>>702108I just think bullies are not worthy of the time of the people who got bullied.
Why should I even take in consideration their lives? Like yeah, I got a really shit school life experience, but I won’t even try searching for their names, and whenever someone from that school even tries to contact me, I block them.
Getting news from family members and such about them is something different, of course, but I honestly just tell everyone who tries to talk about my bullies that I just don’t give a single fuck and that I don’t want to even hear about them.
Basically: if they die, they die.
Victims of bullying need to close the cycle by not looking for their bullies’ info after all the shit they had to go through.
Then again, I’m assuming it’s people from cities or that can actually distance themselves from their bullies, of course living in the same 200 people town will make distancing themselves impossible.
No. 702312
>>702308>>702284I'm not denying pretty privilege, but she is legit talented and knowledgeable, has good ideas for content, and is quite funny/entertaining. I think she would still be popular if she was average looking.
I actually think her weirdness is over emphasized by the contrast with her looks, if she wasn't prettier than you'd expect for someone with her personality it would seem less surprising and bizarre.
No. 702319
>>702312>>702317I think the homeschooling is why she doesn't act the way you'd expect, like there are several times where she gets spooked by guys creeping or staring at her in costume and seems genuinely surprised by it despite being maybe 30. She's quite sheltered from a lot of experiencs which shape your behavior as a pretty girl, while maybe over-exposed to some other experiences by being homeschooled and living/working in a trailer. Being a Youtuber also exacerbates any latent craziness and negative traits (See: Shane Dawson and Tanya Mongeau) so her personality has probably got stronger since being warmly welcomed as another of Youtube's amusing messes.
She is skilled and talented, those parts are the best parts of the video imo. In a way she's kinda not aware of how talentless and average most people are so the behavior is a little off. Also definitely ADHD by how she gets distracted mid-project, acts impulsively, and edits every minute to be wAcKy.
No. 702400
File: 1608898320503.jpg (95.62 KB, 750x852, 0c59d591a9110bc3827fe5de85de21…)
>>702377I understand that some people will only talk about and act like their entire lives revolve around these things, but the stuff a person is interested in, their hobbies and political views ARE a part of their personality.
>>702398I agree with this, not just the white-ish platinum blonde, but also colors like pic related. I think blonde and red are the only natural hair colors that look better artificial.
No. 702442
>>702284Really? I thought she looked kind of strange. Still pretty, but a weird kind of pretty. I would still watch her stuff because she's got similar interests and is extremely creative and doesn't have the personality of wet paint.
Merry Christmas, y'all!
No. 702709
>>702484I love that shit but you're right. I never make good use of 90% of the stationery I get no matter how cute it is and end up throwing it out.
It doesn't clutter my room up though, I keep it in a box.
No. 703218
>>703206more like "I'm not going to support your self destructive behavior because I actually love you and want what's best even if you hate me at the moment"
*Results may vary
No. 703223
File: 1609028708788.jpg (338.48 KB, 1016x774, 1550767500838.jpg)
Being an empath is mostly a disadvantage in life, not a cool super power. I have a family member who has such a high amount of empathy that she can't sit through any movie or show with mild violence. She can't handle anyone jokingly calling someone stupid, even if both parties are clearly being silly and having a lighthearted time. She's incapable of saying no to people in need even when she absolutely can't afford to. Honestly it looks exhausting and incapacitating, her life is constantly feeling others pain, it feels like youre personally hurting her if you tell her about a nuisance you had at work. Seeing people on the internet talk about how they can tootaally feel the vibes and how cool it is to feel one another are liars cough cough shane dawson. I know that family member has many times said she wishes she could turn it off.
No. 703819
File: 1609132871310.jpg (17.18 KB, 474x367, download.jpg)
>>703435>"watery head on its shoulders"is it because budapest is surrounded by rivers?
unpopular opinion
>caramel fucking sucksthis piece of shit candy is literal burnt pus.
it gets stuck in your teeth no matter what and the after taste is like sucking on rotten flesh. the salty versions are even worse. who the fuck came up with such an abomination?
some sadistic, perverted fuck.
>oh here's this fucking snot of fried milk and sugar, how can i make it even worse and unhealthynow the disgusting after taste has some extra crunch! great! the authentic experience of eating a booger!
the caramel loving diseased brain bitches couldn't stop there. they had to put it in every decent candy. a nice fudgy chocolate bar now has to be ruined with a layer of this diabetic death glue. frozen vanilla ice cream? fuck you, here's some gooey snot drizzle all over your otherwise completely perfect snack.
>then they decided that caramel is fancynow it's in every gift shop packet for any occasion!
i deliberately told my coworkers i hate caramel
but their sugar rot brain only was capable of remembering the words CARAMEL because half the gifts they gave me for our secret santa had this disgusting obscenity in one way or another in every type of snack.
caramel is sweet only in it's undertones. the whole time you're sucking on this bitch the main flavor is the burnt cow tiddie juice. just typing this sentence gives me a horrendous flashback of smelling burnt milk. the stench is revolting. only baby brain, candida infested individuals find this rotten thing in any way pleasurable.
the only tolerable version i ever had of this infectious block of hack was one that had so much sugar in it, the texture was basically grits. even then, after consuming such abhorrent shit i had to clear my throat and blow my nose for 2 days after.
i can't wait for the love of this sticky sick chunk to finally fucking die.
fuck caramel.
No. 703820
>>703819Your post is simply bullshit.
>i can't wait for the love of this sticky sick chunk to finally fucking die.It won't. Seethe.
No. 703824
File: 1609133708368.gif (1004.9 KB, 500x256, tumblr_mk3jqh54Su1rtx8l6o1_r3_…)
>>703819Carmel-chan, I think this was better suited for the vent thread!
No. 703843
File: 1609136265454.png (265.73 KB, 540x405, tumblr_pgdqttjjCw1rr5kcxo7_540…)
People who just loooooove True Crime shows are fucking disgusting and no better than scrotes who jerk it to rape porn imo. I understand falling into a gruesome Wikipedia spiral every now and then, but finding endless entertainment value in real life murder is indicative of an empathy deficit. It's even more annoying when they pull the "idk i jst find the mind of the killer so fascinating like what makes a person do that…idk its just fascinating to me but I guess im just weird like that hehe" bitch get a grip. You want to hear about bodies getting chopped up same as everyone else. Go take a criminology course if you're so 'fascinated'. If I ever get randomly axe murdered my last thought is going to be that someday, some Kimberly is going to listen to my last moments being described as a way to relax after a day working at her bank job. Shit.
No. 703885
>>703867Tbh I never really get what people mean when they say it's offensive to do makeup while telling true crime stories. I feel like youtubers who do that are just trying to make the videos feel more "personal" and less creepy while still keeping respect for the people involved. Idk, I feel like if makeup true crime videos are bad, then channels like Nexpo and Reignbot are also bad since they go for that dramatic creepy factor with the voices, music, and the sound effects.
Idk, I feel like there's no "good" way to really talk about tragedies, as long as they're respectful it's not an issue imo. Even though I'm not into it, I understand watching true crime stuff is like watching a trainwreck. You want to look away, but at the same time you want to know what else happened, especially cause stories usually have weird circumstances.
No. 703892
File: 1609146062852.png (229.83 KB, 680x450, dd0.png)
>>703858>If they were listening to a podcast on like hypothetical torture scenarios or stuff that focuses on murder method rather than the characters involved then that would be something that’s actually edgy and fucked up.hahaha…..who would do something like that………
No. 703988
>>703885I think the creepy voice videos are better because they aren’t putting their dumb fuckin faces in them and being like “YASS QUEEN THESE EYEBROWS ARE ON FLEEK SIS” while talking about horrific crimes or making a dumb ass shocked face for the thumbnail in front of pictures of the
victim. That Bailey Sarian bitch is so annoying
No. 704048
File: 1609159967418.jpg (80.44 KB, 900x750, hila-klein-7.jpg)
Hila from H3h3 adds nothing to the podcast and even makes it worse with her embarrassingly bad jokes and slightly creepy/uncomfortable presence. It's embarrassing to see youtube comments saying she's beautiful and funny non of which is true
No. 704075
File: 1609163444415.jpg (72.05 KB, 680x850, shupthefuckupscrote.jpg)
>>704073
no offense but
No. 704085
File: 1609163868518.jpeg (69.13 KB, 526x310, 3124E7C3-2D2C-45F7-AC2F-DD1487…)
>>704073
No. 704106
File: 1609165384359.jpeg (54.34 KB, 700x467, 0f8ae860-acd5-11e9-b31b-008cfa…)
99% nurotypicals are the most annoying and superficial people I've ever met, they hate saying almost any form critisism to your face but think it's fine to make fun of you behind your back, they also act holier than thou because they posted some bullshit on Facebook about treating everyone equally despite treating me(autistic) and others like subhuman pieces of shit
No. 704116
>>704070For the longest time I thought they were siblings. But it was in their early days.
Also I guess somewhat related, podcasts are a shit format.
No. 704125
File: 1609167892332.png (573.55 KB, 446x564, Joe_Rogan.png)
Twitter liberals who try to cancel people like Joe Rogan are stupid since most of their fanbase are not Twitter librals and will continue watching or surporting them
No. 704170
>>704121Seconding this. I have an autistic classmate who is incredibly disruptive and makes us all uncomfortable. Autistic people
of course don't deserve to be treated like shit, but if you're not adhering to social norms and are making others feel uncomfortable, you're going to face (expected) social backlash. This applies to everyone, neurodivergent or not.
No. 704228
File: 1609176974617.jpg (113.7 KB, 1242x1131, DEVg-Cqw-UQAEOfv0.jpg)
Jannies are surprisingly based this month and I'm glad everyone's getting banned.
No. 704275
>>704239Being critical of autistic people in the same way one is critical of neurotypical people is a recipe for disaster, since autistic people don’t function nor comprehend things in the same way that neurotypicals do. However, coddling autistic people or deciding not to try to teach them because you’re too lazy to accommodate for their challenges is a whole other topic. Autistic women often develop masking tactics because women aren’t held to the same standard of accommodating to other people as men are, so it’s often autistic men who have the most issues because no one will speak up and teach them what is and isn’t appropriate because it’s too hard or uncomfortable. Some lower functioning autistic people will never understand it and will never be fully in control of how they act in social situations, obviously, but the higher functioning ones should have caretakers who are willing to work with them to teach and help them as best they can (not just coddle them or let them do inappropriate things because “they’re autistic what can you do!”)
Anyway, in regards to what other anons were saying about being annoyed or feeling disrupted by autistic classmates, it sounds like the typical normie, low empathy opinion of anyone who can’t function the way I do deserves to be shit talked because I’m uncomfy. And in your case, anyone who doesn’t function like you doesn’t deserve to live which is a whole other can of eugenic worms.
It’s always about neurotypicals and how hard it is to feel uncomfortable and not about the autistic people and how hard it is to try to function to a neurotypicals standard just so they don’t treat you like garbage. And then they wonder why autistic people don’t get social conventions, especially when those social conventions inherently don’t value them, or anyone who thinks or functions differently than the group.
No. 704321
>>704275>in regards to what other anons were saying about being annoyed or feeling disrupted by autistic classmates, it sounds like the typical normie, low empathy opinion of anyone who can’t function the way I do deserves to be shit talked because I’m uncomfy. Anon, I'm sorry that you're a literal autist, but when a person makes others feel uncomfortable by being objectively disruptive and rude– regardless of the reason why– that person is going to face negative social consequences. Again, that's how it works for every human being who doesn't abide by social norms.
I don't think you're a lesser human than me, but I do concede that I probably would find you annoying or weird IRL. However, I also recognize that having autism is not your fault.
>>704301 summed it up well.
No. 704371
>>704106I think autists have a stuck up impression of themselves. They think they are deep because of their random interests but they usually have zero work ethic required to achieve anything. A lot of autists don't even have the capability of getting a college degree but think they are so intellectually above "normies."
>>703843Idk I'm into true crime but I'm not really into random murder/torture stories. I like stories about fraud/liars like Theranos where everyone covered up how the company was a sham.
No. 704373
>>704275>>704106Who cares, high functioning austists shouldn't be in education with normal people because they ruin everything for everyone and I'm sure it sucks for them too. I remember when I was going to a private middle school with a very good reputation, parents were either rich as fuck or poor but had kids with very good grades so they could get a scholarship (which was my case), and it sucked that I was stuck with two autistic kids ruining it for others just because their rich granola parents wanted them to have normal friends and pretend that nothing is wrong at all with their deranged, violent kids.
I'm definitely going to complain about it because my memory went to shit due to some health issues and I sometimes had to miss classes because of said health issues at the time, so being with raging kids trying to do interrupt everyone all the time made paying attention even more difficult at school. I can't even imagine working with someone like that in a professional setting full time. I had to basically babysit a coworker who was legit retarded many times at a part time job and it was even more exhausting than dealing with the crazy customers, and I wouldn't be surprised if he were a less highly functioning autist because of his behavior and facial feature.
No. 704399
File: 1609192625414.png (1.12 MB, 1458x813, 1546497058445 (1).png)
>>704106Based. Spergs are at least honest, normalfags will always lie or fake certain emotions just to gain something. I'm a schizoid and I hate normies.
No. 704446
>>704106Only somewhat related but I hate how much normalfags talk about other people. I live with two of them and every time I overhear their conversations they are talking about someone else. It's over very minor stuff too, like someone being awkward, someone having too much/too little social media followers, personal appearance (just minor stuff like wearing a shirt they find ugly), etc.
I get talking shit about an autist who makes things miserable for everyone but why even remember such minor offenses.
No. 704489
>>704484Did you experience any side effects at all anon? How long did it take?
I'm curious about what a positive accutane experience looks like.
No. 704492
>>702484Yeah that’s true.
Tbh a lot of kawaii aliexpress decor looks like shit most of the time anyway.
No. 704498
>>704484May I ask what kind of acne you had and if you knew the root cause?
I'm just skeptical of the drug's effectiveness when the cause of acne is due to hormonal imbalances. It just seems like hormones would kick the skin back into a shitshow the second someone comes off the drug.
No. 704503
>>703850It's gross but at least you can kind of understand that the culture overseas did that to those people, they were taught that is okay since they were children, in their schools, all their life. At least there's a reason that made them that way, it's almost like they really don't know better. Even though they should be taught.
But nothing repulses me more than a person that was born and raised in the West making excuses for that kind of thing or even saying that things like child marriage that were outlawed here 100 years ago should be brought back because some cultures don't think it's wrong. Imagine being born into the most well-being and freedom humanity has ever had in history so far and sympathizing THAT without even getting paid for it. I can't wrap my head around it.
No. 704534
>>704484I will shill accutane at every opportunity I get. If I'd listened to fear mongering about side effects, I'd still be miserable and ugly. In fact, I blame the fear mongering for how long it took me to get on accutane, if I'd tried it sooner I'd have less scars and had a better experience in my late teens.
My side effects were minimal, and I was monitored by a dermatologist regularly (including my mental health). It's absolutely worth the risk imo and some acne just needs hardcore medication, nothing else. I really cannot overstate the relief and happiness that comes with never having to worry about my skin, a decade later it's still resilient af and barely ever breaks out.
No. 704569
>>704498I had cysts, blackheads, whiteheads and pustules, which are all caused by an excess production of sebum, that might have been due to a hormonal imbalance or not, I honestly don't remember. Accutane works by reducing that production of oil, so no junk gets in the pores and they don't blocked, it also kills the bacteria that infects them.
Apparently your skin goes back to "normal" if you finish your treatment earlier than supposed to because the effects work better in the long term and they also last because, basically, your pores close (Excuse the shitty explanation, not a dermatologist by any means)
>>704534Same, I had no idea about the side effects other than the dryness and found out about them after I finished the treatment, maybe that made a difference in my experience
>>704507Yeah, creams just weren't the best for me either. I hope you find something that works for you anon! And if you do try it, I hope everything goes well
No. 704626
File: 1609228927936.jpg (244.28 KB, 570x500, jokepu-hajlektalan.jpg)
>>704561I remember when the media was on this "handsome homeless men" wave, and showed these guys that were basically models living on streets that just picked up a woman to feed/clothe them whenever they needed. Considering they don't even really have to fear being raped or killed, it's a pretty sweet deal for them.
No. 704723
File: 1609246319050.jpg (104.77 KB, 1500x1019, 7177OiK4 dL._AC_SL1500_.jpg)
car accessories like picrel are adorable
No. 704725
>>704723I have literally seen this car irl just yesterday.
It, indeed, was adorable.
No. 704770
File: 1609253469423.jpg (54.75 KB, 570x430, Knix-combo-570x430.jpg)
I've felt this way since childhood and could never quite pinpoint why, but I'm repulsed by the shape of traditional panties/bikini bottoms (right in picrel). I vastly prefer the shape and feel of boyshorts (left).
No. 704805
>>704770Bikini gives muffin top unless you get a pair that's similar to that material. I hate that cut too.
Target has some brand, I think it's Arden? They're extremely comfortable and seamless,
plus I don't have to buy a size up because of my fat ass. No. 704827
File: 1609263017117.jpeg (52.01 KB, 612x612, 149b5ae7-a98d-4b8e-964e-1de729…)
>>704805>>704816I also get annoying muffin tops in regular panties which is why I only wear panties with a strip of lace on the edges. Completely removes any muffin top issues for me, it's both more comfortable and invisible underneath clothes. It doesn't have to be expensive lace either. Maybe try something like pic related? It works on any cut.
No. 704874
>>704849What the fuck? Your boss won't do anything about that?
That situation is clearly above and beyond what your job description detailed.
No. 704895
>>704874NO! he just makes jokes about putting a punching bag in the office. Like i literally hate it because this job is so easy and the pay is good otherwise.Idk what to do. Sorry for venting on here that autistic post just
triggered me lmao.
No. 705219
>>705153Every thread attracts a specific demographic. There's always lots of anachans in the pro-ana thread, lots of junkies in the Luna and TND threads, lots of whores in the shayna thread etc.
Nobody's mad at anyone, people just tend to discuss subjects close to them personally.
No. 705223
>>705153That's how it's always been. That's why all other anachan threads got banned off the site except that one general thread. Made me sick to my stomach to see that fucking thread bumped to describe some instagram ex-anachan in recovery "getting fat" because she was actually reaching healthy weight. Mental illness.
I wish the same was done to all the e-thot sex workers, their threads are filled with other salty camgirls trying to take down the competition.
No. 705324
The internet is not a reflection of reality. It never was. From when it was mostly populated by nerds or those with specialized interests relevant to using the internet to connect with other like minded people, to now socially engineered trends on controlled and heavily censored social media made to sew discord and dysfunction into people; as well as speed up the process of Americanization and globalization. the internet has been nothing but a highly specific group where only the loud minority feels entitled to share their opinions while the rest quietly lurk or retain in their personal conversations.
On to my second point, the internet being a reflection of reality also makes no sense because there is often a controlled narrative forced down everyones throats by a loud minority (many shills, bots, or outright trolls) regardless of personal experiences. Even the real world has a variety of opinions more than what you can find on social media websites (where everyone suspiciously parrots the same thing and same ideas no matter their ethnicity, sex, nationality, age group, or country). Also most people dont care to think deep in the way many of the neurotic, obsessive, flamebaiters of the internet do, so this should also show you how false the internet is when people claim it to be a "reflection of reality". While I believe the internet is influencing people right now and how they think, and this was done by design, I do not think this is peoples "natural" thought process nor how people are going to act as soon as they get anonymous.
No. 705358
>>705337Sincere questions:
1) why don't you trust it?
2) What potential side effects of it are you anticipating that would make getting the vaccine worse than catching COVID?
No. 705365
>>705358Between me, you and others coming on this site anon. I don't believe in any of it and the media can fuck off. I'm British and I personally pray our government are blown up successfully by the next prick who reckons they're Guy Fawkes. The whole tory party are legit cunts anyway. Fuck the lot of them.
>>705360And also, but, why? Rice is gorgeous
:(
No. 705401
>>705362It depends on the definition of unpopular–I guess I meant that it's not unpopular enough, it seems like a good number of people don't want to get it which will interfere with herd immunity and therefore the effectiveness of the vaccine. I work in healthcare, and there have been employees telling patients they don't trust/won't get the vaccine which is so unprofessional and bonkers imo. However, I did read
>>705365 and honestly, fair enough kek. Stay safe regardless!
No. 705402
>>705362Anon it
is broke. We're in the middle of a fucking pandemic.
No. 705433
File: 1609346144054.jpg (96.06 KB, 1200x675, IMG_20201230_103250_441.jpg)
>>705402How is a virus in which you have a 99.8% chance of survival worse than a 95% efficacy vaccine with many side effects?
I could understand if the mortality rate of the virus was much higher, but very few people are dying from Covid alone. The people that are dying are old, fat, crippled with comorbidity and would have died due to these anyways.
No. 705446
File: 1609348049954.png (209.58 KB, 617x732, canvas.png)
>>705440thank you! sure some people will be fine but what about the millions of people who wont be/aren't its not fair to them or their families to just be like "stay away from gandma and grandpa duh"
Anyway my unpopular opinion is that people who spend over 5 mins in the bathroom shitting have disgusting eating habits and bowel movements. I equally hate people who after pooping tell me about it in grave detail like its a quirky thing. Like this has been done to me on numerous occasions and i just dont understand? Like why do people have mugs about pooping. that is so gross
No. 705554
File: 1609358989537.png (827.21 KB, 907x889, kweers.png)
>>705552it's even worse now since now many furries are also troons and they try to piggyback off the alphabet soup community to make themselves look oppressed
No. 705606
>>705337What I don’t like is how you must waive your right to sue if shit happens…
>>705552Furries ALWAYS lie about not jerking off to furry porn when shilling it.
No. 705621
>>705582I like the aesthetics and I do appreciate some of the stories. Though I wish everyone would stop pretending they’re contemplative pieces from a genius. The way normies talk about Studio Ghibli is the same energy as worshiping muh old Disney as the pinnacle of animated arts.
>mfw no one ever talks about Future Boy Conan:(
No. 705637
File: 1609366676707.jpeg (511.99 KB, 1365x2048, 02A64F27-072C-47B5-A618-E81D3B…)
Lily James is not cute
I know there’s a specific thread for opinions like this but it’s past it’s limit and I think it’s too autistic to make a completely new thread just because I wanna bitch about a B List British actress
No. 705666
>>705552Wholeheartedly agreed. I have never met a nerd community with as much degeneracy and mental illness as furries. I know people shit on gamers, weebs, cosplayers, comic book geeks, larpers and all of those but furries are like the rotten bottom scrapings of all those different barrels thrown into a blender and left to fester. It's unreal how many cases of severe mental illness, sexual abuse, rape, child grooming, pedophilia, drugs, trooning and straight out fucking murder they have and this is before counting all the issues with bestiality.
They never have kinks that could be considered mainstream or harmless, it's always some weird fringe fetish and they absolutely devote their lives to it. They have no personal boundaries and think they can do sex roleplay with 13-year olds because ~it's not sexual because we're not human~! Remember when Discord banned shota and loli porn from their servers but left cub porn (furry loli/shota) untouched because the people developing that fucking platform are furries themselves?
>I also hate how furries act like the fandom isn't inherently sexual, when porn makes a huge part of itJesus if this ain't true. I challenge anyone to interact with a furry for more than 2 hours before they start telling you about what kind of fucked up porn they get off to. You can't.
I hate furries and I hate how they're crying oppression like in pic here
>>705554 when they're just broken, mentally ill people who wear collars and diapers outside of their home because of their nasty sex life they can't keep in their bedrooms while dealing with the guilty conscience by policing other communities on Twitter by doxxing and canceling people for completely innocuous mistakes. Furries are the lowest scum.
No. 705669
>>705621Future boy Conan was so endearing! I was surprised by how invested I got into a children's series. It really is a gem.
I watched Castle in the Sky in theaters, and there was this pair of old men who were enjoying the movie so much it was infectious. I'll never see the scene where the boy catches the girl as she's weightless for a moment before struggling as she's suddenly heavy again without remembering those old grandpas cackling like schoolboys. I don't think Ghibli films are cinematic masterpieces or anything, but there is something about them that brings out the child in you, albeit with a tinge of melancholy.
No. 705677
>>705651No, even the furries of the early days of the fandom (When they were called "funny animals") in the 80's and early 90's hated them. It started off with people being interested in anthropomorphic animals and drawing them, sharing handmade zines to spread around. But the community got hijacked by all the hardcore fucks who wanted to make it about fetishes and sex, and the original people left because they couldn't deal with them. The degenerate people that were left in charge of the community were the ones who shaped it into what it is today and inherently influenced the fandom. There were internal dramas in the 90's when people got sick of Furry conventions being basically huge orgies and bordellos.
Furries have always been ostracized because they're mentally ill faggots, not because of some "not like other nerds" syndrome. Here's a big, angry letter some disgruntled furry fan wrote in 2000 to berate the degens taking over their community:
http://web.archive.org/web/20000609053122/http://members.tripod.com/burnedfur/bf_manif.html No. 705703
File: 1609372951389.jpg (141.14 KB, 736x920, 7a61c672e876d0bb0522f76dc51a80…)
I really liked hillbilly: elegy, maybe because I'm not american, but I don't care
No. 705782
File: 1609390187843.png (242.33 KB, 2370x432, nkj.png)
>>705677I love that this person essentially called out otherkin, too.
No. 705884
File: 1609416283899.jpeg (112 KB, 1200x799, 10B94C4A-66A2-44B1-9FE0-2A8250…)
I haven’t seen the movie but I think the baby from Eraserhead is really cute
No. 706124
>>706121How come?
They were my favorite band in late middle school and high school. The Black Parade is when they started going downhill for me. It wasn't bad, but not nearly as good as their previous two albums.
I thought the whole Black Parade persona was pretty lame too. I liked the suits and red ties SO much better.
No. 706135
>>706124Nayrt but I had a similar experience of liking them until The Black Parade. I tried to enjoy it knowing it should’ve been gold to a 13 year old emo, but I just couldn’t. Everything about the album, from the concept to the music to the art, felt try hard and… kinda empty? I really disliked it despite enjoying similar shit.
I wouldn’t listen to them these days, though to be fair I wouldn’t listen to any other bands I was into from that era.
No. 706207
>>70593799% of people on the internet claim to be mistaken for much younger than they are are, it's extremely rare for anyone to admit they look their age or older. Even though, strangely enough, most people irl do look their age or older.
I do think it's common to have people guess your age wrong because not only are people always going to lowball their estimates to avoid any hurt feelings, people think women become old hags at 30, and it's really easy to forget forget how young actual teenagers look.
No. 706209
>>706145i can’t fucking wait. i know i’m gonna sound like a total femcel, but i hope the pick-me’s who are encouraging young, naive, usually unstable women to do this by shaming normal, well adjusted women who don’t do it start getting called out for their degenerate behaviour too, tbh. like go see a therapist instead of whoring yourself out to strangers on tinder for free, you freaks
the same goes for the same pick-me’s who sit on twitter all day chatting shit about women who enjoy ‘vanilla’ sex. congrats on sleeping with random scrotes who enjoy physically abusing you in the bedroom, but i’ll stick to missionary with my monogamous, long-term partner, kek
No. 706249
>>706182>red flag Nah, they see those women as a green flag to be taken advantage of. Everyone knows women with prospects who date scrubs have low self esteem as a rule, which signals all the abusers to the yard who know they can get away with being shit people.
Here's what happens in the scrote's brain when a woman dates him: They start to get an ego thinking that they can pull women when they're jobless and lack a vehicle. That in turn causes them to ponder if they can actually do better. So if you're a 'cute' girl dating a bum, the bum will start to think he has a shot with other, maybe hotter women. He just lies lurking and using up his gf's resources, waiting to see if pursuits with his dream women hit off while having the security of the fallback placeholder gf. At the same time they come to resent the women giving them support in the relationship because they feel emasculated in their presence knowing the reality of things. Scrotes are entitled.
No. 706250
>>706233>most women barely get wrinkles before nearing 50.Yeah, I don't think wrinkles are much of a determining factor in judging age until people are actually starting to look elderly. Most people aren't gonna look closely enough at your face to even notice fine lines and skin problems to begin with. I think when it comes to physical features, sagging or sunken skin is way more likely to affect how old you think someone is. I've seen elderly asian people with no wrinkles at all, I can still tell they're elderly because of how the skin sags. Likewise I've seen young people who spent too much time in the sun and got wrinkles, but I can still tell they're young.
Other than that, it's mostly style, demeanor, and life stage/context (as in you'll assume someone with a mortgage and kids is older than someone living in their parent's basement) that will affect your judgement.
No. 706277
>>706265Am I the only one who thinks cameras are getting more filtered and also augmenting our perceptions of reality? I swear the iPhone camera is even blurrier than I remember it being, photos of me from 2015 look better quality than current photos even taken on the normal phone camera, not the snap camera. I mostly use the Snapchat camera for space constraint reasons but I wonder if that's even more filtered.
Either way it's important to acknowledge that people have facial lines and always have. Smile lines and eye lines are a natural thing that occur even if you don't have puffy cheeks, and people used to know that, hence why everyone looked significantly less touched up before the era of digital filtering. Nowadays however everyone is so accustomed to filtering technology that we forget we have what are now considered facial "imperfections".
No. 706286
>>706281NTA but how convenient that 99% of couples who are just 'in love' despite an obvious disparity in looks involve a better looking woman.
Sometimes it's not that simple, sometimes it's the fact that women have been brainwashed their whole lives to not be shallow, to lower their standards for men's benefit, that men are 'visual' and therefore we need to work our asses off to fit their beauty standards and be worthy of love while they put zero effort into doing the same. Or maybe it's that we're told we're worthless past 30, that men age like fine wine and we age like milk, and therefore we should all go for men much older than ourselves before we expire and become spinsters. Anon is 100% correct that women who go for ugly and old men are ruining it for us, because it just perpetuates male delusion and entitlement when it comes to the calibre of woman they think they deserve just for being male.
No. 706300
>>706295Of course it's not, but we can only control our own actions and by our actions we can theoretically adjust men's expectations.
I'm gonna assume you have an uggo bf if you're this defensive.
No. 706302
>>706279Stop blaming women for male behavior. You're acting like men wouldn't still be trying to game and cheat with every younger and more attractive woman he thought gave him a flirty look.
It's like thinking sexual assault would stop if all women would just wear conservative clothes instead of the skimpy stuff that gives men ideas that they're entitled to look and touch our exposed bodies.
This is how men are and they'd be this way regardless if we gave them chances on our terms.
No. 706307
>>706302This argument is retarded. Assault is something men do TO women without their concert. Dating is something men do WITH women, and it's fully consented to.
And yes, men will always aim high. But if women weren't dating down en masse, they'd have no reason to believe they'd ever be successful. As is, they aren't totally delusional when they go for women half their age and may actually get what they want. Women have been socialized in very harmful ways and sometimes we need to take responsibility and actively work to change it. We need to end the lie that we must be the youthful, attractive half of a relationship, and sorry if it hurts anyone's feelings but calling out women who still believe it is one way to do that.
No. 706311
>>706304But you agree they still would even if we said no. So really the expectation isn't on us having built it up to anything.
Because this is male nature.
No. 706313
>>706311Uh but men expect to be able to get women younger and hotter women which is why they try and a lot of the time they succeed
>>706310Learn to be happy single. I'd rather be single than have some old ugly orge on top of me every night.
No. 706319
>>706313>Uh but men expect to be able to get women younger and hotter women which is why they tryThey'd try regardless. You're pissed because some women let them succeed, which again, isn't their fault and the male entitlement would still be around regardless if all women could magically agree to not like older or mister personality dudes.
This is so fucking stupid. You're only here to make someone with a not hot boyfriend feel bad about it. Don't pretend you're here for some woman's welfare lmao.
No. 706328
>>706312Yeah, because god knows nothing women have ever done or fought for has changed society in general including male attitudes… oh wait it has, many times, and men always had to be dragged kicking and screaming but eventually they come around to a certain extent.
Women get to decide who we will and won't fuck and shutting down discussion about how our choices may harm or benefit us isn't helping anyone. Choosing not to fuck older or less attractive men is not a fucking hardship and encouraging women to have higher standards is not 'blaming them'. Maybe it just takes other women pointing it out for some of us to realize we don't owe men our youth or beauty, and that making better choices will be advantageous to us as a whole in the long run. It's sad you're so resistant to being held accountable for how your actions affect other women.
No. 706329
File: 1609465671950.png (328.95 KB, 950x501, g.PNG)
Trying your best at a game isn't bad. So many people look down on "try harding" but I refuse to throw games to protect some scrotes fragile self-esteem. If you're seriously getting angry and competitive in a laid-back group party setting you shouldn't even be playing games. I'm not saying you should go full tilt autismo mode in a casual setting, but purposefully throwing to coddle someones ego is so dumb. If I kept beating someone at a game and later found out theyre some esports pro I'd just feel patronized. All of that being said it is definitely cringe when you see dads
No. 706346
>>706342Disgusting, you know a guy is
abusive if he only wants teenagers who don't know any better. There's barely any difference between a teen or a mid 20s in appearance so we know the real reason.
No. 706769
>>706740The implication that humans have "roles" in life (other than to be functional humans) defined by one's chromosomes, that somehow coincidentally correlate with whatever a person's society or culture's ideas of "gender" (and subsequently, gender roles, and how they're supposed to be enacted) are at the time that they're alive, is sexist in the way that the ideology of biological essentialism is - and sexist in the same way it would be to suggest that because a group of people with specific chromosomes (XY) supposedly have an innate, inborn role to perform in correlation with the existence of a group of people with other chromosomes (XX), would simultaneously suggest that it is also the innate, inborn role of people with XX chromosomes to exist in correlation to the other sex's "requirement" to serve as an caring, protective authority figure to them. It suggests that people with XX chromosomes, due to said innate, inborn role in correlation with the innate, inborn role of people with XY chromosomes, have an inability to take care of themselves or function irrespective of the other sex, because the other sex on a genetic level was created to care for them.
Anyone who believes that women have bodily autonomy and the right to exert it, and do not need someone to care for them (unless they would like that), in the same way that men do, would of course not believe something so silly.
This is aside from that fact that it is profoundly stupid to suggest that human genetics can understand these invented "roles" (regardless of what chromosomes a person has or what chromosomes are correlated with said "role"), that genetics can possibly be aware of a societal and cultural conflict such as war or the process of performing labor in exchange for currency, both of which are relatively recent phenomena in the grand scheme of history. It's almost as stupid as suggesting that, if such "roles" were objectively connected to genetics or chromosomes and defined someone's "purpose" in life, they could be easily ruined by even more recently invented and likely historically insignificant phenomena like video games or internet porn.
No. 706775
>>706769>biological essentialism is sexistI don't see how
>It suggests that people with XX chromosomes, due to said innate, inborn role in correlation with the innate, inborn role of people with XY chromosomes, have an inability to take care of themselves or function irrespective of the other sex, because the other sex on a genetic level was created to care for them.suggesting that men prefer to be providers does not imply that women are incapable of filling that role themselves. It it just means men have a hard time finding any other place for themselves in society
No. 706799
>>706775>I don't see howAttempting to use supposed differences between, or modern stereotypes concerning, biological sex as an explanation or justification for phenomena that is not related to biological sex is quite literally the definition (but not the entire scope) of sexism.
>suggesting that men prefer to be providers does not imply that women are incapable of filling that role themselvesOP didn't suggest that men "prefer" to be "providers", they said that was men's purpose as male human beings and that if they cannot perform it, they have failed as male human beings. There was no specification about whether taking care of women was something they enjoyed or not. That being said, for there to be a innate role (based strictly on invented human concepts like war, labor, and currency, in OP's situation) for an entire group of people according to their biological sex - something that is determined by genetics - the role has to be genetic and inherent to their biological sex. If this role is to be an authoritative figure to another group of people according to those people's biological sex (women) the genetics that cause this must understand that the role they're creating is respective of, and will correlate to the existence of, that other biological sex. For this to be reality, the genetic makeup of women would have to be compatible with the genetic makeup of men that intends for men on a biological level, to care (in whatever way) for them.
In other words, the genetic blueprint of people with XX chromosomes would have to correspond with the genetic makeup of people with XY chromosomes that causes men to innately "need" to care for women, in a way that makes women innately "need" to be cared for by a man, as nature supposedly intends, according to biological essentialists.
The fact that we can observe women successfully functioning and thriving both as women and as humans without being "cared for" by men, and that they are able to exist irrespective of and have as much bodily autonomy as men can and do, is evidence that no such genetically-determined or biological "role" for either sex to be an authoritative figure to or be a submissive figure to the other, exists or, if it does, is connected to biology and not a facade invented by the cultural construct that is "gender" and "gender roles".
No. 706809
>>706733>>706773this just isn't true. take off your rose colored view of the past where it was a tradfem heaven and men loved their lives and worked hard.
men have always been dissatisfied with the provider role. they've always cheated on and mistreated their wives. they've always been depressed. women have always worked (just in low paying clerical part time positions).
No. 706834
>>706762Sometimes people are more than their jobs.
It seems like if the sentiment of the man is to provide for a woman, treat her with respect, and be kind no matter where he is professionally or aesthetically, then that is a true Nigel.
I'd actually trust a genuinely kind dude lacking those things over a so-called nice guy with them. It's easy to be "nice" when you're winning at life, I like to see men put to the test when they're under pressure and are losing.
No. 707060
>>706809I don’t know, I do think that other anon has a point. “Men still cheated” yes but you have to take into account that there were a lot less women back then who were willing to have casual sex. Most men do a lot better in life when they are busy and have a job, and many get joy out of taking care of a family (You can find stats showing unemployment is a lot harder mentally on men)
I think, in general, back then most people were happier and more fulfilled even if they weren’t “in love” with their spouse, because they all had designated roles, didn’t have to go through long unstable periods of “what will I do with my life??”, less loneliness and isolation, etc. The lack of the internet also helped, but everyone was busier and had designated roles so they didn’t really have that much free time to waste online anyway
No. 707158
File: 1609607093312.jpeg (162.01 KB, 500x1197, 6D223E56-8B7C-4947-80A3-DAC590…)
>>707156It’s far preferable to being rushed into a marriage, not being allowed to have goals outside of being a wife and mother, legally being unable to control my own money, having no control over how many children I get to have and when, and spousal rape
No. 707161
>>707160do you not talk to people outside of the internet? are you 19 and is everyone you know working minimum wage retail jobs? my goal is to have a well paying career and live comfortably like most of my friends and peers.
the job market is fucked right now, minimum wage should be higher, there’s a lot wrong with society today but that doesn’t mean we go back to chasing a tradwife 1950s ideal that only existed in advertisements for ovens and on leave it to beaver. it’s a fantasy and I like to live in reality.
No. 707215
>>707156So, between an uncertain life that you still have control over (and can turn around if you find the right method or circumstances around you change), and a completely certain life of essential slavery to a man who emotionally (if not physically) abuses and cheats on you, can legally rape you, you have no real escape, no bank account, etc, you'd choose the latter? Because you don't like college?
Okay, anon.
No. 707236
>>707180>Women seem to have their own ambitions and drives apart from that and are content to just participate in society.Well, it's this in addition to the fact that if we're not adding to society or popping out kids, we're highly judged, shamed, and criticized for it too. In the same vein as how we're expected to be more mature, polite, and organized than men at a younger age as well.
Basically women are expected to have our shit together, whereas men got excuses and enablers.
No. 707237
>>707234I am not a scrote
My post doesn’t even make sense but no way I’ll try to make it coherent LOL.
I am right anyways
Fuck all people who talk/type too much
No. 707243
>>707241Yeah I realize that
Fuck talkative people
>>707238If you talk a lot get offended
No. 707305
>>707257I agree, it’s so popular and there’s a subreddit for literally everything. Some are full of weirdos, some are full of the shit in the Reddit hate thread, but there’s so many that are full of normies. I use a couple for niche topics and the only strange thing is they tend to be stupidly hugbox-y. Not a major issue.
The simplicity and relative anonymity are nice too.
No. 707346
>>707336Literally delusional. So I guess you'll try to convince us it's normal for psychiatrists to claim abuse is "therapeutic" for men.
http://content.time.com/time/subscriber/article/0,33009,876203,00.htmlThis is from 1964, by the way. Imagine how much worse a decade ago was.
Also
https://surface.syr.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1029&context=etd>for my mother and most young women in the post war 1940s and 1950s, life was bound by rigid, gender-scripted social codes that revolved around the institution of marriage and family (Oke 2008). >At that time, the institution of family was a private and protected entity, crafted by religion, enforced by the state, and controlled by the male head of household (Heinemann 1996; Coontz 2000). Women, like my mother, who were being abused in their intimate relationships were isolated and silenced, literally by their partners and figuratively by society at large. No. 707388
File: 1609633051900.jpg (53 KB, 297x400, shin17.jpg)
This occurred to me while browsing the glamfur thread on /m/: Hentai addicted 4chan scrotes had no business bashing furries as much as they did in the early/mid 2000's, and I'm honestly glad I only saw cringe furry yiff shit as an unsupervised 13 yr old on the internet, as opposed to hentai or real porn. I'm not saying furries aren't some of the most disgusting and socially retarded people on earth and it's MUCH worse now, but 2006 era /b/tards were more degenerate by far than the average furry. I think a lot of legitimately sick pedo perverts used them as a way to deflect attention away from themselves. Also I think furries are baseline more creative than weebs because they create their own IP. This is my unpopular opinion and I'm sticking to it.
No. 707390
>>707346Like 80% of the shit you quoted doesn’t even relate to abuse, ”life revolved around marriage and family” just because life was more centered around marriage and family doesn’t mean women were all being abused by their husbands.
There is still plenty of spousal abuse today, a huge effect of abuse is low self esteem therefore they are less likely to leave their husbands even if they have the choice. Just because there are more laws now against spousal abuse doesn’t mean it gets prosecuted properly, most abuse
victims never even report the abuse until they are very severely injured or ultimately murdered. Look up stats about women who’ve been murdered by their partners- many of them were abused prior but the abuse was never reported to police. Laws don’t work properly unless people report. As I said before domestic violence really isn’t any better now
No. 707424
>>707400>for my mother and most young women in the post war 1940s and 1950s, life was bound by rigid, gender-scripted social codes that revolved around the institution of marriage and family (Oke 2008). >At that time, the institution of family was a private and protected entity, crafted by religion, enforced by the state, and controlled by the male head of householdNone of these quotes are about abuse, hence my claim that 80% of your quotes were not about abuse. You’re acting like living or marrying a man = becoming an abuse
victim. Maybe you’re just a dyke?
No. 707435
File: 1609644116101.jpg (104.58 KB, 1024x768, 279768945_bc1c02c551_b.jpg)
>>707424Wow you sure seem hellbent on caping for boomer scrotes. I wonder why? Why would anyone willingly defend a system that subjugates them and only benefits the man? Unless… Could it possibly be? You had a penis all along?
In any case, not anyone worth arguing with, so keep seething, penis-haver.
No. 707528
>>707346That first article though.
>Most of the husbands, the doctors discovered, fell into a definite pattern. Though reasonably hard-working and outwardly respectable, they were in reality "shy, sexually ineffectual mother's boys."So the incels of the yesteryear who are now stuck playing video games and rating e-thot vaginas online. At least they're now getting weeded out from the gene pool unlike before when some woman had to marry them to avoid living on the streets.
No. 707674
File: 1609695892394.png (559.69 KB, 500x705, download (3).png)
>>707424tl;dr.
>Maybe you’re just a dyke?The projection jumped out. Have you been a closeted lesbian case all along? Mrs Midwest shit. 50s housewife LARPing and conversion therapy won't take away the thirst, anon.
Or, is it just that you want like, secret romantic cake-frosting trysts with other skinny legend 50s housewives while your lame-ass husbands are at work most of the day? You did lament SSRIs making other women fat. Sounding a little
too concerned, there.
No. 707921
>>707904I haven't heard much about "should themselves", but when a topic like this comes up it's common to say "they should die", so I it's more or less the same.
What groups/people?
No. 708484
>>706733Tbh I think its more the porn and video game addictions fucking men than the tfw no gf shit, the former leads to the latter and they're too dumb to see it. Scrotes don't really see the opportunity cost involved with spending each night in front of a computer and cooming to porn instead of having interesting hobbies
Also theyre myoptic as shit. I've known NEET Scrotes that narcisstically think that watching anime all day on welfare is a 180IQ move and wagies are dumb as shit. Then 25 hits and it becomes obvious they're losers and just can't handle it.
My unpopular opinion is that 4chan should be deleted. Not because of the gore or porn, but because I've picked up that most of r9k, pol and soc is just the most loser adults over 25 corrupting 16 year olds with their cynicism.
No. 708499
>>708489Right, but in the era of easy welfare, why would you need such a job? At worst, as a young person, you can do it for three months and then jump ship.
Within 6 months in an average city you should be able to find something decent. What reason could you possibly have to sit on welfare for 7 years?
No. 708507
File: 1609816390244.jpg (8.71 KB, 256x256, 85e6f3deb8e481a0c6b655aadeb730…)
Unpopular opinion:
Flat butts and flat chests aren't bad. Maybe it's just me because i have a flat butt and chest but, yes. Women who are flat? i love you, no homo
No. 708538
>>707921idk, i made up a story about how a
TERF acquaintance i knew killed herself and people ragged on me
No. 708584
>>708543Because obese women who spend their coin on clothes want to see what the clothes look like on an obese body. You don't have to ~aspire~ to be every model you look at, if it need not apply. Plenty of people don't want to
be the actual models. Autistic take.
No. 708608
>>708577ntayrt but god yes
Foundation looks so ugly, even light dewy foundation looks caked on to me compared to real skin. I seriously don't understand why it's such a staple when it comes to makeup.
No. 708610
>>708584nayrt but just like thin people don't look anything like the beautiful people modeling the clothes they want, fat women don't look like fat models.
in some countries models can't be too thin because it promotes bad health, with how much more of an epidemic obesity is maybe fat models will be regulated too…
No. 708641
>>708634The reason why she didn't want to do the scene was that gay porn actors are ridden with STDs due to the unprotected sex they were having and the lack of required STD screenings, not because she was homophobic.
Bruce Beckham, one of the people dogpiling on her reacted to her suicide by saying "She allegedly chose to end her own life when she was exposed to the same vitriol that gay people have been exposed to globally for decades" lmao. Another one was Jaxton Wheeler who basically said that "We didn't tell her to kill herself!" except when he himself had tweeted at her to "either apologize or swallow a cyanide pill".
No. 708679
File: 1609855918088.jpg (114.02 KB, 1024x1024, gtxcq49k.jpg)
>>708634August Ames. Such a fucked up story, so twisted how she was bullied because of it
No. 708692
>>708689also ive lived and am familiar with another western country as well as been outside of the us centric bubble and i honestly notice theres more extreme and outlandish types way more often in the US than in any other western society lol
Dont know about eastern cultures though.
No. 708695
>>708684>>708681I'am that anon and wasn't aware she's been mentioned a lot in this thread. I just finished watching some youtube armchair analysis on her case and was laughing at how much i didn't give a shit about the actual
victim. Doesn't mean that I like her though. Murderous sociopaths don't deserve to be in society… but still.. lol at her killing such a worthless, bottom of the barrel scrote.
No. 708696
>>708689Isn't it obvious? They have no higher group identity to belong to, so they splinter into smaller, more intimate groups where they can feel a greater degree of identity and belonging.
What does being an American mean? At this point it's just living in America, there is no identity to that.
No. 708714
File: 1609860410879.jpeg (6.63 KB, 180x280, download (3).jpeg)
Scarlett Johansson sucks. In everything.
No. 708726
>>708719to add on, many other serial killers too,had college going, young, attractive
victims but since they didnt fit the "All American girl" mold the media sensationalized them less. Either way the calculated favoritism with serial killers due to it fitting a better media story is disgusting. Its different than how Jack the Ripper got infamous in the UK because it was because he was so shocking and it was rare for it to happen not anything to do with the
victims like Ted Bundy obviously is imo
No. 708730
>>708719Anon there are plenty of notorious serial killers that killed prostitutes, John Wayne Gacy killed a ton of young, hispanic prostitutes and hid them under his house's floors and you could argue that he's even more infamous than Ted Bundy. The reason why Bundy's case is so "popular" is that he was a fucking lunatic in the courtroom, escaped after being detained and the media hyped up the fact that some weirdos sent him love letters.
I've never understood this bizarre "I-if his
victims weren't WASPs then nobody would've cared!!!!" mindset to begin with, with serial killers the notoriety comes from them brutally killing so fucking many people, not the background of the
victims. Like the BTK killer, I don't think what his
victims' ethnical background is, it's the fact that he put them through a fucking nightmare that stays in most people's heads.
No. 708736
>>708730It's not about just being wasp (nobody cares about most white runaways, hookers, or drug addicts much), it's the image they fit in of the all american girl and the fact they were used apart of the manhunt against Bundy that gradually led up to his arrest. We also hear far more about Bundy's
victims than we do about gacys, dahmer's, and ramirez. Bundy had like at least 3 documentaries made on him in the past year while gacy hasn't really gotten that despite probably being generally more referenced in media. Btk doesn't get as much documentaries and media attention as bundy so I don't even know why he was mentioned. If you ever watch bundy documentaries they always fixate on the
victims and how normal and innocent they were which is something they tend to gloss over with serial killers who have different types of
victims. There is also a focus on the looks of his
victims which doesn't exist much for other serial killers to this extent in the media
No. 708738
>>708735It’s weird out of context but it’s from when she was on the show and it wasn’t uncommon for them to shout him out on their social media.
>you should probably look at Schneider's behavior with Amanda Bynes when she was on The Amanda ShowNo trust me I think he’s a creep and that he’s behaved inappropriately with a lot of kids. I think he probably is a pedophile. I just don’t think he’s ever actually had sexual contact with a child.
No. 708747
>>708736I’m not American but over here I find Ted was well known for being intelligent, charismatic and for some odd reason having a hoard of fan girls while he represented himself in court. Every serial killer gets known for something unique they do, if the above was the norm with serial killers he would have been forgotten about by now. I don’t hear anything about any of the
victims here and couldn’t name a single one… bar I know one of Ted’s was a young child.
maybe this is an american thing with the victims? No. 708749
>>708736> We also hear far more about Bundy's victims than we do about gacys, dahmer's, and ramirez. Huh? I don't think I've ever heard about his
victims, all the shit to do with Bundy deals with him being a "heartthrob killer" or whatever. I think you've just been watching too many Netflix docuseries since they're milking it right now for some reason.
No. 708754
>>708737But how come there aren't literally just as many cows from places like Switzerland? You can say language barrier, but enough people from those places know English and could put them on blast, or we'd at least see a decent proportion of cringe pictures/screencaps.
I honestly think it's just something about Anglo ancestry in specific. British people are just as autistic.
No. 708784
>>708760What is nationality?
Americans do have a culture
No. 708821
>>708784okay, they don't have culture that isn't utter garbage.
what's worse, they leak that cancer culture and other stupid countries follow lead.
No. 708827
>>708730Samuel Little is the worst serial killer by number in the US but I believe that no one talks about him because most of his
victims were prostitutes.
Overall I think true crime focuses a lot on the murders of rich white women when most murder
victims in the US are black men. I don’t think all groups get equal treatment in crime coverage.
No. 708858
File: 1609874942003.jpeg (10.54 KB, 225x225, download (1).jpeg)
Pretty privilege is a thing but I don't believe extremely average looking women claiming they get free shit and As and jobs everywhere they go.
No. 708954
>>708858On days where I wear leggings I find that men are quicker to let me cut ahead of them in queues too… that's just some creepy shit. If you revel in that kind of attention then cool but there are just as many women wanting to curl up and die at gestures that you just know are based on you having decent tits or an ass.
If it's specifically men letting you skip ahead then it's not even about being pretty…it's them mind-fucking you while you stand there.
No. 708968
>>708858I've had a lot of this happen to me and I'm like a 5/10. I think I've just been lucky enough to be the target of other peoples' random acts of kindness before. The only thing that noticeably increases when I've put a ton of effort into my appearance is male employees being more likely to ask me how I'm doing and random men approaching and talking to me in general. I've also paid for other people's meals and given out freebies at work basically at random and I know I'm not the only one. Like
>>708924 said it's kind of narcissistic to think it's just because you're hot.
No. 709009
>>709005Don't know if this is bait or not but it wasn't this one specific screenshot just anyone who claims to have everything handed to them for doing nothing but being hot (even if they're not)
Men and women alike
No. 709010
>>709009I haven't seen people make claims that bold outside the example anon posted, just passive-aggressive/humble brags like "Men are a lot nicer to me when I'm
not wearing makeup for some reason and women can't stand me lmao".
No. 709023
>>708689The country was founded* by zealots and criminals of all stripes. Not to mention straight up greedy mofos. That's a whole lot of crazy right there. What do you expect in their descendents?
*Never mind all the people who were already living there at the time, of course.
No. 709030
>>709027Anon this is lolcow, an anonymous image board. You don't need "receipt's" when you're just venting about something you find annoying, especially since other anons came in and shared their own experiences with these people…
If you're truly curious go to reddit or something and ask for proof, if you think me and any other anon is just lying then just move on, I don't see what you'd be get out of claiming someone on an anonymous image board is lying about something that others do that annoy them
No. 709031
>>709010Now
this is one of those things that doesn't happen. Also, are you sure it's not projection? Because you're one of those women who can't stand them?
No. 709035
Reminder to ignore the bait like
>>709032>>709031 ladies
No. 709036
>>709035I'm
>>709031, how is my post bait? I've seen countless post on this site raging on women who don't wear makeup just for existing but I've never met a woman who acts like how she described.
No. 709039
>>709036You claimed it didn't happened because you never met someone like that and in the same post claimed the anon was like that. Do you not see the irony?
>>709038You're correct, but in a sense calling all women ugly pickmes for not thinking like you is in itself pickmeism as well as claiming x doesn't happen just to accuse the anon of doing it, especially claiming anons are lying over certain attitude's of people they've encountered in itself is ridiculous
No. 709111
>>709030It's really not that deep. People are allowed to say "I've literally never seen this happen" and call bullshit on what seem like non-issues, because this is Lolcow, like you said.
Not everybody's going to believe you if your scenarios sound unrealistic and unlikely, sorry.
No. 709140
>>709111And that would seem fine if the scenarios are actually unrealistic, people being bitchy/full of themselves/thinking they're better than others because of a certain attribute is not that
On top of that you guys literally have boards dedicated to weird people who say crazy shit, so what's so unbelievable about anons encountering people who say weird shit
No. 709168
File: 1609916812304.jpg (35.93 KB, 750x567, xQzpjdJ.jpg)
I feel insanely uncomfortable when I'm looking at a Robot Chicken short/sketch/whatever that show is.
I hate how it looks, even if I love stop motion, something about RC just looks uncanny and the "Haha Cute cartoon character doing edgy things lol" sort of humor just makes me uncomfortable more than anything. For some, everyone says it is the funniest thing ever, and I don't get why, you can literally just go to any parody animation channel on Youtube and you'll get the same type of humor but sometimes less ugly to looks at.
Picture unrelated because I legit can't find the will to search for a RC one
No. 709173
File: 1609918779946.jpg (25.12 KB, 260x335, 51r6AsIbRBL._SX258_BO1,204,203…)
>>709168As much as pop culture is worthy and deserving of criticism itself, "anti-pop-culture" humor has been a dead medium for what feels like decades now. I hate it regardless of whatever visual style it's presented in, because it's always presented as some kind of intellectual social commentary when it's really just "new thing bad" rehashed again and again. Now media franchises, brands, and corporations can use this humor about their own creations to "make fun of themselves" (promote their product to a consumer audience) so why even bother?
>you can literally just go to any parody animation channel on Youtube and you'll get the same type of humor but sometimes less ugly to looks atThe only thing Robot Chicken has going for it is that it's pre-YouTube, perhaps giving it a tad bit more originality for its time. Of course, it was outdone by MAD Magazine, who has been around since the 50s and is equally obnoxious.
No. 709198
>>709182Im in a cold country and having developed a weird new skin sensitivity to cold in the last couple years.. I'm kind of relieved to have a reason to put a mask on when I head out. Spent the two previous winters with what looked like rosecea flush every day from walking to work. Felt like shit when I would glimpse myself in mirrors afterwards. It happens too high up for a snood to help with it but this year the masks have noticibly lessened the damage.
My neighbour shouted the same thing at me the other day but I didn't want to explain my skin situation to her
No. 709212
File: 1609926290776.jpeg (251.7 KB, 2501x1563, TELEMMGLPICT000139267345_trans…)
>>709198>>709209I didnt look at it this way but why don't you guys wear a scarf like this? Its a lot warmer and easier to breathe.
I don't like people going out of their way to tell you it's stupid but I will still think it and don't appreciate angry looks I get from people for not wearing one outside when its not mandatory.
No. 709217
>>709212I tried scarfs and snoods and either they don't come up high enough or if they do I look a bit crazy wearing them. Masks cover the problem area perfectly.
Like you said though they're not mandatory outdoors here either so I don't think people on either side should be giving funny looks over it. It seems to be 50/50 when it comes to wearing them outdoors here
No. 709244
>>709240Awh that really sucks but also that they feel like they need to hide their face. I don't think the masks do their confidence any good in the long run.
I have a friend who got a serious rash from wearing the mask all day every day at work.
No. 709364
>>708471NTA, but
>Jeffery Dahmer>John Wayne Gacy>Dennis Nilsen>Dean CorllJust off the top of my head.
No. 709405
>>709393Same, I frequently get the urge to just hang around my city’s airport and watch airplanes takeoff.
>>709168I agree with you, it was weird. Somewhat related but I also always hated that Happy Tree friends show. My friends didn’t get why it made me so uncomfortable to watch.
No. 709533
File: 1609982477960.jpg (38.5 KB, 538x301, 4dba56f5719e86d57d81f0babad649…)
I like the bratz art style
They're strangely beautiful in their own way (despite being alien like)it makes them stand out
No. 709792
>>709769honestly i understand this. i am pretty open about it but honestly it's fucking gross when you think about it. gross, but not shameful. the vagina has a lot of unpleasant functions. i think that it being regarded as gross has memed us into forcing ourselves to acting like it's not, but we should be able to speak openly about things like period pain or other discomfort. things can be natural and disgusting, like shit. why is the vagina different? i also still have friends in their mid 20s who won't outright say they are on their period, so that's an entirely different problem.
>>709779to me, this is still letting men control us. again, disgusting vs shameful. one of those things is still true when you take men out of the equation.
No. 709813
>>709806Same, I like wearing mine cause it keeps my face warm. Idk why people act like it's stupid to still be considerate of yours and other peoples help. Even if it's not packed, you can still catch the rona. It's not a big deal.
Also, masks are not hard to breathe in at all, especially the blue ones. If you have a hard time breathing in them maybe you should go to a fucking doctor lol
No. 709927
File: 1610046096098.png (946.75 KB, 1199x678, blob.PNG)
I love stupid modern fashion 'trends', like pic related.
Yes it's ugly as fuck, it looks horrible, I would never wear them. But I love it when people don't give a fuck about how ridiculous their style looks. I want more people wearing whatever the fuck they like even if others will find it cringe or ugly or something. I have a lot more respect for a neckbeard wearing a fedora and leather trench coat because he thinks it's cool than for some /fa/ggot who secretly wants to wear edgy cybergoth but only wears plain fitted t-shirts out of fear of others judging him. If you want to dress like a victorian dandy then do it, as long as you like your own look no other opinion matters.
Yes, I know that the fact that many people do in fact look down on obnoxiously dressed people means dressing that way can have legitimate social consequences that you might rightfully want to avoid. The less unpopular this opinion becomes, the less that will be an issue, hopefully.
No. 710009
>>709927I agree with the sentiment and the neckbeard example etc but disagree that pic rel is an example of someone not giving a fuck how ridiculous they look. If they were some random brand then yes, but they’re clearly an Adidas/Yeezy collab
it’s obvious and I don’t even know fashion. They are ridiculous but they’re also visibly from a desirable brand(s) which costs hundreds/thousands. It’s a safety net, which isn’t necessarily a bad thing it’s just something that makes dressing differently more socially acceptable.
No. 710072
File: 1610066226356.jpg (258.63 KB, 875x630, interesting.jpg)
>>709960>There's no excuse when someone's like 10-30 pounds overweight. it shows that they're just lazy and don't take care of themselves.This explains why a few years back when I got into fitness and lost 80 pounds that people treated me the worst, being on the cusp of average-to-overweight. I received the most negging from dudes, the most catty comments from women, and overall was made to feel like shit about my weight despite the fact that I was in the best shape of my life and obsessively limiting my food. At the time I thought I looked like dogshit, but looking back at pictures I was a pretty attractive early 20-something and I should have enjoyed myself more. I guess people thought they could take the one flaw that still showed and used it to knock me down a peg for reasons like yours I guess. I'll never forget living with two slobby male roommates who'd blame me for the sinks full of dishes they'd leave after a munchie sesh. Because I had a glass and a tea plate from the one 500 cal meal a day I allowed myself to have. I guess they thought because I was chubby they could pin me at every turn for eating. I was the only one who ever initiated chores, yet if I had a bad mental health week and forced their hands to clean the bathroom and shared spaces once a month, they'd act like I never did fucking anything. At the time I had the self-esteem low enough to let them get away with treating me like a lazy overeater, so there you have it.
Now? After a three-year long depression spell and stressful job and
100 pounds later, no one says shit to me. It's like I'm so fat that people would feel bad or believe they'd be demonized for making fun of something I clearly can't change overnight. I actually have a boyfriend who treats me with decency and respect whereas when I was in better shape I couldn't even get a dude to treat me more than a fun night.
People don't have any sympathy for the plight of others unless they think you got it real bad.
No. 710400
>>710393This is an unpopular opinions thread.
>>710395I don't know, they're just especially ugly and annoying to me, I guess I don't really like babies in the first place.
No. 710407
File: 1610121945106.jpeg (796.3 KB, 3191x4255, 63D1A243-DDDA-41E5-8EB9-143E24…)
>>710395It's kind of like how this dog looks creepy
No. 710480
>>710475socially acceptable where? on certain spaces on the internet?
also stop playing the
victim when youre shitting on another type of hair/eyes but I guess we should only care when it fits your narcissistic ego. typical
No. 710484
>>710475I've never seen anyone do that except in this specific thread, and then you immediately reacted with racebait, kek.
You're literally worse than those anons, honestly. You shit on babies,
and you're racist.
No. 710487
>>710437not only is this racebait but it's also bullshit since
all babies are born with dark eyes that only later lighten to whatever color they're supposed to be.
No. 710502
>>710475Why are you pretending to be me? Fuck off.
>>710487I wasn't talking about babies like those anons did, I was talking in general. The complete pitch dark eyes look soulless to me. Like bugs.
Also you're wrong, at least with white kids. You first have light eyes which then darken.
No. 710532
>>710527Not entirely true. I wanted to write something like this and I thought this was the perfect opportunity to see how hypocritical anons can be. It's amusing in a way.
>>710525So? You have the right to shit on blue eyed people like the other anons did. On kids and babies no less.
No. 710545
>>710541I'm not saying one is better, I'm saying yours is even worse.
Sounds like you do have a mental problem. Maybe multiple.
No. 710548
>>710468NTA, I live in a big Western city, but that convo got me thinking. When I watch some documentary about a small Mongolian town community in the middle of nowhere they seem pretty happy to me, like in their entire lives they've probably never even encountered a situation where someone doesn't like them because they're a different ethnicity. Not a single person that looks like me in there, no representation for me to relate to, and they still look happy without me.
Am I supposed to feel angry when I look at that kind of place? When I compare that to the constant hate spewing and cringe on the entire American continent that traces back to the moment the first boats with foreigners on them surfaced on the Native American lands, I feel like those people probably are lucky, and live happier lives. I don't get compulsive feelings of hatred toward them like they need to justify themselves to me because they're not including me or some third group that's neither mine or theirs. They just seem fine the way they are.
No. 710559
>>710548Anon, the people in those small communities still have their own respective ethnicities and conflicts. You're so far away and disconnected from their cultures that you don't even have an understanding of that. It's like if someone tried to argue that the US is the standard for how societies should work because they watched a short, 24 minute video translated into a different language about their average, daily lives.
Do you think hate started with America?
>Not a single person that looks like me in there, no representation for me to relate to, and they still look happy without me. Well duh, your ancestors weren't forced to live there, you weren't born there and you didn't grow up among them and in their society. If you did, you'd probably have much different thoughts if they just completely ignored and downplayed your existence, despite your histories being indelibly merged.
No. 710563
>>710559It isn't a binary thing. Think of it more like a flu or something. Places that have more cases of the flu have some problem with the way they are doing things, places with barely any are doing something right.
Sure, a country that has 1 ethnic conflict or even a civil war in every 10, 50 or 100 years still has hate. But it's better than a country where your ethnic identity is thought of as a sports team, and everyone is thinking 24/7, 365 days in a year how "their team" is doing against everyone else in society. They check which team they belong to in their job and school applications, they have to check which neighborhood they can walk in wearing the sports jersey of their team (their own skin) without getting mobbed. An all-out English football hooligan fight on the scale of 340 million that never stops. I simply think the latter is a worse place to live.
(USER HAS BEEN PUT OUT TO PASTURE) No. 710570
>>710564Read again and be more careful this time around. I likened ethnic conflicts and hate itself to the flu.
Places that have more hate are worse, it's not that complicated. Of course places like America have more conflict and hate than some country that decided to become independent because they realized they have a common identity. That's a very different history than a country founded by foreigners coming on a boat and having a conflict of interest day one with the people already living there.
No. 710574
>>710566Isn't that what all the "look how much better THEY have it" stuff is all about. On American social media people even compete about who's sports team has it WORST over who has the most right to complain and who should shut up, so yeah they definitely do.
It's
toxic and you never see convos like that if you browse a social media from any other part of the world using a translator.
No. 710607
>>71059215 years for just one murder is a very long sentence in Europe, Breivik only got 6 more years for 80 lives. They let serial killers out every few years until they do it again. First timers that are younger than 21 usually get a 70% sentence discount.
Recently, a serial strangler in my country strangled a 17-year-old girl living in the apartment next to him. He had already admitted to strangling another woman (on top of his already serial killer status before that) and the court was "working on his sentence" for that one and he was just living free during it. And then some people complain about their country having the death penalty.
No. 710608
>>710592He has a thread in snow btw
>>710595nta but
>the blacksCan people stop saying "the blacks" and "blacks", please and thank you.
No. 710617
>>710607omg that is seriously fucked my heart goes out to women in those countries including yours its literally open season. how do people not constantly live in fear.
This is gonna lead to an opinion that is starting to become unpopular but i honestly dont believe we should get rid of prisons of course change and try to rehabilitate criminals. But im sorry if you murder someone especially in cold blood i dont think you should be allowed out in the general public. The stakes for repeat offenders is just too high of a risk.
No. 710622
>>710611Great contribution to an already shit thread. It was already made, though
>>710533.
No. 710629
>>710533based, they're repulsive i hate seeing them
>>710626everything is a red flag for men on here
No. 710661
>>710626I had an ex who hated cats. We didn't have any but our complex had some neighbours cats around so I heard about it a lot. He despised them even though they did nothing to affect us. He hated the sight of them. About a week after we broke up he moved in with a new woman (quick and pretty sus lol) He still stayed in touch and told me all about him adopting a kitten… she adored cats so he started loving cats too. I guess he didn't realise he loved cats til his mid-30s after years of very vocally hating them
oh and the pets we had adopted together got dumped on me. He talked me into getting our pets in the first place and then wanted nothing to do with them but got a cat a couple weeks after the split. That woman will likely keep the cat when he leaves her too. Even men who love pets are just BSing their way in sometimes. Has to be one of the weirder forms of manipulation I've seen a man use.
No. 710671
File: 1610139755997.jpg (89.68 KB, 900x750, nikocado-avocado-7.jpg)
>>710437I'm white with brown hair and dark brown/black eyes and I wish I had another eye colour because I do think my eyes do look scary. I don't mind dark eyes on other races, just people of my phenotype. Hate to make you all look at Nikocado but he's basically what I'm talking about.
No. 710706
>>710676How is this unpopular?
Babys stink and they’re full of saliva and sticky shit. Plus they have to idea what’s going on they’re basically human maggots
No. 710723
File: 1610143262081.jpg (22.66 KB, 552x457, hag333bm9iu51.jpg)
I actually feel bad for some of the FBI agents, glowies and other government agents. Imagine you are just some patriotic normie who does their best at school, goes through college and training to get into a government agency because this whole you think you will be fighting russian and chinese spies and deciphering Zodiac killer letters and shit and hell, maybe even escort one day POTUS, only to end up having to watch gigabytes of cp, murder, torture and rape on tape every day, read through autistic qanon 8chan threads or try to infiltrate antifa groups only to get clocked instantly during the meetups because you are the only one who doesn't look like pillsbury doughboy.
No. 710733
>>710676they're disgusting smelly drooling little cretins with awful shrill voices and sticky dirty fingers.
you only have to like your own children anyway. my mom had a bunch of kids and she still hates other kids, won't even babysit for any of her siblings.
t. not cf
No. 710950
The wall is not a myth, unfortunately. Women past a certain age can find a lot of guys who want to fuck them, but not men who want to commit and settle down with them. Men, on average, don't age much better than women, but the difference is that looks is just one relevant variable when it comes to how attractive a man is. He can still get a woman to settle down if he can provide resources, which can't be said about women, because men aren't evolutionarily programmed to care whether women can provide or not, so a woman with resources won't be as attractive to the opposite sex as a man with resources. Men can also have children later than women. Attractive male stars will usually age better than attractive female stars because men have a higher collagen density than women. The only examples of female celebrities who "aged better than men" are always posted with make up, which isn't very reliable. If you look at them without any make up they don't look better at all. Of course, ugly incels who can't find a better job and will never provide use the wall as a cope, but that doesn't change the fact that that's how things work for well adjusted people who actually function on the dating market.
No. 710970
>>710963I feel really, really sorry for young girls or women who believe in that kind of thing because I know so many woman that believed in that shit and got married in their 20s and got kids, because they thought they would be secure forever just to found themselves being dumbed in their late 30s/early 40s because their man found another chick to live with. You better plan to get your own shit together and that can provide for yoursef, with/or without kids because I wouldn't NEVER trust a guy to stay on my side for the rest of my life.
>>710964agreed lol
No. 710999
>>710617>how do people not constantly live in fearYou know how in Japan there's drunken salarymen passed out on the street on a daily basis and nobody ever takes their wallet even though thousands of people going past have the opportunity? That's kind of like Northern Europe. It usually just never happens and people are used to that. In some cities the last homicide happened like 70 years ago and is considered a historic, unusual event that people still remember for how out of place it is. Most smaller cities don't even have a police station, and people still leave their front doors unlocked for the night. Driving into a town is like a "nice suburb" just appears out of nowhere after driving through completely uninhabited forests. And when the nice houses and friendly people end, there's just trees and snow again, no bad part of town exists.
But when something does happen, the justice system is extremely unprepared and naive. It's almost like a child that's never seen anything evil happen and thinks only good people exist is running it.
No. 711001
>>710950To follow up, I have
never seen a non tradthot woman (and they are a minority mostly larping as what they think men want to see)
ever talk about muh provider. That's something only men talk about. Not online nor in real life have I ever had a conversation about men providing resources or any of the other rhetoric in your post.
No. 711002
>>711001Also
>dating marketOnly men say this
>Thinking makeup is some kinda magic dust that drastically changes your faceIssa man
No. 711004
>>710988You must have met 0 people in your life, ever heard of midlife crisis? It's a common joke that men throw in the towel at 40 and get a new car and a younger woman.
>refuse to believe…The people who do 97% of the rapes and murders could be callous in their relationships?
No. 711006
>>711001I heard a youtuber who I think desribed herself as a radical feminist in the past, talking about providers. She was heterosexual of course. Those women may call themselves radfems but they believe men were originally good but the "evil elites" ruined them with porn and other things and that the original role of men was that of "providers and protectors of women". They don't like men watching porn and being violent etc. but they definitely want a male provider and protector. If a woman who called herself a feminist can say shit like this, then it is even more likely for a tradthot or a normie woman
Also hypergamy is a thing. Straight women usually want a man of the same or higher status, while men are usually ok with a woman of lower status. So resources do matter for (straight) women
No. 711009
>>711004I've heard of the new car part and seen it a lot, but I've never seen some happy family dad that takes their kids to hobbies and stuff just disappear out of their family's life out of nowhere after 10 or 20 years of marriage. Maybe it depends on the region and culture.
Usually when couples break up around here everyone already knows it's going to happen because they've been fighting and bickering for months or years and the rumors are already out.
No. 711025
File: 1610206133250.jpg (105.16 KB, 650x825, EdzJrWTWsAE-cw5.jpg)
>>711006>While men are usually ok with a woman of lower status. They may be alright with her "lower" social status maybe but modern men know they cannot or don't want to achieve the status of being sole providers for their families anymore. So in fact, on top of expecting women to be IG hot and youthful, they want women to be WonderWoman Mommy Managers who make half or more of the household income, clean, cook, and raise children. They absolutely want you to have financial status. What a big fib to tell that men don't actively seek rich women to saddle with as if they haven't been dipping their hands in our dowries before time itself. Only now do they feel they have an excuse to be openly money obsessed so they don't have to work as hard. Whoever thinks otherwise hasn't been a woman in the dating scene for the past two decades, or hasn't read any anonymous blogging sites where women are truthful about the inner dynamics of their relationships and marriages.
And I say that's why women are starting to want hotties and men who at least are respectful to them. Cause if they're gonna have a bunch of useless male lions around that just put on a show of providership, they may as well not be balding uggos who treat them like absolute shit. Oh and give them better genetics for their kids too.
No. 711071
>>711025This study is from 1989 so it makes sense how delusional it is
That being said how men treat their partners over things they claim to be "just okay" with should also be counted. For example, many men claim they're "okay" with poor women but when they do have poor girlfriends they often just emotionally abuse them, cheat, or just use them as a placeholder until the next best thing rolls around that they can successfully get with, this doesn't just apply for poor women this goes for any preference the man claims to have
No. 711145
>>711101I don't hate cats but some cats do have annoying/leech personalities and some owners make having them insufferable. I say this as a person who's owned cats and hopes to own another one day.
I can't stand filthy owners who think it's acceptable to have cat hair on clothes and furniture because they're too lazy to clean. Ditto on cat litter. Or just let the cats destroy their homes because they believe cats can't be trained to do better.
I also hate it when despite the owner's best efforts, some cats remain antisocial and neurotic personalities that make their presence wholly unenjoyable. Akin to food-consuming shit machines that you just clean up relentlessly after and don't even get the satisfaction of their friendship for all the effort. Sometimes the cats themselves don't even seem to like their own existence. It would be merciful for everyone to just put some cats down.
No. 711172
>>710626Yep. My
abusive ex military narcissistic step father absolutely hated cats
No. 711176
>>711145I own a cat whom I adore and I agree with you. People allow their cats to get away with way too much, and it's disgusting when someone with a low standard of cleanliness owns a cat because they require extra effort to ensure a basic standard of living. This usually happens when a depressed individual gets one as an "emotional support animal" when they're too debilitated to bathe regularly, let alone maintain a household that has a cat in it.
>It would be merciful for everyone to just put some cats down.Agreed. Some cats live in deplorable conditions (like the ESA situation above). No reason for an animal to suffer unnecessarily.
No. 711184
>>710988>>711009If it's a happy marriage, it probably didn't start off with a 30-40 yr old scrote specifically seeking out woman in her 20s for her youth and fertility, or with an insecure girl in her 20s desperately going for any older man who will take her because she's scared of hitting the wall and dying alone. Those are the situations that rhetoric like
>>710950 results in. Healthy relationships don't come from men who think you become an old infertile hag on the eve of your 30th birthday, if he thinks your value depends on your age he is going to be a shitty uncaring partner in all respects.
No. 711190
Some people shouldn't have pets, not just because they're depressed/irresponsible, but because they have problems with empathy and will lose their shit if the pet doesn't do exactly as they want. They swear on the bible that they love their cat or dog or rabbit, but in the same breath will start beating them if they disobey them or break things, and then put them down for their own convenience when they're bored of them, or realize they can't take care of them.
This is probably how you end up with takes like "The dog is destroying things, and its owners do not care properly for their home or bother to train it. This means that the dog should be put down, rather than trained or rehomed". They see the animals more as possessions that become too much of a handful (like faulty cars) than as living beings. I think about cases like the "Karen" who was choking her dog with its leash while yelling at some guy, and I shudder thinking about what she does if the dog is being naughty.
The same generally applies to children, too. I don't care if it's eugenics, not everybody is prepared to raise a child.
No. 711203
>>711190Samefagging to add that what's even worse IMO is people who simply think that an animal should be put down if it's not "fun" enough for them, seems depressed or is otherwise maladjusted.
It genuinely creeps me out that there are people who reason that way. I've had a lot of pets, and if I had one who behaved very poorly or "didn't seem to enjoy life", and I didn't have the energy or resources to try and help them out of it (and if being patient didn't help - sometimes, they literally act in a fucked up way because they were in an
abusive home, or in some cases, just their mother was, and they tend to calm down on their own as they get older and realize there's no danger), I would just try to find another home for them with a heavy heart. It's not like they're toys you can turn off or on.
No. 711211
>>711177Thousands of cats are put down everyday in shelters because there are no suitable homes for them.
Now tell us the vetrinarians and volunteers are ebil murderers too. You're so naive.
No. 711218
>>711211They don't put them down first thing, though. The priority is to treat them for their sicknesses, and to keep them and try to get homes for them. Also, no-kill shelters do exist.
I hope you don't own pets or have kids if this is how your mind functions (or that people have "cat piss hysterics" for basic logic).
No. 711256
>>711210Not any of these anons, but you guys do realize you can train animals, or even rehome them to people that will train them right? Sure some animals are just antisocial or not cuddly like people expect them to be, but there's a difference between that and and badly behaved animal. Of course, no ones obliged to keep an animal that behaves badly or that they don't have a bond with, but putting them down just because you don't like them shouldn't even be something that comes up. Imo, animals should not be put down unless they have a disease that causes them to suffer (and I also believe we should ban the breeding of cats and dogs that are born with genetic deformities) or is genuinely an aggressive animal that cannot be trained and is a threat to people/other pets.
I guess this is my unpopular opinion (although idk how unpopular this is), but I think you shouldn't get an animal unless you're willing to put in the effort to train them. If you're too busy or lazy to do that then you shouldn't adopt. You will have to train all pets in some way, and that goes for cats, dogs, birds, reptiles etc…
No. 711279
File: 1610240572297.jpeg (307.44 KB, 828x450, 7F6C5888-47EA-41A4-AEC3-12F3AE…)
The older I get, the more disgusted I am by weebs who move to Japan and I understand why they’re considered a pariah by Japanese citizens. Weebs are always bending over backwards to defend and justify themselves but they’re skidmarks on society tbh. The ones who move to Japan I mean.
No. 711297
File: 1610241962788.jpeg (386.66 KB, 1125x1055, 7B19CD23-9EF0-420C-B4D4-3ED506…)
women shouldn't covet stick thin thighs. not that they should be fat either but I hate when anachans post pics of "body goals" and the woman has legs that resemble a child's. if it's her natural shape then ok but I always wonder if anons posting korean fashion girl pics really look like that. This is unpopular here btw so can the "um acshually"s please refrain
No. 711468
File: 1610283171159.jpg (20.22 KB, 407x341, 1608465024737.jpg)
>>710963>You make it sound like all men are pedophiles toothey are tho. at best they're ephebophiles at worst they're literal pedos
No. 711491
File: 1610287346893.jpg (49.56 KB, 700x467, ce106c49e62a8d6fca11670e9cde65…)
>>711297I really don't know why hotdog thighs are an ideal. Like I don't even think men were ever vocal about desiring stick legs, nice muscular legs are always in style.
No. 711514
>>711474i've seen so many girls on here say this lately and it's giving me hope for tumblr again! i've been using the site since like 2011 too but i've become less actively since about 2016. other social media just doesn't hit them same. even when i try to curate my shit to be more aesthetically pleasing with minimal drama, i still can't manage to avoid hot takes from some cringe pansexual they/them or fat quirky xD dyke. maybe this is a sign to make my way back to tumblr and just hammer the absolute fuck out of the blacklist filter and block anyone with an asexual flag icon.
plus, i always felt like a true woman in stem when i would spend hours fucking around with the HTML on my blog and i miss that feeling WAY too much, kek
No. 711592
>>711576I tend to agree that it's a good starting point but then I know a lot of examples where men just randomly switch one day anyway. It starts out that are craazy about the woman and for her it's more of a slow burn..by the time she's comfortable and into it she then gets the most sudden and unexpected dumping of her life. Still better than a guy who starts out less interested cause that just crashes even faster.
Heard so many stories about that sudden switch that it's hard to feel comfortable at any point. People can be that fickle.
No. 711629
>>710518Probably because green eyes aren't generally supposed to develop until later. Subconsciously, we recognize the aberration.
>>710676They are. Evolution has even selected for cries that elicit a care-taking response.
>>710679>no offense, but some child-free people are fucking annoyingI assume they are from less well-off parts of the country (US) where tons of women lose their whole lives over a pregnancy. Around me it's just seen as an option, and there's much less pressure. Or, they are projecting and perhaps struggling with access to birth control.
>>710723Poor dog.
No. 711631
>>710963It is better to be alone forever than to settle for a mediocre man. Also, women on average do significantly better living alone than men, which is part of why men sperg so hard against single women.
And before any tradthots or scrotes try to call "cope", I'm happily married. Just stating facts.
No. 711712
>>710950I agree. The wall exists but I would say that the cutoff age isn't exactly 30 for every woman. It really depends on how well you take care of your physical health and skin. Most women become overweight as early as their twenties and have poor skin hygiene so they start to get wrinkles in their late 20s/early 30s.
>>711650Agreed. It's one thing to say that you're not interested in having kids, but calling human beings "crotch goblins" or "breeders", or having the only reason for being CF be "I have more money to spend on Funko pops!" or "I can sleep in until noon and smoke weed all the time!" is disgusting. These people want to stay in perpetual childhood and that's why they find the idea of an ACTUAL child so abhorrent. It reminds them of their personal failings.
No. 711717
>>710626very true. Most
abusive men I've met hate cats for no reason.
No. 711723
>>711720I meant to post that in the vent thread, I'm so sorry anon, lmao.
I agree with you, though. People are just mad at bisexual people for not "picking a side". I think what it boils down to is bitterness at not being able to "pass" as heterosexual.
No. 711756
>>711720>act like it's wrong for a woman to call herself bisexual if she's with a man Naw, first of all this is not about you, it is about bisexuals that call themselves gay while only dating men (or just gay in general, even if they date women since for normies it means that lesbians are open to dick and 'have fluid sexuality' since they don't care to differentiate).
Second of all nobody cares about normie bisexuals, the ones that have to invade every lesbian space to sperg about their amazing boyfriend are those that nobody likes
No. 711758
>>711650I agree with you. I'm cf myself and while I don't mind older kids, I find toddlers and younger children plain annoying. But since I thankfully don't have autism or any other mental disability, I would never say this out loud or God forbid to anyone who actually has kids.
I don't get people like that, I don't want kids and don't want nosy people all up in my business about if and when I'm gonna have one, so why is it any of my business whether other people do?
Unless the parents are having severely disabled (as in, vegetable-tier) kids knowingly, are crackheads or abuse their children, they're not doing anything wrong.
No. 711775
>>711769why do you have such a huge
victim complex
No. 711789
>>711145I get where this post is coming from. Usually how wonderful and cute / uncomfortable and annoying someone's pet is has a lot to do with how the owner keeps it. As a deprived prisoner, or as a creature with a free will and things to do.
If you visit grandma's farmhouse, you will only find the cat happily lounging in the living room when it actually wants to be there. The way it walks is calm and it's always on it's way somewhere, be it a resting spot, food bowl or the door to go outside. If it doesn't like the visitors and noise, it will meow at the door and ask to go outside. If it wants to piss, hunt, or just move around freely it gets to go out. A pet like this will never pace back and forth nervously and make noise very much unless nobody opens the door for it and it really needs to piss.
Now, compare this to visiting some small apartment in the city. You find some cat or sad little poodle that, as soon as you open the front door, will see nervously pacing around in circles. Pets like this always act strange and make you second hand uncomfortable too. Either they will constantly walk back and forth and room to room nervously chuffing and chirping, or follow you like a duckling and constantly seek attention with a lot of noise and bumping. Even if they are quiet, you will see them with the corner of your eye walking around in circles aimlessly, going nowhere, like they are deprived. Some of these pets even take their frustrations out on the furniture. Usually the apartment itself smells because the owner is lazy and instead of taking or letting the pet out, the pet shits in some box in a corner. It's not the poor animal itself that annoys you, it's the claustrophobic, nervous feeling the whole thing gives you. Imagine a human mental patient that's walking around their padded room talking to themselves because they have nothing to do and no one to talk to, that's the same vibe that pets kept like this give me.
No. 711790
File: 1610323461305.jpeg (440.45 KB, 1242x2217, 1610315085025.jpeg)
She's right.
No. 711950
>>711817Amanda Baggs is my most favoured cow do all time , wtf happened to her?
Chronically Jacquie was a favourite for a while, but then I lost interest, and when I went back months later to check on her she had died. Very sad.
Plastic N Proud was interesting to me for a while but I’ve completely lost interest now, despite the pussy-shaving and subsequent backlash she received. Also how DoorMatt looks like he’s been honking on a crack pipe.
Shayna is boring but every now and then an anon makes a funny meme.
The only ana cows I find interesting are Laura and Nourish.
No. 711963
>>711952Not sure if it's cope, or the effect of this negative correlation we tend to ascribe when it's not there because of the way our perception is biased. Around 5:40 the mathematician gives a very similar example to what you're talking about.
The video does a good job at explaining how these biases arise.
No. 711966
>>711955Balls > brain tbh I stan
Seeing how apparently everyone else is 200 IQ yet all spineless
No. 711981
>>711975and yet some idiots still say that bullying builds character!
Idk if I agree with you that bullied people have 60% chance to turn into Snape. Maybe scrotes. I feel like bullied girls mostly grow into kind, but socially withdrawn women
No. 712031
>>712016Fat people still need to clothe themselves, and I don't think they should just wear bathrobes until they lose weight, which might take years depending on their size. I just find it very wasteful to buy designer brand clothes for an XXXL body, when ideally you should be down a size within a few months.
The original message of body positivity is supposed to be "allow yourself to enjoy life even if you're currently fat/whatever". So people should be able to go and celebrate shit with their friends in normal clothes even if they're still in the middle of their weight loss, and not put their life on hold. It's just that fatties perverted it into "you should never lose weight, so give us tentsized cute clothes".
No. 712051
>>712000I wish people would understand such a thing, whenever I see someone unironically listing their age as
9 years old or some relatives’ toddlers already knowing how to download stuff on their phones, I just pity them.
It’s not quirky nor the future, it just means the kids are so bored that they already have to find new stuff on the internet to distract themselves, like, they’re not getting enough stimulus nor real affection/attention at home.
It would definitely be better if stuff like
>>712003Said were the norm.
No. 712059
>>712000Every time there's a youtuber exposed for sexting kids or some pedo shit there's always an army of 13 years old downplaying and just plain failing to understand the gravity of the adult topics they are commenting on. Every time. 13 year olds downplaying shit like rape allegations and that…parents should really have access to al their social media accounts to monitor the conversations they are involving themselves in. Most worrying part is they are advertising themselves to pedos by making it clear they don't understand what is right and wrong in those scenarios.
My ex had an 11 year old with a porn habit and while he was semi monitoring his activity he still refused to let the kids mother in on what he found. He thought it would break some sort of bro code if he told the mom.. A kid that age stands no chance of understanding normal sexual boundaries when he's consuming 'fucking my stepmom' scenes on the daily. Bit uncomfortable being his dads gf and being made aware that stepmom scenes were this kids porn of choice.
No. 712089
File: 1610372563194.jpeg (73.78 KB, 944x579, 0FE0EC57-858E-42FE-9FC1-6D5F1E…)
>>712016> some gelatinous stretchmark striped blob spilling over a size 4XL right next to a slim model wearing the same clothes in a normal sizeThat’s the thing though isn’t it, brands can offer huge sizes but the clothes are always going to look better on a smaller person. Not even talking about super skinny models but people of a healthy weight with defined bodies. Yes morbidly obese people have access to mini skirts, but they look like shit so who cares.
>>712031> The original message of body positivity is supposed to be "allow yourself to enjoy life even if you're currently fat/whatever"I remember body positive people using this disclaimer on tumblr in the early ‘10s. Crazy how much has changed since then. Recently I saw that Meghan Trainor music video again, hailed as fat positive back then, but the girls aren’t even fat by today’s standard (pic rel). I can imagine the outrage if it was released in 2021.
No. 712127
File: 1610379331862.png (452.15 KB, 585x502, no1.PNG)
>>712016what is yall's obsession with fat people? sometimes i think a lot of you guys are fat and just projecting your insecurities onto these models. Its bizarre
Anyway my unpopular opinion i think its cute seeing bigger women wearing clothes that make them feel beautiful and are styled nicely. I love seeing a confident woman no matter the size. Everyone should wear whatever tf they want (as long as its not ddlg in public) because life is too fucking short to have your outfits decided by anachans with low self esteem.
No. 712134
>>712127I agree with this. I don't think they should just stop wearing stuff that looks good on them because they're overweight tbh. I don't have a hateboner for overweight people like the rest of this site though, so idk. I don't think creating cute clothes for fat people is "normalizing" it, but people aren't going to stop magically being fat when they see clothes that don't come into their size, so might as well dress nice.
Also, this exact same discussion just happened like a week ago in the last thread lmao
>>697881,
>>697914 No. 712139
File: 1610380636759.jpg (32.83 KB, 389x450, 20210111_175629.jpg)
This is the ugliest hand i've ever seen i'm gonna throw up. What the fuck is wrong with teenage girls
No. 712141
>>712127Ok she is styled nice but with people in her weight range I just think she can’t even clean her ass properly or fit on the toilet seat. And she probably has lot of chub rub so idk if it’s so cute.
There should never be a movement to encourage people to stagnante. Shouldn’t movements rather motivate to be healthy and the best form of themselves?
No. 712149
>>712137sorry i wont use yall anymore because it offends you.
My unpopular opinion is i hate that twitter co opted yall as if southern people havent been saying it for decades centuries or more. to the point where if i say it someone has to call it out because it
triggers them. Like grow up. Some of us grew up southern anon.
No. 712157
>>712149nta, not american either so not too familiar with which states say it. I had noticed in the last few months that nearly every post on here that contains the term Y'all has been pretty retarded, like the vast majority of them. I honestly thought there was just one retarded anon using that term in every last post and giving themself away like that.
Y'all feels like a tainted term on here now
No. 712259
>>712016As a size M-L fatty, I assure you that the easy availability of clothes that fit me does not in any way, shape, or form magically make me feel okay with being fat. Being able to dress nice doesn't make my health suffer any less or make me feel any less shitty about my body. It just gives me the ability to dress nicely.
I have a lot of negative feelings about the fat acceptance movement myself, but the level some of you hate fatties is honestly fucking weird. It's almost pathological.
No. 712331
>>712321I kind of want to see hairy women modeling shit. I feel like it'd be the last thing we ever normalize though.
Fat, disabled, birthmarks, deformity, trans, all those cetegories seem to come before the one thing that we all have and hide for some reason. The most disabled people you see in modelling pics still made sure to shave pre-shoot. The woman with birthmarks that cover 70 percent of her body… 'beautiful in her own way' cool but she was perfectly shaved so is that the one thing we just can't get comfy with? That always stands out to me.
No. 712343
File: 1610396934773.jpg (72.69 KB, 702x702, 1170.jpg)
>>712331it happens every now and then, tends to create a lot of drama. I remember few years ago Arvida Bystrom was featured in Adidas campaign and got heavily harassed despite being conventionally attractive, skinny woman otherwise; just because of a bit of body hair. It's not surprising even if someone is fine with bodyhair in general they wouldn't want to submit themselves to backlash like this.
https://www.instagram.com/p/BZd1cbNggu7/ No. 712353
>>712351OP said
>plus size/hairy/old/burn victim>I'm a big/hairy/crispy girlso she's making fun of burn
victims, for whatever reason. I honestly have not seen any burn
victim models get popular, except for Shalom Blac who's not a model. It's not even the same thing as being fat or hairy.
No. 712361
>>712352When I grew up in Ireland I remember we had to learn irish despite the fact that nobody actually uses the language anymore (except some tiny population in one lil part of the country) It's purely a traditional thing but to get into many jobs you still need to be fluent in the dead language.
If you pointed out what a waste of time it was some people would get fiercely defensive about it but I just remember struggling, then struggling because we had to pick a third language on top of that. Scrapping compulsory irish would've been doing a lot of kids a favour. I think they have now decided that only learning disabled kids are allowed to opt out of irish.
No. 712393
>>712352>laugh at the "ESLs"Outside from lower class bydlo mocking your local indian corner store owner, does this really happen? I've never really seen it happen online or in polite society.
But the opposite, continental Europeans tearing into someone for minor mistakes, and derailing the entire conversation to fixate on how shit someone's French or German is, that's not just common but the norm. You don't really see it happen outside of Europe either, people in South America are happy to hear someone try and speak spanish, same with the east asians and their respective languages.
I'd say English speakers are the most accommodating for people trying to learn their language, we're so used to people butchering it that it just doesn't phase us.
No. 712518
>>712461Depends on the person/situation
>>712471Piggybacking that, young people look cool socially smoking, but it’s when you see a coworker or family member who’s been a chronic smoker for decades, I mean it gets old way before that
No. 712624
>>712360That's retarded. Learning a second language is time consuming and difficult, and even more so when you aren't going to use or be exposed to regularly. Even the smartest and hardest working people are likely to prioritize nearly any other intellectual pursuit over learning a language because it's significant effort for little reward. Studying a bit for travel or if you spend a lot of time around people who speak another language is one thing, actually trying to become fluent is only worthwhile if you truly enjoy learning that language.
Not to downplay ESL speaker's hard work, but english is a dominant language so they are often more motivated to learn and more exposed to it from a young age. They tend to be much better at english than any english speaker will be at a second language.
No. 712751
>>712139Whose hand is this, Corpse's?
>>712602Seconding the smell of cigarette burning, I hate the smell of cold tobacco that permeates clothing, but when it's burning, I think it smells nice and comforting. I'm not a smoker and nobody smokes around me so I can't explain where it's coming from, even smokers told me they don't like the smell of cigarette.
No. 713014
>>711650Yeah, I honestly can't stand children and hate being around them, but a lot of CF people are full blown autistic about it, especially in the childfree subreddit. Actual example:
>guy makes post bragging about how he and his mates were loudly talking about sex related stuff in a restaurant>some random dad politely lets him know that his kids can hear them and asks if they can tone it down>guy tells dad to fuck off basically>I get downvoted like crazy for taking the dad's side and stating that all adults have the responsibility to watch how they talk in front of childrenLike JFC, it's fine to hate kids, but being civil toward them and conducting yourself decently around them is just a basic necessary expectation of being in society.
No. 713017
File: 1610481314622.jpg (240.11 KB, 828x1481, D-flMOqWsAIn_Dm.jpg)
>>713014CF people with hobbies aimed at children are always so autistic and embarrassing. Picrel
No. 713055
File: 1610485094352.jpeg (197.88 KB, 652x982, 7CEE461E-B6B0-40E6-BEE0-3FE807…)
>>713044I’m the same so I use incontinence pads. Accidentally purchased some and found they locked in moisture better and weren’t as bulky.
No. 713279
>>711650i'm childfree and i actually like kids, i don't want any of my own but i like babysitting sometimes and i could see myself working as a camp counselor or some shit like that. it took me a while to realize i don't dislike kids themselves, i hate the pressure that's put on people (mainly on women let's be real) to have them, i hate anti choicers, and i hate people who don't respect my personal decisions about what i want to do with my body and life
i think a lot of cf people feel that sort of similar frustration and unfortunately it manifests as them hating children who haven't done anything wrong, instead of being angry at the misogynistic retards who believe being a mom is the life purpose or endgame for every woman. it kinda reminds me of how most atheism spaces online started off as a way for people to discuss their beliefs with others who felt the same way, but then quickly turned into a circlejerk about how all religion/religious people are horrible
No. 713433
>>713302Nayrt but I think the reason why people find it hard to take childfree people/communities (the ones like
>>713017 rather than them as a whole) seriously is ultimately due to their immaturity.
> crotch fruit, breeders, etcThere’s so many good reasons for choosing to be CF especially as a woman: focusing on academics or career, concern about passing down illness to a child, the environment, finances, avoiding the high expectations of ‘the supermom’, not wanting to partake in the system that ensures the continuation of the human race at the great expense of women. The CF people who just resort to getting mad at children and parents and sperging out just seem dumb, like rebellious teenagers. A grown adult using the words ‘breeders’ and ‘crotch fruit’ would make me think they’re intellectually and emotionally stunted.
> their extreme attitudes are obviously a direct response to being worn down I get it, sometimes people can get tired of explaining themselves and just want to sperg out. Understandable. But the fact that posts like
>>713017 are not uncommon and the terminology exists indicate that it’s a movement rather than reasonable people sometimes getting mad. They are doing what they hate but in reverse - getting mad and attacking strangers over their decision to have kids. It’s hypocritical and will just lead to resentment and misunderstanding towards the CF as a whole. Again it’s immature, as they either don’t have the self awareness to realize this is what they are doing or they can’t understand the negative consequences.
These people are damaging the CF community and I wish more people would condemn them. They’re making us look like immature, deranged people rather than reasonable, harmless people who are just choosing a different path in life.
No. 713449
>>713433>There’s so many good reasons for choosing to be CF especially as a woman: focusing on academics or career, concern about passing down illness to a child, the environment, finances, avoiding the high expectations of ‘the supermom’, not wanting to partake in the system that ensures the continuation of the human race at the great expense of women.You say you're CF but you sound exactly like the people who try to force others to have children. None of the reasons you listed have anything to do with women simply not feeling like raising kids or wanting more freedom for themselves, you only accept selfless reasons. Not go mention that people do not need to justify themselves
at all in front of you.
No. 713466
>>713449If you’ve got to the point where you’re having a discussion about being CF, clearly “I just don’t want to” isn’t being considered a good reason by whoever you’re talking with. Also half the reasons I listed are/could be considered selfish so I don’t know where you got that idea from.
> focusing on academics/career‘Career women’ are often considered selfish for not settling down.
> avoiding the high expectations of ‘the supermom’> not wanting to partake in the system that ensures the continuation of the human race at the great expense of womenIs literally about women wanting freedom, and not wanting to have children just because it’s expected of them even though it fucks them over. Which is widely considered selfish because misogyny.
Also
> financesCan be considered selfish as having a kid means less money to spend on yourself.
> You say you're CF but you sound exactly like the people who try to force others to have childrenKek, I don’t care if others decide to have children or not. I just wish the discussions were more thoughtful and mature than “reeeee breeder and her bratty crotch fruit stole muh experience buying a kids book”. It’s not a good look.
No. 713574
>>713426It’s true, and it happens because at least non-retarded women know how to differentiate between fiction and reality.
Hell, even at parties with drunk people, you don’t often see a group of women chanting
kiss kiss kiss kiss when they’re with their guy friends but guys will constantly ask for inebriated women to kiss or grope each other.
Let’s be real, 3D scrotes can’t compete with 2D anime guys.
No. 713629
>>713421you're completely right, and the only reason men think it's such a big deal is because it's the first time they've ever had to deal with objectification and fetishisation. men think women (esp les/bi women) are overreacting and lying until they experience a fraction of what we do, and then it's suddenly the biggest issue in the world.
i do love the sudden outrage about ~male fetishisation~ though, only because i love to see men cry about absolute non-issues. like, oh, a girl tagged her friends in your post and said she wanted to fuck you? oh, you feel like you've been reduced to the size of your giant man tits? that's so sad for you, kek
No. 713649
>>713629Oh, that's the reason? I thought the
problematic part about yaoi was having your sexual pleasure and fantasies becoming detached from your own body and just becoming a "third party" that watches the other sex go at it. I've seen posters on 4chan make that argument about lesbian porn too, that men who like it too much get autogynephilia and troon out. Not a credible source of information by any means of course, but my gut says it kind of makes sense.
No. 713665
File: 1610564559325.jpg (Spoiler Image,95 KB, 634x815, omgwtf.jpg)
>>713664yes. yes there is.
No. 713696
File: 1610567866784.jpeg (195.38 KB, 1242x1242, 20192D01-AAF7-4488-9EAC-512018…)
>>713665I wish I had seen this coming.
No. 713848
File: 1610582167882.jpeg (86.96 KB, 500x500, B0945266-D89E-4721-969C-B74076…)
Some people look pretty with dark circles.
No. 713883
File: 1610590803904.jpeg (73.79 KB, 400x600, B19EDBBF-26F3-4F71-8394-75977B…)
>>713848Dark circles are slowly starting to become trendy, lucky for people who have them naturally. they look very pretty on people who have a round eye shape
Is that sky ferreira in your pic? always found her so pretty, wish she'd drop her second album already
No. 713885
File: 1610590906948.jpg (18.47 KB, 225x321, 75204.jpg)
I hate this very specific late 2000s art style of anime. I'm fine with practically any other anime art style, but THIS makes me want to vomit. It looks so bad and I refuse to watch any anime, manga, or VN with it.
No. 714225
File: 1610648039778.jpeg (156.21 KB, 540x810, 70BF6212-9157-4B9F-B697-0820D9…)
>>714218You are the most retarded pickme I have ever encountered holy shit. Go to the sex work thread where you belong. Why are you even here.
No. 714239
>>714232>>714218They're not even similar. 4chan is full of misogynistic scrotes, actual pedophiles/groomers, racists, aspiring rapists, tranny groomers, porn spammers, proud furries, etc.
Are you like, new to imageboards and just think having similar layouts, greentext and reaction image usage means they all act exactly alike?
No. 714240
>>714225…When did anon even mention sex work?? Where did that even come from? The obsession with OF/porn/sex work in general is so fucking weird.
>inb4 whore/prostitute/variation thereofHave literally never even tangentially been involved in any sex industry
No. 714251
>>714239Well yeah but think about it from an outsider's point of view
>uses the same lingo (greentext, inb4, doubleposting)>casually uses slurs like fag, retard, etc (name any other female-dominated site that does this)>is an image board that looks near identical to the blue boards of 4chan>Lolcow.farm has a simmilar name to kiwifarms, a site that uses the term "lolcow" a lot >sote mostly makes fun of ugly women (notpixj women's appearances), which is something I feel like men tend to do more (especially incels)>refers to trans people as trannies, which is not something most gender crit sites do. They mostly use TRA, TiM, and TiFOf course I know NOW that this is a female site, but I first mistook it for a Male one, and it makes sense why others have too. It's not that confusing of a mistake.
No. 714254
>>714232Have you spent time trying to discuss anything on popular 4chan boards?
>calls you a f*g if you reply politely>calls you a f*g if you're not overtly hostile to other anons>calls you a f*g if you're actually trying to be helpful>unrelated porn webm or ecchi art attached to a post about whatever on a blue boardI was actually so surprised how nice anons were after mainly visiting male dominated forums and messageboards. Yeah, infighting happens, but it's not constant at least.
No. 714320
>>714298Ikr, I ended up using those forums for venting or shitposting.
4chan was only useful because of /co/‘s storytimes with some really, really awesome comics getting posted there. But I just don’t even feel like browsing it anymore, I prefer lolcow.
No. 714345
File: 1610655132293.png (1.31 MB, 2068x1845, f4113ca~2.png)
99% of men have a madonna/whore complex.
No. 714828
>>714820>(minus his charm, of course)based anon
Shrek is love, Shrek is life