File: 1619097604838.jpg (46.18 KB, 600x423, 2314383724_27a6146316_o.jpg)
previous thread >>>/ot/772442
Disclaimers:>Reminder that if you are a radfem/pinkpill/Terf sperg/gendercrit, the "unpopular opinions thread" is not your reverse uno to continue the discourse. Nor is it your general place to try and fight people. Ignore posters you disagree with.
If you are here to;>sperg about trannies ruining your board, or your conspiracies that everyone who disagrees with you is a tranny - BAN.>explain in detail why every man is shit - BAN.>fight people who disagree with you - BAN.>post vaguely veiled gendercrit posts to try and evade the no gendersperg rule - BAN.>reply to someones personal experiences because you inherently disagree with their views - BAN.>discuss your views on racism - BAN.>have gender crit discussions - BAN.>try and score twitter cookie points by dunking on the "bigot" terfs - BAN.
If you are here to;>complain that your boyfriend did x/ you got cat called/ you had a bad day due to a man - NO BAN.>talk about your personal experience and opinions. - NO BAN.>HOWEVER, personal experiences and opinions do not devolve into long political discussions nor do they contain your tangent on how all men are scum or how you want to ethnically purge because once upon a time a (((man))) said you are fat.
Why is not having a close relationship with extended family a bad thing? What if the extended family were alcoholics themselves or abusive
people? I'm shocked you'd think an independent and emancipated person wouldn't make a good witch lmao.
If they come from a lineage of drunks, I can't imagine that the family history was very powerful or they could sway powers or anything. If they come from abusive
people, obviously the "magick" they've tapped into didn't even protect them. How can that possibly positively affect someone else? They'd be better off helping people by being social workers with their poor life experiences.
>>788890>Would you trust someone who could claim to "magickally help you" but their lives are laughable?
I wouldn't trust anyone who claims to be able to help me with magic, great life or otherwise.
Hell, it's even worse if they have a good relationship with their family and a great life, since they are using their good life circumstances to trick people who don't have those into believing their bullshit.
It's all a retarded roleplay anyway, anon. You could have at least said>I don't think you should be allowed to call yourself a "therapist" unless you're successful and have a great relationship with your extended family
Now that would be some kinda take, at least.
Great way to both gatekeep and victim
File: 1619112530369.jpg (46.66 KB, 636x480, f95642fbd0ddc97e655b77eb9bff50…)
Mew Mew Power savagely beats Tokyo Mew Mew any day. The 4kids dub is hilarious for making the girls into various flavours of violently loud spazz and steamrolling any sincerity that the original series might've had. The dub is exhausting and endearing at the same time, which is a hard feat to pull off. It's a post-ironic viewing pleasure. I specifically like how it's mangled into pieces and localized (using that word loosely) to hell and back. It has that special dysfunctional 2000's touch.
The original series is yaada yadda gay poopoo peepee serious shit nobod6y wants to watch anyway. The 4kidz is a whole new piece featuring serious themes such as ADHD, modern slavery and unhealthy obsession with dating/romanticism, all through the eyes of pubescent girls. I mean there's still some of the emotional intelligence stuff but the bright colors and the screaming distracts me into not caring much, after one episode of that shit I'm literally too exhausted to care. It's even funnier and more interesting than the Ghost Stories dub.
The fact that Mew Mew Power is better than the original is not even the only point I'm trying to make. I'll also state that all dubs have the capacity to be easily superior to and more entertaining than the originals. Saying that people who watch the dubs are 'the real geniouses' would be fake, gay and stupid because none of that big brain garbage even matters in the face of living a little. If you watch anime you're a retard to begin with. Trying to be intellectual about it is even worse. Like, if you have to struggle to be deep you've already made yourself look stupid.
The more ridiculous a dub is, the better it is. Mew Mew Power is perfect, aside from the fact that it rots a developing brain in a quick, thus shouldn't be shown to anyone under 16.
It mostly bugs me because of how subjective it is and the fact that it's used often with the implication that " no chicks can't be hot unless it's my narrow definition of hot that may or may not be appealing to scrotes and lesbians"
While Birds of prey was an alright movie I didn't specifically thought they were "hot". Though Harley served looks in that movie, I love a good clown aesthetic and I could see an oc of mine rocking some of her get ups
Sorry, I should have also stated that I don't believe in any of this shit and would never ask someone for spiritual help. Just something that makes me laugh. >>788952
Mine too, people in the astrology field seem to have the most chaotic lives with a lack of self control. >>788956
Also this sounds hilarious. I will continue to do this.
if you do, be ready to be bombarded with extreme audiovisual stimulation
the first episode is the result of having to cram the whole premise into one airable bit to introduce the concept not only to the target audience but parents and buyers too. A machine gun of infodump on everything. It's really hard to explain the high-speed rail of thought that is even the first 5 minutes. The only option is to accept everything. It thankfully gets easier after that.
Since episode two it dips into the 'normal' pace, which consists of savage humor, general chaos and a bunch of screeching. All the characters and their temperaments are super turned up and sometimes their reactions are just way, way off. It's a bit of an experience.
And it's all on youtube, so access is easy. If you have free time, snacks and brain cells to kill, it's a ride.
True but to be fair I kinda sus them out a little bit but when there's a demand there's somewhere to fulfil them. I'm a lot more "insular" about this stuff personally, as I see it as ways fostering a good relationship with yourself and the world around you regardless of your origin. But I suppose with paganism-witchcraft becoming steadily trendy it was to be expected.
Though some of the tools are quite nice got to say so it tickles my aesthetic loving bone lol.
File: 1619137182173.png (328.59 KB, 800x1200, Cornbread_2.png)
Cornbread is trash and doesn't deserve to be known as an American southern food staple. It looks nice on a plate and that's about it. Cheese grits isn't that good either, they're just ok. Ketchup grits is especially heinous.
File: 1619137562593.png (71.92 KB, 495x277, kikomiposting.png)
I agree. that's why i love kikomi. she's funny and unique to lolcow
yes people make fun of shit like twilight and 50 shades and now it all has to be extra pandering like bridgertons. and most male actors aren't as hot or young as their female counterparts. tired of the media trying to meme women into obessing over mediocre men.
I just think it's a pretty shit trope most of the time. Often times it leads to both or one of the leads ( usually the male one) to act in toxic
to downright abusive
ways and then they expect me to buy into them 'slowly " getting on, just because the guy ( usually) is hot.
There's exceptions to the rule though but I don't get why people feel so hyped around it
I just wished those examples weren't so godanm shit.
Also I generally hate erotica based around female submission unless it's G×G ( and even then) so fifty shades was going into my shit list regardless lol.
Twilight felt like reading a wattpad fic before those were a thing but Dominic noble made me reconsider some shit. As long as it seen as the wish fulfilment guilty pleasure to some that it is, I think it's not as bad as some will say. Again if you don't think too deeply
the toxicity is what makes it fun! it does suck it's usually an excuse for the man to be abusive
, the women should be awful in their own ways. >>789650
women's smut encouraging more BDSM and sub fantasies is weird to me, but men and boys making fun of all this shit is annoying. women actually buy books and read so at least more shit will keep coming out, hopefully some of it is better.
Yeah I generally find that stuff tiring especially if it gets repetitive. Like I said I have my exceptions. I just dislike most.
I'd take a thousand friends to lovers or even no romance over Rivals/ enemies/ bullies to lovers any day of the week. I'm a lover of fluff and light heated banter
Agreed. The abundancy of male gaze in media has now been recognized as a bad thing, but instead of appealing to the female gaze more the response is seemingly to try and erase appeal to either gender.
The 90s and 00s at least still had media that unapologetically went for appealing to women. Not by trying to be woke and having a forced feminist message, but just by being made for and by women. A lot of media like that gets criticized now more than ever. I think it's because right now female characters have to be portrayed as super smart and strong and cool to be considered PC. And media framing women like that is just not going to be relatable for actual women. Whatever happened to chick flicks? Right, things like desperately pining for a hot guy or makeovers or being petty about fashion and popularity or girls being bitches to eachother are defining parts of what makes a 'chick flick', and you can't have those anymore. It's so typical for modern woke culture that what's branded as mysogynist is media that's pretty much exclusively appealing to women in practice, like Twilight or 50 Shades or those crappy little smut books. Because apparently women have to be and act a certain specific way or else it's not feminist. It's ridiculous how skewed the logic is there. Maybe this is more of an argument for women-centric media in general and not the female gaze, but the two are closely connected.
I just hope that a female top/ dom and sub male gets some sort of mainstream success because I swear to god it ain't even half as toxic
as the sub woman X Dom dude pairings taking a few exceptions lolol.
But unlikely. It doesn't actually seem to be a somewhat popular enough genre of erotica/ lit if browsing sites with books tells me anything
Taking a few exceptions ( heathers and mean girls) I could go without needless catty behavior, especially if over some scrote
Great female rivalries for the win though.
Also most of what you said it's on point
I also dislike enemies to lovers most of the time, but it's completely understandable why it happens so much from a writing standpoint. It's the easiest possible way to create conflict and drama in a romance plotline. Character development happens almost by itself because it's ooc/unexpected for villains to develop feelings for eachother and they'll have to change for it to work.
That way you don't need the skill to have the characters be interesting and unique enough for audiences to naturally be invested in their romance. It's a lazy plot device similar to the best friend betrayal or the villain turning out to be blood related to the hero. Those don't have to always be signs of a bad story and can be very well done, but they're often used for cheap drama by mediocre writers.
Such scalding hot take. I love it! I find it interesting that I never gravitate towards enemies to lovers as a young girl writing. I remember really liking the idea of two people being like a pair of mismatched socks or even working a bit as a team or unit to be a lot more interesting.
Also the world and people themselves are complicated and unpredictable, so making them dislike each other at first often times felt…cheap. and it is cheap most of the time!
My favorite couples of this type are nina and Matthias from six of crows and even naveen and tiana from princess and the frog. But everyone in that movie is such a fun to watch-
>>789702>Would a movie like Legally Blonde even fly today?
I don't think so. Basically any movie of that type gets called problematic
nowadays. With Legally Blonde it's especially crazy because the entire point is taking your life and goals into your own hands despite what others thing, without having to stop being feminine to be succesful.
The root cause of mysogyny in media appears to be looking down on feminine qualities and considering them lesser because they are inherently female. Current 'woke' movies attempt to solve the problem not by respecting female qualities, but by removing everything feminine altogether. Right now, the ideal strong woman is a man with (well hidden) tits. >>789699>Taking a few exceptions ( heathers and mean girls) I could go without needless catty behavior
I agree but imo the word 'needless' is key here. Heathers is a bit more complicated but Mean Girls is a great example of cattiness being not just an amusing/relatable trope, but an important part of the plot. The characters all display some level of cattiness and superficiality, which are interestingly considered very feminine flaws. Then as the movie continues the protagonist evolves from looking down on these traits and feeling superior, to indulging in them too heavily and embodying them, to finally establishing a balance between the two. It's interesting to me how in the end the message isn't that caring about popularity and looks is inherently bad or stupid like how Cady perceives it at the start. It's just that you shouldn't let those things run your life.
I think that's an important distinction and the problem with needless catty behavior in most media is that it's either just there because it's a chick flick and apparently catty drama is central to what teenage girls like, or it's used to victimize the protagonist and therefore always unquestionably evil.Going off on a bit of a tangent here, sorry. But now that I think of it Mean Girls kind of parallels the evolution of every high school 'not like the other girls' girl. At first you think not caring about girly stuff makes you better and smarter, which is pretty much just internalized mysogyny, although I don't like that term. Then at some point you overcompensate once you realize femininity is fun too. Then finally you gain a healthy relationship with these traits and settle somewhere in the middle, not forcing yourself towards either extreme because of some bias one way or the other. At least I've seen this type of development happen with a lot of nlogs as they mature and I think Mean Girls is a great example of becoming comfortable with your own identity as a woman.
Ohh I see, that makes more sense. When I hear homeopathy I specifically think of homeopathic dilution. Which is basically diluting a substance to the point that not even a molecule is left and the end product is chemically exactly the same as regular water. Then they claim the water somehow 'remembers' the substance, and then they charge a gorillion bucks for 10ml of water.
So I find what I consider homeopathy really dumb but I didn't know you used it to refer to any natural medicine. I think plenty of natural remedies like herbs and the like are valid
so I get why you'd use them as a more financially viable option.
That's a very interesting take on mean girls! It's probably why I was very forgiving about that movie's shade since the movie was about the shade.
I think Heathers does high light of the futility of it all as well in its own dark and bitting way.
Also I think my love of heathers and even mean girls is that it makes a mockery/ criticism of high school tropes, such as mean girls and unironically comes up with some great characters along the way
I do like high school media that doesn't feel the need to rely on stereotypes completely to tell a story lol
Are you guys dumb? Gen z girls love legally because of early 2000s fashion. It was trending on Netflix last week
Also the kids love The Heathers because of the musical.
Don't forget legally blonde has a musical as well ( there right there/ gay or European is such a meme)
I personally got into heathers because of the musical. I like both a lot
>>789766> feminine qualities
What do you mean by feminine qualities?
I don't know if you're the same anon >>789693
who thinks that women being catty, pining for a scrote, being fashion crazy and not being strong and smart is somehow good. In case you are, your entire opinion is trash.
There's nothing wrong in being empathetic and caring but these are the qualities that I like seeing in both men and women. In the same vein, I like seeing women who are smart and strong in their own way (it doesn't need to be some girlboss stereotype or kung fu graduate).
I don't think we're nowhere near that point and you still have tons of movies that have those elements you desire, more or less.
I agree with that notion! Also I would love media that highlights "Soft" strength, like authority and diplomacy and healthy emotional intelligence.
As flawed as Brave was I do admire that they showed Elinor having her own strength and poise and influence. I don't know I just think if well written characters like that are such badasses
Yeah Heathers is a bit harder to place because it's also kind of a satire of the genre as a whole while Mean Girls plays it a little more straight. Heathers comments on the same issue but just does it in a different way, by having the extremely severe and serious exist right alongside the extremely petty and mundane. It also helps that Heathers had a great deconstruction of the typical mysterious bad boy love interest trope.>>789802>I do like high school media that doesn't feel the need to rely on stereotypes completely to tell a story lol
Same, it's really hard to find unfortunately. I think over the years the American high school stereotypes have become so ubiquitous that writers think it'd be odd not to have them in a high school setting.
To some extent stereotypes seem to be a fundamental part of the genre though. High school media very often has themes of insecurity, social belonging, expectations, finding your identity. With most high school settings it's probably not that thought through, but I also think stereotypes are so common because in a way, teenagers do actually tend to see other people as stereotypes a lot. The whole thing with cliques and comparing yourself to others and having that out group that you probably have a way oversimplified view of is a very teenagery way of seeing the world.
Yeah Heathers did a awesome take on the rebel/ bad boy trope! It's a really solid movie godanm-
Interestingly I never related fully to that idea of the stereotypes and I actually took great joy as a loner of knowing about the struggles and lives of my classmates as it kinda made me realize everyone has shit going on. I would love a high school movie or series highlighting that feeling of finding out about people's depth and subverting and playing around with stereotypes and cliques for an authentic feel? Hopefully that makes sense.
I'm currently writing about a original characters life and that includes a high school segment and I'm basically throwing most stereotypes out of the window deliberately because I cannot with them at this point.
Also euphoria sucks
With feminine qualities I mean any trait that's typically associated with women. That includes both good and bad traits, and I definitely don't think cattiness or pining for scrotes or any of these things are good qualities at all. They're flaws and should be portrayed as such.
What I have a problem with, though, is any trait being considered bad or worse than it is, not because of the trait itself but because it's associated with femininity.
Strong action type women who aren't stereotypically feminine can be great characters. Nurturing empathetic type women who are more typically feminine can also be great characters. Hell, I don't think that how feminine or masculine a character is matters at all for how good a character they can be. What I have a problem with is media pushing a specific type as 'strong' and all others as bad.
Women are individuals, but right now it doesn't seem like female characters are treated like individuals at all. It looks like at some point female characters stopped being real characters and started to be treated like representatives for the entire gender. If you have a male character that's dumb or something, that's fine. But if you have a female character that's dumb, it's going to spark outrage and claims that it means women as a whole are being called dumb. Pair that with a negative bias towards typically feminine traits and you get the perfectly sterile 'strong woman' we see today, who is stronger and smarter than everyone else and doesn't have any personality traits that could possibly be interpreted as offensive towards women.
In the end I think we agree, I also just want to see female characters who are strong and smart in their own way, be it typically feminine or not, because they are individuals and not a sociopolitical statement.
Honestly I wouldn't mind a fan project surrounding the common interpretation of Janis having been a plastic in junior high/ early high school! It could put her petty behavior on hindsight and maybe a more humanizing look at the plastics too.
Also thank You! In the story I'm writing my MC is something of a loner but doesn't hate most of his classmates although he's very guarded in general. But even he doesn't paint all of his classmates as one off people if that makes any sense :P. Although his Sharp tongue comes out if anyone gets shady or for the sake of others at times so he's still had something of a sweet spot there in spite of his sarcasm and cynical nature
It would be kinda long to explain and I probably already went off topic lol
Nayrt but the strong woman that kicks every mans ass seems like a pretty prevalent trope to me. They don't always have to be sassy, so Rey and Captain Marvel fit the bill imo because of how almost Mary Sue tier powerful they are and basically show no real flaws.
The sexy femme fatale action type is certainly a thing but it's been on a decline for at least a decade. Older portrayals of characters like Poison Ivy or Harley Quinn were much more like that, but their modern incarnations clearly gravitate more towards 'empowered womxn kicking privileged white male ass'.
What is the last (action) movie you've seen where the female character has any significant flaw or isn't impressively smart/combat savvy? Honest question because I can't think of any.
What action movies have you seen where the male character isn't smart and combat savvy?? That's the default requirement for action heroes, as a general rule.
I'm fine with mary sues in action movies because god knows gary stus are everywhere, I just wish being hot wasn't a prerequisite for women only. There are so many old, mediocre looking male action stars.
The other anon has a point. Why would I want to watch an action protagonist who isn't either physically or mentally impressive? Bridget Jones would suck in a serious action film.
Potential Mary Sues can avoid being such without sacrificing physical or intellectual ability, eg: Sarah Connor. She doesn't start out Mary Sue for one, and the process of how/why she becomes a bad ass makes sense, the trade off for her transformation is she finds it harder to show warmth or affection even to her son, and she still shows abject fear when the terminator shows up, signalling trauma from the first movie.
If it's a super hero then you can skip the process but you can still deal with their humanity in some way that's interesting, like Buffy did in a flawed way.
File: 1619251321916.jpeg (515.15 KB, 1600x2400, 3751A562-5722-49C6-A896-2C0A20…)
Gingered men look so unappealing that they barely register as human. The redish brown or blonde beards, nonexistent brows or too thick brows, oblong shaped heads, lopsided hairlines with excessively thin hair. They look like modern depictions of goblins or abominations. Redheaded women look normal so it’s even more bizarre how strange the men look.
Why would an action character not be smart or combat savvy? Or learn it during the course of the film? Most male action stars are perfect and badass, and men don’t care. What actual “flaws” does James Bond have? Does John Wick have?
A Mary Sue is a fanfiction term for a reason, it doesn’t work when applied to original media because by definition most main characters are Mary Sue’s.
I'd also like to see more explorations of mutually toxic
relationships where both partners are toxic
to one another, not to glorify it. the psychological aspects of relationships that become mutually toxic
are interesting (doesn't mean sexually, just in general). I love seeing characters be flawed shitty people
Agree, sweet vanilla balanced relationships for the win even if dom/ sub stuff is fun.>>790580
I'm not so sure about that one but I do find annoying how people jump the gun and name and bland female lead of mild importance a Mary sue regardless of them qualifying or not because shit writers do exist.
Also anyone here who has watched shadow and bone hates the costumes? I'm ok-ish with the sepia tones but wtf is with the costumes?? Even game of thrones had more personality then this
>>790672>Bit of a strawman
kek seriously. What genuine vegans are buying multiple polyester tops a year? If you’re a lifestyle vegan aren’t you going to be buying second hand clothing anyways, and linen canvas bags instead of numerous pleather bags from fast fashion stores? >>790620>>790611
At the same time your picturing an unethical vegan, you’re imagining an ethical non-vegan consumer that will actually care for their animal product goods and not spend copious amounts on cheap labor and manufacturing as well. When what you’re actually looking for is an ethically conscious minimalist that only shops locally.
File: 1619297314521.gif (921.91 KB, 220x124, AF14173C-7603-44B0-8BE9-CC4C32…)
Nah carnivore I’m fine eating my salty grass sold at whole foods for $50 dollars
File: 1619314441538.gif (1.21 MB, 410x308, 1615405229285.gif)
I was on your side right up until that
I also think a lot of it is how you come across.
Confidence and an open minded expression can do so much.
While I personally do not personally see myself as pretty, I know I do have "pretty privileges" . However a lot of the times where I've experienced things that would count as pretty privilege I was wearing no make up, sweat pants and just generally looking like a hot mess. Still I'm a bubbly person and at least acted like I have self esteem and damn people really appreciate that and cliché af to say but think that's attractive.
So stupid blog posting aside, Pretty privilege is not just down to the way you look or dress, it's also the way you act. Be a chill person and people will be chill with you
File: 1619353842680.gif (551.06 KB, 220x165, 52A46E18-7D35-4397-8D20-807F53…)
I’m so sorry nonny
I wish we could give you a safe haven in Europe instead of allowing a bunch of scummy islamcels to come in and ruin everyone’s life instead. All women deserve liberation from Islam.
I honestly feel the realistic and optimal society would be one where Men primarily only serve as laborers and soldiers and women as Doctors, Lawyers, Leaders and and do all the intellectual work
I think that would be best for everyone Involved, men would like it and women would like it
I don't have a dog in this fight, but like glass houses bitch
outside of tumblr gifs most lesbians do not look that um "heathy" from what I've seen
I feel men and women in general are just are fat, ugly, dumb, lazy and don't even live up to quarter of their potential
File: 1619377044434.jpg (64.88 KB, 850x550, Lea_DeLaria.jpg)
Finally someone dropping the truth bomb. Les/Bi anons always shitting on literally any men that anons wanna fuck like it's any of their business, meanwhile their community is known for being attracted to women like pic related. Which is fine, but certainly not a pinnacle of aesthetics for most people. So how about just letting other women fantasize about fucking whatever adult people they are attracted to? I would keep that comment to myself had I not been tired of the constant 'the straights are not alright lel' comments.>>791407
But why should straight women clamor for your respect in the first place? Shouldn't it be a given, because of solidarity? Kinda rude when you expect to be supported by them while you shit on them constantly. Also, please consider that maybe you don't get the beauty of whatever male that triggers
you, just as straight women don't get how can anyone thirst over a fat bulldyke with cankles.
It's a system/theory that tells you what types of clothes look best on your body based on various factors. Like the apple pear hourglass etc. bodyshapes but far more intricate. The name refers to the man who thought it up.>>791398
I've looked into it before and I don't really see a problem with it categorizing bodies? No type seems to be described as better or more desirable than others. If you go to a stylist and she dresses you a certain because you're fat or tall or curvy or have big boobs or whatever your body gets categorized too.
Or a girl with a shaved hair cut and a nose ring-
Rip being a bisexual in this day and age, half of the girls I could date have some unfortunate styles in general even when they are pretty to me, yet I'm in a phase where most man don't appeal to me lol.
I would be so down for that! Husbando robots when? It's the best of both worlds! Unless certain women would ruin it by shitting on robofuckers and advising to just go celibate and focus on female friendships kek>>791437
The comments like "the straights are not alright" certainely imply that OP isn't straight herself and that's what I've been refering to
Learn to read. I said it's fine, but if you are into this type of look, it's not your place to scoff at other women being into unconventionally looking people. But of course your first impulse is to hide behind feminism instead of facing the hipocrisy.
It's more so the indication to me that they may be a SJW or a lib fem that's trying to use Me to spite someone lol. I think the style can work somewhat, but I just see it as a bit of a yellow flag and it does not look flattering on a lot of people.
Dyed hair is pretty cool tbh
Im straight,i find the super ugly deformed old men posted here ugly the bull dyke that you posted is ugly too, so now whats your point.
Are you that mad that sometimes women express their opinion that some ugly men who are shilled as attractive by society are ugly.
The fact that it can still happen quite a bit in female homosexual relationships does upset me too…
Like danm imagine ditching a scrote only for your homegirl to be a scrotette?
There are multiple anons and that point was brought up once now. And let's not kid ourselves here, the standards for women are much higher than for men. Just compare the conventional and unconventional threads on /g/. And the same standards are reflected in the media.
My biggest issue is women, straight or not, reinforcing the beauty standards that scrotes set, who willingly reduce themselves to a sex object and claim it's because of empowerment or whatever. Or say they're a wifey and trad on the other end of extreme. There's never going to be any progress for normal and sane women if we as a group keep putting ourselves in these second grade roles. And mostly, I do think women lose in hetero relationships. Statistically and mentally and everything, and despite all of that, they think it's okay. So yeah, things are doomed and there's not going to be any change. I feel sorry for straight women who are aware of this and need to cope with that fact.
Not to be mean to this poor woman because I bet she's a ray of sunshine who would carry your luggage if you ask
But that's like comparing dog shit to human shit and making one asked winch looks nicer.
meant my reply to >>791474
as well, phone posting sucks.
Learn to read. This comment:>>791248>I think only stupid women date men
started the discussion. Shitting on (straight) women and victim
blaming them isn't as cool or progressive as (some of) you think it is
You're right anon>>791495
nta yet I see girls here saying shit like "I don't care about the suffering of straight women, they did it to themselves" all the time. I agree most dudes are ugly and shitty but that kind of thinking means most women in bad situations are to blame and don't deserve support. Completely ignoring how our entire societies want women to be with men, can punish them if they don't, and most are naive about men. But also not all women want to be blackpilled and celibate by ignoring their natural attraction. Maybe they are hoping to find a man who will work on his flaws as she works on hers, you know like any healthy relationship.
Yeah I was making fun of some woman in the lolcow cap thread and a salty lesbo replied to me like "that's just the straight experience nonny
, pity her". Rolled my eyes, cringe. Bitter clam muncher, your straight best friend won't break up with her Nigel for you sowwy
I'm bi (aka attracted to men), and I'm just sick of being shown ugly men all the time. I understand that men do it to big themselves up and keep the standards for themselves low, but it kind of feels like I'm being gaslit by all the (straight) women around me when they praise hideous men and say beautiful women aren't good enough for them.
Like, in no world does someone like Robert Pattinson belong with FKA Twigs or Kirsten Stewart, and Jay-Z does NOT belong with Beyonce, Lauren Miller is way too pretty for Seth Rogen, Adam Driver looks like a fucking rat and if he were female every male would rain insults down on him for daring to show his face on camera, etc. I've been raised/socialized all my life to adhere to heterosexual dynamics, so I should understand, but I don't and feel like I never will. You really don't need to be a lesbian or attracted to fat women to see the problem.
I'm pretty sure that was me. I'm not a lesbian, I said that because that's pretty much how every straight relationship is when the guy isn't anti-trans (or when any political discussion comes up and your opinions differ), to some extent. It often takes something else to convince them, even porn, because with only a few exceptions, men don't like listening to women.
I wasn't being sarcastic, I genuinely don't think anon deserved to be made fun of for that. Guys really are just like that, at least some progress was made. I don't know how to explain to you guys that it's not just lesbians who see the issues with straight relationships and men in general. I'm sure there's some lesbian equivalent to that shit, but I haven't seen it and don't hang around that many lesbians to know.
File: 1619382352932.jpg (179.3 KB, 1200x1500, robert_pattinson_instagram.jpg)
All right anon, I get what you mean with likes of Jay-Z, Seth Rogen, etc. But Robert Pattinson is incredibly attractive in conventional sense. Like what kind of man do you consider attractive if even this does not make the cut?
NTA but I personally think RPat is very ugly, he looks dirty and neanderthalish imho, but I don't judge people that think he's hot because eh taste is taste and I have some questionable tastes myself>>791561>looks like a fucking rat and if he were female every male would rain insults down on him for daring to show his face on camera
tbh that already happens with him, but the female version at the face app thread was quite popular for a while kek
I agree with you on parts, but Robert Pattinson and FKA Twigs looks matched
the only thing sucked was that he was a pussy that didn't call out his racist fan-girls
If a literal who like Ross Lynch could do it, then why couldn't he
File: 1619383067497.jpeg (46.24 KB, 480x720, Robert-Pattinson-Hair-480x0-c-…)
I'm just not seeing it. He looks average/above average on his best days, and on other days, like he comes from a long line of inbred peasants and will stab you with a piece of glass so he can steal your wallet and buy a pack of cigs. Maybe if you knew him IRL and he had an amazing personality, it'd make sense, but all these random women worshiping him as a god? No, I'm tired.
Guys I consider attractive enough to simp/stan over would just be most of the guys you see when you Google "male model". They're actually handsome and eye-catching. I don't understand why most female actresses/celebrities have to be on a level of looks where they can compete with models, but male celebrities seem to get in solely through their connections or their skills (which often aren't even that good) and they're not expected to be that good-looking. The amount of times I've been reee'd at and told "It's about talent" when I say some male actor isn't handsome, but then the same person turns around and complains that a beautiful actress looks "too old" or is "ugly" (they almost never are).
File: 1619383472324.png (779.27 KB, 1440x900, Screenshot (22).png)
nta I'm not saying he's super handsome, he's good looking enough for the most part and he looks matched with FKA Twigs imo
I'm more angry about the fact that he didn't say anything about the racial slurs his girlfriends was facing from his psycho former twilight fans
. I'm sure there's some lesbian equivalent to that shit, but I haven't seen it and don't hang around that many lesbians to know.
Anon, it's lesbians, there a sexual minority and I don't doubt some have settled down with what they could find just on those grounds alone
I actually misread as Kirsten durst and I was like " Yeah she's really pretty and was smoking as a younger woman-"
Kristen Stewart is a bit long on the face but good on her for coming out
File: 1619385632108.jpeg (105.05 KB, 1038x1200, EFicMrMWwAEIAe0.jpeg)
Huh, he actually did look okay. That's kind of tragic. Reminds me of how the guy who played Harry Potter let himself go and now looks like a homeless drug addict. Is it just how British men are?
File: 1619387169227.jpg (39.48 KB, 392x600, 47a1f8f0ae7dd62e5681ef76fde3b6…)
I am starting to think that some anons here just dont like men. They like boys.
Someone posted Barron Trump when he was like 12 in one of the male attractions thread in /g/ lmao. Plus, there was that anon who said she wished men stopped growing at 13. What's going on with farmers lately?>>791671>why the hell should I want a grown ass man
…well, aren't you a grown woman?
File: 1619389040161.jpeg (151.54 KB, 1024x615, article-0-1AAD2CD6000005DC-68_…)
…I mean, he looks young there, but at least he didn't look like this? I don't know what to tell you anon, but the image you posted there looks healthier than this for sure. I don't think wanting a guy who looks like he takes care of himself means you must like boys. If that's how it is now, I really weep for the fate of myself and other male-attracted women.
File: 1619389445579.jpeg (278.49 KB, 1200x900, emma-watson-before-and-after.j…)
Samefagging, but this is Emma Watson for comparison.
She managed to age without looking haggard and weird like her male co-star(s). She's extremely pretty. I don't understand why it's seemingly so hard for men to do the same.
Is it really so impossible for them? It's not even like the two have different life circumstances. Both wealthy, successful celebrities that can afford to look good. Probably both do coke because it's Hollywood. And yet, consistently, the men end up looking like ass while the women look gorgeous. It's fucked.
This is kind of a good point, too. Women who are like 18 up to their early or mid 20s (or even younger) are somehow expected to be attracted to men who are in their 30s, 40s and up. Meanwhile, all men are pretty much expected to be into young women, even 16 year olds.
It just doesn't seem right to me.
Op here and i want to clarify that I'm into women as well and while a lot of women look hot even well into their 40s I'm not attracted to them either
, so I'm pretty egalitarian in that sense
Look at the picture I posted, look back at >>791684
. Some people will insist that Radcliffe is a handsome man in spite of everything, but I'm in the wrong for saying Emma Watson is extremely pretty. L. >inb4 you claim they're looksmatched
Enough of the delusions
File: 1619390589306.jpeg (816.01 KB, 3264x2448, 792E07B3-4B8A-4CD0-9F26-E19DCF…)
Hottest celebrities around, that woman’s gunt is making a true fashion statement.
File: 1619390625014.jpeg (20.84 KB, 700x402, 5ee0fbe7bfd17.jpeg)
One of people on these photos is on midnight coke trip, and the other on the red carpet with professionally done makeup. Picrel is how Daniel Radcliffe looks normally. By conventional standards, he is a very attractive man. You dont have to personally be attracted to him, but you cant argue that he is somehow objectively subpar.
Now as for an average man, they do age like shit, because nobody ever teached them how to do proper skincare routine. Or just generally follow healthy lifestyle outside of working out.
File: 1619390954764.png (Spoiler Image, 174.72 KB, 622x1285, handsome_squidward__full_body_…)
At least I'm not exclusively attracted the human embodiment of this image.
Are you the anon in /g/ who posts about how hot you find dadbods and baldness? Pack it up.
And yeah, if I'm going to be thirsting on anon about some celebrity scrote, he better be a fucking 10/10. Real life is more forgiving, but I'm not sure what's so great about posting about how wet you get for weird/ugly men who happen to be famous. Keeping your aspirations low and preparing yourself to settle if the worst comes to the worst? It makes no sense to me.
File: 1619391384412.jpg (Spoiler Image, 72.81 KB, 470x1115, main-qimg-6842a5149fd6b054f5e2…)
Ok, stop, nobody described him as "sex god". As for what I am used to seeing, the answer is an average man (duh). You cant tell me these isnt a clear distinction between Daniel Radcliffe, or Rober Pattinson, or whatever other popular actor, and picrel.
And just out of curiosity, could you post picture of a man you find attractive?
The guy in your image definitely isn't a far cry from >>791715
. He could do 4 months of lifting/weight loss and be on the same level. Maybe do something new with his hair. I really don't see a wide berth of difference. Is it the money? Blue eyes?
There isn't a specific kind of guy I find attractive, which is why I gave the generic male model answer. It's subjective (and I feel like some anons will sperg at any guy I post and make him out to be Driver-tier regardless at this point kek), but when it comes to actually thirstposting, I will never understand anons who go crazy over really average guys.
File: 1619392081289.png (89.65 KB, 1333x1000, social-worker-526067-HL-a2c971…)
The amount of female social workers with hybristrophilia is scary. I don't trust anyone that goes into social work for penitentiaries for goes to work with criminals out of prison.
I'm sick of living around violent scum, and I'm really tired of seeing violent scum get benefits the more benign offenders aren't entitled to.
I forgot my unpopular opinion after all that
Anybody that sets out to be a social worker shouldn't be one, period, or at least their power should be seriously curtailed. Or social work should be managed by the police.
I don't know why people think social workers are UwU perfect. All those criminals brag about how much of a joke the system is once they get those extra illegal perks gifted by "compassionate" social workers.
File: 1619392349437.jpeg (145.29 KB, 866x1390, portrait-of-happy-young-woman-…)
The worst part is that many men who resemble that picture are socially conditioned to think they deserve a woman like this, or even that she's not pretty enough.
The point isn't to talk shit about people's taste (especially since you already seem to know these men aren't like, perfect), the point is that it gets tiring to see straight women praise average or unattractive men as "sexy" or "very attractive", and it's even worse because men generally don't worship anything less than 10/10 model-tier women below 30 years old. >>791757
I agree with that, I'm just confused how horniness can be targeted at people who are not only strangers, but strangers who don't stand out in any specific/positive way.
>>791715>By conventional standards, he is a very attractive man
the man:>no lips>tiny face with close together eyes>messy hair>short and disproportionate >gross beard
what does "conventional" and "very attractive" mean? White and British?
File: 1619420616002.jpg (323.25 KB, 1200x1604, EMMA-WATSON-Out-and-About-in-L…)
emma watson is one of the blandest person ever but people hype her up for stupid nostalgia reasons.
she is not extremely pretty. im so fucking tired of everyone pretending she's gorgeous. its literally just cause she was your crush in middle school and nothing else. she is plain and pedestrian as fuck, just well dressed and makeup. ive never been a potterfag so seeing people go crazy over her is bizarre to me. >>791689
File: 1619428284070.png (447.92 KB, 1024x411, fw3xc6646hj61.png)
Black woman here, it has less to with white women and more to do with black men being the weakest link in our community, there colorism is so fucking deep and illogical that they would jump for the chance to be with the woman on the right then on the left
They make literal fools out of themselves and the black community to get with white women(no1curr, racebait)
what do you mean, she has really delicate features. she's leagues above any big-lipped cheekbone-fillered celebrity.
it's a shame she's retarded, such a waste of a pretty face.
File: 1619446593393.jpg (1.04 MB, 1619x2048, MV5BMTQzMjkwNTQ2OF5BMl5BanBnXk…)
I never understood why people kept gushing over Ryan Gosling and calling him a sex symbol for years, when he looks like nothing but the most basic man I've ever met. Is his acting that good or something?
He's one of those male celebrities that have been memed into attractiveness, even if it's not really true. That's how they were selling Brad Pitt and Orlando Bloom years ago.
Like, think about it. Even here, where he-who-must-not-be-named, Pattinson and other ugly male celebrities are worshiped and thirsted over for no apparent reason, how many Gosling anons do we see? It's fake news.
File: 1619447677801.jpeg (290.73 KB, 1080x1440, disgusting.jpeg)
I never watched HP or read the books. I don't go crazy over her (I like more tomboyish women personally), I just think she's really pretty in the same way a lot of other female celebrities are, especially in comparison to her male counterparts, kek. Also, what >>792110
I'll take 1000 Emma Watsons over another one of these. There is absolutely no excuse.
I disagreed at first, but now I’m seeing ugly ginger men everywhere. This guy I’ve been sexting with is a ginger with freckles. I’ve never seen his entire face, and I’m worried now.
I’m going to kms if I sent nudes to a ginger male butterface. Fuck you for gingerpilling me anon
Tell me you weren't dumb enough to show your face to this guy-
Ginger women are cuties tho
I think she's liked and treated like this because - maybe thanks to a lazy content - she never did anything problematic
; standards are low nowadays.
I disagree. Chris Evans has a lot of attractive qualities that people find irresistible for a reason.>incredibly white smile–
imma reason with you, I was going to disagree with you but then I looked him up and you're right. KEK
File: 1619452003923.jpg (716.7 KB, 3264x2176, indgrex.jpg)
I swear they're made in generic male factories
it makes me cringe especially as a black woman who sees other black women foam at the mouth for him. The only reason why they love him so much is because one time once he was spotted flirting with a hot black girl in like 2005. thats it and thats all it took for him to be a sex god king in the. i want to cry the bar is in hell. anon was right about straight women being the worst LMAO jk.>>792243
sorry i accidentally deleted but he is cute! its just LSA DRAGS IT
He Can actually pull off the scruffy look somewhat.
And he was a danm heartthrob as a young man
I mean its complex, I think Chris Evans attractiveness is more of a meme at this point for black women on twitter and LSA
He really does seem like a nice guy for the most post so I feel that's a factor
File: 1619458200074.jpg (34.47 KB, 599x345, tumblr_lss78nrlQ01r4vn34o1_128…)
I think its important to remember his attractiveness literally started as a meme >In 2010 Ryan Gosling starred in Blue Valentine, the film was given an NC-17 rating by the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) due to a scene involving Gosling's character giving oral pleasure to the female protagonist. Gosling publicly criticized MPAA's decision by saying it is a sexist to give films with scenes depicting women performing oral sex R ratings while his scene in Blue Valentine was given a NC-17 rating. The actor's bold statement received praises from women's blogosphere, most notably a column post on Ms. Magazine blog in November 2010.
>Jezebel posted an article about the single topic Tumblr on the same day it launched and a number of similar articles followed on celebrity blogs like Huffington Post Women, Perez Hilton and BuzzFeed, as well as news media outlets including TIME Magazine, CBS and The Guardian. The blog also enjoyed significant coverage from the women's fashion magazines and blogs, including Marie Claire, Stylist and Vogue among others. Since the onset of mainstream news coverage, the image macro series has continued to circulate on Tumblr
File: 1619458759865.jpeg (366.74 KB, 828x985, 40D46679-FDA0-465E-9318-4CA9B1…)
research suggests that "normie" looking people tend to be the ones like more as well>>792348
kek I had heard it started as a meme but not the full story>>792352
I only like blonde hair on certain men, and most lighter haired men look better with dark hair (see: Chris Evans, I'm not sure what his natural hair color is but he looks 1000x better brunette, Gosling looks better with dark hair too, etc). I tend to be most attracted to naturally dark haired guys>>792324
god why did Johnny have to turn out to be such a mess, guess he always was, but why
File: 1619459531786.jpg (35.42 KB, 468x468, smHKtmqh.jpg)
nta, I feel attraction towards men with blonde hair when its matched with some darker feature, either eye color or a slight tan skin color and vice versa, That said I'm attracted towards pale skinny white guys as well, as well buff white guys(Like I unironically would go for the Chad meme guy)
File: 1619460428320.jpg (71.76 KB, 1030x596, Equ1_4bXMAAGQ36.jpg)
I also think its important to remember that the attraction towards Chris is both genuine and ironic at the same time
basically a lot of colorist black men will claim attraction to only very light skinned women, so black women started ironically posting Chris Evans as their #1 black male crush, claiming he's just a light skinned black man and calling him Chris Jamal Evans
Kek thanks anons, I'm glad to see other women in agreement because the majority of other white women go for these white bread men that look so boring to me. To be fair, they probably think the same of the men I like.
Anyway, no doubt that there's some blonde haired, blue eyed incel reading this and seething because a few women on an obscure imageboard said that they prefer other men. I've posted this opinion elsewhere in a female-only community and ofc it had some moid who lashed out with some passive aggressive response. Just get a spray tan and dye your hair. Wear colored contacts if necessary. Women do all of that shit and most of them don't complain about it ffs.>>792400
When it comes to non-black women, I thought black men were attracted to the women who emulate black women and tan their skin like Kylie Jenner. There's a joke too that black men like overweight white/latina women but I don't know how true it is.
File: 1619467034177.jpeg (1.07 MB, 2048x2048, 1619131242532.jpeg)
she has so great features every combo with her looks beautiful.
she's plain janey but share the sentiment with a previous anon that she's far better looking than the women who get obvious fillers and giant lips.
no comment about her acting tho
The media always uses it as a meaning for "working yourself to death for the sake of capitalism since you have to prove yourself to your male coworkers that you are exactly like them or else you will never get that equal payment by working 110% more".
"Girlboss" basically means capitalist pick-me & is a buzzword that gets glamorized as we work ourselves to death
That isn't true, the term comes from the owner of Nasty Gal, Sofia Amouruso. She was a horrible boss, treated her female employees like shit. The term has a bad rep not because of "working yourself to death", but because it's about treating your fellow women like shit in order to get ahead. But the term now has been co-opted by misogynists and everyone is called a girlboss now. Gone Girl is a girlboss. Any problematic
woman is a girlboss. Someone yesterday during the oscars called the film "Promising Young Woman" by the name "Promising Young Girlboss", because it's girlboss behavior to avenge your friend for being raped. You're a filthy capitalistic girlboss for taking pride in your work, for not wanting to be a stay at home mom tradwife.
And nobody fucking cares of course as usual, but if it was transmisogyny everyone would be up in arms. Every day women are getting clowned for basic shit that was seen as okay or even progressive in a nice way 20 years ago, but now EVERYTHING relating to race and gender can be used as a political talking point by heads treating it like a sports team score for the other time. toxic
as fuck and exhausting. Its better to unplug from the internet
File: 1619491681054.png (230.09 KB, 492x312, 1.png)
Yes, and they avoid acknowledging this by accusing anyone who points out that they're doing it for attention and internet clout while not actually solving any issue or protecting anyone of "supporting pedophilia!!1!".
File: 1619496811241.jpg (41.09 KB, 620x350, ziggler.jpg)
Funny thing actually, I don't think I get attracted towards natural blonde men but I have a Wierd asf towards buff guys with bleached blonde hair
like I find bleached blonde hair on men looks better on men then natural blonde hair
Because the system is straight up flawed. Kibbe left our of body types and compositions, because he didn't believe they could be real.
Not about to sperg about how men are, but it's just one example how men will determine something doesn't exist just because they themselves can't grasp it. So really it's just Kibbe being a kibbe and his system is literally incomplete, ignores like 25-35% of actual existing body 'types'.
His choices led to a system, that when used, leaves women not represented in it sort of hanging and styling to the next closest type they can almost sorta fit, which results in styling that's off. My guess is, that a system to styling that looks "solid" like this probably attracts women who feel frumpy and insecure because their bodies/faces are not really represented anywhere as something worth styling. >>792797>who has the most attractive type to men or who looks the youngest
why did i fully expect this to be the case
(same anon sage reply for correction of typos, i dumb)
*kibbe left out some body types
I'm the one who posted >>792912
and this is what I mean.
When we reduce the physical features into measurables (absolute height of skeleton being x, and bluntness of features being y, very roughly) it's possible to get a basic grasp of how much female existence kibbe's system ignores. Like are these women supposed to be unstyleable? What a message to send. Too bad some women buy the idea anyway.
The system leaves out tall women with delicate features and narrow bone structure, as well as short women who have stern, severe features but aren't stocky or fleshy. Just to name a few.
I only noticed this because I got into the system and had my 'tistic run with it. Less on that now, but it was interesting to see how something so promising turned out to be so dysfunctional in practice.
Sage for fairly mild sperg, sry.
Wouldn’t severe looking short women be Dramatics? Not sure if that’s easy to gauge from the tests but the height limits really only work one way. I could be wrong though.
I agree with you about lacking a category for tall women who can handle delicate detailing - the only options are close to no embellishment at all, or two different types of large, chunky jewelry, details and patterns. My specific gripe with kibbe is how shit the flamboyant natural category is - it’s basically a catch all for tall women who aren’t D or SD and is so broad at this point it barely means anything. I thought I was SD for a while despite none of the suggested lines looking good on me bc flamboyant naturals were described as straightwaisted and more “athletic”, until I realized the celeb with a similar body to me was actually flamboyant natural despite not looking anything like the top examples of an FN. there definitely needs to be another option for tall girls at this point - especially since women are just getting taller on average
yeah you can tell it was done by an old unfashionable scrote because his ideas of height are ridiculous. plenty of women over 25 are 5'10" or taller.>>792935
there's literally no spot for women with round or chubby faces in kibbe either, because scrotes don't notice those & so think they don't exist, OR can't possibly also be thin/tall.
I don't think this is unpopular so much as simply wrong. There are people who get through life by using others, but there are also those who have a big community of friends and people who care about them because they've been good to them, so that has merit too. Between being toxic
and being supportive to receive the same benefits (and being nice has more enduring benefits because you aren't burning bridges), there's no reason not to take the kinder option.
Who is this unpopular with? 12 year olds on twitter?>>793408
Why the fuck is it so hard for moids to have both decency and a job? Literally the world caters to them. Why women have to choose between a leech and a rapemonkey when we're expected to be all the things at once.
File: 1619561657754.jpg (245.22 KB, 1200x1598, the-selfish-gene-30th-annivers…)
Girlboss energy. Remember you have to pick and choose the short and long games.
>>792841>You cant name shit because the internet coddles and enables severe mental illness
Lmao not all internet communities are this
fucked, body systems specifically attract these weirdos, even some scrotes were fighting over Kibbe types it was hilarious as fuck.
>Literally does not attract a bunch of unhinged psychos these days?
You're either delusional or one of them, just a look to that mf reddit and the extra weird, cultist behavior in Kibbe's private group tells you everything.
Yeah cause like you don't have to be a pushover but you don't need to relent being kind and giving either so idk what this anon's been smoking lolol.
Hell, I don't always expect people to thank or appreciate a kind gesture of mine because in my case it was given for its own sake. I do appreciate being appreciated and don't necessarily tolerate people being unkind or rude to me when I offer or they asked for help but sometimes people act like they are expected to be given a parade by holding doors open for people and idk what to tell them-
I agree with >>793261
insofar as this opinion is not unpopular, it's the operational method of liberal societies. The laws basically say "treat others however the hell you want just don't create chaos by harassing/assaulting people". We've internalized that this anti-social attitude is a necessary evil for getting ahead in most environments. What does this do to a person though?
Developing compassionate relationships is painful but they're also a source of incomparable joy. I don't think we're avoiding any pain by denying ourselves the joyful aspect of compassionate experiences and altruism for its own sake. Actually it usually deepens the pain of isolation and meaninglessness. I'm not saying we should all go through life bending over backwards with some performative jesus-loving moralism, I'm saying that the most damaging effects of pessimism are felt in our internal relationships to ourselves.
I'm a little more forgiving on the design and animation, but I think the main characters in both shows are designed in such meh ways comparing to one off background characters who have more variation in shape and less eye seering colors imo.
Also I have a feeling the tone in both shows won't be able to handle it's drama and Comedy since at least Hazbin wants to focus on redemption and other emotional shit but I don't think it has the finesse
I think bad guy is still a fun song other then that she's not someone I listen a lot.
I liked her green haired phase
American teens maybe lol
Never saw that type of behaviour in the kids at my school nor country. They literally just wanted to vibe
File: 1619619681354.jpg (86.42 KB, 988x659, a33.jpg)
>>793823>>Alt girls who complain about the negative attention they receive while dressing like clown hookers are dumb
I hate this, what exactly is "hooker like" in the e-girl fashion? It's stupid coomer males spreading this idea because alt girls tend to be sexually liberated but still too hot / picky to be "available" to regular scrotes thirsting after them, therefore e-girl = dumb whore because she refuses to have sex with me.
I get leered at, and used to cry a lot when I was developing because of what >>792756
is saying basically. I'm not sure if it helped me tbh. You could say that I'll rarely be turned down for a fuck, but I think most women here would happily trade not being sexualised or called whoreish for wearing a standard v-neck with having a smaller dating pool or having a knob or two question my femininity.
I remember in my teens I had one (male) friend ask me if I can't make my boobs look smaller or something while looking kind of unconfortable when I took my jumper off, and another (female) friend ask me why I've got to be so sexual all the time. Just from my natural body, tits in a sports bra already 2 cups too small and damaging the muscle development in my shoulders.
I guess everyone has their problems and the grass is probably greener, but I really wish I had small or no tits.
A few years ago I got tested for a breast cancer gene. I had lost my mom to breast cancer. If I had the gene I would be getting a double mastectomy and you have the option of getting fake ones put in in their place but I wasn't planning on that part. I was excited at the thought of just having them gone.
I tested negative for the gene and lost my chance to join the no titty, no bra gang. In the same way some naturally flat chested women want them bigger..some women want them gone.
could it be the bondage gear or the short clothes and also the fact the male counterparts dont dress this way? lol
I mean I do like alt fashion ngl but we are not gonna pretend alt fashion got more coomy as time went on
File: 1619629685760.jpg (26.62 KB, 404x505, e468c333784708d2c28b9a6c8fc60a…)
>>793946>I mean I do like alt fashion ngl but we are not gonna pretend alt fashion got more coomy as time went on
alt fashion was very revealing for decades. Latex, leather, bondage gear, fishnets, mini skirts corsets, deep cleveages… given that e girl is taking some inspiration from street/techwear you can easily style it to be very covered and multilayered. If you think alt fashion got more coomy then you don't really know alt fashion.
There's a general trend of sexualizing yourself for more clout, definitely more than idk, when emo culture was popular in 2000s so you may associate some behavior with the style, but it doesn't change the fact the style itself is not really overly coomy as compared to older alternative fashion. >the fact the male counterparts dont dress this way?
give me one example of a style where male counterpart shows more skin than female. it's the general society issue, not something specific to egirls and eboys.
File: 1619631015255.jpg (103.92 KB, 778x960, d31dd780a07207a3b4dc39e9d07a65…)
Is that picture from the late nineties? If so, I had pre nineties decades in mind. Punk and goth fashion of the 70s/80s had both genders dressing similarly with women showing their legs more, but deep cleavage cuts weren't fashionable back then.
For your second question.. disco fashion was known for this (or having the same amount of skin showing for both sexes)
on similar conditions of upbringing, wealth and education level, women and black people still underperform and choose cheating or the easy way out too many times.
Sorry, i guess this is fact not an opinion(USER HAS BEEN PUT OUT TO PASTURE)
File: 1619638956973.png (1.81 MB, 855x1569, reminder- males find this arou…)
on similar conditions of upbringing, wealth and education level, scrotes are still worthless, pathetic faggots who can't stay on their own shit websites and globally
perform 82% of violent crime despite being 50% of the population.
Sorry, i guess this is fact not an opinion
File: 1619640156853.png (523.48 KB, 800x900, psduwez6yhd01.png)
Oh nyooo women under perform in crimes (aka cheating) and suicides. Men should keep on being great at one of those things. You too can take the easy way out!
Men are always being class clowns no matter you go no matter their ethnicity because they get coddled/rewarded for being retards while women tend to be the ones quiet and listening to the lessons
So many men waste their lives all day doing nothing and being satisifed with nothing because porn and video games have conditioned them to accept instant gratification since males are a naturally lazy and autistic sex
File: 1619643372806.png (149.17 KB, 600x444, E309EEE1-BCC0-4691-945E-8ADE58…)
Scrotes will latch on to the 0.00001% 180IQ savants and tell themselves that men are all smart bois on average because they watched some youtube videos on babby’s quantum mechanics. “Why doesn’t school teach this!!!”, they write, under a kurzgesagt video.
Meanwhile faggots can barely make it through compulsory school, drop out of college like flies. At best they graduate C- after 7 years and go on to live sub-mediocre life suicideposting on r/antiwork, cooming, crying.
For the “rational” sex men are terrible at confronting facts and statistics.
I just need to point out that the person with the highest IQ ever recorded was a woman- Marilyn vos Savant. So, I never understood underachieving scrotes obsession with using IQ as a way to establish themselves as smarter than women. Like yeah, most people with 180+ IQs are men, but the highest ever is still a female and most of the lowest level IQs are also scrotes, so IQ is not the pwn they think it is…
Also, having a high IQ means literally nothing when you're 30+ living in your mom's basement cooming to anime girls and your only interaction with real women is Tweeting at them about how superior you are for being XY.
File: 1619661552660.png (Spoiler Image, 658.85 KB, 625x1149, Screenshot_20210428-175528(1).…)
Im so fucking tired of the big ass trend. How is this supposed to be attractive
It's funny, because the male suicide rate will always be the highest (as it should be).
Once again, I hope these pieces of shit infesting this place because they need female attention go on to follow their mommy suicide fetish pictures.
File: 1619669655675.jpg (95.21 KB, 906x906, Exb4e8ZWgAM-Qdu.jpg)
God I love being a woman, despite it all, knowing based women exist lifepills me every day.
File: 1619674392320.jpg (26.14 KB, 420x311, liznkids.jpg)
I think after the third kid, moms should decide whether or not they want another. Was reading about Sean Duffy. The man has -9- kids. His wife must be dead, or an ubermensch.
I work in tech and weak scrotes complain about muh diversity quotas all the fucking time. The ones complaining about them the most are, unsurprisingly, the most subpar skill level and the people nobody wants to work with. It's so obvious they're scared of not having their career served on a silver platter and being replaced with an actually competent female employee. They really try to force this meme that diversity quotas mean that you'll hire any dumb amateur based on their background and the field will go to shit with blundering employees all over the place, in reality it would probably change things for the better since techbros would actually be forced to be decent human beings at the work place instead of relying on everyone just tolerating their bullshit.
All the female employees I've met have been hard-working, motivated and smart with good people skills. You rarely even need diversity quotas because they outperform male applicants all the time.
I even tend to like the boring ones because I take it as one of the multiple parts of living a mundane life, and each one just has its own niche that makes it unique, including its range of characters.>>794862
My Little Monster will always take my top spot, I think. But, I've also enjoyed Blend S, Saiki K, and The Devil is a Part-Timer. Recently, I started Dagashi Kashi too, and it seems promising so far. And after that, I plan to start Orange. I heard it's really sad, but that's exactly the type of anime I like lmao. It's my favorite form of catharsis.
File: 1619733143764.png (316.15 KB, 307x468, 473289473286523054230.png)
I'm pretty sure if I was ever to date a man again I'd want him to be an outspoken supporter of women. By that I don't necessarily mean someone who talks about feminism all the time, but a guy who actually opens his mouth to disagree when other men diss women or talk about how great porn is. It seems like there's a lot of hate for "feminist" men or self-identified "allies" and I get that it can be performative/just a cover so they gain trust from women while they're actually as bad as the rest. But I've gotten so tired of the sort of banal sexism that comes from men just silently accepting the sexism of their peers rather than sticking up for women. It's so fucking lazy and classless. Honestly I'd rather gamble and give a "feminist" man a shot over yet another mute retard who has shit to say when womankind is being badmouthed right in front of him. Even if they don't necessarily contribute to the conversation themselves, it shows they have absolutely no drive, concern or affection for women in general so they have no right attempting to be a true partner to one.
File: 1619739839485.jpeg (498.76 KB, 750x806, 33456F9F-7203-4BC2-9DAA-90D525…)
Heterosexual sex is time-wasting. Humans need to stop wasting their reward/attachment system on meaningless sex
File: 1619757092430.gif (1.05 MB, 640x400, 899BE993-3DF8-4744-BEEA-2775A2…)
ily anon and I agree regarding all the shows you mentioned, but I think >>795082
has a point. Yeah scrotes will get off to anything, but Azumanga does have a good chunk of scrote fodder in it. It’s a product of it’s time and the product of a loser scrote. But we shouldn’t let lesser beings (scrotes) ruin shit for us, even if they made it. If you like it then you like it. I haven’t seen this or yotsuba in years but I refuse to let them make me look back on my good experiences enjoying these series negatively.
You right, I feel so understood nonnie
They’ll probably agree, because it’s true. But just because media is not meant for us, that doesn’t stop us from seeing it [whether by choice or chance] and enjoying it. We can’t help that.
For what it’s worth I laughed back then, but I know it was because I was young and stupid and didn’t understand how awful it was. Azumanga was one of the more popular anime uploaded in the early days of youtube and I think was among many’s first exposures to slice of life anime too. Coupled with ‘Cool Japan’ marketing boom I think it became a hit with both young and older audiences.
The genre is also dominated by male writers, and that shit was considered top tier comedy. Now instead the teacher would be a fellow student, like mineta from bnha. Scrotes tend to think anime girl with boobs being sexually harassed with bonus male gaze panty shots = funnykek so unfortunately I don’t know if we’ll ever enter an era where that’s not one of the top 10 gags in anime. Well, maybe we could if we stopped consuming any content created by scrotes until media made by women was so prevalent that you’d find something similar that’s for us, by us way easier than dedicating a search for it. That’d also mean it’d be easier for women in manga to get their stories out than it is right now.
My actual unpopular opinion is that we should do what’s in spoiler. An actual dedicated effort to only legally consume media piloted by women. And we must let it be known what we are doing and why, otherwise there will never be [a bigger] change.
so youre against all ships and think its the same as being a coomer?
you remind me of that idiotic moid who told me masturbating to fictional cartoons is more normal than shipping because at least it acts on a biological urge
There should be a taboo, you shouldn't be allowed to ship sibling's(pinecest) grown ass men with children(peter x Miles) abusers with their victims
(joker x Harley)
There are limes that should be drawn
nta but this is a reach, what about scrote coomers who consume fictional abuse porn? Not all of it is with real people. So does that mean those scrotes are totally well-adjusted, normal, fine examples of young men now? I agree with >>795410>>795447
She’s clearly talking about specific types of content, anons itt are being overly defensive and applying what she said to all variations of shipping for the sake of arguing.
ATA. Are we supposed to view them differently in this scenario? It’s fanfiction written by usually anonymous people on the internet, whether it’s a man or a woman it doesn’t really make a difference. You can’t control who reads/consumes the content, and you can’t control who writes it. >>795396
Was right that it deserves to be publicly shamed. The way anon worded it she’s probably not talking about trauma coping fiction either, which is the really only “plausible” excuse I’m willing to buy regarding this weirdo shit.
Kek it’s the unpopular opinion thread. Why would anyone care enough to subject themselves to scrote boards over this. >>795457
Why is this about shaming women when men on the same platforms should also get the same pushback? And if that’s not happening, who are we seeing uplift or support those men? Is it the same people who shame women for writing explicitly what OP mentioned, or is it other men and hypocrites?
Either way if freaks want to write or read dubious at best fanfiction then I can’t stop them. They can accept the fact that they’re abnormal, or not, it’s really not my problem. I just agree with the unpopular opinion that it’s okay for them to be publicly scrutinized.
Yeah, and my opinion is that sperging out because 17 year old Becky Martin wrote a fanfic about 16 year old Faggot Minamoto and 18 year old Okama Masashima having sex is a waste of time in the face of the putrid shit written/drawn/consumed probably by your "cool" male friend(s), your brother, maybe even your boyfriend, and it indicates that you don't really care about the "morality" of any of this shit. You just want a quick fix of self-righteousness. >who are we seeing uplift or support those men?
The scrotes you're too afraid to rightfully shame.>Is it the same people who shame women for writing explicitly what OP mentioned, or is it other men and hypocrites?
So, what are you doing about those men? Nothing? Still pontificating to women? Okay
File: 1619802519951.png (161.75 KB, 370x371, i3i32i.png)
Cosmetic rhinoplasties are a travesty. The majority of plastic surgeons are bad people who should be shunned from society - the way we would with anyone else who exploits and encourages people's insecurities for financial gain. Working to remove the variety of human facial features is a crime against the inherent beauty in variety.
Why do you think I don't call out men on their disgusting fetishes, I do and I'm more disgusted by them but I encounter more women specifically in fandom spaces
Its not right to wanna draw porn or erotica of child characters and I don't care what anyone says
>>795505>The majority of plastic surgeons are bad people who should be shunned from society - the way we would with anyone else who exploits and encourages people's insecurities for financial gain.
Most plastic surgeons screen for BDD at this point (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/lary.21728
). Scummy one's exist, but thats an exception or if you go to a rare sketchy place. If an entire medical field should be shunned because of a few bad actors wouldn't it also be sane to remove let's say cancer treatment medication (https://www.canceractive.com/article/astrazeneca-pays-up
>Working to remove the variety of human facial features is a crime against the inherent beauty in variety.
Also you underestimate the complexity of plastic surgery. Most surgeries are minor "get rid of eye bags" or "get rid of un-even nose" not "make me look like a generic ideal". It's an over exaggeration to hate all plastic surgery.
To be pedantic why is it a crime?
File: 1619804558147.gif (1.45 MB, 640x360, fggg.gif)
It's not comparing treatment, but instead "if bad actors exist in a field the field should not exist". The irrationality comes from taking their logic to the final level >>795530>if most surgeries are minor then that just means their skills could be better put to use elsewhere and vice versa for the money of eye bag victims
What defines minor then? Is slight pain minor? Is a big feature that makes someone feel bad minor?
Most people say plastic surgery significantly made their life better (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1748681507001076
)so is it minor?
Nta but I know someone who tested positive for the cancer gene mutation bcra? and she had a breast removal and implants put in their place as she was in her twenties. My mom had breast cancer in her 50s and spent her last decade of life with one titty. I weirdly have so much respect for my mom for skipping the reconstruction job.
I remember my mom being offered charity sponsered make up classes on how to paint in her brows during chemo and just.. when cancers involved I hate to see how much emphasis is still put on women needing to look good. My mom was offered more free make up and wig advice than emotional help. Cancer charities, cancer priorities? I saw that messed up side of things and I hate it still a decade later.
minor as in inconsequential. like if you just feel bad about your mom or dad giving you a huge ostrich beak of a schnozz then getting that fixed is minor, however if that same nose is giving you trouble breathing it's not inconsequential any more>Most people say plastic surgery significantly made their life better
having skimmed through the study you linked and I found a few things that irked me>91% female>72% under age of 45>more than 50% of surgeries were breast related with most being reductions of the breast>the first procedure for over 70% of patients>Cole et al. underlined this fact in 1994. Their results showed an improvement in quality of life for 73% of patients. But the largest positive changes were found in the breast reduction group.
kinda feels like you're just a plastic surgeon here to peddle your bullshit, how absolutely groundbreaking that a breast reduction could improve quality of life
File: 1619813407901.jpg (449.98 KB, 600x800, deifn6y-50886586-3448-4fb2-900…)
This is just an example I took from the first page of deviantart. I tend to be hesitant to complain about these kinds of artstyles because whenever I see when someone talks about disliking this type of style for looking generic someone always have to counter that "at least it looks pretty" and seemingly get offended on the artists' behalf. I dislike this kind of art because while it has beautiful colors it doesnt look like the character its based off of but mostly because it looks so generic and empty. More style than substance, imo. I dont think it has to be a grand master piece but at the same time its not difficult to be beautiful AND interesting/creative? This artstyle also got more common when digital artists started to prioritize doing art for commissions rather than a hobby so I have no doubts its more of a commercial style than anything else. I dont blame them but im kinda tired of the internet acting like this is the holy grail of digital art styles or something.
I totally agree. How do girls with big chests say it ruins their outfits? Almost all clothes are made for girls who at least have C cups. It's so easy to get male attention if you can show cleavage.
The back complaining is always funny to me because I have borderline severe scoliosis so mine's probably worse anyways.
I dunno, I have somewhat of a complex about that because I let the booba meme ruin my self esteem as a 32B. Regained some of it after frequenting /tv/ more often.
Not everyone wants male attention, lmao.
IMO, small breasts or flat chests just hold most clothes more gracefully. I don't care about dressing like a bombshell, being sexualized from a disgustingly young age because of my body was a mental headfuck, and having big breasts isn't a privilege. >Regained some of it after frequenting /tv/ more often.
The pedo board? Uh…
>>795654>It's so easy to get male attention if you can show cleavage.
as if having disgusting males stare at your tits is such a privilege>Regained some of it after frequenting /tv/ more often.
oh i see, your self-esteem is built around male opinions, sad
File: 1619819607171.gif (478.17 KB, 320x411, 1611170937119.gif)
I like American choco, I like Hershey's, maybe I don't want to eat some super sweet euro chocolate that tastes like powdered sugar and milk. don't reply to me with that "it tastes like vomit shit" I will ignore you because I'm American
Same. I decided awhile back to only do one or the other from now on.
My somewhat unpopular opinion: reading is better than watching for pretty much everything. Sometimes I don't know why I even bother with movies or tv shows.
>>795396>you shouldn't be allowed to ship children, to ship canonically straight characters in gay, to include kinks and fetishes in your ships, to include rape your ship, to ship characters with a significant age gap
Why not?>moral degenerates deserved to be shamed publicly
How is that moral degeneracy?
Stay seething while I enjoy my degenerate fetishes shipping fictional anime boys. Unfortunate for your moralfagging I won't take them into real life because I'm not a scrote sex offender in the making though. >to ship canonically straight characters in gay
kek I think I swallowed a bait right here
File: 1619907438560.png (182.78 KB, 540x404, chao.png)
>>796272>Sonic and Shadow become allies at the end of Sonic Adventure 2 despite being rivals with the exact same powers before, use their special form to become OP, beat some giant monster in space, Shadow "dies" for the greater cause while falling to earth and everyone gets sad over it except he's actually alive in the sequel>Bayonetta and Jeanne become allies at the end of Bayonetta 1 despite being rivals with the exact same powers before, use their special powers to become OP, beat some giant monster in space, Bayonetta "dies" for the greater cause while falling to earth and everyone gets sad over it except she's actually alive in the next scene>Ryuko and Satsuki become allies at the end of Kill la Kill despite being rivals with the exact same powers before, use their special form to become OP, beat some giant monster in space, the weird living uniform "dies" for the greater cause while falling to earth and everyone gets sad over it except he stays dead
Don't get me started on all the SEGA references in Bayonetta and how she collects rings/halos as currency.
File: 1619991305067.jpg (178.3 KB, 600x861, 31072.jpg)
This was one of the dumbest things I've read in my entire life
I'm not against people having kids I'm against people having kids just because they're "bored" or want to project their mental illness onto their kids. Can I please get a valid
argument against that instead of insulting one liners?
Nta but I'd prefer having a daughter too, it sucks because I'd want it to be a biological child but then I can never be sure it'll be a girl. I don't really like the idea of adopting because I think the first few months starting from birth are really important for a child's development, along with how well the mother took care of herself during pregnancy. I couldn't handle adopting and having no idea about what the child went through before I got it.
Maybe I'm also slightly biased against adopting because I used to babysit a lot and the adopted kids were always the worst by far, with a ton of behavioral issues and cognitive delays.
Not really worth to have potentially 4-5 abortions just to have a girl, not to mention something could go wrong, it's not only edgy.
I'm NTA but if I'd get pregnant and decide to keep it once in my life, I'd be destroyed if it was a boy. Having a boy who's just raised to disrespect his mother by greater society while having all the encouragement in the fields and interests I was discouraged from would probably kill my soul. While mothers are supposed to unconditionally supportive, I'm not sure I could be that towards a son, even though it wouldn't be his fault. I guess I truly am a man-hater after all.
Yeah but anons consider any sort of limiting the procreation of humans to be anti natalism which creates a blurry line to some people who don't read into everything correctly>>797691
That's a waste of time and money and many abortions can cause damages to the uterus. Why not just adopt or even foster? You can pick what kids you want and it gives them a chance to have a good life. You sound like a breeder fetishist
Me wanting my own kids isn't sexual by any means. The reason I'd prefer having my own is because I'd want to be the one responsible for taking care of my kid from the very start. Admittedly another reason is that I might be better at relating to my kid and making decisions that are right for them if they have my genes and some similar traits. I wouldn't mind it if they turned out completely different from me, it's just that if they do have issues that are similar to mine when I was a kid I'll be better equipped to deal with them.
It's also because I feel like I "know" my genes. I know a big part of personality is nurture and not nature but I'd still want to know what kind of person either parent of a child I'm going to raise really is.
(I'm not that anon by the way, nor do I want a designer baby or anything)
>>797765>hope you aren't preaching "adopt, not buy" when it comes to pets
Wait why not? I think for pets adopting is much better than buying but that's because raising a pet is much less significant than raising a child and because pets in shelters/without owners get treated really badly.
Are you one of those people who think pets are the same as kids or something?
>>797748>People who are fixated on having "their own" kids always come off as breeding or pregnancy fetish people to me,
you come off as a fixated kinkster to the rest of us, it's literally you who puts that in there, not the people you're trying to mock
Bonding to non-biological offspring as a parent is not something to take for granted, it's a difficult process that's not available for everyone. It can fail miserably and not everyone is ready for the adoption process.
Mothers bond to their children mainly via pregnancy and giving birth, because of hormonal surges. It literally affects even their ability to breastfeed. Post-partum depression is what happens, when that fails. Imagine then being an adoptive parent who's constantly shamed for not being perfectly bonded to the kid they adopted.
Stop acting like this shit is easy. "Breeder" is such a scrote-speak term. No, I'm not saying you're a scrote, I'm saying you have a bad take. Mothers are women and women are people. Excuse me for my infightey tone.
My unpopular opinion is that people need to stop being so specifically misogynistic towards mothers.
>>797776>My unpopular opinion is that people need to stop being so specifically misogynistic towards mothers.
I wonder if people that think like this do so because they have bad experiences with their own mother, or dislike her for any reason really.
I guess my unpopular opinion is that for 50% of the people on here who claim to have a narcissistic mother it's bullshit and they either victimize themselves too much or demonize their mom for not being flawless. I'm not denying that narcissistic mothers exist and act a certain way, just that the term is used too easily. NPD just isn't common enough to warrant all of these people claiming their mom has it, it's like everyone calling their ex crazy.
, you do
know that hugging/holding hands/not beating the shit out of your partner is also a fetish for some people
and besides, what you may think is average sexual intercourse is in reality just 'vanilla sex', which also is a kink, right
>>797790>getting your own kid instead of adopting is even worse, since human beings are more valuable/precious
First of all orphaned kids don't get chucked into shelters with poor conditions and systematically killed when they've been there for a while (in most of the world). Secondly humans don't depend on their caretakers for happiness and survival beyond childhood, unlike pets. Thirdly, a pet with behavioral issues can be a pain in the ass, but it won't ruin your entire life.
Basically to me personally the good you're doing by rescuing instead of buying a pet far outweighs the potential negative influence on your life. Adopting a kid is definitely morally admirable, but you're also accepting the risk of lifelong regret and resentfulness. Of course that risk is also there when you have natural children, but it's lower at least. I'll admit that I'm selfish for weighing off the risks like that, but I don't think it's that evil to have limits to your altruism.
I don't want to moralfag about it either since everyone has different reasons for their decisions.
Idk if I’d call bullshit on half of anons who claim to have crazy moms. A good portion of anons have visible issues ranging from having low self esteem to being completely batshit and it’s likely those things are rooted in how they were raised.
I think mothers come under fire more as they are the main caregivers, or in some cases the only one. If both parents are equally bad, it’s likely the mother will still be perceived as worse as she’s doing the bulk of the childrearing. It’s also much easier to be a good parent if your duties are smaller, hence the whole ‘weekend dad’ idolization.
I respect your POV even if I don't completely agree. Luckily enough, I live in a country that doesn't have kill shelters (though living in them is miserable enough and no animal deserves it). Growing up as an unwanted kid, often being subjected to (sexual abuse) absolutely is life-ruining, so I think more people should consider adoption or at least not moralfag (since everyone makes decisions that benefit them the most or at least with consequences of which they are capable living with).>Basically to me personally the good you're doing by rescuing instead of buying a pet far outweighs the potential negative influence on your life
Yeah, people absolutely should adopt if they are in the position that you described. But some people have specific needs and buying is much better for them. I don't think it's fair to shame them, if they carefully considered both options.>I don't think it's that evil to have limits to your altruism
I think the principle applies the same to getting pets as to adopting children. Still, more people should at least seriously consider adopting kids instead of making new ones.
File: 1620063832087.jpg (99.31 KB, 500x579, tumblr_pyb8c4W5HS1w3yzuso1_500…)
I checked what it's about and the premise seems really fricking interesting at first glance
which is why I'd be grateful to hear your opinion on why it's garbo, it'd be great to know if it's shit or not before wasting any time on it
tldr go off and don't be easy, your opinion counts
File: 1620063833025.jpeg (29.07 KB, 460x320, a92cf0b12b0bbc4f61bdfccb72c719…)
I'm not even sure if I want kids, but this is the most creepy, unnatural mindset. It's such a woefully sterile, yet cumbrained take. It's the kind of opinion you form when you consume nothing but melted plastic/metal and energy drinks for 5 years or something. Does all or most of your exposure to pregnancy and human (especially female) bodies come from pornography/kink? When's the last time you hugged someone, anon? Please…
I know this is bait but do you even know what a fetish is?
There's only a few basic instinctive sexual and reproductive needs. Namely what you'd call 'vanilla sex'; most simply described as PiV sex with the purpose of orgasm with a partner you're attracted to.
That's basically the only sexual urge that's (for most people) hardwired into your brain, because that's the basics of how you make a baby and how you make a baby is how the species survives. 'Vanilla sex' if anything is the only sexual urge where NOT wanting and enjoying it at all could be called a kink. It's like saying that enjoying the feeling of your brain releasing serotonin is simply a personal preference.
File: 1620064111600.jpg (27.22 KB, 714x714, 52765484_395713651258240_91207…)
It was a sarcastic joke, not a bait. I put the cursive in it and the 'beat the shit out of your partner' to indicate that but I guess online still doesn't convey it very well.
I fucking despise bdsm/kink personally and I thought I rolled it out well but apparently it got lost somewhere midway through
File: 1620064325749.jpg (46.97 KB, 1080x1014, 56770640_1225210474308693_1510…)
H-how about taking this to the the shitposting thread??
Yeah, I respect your point as well. Everyones situation is different and I definitely don't look down on everyone who buys a pet.
Unwanted children are a huge problem and every person who fosters or adopts them is going to make a huge difference. I don't think we'll ever get to the point where enough people adopt for unwanted kids to no longer be an issue though. It feels like maybe we should prioritize putting more money and effort into creating spaces and group homes where parentless children can grow up as comfortably and with as many opportunities as possible. Obviously getting adopted into a loving family makes a huge difference for every kid, but it doesn't change the bigger problem, you know?
I guess the same goes for building more humane and comfy animal shelters, but for obvious reasons the amount of unwanted animals that are born is more difficult to control than with humans so it's pretty much a given that there'll always be a huge amount of abandoned pets around. I guess that's why it seems bad to me to purposefully add to that number by actively breeding them, but again that's really subjective and I totally get where you're coming from.
File: 1620064920685.jpg (135.43 KB, 750x750, 1578554618450.jpg)
Oh shit I guess I'm retarded then, I'm pretty sleep deprived, sorry for the sperg lol
File: 1620071870141.jpeg (496.96 KB, 1280x1280, tinfoilhatday-3.jpeg)
Some posters must be bots or aliens collecting data on human behaviors online. They've been directed to ask questions and identify "contradictions" no actual human being would entertain.
This is how you end up with posts like "The urge to reproduce? Procreate? Hmm…is this not just a fetish? The two desires seem to be linked."
Next, someone will post "Why is cannibalism wrong? You say you care about humans, but hunger is completely separate from love. Some people love cows and dogs, but still eat beef and dog meat, right? Besides, people are put in jail and/or executed all the time. It could help solve world hunger, make space in jail and save taxpayer dollars if humans only ate criminals".
File: 1620078888404.jpg (77.16 KB, 960x960, cannibalis.jpg)
>>797906>Some posters must be bots or aliens collecting data on human behaviors online
this is the most entertaining unpop opinion of this thread so far
10/10 would tinfoil this post-ironically
From the subs I frequent I see quite a lot of complaining about Narcissistic/ selfish dads and their enabling wives and vice versa. It takes two to tango and a lot of people may cut slack towards the enabler in the relationship especially if they really weren't outwardly abusive
/ actually showed genuine care unlike the emotionally immature abusive
more like>if their taste in media wasn't absolute shit from consooming pandery shit
Alternatively, they are too lazy to research, but not sure if I buy that.
There are so many books, how the fuck you don't enjoy anything but 1000k smut angst fanfiction about your husbandos? The problem is you, not the state of literature.
it's funny because yes, 99% of what's on the shelf at barnes & noble is shit, but it's just supposed to take work to find a book that's interesting to you. I feel like people just expect cool deep cut books to be served to them like spotify recommendations. It's supposed to take hours of browsing at a library/bookstore to find like two books you think have a chance of being good. I mean, the browsing itself is interesting too, so it's not work if you enjoy it. And what you end up finding and liking is going to be specific to you. But you have to be confident in your own choices and not self-conscious - people are worried about not picking the "right" books if they're by themselves, so they go online and try too hard to learn what books are cool, then they go get those books and don't like them, and they're like "literature is shit." No…online "literature" people are shit and your attitude is shit. Go to a library and actually look at the books until you find one you like, WITHOUT looking up shit online first. I know it's scary but have some guts.
last 3 things I read that were good:
Alice Munro - lives of girls & women
Jean genet - miracle of the rose
John McPhee- encounters with the archdruid (nonfiction not fantasy lol)
"Books people recommend online" is a very narrow subset of all books, determined by what's new and whats considered "cool old books" at the moment. It's just samey and self-referential vs organically finding books that you actually want to read. And I mean "want to read" not "want to have read" or "want to get through". Don't fill up your queue or feel like you have to read what you have in it before you read other things. Any book that strikes you in the moment is what you should be reading at that moment.
Furthermore reading reviews/discussion online before reading a book predisposes you to the reviewer's ideas, instead of having your earnest naive experience first and then comparing it to others' which is what one should do. The thing is people dont trust their own naive experience and are scared of being "wrong" vs the online opinion of a book. The question is basically, do you want an authentic experience, or do you just want to fit in with lit twitter?
File: 1620150488890.jpg (19.64 KB, 312x353, 1470955751901.jpg)
i like the western animation thread. i think theres solid cow material there. hopefully it will keep going strong. but…
anons asking why are cartoons now politically correct are fucking retarded. have you met an artist lately? theyre all sjw they/them idiots. its always been that way as far as politics, they lean left in the dumbest way. art attracts "wooo im so open minded, dude" people and always has. yeah, fucking edge lords like shmorky and shadbase exist. but for every one of those edge fags theres like 1,000 sjw as fuck artists. seeing nonitas ask multiple times why everyone is trying to be woke on cartoons is fucking retarded. have you met an artist? theyre pretentious as fuck and always have been. it just is. they attract that crowd and even if youre an edgelord you will probably meet enough sjws in art school that you will be pretty open to a lot of dumb shit. lots of people just go with the flow and the flow in those circles have always been that way. i dont know. i feel like i lose brain cells when anons ask for a hundred time why so many popular artists are sjws now. i promise, if youre ever near most art schools, you will understand. some of you are so fucking retarded sometimes.
File: 1620150681620.jpg (49.91 KB, 500x500, shrooms.jpg)
Mushrooms are disgusting. They're really cool looking, and they taste fine, but the texture is so awful.
File: 1620163256121.jpg (156.62 KB, 1080x807, Screenshot_20210504-161029.jpg)
LV bags fucking ugly, overpriced, and go with almost no outfit. They are the worst shade of dookie brown. Plastic covered canvas ass.
File: 1620203834294.jpeg (34.24 KB, 220x220, 1FB40011-B9C8-4380-9543-C511FA…)
I don’t get it
i browsed /mu/ for years, more than i would like to admit. i participated in those type of shit threads for fun.
i dont get it either.
i have no idea what its about or care. the instrumental was pretty special so i vibed with it. have no real attachment to the record other than mangum shitposting and im sure a lot of other anons do too
File: 1620237339393.png (278.62 KB, 446x538, bb.PNG)
I hate monogram print so much and the brown shade is awful, you're right. I think some of their more subtle bags like the Capucines are nice though
File: 1620254439949.jpg (182.89 KB, 1500x1001, henry-cavill-007-bode-na-sala.…)
homegrown British men are just built different anon