I thought about that as well. And this too, lol >>5752
Although it's possible it's unrelated. Maybe the media just saw they're receiving attention and tried to cash in with a story?
Is the anon who was suppose to read Shame's 2nd book still here? If so, did you find anything of interest?
I was reading his first book and nearly all of the interactions he's describing seem so fake ( that they're over the top goes without saying )
I'm confused about who this content was for - he has that typical sassy HS TV humour, but also shoves in adult themes in a graphic manner.
Adults aren't going to find it entertaining and young children shouldn't really be reading it. So who was this targeted at?