[ Rules ] [ ot / g / m ] [ pt / snow / w ] [ meta ] [ Server Status ]

/ot/ - off-topic

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File(20 MB max)
Video
Password (For post deletion)

The site maintenance is completed but lingering issues are expected, please report any bugs here

File: 1703702312459.jpg (918.11 KB, 2103x3000, 1580960996173.jpg)

No. 1830393

Previous: >>1758716
Discuss art and related topics such as:

-Talk about Art Youtubers
-Ask about art supplies
-Discuss trashy art trends
-Instagram bullshit
-Art theft!
-General Art Bullshit
-Fandom and Shipping Discourse
-AI generated art

SCREENCAP EVERYTHING!
WRITE SAGE IN THE E-MAIL FIELD OF YOUR COMMENTS!

Articles about useful resources for improving one's art:
https://hubpages.com/art/how-to-draw-learn
https://sites.google.com/site/ourwici/https://www.alexhays.com/loomis/
Tried and true books on perspective, anatomy for artists, etc:
1. Perspective Made Easy by Ernest R. Norling
2. How to Draw by Scott Robertson
3. Framed Ink by Marcos Mateu-Mestre
4. Figure Drawing by Andrew Loomis
5. The Atlas of Human Anatomy and Surgery JM Bougery
6. Drawing the Head and Hands by Andrew Loomis
7. Figure Drawing by Michael Hampton
8. Force by Michael Mattesi
9. How to Render by Scott Robertson
10. Color and Light by James Gurney
11. The Skillful Huntsman by Scott Robertson/Mike Yamada/Khang Le/Felix
Yoon

>useful youtube channels

https://www.youtube.com/@mangamaterialsyoutube9454
https://www.youtube.com/@hidechannel2
>where to find art
https://www.wikiart.org/es
https://artvee.com/
>other useful sites
https://film-grab.com/
https://www.canva.com/colors/color-palettes/
https://line-of-action.com/practice-tools/figure-drawing
https://color.adobe.com/es/create/color-wheel

MANY OF THESE BOOKS ARE AVAILABLE AS FREE PDF FILES ONLINE, GOOGLE AROUND.also check e-hentai

No. 1830464

>>1829974
I'd be interested. I'm just a fine art hobbyist so I don't know much about industry milk, except for the obvious money laundering. Do tell.

No. 1830495

>>1830078
I honestly thought this was kind of the norm, I notice how common it is for female artists to be cute or outright gorgeous, and yes I assume all you artist nonas must be cute. With men artists on the other hand you can immediately assume they look like hobos.

No. 1830498

Has there ever been an artist for you that showed up out of fucking nowhere, dropped some amazing art, then disappeared without a trace?
I was venturing on twitter and sometimes find such accounts, active for not much time, post some great stuff, then vanish without a trace.

No. 1830502

>>1830495
I think we are cute but we don't have time to be this cute. It's sussy to me when somebody has time to take pretty selfies of themselves with like every painting of theirs. I never have pretty long nails because clay, or skin without some paint i didn't see when i was washing… but maybe it's the differnce between expressive artists and preppy perfectinalists because i can't for the life of god make a nice gingerbread man but i can make an epic painting full of feeling. I bet that artist who took the picture can make nice gingerbread people with perfect topping lines.

No. 1830508

>>1830498
its always japanese artist with gibberish names too, lol.

No. 1830520

>>1830495
I mean, isn't that essentially survivorship bias? A female artist that is unattractive would probably think twice before posting her face online for everyone to judge.

No. 1830674

>>1830393
>moid
nonnie….

No. 1830746

Really sucks that even the male art thread on ic has been hijacked by troons and fags drawing ugly old rat looking ocs.

No. 1830811

>>1830498
I've come across this usually on youtube; post an animation and then disappears.

No. 1830874

>>1830746
That thread has been dead for too long any new blood is appreciated. I don't get mad when someone who's shitty at drawing shows up because everyone is trying to improve.

No. 1831088

>>1830746
>/ic/
Why do some of you never learn

No. 1831123

Does anyone else get annoyed easily when an artist constantly reposts the same art work

No. 1831154

File: 1703734769774.png (1.07 MB, 624x1298, miku.png)

>>1831123
I usually didn't care because I understand twitter algo is shit but now, Yes especially if it gets to the point that 99% of their media is reposted work lol

No. 1831194

>>1831123
I don't really care if an artist reposts a high-effort piece repeatedly, especially if they post some lower-effort work/wips/sketches in between to break up the reposts because I totally get wanting to share and get eyes on something you put a lot of work into, but it does annoy me when someone reposts like >>1831154 constantly, because then it just starts to feel recycled and I don't want to keep seeing/interacting with the same content in a row. My preference probably doesn't do you favours in terms of social media algorithms, but I feel like it's better for establishing an actual dedicated following for yourself (which imo is more pleasant to have in the long-term as an artist).

No. 1831309

>>1831154
Kek shit like that or a media tab full of reaction images always makes me feel like that person is lazy and doesn't enjoy drawing as much as they enjoy receiving attention

No. 1831341

>>1830502
these popular asian artists usually come from high achieving wealthy families so they make sure everything is perfect about them including their appearance. but i always wonder where do they have so much energy to excel at so many things despite apparently being often sleep deprived because i'm often a walking zombie unable to process too much information

No. 1831388

>>1831088
nta but ic has some nice courses to steal
>>1830495
I agree too most female artists I've seen were always pretty or just..average, I've never thought of one as ugly? Since that doesn't even matter I'm here for the art not the person.I usually see this kind of jealousy in moids though, they always seeth if a somewhat handsome moid is a artist

No. 1831407

File: 1703757746081.png (459.92 KB, 578x501, Creepypasta.PNG)

>>1831309
This really skilled artist I followed who won't stop reposting the same pieces

No. 1831412

>>1831088
What am i supposed to do? There is nowhere else to post my art and get critiques. I miss the early days of the male thread, when it was women drawing bishies.

No. 1831466

>>1831407
Honestly can't blame someone who works freelance for reposts, activity is necessary for the algorithm, and if this is his source of income it's just necessary to keep up the visibility.

No. 1831514

>>1830405
kek you just roasted the entire Chinese digital art scene

No. 1831573

>>1830520
True, in hindsight I was deluded about my looks and looked averagely cute but I never posted my face back when I thought everybody else was prettier based on pretty artists showing their faces.

No. 1831587

Seeing a random artist's books on instagram just now made me realize that I loathe artist's books. I roll my eyes at stuff like media art (the creepy videos on a TV in an empty room kind) but something about artist's books makes me so annoyed. I often find their content pointless and also have a deeply held conviction that the whole point of modern books is replicability but I'm not really sure why they are like nails on chalkboard to me.

No. 1831807

Was drawing in my textbook, and realized it is my only passion. I do not value other hobbies, media nor social interactions as me just scribble whatever I want, even if messy or/and without direction. I don't know, it's not really a vent, just realization.

No. 1831829

>>1831123
Yeah, there's one guy who constantly rotates dozens of artworks, granted he is very good and he still posts new stuff but it's a bit annoying to see the same artworks I've known for years.

No. 1831834

Hate that exhibits take such a huge cut. I am applying to a show and they want to take half the cut. I have to jack up my prices to unreasonable levels just to make it somewhat worth it so I doubt I will sell anything.

No. 1831955

File: 1703790607538.png (150.92 KB, 589x686, semicollon.PNG)

Have you guys seen this recent fiasco with SemiCollon?

https://x.com/Minaowaa/status/1740028061976781311?s=20

I believe a while ago on here or twitter (I don't remember) some nonnas or people on twitter were saying SemiCollon has a lot of drama revolving around them. They were apparently shunned from the Thai art community because of constant scamming like this.

SemiCollon has gone private and people are saying they're (It's two people) mass deleting tweets.

No. 1832001

File: 1703793582010.jpg (23.67 KB, 680x359, swag_yolo.jpg)

Are cheap iPads worth it if I just want to use Procreate with the apple pen?
Also which are the cheapest options?

No. 1832024

>>1832001
Kind of unrelated, but does anyone knows how to actually do artistic observations? I repeat the same stuff over and over again and I feel like a mess up whenever I try to offer any artistic insights. How do I train that shit? What vocabulary do I lack and where can I read about it?

No. 1832039

>>1832001
I recently got myself an iPad 9th gen 2021, the cheapest I could get, with an Apple Pencil 1st gen (around 460 euros for everything). Personally, I'm enjoying it. I use it only for Procreate and at first I felt put off by procreate's simplicity, I do now feel quite comfortable. It's perfect for drawing in a comfy bed or while traveling! It got me to draw more, because it's way faster to pull it out and start drawing whenever I have time, than it was with a PC and a screen tablet.
I wish I got more space though, since mine is 64gb, but I just store most of finished stuff on PC and it's alright. Sometimes it limits the amount of available layers on a large canvas, but I treat it like a challenge, kek. I'm not a fan of apple at all, most apple version of my fav apps are shit, but it all worth it to me in the end. And it was way cheaper for me to buy this tablet, than any other non-Apple ones.
Before I used XP Pen screen tablet and, still, occasionally return to it for sculpting and more detailed drawing stuff.

No. 1832119

If anyone is interested in an art forum and sick of /ic/ or random Discord servers, https://crimsondaggers.com/forum/ is similar to conceptart. Users here are not averse to giving or receiving critique, draw or paintovers, and it's usually high-effort.

No. 1832144

>>1832119
they all draw like shit

No. 1832168

>>1832144
Maybe with your help nonnie we can get some decent artists on there

No. 1832192

>>1832024
look up Keys to Drawing by Bert Dodson on internet archive and follow the lessons

No. 1832331

>>1831955
Is there any SemiCollon art posted somewhere because I can't find anything (Unless twitter was the only archive)

No. 1832373

File: 1703812506493.jpg (859.12 KB, 2048x2048, GBvg302b0AAfhEB.jpg)

>>1832331
Their art. I'm not sure if it's two artists, or one artist and someone who cleans up/simply manages the account

No. 1832374

File: 1703812525613.jpg (22.61 KB, 351x495, 1516725797950.jpg)

>study some drawings
>they look decent, so try to draw something on my own
>utter irredeemable shit
I still don't know how to break this certain threshold. It doesn't help that I'm a hobbyfag too.

Nonnies who've struggled with this, how do I break this curse?

No. 1832375


No. 1832382

>>1832374
It's not a curse, drawing for imagination is actually very hard and not something everyone who is an artist can easily do contrary to popular belief, it takes a lot of practice and building up your visual library in your head to make something off that information in your head. Observe the world around you, specifically the things you want to draw, like if you want to draw male butts observe many of those.

No. 1832417

>>1831955
Been following this. As per usual for Twitter, Semi was telling people go fuck themselves with cutesy emoticons, then an hour later spammed a "muh depression muh life sucks" essay under new comments. They also flip flopped between flexing that they were well off, but then also whined that they really need money to take care of something like 14 cats(despite proof that they blow the money on expensive cosmetics/crap). On its own it's not a unique drama, just another Twitter artist being unprofessional, but I'm also not familiar with past milk with these people. Sounds potentially juicy

No. 1832425

>>1832373
Jellyfish art on left is pretty

No. 1832430

>>1832374
You already took that first step keep going. Shit art means you are still learning

No. 1832565

I love drawing and making art so much to the point that when my first hand gave out I learned to draw with the other. Now that one also has pain I just can’t deal with. I’ve tried massages and stretches and medicines. I’ve tried going to the doctor and they didn’t even try to help and mostly dismissed me. The hell do I do now nonnies?

No. 1832569

>>1831955
>>1832417
I have never commissioned an artist om twitter before because i have heard too many stories of artists refusing to do the art and refusing to refund the money lol. Is there a way to avoid scam artists? like should I search an artist's name on different platforms before I commission them?

No. 1832570

>>1832565
did you went to like a regular doctor or orthopedic?

No. 1832575

>>1832570
Regular doctor. Got referred to this ultrasound place or something like that but they said there were no bone fractures and I wasn’t listened to when I said it still hurt just told to have some ibuprofen and suck it up, essentially

No. 1832611

>>1832565
Can you try Epsom salt bath?

No. 1832621

>>1832611
I got some stuff like that for Christmas, I’ll have a look to see if that’s the stuff and give it a try, thanks

No. 1832672

>>1832569
Mine took like 3 months from this one commissioner and my boyfriend, who got a commission a week before me from the same guy, didn't give him his commission for more than half a year. On top of that, the linework done on my boyfriend's image was completely different from the sketch he approved. The sketch was way better in terms of actions and movement and how he wanted the image to look. Then the finished lined and colored one was flat and the approve sketch had changes he didn't ask for and looked worse overall than the sketch. We both agreed to never go back and commission them. I don't want to name drop as artists know who commissions them and that's vague enough as this artist didn't know we were dating.

No. 1832678

File: 1703837642884.jpg (64.73 KB, 736x981, 05d68bfc4e004512eb301a6def47ca…)

>>1832672
Here's your commission

No. 1832694

>>1832678
Faster than the other artist lol

No. 1832730

File: 1703840833143.jpg (71.65 KB, 842x960, 1689193155513326.jpg)

>year is almost over
>barely made progress
n-next year it will be the one

No. 1832735

File: 1703840897888.jpg (41.49 KB, 735x733, 20231224_023446.jpg)

>>1832730
Me too bbg time is a circle

No. 1832896

>>1832730
I cannot even bring myself to look at my works in chronological order lol, almost all of them are wips and doodles… A shame. How to make full work, it is always feels lacking. Hope this year was more meaningful for fellow hobbyists.

No. 1832940

>>1832896
same nonny, same. My goal for next year is to make at least one finished drawing per month, but i want to try to achieve one per week.

No. 1832960

That Chen artist that got posted threads back made a new account and evolved from he/him lesbian to just having a female symbol in her bio. I sincerely hope she peaked.

>>1830746
Looking only at the thread and seeing a some bait shitposts here and there just reminds me that ic is unfortunately 4moids no matter how much women make a space for themselves there.

No. 1833007

>>1832672
I talked to these types of people before, they live in a completely different world. They're riding the high (or low) of messy broke genius artist as an excuse for lack of scheduling and professionality.

No. 1833017

any of you nonnas have a 9-5 job but try to make time to do art too?
>>1832940
I have similar goals, 2 finished pieces per month and I want to get back to drawing 1-2 hours per day like I did 2 years ago.

No. 1833040

>>1832565
It's over for you.

No. 1833060

>>1832575
try to limit how much you draw and I definitely second the orthopedic recommendation
can you detail a bit more what you mean by "gave out" ? is it swollen, numb, does it hurt when you hold a pencil?
It could be arthritis but you need to visit a good doc to be sure.

No. 1833065

>>1832565
Stop being an idiot and rest your hands. For months if you have to. Also, yes, see a specialist doctor but nothing will help if you don't start resting your hand. There's lots of resources about this online, google them. It's too late for everything people tell you about preventing this though so you need to recover first.

No. 1833069

>>1832569
>Is there a way to avoid scam artists?
Do a general google/twitter search of their name + scam. Twitter users are usually decent at calling out art scammers.
Also check their account for posts that read like "sorry for being so slow".
Avoid "emergency commissions", people who are collecting money for their personal causes like "need money for transition/surgery/moving/leaving abusive household".
Avoid if they have disorders listed in their bio for example "he/they ADHD autism "

No. 1833149

>>1832565
seconding the nonny that said you need to rest your hand, but let me reassure you with one thing: i had the same problem, possibly even worse since i work in industrial screenprinting which puts a ton of strain on the wrists and involves lots of repetitive actions at every step of the process. if i can beat it so can you.
so, rest. also, get a wrist brace and tighten it to juuuuuust this side of too tight, not enough to cut off circulation but you definitely dont forget its there. you can wear it to support your wrists during daily activities for a week or so, but give your writs breaks from the compression. work towards just wearing it while you sleep.
ibuprofen.
once you feel an easing of symptoms, look for stretching exercises like vid rel. if you do them right your wrist is going to hurt worse before it gets better.
rest and compression are the most important parts of your initial healing. stretching is for building strength and lengthening/loosening your wrist tendons, which are too tight right now. once you feel better, you should get in the habit of stretching your wrists, arms and shoulders everyday (ish). i didnt for a while and my symptoms came back.
unfortunately, this is something you will have to beat back on the long term, but its not only doable it will become second nature after a while. do not give in to despair nonnie, and go ice your wrist.

No. 1833370

>>1833149
screenprinting always seemed fun
what is your work like anon?
i wish more anons talked about the different art jobs/mediums they use since it's a general thread now

No. 1833417

>>1832374
It's not as straightforward as it seems, I know it's frustrating, but even when you improve you don't notice until you get some distance from it. I hate all I ever draw, but a few months later I realize I was being to harsh on myself. Not that I don't see it's issues, but they are not as irredeemable as I thought. It's fucked up that we mostly never feel happy with what we do, but as you keep trying you will notice some things from before slowly become a bit easier with time.

No. 1833482

Does anyone consider the Eyedropper tool cheating? or do you have the attitude of "Use the tools given."
I use it to help give me an idea of where to go. Like a start off, to give an idea of the lightest colour and the darkest.

No. 1833486

>>1833482
Some 2D artists have massive color swatch rings, it's no different. Use the tools, anon.

No. 1833489

>>1833482
This is why artists get fucked over all the time. Who gives a shit, use what's available or don't. This is like asking a cab driver if he considers using a navigation system cheating. The result isn't the picked color but the overall artwork

No. 1833515

>>1833482
What do you mean? As you draw you color pick your own colors or do you mean color pick the reference?
If you mean color pick the reference, the only thing I'll say against it, is that it can pick up weird ass colors, because the compression of the image creates some varying weird pixels. I usually blur the image to reduce this. If you mean color picking your own drawing, that's a silly thing to feel bothered by, it's a tool like many others. Just use it wisely, as I said it can pick up weird colors, but usually it's fine value wise.

No. 1833676

>>1833370
it can be! the following applies to burgers like me.

most jobs in the industry are unskilled, and most of them are related to printing on shirts and other garments. so you can get an entry position as a "press operator" at all kinds of places. i personally find working with the automatic presses boring, so ive carved our a position where i work with clients fixing their art, prepping screens for the print job, mixed inks, doing manual printing jobs for specialty jobs, etc.

i like it because a lot of shops are moving to the ten hour shift, four day week model. so even if im exhausted at the end of a working day i have a three day weekend to work on my own stuff. its also very self directed once you're trained, i basically spend all ten hours a day listening to books and podcasts about gardening with barely an interruption, heaven for me personally.

i will say since t shirt places are full of those unskilled kind of positions i mentioned, your coworkers will be a real mixed bag, like a lot of service industries. winter is a slow season, so your shop may give you less hours at that time (though many are moving away from this practice as well to stay competitive with workplaces like Amazon and UPS). the vast majority of art you work with is pretty ugly! you learn to love the process and doing things right, not the results themselves.

getting in with a place that does letterpress work, band shirts or paper posters is much harder, as there are less of them and these jobs are prized by assholes like you and me who actually want to do fine art at least some of the time. im interning at one while i juggle a garment printing job to see what happens. i have an edge over my coworkers in both places since i just like doing my job and being left alone, whereas a lot of these guys kind of just want to get paid to doodle all day or something, and aren't suited to the actual repetitive tasks involved in any kind of printing.

honestly if any nonnas in this thread are dying trying to juggle a wagie job with your art goals, id look into screenprinting jobs in your area. lots of shops will let you use their equipment for personal projects, and its good work where you dont get yelled at by customers all day. a good operator makes like 20-22 an hour, graphic artists slightly more, screen cleaners and shirt catchers slightly less. beats starbucks, at least.

No. 1833730

>>1833482
Depends on what I'm using it for. If I'm doing a study, I avoid any tools like eyedropper, liquify, transform, etc. to make sure I'm learning proper portions and color theory. If I'm just drawing for fun then I don't care

No. 1833777

File: 1703901224203.jpg (108.26 KB, 800x600, torean_encounter_by_jennadelle…)

>>1830498
Jennadelle

No. 1833919

File: 1703905992077.jpg (354.16 KB, 460x681, jennachew1.jpg)

>>1833777
I was so intrigued by both her furry commissions and her more professional work. It really is a shame she doesn't seem to be posting anywhere anymore

No. 1833938

File: 1703907200720.png (303.67 KB, 585x618, dot.PNG)

Fucking hate him

No. 1833994

File: 1703914189163.png (23.22 KB, 650x221, sc2342346.PNG)

>>1832565
Your doctor sucks. It can't be stressed enough though, rest and also strength building. With only rest and some stretches, tendon issues might go away, but they'll easily flare up again. Men don't get RSI and chronic tendon issues just from low-activity tasks like drawing and writing at the same rates women do, especially if they're active and weight-lift. Rest, stretch, start some tendon-safe exercise routine for your arms when you feel okay enough (emphasis on safe, if done wrong, it can exacerbate your issues), and if you're death-gripping your stylus, stop.

No. 1834118

>>1833938
What do you mean? It's a woman

No. 1834163

>>1834118
Wrote it wrong I meant her

No. 1834168

>>1832575
>>1832565
>>1832565
>>1832565

I apologise for being vague in the first post, here’s more information. I used a wrist brace and rested for 3 months before doing stretches and being quite gentle with it, and I’ve been intermittently trying some combinations of things to see if they help. Now I’m here, a year later with little to no improvement… I appreciate everyone’s suggestions and encouragement. I think I’ll work on building my strength next and be mindful of the tendons, will report back here with findings later on for future nonnies.

No. 1834169

>>1834168
Oh for fucks sake I can’t delete this and fix the accidental triple copy. Sorry about that.

Got another message for here though, what do you do with your collapsing sketchbooks nonnies? I’m considering glueing them in a sort of collage in another book but would love to hear about others

No. 1834171

>>1833938
why, tell us

No. 1834200

I've reached a level when I think what I draw looks objectively nice (not a masterpiece, but nice) and I still get no engagement. Barely even a like. I see literal doodles get thoudands of likes and a lot of comments but a polished finished piece gets nothing… and it's not like I have no followers, I have them but no one fucking likes my stuff I guess.

No. 1834301

>>1834200
I had that same issue. My old twitter account had 2.5k followers, which isn't much but I had a fairly solid fandom presence. Except…people only cared about my art if it was a shitpost sketch. I've had the stupídest doodles ever reach 10k+ RTs and likes, meanwhile my actual art that I spend a fairly long amount of time on barely got any attention. This type of shit was what made me want to drop that account and just start over.

No. 1834312

>>1834200
>>1834301
the thing with shitpost sketches and such is that they're usually much easier for random people to interact with in a because they're piggybacking off of a meme/fandom, contain dialogue/quotes, character interactions, and tend to have more exaggerated expressions so they can work as reaction images or memes on their own. They're like those shitty relatable comics a lot of people eat up, they're accessible and easy to share around.

With your own art, try including more reasons for your audience to engage, such as by telling a story, having multiple characters interacting in an interesting way, maybe even try asking questions to try and encourage comments. Sorry these suggestions are vague, its hard without knowing what kind of art you do. What makes you want to engage with someone else's work? Maybe try incorporating that more into your own. Something else that might help is posting on a different platform (personally I have more success on tumblr than twitter, for example)

Just don't stop drawing or posting, that's the important thing

No. 1834364

File: 1703956477862.jpg (507.46 KB, 5568x3132, best_ergonomic_mouse_-_main.jp…)

>>1834168
seriously, dont give up! my wrist was also fucked for a year before i saw improvement because i hadnt found the treatment that worked for me.
another thing that helped was i cut out a lot of extraneous activity, some of which you might not realize affects your wrist. i gave up video games for a couple months, because im a pc gamer and clicking a million times a minute isnt a good time for your wrist. i bought one of those carpal tunnel mice for the things that i had to do on the computer. i used my non dominant hand for more things.
youll have to mix and match until you see improvement, but unless your doc recommends surgery (a minor one, dont stress if that ends up being the case), theres light at the end of the tunnel. good luck!

No. 1834446

Nonnies, I don't know if I can draw or write at all anymore. I just want to quit.
I've had one of the most difficult years of my life, am in a rigorous grad program, and have genetic depression that hasn't responded to therapy–and this would all be fine, except my partner is a real artist, went to art school and everything, and now as I start to utterly hate my work and even my vision for my work I can't help but compare to her.
She loves my stuff! But it's very different from hers, and I think this latest spiral started when I wrote a story inspired by one of hers and it was significantly darker and edgier, and she said so saying she'd never do that. And she doesn't. But now I just hate everything I do because it is stupid and edgy. And I hate the ideas that come up in my brain before they even land on paper because they're so generic and edgy and needlessly unmarketable.
I'm a hobbyist and I'll never be anything but one, but I don't even feel good, and I don't think I can be good because the only subject matter I want to draw is… stupid and a waste of time. I just don't ever want to do art again. It's been months since I drew anything decent.

No. 1834453

>>1834446
reading this while drawing husbando feet, do people actually feel like this over the subject they draw?

No. 1834458

>>1834453
reading this while thinking about how to draw my husbando with bare feet subtly and not being seen as foot fetish weirdo. Nah, I am too scaredy cat so I just will not post them as usual.

No. 1834462

>>1834453
>>1834458
Kek hivemind.
BRB gotta draw my husbando with bare feet
Who are your husbandos? Mine is Mahito

No. 1834540

>>1834458
Your comment made me realize that I often draw my man's bare feet and that I put detail on them (mostly veins and changing color hues), but I didn't really notice. Everyone must think I have some sort of fetish…

No. 1834552

>>1834540
You do.

No. 1834565

>>1834446
Before this becomes the husbando foot fetish thread I want to say that I felt this same way for the longest time, when you feel inferior so does your art by extension. I used to want to be able to write and draw like anybody but myself, I thought their stuff was intrinsically better than mine, etc. But you also have to realize that you bring your own unique viewpoint to your work that no one else can. Maybe your partner saying she'd "never do that" was in the vein of "never would have thought of that" instead of the "wouldn't do it because it's bad"? I also think there's a lot of pressure for everything an artist makes to be super deep and meaningful, but it really only has to have meaning to yourself, and even then only sometimes. Even if that meaning is "i want to lick my husbandos feet" or whatever the fuck. That's also why I vastly prefer being a hobbyist to a professional, I don't have to worry about my art appealing to anybody but myself, it doesn't have to be marketable or deep, I can just draw the stuff I want. I wouldn't think about your art in terms of "waste of time" or "genius and worth my time", but instead something you get to do to destress and stuff. Whenever I start thinking about if art is a waste of time I think about how watching tv and desk jockeying is even more of a waste and get back to it. But sometimes you also do just need to step back for a minute if the pressure to be good gets too much. Hope you feel better anon

No. 1834568

>>1834446
is it a lack of response from people other than your partner to your work that bothers you? maybe you see people online making fun of the kinds of subjects you like to explore? by what metric do you evaluate whether or not a work is a "waste of time"?
its possible that like lots of other dedicated hobbyists in this thread, you're struggling to see yourself in your art without external validation. understandable, since its hard to do anything "just for yourself" in a world with some highly engaging media to tug at our attention.
what's helped me the most is realizing that most people's favorite art isn't necessarily the masterpieces of the world. most people are really moved by middlebrow fiction, art fair paintings, etsy jewelry, etc. its made it a lot easier for me to put out self indulgent shit once i realized theres literally always a community of people out there who respond similarly.
including people who like venting their spleen via edgy ass stories kek. dont be so hard on yourself.

No. 1834617

>>1834565
>Before this becomes the husbando foot fetish thread
I just want to say that it's really funny that like 4 of us posted about that at the same time ITT. What are the odds?

No. 1834710

>>1834565
Yeah, I guess my problem is just feeling inferior as a hobbyist–my current social circle are professional artists or at least aspiring to be (mostly my partner's friends) and I just feel really humiliated knowing that I try to do the same thing these people do but I never did or will go to school for it or sell it… I've had recurring nightmares of them reading my comics and laughing at me because they're so juvenile.
My partner just doesn't LIKE dark stories, we played a TTRPG campaign I ran for her and her friends and whenever I had a storyline for an NPC that was obviously heading in a bad direction she'd get really upset if I didn't change it. In the end my story felt really defanged and I hated the way it turned out AND the way I wanted it to turn out since clearly what I wanted was too needlessly edgy–but I digress from my point about my visual art.
>>1834568
>is it a lack of response from people other than your partner to your work that bothers you?
Not necessarily, I get some positive responses to my art elsewhere, I don't really get attention if I post in general, but no negative responses either.
>maybe you see people online making fun of the kinds of subjects you like to explore?
Well, yeah, just because… it's edgy… I see a lot of desire for nice found family soft healing content and I just can't stand any of it. But at the same time I feel incapable of making art (comics, specifically) that doesn't portray addiction or suicidality or abusive relationships or bad endings etc. Etc. It makes me feel like a braindead child.
>by what metric do you evaluate whether or not a work is a "waste of time"?
Does it make anyone other than me happy? Does it demonstrate expertise? Is it something that needs to exist?

No. 1834863

>>1834710
i see! i relate to that quite a bit. especially in ttrpg communities, i feel like everyone wants that cute, ragtag-bunch to loving queer family story that they see in podcast performances and communities. that's fine, but it stifling to people like you. and its hard to push back, because it seems like something everyone "should" want, or at least be fine with. this is true in a lot of creative hobbies.
your partner has different tastes from you, and i dont think youll be able to bridge that gap, but you dont actually have to.
i couldnt find the comic itself, google sucks ass now, but i remember once reading a short comic about telling "dark" stories. it depicted a fantastical floating civilization of goblin like creatures, all creating whimsical air ships called "stories" that other goblins can hop onto to enjoy. but one of them, a grumpy dude off from the rest, is making a mean looking airship, something punky and spikey instead of sweet and charming. one of his comrades says something like, dude, you're crazy, you put so much effort into your stories, but everytime you finish you push it off the edge of our city instead of letting it fly. dont you know stories are supposed to be uplifing (you see where the metaphor came from here, kek).
and this different goblin ignores this, doesnt care. his story ship goes over the edge. but in the last panels, you see far below this awesome magical city, a bunch of people suffering in some ooze, unable to get out. until the nasty looking story gets to their level, and just one of them is able to use it to pull himself out.
sounds cheesy, but i still think of that comic every now that then. now, is every "edgy" story in the world secretly motivated by noble aims? no. but i think some people are just drawn to that kind of stuff, and fluffy stuff just makes them feel more different and fucked up. some of my favorite books are actually massive bummers, but theyre so important to me because i really felt seen. i feel like even 3 edgy 5 me deviant art ocs and splatterpunk shit has a place in the ecosystem.
i think your partner recognizes that while your stuff isnt her cup of tea, its coming from an honest place. if the freaks in this thread can instantly find a community comparing husbando feet i dont see why you should change your style.
remember this: the most fucked up thing you could possibly dream up has probably been done worse by a moid. and he probably got an award for it. go out and even the fucking playing field.

No. 1834895

>>1834710
lmao i can't stand that twee 'found family' steven universe shit and im pretty sure its a lot less people than it actually seems who do like it. ive dealt with people who want to "defang" my writing and stories and it's the most annoying fucking thing in the world, keep doing you because im sure that the "and then everyone hugged it out" is way more cliche and boring than whatever you're cooking up.

No. 1834911

File: 1703995640087.jpg (65.11 KB, 1080x1080, pero las risas no faltaron.jpg)

>>1834617
Just because of this thread, I kinda wanna draw my husbando's feet now damn
>>1834710
>Does it make anyone other than me happy? Does it demonstrate expertise? Is it something that needs to exist?
nta but in my opinion, those questions are meaningless. Well okay the 2nd question I understand, because you can't help but worry your stuff will look cringe to others and that's just something most people fear. But you only have one life, and if you're not doing things (not just creating art, just doing stuff in general) first and foremost for you, for whom? Even if you're dedicating those hours of your free time for a cause or another person, that's still a cause/person important to YOU. And that's reason enough for it to exist.
I also write dark stuff that almost never ends happily, and the reason I do it is because I like it. This year I even decided to revisit a story idea I wrote up when I was like 14. It is quite literally edgy stuff a 14 year old liked, but I still like it, so I guess I'm still kinda cringe in that regard. But thats reason enough for me to want to bring it to life.
I don't know what your comics are like, maybe they really are Shadow the hedgehog holding a gun ow the edge stuff. But if you like it, is edgy that bad? Lots of people have shit taste in lots of things, but engaging with those things still makes them happy. And you can make yourself happy because you can make the stuff you like, so you should let yourself be happy too.

No. 1834931

File: 1703997598953.png (13.6 KB, 377x414, 771.png)

never forget nonnies. most people just want to eat cake.

No. 1834937

File: 1703998882271.png (11.82 KB, 377x624, cake.png)

>>1834931
Sometimes it'd be like this tho

No. 1834980

>>1833938
There is something really wrong with women who craft their artist identity around Sexualizing their own sonas. It’s not even an OC that shares a lot of their traits, it’s literally just supposed to be them. Complete with irl photos for comparison.
It’s an easy way to flaunt your self esteem issues and amass a following of parasocial coomers, and high risk of stalking/harassment by incels. Why any woman would choose to do this is beyond me.

I’ve seen woman who got their sonas turned into coomer art and obsessed over by creepy men, and they weren’t even sexual. But this girl is literally doing it for them. Why??

No. 1835027

Nonas, am i crazy, or is this whole channel fake? Like, these speedpaints look similar to how non-artists see art process. I wouldn't care, but i often see those videos in a group with procreate timelapses i follow, and it drives me crazy that no one sees the suspiciousness of it? Like it's not how painting works? Without as much of a construction of anything, straight up perfect (obviously traced) line art and everything is rendered straight up, with random colors, and it is immediately perfect, that makes no sense.

No. 1835032

>>1834937
Exactly. The best thing you can do for yourself as any kind of creator is not seek constant validation that you will "make it big" some day or something. The kind of artists I see that love the other aspirational meme are bad, use AI and try to pass it off vaguely as their own art, trace and copy other artists, etc. We have reached a point of yes-manning literally everyone instead of being honeast and its ridiculous. "You should quit your job and pursue art full time! You go girl! You got this" and what ends up happening is they beg people online for money for as long as they can until they're forced to get a job again like a normal adult. It's a shameless grift amplified by people rewarding everything regardless of skill or capability. Not everyone can make a living like that, and a lot of the people who try are just not cut out for it at all, it's fickle and requires discipline and resolve that most people just do not have. It shouldn't discourage people from being hobbyists or practicing, but you don't really enjoy it if you start with the mindset that you deserve money, praise, and career from bad or mediocre uninspired copycat art. People believe they're entitled to monetize their mediocrity now.

No. 1835045

>>1835027
yes it's fake, they do shitty paintovers then jump cut/zoom in and out/erase into the AI image, then slowly reduce the amount of their own paintover. you can tell by jump cuts in their earlier videos that skip blending.

their later videos are a bit less obvious, but in the most recent one (not the one you posted) they "paint" the face on the left, zoom in and begin to color the eyes, then zoom out briefly from the eyes to reveal the right face. no process going from left to right. i assume that's also why they draw in the dark, to make the jumps less obvious. my screencaps were at 14:35 and 15:22

No. 1835046

File: 1704019471191.png (823.49 KB, 1111x558, fake paintover.png)


No. 1835052

>>1835032
A lot of people looking to "make it big" forget that internet numbers do not translate to monetary gain. I know people who get 10 000's of likes and retweets on their art and they make no profit off it, they might get some merch sales but after production costs they're left with a very small profit margin. The best way to plan it out is to get a regular 9 to 5 in the industry (or freelance for actual clients, not just $30 twitter commissions) and develop your skills at work while also doing independent art on the side, you can afford all the nice art supplies and you don't have to whore yourself out to fickle memes and passing fandoms to stay relevant just to be able to put food on your table.

No. 1835071

File: 1704024528198.jpg (115.14 KB, 1120x669, screenshot.jpg)

>>1835027
That sketch is all I needed to see to know this is a hack. Non artists can't tell though so they eat it right up.

No. 1835075

>>1834710
>>1834863
I'm probably not going to articulate this well but I feel like edgy art/writing has been defanged unless its pornographic. You can't write something dark because its melodramatic cringe or its problematic. If there's political themes in it then it has to be watered down and forced into the American right/left dichotomy, even it wouldn't make sense. Edginess for coom sake is protected because its men doing the cooming, and we all know cooming is sacred. Edgy art, like most art/writing nowadays, isn't genuine anymore. Even the supposed feel-good saccharine queer stories that are plaguing comics and TTRPG aren't genuine; they're made to virtue signal and show how morally righteous the author is. I don't want to derail too much with my sperg but Nonna I think you should keep writing/drawing your edgy shit, even if its cringe. I can only speak for myself but I would take a billion genuinely edgy stories than even one more piece of edgy media that was made for shock/coom purposes.

No. 1835096

>>1835045
>>1835027
Emilie Autimn renaissance. I know a girl who does shit like this and thinks just posting shitty ai traces with no caption so people assume it's hers is ethical

No. 1835118

>>1835027
Yeah it's fake, the lineart is a dead giveaway. Honestly, pretending to render a generic AI image and then meticulously snipping your video sounds soul crushing.

No. 1835119

>>1834710
If it helps you, nonna, i love edgy things and i think those can have some artistic grandeur through the use of the sensitive topics. Soft things are extremelly boring/unnapealing/underwhelming for me, and i can only truly have fun with a piece of media/art if it has fucked up things happening, like tragedies and those things. I don't believe there's an hierarchy of topics and the one we like is somehow inferior, it's just different. As long as you take time and put thought at your things, avoiding shallow darkness and going after interesting aesthetical dynamics. It's just another way of doing art and expressing yourself. It that's what you like, then just keep doing it. Also, have you talked with your girlfriend about that? I think it would help you to get some words of understanding and kindness from her.

No. 1835125

Is it wrong that I want to use AI for help with backgrounds specifically? I don’t want to trace, I want to learn, but I don’t really have any inspiration.
Also…Does anyone know of any good AI image generators (?) that make good BGs?

No. 1835127

>>1834171
Not that anon but I've seen one of her tutorials and she seems to needlessly add in quirky humor into them.
Tutorials in general should be straightforward and concise. They probably think that adding in some shitty tiktok meme into their videos will make it "watchable" but the problem is that the people watching these aren't elementary kids but adults.
I hate tutorials that add in these shitty memes than the ones where the narrator can't properly explain what/why they are making the choices they are doing (common in 3d sculpting tutorials).

No. 1835128

>>1835125
Tons of people are using AI and they just don’t say anything about it, it’s like all the fear mongering about “references” when professional artists copy from photos and models all the time

No. 1835133

File: 1704034731038.png (194.58 KB, 1440x1442, this is bait.png)


No. 1835140

>>1835133
I’m not wrong and you know it. People have been throwing a fit about comiket for the last two days because artists have been using AI in their work process.

No. 1835141

>>1835140
and they are perfectly justified, fuck those faggot hacks

No. 1835144

File: 1704035926648.jpg (329.82 KB, 1024x1024, e7c657d5-859f-4066-8266-2f2e03…)

>>1835125
A better idea would be to look at inspiring real life photos or backgrounds drawn by people rather than to ask AI, because AI's work will always look weird, stale or overdesigned.
Look at this: I asked Bing to generate fake bootleg game art where the setting is a gnome forest. At first glance it looks fine but upon inspection not only it's weird but also the composition adds a lot of crap just to make it look cool.
It doesn't really have reason or taste, it just apes the work of humans.

You can use AI only when you have developed your skill enough to fix its mistakes and weird, unpleasant decisions. I don't even mean bad anatomy it's just that so far it has no real idea how to create a pleasant image. This is why its works that imitate art that's weird and overdecorated like bootleg game covers are interesting: because bootleg game art also lacks rhyme or reason most of the time, it was just underpaid chinese interns with no taste or sense of aesthetic making collages with other people's work.

No. 1835149

>>1835125
If you want to learn, then you should just study like you would with any element to a picture.

The issue with using AI is that its an algorithm that detects patterns in art; for example, AI creates an anime girl picture but it'll never "know" why it added the shadow in this certain way or why it used specific colors.

No. 1835173

>>1835032
despite being the anon who posted the original meme, i definitely see what you're saying. i'm in a field that requires handmade goods at the end of the process, so ive been insulated from the flood of AI grift. what i have seen is what you describe: people who have a hard time letting go the idea that their feelings about their own art, and the amount of time and (in their view) effort in their final piece should convert proportionally into success.
ive lost friends for being honest in my critiques (when asked for an honest critique, obviously). but the trendy art school i went to absolutely took advantage of hopeful cake makers by not having portfolio reviews, not allowing work to be graded on quality, and in the end spitting out kids in debt with no skills up to par with the competitive industries they want to enter.
that being said, in defense of my meme… the older i get and the more art i sell, the more ive learned to appreciate that "objective" artistic brilliance doesn't always mean people will connect with your work. one of my best friends makes the tackiest (her words) little dragon themed jewelry and her clients loooove her pieces. and she adores making them. sometimes the goofy looking cake is what people want to eat.

No. 1835208

i feel like i should've seen this coming but there's this chinese artist i follow on twitter who i find very inspo and who sometimes draws light gore/horror-oriented art which i love but earlier today they decided to post a fucking photo of their wrist slit completely unprompted and now i'm stuck between blaming myself for following them considering the type of art they draw and being disgusted at them for nonchalantly taking photos of themselves self harming for the lols

No. 1835267

>>1835208
It's really not that deep… drawing "mild" horror has absolutely nothing to do with whether a person is an attention whore

No. 1835278

>>1835208
It doesn't really matter if they draw gore or not. I followed a Chinese tf2 artist with a very nice style and she kept bloging about her self harm and sperging about wah wah I have so low followers I want to die I really hate when artists make their accounts a diary.

No. 1835309

>>1835278
>wah wah I have so low followers I want to die
How to lose followers, for dummies

No. 1835329

>>1835278
seriously, how hard is it to realize that if you want followers you shouldn't make your account a pain to follow? braindead

No. 1835359

>>1835144
Ironically it’s not the details I’m trying to learn from/copy. I’m trying to understand the composition so it actually does help.

No. 1835365

>>1835208
>>1835278
I feel a little bad for these Chinese artists. Their behavior is utterly insufferable, sure, but it has to be shit being born a woman in China.

No. 1835462

>>1835208
Most female gore artists I know are some of the nicest nonspergy people I've interacted with on the internet, so it's definitely not the gore. Troons drawing gore is always a red flag for the obvious reasons however.

No. 1835643

As much as I love mgong's art I had to unfollow all of her accounts because I just got so fucking sick of her complaining over and over about her followers not doing what she wants them to do, about what pieces of hers are popular and which ones aren't, like jesus fucking christ just make a private vent account or something and stop bitching in public in all of your art accounts. I know this probably makes me seem like a bitch but it feels so annoying to see someone who was one of my major inspirations for art just devolve into a whiny, petty attention whore who can't spent a single day without complaining about her art or her followers.

Saged for salt not milk.

No. 1835899

File: 1704097104968.png (504.47 KB, 703x825, Screenshot 2024-01-01 001624.p…)

>>1832373

they constantly ask for donations and yet has no problem dropping however much money all this name brand skincare costs

No. 1835900

File: 1704097180410.png (10.52 KB, 499x95, Screenshot 2023-12-29 214309.p…)

>>1835899

also the commission theyre referring to here is one they wont start for half a year or so

No. 1835905

>>1835899
>>1835900
Christ, he sounds like an insufferable faggot.

No. 1835928

>>1834168
I had persistent wrist issues too, which made me take months off drawing multiple times. What finally helped me was adjusting table to be much lower so my wrists weren't pressing on the table anymore when doing computer work. Seriously why tf is the average desk so damn tall? My desk looks like kid's table now, but my wrist issues are gone.

No. 1835944

>>1835899
Do any of you have the screenshot of someone's tweet saying they were obsessed with some sort of hispter anime themed tights that were like $50 and then they posted a new gfm link that said 'omg sorry guys I thought I met my goal but I need $50 more for my transition now' or something like that? Shameless

No. 1835961

File: 1704106109830.jpg (949.22 KB, 1080x1080, 1000000217.jpg)

A shot in the dark but does anyone know if there is a pirated version available of Esben Lash's Drawing faces from the imagination course somewhere? Don't feel like shelling out 300USD for it

No. 1835982

>>1835961
Man I know artists have to make cash somehow and that art courses are not easy to make and aren't supposed to be cheap either but at the same time I wince each time I see an art course that's 300 USD or more.

No. 1836057

>>1835961
Seconding this

No. 1836161

File: 1704134311438.jpg (789.63 KB, 2026x2026, twitter - IamCryB0rg.jpg)

I'm sick to my stomach, I'm so tired of seeing AI images on every site that sells prints/art/etc. The marketplace is also filled with people selling coyprighted material, like Sanrio patterns or whatever. What's the difference between, say, Society6 or Etsy, and Aliexpress? It's the fucking same shit, with scammers posting products to earn a quick buck.
Is there any way to find a website that allows you to sell your art and that doesn't allow scamming/spammers? I have seen artists promoting Squarespace, but I guess you need a following to get some sales, right?

No. 1836164

was checking my pixiv and noticed coomer art on my feed from someone I follow. I didn't do a cleanup in forever and well, seems this artist sold his soul to NSFW and furry, 3k+ works jfc
time to cleanup my following list I guess

No. 1836253

>>1835899
whats the point of wasting all this money on makeup and shit when you are fat and ugly?

No. 1836254

>>1835961
literally just watch proko this looks like generic samdoesart face anyways

No. 1836261

>>1835961
there are a lot of tutorials on YT for this style, it's an incredible generic portrait face, you don't need an expensive course for this

No. 1836276

File: 1704143731017.png (1.49 MB, 596x2419, Sfa_284c.png)

I'm not a fan of AI art by any means, but seeing these reactions to this postis genuinely making me laugh, these are the same people who would probably be fine with various works of JK Rowling being erased for being "problematic" by their standards, but defend glorified pedophilia in the name of art or whatever.(bait)

No. 1836281

>>1836276
Can you stop with the bait?

No. 1836307

>>1836276
The funniest thing to come out of this were the t-shirt design bots trying to sell the AI crap.

No. 1836324

>>1836281
>everything that makes me grumpy is bait

No. 1836336

>>1836324
sure anon, you totally made a post comparing people into real art to lolicon defenders in good faith, despite no one on the mentions even having an animu pfp

No. 1836484

File: 1704156314526.jpg (339.75 KB, 600x800, SF1_by_jennadelle.jpg)

>>1833919
I was really happy when she opened some commissions with her actual style, but I couldn't get a slot since they went full in few minutes.

No. 1836565

Is it possible to make non-cringy vent art

No. 1836567

>>1836565
personally i only find vent art cringy if it has like walls of text in it. just focus all of your vent in the visual aspect and don't write/scribble text in it like a madman and make it seem more like any other artistic expression of human emotion and less like an attention grab attempt.

No. 1836570

File: 1704165513229.png (Spoiler Image,1.32 MB, 1280x1186, 1496377250195.png)

>>1836565
i dont think its cringy, but everyone is too irony poisoned to be genuine nowadays so anything that doesnt have 50 layers of irony is seen as cringe nowadays

No. 1836601

File: 1704169732513.png (367.97 KB, 583x551, 444.PNG)


No. 1836603

>>1836570
And all people who do this have wasted their entire lives without sincerity and will look back on themselves in pain and embarrassment so.

No. 1836612

>>1836570
Why is there so much emotion behind this piece it genuinely made me laugh thank you

No. 1836770

>>1836161
I mean, not to bum you out, but most of those places have always allowed any old trash to be uploaded. Copyrighted logos, recolored versions of official merch, random memes etc. Most of those sites have zero quality control unfortunately.

No. 1836774

>>1836570
This is haunting

No. 1836831

>>1836565
yeah of course, vent art can look like anything. it can even be colorful and bright. only when you go 2000s deviantart edge that's when it starts to look cringe. it's all about the execution, it's not like the old masters didn't create "vent" art that showcased their depression or troubles

No. 1836861

>>1836601
Whenever I see someone trying to sell themselves using their identity, I immediately put them on the mute list.

No. 1836862

I think I'm forgetting how to draw and paint. What should I do? I get lazier every day. I plan drawing something but I do something else instead. I don't know how to draw anymore. I look at my old drawings and I can't draw like those when I try now.

No. 1836903

>>1836601
> +I'm autistic
Doubt

No. 1837027

>>1836601
>Scroll media tab
>only 3 of her last 20 image posts are her actual art

No. 1837125

File: 1704221859652.jpg (106.84 KB, 1067x800, Donald-s-Crime-donald-duck-198…)

>>1836570
What is the story behind this… did Donald sell his nephews to a circus?? Did Donald and Scrooge die???

No. 1837262

there is something about working on a large size that makes my art look better and feel more comfortable to create compared to when im working on a smaller canvas. anyone else relate or am i retarded/

No. 1837269

>>1836601
Nothing makes me less inclined to follow than people thinking their "identity" gives them merit

No. 1837271

>>1837262
More pixels = less compression and crunch
I used to work on exclusively 500 × 500px and everything I made looked deep-fried, but working on 2500 × 3000 px makes everything look smoother and it prints a lot better to

No. 1837340

>>1837269
My favorite is when they say "Come check out my art I am better than this person" and it's some fat oc

No. 1837350

>>1837271
No shit 500px prints bad, it's tiny. And set your file to 300 dpi if you're gonna use it for print

No. 1837372

>>1837350
I know that nonnie, I was just talking when I was a beginner and didn't understand how compression or file size worked

No. 1837480

art nonas do i really have to draw like a bunch of boxes in perspective and shit for figures?

No. 1837518

>>1837480
It does help, even if it doesn’t seem like it

No. 1837532

>>1837480
what is a figure but a box that you've crumpled into the shape of a husbando

No. 1837649

>>1837480
No just do whatever you want

No. 1837691

File: 1704290647652.gif (3.74 MB, 498x325, stupid-prank.gif)

I think I was fucking scammed by a ftm kek
I say I think because I drew something for her before and everything went fine,but

>I want a card to buy a fucking game and let people in a subreddit know I'm trading a drawing for it

>"If you wanted a trade you should have let me know!"
>I thank her and proceed to tell me what she wants me to draw, etc
>I come back with the sketch in a week
>She likes it, she tells me she's gonna buy the item I want directly instead of the card
>Ok
>I tell her to wait for me to send another update so she doesn't feel like I'm gonna run away with the game (kek)
>I deliver the colored drawing
>She approves it but tells me that she had to spend the money on Christmas gifts for her family and on a few days she'll give me the game
>Days go by, without signs of being alive, I keep checking reddit for messages like a retard at work
>I send her another message yesterday telling her if she's still up for the fucking trade or if she died
>No answer but she's active after I send the message

I was scammed wasn't I lmfao. Serves me well.

No. 1837701

>>1837691
You're now a disabled, mentally ill gendie whose entire life hinges on getting that payment. Make lots of posts in that subreddit about killing yourself, tag the tif in all of them. Once you make enough stink about it she'll give you the money or they'll kick her out for being a meanie. Feel free to destroy her reputation on other platforms too, gendies get away with too much as it is.

No. 1837708

>>1837701
This, make up some bs and say how her scam even forced you to come out as nonbinary femme in front of everyone.

No. 1837716

>>1837701
I'm so tempted but I made the post in my professional art account, mainly because I want people to see I'm not gonna scam them (ironic) so for the sake of that I can't. It's funny because I was already scammed with an art trade some years ago kek
The problem lies on me because I pretty much believe 100% what people say to me

No. 1837717

>>1837691
She probably doesn't have the money after spending on the holidays and is ashamed to say it. There is a chance she'll still pay but next time just take payment upfront.

No. 1837718

>>1837691
I'll never understand how these people agree on buying something for someone only to later bust the money on something else and ghost instead of actually saying something. If you know you'll have to buy gifts and stuff for people don't take on extra debts that you can easily avoid.

No. 1837747

File: 1704296353070.png (550.83 KB, 1576x1360, doodle.png)

>>1837518
>>1837532
>>1837649
getting some varied opinions…
also can anyone recommend a figure book for dummies? huston filtered me (though i think his whole thing about "getting as close to the shape of the model as you can to start with" is very smart) and morpho's "simplified forms" is making me squint. i'm trying to figure out the torso right now, because it seems the most important part of any figure – limbs are just cylinders so they're simple, but the bean of the torso is confusing me.

it's only been three days though (i'm trying to draw for at LEAST 30 minutes per day this year, hopefully more on weekends) so i assume this isn't a sign art's not for me…

No. 1837759

File: 1704297017241.jpg (126.79 KB, 1080x1080, 1d6a34883f72ffb902c2a437900554…)

>>1837747
Three days is nothing. Just keep practicing. Also, his books are memed heavily but I found a lot of Loomis' diagrams helpful. Will Weston also has some good diagrams breaking the shapes down.

No. 1837761

>>1837747
have tried gesture drawings? force by mike mattesi is really good! these look alright nonnie dont lose hope! keep drawing!!

No. 1837846

>>1837747
you're already doing better than most of the newbies on /ic/ just pick a random book to follow, if it's not working use another one. everything has something different to teach you, as long as you're practicing and learning you're good. there's no defined path

No. 1837885

Can anyone recommend a lamp for drawing? A standard one with a led bulb just doesn't cut it for me especially since I started wearing glasses.
I need light especially in the evening, which sucks especially during winter because after 4 there's no daylight and even then if there's no sun, it sucks.
Needless to say it's for traditional drawing and painting, I lose so much of the day because of this.

No. 1838313

>>1837691
Why not send her a small thumbnail or a blurred version of the finished drawing as proof of completion then ask for the payment before she can have it?

No. 1838354

>>1837759
weston's excellent (so far) nona…thanks for the rec.

No. 1838367

has anyone tried coomer grifting? a friend and i are thinking about developing some renpy furry shit coom VN for the bucks

No. 1838373

Is making a FurAffinity account to try to rank in some furry commissions for money worth the trouble or not? I don't want to be the next "I want to be a furry artist for the big moneys" but I do want to try to expand my clientele.

No. 1838386

>>1837747
Michael hamptons figure drawing design and invention

The Anatomy for sculptors books by uldik Zanis.

At the beginning is about mileage, you have to draw a lot and try a lot, eventually you get into the flow. Is like working out, at the beginning just 10 minutes running will have you panting but after a few months you are running long distance and feel great afterwards instead of tired.

No. 1838389

>>1835961
try cgpeers

Also i bet is just more generic Loomis tier basics. Popular artists seriously push it with the tutorial grift. Its oversaturated and everyone is milking it

No. 1838401

>>1835027
lol , yes, he is copying some already existing work and editing the timelapse, probably some AI image . He doesn't even flip canvas or knows how to use selection tools.

No. 1838415

>>1835140
based, filter the posers trying to profit from generic AI spam. Neither real artists or the public looking for art likes that garbage and whining about your machine plagiarism getting discarded just makes you seem like a butthurt poser

No. 1838928

>>1830078
how old is she? I thought she was 25 or something.

No. 1839124

File: 1704394445074.jpg (261.13 KB, 720x1763, 04012024034819.jpg)

I don't know how old this woman is, but these tweets make her sound like a 14 year old girl who cries and gets angry over anything. It makes kinda disappointed because (ignoring the fat/cuntboy art) she's a great artist.

No. 1839132

>>1839124
she's 22

No. 1839174

>>1839124
This is sad, sounds like she lost motivation for her work. I feel sad for her. Especially if you have a large number but no one interacts, its disapointing.

No. 1839195

>>1839124
Sounds like melodramatic humblebragging, what a womanchild

No. 1839239

>>1837718
You expect chronically online ftms/gendies to take responsibilities and pay debts on time?

>>1839124
So whiny. Her work has thousands of views and retweets, so many people view and share her drawings and all she can think about is how no one talks to her on a site that isn't really made for art and art comments. Plus if people were to talk to her she'd complain again about how they comment stupid shit or something. Yeah I'm jealous I don't care, I don't even get likes and views and she gets success by drawing a fat ugly cuntboy and she complains about it too.

No. 1839278

>>1839239
She also complains about people bookmarking her work and claims that "my art must be horrible and embarrassing if people bookmark my work instead of RT and liking it" like at this point she's just forever insatisfied with her followers for no reason other than being a whiny humblebragger

No. 1839317

>>1839132
lol she is older than me but she acts like my pre-teen cousin when the boy she likes doesn't respond to her IG story

No. 1839320

>>1832575

hey nona it could be RSI or carpal tunnel, do you get any paint in your arms/elbows?

No. 1839323

Do you have any art related New year's resolutions ? Mine is to do that portfolio and realizing my dream of becoming a children's books illustrator.

No. 1839368

File: 1704406690924.jpg (41.4 KB, 750x471, life-finds-a-way-v0-jytpicrfxl…)

>>1839323
Not kill myself? doing freelance work is my only source of income in my third world shithole and AI is threatening my survival and my hope for the future.

I am still managing with clients but i've been making my peace with the possibility of reaching a dead end and in that case i'll just stretch my savings until i can't anymore and afterwards just rope. I am not gonna edit or repaint AI trash for pennies either, if it comes to that as the new standard of what an artist is i rather just die.

No. 1839405

>>1839323
make a game, or doom mod. Get better. That's it.

No. 1839487

>>1839323
Draw or paint every day. Try to get into some sort of show.

No. 1839574

Nonitas, any opinions on the VGen? I've recently come across it and it seemed like a very attractice platform for commissions, but getting a code to make an account for it seems like a fucking nightmare and it's giving me major Toyhou.se "special closed little clique" vibes.

No. 1839578

>>1838313
I did this the first time I traded with her, I thought she wouldn't fail me this time either but here I am kek

No. 1839605

>>1839578
she failed you because you didn't do it lol

Shit is getting worse though, even if you send a low res version with a watermark scammers can just take it and put it through apps specifically designed for art theft that remove watermark automatically and upscale the image.

No. 1839722

File: 1704436672939.jpg (97.46 KB, 1080x600, yuwtpl8jxrjfj82uethe.jpg)

Nonnas what are your favorite sketchbooks to use?
(I need some recommendations for a new one)

No. 1839728

>>1839722
cheap dollar stores one so i dont feel like i am ruinnning a good one

No. 1839734

File: 1704438681692.jpeg (309.55 KB, 828x1189, IMG_4130.jpeg)

>>1839722
If you’re in the US, Walmart sketchbooks are pretty decent price-wise. Especially the Bee Paper brand. They’re massive for the amount you pay.

No. 1839784

>>1839405
Nona I wanted to make a doom mod too!

No. 1839802

>>1839239
>>1839278
Kek of course you wouldn't understand it when you've never been in the same situation. It does feel awful when you put so much work into something only to get a few thousand likes and nothing else. Likes don't mean anything. I hope she can find a friendgroup that gives her enough validation to stop sharing art publicly at all. It's embarrassing how upset this makes some anons, how many more times are you going to post her vents in this thread only to say "she's annoying but her art (excluding the ugly cuntboy of course!!) is soo beautiful". It's not like she's ever complaining about something new so why continue to harp on her for the same thing

No. 1839805

>>1839722
I need the sketchbook to be pretty and cheap, and since it was on sale i bought a lot of sketchbooks from Hema. 2€ each for 80 pages.

No. 1839813

File: 1704446213037.jpeg (102.89 KB, 680x653, 1DB9581F-6CAB-40DA-89C9-8DD50B…)

Any artist nonnies relate to giving up on the idea of being a professional and settling for a more stable career? I’m kinda hurt. I don’t have a financial safety net to be able to learn full time it so it will have to be a hobby for now. Studying a major i don’t care for makes me wanna kms since it takes so much energy out of me. I’m holding on to hope I can find a job that pays well and has health insurance. Hoping I’m able to finance proper art education someday so I can study what I’m passionate about full time. I get bitter at the young kids who get to pursue their dream career early thanks to their rich family.

No. 1839840

i actually don't understand that brand of artists that are very good at copying pics, and usually have great coloring too, but have terrible amateur fundamentals and their sketches tend to look like garbage, with very poor linework. however the end result always looks pretty impressive and pretty accurate to the image they referenced. how can they copy an image so well but have shit fundamentals? what's happening there

No. 1839842

>>1839840
forgot to mention that usually they're traditional artists. if you send them to a figure class their art sucks, but the finished paintings always catch the attention

No. 1839851

>>1839840
There's no analitical process in copying something and you are not making any informed opinions, literally anyone can do it even with no knowledge of art, it just a tedious not hard.

No. 1839875

>>1839574

doesn't vgen take a 10% cut from your commission money including tips

No. 1839881

>>1839574
I think they will most likely open their site to everyone eventually, it just got out from closed beta a few months ago & are still improving and checking stuff, it's not a finished website yet.
They advertised themselves as some kind of western Skeb, but looks like its just a normal commision site rather than the "sent money, receive drawing" dynamic Skeb has going on unafortunely. That aside, I think its great to browse and find artists to commision.

>>1839875
That is out of their control if I recall correctly, places like koffi take a % as well even if they don't mention it. It's stuff like Paypal & currency exchange fees.

No. 1839911

>>1839881
The only thing that bothers me about VGen is the absolute clownery that is the process to get a code and to get verified as an artist to start doing commissions there. Getting 20 retweets and 100 likes on a piece? Having to win an art challenge? And then on top of it all having someone scrutinize you, your statistics and your art history to see if you can be considered a "trusted" artist? To me that just seems like they only care about artists with a large following and high engagement (and as a result, artists who should already be able to land commissions without any sort of aid) and is ultimately unfriendly to smaller artists who struggle to get commissions and need the aid of a platform because their following and reach are too small.

No. 1839941

>>1839851
>>1839840

I think the problems with these people are that they just copy without understanding what's going on behind the scene aka the fundamentals of drawing. Copying while applying them to learn is a good things, since we learn from our predecessors. But just copying an image (like something from a manga) just to flex is weird to me.

No. 1839950

>>1839911
It seems like they are trying to use applications for marketing now with all the challenges and hashtags. Iirc they used to manually look through portfolios when they first started. But if those tags aren't dead it should be easy even for new accounts to get to 100 likes as long as the art is good

No. 1839967

File: 1704461595658.png (1.5 MB, 864x575, Screenshot_20240105-132707.png)

YouTube keeps offering me content from the Milan "art institute" under the channel "art social" & it's making me enraged in about 1000 different ways. turns out its a school in Ohio or somewhere where this mum & daughter train gullible wannabes to all paint in exactly the same horrible style, young female faces surrounded by wolves type of thing, heavy on the "symbolism". cloying awful stuff. But the part that really upsets me is how much they seem to sell. The daughter Dimitra Milan seems to make an absolute fortune, and their socials are stuffed with people going "wow this is beautiful, this is real art" etc
I know logically these people are just fools who don't actually know how to look for art but the amount of money they have to spend on shite is depressing

No. 1839969

>>1839950
the tag doesn't seem to be dead going by the "latest" tab on twitter. i see a lot of posts failing the requirements but granted they're all mediocre art.

i think the main issue isn't the whole 20 rts and 100 likes thing but the verification process that comes after that because once your post succeeds in getting the metrics you need to dm it to vgen and someone will basically analyze you to check if you're a good pick (or lbr, to see if you deserve to be in the platform) and then if you get approved you're cleared to go. to me that's the tricky part because they check things such as your online engagement, how often you post, how much art you pump out, your art history, how many commissions you've gotten/how many clients you had and if you posted said commissions and so on. they even check how many fucking tags you add to the posts (i saw a mod say that they consider 3 hashtags or more a "red flag" even though twitter's limit for shadowbanning is around 5 or 6).

No. 1839974

>>1839967
this looks horrific and also somehow like AI at the same time. Do you want to open a fake school, nona? I think we can do better and I'm a shit artist. I'll just come up with oddball themes based on obscure mythology and you can make people paint them

No. 1839984

>>1839969
Interesting, I didn't know about that. It makes sense though, why would they host a bunch of people that barely take commissions or that no one wants to get commissions from? Social media engagement is a good way to measure interest, their business relies on getting a cut of your payment after all. Though to be honest I don't understand why anyone uses that site, does it mask your identity to the commissioner? Like, does the payment go to Vgen instead of your paypal the way it works with patreon? Or is it like ko-fi and it still shows your paypal to the customer? Or do artists just hope they are going to get found by more customers on there?

No. 1839992

>>1839840
They use grids. That's why their anatomy is shit, they don't need to learn how bodies work because they're putting lines in squares. It makes sense that they wouldn't care to work on the fundamentals that they don't need, especially if they make a living copying from photos.

No. 1840002

>>1839984
VGen does operate with VGen Payments which is powered by Stripe and therefore protects the artist and the commissioner's identity but you can also opst to use PayPal.

>Or do artists just hope they are going to get found by more customers on there?


I have some friends on VGen and they told me some stuff about that. Many of the artists that go to VGen do so in hopes of landing a Vtuber costumer that pays big, because many Vtubers use VGen to get commissions for graphics and emote packs and such. There's also the whole FOMO factor and the "I'm part of a fancy closed group" mentality since VGen basically acts as a badge that tells the world you're "good enough" to have been accepted by the platform. Kinda bs in my view, but that's how it is. Like you said I do get why they'd do that since their whole marketing depends on their artist base so it's kind of obvious that they'd want only successful, established and good artists on their wing.

No. 1840005

>>1839722
I'm a sketchbook fiend, what mediums do you wanna use? Do you want something cheap ? Pretty?
Talens Art Creation are great, cheaperish and they come in a variety of sizes and colors, pic related. The paper is very fine and ivory, great for pencils and alcohol markers. This is my togo sketchbook.
Hahnemuhle D&S Sketchbooks come in big square formats and the paper is ivory yellow and has a bit of a tooth to it.
Hahnemuhle Nostalgie is pure white , fine , thicker paper and the colors POP.
Leuchtturm sketchbook is pure white, the colors POP and it's great for pencils and thinner layers of ink.
All those mentioned have hardcovers.

No. 1840009

File: 1704464620879.jpg (139.85 KB, 887x704, mayara.JPG)

>>1839840
I was thinking of making a post about this! I see a lot of artists who got popular doing EXACTLY this, Mayara is a good example, I kept saw her recommended in my feed on instagram and was shocked to see how many likes some of her posts have, mostly those that ride off fandoms, but there are many such artist examples.
They use the grid method ,as another anon said.
IMO it's incredibly frustrating since there are artists a million times better that don't have a fraction of the following.
Copying doesn't take nearly as much effort as creating something original does, and with copying you already know the color and shadow placement and it's easy to change,as opposed to when you create a new piece, have to come up with a color palette etc.

No. 1840057

File: 1704467272265.jpg (39.23 KB, 300x300, DJ_Khaled_Suffering_from_Succe…)

>>1839802
>when you put so much work into something only to get a few thousand likes and nothing else
Oh nooo anon

No. 1840155

>>1839802
What else do you want nonita, somebody licking your boots? Or maybe some other telling you how much the want to have followers/skills like you? Kek
In case you are expecting to gain commissioners here's a thing: you don't need much followers to get clients. I have 200 followers and I still get clients every month, some regulars as well. It's pretty much my primary job because my irl job pay me less but I have to do it anyway.

No. 1840185

Does anyone have any fixes for an overheating iPad when using Procreate? It's an iPad pro, 2nd gen. I've been having a lot of issues with my iPad when drawing for maybe an hour, it can get quite warm in one area and tends to make the screen unresponsive to touch. The battery tends to drain very quickly as well, 30-40% in just an hour.

I tend to use it on low brightness and typically have a canvas of 3000x3000, 300dpi, and reduce it where necessary, but if I can't work at that resolution, I'll probably just sell it and get something else. Thanks in advance.

No. 1840194

>>1840002

>Many of the artists that go to VGen do so in hopes of landing a Vtuber costumer that pays big


so basically vgen is the vtuber version of the "i'm gonna start drawing furries so i can do furry commissions because furries pay a lot" trend except it features gatekeeping? kek this is pathetic

No. 1840303

>>1840155
Did you reply to the wrong post or something?

No. 1840325

>>1840057
You have to experience it yourself to understand it I guess. A huge but silent audience won't make sharing your stuff feel worthwile

No. 1840556

File: 1704493829678.png (426.43 KB, 924x703, OldstylePaintingpractice.PNG)

>>1833482
This anon here

>>1833486
>>1833489
Thank you both. It was encouraging to read this! Made me feel better.

>>1833515
Picrel was a mix of eyedropper and eyeing it. I go by the rule "If it's not the right colour, go darker (or lighter)" It's basic advice, I know. Not groundbreaking.

Clearly, picrel needs work. It's not finished and areas need more blending.

If you go on 4chan's Artwork & Critique board. The eyedropper is cheating. But they consider a reference cheating half the time so I try to disregard them. There is the odd time someone posts something useful, https://color.method.ac/ a few rounds of that and it helps me get into the flow of choosing the right colour by eye.

No. 1840576

>>1840556
It’s nice but the body looks kind of muddy, I think the result would be much nicer if you just apply color theory and choose your own color story

No. 1840670

>>1840576
Thank you for that! Yeah, I notice her torso (and arm area) doesn't look as light and 'heavenly' as it should. It's never the program's fault. I'm using medibang, Watercolor brush (wet) and I'm sure I'm not using the program to its potential. I am drawing more from life now and not another person's painting. Talking about fruits and veggies kind of stuff.

No. 1840973

File: 1704524790215.gif (2.13 MB, 300x300, sad crash.gif)

>tfw style i am striving for is extremely hard to achieve and requieres professional knowledge of all fundies
i really envy my friends who draw in very simplistic sanrioesque styles and are happy with it, i am a sucker for extremely detailed art and i know i will never be happy with my art until i achieve full knowledge of fundies

No. 1840989

>>1840973
it is made me giggling and sad, relatable
year only started, nona, may it achieve your dream goals!

No. 1841050

Furry artist nonitas, where do you go to advertise your services? I could use some extra cash.

No. 1841087

>>1837885
If you need it to be stronger then maybe get a professional studio light? Some of them you can pick the intensity and they get very bright.

No. 1841090

>>1840556
>If you go on 4chan's Artwork & Critique board
Ic are Literally a bunch of larpers making up shit and seething from jealousy at pros and resentment from never improving. Literally the only decent threads are the ones with book links and torrents but i would suggest avoiding paying attention to their retarded opinions.

No. 1841158

>>1841050
I just post on twitter and have other furry friends (that arent degenerates).
To be honest you can't simply say "Hey I draw cats, give me your money" and expect commissions, it a community like any other and if you aren't into furries, it shows on your drawings and people won't buy from you. Also most of them aren't cash cows, they just love their OCs so much and are more prone to commission art of them when they're able to, specially to the people who show interest on them as well.

No. 1841462

>>1840973
Relatable to me top, I just want to be like artists like Roberto Ferri but that takes a lot of time and effort just to be consistent with the style let alone make something nice, rooting for you nonita

No. 1841715

File: 1704579831534.jpg (197.54 KB, 1638x2048, 417498471_918349819855780_5822…)

I liked her hairstyle circa 2018-2019 but now she has gone full tumblr (and it's so fucking weird to see this style in 2024), with clown blush along snowmen noses, the bowl side shaded cut is also ugly as fuck, nobody looks good it it because it gives off addicts who shave their head while high on crack. Gendie-ism is such a fucking disease.

No. 1841716

File: 1704579838513.jpg (Spoiler Image,408.96 KB, 2400x3000, why would you draw this.jpg)

i still cant get over this girl being a lead animator. American animation is so fucking doomed until they start outsourcing to france and japan

No. 1841718

>>1841716
Fuck you for forcing me to see this a second time.

No. 1841726

File: 1704580741758.png (Spoiler Image,1.05 MB, 1088x844, lead 2D animator.png)

>>1841718
I just cant stop thinking about it. Do peple who work in the modern animation industry even like to draw? how the fuck do you draw worse than the average /ic/el while working in the animation industry. She's also almost 30 and has the skill of a 15yo tumblr gendie. It's quite scary.

No. 1841731

>>1837747
Hampton and Proko, look up their videos.
Love life drawing is another good channel for beginners.
It looks like you just started learning, you just need to repeat A LOT. It’s awkward at the start but you have to push through it.

No. 1841736

>>1841726
Why did she draw Butthead with…titties?

No. 1841742

>>1841736
You know why.

No. 1841771

>>1841726
Nepotism or "why american animation suck now"

Nepotism is not new but it used to be that the trustfun kids from cal arts and Sheridan were also talented. Not anymore

No. 1841884

>>1841716
There are a lot of animators that cant draw, it's not required depending on a project, and tbh if she just posted these shitty doodles on her idk, personal instagram or twitter that would be whatever, but I went to look on her official portfolio page and it's all there too, unhinged honestly lol

No. 1841922

>>1841884
>There are a lot of animators that cant draw
what are you talking about

No. 1841951

File: 1704597969795.jpg (107.17 KB, 2048x720, 1000013158.jpg)

Damn this artstyle is ugly as shit.

No. 1841964

>>1841922
Animation is a different skillset. Animators that can draw tend to get better jobs and the ones that can't are stuck in inbetweener or storyboard hell until they quit.

No. 1842008

>>1841951
they all look like varying versions of a groomer

No. 1842084

>>1841964
no, it's not. That sounds like a cope lmao. You have to be good to draw to be a good animator.

No. 1842240

>>1841951
OT but I wish there was a reverse of these games where the moids are the victims of you.

No. 1842252

>>1842240
tbh I'm learning to draw in part because I want to make this a reality.

No. 1842268

>>1840155
How tf do you find clients, do you do fan art? I have a small page of 1k but was never able to get regulars just the odd commission here and there. It tanked even more after instagram took away recent posts from hashtags.

No. 1842270

File: 1704617394677.png (2.49 MB, 2400x3371, speedoru.png)

speedoru has the most punchable style i have ever seen. He also has a really weird case of sameface where all the girls he draws look like the woman from the shining.

No. 1842273

>>1841951
Really loved Gato's style her expressions are on top, Darqx's is fine too, and I cannot say anything of Puke's because I didn't play his routes much to remember just beginner skill (I tend to avoid moid's works and there was no surprise then fellow nonna said his colleagues burned bridges with him)
Also, it is a free indie game made literally by three friends, their art was pretty consistent.
>>1842240
Based.

No. 1842274

>>1841951
what game is this? i though they were the avatars of youtubers with grooming allegations

No. 1842301

>>1842270
the way he draws hands and feet is disgusting. he's also an obvious coomer, judging from his other works

No. 1842315

File: 1704625361755.jpg (120.78 KB, 500x500, wacom_cth690tk_intuos_3d_creat…)

Anyone has tablet recomendations?
I'm tired of Wacom already, while the tablets themselves work, I have to restart the drivers, PC & uninstall updates too often because they decide to stop working at the most random times. I just want to be able to plug a tablet and draw without having to jump 10 loops and troubleshooting. I have only used their Bamboo and Intuos lines, but from what I have heard these are common problems for Wacom, so I want to sell my current tablet and buy one from another brand.
(No screen tablets since my budget is around $150, I draw for fun)

No. 1842342

>>1842315
I have a wacom small since 2012 and I never had these problems. Guess I got lucky

No. 1842434

>>1840185
I have an old one as well (might be the same as yours but I have the first gen pencil included) and I’ve had to replace the battery because of the life issue. It was also overheating as well. It has helped but I don’t know how much more life it has after replacing the battery.

No. 1842438

>>1842084
Anon please, look into things like rigging for example, you need a good understanding of pacing and movement but you can totally never draw a single object in your professional life; someone else will be doing that part of the production process and animator just receives a finished product to work with. Creative industry is very varied nowadays, it's good to research more to see how things are done instead relying on uneducated assumptions and calling facts a cope.

No. 1842510

>>1842315
Become a dirty finger and touch screen digital artist, drivers and tablets are so finnicky and stupid and it's very easy to get used to.

No. 1842568

Lost my jobs due to layoffs, so I ended up opening my commissions again for the first time in ages to survive. My main motivation for getting a job again is so I won't have to do this, because I fucking hate it, kek.

Only once did I have a client who was pleasant and eager to see her vision drawn in my style. Everyone else assumes they can just link me a couple of pieces from artists that either don't do commissions or are way too expensive for them and push me to draw it that way. They approve the refined sketch and the linework, and then decide to start doing the whole "hmm, there's something off, uwu I dunno, maybe the eyes can be bigger?" dance and then link me to the artwork whose eyes they clearly want instead. Never are they straight up asking from the very start, since I clearly state in my rules that I won't change my style and for them to make sure to look through my portfolio before making the request. They are compliant once I point this out, but it always leads to people being disappointed in the final results and leave me feeling awkward once the work is done. I just want to do art as a hobby and earn money from a completely mundane job instead, because this always makes me miserable.

No. 1842588

>>1842510
I used to draw on my phone whenever I was out my house but I don't find it as comfortable as a tablet, specially since the art programs are pretty lackluster compared to PS and CSP (what I use on my laptop)

No. 1842596

>>1841951
I like the guy in the very far left side of the picture but I forgot his name and I forgot the name of this game too. Anyway the only reason why I like him is how fuckable his official dakimakura looks, I will never play this trash but holy shit the daki is so good

No. 1842598

Absolute boogus question that most likely has a very obvious answer but I'll ask regardless.

How do I get more commissions? I don't have a super big following online, my prices are competitive and I do try my best to market myself in every way I can, but I can't seem to land a reliable number of costumers. Dry spell after dry spell, then maybe one or two, then none. Do I need to push for a larger following? Do I have to join Discord art servers or those commission platforms like Artistree or VGen? What can I do?

No. 1842604

File: 1704647987202.png (2.52 MB, 2598x2598, Untitled141.png)

Can anyone give me any pointers on how to shade like this? I would love to use this style of shading for my art.

No. 1842615

>>1842604
That's just cell shading with some blurring on the edges, anon. Literally just clip mask a multiply layer with lilac and you're done.

No. 1842618

File: 1704648343375.gif (1.24 MB, 292x322, huh-ew.gif)

>>1842604
Get better taste what the fuck

No. 1842634

File: 1704649046924.jpg (14.92 KB, 229x275, 1674770856653.jpg)

>>1842604
Nona please, I started giggling at your picrel. If that's what you're really going for go watch one of those old fnaf speedpaints to learn the technique.
>>1842588
AYRT I use a touch screen laptop and FireAlpaca (poorfag lmao) and I'd say it's alright for bigger projects. With PS you could also try and bezel lineart if you want that smooth vectorish line. But I see no point in tablets atm, so my persceptive might be pointless, kek

No. 1842704

>>1842604
This is literally the most basic style of shading ever. At least go watch any art video before asking

No. 1842826

File: 1704657908099.png (Spoiler Image,1.02 MB, 615x901, ew.png)

>>1842596
Holy shit. Whenever I'm reminded of the godawful taste some of you have I feel less bad about someone disagreeing with me on here

No. 1842829

>>1842634
Please use Krita or something, Fire Alpaca is probably the wrost (in terms of brushes and tools) free art program for PC.

No. 1842833

>>1842438
>rigging
ah, makes sense you arent talking about real animation

No. 1842836

>>1842826
GOD how i hate that edgy "oooo insaaaaane" expression on the left pic. Also i need to wash my eyeballs with acid after seeing this, thank you.

No. 1842840

>>1842826
is that a tif? why does he have such an small pp

No. 1842842

>>1842826

He has more pubes than cock did they make him into a tranny or is he a knob dick?

No. 1842844

File: 1704658314274.jpg (Spoiler Image,280.09 KB, 1052x1516, tumblr_60548ebab753fdd56a16f01…)

>>1842836
You're welcome. Can you also look at this one before that, the fucked up shape of the bodyhair is taking me out. It looks like scales

No. 1842847

>>1842844
who the fucks gets off to this?

No. 1842851

>>1842844
The way this artist draws expressions is so fucking jarring. Dude looks like two different people inbetween the pics and also what the fuck is that body hair? (and kek that's barely a hard on. Anyway what kind of diseased fuck finds this hot?)

No. 1842865

>>1842829
Nah you just have to alter your brushes and/or make your own. I don't do like lined art ever, I just use a slightly altered version of the default watercolour brush for rendering and the airbrush in a smaller size for sketching so the lack of brushes or docker options doesn't bother me.
>>1842844
>>1842826
Why are they TIFs and/or micropeened? There's something off putting about the blanks stares and the weird hair details ontop of the plastic skin- I'd almost rather look at the shitting dakimakura that's been posted here.

No. 1842886

>>1842315
The latest huions and xp-pens are good.

No. 1842893

>>1842438
Thats not really animation.

No. 1842904

>>1841951
Is this from a game? Why do the characters look like they were drawn by at least three different artists? the three middle ones are How to Draw Manga tier.

No. 1842924

>>1842826
He looks like Hispanic beardless Jack black than a yandere dilf…

No. 1842939

>>1842924
he's supposed to be a dilf? he looks like your average 21yo moid

No. 1842940

>>1842826
>>1842844
what the actual fuck nonnas, I can't believe some of you get off to this. this has to be one of the ugliest artstyles I've ever seen. reminds me of pompadorkery's disgusting artstyle.

No. 1842954

File: 1704662445143.jpg (707.58 KB, 1280x1600, 1000013192.jpg)

>>1841951
>>1842274
>>1842904
The game is Boyfriend to Death

No. 1842955

>>1842273
Gato's art has improved a lot, honestly wasn't even that bad in the original games either

No. 1842956

>>1842274
Kek, perfect description

No. 1842957

>>1842954
>abusive ugly post wall moid simulator
whats the point, real life already exists

No. 1842958

>>1842954

wow that's the definition of fugly art style

No. 1842960

File: 1704662794591.jpg (75.54 KB, 651x516, tumblr_ngucnh1cLq1u622flo1_r1_…)

>>1842955
>>1842955
What kind of cope are you on kek, this is from 2014. The base is the same, there's just more shading now

No. 1842963

>>1842960
shes in her 30s jesus christ how is she so terrible

No. 1842969

File: 1704663066677.png (1.5 MB, 1198x1400, tumblr_8aa16e70674089d4c593491…)

>>1842963
She probably never grinded fundies and just kept redrawing the same shit

No. 1842970

>>1842969
repulsive. I hate female artists who get groomed into dilfs by sheer social contagion.

No. 1842971

File: 1704663117026.jpg (1.43 MB, 1664x1004, Tumblr_l_1668400928670.jpg)

>>1842960
If you don't see the improvement regardless of if you like the subject matter or not then I'm not sure what to tell you honestly

No. 1842973

>>1842971
nta but that looks heavily traced

No. 1842975

>>1842969
I don't really get why some mediocre artists suceed while people much better get ignored or get nitpicked on to death

No. 1842977

>>1842975
modern western art spaces are fuelled by clout, not skill.

No. 1842984

>>1842969
He doesn't look bad? But I miss his crazy hyperactive eyes, what a punchable face.

No. 1842986

File: 1704663483071.jpg (310.45 KB, 750x891, 1000013194.jpg)

>>1842826
Tell anon that it's time for her and Strade to have a smoke and watch some TV. Straight from Gatobob's deviantart by the way.

No. 1842988

>>1842986
how low does your self steem have to be to coom to this

No. 1842990

>>1842988
About -1000

No. 1842993

>>1842990
you should try seeking out pregory, he looks like this irl

No. 1842994

File: 1704663697833.png (40.05 KB, 720x432, lol.png)

>>1842969
>>1842963
Imagine being 35 years old and still drawing like shit. I would unironically kms.

No. 1842996

>>1842826
I hate his panties hair the most, probably one of weirdest fetishes. Second, his expression on the left, it is just tasteless. Sigh, fly in the oilment.

No. 1842997

>>1842971
Compare the faces, they are basically the same. I'll admit that it's generally less flat but it's nothing crazy considering that it's been a decade

>>1842973
Kek probably traced or closely referenced off of a 3D model

No. 1842999

>>1842975
Well, she wouldn't have succeeded if there wasn't a game. People generally enjoy an interactive experience and she was probably the first to make an edgy dating sim full of ugly moids

No. 1843006

>>1842996
>Sigh, fly in the oilment
What are you even saying kek

No. 1843009

File: 1704664188187.jpg (Spoiler Image,68.35 KB, 750x905, total furfag death.jpg)

thanks anon for introducing me to this awful kusoge. I have been playing it and laughing my ass off at how absolute awful and retarded it is. It fails to be erotic in ways i thought couldnt be possible. It makes so much sense the only fans are mentally ill women with pronouns. I will enver understand how some women meme themselves into finding this shit attractive, and i say this as someone who finds ''ugly'' features cute, but in a 'moeblob with messy hair and dark circles', not whatever this disgusting shit is.

No. 1843011

File: 1704664234400.jpg (83.55 KB, 800x1200, sweet_things_by_gatobob_d9crqb…)

>>1842986
She really loves him. He is her first oc and it is interesting to see how the character changes in years in her eyes.
2015 year.

No. 1843014

>>1843011
this creature is so ugly. He looks like he smells. I am tempted to make an OC thread because so many OCs are so buttshit ugly and annoying. I dont think i have ever seen an OC that doesnt suck.

No. 1843017

>>1843011
I dont play Boyfriend to Death, but Strade was definitely better off in his 2015 version instead of like >>1842826

No. 1843022

>>1843014
honestly 95% of toyhou.se would fit into a bad OC thread

No. 1843025

>>1843017
he still looked like a school shooter thats going to troon out in prison.

No. 1843027

>>1843014
Did you know that your favorite fictional characters are just the creators' OCs? Do you hate all fiction then?

No. 1843038

>>1843014
Why not a oc redraw thread? Could be nice to see what other nonnies think cool in a oc.

No. 1843045

>>1843027
why do ocs fags always say this when their donut steels get called out? there is a difference between Naruto and your shitty she/they sparkledog.

No. 1843052

>>1843045
Kek whose sparkledog hurt you?

No. 1843053

Don't care how much weird the games and other content, I just like how powerhouse Gato is, making game, writing, drawing, merch business, communicating with audience all alone. She is mature and polite, properly tagging and rightfully gatekeeps her content. I am just happy for woman's success by making her autistic shit.
Sorry for weird wording.

No. 1843055

>>1843053
and? omocat did the same and she's a better artist that doesnt make games where ugly post wall men abuse women

No. 1843058

>>1843053
>She is mature and polite, properly tagging and rightfully gatekeeps her content
Ngl this is sweet but esl chan its not rare to see artists managing multiple artistic skills at once nowadays. Her art is god damn ugly for her age. her rendering might be good but that creature looks more like a down syndrome mutt than a man

No. 1843062

>>1843055
>omocat
>Kek

No. 1843064

>>1843055
>make games where ugly post wall men abuse women
Unfathomably unbased

No. 1843065

>>1843064
Fair, I like that you can abuse the fox boy in the second game though

No. 1843067

>>1843065
dont respond to moids

No. 1843068

Either discuss her art or change the topic. It's derailing at this point.

No. 1843069

File: 1704665959490.jpg (109.6 KB, 564x752, 4817865a484e84d6a3cf5eb5faea69…)

>>1843053
That game was pretty popular for some time anyway, don't think there was any gatekeeping at all, just maybe not a lot of public.
>>1843011
>>1842969
It does look better but also he looks too square/old now and the original wasn't even nice looking tbh. I don't think it looks bad, i think the style is representing what the artist wanted, some ugly hairy fat old dude, it's bound to look bad

No. 1843072

>>1843064
Real talk. Does the opposite exist in any capacity? Like, is there a game or a comic or even image sets where "ugly post wall women" abuse young men because I genuinely cannot find such a thing online and I've always found that really strange. I'm not talking about that cringe milf dommy mommy shit, but I mean a genuine female ugly bastard preying on cute men.

No. 1843073

>>1843038
I'm afraid it might turn into the mess that the kiwifarms redraw threads were/are. Just draw something yourself, you don't need to make covert fanart for someone else just because you're too embarrassed to make your own OCs

No. 1843089

>>1843072
I feel like most women just don't want to picture themselves as ugly in their fantasies. I've seen a shitton of yumes draw their self insert not just conventionally pretty but also with almost coomerish proportions. It's like their biggest fantasy is to please a man in any way possible, like even when there are femdom elements she still needs to be pleasant to look at. And what's pleasant is what the mainstream, so coomers, decides. They can't be cruel to their made up men the way moids are when they project onto ugly bastards harassing women because they just don't hate men the way men hate women

No. 1843092

File: 1704667456040.jpg (744.33 KB, 1300x1200, tomoko.jpg)

>>1843072
obviously not. Men dont need to meme themselves into liking ugly women because they can be bridge troll looking goblins and still land a qtie. At worst they just like moeblobs with messy hair like tomoko, but these characters are still made to look cute and attractive, even with the imperfections. You need years of psyops and propaganda to end up liking >>1842986 , and since women are constantly bombarded by ugly men man proganda while pretty men in fiction are punished by either being called gay or turned into ''femboys'' for moid's consumption pickmes nlogs end up being gaslighted into liking ugly bastards. It's sad we cant escape ugly moids even in fucking dating sims anymore. I hate these pickmes. I have 0 respect for women who draw ugly men.

No. 1843107

>>1843092
Preach, sister

No. 1843123

File: 1704670279694.jpg (Spoiler Image,177.54 KB, 735x1308, Landscape_fantasy_woodland_tra…)

>>1835125
You don't even have to find inspiration with a generator, just go on pinterest and eventually you'll start getting bombarded with ai shit

No. 1843130

>>1843123
I don't think I have spotted AI in my pinterest feed yet, but the other day I needed a couple of stock photos and found out that not freepik, and probably other such websites, are now polluted with AI. I even checked the option to filter out AI generated images but they showed up anyway.

No. 1843171

>>1843092
Of course men want to fuck ugly women. Men would even fuck every single goddamn pokémon. There's plenty of moids out there who draw porn of ugly or weird female characters.

You're just making excuses. You're simply mad that some women like things you don't like.

No. 1843188

>>1843171
>There's plenty of moids out there who draw porn of ugly or weird female characters
post one visual novel where moids have to date an ugly fat ''milf'' who's hairy and looks like she reeks, oh and the milf kills them too. Go ahead.

No. 1843189

>>1843188
oh and dont forget men threaten to commit mass shooting if they dont give women in videogames make up, but women clap like retarded seals at fat ugly post wall moids and retarded vampire faggots with nasolabial folds and dry skin. It's acquired shit taste and it's SHIT.

No. 1843235

>>1843189
>>1843188
this line of thinking depends upon framing the male default as the human default. men have inferior social and empathetic skills, and are basically 2 steps away from outright autism at their best. women's tastes are broader because our emotional imagination and empathy is far more developed. there are plenty of women who are only interested in exquisitely beautiful bishonen, and plenty of women who are only interested in 45 year old russian alcoholics. men are the ones lacking depth and range!

No. 1843246

>>1843235
no, you have shit taste because women are held to extremely high standars while an ugly fat obese sociopathic moid is ''daddy uwu'' by retard's standars

No. 1843256

>>1843246
i don't really care about attractive characters to begin with, it's not my style of art. i'm a realistic portrait artist. men basically only like 1 thing and experiencing the same thing over and over again every day because they suffer from an anxious attachment to the very specific familiar. this is a neurological phenomena downwind of men's greater prospensity to austism. we should hold men's tastes as ill-developed on most matters.

No. 1843268

>>1843188
Idc about VNs but for example there's a huge amount of Marge Simpsons porn out there. There's porn of every single female pokémon out there. You don't have to look far to see that ugly women are a niche just like ugly men.
Also I can totally imagine a shota fetish game with a milf like the one you described. I bet it's not impossible to find on dlsite.

Also, I have no idea how you can think ugly men aren't niche. There's no mainstream game, manga or anime for women like that.

No. 1843272

>>1843256
Your ''we are superior for liking ugly moids ackshually, we are so much better and more complex for caring about the personality of the moid(even though he's an alchoholic abusive post wall man) instead beauty uwu'' cope just proves my point. You only feel like that because you have been psyoped since childhood to ''see past external beauty''. The movie industry(run by men) doesnt target little boys with movies like beauty and the beast with morals like ''what matters is whats inside you girlzzz dont you dare not find a disgusting abusive beast ugly, he's just misunderstood you can totes fix him''. You didnt develop supah deep complex tastes that transcend physical beauty due to being female, you were groomed by propaganda to like ugly men because men feel threatened by real attractive men, and targetting ''safe horny'' male ''''husbandos'''' like asstarion, that faggot king from wish, the ugly guy from tangled, etc, etc doesnt make them feel uncomfortable unlike when they have to see real attractive men like Link, Cloud, Dante, Leon, etc. You aren't deep and complex, you are just a pickme victim of ugly man propaganda and you are part of the reason we dont have actually attractive men in media anymore, you are just feeding into moid's ego and the worst part is they have convinced you through propaganda, you are better than women with standars. Pathetic.

No. 1843276

>>1843272
you tear into women like a hateful moid! interrogate that

No. 1843283

File: 1704680537442.png (981.13 KB, 576x1153, ugly as sin post wall moids.pn…)

>>1843268
>marge simpson
she's depicted a lot of times as beautiful in the show, what are you talking about? she even appeared in playboy.
>There's porn of every single female pokémon out there
so you are comparing women into ugly men to zoophilies? lol, so you get they are equally disgusting.
>Also I can totally imagine a shota fetish game with a milf like the one you described.
lol the fucking cope, as if. Men cant even stand to see pubic hair in their porn.
>Also, I have no idea how you can think ugly men aren't niche. There's no mainstream game, manga or anime for women like that.
hahaahah now you are coping. Look at all these fucking disgusting men that get shilled as ''sexy husbandos'' nowadays. There are also tons of anime where love interest is ugly and the female mc has to learn to ''accept him because he's nice uwu'' but there isnt a single instance of this for moids…i wonder why
>>1843276
you are literally just a tool for men. In the 00s where women were allowed to have taste we would have never had this level of disgusting husbandos and there wouldnt be women drawing disgusting post wall moid VNs like there are now. Men feel threatened by attractive male characters and that's why they target pic rel to you instead of another Link.

No. 1843284

File: 1704680742701.png (179.08 KB, 786x1600, Marge-simpson1.png)

>>1843283
You are either a very elaborate troll or insane at this point if you think THIS is hot and beautiful.
>are you comparing ugly women to zoophilia
No I'm just saying men don't have the standards you constantly bring up.

No. 1843285

>>1843284
>shown as beautiful in the show
>has a stalker thats obssesed with her
>husband is fat, bald, retarded
>but she loves him anyways and prefeers his retarded ugly bald self over a rich attractive frenchoid
she's literally a moid's power fantasy

No. 1843322

>>1843283
I thought the only reason Miguel got so popular was because he had fangs and a fat ass.

No. 1843326

>>1843322
>fat ass
you mean flat ass? he looks like he skips leg day because ''its gay''

No. 1843338

File: 1704685581841.jpg (26.62 KB, 228x292, 20240108_004112.jpg)

>tfw youre SO enlightened by your fictional moid taste and much smarter than those damned pick me's into POST WALL characters that you derail a thread with multiple long posts about stupid brainwashed tools who totes think they're superior to you and are WRONG and DUMB(tfw derailing)

No. 1843340

File: 1704685693779.jpeg (511.71 KB, 952x1907, they hated her because she tol…)

>>1843338
>derrail
it has to do with art, ugly moids have infested the western art space. stop pretending like you are a victim because you have terrible taste.(infighting/derailing)

No. 1843362

>>1843340
Hwat
Do you think youre responding to ONE anon or are you retarded? Also, your other posts were better suited for the fandom thread
>stop pretending like you are a victim because you have terrible taste
No anon, i don't feel like a victim for other womens ugly husbandos (i don't like any characters in your pics) BUT i also don't feels so persecuted for liking good looking bishies. I'm not gonna like whatever projection of people you disagree with likes
>That pic
Now thats something…i feel like no one who really draws that shit is into it, they just have no skill and are virtue signalling to get likes for drawing "diverse" (you can draw something else than sameface and not change a bunch if characters, and if you want uggos so bad you can make ocs)
If they were attracted to that they wouldn't consume media with cute (imo) guys

No. 1843370

>>1843362
she got harassed by ugly moid defenders btw, the same autists who come here to defend ugly moid honor's and chant about how so muuuch better they are for liking ugly men instead of those disgusting samefaced bishies!!1! they are annoying pickmes and dont deserve your time, because they will defend their ugly moids over women any day

No. 1843372

>>1843089
You said what I’ve been thinking for a while.
I can’t imagine loving a fictional man and wanting to give him less than the best as far as a fictional gf goes. Men who enjoy ugly bastard/degradation porn do just hate the women they want to fuck in a way I’ll never understand.

I wish more artists drew men cuter and focused on showcasing that cuteness more. Drawing pretty men is a green flag for me in terms of finding new artists. Not just because I like looking at them but it says a lot about the artist themselves tbqhfam.

No. 1843384

>>1843338
I’m sorry but you’re not allowed to smug greentext when I know you’re masturbating to 3d-model-traced graduated tumblr TiF art where wrinkly men with enlarged eye sockets and cat ears torture you to death.

No. 1843388

>>1843384
kek, spot-on. No one who doesnt masturbate to the thought of ugly men drilling nails in their skull get this offended over women on a female board calling a spade a spade.

No. 1843394

File: 1704688127188.png (347.85 KB, 1424x584, 20240108.png)

I just saw this thread on /ic/ and found it interesting. I just turned 21 and the truth is I'm not planning to have children in the near future, maybe when I'm 28 or 30, but it still caught my attention. Maybe some of you have more experience than me on this topic so, what are your personal opinions on this?

No. 1843398

File: 1704688259710.jpg (4.83 KB, 130x149, ranmaphoeniximprinting.jpg)

>>1843388
>No one who doesnt masturbate to the thought of ugly men drilling nails in their skull get this offended
You sound like a moid…

No. 1843401

>>1843394
there was that art anon who was pregnant and couldnt draw because of her belly, so yeah it stunts your grow if you are a woman. There is also that /ic/ autist, tableguy, who spends his time neeting drawing disgusting shit while his cuckqueen wife both works to support his neet ass and takes care of the baby. Another instance of men living on easy mode.

No. 1843405

>>1843370
> others act like victims over ugly moids
>Harassed by people who think they're BETTER THAN MEEEE
>A couple replies disagreeing with her
>On anon ib
Oh yeah i get it. That makes total sense. I get it now
>>1843384
>I just know you masturbate to some shitty tumblr game
No? I dont even play dls
She just kept going about the shit taste of other women instead of actually shitting on the artists who draw that shit and are popular or something on topic
Trying to call out someone else when your only argument is assuming what they masturbate to (wtf) and how offended on behalf of ugly non existent moids they are, is retarded
>>1843394
This made me realize i've never thought about being a mother, because of not liking children and not wanting a relationship but are there examples of famous or succesful female artists with families?

No. 1843406

>>1843398
we literally started discussing this shit because some pickme made some ugly VN where the ugly moids hammer nails onto you >>1843009

No. 1843410

Drawing sexy men has unironically gotten me othered by communities that tolerate drawings of sexy women.
I’m never going to let ugly men and their goons squads defeat me or my will. I’ll be drawing pretty boys until my last breath.

No. 1843415

>>1843283
Every time I see astarion, I keep thinking it's an edit. He's so disgusting. I also never realized the king or whatever in Wish is old too. They really are pushing the old man psy-op onto women where men would never date anyone over 30 half the time.

No. 1843417

File: 1704688779533.png (Spoiler Image,859.56 KB, 1650x1275, where is the cute guy in cute …)

>>1843405
Damn, you have terrible reading comprehension. This girl >>1843340 got harassed into deleting her account for pointing out the obvious by ugly moid defenders. It's just so fucking tired we cant even have attractive men in art anymore. Pick mes will always jump to uglyfy attractive men or draw disgusting VNs.
>>1843410
do it please, clearly these anons who come here to defend ugly 2d moid's honors dont know how bad it is. Friendly reminder ugly moid enjoyers took over the cute guy thread on /ic/. What once was an oasis of pretty male art made by the highest artists of ic turned into…this…

No. 1843418

File: 1704688797487.jpeg (279.74 KB, 905x881, 1700361667609 (1).jpeg)

>>1843406
>some pickme made some ugly VN where the ugly moids hammer nails onto you
Wait, so that ugly ass gray furfag fox thing was supposed to be the VN's protagonist insert avatar? Ewwwwwww

No. 1843419

>>1843069
Sorry reverse image search couldn’t help me —what is the source on that shin Godzilla in your pic? That’s amazing.

No. 1843420

>>1843410
>I’m never going to let ugly men and their goons squads defeat me or my will. I’ll be drawing pretty boys until my last breath
Based. Never give in to those broken pick mes. They are stupid for trying to shill old men and the dad bod. We desperately need another Link type character. I liked Joshua in FF16 too.

No. 1843421

>>1843418
no, it was a commission. But the art is literally about ugly men abusing women, she's repulsive and i am tired of people caping for women who draw rancid shit like that.

No. 1843426

File: 1704689153961.jpg (50.42 KB, 828x559, 1000013208.jpg)

>>1843421
Yeah I agree that the artstyle is just "off", which is why I posted that whole set of Gatobob's characters (and it unintentionally led to kind of an infight lol). That being said, I guess I can KIND OF see that she got a little better over the years, but she still has some practice to do. I mean look at the posture of the dude on the left, does that look right to you? Kek

No. 1843429

>>1843426
she should focus on developing taste first

No. 1843440

File: 1704689458870.png (240.74 KB, 467x465, wide.png)

>>1843426
wide mouth

No. 1843442

File: 1704689470560.jpeg (38.57 KB, 680x383, 297.jpeg)

>>1843401
Not mention also that Israeli artist that used to draw himself with his wife living as a couple, now all his art is related to being parents. Could you do a fanart at least?

No. 1843445

File: 1704689534851.jpeg (351.96 KB, 1536x2048, CtLRxtvUkAAGHR9.jpeg)

Nvm fuck the infighting not gonna argue anymore who cares
>>1843419
I actually had to look it up because i got it from pinterest nonny
https://twitter.com/bamboo_short/status/779916385908432896
>>1843426
>Im da jowka baby

No. 1843448

anons take every opinion they disagree with as infighting nowadays

No. 1843451

>>1843417
>What once was an oasis of pretty male art made by the highest artists of ic turned into…this…
I wish we had one of those threads here

No. 1843453

>>1843417
I hate to say it, but people get harassed over anything on twitter. I've seen people harassed over ships, tutorials, colors, even watermarks… there is no winning.

No. 1843455

>>1843451
I think there is just not that many drawfags on here, the posting art thread on /m/ is pretty slow and the drawing other anons oc's just kinda died out i think

No. 1843457

>>1843451
i just wish there was a way to filter all the cucked retards from women who want to draw attractive men. I wish i knew chinese or japanese.

No. 1843458

>>1843453
Oh yeah, didn't some dude get harassed because he drew on MS Paint?

No. 1843463

>>1843457
There was some anon who posted the tags some japanese/chinese artists used when posting their work but i don't remember wich thread, you could ask in the stupid questions thread maybe?
>>1843458
Doxxed too iirc

No. 1843465

>>1843463
>>1843458
that was fake, how can you be so naive

No. 1843472

>>1843465
Yeah, I don't really give that much of a fuck about the art "community". It seems like a cesspit of artists acting "holier than thou" and cannibalizing each other on the bird app kek

No. 1843475

File: 1704690487262.png (177.71 KB, 391x306, grilli.png)

>>1843455
This is lolcow, nonas are rightfully afraid of being genuine artists and posting on here because they fear being judged. I mean, the last few posts of this thread are a schizo who has ugly fictional moid living rent-free in her head calling anyone who likes recent popular ugly husbandos pickmes… any kind of /ic/-style husbando thread would just end up being that kind of sperging and mean infighting.

There's also the real possibility that most posters on this imageboard don't want to be found our and outed as lc nonas on shitty platforms like twitter and tumblr. Yeah schizo tinfoiling rn but whatever.

No. 1843476

>>1843465
I just heard about it but it makes sense it would be fake, like those chats with "rude clients/asking for free art" that got posted so much people just started making memes of it.
Some artists get really whiny when they use social media as a personal/influencer type thing instead of using it to showcase their art, sad tbh

No. 1843478

>>1843475
this is so stupid, ofcourse ugly husbandos should get called out in a thread about CUTE male characters. It's the reason why the ic thread became a cesspit.

No. 1843483

>>1843475
Yeah actually some artist posted and was recognized
A request thread for husbandos/waifus would work better i think. Or "draw your husbando/waifu" so they arent just expecting someone else to draw for them kek

No. 1843487

>>1843483
mods should allow the husbando board to host a aggeio. Its sad they discontinued them.

No. 1843507

>>1843487
They didn't discontinue them, it was just a theme, they move on to other themes. They even said we could use the no theme/shitpost board to fraw husbandos if we wanted.

No. 1843511

>>1843507
it wasnt a theme, we had two(or three) husbando threads

No. 1843527

>>1843511
I genuinely thought you were referring to the husbandos themed aggie.io boards we had a few months ago, if that's not it then idk.

No. 1843533

>>1843442
Nta and I don’t know what artist that but god it could be a cute thing for the kid to look back on when they’re older but most of these uwu quirky couple artists all draw coomer and retarded shit, I would fucking hate to be one of those kids. Savannahxyz did some of that uwu cute family shit but still appeals to coomers who call her a milf, it pisses me off so much.

No. 1843534

>>1843527
no, its the aggeios. Its weird that if it was only a theme there were 3 of them.

No. 1843556

>>1843283
>>1843272
I agree with you.
I'd also add that so many women meme themselves into liking ugly men not only because they bombarded with pro ugly incel rhetoric , but bc they're also constantly demeaned in media and made to feel incredibly ugly. So many womens' self esteem is nonexistent, and they're made to feel that it isn't right to like a man who is "more attractive than them" bc hes out of their league. Men find every chance they can to erode women's self esteem, and convince them that ugly men are the only men they have a chance with.
People seem to forget that fantasy is just that, and that it doesn't matter how you look in a fantasy, it's about your desires.
But that's the whole point, fantasy is so male centered that even heterosexual women have to bend their fantasies to men's desires, and not their own. As you said men want women attracted to uggos and not bishounens bc those ogreish men are just an extension of male desires. To be the ugly or below average nobody who somehow gets all the hot women. Like in harem mangas. Because women's media has to be an extension of men's media.
It's pretty telling when there are so many stories of men feeling offended by lesbianism or fetishizing lesbians despite lesbians never wanting men. It's because everything has to cater to men and males, and anything that doesn't will get forced to be.

No. 1843557

>>1843272
Wow this opened my eyes a bit. I think you’re right, nona.

No. 1843558

>>1843415
All the men on that game are so ass ugly. No one can look me in the eye and tell me that there isn't some psyop going on to convince women that caveman looking dudes are the true symbol of women's sexual desires.

No. 1843563

File: 1704696159179.png (156.97 KB, 293x410, ugly faggot from skullgirls.pn…)

>>1843556
it's so obvious how men do it on purpose, too. They will draw big titty 16yo anime girls and when they get called out for that they will ''throw a bone'' to women. This means adding drawing turbo roided ugly male that only appeals to gay moids. This happened with skull girls, everytime you criticize it for being an obvious coomery moid game the rabid coomers will try to convince you this receeding hairline faggot is somehow the equivalent of eyecandy for women. The worst part is that the pickmes agree with it, too. Oh, and dont get me started on the women who ruin the genshin impact bishies by making them ugly, old and fat for no reason.

No. 1843569

>>1843556
I think you’re right but there’s more to it than that. I think the other half is that women who love men (fictional or otherwise) genuinely do actually love them, and want to give them the best, including the best version of themselves. Men do not seem to give a fuck because I do not think men actually love women, they just want to have sex with women. Having sex with the most attractive woman is the biggest win for them. The disparity between their ugliness and a woman’s worth may actually be part of the appeal to them.
It’s a whole system that plays into the favor of mediocre men who don’t try.
I’d like for women to love strongly and generously, but they must have higher standards and expectations. There’s nothing wrong with wanting to be your best for your partner so long as your partner is equally trying to be his best for you.(derailing)

No. 1843574

File: 1704696889273.png (Spoiler Image,295.91 KB, 537x775, muh female fantasy i swear eck…)

>>1843569
Its so sad women cant even escape female socialization in fantasy. When i draw husbandos i dont think of myself as some big titty 10/10 gorgeous woman like picrel. I think of my husbandos loving my smelly hairy fat non-make up wearing self because i can fantasize for a second about a world were women get uncondionally loved without even trying like men do IRL. I am so tired of female self inserts all being big titty moidgaze bimbos. I cant wait until i am better so i can start posting my female ugly bastards.

No. 1843577

>>1843563
How does he look like he’s an infant and a 50 year old alcoholic at the same time, while also having the physique of a soft pretzel?

No. 1843579

File: 1704697182805.png (960.09 KB, 1280x1178, 1000013211.png)

>>1841951
Samefag and I just found out about this game's DLC called The Price of Flesh. Apparently Ren the kitsume furrybait boy got the aging like milk treatment. I see fans of this game saying that Ren was supposed to be the cutest male character in the game? But Gatobob still gave him the Twink Death? KEK imagine sabotaging the cutest character on your lineup by giving him a Twink Death instead of being a merciful artist and having him age gracefully. The fact that Gatobob loves ugly moids for her VN so much that she deliberately induced a fucking Twink Death got me laughing like Squidward when he choked on his soufflé. Imagine loving ugly moids so much that you WANT Twink Death KEK

No. 1843581

>>1843579
i wonder if she purposefully makes them ugly or if she thinks this youtuber about to rape his discord kitten guy actually looks attractive. He has a massive fucking head too, the proportions are horrendous.

No. 1843582

>>1843579
why must we experience the horrors of twink death even in escapist romance fiction like don’t women suffer enough? what is wrong with these bitches goddam

No. 1843589

>>1843581
samefagging, just realize he has grey hair and wrinkles now. Dear lord this woman wants total cute male character death. What infurriates me is that i have known these type of women and they are insufferable. I used be mutuals with one of them and then i found out she was shittalking me behind my back and calling me a pedo for drawing porn of some anime boy who's canonically 19. They genuinely think all women who arent into diaper shitting 30yo+ grandpas with beer bellies are pedophiles.

No. 1843618

>>1843272
>>1843556
nta but my issue isn't the discussion of women not being allowed to like pretty men and how low the standards for male are, I just wished this discussion could be less aggressive towards other women. Not every woman who is into a guy that isn't a perfect model is a dumb brainwashed woman or a pickme, there is more to it and not every fantasy is about perfection. People can be into different things at the same time, one doesn't exclude the other. We shouldn't shame women for being into bishies or postwall moids, it doesn't really matter. We don't get as many pretty female oriented males in media because moids feel personally threatened by pretty men. They can't relate to a male character if he isn't acting like a badass, a misogynist or ugly. It's about their insecurities, it isn't about what we like.
Things like >>1843340 are a issue when people distort the source material. If the character is an anime bishie, maybe we should keep it close to that, instead of forcing a whole oc into the character. I know tumblr gendies used to fuck up completely normal and good looking characters claiming it was for representation, but I much rather they create their cringe ugly oc than force a character into something they are not.

No. 1843628

>>1843618
>we shouldnt shame women for being into postwall moids
cry me a river. If you have terrible taste i am going to shame you, grow some ovaries and accept you have shit taste. I honestly wouldnt have a problem with ugly moid fuckers IF they werent so defensive and annoying about it. Every single one i have met has gotten incredibly deffensive over their uggos when they are the ones posting them in spaces for attractive male characters go somewhere else with your terrible taste. I used to be all ''live and let live uguu'' like you until i had the misfortune of sharing spaces with them. They are pickmes. They will shame you for liking cute male characters, they will force their ugly men in spaces were they dont belong, and when you tell them to fuck off then you are the mean misogynistic wah wah. They always come accompanied with horrendous pickme fetishes like maledom and guro, too. I am tired of them, they can make their own spaces but they arent welcome in cute male ones.

No. 1843650

>>1843394
you can. source: i work at an art-centered company exclusively staffed by women, owned by a mid 30s mother.

based on mainstream exposure, probably all the female artists you admire are either young internet artists, or famous fine artists from the 1970s or earlier. for any female artist from the 1970s or earlier, it was practically impossible to be an independent business woman and be married due to legal restrictions on opening bank accounts and the like. the social/economic situation is quite different now.

two notes: the working artist mothers i know already established their career before having children, and, very importantly, they have very supportive partner. someone who proactively supports their career. their spouses take a primary or equal role in childcare, they help run market stalls, help with admin etc etc etc… that makes the difference, i think.

No. 1843651

>>1843417
>this
everything else someone drew from that calendar was more pretty boy. Don't pick and choose.
I'm more annoyed how it pretty quickly turned into a discord clique thing.

>>1843574
>I can't wait till I'm better
If you actually practiced instead of bringing up this tired subject over and over every other thread maybe you'd be better.
It's so obvious it's only one or two people who constantly complain about 'roid pigs' or 'non-bishi' guys being loved or drawn.

No. 1843655

File: 1704701769911.png (Spoiler Image,2.92 MB, 1980x1650, the absolute state.png)

>>1843651
>everything else someone drew from that calendar was more pretty boy
your standars are super low, most of these are fucking ugly. Even if you disagree with some of these you cant deny the vast majority are fucking ugly and not even in a ''you tried way'' but in a shitty stylization way due to liking ugly men.

No. 1843659

File: 1704702024692.mp4 (Spoiler Image,1.81 MB, 1280x720, mental illness.mp4)

>>1843651
>It's so obvious it's only one or two people who constantly complain about 'roid pigs' or 'non-bishi' guys being loved or drawn.
there are at least 5 anons itt who agree with me, cope. We are just tired of women with terrible taste pushing themselves onto spaces that are for women who like drawing attractive male characters. You can go to your spaces where you draw your gendie oc getting snuffed like this mentally ill gendie, but normal women are tired of having to accomodate shit taste and mental illness. It shows you guys just want to push your shit taste onto others, because every time a woman complains about it you just have to jump to defend your terrible taste.

No. 1843665

File: 1704702479561.jpg (95.83 KB, 720x972, Screenshot_20231205_234745_Ins…)

>>1843655
Why are all of the men drawn with dorito bodies?
Giving away my terrible taste but I dont hate muscled men, I hate that over-roided or muscley anorexic look. What's wrong with drawing a bulky guy that actually looks like he got his gains naturally?
I like his body not really his face though

No. 1843666

>>1843665
looks gay

No. 1843674

>>1843666
He was a champion bodybuilder from 1916 so he probably was

No. 1843679

>>1843674
you should check rokudenashi you would like his art

No. 1843686

>>1843655
I like the style of 2. Its the only half decent thing there. The torso anatomy, coloring, shading and tone look decent to me and it stands out amongst the generic plastic looking animu, westaboo shit but kek at that baffling facial anatomy, hair and expression. Still its enough to inspire me to improve my coloring and tone male anatomy.

No. 1843688

>>1843686
it's well drawn, yeah, but it's fucking ugly and doesnt belong in a cute guy calendar. It dries up my vagina like when i scroll past the dano thread. Absolutely repulsive.

No. 1843696

>>1843655
>8, 9, 11 and 12 being "good"
Sorry you have shit taste.

No. 1843697

>>1843655
holy fuck i would rather burn my eyes seeing the sun to tell what day it is than buy this calendar whos the artist for the second left one? the rendering is very good

No. 1843698

>>1843696
they are cute guys, which is the point. Everything else is fucking disgusting. They should rename the thread to male general at this point since there are less than 4 posters actually interested in drawing cute guys anymore.

No. 1843703

>>1843698
>you don't like the things I like than you must be moids
>Retard tier logic
Stop derailing the thread now because nonnies won't lick your shoes

No. 1843705

>>1843703
you cant even read lmao

No. 1843719

File: 1704708019135.jpeg (53.38 KB, 750x471, IMG_2669.jpeg)

>benig this mad and shitting up an entire thread because some women draw stuff you don’t like
You sound worse than the actual males on /ic/ who tried to take down /cbsg/ for over a year, and you use the exact same arguments. Poetic kek

No. 1843720

>>1843719
Its not derrailing just because people talk about your terrible tastes and you feel offended. It's a real problem in art circles that ugly moid fuckers infiltrate them and ruin them with their ogres. Its genuinely not that hard not to post your disgusting men in threads for attractive male characters. Make your own ugly moid club, why you gotta give us eye cancer to those of us who want to draw cute boys.

No. 1843722

>>1843720
>it’s a real problem
No, it’s just drawings. You sound genuinely deranged if you care this much about what some women like to draw.

No. 1843724

>women make art space related to drawing cute male character
>gendies and pickmes infiltrate them with their ogres
>they get told to make their own space instead
>reeee you are literally a moid why dont you want to see my rat fat oc murdering women waaah you are literally opressing me
Genuinely its not that hard to make your own space and leave women who dont like eye cancer alone. Even moids make their own spaces for futashit or fat women. Why do we have to make room for disgusting shrek looking moids?

No. 1843725

>>1843720
>>1843724
Lol just because of this I’m going to start drawing and posting some even uglier men because it’s hilarious how mad people like you get over pixels on a screen.

No. 1843726

>>1843724
what space are you even talking about

No. 1843729

>>1843724
You do realize that the people who got posted upthread that made the calendar are the exact same people who started the /cbsg/ on /ic/ right? Check the archived threads

No. 1843731

>>1843725
Wow so edgy so contrarian
>>1843726
Every single one. Both cgsg and every single bishie game/anime get invaded by those spergs. It would be as simple as to make an ogre or ugly tag so we can filter it, but they are convinced their uggos are sexy

No. 1843734

>>1843729
Nah when it started we had nat the lynch and other amazing artists. These tumblr tumors came after. The ogs also didnt accept obvious femboy/troon vermin but there are two of them featured in the calendar.

No. 1843735

File: 1704709292696.png (2.33 MB, 2000x1250, 1699880845079925.png)

>>1843731
I just checked the thread and most of it looks fine to my eyes
I like the guy with the facial hair on the right. people just have different tastes

No. 1843736

>>1843731
Imagine being so entitled that you need every digital space to be tailored to you because you can’t stand to look at drawings you don’t find attractive.
>>1843734
Nat still posts occasionally. Who are the other supposedly amazing artists? I was there from the first thread and I don’t know who you’re referring to. Also who are the infiltrators? The two “femboys” in the calendar ARE ogs kek

No. 1843738

>>1843735
She thinks anyone who doesn’t personally appeal to her tastes is literally Hitler reincarnated

No. 1843739

>>1843735
>>1843736
Again, go make your own space. Or get rid of the cute in cute guy. Thread already got rid of boy over some bullshit drama, might aswell just accept its not about cute male characters anymore. These tumors spread everywhere anyways. You are scrolling a cute male character tag on twitter then BAM disgusting westoid shit where they give him an ugly nose, body hair and a beer belly. Like make your own tags so i can just not see it, why invade women's spaces like that? Its not that hard, japanese artists make specific tags for ships dynamics, why cant westoids have some decency and tag their ugly moid drawings? Or at least not tag them in tags intended for cute male characters.

No. 1843741

>>1843739
what do you mean. which of these characters do you think is ugly? I don't like ugly bastards, but I enjoy different kinds of art styles and male designs. So I am rather confused about your response to the picture

No. 1843743

All this seething when you could just make your ugly male club. Just asking for a bit of courtesy. That or at least grow some ovaries and dont shit your pants and cry when someone calls your ugly moid drawing ugly and disgusting. It's like drawing gore, tagging it with "cute drawing" then getting ugly people get angry at it, when you are the one invading their space and shitting it up. Seriously its not that hard not to be selfish, women already see enough ugly men irl.

No. 1843744

>>1843741
Left ones and top middle are all ugly

No. 1843745

>>1843739
Women invading women’s spaces? Who’d thunk it
>>1843744
Those two were there from the beginning of the general. Check the archives.

No. 1843747

>>1843743
What are you even talking about? The only one who’s mad here is you. The rest are just peacefully coexisting and drawing whatever they like. Maybe you shouldn’t be online if you can’t handle seeing drawings you don’t like?

No. 1843748

>>1843745
Women into ugly men are traitors. Again, just make your own ugly men club? Getting so offended over it just proves you dont just want to draw your ugly men in peace, you want to force them upon women who didnt consent to it. All of this started because ugly moid enjoyers got offended, as they always do. Kinda sad futa and fatfag moids have more dignity and self awareness.(derailing, infight)

No. 1843750

>>1843747
Explain to why you cant just tag your ugly shit? How is it that hard. Or is it because you know no one wants to see it so you have to shove it down our throats. As much as i dislike gatobob's style and themes at least she made her own mentally ill club instead of infiltrating spaces for women who dont like ugly eye cancer.

No. 1843752

File: 1704710495659.jpg (3.49 KB, 220x217, images.jpg)

>>1843748
>Kinda sad futa and fatfag moids have more dignity and self awareness.
lol lmao even

No. 1843754

>>1843748
Jesus fucking Christ I don’t even know what to say anymore. No one cares this much about drawings of fictional characters, or pointless tags. Literal pixels on a screen. No one here is mad except for you who thinks some people drawing things you find attractive is some kind of infringement on women’s spaces (???) This is not a women’s problem, this is a YOU problem. You need to stop caring so much about pixels on a screen. No one is forcing you to draw stuff you don’t like, and no one is forcing you to like anything you don’t like. But you can’t control what millions of people chose to draw, post and enjoy.

No. 1843756

>>1843750
How am I supposed to tag shit on /ic/?

No. 1843758

It's just the borderline shotafag who only likes enstars and genshin shorties again.
She'll never understand that most adult woman are attracted to adult looking males.

No. 1843759

Just dropping in to say I'm with the anon that's tired of ugly men. Normal women aren't into ugly men, uglyfags should be making their own separate places and leave normal women alone

No. 1843760

I’m still curious who the legendary artists of early /cbsg/ were lol

No. 1843761

>>1843759
You are mentally ill.

No. 1843766

File: 1704711337458.jpg (391.11 KB, 1080x1522, Screenshot_20240108-075330_Chr…)

Again. If you are going to draw ugly men out of your own free will and aesthetic taste why not just at least tag it? So i dont get jumpscared by monstrosities like this when i am searching art of cute male characters. Genuinely not that hard.

No. 1843768

>>1843758
I like adult characters. You like grandpas. We are not the same.

No. 1843769

>>1843768
30 year olds are not grandpas

No. 1843771

>>1843766
>using twitter
>enstars
Opinion discarded. You deserve to have your eyes raped by tif art if you’re this retarded.

No. 1843772

File: 1704712154987.jpg (174.23 KB, 1080x1350, 5e4922d53638e04155de5bab721fec…)

>>1843410
The heroine we need and deserve.

No. 1843773

>>1843769
Yes they are. And you should tag it accordingly because i am not interested in postwall moids. Like seriously just make a dilf tag and share your post wall moids with eachother what the fuck do i have to see ugly old men when i am searching for art of CUTE men. Again, moids keep their futashit, their milfshit and their fatshit isolated from the spaces meant for normal waifu stuff. Cang believe some of you are more selfish than men.

No. 1843775

>>1843771
Why? Enstars is for straight women into cute boys. They are the ones invading it. All social media is retarded anyways. At least unlike pixiv i dont have to pay to see the top posts, but i enjoy looking into the begginer artists and leaving them nice comments too. Too bad that for every honest endearing drawing i have to see 50 untagged ugly moid propaganda shit.

No. 1843777

>>1843773
>Yes they are.
at this point you are just shitposting, aren't you

No. 1843778

>>1843777
Stop defending moids retards. 30yo is old age and not husbando age. Tag it as old and move one we dont want to see your old post wall pigs.(bait)

No. 1843780

Genshin is the enemy. Genshitters deserve all the ugly western fanarts of their waifus and husbandos lol.

No. 1843783

>>1843766
I associate this certain art style with socially inept genuine neurodivergents who don't realize how hideous their work looks to other people. Like they actually think what they're doing looks attractive albeit "original" and are utterly unable to read the room when everyone's there squirming in their seats trying not to vomit seeing their anime husbandos disgraced. Maybe I'm projecting, but this exact kind of muddy serial killer-esque chicken scratch look always matches with that specific kind of autism.

No. 1843784

File: 1704712650842.png (7.76 KB, 224x225, download (1).png)

>>1843778
report and ignore

No. 1843786

File: 1704712798350.jpeg (698.59 KB, 1200x1977, IMG_2687.jpeg)

>this kills the bishie fanatic

No. 1843787

>s-stop calling me pickme some women just have different tastes it's definetly not a psyop by men!!!1!
>proceeds to defend the honor of 30yo+ post wall men

kek, everytime. Why is it that hard for some women to accept their shit taste? just tag your art as ''ugly old man'' and move on, it's probably better for you since you can form your own ugly man club with other women with shit taste and stop invading spaces for women who want to draw and see cute male art.

No. 1843788

File: 1704712910792.jpeg (59.25 KB, 581x800, IMG_2689.jpeg)

>>1843787
>nooooooo

No. 1843790

>>1843698
This thread has been the /ic/ /beg/ scrote central for years now, newfags don't remember when most of the drama was about arttubers being catty getting free supplies they didn't know how to use and not "you shallow whores should stop drawing cute guys and learn to broaden your taste while moids get to enjoy barely legal sexy anime girls to their heart's content".

No. 1843791

>>1843788
may i ask what offends you so much? that women are finally standing up for themselves and do not want your ugly men in your spaces? why is it so hard to just make your own? i genuinely dont get it. Men wont pick you even if you defend them on an anonymous imageboard.

No. 1843792

>>1843787
When was the last time you had a positive interaction with a real man? Or with anyone for that matter?

No. 1843794

>>1843792
men are ugly why would i want to interact with them lol

No. 1843796

ngl this spergout is very funny

No. 1843798

>>1843791
You make this sound like a women’s issue, as if some women enjoying art you don’t like is somehow oppressive. I’m not offended m, I just think it’s genuinely hilarious how much you manage to make a huge problem out of nothing. I literally don’t care, I am not offended by anything. I will continue to enjoy and draw whatever I want, and the only difference between me and you is that I simply chose to ignore content I don’t like. I don’t claim that it’s somehow oppressing me.

No. 1843799

>>1843798
again, just tag it? how is that so hard, lol. It takes like two seconds to add hashtag uglymoid to your ugly art and move on. I dont have to see disgusting shit, you can find fellow women with shit taste. Everyone wins.

No. 1843803

>>1843799
>hashtag uglymoid
KEK anyway you're based anon and you're fighting for a good cause. Fuck ugly moids

No. 1843805

>>1843799
Why should I tag something with ugly when I don’t think it’s ugly? Just to please mentally ill people like you?

No. 1843806

>>1843803
i genuinely dont get it. Japanese artists have amazing tagging systems that make it super useful to find art with the convoluted twitter system. But western artists are lazy, and ofcourse ugly moid artists are entitled pickmes that are convinced their ugly fat post wall moid are attractive to anyone but themselves. They are just proving how entitled and lazy they are by not just tagging their shit.

No. 1843808

>>1843806
Tagging system on western social media is somehow the fault of women’s don’t like. Whew

No. 1843810

>>1843805
to find more mentally ill people like you, form your own club, and let women who have actual good taste alone. Do you have autism? because the lack of self awareness is sad to witness. Any sane person with working eyes can understand old/fat/ugly men are repulsive and dont want to see it. Men know that futashit is gay so they dont tag their tranny shit as women, they tag it as futa. Why cant you be as considerate.

No. 1843811

>>1843808
it takes two seconds. two seconds. how lazy can you be.

No. 1843829

File: 1704716724943.jpg (32.02 KB, 564x557, what.jpg)

>>1843778
>30yo is old age and not husbando age.

No. 1843831

>>1843829
I think that person you are responding to is either very young or just baiting. They don't know how a 30y old man looks like..

No. 1843834

>>1843829
>>1843831
seriously why cant you just accept 30yo moids are old and let women enjoy hot men for once? men wont pick you and will call you old hags the microsecond you turn 25, so there is no need to pander to them lmao. The most popular cute boy franchises dont have ugly post wall moid, you are the only weirdos coping.

No. 1843837

>>1843811
>>1843808
Most social medias don't have a functioning tagging system, when you check qrts like in >>1843766 they sometimes don't even have a description of the image content. It's unreasonable to expect everyone to add "tw ugly moid" to posts (especially when they've memed themselves into believing they are attractive) so you will get jumpscared by them online, there's just no way around it. I agree that the old man psyop needs to stop, but arguing with anons won't help kek all you can do is block everyone you see approving of and drawing those kinds of men and support people who make what you enjoy instead. Women should be free to draw what they like even if their taste is shit. You can make fun of them and what not but you won't be able to stop them

No. 1843841

File: 1704717898210.jpg (109.46 KB, 1152x1152, c420a609c9788d366f282f8ae01e18…)

>>1843834
You know what, I kinda agree with you but the age 30 limit doesn't work in fiction.

No. 1843843

>>1843837
>draw ugly old moid
>tag it as #30yodiaperchangerloverclub
>women with grandpa fetishes can find your art
>you dont have to jumpscare women with taste
it's not hard. Japanese artists do it all the time. There are even specific tags for extremely specific characters tropes. There is one for awkward nerdy girls/boys, for example.

No. 1843844

>>1843841
except these retards arent talking about kawiwi sparkly anime boys whose age tag says 45 but look exactly the same as the 15yo bishies, they are talking about 3DPD. pickmes will never be picked.

No. 1843862

File: 1704720641992.gif (477.41 KB, 400x300, 1192003439972.gif)

Looking for recommendations, what's a good paper for oil pastels?

No. 1843886

>>1843837
>literally asking for trigger warnings on fucking drawings of fictional characters
Kek. Lmao even.

No. 1843901

>>1843831
we know they are ugly that's the point

No. 1843919

I agree with anti-ugly chan and while she is sperging out, i understand because i also get extremely frustrated at the amount of ugliness im expected to tolerate from men irl as well as in fiction. She snapped, but she’s right.

No. 1843920

>>1843917
I don't even disagree with her but I think she's got shit taste and it's hilarious she autistically assumes everyone either has to be into the exact same kind of anime moid she's into or be into "ugly pigs".

No. 1843926

>>1843920
I won’t insult her, even if we have slightly different preferences I feel it’s my duty to uplift her and women like her.

No. 1843929

>>1843919
Policing what people post and forcing them to use trigger warning tags just because you don’t like “ugly” things is just deranged. Does that also mean people who aren’t that good at drawing aren’t allowed to post because their drawings turn out “ugly”? And if someone has different tastes and thinks certain styles of drawings aren’t ugly, how are they supposed to know that other people will find it ugly? Or should everyone just start tagging all their art with “ugly” just in case? Even if you got what you wanted it would never work in a community of millions of people like twitter. Social media already has a block function for you to use on artists you don’t like, and you can also just ignore the drawings you don’t like. No one is forcing you to like them. And if you still can’t handle being in online spaces despite these measures, then maybe you shouldn’t be online.

No. 1843936

>>1843919
Do you realize she’s using the exact same arguments that neckbeards use to demonize any art of women that isn’t hypersexualized moeshit? Claiming that they don't want to see 30+ “post wall” hags and ugly sjw art. But you already know that’s retarded, but when this anon goes berserk she’s somehow right in your eyes because she managed to twist it into some sort of pro feminist message when in fact it has absolutely nothing to do with feminism or women’s spaces being invaded. It’s just women with different tastes coexisting in a massive community of millions of people.

No. 1843937

>>1843936
>i-it's ackshually antifeminist to be repulsed by dadbod grandpas and you're just as bad as coomer moids!!!
Kek. We just don't want to see unsolicited ugly postwall scrote renditions of anime bishies, it's not that hard to understand.

No. 1843938

>>1843929
Idk why this is a hard concept to grasp and necessitates the thorough dissection of so many caveats. Moids do a decent job at maintaining a general standard of sexiness and limitations over the amount of ugliness they’d tolerate from a woman, and they’re stupid as fuck. And yes, before you say anything, there are exceptions and aberrations in specific fetish communities, but generally speaking, men mostly agree on what is and is not acceptable.
Just let anti-ugly chan speak, even if she’s being hyperbolic. We need more women with her spirit.

No. 1843941

>>1843926
I dont see how it's good or uplifting to shit on fellow women with different tastes (no I dont like dad bod or old men, I like handsome men)

No. 1843942

>>1843936
This is a stupid argument because it’s essentially “don’t prioritize what you want because look how men prioritize what they want. You don’t want to be like those evil men, do you?” Come on now, this is retarded.

No. 1843944

>>1843941
It’s giving me the same vibes as anti-makeup arguments and how they quickly devolve into quibbling over everyone’s personal lives and interests. While it is hurtful to attack/call out someone specifically over their preferences, for the greater good, we need to discourage this type of behavior.

No. 1843950

>>1843942
How hard is it to get it in your head that I do not care about men’s or women’s issues when it comes to this question. This question is not a gendered issue. I care about the fact that people should be able to post and draw and enjoy whatever they want on a free and open platform as long as it’s not illegal. Regardless if you’re a man or a woman, if you are offended by drawings then you shouldn’t be online.

No. 1843963

>>1843950
>she’s using the exact same arguments that neckbeards use to demonize any art of women that isn’t hypersexualized
>this is not a gendered issue
are you retarded? you're the one comparing her to men and making it a gender issue kek

No. 1843971

>>1843783
I don't disagree that this sort of style is almost always associated to a certain type of gendie autist, but I also think it's a matter of specific gendie spaces that push people to draw like this and genuinely think that it looks good compared to the actual character the artist is drawing. I've seen women well into their 20s that also draw like this and like clockwork, you see some kind of ridiculous set of pronouns in bio

No. 1843974

>>1843963
Fucking please you know that’s not what I meant. I meant that both her and the neckbeards are equally as stupid because they both try to make it into an issue about men and women, when it is just about censorship. She’s claiming repeatedly that it’s a violation of women’s spaces and that people who draw certain men are “pickmes” or caping for men. While neckbeards no.1 argument is the exact same thing. Both are trying to make “I don’t like this” into “this is a women’s/men’s problem” She is taking a shitty opinion and trying to pass it off as feminist and that somehow this is a problem that affects women. You are even proving my point further by claiming that anyone who disagrees will th her is caping for men and ruining women’s experience in online spaces. I do not fucking care about men or women. I care about posting drawings, regardless of gender, and regardless of whether people like them or not.

No. 1843977

>>1843974
There’s a difference between censoring and shaming. Ya know, frankly I’m envious that men have goons all over the internet to make sure no cartoon woman is allowed to be unfuckable lmao. If only women could be that based, and make ugly men feel ashamed of themselves. Maybe they’ll feel pressured to be cute themselves and draw cute men instead of the slop they serve us amd expect us to be ok with it.

No. 1843981

I'm suddenly reminded of that discussion from last year in /ot/ in which someone said that people with the worst ugly taste in men are the most defensive and have the most autistic superiority complex about it.

>>1843974
>Someone calling your dadbod monstrosity fanart version ugly and asking for tagging is CENSORSHIP YOU'RE ALL NECKBEARDS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Please say sike nobody types this shit unironically

No. 1844002

>>1843981
We had this discussion in different threads and boards and every single time it turns into the same infight.

No. 1844005

It was in an old thread, but I remember a nonnie shared a site where to find courses for free, I remember there were Proko courses aswell. Does anyone know which site was it?
I would like to pay, but I'm a poorfag…

No. 1844006

Maybe this one
https://online-courses.club
there is also an ic thread for online courses
https://boards.4chan.org/ic/thread/6999442
and also a good telegram group, an anon posted in the previous course thread a link maybe it still works. I got the proko courses from there

No. 1844008

File: 1704731885135.jpg (61.68 KB, 1080x963, 1659179539586906.jpg)

>>1843977
This is weird to me because anons on imageboards would fuck anything that's female.
Moids don't seem to care about other moids' tastes and standards, at most they laugh at them. It's women's tasted that make them seethe… and usually I find that if an ugly fictional moid becomes popular among women, moids start seething and crying "why him and not me?".
And let's not even talk about deranged cute husbandos like Nagito Komaeda… moids either hate them or think they're just like them fr.

No. 1844014

>>1844008
Men will fuck just about anything because they are opportunistic sexual scavengers, they can also goon to anything because they can meme themselves into developing a fetish for it.
But they all have strong opinions on what does and doesn’t give them a boner, and are usually offended when they see pandering happening that doesn’t suit their standards.
The majority of men have generic taste and that’s why you end up seeing a lot of the same. But you shouldn’t conflate the general consensus on what gives them boners to the philosophy of their boners. Every man thinks his dick is god and a lot of their dicks agree. The issue is their god complex, not necessarily their specific sexual interests.

It’s very easy to understand.

No. 1844077

File: 1704736576321.jpg (Spoiler Image,70.7 KB, 488x748, Screenshot_20240108_115605_Chr…)

>>1843688
He looks like he shit in the bathwater

No. 1844195

>>1843974
Yeah, I get where she's coming from but accusing people of being brainwashed, demanding trigger warnings on a fucking imageboard of all things and posing it as an issue of invading womens' spaces just for having unconventional taste or liking 30+ characters (There's plenty of 30+ nonas here kek) is absolute sperg behavior and I'm surprised this retarded derail went on for as long as it did. I think uglymoid-chan is underage or needs to take her meds

No. 1844291

>>1843285
She's also every Seth McFarland wife character too.

No. 1844382

>>1842270
Big ass rat feet

No. 1844391

what is going on in this thread
soooooooooooo can you nonnas post a work from your favorite artist?

No. 1844396

>>1844391
I dont have a favorite artist, but I do like Julia's art videos. She has that library of different coloring pencils but unlike those wannabes you knew from school, Julia seems to know what she's doing with her art kits and stuff. I like her content.

No. 1844420

File: 1704756735922.png (624.01 KB, 605x891, __stalker_original_drawn_by_pi…)

>>1844391
I love pigeon666. The way she draws men and women is great and the rendering she can do is a big goal to me. Her work always inspires me to draw and practice

No. 1844424

File: 1704757129861.jpeg (24.79 KB, 564x544, images (33).jpeg)

>>1844391
Aleksandra Waliszewska and her fucked up cats.

No. 1844430

>>1844424
Samefag, alternatively anything by nana825763

No. 1844431

File: 1704757432053.jpeg (154.92 KB, 1280x853, IMG_2543.jpeg)

>>1844391
berlinde de bruyckere. it's a wax statue btw

No. 1844434

File: 1704757609295.jpg (494.19 KB, 1448x2048, suzumesakiii.jpg)

>>1843651
>I'm more annoyed how it pretty quickly turned into a discord clique thing.
It's just easier to set up group projects in it. As for the thread, there are known schizos constantly patrolling it trying to stir in-fighting between artists or attempting to raid the server so we have to be very careful with how we conduct events or invitations. Unfortunately, this often means excluding thread-onlies or inactive posters.

Personal rule of thumb: if it's weirdly rude and doesn't include work posted, chances are it's one of the schizos trying to spark in-fighting within the thread.

>>1844391
I really like suzumesakiii. Their bigger pieces are really fun!

>>1844430
Damn, that's pretty cool.

No. 1844444

>>1844434
Oh okay, I hope more event threads happen then. What about something for Valentine's day? We could draw each other's husbandos or OCs.

No. 1844456

>>1844396
Crazy that you watch that tiktok slop in the first place but has she ever posted drawings that aren't exact copies of photos

No. 1844471

>>1844444
> What about something for Valentine's day? We could draw each other's husbandos or OCs.
I think that would be a wonderful idea! Things don't have to happen just within the discord and there have been plenty of trades in-thread in the past. I could probably make a post at the beginning of February to gauge interest or simply start an impromptu event and hopefully more people will join in.
It's more risky, but this way nobody has to be excluded and I don't have to chase anons around trying to make sure they meet their commitments.
Should also note that if you have any future ideas for the thread, don't be afraid to make a post! Anything that could get more artists to participate is always welcome and I'm usually lurking so if you need any help I'll try to assist!

No. 1844576

File: 1704764951704.gif (986.84 KB, 490x370, 404519e1aebb63251770e5d882d7f0…)

>>1844471
The biggest con a thread event is that any activity on the board instantly attracts retards and retard who can't stop responding to them alike. This is why I suspect people left 4chan and moved all events and general activity to their discord.

More importantly, Why are we discussing /cgsg/? We can just make a similar draw thread here. People spent a great deal of this thread lamenting about 4chan shit but there never seems to be any takers on making anything of ourselves, which is even funnier because I remember when a regular anon from /cgsg/ advertised here once and you catty bitches got big mad because they said foid jokingly so you guys ignored the invite to cry about a word instead. Don't bitch about the next chick's nest when yours is just 3 twigs and an egg.

No. 1844587

>>1844576
Are we finally making our own cute guy thread? We already have an art rate thread on media but a male focus thread would be nice.

No. 1844591

>>1844587
anons are just going to spam the thread with their paul dano ocs and get angry when they get called out for drawing ugly moids

No. 1844595

>>1844591
Who fucking cares, it's retarded to expect everyone to have the same taste. But having our own thread is better than nothing.

No. 1844598

>>1844595
but the problem with cgsg is that no one posts cute men anymore, its been infested with rat ocs, fatties and uggos. So why make yet another ugly moid containment?

No. 1844603

>>1844591
>>1844598
>already shooting down the ideas
like i said before don't bitch about the next chick's nest when yours is just 3 twigs and an egg.

No. 1844605

>>1844598
I don't think those artists would even know if we started a thread here.

No. 1844607


No. 1844612

>>1844603
Make the thread and link it if you make it anon, this isn't the first time the want for our own space has been brought up.

No. 1844662

>>1844612
There isn't a need for a new post your art thread when nobody uses the one we already have. This website is just too slow.

No. 1844677

>>1844576
It is true that the moment anything fun happens schizos and co. come to shit it up, but if people want to hold events in-thread then they should feel welcome to, and I have nothing against potentially seeing more cute guy art.
A /cgsg/ here would be nice but like >>1844662 said people don't seem to post much of their own art already. Maybe we can get something going if we all contribute, worse case it fails but best case we can get a successful art thread.

No. 1844679

>>1844605
This board has paul dano and ugly forbidden man threads. They also just finished seething over women not wanting to see their ugly post wallscrotes. They are obviously selfish pricks that want to shove their disgusting fetishes into places they dont belong. They are like the female equivalent of when moids shove their femboy sissy shit into yaoi tags.

No. 1844692

If you want to make a /cbsg/ here i am all for it, because i know the drama will be glorious. I bet it would last like 3 posts until a old man fucker who cries about waah my censorship when a woman asks them not to post their senile tub of lard calls an anon into drawing cute bishies a pedo for not drawing ''real men'', as it happens every time we give the time of day to ugly moid fuckers and try to coexist alongside them.

No. 1844702

>>1844692
>>1844679
I can already tell you are going to be one of the people who won't be drawing in the thread.

No. 1844711

File: 1704771475407.png (51.25 KB, 743x424, ugly coping moid.png)

>>1844702
Posting my cute husbandos alongside tub of lards and 30yo post wall moids would be an insult to my husbandos. It would only diminish their value since ''cute male'' means nothing anymore and it feels dirty to have them be on the same thread as uggos. I would betray my core beliefs of NEVER uplifting the ego of an ugly moid. Cute men, even if 2D, dont deserve to coexist on the same realm as disgusting scrotes. People like you is why men are so ugly nowadays, you are literally pic rel.

No. 1844719

Damn didn't know me posting how I liked that husbandi dakimakura would create such a shit storm, literally just posted it and left. I'm very sorry everyone from the bottom of my heart

No. 1844720

File: 1704771748038.png (3.05 MB, 2073x1038, IMG_2600.png)

>>1844434
Can anyone recommend any other artists similar to suzumesakiii or picrel who paint in a similar style? It’s like oil/acrylic/impasto painting, but digital and in anime form. It uses thick stokes with visible edges and it uses lots of dark and vibrant colors. Idk if there is a name for this style, but it’s style goals for me.

No. 1844722

>>1843734
The fake news nonna who said all the men are kicked out but the January artist is definitely a white moid from las

No. 1844725

>>1844722
we kicked out all the femboy troons but the pickmes had to accept them back again, as always we have to trelinquish our spaces to moids and women with shit taste.

No. 1844726

File: 1704771950061.jpg (251 KB, 650x1684, E401zk-1680988521287553025-202…)

Made the /cgsg/ thread, let's see how this plays out, sisters.
>>>/m/347403
>>>/m/347403
>>>/m/347403

No. 1844731

>>1844726
start by posting your cuteboys first, OP

No. 1844734

>>1844711
Kinda curious about your cute husbandos ngl.
Like, is it any character past 30 ng or is it a matter of face?

No. 1844735

>>1844720
did we get invaded by tiktok nefags? that looks like the most generic anime painting style i have ever seen

No. 1844736

>>1844734
>is it any character past 30 ng or is it a matter of face?
they have to look old, obviously a 45yo shotabait wouldnt count. Or something like >>1843841 that looks no different from a generic high school bishie.

No. 1844743

>>1844736
I see. What about facial hair, like they look young but with a moustache?

No. 1844747

>>1844743
i dont like facial hair but when its done tastefully like >>1844420 its not annoying i am talking about monstrosities like >>1843579 >>1842969

No. 1844754

>>1844726
>Made the /cgsg/ thread
Why? I bet there are only like four or five nonas who actually draw, the rest will create unnecessary drama instead of contributing to the thread.

No. 1844761

>>1844754
How did we manage to have 50 general art threads if only 4 of us draw

No. 1844769

>>1844754
autism, op doesnt draw either that why she didnt post first. I would post my boys but i dont want them to be contaminated by uggos.

No. 1844778

>>1844769
bitch can't stop complaining about "cute boys" and "uggos" but won't even show if she is actually competent at actually drawing them kek.

No. 1844789

>>1844778
start yourself, you made the thread.

No. 1844794

>>1844778
>>1844789
Check the thread you bakas

No. 1844795

>>1844794
oh you are that sperg from cgsg, makes sense

No. 1844799

>>1844795
I'm not the op or poster I just meant stop complaining about there not being a first post when there already was one.

No. 1844803

>>1844789
it wasn't me retard, anyone who is able to rub two braincells together can see the only thing you are capable of is complaining, I'm sure your art is shit and you are fat

No. 1844807

>>1844799
i dont see the point of a cbsg here then, literally go to ic kek if we arent going to start bullying the uggo posters whats the point they can post on cbsg

No. 1844810

>>1844807
No uggos are here yet. Be the change you want to see, go post your art.

No. 1844818

>>1844810
make a rule to not post uggos and i will

No. 1844835

>>1844818
But if no uggos are allowed how will you post anon?

No. 1844862

File: 1704776138195.png (129.96 KB, 774x891, your_turn.png)

>>1844795
not me lol damn you look stupid right now.
>>1844789
>>1844769
>>1844818
>>1844807
Your turn. You can't because you don't draw and you are too busy walking back your bluff like a dumb bitch.

No. 1844874

>>1844862
pfft I love your confidence.

No. 1844894

>>1844874
So where's yours?

No. 1844907

nonnies i have one of the most basic, retarded questions ever and i'm sure it's been answered before: how do you get yourself to draw again. i used to draw constantly then i hit 20 and now i spend more time thinking about drawing than actually doing it.

No. 1844914

>>1844862
here some quick sketch made in an hour https://litter.catbox.moe/wpm1fd.png
proceed to shit on it
>inb4 he's ugly
he's from a franchise that's extremely popular with women cope

No. 1844916

File: 1704779219958.jpg (425.59 KB, 1205x900, s5PBN0i.jpg)

I won $1000+ prize at an art competition. Out of interest in keeping privacy, I won't post the painting. Picrel is a painting by one of my favorite artists Alexandra Levasseur
wanted to distract from the weeb shit
>>1844907
For me I have to be in the right mood (i.e. creative). Being in school (regular uni) I get so overwhelmed by work that I lose the energy to make anything, and when I do it is very sparse—like once or twice a year sparse! But lately I've been making more art than I have since COVID. What gets me extra creative is listening to music—beside a window—at night, with dim lighting. I also enjoy letting in a bit of a breeze or dropping a few essential oils into a diffuser; in other words, a very zen atmosphere for creating.

No. 1844926

>>1844914
>litter.catbox
it's pedoshit so i don't like but alteast you posted your work.

Still waiting for the other sperg(s) to there's. Something tells me it's their bedtime so they got sleep all of the sudden kek

No. 1844928

>>1844926
>pedoshit
lol i knew it. Anything that isnt post wall roidpig is pedoshit for you people. But waah waaah how dare you call postwall pigs ugly.

No. 1844929

>>1844914
NTA, but that's a pretty good art, anon

No. 1844933

>>1844907
i felt like this too. What helped me is making a list of all the things i want to draw, including anime i like, aesthetics, characters, etc. It made me feel motivated to know exactly what to focus on. Also if you can find a franchise you are really into(if you are into fanart) that's also really helpfuls. I started by drawing GUP fanart and then moved onto different things. That or finding an artist you like and doing mastercopies.

No. 1844949

>>1844916
Damn, congratulations nonna! I love the colors of the painting you posted. I mostly draw on my tablet and sometimes I do watercolors, oil paintings are something very alien but amazing to me.

No. 1844951

>>1844928
My sister in christ. You spent the better half of this thread screaming about ugly ogres and what women liked only to show up with some shrimp dick pedoshit with links to match. At least the uggo scrote enjoyers like men. You are so deep into your terminal internet porn addiction that you forgot that most people aren't into fucking kids.

No. 1844955

File: 1704783555524.png (166.71 KB, 329x814, aira.png)

>>1844951
>pedoshit
how the fuck is aira pedoshit you dumb retard, is any men that isnt 6ft hairy and 60yo pedoshit to you?. See what i mean? old man fuckers are repulsive pickmes, they want you to find ugly old men attractive, dont you dare finding young fit skinny men cute you must be a pedo otherwise! so tired of you. Also, post your ''men''.

No. 1844960

>>1844955
nta but i mean….isn't he like 15? like who you like but its true he's just one step above shota

No. 1844961

>>1844955
nta and I’m not even a husbandofag but I mean he’s canonically, what, 15? and looks it. not gonna shame but most anons will probably prefer characters that don’t look borderline shota

No. 1844962

>>1844960
kek wtf anon, we typed almost the exact same thing.

No. 1844963

>>1844962
nonnie-to-nonnie telepathic communication is real…

No. 1844964

>>1844961
>>1844960
oh my god you were twitterfags all along it makes so much sense now.

No. 1844965

I want to see the twitterfags ugly moids now kek i wonder how many pronouns and mento illnes they have

No. 1844966

>>1844964
Don’t use twitter, and this is my first time in this thread. So not sure what you’re talking about, sorry. I just inserted myself into the conversation.

No. 1844968

File: 1704784125868.png (180.07 KB, 270x844, nito.png)

>>1844966
>waaah le poor 15yo animu boy literally pedophilia!11!
you sure arent a twitter fag, i totes belive you kek. is nito better then? he's 19 and looks exactly the same. It makes me glad that genshit and ES are extremely popular with women, it almost makes up for all the post wall uggos they push in the west

No. 1844972

>>1844949
Thanks! I also do lots of iPad drawing, in addition to watercolors (one of my personal favorites), oils, and acrylics.

No. 1844973

>>1844968
>and looks it. not gonna shame
I literally said I don’t care. I’m just telling you why no other nonas think he’s sexy because he looks like a young boy and that’s a little more niche. No need to get all upset.

No. 1844974

>>1844964
>>1844965
>>1844968
Stop masturbating to teenagers.

No. 1844976

>>1844964
Im an enstarsfag myself, I'm just saying its no surprise some nonas call it pedoshit because some boys do look just like that: boys. I never said there was anything wrong with liking him

No. 1844977

>>1844973
>more niche
kek holy shit the cope Ensemble Stars is not niche. Your ugly postwall moids on the other hands are extremly unpopular with normal women or women with taste.
>>1844976
they dont look like little boys you retard, otherwise it wouldnt be so popular. Same for genshit, oldman fuckers be coping hard today.

No. 1844978

also i have yet to see the ugly moid fuckers post their art, guess rules for thee but not for me

No. 1844979

>>1844964
You are clearly so insecure. Nobody cares you have a 15-16 old husbando lol it’s just weirdo. Anybody who is not social media rotted would think it’s weird.

No. 1844980

>>1844977
I’m saying liking characters that look very young is more niche than liking adult-looking ones. I don’t give a fuck about postwall moids or whatever you’re talking about, I’m a lesbian. I literally told you I just got here, I’m not the previous anons.

No. 1844981

>>1844979
yeah sure thats why enstar is waaaay more popular than your ugly old moids. but''uwu women like oldpigs''
>>1844980
>i am a lesbian
leave no one cares about your opinion

No. 1844984

>>1844977
Please develop a thicker skin. If you like 15 year olds, at least own it instead of chimping out when someone says they don't like your husbando

No. 1844985

For fucks sake, this thread is in shambles. screaming her head off about uggos and cute boys for the entire day when she could've been grinding her fundies to post her own cute boys kek. By all means, set the example, but if you're gonna bitch and whine about it all day, you've wasted your time.

Get good at being the change you wanna see or cry into your overdesigned same faced bland boy genshin dakis.

No. 1844986

File: 1704784648552.jpg (460.79 KB, 2000x1360, etxC4yy.jpg)

Another favorite of mine from a painter called Tom Thomson (he's already ded)
I've always been more into the surreal and unnatural like in Levasseur's work, but I deeply admire Thomson's ability to encapsulate the beauty of a landscape with only a few paints—mind you, he was not classically trained. Picrel is particularly wonderful for the juxtaposition of cool and warm tones, an earthy palette against light and pallid aether holy fuck you weebs are retarded go shit up another thread

No. 1844989

>>1844984
>develop a thick skin
you are the one who was defending the honor of 30yo+ moids because i called them old(because they are) your taste being called shit is way less daming that being called a pedophile for daring to like cute anime boys instead of roidpigs. It's funny because i talked about it in the thread how ugly olf moid fuckers are extremely sensitive and will cry pedo at any male character that isnt super old and decrepit.
>>1844985
i posted my art, yet oldman fuckers havent hmmmm. pyw btw.

No. 1844990

>>1844989
I’m curious as to how old this anon is. Not arguing, just wondering

No. 1844991

>>1844977
You sound like one of those redpill podcasters, femcel version. Share your story pedoanon, who is the boy who ignored you in 12th grade.

No. 1844992

Report and ignore

No. 1844996

>grandpafucker get criticized
>Waaah how dare you say my taste is shit you are like a moid waaah you sound like a basement dweller
>post one generic anime boy from a franchise that's popular with women
>pedophile!! who hurt you? lol you are such a femcel!!!

lol. everytime. oldman fuckers are so mentally ill.(infighting)

No. 1844997

File: 1704785202930.gif (359.13 KB, 200x200, 1000013227.gif)

Wait, is this multiple olderhusbandofags arguing with only one younghusbandofag? Or is this multiple olderhusbandofags arguing with multiple younghusbandofag? I noticed that this went on for a day.

No. 1844998

File: 1704785207167.png (2.56 MB, 1200x1500, 1702075c21360ee751d424654c479d…)

>>1844989
>you are the one who was defending the honor of 30yo+ moids
my taste is literally the exact same as yours retard, im just not insecure about it like you are

No. 1845001

>>1844998
i am not insecure about it, but being called a pedophile over liking a generic animu boy is way more damming that telling someone they have shit taste for liking old men. It's what i hate about grandpafuckers, they just proved my point that they cry about censorship and ''let women have their tastes uwu'' but they are pickmes at core that cant understand women liking pretty boys instead of ugly old men.(infighting)

No. 1845002

stop fighting because of men who are not even fucking you or paying for your shit, yall are so fucking pathetic, just shut the hell up

No. 1845005

>>1844986
Studying paintings really made me understand color theory so much better. It's impressive how we perceive colors related to each other, rather then how they look by themselves in a white bg. I always struggled to come up with interesting palettes that still make real life look like real life and not some drug induced vision.

No. 1845006

>>1845001
It's time to shower and stop roaming around high schools.

No. 1845009

and? where are grandpafucker's grandpas at? i love how they shitted and cried over their 2D moids being called old, but then they throw the word pedophile at someone they dislike like its a quirky funny insult and not a real accusation of something severe that has lead to people losing their jobs. It proves my point grandpafuckers are deeply insecure over women who arent brainwashed into liking older men by grandpaganda. It also means they are worse artists than me which, lol, it's quite an insult considering my art is high beg at best.(infighting)

No. 1845010

>>1845005
Indeed. The way I look at it is that every color and shape is its own separate existence, and they each fit into each other like a puzzle. The colors and shapes do not try to fight one another.

No. 1845011

>>1845009
Confused as to where anyone mentioned pedophilia but you

No. 1845012

>>1845011
here >>1844926 >>1844951

No. 1845017

>>1845009
Anon why do you like teenagers who are not fully developed yet.

No. 1845020

>>1844914
>>1845009
She deleted her art but this is the same retard that was fighting in /cgsg/ after they kicked the pedophiles to the curb a few months back, she wants to act like she not a pedo but what was posted a kid in booty shorts, and a belly shirt FYI

https://i.warosu.org/data/ic/img/0068/51/1695814546474735.png
https://i.warosu.org/data/ic/img/0068/51/1695761651164579.png
https://i.warosu.org/data/ic/img/0068/51/1695756029473644.png
>filename: sex with presto sex with wilikat sex with wally.png

No. 1845022

>>1845020
we dont even use the same brushes kek, holy shit the cope

No. 1845026

File: 1704786544813.png (976.31 KB, 640x800, aira buu.png)

>>1845022
also here is the art reuped so you can check thats not me https://files.catbox.moe/wjoh8f.png

No. 1845029

>>1845026
>>1845020
it's not looking good, nona…

No. 1845031

>>1845029
prove its me. I dont even post in cbsg i post on beg, you can find my beg drawings of ES there. Also, grandpafuckers still havent posted work i see.(USER HAS BEEN PUT OUT TO PASTURE)

No. 1845034

>>1845022
>>1845026
>>1845031
Nice cope but it looks the same lmao
https://files.catbox.moe/ommxin.PNG
>reposted pedoshit without the litter link
Feeling the heat aren't you pedophile?(taking shit bait)

No. 1845035

>>1845034
>looks the same
just because its animeshit?

No. 1845037

It's funny because if aira had mid titties he would be a generic waifushit and no one would care, but he's a pretty boy and women arent allowed to like men that dont look like they drink 50 shots of vodka a day.

No. 1845038

>>1845031
I never said I was going to post it, and even if I was a million times better you'd still hate it so there's no point.
I sorta don't want to post my art on this website anyway. It's too slow and will stay on the servers forever.
Even though /ic/ is archived it isn't consistent.

No. 1845039

>>1845038
post it through a litter box then. It's funny how all of you call me pedo and all but dont have the ovaries to post a sketch through a litterbox link. I did my shitty sketch in like an hour.

No. 1845046

kek this has been a great read

youngcuteboy-enjoyer, I'm curious about your thoughts on monsterfuckers/monsterous-husbando-havers and their artistic endeavours? are they as bad as the uggo-enjoyers you rail against, or are they whatever since (I assume) they don't turn up as much in your animu boys' tags?

No. 1845047

>>1845046
no, monster husbandos arent annoying. I have a monsterhusbandofag friend and she's cool, i only ever had problem with grandpafucker and their superiority complex and calling everyon who isnt into post wall men pedos.

No. 1845048

>>1845047
When is the wall? Is there a precise timeframe

No. 1845050

>>1845047
I wasn't really involved in this fight, but yeah I think it's stupid when youngcuteboy-enjoyers get called pedos. I don't think you're a pedo, nonnie. I don't even know how this whole infight even started.

No. 1845051

>>1845048
30 for men, thats when their sperms deteriorate, they get bald, settle down to have babies etc etc. I dont think women hit the walls and thats why moids didnt have to get psyoped to find older women attractive.

No. 1845053

>>1845048
nta but men are already expired in the womb, which is why I'll never touch one

No. 1845054

>>1845051
also, that's just statistically. personally i dont like 3DPD moids, not even actors, but i am tired of seeing the ugliest mf in fiction like asstarion

No. 1845056


No. 1845058

>>1845056
Jesus you are insane. I am not your boogeyman.

No. 1845061

>>1845056
Wait, is that Bill Dickey in there? Well whoever drew that probably did the Eltingvillefags a favor.

No. 1845062

File: 1704789737328.jpeg (106.24 KB, 1280x1440, EjxnLNNU0AADNzH.jpeg)

>>1845058
maybe you shouldn´t have taken there art here to start your little shitfest, no one cares about your hateboner for these other bitches

No. 1845063

>>1845056
So if I'm gathering everything correctly, uggonona got mad that shota got banned from the threads, tried to hijack them, and then harbored a vendetta enough to scream about it here months later under the guise of being mad at "uggos"?

For fucks sake >>1845058 just let it go.

No. 1845064

>>1845056
Anon…i think you have autism all of those styles are widely different

No. 1845069

What the fuck happened? Wasn't this the art discussion thread?
You all claim to hate moids but coom to fictional moids. Fucking hypocrites. You go drooling retard when you see underage animu boys. No difference from trannies who spit hate on women and go jerk off underage animu girls.

No. 1845073

Its funny how you keep accusing me of being a shotafag when i dont even draw shota. But for grandpafuckers any men with less wrinkles than astarion is instantly shota.

No. 1845079

>>1843283
Fanart really does a lot of the heavy lifting for these guys.

But side note, it is true that women can easily be won over by a male character with a less than ideal appearance if he has an interesting personality or fulfills an archetype/trope that they like. Maybe it’s partly psyop, maybe it’s partly women thinking more about what kind of “experience” they could have with a guy rather than pure looks. Personality just makes better fantasy fuel than smooth skin. When I watched ATSV I didn’t even care about Miguel until he started acting fucking insane.

No. 1845082

>>1844989
>>1845001
>>1845009
This anon is both unhinged but so insanely based for losing it on grandpafucker accusing women of being """antifeminist""" for not liking geriatric men to the point he next accuses her of being some random pedoposter from 4chan since nothing else sticks kek, pedo accusations are the crutch of the weak

No. 1845083

>>1845079
That's a modern fad. In my days women used to lust after link even though he had the personality of wet cardboard. But we also dont get pretty boys anymore.

No. 1845092

>>1845063
No, anon made a post about how much she hates seeing ugly moid fanart of her anime bishies and (pretty clearly in a tongue in cheek way) said that it should be tagged to avoid jumpscares and some autist started fighting her about how she's an antifeminist neckbeard pedophile for preferring cute anime boys over hideous wrinkly dick due to the "women should have the capacity to look past the surface to what's inside" psyop meme. When anon didn't budge the sperg began accusing her of being a pedophile, specifically some shotacon from 4chan even though the art linked as "proof" looks way more incompetent in quality than what original anon posted as her work. And now when "you're just like scrotes" and "you're actually a pedo" didn't work in shutting her up they're going with tranny accusations next kek >>1845069

No. 1845093

has this just turned into the fandom thread? I come in expecting like some huge juicy art drama given the amount of posts and it's the same husbando shit again. This site fails the bechdel test hard. Stop thinking about men all the time(contributing to derailing)

No. 1845156

>>1845079
I think a lot of women in fandoms find male characters with more exaggerated personalities (and other design aspects) attractive in general, but a lot of those who would fall into the 'tumblrsexyman' category are basically the male equivalent of manic pixie dream girls. They look funky and weird, have strong, easy to predict personality quirks (even if the quirk is being cartoonishly 'unpredictable') that would liven up your day and are usually powerful/dangerous in a safe way. Not my cup of tea, but I do understand the appeal (especially for younger women/girls). Plus if someone finds the character design too uggo in canon they can just walk it back into looking more bishie or whatever if they want.

Back on the topic of art though, does anyone have advice for getting into landscape/plein-air sketching/painting? I'm fine with figures, both human and animal, but I feel so intimidated trying to do environments– particularly foliage.

No. 1845158

File: 1704803052912.jpg (Spoiler Image,181.37 KB, 1170x1863, Stacy art.jpg)

Some TIFs are boolying a russian stacy for shitting on fat men kek

No. 1845160

File: 1704803246872.jpg (41.8 KB, 951x589, stacy comment.jpg)


No. 1845162

File: 1704803410562.png (229.85 KB, 612x615, jealous tif.png)

>>1845160
callout post

No. 1845165

File: 1704803716071.png (Spoiler Image,3.17 MB, 1725x1841, tifart collage.png)

>>1845162
finally a collage of the tif's horrendous art, she should stop calling out women and instead grind her fundies ew. She's also accusing the russian artist of using AI. They are grasping at straws to take that poor artist down and cancell her.

No. 1845181

>>1845160
based
>>1845165
maybe it/xze/qwe should try AI, it would save xir/its/qwert "art" kek

No. 1845182

>>1845165
there's a lot wrong and ugly going on here but I am so distracted by top left's pasty guy's leg kek

>>1845162
also yeah, a lesser twitter artist going after a more skilled one, a tale as old as time (only interesting thing imo is what the tif is claiming as ai usage, since that's becoming a popular way to talk shit about artists regardless of if they use ai or not)

No. 1845184

>>1845165
As much as I love big beefy men those look fucking disgusting and the way they draw body hair disturbs me because it looks like they have pubes all over their bodies

No. 1845186

>>1845181
i dont think AI can fix a terminal case of shit taste

No. 1845196

>>1845001
Sage for blog but
I had to break off a relationship with a friend where we had this dynamic. I like young anime men (not shotas, just fit young men with no facial hair) and my one friend called me a pedo for it. I thought it was a joke, and it kinda was, so I just rubbed with her over it and I’d also poke fun at her old man fetish. she started doing it around my other friends. I asked her to stop and it’s not funny to other people and is a serious accusation to just throw around like that, even as a joke. She threw a fit and went on a rant about how much she hated being friends with women and how men are better at everything and we haven’t spoken since.

No. 1845206

>>1845196
I guess anyone over 20 is a grandpa to you

No. 1845216

>>1845206
nta but men will never pick you(derailing)

No. 1845220

>>1845216
I don't really like old men, but you have been samefagging for hours its so easy to tell which posts are yours at this point. stop shitting up the thread with your cope you fucking schizo.(contributing to derailing)

No. 1845224

>>1845220
You are unhinged, not everyone who disagrees with you is samefagging. Anon didnt even say anything against old men.

No. 1845226

>>1845206
The men I like are in their 20s and she was literally into grandpas 55+. It’s just so related to this thread’s topic I had to say something. I’m not antiuglychan.(USER HAS BEEN PUT OUT TO PASTURE)

No. 1845232

this thread is just full of mental illness, stop derailing it already.(contributing to derailing)

No. 1845236

>>1845232
Women get called out all the time in art spaces for drawing the men their like and setting aesthetic boundaries, this literally just happened >>1845158 getting called a pedo just for drawing men in their 20s is so common nowadays it deserves to be discussed.

No. 1845245

>>1845236
A spergfest is not a discussion.

No. 1845248

File: 1704809881301.jpg (274.4 KB, 800x1220, Cincinnati_Fall_Festival,_Sept…)

Instead of sperging about your husbandos, go draw something. Post art.

No. 1845254

>>1845248
Damn, what a beautiful poster

No. 1845307

File: 1704813429761.jpg (363.55 KB, 1427x1183, 12.jpg)

>>1845056(USER HAS BEEN PUT OUT TO PASTURE)

No. 1845406

>>1845156
This guy does a lot of environments and I actually really like how he explains. Made me see environments in a different perspective.

No. 1845459

>>1845158
based. i hate fat fucks and "dad bods" so much it's unreal.

No. 1845465

What are some nice characters design videos or course's out there? I've heard good things about rinotuna but I would love to know more sources since personally I don't like his style

No. 1845587

>>1845158
>>1845160
>>1845162
Even if she hadn't posted her opinions she would've been called out, i think it was in a previous thread (or maybe some other thread) but a black artist got called out for something and she apologized but the people who called her out were absolute shit at drawing, the kind of twitter user to retweet a controversy about some artist with examples of their "much better!1!" drawings that look like melting blobs

No. 1845597

Nonas, how do I grind on fundamentals on digital art? My trad art is good, but on digital art I feel like I can only draw shit animu… Not only that but my rendering sucks kek. And following pinterest tutorials on digital drawing and rendering makes me feel like I’m going nowhere. I just want to draw my husbandos well…

No. 1845624

>>1844677
No skilled artist wants to post on lolcow because they most likely have an established presence somewhere online and it would be social death to get caught posting on here. Hence all the beginner artists exclusively populating the post your own art threads. >>1845165
kekkk TiF-drawn erotica always has that terrible traced directly from porn look. revolting.

No. 1845717

File: 1704843091466.jpg (57.99 KB, 592x680, Fq89SpqWYAAfH-g.jpg)

this never stops making me laugh

No. 1845719

>>1845717
That art makes me so fucking mad to this day

No. 1845725

>>1845165
>>1845624
>TiF-drawn erotica always has that terrible traced directly from porn look.
It really does and I have no idea why. Every time it's completely void of sensuality and eroticism, it just looks like redrawn porn screenshots. I've seen women make even the most obscene fetishes look attractive but these people would make vanilla missionary look like a wikihow illustration.

No. 1845729

>>1845597
digital is not actually easier to do, it can be very counter-intuitive at first but what it offers is much more versatility and low stakes for making errors. Just like any other medium, you have to adapt and get used to it.

You should just do a daily routine of live drawing, figure drawing and master studies, just with digital. Its really not much more complicated.

I feel you may be overrating your trad art skill too. I mean if you know anatomy why would a digital drawing have bad anatomy? if you know it you know it.

As a general tip, lasso tool is your best friend , always flip canvas, and learn to get to most out of actions and custom hotkeys.

No. 1845734

>>1845725
It's because they're American (grew up with garbage art education) so they depend on references to the pixel. There's always that brand of SFW art made by TiFs that look traced too, it's the same crowd.

No. 1845738

>>1845729
Honestly I wouldn’t say it’s bad anatomy per se, it’s like a weird mental block when I draw on the tablet? And yep I may probably be overating my trad art skills lol. Anyway there is nothing else to do other than practicing like u said. Thanks for the advice and suggestions!!!

No. 1845744

>>1845717
This reminds me that I wanted to go reread her KF thread KEK
>>1845597
It will help you to play around with various brushes, tools, and effects on your drawing app of choice, and to be able to recreate the feel of a setting when you draw from life (or an image). When I am creating realistic portrait-type paintings I generally use just a single brush, only adjusting the size if needed; I will emphasize for those types of paintings that the airbrush effect generally cheapens the overall visual quality and can act as a shortcut for novice digital artists who don't understand how color and tone interact in creating shadows or other variations in shade. It's better to get a feel for the different brushes, what kinds of effects you can achieve with them, and be able to pick which one(s) you prefer—then your choices can become more liberal as you add intention to your design. You will just need to keep practicing. Good luck!

No. 1845748

>>1845738
don't be afraid to use every tool at your disposal. gradient maps, Layer modes, adjustment layers and clipping masks are great but i would cut back on them while doing studies and try to get the most out of observation.

I usually prefer to keep studies in the low layer counts, even just one layer, you can also try to do practices where you erase and ctrol z as little as possible, kinda like trad drawing with only an ink pen except you don't even have to worry about paper or wasting supplies, digital art has zero stakes, make as many mistake as you want, that is truly the benefit of digital.

No. 1845873

>>1845729
What is the lasso tool used for specifically?

No. 1845890

>>1845873
i've seen artists use it for getting sharp and defined shapes it looks like it hels with rendering and the dimension of the drawing but idk

No. 1846213

File: 1704859749749.png (38.64 KB, 758x317, the fucking irony.png)

>>1845158
the russian girl protected her account due to the harassment. I hope she doesnt lose her job due to these retards. Meanwhile the tif who started the witch hunt is calling her homophobic for drawing yaoi, the fucking irony kek. This always happens to women. Moids will witch hunt and doxx women who dare to feel uncomfortable at big titty videogame girl number 1000, but god forbid a woman says fat pigs are disgusting, because a horde of pickmes will jump in to defend men's feefees.

No. 1846286

File: 1704862261531.jpg (8.47 KB, 210x110, 1735708aad31372dacdd8a68435148…)


No. 1846293

>>1846286
magic the gatherinc and wizards of the coast is so fucking shit. A few years ago they fired a lesbian artist for saying men cant be lesbians.

No. 1846321

File: 1704864048470.jpg (368.16 KB, 696x1100, jealousy.jpg)

>check their profile
>99% of it are memes with some shitty trad drawings that arent even scanned

No. 1846322

>>1846286
Why'd you use a photo for ants?

No. 1846325

>>1846321
It's a John Cena joke anon

No. 1846330

>>1845158
based good artist, and it's annoying how artists who aren't even english speaking get shit on out of the blue by tranny twitter. they should just stay in their damn ugly cunt boy spheres.

No. 1846337

>>1846330
they should focus their witch hunt on men, but they are deeply jealous pickmes above all else

No. 1846338

Kind of want to start posting terrible fujo art for fun but am kind of dreading attracting attention from minors and trannies. How bad of an idea is it to start a Twitter account for this? I never draw fan art normally but fandom stuff seems insanely cancerous on Twitter.

No. 1846340

>>1846338
just block them or troll them. We genuinely need more based female artists.

No. 1846410

>>1845725
>void of sensuality and eroticism
I think a part of this is because they're pretty much always the types to be trying to engage in activism through their porn drawings, so yeah they are both sticking too heavily to their references while also trying to tack on a bunch of physical traits that just don't match (eg reference is of two lean, athletic guys fucking, gets converted into a pudgy tif and dadbod extraordinaire bumping uglies) and not having the artistic skill to actually make those changes look organic. It must be hard to include a sense of flow and plain intimacy in your art when you're doing that, and the performative nature of it all can't help either.

Oh there's also the desire to depict things as 'realistic' and therefore grungy and including grosser/unappealing details too, which I've seen quite a few of these people proudly talk about in regards to their art.

No. 1846417

>>1846213
are any actual men even bothered by the russian lady's art? I almost never see real men going on these crusades against artists, only other women/female gendies (not saying it doesn't happen ofc, my experience with this stuff is always in regards to yaoi/male character focused artists or POC infighting etc). The tif in question probably only got rattled because the russian artist is better/more popular/is outspoken, and because she feels personally attacked because she's fat and 'a man'.

No. 1846420

>>1846417
its peak female socialization to care about men's feelings. Men only get angry and harass women when their fetishes are targetted.

No. 1846425

>>1846420
>>1846417
Tifs that whine about male body shaming aren’t even defending men, they’re defending themselves. Let’s be real, all that “I love chumby men with silly tummies!” talk is for their own low self esteem. I can count number of het fit/ana tifs that regularly wax poetic about fatass men on one hand. Manhood is supposed to be the magical land of never being judged ever again by meanie women. A woman that openly talks about preferring fit men triggers the same neurons as being picked on for being the only girl wearing a t-shirt at the pool does.

No. 1846426

>>1846425
she draws fat men and only fat men though, she was obviously offended on behalf of her fetish.

No. 1846452

File: 1704883211054.jpg (236.27 KB, 1080x1382, 1000013252.jpg)

Am I the only who thinks this reaction is kinda overblown? I really don't see what would be wrong with redrawing this one manga panel, it's the same as redrawing Sasuke being strangled for example. The poster sounds like a zoomer who has no idea images are turning into memes randomly.

No. 1846461

>>1846452
turning anything into a ship meme is such a fucking cringe western trend

No. 1846462

>>1846461
Ayrt and I agree but she wrote her post like she was talking about holy scriptures or something, it sounds so dramatic.

No. 1846465

>>1846462
its common courtesy to respect an artist's wishes, if the artist didnt want anyone reposting the pic without her permission she should be allowed to call them out

No. 1846466

>>1846452
If anything, the meme helped the author since it has caused more people to actually know the manga (specially now that it's about to release in the US from what I have heard).

No. 1846467

>>1846452
You don't need to pay to read Veil, almost everything is posted on Kotteri's twitter page first and then compiled into books (as long as you understand Japanese though). She got the book deal after her art became super popular on twitter and she started posting her OCs in 2017.

No. 1846472

>>1846461
The Japanese do it all the time. Tell me you don't follow Asian artists or speak their language without telling me

No. 1846479

>>1846472
no, they dont. Just because they did it once over 10 years ago doesnt mean they are constantly looking to turn anything into memes like western artists.

No. 1846506

>>1846472
Japanese people don’t ship much. It’s usually Americans.(bait)

No. 1846527

>>1846506
Have you not been to pixiv?

No. 1846529

File: 1704889487510.jpg (150.96 KB, 1600x900, cover7.jpg)

>>1846479
Most pose memes I can think of were extremely popular with japanese artists, especially coomshit ones like picrel or the jack-o challenge.

No. 1846533

>>1846529
i was talking specifically about ship memes, which japanese artists dont do because they are cringe as shit

No. 1846546

>>1846533
NTA but regardless if its about shipping or not, drawing characters over random pics is the same, both are memes and reduce the character to a single trait (who they migh not even have and just pasted it onto the pic because its trendy)

No. 1846552

>>1846506
This has to be bait

No. 1846553

>>1846533
The delusional moid weebs in this thread I fucking swear. They were all over the famous kabedon ship meme a few years ago and have done multiple others since.

No. 1846563

File: 1704892089581.jpg (348.82 KB, 1622x2247, mery__S2_-1661035520586289154-…)

>>1846546
i was talking about ship memes specifically because western shipfags are desperate and scrapping the bottom of the barrel to turn anything into a trendy meme to the point its trendy and obnoxious. If the shipfag queen can draw her fucking ship for 10 years without purely relying on meme shit then i dont understand why western artists need to turn something into a trendy meme to draw it. It's so devoid of soul and unoriginal.

No. 1846579

>>1846563
These characters are so boring, why fixate on them for 10 years?

No. 1846585

File: 1704894451697.jpg (314.58 KB, 1700x2543, mery__S2_-1603443130665435136-…)

>>1846579
they are boring to you, but not to her. I think its cute when artists obsses over one single topic and draw it endlessly. I would love more recs of autistic artists, they inspire to draw, unlike the trend chaser tards that abound art twitter nowadays

No. 1846591

File: 1704895054429.jpg (225.78 KB, 1500x2011, F9DEmAtaMAADdei.jpg)

>>1846563
>>1846585
Why does "her" ship art always feel so moidgaze, the focus is always on the girl while the boy is comparable to a background character. And then she draws shit like this.

No. 1846593

>>1846591
self inserting

No. 1846595

>>1846593
But that would be the case if the artist was self-inserting into the male character, not the female one. That's why I asked.

No. 1846599

>>1846595
most women want to be desired because the world was built around men convincing women they have value when they are lusted after. It's not really hard to understand anon, do you live under a rock? there are millions of women drawing moidgaze shit like this

No. 1846601

File: 1704896099642.jpg (117.06 KB, 900x636, CULtB-CUEAABWBV.jpg)

>>1846563
But ship meme poses also come from Japan. They also have kiss/expression templates memes like picrel which also are basically work the same way as a social network drawing fad.

No. 1846603

>>1846601
i have literally never seen these

No. 1846604

>>1846563
>>1846585
>>1846591
>western artists are cringe, japanese ship art is always better!!
>posts the most generic malegaze moeblob shit imaginable

No. 1846606

File: 1704896400175.jpg (111.72 KB, 1200x894, EeV2ueUUMAE1DNi.jpg)

>>1846603
Oh well now you know. There's many of them too because it's been a thing for more than 10 years now.

No. 1846608

>>1846603
Children aren't allowed on lolcow sweaty.

No. 1846609

>>1846603
I see these all the time

No. 1846618

>>1846604
i never said that though. its so funny you cant say anything about cringe western trends itt without anons getting offended over it, it must hurt to get called out.

No. 1846628

>>1846601
love coming across template memes like this, reminds me of the similar format ones that were so popular on DA back in the day kek

No. 1846882

I was looking up an artist and realized the importance of having a personal website for your art. He draws pinups and his art is only on deviantart (need an account to see them) xitter (need an account) and instagram (cropped posts once in a blue moon) I don't have accounts on any of those platforms so I gave up on looking at it. I think every artist should have a website.

No. 1846892

>>1846606
I love Gintama so much.

No. 1846968

>>1846585
>>1846563
Just admit you're a weeb if you really think that generic moeblog stuff is better just because you like the artstyle more. There's plenty of American comics that have such tragic and romantic ships, but you ignore those because you probably don't like reading "ugly comics" like Marvel, DC, Darkhorse, even independent things that aren't legit big comic companies.

Your examples are so telling.

No. 1847008

>>1846968
anon, my comment had nothing to do with romance comics in general, calm down. You are making so many assumptions over me just saying i dislike clout chashing ship templates that are just boring unoriginal shit. My examples was of a ship artist that doesnt need to use dumb clout chasing annoying templates to draw cute ship art. Some of you are in desperate need of psychiatric help if you take everything so goddam personally and everything makes you this angry. Genuinely touch grass.

No. 1847014

File: 1704920814527.png (1.27 MB, 1080x1080, jail meme.png)

>>1847008
And since you seem terminally retarded and butthurt to the point it seems to blur your reading comprehension skills, let me give you an example of annoying as fuck western ship meme trends. I know japanese artists have like 3 ship memes, mostly from like the 00s, but it feels like westerns are desperate to clout chase at every beathing second so these stupid nonsensical ship memes pop out every single week and every time get more and more retarded. They are so flanderized and obviously done because the artist is a clout chaser and creatively bankrupt.

No. 1847019

File: 1704921016873.png (3.92 MB, 2048x2048, image_2024-01-11_081111966.png)

This thread has been sperg general for several days but at least it reminded me to look at the Westaboo art thread.
Miss the days when the sperging was about something substantial.

No. 1847038

File: 1704921617618.jpg (276.69 KB, 1170x1295, nonnies.jpg)

i fucking hate this site now

No. 1847051

>>1847038
Are you the tard sperging about how Asian artists never ever EVER do ship memes because they're ~above~ it kek? You sound like a weeb preaching about how Asian artists are somehow just more authentic than Westerners no matter what. Stop sounding so pretentious and up yourself and maybe you'll stop getting the same shit thrown back at you KEK.

Also >>1847008
>Some of you are in desperate need of psychiatric help if you take everything so goddam personally and everything makes you this angry. Genuinely touch grass.
Take your own advice.(infighting)

No. 1847057

>>1847051
no, i said that turning everything into a ship meme was a cringe western trend. Do you retards even read. The meme examples you gave like the kabedon meme are literally from the 00s, but westerns try to come up with ship memes every week. You cant say anything about western trends anymore without getting accused of being a weeb, when its not about the chinese cartoons looking better or whatever, it's about the huge difference between communities. If i say russian artists are better because they go to schools that actually teach them art instead of learning how to develop 50 mental illnesses will i get called a russian supporter? kek

No. 1847059

>>1847019
Fucking kek what is it about Frollo and people making this kind of art of him, I crack up every time.

No. 1847064

>>1847059
Frollofags are the best, they're so fucking funny intentionally or not

No. 1847065

>>1846452
A drawing meme coming out of someone's comic is free advertising for them and therefore more sales, no? Now if someone was just reposting a snall creator's entire comic for free on the other hand, I'd understand that reaction.

No. 1847074

>>1847065
unpopular opinion but i think if an artist doesnt want their art to become a meme or be reposted it should be respected. In this case the artist asked to get tagged and credited as the original, which makes sense, but a lot of people dont do it when they do drawing memes. I think taking artist's works without permission with the excuse of ''its free advertisement'' or whatever ended up leading to the grey area that allowed AI to be made.

No. 1847083

>>1847065
Kotteri and her manga aren't well known enough for that shitty, lazy meme to advertise her work. The person who kickstarted this thing (in a pretty inorganic way somehow) didn't credit her or said where the art is from in the original post either. It's not like people tracing their favorite characters on their favorite Barbie movie or the Office scene or something so mainstream that you can recognize it without ever actually watching or reading it yourself.

No. 1847086

>>1845056
I thought this post was tinfoil tier shit but watching this obvious samefag keeping running back to /cbsg/ to beat on fat calenrar artist is telling. Good job breaking this idiot.

No. 1847093

>>1847051
I'm almost convinced it's a troll because replying to literally every trend no matter how innocuous or niche it is it's always "GOD WESTERNERS ARE SO CRINGE NIPPONESE ARE SO BASED AND REDPILLED WESTFAGS COULD NEVER" sounds like it but the follow-up autistic replies tells me it's an authentic weeb who never interacts with Asian artists and only browses their art passively on Danbooru. The same shit happens in every artist salt thread and whenever they post examples of "god level art" it's always big titted sameface animu waifus they act ridiculously defensive over. I'm a terminal weeb myself and even I see how absolutely ridiculous this is.

No. 1847096

>>1847057
I fucking hate ship memes and think they're cringe but you're stupid if you think it's an exclusively Western trend. People have given you examples (not just kabedon, others have shared pose memes such as that coomer jack o pose) and I've seen Asian artists drawing that shitty Barbie jail meme too. Just because they're older or not strictly ship memes, it shows that it's not a strictly Western phenomenon.

I hate draw your ship memes and those fugly blobby ship dynamic trends, but this is a result of Western artists being the overwhelming majority on sites like Twitter and thus having a greater amount of insufferable clout chasing autists. It's not a uniquely Western problem and I'm quite frankly tired of people discussing Western vs every other type of artist as if they're from different planets. We're in an age where the internet makes it so we're all connected, all taking inspiration from each other, yet people are convinced that any set of artists from one country are especially unique or better? Yes, there is a culture difference, but more often than not when people praise the technical skill of say, Japanese or Russian artists, that's because what they see on their majority USAmerican Twitter feed is the best of the best. They don't see the depths of Pixiv tags or those who can barely hold a pencil. In the same way there's a lot of actually good Western artists, but when your feed is plagued by nonstop tranny pandering with titchop scars and borderline caricature art styles it's easy to delude yourself into thinking all Western art is shit.

>If i say russian artists are better because they go to schools that actually teach them art instead of learning how to develop 50 mental illnesses will i get called a russian supporter? kek

>Implying the average Russian artist doesn't already have 50 mental illnesses

No. 1847109

>>1847096
>If i say russian artists are better because they go to schools that actually teach them art instead of learning how to develop 50 mental illnesses will i get called a russian supporter? kek
>Implying the average Russian artist doesn't already have 50 mental illnesses
It's funny (and sad) because it's true. The price of growing up in a totalitarian state with some angry Soviet boomer whacking you with a stick every time you draw a line wrong is having 50 mental illnesses and I say this as someone who has met a lot of Russian artists. The same goes for Chinese artists. Amerifats who only hatescroll an endless feed of teenagers and 21-year olds drawing cringe teenage gendie shit because they're too afraid of foreign languages to venture outside their echo chamber and decide western artists are all pozzed garbage based on their narrow view are actual ass cancer.

No. 1847130

>>1847099
>Holy fuck if you don't know kotteri(a published mangaka by now) by now, you're definitely a underdeveloped fetus or being living under a rock.

I'm not anon but I never heard of Kotteri (Ikumi Fukuda) either and after some googling she doesn't really appear to be as famous as you're making her out to be. Her only known piece is Veil which is really only known well in Romance circles.

No. 1847137

File: 1704927254950.png (2.59 MB, 2560x1419, image_2024-01-11_095408632.png)

Even Russians have done that stupid Barbie thing, maybe there's clout chasers in every country or maybe people have free will and want to draw shit even if it's retarded. Shocking.
>>1847099
Literally who? I haven't seen their work before this thread. Just because you like an artist and they have a sizable following doesn't mean everyone suddenly knows them, kek.

No. 1847225

>>1847130
>>1847137
I'm gonna assume the now deleted was replying to me so yeah I can confirm that as a professional arrust she's far from famous and she wasn't even supposed to work in art fulltime because she was drawing for fun at first. I say this as someone who started following her long ago on tumblr for here JJBA art (like 10 years ago I think, she deleted her tumblr long ago too) and who bought all the Veil volumes in French as soon as they got released. She draws for a few manga about war and military but I haven't read them and they're even more niche. I've been her fan for a while but that doesn't mean I'm delusional enough to think everyone knows her.

No. 1847318

>>1847225
it wasn't I'm just sleep deprived and kept tagging the wrong post like a retard it was meant for this>>1846533 but I misremembered posts but I will admit fault when needed. looking back kotteri was niche even back then,and her deleting all her other older accounts doesn't help and most of them weren't in english anyways,But my point about shipping trends being traceable and them not necessarily being a western things stands.

No. 1847386

File: 1704935817988.jpeg (642.71 KB, 1540x1219, 5ABA9C4E-5A07-43AC-B260-287442…)

Is there a paper texture cover for iPad that’s generally recommended amongst artists these days? Someone I follow recently rec’ed this one

No. 1847403

>>1847386
Idk about generally recommended ones, but i'm currently waiting for a magnetic paper cover from aliexpress that can be taken on and off and something like resin tip covers, because the paper texture cover i had ruined my apple pencil tip in a month (also made my hands feel extremely dry), kek. I haven't tried it yet, obviously, but i suggest you might look into something similar

No. 1847458

File: 1704939920090.jpg (780.44 KB, 2100x3000, 1000007041.jpg)

Anyone else getting tired of seeing this artist everywhere? Their art isn't horrible, it's just that each piece 'le edgy reference' which gets old fast. I saw another art with makima bathing with peanut butter, implying she was having sex with the dog. Just kind of tired of seeing this guy everywhere

No. 1847475

>>1847458

I've blocked him so it isn't a problem for me.

No. 1847501

>>1847458

I want to go back in time and stop whoever started that women fuck dogs joke

No. 1847564

>>1847458
I agree, but his art also annoys me a lot because a lot of the edgy easter egg things are purposely put in areas of the drawing where you have to fucking squint and tilt your head to figure out what the fuck it's even supposed to be. I know he does it on purpose, and it's basically the point, but it's visually obnoxious as fuck and makes the composition look like shit, which further cements having almost no value outside the edgy shit

No. 1847584

File: 1704943326823.png (2 MB, 2361x3384, aoba.png)

>>1847086
I was having fun just lurking and taking my omegaban, and I wasnt going to comment on this, i was laughing my ass off at you harassing me through an entire day on /ic/ then proceeding to come falseflag here so someone would belive your retarded tinfold, but then i realized, that if you are willing to go as far as to harass someone through an entire day, literally quote them right after they post art in different threads, then harass the same artist i posted here pretending to be me just because i said your taste in men was disgusting and mocked you about it, you are probably capable of much, much worse just to prove you are totes not a pickme defending the honor of ugly 2D men. You are actually unhinged.
https://warosu.org/ic/thread/7009801#p7012648
https://warosu.org/ic/thread/7011571#p7012860
https://warosu.org/ic/thread/7011571#p7012680
i also love how you didnt post work either, all bark no bite. I love how you are such a pickme you continue this fucking infight outside of our containment all because i insulted your ugly old 2D moids. I again ask you to PYW, which you wont, because you lack ovaries like the big retard you are or are laughably worse than a mid beg. At least you inspired me to make a twitter to post my shit, since its pretty obvious ugly old moid defenders will ruin every single space where they arent coddled and told their grandpas are totally as hot as 20yo men and most women are too female socialized to tell them to fuck off, so i want to be the change i want to see. Funny how my whole vent started because ugly moid fuckers ruin every single space dedicated to drawing attractive men, and you proved exactly how all ugly old moid fuckers are all pickmes.(USER HAS BEEN PUT OUT TO PASTURE)

No. 1847591

File: 1704943584387.jpeg (55.28 KB, 457x750, IMG_8082.jpeg)

>>1847584
what the fuck are you talking about

No. 1847593

>>1847584
Please shut up and take your meds

No. 1847607

>>1847584
You act like an unhinged schizo regardless of your opinions. It's no wonder people have problems with you wherever you go.

No. 1847613

File: 1704945711599.png (53.83 KB, 642x402, FlVOKBTWAAQqj8D.png)

does anyone have resources on how to imitate pc-98 art style? I've been trying to imitate it for so long and its hard.

No. 1847615

>>1847501
yeah, isn't it men who commit bestiality in actually appreciable numbers? Where did this even come from?

No. 1847622

>>1847613
a lot of the art was actually done traditionally and scanned in, the actual art as seen by people back then also doesn't look like what we associate with it now because it displayed differently on CRT screens. You can actually still use some of the old software used back then: http://multipaint.kameli.net/

No. 1847623

>>1847584
This is a whole lot of seething for a person who wasn't the so-called pedo poster from /ic/…

No. 1847651

>>1847622
nta and i have no interest in the style (sorry lol) but it all looks so interesting, it's nice to see artists trying to emulate older styles due to the appreciation for the medium

No. 1847662

>>1847613
Get good at pixel art, or find digital brushed that imitate pixel gradients.

Speaking of artists I used to follow this guy named Angel and his work was IG pretty girl with interesting lighting (similar to RossDraws). I think he disappeared for a few years and I’m not impressed with his work anymore. Has anyone else seen his art?
I think I get sucked into pretty shiny things but grow bored quickly. Like I’m glad Ross has success but his characters look flat compared to the background and he uses too much bloom/flare.

No. 1847664

>>1847622
Thank you, this seems to be worth giving it a shot.
>>1847651
I agree, regardless of the medium, there is something wholesome about people being passionate enough to try to learn new things.

No. 1847667

are there any good sites for figure drawing that aren't quickposes and line of action? i just want more dynamic poses to try

No. 1847670

>>1847458
what's even the edgy reference here? the dog ate a baby?

>>1847615
porn is always the answer. probably poor, desperate woman who fucked animals on camera for money.

No. 1847686

>>1847613
look up the old ass how to draw manga books from the 90s.

Not the american ones by people who can't draw, there's used to be a series of books made in Japan for beginners that was decent and explained the logic behind design decisions and certain tropes.

I used to really like those , weren't super deep but great as style reference.

No. 1847688

>>1847458
his art is just copied stills from anime. Literally just a low effort gimmick poster.

I hate how standard in social media always benefit pornsick fetishes or just le edgy meme.

No. 1847717

>>1847008
Japan is ONLY ships. Have you literally not seen the insane CK they have? It's literally all fanservice, headcanon mangas. You are going out of your way to put Japan on a pedestal when you're actively wrong. Maybe get yourself out of your coddle manga circle. This is the first time I even talked about this, I'm not the other anons who have been replying. Nah, you come off as incredibly stupid and biased because anime isn't American when you are 100% wrong that Japan doesn't samefag the hell out of their content.(derailing)

No. 1847732

File: 1704952836129.jpg (394.16 KB, 1598x964, eb04a14027c8b6ceab5042e087e9e2…)

>>1847014
Acting like Japan doesn't do these is a whole other mental illness. Sounds like you're in a bubble surrounded by artists that don't do this stuff, and you're wrong btw. Lol. You're not following the right people if you think Japanese artists are above meme content. you're just ignorant and refuse to follow the right people. Stop putting Japanese artists on a pedestal. It's so embarrassing to know how wrong you are and yet you still argue that Western artists, whatever the fuck that means specifically, are the only ones doing this content. Barbie has a massive Chinese and Japanese fanbase.

https://cdn.donmai.us/original/58/8c/588c7d59c77b4a7cff88209ecea75c1a.jpg
here's another example.

No. 1847760

>>1847667
adorka stock has her own site now, and pose maniacs. i haven't tried either myself yet but worth a shot i'd think

No. 1847794

>>1847667
If you lurk around a bit you can find some links for super pose books that have a lot of well shot action poses.

I always laugh at weebs sperging about "japanese artists nevah use reference" and then they have entire libraries with thousands of books for any specific type of situation.

No. 1847796

File: 1704956054723.png (914.59 KB, 719x1000, image_2024-01-11_175543023.png)

>>1847686
Are you talking about the old Go Office series?

No. 1847842

File: 1704960978793.jpg (54.35 KB, 453x680, FsRrhphXsAAT9y3.jpg)

how do I get over my shame for drawing? I'm a total beginner and I get this weird feeling of "i shouldn't even try this". I'm just putting pen to paper, especially for simple fundamentals. I only want to draw for fun, mostly OCs and the like

pic not mine

No. 1847843

>>1847842
realize you have a certain amount of shitty drawings to get out of your system and just start spitting them out. The more of them you puke out and the sooner the better.

Also, you don't have to show everything you draw, you don't have to show anything in fact. So who cares? There will be a point when you will feel more confident to do so but just keep stakes low and focus on what you need to learn without thinking someone is judging you. Make the mistakes and do the studies to correct them then try again.

Make the goal be the habit itself. Instead of thinking "my goal is to be a great successful artist" start with "my goal is to become someone who draws everyday"

No. 1847844

>>1847842
you have to get the ugly out before the good starts to flow

No. 1847876

>>1847584
Imagine drawing like this and still seething about “ugly” men for over 48 hours. Cosmic fucking KEK

No. 1847894

You don’t even have the ovaries yourself to tell those zero cell drooling gendies to tag their ugly moid art. What? Scared of the tif army? You want to act all Stacy but can’t even tell those tifs in the qrts to tag their shit. You will never be huntang.(derailing/infighting)

No. 1847899

>>1847885
you act like your work is the best art of cute boys there is while they look like wonky doodles made by a 15 year tumblerite who hasnt opened a page of anatomy and look ugly as shit, although im very impressed by your overconfidence kek only a turd polisher would be this zealous

No. 1847902

Report and ignore

No. 1847913

>>1847885
>Too afraid your little hivemind autistic discord or tif friends might find out you use lolcow?
I kekked out loud because it's true, it's clear a lot of posters here clearly hang around tranny circles since they nonstop complain about trans headcanons and tit chops which you wouldn't see that much if you weren't purposefully connected with people drawing it. Grow a pair and tell the Aiden in your Discord to go screw herself.

>>1847794
>I always laugh at weebs sperging about "japanese artists nevah use reference"
Someone says this unironically? They're the first ones to gush about a pose book. The people overglorifying Japanese artists are usually male weebs who don't speak Japanese or really follow any Japanese artists or their work but instead endlessly consoom their art on repost sites with equally pea brained weebs circlejerking about how this top percentile cream of the crop work is representative of all of Japanese art scene.

No. 1847914

>>1847584
Best part about this post is the you left out that anons shitted on you AFTER you ran back to /ic/ to yell at fatmoid poster for the second time in that thread. Kek'd and Kek'd some more.
https://warosu.org/ic/thread/6933707#p7012197

No. 1847918

>>1847913
>Someone says this unironically?
/ic/ really is that retarded. It has the most chuniibyo tier takes about drawing except is coming from adults who have been drawing for years and somehow can't get past loomis.

No. 1847928

You are bringing even more attention to your spergfest by constantly bouncing between websites to scream and cry about people you don't like because what? They didn't want anything to do with you? Well gee, I wonder why looking at this shitfest.

Like I said the other day, learn to let it go. All you are doing is making the situation worse for not only YOU but other people who are just trying to enjoy their threads in peace. But for some reason, you are hellbent on constantly bringing up a vendetta that ultimately only makes YOU look fucking insane because you ARE fucking insane. You can't even keep your goddamn story consistent.
And no, I'm not here to argue with you like other nonas have so don't even bother pissing yourself again, or do and keep screaming at the void like a fucking retard. Dumbass.

No. 1847932

>>1847919
>>1847901
>>1847900
>pyw!! do it!! my art is the best!! look at my twig legs men!! prove your art is good!
>meanwhile post art that looks like it was drawn by retarded toddler who cant hold a pencil
>gets critique
>what no? its not me? schizo much?
>goes to ic pissing and crying
>GETS KEKED BY THEM AS WELL
ahh never change attention whore chan never, you gave me a good kek, i would rather shoot myself than be that confident if my art looked like that

No. 1847939

Go ahead, keep digging that grave.

No. 1847942

>>1847664
also look into:
grafx2
deluxe paint
graphicsgale
dpaint.js

for some of these you will need to run a virtual machine to operate the software provided you can find it

No. 1847949

>>1847945
Nta but why are you backtracking? You called other people's art hideous but can't take it yourself? "Erm actually I KNOW my art is begshit so there" just stop posting god this gay back and forth has gone on long enough.

No. 1847956

File: 1704975845652.png (382.59 KB, 941x910, 7hshpv.png)

>>1847954
report and ignore(contributing to derailing)

No. 1847963

File: 1704977035116.jpg (4.38 KB, 169x176, 1698783298814.jpg)

>>1847956
Nonna you just saying that is interacting with it(contributing to derailing)

No. 1848019

>>1847096
the russian artists i've seen are almost always unhinged and prone to bickering and drama, not very different from lofter chinese artists kek their art might be beautiful but these people are just as unhappy and angry as the average western genderspecial

No. 1848056

>>1848019
Artists regardless of nationality are generally a mentally illl bunch. At least their unhinged posting is in a different language so it’s easier to ignore. I’ll take skillfully drawn hot guys over crappy ugly genderspecial shit anyday.

No. 1848064

File: 1704987805897.png (4.62 KB, 581x612, Really_makes_me_think.png)

Genuine question, I have been around lc for like a year and I check these threads sporadically. Is it common to use /ic/ lingo on the art salt thread and "pyw"? Because from what I saw these threads are not about sharing your work but sharing tips, talking about online art drama and artcows. Drawing and posting art is much more common in the drawboard theme no?

No. 1848095

>>1847842
for me i look at terrible scrote art and think “well if this retard can render his furry fart art like a pro and this other retard can happily churn out years of chris chan tier art and why can’t i also draw? why do i need to be ashamed?”

also i’ve wasted so many years on shame. i’d be great if i’d just kept drawing daily at (x) age — no more hesitation, just draw

No. 1848099

>>1848064
Lets be real herr schizo is only demanding to see other peoples art to futher this dumb drama to begin with. Look how deranged not agreeing with schizo's shit taste in underage/aged down boys has made her already. Bitch is going to stalk anyone who's dumb enough to posts their work.

No. 1848156

>>1848095
Same, nona, same. Whenever I feel overwhelmed or self-critical I remind myself of the genderspecials churning out hideous self-indulgent art or scrotes sharing their deranged coomer art with deformed proportions. I think, if these dunning-krueger effect autists can unabashedly broadcast their mediocre artwork to the world then what’s stopping me from putting the pencil to paper?

I draw as a hobby and not for a living, so there’s all the time in the world to git gud. All I want is to have the skill to create beautiful artwork of my husbandos and ships.

No. 1848172

>>1848064
No it's not common here, maybe on /m/ it could've been but you still don't see it

No. 1848184

>>1848064
I only posted work since i was asked first when the conversation started >>1844862 here. funny how you are trying to put all the blame on me when i didnt even started it lol. And ofcourse when i posted my art i started getting called a pedo and crabbed by retards without the ovaries to post art, which is peak /ic/fag behaviour. I only post on /ic/ because its the only place to get honest brutal criticism, but criticism is worthless if the other person doesnt draw. I genuinely respect the original anon who asked me to post work because she at least had the ovaries to show she draws, not like the rest of you.(ban evading retard)

No. 1848189

>>1848099
Lol says the schizo that was falseflagging as me on /ic/ and looking at all the threads to see if you could spot my art just to post your sassy comebacks. I would never harass anyone, that's something you have done though, by going as far as to pretend to be me to start shit on a thread i havent been to since the discord was made.

No. 1848196

File: 1704997016873.jpg (2.9 KB, 108x108, 1559199907356.jpg)

>>1848099
Tbh I don't care about her, I was just curious if it's something nonas usually do itt or not.

No. 1848198

What the fuck happened to this thread

No. 1848200

>>1848196
Two artists unrelated to this fight posted their art before me itt kek
>>1837747
>>1844916

No. 1848205

>>1848198
As if these threads werent always infighting and sperging, its called SALT art thread for a reason. It actually used to be more spergy when it just started since it was mostly about artubers/art commentators.

No. 1848218

What are your opinions on gouache?

No. 1848227

>>1848218
Pretty good! Really love how good of a medium they are, you can control whether you want it opaque like acrylic or transparent like watercolour. Its genuinely one of the mediums I really have fun with. Although I do wish they were a bit cheaper

No. 1848338

>>1848218
I want to learn how to use it so bad but it’s like an arcane art to me. all I can manage rn is either too wet watercolors or clumps of paint that would put Chagall to shame

No. 1848349

>>1848338
it's just paint? what issues are you having exactly?

No. 1848378

>>1848338
Nonna, you have that retarded jelly gouache set I swear to god

No. 1848398

>>1842833
>>1842893
>not real animation
That's completely irrelevant as rigging/compositing is how like 90% of shows are done (at least in the US). So like OP said, it's possible to have a career as an animator without drawing at all. It's pretty obvious this thread is filled with people who have never worked in the industry, but that's the internet for you.

No. 1848457

>>1848398
i mean you could say that for 3d animators too? I mean they animate and rig puppet but strangely alot of them cant draw? Still you would expect any animator to be atleast decent at drawing sadly its not the case anymore animation jobs are somewhat based on your skills but it matters what skills they are. Rigging puppets doesn't need any artistic knowhow only technical.

No. 1848460

File: 1705005696598.jpg (122.38 KB, 1280x720, maxresdefault.jpg)

american anons who went to art school
how was it? i hear so many people talk shit about the ambience and the cliques they form there, i wish there were more anecdotes but i think most anons are hobbyist/self taught.
Also is there really that much gendie shit? it feels a bit exaggerated. I don't think there's that many women randomly identifying as they/them just for art school

No. 1848484

>>1848460

I'm a hobbyist AND self taught, but I went to art school for 4 years and still am in it because I'd like to graduate with a masters and because I also wanted to improve my skills beyond the self-taught bubble.

It is very cliquey, yes. Sure, there are all sorts of people and some are fine, but cliques are a thing and they are everywhere even more if your class is a big one or/and it's a prestigious, big name school. Lots of bootlickers, lots of people trying so hard to be the best of the class that they make themselves look like an insane clown, lots of people who think that they're secretly a super amazing artist but in reality they're just extremely delusional and stubborn. And, of course, many jealous people. Many.

In my experience I actually didn't come across that many gendies. I saw some here and there but I definitely saw more of them online than IRL.

No. 1848553

>>1848184
>>1848189
Next level mental illness.

No. 1848566

>>1848457
So you don't think capturing motion requires any artistic abilities? Are people working on stop motion scenes not artists either? It's a very limited idea of what art can be.

No. 1848598

>>1848457
So animating something like this in 3D required no "artistic knowhow"?

No. 1848704

>>1848457
Being able to draw is a desirable skill for a 3D animator, not a required one. I'm a 3D artist (can do the full pipeline but prefer sculpting, texturing, and vfx) and while I was studying I was the only person in my class who actually did any form of 2D art and animation before enrolling (similar to how 2D animation attracts calarts stereotypes that want to make their ocs into the next SU, 3D animation attracts people who want to be involved in their favourite or make videogames, with a smaller fraction that want to ape disney-pixar). It gives me an edge to have strong 2D roots, but considering a lot of 3D animators only animate and don't touch the other parts of the pipeline, it shouldn't be surprising that many don't bother to grind a skill they don't need to make their artistic contribution to a film etc.

Rigging is an arcane art (in 3D anyway, not sure about the process for 2D puppet animation), and a good rig with artistic needs in mind is integral to a 3D animator's ability to bring a model to life (even if it's simple).

No. 1849126

File: 1705037385125.png (1000.02 KB, 2000x1359, okayge-ss.png)

is this okay gesture? i asked on /ic/ and didn't get much help outside of a rude and confusing response (i don't know why i went back there kek). also spent today just drawing cubes and shapes.

No. 1849130

>>1849126
they look awesome to me but I'm not a professional, I like them

No. 1849173

>>1849126
The poses look exaggerated and unnatural, but maybe that was your goal.

No. 1849199

>>1849126
Very stiff despite the exaggeration and lacks any real weight. The lack of a structured sketch (i.e depicting where the ribs and pelvis are for example) show me that you're most likely symbol drawing without thinking of the actual 3d form.

No. 1849226

File: 1705044817737.jpg (73.14 KB, 1080x1300, tumblr_p4axurJv1a1tugm28o1_128…)

>>1849126
Try sticking to a single line of action. Picrel is from Griz and Norm. I'm a self taught artist so take it with a grain of salt. The goal of gesture drawing isn't really to make realistic balanced poses (like how your squat pose ended up looking like).

No. 1849251

ignore >>1849130 >>1849173, they dont know what they are talking about. Those poses are too stiff, lack weight, and have no structure. Try to follow a hierarchy like in vid rel, so start with the head, then spine, and lastly weight/legs. If you are going to draw animu i recomend you follow these channels
https://www.youtube.com/@hidechannel2
https://www.youtube.com/@mangamaterialsyoutube9454

No. 1849405

>>1843618
I'm getting caught up after taking a break from this place so I'm late to the discussion but nona is right-ish especially since having been a lurker since some of the first artist salt threads you would get called a pedo for liking shota and now you get called a pick me traitor for liking a guy with a little meat on his bones kek
personally i like a range of guys who are both cute, and handsome and those who look like they can pick up a tree log. This is artist salt not "only handsome guys I personally like" thread. Its deranged and retarded to expect nonas to only post men another nona finds attractive.
Go make the "bishi thread" and the "roid moid" thread if someone with different tastes makes you sperg this much(derailing)

No. 1849417

>>1849405
samefag because i sent too soon
another nona mentioned it but when it comes to "ugly moids" half the time it's the fact that the art style in and of itself is ugly because even if they draw bishis they'll look ugly + for generically attractive male characters personality plays a huge role a lot too because women are usually more about the fantasy than strictly appearance.

No. 1849431

apparently the sonic groomer zer0finix is back under an alias and is getting exposed, again. Makes me wonder how many cancelled groomer artists still work under aliases, kinda creepy to think about it.

No. 1849438

>>1849431
>sonic
>groomer
tale as old as time… why the fuck does sonic attract such degenerates?

No. 1849443

>>1849438
anything that's nerdy attracts degenerates

No. 1849475

>>1848460
>talk shit about the ambience
Sorry anon I can’t help you with art college ambience, but I went in the early 00’s before digital art took hold (it was on the cusp). There were still cliques, anime was derided and no one knew how to network. My school pushed post modern art theory and barely touched on fundamentals. As a result I have gaps and no connections but whatever they taught me is moot because I continue to teach myself and avoid galleries gouging my prices thanks to online networking.

No. 1849516

File: 1705069632446.jpg (181.87 KB, 736x1109, 1000007081.jpg)

>>1844391
I have many favorites

No. 1849519

>>1849438
If it involves a vulnerable group predators will appear

No. 1849523

>>1849516
I hate this artist his style is awful. It reminds me of clipart or class of 3000s

No. 1849524

File: 1705069820872.jpg (126.96 KB, 640x830, 1000007077.jpg)


No. 1849530

File: 1705070214697.jpg (58.51 KB, 540x720, 1000007082.jpg)


No. 1849531

>>1849516
Looks fun, who/what is it from?

No. 1849545

>>1849523
I looked up Class of 3000 and I like that artstyle

>>1849531
It's from Trad Moore's Silver Surfer Black

No. 1849562

File: 1705071607749.jpg (1.6 MB, 2280x1600, 1659882391900.jpg)

>>1844391
i would love to know what medium this is, looks rad

No. 1849575

>>1849545
Thanks, I'll have to check that out! Always love an interesting comic style.

>>1849562
From what I could find, at least some of the pages from Requiem are ink, coloured inks, chinese inks, acrylics, pencils, and gouache on paper.

No. 1849597

>>1849575
>ink, coloured inks, chinese inks, acrylics, pencils, and gouache on paper.
i wish i wasnt a poorfag, gouache looks amazing and it's pretty much irrepliclable on digital.

No. 1849691

>>1849251
>>1849226
>>1849199
thank you nonas, very helpful. especially the vid; i’ll try to apply its concepts when i practice today

No. 1849816

>>1849597
Gouache is so much fun, probably my favourite paint to use tbh. If you want to try it/practice with it, maybe just get a tube of black and white so you can do value studies and greyscale (or monochrome if you want to pick a colour instead)? Then if you decide you like it you could add colours to your collection whenever you have cash to spare instead of spending more on a more expensive set. I can't really recommend brands as I've only ever used a local one, but hopefully another anon can chip in

No. 1849835

>>1849597
Is gouache expensive?

No. 1850044

File: 1705089723926.jpg (340.17 KB, 1479x2048, GCneFn7bUAA_IhN.jpg)

this artist used to draw such cute and funny art, now literally all they draw is this coomerbait oc over and over again (worst thing is it's their self insert but with horribly exaggerated portions lol) yet their fanbase keep increasing. how???

No. 1850052

>>1850044
I hate how most female artist's self inserts are coom, meanwhile moids self inserts is alwasy some squiggly ugly worm cartoon like that fag zach. There needs to be an unbrainwashing program for pickmes.

No. 1850108

File: 1705091634800.png (1.12 MB, 720x1205, screenshot.png)

>>1850044
This makes me physically ill. But at least she's making hundreds of dollars a month on patreon so, uh, you go girl I guess?

No. 1850147

>>1850108
>she
>trans flag and that stupid ikea shark
are you sure this artist isn't a tranny?

No. 1850154

>>1850147
>lolicon vtuber
Definitely a troon

No. 1850205

>>1850154
>>1850147
>>1850147
>>1850147
based on the pic of themselves they posted lately they seem to be that way

No. 1850212

>>1850108
Genuinely don't understand how people like this generic anime coomer shit. I don't even know why people pay them, they can make this with AI

No. 1850224

>>1850108
I don't understand the popularity of this character in the slightest. Doesn't have an ounce of originality yet it sells like crazy too. Sheep mentality?

No. 1850226

>>1850212
Same reasons why men spend 100+ for OF girl shit when they can look up porn for free at their local library

No. 1850263

>>1850044
>cute and funny
…anon

No. 1850298

>>1850108
these types of unfunny retard ironic weebs are the absolute worst

No. 1850634

>>1849126
your gestures are good, some anons will tell you otherwise or that you should stick with certain lines of action. Your poses remind me of old archie comics and I have an extensive collection. Theres nothing wrong with multiple lines and I actually get old school art from your art. >>1849226 Which this is fine, this is way less motion and doesn't look as dynamic.

No. 1850708

>>1850634
Ahh, you're convincing her to stagnate, got it.

No. 1850760

File: 1705119166128.png (7.6 MB, 1857x2500, 20240112_231240_scrubbed.png)

been painting some cows in my sketchbook for practice, who goes in the last slot

No. 1850768

>>1850760
lucinda

No. 1850795

>>1850760
Wow this is pathetic actually

No. 1850837

>>1850708
No, I'm telling her that they have old 50s art comic style. Having a unique style isn't bad.

No. 1851171

Maybe my question is too vague but how does one get better at illustrations? I've been drawing my whole life and i'm good with almost anything, but when it comes to compose a picture it always feels so souless and my imagination doesn't feel vivid enough no matter how i try. I'm just more comfortable with character design and such, is this all i can do?
I really wanted to be self sufficient but maybe 2D is just not enough for me, maybe i have to start getting into 3D stuff.

No. 1851180

>>1851171
it would probably help you to get out of a drawing mindset and start learning more about film, photography, cinematography and creative writting.

i gained more confident in illustration when i started reading animation books and books about filmaking even though i am not an animator but it makes you think more about creativity, composition and design more than just technical skill.

Doing master copies of your favorite artists, learning their process and why they compose the way they do and why they choose the subject matter and themes they do also help a lot, not everything is about anatomy and perspective.

I admit i still get very frustated when i work my ass off in a piece that no one cares about and then some low effort naif doodle gets a million retweets. I guess thats how professional musicians must feel when they see Bad Bunny topping the charts ang getting praise without knowing a single thing about music or playing an instrument. This always gets on my insecurity and makes me think i am just unlikable and my effort is pointless since my my art will never have natural charisma, at the end of the day is just another masochistic spiral to stay in that mindset.

No. 1851186

>>1850837
How can it both be a 50s art style and also unique? I swear 90% of this thread are retards

No. 1851188

>>1851180
Thank you nona, i will admit that i am already into studying and discovering that kind of stuff just because i like it but i've been trying to use it for my art too and still my mind or the final result just doesn't go where i want. I'll keep trying because i really want to get better though!

I undeestand your frustrarion with how easy it is for low effort works to get popular, in my mind i just know that they're appreciated mostly by people who don't even care about art but i'm not a person that really minds popularity honestly, i mostly want myself to be satisfated with what i've done which is kinda rare kek.
I've been feeling better about my art insecurities since i've left twitter and i was able to focus more on my own art too.

No. 1851190

File: 1705141830181.jpg (337.38 KB, 1448x2048, redum.jpg)

>>1844391
for colors redum4, my understanding of color harmony is terrible

No. 1851205

>>1850634
OMG, dear god. Stop!. This is an anonymous forum, be honest for once. You can leave your female socialization behind. This is why you have to rely on scrote websites like 4chan and scrote ridden discords to get good critique, some women are too scared of being ''mean'' and hurt the feelings of others even in enviroments that are meant for constructive critics. You are AIDS anon.(derailing/infighting)

No. 1851208

File: 1705143404813.jpg (185.96 KB, 933x943, MangaMaterials2-15918259836400…)

Gesture anon, dont stagnate. Dont let fake praise that makes no sense ''50s archie style!!1!'' stop you from getting better. You are actually doing monumental effort by studying instead of drawing the same generic 3/4 animu girl like a scrote, try to improve, get better, and apply what you learn to your drawings. Also check manga material's twitter, it's very good. Dont let those shitty tiktok ''how to draw animu'' give you baf habits, learn from good sources and do a lot of mastercopies of artists you like.

No. 1851212

File: 1705143660737.jpg (60.07 KB, 1080x1248, tumblr_ovv7qwFHow1tugm28o1_128…)

>>1851186
That and non artists kek. Worrying about "style" in gesture art is like having a fear of being too muscley and ruining your figure at the start of working out lol.

No. 1851216

>>1851212
nta but also anon is clearly going for an anime style. If i was going for an anime style and someone told me my art looked like ugly stiff western shit like archie i would be devastated kek

No. 1851219

>>1851208
why do people who are barely learning how to draw themsevles are making tutorials?

God, so cringe,they covered it in watermarks too. If the kids that share this all the time on social media would just grab a damn book for once they would get more out of it than saving 300000 random social media post, i think tutorialitis is a major problem now.

No. 1851224

>>1851219
horrible bait

No. 1851285

>>1851216
Nona you can't break rules without learning them, gesture is not about style it's about understanding how to pose a person in a drawing where weight and movement can look life-like, style distracts you in this stage. if you look at her art you will see how much focusing on the shape of hips and waist had distracted her from distributing the weight of the body in a way that makes sense for someone standing even an anime style.

No. 1851293

>>1851285
i know, i didnt say she didnt have to learn how to properly do gesture but that anon's fake praise was retarded and more demotivating than just telling her what you just said

No. 1851356

I know this is the artist general thread, but I really hope it doesn't turn into the new art critique thread- especially with how wimpy/inexperienced some nonnas seem to be

No. 1851556

File: 1705154812630.jpeg (168.93 KB, 625x892, A394B980-F84F-4009-B9D7-9AE8A2…)

>>1851216
archie comics are cuter and better looking than most generic anime, be fr anon. i don't think what she said to the gesturing was that bad, you guys are just aggressive.

No. 1851570

>>1851556
it was obviously fake and condescending

No. 1851607

>>1851570
it wasn't that bad, you're all making it worse and exaggerating the original message. relax. everyone here is so standoffish

No. 1851642

>>1851607
just let the girl receive honest criticism you dont need to pamper here in lolcow of all places

No. 1851734

>>1851556
>>1851607
get over it lol. it's ok that you're bad at art, you don't have to give shitty advice to other people

No. 1851817

>>1851212
It isn't even the type of style the person was drawing. Stop telling them to draw something that they're not actually trying to do. You're giving the most boring examples.

No. 1851822

>>1851642
Nta but jfc. Some of you have no idea of what style and movement can mean and you want everyone ITT to do boring, stoic, poses. You all must hate rubberhose animation for being so off weight too kek

No. 1851981

>>1851817
>>1851822
kek you people can't be serious. you can't do gestures or practice fundamentals if you're worried about "style"

No. 1852008

>>1851981
Telling someone to do traditional gesture drawing isn't the take you think it is. There's various styles of art and this is the type of mindset that sets artists back in art school from teachers who think any style that isn't their personal preference is wrong.

No. 1852018

File: 1705165608567.jpg (166.88 KB, 934x1151, 1000005175.jpg)

Off weight characters are a style. Anons are on some dumb shit.

No. 1852021

File: 1705165687494.png (1.14 MB, 1215x1613, pirdepige.png)

i'm the nona who posted the gestures to start with and i wasn't trying to draw anime, outside of the black figures which were yoh yohshinari copies. anyway i really do appreciate the crit, as it was helpful and not just "this sucks (and schizo babble that assumes way too much about my intent)" which is roughly what i got on /ic/. i didn't find it rude at all.

speaking of /ic/: the guy said it's bad to only practice gesture when you're starting out, is that true? a few books i read said nailing gesture before you try to master structure is important, lest you want stiff figures.

picrel is from 2018, i pretty much stopped drawing because of uni/work kek. i think i've backslid quite a bit

No. 1852118

Ok I think it's a retard, a troll and or someone who got hurt when we said it's a beg move to get tunnel vision worrying about style. Hit dogs holler.

No. 1852172

File: 1705169059295.jpg (1.4 MB, 600x3000, 1531120912455.jpg)

M is so slow so here is some Autistic collages of aesthic panels from bride of the water God.
I wish I could draw buildings and environments well.

No. 1852181

File: 1705169235781.jpg (1.73 MB, 600x3327, 1531122258999-1.jpg)


No. 1852210

>>1852172
Fuck I messed up on erasing dammit. Now I have to make it all over again.
>>1852021
What you should do isn't as important as what you shouldn't do. Everyone has a different way of learning.
What you shouldn't do is let your art stagnate. And working solely on style is going to do that. Whether you do gesture or general studies the most important thing is you actually do studies and you actually learn from those studies. I would also recommend just observing. And not just when drawing. Go out and observe people animals and objects.

No. 1852228

File: 1705170095064.png (1.07 MB, 1662x1006, repaint.png)

>>1852021
nonnie it would be better to post this in the redraw m thread from now on but heres a short quick tutorial on gesture basically it should feel grounded and more lively using a action line might help too, I would recommend doing croquis for atleast 30 minutes daily (it takes time so keep at it!) good luck!

No. 1852274

>>1850634
are you retarded, trying to sabotage her, or just bad at drawing? i'm betting on the last option(infighting)

No. 1852309

>>1852274
Just admit you have no creativity.

No. 1852329

>>1852181
backgrounds like these will come easy to you once you've mastered perspective and visualizing shapes in 3d, it's really all there is (plus a healthy dose of heavy referencing for the most complicated bits)

No. 1852355

For nonnies who struggle with basics, I feel like there are fundamentals that are often ignored by beginners and really help in the long run. If you study gestalt (look up principles of design) you will learn basic concepts that help you build a better understanding of images. It doesn't matter what style or media of art you want to pursue, if you don't understand visual weight, composition, rhythm and core concepts like this, then you'll struggle with the rest. Some illustration books talk about it, but I feel like graphic design texts cover the subject better, since designers tend to work with extremely simple elements. Look up composition videos in illustration, they often talk about some of these concepts.

No. 1852366

>>1852228
I see what you're going for, but kek, some artists need to study and follow their own advice before trying to teach others.

No. 1852381

>>1852210
>And working solely on style is going to do that.
i realize this already after lurking these threads/other art spaces for a long time. like i said, i wasn't aiming for any particular "style", i just wanted to practice gesture

>>1852228
thanks nona

No. 1852495

File: 1705174438123.jpg (152.09 KB, 750x938, Jenna_Gribbon_-_Annunciation_c…)

I hate the "generic Instagram picture except it's unflattering and made of paint" genre of contemporary art. Picture related, it's Jenna Gribbon who churns out tons of these.

No. 1852503

>>1852172
>>1852181
KEK those are CSP 3D assets she didnt draw them

No. 1852563

>>1852495
i quite like this , reminds me of the paintings Joseph Ducreux did. i mean much better than the generic insta thot in water ones

No. 1852691

>>1852495
>made of paint
>it's a painting
interesting

No. 1852730

>>1852691
NTA but I think anon meant those super hyperrealistic portraits copied 1:1 from a "aesthetic" photograph

No. 1852986

>>1852503
She didn't draw them but it doesn't mean that I don't want to draw similar to them.

No. 1853008

File: 1705193192677.jpg (239.65 KB, 1071x1228, piss.jpg)

>>1852691
Not all contemporary art is paintings. There's collages, quilts, urine on canvas… the list of ways to make art is endless.

No. 1853056

>>1849562
The art of this comic is so good but I was so disappointed to read two volumes and find out the main character is a Nazi rapist and the whole story is about excusing male atrocities in the name of "redemption" and degrading women. If anyone here has read the rest, does it get better?

No. 1853085

>>1853008
Valerie Solanas did nothing wrong

No. 1853102

>>1849438
pure autism. Sonic is edgy without going overboard, bright colors, easy to read facial expressions, simple yet detailed world, easy to self-insert

No. 1853103

>>1850795
god forbid women practice and have fun

No. 1853275

Hi nonas, been grinding on my art lately and I’m very inspired and happy! I wanted to focus on fundamentals as I was scared of getting stagnated with progress even while working hard making new drawings (as I have seen countless times with Tumblr and Twitter artists), but I checked out the drawabox site and the sperging on arm placement and boxes scared me, so I’ve turned to copying (as in using a reference and trying to replicate it exactly) old paintings. Is focusing on recriating exactly old master arts (like renaissance masters) a good way to work on fundamentals?

No. 1853410

File: 1705212270865.jpg (731.23 KB, 1348x1600, Tumblr_l_1643845283874431.jpg)

>>1853275
Studying old master paintings is tedious and difficult to stick with for most people, in part because they just do it because it's recommended to them and they don't really know what to focus on and make note of when they're copying. For the best success, I would suggest finding a master's work that you truly enjoy, find and describe the aspects you love and want add to your work, then work on that very consciously while you study. At least, this is how I'd do it if I were to go back and start again. People would tell me to copy Rembrandt and Anders Zorn and they just weren't my thing and I found Rembrandt's works really ugly. Sure, you learn regardless if you copy something at all without thought, but make the most of it. I'm glad you're finding happiness in art. Here's a blog with some classic painters I never see discussed that you might be interested in. https://random-brushstrokes.tumblr.com/
Good luck!

No. 1853534

File: 1705218298527.gif (3.4 MB, 498x370, vash-the-stampede-trigun.gif)

I hope an art and critique thread gets made here someday so that I don't have to go to /ic/ anymore.

No. 1853539

>>1849524
This rules, who made it?

No. 1853540

>>1853410
of course if you come to it with no context you won't even get much of it. These kinds of studies need to be paired with some theory too or else you are lost.

No. 1853565

>>1853534
There's a dead one in /m/.

No. 1853590

I’m not good at character design but I must do some gijinkas concepts justice myself because all I can find for them is moid shit.
>>1850263
I caught that too, but I feel crazy kek are we looking too deep into nothing? Without knowing the artist I don’t know but it certainly gives off a certain vibe.

No. 1853605

>>1853534
Anons are shit at critiquing so its worthless

No. 1853872

Have any of you deleted an artfight account before? How long am I supposed to wait for it? I sent in a request months ago and still nothing. The site says they are working on giving users a way to delete accounts themselves but I don't get why they haven't implemented such a basic feature earlier. I wanted to ask about in the discord but to type you need to now verify yourself using your phone number and I'm not fucking doing that

No. 1853876

File: 1705243654135.png (494.87 KB, 1131x857, jzthkzukluz8.PNG)

>>1850044
Even the first post seems to foreshadow the current stuff and I can't find anything cute or funny. Everyone who draws like this is terminally online and a coomer or at least heavily influenced by coomers

No. 1853885

>>1853872
some guy had to spam the nword and racist art to get his account deleted apparently they dont let you delete it

No. 1853927

>>1845738
is is possible youre using your shoulder less and your wrist more when on a tablet? i had to get over the initial mental block that viewed my digital drawings as occurring in a "smaller" space. like other anon said, its counterintuitive that actually, youre working on an infinite space. its just all those damn tool bars and what not…
i sketch digitally just fine now and prefer to do so for inanimate object concept art, but for paintings ill often just sketch huge traditionally and take a photo to paint over digitally. whatever works, works.

No. 1853937

File: 1705247826833.jpg (1.4 MB, 4096x2304, 20240114_205331.jpg)

Nonnies how do I let go of the fear of posting art with a new style? I've usually only posted the basic generic anime girl in void or cel colour illustration but I really want to post full color illustrations like picrel but I'm scared that my followers might think it's too jarring of a change I've been trying to stall the decision to post the art I want rather the usual low effort ones…I'm quite conflicted. I've done multiple illustrations just sitting.

No. 1853947

>>1853937
I'd say just do it. It may scare off some followers, but it can also attract new ones that enjoy your new style. No need to keep up a façade.

No. 1853955

>>1853876
There's something about this drawing that's so annoying it makes me want to beat whoever drew it to a pulp like a chimp on xanax

No. 1853966

I really wish i had money for an online teacher. I started drawing last year and i have been doing good following loomis and some basic videos on youtube, but i reached a skill ceiling where i am not downright awful but also not good enough to ''just draw''. I have been trying to come up with studying methods and exercises by myself to no avail.

No. 1853993

File: 1705249848185.jpg (250.13 KB, 1318x2048, GDuO-xDaMAAuoXZ.jpg)

Did this artist (the one who was mad about not getting enough attention while having 41k followers on one account alone) just make her fat oc a little less fat? Kek he/she looks nice now. I'm still not sure if it's a cuntboy or an actual woman since it has tits.
Anyway her account is now called "ruining my artistic potential because of horny" and I can't tell if she's having a breakdown or if it's helping her kek. I hope she can be less desperate.

No. 1853997

>>1853993
she always seems to be in some sort of mid-breakdown state. i've been following her for years now and she always goes on long spergs being dramatic about her art sucking ass, or her followers not giving her attention, and so on

No. 1853998

>>1853993
I downloaded the folder nonny made but I deleted it pretty quickly, the fetishes were too powerful for me to appreciate the technical skill

No. 1854004

>>1853993

I tried reading one of her comics and while I do love her art her panel work is absolute shit. I couldn't understand what was going on in the pictures with or without knowing chinese because nothing seemed clear and the movement and angles were crazy as fuck.

No. 1854014

>>1853966
What is stopping you to just drawing? What do you want to draw? There is no skill level necessary to just attempt. It doesn't matter if it looks like shit, it will be less ugly over time even if you don't notice it. You grind fundamentals to help you build the structure to your goal. You won't get better at what you want if you don't try to draw it.

No. 1854031

>>1854014
I just wanna draw with a purpose, that's it. It's kinda useless to just draw when you are trying to improve. I do finish stuff, i try to make at least one full piece a month, but i would like to also spend more time studying, i just dont know how.

No. 1854040

>>1853993
I feel empathy for her. I feel like all good artist are a lil bit crazy. Life just isnt kind to the a(u)rtistic kind.

No. 1854057

>>1854031
>useless to just draw when you are trying to improve
That's going to be your entire art life unfortunately. Artists are always trying to improve. What you see in others and think is "enough" isn't enough for that artist. As for spending more time studying, can you point what you've been struggling with or what you don't understand? I usually cycle through fundamentals. Composition, color, value, stylization, perspective and anatomy, etc. There is fortunately so many videos on youtube of different artists on these. If you find an artist's process you like, try following them or studying how they do something.

No. 1854367

File: 1705260837276.jpg (114.2 KB, 833x2048, [21-01-30] 1355423206979424256…)

can someone give me recs of similar artists to mossa? depressing atmosphere, sketchy look, desaturated color palletes, painterly rendering. I dont want to follow him anymore since i learnt hes a pedo

No. 1854380

>>1854367

Fucking dammit, why is it that all of the artists I once followed for inspiration turned out to be huge fucking creeps or predators

No. 1854402

>>1854367
Where did this come from? This is the first time I'm hearing about this.

No. 1854433


No. 1854849

>>1850263
You're reading in to it too much. The photo doesn't even match up with the term you're inplying.

No. 1854924

>>1853534
Will never happen
Nonnies are too paranoid about getting traces back here. Being an /ic/ artist is better

No. 1855237

File: 1705302460251.jpeg (307.79 KB, 1190x1684, IMG_4817.jpeg)

Sick of the trend of drawing a very obvious woman and calling it a guy. Feels like spicy straights for gendies. And “yaoi” when it’s literally some dude and a girl, not even like a femboy or something just a guy and a girl. Everytime I see a 2000s inspired art style or a grungy one I can 100 percent bet it’s gendie scrabble. Kills any internet I had in the art.

No. 1855286

File: 1705309881291.jpg (182.51 KB, 2048x1100, 161864390_266894791631848_1631…)

>>1853876

They used to draw stuff like this, a lot more artistic things as well, it's just not on most of their social media because they think they have gotten much better lol

No. 1855287

File: 1705309912344.jpg (449.68 KB, 2048x1515, 150351948_247814953539832_9091…)


No. 1855292

File: 1705310568888.png (3.47 MB, 2886x3000, shshshs.png)


No. 1855293

>>1855237
This kind of artstyle awakens a wrath in me I didn't know I even had. Every thing about this screams porn addicted coomtard and it infuriates me.

No. 1855309

>>1855287
>>1855292
>>1855286
It's cute but it gives off tranny tkmz loli art vibes.

No. 1855314

>>1855292
naif art is just an excuse to be lazy and never improve.

No. 1855329

>>1854031
You could try making a comic. It pretty much forces you to learn multiple things at once (perspective, drawing characters consistently in different angles and poses, backgrounds…) and each new page has the purpose of telling a story

No. 1855367

>>1855292
it would be half cute if it wasn't drawn by a moid.

No. 1855387

It's January and I'm still halfway through inktober at this point just want to finish it to prove I can make 31 drawings. Send help

No. 1855507

>>1855314
who needs to improve when they make thousands of dollars out of this shit. i honestly believe 04119__snail ruined art

No. 1855514

>>1855292
whats the point of following a tkmiz clone when tkmiz already exists and is miles better?

No. 1855575

>>1855237
the brujo_ari effect

No. 1855592

>>1850205
post it here anon

No. 1855642

>>1855507
that's an exaggeration imo, this style was already invented but snail made it popular maybe

No. 1855643

>>1852228
why did you broke her leg

No. 1855661

File: 1705338417826.jpg (181.19 KB, 680x883, f54.jpg)

>>1853539
It is by Dogmuth Behedog on Artstation. I love his work.

No. 1855664

File: 1705338572008.jpg (133.55 KB, 400x400, karamabov-knightfull.jpg)


No. 1855677

>>1855514
why follow a tranny wannabe like tkmiz when I can just log into tumblr and find hundreds of other clones with the same boring style

No. 1855694

>>1855677
All of his clones are also trannies and worse artists than him. At least tkmiz doesnt outright draw animu girls holding tranny flags or doing some xitter meme thing.

No. 1855743

>>1855309
I feel like some of you try too hard to see something that isn't there. Way to ruin art for yourselves pretty much.

No. 1855746

>>1855743
nta but its literally drawn by a tranny who draws gawr gura art

No. 1855761

Anyone want to discuss the Hazbin animation? I see so many people being upset over it costing so much.

Tbh some people charge a lot just even for a second of animation due to how many frames they want the animation and how many frames that winds up taking to get the desired effect. The artist definitely charged way more than $80 per frame with all the other parts of the animation included. Say they do $80 a frame though, IMO that's good for clean linework with basic colors only of a single character, that's still almost $15k for 3 minutes of animation. This included instead a secondary character, background, and music syncing, not to mention the sketch stage.. Like 50K makes sense. I don't know what anyone is complaining about. Cringe, yes, but the animation cost isn't absurd.

No. 1855762

>>1855761
someone should really make a new western animation cows thread, that's what this thread is for.

No. 1855765

>>1855761
I don't care about the price. Good for the animator for getting those 50K.

But the video itself made me want to throw myself inside an elevator shaft.

No. 1855768


No. 1855774

>>1855761
whoever did that cringe AMV got paid way better than the official animators on that shitty show

No. 1855783

>>1855575
I love their style but the tranny fallout turns me away so bad.

No. 1855804

>>1855575
I literally thought it was her for a second

No. 1856084

>>1855804
I'm honestly surprised with how many copycats she gets now that she's so popular on tiktok. She already had to make a statement about how she doesn't mind and that no one should get attacked for it

No. 1856128

File: 1705361404629.jpg (151.51 KB, 945x1068, 1705359737168.jpg)

>>1855761
Literally 40% of it is traced

No. 1856236

>>1855237
…you were interested in this art?

No. 1856382

>>1856236
No, I was interested in that one 2000s revival style, the algorithm caught wind of it and this popped up on my explore page along with others. I picked this one because it seemed like an obvious example. Flesh coloured eyes, baggy jeans, short shaggy hair and a pear shaped body with obvious boobs but it’s totally a boy!

No. 1856577

File: 1705386563520.jpg (Spoiler Image,549.78 KB, 4096x1395, F5nxWZfXkAAFwDh.jpg)

>>1855237
i hate that finding good femboy art (while already a herculean effort if you didn't want straight up porn) has become even more impossible due to tifs. i don't even see how they justify being gnc and trans in their heads, it essentially goes against everything they posit.

posting a good femboy artist i like (lirthel – cool gnc woman) for posterity. spoilered because it's slightly spicy.

No. 1856580

File: 1705386706005.png (296.98 KB, 685x885, star girl.PNG)

also while i'm here, would a general thread to discuss art on /m/ be a good idea? just a general for sharing pieces, getting crit, talking about the process + inspiration, sharing art for master studies, etc. i see the 'rate your work' thread but that's a little too specific for me.

No. 1856581

>>1856577
It must be fucking annoying when you’re looking up femboys or yaoi and all you get is a chick or a straight couple in denial. Worst is that they tag it that way.

No. 1856597

>>1856581
yeah it's the pits. especially since i know if you sat them down and forced them to tell you what a boy was without laughing the question off or giving you some circular logic mumbo jumbo they'd crumble

No. 1856617

File: 1705389351824.png (245.75 KB, 667x728, v12trh.png)


No. 1856622

>>1856617
If they were exactly the same, gender affirming medical care wouldn’t be a thing. Why is the cope so strong in this new crop of artists?

No. 1856625

>>1856580
rate your work functions as a general art sharing thread and another thread like that would instantly die, see the cute guy study general one dumbass anon made. this thread moves fast because anons would rather saltpost then actually improve or share, so any /m/ based drawing thread is going to be dead. bump the rate my drawing thread for critique and shit if you really want to but we do not need more random retarded dead threads in /m/ ffs

No. 1856675

>>1856577
Eww what the fuck, that's just a girl with male pronouns. Femboysfag have the absolute worst taste.

No. 1856823

File: 1705413979735.jpg (66.06 KB, 720x916, wkvar0s6gyt41.jpg)

>>1856622
Rent free. It's a drawing and there's no need to gender facial features. Some of you act so weirdly about this shit, there are always conversations about how picrel is stupid, but whenever a character doesn't immediately read as male or female there's even more bitching.

No. 1856898

>>1856823
i’ve never understood why people (it’s not just an lc specific convo) can accept magic and cat girls and whatever other fictional subject in their art but unrealistic gender/sex depictions cause such confusion. i vaguely remember nonas here getting mad at some butch oc because she was TOO male.
>b-but troons!
troons are an entirely different thing.

No. 1856941

>>1856898
Yeah it's weird how anons will accept all other outlandish shit but drawing a butch woman in an exaggeratedly masculine way because it's a fucking cartoon is REEEE THAT'S JUST A MAN HOW DARE YOU WOMEN ARE SUPPOSED TO BE PORTRAYED AS DAINTY AND FEMININE WITH HOURGLASS FIGURES WHY IS PRINCESS PEACH SO ANGRY I AM BEING OPPRESSED. I really want to believe that it's autistic scrotes mad that there are female characters they can't coom to, that's my cope.

No. 1856952

>>1850052
It’s tough because there’s no real standard for female beauty that isn’t from a male perspective. Females tend to model their idea of attractiveness off of what males like, especially wrt to self insert fantasies. The days of plain jane caricatures are mostly long gone.

No. 1856960

File: 1705420821630.jpg (24.94 KB, 600x600, zach.jpg)

>>1856952
why does it have to be attractive though? men draw themselve like this

No. 1856972

>>1856960
It doesn’t have to be, but >>1846599

No. 1856973

>>1849438
Sonic-Induced Autism is real

No. 1856974

>>1856617
>>1856823
this is annoying, 95% of media depicts women as these tiny button nosed angels with big eyes and round face when women come in so many different shapes

No. 1856976

>>1856823
They forgot the eyelashes because female humans and animals obviously come out the womb with mascara on

No. 1856978

>>1856974
you are going to call the sperg that cries about feminine women being erradicated for saying that

No. 1856984

>>1856898
Exactly. I'm still kind of pissed off about that because anons only relented somewhat when someone posted an image that showed her chest off. Their small-mindedness from trans brainrot/their own insecurities is so annoying. It's like a character is only acceptable as a woman if she has long hair or at least lashes or big tits and an hourglass figure or whatever else will make their dumb brains go "ooh! Woman!"

No. 1856992

and to this day western media still refuses to give us proper beautiful men in cartoons and animation

No. 1856997

File: 1705422776956.png (441.84 KB, 779x1003, average western animation male…)

>>1856992
what?? are you telling me you dont like ugly lazy dad with hot wife n253 or buffed up gay bait?

No. 1857014

File: 1705423951698.jpg (32.38 KB, 344x326, 1281377419838.jpg)

I'm so tired of getting tifs and body positive models when I search for references nowadays I use Google and sometimes pintrest are there any art references sources where I can filter out this shit?

No. 1857031

>>1856997
Is it even possible to have an attractive male character in this style? I feel like it’s not

No. 1857064

>>1857014
japanese sources, there is no other way. I completly gave up on line of action and moved onto pic rel.

No. 1857065

>>1857031
some women husbando the twink with the buff reptile bf, so it is possible

No. 1857092

>>1857014
Croquis cafe

No. 1857095

>>1857092
croquis cafe paywalled all its content a while ago

No. 1857103

File: 1705429619718.jpg (184.32 KB, 1088x1451, 6ed9e178afdadf7efc218f54fb2cc5…)

Have any anons here ordered art supplies from Aliexpress? What was it? How was it? I'm thinking about ordering something but i'm not sure (im only thinking of doing it because there are no stores near where i live)

No. 1857112

>>1857014
Learn how to torrent and download all the croquis cafe and NMA files

No. 1857136

>>1857103
A few times. Supplies like brushes and refillable ink pens are generally a good deal because they’re just the off-label version of what gets sold in other countries, and they usually come in a multi-pack. Stuff like paint and markers are 50/50 quality wise, and the lowest price days are largely over. Unless you live somewhere that taxes Amazon packages like fucking crazy, you pay roughly the same for mediums on both sites these days, especially after repackagers seemingly got the boot.

No. 1857267

How do I un-animefy my artstyle?

No. 1857299

>>1857267
the usual, master studies from non-anime artists and classic art mixed with more life drawing and your own experimentation between real life studies.

No. 1857728

>>1856577
I feel like I just got put on a list for opening this spoiler. Barf

No. 1857949

>>1856617
>Generic weeaboo artist that just learned about sexual dismorphism and wants to incorporate it into his/her art but also has a Plato's cave type relationship with anime and refuses to do actual human studies but also really wants to make tutorials online VS 15 year old aidens that think shitty weeb tutorials are a threat on their trans rights to draw a girl and call it a guy

Aidens are more annoying, but it's funny how clueless so many people that make online single image tutorials are. The "longer? nose" is cracking me up a bit. Yes, that is indeed a longer nose, what even is the question lmao
Reminds of this time an artist made a "hair shading tutorial" that was literally "randomly add some blobs of colour and then blend them" #this was years ago but I still remember it when I think of bad tutorials cuz of how laughable it was##

No. 1858021

File: 1705467689985.jpg (1.32 MB, 1080x2055, Screenshot_20240117_050054_Ins…)

Apparently this is a woman but she just draws edgy millennial moidgaze looking stuff? It came up on my explore page and I like the colour pencil look, I think it is actual colour pencils, but why is this all you draw sis. And one of them had a comment like "you can tell this is a woman because it's so intimate" but it all feels very hollow to me

No. 1858050

File: 1705468170033.gif (5.93 MB, 640x414, sorry-women-rodrick.gif)

>>1858021
Vagina art is almost always tacky I'm sorry

No. 1858066

>>1858021
i hate this trevor brown glossy tacky stiff shit so fucking much its insane

No. 1858354

File: 1705476422306.png (219.61 KB, 372x676, dgck118-5522a144-beaf-4faa-a64…)

>>1856992
I liked G3 Dracula…
Wish Valentine was returned to.

No. 1858396

>>1857014
quickposes is free anon and no gendie shit.

No. 1858399

>>1857103
I discovered baohong paper there, it's very good, and some shops make miniature palettes of high brand paints, perfect to test out, and I still buy glass calligraphy pens there. The brushes and sketchbook are 50/50, just like the other anon said. There is a brand there called "potentate" that claims its paper is 100% cotton but I tried a few of its products and it's clearly not

No. 1858415

>>1858021
It's neither good nor interesting. Her compositions aren't great and the ideas are nothing worthwhile, huge waste of skill imo.

No. 1858457

>>1856992
I'm still impressed that people still are holding out for western media to not look like shit kek

No. 1858559

>>1858066
I hate trevor brown in general. The retard even has the audacity to post woe is me images where he shows that his posts on Instagram keeps getting taken down. Too bad.
Can't believe his account is still up. Even more, I can't believe he shows his gory pedophile shit in art museums, and people are looking at the pictures like nothing he's drew is wrong. what a fucking bunch of degenerates all of them are, they should be put down. Sperg over

No. 1858697

>>1858354
thats ugly anon

No. 1858700

>>1858559
I remember i used to like him when i was 15, but it took me back to read he was defending pedophilia in his blog. He said something about how when he moved to japan in the 90s child pornography was legal. Why the fuck would you say that to justify your paintings?

No. 1858743

>>1858559
Wish I didn’t Google him. Why the fuck was his work propped up so much

No. 1858769

File: 1705512326626.jpg (Spoiler Image,304.9 KB, 1262x2048, its ogre.jpg)

>one of my favourite artists is starting to fall for the coombucks meme
its over nonnas

No. 1858832

>>1858769
I’m sorry but if this is the artist nothing of value was lost.

No. 1858837

>>1858769
>furfaggotry
ew

No. 1858841

>>1858769
It's a furry artist, what were you expecting

No. 1858855

File: 1705514572386.jpg (323.94 KB, 2048x871, [21-05-06] 1390347117080629251…)

>>1858832
That's the point. He used to draw full pieces with backgrounds and tons of characters interacting with the surroundings, but now he only draws soulless coom pinups in a void.

No. 1858860

>>1858855
This still looks pretty generic to me tbqhfam

No. 1858864

>>1858860
post something you like

No. 1858865

>>1858855
I guess the bar is really low for fur artists huh. I should start drawing furries.

No. 1858866

>>1858865
sure nonny i bet you are so much better kek

No. 1858869

File: 1705515055430.png (Spoiler Image,1.08 MB, 814x814, amsbt.png)

>>1858769
I know how you feel, a talented artist going from gorgeous painted pieces with full backgrounds to mostly coomer oc's/pinups is painful.

No. 1858870

>>1858866
you don't need to cry that hard, I know it's probably difficult finding an artist that's not drawing coomshit about something that's inherently degenerate.

No. 1858872

>>1858870
Qhy do all of you live with a stick up your asses? it fascinates me. Art truly is a trade for the mentally ill.

No. 1858874

File: 1705515178484.jpeg (4.49 MB, 3277x4096, IMG_3190.jpeg)


No. 1858877

>>1858874
nta but I find this art so ugly. It's unique and I know has an audience, but I can't stand how ugly the anatomy is.

No. 1858879

File: 1705515399315.png (14.03 MB, 4340x1847, 25692234-ded6-4724-8e30-de7f1a…)

>>1858869
the saddest part is that even when he started taking commissions(which were like 1500 a piece btw) he would still only do fully finished pieces like pic rel.
>>1858874
you do you do nonny, but i find anorexic boy lying in a puddle of trash very ugly. Reminds me of how cluttered and nosensical AI art is.

No. 1858880

>>1858874
Who’s the artist? I find this beautiful

No. 1858886

File: 1705515739757.png (6.49 MB, 1639x2048, wtf kek.png)

>>1858874
what the fuck is this anatomy kek

No. 1858890

Artists turn to coombucks because making money as an artist is an uphill struggle and coomers are always gonna have deep pockets. It fucking sucks. The advent of AI isn't helping anything either. Why would someone want to commission an artist for a bespoke picture of their waifu when they could generate one in 5 minutes? aaauuuUUUUGH I hate it here.

No. 1858891

>>1858886
Yeah we would have no way to tell that the anatomy wasn’t realistic without your very helpful redline

No. 1858892

>>1858886
samefagging. It's actually so cluttered and ugly i didnt even realize the legs are actually way more anachan than that. How do you fuck up with the anatomy so bad?

No. 1858895

>>1858891
it's so fucking ugly though, may i ask why do you like it? is it the cluttered background that activates your monkey brain and distracts your from the shit tier anatomy? you can find miles better Kojima clones than that anon, love yourself.

No. 1858897

>>1858890
tbh that's why I started and I like the supplemental income from commissions. It's not hard to draw and there is an audience for non-porn, but just lewd or suggestive and still get a quick $80 to $150. Make enough progress to be able to keep a consistent style and practice drawing 9hrs a day and you can easily do finished, fully rendered work 3hrs at a time or spend a day sketching them all out, take it easy, and have a nice 7hr day the next day and you're done for the week. Do that twice a month between your other job and it pays off.

No. 1858901

>>1858874
I think this is overall a nice image in a weepy Rococo vampire way but I doubt the artist can render anything that doesn't look like this. It's just such a specific style. Like if Yoshitaka Amano was into yaoi, lol

No. 1858907

>>1858895
Do you mean ayami kojima? I like her too. I think I like how dreamlike it is and the details. I like how everything looks like it’s drifting because of the elongation. Anatomy isnt everything. That said she probably couldn’t draw something more realistic.

No. 1858908

>>1858895
NTA but I think it's beautiful, who cares if someone likes something you don't? Even if the anatomy is extremely stylized I like the colors, early 2000s style and edgy subject matter

No. 1858913

>>1858886
anon… that is not where the torso is. why did you think it was? it's a bit cluttered sure, but the outline is like right there. not the biggest fan personally but i like how pointy she draws the noses.

No. 1858917

>>1858908
She was the one calling the artist i posted ''generic'', that's why i am laughing my ass off at her liking such a generic trash clone of Kojima that isnt even impressive skill-wise. At least the furfag can draw.
>>1858907
You do you, i find it quite grotesque and boring.

No. 1858919

Coom commissions are not necessarily better paid than regular professional work, there's just a lot more of it and standards are fairly low as long as you are willing to comply with whatever they ask customers come easy and it is more laid back work. A coomer might be paying you the same regular rates or even lower but they are more likely to be returning customers and there's lots of coomers.

animu and furry art are oversaturated and aren't as highly valued as some people think but is easier to fill out your schedule with that kind of work and its less demanding than being hired by a studio or something more official.

No. 1858922

>>1858913
It's not my fault it's extremely cluttered and looks like AI vomit, the artist should work on her anatomy.

No. 1858931

>>1858922
someone hasn't heard about exaggerated proportions. also why do you care if you don't like the art anyways??

No. 1858940

>>1858931
Why do you type like that? exagerated proportions look good when they are done by good artists, otherwise they just look amateurish and ugly. That artist didnt exagerate the proportions and gave the trap a super long neck and toothpick legs because of stylization, she did it because she's an amateurish artists and you can tell by the cluttered composition, how hard to read the art is on the thumbnail and the horrendous anatomy. It's fine if you like it, but i am free to criticize it, specially since it's your response to a ''boring'' artist that's miles better at drawing than her. Personally i enjoy art i can look at for hours, but the more i look at >>1858874 the bigger is the headache that it gives me…it's just…bad.

No. 1858956

>>1858917
There’s more to art than technical skill. To me what you posted looks like a mobile game screenshot. I was criticizing the style not the technique but it’s not really technically polished either. there’s no defined light source, there’s not clear structure or weight in the characters or the environment, it’s over rendered.

No. 1858997

>>1858855
from subtle coom to outright coom, is it really that different

No. 1859015

>>1858956
You seriously cant call the art i posted overrendered then post art that's so cluttered you cant even tell half of whats going on. You guys always do the same. Someone posts an artists they like, you shit on them, they ask you to post work you like, and you post something equally bad or worse. Maybe dont talk shit about better artists if you dont want the artists you like to be shit on too. Your anorexic boy shit isnt much better, at least the furfag tried to make a good composition and you can easily tell whats going on without developing an aneurism.

No. 1859019

>>1858855
>>1858874
both of these artists mog the shit out of most of the “artists” crabbing itt why are you all trying to pit them against each other

No. 1859024

>>1859019
Anon called the furfag boring then dropped the anakun femboy shit as an example of good art, it's free real state at that point.(derailing/infighting)

No. 1859030

>>1858997
nta but yeah, a lot of artist that do coomer drawings for cash end up with a lot of anatomy mistakes to satisfy clients and never go back, from what i've seen tho, doubt it's all the same

No. 1859033

>>1859024
Wow two retards fighting each other, anyway, I think the problem with art being only valuable to coomsumers is really only true if your are an anime/cartoon artists. People who do, I don't know, landscapes in oil and shit have their own audience which isn't looking for coom.

No. 1859035

>>1859033
ok that has nothing to do with the conversation and everyone knows that kek

No. 1859036

>>1859015
both artworks are good in their own way. nasty to do the same you dislike to someone else

No. 1859037

>>1859036
Its the art salt thread on lolcow. You think this thread is all roses and lovey dovey compliments? If you dont want your favourite artist to get shit on then dont post it here. If she had posted some super amazing artist that mogs the furfag ability i would have conceded and move on, but she posted some coomery femboy with broken anatomy and cluttered as fuck composition that looks like a PSA about how AIDs are transmitted in the faggot community.(derailing/infighting)

No. 1859043

>>1859015
You’re taking this way more personally than I am, I never said you couldn’t criticize what I posted. And calling something generic is barely shitting on anyone.(derailing/infighting)

No. 1859046

>>1859043
Then why did you get so angry when i called the femboy ugly? i just find it funny you lack self awareness to realize your taste is shit. I mostly like the furfag because he's great skill-wise and even if i dont like furries i can still learn a lot by looking at his art. Something that cant be said about the femboy.(derailing/infighting)

No. 1859050

>>1859046
When did I get angry? I said that I liked it for the atmosphere. I even said she probably does use the style as a crutch. You’re free not to like it.

No. 1859053

>>1859037
You are trying way too hard to shit on them for there taste in art. Pleasr upload another personality trait that isn't just being a bitch cunt, its so boring.(derailing/infighting)

No. 1859054

>>1858855
the furfag can draw and that's why it's generic, there is nothing else to it than technical skill, other than that it's nothing impressive and it's furry and male gazed, at least the other art is symbolic and clearly not meant to be anatomically correct anona, he looks "sucked out" as the art surely intended with the vampire theme, I know you are bitter about your taste being shat on, but you can do better then rendermaxxed foxes too.

No. 1859119

>>1859046
>I-I don't like furries!
Sure nona

No. 1859128

>>1858874
This looks like AI art tbh

No. 1859165

thread's getting too salty, tell me what your favorite software/device for drawing is

No. 1859177

>>1859165
For just drawing lineart or studies clip studio paint or procreate but i end up using photoshop anyways for rendered work because i have all my time saving shortcuts and editing tools there.

Krita has some really good brushes . The sketching chrome thin and large that don't have an equivalent in other softwares but i don't like krita so i never use it.

No. 1859182

>>1859165
I'm probably going to get yelled at again for saying this, but FireAlpaca and MSPaint are my go tos

No. 1859184

call me a pearl clutcher or whatever but while i love mgong's art the moment she started to talk about how her fat femboy oc is literally a child predator and detailed in tweets how said oc has sex with kids i feel so uncomfortable seeing some of her art now

No. 1859185

>>1859184
same I wish she kept that to herself

No. 1859190

>>1859184

…fuck this reminds me of a pic she drew of said femboy oc having sex with a person much smaller than him. I used to think it was just some twink but now I want to fucking retch because it was most likely the oc having sex with a child. Fucking christ man.

No. 1859196

>>1859184
how is that guy a femboy? he's just a regular fat male isn't he

No. 1859197

>>1859196
nah he has tits and a pussy

No. 1859201

>>1859196
He looks male but mgong always draws him with a vagina as well as sagging boobs

No. 1859202

>>1859197
>>1859201
the term you guys are looking for is "cuntboy", there's nothing innately feminine about boobs and vagina

No. 1859206

File: 1705531574909.jpg (111.44 KB, 1048x825, E1p8cgbVUAkW0Pr.jpg)

>>1859019
this thread feels like /ic/ sometimes tbh. so many pointlessly bitter and hateful posts. i get that it's the salt thread but surely you don't have to go out of your way to be horrible to nonas

No. 1859213

>>1857103
The famous Paul Rubens's watercolors. They're opaque but quite good if you're not into transparent watercolors.

No. 1859218

File: 1705532386703.jpeg (749.78 KB, 3449x4096, 1704381727331.jpeg)

>>1857949
"What do you mean trans men cannot have broad shoulders and tiny waist?"

No. 1859223

>>1859218
tranny art is so ugly

No. 1859236

>>1859202
>there's nothing innately feminine about boobs and vagina
I hate having to use twitter terms but you really need to touch grass.

No. 1859242

>>1859202
Is this bait or are you serious

No. 1859248

>>1859236
>>1859242
i always think of feminine in terms of things like makeup, lipstick, general stereotypes rather than the reality of being female. i've also never seen anyone apply femboy to cuntboys unless it was shit like this >>1855237.

No. 1859259

File: 1705534742970.jpg (187.6 KB, 624x960, b0e26c224c62dac090b37430aa22c7…)


No. 1859271

>>1859184
huh did she spiral? really weird she seems to jump from fetish to fetish. been following for a long time and she never seemed to be the type into shota/loli
>>1859202
dont even bother this thread reeks of newfaggotry, they dont even know what a femboy is

No. 1859272

>>1859236
>>1859248
This, "female" and "feminine" are different things. Having a vagina and breasts is female, femininity is a social construct.(derailing)

No. 1859276

>>1858886
Not even that anon but being all "LOLLL THE ANATOMY IS SOOOOOOO UNREALISTIC" in a piece that's about composition and largely exaggerated features to strengthen the atmosphere they're trying to get across is actual cringe /beg/ behavior, don't do that. Of course it's nonsensical, I'm pretty sure that's purposeful in this artwork.

No. 1859280

>>1859271
Nta but she has drawn extremely young ..shota porn basically a toddler,which she has deleted after being called out on her old account

No. 1859285

>>1859280
i dont remember that and i have been following her since the start. was it the bug creature things?
>>1859276
i dont know how people can like things with purposefully bad anatomy honestly. its like when coomer moids like badly drawn porn because big tits and ass cloud their vision of whats good art

No. 1859290

>>1859285
No it was based off her half beastman oc , I would not recommend searching for it nonnie because it is quite gross and disturbing. It was posted on lc once and mods removed it because it was borderline cp which it is

No. 1859292

File: 1705536825845.png (970.3 KB, 828x828, image_2024-01-18_110438567.png)

Ignoring this brain rotten discussion, does anyone here have their own personal artcows?
Mine is more of a sad/horrorcow, but here's Speelseal/Nopperabou2/whatever her new username is
> Australian TiF who draws horror guro art
> much of her older work focused on her suicide attempt, which she used to overshare about to a concerning degree
> Therian, believes she has the "spirit of a fox" inside her
> shown uncensored pictures of her healing amputated leg on a now deleted account
> much of her work is now lost as she will mass delete posts and accounts
> briefly had a server where she would complain to her boyfriend about ED related topics in the main chat
Shame that most of her work is long lost because it used to be quite amazingly technical

No. 1859296

>>1859285
She always had some "inclination" towards liking shota but usually managed to keep it concealed save from instances where she'd end up posting a drawing about it but deleting not too long after. Now's the first time I've seen her trying to wedge shota into her oc story to the point that she basically made her oc into a pedophile and it's just disgusting because she keeps calling him "perverted mom"

No. 1859304

File: 1705537277812.png (Spoiler Image,1.96 MB, 1970x2048, mgong thing.png)

>>1859290
this thing? i seriously dont remember her drawing lewds of it but maybe i blocked it out

No. 1859306

>>1859296
>him
her oc is female

No. 1859308

>>1859306
She refers to her oc with masculine pronouns though. Or at the very least I've seen her mixing both.

No. 1859309

>>1859304
I don't even understand why you guys like her so much. There are plenty of good artists with less extreme mental illnesses to idolize

No. 1859310

>>1859308
it has a vagina and boobs, it's female. integrate you dumb twitterfag.

No. 1859311

>>1859309
you guys say this every single time an artist isnt a perfect angel. all good artists are mentally ill

No. 1859312

>>1859310
Nta but cuntboys are kinda their own category.

No. 1859313

>>1859312
cuntboys are just women anon pls

No. 1859314

NOTICE

Thread has reached 1100 posts. The thread will be locked and you will be unable to post in it shortly after it exceeds 1200 posts. Please begin preparing a new thread and post a link to it when it's created.

No. 1859315

>>1859304

yeah that one. she did draw some lewds of him (some more disgusting than others, sadly i remember seeing some of them because mgong never put nsfw warnings on her posts) but as far as i know she deleted them not too long after.

No. 1859317

>>1859304
Could be,it's was genuinely disgusting and disappointing when I found this about her it always seemed odd she was so scared about her art accounts being popular and being "found" out by some.

No. 1859319

>>1859317
At first I thought it was because she used to (and still does) reference nazism/nazi imagery and symbols a lot in her art (she'd barely censor the swastika but it was clear as day) but yeah now it has become even clearer

No. 1859320

>>1859315
were they archived somewhere?

No. 1859321

>>1859311
>all good artists are mentally ill
That's true but I'd rather the specific mental illness not involve them drawing pedoshit. Why can't they just be schizophrenic?

No. 1859322

>>1859317
at least she owns it now, maybe that's why she was schizoing out lately and decided it's best to just embrace her degeneracy. mossa draws worse things and gets followed by professionals who work in the industry.

No. 1859325

>>1859321
all anime artists are pedos

No. 1859334

>>1859322
And yet mossa is only one complaint away from being jailed in Korea since he has drawn literal cp based off real children which is illegal there.and he repeatedly has stated he's afraid if the government finds out. I have no sympathy for these pedo artists they can rot even if it was a artist I liked.

No. 1859336

>>1859313
Cuntboys are trannies made by people with a crippling porn addiction.

No. 1859337

>>1859320
if you google her username (mgong520) i'm pretty sure you'll find something because her art is archived in a bunch of places. i remember seeing a lot of her old art on twfan net so it could be there but i don't wanna look for it and see all her old shota shit again.

No. 1859338

>>1856992
Depends what you mean by “beautiful men,” considering the posters on this board it could mean anything from Leon Kennedy to some ultra-girly bishie abomination to a literal fifteen year old

>>1858457
Same. This is probably going to sound 4chan-esque but I feel like it’s because Western creators are just trying to fill some quota or get across some unrelated point/message with their designs rather than just… Making good designs.

>>1858769
Babyface + overly large/exaggerated body will always get on my nerves

No. 1859343

>>1859338
>Same. This is probably going to sound 4chan-esque but I feel like it’s because Western creators are just trying to fill some quota or get across some unrelated point/message with their designs rather than just… Making good designs.
And they are simply shit artists, lets face it.

After decades of outsourcing and boomers retiring American art academia has lost a lot of know how and now runs of nepotism alone.

No. 1859346

>>1859304

Girl I feel so stupid. I've followed her for years now, back when she drew her OC story "Ice Strider" which had a chubby brown-haired doctor guy with a baby face. She often drew ecchi of him and other baby-faced male characters of hers that looked very much like kids but I somehow always failed to catch on how it was basically shota and now I'm seeing her literally saying it in all words that she pretty much fantasizes about her cuntboy OC being a pedophile. Every single artist I love ends up becoming a shota/loli freak, life fucking sucks.

No. 1859348

>>1859184
Didn’t she say she didn’t want an audience of "western women"? That sure is one way to go about it kek

No. 1859351

>>1859334
no one cares anon his baraag is right there open to the public he doesnt even hide it. but since he isnt female no one cares about cancelling him

No. 1859357

>>1859351
Which is truly infuriating. Korean female artists get doxxed and harassed for fucking drawing a hand gesture and these moids are excused I really don't want to alog but god do I want to. I wish the worst on this moid

No. 1859358

>>1859351
There's nobody trying to cancel mgong, if anything now she has created a fanbase that seems to enable and cheer her on. We're just expressing how it's fucking disgusting that she just publicly exclaims how she fantasizes about her OC being a child predator and how she also describes how her OC fucks children while painting it in a "hehe perverted horny" light. She's just as disgusting as mossa and those other moids that get off on loli and shota porn.

No. 1859365

File: 1705539819261.png (2.36 MB, 1747x2048, mgong oc.png)

>>1859346
> She often drew ecchi of him and other baby-faced male characters of hers that looked very much like kids
>very much like kids
>this
>shota
when did this thread become infested with twitterfags??? is any character that isnt super ripped and has wrinkle lines a shota now wtf

No. 1859367

>>1859365
There is proof but posting that here is a instant ban retard.

No. 1859370

>>1859367
i know she drew shota, but that character is not shota anon is just retarded. Ofcourse every artist she follows is going to draw loli/shota if she considers any character without wrinkles a shota lmfao. why even follow anime tards at that point?? go join western side of twitter and follow all those tifs that draw fat hairy men with tit scars

No. 1859375

>>1859365

nta but she did draw this character as a child and in compromising positions a handful of times, not to mention how she created variations of him who were pretty much toddlers (such as the beast one) but nobody in here wants to look for that shit much less post it here and get banned.

No. 1859383

File: 1705540291503.png (2.48 MB, 1780x2048, mgong oc 2.png)

>>1859375
yeah but she was talking about how that character was a child, not his child versions. between calling cuntboys 'male' and now trying to imply a full grown male character is shota because its not super duper roided this thread is starting to reek of newfag twitter refugee

No. 1859384

>>1859304
anyone know of brushes similar to what's used here kek sorry but it looks cool

No. 1859386

>>1859384
as far as i know mgong seemed to use some default brushes in procreate or something? i remember seeing a screenshot of her workscreen once and i'm pretty sure it was procreate.

No. 1859387

>>1859384
its just the most basic textured brush. this thread is infested by twitterfags…

No. 1859389

>>1859386
>procreate
ah rip, i use csp

No. 1859390

>>1859389
just hit the asset store and dl the very first textured brush

No. 1859393

File: 1705540814123.png (164.12 KB, 720x558, Screenshot_20240117-221247.png)

>>1859184
haha what

No. 1859395

File: 1705540881651.png (107.77 KB, 720x413, Screenshot_20240117-221800.png)


No. 1859396

>>1859393
>>1859395
how do you think she became like this?

No. 1859398

>>1859396
having a super autistic fetish is a bigger motivation to get good at art than anything else. that plus she's chinese and i heard being female in china is hell, she's probably really represed and it's her way of venting. also autism, she seems to collect fetishes like pokemons.

No. 1859400

>>1859396
Autism

No. 1859401

>>1859285
focusing so much on anatomy makes you sound like a newb who just discovered loomis on /ic/. You don't have to be this tryhard nonna(infighting)

No. 1859402

File: 1705541223323.jpg (156.17 KB, 540x673, Screenshot_20230302-163033_Ins…)

I hope I can illustrate a few covers in my lifetime.
Illustrated covers are a good show of technical skill. You'd have to have good composition and story telling to make an eye catching one and for a book it would truly make a difference. Plus many book lovers appreciate such covers and not the graphic shit they do with books commonly so your work would be appreciated.

No. 1859407

>>1859401
whats wrong with focusing on anatomy? some of you seem too afraid of actually studying art and hide under ''muh style''. the piece isnt interesting enough for me to focus somewhere else either, it looks like AI.

No. 1859412

>>1859407
yeah, you sound exactly like a noob who just found out about /ic/ . Now everything is anatomy this anatomy that because you haven't really studied anything else except some figure drawing book(infighting)

No. 1859417

>>1859412
again, you havent told me why focusing on anatomy is a bad thing. you just throw ''hurr durr you must be from /ic/'' when ic is mostly known for not picking up loomis and stagnating out of stubborness. that piece is pretty ugly. everything from anatomy to composition is super boring and you are just getting blinded by rendermaxxing. i bet you really dont look at art for more than 5 seconds while scrolling on your twitter feed, which is why you are so defensive of style over substance. there are artists that are both good at anatomy and very stylish, they arent mutually exclusive.

No. 1859519

>>1859412
Shhh let the newfags redline pls this will be so funny

No. 1859541

>>1859292
I gatekeep my personal art cows because once they become popular they deactivate within a week.

No. 1859566

>>1859541
i miss homie

No. 1859604

>>1858874
I know that the artist was going for a certain style, but the legs are so underdeveloped and tiny it's comical

No. 1859616

>>1859604
nooo anon how dare you to look at it for more than 5 seconds kek

No. 1859629

>>1859566
Me too nonnie.

No. 1859655

>>1859566
>>1859629
I'm still so pissed about that lurker ruining everything, thanks for touching the poop retard, now all we have is the thread to look back on

No. 1859772

>>1858886
I think this solidifies that anons are autistic.

No. 1859787

>>1858886
I love how anon made the torso and arms fatter and didn't line up collar bone properly, incredible redlining you really showed them!

No. 1859803

I have the impression that the tools on Clip Studio Assets have drastically dropped in quality because of western artists. For every couple handful of decent tools I see at least 4 or 5 per page that's obviously created by a mediocre-to-bad western artist and the tools is usually a default tool that's slightly modified. I used to see a lot more good tools on Slip Studio Assets but recently it's all slop and it's almost always by western artists. It almost feels like that trend of mediocre artists who don't know how to draw trying to make tutorials and thinking they can teach shit.

No. 1859804

>>1859803
Clip Studio* kek that's what I get for being a retard and not re-reading

No. 1859809

>>1859541
tinfoil, they all lurk here too kek

No. 1859814

>>1859407
Because any bozo can just point out anatomy mistakes, human eye is specifically trained to spot uncanny parts of the human body and it's the first thing most people set out to learn when they want to study art. But along the way you're supposed to find out more ways to make your art captivating i.e. color usage, composition, stylization, subject matter etc. that you pick up to be able to express your artistic vision. Biologically correct anatomy is often stiff and limited and not suitable for all styles that want to preserve a certain expression, so a lot of artists decide to ignore it. To hyperfocus on anatomy when the artwork obviously is doing it on purpose or has other factors as its main building pieces shows that you haven't developed your eye to the point you can actually spot these other parts of the artwork.

No. 1859815

>>1859803
They do it to farm for clippy points they receive by creating assets for the asset store and can then buy the better materials created by actually competent artists. I just do my best to ignore them.

No. 1859816

>>1859292
I have a personal artcow whose name I won't mention kek. She is a he/they tif who has had a tit chop and had her uterus remove recently. She claims she had the uterus partly removed due to a hormonal disorder, which it doesn't take a genius to see that it won't exactly fix anything hormonal to take hrt and remove your natural hormones to go through menopause at age 30.
Her art is (/was) really good but her art subjects changed to being 90% about trans stuff. And in the few cases it's not she'll make sure to inform everyone the art was, in fact, inspired by an aspect of her transness. In-between art she posts angry cringe trans propaganda. She's not quite milky enough for lc but I can't stop watching her crash the train to ruin everything when her art is (was) so good until she became trans.

No. 1859819

>>1859395
So she wanted her oc to be female but was afraid of reception kek.

>>1859787
I'm convinced no one here can actually draw because that red-lining was awful. Anons can't even observe a drawing properly.

No. 1859821

>>1859819
It really was terrible, how do you fuck up a trace?

No. 1859823

>>1859814
You don't need to hyperfocus on anatomy, but pulling up a reference and give it a few glances as you sketch out your idea is going to help you out a lot. Learning decent anatomy is the very bedrock of being able to express yourself freely as an artist if your main focus is human or humanoid characters. All the best art out there is made by people who learned anatomy and developed a style with this knowledge in mind. It's artists with no or little knowledge of anatomy that make stiff and limited art because they have no base knowledge to play around with.

You can clearly tell zoomers have taken over most of the online art spaces. Not long ago you'd be made fun of if you tried to argue that learning the basics limited your creative freedom. Of course, art doesn't suck just because the artist didn't get the anatomy quite right, but you can clearly tell the difference in quality between an artist who tried and an artist who's convinced they don't need to learn anything.

No. 1859824

>>1859819
This is one of the reasons why I love some art anons here, shit like this and the infamous blue lady series is so funny. Please keep being arrogant nonas

No. 1859827

File: 1705580049923.png (81.97 KB, 717x397, rgncfhdmdthy_y.png)

kek does she lurk here?

No. 1859829

>>1859827
>i really don't want to feel like I was raped because of your beauty
???? is she off her meds?

No. 1859831

File: 1705580300536.jpg (1.16 MB, 850x1164, Cambrai,_Cathédrale_Notre-Dame…)

>>1859823
Don't be obtuse. There's a time and place for the "you need to know the rules to break the rules" mantra but in a picture like >>1858874 you need to have an underdeveloped sense of comprehension if you look at it and the first thought you have is "OH MY GOD THE ANATOMY IS SO FUCKED LMAO". It's what I would expect someone completely outside the art scene to say because they can't pay attention to the composition, usage of art techniques and symbolism and the linework since they're unable to deconstruct pieces like this. It's like normies looking at abstract art and smugly exclaiming how "even they can do better" because they have no idea what it's about.

Honestly Da Vinci and other old master scrotes autistically obsessed with clinically correct anatomy and bible fanart being the endgame of all art completely fucked over the western art for centuries to come, we could still have the creative medieval paintings inspiring us today.

No. 1859834

File: 1705580451153.png (Spoiler Image,35.28 KB, 548x350, ew.png)

>>1859827
although some nona posted this she left out the worst part attached to this tweet…

No. 1859904

File: 1705586463998.jpg (424.48 KB, 1000x1800, E-Mannerism-04.jpg)

>>1859831
>Honestly Da Vinci and other old master scrotes autistically obsessed with clinically correct anatomy and bible fanart being the endgame of all art completely fucked over the western art for centuries to come, we could still have the creative medieval paintings inspiring us today.
You can make your argument without spewing this nonsense. Da Vinci and other Renaissance artists still had rules to follow other than correct anatomy. They were super autistic about composition and still had to adhere to the symbolism of their times, so no they didn't make impressive but meaningless art. Some of them even ditched "clinically correct anatomy", like Michelangelo, whose muscular characters go way beyond real life.
The artists that were the most obsessed with the old masters of Renaissance were actually the Mannerists, who copied only from the work of Renaissance masters to make paintings that couldn't care less about anatomy and were full of symbols to the point of obsession. Going by your logic they couldn't have been able to paint things like picrel.

Also, I got the impression that the old masters people talk about on /ic/ and this thread were actually old illustrators like Leyendecker.

No. 1859946

>>1859827
Oh my fucking god she's such a cow. I understand it's not easy to be a woman in china but she's just so whiny and gross at this point.

>>1859834
The translator is fucking shit up but I can still tell she's saying some disgusting stuff about children. I get that it's fiction and all but she's too far into it.

No. 1859951

>>1859946
the worst part is her followers enabling her and commenting on how sexy it is and then describing other disgusting scenarios in detail. as much as i know that mgong has to deal with some shit this is just fucking nasty and the fact she's happily talking about it in public irks me.

No. 1859979

>>1859787
>>1859819
again, its not my fault the drawing is cluttered as shit

No. 1859990

File: 1705594216508.jpg (1.76 MB, 2000x2753, 1591804919679.jpg)

>>1859814
holy shit the fucking cope just to defend ugly ass yaoi anatomy. like i said, you can both be good at anatomy and have a dystinctive stylized style, anatomy isnt restrictive in the slightlest and that piece would actually be good if the artist bothered to give a shit about anatomy. like seriously how can you say good anatomy is stiff and restrictive while defending an ugly stiff drawing of a femboy with anachan legs surrounded by vomit flowers kek. some of you have never looked for art made before the 2010s and it shows. i seriously dont understand how everyone is defending that piece of shit drawing, do you guys even bother to look at art outside of twitter? art that isnt made by japanese artists? its not an unique style either, there are a bazillion of kojima clones out there. pic rel a better drawing with the exact same style i found in my inspor folder and, gasp, it has anatomy???

No. 1859994

>>1859827

I'm not sure if she does but I can see why you think so because now she just keeps tweeting that she's being "persecuted" over her OCs lmao. She should just lock her account.

No. 1860001

File: 1705595065288.png (2.6 MB, 848x1774, 2deep4nonny.png)

>>1859831
>the composition, usage of art techniques and symbolism
its a faggot being biten by a vampire surrounded by roses. is this your first time seeing art? bloodied character surrounded by roses is one of the most common compositions ever, its like drawing an anime girl with a sundress surrounded by sunflowers lmfao you have to be kidding

No. 1860021

>>1859990
What does that even mean, “it has anatomy”. The anatomy is just as unrealistic in this image.

No. 1860023

>>1859990
Oh hey, it's my dude Amano

No. 1860032

>>1860021
maybe you need to hit loomis if you cant see the difference between good stylized anatomy and eugenia cooney femboy

No. 1860037

File: 1705597401302.jpg (87.97 KB, 719x458, Screenshot_20240118_110215_Tum…)

The image almost doesn't matter but the way "gay" tifs talk about moids is genuinely disgusting. Please don't ever admit this kind of thing again.

Maybe this artist is a gay moid but I somehow doubt it.

No. 1860040

>>1860037
give more context this reads like schizophrenia

No. 1860073

>>1860032
By your logic nobody should like what you posted because there’s medieval art with this theme and better anatomy. Also this weird insistence that you can’t like something if someone somewhere has done it better.

No. 1860079

File: 1705599576464.jpg (498.57 KB, 1812x2048, francine.jpg)

>>1859292
I have a personal artcow but she's less of an artcow and more of a "BPDchan themlet that posts her entire life on the instagram stories of her art account and can't go more than a couple days without posting a detailed rant about what she is currently mad at in her current life circumstances"cow. I just watch her stories like a telenovela. She doesn't post a lot of art nowadays because she's too busy trying to not go back to homelessness.

No. 1860086

>>1860073
i am just saying its not 2deep4u or original in the slightest. you are free to like it but you dont have to cope and try to pretend its anything but yet another low quality kojima clone

No. 1860099

>>1860086
I literally just said that I liked it, idk where you’re getting 2deep4u from. And it looks different enough from kojima as well as being unique enough to be recognizable, even if they use recurring motifs.

No. 1860114

>>1860099
you were trying to say anatomy doesnt matter because the drawing was SO DEEP HAD SO MANY MOTIFS SO MUCH SYMBOLISM and then its a femboy with tranny stockings kek nonny please

No. 1860123

>>1860114
I said I liked the atmosphere and the style, not every post disagreeing with you is the same person.

No. 1860128

>>1860040
>Artist posts what I assume to be angsty black and red vent art of a man eating from another man's hand and a dog

>posts with these tags


>"Gay" male artist

No. 1860132

>>1860037
>tapeworm oc
>dog motif
okay I need to know what these mean and how it ends up either gay or showcasing this tif's feelings about men kek

No. 1860138

File: 1705602064218.jpg (581.59 KB, 719x1395, Screenshot_20240118_122221_Tum…)

>>1860132
>>1860128
The art in question.

No. 1860142

>>1860079
its surreal to see her here since shes my personal artcow too kek, last i heard she was ranting about her family being abusive and asking funds to buy useless shit ,she definitely overshares too much

No. 1860143

>>1860132
Titled "Inferiority complex"

"#This sums up my feelings about men"

"#Longing, Jealous and Cowardly"

Really? Gross.

No. 1860148

>>1860123
its fine if you like femboys and yaois but that doesnt make it high art immune to criticism

No. 1860153

>>1860148
yeah again nobody said it was immune to criticism or it was bad to criticize it. you’re really defensive.

No. 1860154

>>1860138
somehow I knew it would look something like this

(though I was also hoping for a freaky, literal tapeworm oc, but now I see that was just the artist tagging herself. why does so much tif art look like it's aping religious imagery but with more body hair and disfigurements?)

No. 1860158

>>1860153
you are the one still going about someone criticizing the shit anatomy

No. 1860163

>>1860153
Hey anon can you redline this thing I did, I'm very lost what to do.

No. 1860166

>>1860163
comparing that to the femboy fetish art is disrespectful tbh

No. 1860168

>>1860166
whoops I meant it for the silly redline nonachan

No. 1860170

>>1860168
some of you truly dont look at art for more than 5 seconds if you think >>1860163 and >>1859990 is in any way comparable to this shit >>1858874 but it has tons of sparkly shitty effects and roses that makes it sooo deep so much symbolism!!!1!

No. 1860173

>>1860170
Isn't this the same artist as the "femboy" drawing?

No. 1860174

I'm pretty sure I was stuck in anatomy-chan's headspace for a very long time. And I knew I wasn't good with anatomy but criticized stylization, hated pretty much every style from studio 4c. Flash forward to now and I'm still trying to loosen up, realizing that ultimately, art is about conveying the right emotion and message over realism. That's what photography is for kek.

No. 1860182

>>1860079
Checked out her story and I didn't expect to see anything but she's asking her followers to attack some woman on facebook who told her to get a job kek I'm sad she's with some jobless loser though, do you know what he used to do? What workplace gets removed and leaves you with nothing for 5 months while your girlfriend works two jobs

No. 1860185

>>1860173
is it? there are like 5 million kojima bootlegs and they all look the same. the femboy drawing has terrible flow that's only accentuated by the pointy stiff anatomy, while in the other examples the anatmy flows really well and it's not cluttered

No. 1860186

>>1860170
Dog that's the same fucking artist Bani-chan

No. 1860189

>>1860186
and? i wasnt criticizing her art as a whole, only that shitty piece. Hope she focus on animation then since it actually looks better than that cluttered AI mess.

No. 1860210

File: 1705604911232.jpeg (1.2 MB, 1512x2258, IMG_3212.jpeg)

Can I get a redline please I don’t think this guy even read Loomis

No. 1860213

File: 1705605314310.png (1.06 MB, 600x836, image_2024-01-19_061632203.png)

I feel like that anon would really hate artists like Yūko Tatsushima and Brian Froud (picrel)

No. 1860214

LOCKING IMMINENT

Thread has exceeded 1200 posts and is about to be locked! Please create a new thread and post a link to it.

No. 1860215

>>1859182
same, love the simplicity, and i don't even need much other than the round brush + some textured stuff for rendering. just can't get used to super complicated programs. maybe im just a retard tbh

No. 1860218

File: 1705605512632.jpg (18.81 KB, 320x329, not-daijoubu.jpg)

I have a retarded problem, I'm a casual weeb and I think a lot of "problematic" drawings are cute. Nothing extreme but I think a lot of shotas and loli characters are often cute, and there are also a lot of cute female "skimpy clothes" designs that I like a lot because I just find them cute. The problem is that I kinda know that they're supposed to pander to men in gross ways but I guess since I don't find them sexually attractive myself I just think they look cute and cool and can't see what's bad about them. It makes me feel so conflicted because I'd love to draw cute lolis but truly in a 100% innocent way but I know I'd get called a pedo panderer and such.
Somehow I can relate to Dolly Parton saying she thought the local prostitute was the prettiest woman in town. My taste is just trash but in an innocent non-sexual way.

No. 1860220

>>1860173
It is the same artist. Bitchy redline won't touch it though, too busy screaming about Kojima clones dispite the her clearly being inspired by Amano Kek

No. 1860230

>>1860210
hell nah not this pedo again

No. 1860279

>>1860218
>It makes me feel so conflicted because I'd love to draw cute lolis but truly in a 100% innocent way but I know I'd get called a pedo panderer and such.
just draw lolis from non coomer shows? or like idk just young female characters

No. 1860291

>>1860288
new thread



Delete Post [ ]
[Return] [Catalog]
[ Rules ] [ ot / g / m ] [ pt / snow / w ] [ meta ] [ Server Status ]