[ Rules ] [ ot / g / m ] [ pt / snow / w ] [ meta ] [ Server Status ]

/ot/ - off-topic

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File(20 MB max)
Video
Password (For post deletion)

Read the rules and usage info before posting.

The VPN ban is now in effect on /ot/, see this update post for more information

File: 1749132844486.png (908.61 KB, 1000x1066, bingo.png)

No. 2550003

This thread is dedicated to all and any fandom discourse. Global rules apply: don't infight, report and ignore bait, etc.

Current topics include, but are not limited to:
> Proshipping vs Antishipping
> Ao3 Censorship and TOS
> Slapfights between slash, femslash, and het shippers
> Carrds, DNIs and Call-out Threads
> Whitewashed/blackwashed/colorist fanart drama
> ‘[Insert Sexuality/Gender]-Coded’ Characters
> Debates over death of the author
> Stalking/harassment experienced by actors/creators

Related threads:

Fujo vs. anti-fujo discourse:
>>>/ot/2523554
Fujocoomer cringe:
>>>/ot/2540804

Previous:
>>>/ot/2532214

No. 2550052

>pic rel
So what are we gonna talk about then?

No. 2550066

Is anyone actually that pressed about representation in fandom/media? Maybe I just have fatigue, it's been a long time since I've found something new that I like, but I can’t help but wonder is it my own apathy or just genuine lack of need to see every person (or myself) inserted into things that I watch. Representation has been such a big topic for years and it really feels like it doesn't matter that much for everything to show everybody all the time.

No. 2550083

File: 1749137791267.jpg (126.05 KB, 850x1063, __princess_daisy_mario_drawn_b…)

>>2550066
blogposting but as a black woman, representation is nice but at the end of the day it never mattered too much to me. (For ex. I related more to Princess Daisy as a young tomboy than I did any black character on TV.)

That being said, i've never been the kind of person that HAS to see someone that shares the same physical traits as me to know I can do something. But I think that's rare in human beings to not need that kind of external validation.

Most people are visual creatures like that and need to see it, which is why we have this whole dumb topic that's been lasting for years.

No. 2550085

>>2550052
All of them. I'm going to get a bingo before you and win the thread.

No. 2550095

>>2550083
I feel you, nonnie. I'd rather see different kinds of women than the forced diversity we've been getting in the last decade. A tomboy princess would be more awesome. Also, I love princess Daisy's colors. It's interesting because I've grown up in the cosplay scene for the last 20 years now and black women cosplaying has never been an issue, but recently more people are focused hard on it. I just want better written women characters in general.

No. 2550107

>>2550095
fr its so weird. I cosplayed as L and another black friend of mines cosplayed as Envy from FMA back then and no one gave a shit that we were POC or w/e, we all just cared about the source material. I never had that insecurity that I couldn't cosplay as my fave character because we didn't share the same race/gender like I see now in the cosplay community.
This weird hyperfocus on race etc. has actually divided us a lot more imo than unite us.

No. 2550121

I’ve came to the conclusion that male nerds are subhuman and deserve all the possible hate and harassment they can get. I think it’s really funny how they complained about being boolied in high school or whatever as if anyone cares, kek. We need a mass exodus of moids from fandom spaces for good.

No. 2550128

>>2550083
I'm black too, and I hate when anything non-white or male needs to represent every group under the sun. I came for women, not amab NBs in drag?

No. 2550133

>>2550083
Ayrt I also think that there is a lack of character diversity in the sense that a majority of characters also have the same personality and storylines, over and over and over. maybe I'd be less apathetic towards it if I was seeing things like characters with traits that make their plot/development more intriguing. I don't know how many more times I can stomach a character that is a copy and paste of another character except this time it's totes different because they're taking the easy way out with visual rep rather than writing underrepresented types

No. 2550134

>>2550121
I seen a twitter post once saying something along the lines of "the needs are now surface level idiot consoomers and the jocks are reading ancient texts and LOTRfags". They're all moids so it makes no difference but it was a weirs realisation that moid nerds have become this horrific unsympathetic entity that I can only wish the worst upon instead of feeling kinda guilty seeing one get slammed into a locker. Burn their interests the ground is what I say

No. 2550135

>>2550128
This is exactly the way I feel. This is less about fandom and more about media in general, but it makes me cringe so hard the way categories like “female” and “nonwhite” get grouped with every other social justice topic in fiction sometimes, especially when some people online see gendieshit as the only meaningful category of minority.

No. 2550153

File: 1749142269157.png (378.91 KB, 598x776, IMG_1603.png)

thoughts?

No. 2550162

>>2549884
Last time I saw the comments, it was just women being nostalgic. Probably has something to do with the moid attention the video got >>2549002

No. 2550181

>>2550083
The picrel looks ai generated

No. 2550203

>>2550153
watchmojo still exists?

No. 2550207

>>2550203
Kek that's exactly what I was about to say

No. 2550213

>>2550181
all AI images have a smoking gun, and this one's no different- how come her necktie merges into one fabric piece before the knot? not to mention that janky earring on the right, and that INCREDIBLE background.

No. 2550353

>>2550213
I thought danbooru banned ai?

No. 2550370

File: 1749152908077.png (213.4 KB, 578x459, Screenshot 2025-06-05 144656.p…)


No. 2550375

File: 1749153169420.jpeg (936.11 KB, 1242x1237, IMG_6049.jpeg)

>>2550095
>>2550095
as a kid I felt more represented/connected to characters that shared my personality traits rather than just looks. probably because I was already surrounded by people who looked like me. relatability is important for kids but it’s not exclusive to just race
>>2550353
>>2550181
it’s not AI. it’s just the type of generic art that gets fed into AI

No. 2550376

>>2550370
>art so soulless it gets mistaken for ai
rendermaxxing strikes again

No. 2550381

>>2550213
Have people forgotten artists can just be mediocre

No. 2550385


No. 2550387

>>2550381
It feels traced from ai image

No. 2550391

>>2550370
Kek I guess it's just a retard who doesn't know how ties work.

No. 2550393

File: 1749153758564.png (27.9 KB, 548x213, Screenshot 2025-06-05 130059.p…)

Yes, it's a troon.

No. 2550396

>>2550393
Who's that?

No. 2550418

>>2550153
Watchmojo was always a money hungry ,viewer-bait channel.Of course they were going to take a route that could attract possible newer viewers with controversial titles/takes.I don’t get how people are wringing about this when the channel hasn’t been relevant in eons and never had any quality control in the first place.These tards are just giving them what they wanted.

No. 2550458

File: 1749157499822.png (376.46 KB, 595x678, IMG_2175.png)

what the fuck is he talking about?

No. 2550460

>>2550458
It looks like they darkened her eyebrows?? okay, men are retarded

No. 2550463

>>2550458
It’s the same fucking model with slightly different lighting and camera angles. Gamer moids were a mistake.

No. 2550466

>>2550458
I know nothing about this game, but left just looks like really unflattering lighting.

No. 2550488

>>2550458
Am I tripping or is that the same fucking model?

No. 2550551

File: 1749160969138.png (61.38 KB, 600x800, Narigudo.png)

>>2550066
I think representation may be nice for small kids, but honestly, I never cared for that. I usually enjoyed way more the dyanmic of trying to become like the character rather than the character having to be like me.

No. 2550590

>>2550458
Funny Cdpr is being considered a woke company only now when they went out of their way to remove a lot of shit from the witcher books, like kek. Geralt wants adult women. Woke shit probably also includes Geralt not wanting to bang someone he considers his daughter. Witchers are meant to be fucking ugly, if anything Ciri is a witcher supermodel even on a bad day.

No. 2550610

File: 1749162826142.jpg (98.43 KB, 736x1001, dc17b673dcbea6b8fc4a558fce7920…)

>>2550066
Personally, when I want representation, I just write my own fanfics.

No. 2550617

>>2550551
>>2550066
I think representation is important to show children that differences exist and they don't have to be scared of it. For example, a lot of kids are frightened the first time they meet a visibly disabled person, but if they've already seen disabilities on TV or something they won't react so badly. Once you reach your teenage years, though, it's ridiculous to expect validation from media.

No. 2550651

>>2550610
So do I. I don't know why this concept is lost on the youth. They're all so retarded and need everything to be canon and official.

No. 2550693

>>2550651
I'd be happy they shared my ideals and life, could give less of a damn about skin color.

No. 2550710

File: 1749167252922.jpg (32.69 KB, 736x598, 06d410611a2c9cc34bd383cf66c854…)

>>2550651
Responding to say this. I view race bending for "representation" the same as when dumb "fans" horribly mischaracterize because "it's my headcanon". If you truly love a character, you wouldn't change them in a way that disrupts the fundamentals of what and "who" that character is meant to be, even down to the design essentials of what makes that character physically themselves. If you "need" to redraw a character as a different race than what they are, or if you "need" to rewrite them in a way that's objectively stupid compared to what the source material is actually telling you just so you can "digest" and like the character, you're not a real fan. You're just in the fandom to fuck around. It is for that train of logic that I also personally believe that 99% of coomer artists are not real fans of the movies, shows, books, comics, and games they make porn of. When 90+% of them cannot even get the physique of the character accurate to what they're meant to appear as, I'm going to have a difficult time believing that they truly have respect for the media itself.

No. 2550736

>>2550710
>It is for that train of logic that I also personally believe that 99% of coomer artists are not real fans of the movies, shows, books, comics, and games they make porn of.
One of the main reasons fanart lost all meaning for me. At this point, just call it FOTM art and not "fanart" because you need the spark to draw their favorite character. I may have less views for not wanting to do fanart, but I see it as my own way of respecting a character since I don't have the same chops or understanding that the original maker had when they made them. The author may not be the true presider of canon, but compared to what "fans" often do, It feels like a the mona lisa vs sonichu situation. The only case where fanart and fanfic are better than the source material are genuinely mid to bad media, but then is it really fandom?

No. 2550744

File: 1749169070455.jpg (458.72 KB, 2003x2955, 1560367579389.jpg)

>>2550003
>(…) children or troons arguing on Xitter
that's all this general is kek that might as well be the only box (and yet I keep coming back)
it also hurts seeing danganronpa and homestuck in the same box, even if i get why

>>2550153
>>2550418
I have zero sympathy at this point, twittards are so used to being feared and coddled they thought everyone else would keep their heads down and do as they say forever

No. 2551962

>>2550181
me when i'm bored and need to make up shit to argue about

No. 2552010

File: 1749255937741.jpg (298.41 KB, 1080x1644, b5DAKpI.jpg)

Can we include parasocial celebs in the fandomsperg thread? I think Jelena shippers are a good example but Royalfans are literally group psychosis. It's been a decade and they're still saying Meghan seduced their precious Harry. The current tinfoil is Meghan faking all her pregnancies kek

No. 2552013

>>2551962
This reply seems ai generated hmm
>>2552010
These cretins have nothing to dianafags

No. 2552404

It's an amazing time when a personal fandom cow reactivates months later.

No. 2552413

File: 1749287609615.png (279.11 KB, 735x775, asurei fucking sucks.png)


No. 2552432

>>2552413
>ignore the fact that the female characters would most definitely not have any romantic chemistry for such a possible relationship to even work just to draw and write them fucking
I wish shippers like this would just admit that they want to see and make porn instead of pretending that their dumbass pairings are totally aligned with what the source material gives us.

No. 2552454

>>2552413
I probably said this before but I'm sick to death of certain types shoving "make it gay" bandaids over everything.

No. 2552456

>>2552413
Wasn't this already posted before?

No. 2552588

>>2550066
I used to feel this way but then I just know men will suddenly understand the importance of representation if genders were reversed in literally every media by tomorrow.

No. 2552599

File: 1749304523790.png (150.79 KB, 1080x873, 1000010002.png)

What's with this phenomenon where women will defend character designs in smut by comparing them to real women's bodies?

No. 2552609

>>2552413
I remember seeing this shit all the time on tumblr during 2013-2015 and it felt just as forced as the friction between the girls over this extremely mid moid in-universe. I love yuri but it just feels performative as hell.

No. 2552777

>>2552599
Not wanting to see women with boobs pouring out of their clothes means you’re jealous kek

No. 2552802

>>2552599
>>2552777
To be fair it's almost always small breasted women whining about this stuff and trying to politicize their insecurity by masking it as feminism. There are far more pertinent women's issues in the world than a literal fictional character's tit size. Get a real problem.

No. 2552813

>>2552802
nta but you sound fat kek

No. 2552816

>>2552802
>There are far more pertinent women's issues in the world than a literal fictional character's tit size.
True! So why are you getting offended on behalf of fictional characters who are designed for coomers? Because that's what the discussion is about kek. Are you one of those people who thinks Sonico is supposed to be empowering fat representation?
>Inb4 reeeeee chestlet
Jokes on you, my bewbs are average so I have the right to call both sides of this spergy argument retarded

No. 2552907

>>2552599
It's called "coping with obesity", you can be thin or reasonably curvy and have big breasts but it's always obese women with average breasts who project into fanservice characters.

No. 2552921

File: 1749324756346.png (426.06 KB, 756x778, IMG_2214.png)

my default position on posts like this is that, until proven otherwise, they are made by autistic virgins who have literally never touched anyone of the opposite or same sex. The only thing they have that resembles sexual experiences is online rp with other autistic virgins.

No. 2552929

>>2552802
The world doesn’t run on anime logic, go outside and talk to people for once
>>2552907
I have small boobs and the only time I’ve ever been body shamed for it is by fat women or MTF troons. Ironically enough, I’ve never seen a skinny or even just average weight woman with big boobs project onto oversexualized big tit women, it’s always fatties. One of my personal cows is an obese weeb who draws herself as skinny with big boobs and claims anyone who doesn’t like those hypersexualized women is totally jealous

No. 2553261

>>2552802
>>2552929
>>2552813
>>2552907
I have large breasts and still think those are retarded and that moids who like coomslop should be culled, but I don't like the nonas calling everyone who has big boobs fat
You guys exaggerate. The obvious solution is to ban moids from drawing

No. 2553332

File: 1749343848395.png (295.07 KB, 703x1024, 1682319214812.png)

i just can't handle modern fandom anymore. even nerdy hobby spaces online feel nearly unbearable…i just can't believe it. fandom is full of gender humor and spicy straights now, witch hunting, the dumbest discourse over the stupidest, most pointless bullshit. it's so…….i don't even have a word for it. the fact that you can't even really escape it is what really gets me lol. this shit infects millennials, zoomers, everything. it's like i have to be a hermit online now

No. 2553334

>>2552802
In what world do you have stick thin arms and watermelon sized breasts you coomer

No. 2553335

Another reason never to trust small titted women, this thread proves you are the most insecure, bitter and catty women on the planet. Keep crying because your Nigel jacks off to Sydney Sweeney, we all know that’s the real source of your ‘moral outrage’.(ban evasion)

No. 2553338

I could've sworn this exact argument happened this same week/month

No. 2553341

>>2552929
>>2552907
>>2552816
>>2552777
>>2552813
I’m almost certain these are all posts by the one insane schizo samefag who has been screeching for the last 2 days about being boolied by fat women (how fucking low on the social pecking order to you have to be in order to get bullied by landwhales lmao) and screeching FAAAAT at any woman who says ‘having big tits is fine’. You’re insane. You’ve called women with blonde hair and large breasts ‘pickmes’ for existing and are determined to frame your insecurity as some kind of feminism or political statements while having an absolute melty over women with large breasts. You are the saddest creature I have ever witnessed and probably an insane tranny too since that’s why you got bullied by fat middle aged at work kek. Take your fucking meds and woman up.

No. 2553342

>>2550617
>>2550551
>children and kids
Ayrt I mean representation in adult media, my apologies, I didn't think to clarify that in my post. Rep is always important in kids media for sure but I feel like it doesn't always translate well into adult media because it usually comes at the cost of good characters or interesting plot lines. Like I get a children's TV shows all having similar episodes about things like disabilities or race because there's only so many kid-friendly angles you can take with topics like that so they get a pass, but when I'm watching (for example) Law and Order SVU I don't know how many times I can take Olivia Benson being called a bigot so that the disabled or black cop can go on the same journey of self discovery they've been going on for about 7 years now because they're only there to be black or disabled

No. 2553343

>>2553338
I’m not surprised because this board is full of impoverished troons who are depressed about their gross pointy HRT A cups and can’t afford surgery, and insecure autistic anachans with long ring fingers and excess androgens, whose discord e-bf loser Nigels are all porn addicts.
These losers fly into a rage whenever they see a woman who reminds them of their shitty relationship with their hentai addicted moid who makes them feel like they’re not good enough for having huge anime girl tits and they try to frame this insecurity and intrasexual competition as some kind of retard version of feminism. Then they get super upset when you can see right through them and call them out for it kek.

No. 2553346

>>2552816
Are you the same retard who was having a meltdown about Super Sonico like a month ago? Holy fuck you’re STILL mad about that??? I would be triggered by cartoon tits too if my bf chose wanking over it to having sex with me. I feel sorry for you. Pixels and big boobied women aren’t the enemy, your moid is. Leave him.(ban evasion)

No. 2553347

>>2553343
Nta jesus nonna you didn't have to take out a comically oversized hammer to kill her lmao. But you're right, it's always the same shit when a flat chested nonna doesn't like being a flat chested nonna. It's a board full of women who aren't judging them to begin with but they lash out regardless despite the fact it's moids who are measuring worth by breast size (and who cares what moids think anyway? It's so dumb)

No. 2553351

>>2553347
>who cares what moids think
That’s exactly what I’ve been saying. I don’t get jealous when I see a woman with J cups or a big titty hentai girl because I don’t date coomers in the first place. Just look at the relationship thread or LAP thread and you’ll see soooo many farmers are dating shitty men who compare them to instagram bimbos and have hentai addictions, and the farmers feel like shit and hate themselves because they’re dating these shitty ass moids. The cattiness is just them raging and lashing out because their moids make them feel like shit. If they were genuinely happy and secure in themselves then they wouldn’t need to screech every time they see a large breasted character or woman, like it literally wouldn’t affect them in any way whatsoever.

No. 2553355

>>2553351
Also like think about it logically. If you have small breasts and are happy with them, why would you be upset that men lust over big titted ladies? Wouldn’t you be happy that men are leaving you alone and paying you less attention anyway, since moids are evil scum and trash? And if all big titted women are pickmes who enjoy the attention anyway, like you claim, then how does it affect you in any way and why do you want to ‘save them’?
Let them have those coomer moids, it doesn’t affect your life unless your moid is a coomer too.

No. 2553373

>>2553335
Imagine being such a pickme gangbanger you unironically say shit like this. Holy shit kek
>>2553341
>>2553343
>>2553351
Why are you so adamant on defending some Reddit moid just because some women don’t want women with absurdly big tits wearing revealing clothing. You sound like such a fucking NLOG. Go play nikke and zzz to impress the moids you love to placate so much. This all started because I said women not wanting to see oversexualized depictions doesn’t equal jealousy and that’s literal scrote thinking. This has never been controversial to point out in previous threads, and I don’t see why it is now. Stop justifying bodyshaming with more bodyshaming you fucking hypocrite. Also since you’re weirdly insistent on it, my BF loves my body and he’s not a deranged coomer like you want to be so bad.

No. 2553380

>>2553373
>ree nlog!
>ree pickme!
>ree go play bideogames and suck cock you evil pickme harlot!
>ree my nigel doesn't even watch porn!
I accept your concession nona. Get well soon.

No. 2553381

This entire conversation is dumb as hell.
Can't you guys just make fun of character designs without bringing real women into it? Do you really need to screech about fatties and bone rattlers when talking about genshin impact characters? Why the fuck are people talking about their boyfriends?

No. 2553386

>>2553381
It would be good if they actually a sense of humor and would make fun of the designs, but they always just end up screeching and moralfagging and it's boring. Nobody in the real world gives a single fuck about this issue, only terminally online retards do.

No. 2553389

File: 1749348249636.png (1.66 MB, 940x1851, rt62b8djjh5f1.png)

>>2553380
All this because you can’t accept I’m right and you are bodyshaming women because they dare criticize male gaze slop. That you Addy?
>>2553381
If fatty-chan didn’t lose her mind over women rightfully being upset over picrel (I decided to look for myself) and make up fantasies about my boyfriend jacking off to other girls like a scrote none of this would’ve happened. Considering the original subreddit is for male yandere stuff which is a fetish for women with low self esteem and often goes hand in hand with maledom, so I’m not surprised the users on that subreddit are defending it at least

No. 2553393

>>2553389
>150K women with small tits and porn addicted nigels agree with me
LOL. Is this some kind of gotcha?

No. 2553395

>>2553389
i'm a woman and this image doesn't upset me. i have medium size tits and am single. am i a pickme nlog too for not being offended over it? genuine question. i like my 2d moids drawn heavily sexualized, for what it's worth. lmk if my woman status is invalidated by being this way.(ban evasion)

No. 2553399

>>2553393
What are you even talking about? I was just posting the original screenshot in which the thread was from. You can’t deny that’s a porny character design. In a series for straight women, most women don’t wanna see a femc with absurdly large tits. If you’re a fag and like that? Good to you, but don’t try to act like it’s wrong that other women don’t like it. Also ironic for you to bodyshame women with small tits then criticize men for being porn addicted in the same breath like that’s not something a scrote would do. What’s next, you’re gonna call rape eroge empowering and feminist?

No. 2553404

please get back to posting fandom discourse and not arguing over breast size like shitty moeblobs in a 4koma. this site gets stupider every time i visit it

No. 2553405

File: 1749348976785.png (487.04 KB, 680x445, IMG_0324.png)

>>2553389
>>2553399
>you are bodyshaming women
>also anyone who disagrees with me is fat

No. 2553408

>>2553395
You’re desensitized to porn and oversexualized depictions of women. As is the case with most women into nerd hobbies. >>2553405
Fat people can lose weight. Who cares? Muh fatphobia is a burger issue anyway.

No. 2553413

>>2553389
Blasting women who are arguing with you as fatties and talking about your boyfriend makes you seem underage, too easily pushed into talking about your personal baggage that nobody cares or should care about in an online anonymous forum.

No. 2553416

>>2553405
You can control your fat, you can't control your breast tissue.

No. 2553417

>>2553408
you pretty much just immediately invalidated your own argument in one breath. you don't actually care about body shaming because you immediately call any woman who disagrees with you fat. i am not even fat btw, just pointing out your hypocrisy. you just don't like seeing big tits and are arguing in bad faith and multiple people have called you out on it now.
>>2553413
is also correct. i think you are a very confused and low iq underage poster.

No. 2553420

>>2553418
>That goes both ways for women with large breasts too.
Obviously. You shouldn't be shitting on women's natural breast size whether it's big or small for any reason.

No. 2553421

>>2553399
>You can’t deny that’s a porny character design.
Breasts aren't even a sexual organ, that's a very male gaze/pornbrained judgement to make. And yes, skinny women with huge breasts exist, get over it. Giving them representation is not a crime.
>>2553416
That goes both ways for women with large breasts too. But you're only upset about one way and think it's fine to shame one group of women but pearl clutch and cry when yours gets shamed. You can't have it both ways. Either bodyshaming women is wrong, or it isn't.

No. 2553422

>>2553413
I am an adult. I just don’t care. Go read your josei smut comics with G cup women that get abused and raped by the male love interests in suits.
>>2553417
It isnt about women with big breasts because you can have nonsexualized depictions of women with big tits, you’re the one acting like that can’t exist. Straight women don’t like seeing exposed tits, why is that hard for you to understand?

No. 2553426

>>2553422
I don't get aroused or offended by breasts, no matter how big or small they are, because I'm straight and know that breasts are not a sexual organ. Do you also get offended when women breastfeed in public?
>Straight women don’t like seeing exposed tits, why is that hard for you to understand?
I wouldn't say I don't like it. I would say that it doesn't bother me at all, no more than seeing a person's bare arms or legs bothers me, in other words, not at all. If there was a woman with huge boobs and cleavage showing standing right in front of me, I would not flinch. Same goes for character designs.
>but men will jack off to it
Men will jack off to a 25kb low res picture of a woman's feet in sandals. I don't care what men are thinking or sexualize since they are going to sexualize everything anyway.

No. 2553428

>>2553422
>Go read your josei smut comics with G cup women that get abused and raped by the male love interests in suits
nta but this is such an unhinged thing to say

No. 2553429

This feels like a variation of the anti vs. proship retard war. Who the fuck should really care to be this upset? It's a cartoon. Her back isn't hurting because it's not even real.

No. 2553438

>>2553421
I remember this same exact argument being made by a mtf trying to explain how a 13 year old girl in a video game wearing a bikini and doing belly dances was her expressing herself and "representation", completely ignoring the designers were male coomers and that it was meant for male coomers.

No. 2553439

>>2553421
>m-muh representation?
Ironic of you to call me underage when you’re bitching about representation as if women with big tits can’t just check any anime or manga ever for representation. I don’t know if you’ve ever read josei or adult manga for women, but the femc is almost ALWAYS oversexualized with gigantic tits wearing sexy clothing. The average cup size in Korea (in the case of the mentioned manga) is an A or B cup as far as I’m concerned. If anything there’s the opposite issue, where the readers are so insecure about their body they must imagine it as an idealized pornified version of themselves.
Anyway, I never once shamed women with big boobs unlike the anons here who have said degrading terms for women with small boobs like a scrote. I made fun of fatties, who cares? Being fat is a gender neutral trait and a skill issue. Also the woman in the original screenshot you defended is a pickme who uses slurs such as cunt for female characters. This typology of yumejos are always massive pickmes so I’m not surprised

No. 2553440

>>2553422
Even worse then, you're mentally underage. It's not bad to shit on crappy josei webtoons, pretty sure I've seen this comic get laughed at before on this site or another, but yelling about fatties, your boyfriend, and then just a generic josei stereotype insult isn't it.

No. 2553442

Women comparing each other's bodies to drawings is fucking retarded no matter how you slice it. It's moid behavior.

No. 2553445

>>2553438
You are just changing goalposts now as an attempt at some kind of gotcha. First everyone who disagreed with you was a fatty. Now everyone who disagrees with you is a pedophile too apparently.
>>2553442
Completely agree. I genuinely cannot getting offended by boobs, ever. I would check myself into a mental health facility if seeing tits in public caused me to crashout like sperg-chan.

No. 2553448

>>2553440
Samefag but on the other hand, people here usually are really into shitting on big breasted designs so it feels off that now they're fine with it.

No. 2553449

>>2553439
That's not actually true, there's a huge amount of manga and anime that revolves around sexualizing women with small tits. You're just choosing to be offended by the big tit mangas only, again because you don't actually care about hypersexualization of women, you just get upset when other women's body type gets hypersexualized.

No. 2553454

>>2553445
not any of those nonnas though kek. I'm just noting that "it's representation" is mismatched with what usually is the intent behind such designs.

No. 2553455

>>2553426
Wow, you really are brainwashed right down to the point of thinking that a woman breastfeeding and oversexualized depictions of women are the same thing. Hope you get over your ailment soon, women being objectified should always disgust you.
>>2553428
You think that’s unhinged? Kek
>>2553445
That anon wasn’t me but they’re right and it doesn’t exist in a vacuum. Oversexualization of women and girls is disgusting period. The fact that you as a woman aren’t offended by oversexualized depictions of them tells me everything I need to know.
>>2553449
Stop putting words in my mouth retard. I think they’re both disgusting and I have panned loli faggotry on here numerous times before. Either way, I was for the most part talking about josei which to begin with shouldn’t feature hentai-tier women to begin with.

No. 2553459

>>2553455
This will be my final reply to you because you still aren't getting it. But honestly you strongly give off the impression of a pornsick underagefag and have heavily internalized the male gaze. Big breasted female characters are not automatically hypersexualized or offensive, and small breasted women are not inherently 'lolis' or pedobaiting (nobody even brought up lolifag shit except you when I mentioned small boobs, jumping onto the loli wagon over small tits is just weird imo)
It's genuinely sad and concerning that you box female characters into porn categories depending on their breast size.

No. 2553461

>>2553455
>hentai-tier women to begin with
lmao what does this even mean when hentai features women with all tit sizes being raped?

No. 2553467

>>2553455
artists can draw their characters however they want because it's their art. if certain boob sizes are offensive to you, then don't consume that artist's art that triggers you. seems pretty straightforward to me. there are josei characters with every boob size imaginable, i'm sure you can find one that fits you and doesn't send you spiralling.

No. 2553472

File: 1749351433705.png (97.14 KB, 735x422, 1383055063203.png)

Okay now I'm weirded out, this thread has been laughing at josei tits forever. What's next, solid snake is actually attractive?

No. 2553475

>>2553472
replace laughing with crying and you might be right, not many laughs going on here, but a whole lot of seething.
here's an idea. email the mangaka and ask them to draw their character's boobs to your personal size preference.

No. 2553479

>>2553459
>honestly you strongly give off the impression of a pornsick underagefag and have heavily internalized the male gaze
Projection.
>Big breasted female characters are not automatically hypersexualized or offensive, and small breasted women are not inherently 'lolis' or pedobaiting
I literally said that myself.
>nobody even brought up lolifag shit except you when I mentioned small boobs, jumping onto the loli wagon over small tits is just weird imo)
I say that because most if not all loli characters have small boobs, and I can’t even think of any single anime or manga besides maybe like 3 where a small chested character ISNT a loli.
>It's genuinely sad and concerning that you box female characters into porn categories depending on their breast size.
Oh no, I grouped characters designed to appeal to moids fetishes into their rightful boxes. The horror!
>>2553461
You know EXACTLY what I mean, don’t play coy.
>>2553467
This is the same logic libfems use to justify women oversexualizing themselves and other women under patriarchal conditions.
>>2553472
Influx of twitterfags. Not even a few threads ago those same people were seething over an anon calling that character ugly ironically enough

No. 2553480

>>2553475
Tbh I don't really give a shit about tits unless it's taking half of the screen up and covering the sexy man in which case I'm just dropping it but it's unnerving. Like I've shifted to another reality.

No. 2553483

>>2553479
literally just don't consume art that triggers you then. how hard is this to do? what's the ideal booby size that doesn't send you into a spiral? i'll email the mangaka right now for you and request it. i think you're just intentionally looking for things to rage over lol.

No. 2553486

>>2553483
Most animanga and video games is slop with oversexualized women unless it’s for kids or boring josei. Instead of trying to defend these misogynistic writers, why don’t you try to have some sympathy and realized women are tired of the hypersexualization of women in everything?

No. 2553490

>>2553480
>Tbh I don't really give a shit about tits unless it's taking half of the screen up and covering the sexy man
i agree nona and you're one of the few level headed people in this thread. tbh i cant even remember a josei where that actually happened, but you're probably correct that it does in a handful of particularly porny joseis.
thing is that anon is acting like the female character here >>2553389 has some insanely ridiculously huge triple Z cup boobs, when it looks like a large DD or E cup at most to me (not even a rare boob size irl). also she was whining about the boobies being exposed? they're fully covered in that screenshot even, lol.

No. 2553491

>>2553472
>What's next, solid snake is actually attractive?
He could have been if it weren't for the chain smoking and that mullet. God bless the Japanese girls who called him an old fart in front of Kojima when testing the game, at least we have Raiden.

No. 2553493

>>2553479
I was on your side at first because I too have encountered stuff like >>2553438 and I thought that's what you were talking about in general. But then it turns out you mean this >>2553389? Which is literally a completely normal body type and not even drawn in a particularly sexualized way. Get a grip. I think you've started out being mad about a legitimate issue and then gotten oversensitized into fuming over not just actual sexualization, but any body type a man could possibly find attractive at all, which is all of them.

No. 2553494

>>2553486
i'm trying to help you nona. i am fluent in japanese too. give me the artist names whose art is triggering you and the character names whose bodies you want them to change to your liking, and i'll email them right now, saying that their art is too sexualized and misogynistic and that they need to change it asap.

No. 2553496

>>2553490
She is wearing skintight clothing designed to emphasize her tits. Most women in Korea have small boobs, literally what is the point? You sound like those underage retards on twitter who insist loli isn’t inherently sexual.

No. 2553497

>>2553493
Beautifully articulated post nona, but she is still going to rage at you and try to die on this ridiculous hill.

No. 2553498

>>2553494
Nta but that might actually work, some artists are sensitive enough to dfe at that.

No. 2553499

>>2553496
>Most women in Korea have small boobs, literally what is the point?
Most women in Korea don't have eyes that take up 1/3rd of their faces, a tiny pointy nose, or legs that take up 2/3 of their body length either. Yeah…that's kinda the whole point of manhwa. It's not supposed to look like real people.

No. 2553502

>>2553490
I have seen that comic criticized pretty heavily before but I can't remember why. It was more than just her looks, but the looks added on to it.

No. 2553503

>>2553496
Nona you have BPD.

No. 2553513

>>2553472
I don’t know why anons are acting obtuse about why males draw women with comically large breasts. Next they’ll say that the mc from Stellar Blade is super feminist and shouldn't be criticised.

No. 2553514

>>2553499
But you’d want a character that resembles your body, no? Why would a woman with small tits want a S/I big boobs unless she’s afflicted with patriarchal conditioning?
>>2553497
I will not fall victim to you libfems gaslighting me into thinking that is totally nonsexualized

No. 2553517

File: 1749353104392.jpg (64.84 KB, 736x1308, 10f40e40397054b7f17efc7f9abb3c…)

>>2553502
I personally think the way Haesoo is drawn is beautiful, as well as Taeha. I didn't sexualize her, because I have no interest in doing so. They are both gives exaggerated characteristics (large boobs for Haesoo, massive shoulders for Taeha, both have very young looking and beautiful faces) so it's not like some fat ugly bastard stuff with a hideous shittily drawn male character and a pornified female. Taeha is meant to be beautiful and idealized looking too. Some coomers probably will hypersexualize Haesoo but hey, coomers sexualize everything, so who really gives a shit.
It's an 18+ manhwa with adult themes, it's not meant to be read by tweens. It would be a problem imo if Haesoo was presented as some brainless bimbo pickme with no depth, but she's actually given a lot of depth and isn't made out to be a one dimensional slut at all. People who are seeing her as a smut character are just projecting onto her imo.

No. 2553520

>>2553513
Same reason we want 2D men with comically large cocks, pretty catlike faces, and tall height. Face it, real life people's faces and bodies mostly look ugly, 2D is meant to be a perfect fantasy aesthetic. Personally, I prefer to look at beautiful and fantastical art. If I want to see some hideous realism with physically flawed and dumpy looking mid characters, I would just consume some of that ugly ass tumblrina inclusivity art.

No. 2553521

>>2553517
>women is wearing skintight clothing
>moid is wearing ugly frumpy baggy clothing
We are never escaping the patriarchy. Either way, do you not see the issue with a self insert fantasy needing to have the female mc being idealized and perfect when male targeted media on average has average male self insertion mcs. Either way, this scrote looks like James Charles and is a false equivalency.

No. 2553523

>>2553514
>But you’d want a character that resembles your body, no?
Believe it or not, anon, not every woman needs the FL in her junk food smut to look exactly like her to enjoy it.

No. 2553526

File: 1749353524388.jpeg (588.24 KB, 2160x2880, GYkLfPHWAAAsKgG.jpeg)

>>2553521
You are so boring and miserable.

No. 2553527

>>2550083
Princess Daisy being a tomboy is more of a fandom thing, though.

No. 2553529

File: 1749353591579.jpg (100.97 KB, 736x1056, c62e89105af03cd2fd269a73b640ad…)

>>2553389
>anons defending this
topkek whats going on, next they are going to defend super sonico

No. 2553530

>>2553526
Damn! What is this called so I can read it?

No. 2553532

>>2553521
no offense but you sound like the female equivalent of those moids who cry when the male main character is too attractive because it ruins their self insert fantasy

No. 2553533

>>2553517
Thanks for the info, I genuinely can't remember what the original complaint was about(maybe the femc looking too young for her age?), so I'll take your word for it.

No. 2553534

>>2553523
If I wanted to fap and was immediately granted with a female more sexualized than the male id be put off immediately and not wanna masturbate.
>>2553526
Nope. I just don’t like men who look like they take dick on the regular and have had their lip fillers and BBL paid for by their sugar daddies.

No. 2553536

>>2553529
>WHAT IS THIS? an anime girl???? with boobs bigger than a b cup? AHHHH IM GOING INSANE THIS IS AN OUTRAGE

No. 2553538

>>2553534
>nona is so mentally cucked she cant even self insert as stacy
rip

No. 2553540

This debate is caused by some anons not being able to distinguis between fictional women who just happen to have big breasts in a normal way and fanservice female characters invented to make male coomers spend money. It's the only way the way this thread is going to shit can make sense. It's like when normies look at otakubait art and scenes from fotm anime and think it has to be for girls based on the cutesy art, pastel colors, high number of female characters and lack of action scenes when you know the target audience is grown men who won't leave their basement.

No. 2553543

>>2553536
>defending the mascot for a company that makes loli rape games with the artist drawing toddlercon porn of her
Retarded or newfag, which one?
>>2553538
Nope. I just don’t fall victim to patriarchal social programming

No. 2553544

>>2550095
>I'd rather see different kinds of women
Wanting to see women is just a different version of representation/forced diversity, especially nowadays.

No. 2553546

File: 1749354402938.jpg (40.15 KB, 704x396, cMbGyYv.jpg)

>>2553544
This bait is a bit too much.

No. 2553557

>>2553546
You're lucky you've never seen moids complaining about women existing in a piece of media that isn't there to suck them off as forced or pandering. Congrats.

No. 2553562

>>2553536
Anon she's the mascot for a porn game company.

No. 2553563

>>2553529
you dont get it anon, they have 18z natural self supporting breasts, a waist so tiny its literally just empty space between their tits and their ass
and a tiny frame with a gigantic natural ass that everyone stares at

No. 2553566

as a woman i feel characters like felix, bridget, astolfo etc. give me a safe outlet to explore my femininity without the pressure of having to be a feminine woman, they're feminine for me(offtopic)

No. 2553570

File: 1749355596208.png (Spoiler Image,455.61 KB, 600x840, image_2025-06-07_220549274.png)

>>2553529
the funniest part is this is old(er) sonico art, her proportions have only gotten more insane. spoilered just in case.

No. 2553571

>>2553529
No, because what this argument boils down to is Sonico is bad because she's for moids while >>2553389 isn't because she's from a comic for women.
This is why I don't care about women complaining about sexualization in media. Anons would be shitting on Haesoo's design instead if she looked exactly the same but placed in a moid comic.

No. 2553583

>>2553571
>Anons would be shitting on Haesoo's design instead if she looked exactly the same but placed in a moid comic.
why would i read or care what men have in their comics. have you seen the content on the average porn site? its stomach turning. i get upset about real life women and girls being roughly throatraped, sodomized and abused on porn sites, sure but not about literal drawn lines.

No. 2553592

>>2553583
maybe that post isnt about you anon

No. 2553624

File: 1749359307608.jpeg (109.92 KB, 1024x434, download (1).jpeg)

>>>/ot/2552562
A fanbase that I'm glad is inevitably going to become a fraction by the end of 2025. IHNMAIMS dogwalks MW to hell and back anyway. Even Ib is more fun as a game because at least in there you can fuck up in different ways to get more than one ending. Story-based games need to get used to having more than one ending and way to play the game. MW doesn't do anything with itself other than basically say "look at what a piece of shit Jimmy is". If the appeal of a game is the story and there's only one ending you can get, what reason ever is there to play it more than once or just twice?

No. 2553635

>>2553624
i dont want to say but she reminds me of her

No. 2553640

>>2553635
Of who?

No. 2553662

>>2553640
The girl reading this ♥

No. 2553683

>>2553624
Ive read some crazy ass ted/AM fanfiction

No. 2553709

>>2553683
Nta but pls link

No. 2553718

>>2553709
I found it again it was by mswhich on AO3! Theres a lot of new ones too damn. im gonna be reading these

No. 2553743

File: 1749370570300.png (1.21 MB, 1532x672, dfgftj.png)

>>2553389
You might get booed and heckled for your opinion, but I agree. The way Haesoo is drawn feels a little off to me too. No other woman in the entire manhwa has her proportions. I have noticed that some korean shojosei manhwa tend to give the FL comically huge boobs as a visual marker of how she is supposed to be the superior woman. Meanwhile, the male characters like Taeha and Mincheol all have similar, balanced proportions.
I remember reading another manhwa "Your Majesty Please Spare Me", where the FL had this ridiculously huge monoboob. It looked especially wild next to all the other female characters, who were drawn normally. It is not even just about the art though. What really kills the experience for me is how these stories treat every single woman who is not the FL.
Almost without fail every other female character is written as some jealous, bitter bitch who exists just to make the FL look good. Haesoo's coworker was actually sweet to her at first, and then out of nowhere she flips and turns into a bitch. Then there is that other retard who sleeps with Haesoo’s ex-husband. The ex is actual trash so I can overlook this instance. Even in the flashbacks, every single woman is horrible to Haesoo just because Mincheol has a crush on her.
It is hard to take any of this seriously when the entire cast is just there to prop up the main girl. Feels less like a story and more like straight-up wish fulfillment.

No. 2553767

>>2553743
Kekkk the proportions are so funny she looks like a fucking alien with a chest tumor this belongs in the bad fetish art thread

No. 2553768

>>2553662
Oh you're cute.



Delete Post [ ]
[Return] [Catalog]
[ Rules ] [ ot / g / m ] [ pt / snow / w ] [ meta ] [ Server Status ]