File: 1691193001616.jpg (122.25 KB, 1080x1198, EnQal0yUcAAEsDt.jpg)
No. 18424
a thread for those who are considering to take the blackpill feminism, or are already blackpilled on radical feminism or feminism in general (does not mean being anti-feminist though). share your thoughts on why and how it's possible to avoid the blackpilling, or if being blackpilled is the only solution for women.
Previous
>>16240Don't infight and ignore any handmaiden or retard that comes to argue.
No. 18474
File: 1691240696218.png (33.64 KB, 847x533, female-intrasexual-competition…)
Love the OP pic, very fitting. I think that intrasexual competition is underestimated when it comes to women. People tend to view intrasexual competition through male lens in general (they like to image two dudes violently assaulting each other for the hand of a woman because of the cultural significance of securing a woman for a man) and women's gets disregarded in the process. It's interesting because it's not like women compete covertly themselves, usually it's very overt. My favorite instance of this is the self-proclaimed feminists on LC or CC sputtering about their nigels and how they hate other women who so much as look at them. You can just feel female solidarity emanating from them. True feminists at heart.
Picrel is one of the very first posts I've seen where the person clearly pointed out how malignant female behavior towards other women can be (and often is).
No. 18488
>>18474Examples of intrasexual competition are eliminating anything that challenges acceptable rape ape nature such as homosexuality in males and females
>>18462 pretending that homoseuxal males are as much of a threat as all rape apes when it's clear that they're not. Also positing the women are "just as bad as men" dogma and that women are also pedofiles too uwu like schizo gay bashing anon does.
>>18453>>18462Also schizo anon you're identifiable by your use of "jerk off" (still using that to describe women despite their being nothing to jerk off) shaming other women to uphold a violent heteronormative rape ape standard, and your blatant male obsession and rampant homophobia towards gay women and men anything that challenges the rape ape status quo. Also your resoluteness in tearing apart other women and defending good "straight" "normal" men. I'm surprised you're not defending male pedofilia again and how muh normal men aren't pedofiles uwu.
No. 18491
>>18488Yes, there are female pedos, and they are not some misunderstood poor
victims who did it to please their man. They are full on predators. Good job ignoring CSA survivors, anon.
Inb4 I'm your arch nemesis #99: I just came here.
No. 18496
File: 1691268393984.jpg (60.58 KB, 800x400, stprexp-800x400.jpg)
The ultimate blackpill about men is that their low empathy and dark triad nature is not just limited to women but to everyone else and that includes animals, children and other men too.
When you reach this realization that men treat everyone who they see as weak , easy to exploit or think they can get way with it badly….then you come to a realization the majority of the male populations has a form of psychopathy and that their hatred of you is not personal. men want to be at the top and they will abuse and use anyone that they can get their hands on. Doesn't matter if that man is rich or poor they will always find someone to parasite off. Truth is there is no "men love each other and their friendship is pure" that is complete bullshit that handmaidens and men spout to make women feel guilty for getting abused or used by men. Truth is men do not care about other beings and that also includes other men, if their friend is struggling with anything in their life then those men will discard them fast because they see them as a inconvenience. Look at qatar and the rich men who were okay with thousands of men dying and underpaid to build their stadium. Look at how men in power treat men in lower power. Look how men in lower power treat women and children who they consider lower power than them. example:ha my male boss treats me badly so im going to go and take out all of my anger our on my wife, child or on another woman.
When I was a child I remember it was normal in my school for the boys to go around and kill baby kittens in our schoolyard…and then we get surprised that those same men also hate women? It's because they are psychopaths, they hate anything that's slightly remotely different to them and that's why they hate women but at the same time they also have no problem using other men too if that opportunity arises.
Men are opportunistic predators, they have no actual sexuality and "straight" only exists a label them. They are depraved and are able to completely change their morals in a second the moment they get authority or freedom. The moment a war or disaster happens men use that as a excuse to go and hurt, abuse or rape other people. There have been women who have known their neighbour's for years THEIR OWN NEIGHBOURS who raped them when a war or disaster happens. when War starts they realize they can get away their raping their own native women, their own neighbours, friend, children etc.
Yes men are not straight their real security is bisexual, straight wimen lose their minds when they hear this and get upset and say these are lies because they are too afraid that their precious man would have sex with a boy if given the opportunistic chance.
Male soldiers not only rape women and girls during war but they also rape men and boys and this is what I mean when I talk about opportunistic sexuality.
A new popular porn category for "straight men" is trap/tomgirl which are basically really young looking boys who are dressed like women. That category is surprisingly actually really popular among alt-right and right-wing men, yes these same men who are preaching about traditionalism and how women need to be traditional go and watch trap porn. Then those retarded women who simp for these men will talk about how high-value and alpha those men are meanwhile those men view trap, lọli, shotä porn and live parasitic lifestyles, consuming steroids and renting fake cars or prostitutes. Men's sexuality is pedophilic and opportunistic and the brainless women who want to shit these threads up always get mad when male pedophilia is mentioned because they are all straight women who want to have a man and pop out multiple kids with him one day so they get mad when you start posting actual data of men's sexuality, remember in another thread a anon posted a study showing the majority of men showed attraction to girls aged 13-15 and this same retarded bitch here
>>18491 who is also sitting up this thread lost her mind and started posting in a manic way "NOO THEY ARE ONLY A SMALL PERCENTAGEEEE ,MOST MEN ARE NORMAL, BUT WHAT ABOUT FEMALE PEDOPHILES????!!!!!!"
Truth is men are a hollow husk who mask fake emotions. This is the truth. Their whole creation is just have sex with as many people as possible, conquering, sadism , fake emotions, fake personality, fake empathy.
A man only shows his true self based on the cirmustances.
From friendly likeable man to killer and sex offender and then those people ask "how could he do that he seemed so nice" truth is he was never nice his niceness is a thing called masking to them and they mask their whole life with fake emotions, fake empathy and a fake personality.
In my opinion i think most men have varying degrees of frontal lobe and amygdala damage.
No. 18500
me:
>yeah female pedos are predators, also i just arrived so nayrtanon:
>>18496>this same retarded bitch here >>18491 who is also sitting up this thread lost her mind and started posting in a manic wayjesus fucking christ… thanks for reminding me why i left /2X/ a while ago.
(infighting) No. 18506
>>18491The anon you're replying to is absolutely schizophrenic. She's been going on for at least a day now insisting that everyone who correctly called out and corrected a scrote's reposted "stats" that he uses to make himself feel better and his CP spam must be the same person she's trying to beef with from thread to thread.
It's very suspicious that "she" is so upset on behalf of the scrote who got exposed that "she" keeps bringing it up randomly and shoehorning it into new, unrelated arguments. Any actual women discussing these subjects would be glad to not be fooled by false information and just keep ignoring and reporting any male bullshit they see. I can see how a man (or one of many men) would be angry that his cover got blown, but maybe it's just a newfag.
No. 18507
>>18453seriously who the fuck is brian or blaine or whoever it was accusing everyone of being for calling all men pedos (instead of defending them by saying their pedophilia affects only 1% and is due to illness, so in other words they're unwell and need healing)? sounds more like what a butthurt moid trying to self promote would say
>>18475you are skinwalking isaac uncooked at this point with the deadpan schizophrenic beliefs and unbearable lack of self-awareness
No. 18508
>>18506>The anon you're replying to is absolutely schizophrenic.it's actually kinda amusing you don't realise many other people can read your literally schizo posts accusing everyone who disagrees with you of being a namefag called blaine (which you are probably self promoting) all across the forum in tons of threads. actually you're incapable of saying anything other than "YOU'RE BLAINE" or reversing what is easily observed about you onto anyone who points it out, like that you're potentially really schizophrenic
>>18453 and obsessively defending men
>she's going to every thread possible even outside this board and seething like yesterday she went to vent about anons in this board saying that all men are pedos then went on some schizo rants about how some anons here are some moid named Blaine(?) and every anons who disagrees with her is the same person in her head or a troon/male. No. 18509
>>18508You don't know how to format posts, and do literally everything you accuse posters here of doing. I'm pretty sure this is some braindead moid 5D chess to ruin these threads, so I won't bother engaging.
>>18500 is right.
I'm just glad that one anon saved Sekhmet She Owl's content, this place isn't entirely compromised.
No. 18511
>>18474>My favorite instance of this is the self-proclaimed feminists on LC or CC sputtering about their nigels and how they hate other women who so much as look at them. You can just feel female solidarity emanating from them. True feminists at heart.I saw see so many posts on cc (aka pickme/tranny haven) that say "IF A BITCH SO MUCH AS LOOKS AT MY MOID, I'LL KILL HER." Like one anon literally just said a woman smiled at her boyfriend and she wanted to "gouge her eyes out." Like wow way to show female solidarity, except when it comes to your nigel right? Cause your precious moid is just a
victim to these lecherous slutty females gaze because they dared to smile at him right? The lengths straight women will go to tear other women down, be violent towards other women or promote "she asked for it because she looked his way" is proof that anyone who still interacts with moids romantically or sexually can never be real feminists.
No. 18516
>>18513other poster as in regardless of who you are replying to at any given time, you will accuse them of being the same person (usually "blaine", but always a man or tranny) across boards and threads. this is for absolutely retarded reasons such as the other poster having feminist-leaning opinions like all men are pedos and pretending it is blasphemous to feminism. it is extremely easy to understand what the first post in this thread
>>18453 warned everyone of an anon doing even if this is the only thread someone frequents
No. 18518
>>18474>Women are avid supporters of harassment campaigns against women for a reason. Most of them are unaware of said behavior. It's why it's easy for them to gaslight you, they are innocent in their eyes.This about sums up a lot of why feminist groups and even self-proclaimed blackpill ones fall apart. Straight women competing for men. Some of them try to be political lesbians, but this always seems to happen. They tend to react with hostility when other women say they don't trust or like men.
They never mature from the pickme spiel of "You just hate men because you can't get one!" or "You must actually want to be fucked by that man you said was a bad person" or "He's my boyfriend! How dare you tell me he's not muh perfect prince, BACK OFF BITCH". It's even worse when they project their cuck fantasies on actual lesbians. I'm already used to seeing perverted males thinking the only reason a woman wouldn't like them is because they want to have sex with them. That's because the male brain cannot conceive o anything but "fuck" and "hate" or a mix of the two, so they project on women all day. But it's a special kind of putrid when a woman does it.
No. 18521
>>18511>>18514>Like one anon literally just said a woman smiled at her boyfriend and she wanted to "gouge her eyes out." Like wow way to show female solidarity, except when it comes to your nigel right? Cause your precious moid is just a victim to these lecherous slutty females gaze because they dared to smile at him right? >They really think everyone is out to "steal" their men, as if they don't have minds of their own and cheat because they want to.but all you have to do is spend any amount of time around or talking with straight women to understand female intrasexual competition isn't limited to the ones with boyfriends acting unreasonably territorial, and that female solidarity doesn't exist from the straight woman smiling at someone else's boyfriend while he's walking down a street together with his girlfriend, either. deniable, subtle, passive aggressive acts of competition female partners can pick up on from other pickmes who are pretending to be innocent when they're really looking to flex in front of her, or replace her, are always dismissed as her being crazy by the male partner. joining in by immediately calling her crazy is not even consistent with what female intrasexual competition proposes. men cheat because they want to, that is true, but it's usually with women who know he's cheating and still want to and that had to start somewhere
No. 18525
make a "blaine" thread and post screenshots of all the posts you think are that anon (or that have been accused of being that anon) and explain why. not only do we need a containment thread for the schizo and its manifesto chan tumblrina besties but i need a laugh
>>18488>Also your resoluteness in tearing apart other women and defending good "straight" "normal" men. I'm surprised you're not defending male pedofilia again and how muh normal men aren't pedofiles uwu.this is the biggest tell tale sign it's a self promoting namefag who's butthurt at women for saying all men are pedos (and trying to get back at the forum by making literally every conversation on every board about itself) or it really is just a man obsessed neet from kiwifarms who doesn't know when to stop talking about its hyperfixation and is so far gone to the point of seeing it everywhere
No. 18530
>>18527???
I'm not that person who accused people of being him. I was just explaining.
No. 18535
>>18532i am a goldstar lesbian.. stop projecting for the love of god. of course sometimes the girlfriend is just an insecure pickme, and a woman smiling at her boyfriend on the street and not smiling at her could have no awareness of how it may be interpreted by the girlfriend, but intentionally targeting men who are with their girlfriends with small gestures of interest does happen enough for women to be paranoid about it. frankly most women aren't smiling at random men on the street
and as i said joining in with the boyfriends of the world by immediately calling the girlfriends crazy for questioning that behaviour is not even consistent with what female intrasexual competition proposes. it goes both ways. so does him cheating and it has to start somewhere
No. 18540
>>18536Yes, the
blackpill thread, not the "mentally ill newfag having a meltdown and trying to make drama" thread.
No. 18545
>>18535>i am a goldstar lesbian>intentionally targeting men who are with their girlfriends with small gestures of interest does happen enough for women to be paranoid about it.I'm not buying it, you sound like you're talking from personal experience and are too defensive of these "hypothetical" aggressively needlessly protective straight women kek
>joining in with the boyfriends of the world by immediately calling the girlfriends crazy for questioning that behaviour is not even consistent with what female intrasexual competition proposes.What the fuck are you talking about? "What female intrasexual competition proposes"? Female intrasexual competition doesn't "propose" anything. It's not a theory. It literally just means women competing for romantic/sexual access to men. And "that behavior" you're talking about is smiling. What's next, women should wear burqas out in public because if they didn't they'd be "enticing" moids with their sinful bodies which might lure them to cheat? You're a dumbass
>it goes both ways. so does him cheating and it has to start somewhereThis means nothing. If you're trying to say that women smiling at men somehow entices moids to cheat, you're actually retarded
No. 18548
>>18545i am speaking from the experience of reading the fucking material posted here about female intrasexual competition. extending its analysis of straight women past you saying that it explains the behaviour of a few crazy bitches should not have you this crooked. guess what? the crazy bitches you're circlejerking about are the lowest hanging fruit, everyone knows they're crazy bitches who hate women. ironically shitting on them but defending other straight women from anyone applying intrasexual female competition to them is just a way for the cocksuckers in this thread who smile at random men on the street in front of their girlfriends to feel superior
>>18546>of course sometimes the girlfriend is just an insecure pickmeretard
No. 18551
>>18548>defending other straight womenWhen did I do that ever dumbass? I'm not straight, you need to stop projecting. You're the one assuming every random woman on the street is straight and wants to steal your boyfriend by SMILING, miss "goldstar lesbian" lmao
>from anyone applying intrasexual female competition to them is just a way for the cocksuckers in this thread who smile at random men on the street in front of their girlfriends to feel superiorBut you just admitted they could be lesbian and in this case calling them paranoid would be justified lmfao, so which is it? At this point I'm thinking you're either a schizo moid or just dumb or maybe both. Either way, shut the fuck up and dilate.
No. 18552
>>18549>buttmad anon who spammed the last blackpill thread to hell and back accusing everyone of being a man, tranny or mentally ill femcel because someone said women who suck cock are cocksuckers is still madwell duh
>>18551you are putting words into my mouth. nowhere did i say every random woman on the street is straight, nowhere did i say every random woman on the street wants to steal another woman's boyfriend, and goldstar lesbian isn't a political affiliation. of course calling these women paranoid is justified but if you learnt how to read before reacting, you'd see i said the paranoia is caused by other straight women competing with them because female intrasexual competition goes both ways. it cannot be pinpointed down to a few crazy bitches
No. 18556
File: 1691280738806.png (282.04 KB, 960x543, meds.png)
>>18552I didn't spam anything, you schizophrenic. You think that anyone who calls you out is the same person?
No. 18559
>>18556the first post
>>18453 continues to be proven right by schizo anon and its bffs from the manifesto chan thread and comphet "lesbian" thread
>>18558this is the literal definition of a headcanon, and political lesbians believe lesbianism is defined by feminism and can be revoked if language that they believe to be misogynistic is used by lesbians, which is what you're doing. "hate themselves for their own attraction to men" fits the comphets in the "lesbian" thread perfectly who get mad at the word cocksucker because it
triggers their repressed pasts
No. 18562
>>18559>comphet comphet comphetRepeated usage of this word means you're well versed in it. You definitely read the comphet manifesto or whatever and decided you're "lesbian" because you're attracted to fictional and celebrity moids yet never attracted to women irl
>political lesbians believe lesbianism is defined by feminismIsn't that what this thread is about? You believe straight women have a problem and surely you don't believe straight women can be feminists right? Or else what's the point of calling them cocksuckers, just for fun? This is the "blackpill feminism" thread so by your own definition (as if it wasn't already obvious enough) you are a polilez.
>and can be revoked if language that they believe to be misogynistic is used by lesbians, which is what you're doing.No, that's not what political lesbian means, you made that up. Funny how you'll make up your own definitions for things so you conveniently don't fit into them. Political lesbian means someone who pretends to be lesbian for political/nonsexual purposes in order to advance feminism. Often these women hate and repress their own attraction to men, so they take it out on other straight/bi women, for example by constantly calling them sluts or cocksuckers.
>"hate themselves for their own attraction to men" fits the comphets in the "lesbian" thread perfectly who get mad at the word cocksucker because it triggers their repressed pastsThey're disgusted by the word cocksucker because real lesbians don't like to think about sucking cock unlike political lesbians (aka straight and bisexual women larping as lesbians for political/feminist purposes) who engage in their repressed sexuality by exposing themselves to porn on a daily basis where women suck cock and obsessing over the act of sucking cock.
No. 18576
>>18562>anon sees the word cocksucker and it sends her into a paragraph-writing frenzy in which her mind goes straight to the image of lusting for cock and "women exposing themselves to porn on a daily basis where women suck cock and obsessing over the act of sucking cock">knowing what something is means you are itthe lesbian threads are overrun by essays about comphet from supportive anons. you yourself just referenced the comphet manifesto and ideas which originated from it that you have obviously read. keep this gotcha for the crystal cafe rejects infesting this thread
>calling straight women cocksuckers and bisexuals bisluts means a lesbian want to do what they do toophenomenal to see a foid trying to frame calling straight women cocksuckers as feminist. not just that, attempting to turn the blackpill thread into the cocksucker defense league in which only the most obvious crazy straight women she's personally encountered can be shat on by her, but all other straight women are off bars from criticism in terms of female intrasexual competition. standard from a feminist whose edgiest take is calling male partnered women pickmes, and who gets
triggered at lesbians for not using feminist enough language to describe all the other straight women (and bisexuals and comphet "lesbians") with, is legendary
No. 18577
>political lesbians believe lesbianism is defined by feminism and can be revoked if language that they believe to be misogynistic is used by lesbians, which is what you're doing>No, that's not what political lesbian means, you made that up. […] Political lesbian means someone who pretends to be lesbian for political/nonsexual purposes in order to advance feminism.so you just repeated what i said in other words. not only that, your initial response to me
>>18532 when you had your guard down says
>I'm sorry if you were like that in the past, but since you're hopefully over moids now I hope you've grown up and grown out of thatyou have literally already said you hope women you presume to be straight overcome their attraction to men so that they start acting in more feminist ways and prioritise female solidarity which equates to never saying anything negative about cocksuckers unless they get angsty at you for smiling at their boyfriends on the street
No. 18579
File: 1691312261053.jpg (Spoiler Image,33.25 KB, 320x692, ezgif-5-f1e80aa431.jpg)
>>18478>>18488So lesbians can have a whole thread dedicated to calling bi women sluts and whores but fags are off limits. Why are males more worthy of protection than women? And yes faggots are worse than straight males because they popularized the tranny shit, surrogacy, they're more likely to rape children and they make the lgbt community look like degenerates. They do more damage to feminism/lgbt than any "homophobic" woman or straight man.
No. 18582
>>18579l chat is the least feminist place on earth and says bislut and cocksucker freely to keep you types out because it's avidly against comphets, polilezzes and straight homophobic radical feminists. just shows why so many of you offended bitches run to lolcow in these secret hiding places where you can cosplay as lesbians who are obsessed with defending straight women
>And yes faggots are worse than straight malesthe fact enlightened feminist retards made the blackpill threads a cheerleading club for straight women by seething at lesbians calling straight women cocksucking whores only for those women to come in here and parrot homophobic, "not my nigel" talking points about gays (like they're just a stronger pokemon card who deal more damage compared to straight men) is mildly amusing
No. 18585
File: 1691313684938.jpg (41.85 KB, 762x572, chris-chan-youtubeuse-inceste-…)
>>18579>they popularized the tranny shit,Maybe, but out of all trannies, the het men (AGPs) are still the most dangerous.
No. 18586
>>18583Why doesn't she get banned? The trolling is so obvious and over the top, she replies to even the few anons trying to maintain an actual blackpill conversation with the same pedo/cocksucking bullshit despite the fact that they're completely unrelated to the topic at hand. Also, she's been going at it through like 3 separate threads. I assume it's the same anon because the type of 'tism definitely matches.
>>15258 is where she first started derailing the few somewhat decent conversations we get on this board.
>>18584The thread is fine, since every blackpill thread since the beginning wasn't inherently against feminism, hence the
>blackpilled on radical feminism or feminism in general (does not mean being anti-feminist though)in the OP, copy-pasted from the previous.
No. 18587
>>18586>I assume it's the same anonyou're just exposing your own neck here. i wasn't in the first thread you absolute pattern seeking autist and the "pedo bullshit" is a greentext quote from
>>18496 about offended straight women in here defending their nigels from being called pedos
>blackpilled on radical feminism or feminism in general (does not mean being anti-feminist though)yes, blackpilled on radical feminism or feminism in general. you clearly do not know what blackpilled means. "blackpill feminism" got made the title just now. as if blackpill is a form of feminism, get fucking real. that sentence you quoted means blackpill isn't a movement about being against women's rights even though it's framed this way by cocksuckers offended by criticism
No. 18599
File: 1691320665639.jpg (550.61 KB, 834x2185, Why women are offended by cock…)
>>18558Or they're just making fun of pathetic degrading behavior that is widely accepted. It's not that deep. Lesbians and SSA women are able to rail on this pathetic behavior even more because they are free of male sexuality intrasexual oppression Olympics. Also no one has to "prove" their sexuality too. Choosing to be celibate, or in relationships with women exclusively is not shameful to the detriment of males, ever. Why would it be?
It's absurd that cock sucking is defended and that there are anons pathetically projecting like this still after the matter has been discussed already and the horse has been beaten to death, there is a clear conclusion to this. No need to project so hard due to insecurity. In the last thread an anon summarized why women defend the right to be "offended" by the term "cocksucker" perfectly.
No. 18600
File: 1691325460580.jpg (607.81 KB, 1080x1755, Screenshot_2023-08-06-14-31-02…)
>>18424This is the situation she's talking about so stop replying to the troll, she's doing it on purpose. You can find more of her whining in /meta and /ot threads and in the threads on this board. She's doing it all day everyday and always flipping the script
No. 18601
File: 1691325505928.jpg (915.61 KB, 1080x4712, x.jpg)
>>18600Picrel is some of her posts in /ot
No. 18607
File: 1691335439635.jpg (75.63 KB, 1024x768, child-bride-l.jpg)
>>18579Holy shit, you GC or radfem women really are all traditionalist tradthots. You are openly saying this without seeing how absurd and insane and it sounds. You protect straight men because you see them as potential mates. That's why you only focus your anger on a small group of people like faggots and even try and blame them for trannys when most trannys who are trying to invade women's spaces are literally straight men.
Oh and don't get me started how in another thread when anons were discussing men's pedophilia you got extremely mad and started defending men and started bringing up female pedos and how they're just as bad as men for no reason because your retarded ass really does believe there are just as many female pedos as male ones. Your retarded ass worships males. Also another one of your posts said how unwelcome you feel here…so fuck off this thread no one wants you here and no one wants you on the other threads too because even the pinkpill manhate anons think you are a retard so you can't only blame this on "noo these mean blackpill bullies said this about me".
No. 18622
File: 1691351609579.jpg (Spoiler Image,477.14 KB, 1080x3237, 449.jpg)
I saw this (the first ss) in the reddit hate and I wanted to learn more about whatever the fuck a "child rape sex doll" is, why it exist and who makes it so since the ss was from reddit then I searched for the post in there and saw this instead but didn't find the post.
No. 18635
File: 1691399827671.png (59.39 KB, 3693x193, criticalthinking.png)
>>18631Imagine spamming a thread to death and accusing everybody in it of being a samefag sperg moid from /ot, who's also somehow a woman that wants to transition into a gay man, just because the women ITT said all men are pedos.
No. 18637
File: 1691400950092.png (39.29 KB, 3249x161, weirdo.png)
I'm not sure this is where the not all men are pedos argument started on 2X, it seems like it came here from the Pink Pill/Man Hate thread, picrel. It's one troll dedicated to repeating this claim in every 2X thread, against multiple posters, because they know all men are pedos to varying degrees, which is an entry level radfem opinion. It thinks admitting this means saying it's OK. These trolls see your posts and always reply that you must be masturbating to it which is pornsick of them, or that you're a moid, or that you're a tranny, or an incel, or a
femcel, or "Blaine", but they think it comes across badly for blackpill for them to do this?
>>18601Do you see how it says "It's literally always clinically retarded pickmes who are obsessed with the idea that's it's biologically hardwired for men to be pedophilic", which isn't true since it's the pickmes who need to live in denial about their boyfriends, then immediately follows that by saying "or that children are somehow sensuous, or that middle school girls definitely want to sleep with middle aged men"? So it went from an opinion that holds men accountable for their pedophilia by not denying it, to suggesting if you hold that opinion about men, you're on the side of men who also believe children want it.
There's a serious problem with spinning the narrative round, and when it doesn't work, trying to bury the blackpill thread under their spam.
No. 18640
>>18631I mean she does get banned in any thread she posts in aside this one, I think mods let her make and spam her blackpill threads hoping it stops her autism from leaking to /ot/. Whenever she posts on /ot/ she gets banned immediately but they stopped banning her here after the first few times when they realized she'd ban evade and spam even more when banned.
Just let her samefag in this thread and sperg out freely, that way she won't ruin other boards or threads. She's obviously mentally unwell, arguing with her is probably worse for her mental health.
No. 18655
File: 1691435671103.jpg (173.62 KB, 931x488, Screenshot_20230807-221430_Ope…)
>>18652I doubt it's a man, blowjob-chan said she wanted to transition to male in the last thread and seems to think she's not a woman because she's better than women(for fantasizing about sucking dick more than we do maybe).
It's even funnier if it's a man who's been posting for months though because she's been racebaiting about wanting to suck black men off lately ahahaha. Maybe it's just a racist faggot.
No. 18680
File: 1691489220606.jpg (250.81 KB, 1080x1827, GayMale.jpg)
>>18668He was using the opera vpn I think because I just saw one of his ban messages and he does admit that like I have been saying from the start, he did masturbate to anons here.
He's probably retarded and since thanks to him most inbuilt vpns in opera got banned, he can't post now, lmao.
Mods should just delete the thread, he admitted he literally jerked off as he argued here
No. 18682
>>18680I genuinely think I'm being trolled because why me who's saying that I hate porn, humiliation female masochism dick sucking and patriarchy is being accused of liking it secretly. I'm not a normie if I was then I would have no problem with being a self destructive prostitute and with watching porn. Those posts are not me and I'm not a man, stop engaging in female socialization because no matter how much you whine the reality is still the way I said it is and you do nothing about it(but when I prove how real life looks like it's seen as a ragebait) and all women stay spinless and sucking dick aka something you accuse me of liking which suggests you think it's all degenerate, porn is degenerate but won't agree with me that it's all degenerate and reality is degenerate and women are degenerate etc. Women make me so insanely angry, the cycle repeats itself over and over again, women cook up the same shit over and over again for us but its a real life with real human consequences that I wish I didn't have to face because of you spinless pigs. "Lc helps me stay off porn" kek sounds like a female trolling but I just wanna say that the insane female retardation here and the trolling helps me stay away from this place and all online female spaces. And ppl wonder why I'm angry if other women are such a losers.
Yalls mentality:
Me when I love degeneracy and porn: "omg I hate degeneracy and have a phobia of porn that gives me social phobia too" and last thing, shame me as much as you want but I don't feel bad about being such a weirdo if to fit into society you have to LIKE porn aka sex and all the degeneracy and be a prostitute. Drown in filth, you won with the nagging and trolling.
No. 18715
>>18647it outed itself as a vpn changing troll who totally coincidentally "just saw one of his ban messages" from august
>>18680. proves it's a self promoting pornsick moid who wants the threads here to be all about him and is projecting his urges to masturbate to misogyny onto the anons here for.. discussing misogyny (read the ban message), because women couldn't possibly converse amongst ourselves that men use their dicks to degrade women without wanting to join in and suck them!
>He was using the opera vpn I think because I just saw one of his ban messages>Mods should just delete the thread, he admitted he literally jerked off as he argued hereso fucking transparent
No. 18729
>>18728This is 100% true. In Abrahamic texts rape of women is seen as something that doesn't exist amd is natural and only a man getting raped counts as rape. So only gay rape is judged but straight rape or pedophilia is not.
Also to any blackpill anons, this is a really good blackpilling video about religion. I recommend watching
>>18711I wonder why this thread out of all threads here makes it so mad that he wants to get it locked like the entitled male he is. And I laughed too when he posted his ban message saying it wasn't him and trying to accuse other anons of his ban. Considering his derailment of this thread , calling other anons Blaine,male, transmen/tifs,him samefagging himself, him protecting moids and especially straight ones etc etc. This is a moid who has been here for quite some time. I remember seeing him in the previous threads too where he kept calling other anons obese trannys and telling them to chop of their tits or remove their "obese cunt" what a vile moid, and the mods are barely active so he keeps on getting away with harassing anons and not allowing this thread to have discussions. Not gonna lie I feel like he gets away with it because other anons don't like us so they are okay with a male harassing us and posting here because "oh those yucky blackpill
femcels deserve it"
No. 18732
>>18728>the reason why some anons are more outraged about fags diddling kids than straight guys doing it, is that they in all their bravado still do think it is natural for women and girls to get sexually abused.Agreed. I've thought about this a lot, I'm
>>18596 anon and believe this is where a lot of "anti fag" arguments come from. Men being degraded too along with women is not the "natural order" and challenges this violently upheld status quo, it also kills the image of men being the strong rapists and women the pathetic subhuman rape
victims who only play chicken with predators. Most women aside from lesbians who may relate to gay moids oppression, hate homosexuals fullstop but especially homosexual males because they ruin and jeopardise the image of rape ape males. Even the spiciest straights secretly despise gay men and women because they must uphold this rape culture. The meme of rape culture being women that are too retarded to stay away from rapist males in bars for example and males defending each other at a legal level isn't "rape culture" that's normal male nature. Actual "rape culture" is normalizing rape for all women and any challenge to this, which is what both men and women do regularly.
>>18729>So only gay rape is judged but straight rape or pedophilia is not. Absolutely true and blackpilling. I thought I was the only one who thought this lel
No. 18735
>>18733Anon no one here is disagreeing with that and every BLACKPILL anon here has the same thought that BOTH straight and gay men are bad.
The problem is when that male who comes here to derail tells us that gay men are WORSE which is false because BOTH are bad and that's what anons keep trying to explain. But for some reason you think that's DEFENDING gay men?!¿
Do you get it now or do i need to explain it to you in a slower way?
No. 18738
>>18729>>So only gay rape is judged but straight rape or pedophilia is not. Just look at how the public views the Catholic priest pedo scandal. Girls (and even women, esp nuns) make up the majority of
victims but the public remembers it as gay priests diddling altar boys.
No. 18742
File: 1691656873777.jpeg (110.34 KB, 750x544, 2FAEBB04-731C-4A97-8507-E7EB3E…)
No. 18747
>>18737Nobody cares when you say this about every poster in this thread depending on your mood. This person
>>18682 is apparently
>>18729 and clearly doesn't agree with whoever was defending gay men, unlike what the schizo troll you probably self-replied to
>>18722 claimed about her. It's also a different poster from
>>18715, unlike what the other post you quoted
>>18718 claimed about her. The only ones who were defending straight men are the anons calling everybody - literally, all across the board - Blaine, or porn addicted FTMs or MTFs for saying all men are pedos and that heterosexuality is degrading for the woman
>>18411, and the homophobic, lesbophobic tradthots
>>18579 claiming faggots are worse than straight men.
Disagreeing with that doesn't mean defending gay men or saying they're less dangerous, it means not defending any men like
>>18735 already said.
>>18728>Considering his derailment of this thread , calling other anons Blaine,male, transmen/tifs,him samefagging himself, him protecting moids and especially straight ones etc etc. >so he keeps on getting away with harassing anons and not allowing this thread to have discussions. Not gonna lie I feel like he gets away with it because other anons don't like us so they are okay with a male harassing us and posting here because "oh those yucky blackpill femcels deserve it"Agreed, but it's not even just in this thread. It goes across the board repeating the same things about the blackpill thread, trying to get it closed obsessively.
No. 18750
>>18725Replies like theirs add to the irony of knowing there's an angry moid self-admittedly jerking off to causing infighting about himself in this thread, while showing off his ban messages
>>18680 - which explains why he replies to every blackpill anon post to say they are the ones jerking off to their posts about feeling disgust at women being degraded by intercouse with men. It's projection. He then blames his posts on a "gay male" - the file name for the ban message is literally GayMale.jpg - and has been pushing the claim for ages that any post saying all men are pedos is from one gay man
>>18737. A couple offended, homophobic and lesbophobic female anons
>>18579 joined in and started parroting this narrative to get back at the blackpill anons for their own set of reasons, like the pickmes they are.
No. 18759
>>18728and moids still say that female
victims get the most attention lmao what a fucking joke
No. 18761
>>18758>>18754You are a loser male living in some cramped up shithole living space , you spend your whole day refreshing this barely active hidden board to see if there is a new thread or post that you could derail or troll. Which shows considering a day after this thread was made you were here causing the same shit that you did in the pinkpill thread after you had a manic episode after anons said men are pedos. that's actually sad and miserable…life you got there I would actually suggest you going and joining elliot rodger in hell considering that would be a better life than the one you are living now. Your parents and everyone around you would be happy too. All you are a is a worthless coomer moid, the peak of your life is cooming,trolling and spending your time on female imageboards.
No normal anons is taking your shit bait seriously about us being the "obese ftm tanny gaymale blaine" thats why you keep samefagging yourself to make it look like someone agrees with you. Same goes for that ban message
>>18680 you posted thinking anons were dumb enough to believe thats not you.
Join the male suicid statistic.
No. 18762
File: 1691680549315.jpeg (120.92 KB, 1200x675, IMG_8732.jpeg)
how much longer will women keep sucking up to men
No. 18767
File: 1691687611741.jpg (748.34 KB, 1080x1596, Screenshot_2023-08-10-19-15-09…)
REALity
No. 18770
>>18764Girl don't even reply to him, I usually don't feel bad for people but that mentally ill anon who spams misogynistic stuff is seriously making me feel pity. Imagine spending hours digging up misogynistic shit to spam on a board that barely 20 people browse on an active day.
>>18758Because of the schizo moid.
No. 18785
File: 1691745458485.jpg (252.07 KB, 1080x1245, tumblr_a097c4e2564e16bd947460a…)
Edited some meme I found
No. 18810
File: 1691823008401.jpg (1.32 MB, 1080x8422, zzzzz.jpg)
This bitch has been going on for days about how period blood is a biohazard. She wrote at least 100 tweets abt it at this point and admitted to swallowing semen
No. 18811
>>18810This is just not a thing that happens enough to even debate it. I've never once seen it happen. Making up a
TERF to get mad at and ranting about the evils of period blood then willfully confessing to swallowing cum is crazyy
No. 18815
File: 1691829905739.jpg (229.05 KB, 1080x690, Womenrights.jpg)
Blowjob-chan says drinking cum removes women's rights and then admits to licking off blood from toilet seats, this is definitely a gay moid. I'm sure now
No. 18816
File: 1691829954093.jpg (405.82 KB, 1080x1068, Periodfetish.jpg)
>>18815Samefag, adding the period drinking picture which makes me think that it's a gay moid larping as how he thinks a feminist would act
No. 18824
>>18810>This bitch has been going on for days about how period blood is a biohazard. She wrote at least 100 tweets abt it at this point and admitted to swallowing sementhe fact the troll (you know, the one persistently screeching blowjob-kun, who is either a trans identified female or just outright gay moid whenever it decides, across the board) was
triggered by your last sentence into this latest schizophrenic shitpost outburst is very revealing
No. 18838
>>18835I'm not a fujo
>>18836I'm not trans kek. I just don't understand why women accuse some anon of being trans just because she was posting about hating womanhood. Everything she said about womanhood and women who have sex with men is true imo and it's so ironic that women jumped at her for it in a bp thread. Like where are women supposed to talk about their anger if even here this is banned
No. 18841
>>18838because one anon in particular has been
triggered from a really deep place ever since that discussion and can't not attack the women who named her behaviour what it is, or named the behaviour of her "girls" and her "sisters", desperately wanting to get rid of the negative feeling their words brought up from within by attacking and attacking until they shut up. the very definition of masochism is enjoying your own humiliation. so why doesn't she or the rest enjoy the humiliation she naturally feels when women call her a cocksucker.. why doesn't she get off on it unless she can see her humiliation sexually pleasuring a man into orgasm? women should know their place is not to intrude on the home life of the man and the feminist who sucks his cock. the feminist who can't admit to seeing a connection to the humiliation she feels when women call her a cocksucker with sucking it, who can't even see her disgust with the term because it "dehumanises women" reveals that it is a dehumanising term precisely because the act is. cocksucker elicits the shame from participating in the dehumanisation it refers to, just without providing a means of getting her off on it. only a man can provide that. the whole "blowjob-kun" pet name saga is a mental cope to project her shame onto the women who
triggered hers so she doesn't have to feel it. we are the dirty ones, not the men who do that to her and her girls and her sisters. it's the most patriarchal mentality on earth. men can do something to women that women aren't even allowed to name because it is so wrong
No. 18842
File: 1691874761512.jpg (59.39 KB, 917x183, 20230812_231022.jpg)
Someone posted a ss of a moid picture with two women and the moid from the pic captioned this pic posted 3 years ago as "worst threesome of my life" and then reposted it 3 years later with caption "still the worst threesome" and some bitch imagined that the women from the pic don't suck dick and that's why it was bad and decided to giggle about it like a subhuman but yeah dick sucking is what heterosexual relationships are about, (billions of) women aren't held on a leash by men, they have their own trashy sexuality that will never allow male supremacy to die
No. 18851
>>18848Based. Faggots are also much more likely to be pedos than even straight men, who are dangerous enough on their own. Gay men used to support pedo organisations in pride parades in 1970-1980s and only lesbians and bi women were the ones who spoke up against the said organizations. Men are disgusting regardless of sexuality and a gay man is just as capable of hurting you as a straight one is.
The cocksucker who wants to transition into a male and roleplay as a faggot will lose her mind over this but it's the truth.
No. 18856
>>18855Calling women cocksuckers ≠ defending men. And you can't hate men without hating women because they are one through many different ways.
>men are the ones whit hurt youKek I don't have a weird retarded performative misandry
victim mentality as if I'm a slave on a leash held by men and men created all the issues it's just not realistic, not true. I'm tired of this whole "patriarchy created by men" mentality people have that makes them call anything bad women do a result of men lol it's braindead. Idgaf about men or faggots and unlike the performative misandrists I'm not obsessed with them. You just made it up in your mind that anyone is defending moids here. I'm not gonna sit here and pretend that it's men who hold me in captivity wtf
No. 18858
File: 1691916108061.jpg (179.79 KB, 1080x672, Screenshot_2023-08-13-10-43-35…)
No. 18863
>>18862Woman:
Saying something accurateRandom childish cunt: "you're having a stroke"
I see men aren't needed and women can create a dumb catty patriarchy between eachother with no male influence
(infighting) No. 18875
>>18867woman doesn't mean cocksucker. calling those women cocksuckers is an accurate description, nothing more and nothing less. it is not the fault of women who don't participate in the most piggish, depraved, dehumanising, degrading, patriarchal behaviour imaginable that the majority of women do. patriarchy isn't women who don't participate in their own oppression forming negative opinions about the women that do because it directly spits on the human status of every other women who they brag about lacklusterly "bullying" for pointing it out
>>18863>performing misandry when you submit the female body to their violently misogynistic acts and both of you get off on ittheir idea of feminism and supporting women only extends to an in-group of frenemies who lie to each other in exchange for not being "bullied" and bitch about men together before opting to get that sisterhood fucked out of them by one. when the lights are out they don't have to fight against their hijacked biology by wearing a social mask to seem slightly self-aware to other women anymore
No. 18877
>>18851Straight men didn't have to create and support pedo gay organisations because they literally made it legal to rape little girls for thousand of years and not so long ago the age of consent was 10 in USA. Also litle girls are
victims of pedophilia more often than little boys.
No. 18878
>>18867She already hates herself though, isn't that the anon who said she wanted to transition? The only reason she's defending gay men is because she wishes she was a gay man so she could do her favorite activity(sucking dick) freely.
She literally only posts about wanting to suck cock and hating men, she's a wannabe faggot lmao
No. 18884
File: 1691934512465.jpg (455.51 KB, 1080x1182, Screenshot_2023-08-13-15-49-38…)
Lanamisandrist bringing in some real man hating aka probably wishing she was on all fours or knees right now or however het sex looks like. Yasss go misandrists let's fucking gooo destroy men kinda makes me wish I was a man and had a dumb slut like this bowing down to me
No. 18894
>>18893Is it
gloves or someone else?
No. 18907
>>18851No they aren't. The majority of rapists are "het appearing" or rather women and girls
victim-preferring males. The majority of
victims are women and young girls. The sexual orientation of males is highly irrelevant and nonexistent as all are capable of violence and rape but if were going off of optics and assault statistics the most overt threat to women and girls is clearly not gay men who stay within their groups outside of troons, of which the majority are female-attracted autogynophiles. "Sexual orientation" in males is simply
victim preference. Like
>>18496 anon says, I agree with this anon that male "sexuality" is nothing more than psychopathy and
victim preference, in which women and children are most preferred for biological and patriarchal/sexual terrorism reasons.
>>18848>>18790>>18579>>18878>>18851>>18644>>18722I swear you have a massive chip off your shoulder over gay men. No one here is defending men period. This has been stated days ago but you refuse to let it die
>>18747. Blackpill means being aware that male nature extends to all males. But its rather obtuse to assume "gay men" are more of a threat to women then whatever we're calling the majority of male pedophiles and abusers.
>>18877 Is correct after all. You can complain about how fucked up degenerate sexual male behavior is, there are countless examples that sexuality is fabricated
victim preference in history and a larp for males but I see no point railing on gay moids over the majority of rape apes who deliberately choose their
victims to be female, near exclusively. Pederasty being an obvious example of inhuman male behavior historically but the vast majority of
victims today in the modern era are women and girls globally, who are in fact not the
victims of "gay" moids. Please stop bringing this topic up. Go make a thread to complain about gay moids if they bother you this much or post in the troon thread and see if this sentiment gains traction with others. I doubt it would since most agree troons prefer female
victims.
>>18540Late but those posts are not all the same anon, unhinged one. I see one of mine in there, the irony of calling others new while making a very new mistake.
>>18900>>18892Ntayrt but what are you trying to argue? What could "need" mean here but something sexual?
>Why are you assuming its sexual uwuLook at the picrel, look at the framing, look at the caption. If someone says they "need" someone in despite it being embarrassing to their "movement" how is that interpreted as not sexual/thirst? Why would the person in this picture be embarrassed by this? Do you think by "needing" the busted faced moid in picrel they are arguing that they "need" him to fix her plumbing or something? I'm genuinely confused by your confusion and strong reaction to this.
>you're the reason why men are like thisNo. Calling out pathetic hypocritical behavior is not the reason for the hypocritical pathetic behavior. The person making that tweet admits this behavior is embarrassing knowing it is contradictory and pathetic. Their name literally has "misandry" in it.
>believe all of us are cheap whores because that's what you areMan you really hate women.
>You're seeing a woman talk about a man and you assume she's a cheap loose whore like you who sucks men off like a subhuman pig. You're disgusting.The strange catty projection. No, the assumption can be made that the tweeter is making a sexual comment, what else could "needing someone" mean given the context of the picrel. Stop projecting horrible things on other women you do not know. Stop reinforcing gross misogynistic language like "loose woman" that hold no real critical value. I haven't seen the misogynistic term "loose women" used unironically in years lel. At least "cocksucker" describes an actual degrading behavior, what the fuck does calling women cheap "loose whores" even mean? If you are critiquing prostitution then do that. You've completely adopted and internalized fucked up male language and culture without applying critical thought. Even pig-anon at least uses pig to describe masochistic, humiliating behavior of women. I'm Nta but the tweet in OPs picrel is clearly sexually motivated. What makes it bleak is they literally have "misandrist" in their name.
No. 18915
>>18914>A lot of women were quite content to just look after their families back in the day, which is rewarding and helps create solid family environments. But then also, and understandably, women got bored with doing that so they wanted to go out and get careers. But then a lot of women were like, "shit, doing two things at once is bloody overwhelming, why do I have to have a career AND take care of my family?"Just a highlight of the lukewarm IQ takes in the video. The rest of the video she spends going for the low hanging fruit (Oh, LOOK! Some women make money off of OnlyFans, so clearly patriarchy is not a real thing). With some of the things she claims she sounds almost schizophrenic and detached from reality, like she lives in a vacuum. I know that many women start out as pickmes, but the ones that don't grow out of it by age 20 can safely be assumed to be slightly retarded. Going against your own best interest to such a degree is a serious mental health issue and I assume it's because of deeply rooted trauma and/or insecurities. This also illustrates that most of the problem lies with women, not men. Men are doing okay for themselves, they are acting in their own interest. It is normal for an organism to seek what is best for it. It's the women who sink their teeth into outdated concepts and refuse to let go, despite it being detrimental to their health in very direct, obvious ways. Women are unfortunate to bear the brunt of intergenerational trauma and that's what it all boils down to.
I feel bad for her because I see my past self in her. Women who can even pinpoint the problem are lucky in my opinion, because the rest are living in copes and delusions and suffering twice as much.
No. 18917
>>18851And all of this matters to us as women… why exactly? Kek, why do we care about males raping and assaulting each other? If anything, gay males are the easiest to entirely cut out of our lives because unless you want to befriend them, neither you nor they have any reason to spend time around each other. Oh, but you don't want a life free of men, you're obsessed with them. Caring about little scrotoids getting molested (by anyone, really) is the least of my worries (and it should also be yours unless you want to involve yourself with any, in which case I recommend meds), we need to take care of our own kind and yet you lot are so into caring about something that moids would never care about if it were to happen among women. If there were a worldwide epidemic of adult women molesting little girls, moids would jack off to it and never do anything to help. Let them destroy their own sex and turn your attention to something worthwhile. With how much you care about pointing out that het males are somehow the lesser evil between them and the gay ones, I'm inclined to believe you're switching between this thread and replying to your boyfriend's "have you eaten today" texts, lmfao.
No. 18919
File: 1692025310999.jpg (474.54 KB, 1080x4584, 050213.jpg)
This is the business in question. Being a female is inherently humiliating and male supremacy and patriarchy is eternal due to the nature of heterosexuality/hetero sex/men and women
No. 18920
>>18915Not watching that garbage so thanks for the summary
>The rest of the video she spends going for the low hanging fruit (Oh, LOOK! Some women make money off of OnlyFans, so clearly patriarchy is not a real thing).Doesn't this prove precisely that "patriarchy" is a thing though? Literally degrading yourself for money is the most inhuman evil male thing one could think of. The fact that there are whole industries built to degrade and humiliate women exclusively for money absolutely serves as a excellent example that patriarchy is a thing. Are people who's organs harvested taking advantage of the economy? Are children who are trafficked taking advantage of males somehow and beating patriarchy because of their own exploitation for money? Being consumed as a product because of inhumane male biology is not winning or beating the patriarchy.
>>18919>Being a female is inherently humiliating and male supremacy and patriarchy is eternal due to the nature of heterosexuality/hetero sex/men and womenI wouldn't say humiliating but being female is to be seen as purely commercial, as a product. I'm tired of having to defend the humanity of women because of these people who continuously seek to enforce this masochistic role and dehumanize all women. Yes, male biology created this problem but certainly women contribute to it and reinforce it well. If hypothetically all OSA women who engage in casual dehumanizing masochistic behavior chose one day to stop this, dehumanization would still persist because males would but it would be sorely reduced and women wouldn't be in part responsible for their own subjugation.
No. 18922
File: 1692032532546.jpg (241.12 KB, 1155x1907, 1677701236783.jpg)
>>18921Yeah
(derailing/infighting) No. 18981
File: 1692283804853.jpg (308.95 KB, 320x2048, 1.jpg)
No. 18991
>>18986Bitch are you retarded? How are they both the same when her friend literally sex trafficked her or pimped her out and did not tell her the real reason why she brought her out to Dubai. This is that type of ahit I men when I say intra-sexual. Comme ts like yours blackpool me even further on how scummy women are towards other women, blackpill anons blackpill me even further.
Also that "story" sound like a fake porn fantasy posted by whatever degenerate poster that posts here.
No. 18993
>>18987I hate scrotes and all, yet I doubt that an
average scrote is turned on by shit and vomit. Most normies are rather repulsed by it
No. 19011
>>18991>This is that type of ahit I men when I say intra-sexual. Comme ts like yours blackpool me even further on how scummy women are towards other women, blackpill anons blackpill me even further.No, women don't get a pass for retarded masochistic behavior ESL anon. They were compensated for prostituting themselves. They already see women as subhuman themselves and are not allies of feminism let alone other women. The cold truth is you can't save everyone and most women don't want to leave their cages.
This woman was in her twenties when this happened; they are not children. If you believe a bag is sufficient for being shit in the mouth that's on you.
>>18993>yet I doubt that an average scrote is turned on by shit and vomit. Most normies are rather repulsed by itNot this again. Please no, not the prototypical "normal men don't like XYZ" anon again. This thread has devolved into a vent thread for libfems.
No. 19018
>>19016>not everyone is an easy loose slut like youI am lesbian and have never nor will never sleep with a male, I suppose I am separatist, though it wasn't intentional in the beginning it was semi-unconscious lol. This thread does not exist to complain about loose sluts. The discussions here are uncomfortable but in doing so cutting to the truth of this self inflicted behavior. I'm victimblaming no one, these women still signed up for this. It is possible for women to be groomed and masochistic at the same time. I find it ironic you'd make a libfem coaxed argument that I am trying to shame other women for decrying masochism for the sake of consumerism by fighting back with the powerful argument of "loose cock whore".
>This woman was rapedThis woman was given 50,000 dollars to spend on handbags in a sex trafficking hub. Do not act like these women didn't gain something from this exchange, also I am not here to make moral judgements; these woman are idiots but they are not "sluts". Sluts is a made up idea rapeapes use against women, I'm not moralfagging over women prostituting themselves turning themselves into sluts, it is not "slutty", it is illogical and idiotic to do what these women did. Women who are attacked off the street by strangers jogging in parks and children are raped. Women and girls who are abused and threatened by their family are raped. These women signed up for escort prostitution voluntarily in a foreign city known for corruption and a global sex trafficking ring, yes they were groomed but they both were reimbursed for their prostitution services as bleak as this situation is its what happened. They were not kidnapped, they were raped but all prostitution is rape, in despite this, they voluntarily signed up for rape by trusting these rape apes over fucking expensive handbags.
I still find this behavior masochistic and entirely self inflicted, but I didn't catch that OP was 19 admittedly, that is indeed sad and lamentable. The whole read was jarringly bleak and I sped through it after seeing how fucking air headed these women are young age or not. Fucking around with rich arab moids and travelling to a foreign city notoriously known for sex trafficking, mass wealth hoarding, corruption and white collar crime is not a smart idea even for someone as young as 19 or 20. Most 19 year olds are starting their first jobs, degrees or both, not prostituting themselves off to some arab rapeape in a foreign city for handbags. Nothing can be done about rapeapes they will never change as this behavior is rooted in their biology therefore the onus is on women to ensure their own safety. Normalizing prostitution is not a root to this safety, calling these women
victims and equivocating this scenario to women who are raped and not prostitutes normalizes and lessens the severity of rape. What even is the motivation of travelling with complete stranger rape apes aside from the weak consumerist rich shit that apparently sold this woman into prostitution.
You've solidified my opinion even moreso with this weak defense of such overtly self inflicted, masochistic behavior and your genius idea of fighting slut shaming with slut shaming. Powerful stuff.
No. 19020
>>19018I just read a schizophrenic word salad that consisted of nothing.
Your whole paragraph could literally just be shortened to this >I view other women as competition and will blame a teenage girl for getting pimped out by her friend, I will also say I'm a lesbian so I can avoid any criticism.
Also you're that anon aren't you, the retarded one who always posts out of context retarded photos here of some pornstars tweets and then you try to say how it's all women doing that. You also for some reason also posted a picture before blaming a girl because some sick pervert did a deep fake and created fake nudes about her. You are definitely giving of topdyke polilez former whore energy, bitches like you need to stop using the blackpill so you can unleash your hidden pickme side , this is not what the blackpill is for. The original blackpill reddit before it got deleted was great and everything went to shit after that and now it's only retards like you who are left. You and that retarded Indian who is obsessed with blowjobs.
(infighting) No. 19033
>>19018Omg girl stop fucking sucking dick and defending rapists with shit fetishes, you whore. Everyone knows you're obsessed with sucking dick and defending men, you're not a lesbian, you're a mentally ill girl who's a used up whore. We're not like you, we're not going on websites to find out about weird pornsick shit to post here and masturbate to, ew! What kinda dyke is obsessed with defending men with literal scat fetishes who rape women? Just admit that you're a cockwhore whose brain melted from fucking that many men.
You're literally assuming all anons arw competing for men just because you're low enough to willingly defend scat fetish moids that rape teenagers. No, this isn't a woman thing, it's a you thing. You're a huge whore and you literally admit you get off to this shit many time before, go get help instead of blaming us, little cum smelling loose cockwhore.
Btw I didnt read your reply and I'm not gonna read it.
>>19020Yeah it's the mentally ill tif anon who has a fetish for humiliating herself and she assumes everyone(even raped women) enjoy humiliating stuff because she personally likes them.
(USER HAS BEEN PUT OUT TO PASTURE) No. 19036
File: 1692437860441.jpg (978.91 KB, 1080x4760, 3104319.jpg)
>>19020Picrel is from the bpf subreddit
>The original blackpill reddit before it got deleted was great and everything went to shit after that and now it's only retards like you who are left. You and that retarded Indian who is obsessed with blowjobs.No the women who ruin it are the libfem sounding women, women with dumb feminist mentalities, women with dumb misandrist mentalities (infantilizing women). In that subreddit it was even possible to call women retarded without that much backlash and they managed to stay on the topic without infighting(men are inherently misogynistic/rapists/pedos and women are inherently pickmes without men brainwashing them to be pickmes, female nature and sexuality on it's own is a pickme) without whining over the mildest takes like women on the pinkpill.co(website that was made by a
femcel). You're a patriarchal bitch and constantly flip the narrative to try to paint others as the degenerate ones but how many fucking times it as to be said that it's not about any anon here, it's not about us it's about how women suck dick and how it's a male supremacy suggesting that patriarchy is eternal because this shit won't ever stop. No amount of denial will change the fact that male supremacy is in some way natural so by hating the blackpillers you sound like you're punishing them for not obeying it all and no accepting nature and their natural gender role. You can't be anti male supremacy without being anti sex/sex critical. Heterosexuality aka men and women already force us to accept the most heinous sodomite despicable acts and women having their mouths penetrated by dicks as normal for the sake of being respectful toward them all. But it's not okay, we don't have to respect non of that shit I don't care about your mommy god nature punishing me with mental illness if i see something natural as a tyrannical filthy shit. You all need to stop moralfagging and ordering women, after the subreddit was banned it was impossible to even talk about the problems female nature causes without women going absolutely neurotic and mad at you. The subreddit allowed us to criticize women, it was full of whores but at least they didn't try to hijack the conversation that much and stayed in their place unless someone asked why women have het sex or suck dick and you would get a bunch of those women shitting themselves and defending sex or even having incel mentality: weee weee I can't go a whole lifetime without physical intimacy. The sub was definitely a better at talking about male nature without bringing women into it as a infantilized helpless
victims which is a gaslighting because like I already said women have a sexuality and nature on their own not created by men.
It's the female socialization that ruins all the blackpill talk because
if y'all dropped the dumb feminism esp libfem level of critical thinking skills, pro sex, pro choice, dumb fake misandry and stayed on topic then maybe it would be good. I'm gonna repeat it. You can talk about male nature without bringing women into it and infantalizing them while going full schizo mode talking about how men created women and hijacked them and how men brainwash women to suck cock. You or the anon below you sound like you sucked off a bunch of slimy dicks in your life or your sisters(radfems like to call other women their sisters kek) sucked off a bunch of slimy dicks and now you make us face the consequences of it. If you were on this sub then you were probably one of those women who were shitting themselves sometimes over mild takes cause "
victim blaming" was allowed in that space and I even saw user with "I hate women" username and nobody cared. All this situation reminds me of one post from there about how women dont allow other women to be dark and edgy.
>posts out of context retarded photos here of some pornstars tweets and then you try to say how it's all women doing thatThe ss are posted so women become a little more realistic but they end up flipping the narrative like the anon below you. Can you be a little more intelligent, capable of seeing the big picture, perceiving patterns and having critical thinking skills? I'm tired of your dumb patriarchy demanding I respect it and calling me the degenerate. We have to be harassed and violated by heterosexuality since birth and hear all the
triggering stories of male dominance and female humiliation aka the natural dynamic of the het relationship, it's like a sexual harassment. I have to see the same female form I live in blowing dicks while gagging on their own spit and filth. Normie women are the one who are coomers and watch porn for coomer reasons, any woman like me who doesn't fit into society doesn't fit into it because she's not a whore and sees the dick sucking sodomy as subhuman and offensive. You think it's okay to force us to respect it just cause it's women sexuality? That's a patriarchy. I'm tired of heterosexuality being beyond critique. And sigh I haven't even seen any real talk about male nature in those three blackpill threads on the other hand we can brag and brag about men but women will still you know what and they broke me years ago, I don't find spreading truths about men for the purpose of trying to peak women sustainable mentally. See how hard it is to make women stay on the topic like in that subreddit.
No. 19037
File: 1692437953512.jpeg (134.78 KB, 1170x1170, F31etuBWEAAPZWi (1).jpeg)
Here goes our anti-porn feminist queen, Billie Eilish and her ex-bf writing about her pornstar skills in his new song.
No. 19046
>>18993AYRT
>implying scrotes wouldn't do shit that repulses them when they can utilise it to abuse women at any chance they're givenYou're gullible, nonna. Scrotes don't need to be aroused to get hard, and they conflate "sex" (read: rape) with abuse, anyway. Don't think even for a second that they did it (if this is even a real thing that happened and not some moid's/braindead woman's fanfic) because they found it arousing; it was all because they got to cruelly play around with women and torture them. It is the infliction of discomfort, humiliation, and pain that arouses them–not the tools used in the process.
No. 19047
>>19045Another thing that gives it away: accusing anons of getting off to posting critical content here, over and over and over and over. It admitted to doing this in its ban message, so you know it's projection. The mods are aware of the problem and banned it
>>18908 then redtexted it
>>18921 >>18922 for alogging/derailing/infighting. That's when it went to /ot with the screenshots it took of itself from lgbt to blame us. Very autistic trolling.
>>19020>Being a lesbian gives her a way to avoid criticism from straight womenYou are so utterly delusional about this "lesbian privilege" it's laughable, as is you thinking being a political lesbian means any lesbian who is interested in women's politics. Dumbass. NTA.
No. 19049
>>19018>You've solidified my opinion even moreso with this weak defense of such overtly self inflicted, masochistic behavior and your genius idea of fighting slut shaming with slut shaming. Powerful stuff.They say blackpill anons are misogynists (for seeing feminism has been reduced to perpetuating women's status as men's inevitable
victims - for example by this prostitute playing dumb about what a gang of men fetishizing and objectifying her in a luxurious hotel hobby wanted in exchange for giving her money, clothes and spa treatments, then blaming her easily avoided abuse on her female friend after leaving the lobby and choosing to come back, and after days of being given the option not to endure it).
Then they turn around and call women easy loose sluts and little cum smelling loose cockwhores. Why? For disagreeing with their performative, liberal feminist rhetoric that keeps the cycle of women's abuse going by avoiding the truth. The truth is they consent to giving up their consent and being powerless to men when they've got their end of the deal, which they didn't have to make (in this case, thousands of dollars and luxury clothing items which isn't worth even vanilla sex because
that is still rape in context of prostitution but they were willing to keep the cycle going for some money).
It has zero problem calling her same age friend
>>18991 >>19016 the sex trafficker who pimped her out, in the same sentence it says
you're victim blaming. Now that's intrasexual female competition.
>>19048Get help.
No. 19051
>>19049I am blackpill anon and I find it very interesting how you have more empathy for the woman who pimped out her younger friend and the men who did the deed. You even said that I am the one doing intra-sexual competition….for calling her friend a pimp…Meanwhile you call
victims vile names and spend your whole time looking at porn and posting porn accounts here….but waaait I know what your retarded excuse for that is going to be like "I am exposing the evil nature of women by looking at porn all the time and following accounts like that". You are so predictable and mentally challenged.
You are too retarded to gaslight so leave gaslighting for the intelligent people ,OK. You are trying to tell me how the blackpill goes or about the reddit when I literally was there since the beginning, there is a difference between calling out women for
valid things and their nature and there is a difference between sounding like a tradthot and a male.
There is nothing blackpill about your statements, you sound like a tradthot which is the majority of women unfortunately so what makes you so different from them, you are the same as them, you are like Hannah pearl Davis the only difference is your label.
Victim blaming is a slippery slope and it looks like you are about to slip into defending men raping prepubescent girls too soon.
>>19050People like her think the blackpill is just a place to unleash their bitter jealousy of other women. When the blackpill originally was a place to call out the nature of both men and women without bias. Calling out true nature doesn't mean that you have to lose brain cells.
She sounds like one of those pickmes that haven't been picked .
No. 19056
>>19051Ikr. She's a literal braindead pickme who thinks 6 rapists and 1 human trafficker are innocent but the rape
victim is guilty for being innocent and gullible(as expected of a teen girl to be). She's been shitting the thread with her jealousy and it's so funny that she thinks she can post female hatred here and get away with it, lmao.
No. 19057
>>19051I fact checked you already slutoid, I went to the archive of that subreddit and even posted ss as a proof of what it was about but I already knew since I was there.
>>19056Yawn, don't you get tried of nagging
(USER HAS BEEN PUT OUT TO PASTURE) No. 19063
>>19020>I will also say I'm a lesbian so I can avoid any criticism.I don't view women as competition catty pickme. I'm not attracted to males nor will ever be. I have never and will never have sex with a male, I have only ever had sexual encounters with women. If you refuse to believe me you are free to do so but that's on you.
>Also you're that anon aren't you, the retarded one who always posts out of context retarded photos here of some pornstars tweetsNo I'm NTA, but even if I was stop encouraging witchhunting and infighting of other anons, schizo one. You did not counter anything I said and only shit flung and ironically slut shamed lel. I'll repeat again: accusing a woman of slut shaming then proceeding to slut shame is not a good argument.
>>19033Your catty "slut slut slut slut" shit doesn't work on me, I am a goldstar and give no fucks about your obsession with the sexual degradation and the humiliation of women by ascribing to heterosexual shit. So I don't ascribe to slut shaming and moral fagging of any woman, and neither will work on me or any woman with half a unpatriarchal brain. I'm not defending any of the inhuman rapeape shit in that post; those males deserve to be executed in a firing range but we all know male biological nature will never change. But prostitutes and indeed much women continue the cycle of suffering for women, so die mad. These women were escorts who were reimbursed for their prostitution, they are not unconsenting rape
victims. Please have an argument outside of loose slut.
>>1904In previous BP threads anons never moralfagged this hard and arguments were a little more cogent than slut slut slut!
>>19049>Then they turn around and call women easy loose sluts and little cum smelling loose cockwhores. Why? For disagreeing with their performative, liberal feminist rhetoric that keeps the cycle of women's abuse going by avoiding the truth. The truth is they consent to giving up their consent and being powerless to men when they've got their end of the deal, which they didn't have to make Absolutely true. Previous BP threads analyzed this cycle of behavior in women and it can be harrowing to see how women perpetuate the cycle of abuse but it's also vindicating and freeing to see reality for what it is. This behavior of countering slut shaming with slut shaming is baffling to me. Moralfagging about anonymous women in an anonymous image board being loose sluts seems like a pointless waste of time whose only motivation is to divide women amongst each other for their sexual value to rapeapes, it's the most intrasexual competitive petty and catty behavior one could do. Who counters a critism of prostitution and consumerism with w-well you're just a slut! It's purpose is to the fill the void with unassailable weightless insults. Until actual criticism is completely buried. It's to distract away from the masochistic behavior of women and ever present violence of rapeapes.
No. 19065
>>19057>you slutoid Yeah your definitely a male or a woman who has spent so much time around incels or channers that your brain has melted off.
I've noticed someone here before keep calling women names like femoid and slutoid so I guess it was you using those insults that only male incels use on women.
Do you think if you use insults like that you will become a man? You are pathetic.
No. 19067
>>19063>don't accuse me of being that anon you schizo!!>goes ahead and accuses me in the same sentence of being another anon slut shaming her. The jokes write themselves. I'm not that anon who is "slut shaming", that is a different anon. Despite the nasty replies calling me misogynistic names I did not respond with the same energy back because I don't want to stoop low to your level. Not everyone here is the same anon, dogshit hypocrite.
You are a part of the system, you literally ooze of hatred and pickme-ness you and that other lunatics posts bitterness could be felt from just your posts, can't imagine how worse you are in real life.
No. 19069
File: 1692475942824.jpg (428.97 KB, 1080x821, IMG_20230819_221442.jpg)
>The high powered podcast supports political lesbianism
Noooo why does it keep happening
No. 19070
>>19068>>19067>>19065Critical thinking skills level of the average patriarchal bitch.
Are the men in the room with us right now? Can't comprehend that a woman can be smart and conscious? I don't even go to incel forums.
No. 19081
File: 1692479326064.jpg (562.58 KB, 1080x4552, nna.jpg)
Here's a separatist on twitter calling woman a pornoid rat(look at the bottom of the picrel) it's not uncommon. You're just making dumb assumptions to ignore any points that are being made
No. 19092
This thread was a waste. Nothing but derailment and infighting.
>>19081kek pornoid
No. 19098
It's rare to find women discussing this topic, how the man is the deafult human being, how only male art is considered true art and only men are people. Women are guilty of this too and their appreciation of other women often seems performative. I think it's also true that men in comparison to women create fiction of more variety, so women also create their own hell, constantly locking us within the same barriers. I like some female artists, but it's true they tend to create stuff revolved around romance and slice of life bullshit more often than men, and while men do it too, they
also create a huge amount of other things. And when women finally create adventure stories, or interesting stories or "deep" stories with no romance, they make the main characters male (I'm looking at Fullmetal Alchemist for example…) God it's always the same fucking shit over and over again
https://cannabisrefugeeesq.wordpress.com/2023/08/18/real-talk-real-misogyny-humans-reacting-to-humans/>“I will never be a human reacting or being reacted-to.” Yes, and it’s wrenching. Even when you have ‘content’ with two or more women interacting it’s always some fakery like “sisters gotta support each other” which means complimenting their hair or makeup or discussing how to attract / keep men. It can never be about knowledge and life, as you say. We’re never allowed to be human beings with developed interests and senses of self beyond walking ornaments with some stuff about healing the ‘mother / sister wound’ thrown on top. Like they can’t even have a conversation about the issue at hand without having to do all this fake propping up of self esteem, which I guess is understandable since we’re all living under men’s boots whether we know it or not. But it is still boring. But let’s all cry for the ‘young men’ of this country. It’s so hard choosing from among the dozens of unskilled / low skilled six-figure jobs in abundance for males to do, with plenty of free time left to master a guitar and the values, i mean wealth, to turn down industry deals.This shit is too real.
Honestly one day when I start publishing my art I'm going to pretend I'm a dude to avoid prejudice and when I gain traction only then I will reveal I'm a woman and I will make people seethe and they won't be able to do a 180 on me and suddenly call my art shitty because that would make them hypocrites. People of both sexes take everything made by men more seriously so I will use that and reveal it to them and then maybe it will force at least some of them to think. Definitely only a few, but that's something
No. 19103
>>19101I'm that anon
>>19091 and I never posted any porn shit, have you ever considered that you're talking to more than one person here?
No. 19107
>>19105Prove it's me who posts the screenshots about blowjobs. Mods can check my IP. Those are not mine posts. But I still kinda agree with that anon. As I said here
>>19106 posting this doesn't prove she wants to do what those women do. You sound like you feel attacked for some reason. The women from these screenshots definitely deserve to be dehumanized because they don't behave like humans loo
No. 19108
>>19105Also
>normal activists>girlI think you need to go back
No. 19117
>>19111Low IQ assumptions that someone who talks about human sexuality is the degenerate one.
All the sex acts described here and the nature of heterosexuality( both sexes heterosexual desires) + piv for example and what a woman body is in it is a literal definition of what a submission is, in nothing else you are 100% submissive as in this and women have rape kinks because of their biology/their body being designed as submissive so they want to pretend to be forced into sex or want to fuck ugly men/creatures bigger than them because it helps them give up and surrender and surrender is how women receive any stimulation or so called "pleasure" in het sex activities, that's their natural degeneracy . It's other women and not us who engage in all this nature, nature that suggests male supremacy and patriarchy is natural and women acceptance of those natural conditions and seeing them as ok is a proof of how inherently submissive they are and even seeing heterosexual relationships as okay is a proof of a deep submission. So how in those natural conditions the lack of male dominance or female humiliation is even possible? Or how misandry is possible? It isn't and if you go against this nature as a woman then everyone demonizes you but you're the only one who hates the patriarchy. All those screenshots are a accurate representation of reality, this is literally real life, you sound like you have no self awareness. We're not the ones who want to suck off dicks and date men EVER and never ever did or never i imagined myself doing humiliating acts, I would kill myself if I did, there's no worse disgusting shit smelling sodomy than those acts that are a part of real life and women/men heterosexual desires. All of this denialism needs to be studied like none of what you say will ever change real life you male supremacist
No. 19118
File: 1692522739174.jpg (413 KB, 2048x2048, 80737.jpg)
Average day on earth:
-7 men aged 19-20yo gang rape a woman and call her a meat
-Sabrina Carpenter keeps singing her songs
The point is that as a woman I can easily justify finding her songs offensive to me because men are misogynistic rapists who brutalize women while she's publicly worshipping them kek
No. 19123
File: 1692531042120.png (68.06 KB, 3695x296, 22hoursago.png)
>>19108It got banned.
>>19048 No. 19137
>>19067>I don't want to stoop to that catty level uwu>You are a part of the system, you literally ooze of hatred and pickme-ness you and that other lunatics posts bitterness could be felt from just your posts, can't imagine how worse you are in real life.>>19118Bleak. How does anyone here complain about political lesbians when this is reality?
>>19117>>19127Seconding, keep posting your thoughts; that is the purpose of this thread to delve to the bottom of bleakest shit in nature affecting women. It's rare to see anyone, let alone other women critical of biological nature and socialization.
No. 19148
>>19111>You're definitely the one who assumes all straight women have the same disgusting pornsick fetishes you yourself have though and that you're the one who constantly accuses every straight women of indulging in weird pornsick activities.Nta but ALL straight women/male aligned and partnered are either consenting to this inhuman behavior, encouraging it or radio silent about it. Out of curiosity what do you expect the common reaction to be to people who normalize this subhuman behavior? Calling out this inhuman behavior is not "pickme". Defending it; the status quo that hurts women and empowers men, is. It is horrible to see the images anon posts but its reality, it can difficult to confront this bleak reality but it exists regardless of if we are shielded away from it or not.
>>19101Ntayrt but
>DykeLeave now you homophobic woman hating monster.
No. 19158
>>19155You're acting completely oblivious to the fact that women get penetrated irl and give blowjobs to filthy dicks irl and blame what women are on anons here. You have the mentality that woman sexuality/nature is a
victim and male a perpetrator like women don't have a autonomous sexuality and nature on their own. Just typical whore misandrist/feminist mentality but the real life will never change no matter how much you seethe over anons here. Some of us don't wanna engage in the feminist pretending anymore while women are born to suck men off and never will stop anyway kek I don't understand the feminist/misandrist strategies based on denial of things, maybe because I don't gaf about engaging heterosexual relationships and don't wanna make them better for women so they can suck on filthy dicks in peace either, it's all a natural patriarchy in which women are the ones doing the dirtiests, slimiest jobs straight from hell while men the violent etc. ones. And it's all natural, I'm not gonna be bowing down to it under a threat of being deemed as evil and deranged while I'm the only woman ever against the patriarchy and with a phobia of it. Plus you're literally weaponizing porn against us in such a weird way
btw. Real life het sex is the same or worse than porn, porn is filmed in a way that accents the natural male female dynamic because that's both sexes heterosexual desires that's why it's impossible to make non misogynistic porn etc. Kek. Calling us porn addicts but having not
problem with hetero sex, what a genius logic all human interaction revolve around. Just saying dumb bullshit, gaslighting and projections. Why would I engage in all of these dumb social interactions and dumb logic if I'm not a whore. And the retarded own: "you would say this irl" doesn't even matter here at all. It means nothing
No. 19160
>>19155>This little bitch would be beaten up if she dared to call women irl those nicknames or look down on women like she does here.>This little bitchWhy does this read like a catty rapeape gang threat? This stinks of a psychopathic male or a seething het woman who engages with violent males till the point of becoming one mentally. This is alogging btw, dial back the threats of physical violence. I haven't even said any "names" either, I can understand interpreting my post as looking down on others possibly but put into words what your actual criticisms are; this isn't highschool. Try not to mald and keep yourself together, word actual arguments outside of catty spiteful violent schoolyard insults.
Why are you physically threatening anonymous women on an anonymous imageboard like a male? Are you actually male? What kind of woman threatens physical violence on another one, expects and revels in it in other women? Threatening and physically assaulting someone and being assaulted is not a counter argument. Someone being hurt doesn't prove your argument right, ape. Why is your only counter argument to threaten violence when you hear things you don't like unhingedly then screetch that other anons are somehow the losers? "You better shut up or you'll get beaten" is not a counter argument, it's literally trying to shut women up for speaking their thoughts. It's hoping they'll be silenced with the threat of violence and taught how to behave "right" by being assaulted. I miss when actual discussion happened on this board, now it's at its final form of unhinged low intelligence verbal threats. The only explanation for this behavior is that I clearly hit a nerve somewhere in the original post that
triggered this level of violent seething.
>>19156I am lel. When did 2x become all but a refuge for tradthots to complain about trannies, "dykes" and salty het women to complain about anyone who critiques heterosexuality and human behavior? Low effort quips should only be met with equally low effort quips though, die mad. This is an absolute shit storm of a thread and you've made it so.
No. 19163
There is no difference between most tifs and any other females, if you have piv then you do not have a gender dysphoria. It would only make sense if they were like me and I was already told years ago by strangers online constantly that I'm a tm because I feel terror (and always did) at the thought of heterosexual acts ohh but ofc these people were ridiculous sometimes and nagging me for having a month long breakdown after finding out bdsm exists. Yet I fit the gd more than them, there's NOTHING male about them. Literally nothing. Wanting to be a male = wanting to be the masculine energy physically which involves having male genitals.
But if those females are attracted to men then they would have that het woman autogynephylia and would want to present themselves as feminine to make men more attracted to them like this girl
>>17653Who after sex with a 30yo while she was 18/19 suddenly lost her gd and felt womanly (now she has a child with him while he already has a teen child kek). I don't relate to tifs but I relate to preferring to be born on the masculine side of things yet I'm a female for life getting victimized by female socialization and having my mind disconnected from my body since young age(but I had no concept of trans stuff and wanting to be a male till 2 years ago in my mind yet when I look at my past I see that I tried to make myself like being a girl through wanting to become hyper feminine bc I had that delusion that it will give me some power and status and feeling power is what brings my motivation to engage in life back yet it's impossible as a woman especially sexually) I'm absolutely masculine leaning and don't fit into the feminine sexual role my body forces onto me, I just feel a burden of submission on my all the time. I wouldn't date any conceivable man because I can't see myself having sex and submitting for the sake of useless stimulation you can only get of you submit. That's the burdening submissive state I just mentioned that's weighting on me, I wouldn't wanna live in it permanently. Female role in het sex = serving, loving, opening your heart, nurturing, being consumed, being forgiving and male = being loved, being forgiven, nurtured and consuming the femininity.
No. 19167
File: 1692613005154.jpg (275.41 KB, 927x620, Bleak.jpg)
Women barely in their 20s are addicted to male hormones and drugs for mental illnesses. Bleak.
No. 19170
File: 1692630847054.jpg (413.06 KB, 1080x2934, 51433.jpg)
Average "bi" woman with a husband
No. 19171
File: 1692630926820.jpg (296.58 KB, 2048x2048, l.jpg)
Moid makes a misogynistic tweet that gets 30k likes then mocks women who tell him that he will never have a girlfriend by posting picture with his girlfriend
No. 19172
>>19170First they deny it, then they bring random excuses, then "it's your fault!!"
Honestly, why does this "discourse" even exist? Both sides are better off not talking to each other.
No. 19176
File: 1692643403870.jpg (409.23 KB, 1080x1234, Screenshot_2023-08-21-20-45-52…)
This is probably the same mentality anons on this board who seethe over "tifs" every day have
No. 19182
>>19176Yeah there are a few like her and like
>>19178 in the radfem screenshots thread. Rad to trad pipeline.
No. 19186
>>19165>but you know they'd beat you up if you came to their face and called them cockwhores like you do here, lmao. You're a little bitch who will never be a man, that's why you're scared to even talk to women irl but write paragraphs shitting on women here.From the latent continuous calls to violence you've still learned nothing, alogging and infighting driven by the lack of an argument lol instead you doubled down on male violence and seething hatred so I can only say seethe harder. You completely gave up trying to make any argument. I'd argue you're the one on t and the possible troon with your incessant calls to violence and threats towards other women, angered seething one. Doubling down on calls to violence doesn't make a good argument, it only proves your seething because you can't chimp out violently in person kek. Continue your misognistic inhuman chimping too lel your seething is appreciated. To know I've perpetually hit a nerve well from you "cockwhores" anon and it is an accomplishment in its own right. You're chimping out over text on a screen.
>>19178Those are pants on a woman. Woman generally are allowed to wear pants.
>Why are you trying to take the spotlight on someone's special day?Can the Tradthots please leave?
No. 19190
>>19186It's ok to wear pants, obviously, I've worn pants to weddings before but her putting the nonbinary thing up front is so weird. It's like these trans identifying people don't have personalities and their trans identity is the only thing they advertise themselves as. Those tifs never have any videos where their trans identity isn't mentioned which is concerning imo and it comes across as someone with identity issues.
>>19182Thinking someone using a made up identity to describe themselves in every setting is unsettling doesn't make me trad, lmao. Trads are more likely to support trans ideologies since they're the ones who believe butch or masculine women aren't women.
No. 19206
>>19195This. Both trads and gendies accept very harsh gender stereotypes and again both groups dislike feminism and women being masculine, working to be independent etc. The trad will attack you and force you to fit gender stereotypes by changing your looks and personality while the gendie will try to make you believe you're actually the opposite sex and you have to take hormones and get surgery to be happy.
Both groups absolutely hate gender nonconforming women, trans individuals even call gender nonconforming women men just like trads do.
No. 19208
>>19176She looks really good, shame about the nonbinary thing.
>>19178>special dayGo back to your boyfriend and stop posting here. Nothing is special about enslaving yourself to a moid.
No. 19223
>>19208I'm
>>19178 and I agree she looks good and also agree that it's a shame that she feels the need to identify as a nonbinary just so she can enjoy pants or a suit.
No. 19224
File: 1692713464315.jpg (543.67 KB, 1080x1306, Screenshot_2023-08-22-16-08-03…)
>>19163The
>>17653 girl has an article about her story but I can't help but feel repulsed by her for breeding with a creepy 30yo and spitting on radfems who literally begged her(politely) to break up with him but all she did was being snarky about it
No. 19230
>>19224This is so sad. She transitioned probably so her father would stop being attracted to her and then ended up getting taken advantage by another men. I hate tranny spheres for seeing women like this get groomed and not say anything about it. There's a reason radfems lose their shit when they see this but the tranny/nb/
femcel "women" don't ever try to help groomed girls like her. I hope she will find peace and be in a safer place soon.
No. 19247
>>19241It's just nuance. Women aren't holes. Defining yourself in relation to what men can do to your body is a form of mental submission (to their colonisation of women to bend us over for their use).
Even penetration by a woman is different from penetration by a man, and that's not nitpicking, nor is it to say all (or most) lesbians enjoy penetration to begin with. The mind and body are not separate and the body doesn't triumph - that is what male rapists think (she has holes, it's nature for me to stick my dick into them even if her mind is saying no).
>>19243Lesbianism is a natural part of femaleness. Who are you to say the female body was made for males when parthonegesis exists in nature and was clearly shut down as an ability within females by the defective Y chromosome? It's more like the male body is the result of a parasite that transforms the intended female fetus into a mistake, and lesbianism is a part of female nature. What you're saying is, no, males aren't the defects of female nature, lesbianism is the defect of female nature.
No. 19252
*parthenogenesis.
>>19246Just because males are naturally dominant doesn't mean females are naturally submissive. You don't understand basic theory and are parroting the male point of view like it's transcendent and blackpill and "just facts". It's really not and I recommend reading the blog Fact Check Me.
>>19249No, heterosexuality is a natural part of females and understanding why (which is a matter of science) does not make me think women can be led to something that is in opposition to their hijacked biology. I was born a lesbian and all it means is I'm only capable of sexual and romantic attraction to females. Polilez is such an overused buzzword on this board.
No. 19255
>>19250You're saying lesbianism is a defect that contrasts with the natural purpose of the female body (to be fucked by males). It makes more sense even just scientifically that males are the defect of the female body, and that same sex attraction is a natural occurrence which goes back to some deserted part of evolution called parthenogenesis that we are genetically incapable of now.
>>19253Parthenogenesis but that never happened and is never going to happen. By the way, I'm here to learn. I don't mind being wrong, but I hate it when women's ideas are shut down by bitching.
>>19254This is like saying "how do lesbians have sex" and that meme with the two scissors or the meme with the two holes trying to insert themselves into eachother. Gosh.
No. 19267
>>19265Radfem has nothing to do with a blackpiller saying lesbianism is a biological, natural part of femaleness (which you just agreed with) that, yes, proves females are not fuckhole broodmares by destiny of our body parts, and proves that the purpose of me having a female body is not to be fucked by a male to pass on the Y chromosome. Heterosexuality and being female are not the same thing and your line of thinking is the same as lesbians who think they're males in the wrong bodies.
Your ideas about the female body are hateful no matter how you articulate them to appear superficially different from males' assessments of it. It's like when a fat person calls themselves fat all the time to avoid other people doing it to them first, so they can save themselves from the embarrassment. Saying you're just a fuckhole and a broodmare who's gained sentience and is rebelling against the submissive fate all other women are doomed to, even lesbians just by existing with vaginas, is blackpill?
No. 19275
>>19268I don't think you have a "prejudice". You're just operating from a black and white, passive and active, submissive and dominant, hole and penetrator line of thinking that doesn't add up when you consider the totality of female nature can't be reduced to "object waiting to be fucked". If anything that's the radical feminist belief hence why so many radfems "choose not to be heterosexual" (literally biologically impossible") as a display of being active.
>>19270You aren't just describing heterosexual females when you talk about females, because homosexual females exist. Your assessments of females cannot be true unless you consider lesbians in your assessments. If you think the purpose of being born fucking female is to shit out a baby, what logically follows to make your theory work is that lesbianism must be a defect of nature. It doesn't matter how many "bitches" you throw out. Your version of blackpill is being a straight woman who's trying to one-up the hatred of the men you're attracted to.
No. 19286
>>19280>>19281>Female biology is male supremacy and submissive to menThis is the same as saying lesbianism is male supremacy and submissive to men because lesbianism is a natural aspect of female biology that determines how my female body parts function (as far as sexual arousal, and as far as receptiveness to the sex with men you said the vagina exists to be receptive for). It determines how I can use my female body and its parts sexually. By your logic, because heterosexuality affects how most women's female bodies function, there are no significant differences; after all, a male could still rape me. By your logic my body would be fulfilling its biological purpose (to be fucked and inseminated). The reality is heterosexuality isn't the same thing as being female and your disgust at straight women being biologically wired to participate in their own degradation doesn't justify calling lesbians male supremacists simply for having vaginas.
You are extremely ignorant about female homosexuality and it comes out as tradthot-esque "women were put on earth for men to fuck and pass on their lineage through" takes that you think are groundbreaking and
too much for women to handle so that's the only possible reason they could be disagreeing with you. No, my female biology disagrees with you. Meanwhile the lesbians who bought into this crap are agreeing and transitioning to align themselves with "nature".
No. 19290
>>19283Those terminally online circles are marred by mental illness and political cliques so you're not really going to get any clear insight into lesbianism. So many of them seem to feel obligated to perform a version of their sexualities that match their political beliefs about men so they can fit in with those cliques, whether it's to look clean and pure for never having "icky" sexual thoughts about women or whether it's autists who treats lesbianism like a fucking avant garde art exhibition showcase to prove to normies that women/lesbians can have degenerate, pornsick kinks and like
toxic pedo yaoi ships too. I don't get it.
No. 19300
>>19298She's saying she's never had lesbian sex and only sees piv as "real" sex
>in het one they can interact with their genitals with other person genitalsWomen too have genitals that can interact with another ones genitals. The vulva is more than just the vagina, most stimulation comes from the clitoris regardless of what kind of sex the womans engaged in. Woman also have fingers and mouths.
No. 19305
File: 1692728482850.jpg (142.96 KB, 1080x397, Screenshot_2023-08-22-18-46-54…)
>>19292You are bringing up some exception of the rule as a proof that I'm wrong while it means nothing. Thinking involves imagination while I don't see anyone here thinking enough all the nitpicking is a denial of how real life we all can observe looks like but denying doesn't change the real life, you're just fantasising and engaging in natural female socialization and I just wanna add that the circumstances women create for us with their nature and natural female socialization and all the nitpicking they do is a patriarchy that sabotages us. Flipping the narrative here also is not genuine like what does it do? You just hijack the conversation and paint the story the way you want it to be and then women avoid accountability for all this female socialization they do as if it's not a real part of life that happened. It's nauseating being in this female realm stuck with women, stuck as a woman. I can observe how reality really looks like and no the way it is is not a result of men alone I bet you but women in those kind of spaces see women as a
victims and their behavior as caused by men in all cases
No. 19307
>>19305No one is arguing over tiny mistakes, everyone here thinks your whole argument is wrong and the way you lash out on lesbians as if you wouldn't kill to be one yourself proves how sad and cock-crazy you are.
>>19302No. It's a self hating straight woman.
No. 19309
>>19293That anon never claimed to be a lesbian though and I'm the one who was arguing with her so it's not like I am even biased. Actually I'm pretty sure she's had silly fights about predatory, pedophilic bisexuals into yaoi who she called lesbians before.
>>19300>Women too have genitals that can interact with another ones genitals. The vulva is more than just the vagina, most stimulation comes from the clitoris regardless of what kind of sex the womans engaged in. Woman also have fingers and mouths.Right, if your whole argument about the nature of a female body is to submit to men and be their fuckhole is countered by the existence of the clitoris and lesbianism, what kind of argument is it really? It comes across as a straight woman who has internalised men's dehumanising views of her and is weaponising it against other women blindly (she called me a male supremacist for having a vagina
>>19277 when I told her I'm a lesbian) to feel in control. It's fucking scary how someone can live with themselves in such a self-hating mentality and what really gets me is her trying to spread her self-hatred to lesbians. Lesbians with her mentality do exist but the difference from someone like her is they're transitioning to disassociate from this "natural fuckhole" status she ascribes (and all men ascribe, and arguably the sexually active straight women she complains about ascribe) to their female bodies.
>>19305>I can observe how reality really looks like and no the way it is is not a result of men alone I bet you but women in those kind of spaces see women as a victims and their behavior as caused by men in all casesThis is not what I said anywhere. Lesbians aren't a tiny fault in your argument. We aren't an exception to the rule because we have the same fucking bodies you're talking about being natural submissive fuckholes designed for men to stick their dicks in. Our existence entirely refutes your argument about the female body. There is a difference between being heterosexual and being a female.
No. 19318
>>19317Nta but most posters on lolcow never "accomplished" anything in their lives. That on itself doesn't mean their argument is wrong.
I agree that female biology is inherently submissive, that's why I don't want to engage in it, because it's against my mental state. I don't engage but I know it exists, whether women engage with moids or not, because there's always the potential. You can get
raped and impregnated etc. I've also always been dysphoric as fuck, I don't want to be reminded of that part of my body, I had only one gyno exam with a speculum and I will never ever have it again because it was traumatic as fuck even though she used the smallest one. I was crying for hours and I still felt violated days later. I'd rather go to a dentist and have her drill my teeth than to allow anything inside of me
No. 19322
>>19318>most lolcow posters haven't accomplished anything.Speak for yourself. I'm studying in a good college towards a good degree. Already have a ton of money saved up, can and will live comfortably and happily.
You're a loser because you just are. You're submissive, stupid and failed because that's who you are but it's not related to you having two x chromosomes.
No. 19323
>>19319She's a straight woman who hates herself because she's attracted to men and as she admits she "has no accomplishments". If you were a loser whose sole hobby was fantasizing about fucking men and then remembering how much you hate women who feel attracted to men (aka yourself) without doing anything productive all day, you'd go as mad as her.
She thinks it's her biology because that's what her pornsick brain thinks she's capable of, although she deep down knows most women have jobs, careers, houses, friends, hobbies, talents, etc. she attempts to bring us all down to her level and objectifies us for men like she enjoys doing so for herself.
No. 19335
>>19322I don't perceive having a degree as an achievement. That's what most normies do. I also have a big amount of money saved, I own my own apartment, I'm not in debt, I have hobbies, I can earn money from both my regular job and my hobby, people like what I do etc. And I still hate female biology
>>19323Another projection retard. I'm not straight either, I'm bisexual and I only had sexual experiences with other women. But now I'm totally celibate because I see human biology as disgusting in general, I won't engage in gay sex either.
No. 19346
>>19342Dysphoria
>>19318No achievements
>>19318 and in the later reply she admits to having no formal education.
Exaggerated meangirl types don't exist irl, why don't you go and try interacting with real women for once? If anything women who believe rape is natural and that being a woman means being inferior get abused by men, not women.
No. 19349
>>19343>attacks lesbiansI didn't attack them
>say women's nature is to get fucked and give birth to men's children and imply lesbianism isn't naturalI didn't imply lesbianism isn't natural
>says she doesn't think lesbian sex isn't real because there isn't any cocks to suck or fuck I didn't say it I just say that it's less possible to have genitals to genitals sex as lesbians
>assume women can't have successes in any other fields aside from serving menNever assumed that
>argue that women are submissive by natureFemale body can only be submissive and nothing else in sex with men. That was the point
>argue that womens whole purpose is to give birthNever said it's their whole purpose
>lose her shit when a woman is promiscuousThis is a blackpill thread
>say terfs/feminists are evil and bad for womenNever said that, I just hate them for nagging dome females.
A like of brain dead nitpicking.
No. 19350
>>19347But i'm literally not a trad and hate male supremacists learn to stop being childish and have conversations based on facts.
What they do actually is nitpicking
No. 19351
>>19349>A like of brain dead nitpickingWhat.
>I just hate them for nagging dome females.Domme females? Is this a joke? Lmao.
Anyway you were pretending to be bi bur you said you didn't know how lesbian sex works and you didn't say it was less likely, you said it's impossible to have genital to genital sex as lesbians.
You're just a mentally ill straight girl who wants to be anything but a straight woman. You can't even view lesbian sex as real because you can't talk about cocksucking stuff while describing lesbian sex like you do with straight sex.
No. 19352
File: 1692793872767.jpg (8.27 KB, 275x101, 1692728482850.jpg)
That's the definition of nitpicking
No. 19357
>>19355I hate gcs for criticizing SOME females.
>a like briandeadA pile of braindead nitpicking.
(ban evasion) No. 19359
>>19354>you say women's nature is to be submissive and give men kidsRead what I said again
>say all women suck cock while acting like you're better yourselfI am, do you thine those monsters aren't make supremacists
>mention inappropriate sexual stugf with men each reply although you're pretending you're a voluntarily celibate I am lol? Wtf
>argue with any lesbian for hours and try to say that lesbians are just as submissive as you areI didn't say that and I'm not submissive that's why I hate womanhood
>admit to having no education and still think you're better than other womenIt wasn't me plus yo engage in society as a woman you have yo be dome kind of prostitute
>You're the perfect trad cow.But I'm literally not a trad and never wanted to be? I'm literally a blackpilled separatist you female tyrant. All other women are male supremacists trads
(ban evasion) No. 19365
>>19359Both sides are acting really dumb in this thread right now. I had more faith in you for writing such good posts in the past, guess I shouldn't have had faith in a straight woman to understand lesbianism though because your creed in libfem, radfem, GC and blackpill circles apparently simply can't and you always condescend us.
Obviously you can see you're no less of a female just because you are not feminine mentally or sexually submissive (you keep saying you're not like other women) so consider that you're making the same point as I did (female bodies are not inherently submissive) except you dismissed mine because I'm a lesbian and you think lesbians are outliers whose realities aren't important when it comes to defining femaleness. You don't have any more claim to femaleness and you don't have any more authority to talk about it/what defines it than I do just because you're part of the majority of women attracted to men. It doesn't matter if you pretend you were just speaking about straight women when I have already quoted you making the statements about female biology period, including your own, which is just another contradiction.
>>19360Technically you've banned anons from both sides so the thread would die that way.
(ban evasion) No. 19367
>>19330>>19325>Yeah [lesbians] are a feminine body made to reproduce with a male by nature but they a re engaging with other female body. Female body is submissive in relation with the male one but outside it it's still the same female body designed to reproduce with male>Human femalessnes is about having a womb, uterus and capability to birth new humans unfortunately>two sexes are unfortunately made to reproduce with eachother>Jesus Christ, the entire point is that in sex with men women can't be nothing else but submissive and lesbianism doesn't disprove that in sex with men women can only be submissive>But they [lesbians] still embody feminine energy as a female body so what, they still have a vagina and can't penetrate Jesus stop nitpicking>you're just imagining that I have some prejudice against lesbians also it made me think just now about how much less ways there is to have sex as a lesbian because in het one they can interact with their genitals with other person genitals>and it doesn't just apply to heterosexuality but being a female in generalYou made multiple separate points about lesbians specifically. Stop gaslighting. You have repeatedly said you're the only woman on earth who isn't submissive and you said this to a fucking lesbian as a celibate straight women who's attracted to men because of your heterosexual biology, but you're blaming my female biology for it. It's nonsensical.
Your logic is the reason so many lesbians are transitioning (for feeling similar to you, in fact
>>19163, but you're not a lesbian so it affects you differently as far as the likelihood of you ever actually transitioning being minuscule because your attraction to men is "what nature intended for women" so there's nothing to correct). It's harmful and you need to fucking stop and think for a second why you're being told that instead of dismissing it as inconsequential moralfagging and nitpicking (which you're doing because you said you think lesbians are a tiny fault in your argument about femaleness that are of little importance to it; yeah, no, the hundreds of millions of lesbians in the world aren't less biologically or naturally female than you). For someone who complains about mean girls copy and pasting bitchy one-word quips to shut down discussion that goes above their heads, you sure act the same when it comes to needing to rethink your argument.
>>19272Blackpill isn't just doomerism because that means trimming off the parts of reality about femaleness that don't feed your doomerism about it which, surprise, is exactly what you are doing. You have way too much cognitive dissonance about being a fucking female yourself for any of what you're saying about being a female to make real sense.
No. 19371
>>19321Women don't even have to menstruate in this day and age if they don't want to. Evolution is not destiny except to retarded evolutionary biology fanatic incel men from Reddit using it to justify being turned on by 14 year olds. I was offered a device by the doctor to stop my periods because they were causing me serious pain and she told me I had to consider it carefully because it'd stop me being able to get pregnant for something like five years. You do not need to live your life in fear of forced pregnancy.
Blaming women for fearing rape because "the ability to be raped proves we're submissive" doesn't make sense when males can forcibly penetrate other males, and they can actually receive physical pleasure from consensual penetration in the you know what but nobody is saying that makes males submissive holes even though the clitoris isn't a fucking hole or canal and is scientifically more pleasurable than anything a male will ever experience sexually (and the closest thing is their assholes so where is your doomer energy?)
No. 19374
>>19360Thank you for finally banning the misogynist
>>19367>>19371 I agree with you but I doubt that anon will ever understand or even read your posts. It's obviously a very mentally ill individuals and as I said above, she is one of thise traditionalist women who hate lesbians and feminists and preach abouts how much better they are than other women even though their lifes are obviously very below average and unsatisfactory.
No. 19392
I don’t think there’s hope for women because of how sexual reproduction works. Males of all sexed species are the same in that they will constantly be competing for a reproductive advantage at the expense of females. It’s always going to be a constant struggle of females desperately attempting to gatekeep access to reproduction and males employing every strategy possible to mitigate that and use us to incubate their genes. It’s just embedded into their dna, even if they aren’t consciously aware of it. It’s inherent to males to abuse, objectify, and ignore the desires (and rights!) of women and peddal their small gametes. It’s the most important thing to every male when it comes down to it. Much of their behavior simply stems from their neurotic obsession with fighting against their genetic irrelevance. Everything they do, think, create, enact, is all in service of this primal need they cannot escape. They’re incapable of using their front-brains. Any man who showed signs of developing a higher consciousness was out-competed by the neurotic sperm peddlers and died in irrelevancy. I hate male sexuality. I hate it across the animal kingdom. Human males are unique in that they’re intelligent enough to delude themselves into believing they’re smarter than they are, that they’ve evolved past the need to treat women like objects to conquer, but they never have. Everything they do just screams small gamete panic.
I hate that it makes my life and the lives of countless women miserable. The obsession they have over us, the covetousness, it only leads to the suffering of women, and i’d argue, humanity at large.
I started slumping over today because I was exposed to pornography. I have been actively avoiding it for years now, because it just reminds me of this immutable truth and causes bouts of depression. The way men view women, how they discuss them, portray them, etc. when they’re horny is extremely blackpillimg. The objectification, dehumanization, hatred, abuse, it’s all so insane. I’m a radical feminist, a misandrist, and I truly despise men. However that being said, I don’t even think I hate men as much as the average “normal” man hates women. I’m simply reacting to my surroundings, noticing things men do and have done and formulating a world view based on this information. Despite how wronged I’ve been, despite all the wrongs I see women suffering from at the hands of men, I do not dedicate hours of my day to pleasure myself to the eroticized abuse of teenage boys. Yet “normal” men, who would not describe themselves as misogynists (and some would probably even identify as feminists) can pleasure themselves, bring themselves to orgasm, by watching the abuse and torment of a teen girl.
But I feel guilty sometimes at the level of hatred I have in my heart. Why? It makes no sense to me. I hate so much yet I can’t feel any amount of pleasure seeing men harmed, but your “average” man can degrade, belittle, and abuse women and have no moral issues. Then I just remembered that this is how we’re programmed. When I hate men, I want them to go away, when men hate women, they want to see them harmed and enslaved. Because I am not dependent on men, but men are dependent on women.
I don’t think this reality is ever going away, unless drastic measures are taken. And I know that is not ever going to happen because men don’t want it to happen. They hate women but they are slaves to their addiction to women and don’t actually want to change. The most hardcore misogynist doesn’t want to get rid of women, he wants to enslave them. They’re lizard-brained and want to keep the depraved parts of their nature. They don’t want to liberate themselves from their primitive urges. They simply want to create a world where women can’t refuse them.
Sometimes I think of it like an addiction. Would a person addicted to heroin wish that they never tried it in the first place, or would they claim they are oppressed for not having free access to it and demand it be available to them at all times? I suppose men have never known a reality where they WEREN’T addicted to women and can’t fathom being freed from their fixation. Whenever they confront this reality it always just comes back to projection and how it’s our fault.
I really just hate them so much and want them to go away somewhere where I am never exposed to their bullshit ever again. I never want to see pornography again. It hurts my soul, and it hurts my soul all over again when I realize the majority of men I see every day aren’t psychologically harmed by this eroticized abuse, rather, they enjoy it and seek it out.
Sorry for the long, incoherent rant. I’m just really upset right now and needed to vent.
No. 19394
>>19392Do you ever see the cringest misandrist rant and hope it's no one you know being a whore like this cause why do you think that women don't have a sexuality on their own and they are always the
victim, you're getting worked up over feeling oppressed by the male desire like a mad whore while women are designed as a receivers(and bring a receiver of it you see as victimhood in all cases) of this desire and that's their heterosexuality and a are willingly doing porn. If women can live without men then why they can't eben do simplest things like not sucking cock?
(USER HAS BEEN PUT OUT TO PASTURE) No. 19395
>>19394I mean that, fundamentally, women don’t seek, pursue, and sexually exploit men the same way men do. This is true for almost all males/females in the animal kingdom because that is the entire purpose of sexual reproduction. Males pursue women because their gametes are negligible and their investment in reproduction/child rearing is minuscule, comparatively. Women are not driven by an insatiable urge to “spread their seed”, as men put it. Women are primarily motivated to select the best possible mate, by whatever metrics they use.
Of course women have sexualities and are attracted to males (assuming they are heterosexual), but it doesn’t manifest in the same way, aside from rare cases.
If you’re talking about pickmes I don’t think that has much to do with sexual desire. Male humans, like many primates, have incorporated resource hoarding in their repertoire of techniques to bargain for sex. Pickmes are just a product of a system where the easiest way to gain access to resources and leverage is pandering to the males that hoard them. I don’t believe for a moment that pickmes are equivalent to men in regards to how desperate they are to attract (possess) the opposite sex. Pickmes don’t want to get impregnated 1000 times by 1000 men (of varying quality) and have them as their concubines. Pickmes erroneously believe they’ll catch a quality man by pandering to the most common denominator of man.
It’s a path many women are pushed into since it’s told to be “empowering”, and the personal benefits are inarguably there. It’s better to grovel and beg for scraps from your oppressor than get nothing at all. Hell, this is why the patriarchy exists in the first place. It’s just a big racket to deprive women to make themselves more dependent and available to men.
Back to the sexuality thing, even I have a sexuality. I like men, I like romance, I like the idealized version of sex and relationships that hardly exists in our reality. I don’t dislike erotic content outright but the overwhelming majority of pornography panders to malignant male sexuality. Strangers fucking on camera, impersonal sex, physical abuse, situations presented where the woman (or girl, let’s be honest) is vulnerable, receptive, and abused.
I don’t think most women are in the porn industry as if it was their dream or ideal choice. Little girls don’t want to grow up to be porn stars. Most women in the sex industry don’t want to be there but saw it as one of their only viable choices, or, they’re literally abused and forced to stay.
Actually, honestly, I think you’re a man if you could read what I said and imagine women have no sexuality, are designed to be abused, and participate in their abuse for any other reason than they believe it will be for their own personal gain.
Yes women can be complicit in their own oppression, but that’s the way the system is designed. Are we just forgetting tens of thousands of years of male exploitation and how society still enables it today?
I’m just exhausted with how the world is and I want a world where men acted like the ones in my favorite romance cartoons, but I’m not stupid and I have too much dignity to subject myself to poor treatment simply because I want dick, or think I could convince a soulless, lizard-brained frontpole into feeling genuine love. Men are animals and I’m cursed to live on the same planet as them. I wish it were different, but there’s nothing I can do. It’s my wishful thinking vs. 2 billion years of scrote evolution.
No. 19396
>>19394I’m double replying because I take great issue with blackpilled misogynist radfems and moids who claim since men are designed to rape that women are designed to be raped. Women are designed to mitigate rape and unwanted sexual contact. If women were designed to passively accept all male advances then sexual reproduction would be nearly pointless. Women are not passive incubators or enablers of male sexual mania, they are designed to filter it. Almost no females in nature are receptive to unwanted sexual contact. If that were true, rape and courtship wouldn’t even exist at all. We’d all just be mindlessly fucking, spreading diseases, overpopulating the world, and bearing the burden of raising inferior spawn. No woman is born wanting that.
The main issue with human females especially is male extortion and resource hoarding. You have to submit to some extent if your only other option is destitution or death. As women gain more freedoms and are less subject to male extortion, they are consistently shown to rebuff men much more. If it were female nature to “receive male abuse”, nothing would change.
Radfem misogynists (and concern trolling men) are so insistent that women are made for rape “just-so”. There is no rational reason why this would ever be the case. I know you’re probably ashamed and offended seeing women suck pricks of mediocre moids, but that doesn’t mean women literally exist in service of males. It’s the opposite, and the only reason it ever even happens is because males have forced it to be so against our nature.
No. 19398
>>19396It is obvious to me that she has internalized the male perspective on sexual intercourse as the default and regurgitates what they have been saying as if it were the holy truth. I used to have the same thoughts, but that was a textbook example of my internalized misogyny. I understand that it is difficult to get rid of without continuous exposure to female-centered takes, enough to rewire the brain's neural pathways which can take several months.
Truth is that human female biology that she treats as a plague on its own is nothing short of a blessing. Due to the fact that women menstruate, it allows us to discard estrous cycles and feel arousal and desire to have sex whenever. We do not go 'in heat' and hump males, unless we fully consciously choose to (lol). We also do not show any obvious signs of ovulating to titillate males and due to vaginal mucus, we can quite adequately track when we
are ovulating to avoid unwanted impregnation. There is no way our foremothers hadn't observed these patterns in their own bodies, and no way that before Abrahamic religions spread and deemed female knowledge as satanic, that women didn't fully employ this knowledge to their best interest.
All this to say is that female is an active player in sexual intercourse, not just a mere receptive vessel. It is not males using females, it is symbiotic. You'll find that it's in women's interest - as well as men's - to pass on their own genes, and human females fortunately got a pretty good end of the stick in comparison to other mammals. The grass might look greener on the other side, but if blackpill anon was male then she'd be on an incel forum crying about how it's unfair that females get to control reproduction due to being the primary contributors to it. There are drawbacks to both sides, it turns out. The fact that the anon deems the female side of sexual intercourse as somehow more shameful is a result of artificially-constructed circumstances (religion and culture mostly, and maybe her personal revulsion towards heterosexual sex).
Personally I think the way males look while fucking is second-hand embarrassing. They look subhuman rutting into the female body, like animals, the desperation in how they move their hips to thrust in is nothing short of pitiful. But of course, the cultural standard is that it's a 'score' for a man to do so, so he is spared the scrutiny. Imagine if it weren't so glamorized, and that a male who does that liberally is not to be hailed a conqueror but a whore. Most of it is a matter of perspective. Males and females are not too different outside of the hetero-fantasy that she seems to have in her head, both go after their own interests. Male the rapist and female the
victim is not the template, but the derivative resulting from a distortion of how the majority of people view sex. Ironically, due to her upholding this, she is contributing to the viewpoint that she hates. Male the dependant and female the benefactor is closer to the truth, and almost all female-male relationships hinge on this, all you need is but to observe male neediness and causes of neurosis ("she rejected me! >:( better develop antisocial behaviors until she takes pity and comes back!").
No. 19399
>>19398It’s been posited that concealed estrus is an evolutionary response to male resource hoarding, since males are more generous with their resources for more time if they don’t know when females are fertile. Most female animals that have concealed estrus have males of their species who employ this tactic. Females have sexual urges but I’m hesitant to say that not having obvious heat cycles is an integral part of it.
And yeah, calling women weak, naturally submissive, rape fodder, etc. is just repeating incel talking points as a form of self-abuse. Blackpilled radfem misogynists are shamefully similar to the pickmes they despise. They both buy into what scrotes tell them they are. The only difference here is that pickmes think shitting on other women gets them trinkets from men, and blackpillers use it as some weird coping mechanism. Shitting on women isn’t revolutionary or profound, that’s what the majority of people have done throughout recorded history.
No. 19403
>>19398>Most of it is a matter of perspective. Males and females are not too different outside of the hetero-fantasy that she seems to have in her head>human females fortunately got a pretty good end of the stick>Truth is that human female biology that she treats as a plague on its own is nothing short of a blessing>Male the rapist and female the victim is not the template, but the derivative resulting from a distortion of how the majority of people view sexNo, it's you who sounds like a larping incel.
In this world females aren't in "control" of reproduction because, and these examples are off the top of my head: males rape and forcibly impregnate us, enact barriers like anti-abortion laws to counteract our biology's intended control over reproduction after they have overrided it, commit femicide to unnaturally elevate their numbers (so women's "gain" from passing on genes is obliterated), society chimping out for TIMs who identify as lesbians (in a desperate attempt to pass on dead-end sperm to a genetically resistant population of females that males want to colonise). The female body is certainly an active player in reproduction and it has evolved to resist rape because males already know females are the barrier to their reproductive control. It's really bold of you to add this positive spin onto the other anon's more critical observations about heterosexuality/the real world dynamics of women getting fucked by our oppressors consensually or not (porn proves they collectively do not care about consent, they care about staying out of prison). There is more to symbiosis between the sexes than penis in vagina/sperm and egg. Women observing problems with heterosexual intercourse and the way men have evolved to use it against women is not a "personal" hangup, or a religious prudishness, that a minority of women are just culturally outdated for having.
Females are not the benefactor of being the host to a parasite. What I mean is feeling empowered by saying men are the real dependent sluts and whores (which is a
valid point) will never change how women are viewed/treated/portrayed by them as dependent sluts and how that intentionally affects every one of us in general, even outside of sex. Yes, males biologically are parasitical leeches whose existence depends on us, but I don't think that gives females the real power over them we just need to squint to see because of it, considering the purpose of parasitical leeches is to drain power from the host. Women will never start using the fact that males are "dependent sluts" as an excuse for raping them/exploiting them in the ways they do to us. It isn't necessarily that the world can't accept males are the whores, it's that this language wouldn't have equal consequences for males even if sex obsession was universally accepted about them as proof of their dependence on females. Oppression isn't just a mind trick that women need to perform by listening to sex positive feminists in order to become liberated from feeling anything negative like shame about heterosexual intercourse. That's low-hanging liberal feminist rhetoric. Misogyny exists externally, whether any of us internalise it or not, because we aren't the source. Misogyny and inequality aren't resolved by women thinking about the oppressor differently. He is still a misogynist and you are still oppressed by him even if you like how sex feels and can make babies from it. Seeing clearly that female biology isn't inherently submissive and that males are naturally dependent on females won't make sex with them something other than what males have established it as for themselves and for females, even across species (other species of males have evidently evolved to rape females of their species easier), will it? It won't change anon's points about males resource hoarding and forcing women to use heterosexual intercourse as a transaction. Maybe for you because you thought your way out of it, but otherwise? If you have to change your perspective about exactly the same circumstances you were upset about a minute ago because you can't change the circumstances, you don't have power.
No. 19411
>>19405>>19409Well, I didn't say it was good to know. Men wearing condoms sometimes and women taking birth control most of the time is the modern day equivalent of female reproductive control. I don't see anything to celebrate because I'm not biased towards justifying a biological desire to mate with a male. It's obvious some women bend themselves into feminism to ease any cognitive dissonance they may experience as shame. Female reproductive control cannot manifest in a world in which females have no reproductive control, which should be obvious - in the ways it still tries to manifest, it's superseded and outdone by the speed at which males dominate any life form that doesn't submit to them.
>>19400From what I can tell there are a bunch of different posters here with rarely overlapping views and often similar typing styles. Three are straight (two of them are celibate, but only one of them is blackpill and she has dysphoria whereas the other said she still desires romance with men even though it's an unrealistic fantasy, and one of them spams the thread with "porn addict, TIF, wannabe cocksucker, wannabe lesbian, wannabe man" when the celibate straightie hits a nerve). We have a blackpill bisexual with dysphoria anon, two are lesbian blackpills (including me but that doesn't limit me to agreeing with everything a blackpiller says). There was a really elaborate troll who crossposted about this thread on /ot and /g and ended up larping as a blackpill anon to get us shut down until giving themselves away by posting their ban message, but a few anons from /ot and /g bought into it; I haven't noticed any of them acting like that lately so they gave up or they've integrated (some of these liberal feminist paragraphs ring a bell). I know none of this helps and is confusing with nothing to back it up, but whatever the case, believe when I say there's no consistency in the opinions from anons and that's not a bad thing until somebody takes the disagreement personally, and somebody always does.
No. 19415
>>19409>Good to know that women evolved to birth the spawn of the inherently dominant beings called the human malesSame anon as
>>19411. Sperm determines if a fetus is male. This process is seen by some as literal mutation, so they consider males mutated would-be females who got turned into a genetically deteriorated, defective human being instead. Males use femicide, so far more males are birthed and far less females are birthed than is natural, which doesn't mean women evolved to prefer birthing males (who are riskier to push out, obviously). There's a power struggle for reproductive control going on at a biological level that males are winning because they are too adept at colonising, dominating, raping and killing than women are at countering the attacks (and I think submission can be a form of bargaining for resources like the other anon said, which even happens in male-only prisons, but on the other hand I understand how you might call it masochism if a woman actively enjoys participating or deludes herself into thinking she has the power).
In countries like South Korea experiencing birth rate drops, which makes more men involuntarily celibate, women are bargaining for a better position in society by not breeding and get stabbed at random in return (which doesn't make their resistance futile, but like I said it's a war that I doubt will progress any differently to what western feminist movements already went through even if it looks hopeful).
Male dominance completely alters the fabric of societies girls are raised in, so denying the influence of socialisation that go through (like exposure to porn at school by boys who use it to harass girls) before becoming "cocksucking" masochistic women is just ignorance (and that's not me saying girls are socialised to be hetero, because I think it's clear heterosexuality and homosexuality are biological, but girls are socialised to please males). I can't figure out why some of us resist female socialisation instinctively even as children/experience all of this socialisation in a raw, traumatising way and aren't peer pressured into conforming to it, when most don't. A lot of liberal feminists even try to frame women as the problem for disliking feminine socialisation by equating disliking it with disliking women. You say female biology means destiny to be a "cocksucker" but it can't be because you're straight and you have never wanted to do that. That's what makes me think there is some genetic influence on masochistic sexuality, like this relates to human males objectively being the sex who had most reproductive control across history (regardless of what female biology intended) whether it be through consent, coerced consent or rape (which
is a lot of options).
>>19413My post agreed with and echoed all of that. The basic, gaslighty liberal feminist conclusions about it in the greentext just don't follow.
No. 19428
>>19398>it's the same natalist propaganda all over againKek I can't believe we have women in a BP thread who believe it's good to breed with men under any cirmcumsnances. That's why
this will never end.
No. 19433
>>19429You know why. It's because humans are narcissistic and don't want to admit evolution or that they come from apes.
This is a male animal problem but women worship men and want to have babies and relationships with men so they always talk about socialization which is such bullshit and blame every thing a man does on socialization. And same goes for women too the cruelty that women inflict on other women always gets blamed on socialization instead of the truth which is intra-sexual competition. Sometimes women get even more mad when you talk about how women treat other women badly due to biology then when you say that men treat women badly due to biology, the reason for that is because those women don't want to feel guilt or come to the realization why they nitpick other women like crazy, overjudgemental of other women, have higher standards for women, gossip of other women and bullying…is all due to intra-sexual competion. Multiple boards on this SITE are literally examples of intrasexual competition. The cosplay w/ board is a really good example for that. I don't know if you know the history of this site anon bur this was originally created only as a gossip site to gossip about other cosplayers, weaboos or camgirls. This was the original audience of lolcow and some of them are still posting here today and I wouldn't be surprised if some of them are even here in this thread. This started of as a place to bully mentally ill women like pixyteri or destroy women like Dakota because she used photoshop. Anons who are obsessed with Dakota still exist even to this day and their hatred and bitterness is pathetic, imagine if they put this same energy into actually making a change in the world or womans rights.
Same goes for radical feminism, radical feminist public figures will go and March with men who identify as nazis as Ling as they own the troons (you can go look that up it actually happened), befriend Matt Walsh and multiple other hard-core misogynist men, multiple radfem leaders being friends with alt-righters and forced-birth people,radfem foundations getting outed as forced-birth
it's NOT a coincidence it's not that these women don't have the resources for women's rights…it's that they don't want to give their energy for that because they don't care.
Jk Rowling who radical feminists worship as being a FEMINIST has the behavior of someone who is actually the opposite of that, she is friendly with Greg who is MRA and did revenge porn of his ex-wife, she sent a bouqet of rose to Marilyn Manson who is known for being a huge abuser , she has shown support to Matt Walsh, gave a role to Ezra miller who is non-binary in her film despite ezra being well known for psysichally assaulting women and grooming a girl he knew since she was 12, staying silent during the roe w wade overturn….oh and this isn't all of it there are much more other things she has done. Women like her get put as the ring-leaders and as saviors of feminism despite her not being feminist at all, but apparently her hating trannys is enough to become a feminist.
And no feminism as a movement unfortunately has NOT been hijacked…it's always been like this. Alot of women worship feminists from 60+ years ago due to not being around that time not realizing that many feminists then were sharing all sorts of degenerate theorys and think-pieces about how they are okay with pedophilia, young girls and old men and how incest
Is normal…
Blackpill is more "feminist" than actual feminism which is created to only serve the elites, conservatives or pervy men. Look at how fast abortion rights got taken away in the america it goes to show how feminism which women use as only a label or something to roleplay as or bully other women….did nothing to help or stop it.
Its all up to the government and that's the bitter truth.
Women can change things when they use their energy which is how GC and radfems use all of their energy to only hate on trannys, fight with other radfems or act edgy online.
Also another thing to note is that even among us blackpillers there are still women doing intra-sexual competition and using blackpool as a label to hide their jealousy or feelings of competition towards other women. That blowjob obsessed anon who shames rape
victims and thinks all women are pornstars except for her..is definitely a bitter pickme using blackpill to try and get away with her biological hatred, I'm glad she finally got banned.
No. 19434
>>19428It's that male who previously got banned after harassing anons and calling them all gay men or transmen. He even posted his own ban message and tried to blame another anon for that.
It's really hilarious to me how he thinks he is so much better than that
victim blaming blowjob-kun anon when both of them are the same annoying trash. Atleast the blowjob anon is a woman meanwhile he is a literall male psyoping this thread.
No. 19436
>>19403Great post
>Misogyny exists externally, whether any of us internalise it or not, because we aren't the source. Misogyny and inequality aren't resolved by women thinking about the oppressor differently. The anon is a terminally heterosexual, tradthot woman coping pulling the typic woo woo woman are the bearers of life shit argument conveniently ignoring the existence of any women that decry this especially lesbians. The ayrt arguing that the egg picks the sperm is unironically woo woo. The woo woo anon is unironically right to call this out. Thinking a rapeape looks degrading when they rape(and describing this is grim detail lel) is not going to change reality, how many women see themselves as subhuman and will willingly degrade themselves consensually. This behavior doesn't exist in a vacuum.
>It's really bold of you to add this positive spin onto the other anon's more critical observations about heterosexuality/the real world dynamics of women getting fucked by our oppressors consensually or not (porn proves they collectively do not care about consentArguing women in porn are doing it just because of male societal influences and resource scarcity is laughable. These women are active participants in their own masochism and enslavement, they are also signalling and reinforcing that all women must signal this inhuman behavior. Some women are just complicit in their own inhumanity and that of other women.
No. 19442
>>19433>also another thing to note is that even among us blackpillers there are still women doing intra-sexual competition and using blackpool as a label to hide their jealousy or feelings of competition towards other womenThat's not what a pickme means. Female competition is natural and nobody can live outside it, any woman can engage in it and winning it is psychological-you have to be what women in filmed heterosexual sex are basically and be okay with engaging in sex because it's about getting the males to desire you and other women not stealing this desire, I don't engage in female competition(but I still can't escape this human nature defining me and my position in some material hierarchy) and don't seek male desire/being a receiver of the male desire as a female body because I don't even see myself being in this inherently feminine role. So you should reflect on the absurd stupidity of calling me jealous. And it's not about me anyway but I see that everyone is throwing a tantrum at simple facts and try to put the fact speakers into some weird categories they don't even fit into
>Blackpill is more "feminist" than actual feminism Lol we don't have to call it feminist to paint ourselves as morally correct because we don't have to be morally correct unless you wanna engage in female socialization here
>>19434>them are the same annoying trash. The point is that pointing out how an image of heterosexual sex(oh no a human body is talking about human bodies engaging in sex. They must have fetish) looks like forces you bitches to have more clarity instead of sitting here and fantasizing. How human bodies are designed could not be anything that what it's now, dick can't be even smaller than what it is but women will always suck it and stab their throats with it. I'm not the one who's trash, it's literally not about me. Intelligence here is so high that even mentioning facts makes everyone piss themselves and start pointing fingers at eachother, nitpicking and engaging in senseless arguments and none of them are any logical
(USER HAS BEEN PUT OUT TO PASTURE) No. 19443
File: 1692941767882.jpg (108.4 KB, 1080x650, 23073845.jpg)
Ahahahahahaha(USER HAS BEEN PUT OUT TO PASTURE)
No. 19444
>>19442Nta, but why do you have to describe it in detail? When people post screenshots of things I get it, whatever, I've seen it on other places too like radblr. But you describe this stuff in your posts out of nowhere.
Do you have OCD?
No. 19445
File: 1692943484553.jpg (948.03 KB, 2000x5524, 0308.jpg)
>>19443laughs in blackpillMisandrists/rfs/blackpilled women absolutely exposed cause all they do is fantasize about unreal reality meanwhile: picrel
>>19444Do you mean sex acts kek? Cause if yes then how someone can describe them without sounding deranged and the details were important look at picrel anyway
(USER HAS BEEN PUT OUT TO PASTURE) No. 19449
>>19444>why do you describe it in detailPorn addiction + straight woman who's sexually frustrated = straight woman who writes fanfiction about the women she hates getting fucked.
Also, the anon you're replying to aka cocksucker-chan has ban evaded numerous times just so she can post her fantasies about being a submissive woman whose purpose is to suck cock and breed with men, isn't that telling? If someone really hated "hetero sex" they wouldn't go out of their way to ban evade just to post about sucking dick. She's obviously a mentally ill porn addict.
No. 19453
>>19444Anon don't even bother. She goes on these nonsensical inner monologues that are always the same. Also her narcissistic i am so smart compared to all you dumb women statements are so funny considering she sounds like a dyslexic schizo.
>>19442Stop ban evading you retard, even farmhands had to get involved previously due to your retarded infighting, seething hatred of lesbians and schizo speeches.
No. 19460
>>19455Reality is not black or white, it's somewhere in between. In actuality it's BOTH biological and environmental.
We evolved from apes. And by looking at the species who we share the most in common with and their treatment of women it is very obvious that its biology. Unless you are now going to start saying that with other animals it's socialization too.
>>19458This is a very basic and bland description and does no justice to describe what intra-sexual competition really is.
>>19459Hey I'm that anon who wrote that post and it's a mix. I just hate it when everything is blamed on socialization because there are obvious biological factors to it
too. I find it weird how people always want to deny their behaviors being biological or genetic….I think it's because they think biology can't be changed but that's not true since we as a living species compromised of cells and DNA are always supsectible to change and evolution, I actually believe if women put in effort that biological intra-sexual competition can be erased from their biological nature. So when I'm talking about intra-sexual competition I'm not saying that it can't be changed because everything in this world can be changed and DNA can be altered. So I'm not saying to be hateful or depressing but more so as a observation.
No. 19462
>>19452Pretending as if you haven't gotten banned for ban evading 3 times just this thread. Stop posting your blowjob fetish, we all know you suck cock irl and come here to pretend you're blackpill. You're just like those anons who admit to dating
abusive men and then coming here to make larping posts as being seperatists.
No. 19469
>>19460This thread and the deranged interactions in it that are between a potential straight woman (or incel larping as a straight woman)
>>19398 who is offended at a celibate straight woman and both of them spamming that everybody is a cocksucker. Those are two ends of the same depressing female socialisation and it goes to show what happens when women try to challenge it (endless catfighting like they're stuck in a loop they can't go past; the bitchiest wins the argument; thoughtful posts like yours are drowned out).
>>19466One confirmed troll tried really hard to integrate
>>19398 by hijacking reasonable posts and adding incel takes onto them, failed miserably
>>19403, then got called out
>>19434 for being the obsessed incel larper who refreshes the thread all day and night to wait for a post it can spam "you suck cock, degenerate porn addicted submisive tranny whore" at
>>18908 >>19451
>>19462 >>18921 when larping obviously doesn't work.
After failing, it doesn't even try to form a reasonable response, it just invariably goes on a
triggered witch hunt accusing every anon in this thread of being
one self-hating straight woman on a proxy who is jealous of rape victims for choking on cock >>19048 and gets banned for it. It and its cronies have been redtexted and banned so many times (another example
>>19105) for this exact same routine that the VPN ban evading accusations are pot kettle black, like when it said the anons here were getting off to their posts then posted its ban message admitting to jacking off to causing infighting in this thread (and that meltdown was caused by it taking offense to anons saying all men are pedos). I do think it's convinced some offended straighties from /ot and /g of its narrative about blackpillers so they join in self-righteously sometimes, but a lot of it is samefagging to dogpile anyone speaking against the trolling.
No. 19474
>>19472To be fair the only person who is calling her those names is another troll too (the male who posted his own ban message).
So it's basically her and that male infighting and derailing this thread and constantly arguing with each other. They both also ban evade so even though the farmhands keep banning them they stil come back with vpns.
>>19473Fuck off, I'm not that troll. Personally I find both of them to be annoying and derailling. I just found it weird why you were defending her. She also ban evades so I think it's normal that I thought you were her. My bad though, I apologize.
No. 19479
>>19474It's the nature of an anon board to confuse anons so I don't even mind. Basically
>>19472 explained why I was defending one thing about her (not everything). I can't tell if the troll infighting with her (and infighting with every anon it thinks/pretends to think is her as an excuse to call women cocksuckers) is an actual straight woman from /ot or /g going on a self-righteous schizo crusade, or if it's just the incel larper who posted its ban message saying baity shit about irrelevant posts to cause infighting.
>>19477The mods have always been absent from these threads and I've already shown how much trouble
>>19469 they've been given and it isn't from lesbians. Don't be so passive aggressive acting like you care about the thread and don't just have a problem with something a lesbian here said once. I'm not the only anon who's lesbian and disagrees with her, and I'm definitely not the only anon who's ever replied to her to disagree. Your post is essentially equating me arguing against lesbophobia with the lesbophobe who more or less owns the thread at this point, which is a bonkers take when
>>19451 (and the other spammy sexual harassment) is in plain sight.
No. 19480
>>19476I'm not her, you schizo.
Afaik she didn't say it anyone's faces, she said it as a generalization? But you said it as a personal attack. Idk dude it's just weird.
No. 19485
File: 1692964616195.jpg (185.14 KB, 1080x574, Screenshot_2023-08-25-13-58-16…)
>lesbian hornyposting
>cock
No. 19486
>>19483I agree with that but she's obviously doing it to
trigger anons and I figured how mad she got (because I'm right) when I told her her obsession with porn isn't healthy so I won't stop until she does. It's also funny to see her sperg about how superior she is than other women because she doesn't wanna suck dick and then send pornographic text or images of sucking dick.
No. 19489
>>19481>>19476>>19475>>19471>>19463>>19462>>19461>>19454>>19451From the last maybe four hours. I left out the replies that were actually replying to her (>>19442). She got two quotes compared to this so at some point the other anons have to understand you are making the entire thread about her even when she isn't here and sexually harassing women to "own her".
>>19487You definitely got it wrong twice. Maybe you've been doing it longer today than 10 minutes but that isn't a good thing.
No. 19491
>>19443Do you think those
>>19445>>19487 women have a fetish for degradation? Do you think oral sex is a fetish? Do you think women have a degradation fetish because none of them see nothing wrong with extremely humiliating acts? Do you think that someone who observe human nature and points it out has s fetish?
No. 19494
>>19487You know what? Post hand with timestamp.
We've had some resident males on here and I wouldn't be surprised if you infiltrated this board too.
(don't take the bait and encourage selfposting) No. 19495
>>19493>stop calling women cocksucking whoresI'm not blowjob-kun, lmao. She's the one whos calling women these insults lol, see
>>19490 where she couldn't control herself and did it again and called women "cocksucking pieces of shit"
I love how you guys are projecting this hard.
No. 19497
>>19496Nice strawman, retard. The problem is you're shitting up the thread and attacking random people, like
>>19489 also said here. So yeah I'm not convinced that you're a woman.
No. 19526
File: 1693054678351.png (105.19 KB, 1080x1484, misogynist-trolls.png)
I was rewatching Black Obsidian's content and in one of her streams (Parasite/host Part 1) she brought up the wordpress blog "No more paper towels". Picrel is a post that caught my eye, because it is a mirror to what has happened in this thread over the last couple of days. It is a blogpost from all the way back in 2021, meaning the issue is pervasive and enduring across several platforms. Don't know why it's so intense in this particular thread since blackpill is probably the least threatening to the status quo. Blackpillers are notoriously good at embracing conditioned behavior as immutable. It's not a new concept to grind women and/or their biology down, and definitely not new to react with vitriol to suggestions of flipping the script. And yet, the trolling is at its peak here.
This hasn't been the case for the previous couple BP threads, what happened?
No. 19527
>>19526This whole "you're just lucky" argument doesn't sit well with me.
You could say that since we're not men, we're just lucky, so we shouldn't judge men.
Or you could say that since we're born humans and not bugs or plants, we're just lucky. Yeah it's true, but so what? No one denies that people are better than insects.
No. 19542
File: 1693143915291.png (38.01 KB, 1087x221, 89898898.png)
how can normie women claim to not be mentally ill and at the same time constanly throw statements that are mutually exclusive, like how motherhood is amazing and beautiful and changes their life for the better, but at the same time they literally don't have the time to be their own person anymore? I never had even an ounce of 'motherly instinct' inside of me and it seems so strange and alien to me and I genuinely want to understand it like I want to understand the mechanisms of all weird illnesses. It genuinely seems like a mental illness to me.
No. 19549
File: 1693158153422.jpeg (352.41 KB, 1419x725, IMG_5766.jpeg)
>>19528being penetrated isn’t submission, this is a scrotey mindset. Lionesses have the instinct to mate, not to be submissive. They kill way more than male lions do because male lions are fucking useless beyond mating/killing potentially genetically weak offspring (even though they obviously don’t know that’s the purpose of their infanticide instincts, completely incomparable from humans).
No. 19569
File: 1693218547656.jpg (479.06 KB, 954x1634, IMG_20230828_123122.jpg)
What now
No. 19574
>>19569The video was about eating more fruits exercising and accepting your insecurities.
https://vm.tiktok.com/ZMjRTvjEd/Misogynistic tards will take anything a teen girl does and sexualize it or make fun of it, wtf. She was just advising girls to be healthy and exercise to glow up aka look more healthy.
No. 19585
>>19574You playing dumb about what glow up means (looking hotter) and normalizing this content as just "eating more fruit for health consciousness" is so concerning. The tag literally says beauty tips and tips for glowing skin. The point is this trend targets little girls on public platforms by masquerading femininity and doing things to boost your attractiveness, that mostly concern weight control and facial features, as self-care. Funny how boys' self-care doesn't amount to doing yoga at 11, then putting on makeup and a crop top to show it off online. These vids always have K-pop like Blackpink playing (and no, it's not just a TikTok sound, eating disorder Twitter is obsessed with that industry and there's a K-pop trend called it girlism that teaches the same things) for thinspo. I'm just so glad the girl in the screenshot isn't the one who made the video so nobody like you can go look her up and stalk her, but it begs the question who did make it and targeted it at 10 year olds.
>>19569Funny how under 13s aren't even allowed to sign up to TikTok.
No. 19586
>>19585Eating fruits for healthy skin and embracing your imperfections isn't inappropriate for a teen girl. Stop sexualizing teenage girls or thinking they're vain for trying to be healthy. Every teen girl wants shiny hair, fit/muscular body and nice skin, every teen boy wants to be tall, have a nice hairstyle and be strong, nothing sexual with wanting to be be healthy and nice.
Im so tired of "blackpill" anons assuming a woman is doing something sexual and vain when she's just doing exercises and eating fruits. It's like how incels think women do everything for male attention.
I was literally in a blackpill discord a while ago and one of the obese woman was screeching about how she hates her mom because her mom suggested she go on a diet since anon was severely obese. There's definitely some sort of issues with some of you and you're projecting your own body issues onto random underage kids.
No. 19593
>>19587>You're just showing your own bias by imagining underage girls in revealing outfits and makeupDo you have eyes?
>>19569 The trolling and feigned ignorant here is unbelievable. Pointing out pedophilia doesn't make someone a pedophile; pointing out misogynistic double standards targeting 10 year olds does not make someone a misogynist.
>>19586Super weird how you jumped to comparing exercise regimes for little girls that exist purely to enhance beauty to an obese woman on Discord needing a diet and claiming it's other people with the body issues. Femininity sexualizes girls for the male gaze and this trend is hashtagged "beauty tips" because it is about enhancing little girls' beauty, by framing focusing on that as a prepubescent child as self-care. There are shots of girls pouting in crop tops interspersed to show what the goal is and it isn't just health. Why are you describing 10-15 year old girls' appearances anyway and pretending this trend's focus on beauty in literal 12, 13 year old girls is equivalent to boys wanting to be strong?
Like I said, playing dumb about it and pretending it's just a trend promoting fruit consumption for health is seriously concerning. Just goes to show how normliazed sexualizing girls and getting them into thinspo at younger ages has become. The K-pop inspired it girlism trend and K-pop thinspo for children isn't the same thing as someone addicted to junk food having a salad.
No. 19596
>*Why are you describing 10-15 year old girls' bodies and faces as nice anywayI can't delete my post to edit it now but this alone deserves its own one, kek.
>>19549>>19550>>19560Oh, at least that post makes the recent influx of tradthot tards invested in defending beauty regimes for female children make sense and it came right after the natalist spiel.
>You're just showing your own bias by imagining underage girls in revealing outfits and makeup because you're a misogynist who has been so brainwashed it imagines underage kids in a very male-gazey inappropriate way>The video you're defending is genuinely a guide for 10 year old girls brainwashing them to want this and how to accomplish it, and we don't know who the poster is or where they got all these selfies of teen girls all over their channelGo back to Discord to orbit obese women, instead of reporting every post in this thread that isn't essays about women being dominant lionesses for getting fucked by a dick.
No. 19603
>>19596>instead of reporting every post hereUm… So you got banned for your posts here? Why are you admitting to ban evading and then getting surprised when you get reported again? Lol.
Anyway, stop being a pedo. Only a pedo thinks about kids in revealing outfits when that wasn't even mentioned in the video you posted a screenshot of. Pedophilia isn't normal but I'm sure you'll also excuse your pedophilia by saying it's in your male nature to be pedophilic like you've been trying to normalize rape and other stuff by saying its male nature.
No. 19612
>>19603You know you give yourself away by starting your bait with "Um…" every time, right? No, anyone can see the mod already told you to stop falsely accusing everybody in this thread of ban evading and that you keep getting it wrong
>>19503 by saying everyone is "blowjob-chan", a fujoshi, a gay moid or Blaine. The screenshot of the video you're defending for teaching beauty regimes to 11 year old girls is literally of a girl in the type of outfits you were calling sexualized, so how is it imaginary? The reason she's there is to be inspo for the little girls it's targeting.
Thanks for confirming you do sit here all day reporting every post though
and that you're the troll who spammed this board in a rage because the women here rightfully said all men are pedos. No wonder you're so invested in normalizing a pedophilic trend because it makes little girls' bodies and faces look "nice" to you. I didn't post the screenshot, schizo, but you looked it up and posted the link to say a channel dedicated to it girlism and female child beauty is about health.
No. 19637
>>19603>Pedophilia isn't normal but I'm sure you'll also excuse your pedophilia by saying it's in your male nature to be pedophilic like you've been trying to normalize rape and other stuff by saying its male natureNTA but this is the blackpill thread. Pedofilia and rape are normal by male biology, no one's here to defend "normal" males, pedofile and rapeape defender.
>>19628>I've already had feminist friends of mine look at me weird for drawing tasteful mature art of female characters when I'm a lesbian, and I can't imagine what it would be like to be criticized for that on a bigger scale by "feminists" Most women are homophobic and reinforce their homophobia left right and center. The majority of women regardless of what they want to call themselves e.g radfem, libfem, trad etc. push to maintain the rapeape status quo; it's not just males who want gay people eradicated and silenced. Women just do it in underhanded ways like writing gay people out of existence, interpreting homosexual behavior as friendship in women and burying any glimmer of homosexual art and media in swaths of mandated male worship when the vast majority of homosexual media is tokenized rainbow capitalist troon marketable garbage. One of the potentially less obvious blackpilling things is women are vehemently homophobic just like males are, but they aren't as overt about it because of female socialization.
>Meanwhile men can draw the most degenerate of coom porn and no one bats an eye, not even the self-proclaimed radfems.There was a good post in the art thread on /ot/ about this sort of thing a while back. Basically most artists are women who cannibalize each other because they cannot and will not be able to attack males since males are too much in positions of power, I'd add to this that there is a unspoken "knowing" that males will never change since all women are a little blackpilled by being a woman and therefore there's no point attacking males. Add to this intrasexual competition and you have women attacking other women near exclusively, males will only be "cancelled" if they actually commit a real crime and even then it's possible for them to avoid being cancelled. It's telling that only the women here can see this pattern of behavior. Publish your work under a male pen name and hide your identity always, you have good reason to.
No. 19640
>>19628Don't tell people you know irl that you draw pornographic art, don't pretend to be a man but also don't reveal your personal identity on your art page.
>>19637ESL-chan, you should study English before making manic spam posts here.
No. 19645
File: 1693573109830.jpg (679.62 KB, 1829x546, artcommunities.jpg)
>>19640I'm from the anglosphere
>>19628Continuing this topic of interest of a womans work not being recognized as equal to mens (because it has come up a few times in previous BP threads) you may find this thread chain discussion interesting if you haven't already come across it >>1639675 in it anons are discussing how female artists are treated by other women and communities at large compared to coomer male ones in a previous art thread. Women are treated puritanically and there is an inherent double standard, part of it is that a lot of these women are young but that's wishful thinking to think they'd grow out of this behavior. Its nothing new or out of the ordinary if you're aware of female socialization. I think the specific fear you have is the common fear of expressing homosexuality combined with the reality that a womans work will never be recognized as equal to a mans, no matter how truly skilled the artist is and the art shows. I respect that you want to eventually reveal your identity but that will come with untenable consequences. I hope you can succeed and feel fulfillment in some way for your art anon.
No. 19714
>>19712Dumb fucking cow holy shit. I don't have time to watch the video rn but I hope they fine her enough to go bankrupt or that she faces jail time.
Also same anon same. I am one of them and I'm tired of these psychos taking their tard rage out on us. I'm old now and it's gotten to the point I don't like going on without my girlfriends because I'm bound to be harassed my some random psycho that hates her life way too often. It may be me just growing old and tired of bullshit but I swear to God it's gotten worse lately.
>>18474I'm late to the discussion but I genuinely consider feminists are naive when it comes the harm female socialization and patriarchy does to female relationships and to female psyche. Romance with men is a tool of oppression but somehow we are supposed to expect stranger women around us not to treat us like shit because they see us as "competition" or whatever bullshit their handmaid brains have made up about you without even getting to know you and will act in the most fucked up strange ways despite of what you are like with them.
Take care out there girls, specially lesbians. I'm tired of feminists not warning young women getting started on radical feminism enough about how many pickmes and straight down bad people regardless they being female or not there are out there that are dying inside with resentment and for them ruining some naive trusting young girl's life is a fucking treat that makes their miserable lives slightly better. A bitter pickme with a shit family that abuses her or some moron who let's herself be abused by the most despicable men due to low self esteem or laziness or simply to feel she's won something in life (even if it's a mediocre relationship with a moid that hated her) is not waiting for a woman to safe her, she envies smarter women who didn't fall for the mysoginist bullshit she did and these types rejoice when they make our day worse, learnt it the hard way, now I only befriend other radfems or radfem aligned women that I know they aren't nuts and I finally got some peace of mind.
No. 19715
Honestly I find it extremely funny how the infighting in this shit thread went on for weeks while posts like
>>19019 which should be the main topic of discussion are completely ignored. We truly cannot have jackshit in this goddamn website, either obvious bait from pickmechans tradthots fuglies using this thread as an excuse for their resentment to run free calling women all sort of names or naive trusting idiots whiteknighting female mysoginists & abusers that take it out on vulnerable women and little girls that wouldn't piss on any of us if we were on fire. It's so tired honestly.
NTA. This is why feminism as a movement doesn't work. We should get some awareness that we are weird women who are an exception to a sick world and have each other's backs against the abuses of patriarchal society, not to destroy each other like morons using BiOlogY and scrote crap like evolutionary psychology as excuses. This thread has been probably raided by men, though.
No. 19716
>>19714Samefag, watched the video now and all these dumb bitches pickmes have the same phisyonomy has anyone else noticed? It's always these particular breed of numbskull-looking Becky who looks like she probably have several mental breakdowns a week and an ED of some kind the ones that do this kind of shit the most. Also
>Dating an Indian looking moidGod damn I feel so bad for the old lady that died.
Careful with neurotic women out there, anons. They refuse to be single or to take care of themselves and they'll make you pay for their shit choices in life.
No. 19763
File: 1694277547137.png (47.36 KB, 1130x818, image_2023-09-09_193745383.png)
>>19761I've met little girls (toddlers, I wish I was joking) more resistant to patriarchal conditioning than this adult woman. A girl being grumpy that she has to wear an uncomfy dress shows more principle and a stronger sense of self than retards like this. Embarrassing. Pitiful.
She thinks herself competent enough to give tips to other women, but clearly suffers mental breakdowns over chipped nail polish. I hate when mentally ill women get together to reaffirm each other's horrendous life choices, it's a first-class highway to destruction of self from there. Look at how defensive they get over this, I think that on its own should say something about this "maintenance" they're willing to type semi-coherent rants in defense of.
No. 19766
>>19764Kids are dumb and will believe anything adults tell them. But kids can also be very stubborn when they want to be.
Also what
>>19765 said.
Gullible adults make my skin crawl tbh.
No. 19776
>>19764If you told any woman she looked homeless without makeup, she'd report you, kek. Which incel fantasy land do you live that women would bow down to such retarded comments? That shit only happens online in your
femcel spaces and the women accepting those gender norms are either pickmes who never go outside or trans "women"
No. 19778
>>19761Doctors never laugh at your body hair, they see much worse shit every day. The average gyno sees at least a few prolapsed aka turned inside out anus, urethra etc and doesn't view it as anything out of the ordinary. A patch of pubic hair is never going to scare a doctor away and if anything, not having hair on a part of your body when you don't shave can be clues to bad circulation so not shaving your legs can help them diagnose vascular issues earlier on.
Keep repeating that you need to wax to go to a doctor though, since you're a medical school graduate and know all doctors, you're a great source, right? Genuinely anons who talk on behalf of medical professionals like you annoy me so fucking much. No, we're not shallow enough to care about someone's body hair.
No. 19890
File: 1694849350239.jpg (129.04 KB, 1080x341, Screenshot_20230916-103214_Ope…)
>>19883Based. He got mad because op didn't even feel sad about leaving him because she was going abroad. Men really are unnecessarily emotional.
No. 20042
>>19986I don't feel anger when looking at hetero couples because I'm not the one who's eating up patriarchy's bullshit nor will I be the one facing the consequences kek, but what I cannot stand is women (men too, but to a lesser degree)
acting heterosexual. There was some show playing on TV yesterday where they quoted a bullshit study that claimed men who get to look at breasts at least 10 minutes a day are happier than men who don't. And the female participants in the show, women well into their 30s or maybe even 40s, were giggling about it like schoolgirls and joking about it in faked high-pitched voices. The only rational response to shit like that airing on TV is disgust.
I think heterosexuals would be a lot less insufferable if they stopped pretending to be special for something 90+ percent of the population experiences. I feel so much second-hand embarrassment for how most women choose to interact with the world, and what cuts the deepest is that other people (both men and women) then approach me as they would approach them - with contempt and low expectations.
No. 20387
File: 1697367988915.png (942.48 KB, 1116x2800, twitter-rightwing.png)
>>20381It's because misery loves company. One of the best advice I've seen given to specifically women is to learn how to enjoy other people's suffering.
Eventually every woman learns what world she lives in, and makes decisions accordingly. If she thinks playing Russian roulette with her hubby being "not like the other men" and breeding with him is worth it, let her. She knows what she is doing. These women know. You know that they know. Don't gaslight yourself into thinking that they shot out of their mothers' wombs yesterday. One of the worst thins the Internet did is allowing adults to be treated the same way a teenager still trying to figure life out should be treated.
When she (any of these women) catches wind of how better the life of a woman unchained by any man is, OF COURSE she will start acting out by going on social media and preaching her lifestyle, trying to reel in vulnerable 20 year olds with underdeveloped brains. She doesn't want to be the bad example. She wants to be, at the very least, part of the norm. This is Ego 101.
And for any anons who think I'm being unreasonable (or god forbid antifeminist kek) - picrel is le American right-wing women being upset that right-wing men are misogynistic. God, imagine it backfiring on you when you betray class interests for the sake of being Patriarchy's Best Pick-me. Some of these women were super glad to throw other women under the bus, but the very second it has started to affect them too - woah! Stop right there, buckaroo!
Anyway, the best thing a self-sufficient woman could do is establish herself as the elite, the enviable, the role model, NOT the sponge for these uwu poor women who just wanted to martyr themselves at your expense.
No. 20464
>>20463i think a lot of these women are narcissistic. they believe that
they will be lucky,
they are the exception,
their moid will be one of the good ones. they're not like those other girls.
No. 20469
File: 1697947546880.jpeg (41.1 KB, 750x308, 9C605F21-4090-4648-91D3-B1C2E9…)
sf
>>20468Women should be shamed more. I don't think they are shamed enough, clearly it's not working
No. 20503
>>20497Gossip is fine, everyone engages in gossip occasionally out of interest and entertainment. What males call gossip is information sharing and minor petty squabbles at worst. Everyone has their time and place to sperg about people placed in the public eye. What is fucked is catty meangirl types who shut down any discussion that question their way of thinking which unfortunately are those who populate most of this site. The absurdity of women engaging in faux-feminism here with the veneer of dogshit gets me everytime though. There's the most blackpilling thread in /ot/ about news stories that always turns into pink pill-lite due to the vast majority of serial child rapist and murderers being male with almost always exclusively women and girls as
victims yet there's also posters on the same board talking about how some moid at their gym is so hot in the same breath. Its utterly mind boggling. You have to wonder what goes on in the heads of these women?
No. 20511
>>20508It's not a question of "respect" it's a question of absolute mind bending confusion. What kind of cope is "well they don't respect moids anyway so let them 'objectify males' teehee!". Aside from this being blatantly false (nearly all women with few outliers respect men deeply regardless of what they look like and what sick shit they do) it's just maximum cope. In what world is it acceptable and that anyone wants to breed with mass murderers and child rapists? Bleak. This is incomparable to males sexualizing women since women aren't mass murdering and raping males en masse and therefore a constant threat that is ignored because teehee! Men cannot be objectified they are not enslaved and raped by women.
>>20509Ovulation causes heterosexual women to become massively retarded? Isn't this the same argument rapists make?
No. 20519
>>20387Anti feminist women are always gold diggers. They are super mad that feminists created a world where women need to grow the up and be independent.
Trad woman ideology is always about money. It's like prostitution but trads sell not only their bodies but also their independence and freedom.
No. 20530
>>20524You're replying to piganon, kek she's the only one who's as much of a whore to attack other women for men. That's why she assumed everyone's the same as her
Btw, smacking a woman won't make a man more likely to fuck you, go to theraphy instead.
No. 20532
File: 1698315740289.png (23.2 KB, 850x432, marriage.PNG)
>>20519>Trad woman ideology is always about money. It's like prostitution but trads sell not only their bodies but also their independence and freedom.It's by definition prostitution. The bare basics, without any of its decorative advertisements of "opposite energies", "maternal instinct", "girls are from Venus & boys are from Mars", "tradition", the BARE basics of trad couples is Woman Exchanges Sexual and Reproductive Labor For Man's Financial Support. Sounds awfully familiar, doesn't it? Damn, where did we hear this one before… Ohhhh, the definition of prostitution is "the practice of engaging in sexual activity with someone for payment." Wow!
By the way, males constantly tell on themselves that this is how they see marriage, so it's even more embarrassing that their tradwifeys lie on their behalf. I'm starting to suspect it's a humiliation fetish for them. The least they could do is keep it to themselves. Ironically enough, the tradwifey types tend to be the biggest degenerates of the female kind, so they literally cannot contain themselves telling the world how good their degradation feels kek. Oh well, these women suffer more than they let on.
No. 20560
File: 1698513020520.png (169.9 KB, 770x422, Screenshot 2023-10-28 at 18.10…)
this is a rare display of female solidarity and i uncritically support it. in this instance i believe that woman saved this mans fiancee, no woman deserves to be married to a man who would assault a woman at a bar.
No. 20608
File: 1698743498216.jpg (297.27 KB, 1078x897, IMG_20231031_101106.jpg)
Perhaps, but not as much as dicksucking.
No. 20729
File: 1699255333610.jpg (509.99 KB, 1080x1314, Screenshot_2023-11-06-08-19-14…)
Everyone owns blackpillers an apology
No. 20815
>>20532A pastor I’ve listened to has said this before too. He said the only reason men want to marry a woman is for sex period. He said that’s why for women it’s smarter to never have sex unless a man is marrying you because you can proposition your virginity to get with the highest value man financially so that you can live the easiest life or get the highest payment. He said that’s not for every woman and that if you don’t want to get married you shouldn’t let a man have sex with you because he’s robbing you. If you’re having sex with a man as a woman you’re basically entitled to payment.. I do believe that tbh. Why the fuck would you ever have heterosexual sex for free, they just don’t deserve that? I think that marriage is similar to prostitution except that prostitutes usually get the short end of the deal on a purely financial level. Every tradwife I know irl is pretty well off financially but I do live in the Midwest, so that’s not hard if you marry a wealthier guy. Not saying they’re happier! I also know sex workers I went to high school with and even my ex best friend is a sugar baby who got knocked up and does meth now. They’re all broke and on drugs. I think if you’re going to have sex with a man it should be for money and there should be a high payout with a contract. if the man cheats on you or is
abusive, divorce and get paid. If you don’t want kids and he acts shitty because of that after marriage, divorce and get paid. Never do it for free. Men don’t have the ability to love the way a woman does. Obviously that’s propaganda fed to women to be scammed by low value men. I fell for that myself and learned the hard way. Every heterosexual relationship is going to be transactional somehow
No. 20919
File: 1700195211184.jpg (225.37 KB, 1067x693, -46-54.jpg)
Can I call womanhood a slavery now? Woman whole biological purpose is love and sacrifice. And all women are a biological pickmes. But yes gender roles are totally "escapable" and woman purpose can totally be different
No. 20941
>>20891I'm the same way, it's a real problem.
>>20919sorry, excuse me for a second, YOU CAN
TEAR YOUR
CLITORIS???? oh my god.
No. 20944
>>20942It's not just society, it's our whole biology. The thing that will never allow me to accept womanhood is how the female role in life is a martyrdom and being a soft servant, even if women don't act like it, that's their role especially sexual.
There's no "humans", there's male and female and they are different. I think society looks the way it does because of human biology and women sexual role speaks for itself, it's about pleasing men which leads me to believe that woman identity especially hetero is just that: serving, being soft and some form of a martyr that gets off on male approval of your sexual service to them.
Women bow down before men and put men dicks into their mouths as if men are superior gods, this is something that will never make me see womanhood in a positive light, if it's not bad, then men somehow deserve godlike treatment and woman role is truly a martyrdom and psychological satisfaction from giving and serving men as if it's divine.
Physically man standing over a woman with his dick in her mouth is above her/superior to her kek how the womanhood defenders can justify it, if it's equal then female pleasure comes from serving.
I hate womanhood and I don't think women tapped into that feminine sexual role can comprehend my point of view. I don't relate to women and hate how female socialization looks like and hate all that women can be in their existence. I think women who don't care that everything is about male pleasure are just tapped into that servile role cause after all most women are het and have sex with men and women are designed for it and men too, I think hating it is a misalignment with your feminine role which is a blackpill. Women are male worshippers who bow down to men kek, it's their identity they are defensive of, they will defend penis in their mouths just cause it's natural. All you can do is become a selfless martyr servant as a woman and that's what women who fuck men all are. Obedient to their biology women would never relate to blackpill, to them it's all okay, nature is okay and they love men. Despite women being mean and aggressive online esp female socialization can be very aggressive and retarded as if they are guarding the order of things, the soft polite obedience to their servile biological role is reeking off of them and I can't relate, their minds piss me off. I'm envious of men but would not want to interact with them as a woman cause all my gender role allows me in that relation is serving them.
No. 20962
>>20951Human biology seems very patriarchal, I wish I were socialised as a moid and to be independent and masculine growing up. I hate the patriarchy, everywhere I look I see heterosexuality getting a positive reputation because of men and women, meanwhile it's bad. Even having a crush on men as a woman means you're delusional which what I assume nigel havers have and at some point they will be punished anyway but since they are trained to be obedient then they will just accept their fate. I just want to protect myself from all of it even psychologically, I am so scared and women don't have a female solidarity since they hate abstinent, separatist women and get offended by them. I hate all the constant pimping and brainwashing as a result of other women and men endorsing heterosexual relationships and even creating the concept of a good man. Nature of heterosexuality doesn't lie and it's risky and bad, smart women can predict the outcomes of these relationships, notice patterns and make right conclusions. I hate how much of female or male identity revolves around the other sex and how in male female relation women are the unaware or dumb ones and it's such a big part of their psychology, tbh I'm scared of women since they are born pickmes and their minds are stuck on it, there's no convincing them. The danger they both with men create is sinister. They don't even get anything from hetero relationships. They can be tradwives and still get hated by men, they can write posts on social media saying stuff like "men, realize that you being mean to women is what makes them abandon their femininity and become feminists!!" and then get 100
abusive responses from men, I even saw men replying that they aren't gonna be nice to someone who doesn't respect them and that they don't like being disrespected… meanwhile women shit themselves when other woman doesn't respect men.
Misogyny is a terrorism, threat and abuse but it's constant, it's like we're slaves so I wish women could "stop trying to make heterosexuality happen" and what I mean is stop enabling the concept of hetero love so much i swear to god it's seen as the only love available and in our life we have to depend on men and can't just live with other women but it think the world just lives off the female (self) exploitative biology. In all of this shit, women gaslighting me on top of it all just puts so much weights onto me. I hate how fucking judgmental everyone is and I just collect accusations of mental illness, evilness, craziness, sociopathy, narcissism and delusions. It's so tasking to have to deal with women stupid attitude towards me besides all the other shit and oh my own parents and their relationship dynamic being horrible on top of it all and my mother thinking being a good wife is her life purpose.
No. 20966
>>20965since when was it in our biology to serve? that is just something that has manifested in our societies. and really just those societies; there are places and time periods where societies were matriarchal and women were definitely not serving then. it’s easy to feel like it just has to be this way, but our place and time is not the only one to exist, and is not the centre of everything. it’s just an unfortunate but predictable circumstance.
i can understand the hopeless feeling you can get from our problems. it’s very reasonable. i’m sorry about any experiences you might have gone through because of being a woman. but be grateful that you’re not a part of the gender that rapes, murders, and is the cause of most of the problems in this world, frankly. if i was male i would have already trooned out because of how ashamed i’d feel to be a part of a bunch of animalistic ugly ogres. but that’s just me.
No. 20969
>>20967of course you’re not bad, as i said i understand why you feel that way. i guess it’s because i don’t see things in a heteronormative lense? women aren’t in a “submissive” role to me. like i referenced before the things i like most about being XX are on a biochemical level. males have worse chemical compounds in their bodies (from my semi-subjective perspective) and worse emotional control and honestly seem to have slightly less of a capacity for general intelligence on a basal level. i like being female in the same way i like being human and not a gorilla, even though the gorilla is physically stronger than me.
i don’t like “traditional femininity”. i am dominant, assertive, and not very stereotypically womanly at all. i don’t fit in it and don’t want to. i guess the distinction is “femaleness” versus “womanness”.
No. 21045
File: 1700753131996.jpg (362.33 KB, 1080x3091, gross.jpg)
So just serving men, as any other sex? I hate sex positivity. Men live in heaven, sex and relationships are useless for women, what does this life and has to offer to you if you're a woman? Even to be sex positive as a woman you must become mentally gender conforming, it's so retarded. Life is not a fairytale for women and it's so obvious, we're not invited to heaven and women biggest interest in life - love, is bullshit and all hetero relationships fucking suck, women age and get dumped too and only wanted as a nurse or fetish lmao what a life, dependable on this beautiful concept of love. I agree with misogynists that sex is for men idgaf how it sounds. And this video made me feel asexual when she started saying the names of sex acts. She became an escort after 40 years of abstaining from sex after a bad experience in her youth. Tf.
No. 21077
The nature of heterosexual relationships is patriarchal, all men cheat, all men think women over a certain age are ugly, even 70yo men think this way, hetsex is sex work as a woman, being in a het relationship or having het sex requires you to be in the feminine gender role, be submissive, forgiving and naive or let's call it just feminine, I can see male point of view all the time but other women don't seem to see it but maybe they are just feminine and forgiving instead, men hate women especially their wives especially when they age. If this many het relationships are a disaster than it's ALL. Who the fuck wants to live like this. Women desperate to prove that celibate or single women are miserable or that anything heterosexual is beneficial to women are annoying as fuck, nobody asked. Who wants all of this fucking misery, why women keep pimping each other into it instead of agreeing with wgtow women and then come back to their role. Who gives a fuck. Not every woman wants to live a miserable life amongst a moid and age amongst a moid who sees you as disgusting and saying NOTALLMEN see older women as disgusting is a psychop and dumb desperate schizo delusions they love to enable and reject their logic and realism. Stop trying to make sex sound cool or beneficial to women, it is what it is and it is what it has always been. Accept that only men have power in this field and it's feminine to participate in the concept of het dating. Not everyone wants this shit fate and ending up as a hag servant in some moid that hates you house and so what if he stays with you if he literally fucking hates you. It's all for naive (or feminine) women. Defending it out of desperation is retarded, it is what it is and you're gonna engage in what I said it is but then go and deny it's like this kek this is why wgtow women never had a chance to have a voice ever in history. Have fun getting cheated on, aging as a woman, nursing a grown man, being hated in your own house, having to take dick in your ass and mouth, being an unpaid slave, being left when you get sick, being told you're too old by moids your age, getting abused, never being truly loved, cooking and cleaning for moid, being dumped, being lied to, dealing with moid mood swings and ego, having useless sex, experiencing misogyny from your moid but stop pimping other women into delusions. Technically nobody is insulting you and has any power to insult you and stop whining about being offended by rad feminism as a het woman for gods sake
No. 21085
>>21080>>21082I love how certain women claim that blackpill and/or separatist ideology can only be enabled by women who were "unhinged", "unwanted" and "unaccepted" by socety to begin with, that they never tried to fit in and they only developed bp ideas as a cope to justify their "loser" status. In reality, trying to become a normie was always
the cope for me. I literally tried to gaslight myself for years and "fit in" and tell myself that society isn't that bad, that everybody deserves to have their choices respected, that men also have deeper feelings (most don't, they only have basic chemical reactions), that most men are capable of seeing women as people (they aren't) and even when I had the best intentions possible, I constantly saw examples both irl and online that only pushed me back into the blackpill rabbit hole. Yes, there is a very small group of men who SEEM ok (again, they "seem", nor me nor you know them privately so that's that), don't watch porn, don't see sex as something they "do to" women etc., but even if they're genuine, it's an incredibly small group of men and I don't know if it's worth to waste your time and focus so much just on pursuing them, and even if you find them, the risk of getting disappointed is still incredibly high.
I was an autist who could never fit in as a kid and that for sure made me prone to distrust towards people, but it was also a gift that helped me with many important things like pattern recognition for example. When I stopped being a teen I suddenly became attractive in the eyes of society and my exterior seemed to grab normie attention, people suddenly wanted to "know" me, which was blackpilling in and of itself because I knew that if I was ugly literally nobody would give a fuck about me, which made me hate normies even more. It's not true I was "unwanted", people gave and still give me signs they want me both platonically and romantically/sexually, but knowing the truth about human nature and the nature of relationships, I make a conscious decision of never giving it a try. Doesn't matter if you're "wanted" or not, the blackpill is a fact. Telling women that shit is just another way of saying "you're a feminist because you never had sex haha". Then those retards try to prove them wrong and say "No, I actually had sex, I LOVE SEX, and I'm still a feminist, s-see…?", which further proves that they still base their entire self worth on patriarchal values.
No. 21089
Unpopular opinion but some anon said that even "BPF" are always happen to be "feminine" women so I wanted to give my definition of a "feminine" woman. It's a woman who is okay with engaging in sexuality as her female body and is aligned with this role, sex is a physical act and unless you're dissociating, your mind must be aligned with it, Mine isn't and I don't feel like accommodating my whole psychology to fit this role. I like to say that you have to psychologically break yourself to have sex with men as a woman because having to tap into a deep submission feels like breaking myself to me, your body requires this "relaxation" to be receptive. I also used to say that women are inferior because of my personal problem with the feminine role like obviously I hate something I don't wanna be cause it hurts to have to be something you don't want but even if I don't say "inferior" women still get offended when I say "feminine/submissive" and they themselves make assumptions that it's inferior. Personally I can't imagine settling psychologically for this feminine role especially in heterosexuality and do acts that only ever serve men and have to be satisfied psychologically through being so submissive, empathetic, loving, servile and forgiving and in these relationships the bonding happens through the power-vulnerabilty dynamic which means I'm literally useless to men cause I'm not feminine. Another controversial opinion is that it's impossible to detach feelings from sex as a woman if your body requires deep relaxation aka submission to have sex with men, it literally invokes all there emotions mentally through your body submitting physically plus men are bigger and stronger than women which also invokes submission in you, it's also impossible to have sex with men and hate men at the same time. That's just the mechanism of sex because emotions are in the body and sex "moves" them in a certain way, differently if you have a dick or vagina. Hetero sex drives me to the point of suicidality even tho I can feel even more than most other women can feel, it's because I hate how I still feel like a servant because it's a feminine role and i can't stomach the fact that men get to benefit from sex while I can't ans have to surrender to it and I keep imagining being the dick instead of the vagina then breaking down. That's my conclusion, hetsex as a woman - conforming to your gender role (feminine) that is biological that's why I developed a hatred of women, because I don't wanna be a servant psychologically and it caused me pain kek
Even the blackpill about all men being bad says that women just have to be forgiving meanwhile I have an ego like a man and snap like a man when feeling controlled.
No. 21095
File: 1700931494864.jpg (1.13 MB, 1080x7895, harassment.jpg)
They are insufferable
No. 21118
>>21106it's 1 in 4 women, which by any other demographical standard means it's common. not a huge mystery that a lot of women want to do something that gives them pleasure, even if it is bad in your opinion for x y z reason
>>21107>Hetero sex drives me to the point of suicidality >I keep imagining being the dick instead of the vagina then breaking downmeh, well adjusted is relative i guess. you seem to feel inferior, in addition to spending your days using a considerable amount of mental energy sperging out over women having hetero sex. happy you're able to get some joy out of life. would love to offer advice but all i have is anecdotal, i don't tap into deep submission when i have sex so i honestly can't relate. you sound very damaged by porn.
>>21111i don't really consider them broken, it's the most common variation. just tired of this anon basing their opinions around her experiences when women who can enjoy piv aren't some elusive unicorn. i'm sorry i came off that way, was being a bit hyperbolic.
No. 21126
>>21123Dude don't remind me that people still have sex after middle age, it's natural, yes, but fuck this is why I achieve internal satisfaction as a replacement for sexual relationships and I personally hate how sex is one of the only ways people bond over romantically and create relationships around it,
I'm detached from this part of physical life and not controlled by these functions of my body or sad about not engaging in them as a woman. Female position in sex with men is so mentally tasking and so about being desirable, being naked is a vulnerability and being penetrated in your naked bottom is a physical submission and it's literally what makes het women feel high, all the shame, vulnerability, being desired, submission, men being bigger than them physically and just being MALE etc. But anyway, the women who literally admit they don't feel anything during sex or never did at all or never orgasm or are asexual or have to get drunk or high to have sex, still have sex and say that male being satisfied with by it and the closeness is what makes up for them feeling NOTHING physically wtf. I just hate this power dynamic, it is not for everyone but when I say for who it is, even if I don't insult them or call it inferior, they still get mad meanwhile female life being more about love and being a feminine role and male life being more about power and masculine role is just biological, everyone can see it. Logic and rationality has no place in the female position in sex and I just don't like it, not saying one role is more inferior, it's just different cause men and women might be just both human but they aren't the same. It's my personal feelings about sex, no need to get offended when someone says it's a submission if it's literally the physical mechanism of it and always have been.
I prefer imagination over it all (over reality) and have satisfaction from life and are more than ok under specific circumstances hard to attain, there were always people who felt the way I feel but probably just got pimped into marriage and motherhood or worse and we don't deserve to end up alone just cause we don't get married or have nothing to offer to men, no femininity, but that's what often happens.
No. 21132
File: 1701038900230.jpeg (120.15 KB, 1213x828, F8EE28F7-D408-4A26-BB9C-A62AEE…)
I truly despise female masochism/martyrdom. When GCs do the whole “well I suffer from pregnancy, periods, baby fever etc. so I’m a real and special woman” it just makes me sad. Like I don’t want this shit in my house and have no idea how they can spin it into something to feel proud about. When I see something causes pain and humiliation I stay the fuck away from it.
No. 21148
>>21145I'm the anon you were asking, women are submissive in hetsex because that's the physical mechanism of it, our and men biology is designed around reproduction. It doesn't mean submission is inferior or doesn't even necessarily means it's patriarchal, men didn't create female body neither emposed this "natural role" onto them,
what's a patriarchy is men emposing things onto women and exploiting them because of their biology, enslaving, violating, exploiting, abusing women and raping them, no consent
but if female biology is a patriarchy on it's own…?
The mechanism of sex and our biology is what it is, make your own conclusion, women fixate too much on the word submission as if they are being offended. Males are rapey because dick goes outwards and can be put into things, men do a rapey motion to get off and the whole body is designed around your biological sex, so in men it's dick. That's their physical identity and psychology, the receiver of dick is made vulnerable/soft because of the mechanism of sex again, dick penetrates and requires the receiver to submit, men like to force submission because it causes them more stimulation and humans seek max sexual stimulation, women have rape fantasies because pretending they are being forced helps them fully surrender which allows them to receive more stimulation, also straight women like their chosen males strong desire towards them. In a patriarchal or non patriarchal world the mechanism of it is the same, sex still exists and men still desire it, just as women. Getting penetrated by nonconsenting males is still the same mechanism and female in male "rape" is not a problem or something men can fear or be enslaved through for biological reasons.
Female biology is designed for possible motherhood, that's why sex is what it is, for humans to exist and reproduce it must be this way, if this sexual submission, that is not enforced but rather female body is designed around it, is inferior, then women are inferior, but it doesn't seem to be true. This natural physical hierarchy is necessary for some reason
No. 21163
File: 1701148343906.jpeg (176.05 KB, 1280x1069, IMG_7705.jpeg)
As a wise woman once said: "Nothing can make one a misogynist faster than being born a woman."
No. 21167
I saw another age gap couple, ugly fat man with no neck, no fucking neck, just fat, 39yo and a 23yo thin woman who cools for him, then I saw women crying online about getting the most brutal things done to them psychologically by their men. Then I thought about how tragic the female life is, the concept of dating men is disempowering to women, I wouldn't mind never being around heterosexuality ever again, to stop feeling like a punished, humiliated servant. Fuck off from my life, disgusting power dynamic.
My father keeps calling my mother old and hates her and it fucks with my mind, it started when I was young. I quickly realised that the love between them died long ago, he makes ageist remarks about other women too. Then online I saw men talking about how exciting it is to be a 50yo man and still getting to fuck young women and how 30yo+ women are good for sex because they are trained at it, then saw a bunch of men talking about getting their dicks sucked, giving details that made these women who perform it on them sound like a disgusting prostitutes who wallow in filth and engage in the most sinister physical behavior a human being can do, film it and it looks like something straight from hell. They made horrifying, gross remarks about their gfs or wives and talked about how they want women to leak spit all over themselves and be enthusiastic for them, the tone they wrote it in made me nauseous, they reek of sadism, I visualise the smirking coomer meme when I look at their words. They talked about women like they are dogs and they themselves are gods, and judge them by how trained they are, one man said "my wife was so trained at it that after our divorce she had 4 men lined up" wtf.
Reminded me of the haunting sex details I had to hear when I was hanging out online and irl too close to normie teenage girls.
It's like dating is for women with prostitute skills, then I had to hear my parents miserable marriage from my room again and my destroyed mother with constant anger in her voice cause she's fucking nerve wrecked. Oh, and I remembered that all women live the same reality as me and feel the same, but subconsciously and express express it all differently. It's degrading to every woman as it feels degrading to me and they feel it. They are a humiliated to the core people.
KILL ME.
Ok maybe I'm fine now. Somehow it all doesn't matter suddenly cause I'm dissociating hard, all life and all existence already passed by wtf I'm outside the linear time. Eww femalehood
No. 21189
File: 1701260223237.png (707.97 KB, 1050x877, retard.png)
>>21171She means misogynist.
No. 21222
File: 1701352729918.png (1.28 MB, 1044x4464, retards.png)
Lefty men with tranny flags and anime profile pictures circlejerk about porn addiction being a TERF conspiracy theory conservative women are making up to oppress them.
No. 21237
>>21222Media objectively has absolutely gotten more pornographic and raunchy while censors have all but given up. Trannies aside, trannies are a small issue and retards sperging about them are wasting their time. Trannies overwhelmingly are men and men are the problem. Media has gotten disgusting and more increasingly depraved since the 1970s onwards. Most shit on Netflix and any other competitor and TV aside from children's content and the news is full of violent gore, crime and victimhood of women and chidren, dysfunctional families and people verbally fighting and being
abusive, adultary and fucking non stop, prostitution and whore culture, war and glorifying male violence and cruelty as well as women's abject poverty and victimhood. Some variant of trauma is in basically everything with conflict now. Most horror movies are metaphors for women being raped unless they are surreal unique concepts like Get Out. Every genre of media is like this, it doesn't matter what media it is; books, games, movies, tv series whether it's dystopian violence, zombies and monsters, historical male-worship porn fiction which is incredibly popular now due to white supremacist replacement conspiracist males (Napoleon and Oppenheimer) and male insecurity. The violence and the rape of women and girls is in nearly everything. Most bleakly, everyone is participating in it in droves. Women themselves seem to be in a renaissance of porn and make media trauma porn/actual porn of women and girls being raped for the plot or allegorical plots of women being assaulted and brutalized if not outright.
This part possibly belongs more in the conspiracy thread but I do wonder what the end game of this shit is and why it's gotten this way. This is a specific psyop that fucks with women and girls, the rates of child abuse have gone up, child grooming is at an all time high. Consumption of womens rape is at an all time high. Women signing up to be raped on camera is at an all time high. The only people I've seen discussing this are retarded trads but I'd like to hear sane opinions from people that don't worship the same pedofilic trad cult that the very same criticism of violence and pornography is aimed at as a facet of their entire fucking religion.
No. 21244
File: 1701427296912.png (92.95 KB, 885x653, statis.png)
>>21239>Its just the internetThe internet has been around since Tim Berners Lee but prostitution and human trafficking or rape and violence have never been this widespread and common in media nor societally shrugged off and encouraged. Stop gaslighting like a rape chimp. I'm also willing to bet its never been this easy to create harmful content of women and children nor normalized in modern history. No one said it was a "grand conspiracy", its reality. Billionaire pedophilic rape apes are not a conspiracy. The tolerance towards violence is unprecedented now.
https://bmjpaedsopen.bmj.com/content/6/1/e001553>There is emerging evidence that lockdowns significantly worsened child abuse on a global scale. Low-income and middle-income countries are particularly vulnerable to increases in child abuse. In Uganda, for example, there was a 1565% increase in the average number of calls per day to the Uganda Child Helpline in the first month of lockdown.11 Yet, even wealthy nations in the West did not escape unscathed. In the UK, there was a 1493% increase in cases of abusive head trauma at Great Ormond Street Hospital.12 In France, there was an 89% increase in national child abuse helpline calls, a 48% increase in home visits by law enforcement officers and a 50% increase in the relative frequency of child abuse hospitalisations.13 14 Furthermore, there appears to have been insidious changes with potentially long-term effects which are more difficult to measure. In the Netherlands, for example, there was a 32% increase in previously rare harsh parenting behaviours, including shaking and name calling.https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hsr2.790> Twelve articles have mentioned the increase of physical, psychological, and neglect types of abuse.https://www.statista.com/topics/4238/human-trafficking/#topicOverview>Between 2008 and 2019 the number of human trafficking victims identified worldwide more than quadrupled from around 30,000 to nearly 120,000. With the COVID-19 pandemic, the number of trafficking victims fell as travel restrictions made human trafficking more difficult, but were back at pre-pandemic levels in 2022.https://bjs.ojp.gov/library/publications/human-trafficking-data-collection-activities-2022>A total of 2,198 persons were referred to U.S. Attorneys for human trafficking offenses in fiscal year 2020, a 62% increase from the 1,360 persons referred in 2011. The number of persons prosecuted for human trafficking increased from 729 in 2011 to 1,343 in 2020, an 84% increase. The number of persons convicted of a federal human trafficking offense increased from 2011 (464 persons) to 2019 (837 persons), before falling in 2020 (658 persons).Of the 1,169 defendants charged in U.S. district court with human trafficking offenses in fiscal year 2020—
92% were male
63% were white
18% were black
17% were Hispanic
95% were U.S. citizens
66% had no prior convictions.
At yearend 2020, for the 47 states that reported data, 1,564 persons were in the custody of a state prison serving a sentence for a human trafficking offense.
https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/whats-behind-dramatic-rise-rapes>The U.S. rape rate is rising dramatically, topping 100,000 reported incidents for the first time in 1990. Law enforcement agencies estimate that as many as 2 million women are raped every year.https://www.statista.com/statistics/191226/reported-forcible-rape-rate-in-the-us-since-1990/>In 2022, the rate of forcible rapes in the United States stood at 40 per 100,000 inhabitants. As the FBI revised the definition of rape in 2013, the 2022 rate is a slight decrease from 1990, when there were 41.2 forcible rapes per 100,000 inhabitants.
>https://rapecrisis.org.uk/news/32-percent-jump-in-annual-number-of-reported-sexual-offences/>A 32% jump in the number of sexual offences recorded by police from the previous year to 194,683 – the highest number recorded in a 12-month period to date. A 26% increase on the number of rapes recorded by police from the previous year to 70,330 – also the highest number recorded in a 12-month period to date.You will find mixed information online and attempts to cover up child abuse but sexual abuse and CSA has definitely increased since COVID but even years after. My country has some of highest rates in the world and I live in the anglosphere in a "progressive" developed economyd country in the OECD. Some of it can be chalked up to observer bias and increasing normalizing speaking about violence for
victims but that's more of an indictment of how widespread rape chimp behavior is now. I'm not comparing now to the 19th century infant mortality rate, nor how children were forced into labor; just the pedophilic, violent degrading filth that's heavily normalized now. If you disagree that women have been further degraded and victimized I don't know what to tell you. I don't doubt that legal rights and laws enshrined were worse in history for women and children but you can't gauge degrading shit and abuse that skirts the law now just because children usually aren't forced to marry rape apes regularly anymore. Either way my criticism wasn't focused on only children being harmed.
No. 21285
Why are women so desperate? They get excited for a better cage or a better master yet it's still a cage and your master. They act like a prostitutes or like they lack so much self control and feel so incomplete that their heterosexuality makes them dependent on men. I can't trust any words they say since they have a tendency to be a self harming masochists, even their pickme leaders like Lana del rey are a self loathing handmaidens, I guess being such a coquette, daddy girl, nlog man eating blowjob Queen you sing about being didn't work bitch yet women as a collective relate to her so much that she became worldwide famous.
Meanwhile men are set up for life and loved forever, unlike women, men live on easy mode and can experience love, when they say they aren't loved they are just projecting cause they think women see them the way they see men. Female biology doesn't allow women to get loved kek
Truly I despise all of it, other women experience the same life as me but see it from a pickme pov. I saw a pickme flexing on the fact that men hit on her so much and I couldn't stop thinking about how deluded she is and that's probably why she's an extrovert, she's like a prey, they can say anything to her and she believes.
Yet the "misandrists" will say that women are akshually the powerful winners and Queens in life!1!1!1!1!! No. Women are a fucking desperate ass beings who settle?
No. 21308
File: 1701615071907.jpeg (8.85 KB, 264x191, pobrane (20).jpeg)
>>21307
No. 21326
>>20811Aren't there statistics that show how women are more vulnerable to becoming
victims of domestic violence during pregnancy?
I only found this:
https://vawnet.org/material/fact-sheet-domestic-violence-and-pregnancy> Domestic violence kills more pregnant women each year than any other cause. Nearly 20% of women experience violence during pregnancy, with pregnant adolescents and women with unintended pregnancies at an increased risk. No. 21387
File: 1701940527879.jpg (588.36 KB, 1080x3815, jesus.jpg)
Psychotic = based
No. 21388
File: 1701942636264.jpg (569.26 KB, 1080x1619, 0-47-14.jpg)
Comment seen on YouTube, translated by Google so don't judge. Yet handmaidens will still talk about love and needing dick to survive. Women misguide eachother, esp when they already engage in sex with men and their vagina feels like an itching wound they need to constantly scratch out of hOrNineSs.
No. 21406
File: 1701973008145.png (800.81 KB, 1080x1020, IMG_20231206_234233.png)
This is men. Only men are capable of this.
No. 21428
>>21367It's over for us non-pickme women because
It's literally femininity and a submission.
Women are "masochistic" because of their biology that is feminine and sexually submissive. Women not aligned with their biology aka femininity mentally are seen as disordered by life and people and ppl literally hate our fucking ass.
What shows what women biology is the most is their position in het sex where they have to go into a 100% submission to receive pleasure. That's why women get turned on by being vulnerable or by men being dominant, rapey and having a strong desire towards them or by gross things like sucking dick.
No max possible submission = no pleasure. And no initiating sex doesn't make you dominant KEK
Being aligned with a female body sexually makes you psychologically feminine, not being aligned with it can make you develop attitudes like hating men, pregnancy, womanhood, sex and seeing it as degrading.
I suppose that women who's brains find it easier to align with femininity and submission are the ones who desire motherhood and since mentally you become submissive and feminine when you have het sex(it even invokes inherently feminine feelings in women) then having het sex can make you develop a desire for motherhood too esp if you're a cock sucker which is a peak submission lol
Cause pregnancy is the most feminine thing you can do and woman body sexually is feminine or even masochistic? Literally servile, it's about surrendering. Pregnancy is a service to others.
There's basically no point in dating men and having children if you're a moid branded non submissive woman cause how tf are you gonna keep your brain in a constant state of submission or pickme attitude to be able to have het sex. It would feel extremely degrading and like filth, rape or prostitution and would anger you. Imagine an animal refusing to be penetrated and biting the male back, "masculine" women give me these vibes, can't get along with any moid, cause no matter what your mind is as a male or female, in het sex gender roles are biological and inescapable even psychologically.
Some women can want to become mothers out of desperation/wanting to keep their scrote around too,
Or being obsessed with the man so much that they want his spawn.
Some even want a boy child as a replacement for a romantic partner because they think their child won't even leave them so they can have a infinite supply of male attention
Other possible reason is just ego or acting like a child who saw a picture of a pet animal and decides it wants to without thinking much abt it, it's just a whim. Then the child gets bored of the animal kek
But to sum it up, motherhood as a woman requires you to be forgiving
No. 21430
>>21427Your argument is illogical and has no proof(no proof that women lvoing men isn't a biological behavior) in the observable reality and in human behaviors and psychology, you're so feminine that you even get pissed by at someone wording their point in thr wrong way as if it matters. Women love men, stop with the stupid victimhood and look all around you, they develop a deep love and devotion for them without being forced. Even having sex with men is loving men deeply. Imagine endlessly hearing that 2+2=5 and understand why I'm so mad lmao
Women love for men is the kind of shit everyone can fucking perceive with no effort
No. 21439
File: 1702056337089.jpg (641.33 KB, 1080x3671, 90.jpg)
Comments under a video about how to please a moid in sex. They think they are special meanwhile all hetero women are like this because of their biology, sex is for male pleasure
No. 21450
>>21445>Making your own bed ans then crying about it is what handmaidens do the best. We need to sue them for brainwashing all other women about the reality of heterosexuality, this is not a life, this is slavery. And how can you become so close with someone, let them jizz in you for them to just end up dumping you like a trash.This is something that I am struggling to wrap my mind around as well. Being in a hetero relationship nowadays is such a glaring disadvantage, and the most unnerving part is that this is true from whichever angle you look at it. Financial, emotional, spiritual, physical (safety wise), romantic, sexual - there is nothing that a male can give you in any of these aspects of life, at least not without giving 1 and taking away from you 3 or more. Putting
any amount of thought into whether being a het-partnered woman is a good idea would lead you to the conlcusion: absolutely not. This tells me that these women do not stop to think, their lives are on autopilot (schizoposting about the matrix is starting to make a lot of sense ngl).
Hmm, let's see here, I am a woman in my 20s, what should I be doing? Oh yaaah, getting a bf lolz. I need to be married by 30! Pregnant by 40! Oh well. Better get me a man then.When they banned abortions in the US, I was actually excited because that'd mean women would finally have had enough shit from men. A sex strike, at the very least. Maybe something even grander like Icelandic women had done in the 70s, where they checked out of the workforce entirely for a day. How much can they endure, after all? Well, it seems that many women have the mentality of a slave because they have shown that they can endure that
and keep fucking males,
and still create tradwifey content,
and suffer the literal crime against humanity process of childbirth,
and go online to screech NAMALT. Genuinely pitiful. I am not going to lie anons, I know that males have retarded reasons for doing so, but I don't blame them for not respecting women as a whole. I wouldn't either if I wasn't sure that non-mentally-damaged women exist, they're just rare to come by.
>Why are normies relationships like this?Worldwide male-inflicted autism, I think. Everything must have a linear trajectory to be of use to the male. Otherwise, the male is threatened and due to his own autism struggles to navigate this increasingly complex connections-oriented world.
A woman's linear trajectory was that of a maiden → girlfriend → wife → mother → nurse. Everything in our society up until very, very recently pointed women in this direction. Just about any political ideology takes for granted that women will assume these roles. We are still fending off the mass propaganda that males and handmaidens are producing. But I guess most women are lacking in intelligence and/or willpower because they'd rather side with the "safer" status quo than actually set themselves free and carve their own path. Something's gotta happen to stop this clownery. It's not enough for women to have their reproductive rights taken away. Anons did you know that ICC lists forced pregnancy as a crime against humanity and - in times of war - a war crime? Even empathy-less males recognize the horror of childbirth but we're gonna pretend that various flavors of handmaidens spouting about its beauty are in the right. Something even more drastic has to happen! Wait and see, I guess.
No. 21451
File: 1702138468053.jpg (318.13 KB, 1080x1012, 09-11-4-20.jpg)
This is why I don't believe in having moral standards as a woman(I don't mean being a slut), moids and their lovers and screech, squeak, call me psychotic and schizophrenic, psychoanalyze me but I don't give a fuck, if I want to be angry then I will be.
No. 21455
File: 1702157420369.jpg (231.69 KB, 1080x1388, 48.jpg)
Daily degeneracy in "radical feminist" spaces, the stuff you definitely wanna see to feel better
No. 21476
File: 1702237303074.png (897.17 KB, 1844x2344, thesunkenawayworld1.png)
>>21473In my personal experience, as well as in the experience of other BP women that I've interact with one-on-one (only a couple so take it with a grain of salt), a big thing is how close they are to their families. Nobody will pressure a woman into a trad(-adjacent) life like her family. If the family's closeknit and absorbs the kids into family activities, and the mother is not treated (too) badly, it might seem as the most logical life path for the girls. I mean, it's a very comfy, matrix-y world that those kids see. Why not replicate.
If your family was not like that, it's rather obvious why you never had the desire. Also, autism or other disorders that get in the way of conformity could be at play. I can't say for sure though, because my conclusions come from only a handful of people. Some other women have theorized that it's literally different genetics. The idea is, most non-feminine by nature women got killed throughout history and that's why the outliers are so rare nowadays. I think it's a bit of a stretch because the argument for nature vs. nurture usually boils down to "it's both, look up epigenetics", but it's an interesting thought nonetheless.
Sorry for sperging. I also really want to see how other anons understand this? Picrel is food for thought, I just found the blog and wanted to share because it's really relevant to the topic (
https://thesunkenawayworld.wordpress.com).
No. 21483
>>21476That woman is very patriarchical and cock worshiping. If she really hated men they would be the target of her hatred not women. Our bodies aren't the problem males are.
Like many "enlightened" blackpills she falls into the trap of blaming other women and our bodies instead of men themselves. That's exactly what scrotes want you to do.
>You need to give birth in order to honor the goddess Which goddess? There are hundreds of goddesses around the world and I can't think of one that demands her worshipers give birth to honor her. In fact in the ancient world priestestess were often celibate.
>those poor gnc fagsand of course she is the kind of faghag that thinks a man in a dress can't rape. Separatism means giving up all men including your beloved fags who rape just as much if not more than straight moids.
>"lesbian" non-goldstarA man can be married for decades and have multiple kids with a woman but once he comes out as gay everyone accepts him and sees him as a
victim of the evil straight women. But if a woman had even kissed a male in her youth then that means she is forever a tainted slut who will never be a real lesbian. Again her hypocritical patriarchical thinking shows. Not even religious women are that merciless.
This must be the most dick worshiping male loving woman I've seen in a while. I hope no woman ends up in a relationship with her. She should die alone with her yaio figures.
No. 21488
>>21473Hope the previous post is not gonna start a shit storm.
Autism, being mentally gnc, being highly sensitive, not liking being controlled, not being agreeable idk. I don't know what exactly makes most women into what they are mentally but they sound like a hivemind, maybe it's because they didn't have a possibility to raise their consciousness and become whatever they learned from their environment instead but honestly I don't think so because they are too notorious. Especially what the woman body sexually is and the way it creates their psychology makes it impossible to ever change these women minds.
Now most bp leaning women are some random normie women who call themselves that or hetero misandrists meanwhile misandry is not even possible in human nature. Blackpill doesn't even belong in feminism because it doesn't see certain things in women nature as positive and feminists defend women nature biology, engaging with them will just make them use you to express their feminist points and humiliate you for being "not well adjusted
femcel". Any feminists that thinks women can stop being whores for men and that men or love for men can be eradicated are up for a surprise because this shit is impossible so I guess only any other feminism than that can be considered a feminism.
I know that this makes people get offended but rEaL blackpilled women actually are enlightened. I thought about it, they just lack the social skills (or in my case it's me not liking people and society, but I can develop social skills easily when given a chance) needed to survive in the physical life they are fed up with anyway, people just get offended at the word enlightened but language exists to communicate things, they take this word too seriously. We will never get along with other women and they will always call us losers because we can't play the human game and we would indeed not survive in the "wild" KEK
I'm personally so disgusted with life sometimes because of all the degradation, patriarchy, misogyny etc and the thought of being born again haunts me especially because of the repulsive parent and (their hetero relationship that has flaws) I had to have in this life that invaded me to the core and made me feel anxiety every day of my life, I can't believe someone this emotionally unintelligent exists (I only started openly judging her recently after coming to a conclusion that I need to emotionally detach from them), I saw how retarded women can be, I developed a phobia of them and their psychology and I feel nothing but filth now, it's not even only men atp, men didn't even create half of the shit I see as degrading but nature did.
Most bp aligned women mentality is literally just about men and they have the right to brag about them but they become too obsessed with men when they are hetero and their minds get stuck on things,
To me center point of bp is womanhood but to "feminist" bps it's something else cause they don't see the natural male female dynamic as bad but just hate men for not appreciating women service to them and woman nature.
Most bp/rf women idealistic view on women is a feminist strategy and most bp/rf misandrists are detached from the reality and think men are involved in life or can be eradicated and create all these conspiracies about men influencing women nature. Idgaf about men enough to care neither I want to deny the shit women nature causes them to do, the behaviors it makes them exhibit because I'm an observer and I won't deny my fucking observations. I can't believe I have to over explain myself this much out of fear, so do I have to mention that I hate males everytime I say anything about womanhood and pickmes?
Like I fucking hate men or rather I'm not compatible with them and have no business bonding with them and most importantly I know that every male is the same because they all have a male body, simple, to me at least but this knowledge needs to be teached to women by their own observations I guess.
I don't think this bp stuff is a gods feminist strategy if it's not feminism at all to most, feminism but what pisses me of is that in female socialization women socialize over moral standards and libfemisim always becomes that standard
No. 21491
>>21483>if not more than straight moids.lol that's clearly not true but I get your point. Its silly to think males have a set sexual orientation to begin with but its undeniable that women are the most common
victims of males.
>>21487>Dicks are defective not women.You responded to a post criticizing your view for obsessing over males with male obsession, proving anons point. Also what's the point of this point? Unless you plan on eliminating all males this is pointless, you're preaching to the choir here. Women being unconvinced is the problem, nothing can be done about male biology or any biology for that matter.
No. 21502
File: 1702294162223.jpg (166.68 KB, 1080x1119, z8931.jpg)
>>21458And then some women will sexually harass other for calling it degrading.
This whole act and the female pseudo pleasure in it is just an empathy for the moid, women get off from male orgasm and center point of heterosexuality is male orgasm and desire for the woman, this is why engaging in sex means being gender conforming to the core yet sex positive people want to shame sex haters and call them an immature children who have to realize things and awaken, and I did awakened, I saw other women perspective and why they do this shit, then I came back to being gender non conforming again and realized that to a gnc mind, sexual submission and femininity feels forced and that's why it feels like a terror and people should stop belittling women like me in the name of some retarded sex positivity. How many women got tricked into having sex just cause they are hetero and technically it makes them feel what other women feel in sex because they have a human both and heterosexuality that allows them these feelings which they don't CHOOSE, they just happen? While they maybe didn't wanna do it at all, and go and see the testimonies of any other than libfem, sex positive women and real women experiences, and not listen to the mind of a libfem or a hetero woman in heat ready to self violate to feel something,
not every woman has to like sex. There's this whole pseudo psychology made by normies for normies that says: sex haters suffer from shame and suppress their sexuality and it's a disorder hey have to overcome.
Soo this particular sex act is fucking violent, it's like women self harm out of horniness, how someone who sees it as horrifying or someone non submissive can mold their mind to become acceptant of it just to find a man or just to not offend women? It's objectively violent, like put your phone screen down, then in real 3d life imagine as yourself doing humiliating shit like this, with a man who's naturally bigger than you and the dick literally stabs your mouth and you have to wallow in slimy filth in front of a literal fucking moid?
"Wah wah but moids are deficent xy and their opinion and how they view you shouldn't matter!!" - you literally care about what they are and think, you just forgive them and love them unconditionally.
It's self harm, when you can't go into a submission and love for the moid then you will literally molest yourself through doing this.
Idk why there's so much pressure to see hetero sex as equal, non bdsm or non animalistic or something thats serves women in the same way that serves men.
Women can't even detach vulnerable emotions from sex because of their biology and feelings it invokes especially during penetration, if they don't have emotions they they are literally self harming because they are being resistant to the act they fucking chose to have or straight up just being raw whores.
I can't believe this act is a requirement in heterosexual relationships, this is why there's so much pressure and shaming, I guess any woman born with a gnc mind or heterosexuality especially will become blackpilled when she realized what she has to do to herself to get "love". A painful sexual act, choking and not being able to breath even if it's technically not violent or the moid didnt initiate it.
This is why I will never relate to other women, your whole psychology is molded to have a positive view on these creepy sexual acts in which you're in a receptive, submissive male loving role. Life is a hell in earth for non submissive women, and forcing yourself to
conform will make you even more mentally ill.
I don't wanna look for another screenshot I had bit it was from some random discourse on twitter about " what's the point of sucking on a strap" and someone said it's people fetishising inequality but anyway this "inequality" or the male being dominant and the female being in a receptive/submissive role is natural that's why I will never relate to women if their psychology is created from their physical sexual role. To a gnc woman it will always seem degrading, to a gender conforming woman it's a female sexual expression they want
No. 21517
>>21516This is so fucking random and untrue and it's literally for pigs can women fucking stop???
What's wrong with you
No. 21524
File: 1702312924936.jpeg (1.02 MB, 1342x733, 6DF675F9-042D-4E8D-9271-1305FC…)
>>21516Can you just fuck off to the right-wing thread already
No. 21531
>>21528Hate is a strong word. Just be aware that's reality so you won't be surprised when one of your newphes gonna for example, rape a woman.
Btw this thread is pure rope-fuel.
No. 21532
>>21530You’re a retard with no reading comprehension, it just says they’re no worse than other men.
>>21528Well the bp view would be that they’re boys, so they’re inevitably gonna watch porn, probably rape and molest women, probably gonna make a woman bust open her genitals to give birth to their spawn…In a sense you don’t “have to hate” them personally, but they’re locked into a biological/social system that gives them a lot of power and opportunity to inflict cruelty on women. When women feel the kindness you describe, they’re in a sense digging their own kind’s grave. It’s not a situation you can extract yourself from without being extremely cruel and antisocial , and it’s deliberately designed this way to keep the species going. So just do what you want kek
No. 21533
>>21473Same here kek
Also when I was like 5 years old J thought that only your mom is your real patent because she give birth to you and fathers are obsolete and I managed to convince a 6 year old boy that his father wasn't his real parent and he cried because of me KEK
No. 21540
>>21532>but they’re locked into a biological/social system that gives them a lot of power and opportunity to inflict cruelty on women.Lol why put it like this as if socialization is the result of male inhumanity? That's an idiotic question from a idiotic handmaiden that you've given a spineless response to. Male children are still male and should be treated as potential predators. Some of you retards read far too deep into not worshipping males as "cruel and antisocial".
>>21495Because you are literally cocksucking and there's a plethora of insults to describe your own humiliation by the people humiliating you. Because you are placing the dirty genitals of someone's in your mouth, because multitudes of humiliating porn prove that you are subhuman for doing so and don't mince words. Because society sees it as humiliating objectively, because biologically even animals know and see it as humiliating objectively. Go talk about it on /g/ kek you'll be met with empathy and understanding.
No. 21541
>>21495I'd also add that het women don't have any problem mocking gay moids and describing how humiliating and subhuman they are for cocksucking yet for some odd reason the same logic doesn't apply to women. I wonder why that is? Could it be that women are by default seen as subhuman and lesser so nothing is "lost" when they humiliate themselves whereas males are supposed to be the humiliator not the humiliatee like picrel
>>21524Manyy women will often hide their male worship through diversion by defending womens subordination as right and males dominance while insulting males humiliation. Then you can roleplay "misandry" by only mocking gay unmasculine self-humiliating fag males. Fags are far more humiliating then women because males are supposed to be worshipped and have dignity whereas women aren't.
No. 21550
File: 1702360214137.jpg (321.78 KB, 1080x713, 2-06-48-47.jpg)
I have no words, the whole spiritual community needs to be psychoanalysed
No. 21552
File: 1702367442349.jpg (323.72 KB, 1080x2031, 083035.jpg)
Right before writing it I saw this on twitter, she said that women with shorter nails are psychologically stuck
In the spiritual communities it's seen as a fact that gender roles are biological so the entire psychoanalysis of a woman is centered around how much aligned she is with her biology and is she isn't feminine mentally then she's seen as unhealed and they yap about it endlessly and how they awakened their femininity and stopped being independent women who are defensive of their masculine identity.
They talk about sex all the time and it all sounds like: the woman serving the man: the natural gender roles in hetero sex. They like to use the "word" power to describe the femininity but there's no power there's just the "love" gender role and it's all very blackpilling because it contains some truths. They do all those workshops about how to jerk dick and it reminds me of how women just serve men.
Women want to be "sex workers" and it fits their biology, I'm just so repulsed. It's all an endless male pleasure and it's biological. Idk why men whine so much everywhere and have a victim mentality if nature created a literal slaves for them who's sexual role is love with no power, just selfless service.
Women would even build a brothel with their own hands and put themselves in it if they could. I just wish people could stop using the word power and were honest that sex only serves men because there's nothing in it for women, they can only give to men.
Spiritual people now developed a mentality that says sex haters are demonic and true spirituality is sex positive. I just want a space free from sex but I found the worst written porn, I call it porn, because they will literally talk about putting a dick into their ass or throat and how feminine it is.
I don't want to read how diseased I am for not being gender conforming and having short nails, I can't even deny that women love for moids is biological but why do i have to be seen as disordered and have to read this retarded judgmental psychoanalysis. Why can't volcels have anything too!? And yeah yeah I know that faggots want to be prostitutes for men too lol
I hate it soo much if I were a man this shit wouldn't matter, masculinity is much easier and more rewarding to me or maybe I'm moidbrained and egoistic(this isn't your blog, don't post 5 times in a row)
No. 21680
>>21673Dont reply to ban evaders,
nonny.
No. 21686
File: 1702931647011.jpg (1.67 MB, 1440x4213, Screenshot_20231218_203305_Red…)
