[ Rules ] [ ot / g / m ] [ pt / snow / w ] [ meta ] [ Server Status ]

/2X/ - (XX)

gender critical and female politics
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File(20 MB max)
Video
Password
 (For post deletion)
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
| Catalog
Read the rules and usage info before posting.
The VPN ban is now in effect on /ot/, see this update post for more information

File: 1578980825578.jpg (65.24 KB, 1128x635, el-viento-se-levanta-imagen-de…)

No. 1821[Reply]

With the admin's verdict on /2X/ (and pink pill related topics as a whole) announced, where should farmers who want to discuss female politics head to?
The current options seem to be:
>New imageboard
>Migration to other, existing imageboards
>Migration to Reddit
As far as the first option goes, we may be able to create a space on https://8kun.top/ or https://endchan.net/ using their board creation functions. The only downside is that both places are also home to all sorts of unsavory males (virulent racists, pedophiles, pornography junkies, manosphere users, etc).
We could also create our own standalone board/site, though we'd need someone with the proper skills for that. Post any thoughts/suggestions on /2X/ migration here.
450 posts and 46 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

No. 3717

>>3716
Okay, where are the links then?

No. 3718

>>3717
if the invite's expired, feel free to ask for a new one in the chat!

No. 3721

>>3698
No, it's mostly one butthurt anti-gc/pp anon falseflagging like a lunatic.


File: 1576671614730.jpg (19.89 KB, 768x512, Knna2Lf.jpg)

No. 1[Reply]

This is a test-board to assess if a female space for politics will be sufficient in giving everybody what they want while removing some tension in /ot/.

This is not currently permanent but, it can be.
If this board works out then I will make it a permanent board next year. For now you all have the choice of posting in the /ot/ thread or making new threads here. It's your choice.

No. 2

/ot/ rules apply for now. If you have rule requests or any complaints then you can post about it here >>>/meta/11760
Don’t make threads targeting specific nationalities, ethnicities, or races. You can discuss policy and government all you like but don't racebait. It is a global rule violation, this isn't /pol/.


File: 1737203190035.jpeg (13.14 KB, 225x225, images (98).jpeg)

No. 37903[Reply]

For all women who abstain from sex voluntarily/or are virgins who don't plan on partaking in sex
45 posts and 5 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

No. 40820

>>40819
love this for you

No. 40830

>>37903
Based move. I'm a voluntary ascetic woman and I don't play being bedded by moids. I was told I'm ugly as well.

No. 40831

>>40830
*I don't plan

No. 40832

I hate that women bottom in sex. That's it, that's why I hate sex so much, because we as women cannot be anything else but in a submissive, feminine, position in it receptive in sex. We are bottoms

No. 40834

File: 1753481247724.webp (105.43 KB, 1024x1301, The.King.of.Fighters.for.Girls…)

Men in real life will never be as perfect as my husbandos, and since sex is degrading I don't want to ever do it.


File: 1730918036048.jpg (141.35 KB, 1200x675, for-4B-1200x675.jpg)

No. 36210[Reply]

What is the 4B movement?
>4B (or "Four Nos") is a feminist movement which is purported to have originated in South Korea in 2019. Its proponents refuse to date men, get married, have sex with men, or have children.
"Female separatism" is another term that could describe this in English.
Discuss ways women can support themselves and other women while decentering and ignoring men in their own lives. Some starter questions:
>Are you 4B?
>Have you talked to any women in your life about going 4B?
>Do you plan on moving in with women instead of trying to split cost of living with a boyfriend?
596 posts and 49 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

No. 40721

>>40720
I think you need to check out radical feminism on tumblr then because they regularly have hetfem vs separatist slapfights. Including 'babies on a plane' (if you don't like being stuck on a plane with a crying baby, you hate women and are a misogynist).

No. 40723

>>40721
ayrt, I'm actually pretty familiar with the goings on of radfem tumblr kek, a more recent one was about cooking fish in the office microwave iirc
I still stand by the idea that someone who feels personally attacked by female separatism has a warped idea of radical feminism tho, I think a lot of women who claim the label mostly would like to be "a part of the club" without actually understanding the ideas or applying the principles, which happens a lot with these things: think of the "can I have a boyfriend and still be 4B?" posts.
Like idk lady, can you? Do you even know what 4B means?
I think that women who want to have men in their own private lives can still participate in and make worthwhile contributions to feminism, but they have to understand that they're taking a risk, and that their willingness to put up with males in whatever capacity may not be shared by other women.

No. 40728

>>40723
I agree with that, but I also think at this point radfems are enabling those women to up numbers rather than sticking to their principles, to the point that that is part of radfeminism now and separatism is it's own distinct thing (and blackpill on the other side). Some like to argue radfeminism never really believed in separatism - Dworking getting married, Adrienne Rich coming out as bi etc.

No. 40729

>>40728
Fair point, I can see the reasoning behind separating (heh) separatism as its own thing, somewhat like a hardened version of radical feminism in which adherents actually commit and stick to the principles. It does annoy me a bit though, because it feels like conceding the term to people who are neither radical nor feminist. It seems like kicking the can down the road: when non-separatists start (as some have already) calling themselves separatist, will we have to describe what we do with a new term and let them have that one, when they reach a critical number and start to infest separatist communities?
Personal tangent, but at this point I just find it easier to claim no labels and get on with my day. I like radical feminist and female separatist ideas, I apply them in ways that make my life better, and that's it. In the end claiming you're one thing or the other means nothing if you don't back it up with your actions, and going a step further I'd say the only reason to claim a label like "feminist", "radfem", or "separatist" would be if you're an activist or at least trying to set an example for others. And that means having stricter standards and sticking to them in tangible ways, which is a whole different ballpark from posting on tumblr kek

No. 40833

I wish I had 4B friends, it hurts so bad to have your friends always prioritize their nigels over you.


File: 1732121329197.jpeg (222.68 KB, 1083x727, tr000000n.jpeg)

No. 37086[Reply]

#1 https://lolcow.farm/2X/res/4446.html
292 posts and 244 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

No. 40818

File: 1753296688854.png (275.37 KB, 603x748, IMG_2893.png)


No. 40822

File: 1753373796169.jpg (826.36 KB, 1890x1890, GvmbkL-WAAAnMrN.jpg)


No. 40824

File: 1753373848287.jpg (56.3 KB, 827x554, Gwe9x-nbEAAhGUt.jpg)


No. 40826

File: 1753437930432.jpg (154.98 KB, 1070x1529, GtQBfQTWIAANlMz.jpg)


No. 40827

File: 1753437960069.jpg (123.43 KB, 1000x1000, GuJO5vfagAUOmJK.jpg)



File: 1708018774331.png (456.84 KB, 500x500, 1646360745494.png)

No. 22610[Reply]

Post anti-scrote memes here.
173 posts and 122 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

No. 39463

File: 1747100475616.jpg (83.41 KB, 1242x1218, 33554324.jpg)

which way, male?

No. 39464

File: 1747100508738.jpg (54.54 KB, 736x663, 236585.jpg)


No. 39465

File: 1747100552636.jpg (124.24 KB, 959x1084, 535113.jpg)


No. 40370

File: 1749289554835.jpg (76.2 KB, 787x536, 20250605_230549.jpg)


No. 40828

File: 1753438361896.jpg (74.83 KB, 720x703, Gqn7Z8yXIAAti4r.jpg)



File: 1715347680217.png (1.14 MB, 827x1267, DW2M5q7.png)

No. 24356[Reply]

A thread for documenting and discussing the issues of the surrogacy Industry and the harms it causes to women and children.
33 posts and 16 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

No. 38440

>>38409
there was an anti-surrogacy thread on /2x/ and an anti-surrogacy on /ot/, the latter was also moved on /2x/ for some reason

No. 38536

File: 1741244223822.jpg (83.21 KB, 657x415, fdsg.jpg)

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14459733/Couple-paid-85K-surrogate-twins-Cyprus-battle.html

No. 38759

File: 1742288104164.jpg (45.62 KB, 621x193, k.jpg)

Excellent.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/mar/17/surrogate-parents-too-afraid-to-return-to-italy-after-procreative-tourism-law
>The gay couple could be among the first Italians to be prosecuted under the law, enacted in early December, which extended an outright ban on domestic surrogacy by making it a universal crime that transcends borders, putting them on a par with terrorists, paedophiles and war criminals.
>The measure can lead to prison terms of up to two years and fines of between €600,000 and €1m (£500,000 and £840,000).

No. 38977

File: 1743621996292.png (292.12 KB, 605x741, MQiRFCp.png)


No. 40817

File: 1753290449419.mp4 (4.72 MB, 592x1280, pvT-RULl5Fw3NaZW.mp4)



File: 1735594644367.jpg (61.08 KB, 720x855, 1732928401621065.jpg)

No. 37647[Reply]

There have been many "Radfem General" threads on here, but I have never seen one for nonas who are not radfems.

What are your reasons for not being a radfem, and what issues do you have with radfems?
183 posts and 13 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

No. 40803

>>40802
Your men only don't rape you because they have enough pussy 1:1 ratio. Feminist gayropean utopicians. Fake bitches(USER HAS BEEN PUT OUT TO PASTURE)

No. 40804

>>40798
I kind of doubt that that's what that person was getting at. they were lumping in gc and radfems (calling them "terfs", but no one unironically identifies as a terf) there are lots of gc women who aren't radfems at all- jk rowling is one but there's many others, especially on lc. I think they were just repeating the rhetoric that comes from troons that "terfs" (meaning any gc woman) are "like nazis". those people never make a distinction between actual radfems and gc women.

No. 40812

>>40801
have you got any links on these programs? sounds interesting.

No. 40814

>>40801
The main issue I've had with the radfem community, not radical feminism as an ideology, has always been the constant obsession for ideological purity to the point it resembles an aesthetic subculture rather than a collective of people following an ideology. A lot of women disillusioned with the society around them make being radfem their entire identity with no nuance and focus only on hyperfixating on sperging about troons and how evil the libfems boogeymen are rather than engaging in educating and supporting other women. I remember when the Barbie movie came out and anons here and on radtwt were ranting and raving about how it was libfem slop that didn't go radical enough even though for many millenial women it was their feminist awakening and possibly the first time they've ever seen such strong statements for female rights acknowledging their struggles in a big budget mainstream movie. It wasn't enough that it was accessible and approachable for most women who had probably never identified as a feminist in their lives or thought about these things, it should've been a full on Dvorkinfest that could never be picked up by a big studio and only seen in a local 20-person lesbian film festival only people deep into the scene know about. And most of the time even that wouldn't be acceptable because it still didn't dunk on troons and thots enough. It's exhausting trying to be a part of a group that's based on spite and competition instead of hopefulness and community.

No. 40821

>>40814
IA that a lot of radfems were insufferable about Barbie, but all groups do this; it's called the Narcissism of Small Differences and was coined by Freud in 1930. Holding women to the standard that they should be better than doing this is, ironically, a double standard.


File: 1753075118894.jpg (76.45 KB, 640x425, sanmotherandchild.JPG)

No. 40807[Reply]

A thread to discuss evolved differences between the sexes and its relation to feminism. Questioning and critique of theories and even the field is allowed, but please don't comment if you think they have no merit. This is not a place to discuss how much you hate other women or being a woman.

No. 40813

>>40807
Ah, a great idea. I think that even if socialization is very important, we can't simply ignore thousands of years of evolution and their effects on sexual dimorphism.
I think one of the most important diferentials between women and moids is risk assessment and resilience. Moids are far more willing to take a chance on things and have a delusional level of confidence, while women are capable and willing to stick it to a bad situation or to sacrifice themselves to an unreasonable degree. I feel like this difference is too universal and early forming to be a socialization aspect. Do you agree?


File: 1752893299176.png (Spoiler Image,866.83 KB, 1055x622, penos bed.PNG)

No. 40792[Reply]

A thread for blackpill feminism. Discuss heterosexual dynamics, female psychology, and the flaws of the feminist movement here.

Male misogyny and female pickme behaviors are caused by biology,

If you disagree with the entire premise of the thread, you have no reason to enter it. Remember that entertaining disingenuous liberal feminist debate is running around in circles

Previous thread: >>39787(USER HAS BEEN PUT OUT TO PASTURE)

No. 40795

Oh youre back kek

No. 40796

Womens nature is bewilderingly disgusting, I don't know how you can get close to these creatures without feeling dirty. I'm only befriending with men now(bait)


Delete Post [ ]
Previous [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
| Catalog | Search
[ Rules ] [ ot / g / m ] [ pt / snow / w ] [ meta ] [ Server Status ]