[ Rules ] [ ot / g / m ] [ pt / snow / w ] [ meta ] [ Server Status ]

/2X/ - (XX)

gender critical and female politics
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File(20 MB max)
Video
Password (For post deletion)
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
| Catalog

Read the rules and usage info before posting.

The VPN ban is now in effect on /ot/, see this update post for more information

File: 1578980825578.jpg (65.24 KB, 1128x635, el-viento-se-levanta-imagen-de…)

No. 1821[Reply]

With the admin's verdict on /2X/ (and pink pill related topics as a whole) announced, where should farmers who want to discuss female politics head to?
The current options seem to be:
>New imageboard
>Migration to other, existing imageboards
>Migration to Reddit
As far as the first option goes, we may be able to create a space on https://8kun.top/ or https://endchan.net/ using their board creation functions. The only downside is that both places are also home to all sorts of unsavory males (virulent racists, pedophiles, pornography junkies, manosphere users, etc).
We could also create our own standalone board/site, though we'd need someone with the proper skills for that. Post any thoughts/suggestions on /2X/ migration here.
450 posts and 46 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

No. 3717

>>3716
Okay, where are the links then?

No. 3718

>>3717
if the invite's expired, feel free to ask for a new one in the chat!

No. 3721

>>3698
No, it's mostly one butthurt anti-gc/pp anon falseflagging like a lunatic.



File: 1576671614730.jpg (19.89 KB, 768x512, Knna2Lf.jpg)

No. 1[Reply]

This is a test-board to assess if a female space for politics will be sufficient in giving everybody what they want while removing some tension in /ot/.

This is not currently permanent but, it can be.
If this board works out then I will make it a permanent board next year. For now you all have the choice of posting in the /ot/ thread or making new threads here. It's your choice.

No. 2

/ot/ rules apply for now. If you have rule requests or any complaints then you can post about it here >>>/meta/11760
Don’t make threads targeting specific nationalities, ethnicities, or races. You can discuss policy and government all you like but don't racebait. It is a global rule violation, this isn't /pol/.



File: 1690251232503.png (1.17 MB, 1067x1690, young-woman-looking-mirror-por…)

No. 17556[Reply]

I've noticed that in the GC community, rf and adjacent communities there are plenty of women who talked about having dysphoria (and some are detrans). So I've made a thread for this topic.
491 posts and 36 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

No. 39175

>>39066
>Women dont have a sexuality. They are prudish by nature. Women only have sex to exchange things
Wrong, the fact we can get pregnant from sex makes us act more cautiously
>They are passive by nature and i think thats the reason why men were the ones who made great discoveries, because they take risks. Women dont.
Biology fucks us by making us weaker and capable of producing babies but patriarchy has restricted us from doing things. Many adventurous and intelligent women have been erased from history or forced to be brood mares. Not even given the opportunity. Especially when you get sold off at 14 to be impregnated. How much control over your situation do you have? It's such a disservice to all the women who never had a chance.
>Men usually kill each other for petty shit but not because theyre evil.
Go to 4chan and tell how non evil scrotes are. Retardation.

No. 39179

>>39175
Can feminists leave this thread? This isnt female copium thread(baiting)

No. 39235

Being dysphoriac is just so depressing when the OCD and anxiety calms down.
I wonder if I can ever have a happy life without a partner, because I'm too dysphoriac to have a partner. I look at men I'm attracted to and am forced to have my attraction wither away because of my dysphoria. I cannot even have a crush. I cannot make male friends because I don't want to inevitably have to fuck them when they "catch feelings" or want to be horny or whatever. I cannot even increase my attractiveness or do girly things because it's all redundant and accentuates my femaleness; I cannot have fun in that regard. I don't have a romantic future to look forward to because Im so dysphoriac, and when I look at the future I imagine myself rotting away with a bunch of female friends (if I can have any) till old age, but I can't even get female friends to begin with. It would be so easy to have my social needs met with an autistic partner, but I just cannot have a partner because of my dysphoria and distaste of the inadequacy and vulnerability and humiliation of penetration. I genuinely don't think I can love, but beyond that I don't think I can even form any human connection because of how limited my options are. If I was a straight man there'd be no fucking doubt that I'd get a woman and live my best life, but I'm a woman, an autistic woman, and my options are to be with straight men. I have no doubt that if my momma didn't care for me I'd have killed myself as a teenager tbh.

No. 39237

>>39179
Agree they are insufferable and fake

No. 39238

>>39235
I cannot possibly accept womanhood without identifying with sexual submission and it gives me awake nightmares



File: 1729611310176.jpg (52.87 KB, 338x507, istockphoto-178490867-170667a.…)

No. 35690[Reply]

Final warning: report and ignore rulebreaking posts and ban evaders or this thread will be locked

A thread for blackpill feminism. Discuss heterosexual dynamics, female psychology, and the flaws of the feminist movement here.

If you disagree with the entire premise of the thread, you have no reason to enter it. Remember that entertaining disingenuous liberal feminist debate is running around in circles.

Previous thread >>33686
1026 posts and 124 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

No. 39227

>>39223
if bp is evo bio then there’s a lot to be said about men being driven to reproduce and to rape.

No. 39230

>>39227
Even if they are dysgenic they want to reproduce. That is probably how we can get some laws against rape because of a eugenicist bias against lower moids of the species contribution to the gene pool. It is something women can find disgusting enough to support limited pro female measures. Perhaps you would not want to be confronted with that reality though.

No. 39232

>>39223
Blowjob chan is a cocksucker(personalityfag sperging)

No. 39233

>>39230
So feminism is about sucking chads dick? Makes sense(baiting)

No. 39236

wmn genuinely look like pigs on vids or pics where they are sucking dick and i dont think theres a fix for that vile act(bj sperg)



File: 1735594644367.jpg (61.08 KB, 720x855, 1732928401621065.jpg)

No. 37647[Reply]

There have been many "Radfem General" threads on here, but I have never seen one for nonas who are not radfems.

What are your reasons for not being a radfem, and what issues do you have with radfems?
119 posts and 10 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

No. 39202

>>39188
This. Radfem spaces are insanely lesbophobic, full of straights and bisexuals daydreaming about socializing men out of their biology. It's a stupid fandom for OSA women to cope about awful relationships they had with men in the past, have currently or plan to have in the future.
They might put up a facade of being pro lesbianism and separatism but in the end, when you actually start talking to these people, they always show open disgust towards lesbian sexuality and mock separatist women.
Radfem doesn't work as a movement because women don't mind their slavery at all and insist on serving their oppressor. Any attempt at taking their cages away or opening them, always ends up in captive women viscerally hating their savior and/or few others who willingly left their cages to be free.

No. 39203

>>39202
>>39188
Retarded dykes(bait)

No. 39207

>>39203
i’m bisexual.

No. 39226

Radical feminism could have been worth something if anyone actually did anything. For all the whining lesbian separatists do, jack shit has been done by them in the past 5 years, not even a good meme here or there. I think a lot of this is because these are women who genuinely think they can convince other women to leave their boyfriends or husbands by using statistics alone; something that indicates that many of them have almost never taken their feminism out into the real world and tried to have meaningful conversations with real women. They can't even be bothered to try and connect with women who are willing to listen to and agree with most of their views because it's more important to double down on this pipe dream of a bunch of women not having a male partner than it is to build a strong network of leftist feminist gc women who do not always exactly agree but still support each other. This is why us leftists always lose. This is why feminist movements are so easy to dismantle. We're putting in little to no action because we make each other feel alone, and we act like a woman's life choices are a personal attack and keep making our beef with those choices public when it needs to be a private conversation. You should know what topics start bullshit infighting that gets nowhere by now yet retards will still drag it back out like it's a spell that gets all the women to wake up and dump their moids. It doesn't work. At this point it just seems like anyone who brings this bullshit back up without anything that they have actually done to assist separatist women shown is just trying to make radfems fight each other. I bet there's a lot of guys who laugh at just how little we do compared to how much we argue and fight. Also I have never seen any lesbophobia from radfems, but I'm not on Ovarit so idk. The worst I've seen is just bisexual women not understanding that lesbians not wanting to date them is not grounds for asking lesbians to "unpack" why they exclude bisexuals from their dating pool, no matter how unfair it may seem. Past that I mainly just see most of the lesbian radfems freaking out that women with boyfriends are having the audacity to call themselves radfems or other petty bullshit. I realize my hypocrisy but policing each other will destroy us. We need to be forming irl tight knit groups that are putting that energy into direct action.

No. 39231

>>39226
Hi open ai(baiting)



File: 1732121329197.jpeg (222.68 KB, 1083x727, tr000000n.jpeg)

No. 37086[Reply]

165 posts and 141 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

No. 39211

File: 1745060669836.jpg (109.61 KB, 750x600, 1673487362712.jpg)


No. 39215

File: 1745139062654.png (2.62 MB, 1152x1102, IMG_5980.png)


No. 39216

File: 1745139116198.png (69.01 KB, 657x505, IMG_5981.png)


No. 39217

File: 1745139164621.png (122.87 KB, 640x377, IMG_5983.png)

ok mini spam over. gn my fellow terven queens

No. 39219

File: 1745203716342.png (1.08 MB, 745x1058, 1744787511491.png)




File: 1677467085800.jpg (28.42 KB, 336x500, 6703615-L.jpg)

No. 10868[Reply]

I think this is a good thread to discuss here. There's some times when I see women online who once considered themselves to be radfems to completely change their views and get into other ideologies at large. They become spinsters, blackpilled, right wing, libfems, etc. I've even seen women start identifying as nonbinary or transition after they no longer interact in radfem spaces. While some of them do a 180° turn, others just keep some of their radfem views while not interacting with other radfems anymore. I would like to discuss this phenomenon here, and in the case any of you have decided to stop being a radfem, you can also contribute to the thread and say why you quitted and how your views changed. Please no hate.
307 posts and 28 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

No. 14514

>>14512
>I suppose many of these types of women do not actually believe in what content they put out or internalize it. once you truly understand what males are their attention on you is rather laughable.
This is exactly what's going on: she couldn't be bothered to apply the theory to reality and chose to entertain the flirting with an engaged man. Look at how there's no mention of his fiance either in these journal entries. It's all just me me me I love attention that I'm getting right now - yet in a matter of weeks she changed the narrative to claim she was "abused and charmed" and spends her nights crying on the bathroom floor. She also claims to be totally over the situation but can't stop making sly little videos and posts about it.
Tbh there is one good thing about this situation and it's that both KC and LM now have huge red flags over their heads. The former is an autistic unemployed unfaithful scrote and the latter is a spineless attention-seeking homewrecker who can't even muster up any sympathy to the women she hurts. Any person with standards and morals will hopefully steer clear of these idiots in the future. I hope KC's (now hopefully ex) fiance can move on and be happy.

No. 14517

Did anyone happen to see if anything else went down with LM yesterday? She’s deleted a lot of stuff now kek

No. 19726

File: 1694016374973.jpg (48.7 KB, 640x547, trgfs1vs92kb1.jpg)

I'm the person you banned months ago and while I still stand for what I said (criticism of any movement is healthy for the movement itself, or else it cannot be self aware. And more than ever there's more fucking right wingers in radfem spaces) I'm back to being a radfem terf manhater. Long story short I had a mental breakdown where I thought I was going to be exposed and everyone would hate me and I would lose my job because someone told me the lolcow staff had ties to the troon who attacked this site before and I believed it. And I thought I would be harassed and followed. I was in a panic and I'm not the sanest of people. Anyway that was the reason. I'm not anti radfem, pro tranny, or a male. That's all, Goodbye.

No. 22042

I hate coming across interesting threads only to find they've been inactive for months. Regardless, i wanted to share my thoughts on the ex Radfem matter.
There are times where i've distanced myself from GC/radfems over troon obsession but i always realize it is everywhere and it's a major anti-feminist force. But there are bizarre/repulsive things in the movement i simply can't accept. Like millenial radfems seething over younger women/girls in the movement, making degrading comments on their bodies (on radblr, for example) or being pretentious. I've come to realize it's their way of dealing with bitterness and assume a 'mother' role of sorts. Pseudo-familial hierarchies are incredibly suspicious. Separatists would be the worst offenders but i also see this in more normie radfem groups.
I think that the deeper problem resides in how we define 'politics'. Politics is acting on the real world, incl. your intimate life but especially on women around you, in the workplace, in your 'community' . It's great if feminism makes someone leave their mediocre nigel or shave less or whatever but it's not political, at least not to the degree of actively supporting other women. This confusion between personal choices and politics is so deep that even in this thread, we see anons who otherwise fully agree on cultish tendencies argue over husbands. Yes, marriage is servitude but a married woman who volunteers for women or fosters independence in her daughters/friends is an effective feminist. It's nowhere near what we could do, but still.
Imo it's also why the obsession with who we date, makeup and apparent femininity is so prevalent in radfems. It's easy to pat yourself on the back for not wearing makeup, chastise women who do, it's harder to challenge the mean girl mentality which is ironically extremely girly. Radfems' denial of their own, deeply entrenched femininity is super fascinating to me.
I'm just confused by the anons who hate even the idea of platforming our ideas to the wider public. I don't know how to break it but the average person is right-wing, even if they think of themselves as moderate. There's a nonna who kept mentioning people who'd be turned off by GC moms. But who, exactly? I know for a fact normies do not care for trans acceptance and don't care about accusations of 'tradthottery'. I also know that your average libfem has zero political sense beyond sharing nice posts online. Politics (again, action) isn't a game of finding peoPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

No. 39218

bump



File: 1637582008671.jpg (41.29 KB, 640x714, e8sftobwn6121.jpg)

No. 3774[Reply]

While all religion are awful and subjugate women, none is worse then the religion of the Arab pedophile and that is undeniable, so this is a thread to discuss its evils and crimes against everyone but especially the women subjugated under it
432 posts and 102 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

No. 39109

>>39059
if they don't go to hell they get lobotomized basically and serve the moid in his satanic "heaven" orgy.
It doesn't make any sense to me whatsoever why heaven would have such an emphases on such a material and earthly attachment like sex. I always figured heaven would be similar to a permanent childhood where everyone returns to an eternal state of inner peace, innocence and wonder where men and women are equal.
Islam is so ass backwards that they think a divine award is coomerism. But what you expect from pedo worshippers?

No. 39110

This is more of a vent but I'm not sure where else to post it. I'd post it on /ot/'s vent thread but I think I'd somehow get banned for racebait, you know how it is. Tldr is I'm grieving for the girl my best friend used to be before she become more of a hardcore muslim. I miss her a lot. Growing up, she was like my older sister. We'd listen to music and watch anime together. I know that doesn't sound like much, but it was so fun and brought peace to my life. She was always a kind and caring person. We stopped talking for a while because I was going through some bad things (to make a long story short). I never forgot her though and searched out for her to make contact again. We did! And she was so happy to see me and said that our bond is special. That she's forgotten many things from back then but never me. That I'm still in her eyes her little sister. Obviously, I was overjoyed about that. However, she has become much, much more Muslim. She was technically Muslim before but didn't really practice. Now is a completely different story however.

She wears a hijab now. She won't listen to music because it's haram. Obviously, she won't ever do nice casual things like watching anime with me again either. She wants to move away from Switzerland to either the UAE or Medina with her husband (Muslim of course) and their newborn son. Even writing this out makes me want to cry. On one hand, I feel selfish. If this is how she's chosen to live and it makes her happier, who am I to say any different? On the other hand it feels like I'm going through a weird form of grief and I don't want her to be in what I view as a misogynistic cult. I feel grief for the girl she used to be and the freedoms she used to have. Islam has removed her identity and the unique things I used to love about her. Seeing her cover up her beautiful hair with that misogynistic rag makes me sad to the point of tearing up. When I read the Quran I can't believe that a girl that I love so much and is so sweet could follow a religion that teaches both horrible things and outright stupid things. Although her family was Muslim, they were actually against her wearing the hijab and were never that strict. I really do feel like I've seen someone I love join a cult and there's nothing I can do about it. I wish I could have an honest conversation with her about this but I remember years ago the one and only time she ever got mad at me it when I asked about Aisha. She treated me like I was stupid and hoPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

No. 39127

>>39059
Nothing, as the post said.

No. 39194

File: 1744890305100.jpeg (43.92 KB, 640x410, GVqs24AWUAAw064.jpeg)

Sorry for the long rant. I feel like I should quit any media forever to somehow escape hearing about islam because it makes me so enraged 24/7. I read so many horrible things about it and can't get it out of my mind.
But sadly there are so many muslims around me irl too, especially at work I constantly have to meet them, the males causing me trouble and the females causing me sadness because they're so hopeless. Many of them are actually really nice (they kinda have to, they depend on me) but then I remember everything they believe in and then it just feels fake and gross. I get why it's so easy to get lured into all of that.
It's the same for my mom at her job too, and couple years ago she and her (also middle-aged) coworkers were even told to stop wearing short clothes because of them. They literally went to her boss with a translator and asked whether there are still any unmarried women available. Their audacity knows no bounds, back then they just came to our country, didn't speak our language, of course no job, living off our tax money (well they still do), not owning or knowing or being able to do anything, looking disgusting (despite claiming to wash so frequently) and then thinking that they're good enough for my mom? Back then I (and some of my friends too) naively believed that by coming to my country all those girls and women would be freed of their forced marriage, of their coverings,…but nothing happened at all. The moids came and either just left their wifes and kids to fend for themselves and die or they just got to take their childbrides across the border, with no repercussion. Why do we have to save pedo rapists? They treat women lower then dogs, why should I care whether they starve or get shot in a war? To me they're all evil.

I saved these pics of pre-islamic "revolution" many years ago. Knowing how free they were just decades ago somehow devastates me even more. They looked so happy, they wanted to study and learn about the world and then suddenly everything was taken from them. I really hope they somehow managed to flee before all of that and are doing okay now (but I know that's unlikely).

I posted this on ot before (because I didn't know this thread exists) but that was a new low for me. The fact that the moids are disgusting rapist pigs is nothing new anymore but that the women think that not only completely covering themselves but also additionally not seeing anything of this world is needed in ordPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

No. 39208

File: 1745044472615.jpg (270.2 KB, 1299x566, Untitled.jpg)

Check out this new milk thread
>>>/snow/2109604



File: 1733346679213.png (267.43 KB, 594x451, Jennie-Gage-Substack-12-04-202…)

No. 37308[Reply]

Source : https://substack.com/home/post/p-149034490

Moral of the story :

> Never give up your financial autonomy for marriage and children

> Never assume that your man is never going to cheat, or use protection while cheating
> Never have sex without protection with your partner, no matter how long you've been together
> If you end up a homemaker, find side hustles to help you accumulate money on the side

No. 38505

I am kind of a trad wife I guess, but it wasn't an active decision, it was a 'natural' process, idk. Before, I had a job and not that much money, but still, it was mine. Now, I have no money of my own, no job and a gap in my CV of many years of not being working. Thank God I have my children whom I adore with all my heart, but I cannot get out of this marriage. If I tried to divorce or separate, I would not be able to have the kids by myself, since I'm not going to earn enough to even rent a house in the area we live and I cannot remove the kids from their school. Also, I know he would hire the best attorney and my children's life would be miserable in the process. I'm completely trapped here.

No. 39056

>>38505

How bad is it exactly for you ?

No. 39154

>>37308
Tradwives don't exist anymore. Unless you count 80+ geriatrics.

No. 39157

>>39154
they don't even exist now, it's just larping



File: 1672922932953.jpg (118.25 KB, 1280x720, coomer.jpg)

No. 7420[Reply]

A thread for discussing the cancer in society that is pornography.

>pornography is the orchestrated destruction of women’s bodies and souls; rape, battery, incest, and prostitution animate it; dehumanization and sadism characterize it; it is war on women, serial assaults on dignity, identity, and human worth; it is tyranny

-Andrea Dworkin
122 posts and 26 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

No. 26580

>>26434
You've completely missed the point nona. The girl's hair is the same blue color as the girl in the porn video at first, then in the last panel she dyes it a different orange/red color. The point was that she looked similar to the girl her stepfather was watching porn of, and she dyed her hair to try and negate that.

No. 35009

File: 1728096724966.png (407.72 KB, 748x1043, img_7195.png)


No. 38758

File: 1742286707568.jpg (95.6 KB, 691x547, pedo.jpg)

>A Department of Justice, Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention study, Children, Crime and Violence in Playboy, Penthouse and Hustler magazines led by Dr Judith Reisman found Playboy exploiting 4,656 children in cartoons and visuals between 1953 and 1984. Dr Reisman described Playboy’s “systemic use of little girls as autoerotic stimuli” and their “premeditated eroticisation of children”. 96.2% of Playboy’s child photos were centrefolds, and in one year, 39% of Playboy centrefolds were children under the age of 12. Children were actors in or watching sex an average of 8.2 times per issue, with over 30% of images depicting a child and adult in a sex scene. Most cartoon children were aged 3 to 11. Children were drawn laughing at their gang rapes by adults … Playboy’s sexualised children were systemic, statistically significant marketing decisions.
>Playboy cartoons that featured little girls, apparently around age seven or eight, depicted them with “exaggerated breasts”. One photo depicting a girl cuddling a doll and lying face down on Disney sheets was determined to be a cut and paste image of both an adult female and a young girl by airbrush experts. The caption read: “BABY DOLL. It’s easy to feel paternalistic toward the cuddly type above. Naturally, she digs forceful father figures, so come on strong, Big Daddy.”
>Dr Reisman concluded that “eroticising children in Playboy has had a direct impact on pandemic child pornography addiction and molestation.” She argued Playboy trained its male readers to “believe in children’s alleged sexuality as they would become sexually aroused browsing these materials.”
https://www.collectiveshout.org/playboy_s_dark_history_of_sexually_exploiting_girls

No. 39005

File: 1743865135253.jpg (52.65 KB, 630x167, 8.jpg)

Porn makes moids into pedos. It's so over for humanity.
>>>/ot/2475639

No. 39199

According to Linda Lovelace, her role in Deep Throat was forced on her by her abusive husband.



Delete Post [ ]
Previous [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
| Catalog | Search
[ Rules ] [ ot / g / m ] [ pt / snow / w ] [ meta ] [ Server Status ]