File: 1632111348059.jpeg (352.17 KB, 1167x1800, 3C8A40F0-3BE7-4F43-9D08-EFC205…)
No. 173262
Before posting: Read lolcow.farm rules and follow them. Sage your non-contribution, tinfoil and non-milk. Don’t rehash old milk discussed in previous threads. No appearance nitpicking unless you have something new to add (new fillers, plastic surgery, etc). Don’t hi cow, not everyone that disagrees with you is a whiteknight or Nicole, the same way not everyone is vendetta posting. If an anon is breaking the rules, report them instead of infighting. Complaints go in /meta/
Previous Thread (#4)
>>163459(#3):
>>155594(#2):
>>95156(#1):
>>82304All previous threads have been heavily saturated with stretched milk and vendetta posts. In an attempt to keep this new thread on a linear path- we will be posting
>valid milk (no accusations without a screen cap or comment linked to said milk)>no stretching (anons need to quit bouncing their references and continuations off other anons who: a) didn’t provide sold milk with evidence to back up their claims
b) are splurging personally fueled emotional attachment or anger towards the cow in question (ie creating unnecessary, obsessive collages you edited of the cow that don’t add sustenance or align with the point of the thread)
>when posting milk provide time stamps without cropping or manipulating milk (due to past issues with anons posting screenies from years prior to fuel current affairs)>cow edits her pictures enough as it is so don’t go the extra mile and add on exaggerated editing for goofs. (Anons caught previously taking still shots of videos and editing features to post milk) there are more than enough examples without creating your own before and afters >for the love of god sage your shit if it’s not a necessary information on Nicole
>linear timeline includes:• SPECULATION of cheating
Nobody has come forth and accused Nicole of cheating or has publicly outed her for adulterous behavior but anons have pieced together a timeline of overlapping hangouts with people who have later dated her and can be concluded as suspicious activity
•Skinwalking other costhots
•Providing the bare minimum of content due to reoccurring “mental and physical health issues” (yet to be publicly proven with doctors diagnosis)
•ebegging on Onlyfans and social media to your generic breed of scotes and spimps
•Excessively shows immaturity through prioritizing childlike hobbies and interests like Pokémon and Yugioh for the past decade
(tripfag) No. 173267
>>173264Well, you did an awesome job and thank you for including the timestamps thing. Posting together random bits of conversations 7 years back has nothing to do with recently, but the cropping of the timestamps and dates to pretend it is recent has been the biggest issue with the milk. It fed into fake storylines that anons would make up to make Nicole out to be worse than just basic douchebaggery. Also the armchairing.
The Destery thing too I agree with. I really hope this thread gives good milk. She seems like she can supply some good milk, but nitpicking her still owning a shirt and equating it to somehow being some power-play move, isn't exactly milk and it becomes this massive retardation that drags on. I'm actually looking forward to the thread again like I did in thread 1. It's hard to even interact because anons constantly go to meta and complain that everyone is a whiteknight for questioning anything and the mods don't actually read the thread to see how much the anons manufacture milk. Which is probably whats going to happen to your thread, anon. Watch, they will try to get is taken down as a 'shit thread.
No. 173272
>>173262This thread doesn’t even have a name (you didn’t include anything in the subject field) and this would have been a good new thread pic.
>>>/w/171133I am salty af about that otherwise thanks for creating a thread
No. 173282
>>173273Because this thread is just bitching about one or two anons and accusing them of being Brandon; don’t shout into the void with hypocrisy of anons tinfoiling when anon seems to be convinced everyone is Brandon lol.
>>>/w/173259That’s the most retarded reach I have ever heard in my life, Nicole has a tendency to post unshooped photos on her stories and through tagged photos from friends and the edited ones on her post feed that’s how people find the befores of shoops. It’s annoying when most of us just want to enjoy the drama but you guys are acting even more retarded and salty that admin/farmhands don’t ever ban the anons you report for “vendetta” (you’re leaving out Darcy’s commentary out of your OP which is suspicious as fuck) considering it was hilarious when farmhand put a whiteknight on full blast and told them to get a hobby outside of Nicole because they report posts for being “vendetta” “samefag” and cry in meta. The OP is retarded for mainly bitching about anons instead of talking about the cow herself. If you want things to be in a different direction then fucking report supposed vendetta posters instead of making half the thread about infighting. What even
No. 173284
File: 1632113363701.jpeg (17.86 KB, 641x104, A552BD39-299B-42E1-A7BC-EF0E3D…)
Interesting how all of a sudden there’s an influx of anons debating in the last thread til it hit max.
>>173255>none of my post if in defense of her personallyQuestionable with how long your post is kek.
No. 173285
>>173283I literally linked a post where someone accused anons of being Brandon. Are you blind or choosing to ignore
>>>/w/173259 ? lol
No. 173293
These should have been mentioned in the OP: 1.
>>>/w/165507 (Also mentioning how Nicole hired Cassie as a “personal assistant”, after discovering the thread Cassie is nowhere to be seen and her and Nate are not moving into the apartment they worked to get for months. Cassie and Nate are just holed in with his parents and are hiding from the spotlight)
2. Nicole making petty subtweets about her thread directly after Cassie discovers it
>>>/w/1661453. Open about the exact location/booth where she works despite creepy stalkers in the past threatening to rape her and trying to find her irl (Brandon)
>>>/w/1668964. Darcy talking about Connor and Nicole, how Nicole tried to get into Johnnie Guilbert’s pants but settled for Connor
>>>/w/1669575. Farmhand calling out whiteknight
>>>/w/167098 No. 173297
>>173293It was already addressed in the last thread anons had the wrong person when referring to Johnnie. Darcy said the might have been friends but it wasn’t conclusive other than more tangent splurging. Rest is
valid, but stop including hypothetical milk as factual milk if it’s still trying to be filtered
No. 173301
File: 1632114689305.jpeg (242.99 KB, 1201x1800, EF7C1302-2E60-4FD7-9893-6AF1AF…)
>>173297>stop including factual milkIt’s milk from a literal person involved with Johnnie Guilbert and Connor. Stop being this cringe you aren’t involved in their friend group. Connor literally told her Nicole wants to date Johnnie. It is factual milk.
No. 173303
File: 1632114925556.jpeg (120.72 KB, 828x294, D13A5A41-945D-4D59-A75F-44BB08…)
>>173302Nah you’re the one speculating, word from Darcy is factual milk and you’re twisting things lol. Nicole has known Johnnie for years because he dated a Leda skinwalker. We’ve already established every friend and ex and boyfriend in Nicole’s life is tied back to Leda. Nicole can be seen talking to Johnnie, Leda and co. as early as 2015. The milk is that Johnnie doesn’t want to be with her, and she decided to settle for Connor. Don’t twist things.
No. 173308
File: 1632115198791.jpeg (222.31 KB, 828x582, 709BFB2B-8F64-46C2-8F5D-FDF128…)
>>173306Please stop being cringe on purpose. She’s been talking to him for years and before she dated Connor. It makes sense she would want to date someone so closely involved with Leda
No. 173312
>>173309Sorry but you’re twisting the milk to fit your narrative because how dare a man reject Nicole!!1 It’s not my problem if you don’t want to believe Darcy but she knows much more about this than any of us random anons. She said Johnnie wasn’t interested in her, literally here
>>173301 which implies romantically. Don’t be this stupid
Nicole was trying to pursue him romantically and he didn’t have feelings for her back.
Also you requested proof that they even knew each other so that’s what those tweets are regarding
>>173310 No. 173313
File: 1632115542666.jpeg (196.07 KB, 828x1472, F714D137-8EC3-4540-B543-0F06C0…)
>>173311It is romantic lol Darcy says she met Johnnie and she knows more about this than us.
No. 173336
>>173273Who else recognizes this attempt at using a larger vocabulary while not understanding what the words mean because I sure do…
manifesting inaccuracy kek
No. 173339
>>173335>I don’t think anon is denying it.Read the thread yourself lol, someone is keen on making sure nobody believes Nicole was rejected
>>173297>>173302>>173306>>173311All of these reek of gatekeeping factual milk provided by Darcy. Her having a thread is irrelevant, no1curr about your personal dislike over her, she knows more than all of us do.
No. 173341
File: 1632116805790.jpeg (79.08 KB, 762x1024, C660791E-A012-47C9-AFD9-F58A05…)
Nicole:
>Skinwalked Leda to death>Everyone in her life from irl friends, exs, boyfriends and online friends are all tied to Leda>Nicole has been a fan of Johnnie’s since 2015>Connor’s ex says Johnnie wasn’t interested in Nicole, despite Connor and Nicole trying to set her up with him>This wouldn’t be the first time Nicole tried dating someone related to LedaSorry but after all the evidence, receipts, patterns of behavior, and literal word of a person involved, what about this doesn’t scream that Nicole was rejected?
>>173301(Picrel is Johnnie hanging out with Leda)
No. 173343
>>173337100% agree, this whole thing is just Nicolefag sperging out since admin won't let them do it in /meta anymore.
Never seen so much infighting and activity in a short time, crappy OP which is clearly just them complaining about the thread existing as usual and not summarizing any of the milk (of which there was plenty last thread)
Idk why team nicole are so obsessed with the thread. I think they're desperate for autosage, so they made an infight thread with a shit/nonexistent summary to try and gaslight everyone into believing their
no milk narrative.
But we've seen it all. Admin has seen it all. This is incredibly transparent.
No. 173363
>>173329You’re reiterating the same shit the Nicole anon said in /meta/ over and over for over a year lol.
>>173342Sorry, but it doesn’t matter if Darcy’s a cow if she’s adding onto Nicole and Connor’s retardation. Moo has been mentioned multiple times in Lori’s thread for example. Cows can intersect, get over it.
No. 173370
File: 1632125848082.jpeg (24.88 KB, 800x450, D07004CB-AE7E-4522-BD29-09B4E7…)
Notice how a few spergy anons always infight near the end of Nicole’s threads so it gets hard locked with their personal take/arguments as the final say. Also you autists like OP aren’t slick with your minimodding and gatekeeping when you are literal hypocrites and accuse every anon of being samefag and vendetta simple for creating a funny meme picture:
>>173273 and
>>>/w/173259So in relation to this autist
>>>/w/173255 who somehow defended Nicole publicly harassing Heather and making it okay, a response:
-Just because she was in the hospital once or took a picture there doesn’t mean she didn’t self-diagnose herself with ADHD, autism, and BPD. Everyone visits the hospital and that’s not proof of anything
-Johnnie is linked to Leda because they’re literally friends. Nicole gloms onto anyone who is either related to Leda, an ex, or a friend, see
>>>/w/171474 how Nicole doesn’t seem to have a single online friend that doesn’t idolize Leda. And just because you don’t personally like Darcy doesn’t mean her messages aren’t worth less than whatever straws you try to grasp that Johnnie isn’t interested in a Leda clone.
-We say she’s queerbaiting because she is. Creating a narrative that Connor is “fruity” or “gay” because he kissed his friend as a joke is like white girls at parties who take photos kissing to be quirky. Connor never came out as bi or anything nor have they ever come out as in an open relationship. All we know is Nicole wants to be speshul and inclusive so bad but as
>>>/w/171838 said it’s only catering to the male fantasy and all “lesbian” content is forced and unnatural with strapons or not focusing on female pleasure at all (i.e content with Heather).
-Saying Heather stole and manipulated her isn’t proof whatsoever. This isn’t the first time Nicole has accused a friend of stealing from her except here she has no proof. Heather checking to see if Nicole’s followers are talking about her isn’t proof of her being a stalker either. She is in a lot of Nicole’s content so no shit she’s going to read what people say about her.
-As for nobody saying Nicole cheated on them, Nicole only dated two men, a soyboy simp who hides from the internet and a pedophile, and if the pedophile says she cheated on him then that’s at least worth something. Also you’re acting as if her best buddies at the moment aren’t exactly pedophiles themselves and Nicole totally isn’t a pedo apologist
>Real tea is her stalker saga-That’s what the first thread is for. We’re not going to stalk Addi for 2018 news just so you can make Nicole look good. Sorry but curb your ego on an anonymous imageboard, we just want to enjoy drama without the OP complaining about anons rather than Nicole. Report shit and move on lol
No. 173372
>>173370You hit the nail on the head. It’s interesting that the stalker saga has been brought up again, almost as though there’s an incentive to guide the thread back to people who aren’t Nicole, but rather Brandon and Addi who has been discussed plenty previously, and with no new milk beyond that. One thing that stuck out to me with Addi in particular is how there was a screenshot of her Facebook when it wasn’t even listed under her real name.
>>158047 How the hell would any anon find this in the first place?
No. 173394
>>173363>>173370>>173374>>173372It's so bizarre how much you twist what you see online when everyone else trying to participate in thread can tell your info is as credible as OP. The way anons rope in random crap to make what she does seem more nefarious than it is just crazy.
>>173370A lot of what you posted is adding no credible sources to stuff or like anons have mentioned, stretching the truth to fit some warped narritive. If Connor knew Johnnie, thats not conclusive Nicole tried to force him to like her. Destery never said she cheated, taking Darcy's word isn't worth shit because she's absolutely known to lie to create drama and be needed (a narc as well), theres nothing to go against her being queerbaiting aside from anons desperately wanting it to be queerbaiting because it fits a nice little narritive (haven't posted anything not proving she is queerbaiting after all her constant mentions of loving girls, not the same as a one off kiss between bros like 'at a party'), Heather is a cunt and did go out of her way to harass Nicole too on side accounts which anons posted her screens from reddit even, but apparently that's not good enough, but a word from Darcy is lol
>just because she went to a hospital once or twiceCool, same mentally as just because Darcy agrees and is vague when anons contact her for
real facts, doesn't make it true
No. 173411
File: 1632141360824.jpeg (322 KB, 828x618, 1177D9EA-2971-452A-AF8F-751A57…)
>>173408It’s cause the Nicole stans are back
No. 173494
Im sorry but what is this bullshit thread please? I was looking if someone made a new one, right after the unsaging WK anon returned from his ban to shit up the thread for the hundredth time about how all milk is invalid anyways and we dont really know anything about innocent Nicole blabla, who now has the fucking audicity to gatekeep what can and can not be posted. And I'm pissed you didnt use the new threadpic we agreed upon.
>>>/w/171133Delete this wk sperging nonsense and make a new one. Seriously, these accusations and whining about vendetta are pathetic.
No. 173500
>>173490Other anons do the same posting spurts. Your logic literally goes both ways and mods have mentioned the vendetta posters use VPNs too, so maybe just stay on topic and use the thread as intended.
And the OP doesn't gatekeep anymire than other threads that have had to issue warnings, clear fake or exaggerated milk, and most clarify to not nitpick photos just because the thread is dry.
No. 173505
>>173370yep, and the anon thats too retarded to sage, who has been playing little dictator about what can and cannot be done, consistently screeches about the timeline having to be recent and aligned (completely disregarding that with new finds of old proof, conclusions can change when new - as in
new for
US - info is presented), so they demand evidence, and if the evidence is logically older to prove something just developing now, they screech about how its not recent, so not
valid. This loop concludes that either the timeline is not straight OR there is no evidence, which WK will choose either to keep complaining about. rinse and repeat.
We all know you wanna live in Nicoles butthole, but you never stopped these threads from happening and you never will.
No. 173507
>>173335you are already banned in meta, were banned multiple times for wking, please just let lolcow go.
The pathetic OP doesnt even list all the recent milk from the past threads, there is so much missing and I wanted the other picture anon made. Its a dickmove to ignore their work just because it depicts your holy nicole in a dark/funny way.
No. 173524
>>173520I made the fourth thread and tried to remain neutral (not basing milk on feelings, too subjective, stretching) because there was already so much drama overflowing with her getting fillers and the OF post about using the money to feed the family while they’re rich. I think this OP is too flaky, and scarcely talks about actual milk and instead is just fueled with hatred for anons that could easily be solved with the report function. See
>>173293 which is all recent drama OP didn’t include. So I’ll make a new thread which incorporates this as long as admin/farmhands don’t mind
No. 173544
>>173539I think you're assuming I'm the tripfag. Nothing I've said mentions anything about being tired of her or hating her. The /meta/ post doesn't say if its WKs or the Nicolespergs. You guys want her to be milky, then stop complaining. Ask the mods if you can make a new thread and just wait. You're no better than the OP. Nicolefags are all
toxic from both sides. No wonder the threads are unreadable.
No. 173551
>>173550I also kind of agree with
>>173496 I don't know who Darcy is because it's been hard to follow [someone please make a little summary of who everyone is so that newfags know who is being talked about], but if all she has to go of off for milk is her DMs, that's not really a source like anons have been saying, especially if she's somehow the main source for alls these different situations. That really is kind of weird.
No. 173554
File: 1632189951282.jpeg (150.55 KB, 1027x648, E8C9CF69-6C0A-4021-B618-98C6F7…)
>>173544>>173551Farmhand posted in the last thread thread as well as /meta/ after an anon complained about Darcy. It’s a WK.
No. 173568
New thread:
>>>/w/173567I incorporated the Darcy milk but mentioned she may have twisted the story since she’s also a mentally unstable cow.