[ Rules ] [ ot / g / m ] [ pt / snow / w ] [ meta ] [ Server Status ]

/2X/ - (XX)

gender critical and female politics
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File(20 MB max)
Video
Password (For post deletion)
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
| Catalog

Click here for an /ot/ image recovery update and to see if you can help!

File: 1704814540241.jpg (17.54 KB, 226x223, truth about religions.jpg)

No. 22093[Reply]

Probably it's the first thread like this, so all of us nonnas can vent about all the world religions and about why they are all misogynistic. I don't believe self-censorship is needed here.
26 posts and 3 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

No. 35626

>>35454
Hell not even men, look up “Love Has Won Mother God Amy Carlson” sometime. It’s telling that the only spiritual circles open for women are new age shit or Scientology-tier cults. Even in the new age-y stuff it’s surprisingly anti-feminist and nihilistic with ideas like “you’re whole existence is out of a want for you to experiences everything” and “it’s just one life of infinite ones and basically a split second so stop complaining, it will all be worth it” basically just spiritual bypassing to say that rape, war, murder, torture, abuse, etc. is all completely ok. I really would love to see someone say that someone like Junko Furuta “chose all that to happen in the name of love!” because no one would take that bullshit

No. 35635

>>35626
the names Ruth Barrett and Zsuzsanna Budapest don't ring any bells for you, do they.

No. 35753

>>22093
notice how it’s all moids in that picture screeching about which daddy dick is the mist powerful!!!!!! modern spiritual practices are filled with women with a few trannies and males trying to invade but it’s predominantly occupied by women. i love spiritualist, atheist and agnostic women ♥ even if atheist women think we believe in imaginary fairy tales i absolutely understand why they don’t believe in the supernatural

No. 35754

>>35299
>is there a religion that respects women
Coming from someone who actually believes in the spiritual, hell no. Don’t even seek out pagan/witchcraft circles, they are just as elitist and misogynistic as ever. I honestly think that women should proceed to completely let go of religion and even many spiritual traditions to be free. Even in circles where you might not even agree with their entire messages and ideology they still usher in the same woman-destroying bullshit like trannyism, gender confusion nonsense under the guise of “our souls aren’t defined by gender!!!!!!!” (ignoring the material reality of women’s suffering ofc). Even in places that are more poignant in how the world is spiritually constructed like the prison planet community it’s filled with men crying that their lives are miserable because they can’t get their cocks wiped cleaned just for existing. Men virtually ruin everything and they employ the same ridiculous tactics that is religion and for the seculars they now name religion celebrity fanfare and politics. Religion is an inherent force of control, it’s something people especially women should completely destroy and move away from. I also find the whole “mother goddess/mother mama” archetype highly unappealing and does nothing to better women’s lives, even the war female editors are always associated with motherhood even though creation is a lot more things than just shitting out babies, it’s pure uncontrollable, maddening dark chaos that can be terrifying

No. 35975

>>35753
I’m agnostic but I don’t get where much of the comfort from spirituality is. Like if you believe in Heaven do you not get disoriented by the fact that you will be there literally forever? If you believe in ghosts do the ghosts just float around space after the world ends and then float around the void after the universe dies? If you believe in reincarnation aren’t you scared by the idea of infinite future lives? Like you could go through a Graham’s Number worth of hellish lifetimes and it wouldn’t be anywhere close to ending, plus through all the infinite universes and infinite time you would reincarnate into eventually nothing in this lifetime would matter anymore? You’d eventually do everything including being born as a rapist incel so what’s the point of being feminist if that’s inevitable, give it enough time and eventually it will probably happen



File: 1648973794950.png (166.66 KB, 540x332, maleapprovalpoints.png)

No. 4526[Reply]

A place to discuss and vent about pickme or fake self-serving feminist behaviour you have witnessed or experienced, online or IRL, to post cringe screenshots or memes, theories and tinfoils etc.

This is separate from the tradthot general as it’s not just for discussing particular women with particular belief systems, as there are many kinds of pickme out there. However, trad-thottery can still be discussed as it is classified as pickme behaviour.

Pick Me General #1 >>>/2X/627
Handmaiden Thread >>>/ot/398608
692 posts and 143 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

No. 35623

>>35622
She is acting like a overdramatic bitch but there is some truth to her statement. Women here shit on women over every single things and the fandoms here are toxic asf.

No. 35624

>>35623
i don't disagree with that, but saying men aren't as cruel is either naive or just arguing in bad faith. mentioning lolcow on 4chan at all is pick-me worthy in all honesty.

No. 35692

>>35622
>men are less cruel
She doesn't see how she's playing the victim with retarded statements like this, kek? Wahwahwah the female boolies. Just laugh at them and do whatever you want the same way a man would, retard.
It's just pickme cope, crying about the meanie girls who pulled her pigtails because she she wants men to see her and be like "I-Is that a girl who likes BLUE ARCHIVE?!?!? And she knows IMAGEBOARDS and will TELL ME ABOUT THE GIRL BOARDS??? BUh buh she's based and on my sideirino?!?! ZOINKS gulp m-milady, I'm in your service".

No. 35709

>>35622
I can understand the complaint of fujo sperging and broadly friendly fire but men are contradictory and constantly friendly fire at each other too over stupid shit, this is just delusional. Does this pickme only consider it catty when women back bite? Men back bite constantly on chan boards, it's the basis of many threads. I don't agree with back biting unless it's to pickmes and fujos aren't pickmes. It's oddly strange how back biting cattiness and gossip isn't considered back biting cattiness and gossip if it's men doing it. Additionally there are multiple threads on /snow/ and /pt/ about men. There's a whole thread on passport bros, ignoring this just shows the want of cozying up for a crumb of scrote approval.
>Blue archive
>Men are less cruel uwu
Does she not know this gatcha pedoshit series of little girls' fanbase is composed entirely of pedofile wank bait and 2D anime child porn made by middle aged men? Does the last 2000 years of recorded human history and modern reality not exist to pickmes?

"Women have a need to appear victims"
>Incel movement
>MGTOW
>manosphere
>Jordan Peterson and many such incel grand daddy grifters
>Andrew Tate
>Sexpest tourism
>Epstein pedofile island
>Majority of crime committed by one gender yet still plays the victim
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

No. 35713

>>35622
Hope those 4chan smegmas pick her to lick their shit 24/7



File: 1726295862394.jpg (24.3 KB, 450x360, 360_F_43378187_2UghtI4Fj2mec0R…)

No. 33686[Reply]

Report rulebreaking posts in this thread and do not respond. This thread will be permanently locked if the state of posting does not improve.

A thread for blackpill feminism. Discuss heterosexual dynamics, female psychology, and the flaws of the feminist movement here.

If you disagree with the entire premise of the thread, you have no reason to enter it. Remember that entertaining disingenuous liberal feminist debate is running around in circles.

Previous thread >>31633
1174 posts and 81 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

No. 35683

LOCKING IMMINENT

Thread has exceeded 1200 posts and is about to be locked! Please create a new thread and post a link to it.

No. 35684

>>35677
God I love clitoral orgasms(do not encourage personalityfags)

No. 35687

>>35663
>I can’t relate to the ramblings in this thread
Then why are you here? God sake

No. 35689

>>35685
Yes, the anatomy is feminine and women love it. Women do not envy men and never will. Is that what you wanted to hear?

No. 35712

>>35639
Wtf is this



File: 1659079085038.jpg (246.67 KB, 800x800, Tumblr_l_502072421667743.jpg)

No. 6232[Reply]

All day every day in radfem, gc, terf, feminist, pinkpill what-have-you spaces you can find the phrase "no hope for women". I've typed it myself. And sometimes it feels good to acknowledge that despair, almost comforting, but in reality it just paralyzes us. Let's talk about what gives us hope instead.

>What gives you hope for women?

>Are there any women who inspire you? Not just feminists or in a feminist way, but admirable women in general
>What do you think should be the next step for the feminist movement?
>Can you think of an action anons could take today to advance the liberation of women, however small?
90 posts and 19 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

No. 14541

>>7039
>also the sad reality is that without actual military support this uprising will fail
That's the unspoken part of this mythology and the most blackpilling point for me, that all of this is actually wanted (where it exists), allowed by the moids.

To clarify, there are two very distinct topics being discussed here.

The first is separatism >>14537
. It is achievable and already exists without the moids in power having directly created it. They tacitly allow it, probably don't care, and I can't see these groups disappearing anytime soon unless they were to be presented as "deviant sects". For me, this is the healthiest, most accessible and achievable way and the one that allows a total separation, even if it could be subject to troonish infiltration attempts.

The second is the gain of influence in the moid society >>6681 , the access to positions of responsibility, the taking of power in the current system. It seems illusory to me. Generally, for a fundamental social change to occur, there has to be an insurrection, or even a revolution. There have been militant women, even feminist fighters, but nothing analogous. All that was allowed and phagocytized by the moids, at least some moids, the wealthy and powerful ones, obviously. However, the internet has really allowed for the emergence of real mass alternative currents created organically, and this is a note of hope. Too bad it can't exist in a country like Iran that has tight control over its intranet.


But until women have the physical, or at least material (guns), capacity to lead an insurgency, this is all mostly wishful thinking. Even if it seems to be materializing in reality, all this is actually very precarious. To take an extreme case, see Afghanistan. I know it's not quite comparable because religion is much more important there, including for women, but the way everything turned around in just a few days blew my mind. Nothing is ever immutable and the greatest empires have collapsed, but our foundations depend entirely on their goodwill, or rather their interests.

No. 18603

Seeing how many women can now stand on their own feet and leave their abusive parents, partners, etc. compared to 20 years or so ago gives me hope. Men are losing their minds over the divorce statistics because they're mad we can finally leave them when we're in unhappy marriages.

No. 18639

The fact that even young girls on TikTok are waking up to the bullshit and rejecting the tranny narrative.

No. 18651

>>18639
Post caps of it! I wanna see but I ain't going on that cursed data stealing app kek

No. 35128

File: 1728323286177.jpg (72.36 KB, 837x179, huh.jpg)

>>10795
This is very enlightening. No wonder the most patriarchal societies run on scam, like India.



File: 1685702385129.jpeg (16.36 KB, 275x244, 1620635678657.jpeg)

No. 15258[Reply]

Manifesto-chan was a lolcow poster who graced us with her keen and accurate insight. Part artist, part scientist and 100% misandrist. Post your favourite manifesto-chan caps here.

Some commonly used manifesto-chan words below if you want to do your own searching.
"false self"
"cuckoldry anxiety"
"mate guarding"
"coercion"
"sales tactics"
"deference"
"artificial niche carving"
"parasitism"
234 posts and 110 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

No. 29107

File: 1722128870180.png (83.01 KB, 1863x251, screenshot.png)


No. 34837

>>20757
> I can't accept womanhood because of the sado masochistic human sexuality that's naturally abusive and women and men make me unconformable with it and the norm is to accept this degrading shit just cause wonen do it

It’s definitely not the norm. NGL anon you have a very polarized view of manhood and womanhood almost on par with incels judging from your post. I don’t deny it exists but it’s not as big as you’re making it out to be. There are tons of neutral spaces that don’t revolve around men or woman giving to men. And there are a lot of people who don’t give into the game of gender roles. You really should stop having such a black and white view of the world because what you’re describing is such a small echelon of what the actual male and female experience is, it’s alarming that you don’t (or can’t) see it. I know heterosexual couples be weird as hell but the real world is not at all like how you’re describing it. The truth is You don’t have to worry about men usurping you if you have proper boundaries and healthy self-esteem, and care about yourself. After that, you’re pretty much impenetrable. Unfortunately some woman choose that life with men. No disrespect but, It shouldn’t be on your radar at all to worry about these things, if you have your shit together.

No. 34857

>>34837
>There are tons of neutral spaces that don’t revolve around men or woman giving to men
Care to recommend any?

>And there are a lot of people who don’t give into the game of gender roles.

Where would one find these women?

No. 35024

>>20757
>women can give birth therefore women are designed to only be broodmares and nothing else

why do people always say this? Especially when women have so much more intellectual and creative potential than males.
It's like saying that because males have their prostate deep inside their assholes the male body is designed for anal rape only and nothing else. Which would make more sense actually seeing how men are all huge faggots who crave cock 24/7.

No. 35228

>>34837
>u have a very polarized view of manhood and womanhood almost on par with incels judging from your post.
That's because a human man and a woman are a polarity and gender in humans is a physical construct and sex is a fundamental part of the reality. We as women have a femininie voice, sexual anatomy and physiognomy and men have a masculine.
>And there are a lot of people who don’t give into the game of gender roles.
Never met real exceptions or sex that was an expectation of the universal rule created by the structure of the physical reality. One woman had a username called littlefitcumslut and talked about how gender non conforming she is.
>what the actual male and female experience is, it’s alarming that you don’t (or can’t) see it
I'm literally basing it all on observations of real human behaviors all around me and everywhere else in the world
>After that, you’re pretty much impenetrable
The female body was made to be penetrated.
You are literally dismissive of facts about real life we experience from the second we are born which is human biology. None of what you wrote changes the fact that as a woman if I had sex I would be a bottom and feminine. The sexual polarity we embody as humans is never changeable and it's a biological femininity(women) and masculinity (men). Dick is or penetrative with it's anatomy therefore it psychologically creates male sexuality and vagina is receptive, it also creates female sexuality mentally and makes them identify with sexual submission and femininity. Even what sex is is universal for everyone and not whatever you make it to be. Even "normal" sexual acts are sadomasochistic and involve deep female vulnerability and a submission which makes her mental state a similar to that of a bdsm sub.



File: 1652719199311.png (129.34 KB, 672x456, FS32wxXWYAIrWr2.png)

No. 5309[Reply]

a thread for those who identity with strains of feminism while also holding cultural or political right wing and or nationalist beliefs, please don't come here for the purpose of infighting
1157 posts and 95 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

No. 24372

>>24339
I saw this when that female politician in Germany got arrested and convicted for showing people this. It will be a shame when the German people are destroyed, they are a beautiful and unique culture.

No. 26156

>>22583
>jewish poles
shut up kike, your stupid ancestors squatted on my people's land, enjoyed being a priviledged caste and occupied our cities, you have no ties to our land and you're just two faced shits who only got enabled by cucked kings who cared more about money. all jews alive will be dead by 2030 and all migrant scum your leftoid asses flooded europe with will be either hanged or decapitated like kikes. orthodog kike women will be scalped, leftoid whores like you will have your stupid noses cut off. kike babies will be hanged(back to /pol/)

No. 28457

Indian men should all get drafted in Canada

No. 28564

>>28457
hell no, it's already a shithole here because of those moids already. but i don't want to send them back to india to their women, the only solution is to eject them all into space

No. 34913

I just saw a post on instagram calling for “BIPOC” performers for a show, and saying it to mean “everyone but white people”. white people ARE the indigenous population of england. Why is it bad to say that? White english people are genuinely a minority in so many places in our own country, especially in cities. I’m honestly sick of being going into town and hearing like every other person speaking a foreign language, and simultaneously being treated as if I am an “privileged” for being white, even though I am working class, and in fact actively excluded from things in my own country.



File: 1653559502915.jpeg (64.59 KB, 615x410, word-image-115.jpeg)

No. 5459[Reply]

I have been getting more and more frustrated recently with the "radical feminism" some people in radfem communities practise. It's especially apparent here in lc, since we have anonymity - though I have ran across it in radblr etc too. Women saying INCREDIBLY misogynistic shit (cockbreath, dick worshipper, e-semen brain pick me….) to other women they deem unpure, "gender traitors/sleeping with the enemy".

I truly admire women practising separatism or 4W and the like. It is not for me personally (not yet at least), but I respect their choice and dedication. However, I cannot see how the borderline psychotic hatred some women have for like 90% of all other women is feminism. Hating men and male violence is more than justified - but some "radfems" seem to put way too much of their anger into women who choose to interact with men in any way. There are women who deserve criticism for doing vile shit for male attention, but having some lame ass boyfriend and posting on lolcow is not one of them in my opinion.

I'm just so incredibly tired of running from male misogyny to female-exclusive spaces, only to find out the same shit with a pink bow on top.
481 posts and 44 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

No. 33955

I notice another thing with these groups is that they don't deem abuse by women as actual abuse. They'll often invalidate female survivors of female abusers, e.g. moms or ex girlfriends.

No. 33956

>>33917
I don't understand how this is misogynistic in any capacity. If he won't marry to establish a family then why breed with him? Nothing disgusts me more than seeing women with kids, and she's unmarried, but her children have a different last name. If he won't marry you they should have your last name at the very least, you fucking grew them in your womb and have primary custody but he gets the glory of passing on his legacy with 0 commitment.

No. 33972

>>5459
It makes sense because the amount of times you see women dedicating everything to shitty men for years and getting NOTHING in return is insane. We should pretend its all fine and not tell you how stupid you look, why? After all that you still ask for respect? You have to fucking earn it. Marrying some rich douche and throwing your identity down the tubes for points doesn't get any respect from me its just sad. Look if you're stupid as shit enough to stay with the dumbass in your life.. and then proceed to complain about men in general, im going to let you know. You're not above getting an earful about your stupidity just because you're a woman. A lot of women are simply out of touch with how insane they look. I've given up on trying to understand what goes through their little moid-obsessed pig brains. I'm not sure what you want from me? Sympathy? Commeraderie? Over what exactly? You sell your soul and your life to stay with a shit moid and pump out his shit crotchlings and proceed to abandon every shred of joy, creativity, individuality for what? What do you want from me? I don't owe you sympathy if this is how you choose to unravel your life.

No. 33993

>>33972
Based and individualistic. But there's a reason why fuck all people would know of Grace Hopper but everyone knows of some broodmare sex tape nude leaked pop artist. You can only blame men for so long, if you don't recognize women are part of the problem things will never change.

>What do you want from me?

To join the moid worship death cult and/or to assure them they're not in the wrong.

No. 34882

>>33972
>implying someone, let alone a woman, talks to your neet ass irl.
But seriously, you are not doing anything favourable for woman with that miserable, devoid of empathy, moid-like attitude. Idk if you are an under 20 years old, or a very sheltered individual but if you pay attention to these woman, you hear them, you make them feel safe by not judging them, you could actually help a woman who is in a shitty relation to step out.
Even you could help a DA victim, you never know what kind of hell these woman are enduring.
And you could teach them about feminism too. You should get down from your high horse and do fieldwork, because shitposting in a mongolian weaving forum is doing nothing for women.



File: 1723574421710.jpeg (856.4 KB, 2896x2896, wnH6Ki1.jpeg)

No. 31633[Reply]

A thread for blackpill feminism. Discuss heterosexual dynamics, female psychology, and the flaws of the feminist movement here.

If you disagree with the entire premise of the thread, you have no reason to enter it. Remember that entertaining disingenuous liberal feminist debate is running around in circles.

Previous thread >>30265
1100 posts and 84 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

No. 33681

>>33678
The only thing i can think of is me shitting on women who call themselves lesbians then suck dick, then saying you can't trust even "lesbians" to not be cocksuckers, I'm a sensitive person with anxiety due to fear of harsh situations in human life and normies scares me, normie behaviors scare me, and I have a phobia of sex as well due to obvious reasons
Other reason I can think of is the anger, and last reason is me complaining on my twitter circle about you drooling over a 12yo Natalie Portman
, but I didn't even talk about this topic in probably a year, I talked about it cause I talked about all women in general being annoying
None of your words have any meaning if all you do is lie, and yes you did harras me and engage in that

No. 33683

>>33682
Do you have a memory loss?

No. 33684

LOCKING IMMINENT

Thread has exceeded 1200 posts and is about to be locked! Please create a new thread and post a link to it.

No. 33688

>>33642
>Is it a result of the twitter likes going private
No it's just a result of Elon taking over Twitter and allowing this type of stuff to be shared. On Twitter you can see straight up softcore cp, zoophile porn, /Pol/ tard memes and gore with over 1k-90k likes

No. 35118

>>33642
>still using twitter
thats your first mistake. only the most depraved of moids use social media.



File: 1726108518689.png (524.71 KB, 720x707, fem.png)

No. 33444[Reply]

A thread for all your questions about feminism. It doesn't matter if you're a newbie or simply unsure about something, please feel free to ask anything pertaining to feminism over here. Opinions may vary, please don't infight. There's no such thing as a stupid question.

No. 33445

I've been watching a reality show as of lately, and in that show there's a girl that, because she was very vocal about some other contestant being a misogynist pig (he is) she became a "feminist icon" of some sort in my third world country for a week and a half (the guy had to abandon the show because of how much he verbally aggravated others, including the girl). But actually looking at her actions, besides of what she did to the stupid misogynistic guy, she also acts very aggressive and mean with her fellow female contestants, wants male validation, and there's rumours she might have hit her mother before the reality started. People on social media really tried their best to make her into a local feminist resistance icon but I don't think she is one. She calls other women bitches and always tried to get on with a guy that doesn't even like her the entire season and got jealous of her own friends for being friends with the guy. She even tried to use feminism against another woman just because that woman held hands with the guy ("how dare you touch him against his consent" etc, she thought the woman touched him in his privates but she only held hands). My question is, what are you supposed to do in these cases? Am I supposed to celebrate this? Am I being a bad person for pointing out the way she's absolutely not a feminist to my own understanding?

No. 33567

File: 1726221169298.png (239.18 KB, 2732x2048, img_0027.png)

Can any kind nonna give their thoughts on this article?
>The Mother of All Same-Sex Parenting Studies
>Since 1957 the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s National Center for Health Statistics has annually interviewed between 35,000 and 40,000 households, collecting data on 75,000 to 100,000 individuals comprising a nationally representative sample of the civilian noninstitutionalized population of the United States. The present study examines combined 1997-2013 NHIS data, consisting of information on 1,598,006 persons, including 207,007 sample children. This sample included 2,751 same sex couples—2,304 cohabiting and 447 spousal—consisting of 1,387 male couples and 1,384 female couples; 582 couples—406 female and 176 male—had children under age 18 in the home. A more extensive battery of health questions, including the measures of emotional health used in this study, was completed for 512 children sampled, one per family, from the same-sex parenting families.
>Dr. Sullins, who analyzed the NHIS data, concludes:
>The higher risk of emotional problems for children in same-sex parent families has little or nothing to do with the quality of parenting, care, or other relational characteristics of those families.
>If the greatest benefits for child well-being are conferred only on the biological offspring of both parents;
>•and since same-sex relationships cannot, at least at present, conceive a child that is the biological offspring of both partners, in the way that every child conceived by opposite-sex partners is such;
>• then same-sex partners, no matter how loving and committed, can never replicate the level of benefit for child well-being that is possible for opposite-sex partners.

>This defect, moreover, is an essential and permanent feature of same-sex relationships; it is part of their definition, an irreducible difference that cannot be amended or abrogated by improving the circumstances, stability, legal status or social acceptance of same-sex couples.


>The primary benefit of marriage for children may not be that it tends to present them with improved parents (more stable, financially affluent, etc., although it does do this)
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

No. 33672

>>33567
Haven’t read it but Googled “mother of all same sex parenting studies” and found this.
https://whatweknow.inequality.cornell.edu/topics/lgbt-equality/what-does-the-scholarly-research-say-about-the-wellbeing-of-children-with-gay-or-lesbian-parents/

> We identified 79 scholarly studies that met our criteria for adding to knowledge about the well-being of children with gay or lesbian parents. Of those studies, 75 concluded that children of gay or lesbian parents fare no worse than other children. While many of the sample sizes were small, and some studies lacked a control group, researchers regard such studies as providing the best available knowledge about child adjustment, and do not view large, representative samples as essential. We identified four studies concluding that children of gay or lesbian parents face added disadvantages. Since all four took their samples from children who endured family break-ups, a cohort known to face added risks, these studies have been criticized by many scholars as unreliable assessments of the well-being of LGB-headed households.


This is an interesting note: some studies include parents who come out as gay, divorce, and remarry as examples of gay parents, when this is obviously an unusual and highly stressful situation. I don’t know if the study you mentioned accounts for this. Try to look up meta-analyses of same sex parenting outcomes that examine multiple studies, those tend to be more useful than a single study as they reveal statistical trends. This blog post explains the use of them: https://slatestarcodex.com/2014/12/12/beware-the-man-of-one-study/

There’s not a lot of interest in pickiPost too long. Click here to view the full text.



File: 1677161085582.jpg (89.46 KB, 736x736, unnamed.jpg)

No. 10602[Reply]

Hola. Abro este thread para hablar sobre el feminismo en Latino América y España, sabiendo que en muchos de nuestros países se está viendo nuevas corrientes feministas, tanto radfems como libfems. Sean bienvenidas para hablar sobre todo lo referente a esto, incluyendo manifestaciones, nuevas legislaciones, cosas que vean en internet o en la vida real, cifras importantes, incluso drama, o cualquier experiencia o idea que tengas al respecto y quieras compartir, etcétera.
43 posts and 12 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

No. 25476

>>25226
No sé cuál es la tensión entre el PFAC y el Partido Feminista, ojalá hubiera más solidaridad entre ellas. En lo que respecta al número de votos, la verdad es que ya se presentaron en el 2019 y obtuvieron un número extremadamente similar de votos, por lo que en realidad no se ha avanzado mucho en cuanto a difusión del partido. Estoy de acuerdo con que es exasperante, quizás las cosas tengan que ponerse más negras para que entre nosotras haya más unidad.
>En el año 2085 (con suerte estaré muerta para ese entonces) los políticos de "izquierda" irán a los mitines con maquillaje drag y pelucas, y los de derecha se podrán a hacer flexiones todos a una fuenteovejuna, como mongoles que son, a lo Milei o a lo Llados. Vamos camino de convertir el mundo en la mismísima película "Idiocracia". Triste.
Sí, vamos hacia esto, un motivo más para no tener hijas, no podría vivir pensando que en la sociedad tan estúpida en la que les tocaría vivir.
>¿Por cierto, visteis eso de que PSOE propuso lo de que se aboliese la prostitución, pero Sumar voto en contra?
No me había enterado, tengo que informarme más sobre como funciona exactamente el modelo nórdico.
> Se calcula, según datos del Ministerio del Interior, que hay unas 45.000 mujeres explotadas sexualmente en España.
Joder
> Viendo lo que ha pasado con lo de la ley de abolición, me hace preguntarme si quizá PSOE despertará al ver que aliarse con los podemitas, Sumar y demás neoliberales de tres al cuarto no ha hecho más que dañar su imagen y hacerles perder votos.
No tengo muchas esperanzas con el PSOE. Me parece que harán lo que haga falta para mantenerse en el poder, ojalá me equivoque.

No. 26568

File: 1720722346729.png (199.87 KB, 1500x357, Captura de pantalla 2024-07-11…)

Quiero a-loggear de una manera más fuerte en estos momentos…
>El capítulo muestra que la solución no está en demonizar el porno o cómo el control parental de los dispositivos electrónicos no nos asegura que nuestros hijos no tengan acceso a videos X.
Toma castaña. La manera en la que los pedófilos están haciéndole grooming a los niños hoy en día es bestial. El internet fue un puto error. Joder.
Este documental lo televisaron en una cadena local, por cierto. Cuando vi el título ("Generación porno") pensé que iba a ser una docuserie que criticase el porno, el daño que ha hecho, la normalización de la hipersexualización, etc. Básicamente porque esa cadena de televisión local la ven mayormente abuelitos y gente de mediana edad (muchos de derechas y/o católicos). Pero no, resulta que es una docuserie proporno, claro que sí.

No. 32558

File: 1724039188694.webp (23.5 KB, 680x675, GVTQU_7bsAANbE5.jpg)

les dejo este meme

No. 32584

File: 1724094927432.png (485 KB, 720x782, IMG_20240819_131319.png)


No. 33560

>>24397
Los insultos misóginos como "zorra", "perra" y "puta" incluso son usados libremente por las artistas de pop y reggaeton y toda esa mierda para referirse a sí mismas, y esas canciones las escuchan y las bailan las niñas adolescentes de todo el mundo hispano como si nada. No solo eso, sino que es "normal" que estas niñas perreen con canciones extremadamente pornográficas en las que a la mujer se le trata como esclava sexual (y lo disfruta)… Me quiero matar

Ni siquiera interpretaba el uso de la palabra "mariconez" en esa canción como una opinión del autor sobre los homosexuales. Pensé que lo decía el personaje de la canción, que resultaba ser un macho que se creía demasiado "hombre" para las cosas sentimentales y cursis.



Delete Post [ ]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
| Catalog | Search
[ Rules ] [ ot / g / m ] [ pt / snow / w ] [ meta ] [ Server Status ]