[ Rules ] [ ot / g / m ] [ pt / snow / w ] [ meta ] [ Server Status ]

/2X/ - (XX)

gender critical and female politics
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File(20 MB max)
Video
Password (For post deletion)
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
| Catalog

Read the rules and usage info before posting.

The VPN ban is now in effect on /ot/, see this update post for more information

File: 1578980825578.jpg (65.24 KB, 1128x635, el-viento-se-levanta-imagen-de…)

No. 1821[Reply]

With the admin's verdict on /2X/ (and pink pill related topics as a whole) announced, where should farmers who want to discuss female politics head to?
The current options seem to be:
>New imageboard
>Migration to other, existing imageboards
>Migration to Reddit
As far as the first option goes, we may be able to create a space on https://8kun.top/ or https://endchan.net/ using their board creation functions. The only downside is that both places are also home to all sorts of unsavory males (virulent racists, pedophiles, pornography junkies, manosphere users, etc).
We could also create our own standalone board/site, though we'd need someone with the proper skills for that. Post any thoughts/suggestions on /2X/ migration here.
450 posts and 46 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

No. 3717

>>3716
Okay, where are the links then?

No. 3718

>>3717
if the invite's expired, feel free to ask for a new one in the chat!

No. 3721

>>3698
No, it's mostly one butthurt anti-gc/pp anon falseflagging like a lunatic.



File: 1576671614730.jpg (19.89 KB, 768x512, Knna2Lf.jpg)

No. 1[Reply]

This is a test-board to assess if a female space for politics will be sufficient in giving everybody what they want while removing some tension in /ot/.

This is not currently permanent but, it can be.
If this board works out then I will make it a permanent board next year. For now you all have the choice of posting in the /ot/ thread or making new threads here. It's your choice.

No. 2

/ot/ rules apply for now. If you have rule requests or any complaints then you can post about it here >>>/meta/11760
Don’t make threads targeting specific nationalities, ethnicities, or races. You can discuss policy and government all you like but don't racebait. It is a global rule violation, this isn't /pol/.



File: 1733346679213.png (267.43 KB, 594x451, Jennie-Gage-Substack-12-04-202…)

No. 37308[Reply]

Source : https://substack.com/home/post/p-149034490

Moral of the story :

> Never give up your financial autonomy for marriage and children

> Never assume that your man is never going to cheat, or use protection while cheating
> Never have sex without protection with your partner, no matter how long you've been together
> If you end up a homemaker, find side hustles to help you accumulate money on the side
1 post omitted. Click reply to view.

No. 39056

>>38505

How bad is it exactly for you ?

No. 39154

>>37308
Tradwives don't exist anymore. Unless you count 80+ geriatrics.

No. 39157

>>39154
they don't even exist now, it's just larping

No. 39389

>>39154
They exist in very religious communities, and many more traditional or 3rd world cultures across the world. Many women also get hoodwinked into a 'tradwife' lifestyle if they are financially dependent on their husband or babytrapped. Idk how y'all are defining the term tradwife because a hell of a lot of women are stuck living these sorts of lives today, no matter their age. The majority of marriages consist of the woman bearing the brunt of the domestic labour and taking care of a manchild, the main difference between the past and now is that the wives now are also taking on jobs and bringing the income simultaneously.

No. 39443

>>39389
Part of me believes that this whole trend is merely the natural progression of the soft life mindset where a bunch of women fantasize about doing nothing in life and hoodwinking men into giving them the princess treatement and doing nothing beside chilling and vibing at home, while occasionally doing some softcore chores like baking a cake. It's quite easy to see how this is nothing short of an unrealistic fantasy built on many wrong assumptions, the main two being :

> Men will have no issue providing anything their wives wishes for to maintain their comfort


> Taking care of the house and raising children (even more than one) is much easier than office jobs



File: 1729611310176.jpg (52.87 KB, 338x507, istockphoto-178490867-170667a.…)

No. 35690[Reply]

Final warning: report and ignore rulebreaking posts and ban evaders or this thread will be locked

A thread for blackpill feminism. Discuss heterosexual dynamics, female psychology, and the flaws of the feminist movement here.

If you disagree with the entire premise of the thread, you have no reason to enter it. Remember that entertaining disingenuous liberal feminist debate is running around in circles.

Previous thread >>33686
1099 posts and 132 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

No. 39429

>>39427
This tumblr post is a spot on description of women and the general culture that women live and breathe, but it has the wrong conclusion. This is the same tired libfem spew thats been parroted for decades now by anyone critical of the bare minimum degradation, rape normalising, abuse normalising, porn normalising, pedofile normalising, autopedofile culture of mainstream women, that most women hold. Women also egg each other on in this culture and discourage anyone speaking out about it critically. It's funny that their conclusion is the women doing this of their OWN accord are somehow the victims of big mean men. So much for women "genuinely feeling agency". What about the agency to degrade yourself as a woman because you enjoy it? No one ever addresses this, it's incredibly common yet women are radio silent about it. This is where the Madonna whore dichotomy originates from. The inborn conflict women have In their own degrading behavior and feelings that doesn't fit with ideas of human decency and rights. Men are missing this when it comes to homicidal acts and psychopathic cruelty, they are allowed to murder and rape at will and encourage it for other men. Women are missing it when it comes to sexual depravity and dignity, and also because of the insane treatment by men and the latent biology of women they also have the same psychopathic cruelty towards other women, it's just often passive and not after upon like men with murder and rape against women. There is no patriarchy because men have inherent superiority due to their biological strength. This in the form of politics and control is just extension of the aforementioned strength, you can call it patriarchy and act like women are victims but they agree with this superiority and don't challenge it, they simply want to live within it peacefully and remain depraved behind closed doors and dignified in public and around other women. This reminds me of a post in one of the earliest BP threads of how anons were debating whether cocksucker is misogynistic of a term. It's descriptive and the offense comes from the act which is seen is degrading and pathetic by other women, but to men is positive so the cocksucker claims it's "misogynistic" because it's referring to all women, when it isn't it's referring to a disgusting behavior that the cocksucker does. One womaPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

No. 39434

who keeps posting stuff then deleting it

No. 39435

>>39429
what was the tumblr post

No. 39440

>>39438
I think it's partially a result of what a lot of left based ideologies struggle with, which is that they think in order for an oppressed group to be worthy of support, they have to be pure victims. No grey area or co-existence of beliefs is allowed. You can see this in the way they approach racism and other forms of bigotry expressed by minority groups that are oppressed themselves. Another part of me believes that a lot of radical feminists are just ashamed of female sexuality. Whilst other feminists accept it and embrace it, radical ones are in denial about it. I remember reading about a supposedly radfem lesbian discord but the lesbian chat in the discord was just filled with bisexual women admitting that they feel like they were lesbians because their attraction to men was masochistic which is inherently patriarchal therefore unnatural and a result of socialisation. So they were really lesbian. It must feel better to blame it all on the patriarchy than dive deeper into the discomforting thought that maybe women are the ying, to mens yang. Men get off to degrading, women get off to being degraded. etc.

No. 39442

>>39440
Where are you retards coming from?



File: 1690251232503.png (1.17 MB, 1067x1690, young-woman-looking-mirror-por…)

No. 17556[Reply]

I've noticed that in the GC community, rf and adjacent communities there are plenty of women who talked about having dysphoria (and some are detrans). So I've made a thread for this topic.
522 posts and 41 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

No. 39415

>>39312
Someone should have sent your entire family to Auschwitz.(a-logging/infighting)

No. 39425

Watching women in gender ideology hate thread shitting themselves up and proving our point makes me think why do I even take them serious in the first place

No. 39432

>>39425
Watching you prove my point that you pooner fuckers are all worthless to society, histrionic, pathetic wastes of flesh is enough for me.

No. 39433

>>39425
I should murder as much of you pooners as possible.(alog)

No. 39439

>>39436
I'll gladly lock you pooner fuckers up in solitary confinement where you belong. You are clinically insane and don't deserve any freedom.



File: 1730918036048.jpg (141.35 KB, 1200x675, for-4B-1200x675.jpg)

No. 36210[Reply]

What is the 4B movement?
>4B (or "Four Nos") is a feminist movement which is purported to have originated in South Korea in 2019. Its proponents refuse to date men, get married, have sex with men, or have children.
"Female separatism" is another term that could describe this in English.
Discuss ways women can support themselves and other women while decentering and ignoring men in their own lives. Some starter questions:
>Are you 4B?
>Have you talked to any women in your life about going 4B?
>Do you plan on moving in with women instead of trying to split cost of living with a boyfriend?
589 posts and 47 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

No. 38893

>>38888
this post has me considering trying out D&D, if there are other celibate/4B moid avoiders to befriend on there.

If I may ask and if you happen to see this, how/where in D&D did you find them? Ill understand if you dont want to say outright, due to any moid lurkers.

Wish there were more places/sites to meet 4B friends in the know.

No. 38894

File: 1742960237003.png (84.81 KB, 662x744, ihhiuhh.png)

found this post on tumblr and it's really peak

No. 38907

>>38894
Yup, this is exactly what put me off a lot of radfem spaces in general. Then again, as a lesbian, I’ve always noticed it. Just could never articulate it as well as this person did.

No. 38962

File: 1743536793950.jpg (73.15 KB, 641x576, 302423423.jpg)

>>38893
Didn't see this until now, sorry! Did a few meetups and found a group specifically looking for women players. Was just extremely lucky to arrive and find women my age that weren't troons or handmaidens. I'd recommend libraries/local event sites, volunteering at women's shelters, and book clubs. Also depends on how high your husbandofag tolerance is. Lesbians make up my closest friends, but shut-in women who are disillusioned or repulsed by real men and cope with fantastical delusions are more common.

Wishing you luck, nona! Every woman deserves a loving friend group. They're out there.

No. 39426

On the same note as >>38893 how does one meet well-adjusted non-moid centered women irl? I live in a very liberal city, and I swear it’s the worst in a special way because people here just stick to their privileged liberal enclaves (most people here are college educated and at least middle class) so they’re under a false sense of security. As a result libfem and gendie rhetoric runs wild and anything that goes against it gets you labeled as whatever phobic.



File: 1732121329197.jpeg (222.68 KB, 1083x727, tr000000n.jpeg)

No. 37086[Reply]

175 posts and 150 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

No. 39369

File: 1746300273704.jpeg (93.68 KB, 888x499, 1666632523532.jpeg)


No. 39370

>>39369
>no vagina
>no tits
>opt out of misogyny succesfully
Hmm(go back)

No. 39387

File: 1746493695247.jpg (89.14 KB, 960x957, 7567577.jpg)

God I wish more billionaires could be like JK Rowling.
We need to ban men from having money, any income they make should go straight to his mother/wife/next female of kin.

No. 39417

File: 1746770051208.jpeg (82.51 KB, 1125x713, IMG_6165.jpeg)

i love stealing from gender ideology thread

No. 39418

File: 1746773552540.png (1.69 MB, 2048x1946, IMG_6164.png)

accidentally based terf comic from a troon



File: 1735852140139.png (146.8 KB, 1321x667, 1735848957473.png)

No. 37715[Reply]

I got this idea from picrel:
https://retractionwatch.com/2015/07/21/to-our-horror-widely-reported-study-suggesting-divorce-is-more-likely-when-wives-fall-ill-gets-axed
We need to avoid spreading bad information. Whenever we link to debunked or retracted studies in discussions, it only discredits the case for feminists, not unlike the once oft-repeated claim that the world would be underwater by 2005 harmed the environmentalist movement in the eyes of the public. Our arguments need to be strong and factually-based.
In this thread, post any studies or data that pertain to women's rights (eg labor, relationships, crime, domestic violence, sexuality, etc) you've seen shared around that are debunked, misleading or inaccurate. If possible, supplement things with more context and better studies.

No. 37719

File: 1735864190125.png (250.5 KB, 428x413, 434354343434.png)

First one is when moids bring up that men's domestic abuse shelters were closed by rabid feminists, specifically bringing up Erin Pizzey.
Here is an excerpt from Pizzeys own book that shows the real reason why mens abuse shelters don't work out.

No. 37729

>>37719
I remember this, but forgot the names involved. Thanks, anon.

No. 39414

>>37719
Which book is this from?



File: 1637582008671.jpg (41.29 KB, 640x714, e8sftobwn6121.jpg)

No. 3774[Reply]

While all religion are awful and subjugate women, none is worse then the religion of the Arab pedophile and that is undeniable, so this is a thread to discuss its evils and crimes against everyone but especially the women subjugated under it
436 posts and 103 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

No. 39208

File: 1745044472615.jpg (270.2 KB, 1299x566, Untitled.jpg)

Check out this new milk thread
>>>/snow/2109604

No. 39255

>>39208
They literally only do it for moids too

No. 39361

>>38992
how the fuck did the UK fall so hard

No. 39372

File: 1746347058424.png (227.99 KB, 898x850, IMG_5318.png)


No. 39406

File: 1746693527052.jpg (79.51 KB, 576x1024, 1000003661.jpg)

Then take it off or don't do law, simple. Or work in commercial litigation or something. It's not that hard to not require everything to bootride your religious bullshit. I don't care if it's harsh but religion of any kind should not have any place within the state or within law. Self awarewolf



File: 1742758185205.jpg (180.46 KB, 780x593, ovarit.jpg)

No. 38865[Reply]

Since Ovarit is closing down, with no back-up plans from the admin, it's up to the users to archive all of its content. Archive whatever you like and post the links here!
https://ovarit.com/o/Announcements/676340/ovarit-is-closing
9 posts and 4 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

No. 39061

File: 1744092938768.jpg (165.3 KB, 728x551, w.jpg)

Lana and Lily Wachowski - https://archive.ph/XKoJU
Is the new Matrix movie a Genderwoo propaganda piece by Wachowski disguised as a sci-fi movie? - https://archive.ph/LmWpd
From the memory hole: Rolling Stone's Wachowski piece - https://archive.ph/unC9L
Elliot Page, Lilly Wachowski Join ACLU Lawsuit Against Arkansas Anti-Trans Law - https://archive.ph/NKZuX
Lily Wachowski explains that trans porn made him trans - https://archive.ph/hRG1r
The Mystery of Larry Wachowski | Rolling Stone - https://archive.md/VZzfY

No. 39095

>>38998
>service disabled in private mod
Ghost Archive is fishy as hell, if you ask me.

No. 39296

File: 1745736749734.jpg (76.91 KB, 771x277, 656.jpg)


No. 39359

>>39296
I wish i spent more time archiving. I missed my chance to secure contact info with one of these ladies. I feel like shit

No. 39399

There is an archive of the entire site being worked on. It should be finished later this month.



Delete Post [ ]
Previous [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
| Catalog | Search
[ Rules ] [ ot / g / m ] [ pt / snow / w ] [ meta ] [ Server Status ]