[ Rules ] [ ot / g / m ] [ pt / snow / w ] [ meta ] [ Server Status ]

/meta/ - site discussion

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File(20 MB max)
Video
Password (For post deletion)

The site maintenance is completed but lingering issues are expected, please report any bugs here

File: 1677128520290.png (2.66 MB, 1920x1200, tinfoil.png)

No. 53472

This is a containment thread for meta discussion that doesn't fall into complaints and suggestions. Feel free to tinfoil or talk about the state of the site but try to avoid being too autistic.

If cerbmin needs to hear it, post it here. We occasionally monitor the complaints/suggestions thread as well. Please keep in mind we all have full-time jobs and tending the farm is a passion project. Changes may be slow, but we will prioritize quality over speed. We will do our best, anon!
First thread: >>51182

Previous responses to anon:
>>51190 hellweek plans, moderation practices
>>51207 moderation practices
>>51219 server costs, plans for implementing captcha
>>51222 priorities
>>51246 addressing tinfoils
>>51282 site speed
>>51325 lost /m/ threads, improving transparency
>>51381 introductions, regarding farmhands revealing IP addresses
>>51666 addressing Blaine/Elaine/tranny accusations, plans for old staff, plan for off-site updates page, regarding spam/CP
>>52298 lost /m/ threads, speed of site, closing lolcow Discord, males on lolcow/in deleted Discord
>>52931 addressing practice of bumping CP, allowing adriasdome, hellweek and staff plans, should calling out other users as male be a bannable offense?
>>53189 what parts of board culture have deteriorated the most? What would anon like to see enforced?
>>53457 updates on lost m threads
>>53462 old m threads are restored!

No. 53482

File: 1677160535812.png (325.13 KB, 540x401, 6EDF722A-D656-4C56-8ACC-E416D8…)

>>53472
Thank you anon! I updated the OP with some links, and I wanted to include this fanart photo we were going to use as the thread pic. We love it! Everyone, feel free to continue discussing what parts of board culture need to be revived. It’s very helpful as we draft rules for hellweek.

No. 53484

File: 1677166208979.gif (5.34 MB, 454x257, I-love-you-cat.gif)

>>53482
Thank you so much for bringing /m/ back from the grave! I do have a question regarding the old threads and the new ones, should we continue from the old threads or keep on with the new ones.?

No. 53489

>>53472
Most epic lc adminas (inb4 schizoposting happens) thanks for your service so far americas strongest troops

No. 53490

Bless you three.

No. 53491

File: 1677176741329.png (62.21 KB, 357x385, 1674921978927.png)

>>53482
Some fanart from the draw thread

No. 53492

File: 1677178749331.jpg (73.38 KB, 1280x960, 1674598442636.jpg)

The original picture the design came from

No. 53493

File: 1677180868756.jpg (21 KB, 272x199, cerbmin.jpg)

>>53482
heres one i found!

No. 53495

>>53484
Up to you! Whatever /m/ nonas think is most appropriate given the content/context of the thread. There will be an extended moderation grace period with regards to threads while the board recovers from having them missing for so long!

No. 53499

>>53495
much love to cerbmin! thanks for restoring /m/!

No. 53503

thank you for the clear and direct communication, cerbmin. you're doing great!

No. 53506

>>53495
THANK

No. 53531

File: 1677269615755.jpg (68.42 KB, 500x602, 8cc278d344beffa5573211930f1ed0…)

>>53495
With the old /m/ threads back alongside the new ones I think the threads should continue as it did as for example the harry potter thread gotten two threads since the bunker and if one were to participant in the thread from before the bunker which has 373 posts in it should be counted as necro since it's been a year and the topics regarding Harry Potter has since moved on to other things such as the game and the fact that after the bunker it has gotten two threads. What threads I think that fit this criteria is the fujothreads, bookthreads, the j-music thread mostly beacause of that one anon drama/milk with that j-artist and what not etc… I also think if the the newer thread has more posts in it then the one before bunker it should be used instead as in the cookie run thread, husbando smell identification Thread, dubbing/localization thread, female gaze thread and for example an older thread with more posts like the Plush Creation and Appreciation thread should be used instead of the Plush general #2 thread but the link to that thread should be posted in the older one. The same would apply to the Temp Elsie Media Thread and Board-tan Media Thread this topic also has a thread here on /meta/ but it is not getting used and the topic has been evolved into posting pics of Board-tan and X2.
Nothing really comes to mind with threads that are very similar to one another even if the title of the thread is a bit different, so I'll let others deicide regarding it. Cerbmin when you guys and other anons that frequent /m/ finish discussing regarding this matter and come up with more define and clearer rules please post it in the thread that is pinned in /m/ so that everyone can know. I apologise if my wall of text isn't coherent enough and if it doesn't come with my points across but like I tried and I'm too dyslexic and tired to fix it

No. 53547

Seeing as this isn't a complaint or suggestion I'll post it here. I love that farmhands as well as moderating threads with bans are now giving clear clarification posts like they used to! Keep up the great work, LC is already much more fun to browse.

No. 53548

File: 1677372648947.png (298.49 KB, 539x400, 1674666195390.png)

>>53482
A variation of that drawing - an anon clarified who's Aimee, who's Jenny, and who's Sentinel

No. 53549

>>53548
Should we obfuscate the fact we have three admins? I want to make thing more difficult for newfags and others who posts here

No. 53558

>>53549
If you want to obfuscate it I think calling all three of them 'cerbmin' does enough
>I want to make thing more difficult for newfags and others who posts here
This is making me laugh for some reason

No. 53570

>>53549
>fact
Hey, wanna buy a bridge?

No. 53573

>>53570
>>53558
I think what anon meant was that a lot of anons have been calling cerbmin; adminas, admins and other plural form or other stuff with the word admins in other languages like some anons do with nonnique, nonnikas and such.
>>53549
Cute but hard to reinforce
>more difficult for newfags and others who posts here
Most of the anons on here don't even check /meta/ sadly, so win and I don't think that more retards like Elaine will come here and sperg out on randoms on social media that they are the owner of the site i hope

No. 53579

>>53549
This website is entirely built up of newfags now, no point in gatekeeping

No. 53580

>>53579
Bullshit there's like eight of you oldfags and me left by my count.

No. 53584

>>53580
How do you know the oldfags from the newfags?

No. 53585

>>53584
Newfags can't read in between the lines.

No. 53587

>>53573
lol adminas and janinas make me laugh

No. 53612

>>53584
If you can't tell oldfags from newfags, you might just be a newfag
it's not 100% obvious all the time, but to anyone whose been around since 2014-2017 it is pretty easy to spot newfag-isms

No. 53615

>>53579
>>53580
I can attest this, lolcow feels completely different now.

No. 53618

>>53615
So how do we save terf mountain?

No. 53619

>>53618
we keep boiling trannies in a cauldron

No. 53620


No. 53633

Rita's trying to start up a tranny witch hunt again to avoid being documented, can admins start banning over this before I start working on her thread?

No. 53636

>>53633
The absolute audacity for the schizo pedo troon to come in here and call for admins to ban everyone but him

No. 53640

>>53636
You can't even read the OP of this thread, you deleted your comment in the vocaloid thread, no I'm asking for you to be banned, nobody else, others desire for that thread to go up and apparently I'm the only one who's written OPs for this site before that's in there or I wouldn't even bother dealing with you.

No. 53642

>>53640
Blainey blaine… not everyone that disagrees with you is your le ebil archenemy whiteglove. I didn't delete any post in the vocaloid thread besides a screencap of her deleted post, and I reposted that right after because I forgot to sage. If she feels like proving that she's not me she can do it herself.

No. 53643

>>53642
You can't read the OP of this thread.

No. 53644

>>53643
I made this thread, retard.

No. 53645

>>53644
Then why highlight a rule you're breaking in it right now?

No. 53646

>>53645
Kek your every post breaks that rule. Good point though, I'll stop engaging with you.

No. 53647


No. 53662

Why are images so painfully slow to load?

No. 53667

>>53662
I wanna know why too, its driving me up the wall

No. 53689

As of today the old Discord server is being retired and will be completely closed on the 14th of March. Future status updates about server downtime will be communicated on https://status.lolcow.farm/. The link to the status page has been included in the navigation at the top and bottom of every page to make it easily discoverable for all users.

We hope that this will provide a drama-free and easily accessible channel of communication with our users about the status of the site!

>>53662
>>53667
The slow image issue is being worked on right now. We're doing what we can!

Essentially, this site is run on 12+ year old board software that's extremely unoptimized by modern internet standards. Image sizes and resolutions have gotten bigger and bigger over time and this poor old girl still thinks it's 2011, not to mention the negative impact of the unwanted traffic we get from people who want to harm the site.

After doing what we can to make the site run faster in its current form, we plan to spend the next while working on moving the board to a new platform. As previously mentioned, this will be done with the consent and input of our users.

No. 53690

>>53689
Cool, thank you admin. I'm glad we finally have a status page.

No. 53693

>>53689
imo we should keep the original.lolcow.farm link for those who are still in denial with the new software layout, otherwise it would be a pain in the ass for everyone to deal with the same software to please a bunch of whiny users.

No. 53696

>>53689
I’m up for a a new platform and if threads could be moved onto it that would be cool too. If this site is an archive site that is fine. You guys should do a poll at some point to see the general opinion of this user base about this

No. 53706

>>53689
that status page is a great idea, just bookmarked it. thanks!!

No. 53710

>>53689
Based.

No. 53713

File: 1677559130133.jpg (33.99 KB, 720x631, 1676374339546.jpg)

>>53689
thank you so much cerbmin! you guys are the best
>>53693
There should definitely be a beta period where anons can play around with nucow and get used to it. As much as I dislike Null he was right about imageboard users being the most autistic people online.
>>53696
I think Shaymin's original plan of having original.lolcow.farm as an archive of the old site and lolcow.farm as the active new site is a good idea.

No. 53722

>>53636
for real lol

>>53689
Yesss, good luck!!

No. 53723

Cerbmin, could you please put in place a system that delet automatically the metadata of pictures when they are posted on the site please ?

No. 53726

>>53723
super idea, I would be in favor of that.

No. 53728

>>53723
>>53726
I'm against it. Just don't post personal photos here or wipe the data yourself, you don't need this site to protect you from oversharing. Retaining metadata can be extremely handy for drama archival, you know, the site's actual purpose.

No. 53729

>>53728
this. thank you. delete the metadata yourself if you care that much.

No. 53730

>>53728
Agreed. I was just thinking about why 4chan doesn't do this the other day, but it's pretty vital for many reasons. There are so many free exif data removers online. Don't be lazy.

No. 53742

Thinking about it recently and now curious: are there any plans to try and grow the site? User numbers seem to have dropped off a lot. Those who are left would be decimated by a hellweek. And there still seems to be different contingents regarding what the site is and should be. None of this looks good for the farm in the longterm.
The site is still slow and now the threads are as well. And looking at it from a meta perspective, the internet more broadly has changed. A lot of the old sources of cows and drama are gone or completely different to what they used to be. And interest in spaces like this has dropped.
So yeah, tl;dr how to keep the farms active?

No. 53744

>>53742
Keep pissing off the actual users and driving them off?

No. 53755

>>53742
I feel like the farms been active recently? We have been getting a LOT of newfags especially on /snow/. Does the user base really feel slow?

No. 53762

>>53742
>>53755
IMO it's been picking up again recently for the first time since the December incident. The first couple weeks after the site came back online most of the threads I follow (even the MTF threads) felt deserted.
Hoping for a hellweek soon though. I think a majority of newfags aren't malicious, just younger and ignorant to imageboard culture. IMO a hellweek would help the ones that want to stick around to integrate better once they see the rules being fully enforced.

No. 53763

>>53728
How is it helpful for drama archival?

No. 53764

>>53762

ayrt, I agree with you. Esp when people were seeking refuge on CC because they couldn't post here kek. I also think it's younger/newfag users too, they kind of stick out like a sore thumb with their twitter speak ( /s /gen, "omg not this person doing that" or certain twitter reaction images and emojis) I don't personally mind it, it can be annoying but i agree rules can just be enforced and they can integrate. LC is seen as some sort of oldwebcore thing too with certain demographics on tiktok/twitter so I feel it's getting more traction in many ways. I have faith in the new admins though and I can't wait for a hellweek haha

No. 53766

>>53728
sounds like you just want to dox people? the last time I saw metadata used to look at how many times a cow edited her pics was probably Dakota's stuff on pull 2.0. Granted that was funny, but now cows post on IG and that gets wiped anyway

No. 53772

File: 1677618298404.gif (6.32 MB, 360x452, so so cute.gif)

>>53689
This is an appreciation post for cerbmin and farmhands. You all are doing an amazing job! I feel like my reports are taken care of right away. You guys are really on the ball! And thank you so much cerbmin for keeping all of us posted. We all appreciate the updates.

Lolcow today is like night and day compared to when shaymin was in power. The drama-free and transparent way you all are handling things around here is a breath of fresh air. It is very often a thankless job, so thank you all for stepping up to the challenge of saving a beloved site that's a billion years old! ♥

No. 53773

>>53766
>sounds like you want to dox someone?
braindead retard take. go back to twitter. And I'm not even TAYRT.

No. 53776

>>53773
it's hard to understand what the anon earlier meant about drama archival. Presumably the pictures reposted here wouldn't have metadata anyway, so aren't we talking about photos or screenshots anons post, not reposted pics from cows?

No. 53781

>>53776
Idk if you're new to imageboards but… I'll bite.

Cows post pictures of themselves acting like other people. It can also be a useful thing for when death threats get posted with like, a picture from someone's device. For the most part, if someone wants to be cautious, they'll remove exif data. But exif data has helped catch criminals on imageboards before. The guy that said he steps on people's food at burger King and spits on their food, literally left exif data and that's how he was caught. Same story with Amber Coplin (murderer posted her picture on 4chan and they found shit out using metadata/exif data from his device).

This is not about doxxing some idiot anon that posted a pic of themselves. This is about catching the many other shitty people that get cocky because they think they're untouchable behind being anonymous. So they slip up and FAFO.

No. 53783

>>53742
That's tricky because nonnas have a hard time not being massively autistic towards newfags. That's likely a major reason why lolcow doesnt grow, it farmers don't encourage new farmers to take the place of those who leave

No. 53794

>>53781
ah I understand, I'm not new here (really, have been here since 2016) but never used imageboards prior to lc and I only read threads interesting to me. Those haven't included death threats or stuff iirc. I knew about Amber's murderer getting caught via 4chan but had no idea exif was involved.

Thanks for explaining it without going overboard and calling me a stupid retard (I mean, you can anyway, I'm just grateful you explained it & I agree with you now)

No. 53801

>>53755
>>53742
>the farms
I love it when newfags talk as if they're not newfags themselves.

No. 53844

>>53801
Hard agree. I’ve been noticing this a lot lately.

No. 53846

File: 1677692587790.jpg (585.78 KB, 1187x590, boardtanspergchanreveal.jpg)

>>53801
>>53844
The usage of "the farms" was coined by the time we held that board-tan poll years ago.
Since the name of the site is lolcow.farm where there are cows that we make fun of, lolcow users farm for milk and moderators called farmhands for a reason. Or is there some other conclusion on why the term "the farms" came to be?
I mean some anons would use the term "the farms" with an capital F and some simply LC for the site but I always liked to use "the farms" since it was more thematic to the site and the fact I use the abbreviation LC in work near daily doesn't help the matter in not using it.

No. 53849

>>53846
no, anon, the nickname was never the farms, it was the farm. and it originated as a way to direct people from /cgl/ to the site, since posting the link (or even just mentioning lolcow by name) got you banned for dramu. also the term lolcow didn't even originate from the site, rather the site was named lolcow farm because the term lolcow already existed.

No. 53852

File: 1677697346185.jpg (141.81 KB, 768x1024, catputer.jpg)

>>53742
There is some improvement after the whole shaymin new lolcow fiasco but numbers are definitely fewer then we what we had from just a few years ago and I am worried about the non existent growth of lc's userbase, like obviously we don't need to be flooded with the usual twitter/tumblr types and potential moids/trannies but I have recommended lc to one of my close online friends and she uses it every now and then and I think we could do something similar on a larger scale, advertise lolcow to spaces that are more trustworthy
>>53713
as long as all the previous threads can be moved and the new site can be as close as it can be to actual lolcow, I don't think anyone will have an issue

No. 53853

everyone saying that we need a larger userbase needs to fuck off. there's no reason to advertise the site. period. that's entirely antithetical to the site and imageboards as a whole.

No. 53854

>>53853
no one's saying we need to open the gates for all, just a few more uses to counter balance all who have left for one reason or another

No. 53855

>>53849
>farms
>farm
Would you believe that I never noticed the difference. Feel like an idiot now.
>direct people from /cgl/ to the site
>lolcow farm because the term lolcow already existed.
I know that lolcow was a term before lolcow.farm existed, I just didn't think to include it. I actually stopped using /cgl/ after staminarose got shut down and went to browse kiwi and pull before coming here
>>53854
Yes it is a really good idea to put up some adverts on various social media sites or spam some links on other imageboards like retards

No. 53856

>>53854
but we don't though. lolcow already gets name dropped on social media sites and kf regularly. users who want to stay are here and users who don't left. and more are going to leave once admins start to actually implement clean up rules and hellweek. people have always found the site by word of mouth, and it should stay that way. imageboards in general are dying, even 4chan. i've been to /cgl/ during the pandemic and it's totally dead. and new users want to change board culture with shit like censorship of both words and speech. the newer covid zoomer userbase is shitty because their generation leans that way, not because there are secretly people who would be better for the site.

No. 53857

>>53855
fair enough. i think the boardtan and the name had something to do with it's prevalence on our site itself, but going back years in /cgl/ archives you can see that it was used as a code to direct people to milk here. i just threw in the bit about the term lolcow as a kind of extra tidbit, since i think calling it a lolcow farm has always been pretty funny.

No. 53863

>>53856
that's why I said advertise to spaces that are more "in the know" like FDS or radblr

No. 53864

>>53863
>Advertise on Tumblr
I implore you to listen to yourself right now.

No. 53865

So will Hellweek bands be permanent or longer 3-6 month bans ?

No. 53866

>>53863
this is fucking embarrassing

No. 53867

>>53864
I'm not saying advertise lolcow.farm on tumblr, rather send bascially invites to specific radfems who would fit well in here

No. 53868

>>53867
this isn't a radfem site.

No. 53869

>>53865
Hellweek as a band lasted for six years before the breakup actually.
>>53866
the absolute state of this site amazes me.

No. 53870

>>53868
unfortunately it is now which makes the site even a bigger mess because now you have your local weaboo pickme audience who were the original farmers and the radfems who joined around 2020-2021 now having regular clashed with each other.

No. 53871

>>53870
the entire site isn't radfem. allowing radfems on the site doesn't make the entire site that way, and admins already said they're going to restore board culture. also original farmers weren't pick-mes. there's a reason tranny hate started here early on. don't forget those original users banned men to begin with.

No. 53873

>>53870
Most of those original weebs are now pp/gc/malehate anons. Both your assumption that the current pickmes are oldfags and the radfems are newfags are wrong.

No. 53874

>>53873
one doesn't have to be radfem to manhate or prescribe to gc or pp views, but i otherwise agree.

No. 53875

>>53846
Who's on the left?

No. 53879

>>53801
>>53844
Some of you just call everyone newfags for literally any reason you can think of

No. 53883

>>53867
Holy shit no. You want MORE radblr-tier essay infights about everything under the sun?

No. 53903

>>53867
radfems think this place is evil due to the whole concept of lolcows and a preconception of us being racist like 4chan (i mean there are some polfag losers who pop up to sperg but it's not a lot). So no, it wouldn't go over well. The only "radfems" who would come here are the ones who aren't actually interested in radical feminist theory only call themselves that to be edgy, and they would do absolutely nothing but troll and infight.
>>53883
actually kind of yes but only because infights with essay long responses each would be hilarious, like watching the stock market reports on a nintendo DS

No. 53904

>>53903
The few of us who are here likely come off as insufferable moralfags, most who claim it here are just TEs and forget why the term needs denoting from radical feminist in the first place but I digress.

No. 53905

>>53903
tbf 99% of radfems don't care about theory and drop the label when they get a bf or find some other ideology to latch onto

No. 53906

>>53883
I want manifesto anon to post more.

No. 53909

>>53903
>>53906
no more sperg posters please. i don't wanna invite spergs just because it might be funny momentarily.

No. 53916

File: 1677749029506.jpg (93.95 KB, 383x575, 0213pc_whittier_1_full.jpg)

I think some newfags at small doses can be fine as they'll naturally integrate over time without changing the board culture
again my suggestion is sending "invitations" who you know would fit in well

No. 53920

Shayna's thread needs its own hellweek imo. Between the recent 'i hope she dies' 'she's not even human' alogging, doxxing, and cowtipping, it's clear that some of the regulars are completely fucking deranged and need to take a break.

No. 53921

>>53916
thank god admins are smart enough to know your ideas are dogshit. you should go to reddit or somewhere more mainstream if you want more active users.

No. 53922

>>53920
haven't been always like this, its impossible to be shaynatard unless you have been invested in reading her threads for years now

No. 53923

>>53922
While I agree that some of the current batshittery is new, her very first thread is one of the only ones that was removed from lolcor because people were targeting her family members. There's just something about Shay that attracts loonies.

No. 53925

>>53916
this is not kiwifarms dumbtard

No. 53927

>>53925
I don't want it to be kiwifarms, did you read what I said
>>53923
It's not about shayna herself its what she represents to them

No. 53928

File: 1677771005944.jpeg (219.08 KB, 1600x915, 1670516276644.jpeg)


No. 53929

File: 1677771630602.png (221.12 KB, 374x376, 010.png)

>>53927
You're just going to bring in more people than get it, I swear we need some intelligence check before letting people in because some end up as eternal newfags who are missing half of the message here.

No. 53931

>>53929
I have been for 4 years now and I don't want this place to be filled with tumblr types, that's why I said reach out to a few Individuals

No. 53932

>>53931
What do you want it filled with, I'll bite.

No. 53933

>>53931
bitch this is dumb. you can tell anyone you want about lolcow. Go! do it now! nobody gives a fuck, this isn't some secret site that requires a password it's an anonymous imageboard where anyone can discover it, so I don't even know wtf you could even be talking about with this egg-headed ass idea. why did you capitalize Individuals. why would we need to invite anyone. put the crack pipe down.

No. 53934

>>53933
I've missed you so much.

No. 53935

>>53932
no one type really, just interesting women whoa aren't either tardthots or brain poisoned wokeoids but aren't normies either

No. 53936

>>53931
4 years makes you a newfag because you came in when all the retards did.

No. 53937

>>53935
You suggested inviting people from Tumblr so to me you're the normie.

No. 53938

>>53937
seriously this. anon should go to a busy site if she wants to be somewhere more active.

No. 53940

>>53938
I never said I want an active userbase, just a few more users to counterbalance all those who have left

No. 53941

>>53940
Well you can't counterbalance quality with quantity is the thing.

No. 53943

>>53940
you weren't even here when the bulk of users left, which was 2017. if you want more users you want more activity or what would the point be? you're obviously just trying to make excuses now because your idea is braindead.

No. 53946

>>53916
Lmao the autism in your replies. I get your point nonna, it would be nice to have a bit more activity with users who fit the website. Just keep in mind that the same people replying to you are also likely the ones who whine about "LC being so slow", "lolcow is finished" and saying "all users left at x year".

No. 53947

>>53946
Not at all, I have a lot a faith in this site. I just think the idea is retarded. This site is not a secret, anyone can be told about it or know about it. We don't need "recruitment" or invites because there is no need for recruitment. It's an open free site that anyone can use so I literally don't even understand what the fuck she could possibly be implying. If she or you have friends, tell them about it like?? I don't possibly understand what even it could mean. Want a fucking billboard??

Does the site need more users? Sure. Do we need to actively try to garner them? Literally no. wtf. Plenty of people learn about this site on the daily as it comes under the microscopic lens of news sites and twitterfags/tumblrfags sperging about it on twitter, tumblr and tiktok. The ones that like the site stay, the ones that don't either get btfo for being a newfag or they just leave. The problem isn't that we are lacking new users, the issue is getting them to stay. Are we going to ignore the fact that cp is posted literally daily? Why would anyone besides oldfags want to stick around for that unless they had some investment (socially) in the site? New people join all the time, poke some fun and move it along.

I should also add that the site is terrible in the sense of: a lot of social faux pas, a lot of infighting, a lot of unpopular opinions for normal people, racebait, "TERF" opinions. I like it and am okay with that so I stick around. But the average person is not going to want to stay and deal with that. Even if every single anon on this site invited just one person, I don't even think that would be enough for the site to be "active with likeminded people" because believe it or not I don't think there are that many likeminded people to begin with.

No. 53948

>>53946
nice projection.

No. 53949

File: 1677786236893.jpg (481.81 KB, 1417x1484, 35009f6a4989e47795f16213c602c2…)

If a new engine(I don't the technical term) is going to be used for new lc, can there be at least a trial period to see what it's like aesthetically and function wise so we can avoid the mistake of shaymin and of course all the threads from the boards have to be migrated, that's not even a question

No. 53961

is anyone else noticing someone necro-ing a bunch of old threads on /snow/? not sure what's going on.

No. 53963

>>53961
Yeah, reported all that shit already. Wonder what is that about

No. 53967

>>53963
It's just some sperg from kiwifarms seething because he can't dox and cowtip here.

No. 53974

>>53963
Don't waste your time reporting. Let the baby tire himself out

No. 53977

>>53961
Blaine's tweaking and bored again. Fuck else is new.

No. 53978

>>53977
Baaaaaaaaiiiiiit

No. 53979

>>53978
That wasn't mean to be bait? That's legitimately what I think is happening.

No. 53980

>>53979
Then I honestly think you're retarded.

No. 53981

>moid “women be on their phones 24/7 lolz”
>moid refreshing and spending time commenting on threads for the past couple days because…?

As usual moids are braindead

No. 53982

>>53981
I thought exactly the same, guy is legit retarded

No. 53983

>>53979
nonny you’re talking to him. but there seems to be another male doing a sperg out in embarrassing blaine fashion though

No. 53984

>>53983
Yes but he isn't doing it over his cows getting memory holed due to an inept admin.

No. 53985

>>53984
Stop defending Blaine it’s never going to justify his sperg outs that were retarded and extremely cringey

No. 53986

>>53985
Well yeah I completely agree about that.

No. 53988

>>53961
will never understand the point of him wasting all this time when we have a catalogue where we can just as easily find the threads he tried to bury? It's really just a minor inconvenience at best. kek

No. 53989

some retard necroing snow threads. ban pls

No. 53990

>>53977
maybe i haven't seen much of what he actually does but i thought blaine's way of trolling was to cause infighting and confusion directly with other nonnies. based on what this troll is saying he seems more like a bored kiwifarms lurker talking about shit like smugly having jannies clean up after him because they don't have children, how we're all fat and bitter, etc.

No. 53992

There's no way actual anons are coming here to report the spamming for the eleventeenth. it's gotta be the spammer because I know LCF anons are a bit smarter than that.

ignore it

No. 53993

>>53992
>There's no way actual anons are coming here to report the spamming for the eleventeenth
I've been here for 3 years now but what? lol

No. 53994

>>53992
if it was that specific spammer they'd be shitting up these threads in the same style. some of us are actually wondering what's going on.

No. 53999

There's more explanation in another thread but tl;Dr he's a scrote who's upset he can't faildox and send rape threats to a cow.

No. 54003

>>53988
He's a no-life tranny, not sure why you're surprised. If he actually left his basement for once, he would have to confront himself with how much of a xy failure he is. So this low iq retardation is all he has left in his life kek.

No. 54009

It's whiteglove tbh. Tranny behaviour still but they shit up their own thread immediately and then this crap started, trolling and being generally annoying is their thing

No. 54010

>>54009
I will never understand this. If I were listed as a cow here, I would stop posting, stay quiet and leave my thread the fuck alone. It would end up on page 10 in no time.

No. 54011

>>54010
Ask her yourself >>54003

No. 54020

>>54009
>>54011
You really aren't slick amd you will never be a woman.

No. 54022

>>54020
Says the retard who tagged two different people, honk honk.

No. 54023

>>54022
It must be hard to be so retarded you don't even notice how obvious your retardation is to other people, even on an anonymous imageboard. Go make another vendetta thread with "don't call me out!" as a rule kek.

No. 54024

>>54023
Again there was two separate people that you responded to, you might think you're slick dismissing anyone you disagree with as Blaine but you're not and Shaymin isn't here to wipe your tears over it anymore.

No. 54025

>>54024
Here you go again with the seething about shaymin lmao. I'm glad she makes you so mad.

No. 54026

>>54025
The implication is hilarious, go back to the other thread and cry about being banned some more and how we are all alogging you. You were more accurate in your assumptions then.

No. 54027

>>54026
I thought I was whatever person you have vendetta with this time?

No. 54028

>>54027
You could be Blaine trying to start an infight for all I know is my point schizo-chan.

No. 54029

>>54028
Again displaying your low IQ and making your posts even more obvious.

No. 54030

>>54029
Oh fuck you Blaine, I should have known this was you.

No. 54031

Reminder, Blaine and all other trannies and moids that post here like to reply to themselves and fight with themselves to make it look like we actually care.

No. 54032

>>54025
same kek. It's hilarious

No. 54033

>>54031
It's clearly men chasing a tranny, many such cases.

No. 54034

>>54033
>man chasing man
moids are so gay

No. 54037

Wow he just tells on himself, every time. Anyway nonnies, much of the posts ITT are just blaine and you should know how to spot him before you give him the attention he gets off to. Copypasta:
A comprehensive long list of things the rapist pedo schizo troon says and does (feel free to add onto it):
>mask off
>sweep/sweeping/swept
>pedo ring/pedo jannies/jannies posting cp/admin is male/jannies are male (basically any raging hatred and accusations regarding site staff)
>admin is being blackmailed
>blend/blending
>erika/uh
>everyone is blaine/we're all blaine
>pretends blaine and erika are different people
>links to other imageboards and sketchy websites
>shits on fire/sites fucked
>talks about elaine/rachel/null(josh)/michael or other irrelevant kiwifags
>you're going down
>I will expose you
>refers to himself using the wrong pronouns (calls himself she or they despite being male)
>complaining about kuz and soyjak
>coverup
>something real is going on
>this is insane/crazy/huge
>gayops
>random youtube song links and/or random lyric dumps
>anime avatarfagging (usually with pedo anime characters, sometimes with final fantasy ones)
>misuse of sites lingo
>asking or demanding to be a mod/janny/admin
>replying to one of his posts with the same lingo and typing style (samefagging)
>posts cp and then is immediately around to complain about cp he posted
>threatens to kill/rape people
>asks to be unbanned
>mentions his vpns
>refers to himself as erika or UH
>posts ugly pic of his thighs and covered bulge
>spergs about porn and his creepy fetish stuff
>tries to get people to post hand pics
>larps as being a csa survivor
>randomly talks about his sister
>posts /pol/tier nazi and pepe pics
>conspiracies about blackmailing, abuse, pedo rings
>constantly mentions foxdickfarms
>I proved it/here's the proof
>you're killing this website/this website is dead bickers of you/this website is dying
>pro tranny/pro scrote posts (trannies have always been welcome/men can post here if they want/etc)
>schizobabble about being a witch/magic spells/hexes
>says he is a tranny not a troon (and other weird tranny infighting stuff)
>uses sexist insults (calls women whores, cunts, bitches, roasties, etc)
>complaining about jews and nonwhites
>refers to women as "natal women" or "cis women"
>god complex spergouts
>hates on radfems and gcs
>says he is gnc
>talks about his ugly troon dick
>sniffed out
>it was rigged/I rigged it
>slapfight
>I win/I won/I'm winning
>mentions flamenco or undefault or naught
>bbc spam
>bought off janny/paid off janny
>foxdickfarm
>this is why people never use this site
>whines about "transphobes"
>says he is doing damage control
>talks about owning guns and/or threatens to use them
>weird obsession with russia
>pretends he has some greater plan
>randomly counts down (ie 6 days left, 6 hours left)
>broom/broomstick
>so much proof
>look at these connections/all the connections
>you're screwed/it's over
>desperate
>pressed/keeping you pressed
>meltdown
>I timed it/it was timed
>pretends he's doing this to waste someones time
>vendetta-chan
>schizo-chan
>vpn-chan
if you see posts that contain any of these it's the ban evading sweaty gamer tranny, do not reply to him, simply report and ignore

No. 54038


No. 54039

>>54037
why won't mods just delete or at least redtext his posts like they did before? that way we know for sure which posts are his and can avoid replying

No. 54042

>>53866
it's probably one of the retarded teenagers with their "radfem" instagrams linked, they were vocal about being noticed in the old discord

No. 54043

>>54042
I love radfem nonnies some can be very cringe some of the “recruitment” ideas are dumb. I like that LC is women oriented but it’s also not just that. I like that we have things for any personality type of women, wether it’s radfem or weebshit or gossip etc. They will come organically and learn to integrate and stuff. LC isn’t niche for sure. I still laugh at the “abcs of lolcow” book idea that one nonny had a while ago

No. 54045

some brain dead cunt bumped every single ancient thread in snow with their retardation. lovely.

No. 54046

>>54045
he's been doing this 2 days now, what a fucking retard

No. 54047

ban the retard zoomer/coomers who is bumping necro threads in snow ffs

No. 54048

>>54037
reminds me of how men think everything women do is for male attention meanwhile everything men do is literally for female attention

No. 54052

Doxx in shayna and waster threads

No. 54056

wtf is happening ? some retard is spamming every necro threads with "Airplane mode is autopilot for ban evasion" ?

No. 54057

>>54056
samefag forgot to add that its on /snow/, cant see any recent threads now its annoying

No. 54058

>>54056
moid stalker(?) of Whiteglove, a tif cow, he's mad about Whiteglove having a thread on LC or something like that

No. 54060

>>54048
I can't stand that shit. Ot, but Jordan Peterson, being the autist that he is, told his group of impressionable young moids that everytime women wear makeup we're sexually signalling… Because women are two-dimensional beings who only ever have one motivation and it's attracting the male gaze.

No. 54061

So if jannies are handing out bans for accusing posters of being scrotes (I see posters doing that allllll the time but ok), maybe add it to the rules? Am I missing something?

No. 54066

can i ask what happened to lolcow? i used to browse it all the time when i was younger and it seemed extremely active and busy with people posting all the time, i’ve come on it again for the first time in years and it seems so dead and like barely anyone comes on here anymore.

No. 54071

>>54066
Just the same thing that's been happening to all imageboards, people get tired for one reason or another and leave and there's not enough newfags coming in to fill their places.

No. 54072

>>54066
Quality of cows is in the toilet too. We witnessed a golden era of the internet and we didn't even realise it at the time.

No. 54074

>>54031
When he samefags or responds to posts that trigger him multiple times, he does it to create a fake discussion where he can defend himself, to pull retarded falseflags or to do the imageboard equivalent of upvoting his own posts.

>>54037
I feel like this needs an update by now but it would be too long lmao.

No. 54079

File: 1678024408430.gif (2.35 MB, 375x498, happy-popcorn-day-national-pop…)

did the thread and the torium get deleted

No. 54081

>>54066
some posters left last year because of /m/ being broken and the constant cp raids (the former only getting fixed recently), like i distinctively remember a bunch of posts in /meta/ around february or march of last year saying they were leaving because of that. then even more posters left after the "site maintenance" issue in december. for a while some people couldn't access the site at all without using the flipped version, tho plenty of anons wanted to leave cause of all the other problems that went down too.

No. 54082

>>54072
The quality of cows here, plummeted and I don't feel like introducing new ones because it's funnier to watch this place slowly die.

No. 54123

>>54081
accurate reasons for why lc userbase has gone down the last 2 years, this is why I'm saying we should invite more users so lc doesn't teeter and lose is edge

No. 54125

File: 1678078732725.jpeg (32.95 KB, 410x326, question.jpeg)

so will the new engine be able to have all the previous thread moved and how much can it match the aesthetic of current lolcow(cause I fucking hate the design and function of whatever choachan uses)

No. 54126

>>54123
well go invite them. i don't use other social media so idk where i would do that… and i don't want to mention lc to irls

No. 54129

>>54082
Ehh nta but I disagree. It’s kinda hard to find a real good cow now a days. The “market” is saturated. Tiktok is full of cow-esque people. You could always go to KF if you wanna complain about this site.

No. 54142

>>54129
Oh you think I don't sit over there and complain pointlessly too? I don't think you understand what fun is to me conceptually.

No. 54146

>>54142
Lol okay no1curr

No. 54147

>>54142
lolcow is blessed to have a farmer like you, thank you for bestowing upon the farm your everlasting patience and superior taste in cows

No. 54153

Nonnies I think that "someone" is/was ITT

No. 54154

>>54153
he literally always is he has no life

No. 54169

>>54153
He has meta threads open 24/7

No. 54196

can mods do something about the guy thats spamming the fujo thread in /m/ with pics of TIFs accompanied by word salad? it's really annoying, he does it in threads all over the board. is there a reason he hasn't been permabanned yet?

No. 54203

>>54169
Is that why this faggot won't crawl out of my asshole

No. 54206


No. 54208

polfag shitting up the vent thread, probably the same one who was redtexted in tinfoil and other threads

No. 54209

I really don't think there should be an issue of /m/ thread being bumped, cause its literally so dead

No. 54210

>>54209
Most threads on /m/ are so slow compared to the rest of lolcow that it doesn't really matter if they're bumped or not, and the thread will go back to page 3 in an hour anyway. It's just people whining that not every thread is catered to their personal interests. If they don't like the thread they can easily hide it, but for some reason they're allergic to doing that.

No. 54214

Why hasn’t the ass worm /pol/ moid been banned? He whined about femoids and muh jewz he’s definitely a male

No. 54216

>>54214
it might be more than one moid, lolcow was mentioned in a /pol/ thread not that long ago

No. 54221

>>54216
Looks like it was made by a seething moid/tranny from the aella thread.
https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/418585936/#418598804
It's also interesting to note that he changes IPs/IDs within the short span of the thread (from Uw6HQhZ+ to V068NqkW). Also

>You wanna know the best bit? All the mods have vacated the premises because some "nonna" kept spamming the mods nudes everywhere and the mods gave up. The inmates run the asylum now

Since this was coming from the OP and it's complete made up bs about our staff again, I wouldn't be surprised if this is indeed the tranny again.

>As soon as someone pointed out they should try dating shy middle class tech needs, everyone sperged out and started calling them a moid and faggot

>They will permaban you for posting anything remotely male-sounding, or for voicing any smidgeon of defense for the male gender, so keep a low profile while posting.
>they're pretty paranoid about male posters though
Kek, of course that's coming from raid attempting moids. They're real big mad they can't sit with us. Good.

No. 54222

Cp in /m/

No. 54223

>>54222
Cp in /snow/‘s male trannies’ thread

No. 54224

>>54221
he must be using a vpn and circumventing bans that way, that's the only reason I can imagine he keeps respawning

No. 54225

So, what the fuck is this post in the jvloggers thread? Because it looks pretty sus. >>>/w/284781

No. 54226

>>54225
samefag, just adding that it isn't a link or anything. it's the content of the post, it almost looks like it's coordinates to something, is some nonnie innocently trying to get an ARG started or is it some weird shit?

No. 54227

>>54221
>some "nonna" kept spamming the mods nudes everywhere
Lolwut? We know nothing about our admins and less about our mods. We don't have a hand pic of a janny, least of all a mod's nudes. He's just making shit up. Is he mistaking Aella's nudes for a mod's nudes?

No. 54228

>>54225
It's coordinates, looks like dox

No. 54231

>>54224
or resetting his router, or mobile data

No. 54232

>>54226
We have a history of Chris and Sharla fans or friends trying to get people banned from the jvlog thread for discussing the slip-ups of their cows. Could be that one of them has moved on to doxxing.

No. 54250

>>54224
But is he even getting banned? I have not seen any redtexts

No. 54284

Admins I have posted my hand on account of accusations against me, I truly do not mean to derail or "persoanlityfag" but I feel that some of my detractors will not let go and continue to press against me
I think overall it is somewhat my own fault, please forgive me for this

No. 54285

>>54284
You're a retard.

No. 54286

>>54284
Ok hand-chan

No. 54288

>>54284
Kek please tell me this is just bait

No. 54311

>>54284
kek someone please make this into a banner. this is too good. even if it bait/trolling.

No. 54314

>>54311
you're being too optimistic if you think pakichan's autism is trolling lol

No. 54315

>>54284
This cannot be paki chan since there's no cat meme attached so namefag is probably a baiter

No. 54317

>>54315
No race sperging either, this baiter needs to do a better job.

No. 54361

So will nu lc have a beta version that we can test out to see what's it like

No. 54397

Were the mods really replaced or did they just receive new training? It's been days and doxxing is still up in the jvlogger thread >>>/w/284781 and the WK situation is absolutely out of hand and not something you'd see in other threads or in the past under the previous admin. If the mods weren't actually replaced, please consider hiring new people.

No. 54425

>>54397
my theory is their putting most of their effort on the new site

No. 54433

>>54425
WKs have been banned in other threads during the same time.

No. 54462

>>54361
Yes, nucow will have an extended test period before posts are migrated and the current site is retired. We want to get a lot of feedback from users before we commit to the change!

>>54397
We are aware that reports aren't being responded to quickly enough, and we apologise for that. We definitely need more farmhands and we have been working on documentation and process changes to ensure that moderation will generally be more reliable and consistent.

On a related note, we have finished preparations and are now ready to recruit new staff! If anyone is interested in applying, please complete the form linked in the announcement above.

No. 54463

>>54462
Hi admin, just a suggestion but when you hire new farmhands please get some that are GMT!
I would apply but I’m an oldfag and I couldn’t commit enough time!

No. 54491

I'm not applying, but I noticed the mod application is a lot more in-depth and inquisitive than past mod applications that I've seen. Nice.

No. 54494

File: 1678633731938.gif (288.6 KB, 200x150, giphy (4).gif)

>First question is what your discord is.

No. 54497

>>54494
Lol, how else are they going to communicate with other mods? Email or skype?

No. 54498

>>54494
saw this on the front page and only came here to say that orlando kinda looks like grimes here, big droopy puffy eyes

No. 54499

>>54497
Emails like adults yes.

No. 54507

>>54499
why not go for teams or slack, kek

No. 54508

>>54507
Lc site discussion between admins and mods done on zoom

No. 54509

>>54508
Return to tradition, send the messages with snail mail

No. 54510

>>54509
Carrier pigeons and horseback is fine, no need to make the farmhands go slower than they already do kek

No. 54511

So damn excited for nucow. That's going to be absolutely incredible. Also huge shout out to whoever is banning all the infighters and derailing spergs. I love witnessing farmhand justice in real time. Keep it up, lovely farmhands. As for nucow, is there an ETA for it's launch?

No. 54514

Is the disgusting tranny janny coming over to Nucow to get his nuts in a twist over stupid shit and ban anons for not kissing his ass?

No. 54515

Anons are calling a janny a tranny, are there any examples of bans for ”transphobic” posts?

No. 54517

I want to thank jannies for banning anons for every stupid little thing but allowing the site to be raided by nicokado avocados asshole. You are truly doing great work.

No. 54521

why can't I post properly

No. 54525

let's hope something can be done and hope the new farmhands application finish up as well

No. 54528

>>54517
The problem is that there's no captcha so people can use bots to spam the boards.

No. 54531

>>54528
I'm not really knowledge about computers, but my question is why can't these guys(their probably like 2-3 of them) ever be premabanned, like even if their using VPN's can't they also be Ip blocked

No. 54533

>>54531
Banning by Mac address? That's not a trick that a Jedi could teach you.

No. 54534

>>54531
I don't think it's multiple people doing this, it's been the same pattern today as with the joshpocalypse (making new threads using gross people moids love like nikocado, ethan ralph was posted last time, he was liking alogsspace and they love ethan ralph there. etc and having similar text especially with those randomized words at the bottom). They can permaban the ip (whether it's vpn or normal) and remove all posts from that ip, which is what I think they did now judging by how fast they were removed. He's probably getting perma'd every time he spams but he just uses a new vpn location to evade.

No. 54535

>>54533
but they don't even have macs

No. 54536

>>54517
Only administrators can deal with raids being carried out this way, and we dealt with it as soon as we were alerted to it! Farmhands/mods cannot do anything with the moderation tools available, it has to be done by directly interacting with the server/database.

>>54521
The recent raid caused a service outage, but it should be returning to normal now.

>>54531
The bot posts with a new IP address and spoofed device information between every post. It's not as simple as permabanning them, as everything we could use to identify them changes between each post.

>>54534
It is likely one person doing it using a bot. Each post has a different IP, we just purged them all manually through the database as that's currently the only way to deal with it. The frontend moderation tools are unfortunately limited!

No. 54545

My images have been weird lately, the thumbnails are pixellated as hell so I can barely read any text on them but the full image is loading faster? Is this something new or just me?

No. 54546

just out of curiosity admin, how do you confirm that all the people who apply and are selected to be farmhands are women?

No. 54547

>>54546
We don’t

No. 54548

>>54547
rip i guess all we can do is hope that they keep moids out of the ranks

No. 54554

>>54546
Iirc Shaymin says they have a certain vetting process

No. 54555

>>54554
I'm not saying there are men in the mod team, but we all know how reliable shaymin was

No. 54556

>>54555
I believe the new admins can confirm if they’re real woman. I don’t think they’re naive to think that there wouldn’t be males or retards trying to get on the team. Here’s hoping

No. 54560

I just want to let other posters know that if someone's using a VPN the chance of you having your IP banned is extremely low. You're IPs aren't cycled through VPN server farms which is what VPNs tend to use or volunteered IPs they are granted access too and are rented out. I know anons like to say the moids have gotten their IPs shuffled in, but its extraordinarily unlikely and mods/admin probably know this too. Just pointing this out because I'm tired of anons saying their IP was used by someone else when it most likely wasn't and you got banned by accident during the mods activities or its just your ban and mods aren't dumb to think a VPN somehow got access. It's not possible. It doesn't bounce off random people. If you think it's an accident just try appealing.

No. 54561

>>54560
Just wait for the day I go through all those VPNs and appeal the bans, I'm being nice and waiting.(USER HAS BEEN PUT OUT TO PASTURE)

No. 54564

>>54560
Lol you're a farmhand

No. 54565

>>54564
That's what I said in the comment above yours newfag.(obviously not a farmhand, sperg-chan trying to scare retards again. 0/10 bait)

No. 54566

>>54565
what an odd thing to get angry at

No. 54567

>>54566
Angry? It's a term of endearment, what's wrong with being a fag?

No. 54572

>>54560
I disagree. It hasn't happened to me on Lolcow yet, bu multiple times, I've seen ban messages using my IP on 4chan. I know for a fact they're from VPN users because they're usually spam posts, too.
Also, is it so impossible for some moids to just live in the same countries as anons, and for IPs to be dynamic?

No. 54573

>>54560
When I used the VPNs on Brave, I've seen ban messages that stated using a proxy as the reason though. And some people do have dynamic IPs

No. 54574

>>54565
Aren't farmhands supposed to not out themselves and reveal that they are a farmhand?

No. 54577

>>54560
What is the official policy on VPNs?
Different admins have had different opinions. In my personal experience I didn't run into any issues using a VPN until a few years ago when I found that some of the IP ranges available with my VPN were blocked. The admin before Shaymin removed the block on some IPs after I asked her to. Shaymin seemed to want to ban them all and some IP ranges have gone back to either being blocked or being permanently banned with no reason given.

No. 54592

The not my type's type thread on /g/ should get locked I can't stand all the retarded weeaboos seething over asian women dating deformed moids or whatever, this shit has got to be at least 50% bait because I refuse to believe we have that many retardinas here

No. 54593

The not my type's type thread on /g/ should get locked I can't stand all the retarded weeaboos seething over asian women dating deformed moids or whatever, this shit has got to be at least 50% bait because I refuse to believe we have that many retardinas here

No. 54598

>>54572
I don't know how that's possible unless someone else in your household is using 4chan and getting banned.

No. 54601

>>54577
That's what I mean by it's not personal IPs unless you are volunteering them to the VPN farms and getting a rent fee for it. Otherwise you are not using personal IPs. They have their own servers for IPs. If someone is using your IP or your IP got banned on a site and you don't use VPNs and you're super confused, then your IP got stolen and someone could be impersonating you. Just change your IP and I don't mean by using a VPN.

No. 54602

File: 1678727508388.png (15.21 KB, 666x260, heres my screenshot dont ban m…)


No. 54604

>>54598
IP's get cycled by your isp, it's possible to get someone elses IP that got banned before.

No. 54605

>>54602
Are you clicking links, anon?

No. 54606

>>54604
I'd be shocked if someone nextdoor/within your range got banned because they are also on lolcow lol

No. 54607

File: 1678727865185.png (26.4 KB, 689x608, read the fucking article.PNG)

>>54605
You do not need to click any links for that to happen

No. 54608

>>54607
Then lolcow has a security issue, which I don't think is the case.

No. 54610

>>54608
That's now how it works. The IP is hacked independently without any involvement from the user whose IP is being spoofed. The address appears as a normal IP to the site with no signs of tampering.

No. 54614

>>54610
Completely missing why they have access.

No. 54615

>>54614
Access to what?

No. 54616

>>54615
Nta, the IP address you maroon.

No. 54618

>>54616
>>54614
I would assume by randomizing it, pulling it off a database or if they know yours and specifically want to pose as you then they use that.

No. 54621

>>54618
All a person has to do to try that is post an IP, claim it's yours and larp as you. If you haven't clicked any suspicious links then I wouldn't worry about it.

No. 54623

>>54621
Are you playing stupid on purpose?

No. 54625

>>54623
You think someone would do that? Act retarded on the internet for laughs?

No. 54627

>>54554
>>54546
Probably have to do a live chat on discard

No. 54642

>>54623
It's probably the tranny again, since he camps on meta.

No. 54645

>>54572
The false ban messages you get on 4chan is because of dynamic IPs and rangebans (bans based on internet providers and countries). The former is more possible on websites with millions of users, but extremely unlikely on a small website like lolcow.
VPNs don't use normal people IPs, like another anon said, they use their own, which is why they are more easy to identify once you research the IP provider and thus blocked in places like 4chan. So you'd have to use said VPN to encounter a ban on a VPN IP and even then it happens rarely, because most popular VPN providers have thousands to tenthousands of IPs. Though browsers with vpn feature, like opera, probably have less.

>>54607
Yes you do, that article explains what IPs are used for and that they are being abused by hackers but not how the IP spoofing actually happens. Which is being infected with malware that gives access to more information than just your IP address. By that logic every single website owner could "hack your IP" and use/sell it as proxy as soon as you visit the website.

No. 54646

>>54645
>because most popular VPN providers have thousands to tenthousands of IPs
ntayrt but most of the ones i see have the same 10-20 ips unless you pay for it and it's a less popular vpn

No. 54647

>>54646
That's right, I was thinking of paid ones. Though even on the free ones, it's not always the exact same 10-20 ones but randomly different ones per account (in my experience at least, I used to play around with vpns a lot to do ad offers for app games kek).

No. 54650

>>54645
Of course I try to calm nonnas down because all this constant threats to leaking IPs by loser deformed dick scrotes and instead he tries to confuse women into thinking like said redtext >>54565

Anons, just never click links. Period.

No. 54653

i'm aware celebricows has a pretty shit reputation but it seems even worse lately, i don't understand why there are so many anons shitting up the thread with claims of milkless information about specific people or refusing to integrate. it was awful before but not this bad. i just want to gossip about current news on dumb celebrities without someone derailing into sperging about looks and if it's newfags or moids, they're painfully obvious

No. 54654

>>54653
I feel like it got invaded by weird facebook boomers a few weeks ago and they made it their home

No. 54655

>>54654
i'm glad at least another nonna has noticed and i feel similarly, but it's really annoying that they're clogging up the thread with random claims/old photos about the sprouse twins and austin butler, neither of which have current milk. i don't know if they're the same ones derailing about the looks of random celebrity women though. if they're getting banned, it looks like a few have been ban evading but this is all speculation. the one who said that gross comment about lisa marie presley a while back seems to have returned because their typing style is so distinctive.

No. 54656

>>54653
>>54654
>>54655
I think that's a moid. He posts ss of articles a lot and I'm pretty he's the one who kept posting weird edits a while back in that same thread.

No. 54657

>>54656
i had my suspicions that it was either stubborn newfags or moids but i didn't want to state it as fact because obviously i don't really know. i've mainly been reporting instead but i don't know how many people have gotten banned in the thread. i honestly thought it was blaine at first when it started happening.

tbf i do think some of the other regular anons do take ss of articles as well (and i have sometimes when posting milk) but the way that person types or whoever else is involved is very much identifiable with the random dashes and trump-like typing, apparently samefagging as well. i'm starting to wonder if the thread should be moved back to /snow/ or be stricter on moderation because i'm unsure if it being in /ot/ is just inviting weird shit like this.

No. 54660

>>54657
100% agree, they also remind me of the one/s sperging about jim carrey all the time. they all type like total fucking boomers and samefag a dozen times a minute, it's obnoxious as fuck. the thread desperately needs more moderation

No. 54661

>>54657
Yeah, everyone posts screenshots of articles. It's how you share milk sometimes, idk why anon even mentioned it.

No. 54662

>>54660
Carrey-anon is a resident poster, she's just mentally ill and has a hard time getting over her awful crush.

No. 54666

>>54662
Ngl I posted about that fag in celebrity cows, didn't realise it was a thing or that I was probably having a conversation with one person KEK.

No. 54683

Would someone be able to do something about the person who keeps bringing up old milk in the jvlog thread? Mod specifically said to stop bringing up old milk and tinfoiling and that's all this anon seems to do.

No. 54687

Hi admins, pls read this
>>4330
(Click the archived copy)
I know my comment is old and the link even older, but plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose

No. 54688

Why does everything keep getting posted multiple times? Can this be fixed? Sometimes I can't even delete the duplicate posts.

No. 54690

we should get a new discord up and running

No. 54691

why the hell was Misha Mayfair / Laura Renvoize account deleted? she was a BPD cringetard horrowcow

No. 54692

>>54691
>thread* not account

No. 54693

>>54690
sounds like a terrible idea

No. 54694

>>54690
Take a fucking jagged shard of glass and keep cutting up your forearm until your eyes close.(a-logging)

No. 54696

>>54662
>>54660
>>54666
there is a reason I am literally afraid of him now

I wish eternal sunshine memory erasure was real

No. 54705

>>54660
i agree and i'm glad to see more bans being handed out to anons clogging up the thread but i honestly think some or at least one of them are ban evading. i'm tired of seeing random nonsense as if it's one of the shitposting or tinfoil threads. the sheer refusal to integrate is ridiculous

No. 54714

Elaine Miller is claiming the lcf mod panel username/password entry form is "brute forceable as fuck" on sneed.social in a repeated copypasta she has about a user she's alogging claiming that they own LCF.
Not that I expect her to have the know how to actually do something with that, but I think some more security for the mod login should be looked into in the future. I wouldn't want someone of her ilk getting any ideas.

No. 54717

>>54714
is she still on about that random latina

No. 54720

>>54714
While we appreciate the concern, we can confidently say it's impossible for many different reasons. Take any comments like that with a grain of sand. None of the cerbmin have communicated anything like that with anyone so whoever is claiming they 'own LCF' is probably doing it for the lulz.

No. 54721

>>54720
thank you cerbmin you are so epic

No. 54724

>>54720
Please address >>54688

No. 54725

Please hellweek and force these newfags, moids and moidbrained girls off the site. OT has been a flaming hot mess lately

No. 54729

can we get a "notable handmaidens" thread for 2x? I'd be happy to make it and the list is LONG. was going to start with Jamie Lee Curtis cause I may or may not (may, do) have intel and the traitors need to be held accountable.
I was thinking male handmaidens too, a notable Australian comedian is caping for them atm and god, the average have really fallen.

No. 54730

>>54729
A handmaiden is a woman who capes for men in general, not necessarily TIMs, moids cannot be handmaidens.

No. 54731

>>54725
>moidbrained girls
Is that technically against the rules though? I don’t think people should get banned for differing opinions (granted they are not infighting / blogposting / whatever)

No. 54734

>>54714
Elaine has been embarassingly larping as a hacker and spreading bullshit for about two years now, it's nothing new.

>>54725
This, if you're going to enforce hellweek please also go lighter on the "benefit of doubt" in case of moid- and newfag sounding posts and harder on the punishment

No. 54735

>>54731
Yeah I agree with this, this site isn't just for one type of woman and banning anons because you don't like their opinion is a very quick way to lower the amount of users on this already pretty slow site. Not to mention that what's considered moid-y differs from farmer to farmer so it's not even a clear-cut rule and would make jannies very biased.

No. 54736

>>54735
Not this shit again. It's not about "not liking opinions" but posts that sound like moids. If we went along your logic, no moids would ever be banned because it "could just be a woman with a different opinion uwu~". But that's not how it is. If you want to post like/as a moid, you have literally any other imageboard and forum to do so.

No. 54738

>>54736
When men are actually here though, it's very obvious that they are men.
>If we went along your logic, no moids would ever be banned
Did you forget that staff can see post history? That anon said "moidbrained girls" so it's clear she doesn't mean actual men and it seems more like she's talking about anons who have dissenting opinions. And again, what is considered sounding like a scrote differs from farmer to farmer and if you've been here for any amount of time then you've seen that a lot of anons will accuse each other of being moids for petty reasons. There's no clear guideline for that and it just doesn't really make any sense to ban anons for being "moidbrained" unless they're infighting or otherwise breaking an actual rule. As annoying as those anons are, this site isn't a hivemind.

No. 54739

>>54725
>ban people i don't like, even if they don't break the rules
At this point go and make your own site

No. 54740

>>54738
Im not talking about differing opinions, im talking about girls who are completely ruined by 4chan culture. I'm sick of female r9k posters who only live for incel attention and think this site will cater to that need.

No. 54741

>>54739
newfaggotry isnt allowed

No. 54743

>>54738
This discussion has been already been held in the last thread with responses to all the assumptions in your post so I don't care enough to repeat them. I disagree that moids are always obvious. Unfortunately, especially recently, they seem to get unnoticed at first because muh benefit of doubt and shit up several threads until they finally get banned or anons respond earnestly to them, giving them fooder for whatever they came here for. On other websites, they are openly admitting to posting here freely, for example >>54221 where the moid openly admits to posting in the Vent thread, Get it off your chest thread, Confessions thread and on /g/ and probably has an extensive post history due to it. In the complaints thread there are anons currently mentioning a pol moid shitting up celebricows.
It ruins the board atmosphere and sooner or later prompts this website to get infiltrated with the same garbage you have on any other imageboard. Actually, I don't know why any woman would want to visit non-dramaboards just to bring up the same pol/r9k/misogynistic garbage they can find in any other place.

No. 54744

>>54740
I noticed "anons" unironically calling themselves femcels and I hate it.

No. 54745

>>54743
I'm not exactly sure what your point is. I think moids are usually pretty obvious but maybe it isn't to some anons and that's fine, but either way I'm not arguing against them being banned.

No. 54746

you're doing meowtastic, mods

No. 54747

>Wahhhhh conversation sucks now.
>Proceeds to have nothing to talk about other than trannies.
Really makes ya think jk it doesn't because it's very very easy to see the difference in five years.
You're all newfags left and you're asking for a hell week? Lunacy.

No. 54748

>>54747
I've been here since 2014. Why are you so against a hellweek if you dont break the rules?

No. 54749

>>54748
Against?

No. 54750

>>54747
Then talk about something else lol, no one is forcing you talk about trannies

No. 54762

CP in /m/

No. 54781

File: 1679292876947.jpg (191.51 KB, 900x1200, 1672041048010.jpg)

Apologies if this is a bad idea but could we do something for april fools? I think it would be fun. It doesn't have to be something extravagant

No. 54789

>>54781
We have had April Fool's events in the past, so it's not a crazy suggestion

No. 54814

Hey new jannies, we've literally always been allowed to post the text heart, it's a character like any letter or number, not an emoji.

No. 54818

>>54814
All you have to do is type # < 3 to get the correct one. (Not sure if the approved heart icon is different on devices even when that code is used tho?) I love a heart as much as the next bitch but this shit is getting annoying. Either ban them outright, explain the correct formatting in the redtext and/or ban notice, or allow any kind of heart. What a stupid thing to waste our already retarded and stretched thin mods' time and mental energy on. ♥

No. 54821

>>54818
❤ ♥
don't mind me, just curious how different they actually look posted

No. 54822

>>54821
huh, maybe they were mad because it's bigger kek

No. 54824

Just wanted to thank the new staff for the liberal use of redtext as a warning again. Its nice to see violations being noticed by the mod team and it gives the poster a chance to correct themselves before being put out to pasture. Reporting feels less like pissing into an ocean of piss than other imageboards again.

No. 54825

i'm curious about this, and i'm sorry if it's a goofy question but do mods have the ability to delete posts? or is it just admins?

No. 54826

>>54825
technically even jannies can delete posts, but they're instructed not to unless it's spam/gore/cp

No. 54829

>>54826
thanks nonna. it was because i wanted to suggest the trump-chan spam be deleted in celebricows, especially if that person just isn't going to contribute anything other than irrelevant spam. it just shits up the threads, the last one was full of it, and sometimes anons can't help but respond to the bait. i feel bad for even complaining and the team's doing great with moderating (imo) as far as i can see, but because of that anon insisting on ban evading and clogging up the thread about the sprouse twins or whatever it's making scrolling through the thread very annoying.

No. 54831

File: 1679535058406.jpeg (14.37 KB, 828x218, 3F2F3397-D020-4714-BC7B-F4170F…)

>>54821
This comes up as an emoji on mobile

No. 54832

>>54831
>the jannies are mobilefags
disappoint

No. 54833

File: 1679536238381.png (1.69 KB, 468x87, hearts.png)

>>54821
On mobile both of these appear to be the red hearted emoji. Bit surprised that the first heart is bigger then the other

No. 54835

>>54814
Yeah I got banned for that the other day
Dumbasses

No. 54836

File: 1679543914299.png (9.51 KB, 929x274, Screenshot_20230322-205755_(1)…)

>>54821
They both come off as emojis but one is slightly different from the other
Using Google Chrome if that matters

No. 54838

>>54836
Nta but I'm also using google chrome and they both show up as black hearts for me, just one bigger than the other

No. 54839

File: 1679551005709.png (33.95 KB, 1710x264, heart.png)

I get an emoji on mobile and a bigger heart on computer

No. 54840

File: 1679564277359.jpg (73.18 KB, 1080x1280, Screenshot_20230323_093416_Sam…)

>>54831
>>54836
this is how it looks on mobile for me

No. 54842

accidently had 2 images posted due to the error(you know one) jannies please don't ban me for that

No. 54844

File: 1679579647461.jpg (23.47 KB, 720x346, hearts.jpg)

weird how much variation there is

No. 54853

File: 1679618707783.png (447.27 KB, 2022x1167, Screenshot.png)

What is happening in the Dasha thread lately?

No. 54854

File: 1679641548313.jpg (109.6 KB, 1080x697, Screenshot_20230324_090335_Bra…)

>>54844
>>54840
>>54839
>>54838
>>54836
>>54833
>>54831
The supposedly allowed heart is the black heart suit Unicode character (U+2665) which on many modern browsers, particularly mobile, now gets parsed as the heart suit emoji. The original "no emoticons or emoji" lolcow rule was obviously introduced prior to this, so now we really do need a proper updated consensus if this one emoji can still be allowed.

No. 54868

>>54853
i wouldn't be surprised if it is her having an episode again. she needs to take her meds.

No. 54872

Probably need to lock the Kirsten thread in /snow now it is unfortunately confirmed she has passed (how does this keep happening, coconutkitty not too long ago too and that Aussie girl a while ago)

No. 54886

>>54854
Anons can also ALT+3.

No. 54906

Petitioning mods to move Jill's thread to /pt/ now that she's actively sending her confetti club to harass real doctors and try to take their medical licenses over her DID larp. She's gone way beyond normal /w/ cringe weebery for a while now.

No. 54910

can the second racefakers/transracialism thread be locked(this time without the potential troon derailing)

>>>/ot/1498337

No. 54911

>>54906
I agree

No. 54913

>>54906
i get you're suggesting this because her retard behavior has transcended. but shes a very profilic cow and /pt/ is dead most of the time.
if you take someone like jill out of /w/ or shayna out of /snow/ and send them to /pt/ its gonna be very unhelpful. /pt/ is too restrictive for the autisitc tirades of shayfags and pixietransretards. /snow/ and /w/ would get less traction without their most popular cow threads in their frontpage. the only thing /pt/ would mean nowadays is "recognition"

No. 54914

>>54913
>/pt/ is dead
Yeah, because the cows aren't milky right now except for Chris-chan because he was just released from prison, not because /pt/ is supposed to be a graveyard.
Jill by all means should have already been in /pt/, she was one of the original cows. I can see why she was put in /w/ at the time because she was just an annoying pastel weirdo for years but now that her behavior has escalated why not put her in /pt/? Who cares if /w/ becomes dead, /w/ is supposed to just be for annoying weeby snowflakes.

No. 54919

>>54906
>>54914
idk anything about that cow but if she's that milky then i think she should be sent to revitalize /pt/. The rest of the threads on /w/ are unmoderated trash anyway so it's not like keeping it there is sustaining anything of value.

No. 54921

Please lock one of the Jerma threads in /m/, there doesn't need to be two.

No. 54933

File: 1680012153108.png (39.4 KB, 1051x514, Catalog.png)

looks like someone's having a rough day

No. 54934

>>54933
OK who called paki chan a moid again so she's seething now?

No. 54935

>>54933
Would love to see red text or some indicator a la Mystery to showcase the amount of samefagging in this thread

No. 54936

What’s going on the last 24 hours or so? There’s way too many shit threads and males and shitposts. Is it just a couple deranged posters or is there some type of amateur brigade happening?

No. 54958

>>54936
I am assuming it’s because of Chris Chan out of jail and the tranny school shooter.

No. 54961

>>54933
That explains a lot of the posts on ot and the fakeboi thread today.

No. 54973

>>54961
This basically. It feels like a bunch of people showed up to gaslight the fakeboi thread. I don't like that I'm seeing posts that come off like there's a coordinated attempt to obfuscate the shooting details. A troon is a troon.

No. 54980

ONGOING RAID FROM SOYJACK.PARTY JANNIES PLS BE ACTIVE

No. 54981

File: 1680122178293.png (109 KB, 1964x956, Capture d’écran 2023-03-29 à 2…)

>>54980
they are targeting /ot/ so pls nonnies be careful there

No. 54984

>>54981
they think we're a pro-troon board lmao. moids truly are retarded

No. 54990

>>54981
at least we know which vpns to block now

No. 54993

Apologies nonas, the person who called for/started the raid was a known troon we've dealt with before. We've cleaned things up and are still monitoring. I guess the recent events have caused this troon to lash out.

No. 54994

>>54993
God bless you!

No. 54995

>>54993
I assume that you had issues with this troon before? What recent events are you referring to? I'm sorry this freak tried to weponize the sharty against you. Is there any way that you would ingratiate us with some lore surrounding this troon so that we can make fun of him in the future?

No. 54996

>>54993
blaine ?

No. 54997

>>54993
They are at it again.

No. 54998

>>54995
get your attention elsewhere

No. 54999

File: 1680136274427.png (345.73 KB, 2012x1969, 1658432943378.png)

>>54995
You might remember in 2022 a troon posted disgusting thigh pics and asked kuz to be a janny, pic related. Kuz rejected him obviously and the troon sperged out and posted 'p on the sharty and tried to ddos it as well. He's on the kolyma anti-subversion list https://nss.kolyma.net/anti-subversion/individuals/blaine-gaven-ross/ He's posted 'p here too and is embarrassingly annoying. He'll deny it but he hates lolcow and will do anything to take it down because he will never be a woman. The best thing you can do is soyquote him with troonjaks if he makes a thread trying to get 'teens to raid lolcow for him.
sorry for my soyteen sperginess here cerbmin I understand if you ban me

No. 55000

>>54999
There is also another troon named Dawn or something like that that is the main BBC/ gay black porn spam

No. 55002

>>55000
I don't think I've heard that name before, he's not a known troon here. It's disgusting that these creatures haunt sites they're unwanted on for validation or however they rationalize it, it's just so mentally ill. It's always the troons doing this shit, never normal people. we really do need ttd

No. 55003

>>55002
Ayrt I’m not terminally online (not making fun of you kek) I only know the name because he outed himself in the now defunct lcf discord as the main black gay porn spammer. I know Blaine posted to Soyjack too to spam LC a while ago. Troons need to fuck off and leave us alone. I think it’s funny that soyjackers think we’re troons / Troon lovers Kek

No. 55004

>>55003
The 'jakkers don't think we're troon lovers, they were only raiding just because it's fun to them. A few were calling out OP in the thread for trying to get them to raid a site that hates trannies. Do you have screencaps of the tranny admitting he's behind the bbc spam?

No. 55025

File: 1680216101760.png (84.35 KB, 1834x845, lol.png)

Some guy that was part of the raid tried to apologize.

No. 55027

>>54993
I hoped he finally joined the 41%.

No. 55033

Incredibly quick stop to the gore raid, thank you admin/farmhands

No. 55037

Tranny gore raid

No. 55043

The tranny is still at it in /ot/. Gore and trans rights shit.

No. 55046

>>55034
>>55038
>>55039
>>55044
>>55045
you will never be a woman you tranny pedophile

No. 55047

Gore poster back at it in ot

No. 55048

>>55047
he's getting more persistent.

No. 55049

Just men being men again posting gore

No. 55051

>>55049
its some troon

No. 55052

This is my first time seeing gore. I'm traumatised. How do you guys deal with this constantly. Blergh

No. 55053

>>55052
I think you just slowly forget. During a raid like maybe 2 weeks ago I saw a gore gif on the front page and it still makes me a little sick.

No. 55054

>>55052
kys concerntroon

No. 55057

wtf is going on

No. 55061

>>55057
Soyjack trannies most likely

No. 55067

>>55057
Fags gonna faggot

No. 55068

File: 1680279815196.jpeg (73.85 KB, 1125x1034, F565560B-0E95-40B7-A035-5CA5E5…)

>>53472
If you want to use lolcow during a raid, go to your browser and turn off images. All images will appear as blank spaces. Obviously you can’t see any good posts either but it’s easy to turn on and off.

No. 55074

Apologies nonas, it's been the same troon for the last few days.

No. 55077

>>55068
Omg kisses to you!! Great tip

>>55074
Thank you queen.

No. 55078

>>55074
no need to apologize, troons gonna do troon shit.

No. 55079

>>55074
No apologies necessary. it's just crazy how troons are this way and idiots outside lolcow will still defend them as sane.

No. 55080

can someone tell me if the gore/porn spam is over so i can go back on the rest of the site please

No. 55083

>>55080
It’s gone nona but also look at this
>>55068

No. 55084

Please close this thread >>>/ot/1495349 and allow us to use this one which actually has the rules of the thread in the OP. Too many stupid retards that can't follow the rules replied to posts that they weren't supposed to. In previous threads these anons were banned, but I guess they're not being reported enough.

Here's the new thread:
>>>/ot/1538063

No. 55092

File: 1680326406222.png (538.24 KB, 1817x565, 1.png)

/shay/ reminds me of keekweek with kiki. What would be an apt name fitting with shayna regarding this? shaydays? dollyhaus theme?
Also love that royalolcow line.
>Queen Pixyteri and Princess Shayna.

No. 55093

>>55092
i vote for shayday. short, simple, and it rhymes.

No. 55096

>>55092
i really wish we could keep this board as i kind of love it in all its tacky, white trash glory. please cerbmin? arigato.

No. 55097

KEK CERBMIN

No. 55099

Love you, admins. You guys are absolute legends. Best admin/s EVER.

No. 55101

>>55092
I only saw this on mobile and scrolled down and got a jumpscare omfg

No. 55103

>>55092
Could we please keep it even if it's closed after the 1st, just for archiving? Love it.

No. 55104

>>55092
i am dying at the shayboard. pls pls keep it for a little longer than just today

No. 55114

File: 1680410241233.jpg (316.29 KB, 1080x2402, Shayday dark.jpg)

>>55092
Please make a darker variant of shayday like picrel. The current one hurts me eyes

No. 55117

>>55114
seconding this and also make it so that when you hover over a >> 12345 post number it highlights the post in a darker colour if it's on the screen like it does on every other board (sorry i'm so fucking shit at explaining what i mean)

No. 55153

We hope everyone had a good Shaypril Fool's Day. We've gotten a few requests to keep /shay/, and while we decided to return her main threads to /snow/, we'd like to let anons vote on whether to keep /shay/ to house the shaynatorium and other shatposting (option to link with each new Shay thread), or whether to retire /shay/ and return the shaynatorium to /ot/. Here is the link to vote: https://strawpoll.com/polls/05ZdWJEVNg6

No. 55154

>>55153 please please please no. Make it a yearly thing instead, something to look forward to. I really do not want this permanently. No offence to who made it, its great as a gag but my god can I not stand it.

No. 55156

>>55153
So fucking amazing. Shaypril Fool's was incredible and /shay/ is a magnificent containment board. Well done admin. golf clap
>>55154
Why'd it bug you so much nonna? If you didn't like it just don't go? I don't see any downside for a permanent /shay/ board that's hidden.

No. 55157

>>55153
I'd rather it didn't stay and I agree with >>55154 as while it was fun, it's not going to last all yearlong as an active board. Also the board style is rather harsh on the eyes and makes it so that it's harder to read the threads as one would normally.

No. 55158

>>55156
Nta it was a good April fools joke but giving shaytards everything they want will probably inflate their ego. They already have the shatpost thread in /ot/

No. 55159

>>55153
I'd rather keep the /shay/ thing as an optional theme instead of have an entire board dedicated to it. Plus, making it a permanent board just gives Shayna more of a reason to say we're a hate site dedicated to her.

No. 55160

>>55158
Cranky bc your cow doesn't have a dedicated board, aren't you

No. 55161

>>55160
I don't have a cow I use lc for /ot/ and /m/

No. 55162


No. 55163

>>55162
Why ew?

No. 55164

>>55161
then your opinion doesn't really matter, does it?

>>55153
keeping it sounds fun now but other anons make good points. I think having it as an optional theme or keeping it for just the shaynatorium and other retard threads is alright. maybe we could bring it back for her birthday month? either way thank you shaymin for the laughs, it truly was amazing.

No. 55166

>>55164
Why doesn't my opinion matter?

No. 55167

>>55166
because you just said you don't browse cow boards? hello?

No. 55168

>>55167
Stop behaving like a petulant child.

No. 55169

>>55158
ayrt Maybe, but will also contain a lot of the shaytistic behavior many nonnies are tired of. If the board is hidden and not interfering with any other aspect of lc, then what's the problem? If the board dies, it dies and Shaynus is finally put out to pasture. No big deal imho. I would even go so far as to suggest any shat posting outside dedicated cow discussion threads in lc where applicable is a ban worthy offense kek.
>>55159
I mean she's more than welcome to but what can she do? I figure she ought to be flattered. She largely ignores us these days and during balconygate I don't think she even figured out the tipper was from lc.

No. 55170

>>55168
your whole reply chain is why non cow board users are ew

No. 55171

>>55170
I'm not that anon, but why are noncow board users ew?

No. 55172

>>55168
You're the petulant child here.

No. 55173

Non-cow board users are no better than twitterfags and we all know it.

No. 55174

>>55173
i think either noncow board and cowboard users can have their own cringe

No. 55175

>>55173
>we all know it
I don't, I think both sides are cringe, based on this conversation it looks like both have an annoying superiority complex.

No. 55176

>>55153
Keep it pls, but if you do keep it you’ve got to add the other themes as options. I can only use dark themes on chans and not having the option on /shay/ is frying my retinas kek

No. 55177

>>55175
>>55174
>cringe
Back to twitter

No. 55179

>>55153
voted for it to stay. shaydemocracy will prevail and win.

No. 55180

>>55177
>cringe is twitter now because one anon said so
What should we use instead o wise oldfag and protector of lc's culture? I'm thinking ungood but locked is also schwayed

No. 55183

>>55153
im thinkin keep /shay/ in it's own containment page, because all the shayheads bring up her name in almost every thread that's not even related to her.
maybe keeping it hidden will expose that shay lurks because she'd have to link to the hidden thread. also shayheads are insane.

No. 55184

>>55153
im thinkin keep /shay/ in it's own containment page, because all the shayheads bring up her name in almost every thread that's not even related to her.
maybe keeping it hidden will expose that shay lurks because she'd have to link to the hidden thread. also shayheads are insane.

No. 55188

>>55153
I posted this in /shay/ but reposting here…

This whole thing was a funny Shaypril's fool joke but is dumb as hell to continue with and just another ego boost for Shay. Anything in the /shay/ can be posted in the Shaynatorium in /ot/. The original thread should be moved back to /snow/.

Didn't we for years resist making Shayna a /pt/ cow because it was funnier to keep her in /snow/ where she was just another ho?

The creator of the Shaynatorium has already admitted to it being a bad idea and taking fun away from the main thread. The first thread took months to fill up, she isn't as popular here as some of you think other than her main thread. Spreading out the shaytism through /shay/ is like not enough butter spread across bread. It's a bad idea and will kill the fun even more.

Too much of a "good thing" always turns bad nonas. Mark my words.

No. 55191

>>55188
I agree 100%. It was definitely funny for april fools but it's better to put her back where she belongs.

No. 55192

>>55180
I'm not even the original anon you're arguing with, you just type like zoomers from twitter and thought you should know.

No. 55194

>>55191
Plus, when I'm feeling a little Shaytistic, I like to scroll through the Shaynatorium and laugh at the random shit. So now we have to click through each thread in /shay/ trying to find the funny? Nah, not cool.

No. 55196

>>55177
It’s true though, both types of users have weird unhinged and cringe posters.

No. 55199

File: 1680692652663.gif (1.13 MB, 300x226, tiffany.gif)

when new hidden board gets posted:
>omg i love it so much! can we keep it? hehe i hope shayna sees this, fat ass cow.

when new hidden board is kept and some threads no one really cares about get moved there:
>what the fuck did you bitches do?! i hate this bullshit! fuck shayna, fuck the mods, fuck everybody! i want all my motherfucking threads back in /snow/ right now or else!

before someone chews me out, i don't really care either way. i like the new hidden board and think it's funny but whatever. i know you autistic bitches can't handle any sort of change.

No. 55200

>>55171
I'll bite: We are a drama site. The drama boards are what our site is about. /ot/ /g/ and /m/ were added to give drama thread users a spot to take offtopic conversations to. Users who don't care about the core community of the site (and often rebuke it) obviously lack enough understanding of our board culture or want to actively change it. They have no place in the conversation. The fact alone that there are /ot/ users who consider themselves separate from drama board users is laughable and shows how bad the twittok infestation has become in recent years. It's like saying you go on KF just for the chat or you go on PornHub for the comments. If you don't care about the main focus of the community then find one that isn't centered around drama or make your own, but don't try to change ours. Personally I think all outspoken /ot/ only users should just get banned instead of letting them continue to dilute board culture. I'd even support closing the offtopic boards so that the farmhands can focus on the main boards. We could always just do a crystal.cafe takeover, that's what it was made for and we could easily displace the trannies

No. 55202

>>55200
Nta but no off topic board users are trying to change the culture of the site or get rid of them (no, not even that anon. Admins asked and they voiced their opinion but they didn't say that should be /snow/ be deleted or shayfags banished). If anything, it's the users who keep coming to /meta/ demanding that the off topic boards be deleted that are trying to change the culture of the site. Yes this is foremost a cow site, but off topic boards have been on LC since the beginning and they're a part of the core community and culture whether or not you have an autistic hateboner for them.

No. 55203

>>55200
i don't want to get into another oldfag vs /ot/ debate but this part that you wrote > If you don't care about the main focus of the community then find one that isn't centered around drama or make your own, but don't try to change ours is so fucking true. i have absolutely zero issue with newfags or board users who prefer one board over the other, but the whole issue with the influx of newfags is that they want to whitewash the site and turn it into something that it isn't and anyone who tells them otherwise gets told to basically go to hell. they aren't interested in board culture and more often than not, want to astroturf the board and turn it into this uber-liberal political hellhole with a little sprinkling of q-anon here and there for good measure, all while nuking everything that made lolcow lolcow in the process. and no, this board was not originally a "feminist" board, it was a gossip board started to contain drama from /cgl/ and that's a very, very simplified version of how lolcow came to be.

>>55201

they've never come out directly and said they want to change the culture, they always have some slick way of getting around it but their intentions are very obvious. i remember the whole meltdown over the cow lore poll (basically a bunch of users failed) and that was when it became obvious we had two different sects on this board - general board/chan users and then these other people with no interest in the culture at all. i remember the arguments between oldfags and the newfags from twitter and tiktok who didn't like the cow boards because they thought they were "mean" or whatever for gossiping about "autistic" people. i remember these same newfags during covid terrorizing burritomin and trying to turn the board into a white feminist hellhole and anyone who dared to call them out on their whining and bullshit would get piled on and called all sorts of crazy names.

i've been here since the staminarose era. i've seen this site change hands and have been through most of the attempted takeovers and it's been interesting to watch it all happen over the years.

No. 55204

>>55153
>>55188
Agreed. I’ve contributed to the majority of threads on /shay/ and I still voted to get rid of it. Idk if other anons just aren’t using them yet because they don’t want their efforts to end up getting deleted, but it’s crickets in pretty much every thread. Even if it stays I’ll keep posting my retarded edits in the official Shaynatorium thread anyway in protest. Like you said, it’s already the perfect hub for all things shaytistic. And I’ll slightly disagree with it being a bad idea and taking away from the main thread. At least there you can post your edits without being banned for fan art, which always cracks me up because isn’t this an imageboard? How are you gonna get funny thread pics without edits? But I digress. The main thread for milk and Shayna’s autism + the Shaynatorium for shaytards’ autism is already the perfect combo imo. Also the first thread only took 5 weeks to fill up not months, but I’ll grant you that the second one is a lot slower

No. 55205

>>55204
Samefag, coming back to add that the Shaynatorium is already auto-saged, so why do shaytards need further containment? Who in /ot/ is being bothered by shaytards in an un-bumpable thread at the bottom of the catalog for active threads? I just don’t understand the need to decentralize the shitposting even further, it dilutes the quality overall.

No. 55206

>>55202
Just FYI I don't have a hate"boner" for the /ot/-chans either, I just think they shouldn't insert themselves/make themselves heard. If they have complaints, they can do their own thing, but they shouldn't take up more site resources than needed. Imo they're guests. They're welcome to join in but need to sit down when farmers are talking. I don't think farmers are better than them, we're just different userbases and this happens to be a site for farming. That's all.

>>55203
This. Maybe they don't outright call for a rule overhaul but everyone can see how they're trying to police language and thread content while having no connection to the original board culture whatsoever.

No. 55207

File: 1680702045487.jpeg (81.88 KB, 1080x1543, 1603331467415.jpeg)

Yeees, yeees, close down /ot/ again and let the Pitbull posting begin!(USER HAS BEEN PUT OUT TO PASTURE)

No. 55208

I don't get how none of you ever get tired of this retarded discussion.

No. 55209

>>55175
I'm >>55167 and haven't replied since. it wasn't coming from a place of superiority, it was more that someone who doesn't even use cow boards shouldn't be trying have a say in what happens on them. not sure how >>55168 interpreted that as being a petulant child but it seems like a nerve was struck kek.

>>55188
I don't see why we care about giving shay an ego boost or "giving her more ammo" as another nonnie put it. lolcow is for our entertainment really and if it's funny we should do it. her feelings shouldn't impact our decision imo. I'm not too fussed on what happens either way, it would just be a shame to get rid of it entirely cause it was pretty hilarious.

No. 55210

>>55207
based and dalepilled

No. 55211

>>55208
I just think the non-cow vs. cow board thing is kinda forced and get annoyed seeing anons act like all of these boards aren't a part of the site and an integral part of the culture here. Farmers will start a division over aaaaaaanything and there's so many better things about the site to be debating that the constant "shut this board down!!!!!" almost feels like a distraction.

No. 55212

>>55209
>it would just be a shame to get rid of it entirely cause it was pretty hilarious.
Keep /shay/ but close it and only reopen it on April 1st every year for a few days so shaytards can enjoy a recap of the previous year's shaytardation.

No. 55213

>>55211
Not a Shaynafag and I don't care about her threads either way but she's one of the cows whose threads harbor shittons of camgirls and other twittertards and having the whole /shay/ board is inevitably going to empower them to run more rampant. I don't know if you've ever been around for any of our "containment zones" but they've never worked and always ended up just attracting much more of the undesired postings. I know /shay/ wasn't made as a containment zone but that's what it'll turn into if it stays. Spergy threads need to be given less leeway, not even more. My main point being that this is a conversation around the bigger board culture and its long-lasting issues. If you disagree, you're at least contributing to the conversation, but you just want to sidestep it entirely because you don't care about the state and future of the site as a whole.

No. 55215

>>55213
/shay/ just came about 5 days ago. I'm talking about our main boards and how every so often anons come into /meta/ saying that off topic boards should be banned or whatever if that wasn't clear.
>you just want to sidestep it entirely
What? I literally made a different post about this earlier and have talked about this in the past when the topic came up.

No. 55216

>>55174
>>55175
Oh of course you two twitterhags disagree with me kek.

No. 55217

>>55153
I don't mind keeping it IF we can change the theme because the current one is awful to read (no offense to whoever made it cause its fun for what it is)

No. 55219

Shay-lution:
1. Move the main Shayna threads back to /snow/.
2. Put the Shaynatorium back in /ot/ to be linked in the main thread like usual
3. Leave /shay/ and the rest of the shit-threads within to be actually "hidden" and a time capsule. Only accessed by die hard Shayheads to be freely Austistic and to fuck around in if they want. Have it not be mentioned in the main thread and be a true "Lolcow Easter Egg"
4. Make the Shayna theme an available style on all boards for the fans of the sparkly butt plug

No. 55220

You know I'm really thinking about this as someone who has been diehard about keeping /shay/. Why do we want to keep it so badly? Because it's fun as hell. We love the shenanigans and the tomfoolery with fairly free posting. I suggest cerbmin come together and add some more fun elements to lolcow. Don't mess with the original boards, but maybe add some experimental stuff like /shay/ every so often. Like maybe every couple of months if possible. Now I'm a complete idiot and have ZERO clue how much time it took to make /shay/, but we've had soooo much laughter and fun off this versus bitter sperging I can see some humorous elements injected into our beloved lolcor being a good thing. Now I know there's gonna be some nonna's who will screech and moan about the OG lolcow and how it should never be altered, but good God ladies isn't it time for a little spice in our lives? The fact cerbmin even put this together is the best thing that's happened in ages. Let them get a little weird and wild. Why not turn /shay/ into a fully autistic haven for us spastic weirdos to post weird edits/ramblings about our favorite cows? If you don't like the retarded hidden board… don't open it. Pretty simple. In fact make /shay/ the theme board and leave OG lolcor alone all together. Weird ass themes and bizarre posting galore depending on what admin picks/lets us vote on.

No. 55221

>>55219
This is the way

No. 55223

I think the shaynatorium and current shay threads should stay in /ot/ and /snow/ respectively and /shay/ should serve as an archive of her old threads and for other shaytistic shay threads (like the ones currently in /shay/)
>>55220
>Now I know there's gonna be some nonna's who will screech and moan about the OG lolcow and how it should never be altered
This is how 4chan died. I get wanting to preserve culture as much as possible but there has to be something new introduced every so often so lolcow doesn't go the same way.

No. 55224

>I think the shaynatorium and current shay threads should stay in /ot/ and /snow/ respectively and /shay/ should serve as an archive of her old threads and for other shaytistic shay threads
ayrt Love this idea.
>This is how 4chan died. I get wanting to preserve culture as much as possible but there has to be something new introduced every so often so lolcow doesn't go the same way.
YES I agree completely. We gotta keep injecting some fresh fun otherwise it will all go stale. We're already seeing cows dwindling with no replacements. We have loads of material in personal cows but I think nonnas are intimidated by the thread making process as well as being critiqued for their cow choice. Maybe we need a process for voting on new cows for fresh threads? Or maybe updated criteria?

No. 55225

I think we should go back to the old Shayna main thread on /snow/ and the Shaynatorium on /ot/ arrangement. We can keep /shay/ as an archive. On /shay/ there are many dead threads with 5 replies and I think it would be more fun to have the off-topic shay discussion in one place (the Shaynatorium).

No. 55228

>>55223
I dont know how much work for the admonnies this would be, but I think thats a great idea to have all the shayna threads archived in one spot in /shay/ after they fill up. Will doing this kill all the links existing threads (ei. old thread lists and when we link back to the last thread)?

No. 55233

I think /shay/ should stay. There is no harm in making shaynafags happy

No. 55239

File: 1680803839262.png (10.55 KB, 867x401, 91A163A0-3154-4E36-BAD6-A34416…)

Due to popular vote, the Shaynatorium will remain in /Shay/. /shay/ will continue to be a hidden board. Shayna’s main thread has been moved back to /snow/ and any new Shayna threads should be made in /snow/. We are currently working on tweaking the Shay theme to be less eye-searing, once it’s tweaked it will be available as a theme site-wide. Thank you to everyone who participated in the vote! In the future, expect to see more strawpolls held for more serious site changes.

No. 55289

File: 1680947820062.jpg (23.91 KB, 340x340, 1646985170457.jpg)

>>55239
Not a shaytard myself (even if I think their brand of autism can be quite endearing at times) but seeing how much you are willing to do for our beloved Peruvian knitting forum is very nice. Keep up the good work Cerbmins !

No. 55295

>>55239
Thank you for this.

No. 55299

https://lolcow.farm/2X/res/10868.html
Person is infighting and accusing others of being a scrote.(samefagging anon from the thread)

No. 55304

Maybe /2X/ would benefit from having poster IDs enabled. There's so many moid, tranny, tradthot, pick me, samefag, etc. accusations. Some people will probably still infight because threads are slower and they don't understand what a dynamic IP or a VPN is but I think it would reduce a significant amount of it.

No. 55309

>>55304
Seems like dangerous territory

No. 55310

>>55309
How? NTA but I actually wouldn't mind it. At least some of the more moronic samefaggers and infighters would be called out. Plus, iirc how 4chan does it, it's different per board.

No. 55311

>>55304
/2X/ would benefit from being hidden just like it was before

No. 55313

>>55311
agreed. /2X/ was pretty dead when it was hidden but its environment was way better. most of the posts were very high quality, informative and thoughtful, even if threads did move a little slower. having it out in the open i think attracts a lot of people (maybe moids/trannies) who just hate anything radfem adjacent and want to infight and derail threads. the overall quality of the board's gone down a lot.

No. 55314

>>55311
agreed; i'd rather haver a less active board that this pickme and /pol/tard infected mess

No. 55319

>>55313
threads were replied once every 3 months u cant be that serious

No. 55321

Is there something going on with /snow/ at the moment? It seems unusually slow this week

No. 55324

>>55299
lmao ywnbaw

No. 55325

>>55313
Maybe if you like reading a new post every 2 months (or more) lol.

No. 55330

>>55319
>>55325
A meaningful, high quality post every few months with limited interference from hostile parties is infinitely preferable to shallow, uninformed, low quality posts every few minutes from the entire demographic of the website.

No. 55332

>>55304
I also think /2X/ should have user ID because it now feels like there are two males/baiters who keep samefagging and shitting up the whole board. At least they'd be more ashamed of it if all posts in that thread got exposed to be theirs.

No. 55333

File: 1681023679388.jpg (78.28 KB, 914x551, Screenshot_20230409-100019_Ope…)

>>55332
Samefag, this is the average post in /2X/
Can mods please ban these baiters? Why is it allowed for them to call women free prostitutes, samefag, bait and do all of this shit yet they never even get redtexted?

No. 55335

>>55333
>This thread full of discussions I hate having, which I willingly read, has upset me. Moderators, hear ye! Hear ye!

No. 55336

File: 1681025950513.png (263.01 KB, 358x651, dddne.png)

>>55333
that anon is kinda right though. Stay out of the blackpill thread if it triggers you
>>55335
kek, picrel

No. 55337

>>55333
>read a blackpill feminism thread
>is pissed because the blackpilled feminists have blackpilled thoughts

No. 55338

>>55336
>>55335
>>55337
Calling women prostitutes or believing every woman is an unemployed loser like yourself that depends on men to live isnt feminism. Anon could post this to any given incel forum and she'd be applauded and incels would agree that women are just sextoys.

No. 55339

>>55338
I'm certain you're the same retard that posted a blackpill screenshot to the funny caps thread yesterday in an attempt to stir shit up there, that didn't work and everyone shat on you for derailing so now you're taking it to meta and begging the farmhands to moderate based on your personal opinions. Just hide the thread.

No. 55340

>>55338
I have to say I agree on this one. Why do we want to foster that kind of audience on this site? Not only that but it'll probably attract incel moids in a "how do you do fellow blackpilled stacies" kind of way and it's just toxic. There's nothing based about giving in to utter hopelessness and paranoia while living as a woman in this world, it's not empowering whatsoever, and it really all puts one's traumas and insecurities on blast as they lash out at everything around them. It's just not mentally healthy and these women need help. I feel pity for whatever extreme events turned them to this thinking. Although I can't say I feel the same for moids because they're mostly awful by default and go blackpill because they feel entitled, thinking the world owes them something, specifically pussy.

No. 55341

>>55340
Wasn't one of the massposters on /2X/ banned yesterday for samefagging and infighting? A lot of anons think it's an incel so what you said is already happening.

No. 55342

How does this keep getting sillier?

No. 55344

>>55340
>women who don’t think like me need mental help. Ban them mods!

No. 55345

>>55341
If we deactivated portions of this site every time a moid tried to get into then there wouldn’t be a board left on this site. Everyone could tell there was something wrong with that poster, it’s not like everyone was nodding along kek. Women are not responsible for what men do.

No. 55351

>>55344
nta but if you saw yourself in her description, yes, you need help.

No. 55352

File: 1681089150335.jpeg (28.53 KB, 480x360, 6A30E9A9-CCEC-49BF-83F5-B940C3…)


No. 55363

>>55341
Pretty sure it was the tranny again, since he does the exact same thing on /meta/&/ot/ too to this extend. So I'm not sure if that counts, since he is an incel but sadly isn't 2X-only.

No. 55364

infighting in the amerifag thread in /ot/

No. 55399

>>55333
>>55340
Came here to complain about this, albeit days late. It's indistinguishable from the incel mindset and trying to pass blatant misogynist ideas like "women are just leeching off their husbands and being prostitutes to them" as "blackpilled feminism" is fucked up and only used to attack other women based on oversimplifications, not to criticize structural misogyny, the patriarchy or even feminism. Femcel isn't a term I use lightly but in the case they're actually female and not baiting XYs they view other women the same kind of cock carousel riding hussies as actual incels do and harbor resentment towards them, it's so personal sounds like a desperate cope for not being picked. It's unhealthy and obvious mental illness like that should be treated as such especially because it keeps bleeding over from that thread to other places outside of /2X/, a board that's already oversaturated with larping scrotes, /pol/tards and Paki-chan and Seal-chan samefagging.

No. 55402

File: 1681260473538.jpg (1.7 KB, 112x30, hidethread.JPG)

>>55399
so lemme get this straight, your big brained interpretation of blackpill feminism is that it is
>a desperate cope for not being picked
but they're the incels, not you? Kek, that's literally what moids say about feminists all the time. You're entitled to your (wrong) opinion but so are blackpillchans. Constantly shitting up meta with your sperging about the thread you hate yet compulsively look at is not gonna make admins ban it. But there is a solution! (picrel)

No. 55407

>>55399
We got a group of new fag femcels and they don't only keep their misogyny contained in /2X/. I've seen anons get attacked in vent thread with the same aggressiveness of blackpill anons, blaming anons who got raped for dating men, insulting anons who want to have families, etc. These are obviously some really sad femcels who have no lifes outside of 4chan and because of that carry the 4chan stereotypes of women being prostitutes hungry for money. They think they're superior to other women because other women are cheap easy whores just like incels.

No. 55409

The site is so slow for me that when I post sometimes, it posts it 5 or 6 times. I’ve been lucky enough to be able to delete it today, but I don’t want to get accused of being a newfag when it’s out of my control. Is there something going on or is it just me?

No. 55410

>>55409
If you haven't noticed that it's been happening all over the site for weeks then you are a newfag.

No. 55411

>>55410
>weeks

No. 55412

>>55411
Feels like weeks, you saying it's longer or shorter? More than a few days at least.

No. 55413

>>55412
It's been years anon…

No. 55414

>>55413
Not the general slowness, but the posting glitch.

No. 55415

>>55414
Yes, that. It's been years, admins have said it happens when the site is under heavy load

No. 55416

>>55415
I never noticed it before a few weeks ago, wonder what this site considers 'heavy load' more than 2 people trying to post at a time?

No. 55417

>>55410
Ffs I can’t even mention something here without retards like you saying stuff like that.
It has happened in the past (for me) a few times but now it happens regularly. Why do I need to make that clear to you?

No. 55418

>>55417
AYRT is clearly another newfag if she never noticed it until a few weeks ago, trying to pull rank on other newbies. Just move on.

No. 55424

Can someone make a new thread for camgirls in the /snow/ board?

No. 55426

so I was banned for my post here https://lolcow.farm/2X/res/5459.html#q13252, I made a repeal post but now suddenly I can post again in like 2 hours, is there something going with my Ip cause I now ban repeals take some time.

No. 55432

>>55426
did it say it was a temp ban?

No. 55437

>>55432
I was apparently permabnned(this ban will not expire) and I just made an appeal and explained the situation and 2 hours later I wasn't banned.

No. 55438

>>55437
So you got unbanned after newfagging and you came here straight away to newfag it up some more instead of just being happy your ban got appealed successfully?

No. 55439

>>55438
I have been here for 4 years, I just wanted to know if there's some error cause my family uses this chinese Internet service and It might be causing some issues

No. 55440

>>55439
>4 years
>doesn't know how to sage or even how to link a post correctly >>55426
doubt.png

No. 55441

>>55440
Ntayrt, I know you don't have to sage in /meta/ but what about 2X? I didn't think sageing was necessary outside of cow boards and celebrity cows?

No. 55442

>>55440
Nta but it looks like anon just copied the link of the post, which is a way to link them. It's supposed to automatically turn into a regular post link
>>>/ot/1547287

No. 55443

>>55442
Samefag, perhaps it doesn't work with /2X/?
https://lolcow.farm/2X/res/11172.html#q13326

No. 55473

>>55439
That's the same excuse VPN anon had

No. 55474

>>55473
Pakichan already got like 100 vpn ips banned probably, kek. It won't stop her.

No. 55475

Mods PLEASE ban every single anon who derails about the shit-eating/eating ass anon in Shayna's thread. Even the people replying are derailing and deserve bans, make it stop.

No. 55476

>>55475
>There's an anon sperging about eating ass so hard now anons are sperging about the initial sperg.
Brilliant move

No. 55477

>>55475
Yes let’s have a blanket ban on the subject of ass-eating in that thread, Shayna is gross enough as it is. Blogpost sperg outs all around.

No. 55481

>>55474
I have never used a VPN(I can't even fucking afford one If I wanted you Idiots )
This https://proxy-lon.hidemyass-freeproxy.com/ is the only thing that comes across as a VPN for me and I use it for browsing tumblr(USER HAS BEEN PUT OUT TO PASTURE)

No. 55482

>>55481
>I don't know about free VPNs so you're the fool.
Not how that works Pakichan.

No. 55577

File: 1681510415263.png (Spoiler Image,44.47 KB, 929x924, welp there it is.PNG)

>>53472
Well, newmins.
This is why the shaynatorium had always remained a hypothetical.

No. 55578

File: 1681512102198.png (Spoiler Image,38.02 KB, 1015x877, missing nip.PNG)

>>55577
I mean it's a moid larping, but still

No. 55579

Please don't get rid of the shay board..

No. 55580

>>55577
>>55578
the anon who had the tinfoil that the ass-eating-obsessed sperg was a male larping his fetish in the thread is starting to look more likely. Gross.

No. 55581

I cant believe it but I think we need a sitewide ban on the subject of rimming.

No. 55582

File: 1681516640469.jpg (17.79 KB, 473x266, 949e23f006b7b130d733d66e3cc405…)


No. 55583

>>55581
The absolute state of newfags that a civil discourse founded upon analingus could not be attained, I scoff at this outcome, scoff I say!

No. 55585

>>55580
Maybe it's me being an autist again, but there was that porn-sick troon in the Venus thread months ago who posted some of his femboi fap-folder, wrote long ass tirades accusing nonnas of being ~prudes~, ~evil radfems~, ~sexually repressed~ and other moid bs while larping as a true and honest "female" (his words, not mine kek)
I went to the Shayna thread and it really sounds like him…I wish he 41% already.

No. 55587

>>55577
>>55578
oh what the fuck. i thought the anon posting her own chest in that one celebricow thread before was stupid but this is downright unhinged. if they're actually women i don't get why anons are hoping to prove themselves to internet strangers over ass eating of all things

>>55581
i sort of agree but if weirdo anons want to sperg about ass eating let them battle it out in their own contained thread so they don't spread their shit to the rest of the site

No. 55589

>>55581
It's what happens if you don't ban the retards (and the moids immediately joining) the first time they pop up. There's one who desperately tried to bring up anal in various /ot/ threads within the past ~2 years, always almost verbatim the same post and he and his derailing never got banned despite me reporting him every time.

No. 55590

>>55589
Mods won't ban obvious trolls/ unhinged anons until it's too late. It's annoying.
>>55587
The anons that posted nudes definitely did it to get praise out of people. One of the tit posters later went to /ot/ to complain about her boobs and how she hates herself and her genetics after anons made fun of her.

No. 55592

>>55590
>One of the tit posters later went to /ot/ to complain about her boobs and how she hates herself and her genetics after anons made fun of her.
Kek link? Was it the one who said she was leaving the site?

No. 55594

>>55592
There was an anon in the vent thread who said she had tubular breasts and felt ashamed of them. Some other anons from the /shay/ thread just assumed it must've been the same person and started laughing at her.

No. 55595

>>55592
>>55590
No, it was just a random anon in the vent thread complaining about her breasts unrelated to the /shay/ stuff. Anons assumed it must be one of the anons who posted their boobs and went crazy
>>>/ot/1549785

No. 55596

>>55592
If you’re talking about the anon who said she was leaving in the caps thread, that was me and it was an obvious joke shitpost, you poor autistic bastard.

No. 55598

>>55596
The joke wasn't "obvious" since other people believed it too. I don't think I'm the autistic one here.

No. 55599

>>55598
Just because there are a lot of autists here doesn't make you correct, the joke was obvious to me as well but apparently no fun is to be allowed.

No. 55601

>>55599
thanks anon I was starting to think I was insane kek

No. 55603

2x should be hidden again

No. 55607

That tranny in the anime thread is also pestering the husbando thread with autistic femboy shit.

No. 55620

>>55603
I agree, Shaymin truly shat the bed at the very last minute with all of her stupid decisions

No. 55633

idk where else to put this but thread requests thread hit max

No. 55640

cp on snow for over 20 minutes

No. 55643

Will we have a town hall again?

No. 55644

>>55643
This please

No. 55694

Is PNP retarded from her cowness?!

No. 55705

>>55694
Yes but did you mean retired?

No. 55742

>>55705
I actually did omg lol

No. 55754

Can we get a new thread requests thread?

No. 55772


No. 55785

Is posting links about disgusting artists ok as proof about their degenerate art? So it won't be like im posting vendetta (I posted a photo about their pedo shit but it got deleted)

No. 55788

Anyone notice a spike in spam/cp lately

No. 55790

>>55788
It's because of the troon that has been here lately, he's been posting a lot of trapshit in m and sperging about anons hating traps.

No. 55797

>>55790
This. We can't have our female exclusive space in peace without seeing whatever shit coomer moids/trannies love and admittedly get off to. Posting traps and femboys should be banned on site and is an obvious sign of a moid/tranny posting. Thanks to them, the yaoi/bl pic dump thread is now another /cm/ from 4chins as if they couldn't keep their shit over there instead. They can't deal with our hate for these flat futas knowing that moids and trannies are egotistical and entitled.

Also I think he or some other moid/tranny keeps bumping the low quality anime thread. The one that doesn't link to all the older threads.

No. 55819

>>55797
No it's all one person, everyone here is super smart and this site is not dead. Up is down, left is right and there are six users left on this site.
One of them is your tranny, that's what you last people are. You're all trannies as far as I'm concerned this is my final post.

No. 55821

>>55788
It's because anons keep attacking the tranny instead of ignoring it and then he sends illegal content to get even more reaction. Realize how it's only posted when an anon fights with the tranny or complains about it?
When you see it, just ignore it. It'll get bored eventually, please stop feeding it attention.

No. 55833

Someone posted a petition to get Venus off insta in her thread >>286668

No. 55850

>>55821
These trannies and moids literally have nothing better to do than stalk this site and post gross and annoying stuff. Wish they’d all rope already. Good for nothing

No. 55851

>>55850
Me too but we should still ignore them if we see them in threads, they literally bait for attention so any attention is good for them.

No. 55854

Apologies for not interacting for a bit, we’ve all had irl commitments to attend to that converged around the same time. We are still collecting farmhand applications. Please continue to report cp with “cp” in the reason field, this is helpful for us to filter reports to collect and compile IPs for the FBI.
>>54664
Yes, it makes it much faster/easier to issue bans. Thank you, anon!
>>54061
We are reviewing our revised site rules currently and will update lolcow.farm/rules when they are finalized.
>>54125
Before we move to LCF 2.0 we will allow (and encourage) anons to test it and give us feedback. The period between rolling out LCF 2.0 for testing and permanent migration to LCF 2.0 will be a few months at least. But yes, all threads posts, images etc. will be moved over to the new platform, and we’re going to make it match the current aesthetic as much as possible.
>>54546
All farmhands go through an extended interview process, including voice verification, and if there are any remaining doubts we require documentation.
>>54688
It's a hard issue to pin down as duplicate posting can often be caused by device or internet issues user-side, or small outages from our host, but we are monitoring the logs to try and resolve any issues we can.
>>54853
We think Dasha is off her meds.
>>55114
We’re working on bringing you a “dark mode” to the Shayna theme, please hold.
>>55130
Adding new banners has been broken since before we became admin. We had to fix some broken moderation tools so it was low priority, but we absolutely do plan on fixing it and adding new banners.
>>54187
Yes, 2X will be hidden on Friday the 28th.We’ve decided to hide it again as we never really agreed with unhiding it and its “trial run” as an unhidden board has attracted a lot of new users who don't integrate and shit up other boards.

No. 55856

File: 1682364867220.gif (34.43 KB, 500x397, 1673364211296.gif)

>>55854
Petty maybe but I hope nucow will still use lynxchan. Out of every other "modern" imageboard lynxchan is my favourite. Also thank you for everything, every change you guys have done has been awesome so far

No. 55857

>>55854
Will-do with the Belle edits.

Also can we add another header when the new rules go live because I don't think a lot of anons visit meta to see when updates happen, even though they should check here once a week IMO, just to make sure rules haven't been changed.

No. 55858

>>55854
Random and unimportant but I came over to meta to ask why the pro ana scumbags thread 90 was deleted? I just noticed now so I was curious. The original link was >>>/snow/1751458

No. 55863

>>55854
will lcf 2.0 be able to hide/filter posts? i feel like infighting would go down if people could hide things

No. 55876

Cp on /m/

No. 55879

>>55876
and /ot/

No. 55881

File: 1682429961849.png (2.76 KB, 662x122, tardog.PNG)

What do the jannies think "a-logging" means?
because there is 0% a-logging in this post

No. 55883

>>55881
Yeah that's more funny than the actual alogging we have all over /meta/, seems the hope for this site was overly optimistic. It's over.

No. 55892

>>55881
>a-logging a dog
making me kek

No. 55896

>>55881
>that one autistic/likely male shay poster who spergs about her dog getting banned
I see no problem here

No. 55897

>>55896
He absolutely needs banned, but the jannies also need to know what the rules are

No. 55908

if i want to make a fishtank thread, what board would it be most appropriate in? i'm in-between /ot/ and /m/ and i dont want to work on it if it'll just get removed for something silly

No. 55918

>>55908
I say /m/ because it's a show but other anons might think differently

No. 55919

>>55908
Oh wait hold on there's one in /m/ already. It got locked and redtexted, not sure what that's about, it didn't break any rules or anything. If mods could unlock it that'd be nice, I have no interest in fishtank but other nonas might >>>/m/291726

No. 55920

>>55919
oh shit i didn't notice that either ty nona. mods pls let us have fishtank thread i think it would be fun. but maybe autosage it because it could get too fast-paced for /m/?

No. 55921

>>55919
Oh dang I reported that one as male bait but I’m not sure if that’s why they locked it.

No. 55922

scrote posting his nasty dick on the mtf thread

No. 55923

>>55922
Also in ot

No. 55924

he's made a thread too, report it >>>/ot/1559811

No. 55925

>>55922
he's on ot as well

No. 55926

he's on celebricows as well, it's been hours now

No. 55928

so I get the farmhand applications have to be thorough so that the new mods can be proven reliable but you could idk hire a temp or something so that blatant spammers(who are getting way more bold) can be permabanned

No. 55932

File: 1682521212049.jpg (25.96 KB, 450x324, ccd498d1d2b507d80828430590a3b6…)

>>55854
>Before we move to LCF 2.0 we will allow (and encourage) anons to test it and give us feedback. The period between rolling out LCF 2.0 for testing and permanent migration to LCF 2.0 will be a few months at least. But yes, all threads posts, images etc. will be moved over to the new platform, and we’re going to make it match the current aesthetic as much as possible.
It would be sad to see old lc gone but If this can be delivered, we would all be extremely grateful and its smart choice to test the site first for a few months, fix any bugs, and make sure everything is optimized before launching the new one.

No. 55933

>>55854
i hope there will be css customization available in nucow so we can have a thread sharing themes…

No. 55935

>>55854
Will LCF 2.0 have a thread watcher function? That would be very handy.
Sounds great that you will be taking the time to check how it works before moving btw.

No. 55936

spam in /ot/

No. 55937

Baiting scrote in /2x/ calling women "cockbreath" and "dickbrained."

No. 55938

>>55937
i dont think thats a moid, i see plenty bp women on twitter talking like that recently

No. 55939

>>55932
>if this can be delivered
>if
Communic-admin still coming in short on a lot of details and just general presence. Site still runs like shit. Most users gone. "a-logging a dog" iconic of moderation as it stands.
Nu-cow seems like a joke even if it happens. It'll be nu-something but LC is a ghost. Nu-GG or -Pull seems more likely.

No. 55942

>>55938
Well, this isn't Twitter and the anon I'm talking about also clearly hasn't integrated, so.

No. 55952

scrote in /2X/, he confirmed it

No. 55957

>>55952
I can't believe mods didn't ban obviously scrote-tier posts in /2X/ to the point that scrotes got courageous enough to admit they're males and insult anons for being "typical females"

No. 55958


No. 55963

cp in the lolita thread under a spoiler.

No. 55970

File: 1682664016936.jpg (59.23 KB, 497x650, 923216-6.jpg)

>>55939
your being to negative, yeah it will be sad to see old lc gone but the admins are claiming they will test for a few months with user feedback to get it at close to lc's design and feel as possible.
think of all that new mods have done since shyamin, they fixed lc, they brought back /m/, they severely reduced the raids, it's clear to me that they truly do love lolcow and want what's best for it and us as well.

No. 55972

File: 1682671015184.jpg (51.01 KB, 564x633, c860be8cc21025b623dab3d869ac0b…)

>>55970
Some anons are just going to be negative no matter what. I felt pessimistic during the Shaymin era when things got actually fucked up but the new admins have really fixed things. Cute pic btw

No. 55979

Thank you mods for actively banning imfighters lately

No. 55980

What happened to the ac thread?

No. 55982

>>55854
I'm wondering why don't farmhands ever redtext or delete posts made by the schizophrenic pedophile tranny anymore ever since cerbmin took over? he posts frequently in meta and snow it's rather obvious which posts are his, and I'm sure he's occasionally on other boards shitting them up as well. are males allowed to post on lc? I'd really appreciate some clarification from admins or even farmhands since right now it seems like males are allowed to post as long as they don't outright state that they're men.

No. 55983

>>55982
We ban them when we can, bans aren't always redtexted, and we only ban it when it's very obvious/we know it's them. btw, there is more than one, and we try our best to catch it. Moids are never allowed but the amount of nonas that report someone they think is a moid and we check and it's actually not, just a very tradfem or whatever else, is a lot higher than you think, like a LOT higher than you think. Please keep that in mind.

No. 55985

>>55972
We have 3 admins, one of whose sole job is to communicate with users. We rarely hear anything and when we do it's always real life and jobs and spare time. Either they've taken on a commitment they can't handle or they're just making excuses. How exactly are they going to spin up LC 2.0 if real life and jobs and spare time?
Every time we get a staff changeover, there's asskissing and omg so based staff and all the rest of it. It's retarded.

>>55982
That's a throwback to how it used to be. It wasn't until (if I recall correctly) admin before oldmin or so that men were explicitly banned. It was traditionally no-one gives a shit as long as they aren't obvious about it.

No. 55990

>>55983
ah ok that makes sense, it's extremely unfortunate that there is more than one of these freaks continuously posting here. thank you for the clarification

No. 55991

File: 1682729232317.jpg (62.45 KB, 750x750, cq7q1dbjime41.jpg)


No. 55992


No. 55993

>>55983
>a LOT higher than you think
Honestly suspected this. Moid is used frequently as a catch all for not complying with the general consensus. Kinda devalues the perceived feminine solidarity anons that throw it around talk about when you can't accept not all women think alike.

No. 55994

>>55993
Agreed

No. 55997

>>55985
compared to Shaymin are miracle workers, its not asking to generally appreciative

No. 55998

>>55993
But at the same time, we can't see the other anon who is posting and there are a bunch of moids and troons around. So how can we know?

No. 55999

>>55998
Nta but I think a lot of us have been called a moid or tranny on here before, wasn't there a whole thread dedicated to that? Also this post here >>55983 kind of confirms that some of the moid/tranny allegations aren't true and just used as an insult or to disregard someone's post.

No. 56000

>>55998
>So how can we know?
There is no way to definitively identify a moid, unless he admits that he is male or you are a farmhand with access to post history. Accusing other anons of being moids doesn't achieve anything. If the accusation is wrong, you've probably caused another infight and if it's right you've given the moid the attention he was looking for and are encouraging him to come back. If you suspect a moid, report and ignore.

No. 56001

fuck you jannies and admins why the fuck is /2X/ hidden again ??? yall didnt even communicated about this action nor even made a poll for an agreement. you newfags admins fucking sucks and you’re a bunch of liars promising bullshits. fuck every member of the staff yall are just insufferable retards

No. 56002

>>56001
Here you go, nonny: >>55855
and: >>55854

No. 56003

>>55998
Farmhands are probably very generous with the bans/post history consideration because they are terrified of accidentally banning actual women. So if they larp as women in other threads (like moids already admitted both on here and on websites like 4chan), they might not get banned and it can be written off as "tradfem retard".
It doesn't make sense why the website suddenly gets simultaneously an influx of actual moids, cp spammers and also tradfems (for some reason lmao) in the same time.
The solution would be to give farmhands more access to info on the posters, so they don't have to go off solely by Ip & post history.

No. 56005

>>56001
Get help, it's not normal to get this angry because of a random board going hidden especially when it was hidden because of aggressive posters like you. Everyone warned /2X/ posters to chill with the infighting and baiting but you didn't listen until farmhands finally got tired.

No. 56006

>>56003
uhhh what else is there even

No. 56007

>>56003
There's a distinctness with moids though, a certain obsession with sex and coom that can easily be recognized

No. 56008

>>56003
Most moids use vpns and if the vpn is also used by a normal anon, it'd be hard for farmhands to tell apart males. That's why it's best to just report and ignore moid-ish posts. Even if they don't get banned they'll leave if they don't attention

No. 56009

>>56006
Duh, post full vag with date and timestamp next to your butthole

No. 56010

There's some porn (CP?) link in /m/

No. 56011

>>56010
Well it's definitely CP and now it's in /snow/ too

No. 56013

>>56011
it's back on snow

No. 56014

Cp in the same hyde thread

No. 56021

Why is posting about drag kids okay in the MtF thread, but not the drag thread? Should it be banned in both because posting kids isn't allowed, or permitted in both because they're sort of related? Like what was the logic with forbidding it in one and not the other?

No. 56024

I'm glad that /2X/ is hidden again, I was beginning to associate the entire board with infighting

No. 56026

I see the men trying really hard to make their post histories look like a woman's across the site. I see it all.

No. 56027

>>56026
No you make assumptions about who posted what and that shit's annoying and sort of takes away the point of an anonymous imageboard

No. 56028

>>56026
I feel like this is kind of schizo but don’t doubt it at the same time. males will literally spend all their time trolling here. Like that one tranny who would literally be here for hours posting even if he got banned. Obsessive and unhinged behavior. Men are so weird. I think it’s best if we just leave it to reporting it to the farmhands

No. 56029

>>56028
I agree, furthermore I think she should start worrying about people in her life being secret men.

No. 56030

>>56001
>yall

No. 56031

>>56021
because "drag kids" is usually a front for future transition and pedophilia common among MTFs and handmaidens

No. 56032

>>56007
I wish that were true but it's not always the case. Just remember how much they instantly shat up the europe thread when the russian/ukranian war started. Thankfully farmhands were more consequent with banning in that case and didn’t insist it could be tradfems.

>>56006
>>56008
Lots of device info that is harder and more expensive to fake than just using vpns. A few years ago during some retarded drama with oldmin, someone posted a screenshot of an admin panel running on the same imageboard software lolcow uses, which had at least two more identification factors than IP.

No. 56033

>>56031
Okay but why ban it from the drag thread, then? And why does the sitewide rule of "don't post kids" suddenly not apply?

No. 56034

>>56029
You didn’t even read my post

No. 56035

baiting fujoshi in the hot couples thread

No. 56036

>>56034
Or I was being sarcastic, it has to be one of the two and I just cannot figure out which it is due to my autism.

No. 56037

>>56036
weird

No. 56042

>>56033
Nta but just on the subject of the rule Specifically I'm pretty sure if the cow in question is actively posting their child it's acceptable. For instance Taylor R's whole social media revolves around her child. But posting kids out of nowhere is not allowed via the under 16 rule. When posting an on topic image that's collected from a public place, I've always courtesy blurred the child's face and never had an issue with bans but I could be wrong.

No. 56049

soyjak baiting post on /ot/
>>>/ot/1564323

No. 56052

>>56049
It's been 4 hours, god I hope the farmhand applications get done soon

No. 56053

CP on /ot/

No. 56055

>>56003
This post glows so hard I'm blind now.

No. 56056

>>56003
> doesn't make sense why the website suddenly gets simultaneously an influx of actual moids, cp spammers and also tradfems
Half the posters her at any given time are men. The “tradfems” that pop up during those times of moid infestation are men. Not that there aren’t real tradfem women here but there are plenty of men who are lying especially when there’s an influx of newfag moids

No. 56057

>>56032
How do you imagine device info identifies someone as a moid or not? Knowing that someone posted it from an iPhone won't help anyone figure out if it's a scrote

No. 56065

Gross pic on /ot/, /snow/ and /meta/ so far

No. 56066

on /g/ too

No. 56074

>>56056
That is also my impression, I was referring to a farmhand who claimed those posts com from actual farmers more often than we think. Though I don't believe moids make up half of the userbase, it's starting to get really noticeable that there are more now.

>>56057
Because it would be easier to identify their real post history, including any avoided bans and more obvious posts.

No. 56081

>>56074
I'm not sure why you think an anonymous imageboard is going to be exclusive. It's possible to have a verified female userbase, but we'd need to move to a closed forum. I see the need for farmhands to have data about a user's post history, bans, and IP, but I'm not crazy about adding to the data collected here. All it takes is one asshole leaking IPs and people who post without VPN are at risk of being doxed. (And we had a farmhand who leaked an IP just in December.) I hate the raids and the dumb moid stuff as much as anyone, but it's an open imageboard and that's going to be hard to eradicate.

We put a lot of trust in the farmhands by default and there have been a few, past & present, whom I wouldn't want to have my mac address or device info because they themselves act cray from time to time.

No. 56083

Hellweek pls

No. 56084

>>56081
>All it takes is one asshole leaking IPs and people who post without VPN are at risk of being doxed.
Lmao that's not how it works.

>whom I wouldn't want to have my mac address or device info

Wait till you find out how much device data 90% of every website saves.

No. 56085

>>56084
stop glowing I'm already blind

No. 56086

>>56083
Not much point doing it in May, right before all the summerfags pour in.

No. 56089

>>56081
>And we had a farmhand who leaked an IP just in December.
Last two numbers were censored iirc, it was not a full leak. Even then, ip addresses are useless because they change all the time and don't even give away your exact address.

No. 56093

>>56089
Nta and not defending the janny but it was at least a VPN and not someone's actual IP

No. 56094

>>56084
Stop glowing I rarely post here nobody besides jannies know this.

No. 56096

Tranny spamming gore in /ot/

No. 56098

moid spammng gore and nickado porn on /ot/

No. 56099

>>56084
I knew I'd get these replies but it doesn't matter to me, I'm entitled to an opinion. I found that IP leaking event (no matter how many numbers or if it was a VPN) very alarming and some people who were angry about it even got bans wrongly labelling them as the troon. because they expressed anger about it. Didn't someone recently try to goad a poster into posting their IP on here in meta?
>>>/meta/53036
but in the end admin will do what they will, I'm not gonna whine about it. I don't say anything very personal on here but regardless I still value anonymity for other normal (=not spamming gore/cp) posters who might.

No. 56100

>>56099
Admin's said they disagreed with the whole IP thing and wouldn't allow it like Shaymin did. Anyway, I agree that this site will never be exclusive to only women. We don't need an exclusive site, we need more jannies and an updated site so we can have better moderation tools.

No. 56101

>>56098
>>56096
i dont see a thing

No. 56102

>>56101
How? It's all over the catalog

No. 56104

Why don't we have a captcha yet?

No. 56105

Christ, this moid is not stopping, god when will then farmhand applications be finished

No. 56109

>>56099
Sorry, I just couldn't care less if some samefag and or tranny got part of his vpn revealed. If posters were that easy to "doxx" he'd rightfully be in jail now instead of spamming lolcow daily with cp and porn. There is 0 reason to be against what I mentioned, unless you enjoy the spam and ban evading moids shitting up the website endlessly. Giving farmhands more info that admins can see anyway doesn't pose any danger to normal posters.

No. 56115

>>56109
>Giving farmhands more info that admins can see anyway doesn't pose any danger to normal posters.
Nta and I don't exactly know what this is about, but if you think jannies wouldn't take advantage of being able to see all of farmers info then you're delulu.

No. 56116

>>56115
And how are they going to take advantage of device info? Drive to nonna's ip region, visit every surrounding city and harass everyone who happens to hold the supposed phone model? kek
> I don't exactly know what this is about
It shows.

No. 56118

>>56116
For the record, I read back the full convo and I still stand by what I said kek. Jannies and ex-jannies have used the info that they can already see to their advantage (posting regular farmers post histories and IP addresses to name recent examples) to be petty and violate the anonymity of farmers. What exactly would they do if they had access to everything admin does? Idk, but I can tell you it probably would affect normal posters.

No. 56119

>>56115
newfag, and a twitterfag all in one? nice

No. 56121

>>56119
Nta but everyone says delulu now, it's not just twitterspeak anymore (unfortunately)

No. 56124

>>56119
I've been here for like 6 years, fuck off. If this is about me saying delulu, I literally got that from this site. You're sound like more of a newfag if you haven't seen farmhands abuse their privileges.

No. 56125

>>56124
>If this is about me saying delulu, I literally got that from this site.
Kek, how the turn tables turn

No. 56127

File: 1683162899368.gif (305.47 KB, 220x220, cat-kissing.gif)

I just wanted to say thank you farmhands for banning replies to vents in the get it off your chest thread again!

No. 56128

>>56118
They just followed the rules. Maybe you should read them again.
>What exactly would they do if they had access to everything admin does? Idk,
Exactly, you don't know, because it wouldn't make any great difference on the privacy.

No. 56129

>>56128
>They just followed the rules. Maybe you should read them again.
No they didn't. You clearly don't know what incidents I'm talking about.

No. 56130

>>56121
>>56124
I'm once again asking everyone to stop replying to the "haha twitternewfag!!!!" accusations because they're obviously bait laid out in the open. I wish calling someone a "twitterfag" or a newfag was a bannable offense just like accusing someone of being a scrote based on a disagreement because it's basically the same ad hominem fallacy that's bound to shit up any thread.

No. 56131

>>56130
when all of lc reads like
>omg delulu!! Not her xing! It's the x for me [skull emoji] sPoNgEbOb tExT
I will hold you personally accountable. We're already halfway there. Twitterfags need to be shamed back to where they came from if they can't ~integrate~. It's literally one of the rules.

No. 56132

>>56129
>You may revoke your own anonymity only if your identity is essential to the information you're providing. Staff will revoke your anonymity if you attempt to deceive lolcow.farm.
Which includes samefagging and pretending to be different posters while arguing with yourself.

>>56130
omg ur so right queen while were at it we should ban all the transphobic toxic white karens /srs

No. 56133

>>56132
Nta but
>omg ur so right queen while were at it we should ban all the transphobic toxic white karens /srs
That's obviously not what she was implying

No. 56136

>>56130
You're right and I know anons just use twitterfag/newfag/scrote when they don't have any other argument, but if another anon accuses me of being something, I just can't help but nip it in the bud. Whatever they say after that is on them though.

No. 56137

>>56132
Again, you clearly don't know what incidents I was referring to. The ex janny that posted an anons post history didn't do it because they "deceived lolcow" and even the current Admins disagreed with the last time a farmhand partially exposed someone's IP (probably because the rules are super outdated). Samefagging a post about cat pee was barely deceptive and they weren't samefagging to argue anyway. Anyway, if you want to WK the mods then go ahead anon. This is pointless.

No. 56139

Lol the furries on this site are arguing that they don't fuck animals again. Like okay Jan, why do you jack off to pictures of animals then? Fucking freaks, ban them all farmhands! Ban all of them, NOW NOW NOW!!

No. 56140

>>56139
What thread? I love laughing at furfags, the ultimate internet freaks imo

No. 56141

>>56127
I love the "It's not about you, you vain bitch" auto message. Kek everytime

No. 56148

>>56133
yea ok but i did like take ur problematic takes elsewhere lol you just pressed that you cant get that themussy anyway ratio

>>56137
> The ex janny that posted an anons post history didn't do it because they "deceived lolcow"
Except for manifesto-anon, they literally did it everytime for that reason and post historys aren't revealed by farmhands, but by admins. The anon who got their history revealed on meta a few years ago was larping as both radfem and tranny while responding to itself like a schizo and admin revealed it to show that. The anon who was samefagging in the cat hate thread explicitly claimed otherwise, so the farmhand added a censored screenshot of what they could see. Just don't be a samefagging sperg or a literal cow and you have nothing to fear.

No. 56149

>>56148
>yea ok but i did like take ur problematic takes elsewhere lol you just pressed that you cant get that themussy anyway ratio
Hey look a tranny openly bragging about it…

No. 56150

>>56149
I was the anon she was replying too and I'm pretty sure she was being sarcastic in her reply. (I hope)

No. 56152

>>56149
umm ok t*rf chile what is it w/ the transphobia on this site???? of course i was /srs

No. 56153


No. 56154

>>56148
The ex jannies were too retarded to make use of the data access they had. They banned me thinking I was Elaine because, get a load of this, she changes IP's all the time, and my IP is dynamic, so I must be her.
>Just don't be a samefagging sperg or a literal cow and you have nothing to fear.
Not true, see above

No. 56155

>>56148
>post historys aren't revealed by farmhands, but by admins
FWIW farmhands have labeled posters wrongly before and backtracked. They can see everything admins can see, they're just not supposed to act on it without permission.

No. 56156

>>56154
sure jan

>>56155
The anon was talking about a post history that got shared with everyone, which is something only admins compiled so far.
>FWIW farmhands have labeled posters wrongly before and backtracked
Wow, if only there was a way to help them be more specific with labeling.

No. 56157

>>56148
>post historys aren't revealed by farmhands, but by admin
Their post history was revealed by an ex janny, not by admin or an ex admin.
>The anon who was samefagging in the cat hate thread explicitly claimed otherwise,
Yes, but they were not samefagging to argue or doing anything outrageous. I've seen anons samefag many times and never seen farmhands post their (partially censored) IP address in retaliation. It was fucking stupid no matter how you spin it.

No. 56159

File: 1683220007890.png (50.07 KB, 1820x223, vent-thread-172.png)

>>56130
You know what else shits up threads? Shit like this. Some twitterfag/newfag accusations are wrong but banning the entirety of it will lead to this.

No. 56161

>>56157
You're just arguing in circles on top of being simply wrong. How is an ex janitor able to make extra pages on lolcow for post historys?
And yes, the cat hate poster was samefagging, then ban evading (also against the rules) and then sperged on and on about totally not samefagging.
>>>/ot/1441989

>>56159
If this turns out to be the same poster as PIG PUNCHING STACY, I'm sad.

No. 56164

>>56161
No one said they made extra pages on lolcow, you fucking retard! If you saw it then you know they shared it through a different (file sharing, iirc) website. I don't know why you're trying to argue with me about things that you didn't even witness.

No. 56165

>>56164
Samefag, but also this has strayed so far from the original discussion just because you wanted to debate things that you didn't see. Anon, you're weird. Farmhands/jannies have been very untrustworthy and that's about all I have to say about it.

No. 56166

>>56159
>lil tit

No. 56167

>>56164
>No one said they made extra pages on lolcow, you fucking retard
Every single post history outing has gotten an extra page on here, structured like here https://lolcow.farm/posts-kiki.html.
"I've been here for like 6 years" my ass.
> this has strayed so far from the original discussion
You weren't close to the original discussion in the first place, since you self admittedly jumped in without even reading the full discussion. My point was that giving farmhands access to additional device info will help them with banning more efficiently to which you voiced converns about poster's privacy. Other anons and me then explained why it doesn't pose any remarkable danger to our anonymity, which you completely ignored to go on about falsely retelling farmhands banning of samefags and then also ignored the corrections.

No. 56168

>>56167
I'm not sure what you cannot understand. I am not talking about a regular cow or farmer post history reveal. No shit manifesto-chan didn't get her own post history page, it was not an authorized reveal. You just look like an idiot anon.

No. 56169

>>56168
>I am not talking about a regular cow or farmer post history reveal.
>Jannies and ex-jannies have used the info that they can already see to their advantage (posting regular farmers post histories and IP addresses to name recent examples
>The ex janny that posted an anons post history
Nice backpedaling. Manifesto anon was the one exception I named but you previously didn't acknowledge it at all, how come? And I don't care about "how i look like" or you think "I'm weird" since this is an anonymous imageboard and not twitter. Just take the hints to integrate instead of larping as an older user.

No. 56170

>>56169
>you previously didn't acknowledge it at all
Anon, that's literally the only instance that I know of an ex janny exposing someone's post history. I was referring to it from the start here.
>>56118
You yourself just cited the part where I acknowledged it, hence the "ex-jannies". Manifesto-chan's post history reveal was not a normal or approved reveal and it got deleted because of that. The previous admin even said that stuff like that is why people didn't trust staff, or something to that effect. I don't even want to fight anymore I genuinely think you're just misunderstanding me or maybe the way I wrote it was confusing, but I was literally always using that situation as an example.

No. 56173

>>56170
I was the one bringing up manifesto-anon as the one exception here >>56148 . You didn't mention that case in any of your posts, not even after I mentioned her and even afterwards claimed we were talking about something I supposedly wasn't there for. Nevermind manifesto-anons post history was not "used to farmhand's advantage to be petty", they wanted to share it out of admiration. Which is questionable too, but obviously not what you were talking about.
The point stands that farmhands would benefit from more poster info in their ban options than just IP and post history and that the risk in any meaningful privacy breach or "doxxing" for the average nonna would be low to nonexistant.

No. 56174

>>56167
>every single post history outting
I love it when the know-it alls talk out their ass. No, that isn't how it works. If an admin wants to do it their own way, they will.

No. 56175

>>56173
Ok anon.

No. 56176

>>56174
I'm sure they will, even the kiki page I linked used to have an extra page explaining the whole ordeal and how admin handled the identification. But so far it literally has been the case, pretty sure even super old cows like mystery and that one princess skye copycat got extra pages when their post history got revealed.

No. 56177

>>56176
>No, that isn't how it works. If an admin wants to do it their own way, they will.
It's almost as if there's a reason every admin has had their own way of doing it.

No. 56181

>>56156
Nta but so many people have complained about being banned for the wrong reason before or been accused of being another poster based on VPN use or something similar. Not sure why you're dickriding the jannies so hard but it's weird.

No. 56182

>>56167
>>56169
This anon argues like an autistic male, nitpicking and taking things out of context to try to get a "one up" or a gotchya or whatever. Anons like this are so annoying.

No. 56184

>>56181
I criticized moderation myself which is why I made suggestions in the first place. But I also suspect at least half of the anons who claim to have been misbanned on meta, especially for being one of our resident pests, are just our resident pests themselves.

No. 56185

is there a thread for DID cows? i’ve gotten some on tiktok and they’re hilarious

No. 56191


No. 56192

>>56184
you really don't remember how bad all the misbans were in December?

No. 56193

>>56173
>>56167
>The point stands that farmhands would benefit from more poster info in their ban options than just IP and post history
>My point was that giving farmhands access to additional device info will help them with banning more efficiently

Again, farmhands already see everything admins can see.

No. 56194

>>56192
Yes as they're clearly either a newfag or being disengengious kek

No. 56199

>>56192
As I said, misbans do happen but I suspect at least half of the anons who claim to have been misbanned on meta were not actually misbanned. The shitshow in the CC bunker threads with all the tranny samefagging and falseflagging attempts from some literal who kiwifags getting mass deleted in one go, only further makes me believe this. Then there's also shit like >>54561
>>54565. Nevermind some of the explanations why some were supposedly misbanned make no sense or are delusional (one in a million chances to use the same vpn ip in the same thread at the same time while responding to that same person, claiming it's because of dynamic ips even though most users have those, etc).

>>56193
My impression was that farmhands can see IP & posthistory while the admin panel has more additional device info. Isn't that the same reason the excessive bot spam got deleted so late?

No. 56200

>>56199
>sperg-chan trying to scare retards again. 0/10 bait
You seem pretty scared right now, don't let sperg-chan win nona.

No. 56201

>>56200
0/10 bait again

No. 56202

>>56199
>My impression was that farmhands can see IP & posthistory while the admin panel has more additional device info.
Your impression is wrong.

No. 56203

>>56202
>source:trust me

No. 56204

Cp on PT

No. 56205

>>56204
Still there, I just reported it.

No. 56206

>>56199
Nta and not involved but I wanted to say that this
>one in a million chances to use the same vpn ip in the same thread at the same time while responding to that same person
That's not true. I use Norton VPN and apparently there is a limited amount of IP's on there because I've received ban notifications twice now in threads I lurk but don't post in. One was for asking dumb questions unsaged, the other was for alogging, both comments weren't mine but some other farmer who uses Norton VPN. I do think the samefagger in the cat thread was a samefagger, but my point is it's not a one in a million chance, I've seen other anons talk about it happening to them as well.

No. 56209

>>56204
>>56205
Still there, I also just reported it.

No. 56210

Hey cerbmin (or anyone in the know). I've been wondering how the farmhand search is going. The posting has been up for about two months now and I know that it takes a while to vet people

No. 56211

>>56210
Also thanks for hiding 2x again

No. 56217

>>56206
The schizotroon+other assorted moids burned through half or more of the free ProtonVPN IPs so far. I have also seen a few bans using this VPN directed at normal farmers for posts that had nothing to do with the troon. It's definitely not super unlikely to use the same IP that other posters are using.

But reading the AYRT's post, she's not just talking about these coincidences but also the same IP replying to the same person at the same time in the same thread. That's much more unlikely to happen.

No. 56218

>>56217
It is unlikely, and I do think the user was just samefagging, but it could happen. The samefagged reply in the cat thread was a joke so she probably just thought of something funny and then replied to her own post pretending to be another anon, weird she kept denying it though as if the jannies can't see IP addresses lol

No. 56229

cp in m and snow

No. 56234

It’s been two hours and there’s still cp on /m/ and /snow/

No. 56243

Is there a reason why the amanda bret thread is on auto-sage? I almost feel like it's a mistake because there was no explanation given, there isn't any reason for it to be auto-saged, and a farmhand recently redtexted someone for not saging in the thread, so it seems like even the farmhands don't know it is on auto-sage?

No. 56248

>>56243
i wondered this too. i think it's been asked before but no explanation given.

No. 56255

File: 1683513024401.png (14.6 KB, 724x533, nvm.png)

I'm not going to post again and I feel shitty to ban evade, but I kind of feel the need to say this
I wasn't trying to hurt anyone, I'm not a troll, and I'm not a moid. I understand that I was foolish to post the thread, I got dunked on plenty. I just wanna say again, you can't suck your bladder out with crumpled walmart water bottle, I was not trying to dupe people into hurting themselves.
This is the only time I've ever made a thread, and I understand that I was wrong. I mostly only post in the Shayna thread, and I really hope you can please allow me just to post in her thread. A week is a long time (for me) to not be able to post on any board at all, lolcow is my life.
Even if not, and everyone agrees I earned it, I am still extremely sorry, I was not trying to hurt anyone.

No. 56256


No. 56257

>>56255
>A week is a long time (for me) to not be able to post on any board at all, lolcow is my life.
Holy kek just use a vpn or reset your router or phone data like everyone else damn.

No. 56258

>>56255
Anon, you could've just posted in the dumbass shit thread and you even said that you would take your ban.

No. 56259

>>56258
I know and you're right, but I thought it would only be a day or two, I didn't know people would think I was trying to cause harm, I fear this is a black mark on my record

No. 56260

>>56259
>I fear this is a black mark on my record
poor nonna will never make it into Farmer University

No. 56261

>>56259
KEKKK This is too funny I'm sorry

No. 56264

cp on /snow/

No. 56266

>>56255
Thank you to whomever lifted my ban, I'm sorry again, I'll never post like that again

No. 56268

CP in the TIM thread

No. 56269

Cp on /m/

No. 56271

>>56255
>I mostly only post in the Shayna thread
Kek

No. 56272

cp in replies in /m/. some retard bumped the thread too

No. 56275

>>56260
holy fuck this unlocked a desire to have some Farmer University roleplay thread. With classes and profs and extracurriculars.

No. 56276

>>56275
do eet

No. 56282

>>56275
>>56276
I too would like to see this happen.

No. 56284

>>56255
don't feel bad anon, I thought it was helpful. Last time I peed in a bottle I cut the top off and had to keep emptying it, I'll try this out next time.

No. 56286

Hi farmers!
If you have even had the fleeting thought to apply as a farmhand, we strongly recommend you do so. The site is in need of help and we have received 20 legitimate applications as of today. You don’t need loads of free time, just a general idea of how to internet works and a willingness to check in on the site when you can. The more farmhands we have, the less time each of them will need to dedicate to clearing reports that can get into the hundreds if not tended regularly.
>>56210

>>55857
Yes! Once we have the new rules in place, we will update the announcement to bring users to the new rule page. Keep in mind, these are small edits and will not be anything like a complete overhaul.

>>55858
>>55991
I looked through our moderation log it hasn’t been deleted by a farmhand or mod. I also combed through the staff email and didn’t find any takedown requests. Apologies for not having more information, my pet theory is it had something to do with Colours but I obviously cannot prove this.

>>55863
We have considered the ability to filter and hide posts. We will open a thread for LCF 2.0 recommendations once we have farmhand applications dealt with!

>>55921
The fishtank thread >>>/m/291726 was locked because there is already a Sam Hyde thread in /snow/. If anons want to liveblog about the show, an autosaged /m/ thread is acceptable.

>>55933
I like this idea a lot! Adding it to the requested features list. This is not a guarantee that we will be able to deliver it!

>>55939
I understand the frustration, anon. We have optimized images on the site to help with speed. Our userbase is arguably larger than it’s ever been based on stats provided by our host. As new moderators are brought on, expect there to be an adjustment period. If you are concerned about rules not being understood or upheld, I would refer you to the Farmhand Application.

>>56021
>>56033
Regarding drag kids being posted: the drag thread is relatively inactive and the OP decided to specify not to post about drag kids. However, our site wide rule is that minors should not be posted UNLESS the focus of drama/milk is on their parents who post them online (think Hartley family). Because the MtF threads are more active and the OP didn’t specify not to post drag kids, it is acceptable. See >>56042 as well.

>>56083
Once we onboard the new farmhands, sweet anon

>>56104
Captcha will be implemented with LCF 2.0

>>55865
I agree that jvloggers is not a high quality thread and ends up in the report queue often. However, it doesn’t seem to benefit from the modding we’ve done. From Global Rule 4, “All users are expected to contribute in a constructive way and are discouraged from posting low quality comments and images.” So, please report any low-quality posts as such and we will give it our best try.

>>55869
>>55872
Thank you for posting links! From >>>/w/291608 it looks like Emma did a charity stream for Lili and Sharla posted Lili to her Instagram story. Although Lili was posted to the munchie thread, there has been little traction there and the last post about her was 15 days ago >>>/snow/1813682 In cases like this, the mods and farmhands aren’t around to be the police. Anons who enjoy the jvloggers thread should come to some sort of consensus together. From what I can tell, there are two options: Lili is sequestered to the Munchie thread and discussion is slow and disjointed from the vjloggers, or Lili remains in the jvloggers thread despite not being completely relevant, at least the threads of her and the jvloggers stories are easier to weave together. There are many good posts making their points in this thread. You are all adults and the internet is full of software to help you make decisions (strawpoll…) I believe in you.

>>55878
The wave of twittertards is a plague indeed, please continue to report their infighting.

>>55853
At this point, it seems unfair to well-intentioned users to ban the use of VPNs entirely.

>>55916
I understand you find it gross, but pigs mating is not bestiality. At worst, it was a gross joke.

>>55914
Looks like it was regular discussion by 10-15 different anons. The Jhonen posts number in the 30’s, not necessarily spam. Although there was no drama, discussion is allowed when it’s not infighting or spam.

>>55955
In most cases, posts taking the bait shit up the thread even more than the initial bait post. Taking the bait is also known to turn into multiple posts of infighting. However, a permaban for simply taking bait is not warranted. Please email administration@lolcow.farm with a screenshot of your ban message.

>>56039
Shotacon/Lolicon has become an ugly topic on the farm. It seems to bring infighting wherever it comes up, and it’s not something we particularly want to encourage posting about. However, the role of admins is not to ban things we don’t like. So, we’ve decided to host a poll here:
https://strawpoll.com/polls/mpnboq4JYg5
https://strawpoll.com/polls/mpnboq4JYg5
https://strawpoll.com/polls/mpnboq4JYg5
To kill two birds with one stone, the poll combines shota and loli together. If you feel passionate about shota and/or loli as a topic to be preserved or culled, PLEASE VOTE! VOTING ENDS MAY 29th at 11:59PM EST.

>>56044
>>56045
>>56046
Could you link some of her posts so I can take a look?

>>56080
Please link the “hi cow” posts to make bans easier to issue.

>>56095
>>56107
We are doing our best with the staff we have, but we need more hands on deck. If you are concerned about the wellbeing of the site, please consider applying to become a farmhand.

>>56110
If we were to fire all of our old farmhands, the site would be overrun with garbage. The farmhands we have are consistent and keep you from seeing CP and gore more often than you can know. See the beginning of this post, we have gotten 20 legitimate farmhand applications and out of those, they are not all high quality. The purpose of making a new site is to update the board software so the site doesn’t break as easily, new features can be implemented like CAPTCHA, and security can be improved. Whatever moderation team exists on this version of lolcow will be carried over to Nucow barring some drastic circumstances.

>>56120
Good catch, yes that is a post that should be reported. Bans have been issued.

>>56130
Accusations of anon being a newfag are usually more legitimate than moid accusations. If derailing or infighting persists, bans will be issued. If the newfag accusation is wildly inaccurate, anon will just have to live with knowing she’s been called a newfag without reason. Again, if derailing or infighting persists, bans will be issued.

>>56139
Please link the posts to make it easier to investigate. The report queue easily climbs into the hundreds, if there’s something urgent that needs to be modded in the future please link the post(s). CP/CSAM or anything else we really don’t want anons exposed to is the exception here, you do NOT need to link those posts, just report and move on to avoid further exposure to them.

>>56137
>>56148
>>56157
>>56161
Regarding the toxoplasmosis samefag incident: the proper response to the samefag would have been to stop after the redtext calling them out. It is well known across the staff that most every decision we make will be met with backlash or pushback in some way. In this case, it seemed like farmhand was aggravated that anons didn’t believe her samefag ban reason and took the extra step to expose anon’s IP address to prove that her ban was correct. This would have been less inappropriate if she had done a better job of censoring anon’s IP address, but she essentially exposed anon’s entire IP which is not something casual users should be subject to. For context, Kiki being revealed as spergchan (lolcow.farm/kiki) is another time anon’s IP was revealed.

>>56243
Amanda’s thread was autosaged by a staff member who has since left the staff. Her thread is now unsaged and will remain that way unless autosage becomes necessary.

>>56195
The post you linked was the most recent post after a week of silence in that thread. In this case, my mentality is that the thread has been dead silent and anons just want to discuss cows. It seems a bit too overbearing to issue bans for that. When milk is flowing, nitpicking and discussing things like this tent (kek) are punished because they distract from the milk. We aren’t trying to rule with iron fists, but we have also gotten a lot of feedback that the state of /w/ is abysmal. We have yet to decide on a course of action to remedy this, but as of now you can continue to report posts that don’t fit with a good explanation to help farmhands who don’t keep up with /w/, post in /meta/ when bump/delete posts are occurring, and if you’d like to go the extra mile, we are still accepting farmhand applications.
>>56625

>>56227
A ban has been issued. The thread is mostly two users posting with no milk thus far, so it has been locked.

>>56231
>>56245
>>56249
Banners are low priority right now. When we do get around to it, we’ll have users vote on which banners to keep and which to discard. Like anon mentioned, some anons feel strongly about keeping these banners because of their history on the site.

>>56267
Yes, there are plans to change this. The point of the farmhand search is to have farmhands in every timezone. For now, feel free to browse during US hours or apply to be a farmhand to increase the coverage during your timezone!

No. 56290

>>56286
kind of got my fingers crossed you guys are gonna blacklist anyone who votes that we should allow loli/shots

No. 56291

>>56286
thank you for the update and reliable communication, cerbmin! you are appreciated!

will farmhand applications be open indefinitely, or when will they close? i'm interested, but i don't think i could devote any time to it right now. in a few months, some commitments i have are ending and i'd love to be able to help out then.

No. 56296

File: 1683595513884.png (58.58 KB, 150x150, s.png)


No. 56297

how have this many people voted on the poll already despite it only recently being announced and the site being so dead overall?

No. 56300

After this vote, could we have a run-off poll with the two most popular options? I feel like choices 2, 3 and 4 would form together (for example), so it would consolidate all the other opinions into two options.
I feel like that way, rather than satisfying only ~30% (though that percent is subject to change ofc), we could have a "final choice" that the majority would be satisfied with.

No. 56301

>>56297
They put the link to the poll in the sitewide announcement

No. 56307

This poll is a little surprising. Has there been interest in allowing loli/shota content here? What is the context, specifically? I could understand allowing discussion of it if a hidden (usable) board like /z/ popped up, sometimes women have sick fantasies as well, but unless it's directly related to milk it doesn't really have a place here. I can't really see why nsfw images would be posted either, unless censored and related to milk.

No. 56310

>>56307
The poll was made because of a huge day long argument about shota in the unpopular opinions thread a week ago

No. 56311

>>56307
Some voters could be moids or trannies, but unfortunately a lot of women on CC and sometimes here seem to be into shota. I voted for spoilered and censored only if it relates to milk, maybe I should've voted for none at all but I figured sometimes in the youtube or twitch thread screencaps of it get posted in context of some moid liking a tweet or something.

No. 56313

>>56311
I accidentally voted for none at all ever because I just assumed it was a given that we can post it if it directly relates to milk, since that's how we do it now

No. 56314

>>56313
Yeah that's how it should be, only posted in reference to milk. I really hope they don't end up allowing shota and loli threads. I think they do that on CC anyway, the shotafags should just go there.

No. 56316

>>56307
>Has there been interest in allowing loli/shota content here?
This one shotafag who keeps trying to justify it and calling anyone who disagrees a secret pedo
>>56302
>>56306
At least I think that's the same poster as the one on /ot/, judging by their tone and posting style and making the same retarded points as the other day. might be the trapfag too for the same reason

>>56311
Among fujos there's a lot of fujochan overlap, too, and they literally have a board for shota (last I checked ages ago). Let's remember that fujochan's initial userbase came from 4chan fujo threads. So perhaps due to that cross-pollination we're seeing an increase in posts advocating for or defending shotacon.

>>56314
>I really hope they don't end up allowing shota and loli threads. I think they do that on CC anyway
Last time I checked there's a complete ban on shota and loli. It's fujochan that has a shota board.

No. 56318

>>56316
rent free kek

No. 56319

>>56318
If this doesn't confirm it for you nonas I don't know what will

No. 56320

Remember when Blaine used to spam here all day every day, he used to use the term "rent free" alot. Mhmm… strange…

No. 56321

File: 1683609882901.jpg (44.68 KB, 583x498, 1681592472181.jpg)

>>56319
i wasn't even aware of an argument on /ot/, i thought you lot were speaking on the mild drama unfolding between the fujo thread on /m/ and the fujo hate thread on /ot/ (?). anyway hang up your detective cap sis

No. 56343


No. 56344

>>56307
I agree. Is this in regards to reaction images as well? I suppose using characters that also are used in cp doesnt really sit well, but lets be real all anime characters look like kids. Is this specifically about porn? Even farmer chan is bordering on a kid at times seems odd to wanna ban that

No. 56346

>>56316
Fujochan has actually deleted the shota board. The shotafags from there are probably desperate for another imageboard to post it on and so they’re flocking here. I for one hope that loli/shota is banned, if you let them in, you let in all other kinds of degenerates.

No. 56349

>>56313
Then why did the anon who posted Brittany Venti posting loli on her Facebook in the YouTubers thread get banned with the image deleted by mods if we’re allowed to post it when it’s milk? The whole poll is hilarious to me considering actual child porn gets posted here on the daily but apparently loli is too offensive for our sensitive eyes

No. 56350

>>56346
Agreed. First its "They're not a REAL child so it's okay" and then they'll start to shoehorn in rape/incest/beastiality porn because "come on it's just fantasy and doesn't hurt anyone guys! It's just 2d!"

No. 56351

>>56344
someone correct me if I misread it but this is in regards to romantic and sexual images it seems. posting reaction images, fanart, screenshots or whatever else of underage characters would still be fine as long as there is no romantic or sexual context to it

No. 56352

>>56351
This is also how I read it. It's not discussion or child characters that's the issue, it's the concept of sexualising those characters.

No. 56353

>>56349
This is the stupidest fucking argument for shotacon not being banned

No. 56364

>>56300
I also support this. Poll is a bit confusing with all the choices, this would provide a clear answer.

No. 56366

>>56193
I know you think you know things but at the end of the day you have no way of knowing how the admins have things set up, sowwy

No. 56372

>>56286
Thanks for getting back, admin! Regarding
>Please link the “hi cow” posts to make bans easier to issue.
After that infight the thread actually calmed quite a bit, and when looking back I saw that quite a few offending posts got redtexted eventually. I understand moderating is delayed at the moment, if it happens again I will compile any specific posts.

No. 56374

Really hope that loli and shota outside of milk posts get banned, pedos shouldn't feel welcome here.

No. 56377

>>56375
Seriously. The results of the poll are bleak. I also don’t really get “when related to milk” if this discussion arose out of /ot/?

No. 56378

>>56377
Nta. Bleak but predictable, easy win for any cow ever featured on this site.

No. 56379

>>56377
I honestly think there's trannies and moids voting, as well as people using a vpn to vote multiple times. (if that's possible)

No. 56380

File: 1683640793712.jpg (217.79 KB, 2311x1415, Untitled.jpg)

>>56374
it's over, they rigged the poll already lol implying we have more than 400 people on the userbase… could've been more subtle about it

No. 56381

>>56379
wait i dont get it why would scroids not want pedoshit posted here

No. 56382

>>56381
Scrotes are voting to allow pedoshit.

No. 56383

File: 1683641240414.png (44.32 KB, 1112x843, Screenshot (19907).png)

>>56380
Yeah I don't buy it, people are definitely switching IP's and voting multiple times. Last night these were the stats. 1/2

No. 56384

File: 1683641266960.png (27.4 KB, 1096x799, Screenshot (19908).png)


No. 56385

>>56383
modmins have terminal brain damage if they accept this poll's results. just fucking ban discussion of lolisho outside anything related to milk.

No. 56386

>>56381
Ayrt, no I think the moids and trannies are voting for everything to be allowed regardless of if it's related to milk.

No. 56387

>>56386
I assume we have different individuals spamming for different things which makes the poll null either way.

No. 56388

>>56386
This. Loli/shota is illegal in certain parts of the world anyway, why should lolcow host that content? Isn't that literally illegal to see illegal shit and willingly let it grow in your website?

No. 56389

Quick question from those of us without autism;
Why not just label the poll should we keep up the CP we falseflag?
This is sick.

No. 56394

>>56387
The 20~200 user figure is just speculation anyway, I fully believe there are, easily, at least 150 different, legitimate users on this site across all boards (mods say this is the most users there have ever been). What's hard to believe is that there are that many users who are ok with shotafags sharing their degeneracy here, especially when at least half of the site considers it milky when a cow is into that

No. 56396

>>56394
No oldfags thought it was, now you know the actual culture shift and whomst actually left.

No. 56401

>>56394
Farmers think anything is milky when they hate a cow. I voted to allow it because they're just drawings. Japanese, Korean, Chinese, etc. non-western fujoshi discuss shota all the time with no problem. This is basically just twitter anti/pro-ship drama on lolcow.

No. 56402

>>56401
I don't think many of those votes to allow NSFW if it's spoilered are legit. I think the votes to allow discussion but without NSFW pics are more likely to be real.

No. 56403

>>56380
That poll is definitely being posted on some tranny discords

No. 56404

>>56396
Nta but thought it was what?

No. 56405

>>56401
just because asian standards for pedophilia are low, we don't have to put ourselves up to the same standard.

No. 56406

Wtf guys? I thought we were anti-CP, when I was a janny here I had to delete CP as well as loli constantly and it was upsetting to see it all the time. Why the fuck are you even considering allowing it to be a topic of discussion? Obviously fuck jannies, but why should everyone on the site be subject to shit that disgusting?

No. 56407

>>56406
where does it say that they'll allow cp? are you stupid?
also
>when I was a jannie
lol ok

No. 56408

>>56407
>where does it say that they'll allow cp
Loli and shota are CP, get over it pedo.

No. 56409

This is actually such a non-issue. Whenever somebody tries to post "shota", it's always a completely sfw picture, and the discussion never turns sexual. But then it immediately turns into a thread derailing argument because one side sees it as pedo talk and is disgusted, and the other one sees it as normal anime talk and is upset that it's being censored.
For me the real issue is the infighting and not the shota itself, so I'm glad admins did this vote. I don't care if shota is banned or not, but I'm glad there will be an official stance forcing the infighting to finally end. Godspeed admins.

No. 56410

Drawings of naked, little boys harm nobody. You are all just clutching pearls.(bait)

No. 56411

>>56410
Okay what about naked little girls? I notice very few people in this thread are paying attention to the fact we're considering allowing loli as well

No. 56412

Hosting a poll when kiwifarms is down was probably not the best timing.. We all know who the demographic for loli/shotashit is. I also don't think it's necessary to make a poll on an infight that 2-3 posters of questionable origin had.

No. 56414

>>56410
stop samefagging, you mentally ill cunt. either kill yourself or get admitted into a fucking mental asylum you deranged piece of fucking shit. your paraphilia will never be accepted.

No. 56415

>>56351
Yes, this makes sense when i read more carefully. I guess i just didnt want to believe a female image board actually tried to ask their users if they want to allow porn or not. This is a gossip site. Sometimes uncomfortable screenshots of milky behaviour will be posted, thats why we have spoilers. Women dont need rules to understand what is proper to share. I dont use /ot/, but if that board is used to post porn not for laughter but for cooming, i say just nuke it.

No. 56416

>>56409
exactly my point. kind of. it feels wrong to punish people who like shota because farmers can't ignore shit they dislike, and mods don't want to enforce their own "no infighting" rule. how hard is it to just ban anons that whine?

No. 56417

I don't get this. Things like Madoka and Kuroshitsuji have obvious shota/loli themes and fanservice, so if discussion "outside of milk" is banned, does that mean we can't discuss them or the main characters unless we're talking specifically about some cow liking them? It's weird. Tbh this would make a lot of anime, manga and games in general kind of a landmine, and doesn't seem enforceable on a large scale unless weeb stuff is banned entirely from /m/. Also, if by "SFW shota/loli", we just mean non-sexual pictures of underage characters like what we normally see posted anyway, I don't see any point in banning that. Just seems like it'd give extra work to mods for performative reasons.
All unwarranted NSFW spam and infighting should be disallowed, but I really cannot find it in me to care about anons talking about their favorite yaoi or whatever under a spoiler in their own designated space. We can all see the difference between unhinged scrotes posting shit to disgust people and actual nonas minding their business.

No. 56419

To be clear, the purpose of this poll is not to decide whether to allow this content, but to formally add to the rules exactly when and how such content can exist on the site, if at all.

As it stands, this content is currently not expressly forbidden anywhere in the rules. So to act as if we have created this poll to try and allow content that was previously banned is disingenuous.

The least restrictive option on this poll would be the rules as written staying exactly as they are, and it currently seems very unlikely that that will be the case.

We keep getting reports over and over again regarding this type of content being posted in the off topic boards. We do not want to add rules that restrict free speech on the site (within the bounds of the law) without the general consent and consensus of our userbase, even if that speech is distasteful.

We are monitoring the poll and votes over time to check whether it is being botted or abused. If the vote is compromised we will use the last legitimate tally to determine the outcome.

No. 56420

>>56286
How long does it take to get a response if you applied to be a farmhand? I know admins are busy, but I don't know if I've been rejected or if the app didn't go through…

No. 56421

>>56419
>to act as if we have created this poll to try and allow content that was previously banned is disingenuous
or we misunderstood because the poll appeared without warning or context

No. 56424

>>56419
screenshotting this post to use it against anyone who accuses me of "redditspacing"

No. 56427

>>56380
cerbmin should run a poll here - make a /meta/ thread, list out and number the different options, we reply to it with which option number to vote for, and admin/farmhands only count ips that are not vpns and have a posting history on the site rather than let troons and scrotes or vpn samefaggers vote.

No. 56429

>>56427
NTA, but I've been here from the start of the site, but started using a VPN and clearing my cookies in the past two years because of Shaymin (and Regina) being invasive and trying to fuck with anon's privacy. I've seen others say they did the same. It doesn't make us all trannies, scrotes or samefags, kek.

No. 56431

>>56429
it's obvious there are offsite people using vpns and proxies to spam vote, there is absolutely zero chance this site has over 400 regular users that are all voting on the poll in such a short amount of time. the schizo pedo troon was also sharing the poll on some of his social media along with posting in the meta threads so I guarantee he is vpn hopping to vote to allow loli/shota.

No. 56432

>>56419
>restrict free speech on the site (within the bounds of the law)
are you really trying to protect the free speech of pedophiles? you have got to be kidding me.

No. 56433

>>56417
>We can all see the difference between unhinged scrotes posting shit to disgust people and actual nonas minding their business.
this

No. 56434

>>56417
if you cant see the difference between a cute madoka/homura or a ciel picture posted with 0 sexual intent between a clearly lascivious description of whatever sexual with someone underage is, you're irredeemable tbh.
>>56433
stop coddling shotacons just because they are women.

No. 56436

>>56410
Seek help in form of a bullet to the skull

No. 56437

>>56431
if we leave this one schizo unattended soon he will bring his friends here and we will have generals of this shit, because the admin wants to protect their free speech. I say nip it in the bud.

No. 56438

the poll was a bad idea. i don't doubt lc gets a lot of traffic from day to day (lurkers) but lurkers =/= lc users and there's no reliable way to tell if it's farmers voting or tourists. staff should sit down and discuss this issue amongst themselves, in my honest opinion. if it's ONLY being banned because of the fights it causes, the solution to that is simple: enforce the rules that are already present on site that regulate infights. ban nonas that reply to other nonas in bad faith because they've seen a picture they dislike.

No. 56439

>>56431
I don't know the schizo troon's social media, so I don't know whether or not to believe that. I do think that if it was him and other moids botting, we'd probably see a massive, ridiculous uptick in "leave the rules unchanged" votes, but it's still fewer and pretty balanced so far. There's a variety of actual anons with differing opinions here, that's just part of being on an imageboard. Also
>there is absolutely zero chance this site has over 400 regular users
Nona, sorry if I sound harsh but this just isn't true. Do you know how slow this whole site would be if we had less than 400 regular users? It'd nearly be dead, there'd be no fanfare for a /shay/ board, etc etc. Maybe I'm wrong, but I first saw this sort of "We have less than 150 users" or something meme posted at the same time Oldmin gave a poll asking whether we want to keep /2X/ and pink pill/gender critical threads. Most farmers said yes when she wanted no, so she got angry, started claiming all the votes she didn't like were fake, locked the board and anti-/2X/ anons latched on and claimed we have almost no users. We all know that was nonsense, and it's just always seemed ridiculous. Some people even admit to only coming here for specific threads or boards.

No. 56440

>>56438
>ban people who hate pedoshit
just ban the pedoshit and get over with it.

No. 56442

>>56416
it doesn't bother me that much either but i guess spoiler it and keep it to the relevant threads if it's going to bother anons that much.

>>56409
>derailing argument because one side sees it as pedo talk and is disgusted, and the other one sees it as normal anime talk and is upset that it's being censored.

this is the real issue that needs to be addressed and it isn't just with the shota content. everytime something gets posted that these people don't like, they derail. every thread on this site has been derailed or is getting derailed at some point in time, and it's ruining the usability and overall experience of being on lolcow. deliberately derailing threads just because you don't like the topic being discussed or because you want to bully other users should be a bannable offense, at minimum a week. if this was early lolcow era it would have been happened already, especially during hellweek. but the current userbase is so low, we would probably only have a dozen people here if that was actually done, so it's a catch 22. curb the content that causes the most autism or get on the ass of the people who are causing the most drama and end up with an even slower site.

No. 56443

>>56439
>Do you know how slow this whole site would be if we had less than 400 regular users? It'd nearly be dead
NTA but it's already like this kek. Like since December

No. 56444

File: 1683659703281.jpeg (118.53 KB, 828x1211, IMG_0626.jpeg)

>>56435
he currently has a link to the site and therefore poll as his pinned tweet, pic related. he is 100% voting on the poll multiple times I guarantee. right now allowing nsfw loli/shota sitewide is in second place very close to being first and there are almost 700 votes, it's obvious that a chunk of these votes are not from women who regularly use this site. this site is nearly dead, most boards move very slow and it seems a lot of traffic is coming from lurkers rather than actual posters.

No. 56445

>>56444
oh god damn it

No. 56446

>>56443
I mean like literally dead. As in, this thread would have maybe 30 posts because no one cares and no one comes here. We're literally so known that TikTok/coquette zoomers try to look like edgy femcels by mentioning this place, Red Scare people camp out in the leftcow threads and Kaitlyn Tiffany plastered the name of the site on her "femcel" article.

No. 56447

>>56434
Exactly, like all pornography, you'll know it when you see it. You can't discuss anime or manga at all basically without occasionally discussing an underage character but I know a normal image of Detective Conan and an abnormal one. Besides aren't there a million places online to go talk about shota or loli shit? Why do it here? To be fair I don't really post that much in /m/ or /g/ where I imagine a lot of this anime talk happens but if I did, I'd have zero problems with normal, nonsexual chat about underage characters, how is this even an issue or discussion?

No. 56448

>>56440
no, i mean ban people who are breaking the rules you (general you) currently have instead of punishing people who aren't/adding new rules to coddle the former group.

No. 56449

>>56444
this tweet is in support of people who want shota banned though. so we can also assume a chunk of the votes asking for its removal are from outsiders kek

No. 56450

>>56449
>this tweet is in support of people who want shota banned
it's literally tranny psyop

No. 56451

>>56449
he is voting on the poll to allow loli/shota so he can say the site is full of pedophiles and report it to the host, he inadvertently admitted it in a /meta/ thread. it's similar to what he does with his cp spam - posts cp on the site while claiming it's filled with female pedos and reporting it to the sites host to get it taken down.

No. 56452

>>56444
That's concerning, but he has like 40 followers (probably mostly his own alts) and that post has like 72 views. I don't think he is accounting for ~200 votes undetected with strict checking on, and it seems like he's trying to push this as "proof" against LC. And the site isn't fast, but it's not dead as I said here >>56446, though there are a lot of lurkers. Slowness can be attributed to a large chunk of users only showing up for certain threads, not a lack of users IMO.

No. 56453


No. 56454

>>56451
NTA, but no content that was banned before will be "allowed", it's literally asking whether to keep the rules as they were from the start or not. He's mischaracterizing things on his shitty irrelevant account, and even anons here seem to misunderstand what's being asked.

No. 56455

>>56431
I love it when anons claim to know the site posting stats that nobody except admins can see themselves. Just stop already lol

No. 56456

>>56454
What is shit stirring for 500 Alex.
>>56450
Correct and mocking the fact the staff needed a poll and didn't just change the rule outright. Any ped shit outside of milk shouldn't be allowed at all and even then is risky as this is a gossip site so linking this site isn't good proof for law enforcement.
>>56444
>Can't recognize hyperbolic satire from a tiny account.
No it's legitimately just mocking the poll having any options for the original writing of the rule. It causes confusion as you see here now.
>>56455
Only 15 ppl post here and I can prove it.We are all on a bridge to Cambodia and I'm selling tickets to it.

No. 56457

I'm a fucking idiot and voted wrong on the poll. I thought the top bit was just a literal list of definitions and I had no idea it was specifically a vote about loli shit. It was pretty confusing with no context ngl, can you update it in some way to clarify what exactly we are voting for.
t. room temp iq probably

No. 56458

>>56446
Anons leaving their containment boards have been pushing this bullshit for years. It's obvious that the site only continues to grow in popularity and it also weighs on the mods. We've had Doja Cat post about us on twitter, and are basically a known source for shameless grifters and youtubers seeking out information. Furthermore, scrotes wouldn't be so obsessed with this place.

No. 56459

>>56455
I'm allowed to make note of something based on my personal observations. if we had 700+ individual women regularly posting on this site it would appear a lot less dead imo. ever since the frequent cp raids and the whole shaymin debacle the site has seemed to have a lot less posts compared to what it did before.
>>56458
scrotes definitely still would be obsessed with this place even if it's completely dead. crystal cafe is (or was) a relatively small and obscure site that at first was only advertised here but as soon as scrotes found out it's female only they dedicated their lives to shitting it up. just look at the current state of cc - even though it's quieter than the average alt chan scrotes are still regularly raiding and posting garbage there.

No. 56462

>>56444
of course it's blaine, he is so obsessed he posts here pretending to be one of us but hates this site at the same time

No. 56463

>>56462
samefag, I wonder if he is one of the posters who get vehement about shotfags when they post. I don't like shotafags but I do notice when there is nonstop aggressive arguing about it instead of just reporting and ignoring.

No. 56464

>>56462
also this is the same guy who said "women scream rape at literally anything" and said he would break an 18 year old girls' wrists because someone said she was a transphobe with no proof. so it's funny he is trying to be morally just kek.

No. 56465

>>56459
Yeah but here's the thing. Your personal observations mean absolutely nothing on an anon board. In fact the majority of predictions in the past few months were wrong, or proven to be false. I'll stick to what the admins see on their end, since they actually see the statistics.
I'm certain that most anons have a different definition for what they consider regular posting.

No. 56467

File: 1683666464034.png (125.33 KB, 687x891, image.png)

>>56462
>when you like a comic drawn by a pedophile
good one blaine

No. 56470

A bit more negative attention is needed for my next spell so if you could keep it up that'd be perf, thanks~

No. 56471

>>56434
Did you even read my post? I literally said putting a ban on SFW content like that is counterproductive and a waste of time, and it shouldn't be classed the same as NSFW. Nvm, I better not bother explaining myself again. This is probably just Blaine antagonizing, now that we know he's here.

No. 56472

>>56470
mf can’t even defend himself for this one lol

No. 56473

>>56471
God I wish it was honestly but it's not.
>>56472
Refuses to actually, that's what you want and this is a gossip site, I won't squash such a fertile rumor despite me also liking many things Harry Potter related like I do death of the-wait god damn it you almost tricked me, bravo.

No. 56474

>>56444
>confirmed the site is geared towards pedophiles
This pretty much confirms half of the retarded derailing and samefaggung about it in the past few days was him, even in this thread.

No. 56475

>>56474
Exactly so just report and ignore next time ♥

No. 56476

>>56474
He’s mad he got caught supporting a pedophile lol. Sad ass life.

No. 56477

>>56465
it's not only me who's noticed, there's been lots of other posts mentioning the decreased activity both in /meta/ and on miscellaneous threads across the non-cow boards. the admins didn't mention anything about whether we've had more or less individual women posting on this site, and from my understanding the stats can look falsely inflated due to raids, lurkers coming here to gawk, etc. it's ok if you don't agree, I'm just going based off what I've seen

No. 56478

>>56477
NTA but cerbmin did say something here
>>56286
>Our userbase is arguably larger than it’s ever been based on stats provided by our host.
We definitely don't have so few users that 400 is a stretch for a sitewide poll, anon.

No. 56479

>>56478
Lc moves kinda slow but I feel like we have been getting a lot of new users. I don’t think lc has ever been dead in terms of activity.

No. 56480

>>56475
You will never be accepted here, you will never fit in, you will never be a woman and anons will always call your autistic tranny posts out.

No. 56481

>>56479
Samefag lc is mentioned on tiktok with zoomers. They even call certain people they follow lolcows and know of this site. I’ve seen it in comments on a video earlier today. You can tell by the posts that we have a lot of new or younger users, they def type like twitter or TikTok fags

No. 56482

>>56481
Lolcow is not a lc exclusive term

No. 56483

>>56481
And being a femcel /radfem has a younger audience on TikTok now too. I know it’s a hell app but you get a gist of newer users who come here.

No. 56484

>>56482
I know but users also are aware of this specific website too

No. 56485

File: 1683668197582.jpg (478.31 KB, 2448x3264, Gallery_2023173240841.jpg)


No. 56486

>>56485
I don’t believe the male percentage because what does that even go by? Man hate is exteremely popular on this site so if it goes by what is talked about I don’t know (mentioning the words men scrote male etc.)

No. 56487

>>56478
this doesn't specify what the stats are based on though. do we have more individual ips posting, more posts per hour/minute/day, more overall views on the site, or what? it's not just the sheer amount of votes that are suspicious to me but also the poll hasn't even been up 24 hours and already has gotten so many responses. I really hope our current admin team is more honest, commutative, and technologically capable than the last one

No. 56488

>>56487
They said our userbase is larger, IMO that indicates both posters and views. 400-700 over a day or two is practically nothing. Abnormal would be like 10,000 votes in the span of an hour or something.

No. 56490

File: 1683668850168.png (457.17 KB, 1242x1198, 90E0E414-CA81-48A5-BD02-88F5E8…)

>>56485
>mfw I'm the finnish nonna who samefags and has a dynamic IP

No. 56492

>>56490
nonny u are now traceable sorry…

No. 56493

>>56488
Or the tranny is smart enough/has watched Internet Historian and knows to keep the number believable

No. 56495

>>56493
>tranny
>smart
lol no
just no

No. 56497

>>56479
It's felt like this steadily over the past 2 years it's only anons expecting the board to run like twitter complaining.

No. 56499

>>56495
jfc, you don't need to ignore my obvious and only point this hard

No. 56500

>>56493
I really doubt it, he can't even go a single thread without announcing himself or leaving his doxx out.

No. 56501

>>56500
so what? do you really believe 400+ women are pro-cp?

No. 56503

>>56501
*400+ women who specifically use this website

No. 56504

>>56487
meant communicative, not commutative
>>56488
still feels off to me but I'll wait and see until the poll closes/cerbmin gives us an update, hopefully they stay on top of monitoring the poll

No. 56506

>>56505
Okay then, well if over half of this site is pro-cp, then I'm out, that's awful

No. 56507

>>56501
You have to just live with the fact that not all women on this site or in the world will have the same opinion on drawings, anon.

No. 56508

>>56501
>conflating abuse of kids (cp) to creepy anime drawings (shota)
you're retarded as hell

No. 56509

File: 1683670808994.png (9.76 KB, 971x345, weird.PNG)

>>56507
Nice try, creep, I saw you

No. 56512

>>56508
why do you want to be on a website that permits JuSt DrAwInGs of naked children, nona? may as well just go to 4chan at that point

No. 56513

>>56508
Get that weak bait out of here this is my site to troll.(USER HAS BEEN PUT OUT TO PASTURE)

No. 56514

>>56512
it's not real. they are not real kids. they aren't based off of any actual child. i'm done fussing over this, you all are being purposely dense

No. 56515

>>56514
also shota porn has not been even posted outside of the context of trolling. literally this whole situation is just this post >>56409

No. 56517

>>56514
I am asking a very simple question, nona
who tf wants to use a site where you're at risk for seeing drawn pornography of children if you accidentally hover over a spoiler?

No. 56518

>>56497
>steadily over the past 2 years
nta but i strongly disagree with this, there was a major difference right after the nucow incident compared to earlier months of last year and the year before. idk if it just depends on the threads or boards but the only off-topic ones that have consistent speed are infighty threads on /ot/ like vent and unpopular opinions. the other threads i usually read on there and on /g/ and /m/ (especially those two) only get like a couple of posts per week now

No. 56519

>>56517
apparently fujochan users and all who endorse them at least CC bans it all together

No. 56520

>>56501
Not that nona but I believe
I was unfortunate enough to see how degenerate young women can be
I also believe that scrotes are messing with the poll
I'd say it's a bit of degenerate women and a bit of scrotes.

No. 56521

>>56520
I agree with scrotes messing with the poll because as you can see with trannies, they will literally spend every day here and trolling because women use this site. thats why they post soyjacks, or post cp links, or whatever else

No. 56522

The poll should be redone to be less vague, either that or adjust for different options. I don't care if someone is discussing Black Butler's Ciel (using him for example) as a character, but if they're making posts talking about a character like him in a sexual way or posting NSFW of him, I think they should be banned. Shota shit is just as bad as loli shit.

>>56515
Trolling is just as annoying as posting it to be serious. Those threads have so many coomers in there bragging about being into the most degenerate of kinks ever, even opting to not engage in fiction if it doesn't include things like incest, grooming, or pedoshit. Who cares if shota shit gets banned, good riddance.

No. 56523

>>56521
yeah it can be a bit of that but lets not pretend that there aren't freaks with rape fetishes against men and boys on here

No. 56524

>>56523
but they aren't the majority, that's why they're already in a containment thread
I do not want to believe that the majority of women on lolcow are pedophiles

No. 56525

>>56523
>>56523
I don't disagree with that. Female pedos definitely exist, I don't deny that
>>56524
Which is why I think there's some stuff happening messing with the poll.

No. 56526

>>56409
Exactly this, and the whole reason for the infights seems to be anons letting shotafags live in their heads rent free. They keep posting repetitive bait in unrelated threads to cause a storm of infights, probably with the intent to influence admin. Whatever way this goes I'll be glad when it's over if it ever fucking is

No. 56527

>>56497
No I'd laugh about it and say there's nothing to do and thus killing my 'proof' if it was me. I'll still say it was me, I'll let others say it was me but it won't change the number of gross organic votes.(Blaine)

No. 56528

>>56524
>>56525
Agreed, and not too tinfoil, but there's no way the majority of people voting on this poll are active users here. Every time someone goes into a thread and sperges about shota, there are always people there who call them out for it. The only times this doesn't happen is in containment threads meant for fujo media; and in those threads, there's always infighting. I highly doubt the majority of people on this board are in favor of it. Plus there's no way there are almost 200 people in those threads that are always in favor of it, they've got to have posted something about it to their friends to get help voting.

No. 56529

>>56528
Well, they could be active lurkers. And it's hard to number lurkers
I mean, there could be hundreds of them, and the site still will appear almost dead.

No. 56530

>>56522
Nona, the poll rules specify that child characters merely existing isnt shota, but putting them into romantic/sexual situations is

No. 56531

>>56530
You're right nona, thank you for correcting me! I think the poll was confusing because of the lengthiness of the answers, but having reread it, I realized I picked the wrong selection then.

No. 56532

File: 1683676308629.png (275.19 KB, 1600x556, pasted image 0.png)

>>56522
>the poll should be redone to be less vague
Seconding this, the definition of minors is too vague imo. I'm against any nsfw but I'm not sure about the SFW. I don't think that medias like idk Skip and Loafer for exemple ( technically minors in a romantic situation ) should be called shota/loli. Where do we draw the line ? Also I think that putting minors in a non sexual romantic context is very different from puting minors with adults in a non sexual romantic context and I've seen some anons here have the same feelings about it. I do appreciate the admins trying to sort this out though.

No. 56533

>>56532
I can see your point, but it's reasonable that mods phrased the question assuming we'd know what they meant in this context. Your example sounds purposefully obtuse especially with shotafags crawling around. Also imo redoing the poll only opens it to further voting abuse by moid/tranny raiders, I don't think as many nonas would vote in a redo.

No. 56534

>>56533
>Your example sounds purposefully obtuse especially with shotafags crawling around
well fuck, I really didn't want to make it sound like that. I was just wondering where the typical highschool romantic story would be considered as shota/loli or not. I was also advocating to forbid SFW of aduts and children together if that wasn't very clear.

No. 56535

>>56424
kek, i also got banned for "redditspacing" once even though i don't use reddit. farmhands please arrest the admin

No. 56537

>>56532
technically minors by western standards, but definitely not loli/shotacon, which has a distinct artistic style focusing on prepubescence. it was obvious, to me at least, that the type of example you've provided would be permitted. i would agree that "minors" should be defined more clearly.

No. 56539

>>56532
samefag, but another example following yours would be inuyasha. kagome is 14 at the beginning of the series, and inuyasha is what like 300 years old? its obviously not loli/shotacon but she is still technically a minor. it also slightly touches on your last point, though i believe inuyasha is actually around 17 years of age, he was just frozen in time.
my point being is that it gets muddy with anime and there should be clarification that loli/shotacon is a specific artistic style within anime focusing on prepubescence.

No. 56540

I was also wondering if admin could clarify what shota is going to be defined as. If a character like Ciel is going to be the obvious shota, where do characters like Venti (genshin), Epel (twst), or Honey (host club) fall? They all look similar to characters like Ciel despite being 16-17, I just don’t want to catch a ban for talking about ships with underage characters
What about a character like Ritsuka from Loveless who is 12 but looks older than all of the above characters?

No. 56542

>>56509
? Clarifying my point so no one thinks we're discussing actual CP is creepy? Touch grass. Tbh this thread was full of such bad faith takes at that specific time, opening it while the schizo troon is/was around was a mistake and I wish I'd known before kek. Of course he'd try to self-promote and look like a mastermind puppeteering the site too ffs.

No. 56543

>>56541
>>56542
maybe just finish a thought before posting it dude

No. 56544

>>56543
Are you new? Posting something one minute, then deleting it to add the rest of your thoughts is really common. Just refresh, and the extra post goes away.

No. 56547

>>56544
I'm not going to continue this conversation further, but you are deleting and re-posting kind of weirdly often(infighting)

No. 56548

>>56547
I did it two times. Please don't continue, you're starting to sound schizo.(infighting)

No. 56549

File: 1683680390925.jpg (Spoiler Image,66.05 KB, 476x600, New.Prince.of.Tennis.600.15699…)

>>56540
>>56540
IMO shota is only characters who look underage/resemble irl children? for example picrel is 14, would this be banned? i'd assume not, but admin should clarify. spoilered just in case.

No. 56550

>>56548
she literally said
>I'm not going to continue this conversation further
so why would you keep responding

No. 56551

>>56550
>responds to complains about person responding
Stop.

No. 56552

>>56551
Good God the irony, is there a fucking gas leak in here?

No. 56553

>>56552
Evidently, now stfu.

>>56532
I don't think characters that look like adults would be bannable, but some people might be bothered about the canon ages.

No. 56554

>>56549
>>56553
it has to be a body type thing, I think the jojos are canononically like 14

No. 56555

>>56549
Yeah I agree. Honestly, I don’t really think Ciel looks like an irl child, but I know some anon feel differently, that’s just why I wanted some clarification. I don’t really care if it gets banned, I just want to make sure I don’t post any talk of ships in the future if the characters are going to be considered shota

No. 56556

>>56549
as someone who is not so fluent in anime, I have to tell you that this post was an adventure

No. 56557

>>56540
I think it's just if they are underage and were deliberately designed to look that age or younger. But in my opinion, I think people like Venti or Astolfo who are designed to look feminine walk the line depending on what fanart you're posting. Some people draw them to look like shotas, some draw them to look how they do in canon, and others just draw them like traps. I'd like to think most of everyone (at least anime fans) subconsciously are aware of when someone is made to deliberately look like a kid.

No. 56558

>>56557
Definitely, but the poll looks like it’s likely all discussion about shota outside of milk is going to be bannable, so just judging by picture alone would be impossible in that regard. Obviously just talking about underage characters is fine, but is talk about shipping going to be considered inappropriate for certain underage characters but not all?

No. 56559

>>56553
Then those people should get real problems, honestly.

No. 56561

File: 1683687309698.jpeg (63.39 KB, 476x507, BC79C21E-F4D5-4E17-8253-B380F1…)

I initiated voted to ban any kind of discussion related to lolishota solely because it gets old to see threads derailing with the same twenty “reeeeee pedo “ comments an aditional person who goes “it’s not pedophilia!” and then the circle starts again. It’s incredibly annoying and usually irrelevant for whatever cow is being discussed.

Recent posts made me rethink it; Yeah, the /m/ inhabitants would be indiscriminately affected and make the board nearly unusable. Shota and non-shota-but-still-underage characters make up like 90% of popular anime.
Even among the ones who oppose shotacon, a lot of those people still welcome characters that are 15 year olds like picrel, while condemning 18 year olds like the lucky star characters. Truly Schrodingers pedo.

The “disregard canon ages, we should go with pure looks” doesn’t seem like it’d be able to be properly enforced; I disagree that Venti looks canonically meant to be feminine, I see pure shota fuel. Aether seems more feminine to me, mirroring his twin sister, but I still see people referring to him as shota. I think it’s too subjective to make banning rules properly enforceable.

IMO all discussion of it should be banned from all boards but /m/ where only sfw should be allowed, with suggestive stuff being allowed while spoilered, and NSFW should just be discouraged altogether unless it relates to milk. Not sure about banned, though, again, because of the subjectivity. People are already banned for dumb shit. I got redtexted for telling kys to a scrote. I don’t trust mods to know when Scaramouche is drawn sissified, gender bent, or shotaified.

No. 56563

File: 1683690427657.png (Spoiler Image,390.75 KB, 515x588, jibaku-shonen-hanako-kun-vol16…)

If we're going by body type, I think "shota" can most easily be defined by proportions like picrel, 100% safe picture but spoilered just in case. It's a younger version of an existing character that toes the line but (usually) looks fine IMO. Characters like Venti and Ciel just look like more andro and sometimes shorter versions of typical anime teenage boys to me.

>>56561
I agree with most of this, though. Overall, this seems hard to enfoce and a bit knee-jerk. We can all agree on not wanting moid spam or infights about this topic. Since this is a site for grown women, I think we can pull that off without having to ban any topic entirely or disrupt normal fandom discussion. Just like with anything else, anons who don't like it simply shouldn't engage with it, and anons who do like it shouldn't be overbearing or try to force it.

No. 56565

>>56286
>I looked through our moderation log it hasn’t been deleted by a farmhand or mod. I also combed through the staff email and didn’t find any takedown requests. Apologies for not having more information, my pet theory is it had something to do with Colours but I obviously cannot prove this.
Thank you for responding, maybe I'm just dumb about how things work behind the scenes but how is it possible a thread can be deleted without any admins or jannies knowing about it? Who could've deleted it if it wasn't a janny or farmhand? Is it possible someone on staff didn't like something that was posted in that thread and deleted it secretly? Sorry for all the questions I understand if you don't have the time to answer this I was just curious about why it was deleted and your answer made me even more curious lol

No. 56566

There's a well known shotafag in 4chan named chickn and she has groomed multiple underage boys using /soc/ ranging between 14-17. She also raped one of them afaik(?) as she admitted meeting one underage boy. She's also leaked nudes of most of the underage guys and got them harassed if they stopped interacting with her.
While grooming them, she actively send them shota porn and videochatted them, making them show their bodies while she took pictures to later on leak.
If you think shotafags are still not dangerous, idk what to say to you.
A quick search to 4chan archieves and you can find most of the crimes she has admitted to commited I can't even imagine the ones she doesn't admit.

No. 56567

File: 1683695652591.png (71.11 KB, 1460x800, 1683402464537611.png)

>>56566
Samefagging and adding on screenshot
>inb4 how do u now she's not a man/tranny?
She had her nudes get leaked. She's an obese brown woman.

No. 56568

>>56566
>>56567
Has this person ever even posted about shota? Is it a fujo? Seems like another obese furry groomer, probably belongs in its own thread.

No. 56569

File: 1683696397006.png (Spoiler Image,21.56 KB, 800x475, chicknn.png)

>>56568
Samefag, looked this person up in the archive
https://desuarchive.org/r9k/search/text/Chickn/
There are a bunch of posts calling it a tranny, even the people exposing its pedo DMs are saying so. Honestly seems like it's a tranny who keeps getting all the proof of its manhood deleted from the archive, but I can't say for sure. Either way, I'm not sure why anyone would post it here insisting it's a true and honest woman, doubt anyone here would support it.

No. 56570

>>56568
I literally said she sends SHOTA to guys she grooms and has a SHOTA fetish she admits to to guys she talks to, her SHOTA fetish is why she targets young boys. You guys are no different than her, she didn't start grooming early on, it escalated and as it did, her victims age started dropping even lower.

No. 56571

>>56569
She not a tranny, she had her nudes leaked. She's accused of being one because most women aren't stupid enough to admit they both consume shota and rape little boys. You're just deflecting now because you know this is the type of shotafag female you guys defend when you defemd shota site wide. She's a rapist.

No. 56572

>>56570
>she
I'm not even a shotafag, just keep your /r9k/ discord tranny shit out of here.

No. 56573

>>56569
If you can get proof she's a tranny(picture of his face/dicketc) , I'll leave shotafags alone but until then, you posting deleted pictures won't be worthy of an argument when there are literal pictures of her, A SHOTAFAG, admitting she raped boys.

No. 56574

>>56573
The proof is that everyone who posted it called it a tranny. I don't know who this person is. You brought it here, so you prove it's a biological woman if you care so much.

No. 56575

>>56574
So you think shota is no big deal even if its used to groom underage boys and rape them because you assumed the rapist is tranny because you found a random accusation online? Do you also think the shotafags in /ot/ are trannies because they're defending the distribution of loli/shota and most anons call them males/trannies as well?
Because by that logic, you'd also think these shotafags are also male since they also randomly got accused of being male, right?

No. 56578

File: 1683697966747.png (Spoiler Image,2.44 MB, 2800x3300, 1683660407616.png)

>>56574
>>56575
Samefagging again because I did decide to look, just for the fuck of it. This took me all of 5 minutes. People who've talked with him have exposed him. He's a tranny catfish who's been at this for years, grooming young boys. Notoriously refuses to VC on Discord. Someone ("Gumshoe", with the Jojo reaction pic) who met up IRL with him at 16 confirmed it's a gross man and he regretted every decision to that point. I'm annoyed that you posted this and feel stupid for even entertaining it for even a second, thereby helping your dumb ass derail the thread. Enough bullshit, discuss the subject like a normal person instead of pushing tranny drama. We already have to deal with Blaine. You are an actual retard for assuming it was a woman "because he said so uwu" and dragging this bullshit here as a "gotcha".

No. 56583

>>56575
“Shota is used to groom underage boys!!!” There are a million things uses to groom underage boys. NSFW pictures of adults or completely SFW movies are used as tools to tell vulnerable kids “this is what grown ups do, and you’re grown up, aren’t you?” That is WAY more common tactic and you know it.
Statistically, that person is highly likely to be a tranny, if it’s actually a woman (burden of proof is on you) it’ll be an outlier so not worth the autistic screeching. The derailing is so annoying.

No. 56584

>>56570
Caps lock doesn’t make you sound more convincing, correlation doesn’t mean causation, lolifags get caught raping kids all the time just like people who condemn porn or sexual thoughts at all get caught raping kids all the time, too. It’s men who are the common denominator. Why can’t you discuss normally if you don’t wanna see it like everyone else has been able to do?

No. 56586

>>56585
>LC is just too wrecked culturally
because most anons don't want to see drawn kiddie porn? Huh? kek I've never even participated in these arguments before but your post really cracked me up. Reminds me of scrotes bemoaning modern society because it's becoming more hostile to their degeneracy towards children.

No. 56587

>>56586
Nope I meant the infighting among other things if you read the rest before I deleted

No. 56588


No. 56589

>>56586
Plus I literally said shotafags should accept getting banned if it happens since this debate is tireless. I just haven't seen the drawn kiddie porn being posted that you're all up in arms about.
>>56588
You're throwing a tantrum and it's embarrassing

No. 56592

I think the poll should have a runoff where people have to pick between whichever two options end up being the most popular.

No. 56595

I wish we could just rely on common sense on whether something is pedobaitshit and not deal with the "but my 300yr-old whos 17" or "my bodybuilding 15yr old" scrote-like whataboutisms. take your sebaciel to discord or ao3 if you care that much about bans. im tired of seeing complaints being ignored by shotafags and fence-sitters just because ~men do worse but we're women so its moralfagging and bordering on antifeminist~
>>56583
>>56584
your absolute refusal to not talk about shotashit on a retarded imageboard where 99% of us dont want to see it reeks of psychosexual issues. Why can’t you take that shit elsewhere if you don’t wanna see everyone hating it?

No. 56596

>>56595
Yeah, I agree. It's pretty straightforward. I think arguments like >>56561 are disingenuous. Even thought that character is apparently 15 no one thinks it looks like pedoshit, and saying a pedobait character is a 9000 year old dragon is bullshit, it still looks like a kid. Besides, no one is talking about banning talking about underage characters, just sexual content involving them. If you can't talk about anime kids without sexual stuff you have issues.

No. 56599

>>56591
you literally have the smallest perception of the world if you think any one post of yours out of everyone else’s or your own views is supposed to be this big grandiose thing it’s literally known irl outside of online. Terminally online shit go outside tranny

No. 56600

>>56485
Analytics sites such as this are not to be believed because they usually estimate the sex of site visitors by typing style. The site thinks farmers are male due image board posting habits. The majority of image boards are male dominated, therefore image board posts are classified as male.

No. 56606

>>56566
>>56567
>>56569
>>56578
And this is precisely why shota/loli needs to be banned instead of being entertained because some individual woman might have a thing for it. It's like honey to demented trannies, almost everyone who's supposedly """a woman""" and into shota (i.e. little children, not muscular teenage anime boys) is revealed to be a man sooner or later.

No. 56607

>>56600
That's the most retarded thing I've ever heard. Analytics aren't based on typing style they're based off of data collection. The grand majority of sites use third party services for this, like Google analytics, to collect your information

No. 56611

>>56606
This is a bit of a cope.

No. 56612

>>56607
Those can and do make mistakes too, many cases of female users being marked by the algorithm as male because they don't have "typical female interests"

No. 56613

my question is why the fuck does ANYONE feel the need to be posting NSFW loli/shota on this site in the first place? Pedo pandering scrotes

No. 56615

I have a feeling that regardless of the final results for this poll we're going to get an influx of actual shota and loliposting, from trolls and actual lolishofags alike. Call it reverse psychology, perverse incentive, hydra effect etc

No. 56616

>>56612
Not sure how it can be so inaccurate when majority of people surf chrome with a Google account that knows your gender (because it was part of the sign up). Personally the 60/40 ratio doesn't surprise me especially with how much cp and gore get spammed here all the time. Hell, everyone here has been sperging about anime cp for an extended amount of time, they even held a fucking poll for it ffs. How is anyone surprised with so much male behavior on this site everyday.

No. 56617

>>56616
The question is, if lolcow too does use Google Analytics cookies, is it GDPR-compliant? Haven't seen any cookie consent pop-ups on here.

No. 56620

>>56616
>browsing LC while logged into chrome with a google account
I have no words for how fucking stupid that is.

No. 56621

>>56613
>why does anyone want to allow nsfw loli/shota?
If you haven't realized the same men that spam CP are now trying to allow loli/shota so their spams can stay up. Their irl cp get removed but if this poll ends up being to their liking, they'll be able to post drawn stuff that'll make anons uncomfortable and it won't be able to get removed.

No. 56622

>>56620
Nta but why? Now I'm scared

No. 56624

>>56623
I don't get it

No. 56625

To clear up further concerns, if the majority of users have voted to restrict this type of content being (as it is right now over 70% of votes favour some type of restriction), then we will implement the restriction with the highest number of votes, even if it does not reach first place. The only way that no restrictions will be imposed is if the two options that represent that choice total more than 50% of the votes.

Given how quickly votes are being cast, we are reducing the timeline of the vote down to 5 days (which will mean it finishes on the 13th). If several similar options are very close we will have an informal run-off vote in a thread in /meta/.

>>56456
>>56457
Making decisions behind closed doors isn't the transparency we want to have with users. We acknowledge this was obviously a very awkward and clunky way to do it and we didn't provide enough context. We've updated the poll page to make it clear what is going on.

No. 56628

File: 1683722894914.jpg (21.23 KB, 553x456, 1648284870960.jpg)

>>56589
At this point, I think it's the baiting and infighting that's the problem, not even the subject matter or content. I've literally never seen anons spam shota or NSFW to warrant this kind of attention, but I have seen posters both for/against arguing their gay theoretical opinions about it for hours. I think the admins know this, and that's why it feels so juvenile and embarrassing that the question is whether to add clauses to the rules in order to restrict it, instead of how to better handle our infights. It feels like putting a band-aid on the situation, and giving baiters and shit stirrers on either side "their way".
I know I'm paranoid, but I can't help but feel like this means men will eventually actually be able to control what we talk or post about, in a roundabout way. For example, a small to medium sized Discord server of men/troons can easily decide they're going to post bait and start incessant arguments on any hyper-specific topic. Imageboard-illiterate retards and twitter newfags will eat it up and engage with it every time instead of reporting/ignoring, and rather than addressing how we respond to bait or infights, whatever hot button subject it is will just get banned. It's almost like if the anorectal violence sperg was taken seriously.
Also, on the entire debate: Lolcow will never be anyone's "pure" mental home. About the one thing we can all agree on is fuck men, and that's honestly how it should be. People can hate or like whatever genre of fiction, politician, celebrity, whatever. Some people are almost exclusively posting fearmongering and emotional baits to try and deflect from this fact, but that's the crux of it. I know from certain threads on /g/, /m/, and /ot/ that I'm posting alongside nonas with all sorts of weird and fucked up fetishes and dumb opinions, and that some of you are literal furries, but it just doesn't matter. Come to think of it, the dog and cat hate threads managed to attract actual scrotes, gore spam, and posters casually advising each other on how to to do illegal things like poison other people's pets, but neither generals or the topic itself were ever banned. Mods just ban the insane ones. This is despite the fact that typical posts about disliking dogs or cats easily go in the vent, GIOYC or annoying threads. I'm sure some anons from those threads will get mad at me for talking about this, try to deny it ever happens (we've all seen it, don't bother, idc) and argue it's justified because of free speech, but by that same metric, anything else "sensitive" can easily be handled the same way if only anons knew how to stop taking shitty bait.
>Any posters trying to push deranged or extreme takes = We tell them to shut the fuck up, report them for derailing and infighting. No more attention for them.
>Any kind of advocacy for illegal acts/harm = Ban and sitewide shaming.
>Avatarfagging and constant attention-seeking over one's own autistic interest = Ban and/or sitewide scorn until exile (like seal-chan).
It should be this easy. Outside of maybe how we handle infighing, I don't think the rules need to be changed, or that we need to add fresh restrictions on any one topic, because again, the reaction and eternal slapfights are the real issue.

No. 56629

>>56625
>We acknowledge this was obviously a very awkward and clunky way to do it and we didn't provide enough context.
Yeah? Is that why you accused us of disingenuous interpreting the poll on purpose first?

No. 56630

>>56628
100% correct. Changing site rules in response to vicious infighting is not an appropriate response. Dealing with infighting quickly and consistently is the solution. Infighting is literally already mentioned in the rules. We're going to fuck with the site rules instead of just enforcing the ones that would solve the entire mess?

No. 56633

>>56621
You’re fucking stupid if you think that spam threads are gonna be allowed to stay up just because the picture is ‘within the rules’. Saying ‘lol’ is within the rules but it’ll get you banned if spam, off topic, necro and so on. Go Qanon somewhere else.

No. 56634

>>56628
Do you really think banning shota and loli, one of the most popular genres for men and generally hated by women, is some tranny/scrote psyop to "control lolcow"? You went too deep, anon.

No. 56637

>>56634
Here is the baby version: Banning discussion of something because certain kinds of posters can't stop arguing about it does nothing but infantilize us all, and it make it so scrotes can have our speech censored with enough pressure on any topic. Literally anything you can think of can be described as "generally hated by women" if the speaker wants to push that angle enough. This is because we're fucking human beings with a variety of opinions. Ban scrotes, ban spammers, ban trannies, ban infighters. Stop shitting the bed. Simple as.

No. 56639

>>56584 >>56613 >>56595 >>56596
Nobody is even regularly posting NSFW shota on lolcow aside of spamming scrotes. It’s amazing how indignant people can be over a non pressing issue. You’re all shitting yourselves over something that literally does not happen.
Where are the hoards of shotacons making threads craving for visibly underage NSFW? How many times have any of you honestly seen a sizable chunk of users banding together to cheer for pictures of sebaciel exploring each other’s yaoi holes? Only significant times it gets posted is in bad art thread for the shock factor, and it didn’t warrant any of this shit fest from the incompetent admins. But thanks for the infighting over some hypothetical cryptid pedo fujo and her two or three friends, farmhands. Great work.

>>56628 is right.

No. 56640

>>56638
kek and based

No. 56641

>>56638
Smartest moralfag

No. 56642

Please lock the KF thread in /snow/ we really don't need scrotes shitting up the site again. Every time there is a new KF thread cause the site is down again scrotes flock here and make this place miserable. Please.

No. 56643

>>56638
>If you're not on my side, you are xyz
Sure, whatever. You're not going to meme me into one of your baby slapfights, I've seen it happen too many times. Once again, I've literally never once seen shota/NSFW spam, only ever seen autistic never-ending infights to try and derail the point.
The problem will always be baiters and retards, everyone knows it and the two groups mentioned in this sentence can mald for life about it.

No. 56644

>>56637
K-pop, Pro-ana topics and to some extent, vtubers for a time got banned too, was that some 4d moid chess move or just that the mentally ill posters were universally hated and insufferable with their infighting and spergery, bringing in an userbase nobody wants here? Some topics are doomed to fail and dying on the hill of defending shota and loli is some really terrible optics.

No. 56645

>>56644
What shota userbase do we actually even have? Are they frequent posters in the /m/ or fujo threads? If they're here, there's not even enough of them to sustain a single containment thread. I have only ever seen scrotes baiting and dumb anons swallowing that bait, and now they're here pretending it's just about this ghost shotafag demographic and they'll totally stop infighting if the topic is banned. That's not what's going to happen, and you know it.

No. 56646

>>56642
Elaine is already using that thread to self promote her streams venting about her vendetta against Null cause he refuses to fuck her skelly ass.

No. 56647

>>56638
Well thank god we don't make all our rules and laws based on whatever nonna "considers", you absolute fucking sperg
Back to 2X with you

No. 56648

>>56645
Just because you don't see it doesn't mean it doesn't happen around the board apparently enough to be reported in such volumes for the mod team to take action, I've seen it around /m/ and /ot/ plenty. If you think that banning shota and loli is a slippery slope into losing a female space to scrotes then I suggest you leave, in fact I encourage it.

No. 56650

>>56648
The infights are what's reported. I'm pretty sure the admins have said this, too, so I'm not sure why you're trying to pull the wool over anyone's eyes. All examples of shotafags being a problem are described as the same arguments I'm talking about, no one has said "The shotafags keep spamming their hentai everywhere" in any /meta/ complaint thread because that's straight up never what happens. These problem posters pretty much never seem to actually post any shota pictures, probably because discussion is not the point for them. It's a bunch of men who like to make women mad, and they know they don't have to save or post any pictures to get replies here. If you think women are adult babies who need entire subjects blocked from discussion or else we collectively lose our minds and can't discuss things like sane/normal people, maybe you should leave, because that's clearly a you problem.

No. 56654

>>56628
Of course it's the infighting, the pics they post are pretty mild but sometimes the accompanying text is creepy and annoying as fuck talking about boy this shota that which is probably what other fujos hate. And to top it off whenever you talk about how disgusting shota and shotafags (along with lolifags) are, even if you mean the really nasty type and not the mild pics that are posted here, they will always come to defend it all as "not real so nothing wrong with it"

No. 56655

If admin banned all shotafags I bet both the infight and real cp spam would slow down. I don't understand why anons don't see that the pedos that have been religiously defending shota are probably the same ones posting CP behind VPNs, one shotafag even got mad and didn't believe me when I told her even with a VPN she's traceable so I'm starting to believe they're the same people more and more.

No. 56656

>>56655
Why do you think real cp spam would slow with a new rule when posting cp is already a bannable offense, kek. This site is such a wasteland these days

No. 56657

>>56656
>why do you think banning pedos will slow down cp spams when pedos are the ones who are spamming?
Are you retarded? To spam, you need content and the ones who spent hours defending their pedophilia are the types to have this content on their computers ready to spam. If they got device or rangebans they couldn't evade, the spams would lessen in quantity.
How can you not understand that banning pedos will lessen pedos who spam?

No. 56661

>>56650
And other topics that cause constant infighting and cultivate a shitty userbase get banned or have their threads locked because they're hogging mod resources, it's not a new thing. Why are you so hellbent on defending shota and loli if you don't even see it being posted here? If it barely exists, what integral board feature of value are we losing by banning it? Drawn child porn is even illegal in plenty of western countries so it's not something outlandish to demand, in fact it's quite sensible to not want to see it. And don't try to claim "b-but it's not all nsfw", shota and loli as a genre are quite explicitly used to refer to porn.

No. 56662

File: 1683728234049.gif (111.34 KB, 157x90, shrug.gif)

>shotafaggotry comes up
>thread immediately devolves into retarded infighting
yeah ban it lmao

No. 56663

>>56659
These pedos wanted shota be allowed so they could spam it and make anons uncomfortable %100!they literally complain about real cp being removed fast in all the infights and say they dont want shota/loli to be removed as well, it's obvious that drawn contented is the only ones they can get away with posting and they don't wanna lose it.
Those are definitely %99 male anons or some female pedophiles.

No. 56666

>>56661
Because “drawn child porn” includes all depictions of minors, not just the ones you have deemed look too young. I don’t want /m/ to get nuked because admins are forced to ban all NSFW images of characters under 18. I can’t comprehend how your moral standing applies to some children but all, not characters 15, 16, 17. Those characters are children too, why do you not care about NSFW images of them being posted?

No. 56668

>>56661
I've already explained why I don't believe in banning any particular topic rather than banning tards for sperging and infighting. It sets the worst possible precedent. If it was about Amber Heard and Johnny Depp, I'd say the same thing. The autism will migrate, because it's not even the subject that's the problem, but how our userbase reacts and self-rewards for certain behaviors.
There's little to no "userbase" to speak of, the problem is bigger than what it's being made out to be, and I maintain that. If you think moids and trannies seeing this don't know now how easily they can brigade us just by shitposting hard enough, you are giving them too much credit. I guess another reason I have stakes in this is because it reminds me of how subjects I actually do enjoy (pinkpill, 2X, anti troon discussion) got banned for years over trannies and men starting infights, spamming and destroying a bunch of threads.
>And don't try to claim "b-but it's not all nsfw", shota and loli as a genre are quite explicitly used to refer to porn.
So what porn gets posted? Again, where is the userbase to make a problem of? Are they in the room with us right now? It's always shitty moid bait, and they will keep baiting, and we will pay the ultimate price as the focus keeps changing until we can't post or do shit.

No. 56669

>>56666
>6666
>complaining about nsfw images of underage children possibly getting removed
Really honoring your satanic postnumber, huh. Why are you so angry about the possibility of not being able to post porn of underage kids if you're not a pedo?

No. 56670

>>56663
Nta and I'm personally tired of shotafags defending depictions of sexualized prepubescent children so stubbornly, but it's obvious you don't know much about female otaku. There is always a "shota type" of character in any anime-style franchise with a large bishounen cast, even if said character is not actually a child and just looks really young, which seems to be the only real kind of shota characters being posted. I really don't think those posters are spamming CP (which btw, at least from the few times my eyes have been assaulted with it, seems to always be of girls).

Anyways I don't know how shotafags expect everybody to not think they're pedophiles, when they don't even bother explaining this distinction or specifying what kind of pictures or characters they want to post, and instead keep defending ALL degenerate depictions of children.

No. 56672

>>56669
I’m asking a legitimate question, do you want to ban all NSFW images and discussion of minors, or just specific characters you think look too young?

No. 56673

>>56657
>>56663
Are YOU retarded? There is no "spamming" because spam isn't allowed on lc in general, it's global rule #9, and global rule #4 if you want to get technical. Banning a subject isn't going to magically stop bad actors from spamming, they do that anyways.
Are any of you losers actually interested in discussing what's best for lc, or are you just taking the opportunity to moralfag us all to death?

No. 56674

>>56672
Even if that anon tries to avoid this, at least a few posters (not all) are "anti" types who most likely will want that, and after that it'll be "problematic" content in general, so discussing things with ethically wrong/questionable themes like in American Psycho, Game Of Thrones or Flowers In The Attic will probably garner reports and complaints too. This is on top of scrotes ruining threads on purpose to fuck up conversations.

No. 56676

In the past, whenever shota gets posted that anon gets banned. I've even seen anons be banned just for saying they like shota. For years it seems like it was already a bannable offense. I voted, but tbh I still don't understand what the poll is for or what exactly is supposed to be changing.

No. 56677

>>56663
>they literally complain about real cp being removed fast in all the infights
Wtf, when and where has this happened? Who would complain about CP getting deleted quickly?

No. 56678

>>56674
I know, I just find it ironic there’s so much screeching about pedophiles without realizing that pedophiles also prey on teenagers. It’s like they’ve conveniently excluded themselves from the discussion by saying “well 16 year old anime boys don’t look like teens, they could well be adults!” (The exact same thing people who like shotas say) It’s incredible watching them do mental gymnastics around their own flawed morality.

No. 56679

>>56676
Samefag, I say shota cause anons keep talking about that specifically for some reason, but this goes for loli too. Also the rules page hasn't been updated since like 2016 so idk why we're still using that as a strict guide of the current rules.