File: 1678096646817.png (359.46 KB, 720x720, 1656286890779.png)
No. 54143
>cont. from last thread, post limit>>54134AYRT, I agree. I know skid is 100% schizo layna-butthole posting and they both lurk, but the uptick in pro-BBP is wild. I'd even suspect Taylor on another relapse but it seems too nasty for her (can't believe I even said that but she seems too dumb and lacking the guile)
it's safe to say that literally any person who has a thread lurks (just look at the prettypastelplease/gurugossip situation, and sperg-chan) so it's almost frustrating not to be able to hi-cow and copping a ban when it is clearly the cow in question. my one and only gripe with this site.
I'm sure if skid or BBP keep shitposting mods will disclose their posts like they did with sperg-chan, but I remember replying to her and dasha in real time before they were revealed and not being able to hi-cow was so fucking retarded when it was clearly them.
again, I know it's the rules but sometimes a bend of rules is copacetic.
mostly great job from current admins. I got banned for reddit spacing and fully deserved it, my bad. I'm also enjoying some of the redtext quips, I like the cut of your jib new admin. myriad chuckles
No. 54145
>>54138oh my god it's too cute and pretty and adorable she's such a sweetheart i love her
>>54144yeeah, i hope it's fixed soon
No. 54148
File: 1678121967520.jpeg (63.63 KB, 564x753, A938A51D-CB99-4B92-80B9-0CB86E…)
I jus wanna say fuck the people who get mad that lc gets cutsey-fied sometimes I love it, threadpic is super cute.
No. 54152
>>54150Oh yeah I was totally mocking that exact thing honestly, I hate policing feminine hobbies or choice like of what pictures to use.
>>54151I'm glad it ended well, limiting expression is never the answer to me.
No. 54164
>>54127>exif dataWhy would I care if someone wanted to doxx me? I didn't even do anything wrong, I literally just want an answer to my original question. If someone wants to try to figure out who I am then they're weird and creepy. I was hoping to prove I'm not a tranny so I could get an answer. Other
nonny was correct though that it wasn't necessary to prove myself and was ultimately retarded of me. I thought hand posting was A Thing but I'm not immersed enough in LC culture I guess. I'm just gonna accept that something got fucked up or I did something horrible and I got a permaban and there's nothing I can do about it. Kinda sus though that you're trying to threaten or intimidate me.
No. 54179
>>54176I guess he did not use strong enough bleach on his enemas to get rid of that autism
He’s continuing in the tinfoil thread. God, that thread attracts the worst kinds of posters.
No. 54190
File: 1678152268518.jpeg (56.7 KB, 900x600, 76A80B04-8689-4778-B37C-E6D728…)
reee lolcor keeps freezing my browser reeee
No. 54198
File: 1678210848960.jpeg (32.63 KB, 500x333, 4F7D4B33-9312-415F-B530-47EEE8…)
So I was rextexxed and my ban was supposed to be end by net morning(relative to yours) so I really didn't have an issue, but then I had to leave and do some house work and my ban still had maybe 8-6 hours left but I can somehow post again
was this intentional or is this some error ?
No. 54200
>>54195In that case, I appreciate the heads up nonna. I was very determind to finally get and answer so I went out on a limb. I've been here for quite some time and am well aware of trannys and faggots, hence my speculation of a tranny janny. I will not be receiving an answer so fuck it.
>>54187I agree. It's too vulnerable out in the open. Moids just love to violate anything and everything we have and create for ourselves.
No. 54219
>>54207appears to be in the unpopular opinion thread now racebaiting about european and middle eastern phenotypes
the racebaiting and misogyny makes it so glaringly obvious it's a pol moid
No. 54240
>>54236Try "expand all images" at the top right, it usually loads faster.
>>54238shut up retard
No. 54248
>>54246Oof, yall need to move over with this
toxic bs. Yall aint r-slurred or twitterf-ggy at all, this is just yall being
problematic. Can you
trigger warning your post before posting something so
abusive? Yall are obvs
toxic. I feel like a
victim after reading this.
No. 54251
Saw that the (new?) mod has taken care of WKing in Taylor R's thread.
>>>/w/284237 >>>/w/284108Will something be done about the WKing in the jvlogger thread which is arguably much worse? An anon has threatened someone with doxing for mentioning Chris lying about his knowledge of a rapist's past. >>>/w/284781
Another WK, who may or may not be the doxxing anon, keeps getting upset at any mention of Chris' relationship with a sex predator and lying about the circumstances, when we've already established in multiple threads with proof that Chris had been informed of the predator's past prior to advising and meeting with him in person.
>>>/w/284829 >>>/w/284858 >>>/w/284869We also have a WK, who may or may not be the same anon, trying to stop any discussion of new milk via Sharla that Chris began his relationship with her while he was still with his ex.
>>>/w/284741 >>>/w/284872 Like other WKs from the past, these anons accuse other people of being from reddit, call the milk "boring" and/or or claim "no1currs."
No. 54258
>>54257Nta, but reading it all:
>no date for the breakup, its up in the air with assumptions it was Dec 2018>I'm not who doxxed someone, in fact reported it right away last night, also doxx might be a roaming and not even a legit anon locationYou have gotta stop grouping anons together. Every post from /w/ to here is anons claiming samefags. It's stupid as hell.
No. 54260
>>54259Make it make sense how no one but Lily has mentioned cheating. Even she deleted it. Who's this "insider" who fed her that? No info, for any of this, almost a year later you guys won't shut up and infight over it still. 5 threads have been ran through.
Disagreements aren't the same as whiteknighting and constantly calling people whiteknights because proof isn't available makes you look insane. Ambiguity is still tinfoiling.
No. 54262
>>54261Can you all move to a thread that's not /w/ for all this infighting? Ruining threads for unprovable shit because you assume someone who can't back up their claims is telling the truth. Idgaf if Lily was a saint, spoiler she's not, but posting basic ass proof is needed on an imageboard, not random assumptions and putting together an unverifiable timeline. The cows said themselves when what happened, but apparently it's not good enough, so back to tinfoiling about
what really happened . Honestly, holy shit.
No. 54269
>>54262This is a thread to make complaints and suggestions about modding, which was what
>>54251 was about. Anons who've either refused to lurk and want to be spoonfed, or WKs who are upset they've been found out are trying to instigate fighting here. Repeatedly lying about a cow's knowledge of a rapist's past and trying minimod a thread from discussing new milk is surely breaking lolcow rules.
No. 54290
Kiwi newfag tinfoiling, unsaged in the Rita thread
>>>/snow/1778636I'm not sure if male but they definitely type like one
No. 54294
File: 1678358790600.jpg (216.74 KB, 1005x978, IMG_20230309_114354.jpg)
>>54290The thread is made by a pedo schizo male, also spammed by the same pedo schizo male and mostly contains the pedo schizo male.
No. 54295
>>54291I find it odd that speaking like a minority of English speakers, specifically located in southern America, is the first thing esl-chans go to rather than the myriad of words
>>54293 provided. Must be the sheer amount of influence burgers have on the internet.
No. 54296
>>54293>nonniesYes
Nonny I love using
Nonnie it's not the sign of a tumblrite newfag at all!
No. 54301
My opinion is that y'all is the most superior form of addressing multiple people, and my country ass won't stop using a word that's been used for decades where I live just because chronically online ESL anons associate it with twitter. That would be like me going on a Japanese site and telling them to stop saying kawaii because I associate it with cringy weebs, like that's not a part of their language.
>>54296You still going on about this?
No. 54310
The unironical use of "femcel" should be a bannable offense as indicator for either unintegrated newfags or moids.
>>54306>>54308kys blaine
No. 54323
File: 1678397757294.jpg (405.75 KB, 1080x1716, Screenshot_20230310-082719__01…)
>>54304Best threads for observing zoomers/twitterfag posters is the Yukapon and Gyaru threads. A quick flick through will show you how easy it is to spot them.
No. 54324
Anons just posting porn for no reason in the Belle thread as usual. Easily could've just cropped the phone, but anons need to share her porn apparently and nitpick an editing app we've known for years that she uses if they just lurked or crtl+F. Seems like Edit-anon again, still just trying to make sure everyone knows Belle edits her photos at least once a week, so that any actual shitpost edits get questioned again if its her or anon editing them. The whole thread is so obvious.
>>>/w/285062>>>/w/285056Why post the porn in general when you can just do this to begin with
>>>/w/285057 I can't believe some anons have all these asshole/snatch shots of her on their phones when it's not even milk.
No. 54330
>>54329I don't think you understand what WKing actually is, anon. I 100% agree with
>>54318 too.
No. 54331
>>54328hm, no, you can't also minimod /meta/. Doxxing is pretty serious and you want to mock an anon for asking why the threat is still there? Your behavior gets more and more sus with each post.
The minimodding in the jvlogger thread is insane, but the attempts to paint Lily, the woman who was cheated on, as psycho are really sad to me. Because she deleted a tweet, she "pussied out"
>>>/w/284751Maybe I don't read the right cow threads but I don't think I've seen women here talk like this often.
No. 54341
>>54338Look at the punctuation. It's the same as the anons who posted
>>>/w/284872>>>/w/284981And some of the anons from the thread have come here to defend
>>>/w/284872 's minimoding, which got called out.
>>>/meta/54251 No. 54346
>>54344>Yeah. It's clearly the anon who's been pretending to defend Lily every time.Huh?
>They've done this in the previous threads too and it's obvious when it's them. Feel free to share proof.
>Also one of those posts was mine from that retarded wall of text. Which one?
>Anon needs to touch grass, stop minimodding people not agreeing, and fuck off if they can't handle anons not believing the thinnest damn strung together cheating conclusion ever.Except anon didn't say people should get banned for not agreeing. Anon said someone was breaking rules by minimoding and trying to stop others from discussing new milk that the couple provided yet another timeline of their relationship. And now you're trying to minimod people for calling out minimoding.
No. 54349
>>54346It's funny how you're complaining about someone who is just as annoying as you. No one has been minimodding except you spergs. A mod would've done something about all the cheating/not cheating stuff a while ago, same with the Bald crap, the doxx is clearly a roaming/vpn which is why it isn't gone. Froth moar about not getting your way. Also rebringing up old issues to try and create some agenda is fucking weird too. Mods aren't your puppets. You guys berate them when you don't get your way and berate them when bans do happen. Pick one. Clearly they don't moderate the way /w/ anons want too. Epitome of minimodding.
Also your posts in thread sound stupid and baity. All you do it nitpick apart posts. You contribute nothing but infighting.
>>>/w/285126>>Your precious Chris cheated on his gf No. 54355
Can someone explain what
>>54349 is trying to say? You're also linking two completely different anons.
No. 54357
>>54356I posted
>>>/w/285126 and not
>>>/meta/54346. So yes, two different anons. More than one person knows how to quote posts using greentext.
No. 54360
File: 1678442758418.png (420.41 KB, 770x1420, Screenshot_20230310-110201~2.p…)
>>54353You or someone like you used the same excuse when very similar-sounding posts in Taylor's thread (attacking Tom's ex-gf) were called out. You are unnecessarily shitty to the exes of scrotes you ship with someone else.
No. 54380
>>54379Legit question, for two years now even when I'm fully anon people repeat my phrases, why is this? I'm not saying I invented the can't handle the heat line I'm saying I clearly just used it and now you're using it.
I'm just overall confused and normally I don't ask shit because I can figure it out on my own but I'm genuinely confused at this point. In this instance did you think you were responding to me? I've seen it used in banal ways so it's been driving me up a wall for a while.
Thanks.
No. 54383
>>54382nta
nonny that is an extremely common phrase kek
No. 54385
this is directed to whoever has administrative access to the linux server hosting the tinyboard software.
a crazy woman (not a tranny) who's a long-time poster from our board keeps linking to your site, and i don't care for the subject matter of your site and it seems super girly and childish, but i noticed you have really bad page load speeds, and i like fixing things, so allow me to [redacted]splain some suggestions
from some brief performance profiling, one of main things slowing down page loads on your site is the fact that animated GIFs do not have static thumbnails. this means that from just four 3 MB GIFs posted in a thread, everyone who opens that thread also has to load 12 MB (or 12,288 KB) worth of GIFs. i have not measured the download throughput from my end of your server but from my estimation it's roughly 25 KB/s based on the few seconds i had to wait just for a 100 KB JPEG to load. for any troll who is malicious, he can just post thirty 3 MB GIFs in a thread and now everyone has to load 90 MB worth of GIFs just for the page to load. so while not technically a security vulnerability, this is a serious vulnerability in terms of usability for the average user and could almost be considered a denial-of-service attack.
you can fix this for future posts and threads by enabling tinyboard to generate static thumbnails for animated GIFs uploaded.
1. ensure graphicksmagick is installed. on debian or ubuntu the command is:
sudo apt install graphicsmagick
(if you're already on root account you can omit sudo)
2. ensure gifsicle is installed.
sudo apt install gifsicle
3. if you have a SERVER_ROOT/inc/config.php file, change this line:
https://github.com/savetheinternet/Tinyboard/blob/master/inc/config.php#L624to
$config['thumb_method'] = 'gm+gifsicle';
if you have separate board config.php files or an instance-config.php make sure they're not overriding $config['thumb_method'] (just remove the line from these files if it exists).
i noticed you didn't enable removing EXIF data from images uploaded. you should enable this if you care about users' privacy (then again maybe you don't since i can see this site's all about stirring drama lol).
change this line in SERVER_ROOT/inc/config.php so it's set to true instead of false:
https://github.com/savetheinternet/Tinyboard/blob/master/inc/config.php#L632$config['strip_exif'] = true;
there are other suggestions i can make which i have the instructions for since i've done it myself (e.g. implementing a simple captcha, enabling webp thumbnails to further speed up page loads, enabling webp image posting, enabling lazy-loading for catalog thumbnail images to speed up catalog page loads, adding delay to how long an individual IP can create a new thread since his/her last not sure if you implemented this already, etc.), i also have a simple anti-cp python script which runs as a cronjob (scheduled task in linux) that checks recently made threads routinely that you can check out that i've shared with other vichan/tinyboard admins i can't post publicly which partly automates the removal of the long-time cp spammers images since he has a known pattern, but i have to go now and i'm not going to expend any more effort if i'm just going to get banned
(USER HAS BEEN PUT OUT TO PASTURE) No. 54388
>>54356Not only are those two different anons, there's nothing remotely similar about those comments both in style and content. If you think using the lolcow quoting function makes them the same, you need to lurk more. However,
>>>/w/284981 >>>/w/284981
>>>/w/285080 all use the exact same odd punctuation and wording, and they're all trying to claim that cheating isn't cheating while discouraging further discussion of this new milk. Not to mention,
>>54344 is deflecting by refusing to say which post they were responsible for and share evidence that the other posts were from a Lily defender, and
>>54349 is deflecting by changing the subject and accusing others of samefagging based on absolutely nothing.
No. 54403
>>54400See
>>54385 because he's actually right.
No. 54404
>>54387>>54389i am anonymous. i contributed a few bug fixes, performance optimizations, etc. to vichan (fork of tinyboard). i've known STI (creator of tinyboard), not personally, but have chatted online regarding his software. i am not a big name (or small name) nor do i even have a nickname so there's no point making speculations. that's all you need to know about me. only strictly technical questions i will answer from here on. i'm only here to impart whatever technical knowledge i've obtained from my experience i can to the admins/devs here on these /meta/ suggestion threads (i will not post anywhere else on this site since none of it interests me) to help them get up to speed on various tinyboard pecularities (it's poorly designed, i can give plenty of examples, and just plain undocumented in many cases), tips on dealing with typical imageboard and server bullshit, etc. so this site's users can have an optimal user experience. if they don't want a helping hand as i've helped a few other vichan boards, i'm totally fine with that. i have no ego and don't mind being insulted (i personally like banter, helps keep me humble and know my place as a plebian, but don't do that here please because of the attention-seeking and thread derailing rules, i am not here for that, only admins/devs are allowed to do that from here on).
>>54394this is good advice is general, especially given the lunatic cp spammer (redundant i know lol) and his pattern of posting his link-shortener links. but github.com is owned by microsoft and is where you can download the tinyboard software which this site runs on.
(no1currs, typical moid assuming women dont know shit) No. 54408
>>54405no he is 100% not a bot because a few times i caught him double-post in a human-like fashion when one of his thread postings semi-failed (one of my earlier scripts caught it) and because i implemented a captcha system (and saw it in other imageboards with captchas also with the same spammer getting through) and it didn't deter him one bit, so he obviously manually types in the captchas. he may have some aspects of his routine automated, but his weekly and sometimes daily routine is to create a link shortener URL, pick a CP pic from his CP stash, occasionally modify the pic and imprint his URL onto it, log in to VPN, go through each of the dozens of imageboards out there, and create a thread with this CP image and paste his URL in the body text ocassionally together with some child abuse keywords. this guy has been spamming imageboards with this exact routine for well over a decade. he'll never get arrested because there's no justice in this world (life's not fair) and he probably lives in some corrupt shithole (who am i kidding, every country is "corrupt" in their own way) where interpol cannot realistically intervene. it may even be a so-called "civilized" country like germany of all places (read rt.com/news/568400-germany-darknet-pedo-network/ ), pedos exist everywhere, laws and "civilization" don't deter them one bit.
No. 54413
>>54412Here you go:
https://kiwifarms.net/threads/unabashedhermaphrodite-belial-the-actual-queen-actuallybella1-autisticaizen-blaine-gaven-ross-jess-ross-erika-starling.99380/He also wrote a couple threads and admitted it, namely the Rachael and Rita threads, because they told him to fuck off. Both are still cows, but it explains a lot.
No. 54414
>>54413He's not the regular cp spammer. He posts cp when he someone makes him seethe but he's not the spammer
>>54408 is talking about, the one who posts those cp threads with a link shortener and the same images.
No. 54426
>>54418regardless they are right that it was obnoxious and pretentious for me to just come in here as visitor, take a quick look, and shit all over your house like that by flippantly invalidating other people's interests like an asshole (not knowing their brains are wired differently on what they receive dopamine hits from due to different experiences in life / memories, genetics, other biological factors, whatever) and act like only my interests are
valid. it's such shitty behavior. she's right there must be something defective in my brain to fail to do such basic etiquette. need to never do that again, whether online or especially IRL. will repeat in my head never to invalidate other people's interests 50x so i don't forget
No. 54429
File: 1678528122068.jpeg (23.51 KB, 701x438, 13948382649.jpeg)
>>54426Not sure if autistic or sarcasm
No. 54438
>>54436I honestly got an expired plane ticket when I Googled the numbers, not an address. Read upthread, anons have mentioned it being a roaming/VPN and in that case, not a threat, also if the IP is landing in the middle of a state and not even a specific home location, it's not worth worrying about the doxxing either. Also the open threats were deleted as seen from this list
>>54420 The WKing accusations are hilarious because you don't like when someone has a different take.
No. 54439
>>54436super weird. I reported that but also these:
>>>/w/285258 infighting
>>>/w/285260 hi cow (Lily)
>>>/w/285279 hi cow (Lily)
>>>/w/285282 hi cow (Lily)
>>>/w/285295 "I don't see the big deal about sex trafficking"
None of these were red-texted despite 3 of them containing the exact same offense as the Solar one
No. 54447
>>54438Funny, the post is now mysteriously gone, so it was clearly a problem.
>>54442There should be some consistency and it doesn't make sense when it's only posts related to a particular cow that get redtext bans while others never seem to, and then you have the other issue of anons getting redtexted for things that aren't against rules or even borderline, while the posts they responded to about that particular cow could be. But I think you know that and before you start throwing accusations, I wasn't one of the anons who got redtexted or banned.
No. 54451
>>54431Because you come here begging mods to ban people everytime anything minor happens in that thread. I doubt a small w thread thread has that many autistic posters, so I assume it's mostly one poster.
>>54432I don't care.
No. 54453
>>54445Just to clear up something about bans/redtexting: the way the board software works is that you apply a redtext when you ban a post, so in order to redtext a post you must issue a ban for it.
If an anon has made several posts that are rule-breaking, they won't get a ban for each one, they will get one longer ban. That means only one of these posts will be redtexted, but they'll have been punished for all the others too. It has to be done this way as bans don't stack. This can lead to confusion about whether a post has received a ban particularly if they've made rule-breaking posts in several threads/boards.
There are other occasions when we may not add a redtext, but that accounts for the majority of occasions where a ban won't have one.
>>54447The post was trolling and not a danger in any way, we deleted it because anons wouldn't stop shitting up the report queue regarding it. In the end it was easier to remove it, since it added no value and it was upsetting anons.
>>54450Based on the post history of the users in that thread who are derailing, they aren't moids, they're genuine users who really hate camwhores and can't keep it to themselves (including the one who posted "I love camwhores").
No. 54455
File: 1678570906314.png (15.95 KB, 926x598, Screenshot 2023-03-11 163717.p…)
>>54453> (including the one who posted "I love camwhores")Thanks admin. Alrighty then, that's pretty bleak. Also did I have to get banned for this (picrel)?
No. 54480
File: 1678602467824.jpg (195.48 KB, 1080x2012, Screenshot_20230312-012611_Bra…)
In the Pixieelocks thread on /w/. I'm not really complaining though since it made me kek.
No. 54484
>>54478lying to defend a cow
lying about what anons say about a cow to make anons look deranged
defending a cow from the most minor opinions
basically defending cows beyond what is reasonable.
what is YOUR definition of WKing? I keep asking and you never answer.
No. 54486
>>54485I know that the anon (you?) who writes things in Taylor's thread like
>anons get mad when Taylor isn't blamed for infertility>anons say she's gained weightis just straight-up lying, there isn't any evidence of these claims. So idk what you're referring to with some "narrative" and "facts" - either farmers posted these opinions or they did not. They in fact did not. So these are lies.
No. 54505
Anon can just not watch the video then even though there were announcements in it, but okay.
Derail with the attempt to infight. It's like the farmhand's post did nothing. Don't blame anons for not greentexting and then throw a fit that a video doesn't have good enough milk when the rest of the thread is low effort infighting for 3 days. Instead lets derail about content actually posted. You anons never learn then get mad when banned after the fact.
>>>/w/285555 No. 54512
File: 1678649640799.jpeg (71.92 KB, 1052x730, E1CD6D5E-20D3-42B1-91F7-40C736…)
Why did anon get banned for this? She provided a source to another anons question lmao
No. 54541
>>54512This ban was a mistake and has been reversed. The post was reported multiple times and the farmhand who banned it did not take the proper care to examine the post in its context before banning it.
There are only a few mods active at one time, and the list of reports can get into the hundreds quickly.
With the addition of more moderation staff, less poor decisions will be made as there will not be as much pressure on each individual to make decisions quickly.
We appreciate you bringing mistakes like this to our attention! We welcome any women who care about the future of moderation on lolcow to apply using the link in the announcement above.
No. 54543
>>54542Seconded, I’m super relieved something is finally being done.
I really hope the quality of posting improves/they go back to Reddit, otherwise threads will just be redtexted posts!
No. 54575
>>54571Look at the name of the board the thread resides in and op says
>A thread for discussing everything tech-relatedI mean as retarded you think discussion is it's not really offtopic to discuss cyber security or tech related conspiracy. From an outside perspective I'm not sure why you feel farmhands have to step in, it all seems pretty harmless?
No. 54579
File: 1678708245777.jpg (1.82 MB, 2027x3153, RDT_20221011_18100826084268506…)
CP IN FRONT PAGE. POSTING IMAGES TO GET IT OFF FRONT PAGE.its in /pt
No. 54582
File: 1678708385783.jpg (846.69 KB, 640x1054, RDT_20230311_02122757400437800…)
More
No. 54595
>>54594I'm not this anon
>>54576 and yeah some people got banned recently but there have still been Chris and Sharla fans ITT for a long time.
No. 54617
File: 1678731239990.png (9.29 KB, 1708x154, Repost of what farmhand said.p…)
>>>/w/285773
Anons can't help but continue trying to bring up old shit again after mods said to stop
No. 54624
>>54603I suggested this because people who know how to use imageboards don’t care about a thread being on autosage, if there’s milk to discuss it’ll happen. It deters the newfags, why wouldn’t you want it autosaged if the quality of posting improved?
>>54609I’m sorry anon but how does a thread being on autosage change anything being posted about Sharlas OF? I don’t want to read nitpicks about her body, have you seen Belles thread?
Seeing both of your replies just makes me think it’s a good idea, all you have to do is search for it in the catalogue. Policing isn’t going to deter newfags
No. 54630
>>54628No anon, it’s because the threads have been absolute hell. Autosaging a thread doesn’t stop people discussing milk, it just stops it from being bumped to the top of the catalogue. Don’t assume my aim is to stop conversation because it isn’t.
If anons happen to ask for it to be autosaged when there’s ‘milk’ I expect it’s because it keeps getting repeatedly bumped to the top with unsaged shitposts.
No. 54652
>>54651I'd rather be put into timeout and be able to learn than have this place continue to go into anarchy.
Keep it up Cerbim! Thank you for letting women have a space to shitpost and vent!
No. 54670
>>54658I think the vast majority of posters in that thread need to learn to integrate and lurk more.
It has gone so far past the normal rules/culture that I don’t know if it can be fixed. Which is funny cos that’s exactly why PULL closed…
Maybe mods could think about whether it actually still fits in /w or should it be in /ot or even locked? I don’t think the quality of conversation is ever going to change, no matter how many times people are banned or put into time out
No. 54673
>>54671Yeah I agree. Something for admin to think about!
They are doing a good job so far, one can only hope!
No. 54678
>>54677If you can post, that sounds like your ban got lifted but something went wrong. Try
clearing cookies and it should be normal again.
No. 54685
File: 1678928159048.png (5.67 KB, 1349x100, thumbnail_Capture.png)
>>54684>>54684this is what I keep getting, along with the "You are banned" message, the only way i can use the site is when it's reversed.
No. 54704
>>54702As
>>54703 has said, incognito doesn't change your IP. Browsing in incognito just makes it so your browsing history/passwords etc don't get saved. But I looked and you don't have any posts that were redtexted at all. Can you link the post itself? I don't see it.
No. 54708
>>54704this one
>>>/ot/525043 I should state that my family uses some chinese service for internet so maybe that's a factor
No. 54757
Why not just lock the current unpopular opinions thread?
>>54756I agree with you. It was actually be devastating to lose the thread because it is a really fun thread when the milk is flowing. Wasn't it in snow at one point anyways? I never saw how it was different from other general threads in snow.
No. 54764
Anon derailing about prostitution
>>>/w/286738 which the girls aren't even doing. Taking censored photos on OF really brings out the idiots. It's just derailing and obvious bait.
No. 54766
>>54765How do you not notice the annoying capslock spammer. Also everything
>>54759 said
No. 54768
verified male (talking about his cock) sperging in /snow/ and threatening to dox people (kek):
>>>/snow/1791287One of many of his posts. Ban this schizo
No. 54777
File: 1679237612163.png (30.92 KB, 784x718, Screenshot_20230319-155154.png)
>>54776>>54775yeah here, for anyone who missed your autism.
No. 54782
File: 1679293179349.png (20.33 KB, 1188x581, Capture.PNG)
What is this, fucking Reddit?
No. 54812
>>54404So some random turns up and offers actual solutions after two plus years of fucking around and it's no1curr? And then a bunch of moid sperging and saying oh admin doesn't need help, look how well the site is running!
Meet the new boss, same as the old boss. God this site is depressing now.
No. 54845
When were threads based on posts all from 2017 and 2018 considered good milk?
>>>/w/287724 All anon has been posting is stuff over a year or more. She doesn't deserve her own thread when the posts are all about men giving reviews of the cow's sex work.
When did men's opinions from a porn site or reddit become milk anywhere on this site? Especially if the thread is about a women,but anons only focus on what men have to say? This isn't a cow's thead. This is a thread anons made just to shitpost other people's takes (men) bc they think men have the most valuable criticism of women.
When did a committed relationship, no longer doing sex work, cow become thread material when the biggest recent milk in years is an age gap when shes over 25 years old?
No. 54848
>>54845I don't mind Amina but that thread and the OP were obviously written by a newfag (or a retard, idk kek)
And I agree, scrotoids reviews aren't milk.
No. 54851
Hi admins, farmhands and jannies. We have potential milk in the Pixielocks/Jillian thread. This poster doxxed herself as Jillian’s friend and previously documented snowflake in the confetti club threads.
>>>/w/286408 Could you check the post history of that IP address and redtext her previous posts? (Keekweek style) This could reveal if she had any doing in previous milk reveals such as Jillian’s drag show stalker, the pics posted of her townhouse etc.
No. 54859
File: 1679691214673.png (13.49 KB, 1266x266, Capture d’écran 2023-03-24 à…)
now just mentionning you use twitter will get you ban ? the post wasn't writen in a twitterfag way, i thing we should distinguish between the two
No. 54867
File: 1679739642403.png (14.11 KB, 518x784, 1665035923373.png)
>>54864B-bu-but…it was saged! Blogs, armchairing and twiterrisms in cow threads are allowed when I put sage, right ? Right ?
No. 54877
Weirdos posting photos of belle's home
>>>/w/288614 I thought this attempted doxxing stuff not encouraged, address or not trying to find a cows house and photos of it is very moid behavior
No. 54882
Mods could you please delete the duplicate posts here?
https://lolcow.farm/2X/res/4526.html#q4526I got errors when I tried to post. Sorry for the inconvenience.
No. 54887
>>54885That's
exactly what one would say, I'm keeping my eye on you.
I know I'm being hyperbolic at a specific person to mock them. No. 54891
>>54885'Anti' usually refers to people who are anti-pedo, anti-zoo, or anti-loli/shota. The only other thing I know it refers to, is people who whine and cry about shipping an
abusive couple in fiction. Only the last one, I'd consider retarded.
No. 54923
File: 1679989127855.jpeg (15.95 KB, 400x274, _.jpeg)
cp on frontpage
No. 54925
File: 1679990393974.gif (864.79 KB, 500x281, Bear GIF - Find & Share on GIP…)
>>54923cp in /snow/ bumping off front page
No. 54947
>>54899If only we had a co-admin whose job is communication to keep us updated. Ah well.
>>54916Feeling attacked, huh.
No. 54952
>>54948Nta but they already explained in another post that this site is old as balls and that a lot of issues, like the ones you're bringing up, can't be fixed until there's new site. It's also pretty unreasonable to expect them to have fixed ALL of that in the short time they've been here. In less than a month they set up a server status page and rejuvenated one of our boards, and I think that's pretty good.
I do agree about the webms though. I don't understand why it suddenly got so bad for them to load. Since that problem and the problem with slow loading pics is recent, maybe they're working on that now
No. 54971
>>54964Are you new? I’ve moaned about it a few times and I’m not the wk.
Over the last year or so /w has deteriorated into this hot mess, it’s a general consensus that it is full of PULL/Reddit/gurugossip/tumblr/twitterfags.
They will fight you to the death if you suggest their latest derail isn’t milky, with the usual you’re a wk/moid etc.
No. 54992
>>54987i agree as well, i think thread approval and locking of old threads after a certain time period from it last being active could be something to implement across all boards considering that spam or necroing can occur on any given one.
>>54988i also agree that it may be a good idea to have select people monitoring that thread. i frequent it to read milk and gossip but i hate that it often devolves into infighting and spam. i'd volunteer myself but i don't think i'm able to commit enough to do it.
No. 55005
>>55001came here to say this, it’s just endless infighting, insult lobbing, samefagging, and obsessive sperging
can anyone just reveal the weirdo - they broke several rules including posting family and minors (of people who weren’t the cows too)
No. 55017
File: 1680207835206.png (50.4 KB, 474x453, 1675286632687.png)
Child gore on main page troon is posting again
No. 55021
File: 1680210087408.png (62.47 KB, 550x960, Ned Flanders.png)
>>55020Can't believe that Ned's a farmer!
You still gonna need to leave Ned No. 55022
File: 1680210938205.jpeg (8.5 KB, 219x219, FB2E2E09-75AC-442A-975C-3A81CB…)
Gross pic on /ot/ of infected genitals reported it
No. 55028
File: 1680252843711.png (10.61 KB, 388x209, sage.PNG)
Why was this anon banned for not saging in 2X? The infight ban I understand but why do you have to sage on 2X?
No. 55040
>>54948you left out this part: "…more competent than she who shall not be named"
(shaymin). i didn't say they were perfect perfect, or that there aren't issues with the board because there obviously are, but in comparison to the hell we went through with her and even burritomin, they are way, way better. they communicate. they don't go off on paranoid delusions whenever someone dares to question them. they're aren't feeding cows like
elaine or
blaine and encouraging their bullshit. they aren't stalking users on 4chan/crystal.cafe and whatever other boards people use here because they're schizophrenic retards. a lot of things she left to break on purpose, they have fixed and done so much quicker than i thought they would. also, they stay on top of the raids and cp spam, which was one of the big reasons why i stopped coming here for a while. i'd rather they take their time building the new site than just pooping another one out like
shaymin did and then we're back to square 1 with the bunker threads.
No. 55070
File: 1680280297190.gif (56.66 KB, 298x233, 3EF24970-A1FB-4294-935D-984414…)
>>54138Thank you mod nonnas and farmhands; really appreciate the quick clean up! Love you! (Also every poster who bumps and warns)
No. 55082
okay so I was banned for alleged racebiat on,
>>>/ot/1537910, I explained what I meant and my ban was repaled and I could post again with in less then hour but now some of my posts are getting deleted again and I don't know what's happening ?
No. 55089
File: 1680323898751.webm (450.71 KB, 1920x1078, for weekend shaytards.webm)
unironically… the /shay/ board is one of the greatest changes in lolcow history even if its an aprils fool joke. absolutely based and shaypilled. love u all.
No. 55109
>>55105No one else but him cries about shaymin having "paranoid/schizo delusions" because she redtexted his ass. Or claiming retarded shit like her breaking the board on purpose. My guess is that he's glad cerbmin didn’t continue to do so.
Nevermind the admin before her was the one who made the most fun of elaine.
No. 55124
>>55122that thread was always insufferable but got so much worse after the shooting
tifs showing up in the thread are much more pleasant than the tradthots, as long as they sage and respect others. which is rare but usually nice
No. 55127
I was going to take my suspension like a good girl but
>>>/snow/1797293 made me think that telling scrotes to die hasn’t ever been suspension worthy before (it’s generally agreed upon, or at least heavily suspected in FTM threads, that “pooner” memes are made by males), and with
>>>/snow/1799611 being put to pasture over “racebaiting” over an actually anti-racist stance (zootopia is a shit racial allegory because it’s claiming that oppressed people are “predators”), I wish jannies saved their
trigger happy banning impulses for the cp raids or derailing on threads.
Are mods keeping in mind the context of the posts they ban?
No. 55128
File: 1680532579219.jpeg (32.79 KB, 497x429, cat.jpeg)
constantly getting "Failed to resize image!" when trying to post a cat gif
No. 55129
>>55127>“pooner” memes are made by malesI don't like the pooner memes personally as I find them grotesque and gross most of the time, but the origin of the meme wasn't some TIF redditor ?
Sorry for the retardation, I'm just curious.
No. 55138
>>55137I post constantly about other topics and nobody cares. I listen to the rest of you on radical feminism and try to get your point of view, I can understand I probably come off as forceful or annoying, when I'm really not trying to. Regardless, if I think it's relevant, I'm going to reply without giving a shit about your opinion. If you can share yours, I can share mine. Besides, I really am not constantly talking about it at all. Compared to how frequently I post, I very rarely post about or lament about that delusion.
I just think you don't like diversity of thought on a women's only space, even if it's another woman after all. So long as I have XX chromosomes and don't break forum rules, what's the problem? Genuine question, because it seems like only 1-3 anons have an issue with me and they're always the ones calling for tranny death kek. I won't shut you up, but I will laugh at you.
No. 55141
>>55139You know what? That's actually a really good point. I know people tend to not hate me when I avoid the troon subject, so that'll be what I'll try to remember to do.
Although, it is something I'm trying to unlearn, but I feel like being anonymous, while freeing, can be interpreted as a lie so I tend to do everything just short of tripfagging mid-meltdown.
I will stop, though. I won't bring it up anymore and I'll attempt to blend better.
Of course, part of me thinks it was always obvious, instead of just recently.
No. 55143
>>55141You literally go around doing what people tell you not to do. How this little sperg of yours started:
I write how bothered I am by by low quality posts in the ftm thread with examples
>>>/ot/1538414>MY theory is [personal experience projected on the shooter]You read that post and what do you do? You immediately go to the ftm thread do number 2 from the list
>>>/snow/1800471>My source is personal experienceSo now you're supposedly oh so confused and sorry that people are mad at you, bullshit.
No. 55144
>>55143Bullshit, I never mentioned nor defended the shooter once. I was not talking about her at all, merely referring to troons in general because, contrary to popular opinion here, not everything is men's fault, sometimes it's purely mental illness, likely due to poor genetics and not because some man was being misogynistic.
That's all I wanted to say. Now can we stop infighting?
No. 55147
>>55146I wish TIFkun
kun used in an ironic way would get banned. She always needs to bring up the fact that she's TIF and that while she knows that she'll never be man. You can very easily spot her posts as she always brings up being a truscum, a TIF.
She even posts itt No. 55149
File: 1680600925280.jpeg (88.72 KB, 913x1121, 1665342142538.jpeg)
whats with the most useless posts being unsaged in every /w/ thread today? im reporting the ones i see but it seems like the same person having their first day on lolcow. same typing style and nothing burger posting.
No. 55155
Already reported yesterday, but hi cowing and minimoding
>>>/w/290337 tinfoiling
>>>/w/290338 and shitposting
>>>/w/290353 in the jvlog thread, all because another jvlogger's vanlife vlogs were deemed better than a cow's.
No. 55182
>>55181I only type in lowercase when I'm in /ot/, /m/, or /g/ and am making a 1-2 sentence or partial sentence response.
If I'm in a cow board, /2x/, or meta, or if I'm typing a serious response or vent, I type in proper English.
Users who type in lowercase when it's not socially acceptable to do so are typically newfags. But the RadTwT/RadBlr ones are very different from the troons, because troons discovering the site often ends in a massive spergout while everyone laughs at and reports the troon.
No. 55189
>>55155Nta but I like discussion comparing cows like anons doing it with Paolo, but this Hannah anon is just namedropping as a shitpost, especially because no caps, no milk, no real comparison except "She's BettEr", and then refusing to post caps.
A farmhand or admin need to make it clear that the tinfoiling in these threads is bannable. Thats what prior mod said.
No. 55197
>>54138Lolcow.farm/snow/res/1725558.html#q1802592
(Dead) link to a cp post in /snow/, just in case it doesn’t show on your report log thing
No. 55198
>>55129No worries; I saw the person claiming to be the one to make them but theres no proof really. The person goes by Kalvin Garrah (whether they are the real one or someone skinwalking her) and hasnt delivered any proof that she actually made them beyond bragging about it on edgy TRA subreddits. A PSD file or archive data showing date of creation would be cool, for example.
Going by Kalvin Garrah it’s kind of a red flag that they’re a NLOG just looking for attention/recognition. Though there’s always a chance that those memes were actually created by a ftm, the general consensus now is that they’re male-made scrote tier humor,
No. 55229
File: 1680743458721.gif (45.95 KB, 498x498, pepe-the-frog-shocked.gif)
ermmmmmmmmmmmm the cursor on the front page turns into shaynas butt plug sometimes
No. 55235
File: 1680798854329.png (709.01 KB, 2000x2500, lcbump.png)
cp in /m/ meme thread
No. 55278
>>55272>This isn't summertimeNo shit
nonnie, it just became Spring
No. 55305
File: 1680975161772.png (68.29 KB, 936x862, br_.png)
How is talking about a cow being a hypocrite and posting proof not milk? Melonpan is also a YouTuber, that's partly why I posted him. Jannies pls, enough
No. 55312
>>55305Like
>>55306 said old milk is supposed to be saged. The only time anyone should post unsaged is if they are sharing new information important to cow lore
No. 55380
>>55375Sounds like a
>>>/snow/387658 cow. Her new addition would fill the thread and then you guys can start a new one with her current info and not get hit with necro either. It stays out of jvlog and it fits better. It's not that big of a deal, she really isn't Jvlog /w/ material.
No. 55393
>>55392Alright. If thats how you feel about it, thats fine by me. I was already worried posting here because I don't like bringing stuff like this up.
I am however entitled to having my own opinion and it is my opinion that this is bad modding and not resolving the issue.
No. 55394
>>55393Might have been some samefagging. They don't submit multiple bans for the same user, and that is why sometimes you don't get redtexts. Honestly, I do wish that
every post that warrants a ban got redtexted, just because I think transparency is always good. But I understand the limitations in the software mean that not all bans get redtexts, it isn't necessarily just bad modding.
No. 55408
I think this guy is selfposting
>>>/snow/1806174 His video only has 2k viewes and his video averages on 300 views. On his twitter he pretty much admitted on atleast lurking on the vtuber thread in lolcow and also kiwifarms. It could also just be a kiwifag because it seems like they discuss him a lot on thread but I don't want to bother going to check in that shit place.
No. 55556
File: 1681441397270.png (38.26 KB, 939x1162, gemson.png)
(USER HAS BEEN PUT OUT TO PASTURE)
No. 55605
>>55604that anon means highlighted in red, like words such as
trigger warning are
No. 55615
File: 1681631669690.png (29.72 KB, 715x301, Screen Shot 2023-04-16 at 1.48…)
there was one poster in the pixielock threads making unsaged garbage posts. somehow they dont realize it makes their samefagging even more obvious? are we supposed to think the only unsaged poster making bait posts got a bait unsaged reply in the same typing style? i dont know but they seem retarded and i reported.
No. 55651
File: 1681786964087.jpg (137.12 KB, 811x1146, 959afe4a11c1723f5772c59383df30…)
>>55645>>55649Can "femboys" be banned as well outside of the discussion threads on /snow/? Or can a mod check that poster's history? I can't believe a woman would actually enjoy this shit. I keep seeing the character posted so I assume the poster hasn't been banned either?
No. 55653
Anon seems to have some vendetta against Taylor's baby and keeps pushing that something is going to be wrong with it and it's just tinfoiling and claiming that calling out the stupidity of the tinfoil means anons are defending a scrote and they are infighting over being called out by multiple anons about it.
Basically medfagging [about Tom's sperm because anons have an obsession, over a year later, about his sperm], tinfoiling [the baby is going to have some cognitive issues when no signs or mentions of it of any sort have been posted], infighting [trying to claim anons are whiteknighting], and armchairing [claiming the baby is going to specifically have mental issues such as adhd/autism based on sperm]. This isn't a thread to discuss sperm and how older people have chances of XYZ. Especially if there's no proof to it regarding the cows.
Can we make sperm discussion bannable? Taylor's thread has a set of anons who love Tom's sperm to be discussed and it's absurd.
>>>/w/292957 No. 55655
>>55654NAYRT but "she" is always trying to piss people off and arguing in bad faith such as "if you won't allow tranny coomer traps then don't allow any GNC character at all since they're trannies too by your logic hur hur".
There was another poster agreeing with her occasionally as if acting like a scrote and defending coomshit to death was
triggering le sensitive snowflakes and not just plain annoying and degenerate. Maybe it was the same person samefagging but this other one actually capitalized words so I think it's two different people.
No. 55658
>>55656Irl "femboys" are well, real men, and some of them are actually cute so it makes sense women would find them attractive.
Anime traps are just another fetish for males, just "draw a girl call it a boy", see this pic
>>55651And yes, there's actual women who are into that too, but this particular poster gets ultra annoying by virtue of not shutting up about something that's by nature a male fetish, if you dare point out the obvious fact "traps are for coomers".
No. 55663
>>55655I am sure it isn't just one anon. I just mentioned this one because it stands out.
>>55657I refer to reddit spacing when they break single sentences, not a paragraph. I also never replied to them.
No. 55665
>>55663>I refer to reddit spacing when they break single sentences, not a paragraphYeah, this. Adding breaks between paragraphs is one thing, but:
>always typing in all lowercase>never saging>typing short sentences then separating them so much for no reason>being a condescending trapfag constantly trying to bait because someone called your fetish scroteyall this shit just makes your presence obvious everywhere you post and annoys everyone.
No. 55675
>>55661Nice parody of literally everyone left using this site, all the oldfags left and now it's just children who hate women. Why bother with people who clearly just hate themselves the most? This site is horrifically shitty now and we were all warned, most of us bailed already and I come back to be catty and tell the staff they all fatties.
Those retards are just following Shay's mistake without knowing it, they deserve this userbase;
objectively the shittiest userbase any site has ever had. No. 55678
File: 1681829075124.jpg (199.42 KB, 857x1132, Capture.JPG)
Uhhh is the /shay/ buttplug cursor supposed to be on the frontpage? It didn't show up when I took a screenshot so I had to take a photo. If this is a mistake it's probably one of the funniest I've seen
No. 55679
>>55675I feel like it’s the oldfags who complain the most because the culture has completely changed, and subsequently that’s why they’ve left.
The newer generation of users just gaslight and manipulate any disagreement to their favour, and mods just don’t engage unless a thread has descended into absolute hell. Either way, this is the same problem PULL had, and it’s ironic how shit things have become here since it closed.
No. 55682
>>55671You're tinfoiling that a baby is going to have mental issues with no proof of would even be because of Tom, just speculation. Leave the baby alone. Being so obsses over it is really strange on your part. It isn't milk or milky to discuss. Also anons have called out nitpicking about her baby from the beginning. It's a
baby.
No. 55690
>>55683Nta but she's talking about
breaks
like
this
not spacing between walls of text
No. 55693
>>55687>>55685>>55686Hey retard I literally said it didn't show up when I took a screenshot, work on your reading comprehension.
>>55684Definitely not just you lol it was on both my regular and work PCs
No. 55698
>>55689Stating that there is a risk, which is a fact, is not a tinfoil.
>it's a veiled wishing unwellAbsolutely delusional thinking. It would be weird not to think about the risks associated with having a child with a man in his mid-40s and beyond, and that doesn't just include the biological risks, but social risks as well. Nothing about that is wishing someone unwell. It's also true that a lot of these disorders do not appear immediately, so you can't assume everything is fine. It's something to consider in the future.
No. 55702
>>55701Sure
>>>/ot/1553031Check the posting times, I'm pretty sure they were butthurt over
>>55665 No. 55704
>>55703No! She isn't gender normative she
must be a man.
The state of lolcur…
No. 55709
File: 1681873625224.jpeg (52.24 KB, 563x560, otter.jpeg)
cp in /m/ bumping off front page
No. 55715
>>55714Saying lolcor doesn’t help you blend the same way saying radfem, libfem,
nonnie, or tradthot doesn’t help you blend kek. Trapfag scrote is the one seething about anons shitting on trannies. YWNBA. Do you identify as a farmer the same way?
No. 55717
Regarding the troon posting about hating trannies bad and drawing a girl with a female VA and calling it a guy for degenerate moids to fetishize being totes the same as female characters that wear pants (such a male thing to think KEK), remember
>>>/meta/53631 .
I like to play bingo:
>anime avatarfagging (usually with pedo anime characters, sometimes with final fantasy ones) >misuse of sites lingo >spergs about porn and his creepy fetish stuff>pro tranny/pro scrote posts (trannies have always been welcome/men can post here if they want/etc) >says he is gnc >whines about "transphobes"It's the same troon who has been coping over anons realizing he is a man for months. Tttt troon faggot also thinks using lowercase = more girly writing style because his only knowledge of real women is form tv shows and scrotes are trying to copy the uwu valley girl style of texting the same way they try to copy the accent as their natural voice is male and can't be mistaken as anything else kek. Shocking that he posts during the same time as the plaguing troon and we get spammed with cp at the same time as his seething about anons bullying trannies and hating traps. Men will die before acknowledging that they are pornsick.
No. 55720
>>55715Anon was mocking the trannys writing style I think.
>>55717>>55718OMG! Is this the same tranny that admitted to watching his young sister nude and
in the toilet to document her toilet behavior(?) while she's pooping in the relationship advice thread? He posted even more about his sister and how he creeps on her there.
No. 55722
>>55717shit detective work
>…as female characters that wear pants…this isn't what was said either. never did i say this. i said if draw a girl call it a boy = trans then so does drawing a boy and calling it a girl, or having any character that outright says they're a man or a prince, e.g. characters like oscar and the tops from oni sama e, or utena. nobody cares if you shit on trannies (i shit on trannies all the time), it was the hypocrisy of your statements.
also if just looking like a girl makes something a girl, then i guess all troons who pass are automatically women right? who cars that they are male.
No. 55725
>>55722>drawing a boy and calling it a girlThis never happens though. You know very well that drawing this shit
>>55651 and calling it a boy is a moid fetish. Coincidentally, someone posted Astolfo porn that looked like pedoshit in the husbando thread around the same time you had your spergout in the anime thread, and everyone called you a scrote because they know it's a moid fetish. Anons only called it tranny/coomer shit, I don't know why you keep crying about it so much when it's a simple fact that anyone can realize on their own. Like damn, shut the fuck up about your damn anime traps already. The problem isn't that you're not "gender normative" by having scrote taste but that you shat up the anime thread when you couldn't accept that you have scrote taste.
No. 55726
File: 1681910158228.jpg (88.33 KB, 540x783, tumblr_inline_oev1fkWy711r5632…)
>>55725>This never happens though.it happens all the time, see picrel.
i'm going to keep posting whatever the fuck i want, by the way. there's weirder shit on this site than a trap. if it pisses you off that much then maybe you should ignore the posts.
lots of things are posted here that i hate; i simply do not engage.
No. 55743
File: 1681936008142.jpg (247.27 KB, 939x1922, Trannyspoopadventure.jpg)
The tranny that always uses lowercase letters and redditspaces did get permanently banned before although he says he didnt. I'm posting pictures of the incident and you can obviously tell it's him from his writing style alone.
No. 55744
File: 1681936068224.jpg (195.25 KB, 929x1719, Banned.jpg)
>>55743Samefag to continue, he also admitted upthread to being male and being upset he didn't have friends because men don't befriend outcasts etc so this is definitely him.
No. 55746
>>55745This posters specific style of spacing is like how this anon made fun of
>>55714He doesn't only use redditspacing, he spaces between every sentence so it's definitely him. He always uses this very specific spacing when he posts because he likes being recognized.
No. 55748
File: 1681940632169.gif (753.79 KB, 220x409, 234234.gif)
>>55743>>55744this is the most retarded attempt at detective work i've seen recently
No. 55767
File: 1682065373158.jpg (249.46 KB, 1204x1388, trapfag.jpg)
>>55744>>55743I don't know if this is the same user, but can we please ban the annoying trapfag on /m/?
They purposely post with a distinctive style all over the board so it's really easy and annoying to recognize them everywhere.
They also seem to samefag a lot. Almost nobody replies to their posts except someone who types exactly like them.
They clearly have a grudge against some other autist who doesn't like traps and keep bringing it up whenever somebody insults his precious traps. You can't disagree with them or else he derails into infighting. Just look at what he did in the anime thread.
>>>/m/289713>>>/m/258355They're also an outsider and kept talking shit about lc posters.
Mods I am begging you, this moid or whatever is sucking the joy out of /m/.
No. 55769
>>55767You're the poster in that person's screencap, aren't you?
But anyway, I do find it quite annoying how that poster thinks they're superior for being a "tr00 otaku" (like that's something to be proud of) and fully accepting "cultural differences" in weebshit just because (s)he's not critical of anime like most other anons. And how (s)he keeps equating hating coomshit anime traps with hating all crossdressing characters and supporting gender stereotypes. As if Astolfo porn was this revolutionary anti-gender thing when in reality it's just fap material for scrotes and actually makes you suspicious if you post it (there's some Astolfo ship art in the couples thread but that art actually looks like it was drawn by a woman and doesn't look coomer at all… There's a difference). That dumb attitude is really annoying, and trying to explain things to the other autist is frustrating, so that makes me think they're just trying to make people mad.
No. 55775
>>55767anon. if they haven't been banned yet, it's time to assume this post is right
>>55724 and pack it up with the crying. hurting your feelings isn't against site rules, and surely if these posts were racking up that many reports/notably "sucking the joy" from an entire board, they would've been banned a long time ago. cp's been deleted from /m/ multiple times, people have been red-texted on elsewhere…we can assume the mods are active.
they are probably giggling at this whole situation because it's dumb as hell and this is ultimately a site that loves drama. log off.
No. 55781
There's a scrote on /g/ bumping and replying to a bunch of year-old posts in different threads
>>55777>>55778NTA but this looks like you samefagging. Seriously just let it go lmao, no need to persecute everyone who doesn't use capital letters, like you've already been told a lot of users type like that. You're legit paranoid, calm down.
No. 55784
File: 1682176276206.jpg (49.13 KB, 1459x459, Untitled.jpg)
my favorite theme is all messed up, helpppp
No. 55789
File: 1682208072430.png (68.3 KB, 673x850, 1682208101352.png)
Mods please ban the sperg in the /m/ yaoi picture thread that derails it with tranny allegations every time someone posts a guy who they deem too feminine every damn day. Everyone is tired of their bullshit and ugly troonjak reaction pictures. I don't know if it's Blaine trying to ruin another fujo thread or what but it's really annoying.
No. 55791
Anon needs to chill with the other infight spergs
>>>/w/293803 This is ridiculous that these baits aren't banned more.
No. 55795
Question/suggestion (long bc I plucked a few examples):
Can we please ban posters who behave like this in order to incite infighting? We should be able to have a civilized discussion in cow threads without some smug liar caping for cows, minimodding, and trying to get other posters banned.
1. Posting some milkless social media update and trying to infight by preemptively insulting farmers critical of the cow ("anons are just going to say x"). This is in fact tinfoil and derailing because no farmers have said these things:
>>>/w/293799 >Natsuki shoot. Anons are just going to make up some crap about how he's uwu bullied when every time.>>>/w/293386>I bet anons are going to complain that this was more of a birthday, just for the dog, than what the kid got for his birthday.>>>/w/268990>However, anons will say she's overworked and probably not taken care of for some reason, but nothing to back it up.Bizarre attempts to start infighting with the words "but according to anons…" usually followed by something either undeniably true or a blatant lie/misrepresentation. This tactic defends the cow by alleging that LC posters make things up about the poor innocent cow.
>>>/w/293278 (misrepresentation of what farmers think is relevant in the jvlog thread)
>But according to anons, Mikan reblogged this girl a while ago, so she isn't new to the scene. >>>/w/274112 (lie)
>God save the women who can't breastfeed whatsoever because apparently their kids are gonna die according to people in this thread for using formula. >>>/w/278290 (lie blaming a farmer for a cow's bad filler & botox)
>It’s frozen because women are not allowed to age according to retards like you.Sorry for putting these examples here & only searching jvlog & Taylor threads - probably it's going on in a couple others too. But these are blatant attempts to bait and start infighting - why js this allowed? I report them every time. This person never gets banned for this shit. It's obviously the same person who's been doing this for more than a year in certain threads. If replying to one of these bait posts gets a ban for infighting, the lame bait post should get banned. And no, I haven't gotten any bans, I'm just sick of this. The moderation of /w/ hasn't changed significantly, I see.
No. 55796
File: 1682214468764.png (17.98 KB, 640x160, kiki overblot.png)
>>55792neige was to vil what taylor R was to kiki
>>55794no, this is my first post in meta since the fall of shaymin
No. 55803
>>55799You retarded a little bit? Her point is that only one anon hates them to this degree (you).
>>55800I think the astolfo poster is partially doing it to troll the sperg, since it's so easy to set them off on one of their tard rampages. If the sperg was banned, maybe she'd cool it too. The art she posts isn't really moidy though.
No. 55807
>>55804Not to mention the trapfag has been sperging that it's totally possible for women to like traps because anons like characters like
>>55726 . Definitely not suspect to conflate women with pants to draw a girl call it a boy with female VA and all in some instances, or all male traits removed in fan art by coomer moids.
No. 55808
File: 1682224452085.gif (191.21 KB, 318x252, PeacefulFewAmethystgemclam-siz…)
>>55807you need to move on anon. it's been five days since you (or another poster who gets really incensed over traps) posted
>>55651 and all that's happened is one of you (or (you)) being banned on /m/ for complaining about traps again.
however i've still yet to be banned even once for posting astolfo
who i don't even like that much, this anon is right >>55803. take the L
No. 55810
File: 1682225809775.jpg (Spoiler Image,89.55 KB, 550x615, boris.jpg)
>>55809>op image of the couples thread is painted by a man who mostly creates sexy pinups of women (picrel)>five posts down you have arkuny art, a (male) coom artist >plenty of series written by men (or from "scroteshit anime") being discussed in the gl thread (madoka, higurashi, utena) you tried it
No. 55813
>>55810Nope. Didn't made the couples thread or post that specific art. By scroteshit meaning coomer garbage like Dragon Maid or My Dress Up Darling. I know nonnas hated these anime but some women unfortunately like them thinking that they're the best cutest and wholesome anime ever despite the gross fanservice and to some that reccomend it to others. At least Madoka, Higurashi and Utena are more tolerable and appropriate.
>>55811Those "BL" fanart are something you don't see the majority of fujos enjoyed or consumed. Petite "boys" that could pass as female and I'm not even talking about pretty bishounens. I just hate seeing shit that scrotes and trannies get off to especially on a site that hates them. Of course they should be canceled and also for blemishing 2D fictional men to fit their fetish taste by making them more "girl" if not completely. They're allergic to handsome men.
No. 55820
>>55814That's literally blending into this site not a glow sign for some poster hon.
>>55808Oh fuck Empresa what are you doing?
No. 55822
File: 1682256974811.jpeg (42.46 KB, 500x500, 34E2A922-ED87-4F74-BAD9-6BCF5C…)
that retarded "right wing femininism" thread in 2X is once again full of infighting and racebait
No. 55829
>>55828 no. there's more than 2 ppl ppsting, retard
>>55824yeah and it's full of /pol/ shit and misogyny now
No. 55830
File: 1682266362131.png (1.3 KB, 296x147, error.png)
let me guess, i did made a post. last time i got gateway error, now it's this. though my 99 duplicates haven't come through (yet). have you figured out what the issue is? it's a recent one that's for sure
No. 55835
>>55826Saged posts are given bans all the time in /w/ for various reasons. Sometimes for good reason. The posts in
>>55795 are examples of a posting style that attempts to bait infighting and derails the threads, both
valid reasons to issue a red text warning or ban. "Anons will just say" = tinfoiling what posters here will say before anyone wven expresses an opinion. just to start a fight. It's obnoxious and I'm glad many people see it for the bait it is, but the same sperg inhabits their fav threads waiting to derail with this shit. Posting milkless media updates from their holy cows and trying to elicit reactions. Why is it tolerated?
No. 55837
>>55835Posting nitpickimg updates should be immediately banned too, but anons think those are board culture kek
All those posts anon (you) tagged weren't even the same poster. How many times do you have to be told that compared to the countless redtext samefagging all over/w/ of bait/shitposts that aren't these? Lol. Just say you don't like people disagreeing with you and be honest. A few of those posts were from anons even I've reported but you also tagged one of my posts. The idea that there are multiple posters really wedges your panties, doesn't it,
nonnie?
No. 55838
>>55837At the beginning of the post I wrote "posters" and should have been more clear that I think there's one obsessed sperg offender and a couple others as well. They were examples that took 3m to pull up. I don't care who agrees or not, you can stop trying to bait further.
I stand by the fact that saying "anons will say x" is derailing for the purpose of infighting and I also am p sure none of the posts in category #1 were yours anyway.
No. 55841
Can we get this munchie shit out of the jvlog thread already?
>>>/w/294016 suspect they are ban evading too
No. 55855
Apologies for not interacting for a bit, we’ve all had irl commitments to attend to that converged around the same time. We are still collecting farmhand applications. Please continue to report cp with “cp” in the reason field, this is helpful for us to filter reports to collect and compile IPs for the FBI.
>>54664 Yes, it makes it much faster/easier to issue bans. Thank you, anon!
>>54061 We are reviewing our revised site rules currently and will update lolcow.farm/rules when they are finalized.
>>54125 Before we move to LCF 2.0 we will allow (and encourage) anons to test it and give us feedback. The period between rolling out LCF 2.0 for testing and permanent migration to LCF 2.0 will be a few months at least. But yes, all threads posts, images etc. will be moved over to the new platform, and we’re going to make it match the current aesthetic as much as possible.
>>54546 All farmhands go through an extended interview process, including voice verification, and if there are any remaining doubts we require documentation.
>>54688It's a hard issue to pin down as duplicate posting can often be caused by device or internet issues user-side, or small outages from our host, but we are monitoring the logs to try and resolve any issues we can.
>>54853We think Dasha is off her meds.
>>55114 We’re working on bringing you a “dark mode” to the Shayna theme, please hold.
>>55130 Adding new banners has been broken since before we became admin. We had to fix some broken moderation tools so it was low priority, but we absolutely do plan on fixing it and adding new banners.
>>54187Yes, 2X will be hidden on Friday the 28th.We’ve decided to hide it again as we never really agreed with unhiding it and its “trial run” as an unhidden board has attracted a lot of new users who don't integrate and shit up other boards.
No. 55872
>>55869Forgot to post links:
>>>/w/291608She was moved before this new thread even started and anons did take the discussion over there then brought her right back just because a cow mentioned her name
However, anons are still talking about her in /snow/ and are begging to be spooned posts from /w/
>>>/snow/1813682The Jvlogger thread is not the place to tinfoil and medfag about her. She's a munchie.
No. 55878
>>55874She does have a point anon, I’d just write no1curr in the report field, it’s worked for me before (if that helps)
Which brings me to my next point, I’m fed up of (mostly) twitterfags who think they have integrated and adopted board culture by being absolute assholes and infighting with everyone.
You can disagree with someone without calling them a smoothbrained retard, moid, etc. this is what’s driving most of the threads in /w/ to shit.
No. 55885
>>55872Adding another reason. The cows surrounding this cow aren't jvloggers only. Now anons are derailing about munchies that aren't associated with jvlogging at all who are artists/authors instead. They just live in Japan, really needs to go back to /snow/. If she was friends with any of them or hung out with them or did any kind of YouTube at all? It would make sense but nothing whatsoever about her is relevant to the thread besides some of them reblogging and helping her raise money also which they aren't even the only people doing that.
>>>/w/294245I really don't see the point of the thread derailing about 2 non-jvlogging authors. At least Chris's girlfriend met people and had a YT channel.
No. 55887
>>55885Expand the thread to include milky Japan-based influencers doing milky shit in Japan. Problem solved. The Lili milk isn't taking away from the usual CxS milk that gets rehashed and discussed ad nauseam, and if you have any more direct Jvlogger milk, by all means, post it- but perhaps no one will, because these aren't the days of yore where the Jvlogging scene was at its peak. Lili was brought up because all these Jvloggers have been promoting her scam, a really big one at that. She's Japan based, and her situation is quite milky, but not enough for her own thread and definitely not as a stand-alone munchie case since, again, the milk ties back to the Jvloggers' lack of judgement and how they're dragging their fanbases into this dumb shit as well. The munchie thread is full of normies who don't care or know jack shit about the Japan scene, so the conversation won't go as far as it would in the Jvlogging thread, where people are more invested in that sort of thing because of Lili's ties to certain Jvloggers.
No. 55904
>>55902you're correct and idk why someone is so pressed about having her in the thread. She herself isn't even being discussed as much as the whole circumstances of the fundraising. And these influencers are telling her story for her… they are involved.
Tinfoil about jvloggers getting a cut of the money is stupid or bait and probably deserves a ban tho
No. 55948
>>55946It will probably slow down a lot, but 2X has also gotten a lot worse since being unhidden sadly.
Man hate was a good vent thread that fit in with the rest of /ot/. Maybe we could do a 'soft launch' by calling it bf rant thread or something.
No. 55954
I removed my posts, but anon is chimping out about the deleted posts which were deleted to avoid infighting yet they do this is the cow thread:
>Infighting, derailing, accusing anons, and in general minimodding when complaints go in /meta/. They want a ban so bad, so I'll leave my compaint up this time. >>>/w/294446Sometimes vendetta posters are the biggest off the rocker anons.
No. 55960
File: 1682645584342.jpeg (22.87 KB, 500x314, 64AF3684-E43A-43CD-8CD3-5B71AA…)
>>55959I am sorry if I started this in anyway, I was hollywood anon who's afraid of jim carrey. I am convinced there are bad actors or bots, I thought it would subside by now. but the gross posts persisted. I feel like somehow it's my fault, even if it's not.
When I brought up fixers and lawyers and jim's abuses I was wrongfully accused of antisemitism and hounded with creepy nonsensical replies and bot like posts despite being part jewish myself and the apolitical nature of my text wall. The antisemitism in the thread has amped up significantly since then. I faced similar tactics when I was dealing with reddit and twitter. To any legitimate anons who were caught in the crossfire, it's not your fault, this happens.
the type of misogynistic drivel dogpiles and false accusations demoralizing my sociopolitical views I received on reddit were so heinously worded and sometimes so many, they actually drove me to start crying. I had to leave pretty much all social platforms and thought maybe this place would be safe. it's not.
part of why I exploded, left the site i briefly came back to lurk, saw what it had turned into. the tinfoil thread did not used to have this problem to this degree. so much for wanting to tinfoil in peace. I literally meant to be apolitical and it chewed me to the end of my rope to see what I said misrepresented and bastardized but to also see other anons no longer be able to discuss things when it was buried under so much anger, hatred, and derailing
own tinfoil is that someone is offset the thread in its entirety with their antisemitic nonsense whether it be a runaway /pol/fag or some hired goon. anons should probably ignore it, if it's not fed it will go away. once again I'm leaving. I'm truly sorry if this is somehow my fault. The fact that I can't even feel safe to discuss my own trauma and pain and what learning shit has done to me and discussing how fucked up hollywood is on an anonymous ib is sickening and maddening.
and I guarantee the same thing would've happened if I brought up his actions without mentioning the stalking. this is just censorship induced by fear.
>inb4 "send her to a mental ward" like that'll help my ass>I have bipolar and bpd, I'm not schizophrenic. whoever is doing this leave my sister nonas the fuck alone
(take your meds nona and go outside) No. 55961
File: 1682648317706.jpeg (246.29 KB, 2521x934, 4F7FA18E-3D2C-45D0-AD31-19AC28…)
>>55960similar script on reddit for those curious
>says certain actors are abusers and predators, particularly carrey>get falsely accused of being a /pol/ idiot >literally say I'm a female leftist and feminist whose ancestors killed nazis and am grossed out and offended by the insinuation>link "user" posts detailing his abuse that "user" aka possible bot refuses to read>why can't I hate this actor>blocked harassed and hounded like this repeatedly everytime I'd bring up receipts, particularly on redditsame shit happened with the false accusations regarding my hollywood anon posts. there is a pattern and I'm not crazy. similar derailment and false accusations thrust my way
No. 55964
File: 1682658208841.jpeg (256.68 KB, 1681x1121, EB2A6321-CFD2-4E18-872C-4327E4…)
>>55962go choke on your clap and crabs infested dick
No. 55966
>>55965well obviously I cant stop using my phone entirely but I'll probably stop using lc and I've halted all posts on social media for a few months now. I just lurk
please manifest jim dies for me
No. 56015
File: 1682785115950.jpeg (Spoiler Image,33.99 KB, 725x384, C04788AC-CE7F-4461-A81F-776C00…)
>>55975kys
I'll take my pasture, thanks
(seek help) No. 56018
>>56015Are those cat scratches supposed to gross me out or something? I expected you to come back with more than just that.
Get some help Basic-chan, you're clearly too mad on the internet.
No. 56073
>>56071Funny thing is that anons saying that sons should be aborted is one of the things that
triggers the tranny into the spam. It's like he just can't help but prove us right everyday.
No. 56090
File: 1683107362032.jpg (43.29 KB, 671x372, 67nyyc.jpg)
gore above dont scroll
No. 56092
File: 1683107383048.jpeg (22.3 KB, 580x386, 0BB104FF-F1D0-498F-ABC6-0906A5…)
bump
No. 56110
>>55855this is the post done by one of the admins
>>56108it was mentioned in a previous admin post that they were keeping on old farmhands, and they've been looking for new farmhands for a while now… wouldn't it be more appropriate to update on moderation and not trying to make a new site? they should fire all the old farmhands since they haven't been consistent since shaymin.
No. 56126
>>56108i didn't see the last update from the mods, sorry nonna. i've been busy.
>>56110with how slow the site has been, they've probably been having issues finding people who have the skills and time to moderate the site on the regular and in the time zones needed as well.
No. 56180
>>56178But you in turn can't take a joke if you thought this anon
>>56143 was being serious and was genuinely concerned about you.
No. 56195
Can we get some quality control in /w/? Multiple threads have been filled with mundane social media or nitpicks and things like mostflogged has bumpers who delete after their post. Example is useless post
>>>/w/295562>bought a tent>posted just to shitpost about a scrote not doing anything milky besides buying a tentQuality.
No. 56223
>>56195anons are allowed to discuss the cows,
nonny. if it bothers you, maybe that's not the thread for you.
No. 56226
>>56223Nta, but I agree with
>>56220>>56225>>56215Anons haven't gotten bans so they are derailing and nitpicking, posting porn, bumping this shit Brazilian thread which is all samefagging, unsaged, porn links, and random not milky social media photos.
No. 56227
>>>/w/295710Unsaged poster saying they might post about the lolcow thread for the Brazilian costhot in order to get more foot traffic when there's not even milk and the old thread was dead too. No one wants to see this bitch's porn. If that's what the thread is for, especially see if OP is that poster too, then please lock the thread.
Getting scrote vibes and we don't need a thread where they keep dumping porn links in the replies
No. 56231
File: 1683443117043.jpg (33 KB, 1080x375, IMG_20230507_090513.jpg)
Can we FINALLY get rid of the fucking porn-y banners PLEASE? ruins my fucking day seeing this nauseating shit that scrotes probably made.
No. 56262
I agree about the Pixyteri corndog banner being gross and IIRC that shit was taken from leaked sex clips scrotes paid her to make so is technically revenge porn adjacent which we used to tolerate but don't anymore. The Mystery banner I don't mind because the whole joke is that she was a prolific selfposter who spent all her time a-logging other e-whores while secretly being the biggest one of them all. Context matters and lolcow is never gonna be worksafe anyway (re: changing the spoiler image
>>56240). I recommend anons who mind specific banners just right click and block the file via adblocker.
Phoneposters, you can do this toos
No. 56278
Anon needs help in the Taylor thread. Infighting for no reason because they think an anon is someone else on an anonymous board.
>Anons have been told several timesuh, by you? so what? newsflash: you're an anon. No one has to believe anything you say. I sure don't remember you posting any credible sources for all your claims about confinement and foods and wrapping. Just reeing about how yt peepol are so stupid and don't know about wrapping or whatever the hell you felt salty about. Frequently you didn't even watch Taylor's content about it and started spouting your own crap about whatever the topic was. So unless you have some sources, no1currs confinement-chan. I also remember you defending the worst of the woo: no cold foods, drafts, keeping warm, no leaving home, not to mention TCM.
>i remember you>but also says uh, by you? so what? newsflash: you're an anon.As if it hadn't been three threads of multiple anons mentioning benefits to it. This is bait and a really bad attempt at infighting.
>>>/w/295861 No. 56287
Hi farmers!
If you have even had the fleeting thought to apply as a farmhand, we strongly recommend you do so. The site is in need of help and we have received 20 legitimate applications as of today. You don’t need loads of free time, just a general idea of how to internet works and a willingness to check in on the site when you can. The more farmhands we have, the less time each of them will need to dedicate to clearing reports that can get into the hundreds if not tended regularly.
>>56210>>55857Yes! Once we have the new rules in place, we will update the announcement to bring users to the new rule page. Keep in mind, these are small edits and will not be anything like a complete overhaul.
>>55858>>55991I looked through our moderation log it hasn’t been deleted by a farmhand or mod. I also combed through the staff email and didn’t find any takedown requests. Apologies for not having more information, my pet theory is it had something to do with Colours but I obviously cannot prove this.
>>55863We have considered the ability to filter and hide posts. We will open a thread for LCF 2.0 recommendations once we have farmhand applications dealt with!
>>55921The fishtank thread
>>>/m/291726 was locked because there is already a Sam Hyde thread in /snow/. If anons want to liveblog about the show, an autosaged /m/ thread is acceptable.
>>55933I like this idea a lot! Adding it to the requested features list. This is not a guarantee that we will be able to deliver it!
>>55939I understand the frustration, anon. We have optimized images on the site to help with speed. Our userbase is arguably larger than it’s ever been based on stats provided by our host. As new moderators are brought on, expect there to be an adjustment period. If you are concerned about rules not being understood or upheld, I would refer you to the Farmhand Application.
>>56021>>56033Regarding drag kids being posted: the drag thread is relatively inactive and the OP decided to specify not to post about drag kids. However, our site wide rule is that minors should not be posted UNLESS the focus of drama/milk is on their parents who post them online (think Hartley family). Because the MtF threads are more active and the OP didn’t specify not to post drag kids, it is acceptable. See
>>56042 as well.
>>56083Once we onboard the new farmhands, sweet anon
>>56104Captcha will be implemented with LCF 2.0
>>55865I agree that jvloggers is not a high quality thread and ends up in the report queue often. However, it doesn’t seem to benefit from the modding we’ve done. From Global Rule 4, “All users are expected to contribute in a constructive way and are discouraged from posting low quality comments and images.” So, please report any low-quality posts as such and we will give it our best try.
>>55869>>55872Thank you for posting links! From
>>>/w/291608 it looks like Emma did a charity stream for Lili and Sharla posted Lili to her Instagram story. Although Lili was posted to the munchie thread, there has been little traction there and the last post about her was 15 days ago
>>>/snow/1813682 In cases like this, the mods and farmhands aren’t around to be the police. Anons who enjoy the jvloggers thread should come to some sort of consensus together. From what I can tell, there are two options: Lili is sequestered to the Munchie thread and discussion is slow and disjointed from the vjloggers, or Lili remains in the jvloggers thread despite not being completely relevant, at least the threads of her and the jvloggers stories are easier to weave together. There are many good posts making their points in this thread. You are all adults and the internet is full of software to help you make decisions (strawpoll…) I believe in you.
>>55878The wave of twittertards is a plague indeed, please continue to report their infighting.
>>55853At this point, it seems unfair to well-intentioned users to ban the use of VPNs entirely.
>>55916I understand you find it gross, but pigs mating is not bestiality. At worst, it was a gross joke.
>>55914Looks like it was regular discussion by 10-15 different anons. The Jhonen posts number in the 30’s, not necessarily spam. Although there was no drama, discussion is allowed when it’s not infighting or spam.
>>55955In most cases, posts taking the bait shit up the thread even more than the initial bait post. Taking the bait is also known to turn into multiple posts of infighting. However, a permaban for simply taking bait is not warranted. Please email administration@lolcow.farm with a screenshot of your ban message.
>>56039Shotacon/Lolicon has become an ugly topic on the farm. It seems to bring infighting wherever it comes up, and it’s not something we particularly want to encourage posting about. However, the role of admins is not to ban things we don’t like. So, we’ve decided to host a poll here:
https://strawpoll.com/polls/mpnboq4JYg5https://strawpoll.com/polls/mpnboq4JYg5https://strawpoll.com/polls/mpnboq4JYg5To kill two birds with one stone, the poll combines shota and loli together. If you feel passionate about shota and/or loli as a topic to be preserved or culled, PLEASE VOTE! VOTING ENDS MAY 29th at 11:59PM EST.
>>56044>>56045>>56046Could you link some of her posts so I can take a look?
>>56080Please link the “hi cow” posts to make bans easier to issue.
>>56095>>56107We are doing our best with the staff we have, but we need more hands on deck. If you are concerned about the wellbeing of the site, please consider applying to become a farmhand.
>>56110If we were to fire all of our old farmhands, the site would be overrun with garbage. The farmhands we have are consistent and keep you from seeing CP and gore more often than you can know. See the beginning of this post, we have gotten 20 legitimate farmhand applications and out of those, they are not all high quality. The purpose of making a new site is to update the board software so the site doesn’t break as easily, new features can be implemented like CAPTCHA, and security can be improved. Whatever moderation team exists on this version of lolcow will be carried over to Nucow barring some drastic circumstances.
>>56120Good catch, yes that is a post that should be reported. Bans have been issued.
>>56130Accusations of anon being a newfag are usually more legitimate than moid accusations. If derailing or infighting persists, bans will be issued. If the newfag accusation is wildly inaccurate, anon will just have to live with knowing she’s been called a newfag without reason. Again, if derailing or infighting persists, bans will be issued.
>>56139Please link the posts to make it easier to investigate. The report queue easily climbs into the hundreds, if there’s something urgent that needs to be modded in the future please link the post(s). CP/CSAM or anything else we really don’t want anons exposed to is the exception here, you do NOT need to link those posts, just report and move on to avoid further exposure to them.
>>56137>>56148>>56157>>56161Regarding the toxoplasmosis samefag incident: the proper response to the samefag would have been to stop after the redtext calling them out. It is well known across the staff that most every decision we make will be met with backlash or pushback in some way. In this case, it seemed like farmhand was aggravated that anons didn’t believe her samefag ban reason and took the extra step to expose anon’s IP address to prove that her ban was correct. This would have been less inappropriate if she had done a better job of censoring anon’s IP address, but she essentially exposed anon’s entire IP which is not something casual users should be subject to. For context, Kiki being revealed as spergchan (lolcow.farm/kiki) is another time anon’s IP was revealed.
>>56243Amanda’s thread was autosaged by a staff member who has since left the staff. Her thread is now unsaged and will remain that way unless autosage becomes necessary.
>>56195The post you linked was the most recent post after a week of silence in that thread. In this case, my mentality is that the thread has been dead silent and anons just want to discuss cows. It seems a bit too overbearing to issue bans for that. When milk is flowing, nitpicking and discussing things like this tent (kek) are punished because they distract from the milk. We aren’t trying to rule with iron fists, but we have also gotten a lot of feedback that the state of /w/ is abysmal. We have yet to decide on a course of action to remedy this, but as of now you can continue to report posts that don’t fit with a good explanation to help farmhands who don’t keep up with /w/, post in /meta/ when bump/delete posts are occurring, and if you’d like to go the extra mile, we are still accepting farmhand applications.
>>56625 >>56227A ban has been issued. The thread is mostly two users posting with no milk thus far, so it has been locked.
>>56231>>56245>>56249Banners are low priority right now. When we do get around to it, we’ll have users vote on which banners to keep and which to discard. Like anon mentioned, some anons feel strongly about keeping these banners because of their history on the site.
>>56267Yes, there are plans to change this. The point of the farmhand search is to have farmhands in every timezone. For now, feel free to browse during US hours or apply to be a farmhand to increase the coverage during your timezone!
No. 56302
>>56299how can you call shota "drawn cp" after seeing the actual cp that gets posted here retard.
anyway i am specifically mentioning shota because i've honestly never seen loli content discussed (outside of milk) on lc. even shota barely crops up unless it's the fujo thread reminiscing on black butler or something
No. 56330
File: 1683611404828.jpg (40.75 KB, 452x640, 181940e209bd51416e8c73fc477eaa…)
anyway, a shota ban would be unfair. i could understand it if it was shadman tier, where pornographic/suggestive images were being dreated of children that actually exist, but it's not…it's like occasional mentions of yaoi that involves shota characters, and none of that is even explicit. why hard ban it from the site because of blind anons that think picrel is an actual child, or at all representative of an actual child.
maybe just restrict it to the fujo generals?>>56329anons answer this question every time it pops up in the fujo thread though. you whiners just don't like the answers because they don't confirm what you want, e.g. people enjoying cartoons means they desire actual kids too
No. 56333
>>56332Exactly
>>56330>anons answer this question every time it pops up in the fujo thread though.I don't visit that thread most of the time because I'm not a fujo and I do not want to go there just to infight. You always drag your pedo excuses outside of that thread to everywhere shota is criticized. And of course us two are not the only ones who think you're a sick fuck so it's not just the one "moralfag" persecuting you all over this site. Just face it, degenerate, you're a tiny minority here and most of us want nothing to do with you or with the moids you help blend in.
No. 56334
>>56332you seem unable to understand that it isn't real. like this
>>56330 is a drawing of ciel, a fictional character, not a child (a young human being). can you tell me what child (young human being) ciel is based off of? what child has a demon butler and solves crimes for the queen of england
>masturbating to drawings of childrenwho said anything about masturbation
>>56333we're a tiny minority but…we're also helping moids blend in? how is that possible? if we barely exist on lc, then pointing us out (and these supposed moids that love shota) should be easy
No. 56335
File: 1683612463155.gif (1.24 MB, 498x371, family-tom-and-jerry.gif)
like for me, i get that people think it's weird and uncomfortable. but it's not wrong, per se. to claim it as "morally wrong" or to say anons are "pedophiles" for enjoying it is as absurd as getting mad at people for laughing at tom killing jerry…or even claiming they enjoy animal abuse because this shit is humorous to them. it's a fucking cartoon, it is not real, it is so far from reality that it basically does not matter unless you can't tell 2d from 3d
No. 56336
>>56334Nta but you argue like a moid, just letting you know.
>who said anything about masturbation This whole discussion is about shota, don't play dumb
No. 56338
>>56334I don't know if you're aware of this (of course you are kek) but shotacon is not a cute and innocent genre, it's porn, sometimes explicit, sometimes softcore. If you only want to talk about Ciel from Kuroshitsuji without sexualizing children why the fuck are you so defensive when anyone criticizes shota as a whole? Just say "I only like Ciel" or "I think Kuroshitsuji should be an exception" instead of using the exact same arguments male lolifags use. You always use Ciel to hide from criticism (along with retarded excuses such as "what child has a demon butler? what specific real life child is he based on?") again avoiding the fact that he was drawn to look like a young teen, and the average shota character is drawn to look and act even younger. In other words, you're being obtuse on purpose to justify your pedophilia.
I hope everyone else can see what she does here, she (or he) does this every single time, she derails any thread where someone expresses disgust for shotacon with these flimsy excuses and disingenuous questions and the conclusion is always that she is a sick fuck like any annoying male lolifag elsewhere. She's either baiting or genuinely defending her pedo fetish but doesn't seem to get banned. This is the reason there's a poll right now to ban shota outside of cow threads.
No. 56339
>>56287>Could you link some of her posts so I can take a look?Not any of those anons, but I've been noticing her for a while too. Not sure where tf she came from.
Or if it even is a her. I'm pretty sure she got banned quite a lot in past threads.
>>>/ot/1568029>>>/ot/1568111>>>/ot/1569059>>>/ot/1571789Sorry if I tagged an innocent anon. These just felt a lot like her.
No. 56345
File: 1683614989677.png (10.44 KB, 1829x227, bl thread #8.png)
at the end of the day, this pic sums up my thoughts on the whole shota situation pretty well. i know myself better than armchair psychologists like
>>56341 here and therefore can confirm that i'm not, and never will be, a pedo. pretty sure this is the case for most anons that have ever posted shota here
i wonder if you anons also get mad at rape/incest/other dead dove content that sometimes pops up on lc
No. 56356
>>56345We don't give a fuck if you, personally, don't feel like raping a child, but we don't want to see that shit posted here either. I don't give a fuck about your personal life or whether you are a """"true"""" pedophile or not, whether you "only" like 2D little boys and not "3DPD" ones, I just don't want to see degenerate drawings of kids posted in a positive light on this site, and neither does the majority on the userbase.
Also wanting to ban shotafaggotry doesn't mean I want to see real CP here either. Are you mentally deficient? Why do you keep bringing that up when it's obvious? Even though one (real) is clearly worse than the other (drawn), I don't want either on this site. Allowing farmers to talk about their non-pedo fetishes isn't the point of this imageboard anyway, you are not entitled to be allowed to post about your pedophilia here.
No. 56363
File: 1683619806166.png (259.07 KB, 909x1275, Shinano.Toushirou.full.2423860…)
i'll be real. even if it's banned i'm just gonna keep posting it
No. 56425
>>56287I think the jvloggers thread would significantly improve if mods would redtext or ban anons who blatantly lie to whiteknight a cow. The opposite (vendetta posting and lying about a cow just to make them look bad) isn't allowed. This isn't the first time, but we just recently had two anons
>>>/w/295777 >>>/w/295776 lie about a jvlogger (John Daub) copying a vlog of Chris Broad's, when the video in question was filmed and streamed long before Broad's vlog was released. It wasn't an innocent misunderstanding because it could be easily confirmed by merely visiting their channels and the content was so common for jvloggers (they both visited the same famous outdoor site that tourists only visit during the same couple of months every year) that it was odd to make the accusation in the first place. Chris Broad's fans have a history of having beef with John Daub and our thread has a history of anons WKing Chris ever since someone linked to our thread in his subreddit. I've seen mods call out WKs in other /w/ threads and I think redtext would at least discourage anons from lying and reduce infighting in the jvloggers thread since most fighting is caused by vendetta posting or wking cows.
No. 56441
>>56413Belle did get a lot of whiteknighting and suspiciously scrote-y posts in her thread, but I fully support moving her to the camgirls thread mostly because her own thread
did attract so many weirdos. Random screenshots of her with Mia Malkova really didn't seem milky and also felt like it was just attracting scrotes looking for free content. The picture of her where she forgot to take the faceapp watermark off or whatever, slightly more milky but again on the level of the camgirls thread. She's a pedopanderer but honestly she's one of what, a few thousand now on OF and instagram, so she doesn't really merit an entire thread.
No. 56468
File: 1683666612364.png (22.31 KB, 897x511, lc poll.png)
Since these two answers are similar enough to cause some vote splitting, when the voting is done can they be counted together with the majority vote choosing which version of this response that's gone with?
No. 56502
the kiwifag bunker thread
>>>/ot/1571389 should probably be locked. we're gonna be invaded by trannies and kiwifags
No. 56511
>>56425>>56496I agree with these posts. The same thing happens in the Taylor R thread. To the point where posters calling out lies with proof got banned but not the liars themselves. Whoever is doing it can't let a single criticism of their cows stand and they just blatantly lie to gaslight everyone in the thread. There are a few posts in meta about how a person or group lie in order to WK or cause infighting in Taylor's thread (ex
>>54486 I don't want to find them all but multiple anons complained) and I personally think the same person or people do it in jvlog too.
It'd be wild if it were someone close to Sharla, since that's the obvious link between these two threads, but idk that's just fun tinfoil, not serious accusation.
No. 56580
>>56562None of those sex workers do anything milky these days and their threads are just as autistic. Belle is still out here pretending to be a kid like shayna, has a room in her house to shoot porn that looks more like a child's room than shaynas does, is starting to desperately dabble in shitty threesomes, goes on manic posting sprees (when most of her hilarious photo mishaps happen) and its likely only going to get worse as time goes on. Apparently it's come out that recently that she got kicked out of school for lying about having cancer, which I think is on fucked up level right up there with selling other people's underage nudes and passing them off as her own
>>56564 nobody said she had genital herpes, she has oral herpes which she's admitted. The time you're speaking on she had warts or something on her asshole in a video she posted, which was very reminiscent of shaynas boil saga.
No. 56582
File: 1683701281063.png (37.32 KB, 863x656, Screenshot_20230510-084423.png)
>>56538This isn't my post, but I hope it's ok to ask here for genuine clarification: how is this post
>>>/w/296115 derailing? Multiple jvloggers were mentioned by that anon and all of them were still being discussed.
No. 56597
File: 1683708859165.jpg (Spoiler Image,153.22 KB, 1074x1788, Screenshot_20230510_045341_Chr…)
>>56581Back to the gaslighting I see.
No. 56601
File: 1683712401211.jpg (47.15 KB, 587x498, haha sweet.jpg)
The address this already sperger is back on ot
No. 56618
>>56610>I don't post here I lurk every monthSure jan
Anyway I was giving my .02 on why belle is just as milky as any other run of the mill SW here with a thread and ofc you have to come out of the woodwork splitting hairs about warts and herpes, trying to derail like it's not easily searchable in her previous threads. The point is she's festered with diseases that she sloppily posts during manic episodes which is funny and milky for the same reasons when shayna does it
No. 56671
>>56605The state of /metas/s arguing over Belle is why it was locked. Also you will never seem to understand how there's more than one anon who sees she's not milky and even the moderators and farmhands agreed. They don't close a thread over 1 persons reports.
>>56582The constant whiteknight accusations add nothing to the thread and I'm personally tired of every /w/ thread having a few dozen posts reeeing about "whiteknights" because someone doesn't agree with someone else. All anon accusations should be banned imo, "hi cowing" already is.
No. 56777
>>56774No one cares about whether anon lied or not. Accusing anons is derailing and there's a difference between infighting and correcting someone and accusing them of lying and being a whiteknight and basically just throwing a fit which is what warranted the ban I'm sure.
Also bait like this, someone pretending to be the cow, unsaged and all, is embarrassing.
>>>/w/296222 No. 56778
>>56582This makes me question if the mods were ever replaced or re-trained. It may not be a quality post, but not a single comment was remotely derailing. In the past, there were a lot of complaints in this thread about modding being oddly in favor of Chris and Sharla, and this is a perfect example. There are other posts that actually deserved warnings or bans.
>>56776>>56777If no one cares, why are you replying? Why have multiple anons complained about the whiteknighting, here and in the thread? No one's been banned,
nonnie. It was two anons who lied and you're not going to waste your time to lie about basic facts to accuse other people of copying your cow unless you're a fan or trolling. Yes, the lies led to infighting from other anons and was also derailing because it was about something that never happened. Just follow the thread. Are you one of the two anons? Because it's hard to understand why you care so much that some people are asking admin to consider redtexting or banning people who are lying to defend cows to improve the quality of the thread.
No. 56779
>>56778You'd think if there was actual whiteknighting going on it would get redtexted more often. Just not agreeing with someone isn't what makes someone a whiteknight. Not disagreeing or agreeing is also not whiteknighting. You can fence a lot of discussions, but the constant in-thread infighting about it, wasting space to accuse anons, it is not helpful to the thread. It's completely non-contributive.
>one of two anonsYep because only 3 people are in that thread, definitely, 100%. Maybe just report, anon. Try reporting and see if those 'lying posts' get redtext or the users banned. You're fighting so hard for a post that isn't even yours. This idea that the /w/ mod is somehow corrupted or a user in disguise and is a sympathizer towards Chris and Sharla specifically and apparently Belle. That doesn't even make sense. I never see the anons who are apparently whiteknights come to /meta/ to complain about this stuff. It's only even the redtexts calling out derailing or samefagging.
No. 56781
>>56779>Just not agreeing with someone isn't what makes someone a whiteknight. Not disagreeing or agreeing is also not whiteknighting.This is about lying about basic facts. Why are you derailing the discussion and talking about disagreements and opinions? Perhaps you should go back and read through the thread again.
I don't understand why you care so much and are fighting hard against the idea of anons getting warnings or bans for outright lying to defend or praise cows if you've never lied to support a cow yourself. Mods also are not infallible, no one is, or have you forgotten that one doxxed an anon? What do you think the purpose of this thread is for? They can make mistakes, too, and if you've been following jvloggers, it should be clear to you that mods rarely redtext blatant whiteknighting in that thread while they do in others. Seriously tho, why does the idea of improving the quality of the thread by discouraging people from lying and derailing the thread bother you so much?
No. 56783
>>56781This is the best time to use
go outside I've seen in a while.
No. 56797
>>56787Adding onto that, there are also WKs from the jvlogger thread who've sat in meta for months and tried to get anons banned for discussing new milk about specific cows. I forgot about the repeated cancer claim by a Sharla WK. Surely, that's derailing and ban-worthy, but mods did nothing despite the anon doubling down:
>>>/w/246706>>>/w/246757It was even included in a thread summary before, which is another reason why mods should redtext anons when they're sharing false facts to stop derailing
>>>/w/203508 No. 56799
File: 1683749786868.png (22.63 KB, 916x357, Screenshot_20230510_151338_Chr…)
>strawpoll meaning this is literally a competition to see which side has a sperg with enough autism power to mass vote via vpn 200 times
>most of the other voters don't even use /m/, /g/, or /ot/
Hey admin, can you give a little insight as to why you thought this was a good idea? Genuinely asking.
No. 56801
>>56798Seriously? She didn't have cancer and
>>56787 gave other examples. I was just added on to their post to show how WKing was not banned in that case, even when it was in a thread summary, and how it can derail the thread. It's really strange how some people are so bothered by the idea of anons copping warnings for sharing false info. If you're not doing it yourself, why do you care so much?
No. 56821
File: 1683756103561.jpg (127.25 KB, 1920x1278, Portrait-von-zwei-geschmückte…)
maybe for the next thread? There are some cool photos of the Alpabzug or Dèsalpes, which is a Swiss/Austrian festival celebrating the cows coming down from the mountains to the valleys (for the winter). They get flowers and music. I find it all very interesting and kinda pagan