[ Rules ] [ ot / g / m ] [ pt / snow / w ] [ meta ] [ Server Status ]

/meta/ - site discussion

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File(20 MB max)
Video
Password (For post deletion)
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
| Catalog

Click here for an /ot/ image recovery update and to see if you can help!

File: 1447223695752.jpg (25.94 KB, 408x256, cow.jpg)

No. 1706[Reply]

Excuse my autism, but I've noticed posters sometimes seem to mix up the following terms. I see this on other websites, too. This is understandable, since the terms are vague and not widely known.

These are subjective to some degree, but here is how I personally define them.

Samefagging

This is a general term for deceptive posting. It can mean the following things:

- Taking on more than one persona in a thread to make it seem like your view has wider support than it actually does. This is also called sockpuppeting. May involve replying to your own posts agreeing with yourself, or significantly changing writing style to make it seem like a different person is also giving similar positive or negative remarks. Particularly dedicated samefags may try to use a different IP address as well.

- Making multiple posts back-to-back, without obvious indication they were all made by you. This is not always deceptive, though is often annoying.

- May also apply to general false or omitted self-identification. For example, if the subject of a /pt/ thread started secretly and anonymously posting in her own thread to disagree with people or defend herself, this may also be called samefagging. There may be a better term for this, but if there is, I'm not yet aware of it.


Self-posting

Posting about yourself in any way, whether anonymous or self-identifying. For example: posting a picture of yourself, linking to your own profiles, giving excessive details about your life, etc. Self-posts are completely acceptable in some threads and some contexts, but they usually are frowned upon otherwise. You shouldn't try to make yourself stand out on an anonymous board. Valid spellings also include self posting and selfposting.


Vendetta / vendettafag / vendetta-posting

Posting about someone as if you are a random person who happens to dislike them, when in reality you have some sort of personal connection or grudge. Often involves samefagging. Generally has no relation to self-posting, except in cases of self-victimization. In cases where you present the chan with an implicit or explicit "call to action", to further your vendetta, this is also called a personal army (PA) request. It often involves misleading or deceptive information.

An example of a vendetta post would be arguing with a girl on social media, and later posting a thread calling her a whore. Asking people to send things to her parents, or falsely claiming she's violated some site's terms of service and requesting people report her, or including her address and phone number in the post, would be a vendetta post as well as a personal army request.
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
167 posts and 6 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

No. 84305

>>84277
OK I had no idea I always was more of a redditor than a 4channer, thanks

No. 84306

>>84244
Personalityfag who fixated on the protagonist from a loli rape porn VN and did gayops with her discord server full of retards. Also she posted her selfies and she kept censoring her chin for some reason kek. Someone else could probably explain it better.

No. 84307

>>84244
Like anon stated above, personalityfag whose husbando is a rapist from an old degenerate VN that only moids seem to be interested in. She claims to have had a mental breakdown in which she proceeded to get naked on camera, upload her nudes on lolcow and even write "I want Rance to rape me" on a paper while posing with them. No idea how a mental breakdown makes you strip naked, pose for the camera and upload nudes on an imageboard kekw. She is also very obnoxious in general, she was active on this 4chan esque dating app and made it pretty obvious it's her by namedropping husbandos and interests she was quite vocal about so when people recognized her and started making fun of her, she spazzed out like she got actually doxxed or something.

No. 84308

>>84244
Ntyfags girlfriend

No. 84316

>>84307
>>84307
Adding to the rancefag lore, she posted her nudes because nonas called her moid, and she wanted to prove she's female.



File: 1722451925634.jpeg (54.62 KB, 626x626, IMG_4807.jpeg)

No. 81334[Reply]

Previous thread: >>>/meta/79881
1203 posts and 75 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

No. 82789

>>82775
They ban in meta pretty often now. Don't forget that movie thread anon got permabanned last summer for posting in meta. And now they allow certain anons to basically personalityfag and start infights here. Only the nonas responding to it will get banned.

>>82779
Admin needs to clarify the definition of these words then, because speculation and normal discussion is no longer even tolerated in many threads. If the janny were at least consistent and would ban the anons who start infights or post retarded ad hominems and non-con wk posts, then it would at least seem less biased. I'd rather read anons speculating than have some rule that everything a cow says is automatically the truth. Tinfoil is speculation without any foundation at all, it's batshit crazy crap, not normal use of powers of deduction.

>>82777
I also think talking about cow threads being 'necessary' or not is pretty weird. There isn't a finite amount of resources. Don't like a thread? Don't read it. It's silly to expect an entire imageboard to change because you don't like some thread or you personally like the cow. I don't get why this is hard, there are so many threads I think are boring or nitpicky or mean; I just don't read them or get involved.
It just seems like you want to minimod what anyone talks about - why? Genuine question, do you like any thread on LC? What's a "good" cow thread to you?

No. 82797

>>82782
do you also scream in horror when seeing a womans body irl. i doubt you even ever got pussy if body hair triggers tf out of you

No. 82801

I stg this is the skirbyfag >>>/snow/2031820

No. 82815

>>82789
So many cow threads can be reduced down to generals. Theres a bunch of dead cows with threads alive just from rapid anons deaperate for drama and milk that will never flow again. It's obvious when you go intk the threads.

No. 82841

close the BP thread. it's dogshit



File: 1720197680881.png (623.65 KB, 571x589, Get_Milk.png)

No. 79881[Reply]

1203 posts and 79 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

No. 81323

Being notified of a ban that's expired only after you try to make another post is really stupid. Why would you even be notified at all only after its expired anyway? It looks like it's a way for mods to just show off banning you because this is retarded design.

No. 81324

>>81323
Because you didn't see it when it was given. It's not that complicated.

No. 81325

Just wanted to say sorry to the jannies for not spoilering a pic I put in ot I've learned my lesson.

No. 81327

CP link in amerifag thread GET RID OF IT TRANNY JANNIES

No. 81328

Why has there been a lack of banning on obvious male posters in /ot/? They are baiting and infighting, race sperging and shit posting and no red texts anywhere? Come on now



File: 1717593557265.jpg (110.64 KB, 744x379, cow-using-computer-3.3.jpg)

No. 78429[Reply]

1203 posts and 77 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

No. 79884

>>79878
Not a bot, my browser just had an autistic meltdown, like you’re doing now
>Where did you find such art in the fujo thread?
Lurk more. Blatant shotashit usually gets deleted by farmhands
>>79879
>Nigga shota stuff has been part of the fujo subculture since the 70’s.
Ok? I don’t care? Sorry this site isn’t your pedo sanctuary

No. 79885

>>79879
>14. Do not post or discuss sexualised and/or sexual art featuring minors unless it is related to milk.
>she's so new she doesn't know the rule was specifically put in place because of shotafags and we had a poll about it relatively recently where a sitewide ban won the most votes

No. 79886

>>79884
Women consuming drawings of fictional moids is not pedophilia, once again. If you wouldn’t deck a kid scrote in the face you’re lying, stop defending them
>>79885
Nigga I was there for it, I thought it was stupid then and thought it was stupid now. What’s your point?

No. 79887

>>79886
Shotafags are such cows. Stop embarrassing yourself by admitting to jerking off to animu art of little kids.

No. 79888

>>79887
Sorry for not liking hags with a grotesque amount of chest hair and a receding hairline. Hope you get over your brainwashing soon



File: 1672270536958.jpg (66.11 KB, 553x435, lolcowversustheworld.jpg)

No. 49318[Reply]

I'm sorry it had to come to this. I've tried my best since coming on board as admin but the honest truth is that I underestimated the work it takes just to keep lolcow running, not to mention the intensity of raids this year. I thought I could get it done while dealing with my job and personal life too but I was wrong and had to realise that I can't give this community what it needs. A lot of volunteers have stepped forward, so I'm positive that we'll find a great new team. If you want to apply as admin or moderator, email administration@lolcow.farm or join the discord linked in the navigation bar. The hidden board can be accessed through there now since there were complaints about the posting traffic.

The migration to an updated software is still most likely going to proceed, but for now our focus is to find a new admin and more farmhands. Timezones outside of North America will get priority.
264 posts and 23 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

No. 77440

>>77438
>>77437
i'm retarded and i shouldn't open lolcow when i wake up, but i'm still thankful even if i'm not sure how i got there now, my bad i've never cared about all the site and mod stuff before this year

No. 77494

>>77440
Good you missed a few years of pure chaos.

No. 78905

Patiently waiting for this thread to be bumped by current admin.

No. 79135

>>50426
This stands as a tribute to how far this place has fallen.
Gc and terf shit was always banned BEFORE oldmin precisely because … gestures vaguely at the state of the site That and sperging about moids instead of concentrating on milk and cows.
Most people hated oldmin for a whole lot of reasons but the stuff about boohoo muh gendershit is 100% retcon retardation. There was a handful of obsessive autists who desperately wanted to make this place manhate / gc. It didn't work so they went and made their own board. It lasted a while and is now basically the same half dozen spergs checking in. So they came back here and went back to harrassing staff until they finally got what they wanted.

No. 79389

>>79135
It's funny how there's always at least one perpetually victimized anon on /meta/ insisting that lolcow has fallen because of manhate and gender criticism. Why would you want to coddle male/tranny feelings this hard? Are you personally affected? Men and their actions specially troons can be as cowish as anyone else. Cope harder.



File: 1716006523264.jpg (57.61 KB, 640x620, amorphous_globosa.jpg)

No. 77002[Reply]

1203 posts and 69 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

No. 78420

goodbye cowball!

No. 78423

File: 1717582147784.jpeg (41.48 KB, 1021x213, IMG_5528.jpeg)

>>78357
80% of that thread is just one autistic anon replying to every single post with a wall of text and getting mad when people don't agree with her covid vaccination opinion. It's obvious who it is because of their writing style and refusal to sage, you'll literally just get banned for replying to them too much because they literally will not stop posting

No. 78432

>>78414
personally I think that poster was being annoying in other posts and that red-text is just a technicality. I can't see IPs but I just know they were shitting up other threads.

No. 78442

>>78419
This has been a rule for years

No. 80320

File: 1720534292713.png (1.43 MB, 1179x2556, IMG_9787.png)

Please reopen the Onision thread. Ever since yall closed it he’s been prancing around the internet acting like he’s invincible all the sudden.. he has a new YouTube, pushing his website again and pushing onlyfans again and asking old patrons to sign up to his OF for a year free



File: 1707778229712.jpg (219.74 KB, 960x610, 2964740354d9b0fcde88e16.069961…)

No. 71238[Reply]

This thread is for discussing the results of the Jan 22 - Feb 5 Hellweek of 2024.

It was requested in the original Hellweek thread that we provide some statistics, so we've spent some time putting together a spreadsheet with some stats which you can access here! Please note that the spreadsheet has 2 pages which you can switch using the tabs at the bottom. The first page is statistics about users, and the second page is statistics specifically about moderation.

For those who don't have the time to read that, here is a brief overview (the spreadsheet has more detailed information):
>Total posts
27775
>Total reports
3165
>Unique posting IPs
8005
>Unique posting devices
5681
>% of posts that are by VPN users
13.4%
>Total bans
1248
>Total permanent bans
188
>Top 3 most common ban reasons
Derailing, infighting and lack of sage
>Top 3 most banned threads
The Celebricows thread, the Shayna/Dolly Mattel thread, and the Twitter/Tumblr Fandom Discourse Thread

733 posts and 20 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

No. 73680

>>73663
The problem with that is that some anons don't title threads properly

No. 74155

I saw someone a few weeks ago asking if admins posted any statistics of bans pre and post the dumbass shit thread autosage, and honestly I would be very interested in seeing it. The autosage was supposed to cut back on newfaggotry and infighting, but as far as I can see, there's still a lot of both in /ot/. There's also the issue of anons posting off-topic things in other threads that would typically go into the dumbass shit thread, which for some reason doesn't seem to get banned most of the time. And the mods nowadays frequently bend to the wants/demands newfags, so it's incredibly unclear what direction you guys are trying to take.

No. 76759

It's actually super disappointing that townhalls are being refused, because the polls in townhalls would be a lot more reliable and verifiable for making decisions than holding polls on poll sites like what was done in the past

No. 76894

>>76759
Please understand. There are no chat platforms with an archive function and also screen recording software doesn’t exist. So they just can’t I’m sorry. It’s for our own good.

No. 77667

>As for why other threads are not locked or autosaged, we have discussed as a team whether or not to close the worst offenders (e.g. Unpopular Opinions) and we’re still keeping an eye on it. We aren’t ruling out closing them in the near future if things do not improve.
So are we ever going to get an update on this? Or any updates literally at all



File: 1713533795384.gif (982.02 KB, 256x256, IMG_0054.gif)

No. 75552[Reply]

1203 posts and 75 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

No. 76997

>>76992
A tiny amount of cartoon blood is not nsfw, spergchan. If you're a cutter, hide it yourself.

No. 76998

what a bunch of spergs who cares if its spoilered

No. 76999

>>76994
>suprised farmhands haven't said or done something about it already
well the admin allowed the embedding feature for tiktoks in the first place (tbh kind of a dumb move, but it was the result of anons constantly asking for one)

No. 77000

>>76998
i dont know maybe because its a op pic meaning the thread will be less noticeable at a glance and theres no reason for it to be spoilered in the first place

No. 77001

>>77000
good it will filter newfags



File: 1711867834557.jpeg (393.74 KB, 750x671, IMG_9784.jpeg)

No. 74111[Reply]

1203 posts and 74 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

No. 75537

>>75536
how is finding actors attractive attention whoring

No. 75538

>>75536
for finding scrotes attractive? please, it’s /g/

No. 75539

>>75526
This. I need this.

No. 75540

>>75527
I love this thread it's hilarious, but for a thread pic it's just dumb. Posted in the thread with a spoiler would've been fine though.

No. 75541

Can I appeal a permaban? I wasn't infighting or anything that's worth that. I guess I band evaded but my ban was a temporary one.



File: 1709292753068.jpeg (852.4 KB, 1242x1606, you will never be farmhand.jpe…)

No. 72411[Reply]

1203 posts and 79 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

No. 74106

>>74101
Why do you think you can shit talk staff and not get banned. You're perpetually retarded.

No. 74107

>>74106
ntayrt but the staff shittalks anons too so it should be fair game kek. the anon who actually started the fight should've been banned too tho. (tried reporting earlier but nothing happened) >>>/g/388156
>>>/g/388181

No. 74108

>>74106
I really do love how this place alternates between kek kek this is an imageboard my fellow kekkers and an overmoderated discord server where staff disrespect is a punishable offense depending on the day

No. 74109

>>74106
NTA you can shit talk the staff in some circumstances without consequence but I think it depends on the mood of the mod banning and how badly they can miss the point of a joke. However in this case both should have been redtexted for derailing and both were kinda being stupid. I think in the perspective of the mod anon was the one who dragged on the arguement and so she was the one banned, unfair but makes sense.

No. 74110

>>74107
thank you for trying anon. I appreciate it. That farmhand clearly has some bias.



Delete Post [ ]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
| Catalog | Search
[ Rules ] [ ot / g / m ] [ pt / snow / w ] [ meta ] [ Server Status ]