File: 1732658958569.gif (21.41 KB, 540x486, tumblr_4b2f949a04276cf724eec7b…)
No. 86791
>>86786theure all over /ot/, all tranny they/them threads, celebrity threads (celebricows, elon/grimes) jirai kei on /w/, the virgins arguing over their 2d porn and/husbando, theyre a cancer. they expect near constant replies like this is a chatroom for their short attention span or they whine the site is dying. they reply back with fury all
triggered lso infighting as gone up.
No. 86801
>>86795Not to mention these users on both the fashion and jirai kei threads are unintegrated as hell. Here is one poster
>>>/w/339469 shitposting about what anons are saying in the fashion thread regarding the supposed "lolicon" images and bringing that sarcasm over to the JK thread. So not only are they watering down terms and infighting about it by saying everything that exists is lolicon (to the point that wearing pastels as an adult with pigtails, even without editing, is lolicon coded) that these girls do.
No. 86807
File: 1732686337401.png (204.05 KB, 665x433, xxxzcxzc.png)
Yuripedo spamming the yuri fandom crazies thread, she cannot help but avatarfag as one of her loli waifus everytime she shows up. Please begging farmhands to redtext her sperging instead of deleting it this time, it's funnier.
No. 86808
>>86803nta but no matter how hard you deny it pedoshit is still pedoshit
>>86773>pretending like threads don’t get derailed by anons calling someones husbando uglymost of the fujo-related derails I’ve seen are because of some nonas hateboner for fujos
No. 86809
>>86804Fujocoomer used to have actual milk in the past, but nowadays the thread is just vendetta screencaps of LC posts and tifs (seriously why do the tif fujos need to have a separate thread whereas tim himedanshis cant; not all tifs are fujos in the same way not all TIMs consume yuri and are hsts)
honestly having a fujocoomer cringe thread only emboldens nonas into being more malicious against women who happen to be fujoshi instead of disliking the content itself. Its not even about hating yaoi at this point anymore, its all about finding a moral high ground to look down on other women for being "moid centric"
No. 86812
File: 1732690454080.jpg (Spoiler Image,179.18 KB, 1170x1449, 1732648663997.jpg)
>>86801>everything that exists is loliconNo one said that, and you're conflating and twisting several arguments. The idol duo referenced in the thread styles and shoops themselves to look extra underage, whereas in a normal photo they look like 20 year old women and not uguu babies. Liking them wouldn't make someone pedo but it's not exactly a secret that jirais infantilize the hell out of themselves. Secondly, I guess we can keep ignoring the whole right side of picrel.
(dragging infight to /meta/) No. 86825
File: 1732726934729.png (728.76 KB, 818x1022, hi-cow.png)
This post didn't suggest that the OP was Dana. It was pointing out that Dana was lurking that thread. Why did it get a "hi cow" ban?
No. 86826
File: 1732727921220.png (595.34 KB, 1152x1120, addressing-a-cow.png)
>>86825Same fag. See all these other posts that mention Dana by name? Those aren't "hi cow posts," they weren't banned, and they shouldn't be. It makes no sense why that one was singled out.
No. 86830
File: 1732730267105.png (143.82 KB, 524x343, Screen Shot 2024-11-27 at 12.5…)
>Suggestion
When there is a raid that happens, jannies should go through threads and check for stuff like picrel. This is the 5th time I've gone into a thread and seen nearly month old spam posts from a failed raid. I report them and they're deleted, but I really shouldn't have to report them to begin with. When there is a raid doesn't it make sense that farmhands should manually check threads to make sure to delete any spam posts? It makes staff seem lazy.
No. 86831
>>86824If you was that much of an
oldfag by now you would consider having coomer animu uguu waifu posters as lowtier milk. It’s not normal but in comparison to everything else they are doing it’s hardly milk to constantly sperg about in multiple threads on and on so unclutch your pearls whining about gen xyzqwerty faggotry you nasolabial fold having hag
(infighting ) No. 86844
File: 1732762042468.jpg (81.86 KB, 925x338, 1000008309.jpg)
I hate the kid's on /w/
No. 86848
>>86822moeshit
is pedophilic. also everyone going >b-but lolis don’t have boobs just be grateful that you haven’t heard of
oppai loli No. 86853
File: 1732790701799.jpeg (206.96 KB, 749x1458, IMG_4436.jpeg)
Is this thread a vendetta? I know its old but a still active instagram account has it linked in its bio for no reason and i thought it was weird, plus it's definitely attracting newfags and scrotes.
>>>/snow/1371005 No. 86860
>>86841the site is back up were you literally counting the hours instead of doing something else. weird ass nitpick
>>86842imageboards do not have the infrastructure of social media platforms run by Big Tech.
No. 86864
File: 1732804822249.png (189.12 KB, 1080x500, image.png)
how is this bait when all of the things that anon listed is factual and a contribution to the discussion
No. 86899
>>86890He's still going. You're not beating the trannyjanny allegations any time soon.
>>86897Oh my god, will you quit wking/victimizing yourself? An anon replied something like "good luck on your transition" which delved into a whole spergout from fujos. Learn2ignore instead of seething, you already know gender ideology hate thread isn't fujo general.
No. 86901
>>86897It was an offhand reply to a post about a shounen mangaka being
convicted of pedophilia. Frankly, it should've just been ignored.
No. 86902
>>86898>Staring the truth is starting an infighting. You're too sensitive for this website and especially gender critical threads. Stick to your fujo containment ones if you're this easily
triggered because fujos themselves admit most of them transitioned due to yaoi. The manga author isn't a TIF, she's non-binary, and she's addicted to gay porn by her own admission so it was a relevant conversation. Nobody denied the fact that the sexual harassment she experienced was the main reason in her case, either
No. 86903
>>86900That wasn't my conclusion nor how the infight actually started, we had moved way past her manga atp.
>>86901But you can't ignore the objectively true observation that there's a fujoshi to TIF pipeline? No, you always have to victimize yourselves and derail every thread defending your sodomite porn
No. 86907
>>86904>Says the anon that couldn't let someone replying to a pedo post pass up kek. Huh? I don't know who you're confusing me with but I don't care enough about you retards to post in a thread about it, in fact I'd like to stop hearing from you at all.
>>86905Yeah… that's what I'm saying. All fujospeds should've ignored it. Is everyone ITT retarded except me?
>>86906She really made you seethe, huh? Cope kek %99 of TIFs themselves admit yaoi made them troon out.
No. 86908
The fujo obsessed retard keeps shitting up unrelated threads on /m/. Please start banning that fucker because it feels like every damn thread gets derailed by her.
>>86894Shut up and stop lying, no one is buying your schizo ramblings and samefagging anymore. Fujos rarely go out of containment, instead it's you who brings tif/tranny and yaoi talk into every fucking thread, even ones that are completely unrelated. Go back to kiwifarms, seriously.
No. 86910
>>86906I'm not the one who posted that. Most of us ignored the yaoi shilling post except for that one autist, I'm saying that the fujos who kept replying to that bait should listen to your own advice and ignore clearly inflammatory posts and report them instead
>>86908It's both actually, this may surprise you but there are infighting spergs from both sides, and both of them claim the farmhands are persecuting them (they may even be the same person idk). Both should be banned
No. 86919
This is 100% the moid that Kinpatsu stopped dating. This is Eric. He's been defending himself in the cosplay thread for over a week now. You can tell it's a moid because he's calling the new guy out and suddenly between the "Why do we need to choose who is worse?" he defends Eric, the ex non-stop, while calling his ex
mid. I have never, ever seen a farmer who is a female call a woman 'mid'. This is a very moid-centered way of talking about women and the whole paragraph is clearly him trying to defend himself and shit on his ex girlfriend and her new boyfriend.
>>>/w/339584 I think most anons already knew he was posting about himself in the thread previously. Makes sense why it's a massive wall of text because he got banned for not integrating before. He's learning, but he's so obviously Eric. Also not posting proof of any of these claims that Kinpatsu is mentally unable to care for herself to the degree of a 13 year old girl? What fucking shitpost crap is that? You can't tell me that's not a salty male behind those words.
No. 86972
Ember Whann is writing ChatGPT odes to herself in /snow/
>>>/snow/2063807 >>>/snow/2063797
No. 86974
File: 1733127963444.jpeg (17.86 KB, 678x452, Grinchy nona.jpeg)
>>86968>t.But really, as a poorfag to another poorfag the solution is easy and also yearly so why aren't you used to this?
No. 86979
File: 1733165564023.gif (38.51 KB, 169x169, 1000003290.gif)
it would be kind of cool to have a meta thread dedicated to listing/sharing new threads.
it would make it easier for nonas to point each other in the right direction when finding a topic and would give new threads some more traction.
No. 86980
File: 1733166193787.png (50.58 KB, 1816x382, locking warning.png)
for the last 4 jill threads, newfags have been replying after the 1200 post locking warning and the new thread isnt able to be linked as a reply
i understand it's not enforceable, but fwiw would it ever be possible for the warning language to be changed slightly so they know not to comment?
No. 86985
>>86983the warning itself says to post a link to the new thread so thats why i asked
>>86984i agree, i think the issue is jills thread specifically seems to have an overwhelming amount of newfags since the DID saga. since we recap thread highlights in the new thread description, it can take a bit and seems like the threadnonas cant get the threads made before its maxed
No. 86997
>>86994since theyre still up… can you please delete personalityfag posts instead of slapping a witty redtext on them? they
want the special mod treatment and can easily evade the ban anyways, so the only way to get rid of them is to nip them by the bud and remove their means of getting any attention.
No. 86999
>>86994>>86998I really dont want to be a minimod but holy shit this is a new low for
nonnie retardation. Im assuming mods are asleep and cant do immediate action but holy fuck can they not see the blatant personalityfag in front of them and learn to disengage and report for just a couple minutes? Are they that desperate to post a witty comeback as an "own" to someone intentionally fishing for bait?? these shitty newfags are a plague on this site, and they're clearly showing their zoomer tendency to dramaseek and attentionwhore.
If VPN bans aren't going to be enforced, they should at least do a 1-2 minute cooldown between posts so nonas can actually contemplate about hitting send instead of rapid firing shitposts made during the heat of the moment.
No. 87004
>>87001thanks for admitting that you are a newfag but the reason why there is less child abuse material on lolcow now has nothing to do with the moderation and has more to do with the tech team who implemented a software here to catch those types of images that majority of the time here got spammed by bots.
Before that got implemented some of those images would stay up here for hours until a mod would check up on the reports.
No. 87009
File: 1733198786721.png (581.98 KB, 1200x962, 461783483218487.png)
>>86997….and they redtext a single post and left the other posts unaccounted for the night. do mods not know that having a unique redtext for personalityfags is giving them the attention they seek by having their alias kept up and known?
No. 87012
>>87009That's a troll twitter. Are you serious?
>>86985Its never been that deep. Ive never seen anyone banned or complaints for that matter, over this. You sound like a newfag who's latched onto Jill on this site.
No. 87016
>>86977Don't respond to them if they're derailing the thread, report and move on, it's not that hard.
Venus is a legacy cow, even if she's milkless these days there's no way her thread would be lock.
No. 87025
>>87024I second something needs to happen with /ot. Now there’s a nazi sperg. Feels
sus.
No. 87032
>>87031they just need to implement a permanent vpn ban in the america, unpopular opinions and fandom thread.
Also the vpn ban has been proven to work since the america and fandom threads were normal when they were under the vpn ban. I don't know why mods won't implement something that has been proven to work and be effective at curbing bait.
No. 87053
>>87050This would never happen but what if the non cow boards were hidden? In that scenario newfags looking for "
femcel 4chan" would either get invested in a cow and be forced to integrate or get bored and leave.
No. 87056
>>87053The idea of hiding /ot/ isn't new. I think the last time it was seriously discussed was when /ot/ was locked under one of the previous admins.
I would support a trial of hiding the non-cow boards to see if it does anything to improve post quality.
No. 87058
>>87057ntayrt, i guess its a kneejerk reaction since most self proclaimed himejo on this site are very vocal about being anti-fujo and gatekeepy about yuri content along with bragging about their "moral high ground" since theyre not into "scrote centered" media.
Its discouraging to discuss yuri topics when theres this expectation to be a gold star lesbian who only consumes GL and nothing else.
I personally tinfoil theyre just lesbian yumejo who heavily self project onto the media they consume which is why they cant see GL content as a story telling media that anyone can enjoy/create regardless of sexual orientation No. 87079
>>87061Thank you, farmhands.
>>87062Sorry anon, I miss personalityfags whenever they're active so I don't know too many of them. I know of rancefag, yuripedo, that self-obsessed faggot who spam posts every now and then, and kirby anon. But I don't know their posting history or anything like that. Not sure who bp-chan is, but I'm aware there is an anon obsessed with fellatio, specifically concerning women.
I couldn't tell if this was a troon larping as a depressed blackpilled anon, or one of those extremely mentally ill anons who can't stop themselves from sperging. I just wanted the retard shitting up the thread gone, and the bait with it. Thanks again, farmhands.
No. 87092
Worst infight of all time happening in amerifag thread
>>87088Sometimes I just put "retard" in there and mods get the jist. Retards are basically baiters
No. 87102
File: 1733406083063.jpeg (199.96 KB, 915x375, IMG_0301.jpeg)
>>87100>>87101Doing that is even worse because then stuff like this gets left up and unchallenged.
No. 87118
>>87101the animal hate threads don't talk about animals being "overrated". nobody would have a problem with them if they did.
the dog one has a schizo who obsessively follows, screenshots, and rants about Facebook posts and how happy she is when a dog dies. she can't even contain herself to a single thread. the cat hate thread is full of zoosadists.
No. 87120
>>87118I've seen her posts when I scroll by the dog hate thread. She is posting Facebook posts by people trying to adopt out pitbulls who have a history of aggression and biting. Dogs are meant to be put down when they attack people because they are a danger. Pitbulls are understood to be the most dangerous because they have locking jaws and are bred to be fighting dogs with heightened aggression.
Anons discuss news stories about
pitbulls ripping the legs off newborns, and mauling and dismembering their owners obviously they are going to be happy when a dangerous animal like this is put down instead of being adopted out. They aren't breaking any rules. The zoosadist who
wrote the post about raping cats was put out to pasture by the farmhands.
Misrepresenting the threads like this, whether moralfagging or illiteracy, doesn't help anything. These threads have been around for years, and learning how to hide threads you don't like to see is part of integration. If you can't handle that responsibility, maybe sites like Twitter or Tumblr where you can report posts for "disturbing content" would suit you better.
No. 87124
>>87118Found a
triggered pitnutter in the wild.
(dragging an infight to /meta/) No. 87126
>>87125I love cats. I own cats. But this is not true, cats do hunt for sport. They severely damage the ecosystem and many species populations when let outside. It should be a requirement that all cats are kept indoors with any found outside removed from the owner's possession and taken to a shelter.
I wish cat owners didn't have a blind spot about outdoor cats. It would be much more humane to cull feral cat populations than to let these colonies be infected, mauled, and eaten to death. These are slow, painful, and sorrowful deaths.
That said, I still don't have a problem with the cat hate thread. There are posters who hate dogs for "humanitarian" reasons and also out of spite. The same can be said for posters who hate cats.
No. 87145
>>87118i used to post in the dog hate thread to discuss about shit like bad owners and offleash dogs and ngl i stopped bc of the pitbull facebook schizo, you can clock her repetitive posts from a mile away
she's so annoying, just the same "zomg look at this ugly beast i hope it dies" shit over and over. we get it.
No. 87152
File: 1733581964646.png (7.82 KB, 1376x70, cbsbcxzxc.png)
So why is anti semitism a big no but blanket racist and classist statements like these are suddenly allowed?
>>87146>>87147>>87148>anyone who criticizes my pedo religion instead of coddling me like my entire life has been is from 4chan!You people are the biggest hypocrites ever. Judaism is entangled with US politics and it's not derailing in the slightest. It's funny kikes have no issue with racist remarks, but the second someone doesn't put you on a pedestal for once and treat you like the #1
victim suddenly it's the end of the world. And of course, in typical Jew fashion, instead of actually engaging in critical conversation with me, you're just gonna report and cry about "MUH EBIL GOYSSSSSSSS".
(ban evasion) No. 87153
>>87152Samefag, the context was that I was complaining how my city would rather help rich jews overseas than our majorly
POC population where a good portion of them are impoverished bt sending 16 million in bonds to Shitrael that'll never get paid back. This would not have happened if not for Jewish meddling. Truth hurts though I guess.
No. 87157
>>87156Are you Jewish? Very easy to answer question.
By your logic a good portion of posts would be removed for being low quality and irrelevant, or is it only "low quality and irrelevant" because it criticizes your group? Why is ableism okay but anti semitism is the worst thing possible? I don't give a shit about ableist words on an imageboard, but you should try to keep your principles consistent.
No. 87158
>>87157I'm not jewish but you continue to obsess over that.
>Why is ableism okay >try to keep your principles consistent>By your logic a good portion of posts would be removed for being low quality and irrelevantWhat the hell are you even talking about?
No. 87163
>>87161I'm not
>>87160. You realize I talk about other things besides Jews right? It's an anonymous imageboard, it just seems that way in isolation. Whenever someone talks about a certain group of moids they don't get accused of this.
>>87162Lol once again, classic Jew deflection. "Nazi!" "Poltard!" "Antisemite!" "Just report and ignore because I can't accept criticism and need to cower in fear even on an anonymous imageboard!". You realize a lot of my points were about how Jews have fucked over
POC, specifically black Americans right? I don't think a /pol/tard would ever come in defense of a minority group.
(/pol/sperging ) No. 87177
>>87176>>87174>>87172There must be new jannie’s who are banhappy today, I guess. If it was hellweek I’d understand banning a
nonny who makes herself sound dumb and isn’t familiar with types of therapy
most burgers aren’t but whatever , but the rules don’t have any about venting about extremely graphic stuff. It’s probably just recommended to spoiler it.
No. 87182
>>87180well technically this isn't their
job, if it was lolcow would probably be paywalled
No. 87183
>>87150i know the thread isn't obligated to cater to me which is why i said i quit posting in it, genius.
im still entitled to say the pitbull facebook retard is a nuisance with her constant sperging. this is the complaints thread, you know.
No. 87196
>>87190This is a good idea. I don’t think questioning why a disproportionate amount Jews are in positions of power despite being only 2% of the US population is polsperging though. I consider polsperging shit like “the Holocaust wasn’t real and all kikes should be gassed” or something of that sort.
>>87192I’m a straight woman.
No. 87197
>>87183NTA, this complaints thread is for complaints the jannies could help with or ideas that others can come up with, you just complaining about not liking a thread is kinda pointless because there isnt anything anyone can do about it. The only solution is that you do post (if you want to obviously) because varied content in the thread may encourage others to post varied content more to your liking.
>>87189True.
>>87190I think the jannies have been good with banning the jew derails and you have a sensible idea so I dont see why your thread could not go ahead.
No. 87203
>>87197im complaining about a specifuc user ruining a thread, the pitbull crusader's spots aere easy to spot to the point it's borderline peronalityfagging.
>>87200one can think these dogs are a menace (i certainly do) and still get annoyed by repetitve autistic posters
No. 87215
>>87210again learn to read, i don't even like dogs, i used to post in dog hate threads quite a bit before they got overrun by the pitbull obsession. not everyone who disagrees with you is a pitbull lover.
i was just agreeing with another poster that the pitbull facebook poster is obsessive and annoying.
>>87208yeah it's a topic that merits discussion but lolcow is probably not the right place for it. there's way too much politisperging in /ot/ already and it always brings out the infights and the baiters. no way a thread on such a contentious topic will end well.
No. 87233
I don't know if farmhands can figure out which posts are this user's, but they are clearly the only who is cowtipping and using lolcow as their personal army
>>>/w/340419>>87229That's what I'm worried about. They will just find some other thread, like mirgate to Addy's.
No. 87241
File: 1733636001987.jpeg (103.46 KB, 608x405, stock-photo-close-portrait-han…)
>>87236The Jews win again!
(bait) No. 87246
>>87242Its almost like you throwing out "racebait" to cover up the truth. Like
>>87244 said it wasnt a racebait thread most of the posts I skimmed over were annoyed that American funds were going to Israel. Stop being an idiot.
No. 87247
>>87242And how is this
>>87241 not some Jewish supremacist racebait? Gee I wonder why that’s acceptable but being sensibly critical of Israel is immediately censured
No. 87250
>>87219yeah that's exactly what's happening. they're using it like it's an anonymous discord server or anonymous twitter to vendettafag and fight each other. a farmhand needs to nuke all the unsaged and namefagging chatroom-style spam instead of being so lenient and merely politely warning them to stop. one of them even said the twittards plan to keep shitting up the thread until someone makes a good jirai confessions page so they're just going to ban evade and refuse to integrate.
>>87224imo the thread was actually going ok up until the cows decided to direct an army of spastics to raid it, now it's going to be nothing but a bunch of spamming idiots fighting with each other constantly and spoiling the milk. the jirai cows seem a lot more unhinged than the lolita cows and the general kawaii/jfashion cows so it makes sense for them to have a separate thread if there's enough milk to sustain it.
No. 87256
File: 1733651529543.png (823.45 KB, 761x1608, 1000039523.png)
Not my post but this is a ridiculous redtext. Can you not get a sane farmhand? nm, there's probably just one anyway.
The post isn't "misleading," even if it's boring and not milky. No one needs to cap every single thing about a reel like a fucking journalist. She still copied her "Inspiration" exactly. Do the farmhands even know what "vendetta" means?
No. 87260
LC has proven to itself again it's run by neolib zionist shills and I am going to continue to post in the Amerifag thread because I'm sick of the influence they have in politics over our nation. The jannies have proven time and time again they want to kill this website but this is a new low.
>>87198>anyone who criticizes my pedophilia ridden religion is a male! all women have lukewarm libshit beliefs>>87204Love how you didn't mention Zionist shills or Jewish supremacists as part of the problem, your bias is showing!
>>87211Funny, because there are countless janny-approved bait threads up right now.
>>87218>muh tankies!Lmao, only chronically online libsharts care about tankies. I don't like them either but come on.
>>87231Jews can't handle criticism. You can see it in this thread. Notice how every
valid criticism is labelled as one of the following:
>polsperging>anti semitism>moid>nazi>report this userLmao.
>>87238>>87239I can only hope your shitty ethnostate gets nuked off the map. No wonder your ilk has been expelled from 100+ countries, you are truly vile sociopathic people.
>>87240Based
>>87242Jewish deflection tactic.
>>87247Mods are either zionist shills or kikes themselves, it really is the only explanation.
>>87255Isnotreal shill dogwhistle.
(ban evasion) No. 87263
>>87260News flash for newfags. The discussion of conspiracy theories involving jews is not new to LC. Years ago, around the time of Shaymin, it was discussed in depth in the tinfoil thread. No one was banned and jewish anons took part in the conversation. The difference is that no one resorted to using insults based on race, ethnicity or religion. It was just a respectful discussion where different view points were shared.
The instant anyone resorts to acting like a hysterical /pol/tard shrieking about "k*kes" and repeating /pol/ rhetoric they are going to get banned under global rule 7. This shouldn't be hard to understand but I guess the quality of the userbase has declined.
No. 87264
>>87263I'm not new and you're a retard. In this very general we've seen anons engaging respectfully in conversation that just so happens to pertain to criticizing jews is considered "muh racebait" or "muh polsperging"
>censorship of the word kikeSure you're not the newfag?
No. 87265
>>87263"Conspiracy theories involving Jews"
or "conspiracy theories
that aren't theories so much as they are demonstrably factual about Jews being solely responsible for certain phenomena"? Because there is a distinction
No. 87273
>>87256It's pointless,
nonnie. The moderation of Taylor's thread has been a complete joke for a while now. Wks nitpick and report every single post and mods blindly ban. They even confessed almost every post gets reported. Yet they fail to ban the report button offenders, moreover they encourage such behaviour. Of course it will get out of hand, when wks get supported by the mods, instead of being banned.
>>87270Posting proof of objectively bad and lazy content is not vendetta, dumbass. Look up the definition of vendetta before showing off the retardation. I suppose it was you who reported the post, judging by the language of the ban message and this incoherent thought train. Plus, you frequent the tread to spew your "You're all jealous of my princess Taylor" every now and then. Couldn't stay silent when her talentless posts got called out?
Anyway. How come mods haven't banned a nutcase wk yet?
No. 87285
>>87270This. Always posting the dumbest things and they refuse to admit its nitpicking, trying to string along tinfoils too.
>>87273>you meanie you big report wkUnhinged retard. I'm the one who reported it. There's a bunch of users who find these posts pointless and not milky. Maybe if they were they wouldn't get banned.
No. 87289
>>87256>>87273Came to report this, but I was late. The post is not milky but it was saged. Sure it is not a great contribution and not news, but archiving these examples is part of thread culture, too.
Mods really should stop the nitpicky bans just because a couple of whiny bitches kept hitting report.
No. 87298
>>87295There's also that anon/anons
I think it's trump-chan from before who keep spamming and reposting shit that was already posted multiple times, and posting people who aren't even celebrities to begin with. I think some of them genuinely don't know how to scroll/crtl + f/or lurk
No. 87301
File: 1733727809819.png (1.5 MB, 720x916, 1733400187245.png)
how it feels to see your question get ignored because a retard posts bait directly under you and nonas falling for it bumps out your post
No. 87374
File: 1733835245062.png (67.1 KB, 767x407, 1733834506753.png)
Stolen from the retarded bans thread but the hypersensitive fujotard janny needs to chill already kek they weren't even mocking you, but fakebians. This is embarrassing, maybe you're too sensitive to moderate if you can't handle seeing the word fujo outside the context of praise without reeeeing and handing out bans indiscriminately, this isn't a dictatorship
No. 87392
File: 1733866434585.png (5.29 KB, 792x81, 347732.png)
Why are posts like which promote supremacism over one religion allowed, yet anyone who criticizes that religion is banned? This is just as racebaity as the anti semites of LC and mods are showing a clear bias.
No. 87395
>>87393>jewsperging is when you dare have an opinion different than me!Would you have the same reaction if this were said about muslim moids? Or black moids? Or christian moids? Or asian moids?
>>87394Promoting hateful religious extremism isn't a joke. Stop pearl clutching whenever someone dare criticizes judaism.
No. 87406
File: 1733878945722.jpeg (702.58 KB, 828x1325, IMG_6685.jpeg)
i might be remembering wrong but wasn't that a self-poster? in the small web/geocities thread
No. 87409
File: 1733881317358.jpg (171.79 KB, 597x1223, Screenshot_20241210-050226_Chr…)
>>87391Idk just randomly on all different kinds of threads, it started popping up around 6 months ago
No. 87418
File: 1733898906404.jpg (55.94 KB, 750x1000, flat,750x,075,f-pad,750x1000,f…)
>>87369Chud has been used on 4chan for over 10 years now, its a term for /pol/tards with a certain look and has nothing to do with trannies? Never even seen a tranny use chud.
No. 87445
File: 1733941015999.png (413.71 KB, 360x800, weegee.png)
can we please enforce the Luigi containment thread on /g/? I get it he's a hot guy and all but a few nonnas have been flooding like 5 different threads hornyposting about him and it's getting exhausting.
No. 87456
Isn't
>>>/w/340755 breaking the same rule as
>>>/w/336817 It's outstanding how even farmhand warnings do nothing to make sure milk is posted in that thread. It's going to be boring nitpicking forever.
No. 87481
>>87468The mods are quick to ban every single critical post, but the wk sperge about godforsaken
fonts is allowed to go on. Wks use their usual tactic of derailing the discussion by mentioning a small detail or word from the critical posts and sperging about it as if it will somehow discredit the criticism. There's been more than enough comments about the fonts when the discussion was first of all about Taylor's laziness and lack of creativity. All this dumb nitpicking just derails the thread, but mods are conveniently absent. Meanwhile critical posts get banned within hours if not minutes after being posted. What a coincidence! Make it make sense.
No. 87483
>>87482If anons posted every single shill, the thread would've run out already because that's all she's been posting for the past year. And yes, halfassing and ripping off content as an influencer is a
valid critique, especially if the said content is a text wall with a two second clip in the background. So is questioning a creator's integrity, when they start abusing the trust and loyalty of a fanbase by exploiting it to sell people products they themselves don't use and then getting offended when such behaviour is called out and questioned.
No. 87484
>>87483You described rule 7.2 perfectly and why mods had to step in and make all these extra rules for the thread, so almost none of that is allowed to be posted at all anymore. It's been all she's done for over a year like you said. That's all that's been posted aside from more nitpicks like her hair, how she cares for her son which hasn't been
abusive or neglectful and pointless to post, and tinfoiling about her currently having eating disorders. It's almost like having a slow thread is impossible, but if anons waited for milk like they should it would be extra milky due to the drought. The issue is some farmers can't handle that.
No. 87526
>>>/w/340853 Not the anon you banned but how you going to redtext someone as hi cowing retard when you didn’t understand the context of what was said and what they were replying to, which was ironically
>sensitive bby retards who lack reading comprehension apparentlyThey was agreeing with them and using the very generalised “you” not hi cowing. I get it’s hellweek but it’s for you guys to tighten up on your moderation, not ban people for your own poor reading comprehension. Unsaged red text was warranted tho.
No. 87535
>>87531Ayrt. Agreed that was retarded and deserved redtext but I doubt janny noticed that and just saw
>”you”>BANkek
No. 87539
>>87519please define vendettafagging.
I'm not defending the posts, I'm annoyed at the one or two people who just have to shit up the thread if anyone says anything at all. At least the farmhand has finally started banning the people complaining about the thread in the thread, which is clearly against the rules.
>even Venuspredictable
>>87533the thread can be slow, and you can hide it - the farmhand has even suggesting hiding threads you don't like instead of playing minimod. General threads are like garbage cans. She's a legacy cow and has milk sporadically. I can't imagine going into some other cow's thread and reeeing for it to be autosaged or locked when … I can just not click on it!
No. 87600
Lock
>>>/m/440644 we already have ugly man psych-op on /ot/
No. 87636
why aren't pointless bait posts like
>>>/m/441127 just deleted instead of being redtexted
No. 87640
>>87635it's a monsterfucker thread not a furfag thread, and in any event you aren't allowed to post porn in /m/. and yet that retard janny banned everyone that said pokeporn is gross, but not the porn poster. It's bullshit.
Saying 'pokemon porn is disgusting' is not bait and it sure as fuck shouldn't be a bannable offense.
No. 87647
>>87642I just don't know what anons expect when theres crossed lines considering anons are admitting
some of them are monsters. Either all of them are or none are. This is when the cherry picking causes issues in thread.
>>87643Nice bait
No. 87667
>>87664>>87663Talk about
trigger words. I hope they don't, that's so pointless. You plan to do that with every generation?
No. 87685
>>87672I think you missed the point of using the word '
trigger' as an example. 'fr' 'cap' and 'bruh' are not
trigger words. They are just abbreviations and slang you don't like. It's not the same.
No. 87690
>>87689no. all debate is
valid, barring the shit that has legal consequences which wouldn't be what this site would dal with. if you want to be insufferable and a psycho stop getting mad at people responding to you go complain.
No. 87691
>>87685Do you think certain words are redtexted because they're
triggering?
A surprise month of Hellmas is now in effect. For the rest of the month of December, VPN posting will be banned.