File: 1739972577440.jpeg (83.07 KB, 900x600, IMG_7856.jpeg)
No. 90739
File: 1740000552041.png (21.4 KB, 1795x247, r3z1.png)
Why is the first post in this screenshot considered racebait, but not the second one? Both are from /snow/.
No. 90745
File: 1740003650938.gif (3.22 MB, 374x498, goodmorning.gif)
baiting retards in unpopular opinions
No. 90753
File: 1740009746241.png (50.89 KB, 1909x173, lolz.png)
also this nona got banned for saying jew and italian men are ugly spoiled momma's boys (which they are)
pathetic
No. 90775
>>90773yes, I am a new lesbian.
how could you tell?
No. 90782
>>90780This is not the designated bitching thread. This is the thread where we complain about moderation or threads in need of moderation, and suggest things for the site.
The weegees are in the containment thread made for them. If you're too incompetent to type 2-4 more letters after the url, that's not the weegee wives' problem.
I'm sure there's an anti-Luigi thread floating around somewhere, and if not, you can make it.
No. 90791
>>90786newfag alert. they always delete. some people attention needs should be curbed. get over it.
>>90788where, post proof.
>>90789has this retarded newfag even taken a look at /snow
No. 90793
File: 1740166920297.jpeg (185.89 KB, 828x971, IMG_7870.jpeg)
>>90791lisa yo thread
>>90786i think it's fair to delete the posts if the cow actively enjoys the attention. the bpd types who selfposf actually relish getting mean comments so deleting their posts stops them attention whoring.
No. 90837
Thanks for taking care of the TIF in /ot/, and also the antifujo sperg shitting up multiple threads.
>>90835That anon had a lot of their posts deleted across multiple boards because they were having a meltdown. Don't worry, there's plenty of other anons still bitching about the site's moderation.
No. 90845
>>90842Yep. Also I understand why scrotefoiling is banned in lolcow threads cause anon's personal beef with each other is irrelevant in them, but it should be fair game in certain contexts like threads on /ot/. None of us are stupid. Men clearly post here and they don't deserve to always go unchallenged. I got to Kiwifarms and see the same line or line rhetoric spoken by "female" users here.
>inb4 "But you're supposed to just report and ignore!"What's the point if the questionable posts aren't banned or redtexted? You've essentially given scrotes a free for all platform to say whatever shit they want, all they gotta do is not admit they're male which is easy enough for the majority. And anyone who calls it out is hit with a ban.
At that point? Just let moids post because that's what you're allowing anyway with such a broken system.
No. 90859
File: 1740285822096.jpg (1.38 MB, 1079x4640, 1000023034.jpg)
>>90850Here is what actually happened.
Cat poster made some stupid comment about anon's vagina. Second poster made some stupid comment about being dicked down. YOU made a stupid comment about how you couldn't understand how someone "accidentally" got pregnant without considering anon got raped or coerced, which she later revealed to be true.
Tell the whole story next time. Everything up to her saying the comments were scrotish reeked of misogyny and she astutely pointed it out. Do better.
Not to mention there was no accusation of scrote towards you, she just said she didn't want to list the reasons to get nitpicked and infought about them which your questions pryed out of her anyway. So not even sure where you are getting that from.
No. 90878
File: 1740326113949.jpg (1.22 MB, 1079x4269, 1000023040.jpg)
>>90870>rape is accidentalRape is forced.
>The anon who pretended to care about misogyny and called me a liar but used the word foids was the worstHardly the worst but maybe you deserved it after accusing the op of being "aggressive and scrotish" just because she didn't want to answer your question.
>"You could have just not answered if you didn't want to talk about it."She told you that twice and yet you pressed anyway. You got what you deserved, take the L.
No. 90882
>>90804To add to this, all the posts have no proof or credibility about what is actually happening to venus currently. Margo is making up and going back and forth about what is happening and where she is and some random tiktok girl is getting messages from someone who only
heard things about Venus with, again, no credibility as to what is actually going on. All the info being posted has been talked about in length in thread already and it's no new.
No. 90893
>>90873how misrable do you have to be to get worked up over a fucking "thank you" fucking loser kek
>>90882it need to be locked until we have legit proof, not bullshit from margo's crazy mind.
>>90888her thread is full zoomers from reddit nitpicking her features, posting decade-old pics and rehashing old shit. other than that, grimes just word vomits on twitter. she will never generate milk like her baby daddy elon using the kids as a meat shield
No. 90897
>>90896seconded
move it to /manure/ or what that board for bad posts was called
No. 90938
>>90935There is a difference between discussion and infighting. Discussion is allowed, infighting is not. What they are doing in the latter. And it's as
>>90937 said. Its originally to discuss discourse in fandoms, not actively participate in said discourse. The original fandom psychology thread got locked years ago for less so why is this one allowed?
No. 90957
>>90956There is LC itself, and then there are the LC communities. These communities function as a sort of "deep state." Most anons on this site, maybe 60-70%, only interact with it at a surface level and they'll never experience the true underbelly. There are at least 10 different LC community Discord servers, each with upwards of 50 members, and that's just the Discord servers.
>what's keeping you from sharing?The administrator and moderators can see every single thing that you've ever posted on this website with the click of 2 buttons. A lot of anons don't realize this until it's too late, until they've already shared incriminating information about themselves. If an anon is in the admin's Discord server, then the admin already has access to that anon's Discord profile as well as every single post that they've ever made or will ever make. That makes it very difficult to for an anon to go against the grain in fear of the consequences that could arise from that.
>You covet your spot in the private Discord that much more than unleashing the milk?There would be no milk. The milk would be instantly removed, and all discussion of it would be met with deletions and bans. I'm talking device bans, not just IP bans. The whistleblower would be made into a cow to deflect. The admin would just compile a page with every weird post made by her in the style of Kiki or Rita to make her seem crazy or retarded.
No. 90960
>>90957you think they'd instantly figure out who the leak was? to me it beggars belief that nothing concrete has made its way out when the site has been down for huge lengths of time, with many anons tinfoiling on sites that (as far as I know) wouldn't have any interest in quashing that discussion
>The whistleblower would be made into a cow to deflectjustice for lorena, kek
No. 90966
File: 1740509234060.png (27.81 KB, 1826x218, porn not allowed on g.PNG)
>>90965Not my post, and it wasn't 3d porn. I think porn should be allowed on /g/, in a reasonable quantity.
No. 90967
File: 1740509278388.png (12.67 KB, 854x167, da rules.PNG)
It's also literally the site rules
No. 90981
>>90977The Pope is cringe and his hat looks funny
>>90723Farmhands better curbstomb the lolishotafaggotry in the unpopular opinion thread
No. 90982
File: 1740524812269.png (22.29 KB, 930x239, genesis 41 2-3 NCV.png)
>>90978Nonnie stop, the bible warns about infighting. Love the furries
No. 90997
Not my post, but this is not derailing:
>>>/snow/2092994German-speaking nona watched one of Lisa's old videos about plastic surgery and recapped it for the anons who don't know German. That's a quality contribution to the thread and the red text should be removed.
No. 90998
File: 1740571237675.jpg (113.75 KB, 1080x422, 1000021163.jpg)
How is this baiting exactly?
No. 91007
>>90957>>90955>There are at least 10 different LC community Discord serversDeepest lore.
>The administrator and moderators can see every single thing that you've ever posted on this website with the click of 2 buttons. That's why everybody should use VPNs.
>I'm talking device bansCan't be done when agent user switchers (and phones) exist.
No. 91025
File: 1740627128722.png (44.86 KB, 702x323, degens.png)
so…you're going to finally do something about posts like these as well, right? please? pretty please
No. 91045
>>91034>>91044rapelogging/alogging like
>>91036 said. the entirety of /g/ is full of alogs but luigifags get away with it for some reason. only alogs in unconventional attractions get banned, but not others
No. 91061
>>91053Interesting, I also noticed a ban on naked chibis (there wasn't even any dick) in /m/ today, maybe we have a mod with a vendetta against cartoon lewd, kinda like those anons who sperg "only pedos like anime!" Or it might be a moid like
>>91055 said.
No. 91063
Please remove the Farmhand here
>>>/ot/2422085 who clearly has no idea what he is doing.
>tfw mods are newfags who can't into imageboards No. 91066
>>91051>>91060Look, you can argue for an infight, but it was mostly anti-AI nonas getting a little too aggressive. Even if the AI anon was baiting at the end, she should have been ignored.
And bringing up AI is not against the rules in artist salt, it is explicitly mentioned as a suggested topic in the thread OP.
No. 91069
File: 1740751272933.png (308.35 KB, 915x852, 1740606797237.png)
Is it really alogging if an anon says she would rape a man when he was younger and better looking? She is clearly not going to inflict bodily harm on these men's past selves.
No. 91070
>>91069Like if someone wrote things like
>I want to go back into the past and molest Napoleon>I would stab Julius Ceasar in the faceWould that also count as alogging now?
No. 91071
>>91069Posts like this are extremely cringe and defending it glows hard. Why post about shit that you know is illegal? All it does is potentially alert the feds that we’re on some evil
femcel rapist board.
No. 91074
File: 1740754310800.png (81.77 KB, 842x191, lolcow.farm rules.png)
>>91072Refer to global rule 1, faggot. I’m including global rule 2 for your own consideration as well, because I figure it’s underage newfags who think wanting to rape moids makes them edgy and cool. If you don’t think feds monitor ibs, you’re a retard who shouldn’t be here.
No. 91080
>>91071It's not illegal to be cringe.
>alert the fedsAbout what?
Oh no some woman is going to time travel and rape young Till Lindemann, known actual rapist himself?
No. 91087
>>91069The thing is though when some schizo snaggletooth with 50 cats takes those posts as a call to action and tries to harm a scrote irl the investigation might lead back to lc and then we get rep for
femcel discourse and taken down. It wouldn't be fair, of course. But that is what would happen.
No. 91092
>>91071>>91074>>91082Uh oh time to ban and arrest all the luigifags since they say this shit regularly (and yet they mysteriously rarely get banned kek). Ban and arrest half the posters in the male bodies thread as well, that's where
>>91025 posts in that cap come from
>>91087School shooters and other killers constantly post their plans on 4chins yet their site is still up
No. 91094
File: 1740785523583.jpeg (421.69 KB, 828x934, IMG_7984.jpeg)
the absolute state of the amerifag thread.
we should ban all politisperging before autists like these ruin the whole board
No. 91103
File: 1740789825963.jpeg (570.16 KB, 828x1288, IMG_7987.jpeg)
>>91102they both got banned. hilarious how the putinfag is also the same "shitbull" obsessed retard who should have caught a personalityfag permaban ages ago.
No. 91104
>>91100You're so right. It's obvious that they're all Russian agents.
>>91101Nothing in that screenshot is /pol/ tier nor is it in support of MAGA.
No. 91107
A bunch of trolls here:
>>>/ot/2382949 . I think they want to make posters from there look bad.
No. 91117
File: 1740848349716.jpg (167.19 KB, 1002x621, 1000004461.jpg)
Tradfag retard in unpopular opinions again
No. 91121
>>91114moralfags and aantifujo spergs are a plague on this site.
if someone posts yaoi you can just hide the pic or report it but there's no escaping all the unprompted sperging about how foojos burned their crops and poisoned theeir well or whatever
in general people who moralfag add nothing to this board. if you thrive on outrage and callouts, go back to tumblr
No. 91122
>>>/ot/2423171Can moderators do their job for a minute? The Mundane Shit thread has once again been hijacked by retards that want to turn it into a chatroom.
The OP has been changed, yet again, to include "random thoughts" even though the thread was never about that.
Start banning anons for posting off-topic shit in that thread. Chatroom threads kill the board.
No. 91149
>>90845Came here just now to express a similar sentiment. Moid posters are ruining this site and there's literally nothing we can do. The /ot/ rules even have this condescending, chiding admonishment that "not everyone who disagrees with you is a man!" Which 100% feels like it was written by a man.
Also, a lot of nonas assume that moids are expressly banned from posting here, and it's actually so fucking disappointing that they're not:
>Rule 4 subpoint 3: Any posters with a phallus, do not come here for validation or to announce yourselves.This rule needs to be changed to
>Any posters with a phallus, do not come here No. 91153
File: 1740981488567.png (467.48 KB, 1030x698, kiwifarms example 1.png)
>>91151>We can't prevent them from coming here.This is the biggest hurdle, and there's no way that it would be possible to prevent it. A lot of anons seem to think that this IB is 100% female with only a few random males showing up every now and again, and only ever to bait or stir shit. This isn't the reality. Just a cursory glance at certain threads and one can identify them as male-dominated. You can go on KF and find lots of moids discussing how they regularly use LC to keep track of certain cows, or their tips and tricks for blending in.
Maybe a more shocking example that might wake some anons up: check out this 50 year old gay scrote posting in PT's thread last year:
>>>/pt/928021>>>/pt/928029How in the world does some random gay boomer know about LC? Let alone PT? I don't think that he is an anomaly. If one gay boomer is using this site, then there is more than just him, and there a lot more younger ones too. Homosexual males are particularly attracted to gossip, so it's logical that many of them would be aware of this IB and be active users too.
Besides that, the newfag flood post-pandemic had brought in a lot of younger women that are incapable of gatekeeping. Just imagine: a 18 year old woman just found out about this place, she's only interested in one singular thread - perhaps of a cow that she's been following on Reddit; she immediately texts her gay friend and says "OMG! Look what I found," knowing that he'd be interested in their shared gossip subject, and she sends him the link. That faggot clicks on it, and now we have yet another gay moid user.
At best there's a 80/20 ratio of women to men, a more likely ratio is 60/40, and maybe at worst it would be 40/60. Moids are more present than a lot of anons would like to admit. This isn't really an issue on the gossip boards, since really everyone is there to discuss cows and snowflakes: but, it becomes a bigger issue on the off-topic boards, and especially on threads relating to female-only experiences or sexuality. For example, how many anons know that KF users go into the Fetishes You're Ashamed Of Thread to screencap posts and share them on KF? Would those anons be comfortable posting if they knew that thousands of moids would have the chance to not only see them, but to laugh at them too? You can see an example of that in the attached image. Lately, there's been a lot of posts uploaded to KF of the cringe happening in the Luigi thread on /g/, which is funny considering that a lot of more experienced anons have pointed out that that thread attracted both newfags and unwanted attention to the site. A lot of LC threads have been archived in their entirety on KF, some by regular LC users, since there is more of an overlap of KF and LC users than many would rather deny.
Anons that have deluded themselves into believing that only other women see their posts or reply to them feel more comfortable to share intimate details about themselves, or to say things that they otherwise wouldn't when around moids. I feel bad for these anons, but at least they're still shielded by anonymity.
It's also why the recent perception that LC is a "
femcel" site, or even a radfem site, is such a laughable concept. We don't even know if the majority of anons are women or men! We have no way of knowing! We never will. I wish that this IB was female-only, and that we had a way of detecting a moid from 6 feet away, and that only women could post and view posts here, but that's just never going to happen. It's why I don't treat LC as a female-only IB - I treat it as an IB that's female-centric, or at least male-minority.
>It's not really a "safe space"This is what a lot of anons need to get through their skulls, for their own sake. It was never a safe space and it never will be.
No. 91157
>>91156>I don't really get why scrotefoiling was banned.I'm tired so I'm not explaining it good, but:
The explicit reasoning was: "if you think a poster is a male, report it" and that "most reports we [mods] receive regarding this aren't viable."
The implicit reason is that the new moderators are incapable of determining whether or not some is a male. They can't do this because they are very inexperienced and they aren't familiar with the site culture as it was pre-2021. For the majority of experienced users, it's very easy to tell when a post was authored by a male, but for these moderators it's next to impossible. Since they very rarely ban potential male posters, it enables males to post more.
No. 91160
>>91156men posting here are either trying to blend in or are looking for attention. they're sad attention whores and they know that this is the closest they'll ever be to the proximity of women and the closest they'll ever get to attention from a woman. if you suspect someone is a male, you report it, why would you feed the retards?
calling someone a male poster doesn't contribute to any discussion, you report and ignore if you really think they're a man. also it gets in the way of discussion because for some reason, people on these boards automatically assume that if someone disagrees with them on specific topics then they must be a male, which is pretty retarded. we all have different opinions and are bound to disagree on things. it's annoying seeing scrotefoiling because it accomplishes nothing, imo. infighting doesn't accomplish anything either, it shits up threads. if i wanted to watch a slapfight i would unhide unpopular opinions
No. 91166
>>91161>Scrotefoiling was used as an insult during infights to the point that it lost all meaning.Yeah i got called a scrote for posting an unconventional attraction. it was in an unconventional attraction thread, mind you.
I've seen other anons get called male just for having a different opinion in a thread on the dumbest shit, not even political.
nonas do weaponize scrotefoiling at times
No. 91168
File: 1741024114599.gif (3.18 MB, 275x215, retribution.gif)
>>91161>scrotefoiling was used as an insult during infights to the point that it lost all meaning.yeah exactly, it has no meaning if used against a woman. who’s going to get a bruised ego over being called a scrote anonymously? trannies.
No. 91173
File: 1741025751265.png (27.61 KB, 371x229, 3409583454.png)
>>91171>wasn’t any of the other anons in that discussion but, please, keep sucking assok nona but, please, keep weirdly double posting then deleting your shit like a sped
No. 91178
>>91153I remember a couple of years back on the Kibbe body types thread in /g/ some anons posted their full body pics to get feedback from others on what their Kibbe type is, then moids from KF screenshotted them to make fun of nona's bodies on the moid farms (you just know the people who reposted the pics there were obese neckbeards too).
Moids walk among us and they're screenshotting our posts to laugh at with other loser moids on the scrote farms. Be careful what you post.
No. 91180
>>91153banning obvious kiwi favorites like cunt, whore, and roastie would be a good start. don't forget about how these men try to cloak themselves by pretending to be lesbians, which is hysterical and just so statistically unlikely. only 30% of women use online discussion boards, and lesbianism occurs only at about 1% frequency in women. so it's already a low chance that you are talking to a woman, and an even lower chance that you are talking to a lesbian woman. it is very, very unlikely that the onerous moid opinions anyone comes across online is coming from the new boogeyman, the bitter lesbian. if it talks like a moid, thinks like a moid, and smells like a moid, it is most in all likelihood a moid. gay and straight men cannot help themselves from trying to mold a space's culture to suit their preferences, even if that means destroying what attracted them to the space in the first place. if someone is complaining about things men despise, like fujoshis, yumes, radical feminism and the ugly man psyop, while trying to press for increasing things they like such as the possibility of the mythical good tranny, endless nitpicking of the female body, straight up dick pics, and shota. it is a scrote.
No. 91186
>>91178Who even cares. Moids are losers, what else is new.
>>91185Infighting is gay, learn2banter
No. 91193
>>91180>if someone is complaining about things men despise, like fujoshis, yumes, radical feminism and the ugly man psyopThis is why scrotefoiling needs to remain banned
>don't care about anime porn?Moid
>don't care about radical feminism on a lolcow website?Moid
>don't care for a thread that's newfag central?Moid
This is mental illness. Not every woman is going to care about or want to discuss the exact same shit as you. The bar for what makes someone a moid is buried in the ground.
No. 91195
>>91187Nta but I was thinking this as well but too scared to say it kek. And they always try to disguise their clutching under "man hate" or make it political in some way but it doesn't seem sincere, like fantasizing about normal, non-weird imaginary missionary sex or offhandedly calling some guy hot isn't setting back women's rights but they try to frame it that way. It's so dumb because oftentimes sexual posts are in the appropriate threads, so they're going out of their way to sit next to the other degenerates and then want to act like they're somehow different and pure. It doesn't help that farmhands also sort of go along with it considering some bans.
Also I suspect there's possibly an overlap with the anons who shit themselves over the word boyfriend
No. 91199
File: 1741073753428.jpeg (Spoiler Image,42.59 KB, 225x225, IMG_1583.jpeg)
>>91198Just for reference, how young are you
No. 91203
>>91202just type
valid. Nobody cares if it's redtexted kek you don't get a ban for it or anything.
No. 91208
>>91204i do kind of get what you're saying but i don't think that's ever going to be changed. in certain contexts, the word is fine, but in other contexts i absolutely get why it became a redtexted word. still, i do find it a little annoying but it's not
that big of a deal. unfortunately it's a versatile word that got ruined by retards. recently i hated how it looked as it broke up one of my longer posts i had wrote out. it was distracting to me but it is what it is. i wrote "
valid criticism" and the way it looked annoyed me, so i deleted the post and re-worded it. i used the thesaurus in my brain to come up with an alternative replacement word. one of my favorite things about the english language is a lot of words and phrases can be replaced by others without losing the meaning very much. i hope this helps. i can get why you're annoyed but this is just a suggestion and might be a way around it for you. realistically i don't think redtexted words are going to be removed, only added and at the end of the day it's not a big deal and can be worked around if you don't like how it looks on your own posts
also major kek at
>>91206 ; this was also another point i was going to make is that admin is MIA and has been for way too long. seemingly there's not that many farmhands either so i don't really think there's going to be much changes to the site for the time being considering there's still no news on the VPN poll or anything about the lolcow awards, not even an update. redtexted words are a bit silly and will be low priority so do your best to work around it if you can.
No. 91211
File: 1741096623160.png (220.8 KB, 1228x1470, valid-alts.png)
>>91204You could use another word if it bothers you. It's not the only
valid choice.
No. 91212
>>91208jfc all this over a redtext word filter. i swear to god it's not that deep.
>>91209the amount of newfags complaining that lolcow won't cater to them personally is concerning
No. 91214
>>91202That "artwork" was made in 2024 lol, SJW still overuse and misuse the word
valid. Oldmin redtexted the word in like 2019.
No. 91220
File: 1741120163202.png (837.45 KB, 1440x1923, Screenshot_20250304_152741.png)
Do the mods have a requirement for being lobotomites? This was clearly a server error, these posts are identical and have no edits.
No. 91226
File: 1741176228794.jpg (1.63 MB, 2079x3307, 1002834001.jpg)
>>91069Late but I'm confused as to why those posts were bannable, but posts like picrel aren't. Genuinely not trying to start shit with luigifags I promise, this is more about the farmhands. I'm just trying to figure out what is/isn't bannable and what the difference is
No. 91234
File: 1741200411110.jpg (194.63 KB, 903x571, 1000023162.jpg)
>mods banning me for a log in the vent thread meanwhile not redtexting literally every other a log in the same vent thread
Boo food thieving mods.
No. 91239
>>9122699% of that thread is the same never-saging schizo talking to themselves
and posting moid-coded rape fantasies
No. 91241
File: 1741205309215.jpg (186.6 KB, 888x1033, 1000008620.jpg)
Reminder I got shit for replying "kys" to a nonnie saying "kill yourself" in another thread and that person got nothing until after I was banned 2 weeks later but this is just fine according to them (also I agree with this nonnies overall point I'm just pointing out the hypocrisy here)
No. 91246
>>91243nta but i think OP's point is that the bans are inconsistent more than anything. like farmhands should either ban all violent posts or none, instead of picking and choosing
>>91245they would have to end up moving the first two threads and the dano threads, driver threads, joost thread, rpatz thread, midskillison thread, jerma thread, and draingang thread too kek
No. 91262
>>91259>>91260Exactly. Why can I shit on Christianity, but not Islam? That's not race bait, there's like 32 different countries practicing it. They're literally killing people here, one almost hit my mom a week ago!! Why am I not allowed to talk about it and how it affects women in our countries? I know this is an America centrist board, so it's hard to explain what we go through in Europe. (There's like two group rapes in Berlin every single day..)
I'm not shitting on brown people ffs, I'm shitting on a religion that believes it's fine if you kill your slave, execute women by stoneing and literally have slave markets to this day..
I'd believe that be relevant to talk about? Especially if they're starting to go after women in my country for Sharia Law, covering up in certain districts, beating women in my country because they tanned top less?
I feel a bit lost and would like a proper explanation. If I'm not allowed to talk about it in "unpopular opinions" for example, where am I allowed to? Especially since it concerns women?
No. 91265
>>91264Thank you, i definitely will. Sometimes I just want to vent and not immediately be accused of racism though, like lol, it's a religion not a race first off, especially if a car almost hit my mom a few days ago.
And I'd like to understand it in general. Either to adhere to the rules, or be able to complain about them. I just find it hypocritical on a message board such as this. Especially when it does concern women very much.
Help me understand, mods. And super irrelevant question, how many of you are from Europe?
No. 91272
>>91267Ayrt, I do get it. It just feels very isolating not being able to talk about a dangerous and restrictive religion and how it impacts us. I was there at a knifing like 8 yrs ago, they almost hit my mom a few days ago.. I'd like to talk about shit like that and how it fucks with us, especially as women in European countries. I understand it's not that big of an issue in the States, but its really becoming one here. I'm sure I'm not the only women that feels lost and isolated, bc you're immediately a Nazi if you say something.. anything. Apparently anywhere. It's lonely and suffocating.
So I'd like to understand what the boundaries here are. What's the line I shouldn't cross? How much am I allowed to share?
No. 91278
Re: the mod post in the Mundane Shit thread,
>>>/ot/2431383You guys don't even do anything to moderate the thread though. I report so many posts and they're never banned.
>>91275Try clearing your cache, I think it resets the flood detection timer. It's really annoying.
No. 91294
File: 1741380695332.jpeg (370.36 KB, 1179x950, 1741367034627.jpeg)
To no one's surprise, the luigi containment is attracting underaged twitterfags. Just nuke that handmaiden thread already.
No. 91309
>>91306Clear proof they’re underaged twitter fags. Being a porn addict is a cute quirky feature now.
>>91308Agreed, we don’t need them leaking into other boards and threads.
No. 91315
File: 1741415991399.jpg (211.62 KB, 1471x2221, 1000022402.jpg)
>>91314Keking at how half the posts there devolved into
>u fat!>no U FAT! No. 91322
File: 1741420906786.jpg (43.5 KB, 586x577, 103466b427b6de7b2c49ceee5d5e01…)
the animal gore has been there for like 20 minutes now what the fuck mods
No. 91327
File: 1741421991480.png (115.46 KB, 275x269, 1643241356297.png)
Love that Jannies are basically sending the message that if you figure out when they're asleep, you can break the rules at that time with impunity. A+ moderation
No. 91330
File: 1741422218031.png (138.83 KB, 902x610, kek.png)
>>91328They also deleted the shota posts but none of the spam left by yuricuck, the jannies are a joke
No. 91340
>>91337Please go to sleep, you have school tomorrow
nonnie.
No. 91350
>>91347You sound like one of the retards from years ago that blamed everything on Null. This is nobody's fault except the STAFF'S FAULT. They are the one that needs to be active. They are the ones that leave the site unmoderated for HOURS. They are the ones that enable all this shit.
We are being buried beneath the avalanche of their inadequacy.
No. 91360
File: 1741423551617.jpg (75.35 KB, 680x425, Jannytales.jpg)
>>91328>>91331lmfao she's only deleting a few at a time instead of locking the thread like she should
No. 91361
>>91355Can you actually prove that, though? How can you be certain that they are three discrete, sincere people and not one sperg samefagging, or one sincere person and two baiters, etc.? Yuripedo admitted to spamming the thread, which puts the sincerity of literally all posts in it into question. We don't know how long she and her sped friends were there before they want mask-off.
Fucking ridiculous how fujos have to account for literally every bait post ever involving shota, but yumes get to sperg about how they're totally not the same as selfship autists, and himes get to distinguish themselves from Yuripedo and AGPs. At least be logically consistent. Either everybody has to "account" for their genre's baggage or no one does.
No. 91364
>>91359It says a lot about you that you read
>saying a woman should he rated is scrote rhetoricAnd you extrapolated that into
>Women must be perfect and good at all timesA hit dog hollers. Maybe you should stop telling other women to get raped instead of demanding that anons lower their standards of acceptable behavior.
No. 91370
Post all the milk to
>>>/m/434062 before it gets deleted kek.
No. 91397
File: 1741461430305.webm (505.28 KB, 512x286, 0607800174837741.webm)
>>91334Lmao I got banned for posting this webm. This place is really filled with special snowflake zoomers who report every post they see and retarded newfag mods now huh
No. 91414
File: 1741512844345.png (102.06 KB, 460x430, 2934-02893423.png)
How is this even bait you insufferable shit for brains newfag mods
No. 91420
File: 1741537587779.png (25.37 KB, 1814x221, Screenshot 2025-03-09 121244.p…)
If you want me to learn to delete then actually make it so the spam filter actually lets me repost after 30 seconds instead of edging me for 5-10 minutes. You're so fucking anal over your broken ass website.
No. 91434
if no thread has been posted by tomorrow I'll take the OP and threadpic
>>>/snow/2092127 to create a kaijuno thread in /snow/. posting this for posterity's sake
No. 91438
File: 1741566490756.png (40.75 KB, 1851x163, nullfag.png)
>>91427Nta but Nullfag is an underage girl. Not a man nor bj-chan.
No. 91440
File: 1741566987081.jpeg (1019.98 KB, 960x2000, IMG_1087.jpeg)
Scrotes all over this site finding any excuse to say “women shouldn’t be allowed to vote”. Am I supposed to believe these posts were written by a female?(scrotefoiling)
No. 91461
File: 1741592492264.jpeg (105.79 KB, 1077x296, IMG_9236.jpeg)
Can jannies please just ban the "bpdemon" avatarfag, she seems to be a Luigifag as well so the site is much better off without her
Gonna report her everytime I see her ass from here on out and maybe someone will actually do something
No. 91462
>>91453I'm pretty sure she's gone. That doesn't seem like her typing. It's melodramatic, but it's not her.
Snookifag was also never proven to be other personalityfags if that is who you're thinking of. She just claimed to be
No. 91465
File: 1741593592469.jpeg (828.52 KB, 1051x922, IMG_1088.jpeg)
>>91441
You are a scrote(scrotefoiling)
No. 91474
>>91471You’re right
nonny and that’s why “she” had nothing to say in response. I’m tired of it. Every day it’s
>women who suck dick shouldn’t vote>women who dress slutty at the club are causing us to get raped>women who have slightly unorthodox crushes are the reason men are misogynistI actually hope it is a lurking scrote because if these are women they are the most pathetic and hopeless creatures in the world.
No. 91478
File: 1741618277401.jpg (64.56 KB, 828x752, 1000078825.jpg)
No. 91481
File: 1741620715199.png (305.64 KB, 1825x497, 1333.png)
>>91462>Snookifag was also never proven to be other personalityfags if that is who you're thinking of. She just claimed to beI was referring to the time carreychan got revealed as one of the hair color spergs. But yeah the vent sperg might be someone different
No. 91486
File: 1741632339661.gif (80.82 KB, 220x220, IMG_6633.gif)
Why did all my posts get deleted. Mods.(ban evasion)
No. 91495
>>91467The problem is that misogyny is trickier to define than you might realize. We can all agree that BP schizo and her cockbreath nonsense is misogynistic, but what about the endless nitpicks you see of women's bodies in cow threads? You can't really get rid of
all misogyny here, because unfortunately cow culture is a little misogynistic.
No. 91497
>>91495Again, misogyny isn't calling a cow ugly or a whore. Misogyny is generalized statements like "women shouldn't vote" or literally "I hate women" (literally it's allowed to post this on the BP thread that was allowed to stay open for some reason) or that all straight women/lesbians/white women/mothers/insert some subsection descriptor of women here under the guise of "I hate this specific type of woman!!" but if that specific demographic of women is a large percentage of women, it's like likely that they are larping or concern trolling.
>>91492I was for the scrotefoiling ban at first but I honestly think it was a mistake. That and Pink Pill were the only things making moids too uncomfortable to post here. Now that they are both gone, moids post here freely completely unchallenged. The culture of the site has already changed so drastically from what I remember, this place honestly feels like Kiwifarms
No. 91499
>>91495>>91497Not you faggots are trying to get away with it again. Misogynist dicksuckers are mad. Stop gaslighting us you white whore. We know what and what isnt considered misogyny. You just dont want to admit it because youre a spineless pig.
>this place honestly feels like KiwifarmsThis place is female equivalent of 4chan. If most of the racebait doesnt immediately get deleted, most misogyny posts wont get deleted either.
(USER HAS BEEN PUT OUT TO PASTURE) No. 91510
>>91507>>91509Yes, you are right, and there will be a runoff poll after this one finishes (assuming there isn't a clear majority). We've updated the post to reflect that.
>>91508We will not be deleting any votes, I'm sorry.
No. 91511
>>91510Could you please be able to clarify the impact of clearing cookies and cache?
For example I've used the same IP range to post on LC for years but I clear my cache and cookies after each browser session. Is my vote discarded because my post history is not attached to a cookie?
If it is discarded, it's not a problem. I appreciate the effort that went into creating the poll and it's unreasonable to expect the poll to account for the browsing habits of every single anon.
No. 91514
File: 1741703190201.png (793.23 KB, 1080x719, It Is Already Too Late.png)
>>91510I Cannot Be Won Over By A Measly Poll. Get In Here And Answer For Your Crimes. This Cowardice Will Not Be Forgiven.
No. 91521
>>91519Just read the OP
>If you have already voted, submitting again will not count your vote, but you will be able to see an up to date count of the results. You can only submit the form once per minute in order to prevent abuse.With this state of reading comprehension I don't know how these anons are able to vote in their countries' elctions.
No. 91523
File: 1741717329520.jpg (409.19 KB, 1080x1559, IMG_20250311_192118.jpg)
>>91507That's a good idea, it seems like there's a drift from the beginning of the voting.
>>91522Maybe they have a way to filter votes if there's no post history?
No. 91528
>>91523I didn’t take that into consideration, that could be true!
>>91524>>91525I refreshed my page and it gives me the ability to hit the vote buttons but I haven’t tried to, I didn’t even have to put on a VPN or change my wifi
No. 91537
File: 1741739035124.gif (535.09 KB, 487x498, luluco.gif)
>>91514Nonnies really posting mass shooter pics over a VPN poll…
No. 91545
File: 1741742167361.jpg (10.86 KB, 250x202, tails gets trolled.jpg)
i wonder if fujo discussion would eventually become a banned topic like kpoop due to the amount of shit flinging it causes. imo its would be sort of unfair if it gets the ban but hime/yume gets a pass but i also hate being associated with infight hungry tards who only exist to make a bad name for fujos and im sick of seeing yaoi outside containment and wouldnt mind the ban migrating the lc only userbase to use fc more.
that makes me wonder why lc fujos prefer to use lolcow for fujo discussion rather than fc
No. 91554
File: 1741798609683.jpg (1.5 MB, 2000x1335, 1728378087235.jpg)
>>91537you arent worthy to know the legend of the fagmin
No. 91567
>>91537why are people so
triggered over this comment, why are people so mad over the vpn ban like seriously get a life
No. 91568
>>91567?? none of the replies are
triggered or mad about anything, it's just silly to pearl clutch over a joke post/meme. i don't think the anon who posted the pic was genuinely upset kek
No. 91571
File: 1741844348365.jpeg (644.21 KB, 1147x1351, IMG_1134.jpeg)
Scrote in unpopular opinions
No. 91589
File: 1741933228550.jpeg (51.55 KB, 736x724, IMG_6656.jpeg)
No. 91590
>>91588i think some of them also legitimately don't know what the word conventional means and believe that some uggo having hundreds of tumblr fans or just believing "but
I personally think hes conventional to
me" equals actually being conventional
some of them are from that pirate imageboard too just fyi No. 91599
>>91592women are born with brains anon, theyre not retarded, so we are capable of full autonomy like deciding which guy to be with. does this take away how shitty guys are? no, some women have shit taste in men and cant keep crying
victim. there are too many cows that fit this profile while at the same time being terrible human beings. they need to stop dating and focus on themselves and grow tf up.
No. 91617
File: 1742086067617.jpg (13.54 KB, 247x264, 1531703320128.jpg)
>>91616and the sky is blue, and men can't be women. what is your point or do you just say obvious things
No. 91621
File: 1742094266092.jpg (378.46 KB, 1589x928, 1000023298.jpg)
>>91609>This is an imageboard made for people to respond to eachother.apparently not
No. 91622
>>91621Being this obtuse is annoying. All the post in that picture are off-topic posts made in Mundane Shit. It's not a thread for sharing pictures of Animal Crossing, it's not for saying "hello" or "hi," it's not for chatting, it's for recapping shit that happens to you in your life. It's been that way for years, until you newfaggots showed up and tried to change it to fit your standards because you find it so impossible to integrate. I have no idea why you lot struggle so much with understanding thread topics and have such hissy fits when you're reminded of thread topics.
>>91617>do you just say obvious thingsIf it's so obvious, then why do you still act confused about it? The focus of this site is on LOLCOWS. It is in the name. This IB isn't one big Discord server for you to chat with your friends. It's a place to laugh at lolcows.
>>91609Lurk more and figure out the definition of a chatroom thread on your own instead of reeing about it. It's pretty self-explanatory.
>>91614A lot of us do advocate for that. It would get rid of a lot of trash.
No. 91629
>>91622I've been here longer than you and it's funny you say that because the muh chatroon complaint/excuse is fairly recent. If you want to read wall of texts talking to oneself, you might as well just go to twitter and start a thread there. As much as I personally hate Unpopular Opinions, it's not a "chatroom" in any way.
>>91612Like the other nonna said, if your beef is with off-topic boards then just say it instead of pretending it's individual post/threads that bother you or pretending you care about the quality of a board you want gone.
No. 91633
>>91625>sets off my newfag/bad actor alarms hard.>>91629>I've been here longer than youwhy do newfags always have to bring up newfags? kek
>>91632"kiwitards" is a scapegoat because anons dont wanna admit that the off topic anons are the problem
No. 91636
>>91632>proceeds to go on about kiwifarms like the regular it isYou're just proving me right kek. Go back.
>>91634Explain how Unpopular Opinions is a chatroom thread. It's you who sperges out because nonnas dare to talk about non-cow topics.
No. 91639
>>91638nowhere does that imply that unpopular opinions is a chatroom thread unless you're being a pedantic eslfag kek
also you realize that most farmers have a kf account or lurk kf, right?
No. 91640
>>91639>into the other chatrooms>other chatroomsYes it does. But I'm glad you or that anon agrees they has been retarded with their definition of what a chatroom thread is(everything I don't like).
>also you realize that most farmers have a kf account or lurk kf, right?God I wish oldmin would've kept banning you fags on sight. No one wants you here, stay on your autistic moid infested shithole and leave lolcow alone.
No. 91641
>>91640the seethe is crazy… kf and lc are basically the same thing kek there's a reason why so much milk gets cross posted
>still doesnt know what a chatroom thread is/ot/ was such a mistake i cant wait until the vpn ban nukes its activity
No. 91651
File: 1742166377177.png (162.48 KB, 1503x326, 1732492058688.png)
>>91646>hmm, haven't really caused any problem beyond-Their moids constantly come here to shit up the place and bait. Can't believe anons are defending this shit
No. 91678
Looks like the farmhands have had to be professional tard wranglers today. I can’t wait for the VPN ban.
>>91676There’s already a car thread. You can ask advice here
>>>/ot/1949168 No. 91689
Turn the VPN ban on for the Things You Hate thread to counter the non-stop ban evasion. Either that or sit in there and do your moderation task. The former is easier for you than the latter.
>>91688>What are female KFers doingActively archiving the site in case of an unexpected deletion. Ironically farmers that use KF are better farmers than anons that shit on KF.
No. 91696
File: 1742262066411.jpg (77.92 KB, 1254x298, dfaww4r4asds.jpg)
>>91651more moid tourists directing men here to colonize. we need to lift the scrotefoiling bans until we figure out what's going on
No. 91700
>>91688The goalpost keeps shifting kek. You asked for behavior that farmers don't do, which is already dishonest in the first place (you can use the same premise on twitterfags and 4channers, both are still cancer but at least these aren't as vocally urging to change our website so it's more like their shitholes). And no, it's not just kiwifag moids either. Again if you'd have been here longer than a year then you'd know.
>>91689I shit on kiwifarms and I do this too. I also guarantee most of us would rather have an actual farmer share a backup than someone from kiwifarms.
No. 91703
>>91702Yeah I was gonna say I fled here from 4chan. Sure, there's some petty gossip here, but that is the entire internet. At least they don't allow constant race sperging and infighting. I find this place to be a perfect middle ground between the totalitarian chronic censorship that is plebbit and the psychotic gore and pedo infested nazi shithole that is 4chan.
Ironically both those sites cape for trannies.
No. 91712
>>91711NTA but anon said "usually". Because it's true. Personalityfags, scrotes, and severe bait are USUALLY deleted outright, and many times it is a scrote.
Why even bother coming to /meta/ if you just want to infight kek
No. 91718
File: 1742314347892.jpeg (668.71 KB, 1170x1398, IMG_9982.jpeg)
Why did this get banned for cowtipping?? This is literally a screenshot from the retard who doxxed her’s page? Also sorry for phonefagging I’m just passing time lol
No. 91720
File: 1742320705171.png (330.31 KB, 1473x858, whatthefuck.png)
>>91719Samefag - what THE FUCK are these bans? "Wrong thread"? That's the wrong ENTIRE WEBSITE. Unsaged? Ban evasion? Are jannies just straight-up right-wing moids now?
No. 91724
>>91710this isn't true. they're been straight-up deleting posts for more than a year now with very tenuous reasons why. Sometimes they claim the poster was ban-evading. Sometimes it's some other reason. But no, not all deleted posts were male posts.
Posts got deleted in the "good moid" thread. Other normal anons have had posts deleted. I am not one of those anons, before someone accuses me of that. I personally think that deleting posts for non-transparent reasons is not good for lolcow. I also don't think ban evaders should have their posts deleted as a rule unless they are spamming or in extreme cases. At the very least, the admins should make a general statement in the rules about what kinds of posts might get deleted. That would be more transparent than the current way of operating.
No. 91728
can a mod pls delete this post >>2100301 in the snow post-left thread i posted it in the wrong one by accident and when i refreshed to delete it didnt show up. then saw it hours later
>>91721nta it's not letting me delete mine after an hour. the anon ayrt is talking about has been shitting up that thread for months, some shit should get deleted
No. 91733
>>91723I'm not responding, fuckwit, but even if they get no responses they're still around and shitting up the thread
>>91727>ha ha trolled xdd>wahmen cant take responsibility kekk xddI see you found your way to /meta/, retard
No. 91735
>>91719We ban and delete scrote posts (unless there is a good reason to keep said post, which is rare). If they are banned but not deleted, it is not a scrote. There are a lot of women with different political views on here and often type in moidspeak. Don't assume who you're arguing with is automatically a scrote just because of those view points.
And always, REPORT AND MOVE ON. Do not give any of these people attention, it's what they want and you are being part of the problem by responding to them instead of just reporting and ignoring them.
No. 91738
>>91703>At least they don't allow constant race sperging and infighting.Oh you sweet summer child. The moderation for that thing has been all over the place here, some times its allowed some times its not.
>>91705Yeah no. Men are the biggest bitches and outdo women in all those fields especially cattiness, let not fall for the moid propaganda now.
No. 91742
>>91741They been
rightfully disliked for years, it's nothing new
No. 91750
>>91749Yeah. I think admin wants a VPN ban no matter what, so they're gently rigging the poll.
It doesn't matter, this is admin's site and we're all just living on it. But it still sucks to see.
No. 91758
>>91755There is no scenario in which a total no ban option would be feasible for this site. You're just admitting you want the admin team to have no way to deal with ban evaders, and for the site to continue being plagued by rule breaking retards
>>91756It wasn't implemented in the best way. The first poll should have said "Do you want a VPN ban? Yes/No" and the runoff should have been how to implement it but I wouldn't say it wasn't democratic, the majority still voted for some form of VPN ban
No. 91769
File: 1742415826946.png (266.47 KB, 650x902, nard.png)
See? I told you that the VPN poll is a sham and the admin will ban them no matter what the results would be. I was right. You're all being played for fools.
No. 91773
>>91766Because they own and run LC. Cerbmin pays for the hosting and the farmhands moderate the site in their free time.
>>91767Obviously I don't agree with all decisions made regarding the site. I've taken some weird and retarded bans over the years for example. However it's possible to disagree with someone while still having respect for them. It's not like the site staff ban anyone for posting criticism, /meta/ is an entire board for exactly that. Even if LC moderation is far from perfect, it's still one of the better moderated image boards I've posted on.
No. 91774
Could farmhands please ban me for one second (2 hours) so I can directly ask what
>>91745 was talking to you about because I'm nosy?Thanks
(as requested) No. 91786
File: 1742427426021.png (25.09 KB, 1283x255, 0027.png)
This person is clearly ban-evading. Jfc I can't wait until the VPN ban is implemented.
No. 91798
File: 1742435463402.jpg (137.05 KB, 718x565, 1742429433892.jpg)
>>91796Basically an extremely edgy version of picrelated but with zeno
>>>/g/508386 No. 91817
>>91800>the users are NEETs and too easily offendedYou hit the nail on the head. This retard
>>91815Can’t even handle someone talking about hyenas. At this point needs humane euthanasia.
No. 91829
File: 1742484060473.png (180.3 KB, 1206x620, elon compares himself to tolki…)
>>91828Samefag, thanks for banning the phenotype sperg. Sorry for lashing out, I know farmhands are just offline sometimes kek. To add context that might be relevant for farmhands to be aware of, many white nationalists types have split with Elon after the H1B visa drama, and so /pol/tards are now accusing him of being a “mutt,” “Jew,” “mongoloid,” “African,” ect to cope. Meanwhile, Elon still tries his hardest to pander to them (which is milky as hell). Elon comes from a famous family, so it’s easy to actually look into these claims and realize they’re just straight up schizo or alt right coping. Elon is proud of the fact that he’s English rather than Afrikaner (Dutch) because he sees Afrikaners more South African in culture. He’s even compared himself to J.R.R. Tolkien (picrel). It’s hilarious how much he cares about being non-African, but unfortunately we can’t make fun of him in the thread with tourists shitting it up constantly. I didn’t want to post this info there to encourage them more.
No. 91830
File: 1742488177718.png (56.35 KB, 807x290, img-2025-03-20-16-28-53.png)
>>91829Anon, British people use "mongoloid" as a synonym for "retard" (I think because people with Down's have monolids?). They weren't making a comment about his race.
No. 91831
File: 1742488851443.png (179.49 KB, 1095x512, uh….png)
>>91830>British people use "mongoloid" as a synonym for "retard"Didn’t know this, so thanks for the insight into bongspeak. I am a burger.
>They weren't making a comment about his race.Definition of “mongoloid” aside, yes they were explicitly talking about his race. The race tinfoiling has been going on for days, so I’m not sure why you’re denying what was plainly said.
No. 91837
File: 1742525305580.png (423.89 KB, 631x637, 5574150.png)
>>91836Ugh, I'm sorry for participating in this infight, farmhands. If you ban me, please make it mercifully short.
No. 91854
File: 1742613948265.jpg (36.62 KB, 909x230, huh.jpg)
I just think the moderation is not consistent on this site which is why some people do end up breaking rules through no fault of their own. Neither of the posts linked were redtexted and only one AFTER I got this redtext defending my original post. A lot of the posts in that thread are like that and not marked as bait? Its all so confusing.
No. 91855
File: 1742628105962.png (155.49 KB, 969x435, 1000033927.png)
Can these tifs be banned of the site pls, jfc
No. 91858
File: 1742649661299.jpg (29.84 KB, 500x500, 1000000579.jpg)
>>91855I don't even know what this conversation is from but stereroid usage isn't the same as transitioning. This is what a woman in anvar looks like and this isn't even the must subtle case. Stereroids aren't just for test.
If the anon you're replying to is saying women should take it simply to be more masculine, then I agree with you.
No. 91859
File: 1742650091523.png (438.86 KB, 798x1427, 1000045936.png)
So, sarcasm is being banned, too? Seriously, why ban someone for this post?
No. 91861
File: 1742651994223.png (112 KB, 1190x496, IMG_1542.png)
talking about jill's stoner behavior is not fucking derailing.
No. 91874
>>91871Even if there is a single mod dedicated to the thread, "that" mod deletes the /pol/ and scrote posts. I don't expect them to be active 24/7, especially on a Saturday.
>>91872I made the first post in that thread saying I liked the threadpic and thanks for making a new thread. I did not recognize threadpic was the jewface /pol/ meme. In fact, nobody did for a while because it was brought up for the first time 2 days ago. It was subsequently reported and op was banned. We all thought it was an ironic "aesthetic" jfk joke.
inb4 bootlicking accusations, I'm a VPN user. I'm not happy with all decisions admin/jannies make, but I don't see a point in lying about the effort they put into the site. And I think bringing up when they do a good job keeps the narrative straight. No. 91887
Just a heads up, there is some fuckery going on in Elaine's threads. This one
>>>/snow/1360109 was bumped with no post. There is a suspicious amount of WKing in this one
>>>/snow/1567357 No. 91890
Can you lock
>>>/ot/2458694 ? It's a duplicate thread made 15 minutes after the other.
No. 91897
>>91896whoever originally posted them is the one who blurred it out. not necessarily anon, but the reddit mods didn't blur them, they are screencaps blurred with a phone edit tool. do you understand? someone saw them and saved them before they were deleted and
that person blurred it out.
No. 91899
File: 1742814055602.png (59.42 KB, 757x562, crippinganxiety.png)
>>91898The mod claims she doesn't want to support Venus attention seeking and claims she was being racist and said nigger which is annoying because this is the first update we've gotten from Venus in months and the reaction is to just ban her?
No. 91900
>>91899To be fair…not to whiteknight the reddit mods but they are right.
Venus would have just started spamming the reddit with porn, death threats and racebait the same way she spammed Twitter and lol cow so I sould understand a little why they banned her. Also one of Venus's removed comments on reddit were literally with Venus calling someone the hard N-with a r. Which is a reddit violation. So I can see why the mod doesn't want to risk it.
No. 91914
>>91913my post in question
>>>/snow/2102356 and I only did it because someone talked about Uncle Fester and someone else said it should be a threadpic but I guess mods don't allow fun thread pics anymore
No. 91925
File: 1742970666137.jpeg (642.5 KB, 998x1240, IMG_1413.jpeg)
Admin let’s baiting misogynist scrotes shit up unpopular opinions but bans us for calling a spade a spade
No. 91926
>>91925I can easily believe that's a self hating woman. It's hard to articulate but there are certain verbal tells of male larpers and it doesn't come across that way.
It is functionally bait regardless, it deserves to be reported for that reason instead.