>>175848>>175829It's cool,
nonny. I've been into field recordings for a while, and I really like folk/electronica/baroque pop. Basically folkish baroque pop tinged with electronica (or perhaps the opposite?)
>>175842Thank you,
nonny! I'd really like to learn theory as well. Going to go autodidcat on that one, I really don't like the haughty attitude
>>175843
>so when i read discussion from music producers online its like we're from completely separate worldsOh, same. It's why I like self-sufficient artists, after all. They had to learn everything on their own. I'm still an earnest novice and I've always come upon this attitude from second or third gen musicians or people who are classically trained that is very arrogant and very nose-up-in-the-air, which sucks because I've always wanted to learn and be technical. As I grew up and started realizing how much Money is important (esp when it comes to something like music), I started noticing there's this division of "lower form", very stitched-by-the-hands art, and then these well-off kids who've been learning everything from the hands of the master since age 5 or something. Kind of like the division between embroidery and doll-making, and other "higher" forms of art that are considered more "legitimate."
Anyway, I'm learning FL Studio as well, and looking to buy a synth. Just to get a small workstation going. I've been getting the itch to record something recently but I find myself putting it off because of my non-technical peasant status. There's this band I listen to, and the frontman is hesitant with calling himself a musician since he has no formal training and he just sings/screams, and when the interviewer asked him how he communicates with band members he kept saying, "I say stuff like I need that part to be not so limp dick" – and that's the level I'd be at right now.