File: 1713533795384.gif (982.02 KB, 256x256, IMG_0054.gif)
No. 75576
File: 1713565527147.jpg (293.07 KB, 968x759, 1000002775.jpg)
it really feels like you can get banned for anything. posting a meme in a relevant thread? ban. being a little silly? ban. pointing out how dissolving the dumbass shit thread has lowered the quality of posting site-wide because there is no longer a containment thread for dumbassery? b-
No. 75581
>>75579>these supposed oldfags act like this isn't the case even for the more mundane postt. confirmed newfag
>>75578nta but it was fucking bulbapedia. imagine someone links to a wikipedia article and gets banned for not taking a screenshot of it first, because that's exactly what happened to that anon. it was a retarded ban, simple as. did someone tell you you'd get offered mod privs one day if you bootlick hard enough?
we screencap things that cows can delete. not the sex ratios of over 1000 pokemon on the biggest pokemon wiki there is. this is insane.
No. 75582
>>75581Second ayrt, like I literally said in my post, sometimes farmhands do give out unreasonable imageboard bans and I agree that the Bulbapedia one was one of them. That anons post was not solely about that specific incident, it was giving a (bad) suggestion.
>imagine someone links to a wikipedia article and gets banned for not taking a screenshot of it firstThis just depends on the post. I feel like this is common sense, but you don't have to screenshot an entire page. If there's a specific part that's relevant to the post, then yeah it should be screenshotted. Afaik for the Bulbapedia post, anon wasn't referencing a specific thing that was said in the article but something she just observed from reading.
>did someone tell you you'd get offered mod privs one day if you bootlick hard enough?I probably criticize and complain about the admin and jannies in /meta/ more than the average anon, but sure lol.
No. 75583
some vendettafag is trying to remake a thread that was locked months ago
>>>/snow/1987088old, locked thread
>>>/snow/1954761 No. 75586
>>75584I don't think that you guys get that this site isn't meant to coddle you or spoon-feed everything to you. You either learn how to do certain things as a part of integrating, or you don't and get banned.
Also, "this is an imageboard" bans probably aren't that long. Likely no more than a few hours. You guys need to stop taking short bans personal rather than just a correction.
No. 75590
>>75588Im not complaining. Anon(s) can post, I just think it's a bad suggestion.
>has been whiteknighting the mods for several days Wtf are you talking about kek. The past few hours have been the first time I commented on this and I said in two different posts (>>75582
>>75578) that they sometimes give out wrong bans, including the bulbapedia one. The OP was not even specifically about the Bulbapedia post. This board really is schizo central.
No. 75608
>>75597Yes… they’re external websites, and you embed the images they host on this imageboard. They’d just extend this functionality to embed other websites. Nice try.
>>75602They couldn’t even figure out a way to archive chats. It is for this reason I believe we don’t have a troon admin team.
No. 75614
>>75611Embedding images from a link doesn't even make sense. The whole point on posting caps is to specifically screenshot want you want to show (plus archiving for cows) other anons. How will the site know specifically which part of the website to screenshot and then embed onto the post?
Again, every other year before this no one had a problem posting caps. I don't get why it's suddenly an issue now. It's like you guys are spinning a wheel to find things to complain about.
No. 75615
>>75613Idk the same way anyone capping a link probably just caps the first page they link to? Plus embedding wouldn’t take away the ability to screenshot a specific area of the screen and upload it. It would just make it easier. And from a user perspective it’s like staff are finding things to ban people for when they could be automated. It makes sense when it’s a snapchat that a cow could delete, not so much when it’s a Wikipedia link that’s not going anywhere.
>>75612You said “this is an imageboard” and I asked what other imageboards stipulate this as a rule. Apparently none do so it being an IB clearly has nothing to do with it.
No. 75619
File: 1713591751402.png (310.25 KB, 734x742, 1000024453.png)
Never saw a ban page so no idea if my ban is over or what. Not using vpn or mobile data either. I posted media and an opinion (picrel and
>>>/w/325219). It's not nitpicking to say a dog actively trying to remove a tight hat doesn't look comfortable. And pretty low blow too with your toady or sockpuppet talking about how "if you had ever had a dog, you'd know they actually love having tight elastic hats shoved on their heads" Yeah fuck you, one of my most recent long posts was about grieving my dead dog. I've posted many times about my dog from this location/ip, which is where I cared for her during her final months. I don't go into that thread to ree about dogs, unlike the dog sperg, who usually never gets banned. So I find it suspicious how targeted the red text and retarded replies were. Save your mockery and calling me crazy, I don't care and it's not the first time an anon has had suspicions like I'm having. I brought it to /meta/ and I'm done now.
Meanwhile we have wks in the thread gushing over how Taylor is too pretty and too perfectly shaped to wear some designer's clothes:
>>>/w/325231 Can the mods actually mod instead of banning everything that doesn't fawn over the cow? She chose the designer and liked what she wore (I also liked it fwiw), why is it not "nitpicking" to shit all over the designer then?
No. 75623
>>75619I always try to be supportive of our mod team but yeah, that /w farmhand is really weird and Cerbmin should investigate them a little bit (and take a look at the obsessed WKs post history too)
There's one or two anons abusing the report system, marking every post as nitpicking and then they come cry here in /meta (the only reason I know about them since I don't read that thread) and the farmhand just goes along with it.
The way they're caping for her ugly scrotoid is especially weird to me.
Like, imagine the same redtexts anywhere else on the site :
> Noooo! You can't make fun of a cow's boyfriend ! You're so mean and this is not ok ! Lurch is not that ugly and he doesn't look like a corpse!!1 No. 75624
File: 1713608312269.png (7.83 KB, 570x111, image.png)
This anon should have said where she got this from, but is there really no place for rumors here anymore? There's been countless instances over the years where someone claiming to know a cow came here to leak info without screenshots or share private information that turned out to be true. If every update requires a screenshot regardless of whether that's even feasible then people will stop coming here to share dirt on cows they know and the only type of new content will be whatever the cows post on social media.
No. 75627
>>75619tl;dr
where are all you entitled newfags coming from? sucks to be your dog but that doesn't mean this wasn't sperging. Animal sperging derails things quickly, that's why they ban it.
No. 75629
>>75625I made the thread and I'm not sure either why I was banned (it has now expired, so whatever. I didn't even notice until today lol). I don't remember there being a rule forbidding creating new threads until X number of posts are left in the old one or something, so who knows. Do enlighten me if there
is such a rule.
>wks thought the old one was finished and started shitting up the nextMay be this is why?
No. 75631
>>75630just report them for derailing if it's not relevant to the thread.
jfc i can't believe we're circling back to the 00s where you had to warn "boy x boy content!!1!" or else people would throw a fit.
this is an imageboard for weeb women, of course there's going to bhe fujos. why should hetero shippers get precendence?
No. 75638
>>75623Isn't
>>75619 the one being in meta?
No. 75675
is it just me or is the strike witches spammer
>>>/ot/1966995>>>/ot/1968317>>>/ot/1973013>>>/ot/1973024acting very similar to rancefag
No. 75683
>>75679>would you be like UMMMM POST PROOFyes. I was one of the anons shitting on the retard who banned that person in the /m/ pokemon thread earlier but this is a situation where that rule is actually supposed to be enforced. gossip site =/= shit up threads with your baseless rumors.
>>75681>if someone just said this to you verballythen no one gives a fuck or has any reason to believe you, end of story.
No. 75689
File: 1713676597270.jpg (2.07 MB, 2685x2012, worldsshittiestcapcollage.jpg)
Can farmhands tard wrangle the Fujocoomer and Fujo vs Antis discourse threads?
There's been an anon claiming to be a lesbian into loli anime, posting racist shit. overall just being an obnoxious personalityfag. Both fujos and antis are flinging shit trying to pin the blame on each other for making them look bad.
No. 75693
>>75691Well, it's a little hard to follow, but she derailed the fuck out of the lesbian thread for days to attention whore and sperg about fujos. She tried to get women to add her on Discord here
>>>/g/363983 and the Vocaroo was here
>>>/g/364094. She also recommended some oneeloli
>>>/g/364750 and then backtracked
>>>/g/364756. People also got upset because she posted a sexual fantasy about "curing a fujo's bisexuality."
>>>/g/363960. There are enough coincidences to make me think this is her, but maybe it's not.
No. 75699
>>75690We don't know if it's the same person. It could be a coincidence, or it could be an elaborate troll who pretends to be her.
I'm still in the camp that the hand poster was a fujo.
No. 75709
>>75623agreed.
>>75627Well, I wasn't banned for "sperging" and also I didn't sperg, I just said I thought the previous Rosie birthdays were better.
>>75643You have no idea who bumps it, pretty sure the WK(s) do so it gets attention from their fav mod. The last time I mentioned a problem with that thread getting bumped,some bootlicker in here insisted it's people testing their bans and that this is a normal thing to do. It's not normal.
No. 75726
>>75714According to the farmhand that banned the baiting fujos in the cringe thread it's like 3 people
>>>/ot/1973705 That was tones of posts, so I assume it's the same for their contributions to the discourse thread. Some anon said they have won a war
>>>/ot/1973502 so I assume a few retards think spamming as many posts as possible = winning some made up fight. Shippingfags are insane.
>>75723The fujos were the ones banned for baiting the cringe thread anon…
No. 75729
>>75728>twisting my words this hardYou and others like you are retarded cows. You're effectively being trolled
because you are retarded cows. You will continue to be trolled until they get bored of you. Best you get back to it now instead of wasting your time trying to spin the narrative to people who don't like either of you. Maybe if you guys can prove to them just how deep your retardation reserves run they'll get bored a little faster.
No. 75739
File: 1713770716842.png (38.43 KB, 727x229, 1000024590.png)
MtF thread:
>>>/snow/1987653 (not my ban)
Seriously? We can no longer use any black humor about TiMs abusing children? Men will abuse anything that moves. wtf how is this "tinfoiling," this nona didn't even specify which stunning brave troon she meant.
No. 75746
>>75736That's not what cowtipping means. Cowtipping is directly interacting with the cow themselves, which in this case would be Scott. Letting
victims know that there's a place they can come to share the experiences they had with a cow in the past isn't tipping, and has been done since the beginning of this site. It was even done in Lori's early threads, with Soni, Scott and others being told about it and they came to spill milk.
>>75743>>75745You are way too passionate about begging for this thread not to be made. To suspicious levels. If the thread ends up shitty, mods will deal with it. But let it be made and see what happens.
No. 75774
>>75763I agree with all of this.
>Fandom threads never should've been left in ot and moved to m.Remember when the kpop critical threads were on m? Why is anime fandom discussion different?
No. 75776
File: 1713824405384.gif (267.03 KB, 220x217, IMG_0018.gif)
>>75768It’s because one of the mods created those bait threads in the first place. Think smarter not harder
nonnie No. 75806
>>75804The Lori/Scott stuff is old milk and anons can go through old threads to read about it. Other than trying to have something to talk about because anon said the thread is slow, it's not new content and we don't need anons just talking about it again for funsies. I don't think anons understand how threads work anymore at all. A slow thread is a fine thread. Not every cow has longevity when it comes to milk. She's just a normal e-thot who's aging at this point. The most milk she has anymore is complaining about hating her outfits and faces she makes in facetune, blocking/unblocking of Kevin, and that's about it. There's tons of threads that are stagnant because the cows aren't interesting anymore even if they are interesting to a few people. If there is nothing to post about who cares, but trying to force discussion and then having to expand it because you
need milk is pretty sad. Not to mention the anon who said they have contacted the cows that would be called calves.
No. 75812
>>75811There is a tinfoil thread. And interesting, any mention of zionism is pol tier now?
Anyway, i want a farmhand to respond, so i know for sure.
No. 75817
>>75814basically nothing is allowed anymore. And you're replying to someone who is anti-everything.
I wouldn't agree with your conspiracy stuff but idk why that's forbidden if it's confined to a thread. And for what it's worth, even some very mild things have been marked as racebait, including any mention of Islam as a misogynistic religion.
No. 75820
>>75819I said if it is confined to a thread, meaning the conspiracies thread. Was anon saying posts about Zionism were being banned from that thread? I thought that was the implication.
I don't support it taking over other threads. I don't enjoy reading it, but if it's in one specific thread I can just scroll past.
No. 75827
File: 1713898818252.jpeg (542.07 KB, 734x1225, IMG_2107.jpeg)
>>75826Kek was this you? Banned deserved. Please go be schizophrenic elsewhere
No. 75832
>>75828The history of it goes:
>artist general created in /ot/, in practice it's a way to complain about fandom discourse >fujos start reclaiming their name (from 2009 to 2022 calling yourself a fujoshi online was cringe) and making memes about it, awareness of fujos grows>meanwhile, artist general is a toilet of fandom discourse, fandom discourse thread gets made>artist thread is now peaceful and has been ever since>fandom thread is normal for a while until the awareness of fujos reaches critical mass, and it gets taken over by fujo vs antifujo sperging>No thread allows anons to discuss with each other on this topic, attempts at a fujo coomer cringe and anti-fujo cringe threads prove unsuccessful, what anons really want to do is argue with each other as is the nature of jobless imageboard users >Fujo vs antifujo thread created >fandom discourse thread suddenly peaceful, history repeating itself.The containment has proven effective. Despite what it seems, there's actually not that many bans in it. If you remove this containment, it will go back to fandom discourse and spill over to the rest of the site again. Mods are going to have to ax fandom discourse for being a hive of infighting, meaning the discussion will go back to artist general. Rinse and repeat.
It's impossible to ban fujo content on this website as half of the /m/ threads would have to go. Conversely, it's impossible to ban antifujo sperging because the FTM thread would have to go, too. In an ideal world we wouldn't need containment threads but sadly we need them and most of all they work.
No. 75837
>>75835>The fujo threads in /m/ existed long before the artist salt threads in /ot/pretty sure this is just straight up untrue, but maybe I'm remembering wrong. both threads weren't always the generals we know them as now before /m/ was a thing.
but also the fujos who've been on /m/ for years aren't the same fujos in the /ot/ threads. the autistic ones from /ot/ stand out immediately in /m/ because they start acting the same way they do on /ot/ and act like
victims of cruel boolying when the /m/ regulars say they're annoying and should kts.
No. 75842
>>75838right, and that's how /ot/ has been as a whole since the unpopular opinions thread came about. it's neither fujos nor antifujos who are the problem, it's the board culture of /ot/. infighting has gotten out of control, /ot/s userbase encourages it, and the mods are incompetent in dealing with it. infighters become obsessed with their topics and attempt to spread their beliefs in unrelated threads at every turn, whether they're doing it subconsciously out of autism or because they're trying to get more people on "their side" or a mix of the two. but banning the topics they fight about outright has never worked because those anons are here to fight, and they will find a new thing to fight over within a day. this isn't a problem on any other board, and when someone tries to make it one they get dogpiled and chased right back to /ot/. this all reminds me of what happened on 4chan with /pol/.
>>75840>RFH is a mod heresince when? post pics
No. 75844
>>75839Having a line break between every one or two sentences
or god forbid two line breaks
looks fucking retarded and wastes space. While it could improve walls of text that are several hundred words or more, it's fine if two or three paragraphs are combined into one.
No. 75846
>>75839Reddit spacing is when you put spaces between small amounts of text that don't need to be broken up for readability.
Like this.
If you're writing a really long post, adding some space is fine.
But there's no reason a post with five sentences needs three breaks. It's not a poem.
No. 75848
>>75835Nice try, no they did not.
>>75837 is right, artist salt general has existed since 2017 while the fujo thread in /m/ was created in 2022. I know not every fujo jumped on the bandwagon of not calling themselves expressly "fujoshi" during this period but let's be real, the ones that still called themselves by that name proudly and openly were a mocked minority. The original audience of this, the artist general, is of course made out of half-twitterfags because 99% of online artists have to be active in woke ass tumblr/twitter circles to get their art seen. That's why I said fujos
reclaimed their name and got it to be accepted in mainstream internet culture again.
The first fujo thread even has a definition of what fujoshi means, exactly because it was "new" for the zillennials on social media who were shitting their diapers in the 2000s. Nowadays even moids know what a fujoshi is which really was NOT the case in the decade before. I've been on LC before any of the offtopic boards even existed and fujo or anti-fujo were really not topics that even grazed this website.
No. 75855
>>75853but the infight fest on /ot/ isn't that at all. we need to stop having threads that both condone and criticize the same topic, it's not how threads work on here, and
that is what's newfaggy. imagine if the dog love and dog hate threads were the same one, it makes no sense. i know the site is kind of slow but if one topic creates another they need to be separate.
No. 75858
>>75855>imagine if the dog love and dog hate threads were the same one, it makes no senseThe difference is that dog haters and dog lovers don't want to interact with each other. Fujos and antifujos desperately want to argue and shit up the entire website looking for their opponent if they're not contained. Do you want to go back to before the containment thread was created? At least now there's a place to direct them to so they can make hatelove in peace.
>i know the site is kind of slow but if one topic creates another they need to be separateThey were separate before and as a result the fandom, fujo and FTM threads were absolutely fucking obnoxious. And it's not like we all love each other and live in harmony discussing cows in this website, anons have been fighting about a cow's nasolabial folds and 22 inch waist since LC's inception. Despite some recent moderation trends, farmers have never been passive consumers of milk shaking hands with each other that the cow is BPD fat and cringe.
No. 75861
>>75853Ayrt and kek, I forgot about this completely even though I just found some of my posts in there from 8 years ago. Forgive me nonna.
That said, it says a lot that that thread lasted for 5 years before filling up. There's definitely been a resurgence in popularity when it comes to the awareness of the term "fujoshi" ever since 2022. The thread has more posters and goes much faster now. As a sad collateral, xitter Discourse about fujos exists now too.
No. 75866
File: 1713952415916.jpg (68.88 KB, 640x463, 1652416529225.jpg)
>>75862I think it all went downhill with the Genshin thread in /m/. It attracted a certain type of infighting zoomer, newfags who arrived here from twitter and tiktok. Always saw fighting there will scrolling down /m/. While browsing LC on my phone a "related searches to lolcow.farm" popped up. The first was "lolcow genshin". Sigh.
No. 75867
>>75866nta but i wonder if it's because zoomers don't have an outlet for being mean? they have to virtue signal constantly online and irl and they can only criticize others for morally "
valid" reasons. if they go anon they can chimp out without any consequences so they just vent their bs here and fight with everyone.
No. 75871
>>75863>this behavior shouldn't be encouraged. having a single infighting shitshow instead of just two on-topic threads where infighting is moderated goes against the entire landscape of the siteWhat landscape? It's /ot/, the offtopic board. Containment threads (and boards) are a concept inherent to all imageboards and while it would be awesome not to need them, we do and they keep the rest of the site clean. Don't forget that lolcow was created because PT and cow discussion was banned from /cgl/. Go to /cgl/ now and take a look at the catalogue. From one of the most active 4chan boards to a fucking wasteland, being slowly colonized by coomers.
A lot of current farmers are involved in internet culture in general otherwise they wouldn't even be here. Fujoshi and yumejoshi shit are part of internet culture, and that's why this website counts multiple threads dedicated to anime husbandos. You cannot ask farmhands to ban discussion of fujo and anti-fujo ideological talking points while allowing things that clearly fall under that very broad scope, like the FTM general, to continue existing. This would only make the sperging go back to the original threads they came from, see historical timeline
>>75832. If you ask for effective moderation, you'll need to ask for the whole ban hammer to come down on anything that is fujoshi or anifujoshi/yaoiboyTIF-critical. And let's be real, while certain threads move much faster now the entire website is considerably more empty than it was in 2016.
No. 75875
>>75871what are you even talking about? it's as if you didn't comprehend my post. by landscape i meant the state of the site, as i said, incorrectly, but overly moderated in the wrong areas. and my entire point is that
COMBINING the threads should not be allowed because it directly promotes infighting rather than infighting being a secondary occurrence in their own respective threads that could be banned as derailing. we should not be doing anything to directly promote or condone infighting.
No. 75887
>>75875First of all, define infighting. Disagreeing with other anons on yaoi and having a discussion about it is not infighting. Like our own farmhands like to say, women are not a monolith. An anon disagreeing with you and stating their opinion is not infighting. By your own metrics, we would be infighting right now.
And believe it or not, bans for infighting do still happen inside the discourse thread. For a questionable (and honestly unfounded) example, see
>>75576. All this goes to show that thread is being actively moderated and the infighting rules apply, even if strangely enforced. You're acting like the thread is a special exception to infighting when that's not the case. There are farmhands who are still moderating it and banning what they consider infighting.
No. 75903
>>75895Here's your anti-fujo cringe containment thread (originally on /ot/)
>>>/snow/1966263Here's your fujo cringe containment thread
>>>/ot/1959358 No. 75928
Can a mod go into this thread and tell the users they need to be posting caps with the cows names and stuff? We can't verify anything is true or even from the cows themselves because anons are talking to the users directly for info.
How are we supposed to believe anything being posted isn't from anons pretending to be the cows when they are going out of their way to hide who is sending messages? The girlfriends are cows too, stop protecting them if you're ging to be posting about them. We don't need a whole thread full of selfposting, cowtipping retards.
>>>/w/325436 This is exactly why users were saying don't make a Scott thread. Nothing seems legit.
No. 75932
File: 1713978549142.png (67.74 KB, 702x270, ot - Unpopular Opinions #124.p…)
Not my post. Farmhands, the OP did mention other races. While I’m glad to see more of a crackdown on racebait, this is an embarrassingly retarded ban
No. 75936
>>75932The OP that started the discussion mentioned Americans and American isn't a race. She then said
>Asian/Black/Whatever? which includes all races. Her post was not targeted and any one race in particular.
No. 75941
>>75918True. Ot was at it's best when pinkpill, gc, etc. threads were in ot honestly. It worked as a great filter for newfags. You don't even have to agree with it or post, just not seethe in the thread of a controversial topic, showing they could follow the rules and allow other anons to express their true thoughts. The lack of new anons ability to do this at least 90% of the time is why certain boards have sunk in quality.
>>75858I think only a couple want to interact with each other, like the ones who spam each others containment threads.
>>75897Based. They even have their own imageboard already yet can't stand not everyone being 100% uncritical of their thing.
>>75912We need more normies who don't come here after being ousted from reddit, tumblr, or twitter.
No. 75942
>>75876i agree with the rest of this post but
>like a kuromi anon writing a TikTok caption on the vent thread (someone literally asked her if she made a tiktok with the same thing she wrote)it was never confirmed if she was the tiktok poster. seemed like another case of poor detectivefagging imo like when some anon in another thread thought zhang yong was actually self posting a years old meme on here kek
No. 75943
>>75897>t. was not here when kpop got bannedJust so you know, back then twitter behavior wasn't the norm. On modern day lolcow, it is, and that's not just a fujo problem. Whine about it all you like, it's not going anywhere. If it did, that ban would entail all the anti threads going down with it and calling a tif a fujo in that thread resulting in a 3 day ban, you cannot have your cake and eat it to. Kpop was banned because of the kpop CRITICAL thread, not the normal kpop threads. The situation isn't comparable and to insist it is is to announce to us that you're a newfag. Go sperg about muh pinkpill on /2x/, you have a whole board and you're mad you can't have a scrote magnet on
tw/ot/ter? Kek
No. 75953
File: 1714040067209.png (3.02 KB, 413x80, stop making shit up faggot.png)
>>75897no one said hetters in those threads. Where did you get that from? why do you guys need to make shit up, this is why no one likes you.
No. 75954
File: 1714047171432.jpg (168.33 KB, 945x468, Screenshot_20240425_071124_Sam…)
This wasn't a fucking "infight" you retarded ass mods this is what plenty of people would call a joke. Did the retarded mod think I was infighting with fucking Tony Evers himself?
No. 75961
File: 1714059349798.jpeg (107.56 KB, 1280x1137, pouter.jpeg)
>>75959>anyone that uses AI is a moidThat's enough LC for today
No. 75975
>>75972There already is and every time they breach containment normal anons hate it. There's no fucking reason Stupid Questions or Unpopular Opinions or any other thread should have that fucking slop as a threadpic.
It's not fucking hard to find a new picture of a cow or nun jesus fucking christ.
No. 75978
>>75972there is a containment thread already but some aifags insist on posting that shit out of containment then get pissy when peoole don't like their slop
also there's 0 reason to have that shit as a threadpic
No. 75980
File: 1714088903684.jpeg (715.05 KB, 828x1499, IMG_3587.jpeg)
AI crap is all over /ot/ now
mods please ban it or at least make a rule against using it in threadpics
No. 75981
File: 1714090684740.jpg (157.15 KB, 1280x1280, Computer-Geek-Rubber-Duck-Scha…)
>>75980seeing the ai duck made me so upset
:( No. 75986
>>75985Shaming leads to an
(infighting) redtext these days.
No. 75992
File: 1714141252545.png (459.51 KB, 717x1054, satan.png)
cerbmin! farmhands! permaban this devil and save our souls from the blight of ai threadpics once and for all
No. 75996
File: 1714147492455.jpeg (409.95 KB, 821x821, IMG_3590.jpeg)
mfw i gotta see this (unsaged) bullshit in the mtf thread with my own two eyes. /ot/ tradtards have found their way to the cow threads rip
No. 75997
File: 1714148947692.jpeg (381.76 KB, 716x855, IMG_2212.jpeg)
Denying baseless accusations isn’t allowed? Why is only the response banned for infighting? I hate this culture that farmhands enable where anons can project whatever they want onto you, accuse you of being a different anon, holding certain opinions that are never stated, etc and we’re not allowed to call out their retardation. Fuck off
No. 76006
File: 1714161364371.jpeg (110.24 KB, 699x221, IMG_3591.jpeg)
>>76005quit sucking your own dick, ai tard
No. 76014
>>75997That's still infighting, don't whiteknight yourself as if you didn't do anything wrong. Maybe you need to go back to Twitter.
>>75987Then the malicious accusation doesn't apply to you.
>>76012You're going to find a lot of banned VPN IPs one websites like 4chan, lolcow, CC.. Other imageboards.
No. 76024
>>76023No one wants to listen to possible made up stories they have to take with a grain of salt. Cow threads thrive on proof and milk that comes with it. This isn't an anecdotal website unless there's some kind of papertrail.
Why is this cow's thread trying to make uncapped posts canon? This is why anons warned about people reaching to people and telling them to come to lolcow to post. Anons warned about this lol And now you're mad you're being held accountable for it.
No. 76026
File: 1714221111245.png (57.49 KB, 1738x218, image_2024-04-27_222945316.png)
Not my ban and I thought this person was stupid but really? I mean the link says what the entire news story is, I don't think anon needed to screen cap and post bleeding injuries
No. 76027
File: 1714221632944.png (232.61 KB, 1792x412, Screenshot 202.png)
Not my post but jannies this is so dumb. It's not even being used as a thread pic, and the anon isn't avatarfagging or derailing to spam AI shit. It's just a reaction pic or random image. If some people start shitting up /meta/ demanding all images of, idk, anime characters be spoilered or put in a containment thread because "anime is pedophilic, unethical, ugly and spammy af", will you listen too?
No. 76032
>>76027don't be disingenuous. that anon was infighting. and a lot of anons are asking for an ai moratorium, especially since it's being used to bait.
topics that shit up the boards get banned, this isn't new. (cf. kpop)
>>76030agreed. I hope all ai slop outside of dedicated threads is banned for good
No. 76033
File: 1714228232896.jpeg (105 KB, 640x622, 1702197028167.jpeg)
>>76027God bless that farmhand. We have enough AIslop on the internet, we really don't need it here- go to Facebook and 4chan if you absolutely
must post your awful images and not using it to start fights for your own dull amusement.
No. 76037
>>76030>>76033It's actually far more normiebrained to get
triggered over random 3D pictures, I wish underage twitterfags would leave. It's pointless censorship when there are unironic trannies spamming this place with scat and it gets left up for an hour or more.
No. 76040
>>76037>wuh wuh everyone whobdisagrees with me is a twitterfagif you absolutely must post that shit ti satisfy hour autism, just put it in a containment thread, it's not that hard
>>76038ai shit looks creepy and relies on art theft. many ppl don't like to see it, that's why there's containment.
No. 76042
>>76040Notice how you didn't deny it. Go back already. I'm tired of performative retards reeeing over nothing, you have the rest of the internet for that.
>art theftHope you ask artist's permission before you post any picture here. This isn't the fucking Louvre, it's Lolcow.
No. 76045
>>76042it's far from the firdt time a topic has been banned outside of containment, whybshiuld ai be special
>>76043>notice hiw you didn't deny itbeen here since 2016 but this isn't a court of law, no one is obligated to disprove your retardo "everyone i don't like is a newfag" arguments
regardless i genuinely think ai slop is low quality posting and shits up the board. Clearly i'm not the only one with that opinion.
if your autism compels you to bang prompts on a keyboard like a monkey with a typewriter until your husbando comes out with a regular number of fingers, you can do that in the containment thread. ain't life grand?
No. 76047
>>76046>projecting your own newfaggotry whenever it's called outClassic
>>76045Sure, Jan. You probably would've thrown a shitfit in 2016 Lolcow daily.
>more strawmanning because reee everyone who doesn't share my opinion must make ai imagesYou keep doing this because you can't argue with anything I've said. Again: It's just dumb to ban inconsequential things over a couple of autists malding. This goes for Sonic, it goes for doodles, anything. If it's not gore, porn or avatarfagging, it doesn't matter.
No. 76052
File: 1714235656595.jpg (17.97 KB, 474x473, 0923811.jpg)
>>76051Where's the bait, though? It truly isn't a significant problem if someone types something here and uses one AI pic. There are actual issues on the site.
No. 76058
File: 1714237638070.png (773.71 KB, 1080x642, l0umer0dspb31.png)
>>76053If you could read, you'd see me saying the constant OPs and avatarfagging were bad. A random post by some anon with an AI pic attached isn't that, and treating it the same is just being overzealous and retarded.
Accusing me of posting it is kind of worthless when mods can look at post history.
No. 76060
File: 1714237916143.gif (1.59 MB, 372x298, 1640279846539.gif)
>>76055
No. 76071
File: 1714251862063.jpg (90.25 KB, 348x468, GCKWdQKbsAAFk5b.jpg)
Probs a dumb question. Is there an extension ala 4chan X to save threads that you visit often?
No. 76098
File: 1714262262575.png (67.28 KB, 1071x889, janniesaregay.png)
Jannies have suddenly been granted the ability to moderate threads properly, and which thread do they get overly strict with? The moid worship thread.
Stop deleting posts like the faggots at CC you fucking softies.
No. 76107
File: 1714263244729.png (87.41 KB, 720x747, IMG_20240427_181049.png)
Immediately banned for a simple question?
Why are you allowing a thread no one wants to exist?
No. 76113
>>76106>>76107It honestly feels like a jannie got her
or his feelings hurt and is lashing out because lc isn't more accepting of moid praise
No. 76114
>>76112Jesus Christ, kek
>>76113Exactly how it looks.
No. 76126
File: 1714264293205.png (21.8 KB, 720x188, IMG_20240427_182645.png)
What's going on? Why are you deleting so many comments? I don't want to be mean to farmhands because they do a lot for the site. But this feels like power tripping, there's a whole collection of deleted posts from dissatisfied anons, it feels like discord/reddit levels of petty. You can do better than this. I'm sorry. This isn't okay, anons are allowed to decide what threads should not stay up as a community. Reported threads that people don't want stay locked. This was a thing before
No. 76128
File: 1714264456329.png (9.75 KB, 816x201, Lmao.png)
Kek, they deleted the lower one, but let the other stay. Embarrassing and clearly showing their side of the argument.
No. 76153
File: 1714265457977.gif (984.83 KB, 500x334, IMG_1535.gif)
damn tgat pickme jannie needs to get the mop taken away from her
anyway
moids get the rope
troons get the rope
moids get the rope
No. 76154
File: 1714265491462.jpg (140.94 KB, 1080x1017, Screenshot_20240427-214650_Chr…)
Stop deleting posts lmao you guys don't get that fast when men post gore but a flayed statue gets insta deleted also not my fault the only good men are Jesus and his merry band.
No. 76159
File: 1714265744172.jpeg (121.83 KB, 750x933, 7E67B00C-5FCB-4FF9-A74A-EC5327…)
that’s not very goated of you, farmhand :(((((( <3333
No. 76173
File: 1714265943175.jpeg (11.81 KB, 219x290, IMG_0225.jpeg)
>>76152My sides are folding in completely. They have time to delete all of those posts but they couldn’t quickly delete the thread when it was requested to? They aren’t that fast or efficient when it comes to cp or gore
No. 76183
>>76167You can't have been around for Shaymin. CP was posted multiple times a day and left up for hours.
>>76171Fucking retard. LC is a privately owned website and the admins can do whatever they want with it. No one has a right to post on this website. It's like going into a cafe, calling the female owner a tranny and then complaining that she kicked you out
Previous post deleted for grammar error.
No. 76206
>>76201>watching it and banning anons in minutes.In seconds more like
>>76202Kek
No. 76207
File: 1714266658288.jpg (26.71 KB, 1328x109, okay.JPG)
So calling women
>nasty ass literal cum receptacles
is cool and fine to leave up, but posting Jesus is a 7 day ban and a deleted post
No. 76211
File: 1714266763304.png (188.29 KB, 583x1243, picture .png)
At last it was finally locked. Thank you
>>76200That thread isn't even blackpill
No. 76224
>>76223>Everyone who disagrees with me is the same anonYou janny wk's
and actual jannies are so embarrassing
No. 76229
>>76200oh no we shouldn't be too mean for the poor moids unu
leave
>>76201ikr. it's only a small step from allowing moid worship threads and banning dissenters to allowing male posters outright
No. 76234
>>76230It was the same farmhand that we had to unfortunately let go.
>>76231This is false. We have very strict rules about this that we go over with staff when they start. If we see them doing so, we remove them from their position.
>>76232Yes.
No. 76236
>>76228>as there required a longer discussion about it's existence.Im so confused what is there to discuss about when the majority of the userbase here doesn't want that thread or do you not care about how the userbase feels and are trying to run rhis site to the ground?
I dont think the admin or farmhand privileges should be used this way…..
No. 76238
>>76228ty for the response but why should there be a discussion about its existence? doesn't seem such a thread is compatible with board culture
>>76235It's kind of a weird complaint, as long as it's on topic wrt anime why would it warrant mod action?
No. 76240
>>76233>Dehumanizing women for being sexual beingsStandard lolcow. Rant about men, posture at separatism but rage with the fury of a thousand suns if anyone mocks BPD promiscuity because of a guilty conscience.
If you don't like most men, and I would count myself as someone who doesn't, then stop caping for trashy and promiscuous behavior.
No. 76242
>>76214It seems like this site is now for weird tradthot baiters like you.
This is like the 30th post this week ive seen of something misogynistic like this and it didnt get banned but i bet after my post the jannys will give you a small 2 hour ban to make it look like they are dokng their job when you baiters deserve a permanent ban.
No. 76243
>>76236To be honest, I'm referring to not just that specific thread, but a general restructure of some threads/boards. There's been some discussion on /meta/ about some things like making /img/ for images and such but we wanted a proper concession with the farmhands for such actions before moving forward and proposing it to the rest of the users here.
>>76239This is indeed the case for some.
No. 76246
>>76243Your post was specifially about that thread though but whatever you say. Also i dont know if i could ask this but was the farmhand who got let go also the same one who was banning anons unfairly? Im asking because i had to deal with some unfair bans where all of a sudden i got a permanent ban for no reason on months old posts and i always appealed them and the bans got removed because they were false.
The recent false ban i received was on a weeks old post of me just saying that the ariana hate was going too far, i apealed it and the permanent ban was removed but the fact that i got a perm ban for it (the post didn't break any rules) in the first place was so weird.
No. 76247
>>76244You are very obviously a baiter that im not even going to bother feeding you attention anymore.
That anon who made the swedish roommate post was obviously a baiter and you are also a baiter.
No. 76253
>>76248You have no idea how mod.php works.
>>76249The admins can see more than IPs. Browsers and devices that are used to access the internet have several identifiers. Even if the IP changes, these identifiers remain the same.
No. 76258
>>76255I've been around image boards for a long time.
>>76256Lurk more
>>76257I'm not a farmhand and I never have been.
No. 76262
>>76259Its a moderator anon. They are using anon right now to defend their lame ass before they switch back to their mod status and start banning us for 3 month old posts.
The mod php thing they said 100% coninves me of this being a janny on anon.
No. 76269
File: 1714275997336.jpeg (34.78 KB, 452x678, IMG_3625.jpeg)
So ummmm… can we have a “bad moid stories thread”? Pretty please?
No. 76280
>>76234>It was the same farmhand that we had to unfortunately let go.Kek why does this sound so sad? Power tripping isn't good.
>>76228I don't think the thread should come back. Same thing will repeat. It really wouldn't be the wisest decision to let it stay.
No. 76282
>>76228>As for the good moid stories thread, it is locked until further notice as there required a longer discussion about it's existence.I think it should stay locked.
>>76243>To be honest, I'm referring to not just that specific thread, but a general restructure of some threads/boards. There's been some discussion on /meta/ about some things like making /img/ for images and such I think this is a different topic altogether that doesn't really relate to the good mood thread, but as for /img/, I approve of its creation
No. 76286
File: 1714294158707.gif (980.4 KB, 376x285, 1000387896.gif)
There's always been a divide in the site because not every single person who uses it is a radfem (this is a lc site first) but the radfem users want it to be. I came here to follow the queen but I think the progression of the site is natural and I don't mind it, it was way worse and the post quality was so much lower when moids were allowed, I just hate the constant infighting.
I think the thread should stay locked because it only highlights this userbase division and it's already caused a shitstorm. There's also way too many fucking threads about males, I already avoid /g/ for this reason, don't turn /ot/ into /g/ please
No. 76297
>>76286I think there must be some sort of middle ground between allowing men on this site and turning this into a suffragette imageboard. It's just that it's gotten a little overbearing these past few years and every other post/topic is about MEN and feels like a competition on who's the most radfem and anons grandstanding/getting on their high horse/whatever you wanna call it. It has contributed to the aggressive and overall less fun energy of lolcow recently, imo. I also think it's always going to look off and out of place here considering this is ultimately a gossip board. Even with the dying milk boards, there's always gonna be someone in /m/ and /ot/ saying "hey, look at this weirdo". I think all of this is the fault of the second to last admin banning /2X/. But then it's also like, what can you even do to change the site now? If staff were to do anything they'd probably be accused of trying to make this site male friendly so it's purely a userbase issue.
This isn't about that "good moid" thread btw. I didn't care about that thread. It's just my thoughts on the state of lolcow.
No. 76306
>>76299NTA. This isn't a feminist website or even an anti-male website. It's primary purpose is as a gossip website for documenting lolcows. It became female only over time because the main demographic of the site was women from /cgl/.
If you want a website that is dedicated to hating men, then create your own and administrate it how you want. IB software is free and open source. Trying to transform an already existing site with an established purpose and culture into your personal political safe space is never going to work.
No. 76312
>>76306there is a
terf banner now, cope
No. 76314
File: 1714307390386.gif (2.79 KB, 300x100, IMG_3610.gif)
>>76306but this is an anti-male website, have you looked at the banners lol
you don't have to be a radfem or suffragette to dislike moids btw.
>>76292/g/ and /ot/ have a pretty different culture, many /ot/ anons don't much go to /g/ and vice versa
No. 76317
>>76307I wish this was true. I don't have a problem with man hate, the problem only occurs when it takes over everything else the site is supposed to be about. As I said LC's primary purpose is as a gossip website but it's also unique in that it's a site where women can talk about anything within the rules. Yet we have people fighting to destroy that and trying to limit what can be discussed.
>>76310No shit there's man hate on a women's website. My point is that man hate is not the primary or only purpose of the site. Man hate is part of the culture, not the entirety of it.
>>76314>>76316My point is not that man hate doesn't belong here, it's that discussion that is not man hate should also be allowed.
No. 76330
File: 1714312818618.png (157.86 KB, 594x1157, IMG_20240428_075813.png)
If you red text the infighter you should also red text the person who came into the thread to infight in the first place, just saying
No. 76336
>>76322Why is it bait? Is any opinion you don't like bait?
>You can discuss your nigels and family members in many other threadsYou can also vent about men or complain about men in other threads.
>Anons dunking on retarded ass kissing of moids is not a limit of your free speechIntentionally derailing a thread until it's impossible to use for it's intended purpose is limiting the speech of others.
>>76325I'm the anon that originally posted the screenshot to /meta/. An anon asked why a post was deleted and then the now fired farmhamd replied with "I ss'd it" and posted the cap of the anon post with mod.php clearly visible. The post had been up for around 10 - 15 minutes and none of the mentally delayed retards shitting up the thread recognised the screencap for what it was.
Farmhands identifying themselves and revealing the IPs of posters is a violation of trust between the moderation and site users, which is why I posted it to /meta/. I wanted to alert the admins as to what happened. I didn't do it as some sort of epic "tranny janny" own.
No. 76337
>>76336And apparently you're the same user as me since there's oy one
bootlicker. /meta/ is unusable and users like
>>76334 who avatarfag so hard for funsies. These users aren't here to use the site properly.
No. 76344
>>76341I don't think you realize it's to
mock users same way the shitposters do it to
mock users. There's no
singular user kek
No. 76352
File: 1714346961887.png (809.55 KB, 1080x1961, Screenshot_20240428-182422~2.p…)
I got banned for "ai bait" in the Ugly Man PsyOp Discussion Thread #3 for posting this.it isn't even ai at all it's something that got made over 10 years ago, dumbass mods.y'know the funny thing is that Zac Efron is looking exactly like that even if 40 years haven't passed yet lol.
No. 76353
File: 1714357115888.png (15.39 KB, 903x224, 111111111111111111111111.png)
Anyone else noticed the uptick of typo nonas in /ot/? I don't know if it's the same person but they keep replying to their post with the correction rather than deleting and reposting. They all stand out so much.
No. 76365
Since when is the ugly man psyop thread a place to discuss moids you find attractive? What happened to the thread topic?
>>76358This might be a good idea
No. 76378
File: 1714437856166.jpeg (98.74 KB, 640x631, farmhandspolicy.JPEG)
just jokes
No. 76379
>>76378Lmfao. Years ago some
nonny showed me a trick on how to make an (allegedly) acceptable heart emoticon using #s. I did it and a farmhand banned me and I’m still kinda salty about it. Why encode the trick if we can’t even use it?
No. 76392
File: 1714505373142.jpg (614.8 KB, 926x1389, Trannyjanny.jpg)
This is not a tinfoil this is pattern recognition and a hypothesis. Can mods remove the retarded janny that camps in Jill's thread? Thanks.
No. 76399
>>76395>>76396>>76398Please report them as soon as you see them. As
>>76397 has said, it's a scrote trying to raid and they get banned and deleted on sight but try to ban evade every so often. I understand the frustration of those baits but please do not respond to them, it only encourages them to continue.
No. 76417
File: 1714700302256.png (46.33 KB, 926x407, firefox_uX8B3dswR5.png)
>>76071You can enable 4chan X to work on lolcow.
No. 76433
gay slapfight between newfags in the get it off your chest thread
>>>/ot/1989361>>76431I actually find it so fascinating how widespread kekking is here and here only
No. 76437
>>76432Why do you care so much? Just refresh the page. Also did you somehow miss the multiple YWNBAW and
terf banners?
No. 76438
File: 1714772954300.jpeg (124.83 KB, 582x310, IMG_0351.jpeg)
It’s becoming so hard not to alog about farmhands. Imagine some fat anonymous cunts laughing and snickering at you for using the only off topic thread allowed on /ot/ and then banning people about some stupid arbitrary rule when you know they aren’t allowed to have an alternative where they can talk about anything they want. I’m not the anon in picrel only using it as a prime example but it’s so frustrating, so ban-happy for fuck all nothing like calm down it’s just lolcow.farm
No. 76442
File: 1714773993721.jpeg (33.87 KB, 621x274, IMG_0352.jpeg)
>>76439KEK
>>76440>>76441picrel, you can both kiss my stinky pussy flaps, bootlickers. i really wish autists with OCD would stop using imageboards, if “disorganization” and “rule-breaking” kills you so much you and make your hands go flappy then maybe you should fuck off and go somewhere else. mods don’t care if you support or hate them, so stop mini-modding
No. 76444
>>76442You're just taking the ban too personally. It's not mini modding (that's not what minimodding means btw) or bootlicking, it's literally just true that that's what the thread is for. If we completely ignored the thread topics and purposes then there would be no point in having threads at all. You're making all of us anons who want the dumbass shit thread back look retarded. Also,
>complaining about autists on an imageboardI think you're the one who needs to go back anon, there's multiple points in this post that make it clear you don't know where you are.
No. 76445
File: 1714774779624.jpeg (76.76 KB, 750x163, IMG_0354.jpeg)
>>76444it’s a fucking /ot/ thread anon, breaking rules has not destroyed this website because rule breaking is an integral part of using imageboards and i really hate it when you people deny this like this should be a hidden truth. and yes you and the other anon are in fact mini-modding
No. 76446
>>76442NTA but how is this such a contentious issue? I don't even use the thread but I know that if I do I'm going to respect the one rule that the thread is based on. Imagine if you made a thread for posting cute birds and then some people come in posting pictures of cats, wouldn't that be annoying? Or for example you go into a restaurant that doesn't allow people with no shoes, are you going to literally die and waste away if you can't go into it because you have no shoes?
Maybe you're the autist.
No. 76454
>>76452>I swear some of you are either extremely poorly socialized, are autistic, or are below average IQYes tranny, sure. Every woman who's not a handmaiden for ugly males in dresses has autism or a low IQ. Sure. See, that's why you don't fit among women, we can see your "muh wahmen do what I say or durr hurr wahmen dumb" male socialization (as well as the male pattern baldness kek).
>it's a lamenting the politicization of LCYou wish kek. Most women just don't like troons, stupid. Even the handmaidens just see you as ugly faggots larping as women lol
No. 76455
>>76454>Yes tranny, sure. Every woman who's not a handmaiden for ugly males in dresses has autism or a low IQ. Sure. See, that's why you don't fit among women, we can see your "muh wahmen do what I say or durr hurr wahmen dumb" male socializationTroons are irrelevant to the issue. The issue is politicization. It's the introduction of politics to a website that was not political.
>You wish kek. Most women just don't like troons, stupid.I never mentioned any opinions on mentally ill men in dresses. You completely misunderstood my post.
No. 76460
>>76458>>76459I'd argue that the site isn't even that radfem leaning at all, just because there's a /ot/ general troon thread and newly peaked and exetremely angry anons incorrectly calling themselves radfems doesn't mean the site is suddenly political all of a sudden. Look at the anons complaining about the lack of a non-hidden Pink Pill thread, if we were super duper radfem we'd have tons of adjacent threads instead of hiding them away. Yeah, the site is more forgiving of radfem views thanthe wider internet but you have to remember that even though much milk is dried up
I say we start stealing from KF, we'd do much better with certain cows than they do this is first and foremost a gossip site
No. 76461
File: 1714812343550.jpg (634.85 KB, 1000x700, 1675397557718.jpg)
Kek and of course the one complaining about manhate being "too political" turns out to be a tranny crying about jk rowling. Funny how those concerntrolling abominations never seem to care about the other actually political discussions and literal threads revolving around them in /ot/. Cope seethe and dilate, your opinion is worthless and this place isn't for you.
No. 76479
File: 1714855586022.png (3.63 MB, 2246x2762, male insecurity.png)
original OP of the ugly man psyop thread, i didnt make the new one. Can i remake the thread once the old one hits bump limit? or can any admin change the OP image to this? if not that's okay too i will save it for next thread.
No. 76498
>>76497We can tell you're the exact same anon who's been whining about Scott's thread here before because you
still don't understand what cowtipping means. Give it up already.
No. 76508
File: 1715008740000.jpg (68.15 KB, 720x325, Screenshot_20240506_171545_Chr…)
How is this bait? If they want to talk about 100 ways to please a man and suck his dick, they can make their own thread on "tips and tricks to make your man cum" instead of derailing the femdom thread with being man servants.
No. 76512
>>76509This too. Feels like perpetual infight stew.
>>76510I feel like the dumbass shit thread moved a bit faster and infights dissipated quicker and were less catastrophically autistic.
No. 76526
>>76525TERF = Trans Exclusionary Radical Feminist
GC = Gender Critical
TERF =/= GC
Being a
terf requires someone to be a radical feminist. There are very few actual radfems on LC, the majority of anons claiming the radfem label do so ironically or do it because they think it makes them fit in. Any discussion of feminism is very surface level, very few anons read feminist literature and /2X/, the feminism board, is dead because no wants to discuss feminism in any real depth.
No. 76528
>>76525Like the other anon said, there aren't many actual radfems on lolcow and anons will call themselves terfs or radfems because they hate troons and moids while not actually having views reflective of the ideology or even reading literature and understanding what it means. I'm talking from a personal experience, even though I consider myself fairly blackpilled on moids I quickly realised I couldn't really call myself either in good faith after actually looking into the movement. You don't even have to be GC to hate troons either.
>>76527Wasn't there a issue last week with a power mod? I feel like mods should be vetted better.
No. 76530
File: 1715086019764.jpg (156.79 KB, 1080x907, Screenshot_20240507-224416_Chr…)
What is it with newfags treating /ot/ like Crystal Cafe? This newfag has tried to post the exact same thread twice today
No. 76532
File: 1715087712383.jpeg (44.94 KB, 678x377, IMG_4660.jpeg)
So one off comments laughing at retards are bannable as infighting now? We can’t disagree or insult people at all? What’s the fucking point? lc is going to turn into Reddit, it’s already filling with tradmommy faggots
No. 76535
>>76534Nah, you’ve always been able to laugh at retards here. That anon was posing as better than other moms because she can take titty assault 24/7 unlike those other pathetic psychotic moms.
>which is reault in a reply and then others probably chiming inThat’s called a discussion. But bullying retards is lolcow tradition. Infighting would be going back and forth about some small retarded thing and derailing the thread for hours, not posting one joke and leaving.
No. 76541
>>76533Infighting is when the farmhand and enough handmaidens don't like your opinion. It should only be for instances of complete retardation with no argument to back anything, some variety of extreme misogyny, racebait and/or handmaidenry or extremely long winded dragged out OT shit. Too many times anons get banned for having a different non handmaiden opinion that is in opposition of choice feminism, is actually critical of the majority of the userbase here and therefore hits too close to home and so mob rule takes its course and brands this as "infighting".
>>76509Catty anons back talk other women here who don't fall in line as male appeasing hyperfeminine handmaidens all the time. Remember that there's whole threads for catty backtalking of non conforming women for no good reason other than to shame and police the ranks of women for men like the fujo "cringe" one which has primarily teenager and autistic women who are generally foolish and the TIF threads which exists to shit on mentally ill women and lambast women for not looking feminine enough. I recall this site existing to shit on actual idiocy, handmaidens, tradthots, and males not obsess over them over dozens of male focused threads with gimmics like "don't talk about males teehee", bleak.
>>76536Carrying on a infight from a previous thread and tinfoiling about other anons! uh oh looks like that's a infighting infringement. At least follow your own retarded ban logic kek.
No. 76544
>>76543Samefag, I really wish this thread
>>>/m/377224 could have been created on a community board, or even /snow/. I don’t think it really fits in with the rest of /m/ at all
No. 76545
File: 1715121348417.png (1.45 MB, 1242x2208, D9F96F1C-EE90-405E-91F0-C60A42…)
was scrolling /snow when I came across this retarded redtext in the ethel cain thread. if you think "realness" is twitterspeak you shouldnt be a fucking mod because that was before twitter's time. I saw that this shit during the 2010s and livejournal.
No. 76570
>>76567great example, thank you.
see what i mean? the entire thread is littered with shitposts like that. same with the blaire white thread. total nitpicking fiesta.
whoever mods those two threads figure it out.
No. 76581
File: 1715263058021.png (66.54 KB, 1311x349, Screenshot 2024-05-09 095606.p…)
>>76578It's usually posts that are significant to the sites culture or I guess really funny in some cases. The announcement for the movie night rooms creation has a gold star.
No. 76594
>>76587Seems reasonable
>>76590Um, no. Sorry nonna
No. 76595
>>76590there's like 3 food threads total and you want to make a whole board? wtf
i can get behind /img/ bc picspam represents a lot of threads but making hyper specific boards just mean they end up super slow with only a few active threads. a whole board just for food would be even deader than /w/.
>>76591as much as i hate ai slop, these threads at least act as containment. i fear if they weren't there, ai tards would go back to posting their shit all over the boards
No. 76598
>>76596That is 100% avatarfagging, that is the definition of avatarfagging.
>>>/snow/1993065 could this thread be better suited for /ot/ ?
No. 76605
>>76599I like this
>>76600>wants to nuke /m/Kys
No. 76607
>>76604Please. I'm glad that the most recently created food thread gets decent traction but when it was created I was going, "Seriously? Another one?"
Arguments for its originality are pointless because its content is already purely a merger between the /ot/ Food You Ate and Cravings threads and the /g/ Cooking thread.
No. 76615
File: 1715373409455.png (194.39 KB, 1440x591, Screenshot_20240510_163540.png)
this isn't medfagging, i even said in my post it's not real. you guys have that brain poisoned zoomer level comprehension.
No. 76641
>>76599Yeah, in theory keep all the off-topic boards but it would be /cow/ and /comm/ like it was pre-/w/. You could even move celebricows to /comm/ if /ot/ anons won't lose their shit over it.
With /archive/ being like /2X/ in that it's a hidden board with the older threads present. /pt/ you could also just have for pixyterri content only as a sort of legacy board with locked threads simply giving tl;drs on the site's history for new and oldfags. Even showcasing things like past cow of the year winners n' such.
No. 76650
File: 1715522657256.jpeg (121.28 KB, 828x263, IMG_3756.jpeg)
>>76642yeah the farmhand message wad retarded. ppl were jsut having fun posting azumarill pics which is a lolcow meme at this point, some infighter comes in to bitch and mods side with them. fuck this
No. 76668
>>76662>reee everyone who disagrees is a newfag zoomer retardsthe discussion is about the
terf azumarill memes in the pokemon thread. azumarill is a pokemon.
No. 76672
>>76671Posting
terf azumarill memes is political. A video game thread was derailed with politics.
No. 76675
>>76672Retard bootlicker, it's
Pokemon memes in the
Pokemon thread. It doesn't fucking matter what the meme says on it, it's Pokemon. Can you pull your head out of your ass please? I'm literally begging you.
No. 76679
>>76673It's a meme that I like, it's still politics in a non-political thread.
>>76675A video game thread is not political, so posting political memes in a non-political thread is off topic.
No. 76691
>>76666the ugly man psyop thread was interesting when it was actual critical discussion about casting choices and character design but now it's just /g/ tier sperging about what moids they find hot. sad. we should retvrn to our manhating roots
>>76690based and true.
terf azumarill is oractically lolcow's designated poke, of course she's relevant in the the pokémon thread.
No. 76709
>>76707It was good for the first few threads when farmhands were actually moderating
>>76708>straight women bully ugly men while collectively raising their standardsYes but that’s not what the thread has become. Now it’s unironic tradthots talking about how sexy ~aryan~ men are and kpoppies ranking their idols
What the fuck happened, farmhands? It’s so over
No. 76711
File: 1715696892812.png (602.18 KB, 1440x2724, Screenshot_20240514_102655.png)
can we get crystal.cafe faggots off the fucking site. whoever banned me is a lobotomite.
No. 76713
>>76709>Now it’s unironic tradthots talking about how sexy ~aryan~ men areone single retarded baiter doesnt represent the whole thread. I am so tired of retards begging the mods to lock the thread because one single anon, who's most than likely a falseflagger anyways, posted retarded shit.
>>76710>you dont like my ugly scrotes therefore you dont belong herenah fuck you, tumblr refugees are the ones that dont belong here. I have been here since before /ot/ was even a thing.
No. 76714
>>76713>I am so tired of retards begging the mods to lock the thread because one single anonFirstly, I don’t think it’s one single anon, and the edgelords are cringe. Secondly, where the fuck did I ask mods to lock the thread? I asked them to
moderate since they seem to have let the kiwifags, twitterfags, and kpoppies run wild there
No. 76717
>>76716can you link me to those tradthot
nazi boogeyman comments please? i would like to see those for myself, because i have been skimming the thread and nothing.
No. 76723
>>76722That thread is just them talking about what men they find hot though.
>Anyways its obvious the mods arent going to move it How, cause you said so?
No. 76727
File: 1715698931335.jpg (304.92 KB, 918x1638, 20240514_163822.jpg)
Bring back the pinkpill threads, why is feminist discussion not allowed even on this site. And no i don't want to use the dead inactive board.
Shitload of gc threads in the inactive board yet a gc thread still allowed in ot but god forbid you want to talk about feminism. There is literally no thread where i can post picrel and that is a problem.
No wonder why we have so many tradthot anons lately, when feminist discussion is silenced.
No. 76731
>>76722The ugly male psyop thread has literally brought even more men to this site and got shared on the most cancerous parts of 4chan such as r9k. You can tell by looking at the posts that atleast 1/3 of the posters are seething men.
Funny how the jannys will allow a thread like that but not the pinkpill one, it really makes you wonder and think….hmmm
No. 76740
>>76735Maybe take a look at that thread first because that thread is now literally bait central with racebait, obvious male posters, anons asking other anons to rate their men and getting angry if anons say he is ugly, anons spamming their mediocre husbandos. The male ugly psyop has literally devolved into a retarded thirst thread with ocassional bait.
How dumb do you have to be to even compare that shitpost thread to pinkpill thread when PP is the reason why radfems and GC are even allowed on this site.
Also why are you even using "bring them here" in quotations when men have literally admitted to using that thread. Lol the gall to compare the pinkpill that actually helped anons peak on feminism vs that shithole thread. Just say that you are one of those retards who posts your husbando there.
No. 76745
>>76740>The male ugly psyop has literally devolved into a retarded thirst thread with ocassional bait.everything on that thread is completly on-topic. Part of discussing the ugly man psyop is talking about how moid standards downgraded through the years, and thus using hot moid examples is perfectly fine. Anons are talking about hot moids because there is a bunch of spergs who cry about how all anons are just nitpicky and dont fine any moid attractive waaah. If you read the thread you would know.
>How dumb do you have to be to even compare that shitpost thread to pinkpill thread when PP is the reason why radfems and GC are even allowed on this site.because both would attract seething moids. were you even here when /2x/ was public? it was prime target for moid raids.
>Also why are you even using "bring them here" in quotations when men have literally admitted to using that thread. and? again, i dont get your point. should we close and hide and destroy every thread that hurts moid's feelings? should we give them the power to shit up every thread they dislike until it gets closed? you are advocating for censoring speech on one of the very few sites women can actually shit on moid's looks without being judged.
No. 76746
>>76743Yeah, it’s obvious the thread quality declined after it was broadcasted all over /r9k/. The autistic race-related discussions are just one example of this
>>76745>everything on that thread is completly on-topic.Kek. Read the past threads. “Rating” moids by attractiveness was banned before because it’s not on-topic. You really pulled this one out of your ass
No. 76748
File: 1715701448610.jpg (67.24 KB, 638x120, uglymanpsyopban.jpg)
>>76747Here you go, anon. Took me about 1 minute of scrolling to find just an example of this rule being enforced in the last thread
No. 76749
>>76745Lmao i was just discussing how unfair it is that shitty barely-moderated thread is allowed yet the pinkpill isnt.
No one is censoring your free speech you dramatic sperg.
Go and sperg on that thread, no one is stopping you (unfortunately)
No. 76750
>>76727>>76745Yes. Nobody can answer why one thread that was linked on r9k is still allowed to stay while pp can’t. 2X was dead as fuck even then. Nobody would care if 2X was deleted tomorrow, but this conversation would still leak out everywhere else because we want to talk about it and this is the only place we can.
And honestly even if it attracts raiders bending the knee to le raiders is completely cowardly and pathetic. I think the current admin is just scared of making new decisions so they go with what the old admin did as if it was set in stone which includes pp in 2X for no real reason. If they were fair they’d at least shove ugly men and gender ideology into the ghetto as well.
No. 76752
File: 1715705034143.gif (1.42 MB, 480x480, IMG_0573.gif)
>>76750someone please get the new admin to allow dumbass shit thread back like omfg pleasseeeee. cerbmin, WE NEED YOU please save us from these retarded ban-happy mods
No. 76762
>>76761I know they can and I never denied it
I'm talking about the recent uptake in blue archive posts the gacha game full of lolishit falsely being branded as "its not that bad!! Female gamers play it too!" I know unfortunately shota shit is ripe in some female fandoms and I hope it dies but that wasn't my concern for now
No. 76763
>>76761Nta, but women (doubt) liking lolicon is more suspicious than the usual shotafags.
>>76762Yeah, anon, it's just another "totally
valid opinions of women", this will always be suspicious, especially if there's an uptick, as you describe.
No. 76787
>>76786Samefag but also remember they said this
>>51325>The purpose of a liaison and project manager admin is to improve transparency and communicationAccording to them there's an admin only dedicated to communication, so where are they? I assume they all have the same privileges so why can't the other admins step in to reply on /meta/?
No. 76791
>>76790The update thread is for updates to the actual site not responding to questions, suggestions or complaints.
>farmhandsFarmhands don't respond that often, but that's not an issue because the farmhands are not the admin. They do not have the same privileges or responsibilities as admin, so they cannot respond to everything.
>Demanding the site admin to personally chime in any time you want them to is unhinged.That's not what's happening. I know you're likely one of the anons who like camping in this thread to infight with every complaint and suggestion made, so please fuck off.
No. 76794
>>76783>>76786What I don’t understand is why cerbmin pretends they’re going to make improvements here and then give us something insignificant every 6 months? Sure, it’s better than a schizo admin nuking /ot/, but this site could be so good if it was updated more regularly. It’s sad. Feels like we’re being breadcrumbed lol
>>76789>probably because she doesn't owe us shit.Cerbmin took their role voluntarily. It’s not wrong to have expectations. I think most of us would be kissing their asses still if they actually demonstrated a willingness to listen to farmers and improve this site
No. 76802
>>76783>cerbmin please just quitCerbmin has been the best admin this site has had in years. Do you really want to go back to CP and gay black dick spam being posted daily and then being left up for hours?
Moderation is always going to be subjective but technical administration is not. The improvement in the stability of the site under cerbmin has been huge.
No. 76825
>>76819>>76821I am the AI retard. Imagine coming to /meta/ just to snitch about something you started over pics that never saw the light of day. I already said I did the same thing to dead men and more often at that, but you conveniently skip over that part to focus on three nebulous words that I wrote in the initial post like an infighting dipshit. The most radical thing any feminist could do is be attracted to other women, but the "feminists" who think they have a home on lolcow wouldn't know that because they're normie-tier heteros and think that they can take a moral high ground on a thread infested with fangirling and spergouts over the same rapist and enslaving white men (
not history general). At most I
implied that the pics were NSFW, but you act like I posted AI bukkake. Let go of your pearls and stop acting like a butthurt faggot.
No. 76830
>>76829The problem in today's internet is that there are
too many cows, when every third person online is a cow it's just boring.
No. 76839
>>76833Nah, shotafags are more annoying and than any /g/tard because they’re constantly announcing themselves and baiting in /ot/
>morally questionable I wouldn’t call pedophilia morally questionable
No. 76842
>>768081. no cow becomes a cow solely because they read shota, that’s a lie
2. a crackdown is literally impossible. people are just going to evade their bans and return to posting what they want. all it does is satisfy the whiner who got the banned person banned and tick off the banned person so they get worse
3. defining what a shota is, is honestly too vague. i’ve seen. regular adult anime boys get flagged as “shotas” and the standards for what makes a cartoon “look underage” change from person to person.
it never should’ve been banned in the first place though. porn yeah, sfw bl style images with the slightest hint of spice, non.
No. 76849
>>76839>shotafags are more annoying and than any /g/tard because they’re constantly announcing themselves and baiting in /ot/you have got to be joking, the confessions thread, unpopular opinions thread etc are always filled with nigel/husbandofags baiting and talking about nasty shit
>>76842>defining what a shota is, is honestly too vague. i’ve seen. regular adult anime boys get flagged as “shotas” and the standards for what makes a cartoon “look underage” change from person to personthis is true and anon was not even suggesting a ban on shota (it's already banned) but even mentioning you're into it. then logically every other person mentioning their
problematic fetishes should get banned as well. this excessive moralfagging just seems like backlash directed at the ugly man psyop discussion threads tbh.
No. 76860
>>76855>drooling retard online: I only lust for the 2D depiction of a smol boy UwU. If you think that's weird or even accuse me of being a pedo, then you're just fucking reaching reee!In meters or feet how close are you allowed to get to the nearest school in your area, nona?
>>76857I won't deny pearl clutching anons who think any skinny bishie is akin to shotashit makes enforcing the rule a nightmare but, shotafags act like they can't just migrate to Crystal Cafe or even 4chan to discuss their kiddie lust.
No. 76861
why is
>>>/ot/2002685 banned for breaking global rule 4 but the self-posting unintegrated cow in the old web thread is allowed to violate that same rule repeatedly without a redtext in sight?
>>>/ot/2003046>>>/ot/2003055>>>/ot/2003078>>>/ot/2003091this "grandma" retard is basically a personalityfag in the making with the way they seem to be purposely making themselves recognizable and refusing to integrate even after admitting to being banned previously
No. 76862
File: 1715814828551.jpeg (42.22 KB, 602x315, main-qimg-6a5b477fb67ae7b86bc3…)
>>768602d will never be 3d. yes, you're reaching. yes, you don't care for children's safety – you just want to moralfag and bitch. no, women aren't pedos for liking lines on a screen.
No. 76869
>>76857i don't really understand what the twitterfags want to happen? shota
is already banned on all boards. if alluding to enjoying it - baiting or not - was to be bannable, then pretty much everyone in the shameful fetishes thread for example should get banned as well or it would just be a retarded "everything goes except x" rule when there's loads of shit other than x that is equally reprehensible if not worse.
No. 76870
>>76869>muh twitterfag boogeyman!samefag as
>>76863. I’ve never had a twitter account ever
>if alluding to enjoying it - baiting or not - was to be bannable, then pretty much everyone in the shameful fetishes thread for example should get banned as wellas other anons have stated itt, shotafags continually announce themselves in /ot/. name one other group of degenerate anons who repeatedly announce themselves and then sperg out when they’re mocked for being disgusting degenerates. this should be banned for bait because it instigates the same infight every time
>there's loads of shit other than x that is equally reprehensible if not worselike what? seriously, what is equally if not more reprehensible as wanting to fuck prepubescent children? it’s sick. even if there was such as a thing, I don’t see anons on /ot/ announcing themselves in completely random discussions like shotafags do. keep that shit to yourself or fuck off back to 4chan with your lolicon brothers
No. 76873
>>76870>name one other group of degenerate anons who repeatedly announce themselves and then sperg out when they’re mocked for being disgusting degenerates. this should be banned for bait because it instigates the same infight every timei very rarely see anyone "announcing themselves" as actual shotacons, unless you count posting sfw genshin impact twink husbandos as shota. and if we were to ban everything that causes infights, there was/is a whole bunch of blackpilled anons continuously demanding all mommyposters, nigelposters, husbandofags and so on get banned for being disgusting cocksocking bangmaids etc etc according to them and they sperged about it on several boards as well as in /meta/ for idk how many threads. should they also get their way then according to you just because they'll whine and infight otherwise?
>like what? seriously, what is equally if not more reprehensible as wanting to fuck prepubescent children? it’s sick. even if there was such as a thing, I don’t see anons on /ot/ announcing themselves in completely random discussions like shotafags do. keep that shit to yourself or fuck off back to 4chan with your lolicon brothersfirst of all, again, where are all these shota posts popping up in completely random discussions? second of all, just from scrolling through the most recent shameful fetishes thread on /g/ as well as the recent confessions thread on /ot/, there's anons wanting to fuck all kinds of family members including kids, wanting to be kidnappped, raped, molested by pedophiles, beaten and choked, forcefully impregnated, wanting to rape severely disabled people and amputees. i could lurk more and make a collage or something if you want. why is no one coming to /meta/ to screech everytime posts like that pop up?
>>76871posting shota is already banned. you're just trying to move the goalpost which would be objectively unfair as long as shit like what i mentioned above just gets to fly by.
No. 76882
>>76874>I think it's disingenuous af to pretend like it isn't because you have the handful of de/g/enerates who keep their gross shit to their containment threads.as i explained they're on /ot/ as well, and i've seen more of them there than i've seen anyone posting about being a shota. i might not lurk the same threads as you but it sounds very dubious that there would exist more of these allegedly numerous shotacon spergs than the "handful" of de/g/enerates that also post about their gross shit on /ot/. also, are you implying there should be a shota containment thread then? because there isn't and as i explained the "handful" of people that i described aren't just sticking to theirs either.
>If people want to post about their prepubescent husbandos, have them do it in their containment threads or eat a ban if you can't stfu and behave yourself. The same with anons who need to publically announce wanting to get gangraped or have their asshole ripped open by some 13 inch furry cock. there is no shota containment thread though? and i don't see the latter catching any bans at all.
>If you can't handle anons making fun of you for being a gross degenerate and feel the need to start fighting with others instead of taking the L and rightfully being derided or made fun of for that shit, then yeah you should eat a banno one is arguing against that.
No. 76884
File: 1715857272707.gif (11.22 KB, 205x274, 1705124773893.gif)
Can we get a Crystal Cafe bunker thread please? CC has been down for several hours now and the thread on /ot/ is closed. Can we get that one reopened or have a new specifically bunker thread?
No. 76888
>>76882The "shota containment" threads would be things like the /g/ board's various horney posting threads, /m/'s fujo or image sharing threads (since loli and shota content in a sexual context is banned on this site but not if the images lean more towards sfw), I do agree out of fairness if you're horney posting edgy or horrific shit like the anons openly lusting for family members or their abusers, it deserves the same scrutiny as people are calling for in regards to shotafags out of fairness and the simple fact that no one wants to read that shit.
>>76885That depends on the context because some attentionwhoring anons love to just post edgy or horrific shit just for the sake of riling others up.
No. 76895
File: 1715880413172.jpeg (113.44 KB, 716x711, IMG_4757.jpeg)
Autistic /ot/ mod strikes again. This is derailing at worst.
No. 76898
>>76896I think it's the part where anon says
>you should get shot and your money should be given to people like MEthat the jannie saw as alogging, or someone had reported it as alogging, but it's obviously sarcastic.
No. 76910
>>76909ntanons but it's not really tinfoil since she has always had an ED
>untrue rhetoric kek
No. 76918
>>76916Crystal Café started as an off-shoot of lolcow.farm
>>76917Funny to bring up "scrotefoiling" as a means of preserving site culture. Did you know that males were not explicitly banned from posting here until around 2018 (under Shaymin to boot)?
No. 76936
>>76921>>76923>>76924>>76925Kek'ing at all the newfags I pissed off. If you don't want an "oldfag" lecturing you on site history, don't say stupid shit. The site's culture has not been the same since 2017, which wasn't the same in 2014. I'm sick of the retarded "scrotefoiling" or whatever bullshit that newfags think make this site more productive. It's not and only makes you look like an underaged sperg. Newfags love complaining about site culture but get butthurt when older users point out that site culture was different before they had even shown up, 'cause it ruins the street cred that allows them to call other users "newfags". LC will never be the way it used to be—no effort has been put in now or over the last year, or over the last five years, to fix it.
>>76931Burritomin (assuming you mean the Mexican kek) is Shaymin.
No. 76947
File: 1715947550951.jpeg (241.19 KB, 1300x956, IMG_1141.jpeg)
>>76946
>how did she manage to find not one but three administrators in the span of a month?(ban evasion)
No. 76948
>>76945>fucking worthless spicThis is very autistic and retarded, and you should feel autistic and retarded.
I do agree (in less racebaiting terms) that the admins very clearly fell through on their promise of "fixing" or "building" a new website. There has been no transparency on the progress of the alleged website. Apparently they are three software devs, and it takes them over a year to make any appreciable changes to the website? The only noticeable difference are the new site banners. And why would they add new site banners if they're giving us a new website? I honestly don't mind keeping this one, I don't have any high expectations—but the admins should also be keeping their expectations at the same time. And seeing how long it took for "oldmin" to hire a new admin, how did she manage to find not one but
three administrators in the span of a month?
No. 76953
>>76952I agree with you but there really isn't any winning. When they deleted the posts from the choachan spergs before, it just made it worse. It fuelled the conspiracy enough that users who weren't online to see what the posts were (i.e. absolute retardation and literal spam) believed that the admin was actually actively censoring
valid criticism or that it made what the schizos were saying seem more true etc. I think that admin should ban VPNs from posting on /meta/ and only /meta/, that way genuine users can actually use it and the schizos can't derail and do gayops every few months like they do currently
No. 76960
>>76909Go look after your kid, Taylor, and eat a proper meal at least once a day then you won't get anachan "accusations".
>>76950Nta, but who said it's the same wk? It's obvious there's a least a couple of them checking in now and then, shitting up the thread and abusing the report button.
Sometimes we go a week or so without dumb takes defending princess TayTay and her noble causes, then suddenly either mods arrive with belated bans thus announcing the wk raid, or wks start foaming at the mouth because of the tiniest criticism.
No. 76961
>>76954>idk how you got so butthurtI don't care about your post and didn't aim at you directly, I only quoted it because it was part of the sludge of newfaggotry that responded to me first, and I'm not "butthurt" for telling the truth. It doesn't matter what year the "no scrote" rule happened (I said
around, not
in, which
obviously implies an inexact time period), just that it wasn't always a rule, and it happened under a newer admin. Stop autistically hyperfocusing on the number.
No. 76986
>>76983Nta2 but also it's clearly someone who just wants to annoy the thread, i don't think insulting moids should stick to one thread either but if you can't recognize a single idiot and report them or ignore it's your issue, the fujo thread got filled with twittertards anyway.
The same retard went to the male psyop thread to complain about golden kamuy men too because she thinks it's unfair that they are popular with women and no one really cared, it's not like people like this didn't exist before that thread.
No. 76989
File: 1716003624557.gif (1.3 MB, 498x309, 1715998568125.gif)
why would this picture need to be spoiled for nsfw?
>>>/m/383328 No. 76991
File: 1716004402425.jpg (184.3 KB, 1092x1052, 1680953679496.jpg)
>>76990>a bead of blingee censored anime boy blood is gorekek. where's the spoiler for the hot and cute couple's thread pic been for the last year then? since it's obviously porn
>>>/m/288308or any shayna thread pic for that matter
No. 76996
File: 1716005273021.png (43.8 KB, 312x378, PLS SPOIL.png)
Admins!!! Pls spoil this, this is literally fetish art, i'm very disturbed…!!