[ Rules ] [ ot / g / m ] [ pt / snow / w ] [ meta ] [ Server Status ]

/meta/ - site discussion

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File(20 MB max)
Video
Password (For post deletion)

Click here for an /ot/ image recovery update and to see if you can help!

File: 1699976547047.jpg (70.53 KB, 800x533, photomontage-cow-grazing-mount…)

No. 65391

This is a containment thread for meta discussion that doesn't fall into complaints and suggestions. Feel free to tinfoil or talk about the state of the site but try to avoid being too autistic.

If cerbmin needs to hear it, post it here.

NEW /meta/ THREAD: Site Updates Thread
>>63266

Previous responses to anons:
>>62774, >>62928 regarding moovie thread
>>62963 accusing other users of being moids
>>63136 explaining infighting from a handful of users

Previous threads, newest to oldest:
>>62751
>>60569
>>56933
>>53472
>>51182

No. 65401

File: 1700006485939.jpg (178.35 KB, 736x981, Miniature pony foal (1).jpg)

Not to be a bootlicker, but I've been here since oldmin and this feels like the first time we've had an admin(s) that doesn't suck. We've had many updates this past year in comparison to what we had before, even if some of them were small. I'm very grateful, I think lolcow has a good future.

No. 65428

>>65401
I agree, I know their trying their best but I just think they are very obviously understaffed at this moment.

No. 65429

requesting again that that Child at Heart" thread on /m/ be restored and why it may have been deleted in the first place
>>>/m/263042
https://web.archive.org/web/20230613160830/>>>/m/263042

No. 65432

>>65401
I feel sorry for them having to stear this sinking ship. If anything happens to this place it's most likely going to be symptomatic of how cancerous culture/society has gotten as a whole.

No. 65437

>>65401
Agreed. I've noticed a definite improvement in how the site loads, so thanks for that admins.

No. 65468

I just wanted to let it be known that tiktok videos previously embedded has disappeared after the embedding update and each post that had been embedded with a tiktok video has been replaced with the text embedding error.

No. 65469

>>65468
It went away for me on desktop Google Chrome, not Firefox for some reason.

No. 65485

>>65469
It seems to be in my chrome

No. 65498

>>65469
See:
>>65400
For details on the limitations of Firefox (and other privacy-focused browsers) with regards to TikTok embedding!

>>65468
>>65485
Anyone having issues on Chrome, can you hard refresh your browser and see if the issue resolves. If it doesn't, could you either email (admin@lolcow.farm) or post your Chrome version numbers so they can be used for testing/resolving it? For transparency, our Chromium testing of the embed changes was done with Chrome version 119.0.6045.160.

No. 65500

File: 1700157750161.jpg (110.61 KB, 700x698, 1652179487410.jpg)

Thank you Cerbmin for the updates and for finally adding new banners!

No. 65501

>>65401
>>65437
>>65500


>>65429
Apologies for not getting to this sooner, we missed attention that was drawn to it previously. Fortunately this thread was created after I was able to fix the backups function, so it was fairly quick to restore. We are missing the full resolution of one image, so if anyone happens to have it, please email it to us (admin@lolcow.farm)
>>>/m/297106

We're looking into what happened to the thread now, and we'll make a post when the investigation is done

No. 65502

>>65498
Thank you admin! is there a way to embed instagram reels as well?

No. 65503

File: 1700160856604.png (1.98 MB, 1884x2048, LW4Kvqfa.png)

>>65500
Thank you so much, but yeah I'm curious of why that(and according to other nonnies some other thread) were deleted.

No. 65504

Wait what happened? Why are the TikTok embeds not working?

No. 65513

>>65498
My version which works is Chrome 119.0.6045.135

No. 65515

>>65504
and a few youtube links too

No. 65518

>>65504
>>65515
can you please post links to the embeds that are not working? it's not helpful to just state that some aren't working without making it clear which ones.

No. 65520

Thank you to admin for putting new banners in! It's been nice seeing all the new ones pop up.

No. 65521

>>65520
Also thank you for the other technical updates in the Site Updates thread, our admin are working very hard. ♥

No. 65528

>>65518
Some of them are in the current consoom thread in /ot/, there were plenty last time I checked

No. 65529

>>65520
and most importantly, super thanks for removing the daddy's little porkchop one.

No. 65530

is leftcows never being unlocked?

No. 65531

>>65530
Maybe we can unlock it when Amber’s book finally comes out? She narrated the audiobook too I cannot wait to pirate it

No. 65536

i'm sick of romanianon making her posts so obvious on the vent thread, she needs to integrate better. i don't care about occasional vents you can tell it's her, but today was too much.

No. 65539

>>65529
I still see this one

No. 65540

Can I ask to be perma banned from posting? I'm too addicted to this site it's ridiculous.

No. 65543

>>65536
Doesn't she literally have schizophrenia? It's impossible for her posts to be integrated when she's unfortunately not medicated and has a serious mental illness.

No. 65544

>>65540
Samefag, I especially need this IP permabanned if possible, it's my WiFi. Thank you(you'll be missed)

No. 65545

Can you ban the male in unpopular opinions thread that's calling anons cock sucking whores? This male has been posting for ages but you guys never even delete his posts even when you redtext him, it's suspicious as fuck

No. 65546

just wanted to say thanks to admin because I have seen a lot less CP in recent months. whatever you're doing is working

No. 65547


No. 65548

>>65544
Sweetest redtext I've seen.

No. 65550

>>65543
I thought it was BPD

No. 65552

>>65543
No she’s not schizophrenic, she doesn’t hear and see thing that aren’t there, she’s just traumatized and has the usual cluster of diagnosis that come with that as if it’s not a normal response to what happened to her (bpd, schizoid, histrionic etc —all the bullshit that gets thrown at women who were abused as a diagnosis with no real treatment except zombification when what they need is to be shown and believe that trust is possible between people, she may never trust people again though)

No. 65556

Gore in /ot/

No. 65557

>>65552
Doesnt she believe everyone is after her and she killed her cat or something? Visual Hallucinations aren't a must for a schizophrenia diagnosis, I'm a med student.
Also you don't know if she auditory hallucinations, she probably does given how she thinks everyone hates her - something that voices commonly say.

No. 65558

>>65557
Nta, but on top of that, she also believes that Gorillaz stole her ideas

No. 65559

File: 1700377291460.jpg (216.96 KB, 750x662, 1673819758685.jpg)

>>65558
nta but omg i almost forgot about that kek

No. 65560

File: 1700377316099.jpg (90.17 KB, 1125x435, 5.jpg)

lmao

No. 65561

>>65560
>>65559
>>65558
>>65557
Stop posting about your special interest here

No. 65562

>>65558
This is a sign of schizophrenia as well, as I said she has mental disorders you cant expect her to integrate unless she gets help.

No. 65563

Anon calling women cocksucker retards is back in unpopular opinions again.

No. 65566

>>65562
I don't expect her to integrate, I was just saying

No. 65569

why do mods keep autosagging the funposting threads? it wont kill them

No. 65570


No. 65571

>>65569
Why kill them? They need containment

No. 65572

>>65569
They can keep a tab open and refresh it. You know exactly why it's been autosaged since it was made.

No. 65573

>>65569
If it won’t kill the thread then why do you care

No. 65574

>>65572
no, i genuinely have no idea why it has been autosaged. do explain.

No. 65575

>>65572
Nta but the thread only started getting autosaged during thread #2 and once it was already halfway full. Like I could understand if it was autosaged when all the shitflinging was going on (surprisingly it wasn't saged during that time) but why after that once everyone chilled out?

No. 65577

Mods probably autosaged that thread to curb all the infighting in and outside of it. It's not hard to figure out.

No. 65578

>>65577
there was no infight on that thread though

No. 65580

>>65575
I don't know how you're being so oblivious as to the why.. They don't just un-autosage a thread the second infighting and shitposting is curved. Sometimes you need to wait a few weeks or even wait until a new thread. It's still a containment, just won't be bumped. The complaining regarding it not being bumpable is really telling of newfags and makes it clear it should stay that way.

No. 65581

>>65580
we both know it's because of a vendetta, the unpopular opinion thread is infighting general and it's not autosaged even though its the thread all trannies/moids gravitate to

No. 65583

>>65501
Following up on this, it would appear this thread was deleted during the same incident as the Moovie Night thread.

>>65569
We aren't trying to kill them. If we wanted to do that, we'd just ban them. The threads are autosaged because they were created by anons who were banned out of the Dumbass Shit thread for deliberately being disruptive and vastly increasing the moderation burden. The anons who now use Funposting were generating around 100 reports a day by themselves in Dumbass Shit. As long as you obey the global site rules and spoiler NSFW you guys can do whatever the hell you want in Funposting, but the threads will stay autosaged because of that. If you want to follow board etiquette, use Dumbass Shit. If you want to exist outside of society, you have your Funposting containment thread.

>>65570
This is great, thank you. We were able to fix the issue with this, all TikTok embeds should now all work again. If you find any more that look off, please let us know!

>>65536
We have spoken to romanianon and asked her to make her presence less obvious. She has agreed to try and integrate a bit better. We genuinely wish her the best!

No. 65584

>>65583
>The anons who now use Funposting were generating around 100 reports a day by themselves in Dumbass Shit
I'm surprised that they are allowed their own thread and didn't just get banned after that tbh. Very generous, hope it doesn't backfire.

No. 65586

>>65583
NTA but I really wish this applied to /ot/ as a whole. Unpopular opinions has been a disaster for weeks.

No. 65587

File: 1700422860154.png (327.59 KB, 563x586, D2258E13-5C25-48D6-96FD-9A6B9B…)

>>65583
based admin, funposters die mad

No. 65588

>>65583
>retards spam the report button
>umm ackshually you are the problem
there is no porn or infights on the funposting thread and the only reason it was made was so the retarded normalfags from the dumbass thread would stop sperging when someone posted something they didnt like. Are you going to punish the entirity of dumbass thread when someone posts something outside the rules too? i remind you they posted dead animals without spoilering even though they shit and cry whenver someone posts an anime boy unspoilered

No. 65589

>>65588
They were baiting and posting the same shit over and over again every day, but you knew that already.

No. 65590

>>65589
having a conversation about something the majority of this female-adjacent weeb board is into isnt spamming. If they ban horny women they should also ban the celebricow spergs who shit up the entirity of /ot/ whenever they develop a hatred towards celebrity, the unpopular thread has been unusable because its been invaded by them, same for the dumbass thread that has been nothing but sperging about celebrities looks and calling normal attractive women fat or ugly.

No. 65591

>>65583
retarded soft touch admin strikes again. all the "funposters" should have been perma'd, not given free reign to do whatever the fuck they want. they made a popular thread unusable for almost a week spamming yaoi, other threads would never get that kind of lenience. if admin is a fujoshit she should honestly kill herself

No. 65592

>>65588
You guys keep saying there was no porn/yaoi being posted in the funpost thread, but doesn't that prove what admin and other people have been saying about anons being purposefully disruptive in the dumbass shit thread

No. 65593

File: 1700426967288.png (47.13 KB, 2461x452, insanity.png)

>>65591
the thread wasnt unusable because of the yaoi, it was because you could not just switch to another tab for a few hours and let anons talk about what they talk, no, you had to start sperging and threatening to call the police or other unhinged shit. I dont know why the admins are ignoring that the infighter was an obvious moid calling women fish fingers and a-loging them

No. 65594

>>65592
yaoi was only posted after the infighters started calling fujos who were just discussing a vn fish fingers/fat/telling them to kill themselves, it happens every time an anon starts being annoying. It happened when people were complaining about isopods and sylvanian families too. Maybe if anons banned the obvious moid infighter instead of anons it wouldnt have repeated itself so many times.

No. 65596

>>65593
nta but
>the thread wasnt unusable because of the yaoi
Meanwhile
>go to dumbass shit, they’re posting yaoi, leave for a few days, go to dumbass shit, they’re posting yaoi, leave for a few days, go to dumbass shit, they’re posting yaoi…
>>65590
Why do you children keep acting like all women simply must be into yaoi? Yeah the celeb sperging is annoying but it’s a lot easier to glaze over than HAHA YAOI YAOI WHAT ANIME BOYS DO YOU WANNA SEE GET RAPED YAOI HAHAHAHA that kind of horny shit goes in /g/ which your kind refuses to use so this is what you get. I think you are a bunch of newfags trying to turn this place into fujochan 2.0

No. 65598

>>65596
>that kind of horny shit goes in /g/ which your kind refuses to use
See that just makes it obvious that they were baiting and refusing to integrate. When the dumbass shit/shitposting threads got too full of husbando posting, a husbando shitposting thread was started in /g/ and everyone happily went there to post among like-minded. There have now been 17 of those threads. But when a similar fujo thread was started in /g/ the spammers didn't want to post there. Hmmm

No. 65599

>>65593
>>65590
>>65588
Let it go for fuck a sake, it's been almost a damn month you autist. You even got your own thread to post whatever you want, no one else would've gotten such nice treatment after spamming porn and shitting threads, they should just perma ban you already

No. 65600

>>65596
>>65598
i have no idea what you are talking about, the funposting thread BARELY has yaoi. It was made because anons were tired of people starting infights instead of ignoring posts they didnt like.

No. 65601

>>65599
why do you keep lying as if lolcow threads arent easy to check? no one was spamming porn, someone posted a spoilered figurine and a retard started infighting calling women fat/ugly/fish fingers. It's not a coincidence /ot/ has more moid bait than usual lately.

No. 65602

>>65601
>why do you keep lying as if lolcow threads arent easy to check?
I could ask you the same thing, retard. There is porn at your thread rn

No. 65607

>>65599
>for fuck a sake
aww, I'm exhausted and read this in Mario's voice

No. 65609

>>65588
You're making yourself very obvious

No. 65610

What does it mean if someone gets banned for being a “vain bitch”?

No. 65611

>>65610
Wait, nvm. I think I figured it out.

No. 65612

>>65531
why has it still not been unlocked? a week or two lock shouldve been enough.

tinfoil but there is a white nationalist woman named victoria delarue who is or used to be a moderator here, she's a computer science major at u michigan, and whose ex boyfriend atom chetcuti who was a former troon was doxed by someone claiming he was a pedophile and while defending the indian groomer remilia milady maker ceo or whatever, they were the so called leaders of kaliacc and that was in an old leftcows thread, so they have a reason to want it down. her ex bf has ties to other cows too. if she wasn't a mod she certainly knew mods, other posters and frequented the old lc discord server. others may know her as yuno or a^3. it isn't news some subjects of that thread and people adjacent to it browse lc but just wanted to put that out there

No. 65613

>>65612
Where's your proof of them being a moderator?

No. 65614

>>65613
i don't have any proof which is why i added if she wasn't a moderator she was in sections of the server that were verified, but i recall her being mutuals with some old moderators so that was mostly speculation. but yes the old leaders of kaliacc were certainly involved with the community here and knew other posters. can't really share screenshots without it giving too much away unfortunately so i don't expect you to believe it, mostly just in case any other posters recognize the username.

No. 65615

Why did I get a tranny redtext for making a shitpost about Anya Taylor Joy in the punchable faces thread? It was a dumb joke and I’m not sure why it was taken seriously. The ban reason said “hi Stephen” and I have no idea what that means or who Stephen is. If you look at my post history it should be pretty clear that I’m a woman.

No. 65616

>>65614
Your tinfoil doesn't even make sense.

No. 65617

>>65616
it does if shes actually a mod. it's a tinfoil because there's no proof.

No. 65618

>>65615
I also got permabanned for infighting in the Reddit thread after being called a scrote. Admin and janny are retards. I’m not even appealing because that’s how little respect I have for them. Get a VPN and carry on.

No. 65619

>>65618
I’ve never even been accused of being a scrote on this website and I know for a fact my post history shows I’m not one, so I don’t get why the mod gave me a tranny ban randomly. It’s so weird.

No. 65623

>>65619
They don’t check your post history. The person you were infighting with probably reported you for being a tranny and they banned you without checking.

No. 65624

Unlock the leftcows thread it's been a month like wtf

No. 65626

>>65614
Is that who banned everyone in the Sam Hyde thread too?

No. 65627

File: 1700493103068.jpeg (51.75 KB, 319x410, IMG_1639.jpeg)


No. 65628

>>65615
>posts women in punchable faces thread
>gets surprised when he gets accused of being a man

No. 65630

>>65598
I just don't get why they can't use /g/.

No. 65631

>>65583
Thanks admina ♥ I found another broken embed from a year ago in the minimalism thread, not sure if it was YouTube or TikTok. >>>/ot/1243631

No. 65634

>>65612
why post their dox? also you got the edrama details wrong.

No. 65635

>>65634
Thank you, I've fixed cases like this as well!

>>65502
Instagram reels currently can't be embedded, but we can look into it as it is supported by Instagram

No. 65638

File: 1700521587084.jpg (959.29 KB, 1662x5354, romanianon and dumbasses in th…)

>>65583
>We have spoken to romanianon and asked her to make her presence less obvious. She has agreed to try and integrate a bit better. We genuinely wish her the best!
It didn't work. Go look at the vent thread >>>/ot/1780343 I'm not gonna clog the report queue with all this shit. what do the people replying to her expect? a bunch of be quiet romanianon/ it's romanianon/ log off comments is honestly just as annoying as her repeated identical vents.

No. 65642

File: 1700523184383.jpg (405.42 KB, 1079x814, 167754334.jpg)


No. 65644

File: 1700523519840.gif (2.32 MB, 480x448, dare.gif)

>>65640
>It's just me saying "my life is shit". "I'm being accused of things that are unfair" then a bunch of replies "calling me out" what the fuck am I supposed to do? I'm just talking about my life like everyone else. It's not even something cowish or funny.
So those posts calling anons "whores" and telling them to kill themselves in that cap weren't yours?

No. 65650

File: 1700536032018.gif (496.31 KB, 500x500, b8XZRoO.gif)

>>65641

No. 65651

File: 1700536124307.gif (323.67 KB, 480x288, pU71Qrs.gif)

>>65650
2D was my husbando in middle school

No. 65654

>>65628
What? Women are posted in that thread all the time

No. 65657

>>65654
That anon has been posting about her for a few hours and saying he only dislikes that actress because she's not pretty enough. I don't think women would say a conventionally attractive actress is ugly and should be punched because of that.

No. 65658

>>65583
You guys are so fucking stupid and dumb do you know not even a year ago she was a-logging about wanting to stab and kill people from this site for “rejecting” her and brainstorming about how she’s totally going to kill someone to relieve her angst. Yet you permaban and give the farmcow layout to anons after getting in the dumbest infights. Why not permaban the stupid Romanian since that’s what she deserves? She will never integrate get used to it!

No. 65659

>>65657
>I don't think women would say a conventionally attractive actress is ugly and should be punched because of that.
Have you ever met a woman? Have you only just started using this site? Women are fully fledged human beings and many are evil and horrible. Get used to it.

No. 65660

>>65657
Um are you talking about the discussion about her in the dumbass shit thread? That was like two days ago and no some anons were saying she’s unattractive and some were saying she’s attractive, but no one said she deserves to be punched because she’s unattractive. Anons were also talking about how she’s a shitty person and a nepo baby, why does that sound like it was all said by one male to you?

No. 65661

>>65660
Anon is stupid. Probably a larping scrote himself. Report.

No. 65662

>>65657
Twitter misses you, anon.

No. 65665

>>65658
I'm pissed that normal posters get banned over nothing or for shitty reasons and Romanianon can a-log at other nonas while the mods and admin just give her a friendly talking-to. She promised to integrate! bullshit. How did you talk to her, did you phone her up? Give me a fucking break.

Also, however, why are other nonas continuing to engage with Romanianon? Just ignore and report. She's never gonna change and provoking her seems like male behavior at this point (no, I don't think it's males who are provoking her own here, but it's just copying what males do to mentally sick ppl on other sites).

No. 65669

>>65665
>it's just copying what males do to mentally sick ppl on other sites
agreed, people just need to ignore it and stop shitting up the thread even further

No. 65672

>>65665
I think Romanianon does get banned, but she's admitted before that she IP hops

No. 65673

>>65672
Avoiding bans is way too easy on this site

No. 65675

>>65658
>>65665
The ban/appeals process can be used to facilitate a conversation. We extended to her the same courtesy that we have to other users who behaved in a similar way, which is one last warning before their posts will no longer be allowed here. She knows how to ban evade and permabans do not work (she's had many), so all of her posts will just be deleted.

No. 65686

>>65675
I can only imagine what these ban appeals looked like

No. 65687

>>65659
Usually people beating up and domestically abusing women and saying those women deserve it tend to be men, retard. %99 of incels think ugly women deserve to be abused

No. 65688

What is the original of the Spoiler pic? Sorry if thats a retarded question I've just always wondered if its a lc or something.

No. 65690

>>65688
It's the queen

No. 65697

>>65675
RIP to our sister who couldn’t integrate, wish her the best with all my heart.

No. 65698

>>65687
> Usually people beating up and domestically abusing women and saying those women deserve it tend to be men, retard. %99 of incels think ugly women deserve to be abused
Nothing like this was ever said about Anya Taylor Joy, stop trying to start infights. The punchable faces thread is filled with pictures of women who annoy lc users, it isn’t men posting them

No. 65699

>>65698
Anon kept saying anya wasn't even pretty enough, looked like an alien and that she deserved to get to get punched. Quit lying, if you think a woman deserves getting punched because she doesn't fit the Hollywood beauty standard which even other actresses can't fit without proper makeup lighting etc. you're as bad as a man. No woman thinks about punching her when they see a woman they don't find attractive, that's male behavior little incel.

No. 65700

>>65624
leftcows is one of the most popular and most frequently updated threads and is repeatedly being locked for extended periods over bullshit, yet there was a troon spamming cp for months, the threads he would post in didn't get locked and his posts were removed if cp or banned accordingly. we know the cows had a habit of checking it. either there's more going on, some bias and conflict of interest possibly affecting what we're allowed to discuss here or we have idiotic mods determining that the most retarded threads ever are allowed to exist doxing private randoms with no ties to any other cows, posts about teenagers and minors for idk being young and stupid, and photoshopping or badly done cosplay in and of itself as opposed to actually popular threads covering adult narcissistic micro internet celebrities with ties to groomers, ideologues and demonic homosexual venture capitalists. if shay is your cup of milk you get a whole shaynatorium to see a grown autopedophilic woman putting on a diaper for the umpteenth time but leftcows is locked for a month due to… higher influx from twitterfags and derailing about palestinians and israelis at the height of escalation over a month ago? who cares? why can't you moderate?

No. 65701

>>65699
No, what was actually said is that she’s a mean person who used to be a bully

No. 65707

>>65701
Stop pretending to be a different anon. Just because you got bullied in highschool doesn't mean you now have the freepass to call women punchable for being ugly.

No. 65711

>>65707
punchable face is a subjective term but it basically means they find that persons face annoying. she’s allowed to find whoever annoying looking and post them in a thread dedicated to that purpose she doesn’t need a ‘free pass’.

No. 65715

if namefagging/tripfagging is a bannable offence, why is it possible to do? is it not possible to use an imageboard format without it?

No. 65721

File: 1700675069318.png (4.09 KB, 638x185, 1700666028943.png)

could someone tell me what font this is? At first I thought it was someone's own font set up, but several other anons have said it's the default font for the website.it's a different one for me, so I wasn't aware.

No. 65733

>>65721
Whatever you set your font to on your computer/browser is what will show up. So, thats a you issue.

No. 65735

>>65715
It's a newfag trap. Why do you think Anonymous isn't pre-filled into the name field

No. 65765

>>65651
Me toooooooo nona good taste

No. 65773

>>65707
I watched the entire discussion play out, no one said that she needs to get punched for being ugly, stop making things up. I was never bullied and I’ve never said anything about Anya or anyone else being punchable, I just don’t like the fact that you created an entire made up narrative about why anons were making fun of her. People were saying her rich parents bought her career because she’s too unattractive to have become famous if she wasn’t a nepo baby, then an anon (you, I’m sure) started samefagging about how beautiful you think she is. No one ever said she deserves to be punched or “domestically abused” of all things you lying retard

No. 65787

>>65733
How is this an issue? I was just asking if anyone knew what font this was.

No. 65822

File: 1700752257021.png (8.47 KB, 461x122, 8b1a92ab7bba528af779919ab66093…)

>>65721
you mean the font or the way the letters look like? picrel doesn't have those pixels

No. 65906

>>65612
Huh that explains some things. Thanks for sharing! I do think it's funny that white nationalists will lean super hard into the anti racism shit and think that would give them a cover but they always sound so rehearsed and OTT about it. Too bad we can't talk in private about this, would love to know more about her

No. 65946

Honestly I'm surprised the leftcows thread was locked for so long, when tradthot had equally if not worse amount of baiting twitter troons/moids.

No. 65953

>>65735
Wait, do you fill in "Anonymous" into the name field?

No. 65955

>>65953
No lol

No. 65956

File: 1700835604798.png (6.77 KB, 292x36, Screenshot 2023-11-24 at 15.21…)

>>65953
No and that wasn't my point at all. Over the years a lot of anons have asked why we even have an email or subject or name field in the first place, like >>65715, and I feel like a mod or admin on the lolcord has said before that they keep those fields around on purpose because it's funny when a newfag enters their info. See crystal.cafe for example. They want to make it clear even to newfags that they don't need to enter anything. Meanwhile, on here, in the Quick Reply field it even says 'Name' as if you're prompted to put something in. So I see why newfags fall for it and I believe it's by design, that's all I wanted to say

No. 65988

>>65956
Oh ok, I misunderstood then kekk

No. 66005

>>65946
It shouldn't be locked, and it was one of the biggest threads on here. Get more farmhands who read up on the lore if you want better moderation I guess?

No. 66030

>>66005
Lore doesn't take precedent over unruly posters.

No. 66042

>>66030
It doesn't have anything to do with lore. Locking a thread because mods can't handle the traffic is bad moderation, or are they understaffed? I don't see the application up anymore. If they do have enough mods, then why is the thread locked again? Mods can't moderate the thread properly?

No. 66043

>>66042
It probably generates hundreds of reports because it's always disorganized. It being in that state has nothing to do with mods because if they modded too much, then it's just more complaints.

No. 66053

>>66043
>It being in that state has nothing to do with mods
Yeah, it's the lack of moderation. Locking a thread means they don't need to moderate it whatsoever.

>if they modded too much, then it's just more complaints.

You realize that people are complaining about how threads are arbitrarily treated? Maybe mods shouldn't lock threads they're don't want to personally moderate. The majority of /ot/ is a bigger dumpster fire than left cows ever was and they know it too.

No. 66062

>>66053
You're just baitin the staff. Proceed to tinfoil even though it doesn't make sense.

No. 66207

I got banned yesterday and I appealed my expired ban some hours ago. I just wanted to say to the farmhand? mod? that I appreciate her work despite disagreeing on the topic I was banned for. That's all.

No. 66247

Thanks for the snowflakes!

No. 66250

I love the snowflakes so much! How festive!

No. 66251

File: 1701455612139.jpg (205.84 KB, 1080x1350, 6b01610330763e2bc7a5634774a61a…)

Yaaay! I'm happy to see the snowflakes return!

No. 66255

thank you for the snowflakes and most of all thank you for a way to turn them off!! love them on desktop but prefer them off on my phone. glad to have the choice

No. 66258

File: 1701459500052.gif (1.99 MB, 253x231, yay.gif)

Yes!!! Thank you! How kind and lovely of you.

No. 66292

>>66258
I didn't realize how much I love watching cows eat snowflakes until you posted this nona

No. 66322

Idk if this goes in meta or not but who do you nonas think is gonna win each award? I’m 100% sure titsperging is gonna be the one who wins plot twist

No. 66323

>>66322
Admins who actually take care of the site might win that category imo

No. 66326

>>66322
I think meta general is fine for anons to discuss who they hope win?

No. 66328

Just to confirm we are happy for you to discuss the Lolcow awards in this thread. Have fun!

No. 66342

why is the canada thread autosaged?

No. 66347

>>66342
because of the infighting over immigration (that's what I thought anyway, it was a dumpster fire for a while)

No. 66474

Did the Venus thread disappear? I can't find it for some reason

No. 66480

>>65401
>since oldmin
So you have a sample of … one. The state of this place.

No. 66485

>>66480
Nta, but that's not what that meant

No. 66486

>>66480
No, it's two previous admins before the current one(s). Oldmin and shaymin. Also, I said "feels like" anon. Oldmin's reign lasted a few years so I grew accustomed to that type of struff.

No. 66490

>>66474
Nvm it showed back up now… weird that it was apparently hidden for a little bit

No. 66531

Would a vintage toy collecting thread be okay to make? If so, where should I make it?

No. 66533

>>66531
yes although we already have a doll thread and make it in /m/

No. 66603

What is /manure for? Ik cream is mostly for self posters, 2X is feminism, and Shay is Shay, but I have no clue what manure is

No. 66615

does every ban not get red texted? there's so much racism and racebait in celebricows and I don't see it getting cleaned up despite reporting some.

No. 66616

>>66615
People can get bans without their posts being redtexted, and a lot of redtexts are given without the poster being banned

No. 66673

>>66616
>a lot of redtexts are given without the poster being banned
that part is wrong fyi. Redtexts always mean a ban happened.
>>66615
However if 2 anons spam 30 infight posts there might only be 2 redtexts (1 per user).

No. 66684

>>66616
When is a redtext not a ban?

No. 66687

>>66673
They are almost always used for that purpose but from personal experience I've seen farmhands use minute bans and redtext to communicate. I've had a post redtexted ages ago and never recieved a ban page upon trying to post directly afterwards. Whether that was a malfunction in my case I'm not sure.

No. 66692

Just came here to say the SOS:AWL logo they have added to the page banners is so cute and I am in love with whoever is in charge of choosing those

No. 66694

>>66692
I'm confused, what do you mean?

No. 66695

>>66673
>that part is wrong fyi. Redtexts always mean a ban happened.
That's not true. You can get a redtext without getting a ban and get a ban without getting a redtext.

No. 66696

>>66695
Redtexts can only be given as part of a ban, unless you got 1 minute warning bans you never saw because your IP cycled out before it expired.

No. 66712

>>66696
Not true and mods have addressed this.

No. 66714

File: 1702617654158.png (966.63 KB, 922x882, canada 5.png)

I want to make a Canada General #2, how do I do that?

No. 66715


No. 66723

>>66692
The banner changes have been great, makes the site feel a lot more welcoming and cute. I just wish they'd finish cleaning out those awful banners with bad things in them. Always upsetting to see n*dity.(USER HAS BEEN PUT OUT TO PASTURE)

No. 66731

>>66723
>with bad things in them. Always upsetting to see n*dity.
Are you a fucking baby wtf

No. 66737

massive racesperg derail in the confessions thread

No. 66743

can we get a BinkiePrincess post reveal? she’s actively shitting up her own thread on a regular basis and currently trying to defend her own pedophilia >>>/pt/864707

No. 66748

>>66743
Please. They haven't stopped shitting up the thread since it's inception.

No. 66751

I keep seeing all these new banners about troons and moids. That's it? That's the best we can do?
May as well make one with a welcome mat for them if we're going to obsess over them that much.

No. 66752

>>66751
I've only seen one, the one with the witch

No. 66755

>>66743
I don't know why they don't lock shit threads from the get-go. Especially if its not something like "shit op". A "shit thread" should be thread closure.

No. 66766

>>66755
her thread should stay open even though the OP is shit. Jess would LOVE for farmhands to close it and bury her past, but she was still selling pedo pander porn and interacting with that circle even after her baby was born. and now she won’t stop WKing herself in her own thread.

No. 66769

>>66751
Seethe more moid.

No. 66771

>>66751
The old banners with female nudity were like a welcome sign for them, these new ones are telling them to fuck off.

No. 66787

>>66751
>That's it? That's the best we can do?
Then make some yourself

No. 66810

when will the results be posted for the lolcow awards?

No. 66838

>>66810
came here to ask the same thing, i'm so curious about the results

No. 66914

>>66810
>>66838
February - March.

Still need to remove the voting header. These things take time.

No. 66916

>>66771
They come here seeking attention, you retard. The old ones meant nothing to them because coomers don't care about a quick flash. Again, you're literally making this site all about them and insisting it's the opposite. This isn't twitter, hun. Doesn't work like that here.

No. 66924

>>66914
it takes several months to remove a header from a website and view the results from a google docs poll? you make the mods sound like amateurs. it should at least be posted before 2023 is over.

No. 66926

>>66924
The mods and admin are unpaid to do all this work and have lives outside of lolcow which is more than I can say for most of the users. If you don't like it, you don't have to be here. This has been routine for years now, newfag.

No. 66940

>>66924
Maybe the admin wants to spend time with their family for the holidays instead of focusing on what whiny entitled anons want

No. 66942

>>66916
You’re right this isn’t twitter, that’s why we can have banners telling men to kill themselves. Sorry if it hurts your feelings.

No. 66972

>>66940
This. Newfags always find something to bitch about.

No. 66998

Would it be possible to create a new Amberlynn Reid thread instead of necroing the old one? With the purpose of creating a good start for the thread with a milk overview spanning of links and a rundown of each year as well as a list of associated cows such as prominent ambabies and reaction channel cows. The old thread just lacks genuine effort. I feel like we could have a better milky discussion here than on kiwi or Reddit where this topic has a following, just because of the fact that we’re women who also notice that amberlynn haydurs are retarded moids too.

No. 67000

when are we shutting down

No. 67005

Merry Christmas admin and farmhands!!!

No. 67014

>>66998
i would love an alr thread. didn't she make it into one of the new banners? she should have an updated thread.

No. 67019

>>66998
I'd much prefer it over the other farms. also a good old fashioned lolcow who isn't a pedo or a rapist would be nice here, might uplift the mood a bit

No. 67030

>>66998
You are welcome to make a fresh thread!

No. 67032

>>67030
Thank you so much, I’ll start working on compiling all the milk! The current one that's pretty shit is on /pt/. Should the new one be there too or should we try to see if it gets farmers more involved on /snow/ first?

No. 67059

>>67032
i'd put it in /snow/ for more traffic. if farmhands dont agree with it they can always move the thread over to /pt/

No. 67838

out of curiosity, I have a question for oldfags. how has LC site culture changed over the years? have those changes been for better or worse?

No. 67899

>>67838
Not sure how old we're talking here, but I was there when /cgl/ started going downhill and began paying serious attention to the site when the Felice Fawn, Berry Tsukasa and shmegeh threads were starting to take off (2015).
Might just be the nostalgia talking here, but people are a lot more paranoid and sensitive nowadays. You could make edgy jokes and be cringe about your 4chan-related interests without people and jannies losing their minds. It felt as though the posters were both cringier yet cooler back then.
You can still have decent conversations and stumble upon fun threads, but you have to shift through a lot of shit, such as tiktok-fags, unfunny people trying to be funny, low-quality content for the sake of content etc. Guess the early years were better due to the amount of content we could talk about. The best threads around now are the moovie nights and doodle board in my opinion.
The community was slightly chaotic, but the site felt like it had a purpose and everyone had a similar mindset across the boards/threads despite varying topics. It's kind of like comparing old anime cons to what we have now I guess.
I think it's a clash of oldfags getting older and newfags not understanding the culture of the site and where it came from.
Moderation has also become more stifling, but at least the site loads faster now.
There's also this recently made thread >>>/ot/1817934 if you want to read more about what some oldfags think about the state of the site.

No. 67942

Tranny accusing me of being a moid and requesting hand pics to masturbate over
>>1957993

No. 68386

>>67838
>>67899 is pretty spot-on.
for the record i have no nostalgia for how lolcow used to be.

No. 68512

>>67899
What do you think is to blame for this push to sensitivity and policing people so much? While I agree society felt meaner back in like the 00's when I was a teenager at least you could say whatever you wanted and it was like damn thats an opinion, let's move on. Now it's like everything vaguely non PC has got the pitchforks out and people are like leading crusades against people for their opinions it's utter madness imo.
The left and nerd culture used to feel like a refuge from society and the right…now it's just as puritanical and unrelenting

No. 68552

>>68512
There's a lot of people looking for proof about things now which is understandable. early 2000s was tabloid culture, even online.

No. 69117

I think I posted in the wrong place but I'm trying to figure out what happened with Elaine's thread(s)

No. 69213

>>67032
Are you still working on this anon? I'd be happy to try to make a write up of her milk if you aren't interested anymore

No. 69242

Can I be permabanned please? Thank you.

No. 69673

>>67838
i'm late but like >>67899, this place was a lot more fun, so, so much more fun. the milk especially was way more entertaining and silly, mainly because people actually went to cons and/or ran in the same circles with a lot of cows, so there was always something stupid to talk about and it was fun to just laugh at people being weird and goofy. most of the cows we talked about were genuine eccentric types who were relatively harmless speds with unusual personality quirks and strange behavior, other than obviously toxic characters like onision. no thots and political stuff - just weirdos like kanadajin, early venus, vicky, felice, pre-incest chris-chan.

i feel like older farmers also had a genuine sense of humor about themselves and their lives as well. we all knew we were weirdo weebs, since most of us grew up during a time when anime and manga was still perceived as "strange" by normalfags, and being on the internet was considered even weirder by most since you would get labeled a nerd or a shut in introvert. so even though people here did fight a lot and we could be assholes to each other, i think we understood one other and related well because we all had similar interests and experiences in our own lives that drove us to using lolcow, /cgl/, maxfag, etc. i don't feel the same kind of connection on the boards now and i notice a lot of the younger users don't always understand how different things were because "nerd" culture has become so normalized and mainstream.

i do think some of it is age related, but it's also how internet culture has changed since the mid 2010's and after covid. i agree, people are way more sensitive, way more argumentative, too quick to get upset even when you meant no harm; it's like they're always assuming you have some sort of ulterior motive or have an agenda. like >>68512, in the 2000's people said and wrote crazy offensive stuff all the time. people in general moved on, even if they were offended or bothered by it, they just moved on. you were expected to be thick skinned and not take things personally, because there was always the risk of you getting posted and flamed on encyclopedia dramatica or 4chan for engaging with trolls. internet culture also did not revolve around politics 24/7. we used to get told that it wasn't about us, stop being retarded, go touch grass, gtfo your mom's basement…it was quite mean but eventually you got over it.

No. 69714

>>69673
Who is "we," motherfucker?

No. 69725

>>69714
I stand by anon

No. 69974

why do i keep getting told i'm ban evading when i've never even received a ban message/warning or whatever

No. 71389

>>69974
It happens sometimes. You cop a ban for a post you never made. It’s something to do with the vpn getting mixed up. Just appeal it. Or if that won’t work just download another web browser. Admins here are fucking stupid kek.

No. 71672

File: 1708707184502.png (895.91 KB, 640x640, IMG_0773.png)

Been using lolcow for quite a few years now and I’ve always wondered a few things:
1. How did people find out about lolcow when it was first created; was it advertised anywhere?
2. How does lolcow afford to keep running what with no ads?

No. 71674

>>71672
1. oldfags usually migrated here from /cgl/ and then stamina rose
2. donations from users and staff members

No. 71695

>>71672
We (the admins) pay out of pocket for all costs, no contributions are made by farmhands or users. There was a Ko-fi at one point that the previous admin made, but we closed it as it was pointless (it hadn't received a donation in over 6 months at the time of us closing it).

No. 71718

>>71695
there was someone who gave the site a large amount of money a while back (I think it was during shaymin's time), was that all gone or was there any money leftover?

No. 71722

>>71695
Hey how come the "three of you" only ever use the turquoise admin tag?

No. 71730

>>71718
that was when oldmin was around and threatening to shut down the site

No. 71732

What counts as bone rattling?

No. 71742

File: 1708785998836.jpg (178.05 KB, 1080x1913, vTngcXp.jpg)

Would a thread on lookmaxxing scammers @syrianpsycho or @anastasiabeautyfascia be milky enough to warrant a thread and not get closed?
A lot of them shill their self help products by lying about surgery or encouraging their followers to develop insecurities to make money. In addition to them being political grifters.

No. 71743

>>71742
Thread requests is in /pt/. I swear someone posts something like this here every other day now kek.

No. 71784

Do any actual women post in the ideal male bodies thread? Do they??

No. 71785

>>71784
Yes. This is what women actually like when they aren't being nagged to death about dadbods being so hot ackthually.

No. 71788

>>71785
Damn ok could’ve sworn you were all fags kek

No. 71793

>>71784
it's funny how that thread is full of that specific type of muscular moid. There's nothing wrong with liking whitebread with muscles but I'm sure anons' taste is more diverse right?

No. 71795

File: 1708849780004.png (40.22 KB, 1191x117, 433.png)

>>71793
That's because whenever something slightly different from that is posted (like that one super skinny slenderman looking guy) anons roast them in like 100 replies kek so everyone else is probably too scared to post

No. 71802

>>71793
I asked if anyone liked skinny guys and they posted a slightly less roided out roidpig kek.

No. 71815

>>71784
No it’s direct clone of the 4chan handsome men thread except a little classier. Demographic shifts and it’s not even subtle

No. 71835

Where is the CC hate thread?

No. 71836

>>71784
As long as they cut off the heads of the moids I dont mind the thread tbh. The ones who try to sneak in faces need to be banned

No. 71845

>>71732
Still waiting on this one.
Another question I have is why exactly kpopfaggotery is banned? I hate kpop but I wanted to post an image relevant to discussion as a comparison point but I’ve seen anons get banned for just posting any picture of a korean idol. Just curious as to why it is exactly + what’s allowed and what’s not.

No. 71853

>>71845
There’s not logic behind it. Oldmin banned K-pop threads because it led to infighting and insanity which was fair enough. It never meant any mention or picture of a kpop celebrity wasn’t allowed. Current mods are just going off old memories and interpretations which leads to just any (kpop mention) getting banned like it was in some tumblr kids DNI.

No. 71855

>>71845
Kpop fans spammed lolcow and crystal cafe with extremely fast-moving thirst threads that started taking over the rest of the site so they first got containment threads and when that didn't work they got banned from both sites and made choachan.cafe which later turned into heolkek.cafe. Check it out and click one or two threads and all your questions about the current state of lolcow will be answered

No. 71859

>>71845
kpopfags just wouldn't stay contained and would spam kpop reaction pics in unrelated threads, so even these get redtexted

No. 71862

>>71855
Ayrt, wow, give me my soul back. I thought fujos were weird. I can see how allowing kpop could harm the culture of site.

No. 71967

>>71855
also after choachan.cafe collapsed the admin of that site (a former farmhand with a huge hateboner for oldmin) started a weird schizo spam campaign here and in the lolcow hate thread on CC claiming that lolcow was owned and exclusively moderated by some kiwi farms retard called Ashley Jankowski. oldmin posted about it in the choachan thread here but I think its deleted now

No. 72079

>>71967
It was up to 3 former farmhands who were involved with choatard fuckery. One former discord mod known for harassing farmers on discord, and Schizo tranny or another cow saying some pinterest was proof cerbmin is some cow named Ashley.

The new k pop site has explicit rules against lewding underaged idols because CC had problems with sexualizing straykids and other groups.

No. 72129

https://anonymousworldwide.com/2021/12/10/the-gen-z-hacker-behind-operation-lolcow-farm/

Really late, but is this the shim that's been posting CP here a couple years ago? If so, is there any milk? Top kek at that "hacking" btw

No. 72262


No. 72379

>>71967
>>72079
that wasn't us dude, that's the same infighting samefagging schizo who's spamming you guys about your admin being an evil moid. although you're probably the schizo yourself, huh, given how you're recounting your retarded story about ashley and how everyone is a tranny? give it up, sister

No. 72413

>>72379
So how is that FBI report going? Are your devices and modems still infected with AIDS?

No. 72443

>>72441
retard, that sc is not from lolcow.

No. 72445

>>72444
Our site isn't formatted like that. Plus, just look at the post numbers, they just got it off a different 4chan board

No. 72448

>>72443
>>72445
Ok, sorry for the mistake then

No. 72449

File: 1709363575279.jpeg (457.37 KB, 1170x1076, IMG_6358.jpeg)

>>72129
Definitely a tranny

No. 72468

>>72449
My brother in Christ this is the old interview Elaine did when she first started larping as anonymoose

No. 72532

When will the site get the recent updates that were revealed after hellweek? I really want to use the watch threads feature.is there a a time when will it occur? Or even a time estimate or has it been already implemented?

No. 73641

Is there a new version of the online vs irl thread? They were amusing to scroll through, although they did bring a lot of drama so I wouldn't be surprised if the threads all got deleted.

No. 73644

hello from moovie thread anons! can someone please pin the new moovie thread in /ot/? 
>>>1936427

No. 73646

>>73644
sorry, fixing the link for new moovie thread

>>>/ot/1936427

No. 73719

Thank you to the admins upgrading the site! I bet the back end is a mess after all this time kek

No. 73731

>>65612
This is a very late reply, but I was a close friend to both of them and they seemingly vanished from the Internet entirely last year. Does this website still have an operating Discord?

No. 73956


No. 73958

test

No. 73964

Is the sage and unsaged post look different now? They're not blue or green for me anymore

No. 73971

File: 1711733432307.jpg (135.29 KB, 600x597, trance-version.jpg)

yay we're back! performance is much speedier it seems – browsing boards, loading threads, expanding pictures, opening the catalog – all seem noticeably faster to me!

No. 73979

not sure if its related but since the update my browser doesn't crash when I try and open the catalog on /ot/!! thank you mods!

No. 74073

Is there even an actual issue with tradwife posting or is it just some farmers being schizo again?

No. 74074

>>74073
I feel like it’s 80% schizos. I get accused of being a tradwife every time I disagree with some blackpiller on here even though I have premarital lesbian sex on the regular

No. 74077

>>74073
It's the new cope now that scrotefoiling has been banned
>everyone that disgrees with me is a moid tradthot

No. 74219

File: 1711925949668.jpg (107.16 KB, 716x1103, wtfffff.jpg)

Lolcow was mentioned on the gay forum LPSG in 2023. I was looking for mentions of Romeo Beckham in lolcow and that site came up.

No. 74220

>>74219
Disappointed but not surprised. Also an anon in the last vent thread said she overheard her gay male co-worker name drop lc.

No. 74233

The April foods joke seems actually really clever.

No. 74234

My heart literally dropped when I saw the "ads". Good prank admins kek.

No. 74235

>>74233
yeah, I loled. Not site-breaking, but hilarious. Love the Eugenia ad.

No. 74236

ngl I got jumpscared when I refreshed the page and they suddenly appeared

No. 74239

The fake ads are fantastic ! Good job farm team and happy April's Cow day !

No. 74241

Love the effort ladies for April Fools!

No. 74245

kekkk these are great

No. 74247

10/10 great work on the ads

No. 74252

Love the ads. The Taylor one must be giving her fangirls such rage rn kek

No. 74277

Love the ads holy shit kek, for a split second I really thought someone hacked lolcor
10/10

No. 74291

april fools day ads are incredible!!! wouldnt complain if they were kept around kek

No. 74313

love the ads! Great one this year

No. 74316

So the hetship shitters going around are straight women too, right.

No. 74321

Love the April Fools jokes. Thank you adminonnies for taking effort to make them

No. 74324

We're glad you guys had fun with the adverts! As we're removing them from the rest of the site we've made it so that they'll live forever in the April Fool's Day thread here:
>>>/ot/1945730

No. 74339

>>74324
Thank you!! I was hoping there would be an archive and users can see ones they mightve missed

No. 74340

>>74324
Based thank you

No. 74952

Will you please split /m/ already and take all the fandom and art related threads over there? Including the psyop one

No. 74997

>>74219
>>74220
So you're all just newfags?
LC entered the mainstream at least five years ago. KF always knew about us. What the fuck is this pearl-clutching?

No. 75952

>>74997
This. The Creepshow Art drama videos with millions of views have bought in more people than any mention in some obscure fag forum

No. 76404

What constitutes an oldfag and a newfag? When does a newfag turn into a regularfag?

No. 76405

>>76404
Newfag is a state of mind more than a timeframe imo

No. 76406

>>76405
Also, it could be your first day here but you're not a newfag as long as you only lurk and don't post.

No. 76409

>>76406
this isn't true really. newfag/oldfag tendencies aren't the same as being on the site. having site etiquette isn't a good indicator.

No. 76411

Should i be asking admins to lift bans from VPN ips when i see them? Or they aren't going to unban them anyway?

No. 76629

has anyone else noticed that a lot of anons are not really reading their posts? idk if it’s a reading comprehension issue but a few times lately, i have noticed anons taking my replies out of context or ignoring portions altogether. they aren’t being mean or anything thankfully, but it gets annoying because they will sometimes repeat basic information i already know about a cow or just go off on a ramble about something completely unrelated to what i wrote. it just happened again today: i wrote a reply, and i noticed one anon started going off on a tangent and regurgitating stuff i’ve known for years. so i reread my reply to see if i was being unintentionally vague and she just ignored the first part of my post, where you could tell i was already familiar with the subject of the thread.

No. 76630

File: 1715440534149.jpg (217.84 KB, 1024x1024, soup for nona.jpg)

copped a retarded ban recently but seeing the uptick in retarded posting makes me kind of empathise with admins more than ever. being mentioned on tiktok has truly given this place a bout of aids and thanks farmhands for doing your best. I know it can't be easy and sorry for sassing you. sometimes a shitpost is just a shitpost though tbf
hope farmers and farmhands alike are doing well

No. 76635

>>76629
>has anyone else noticed that a lot of anons are not really reading their posts?
This is not a novel issue and has always been the case on lc. The truth is is that a lot of anons are not very smart—like literal NEETs—or they're underaged and by consequence not very smart.

No. 76636

>>76635
This is true. Sometimes anons will do this because they want to let off steam by starting a fight. It's always been a problem as far as I know, people just act like this when they're anonymous.

No. 76653

Can an admin or farmhand tell us what the (now deleted) >>2000000 post in /ot/ was? /ot/fags were waiting for it and we missed it. Was it one of the moids who was spamming?

No. 76654

File: 1715537868559.png (13.6 KB, 275x208, 1715458504093.png)

It's unlikely that this retardation will spread to here, but apparently troons are planning a spam campaign for the 1st of June. Might be a good opportunity for a hell week lmao.

No. 76655

>>76654
What site is that - tumblr? I don't see how it would affect us.

No. 76657

>>76654
harassment begging for approval doesnt really help their cause kek, i'd love if these fruits came over here and tried to put on a show about how theyre totally women

No. 76667

>>76653
It was a soyjak..

No. 76670

>>76655
You never know tbh

No. 76674

>>76654
>don't stoop to their level
I bet they wouldn't be able to find a single instance of a terf sending a death threat, meanwhile I could send them an entire folder of trannies and TRAs threatening and using violence against women.

No. 76676

>>76674
They're doing a reverse and larping as victims as usual, all while trying to slander terves as goreposters.

No. 76703

File: 1715691599095.png (24.29 KB, 781x208, Things You Hate #36.png)

Can I ask why was this anon banned?

No. 76704

>>76703
Being too based

No. 76775

>>76703
maybe hit too close to home for a farmhand. they really are pathetic these days

No. 76788

>>76703
maybe alogging?

No. 76872

>>76788
towards whom? or does simply saying "these type of men will murder women" count as alogging now

No. 76875

>>76703
The mods are legit brain dead, they banned someone in that people who have punchable faces thread for not saging, and then we had that whole good moid thread ordeal and a mod leaking someones ip. Too much stupidity this year and we're not even halfway yet.

No. 76876

File: 1715835283639.jpeg (412.45 KB, 1054x778, IMG_3923.jpeg)

Guess they weren’t kidding amirite

No. 76912

>>76876
ironic, farmhands themselves are the ultimate nitpickers

No. 77554

Has there ever been a lolcow.farm e-zine? Like where nonnas could submit articles, drawings, reviews etc.

No. 77558


No. 77680

pretty sure the recent uptick in "blackpill" anons degrading women for just about anything are just males

No. 78283

test

No. 78747

I was gonna link to Goatchan with the suspicious amount of feedback relative to other posts in the post art thread but no one made the next complaints thread yet and she already got banned kek. What does goatchan get from replying to herself?

No. 79027

File: 1718328574546.png (11.23 KB, 1566x96, is it really (1).png)

Sorry if this isn't actually the right place but is it really cowtipping if someone is going around physically assaulting people? I'd hate to make a big deal out of nothing, but she's been hinting at going full horrorcow, bragging about having a firearm and manifesto and painting an animal crushing scene. It's just we thought she was a harmless spineless retard a while back and now she's going around hitting and spitting on people. Her behavior is escalating fast. Maybe it shouldn't have been announced to the board, but still…

No. 79028

>>79027
sorry fam, tipping is tipping, sort of like when shayna was filming kidnapping porn outside on her balcony
doesn't matter what a cow does; you do not take it irl, cuz that's the rules (or if you do, you don't announce that you've violated the rules)

No. 79029

>>79028
>>79027
we also had an entire thread on zoophilia where it was entirely personal army moralfaggotry so it's completely reasonable for anon to ask. that doesn't fall under cowtipping though honestly, personal army, call to arms shit is different.

No. 79030

Can we like estate I.Ds or something? Atleast something like session I.Ds. for a hellweek.

No. 79031

>>79030
Seems like that wouldn't do anything other than punish users who use the site properly, I don't think it would help with ban-evaders, which is the whole problem this site has in the first place. People who are baiting just immediately ban evade to continue starting shit.

No. 79032

Can mods crack down on people going into other countries threads just to shit on them? It’s happened several times in both the British and American threads and every time it derails the thread.

No. 79223

There's a troon or a mega handmaiden shitting up the Lillee Jean thread. Starting in-fights, doing their best to derail (and succeeding) and it's so annoying. Or maybe it's Laur trying to kill the talk of her and her daughter, wouldn't surprise me. They became even more active after that one journalist wrote about them and the tea channels they DMCAd got their videos rereleased in YouTube.
I wish one day admin will expose all the messages they sent kek.

No. 79319

When CP posts are deleted is the IP sent to the FBI? I ask because there was just one in /pt/ and it had links and I wanna know if they were sent to the FBI (please don’t link them if you have it, just send it to the FBI yourself if farmhands/admit don’t)

No. 79391

>>79319
According to past communications the lolcow admins send information such as IPs connected to the people posting illegal things like CP to the FBI, yes.

No. 79414

Does anyone know how many people use this site? I am curious

No. 79419

Sorry if this is a retard question but why isn't Shayna in /pt/? I just started reading her threads so maybe it's answered in there but she has so many threads AND the Shaynatorium?

No. 79420

>>79419
Because oldfags keep insisting "s-she's not a real cow!", not a legacy cow, something something about the thread quality not being good. You won't get a real answer, but no she will never be in /pt/ because they don't want her there. This question has been asked a lot.

No. 79422

>>79419
>>79420
When will you guys understand that having tons of threads is NOT how cows gain /pt/ status, that's literally not how the site works
>>78821
>>78825
>>78826
some cows that gained /pt/ status had even less threads than shayna before getting there

No. 79439

>>79414
Hellweek had ~5000 unique posters over 2 weeks. There's more stats in the Hellweek thread

No. 79463

>>79422
NTA but I've been here for years now and I don't really understand how cows gain /pt/ status either. Plenty of notorious legacy cows like Dakota and Taylor were never moved there, for example. I don't get it

No. 79519

I’ve been having more fun here in the last few days than I have in a while. I feel like nonnas who are actively trying to use other interesting threads beyond just the usual chatroom threads have really helped with that. Also racebait is getting more consistently banned. It’s nice to see. Perhaps summerfags are also starting to lose interest or integrate. I hope this continues.

No. 79520

>>79519
Agree, nona. I'm loving the /ot/ revival. It's been fun!

No. 79543

File: 1719614952938.jpeg (260.04 KB, 1179x1525, IMG_3485.jpeg)

Mods, is this whole thing in the vagina thread about going to the gyno as a virgin and being denied a pelvic exam but offered an alternative rectal exam actually a troll? Just typing that I feel like it must be. You can’t even examine the same things rectally as you can vaginally. If this is a troll and they even got so weird as to include some public pool / public school typo… hats off to her, honestly it’s weird as fuck

No. 79559

so when is unpopular opinion thread getting removed? it generates way more baiting and infighting than dumbass shit ever did. it's a magnet for trolls and moids to shit all over the board. a lot of nonnas are genuine people and respond to them, there aren't enough moderation to keep up with it so the overall quality of /ot/ is fucking garbage right now. either ban VPNs or delete unpopular opinion.

No. 79621

So is the weaboo hate thread just a containment thread for retards to sperg at each other? If so, fair enough

No. 80078

I was browsing the skirby thread in /snow/, and had to tap out minutes in because every other post was straight up braindead. A lot of anons there also struggle to integrate, I wish the influx of 15 year old tiktok users would fuck off this site already.

No. 80282

Why is kpop still banned
>inb4 spergy, dont follow rules
dont lie cause thats not the reason. Just look at the inifghts above me,

No. 80283

>>80282
There is an entire imageboard for you kpop faggots. No one wants you here.

No. 80284

>>80283
stop yapping faggot.(infighting)

No. 80285

>>80078
Yeah unfortunately they're her demographic. They were beginning to be reigned in in the photoshopper's thread but it all went out the window when she got her own. Hopefully with enough bans they'll get the message.

No. 80286

Is there any farmhand awake or even active?
There is a ban evader sperg in the confessions thread aiding to cowtipping and infighting with all the anons basically.
The threads a mess.

Also suggestion but think about implementing a ip rangeban.

>>>/ot/2081279

No. 80289

>>80286
every fucking day there is a ban evader. people stopped coming here because every single day some absolute retard bait and shitposts a la carte. admins are spineless retards and would rather let them shit all over the board as long as we get any traffic.

No. 80290

>>80286
Just to add that the ban evader seems to be a male too since he listed anons hating men as one of his reasons why he wants to troll this site and cowtip.

>>80289
Agreed

No. 80291

Theyre posting gore now in confessions thread

No. 80292

i know this has been brought up before but the lack of reading comprehension on the boards gets on my nerves at times. someone replied to a post of mine and they totally misunderstood what i wrote and tried to twist it into something else. it's like they always somehow give you attitude and try to start a fight over their own incomprehension. like if someone says (as an example), "i love green bananas", how do you jump to "well you must hate oranges then?" i'm irritable already so that isn't helping things, sorry anons for sperging but god it pissed me off today.

No. 80293

>>80290
It's 100% a man.

No. 80295

have farmhands even heard from admin at all? is there any talk of recruiting more mods? if perma bans aren't a solution why not just add more so it's harder for ban evaders to keep going?

No. 80318

>>80292
That's not a reading comprehension issue, it's just some fag baiting an infight because they're sad and lonely.

No. 80370

File: 1720591834336.webp (38.35 KB, 373x280, IMG_9923.webp)

Anyone else feel like lolcow is dying? I feel like ever since mid 2023 I’ve seen the site just slowly die off in terms of activity outside of the notorious cows like Shayna and Pixielocks. The only thread that really sees any new activity anymore is Addy Harajuku’s, every other thread gets bumped so infrequently, even the OT boards it feels like it’s just the same 5 threads getting bumped over and over again. Even in early 2023 it felt it was more active, is there a reason for this or is it just a consequence of me posting here more and noticing more of this shit as I do?

No. 80372

>>80370
it definitely seems less active. my theory is that it has to do with how easy it is to ban evade. this causes low quality posters to camp out in threads and ruin them for everyone else. retards like racebaiters, infighters, personalityfags, derailers etc just evade their bans to continue to shit up the site and actual contributory posters grow tired of the declining quality so over time they all leave which leads to a noticeable decrease in activity.

No. 80373

>>80370
The current posting speed on all boards feels like how things exclusively used to be on sundays.
>is there a reason for this
Rule changes and moderation that benefit the worst posters + the absolute overmoderation on /w/ + destroying of popular generals that caused nonnies to visit the site more often. Also what the other nonna said, refusing to ban vpns.

No. 80374

>>65391
Estee Williams the OG trad thot went on Dr. Phil with her moid and made herself look unhinged af kek time to reopen the tradthot thread or at least give her her own thread while the milk is fresh

No. 80375

>>80374
Ask for the thread to be made on the thread suggestions in /pt/

No. 80377

I'd appreciate if the mods could keep dog/cat hate solely to their dedicated threads, they are very baity.

No. 80380

>>80374
>tik tok pays me 50-180 dollars per month and youtube pays me 300 dollars per month
oh my god what the fuck she makes NO money??
Also her husband is so creepy/entitled in this and the body langue between them sitting next to eachother on set is so bad, jesus christ is she in a hostage situation??

No. 80398

not a complaint just wondering why is almost every single anon who posts about Skirby a blatant newfag? where do they come from?

No. 80399

>>80398
I notice it too, it’s really PULL tier. I assume most of them are tiktok fags but skirby feels like a dime a dozen photoshopping ethot, the only reason like she got her own thread was because she kept getting brought up in the ridiculous photoshop thread so it was just easier to give her her own even if it isn’t necessarily warranted.

No. 80403

>>80398
Skirby is the new influencer that's extremely popular to hate for teenage girls, because moids coom to her non stop and can't stop talking about her on social media, mostly tiktok.
In return you've got disgruntled girls coming on to here to hate on her freely where men won't simp, but they're too retarded to integrate.

No. 80455

>>80398
There's one poster specifically according to their file name that has an unsaging vendetta against the chick. The whole reason a thread needed to be made.

No. 80468

>>80455
well if that's true the farmhands need to wrangle them or expose their post history or something.

No. 80471

>>80455
the whole entire thread is filled with nitpicking vendettafag tiktoktards that appear to be purposely refusing to integrate. farmhands should start moving their posts to /manure/ if they keep refusing to integrate

No. 80472

>>80398
My tinfoil is that it's like the Shayna thread where some of the posters are disgruntled shoopers/ethots who are mad at the attention she gets.

No. 80490

>>80471
They are bumping the thread on purpose, that's for sure. I wouldn't doubt one of the tiktok 'callout' videos were from the nonna and posting that all these people talk about skirby and hate her to try to blend in. It really feels that way.

No. 80577

>new admin post in the site updates thread
So the admin is present and pays attention to the site, surprising.

No. 80582

>>80577
no, they are just like shaymin in the sense that they will be gone for months and come back for one day every 4 months. What was the point of staying leaving when the new admin is just like her.

No. 80583

>>80577
What happened to that huge lolcow upgrade that was supposed to happen anyway?

No. 80714

File: 1721175801586.jpeg (800.96 KB, 1125x773, IMG_5874.jpeg)

We may need the Onion thread opened up, new updates are happening.

No. 80746

File: 1721324226072.png (17.15 KB, 426x122, 54107.png)

What should be done about self admitted infighters/baiters?

No. 80752

I just wanted to thank the staff for the increasing amount of swift bans for infighting bait and above all redtexting them as such, I've seen much less infighting in the threads I follow recently thanks to the increased moderation. It really works once an effort is put in because when people see the redtext they don't engage further.

No. 80756

>>80752
Seconded.

No. 80798

It’s just come out that a university in the UK has been scraping Mumsnet (large woman’s forum) for years. The site owner at first tried to licence the site’s data for a fee behind closed doors but are now suing to have it removed as the university doesn’t want to pay.

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/site_stuff/5057903-mumsnet-corpus

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/site_stuff/5122770-why-were-taking-legal-action-against-open-ai-and-other-scrapers

Part of the reason for AI scraping is to learn to de-anonymize users. What will lolcow do if that starts happening here?

Consider that while lolcow is relatively small site, the users are mostly female making posts valuable for scrapers who want to be able to program AI in women’s speech. There’s also anti-trans content here which I think is part of the reason Mumsnet why getting scraped for de-anonymization. Lolcow goes back over ten years too and has very few bot posts.

Is lolcow doing anything to stop this site being scraped? Or are you guys ok with it? Will you attempt to sell our posts and data if given a chance? Who owns the posts here (users or site) and does posting here give the site licence to do what it wants with the post forever?

No. 80799

>>80798
Forgot to add, the de-anonymization projects are being part funded by the US government.

No. 80800

>>80799
Source on this? This is interesting.

No. 80801

>>80800
Read the linked threads

No. 80802

>>80801
I don't see anything in the linked threads about partly government-funded deanonymization programs.

No. 80804

File: 1721484742202.jpg (7.7 KB, 225x225, uwu.jpg)

>>80714
Come on admin-sama open the thread while the milk is still fresh

No. 80806

No gregory and no dumbass shit. Also I have a question why would you guys wanna moderate a website for women?

No. 80824

It's been days since the updates and these jannies won't open the grease thread yet retards get to make thread after thread nitpicking Shayna's outfits kek no wonder this site is dying

No. 80829

sometimes I think the mods must be incredibly chill people because it must be so hard to never get irritated enough to expose a poster's more embarrassing, contradictory, or newfaggy posts when they're being annoying and sperging or infighting. like there are probably people posting blackpill shit while simultaneously complaining about their nigel in another thread, or people on /g/ talking about being overweight or alcoholic or bpd while simultaneously insulting other users or cows about the same things. but they don't expose you (unless you're rita-tier annoying) instead they just give a little ban for whatever rule was broken and they move on. and they get so much hate for being vindictive with their bans but they're really not kek, it's clearly not personal.
I wish they had exposed the posts of the users who got dumbass shit shut down though, I kinda want to see that but maybe it's not interesting.

No. 80844

>>80829
They're not going to expose a bunch of fucking nobodies kek they only post the history of people with a following. They said they will reopen the onion thread when new milk comes out and yet here we are

No. 80845

>>80844
Also iirc it's the admins who've done post reveals in the past. I don't believe farmhands have access to the same level of user information (also people aren't as dumb nowadays so it's more difficult).

No. 80891

I'll get called a bootlicker but I feel bad for the moderation team and admins. I saw a lot of improvement recently, it's been months since I saw gore or cp, cerbmin managed to filter that and it's been so much better. The banners changes and additions were cool, I didn't mind the previous ones, but I understand why some asked for the changes. I know moderation has been heavy with the bans and some I disagree with, but I feel it's honestly a hard thing to get always right. You're either not banning enough or banning too much. People know how to ban evade, so infights never end, everyone takes the bait and every day it's a new huge infight to ban tirelessly. I'm not saying they are perfect, but I do feel there is some effort that gets over-scrutinized. Idk I've been thinking about this for a long time and for all that's worth, I appreciate the effort of the staff. I might graduate from lc soon, so I figured it was best to at least say this once here.

No. 80938

>>80891
i've honestly enjoyed having cerbmin as admin. while i'm not entirely happy with a lot of the changes, i've generally had a pleasant to neutral experience with them so far and most of the time whenever i've complained or needed help the issue was generally fixed within a few hours to a day or so. it's sad seeing the site starting to slowly fall apart again but not entirely unsurprising. once i saw people complaining about cp and gore slipping through again i knew that was a bad sign.

No. 80990

>>80829
>the mods are chill and good because they do the bare minimum
bar in hell etc. etc.

No. 81007

>>80938
we only have 1 admin.

No. 81062

File: 1721863457562.png (426.34 KB, 1086x661, 2024-07-25.png)

Onion is losing his mind posting milky shit and is representing himself. When are these retarded jannies oppening the thread?? we've been requesting it to open for days

No. 81063

File: 1721863932738.png (349.94 KB, 706x794, 2024-07-25 (1).png)


No. 81064

>>81062
UGH I miss the Onision thread

No. 81065

>>81007
More like no admin considering how often he forgets to administrate

No. 81066

>>81062
>>81063
He's been putting out this desperate attention grab content for years. It's played out and not worth reopening the thread so the same 3 losers can comment "omg epic fail" and shooped fake evidence again

No. 81074

>>81062
it's been unlocked

No. 81080

>>81066
>shooped fake evidence

No. 81101

>>81065
>>81007
more like badmin amirite

No. 81142

>>81066
Thread's going great already.

No. 81272

Since BallerinaFarm has been especially milky these past few days, can the tradthot thread be unlocked?

No. 81281

I just posted something and was notified that I had been banned for a post I never made. I assume this is because the poster shares my IP address, but I wonder how this can be. Does this mean it is someone in my household, my neighborhood, or just general region? I can’t imagine it would be as impractical as someone in the region making a bannable post and then affecting everyone else.

No. 81282

>>81272
Yes, I want this too!

No. 81295

>>81272
posting about cheese and making cookies with your redneck husband is not milk. you guys should really go read up on the important threads to see what real cow behavior is. Teri, Shayna, GREGORY…

No. 81296

>>81295
>Shayna
lol. she hasn't been milky for a long time

No. 81297

>>81296
do you think lurking the old threads for the purpose of doing necessary research about the lore of this website isn’t an option nonna

No. 81298

>>81296
even at her milkiest, anyone saying shaynus is an important thread with real cow behavior has got to be either a shaytard or just a newfag. her threads were some of the worst on the site until she went full fat and nasty and finally produced some milk, and at that point her threads were still 99% nitpicks and other camwhores clawing at eachother necks. the value of shayna's thread comes from the 2 for 1 deal of half the posters being cows themselves.

No. 81306

>>81295
There was an interview conducted with them recently that sparked outrage. Their billionaire and Mormon connections are also very interesting. They might be a better fit for the fundies thread.

No. 81307

>>81298
I feel like Onision or Venus are both good starter cows for those who are actually ignorant to cows kek. Or Julia?

No. 81308

>>81307
And Luna.

No. 81330

Other thread is full, but the cunt who keeps infighting and unsaged posting in the skirby thread just double posted and of course, infighting again. Which means she evading. They also made the same random MILK RECAP in the photoshop thread, bringing up skirby when she had her own thread to be contained in. We don't need photoshop anons bringing skirby back to that thread.

This is the same anon.

No. 81331

>BP thread full of infighting, bait, personalityfags
>Bring up anything regarding the actual point of the thread
>Immediately trolled and bait attempted
For the love of god lock it

No. 81332

>can't hide threads in the catalog
>hidden threads still show up in the catalog
technologically literate admin when

No. 81333

>>81331
make a new complaint thread, 2x is a shithole and they'll never waste their time modding it.

No. 81335

>>81333
nayrt but new complaints thread >>>/meta/81334

No. 81378

Funny how you can't trash Pakis in the Britbong thread, because it's 'race bait', but this entire thread is okay for some reason:
>>>/ot/2109232
Really makes you think.

No. 81386

>>81378
So based on this it’s ok for anons to shit on any specific race of men they find repulsive and call them the ugliest race on earth, right?

No. 81393

>>81386
You'd think so. I'm not holding my breath though, because some races/ethnicities are more sacred than others to lolcow mods.
Personally, I can't wait for a thread dedicated to black moid chimpouts and general retardation for the sole reason of seeing redtext everywhere the word 'nigger' appears. There is lots of content ready for milking, starting with
>https://www.reddit.com/r/BlackPeopleTwitter

No. 81397

>>81378
I'm not sure if there needs to be race-specific incel threads. As pointed out in the thread, the rhetoric and terminology are the same as any other incel community. The amount of vitriol in that thread is strange and seems like race-baiting. As you and >>81386 mentioned, it usually isn't allowed here. Also it’s not even on the correct board.

No. 81439

can we be degenerates on the hidden boards?

No. 81452

>>81397
there is no need to have race specific incel threads here. i think it's fine to talk about it in the context of inceldom when it is a contributory post (like the history of hapa relationships, why hapa kids often feel isolated, etc.), but specifically circulating threads about ricecels and nigcels with all the stereotypical imagery of ugly buck-toothed chinese men or ashy black dudes wearing hoodies in dark rooms is just bound to attract those kinds of men to the board. it also brings out the worst in other posters and i've already been seeing an influx of borderline white supremacist posts here and there with their usual dog whistling statements like accusing anyone with a slightly aquiline profile of being a "joo" or insinuating that all blacks are loud and poor.

race and politics are two of the trickiest topics to deal with on this board. sadly i notice that everytime the mods relax the rules on race-based and politics-based topics, all the toxic /pol/ groupies and nazi bootlicking fetish fiends crawl out from the dungeons and immediately start going off on tirades about stinky brown migrants, their non-white neighbors, and how x ethnic group males are disgusting while saying not a lick about their own men. there's already enough of this going on in other communities and i feel like if anons really wanted to sperg about race, they should go to lipstick alley to bitch about how lightskins like tyla aren't black, or they can hang out with the local mississippi ku klux klan chapter on stormfront to find their nearest tattoo parlour to ink up. also every unloved, unmonitored 14 year old future school shooter on kiwifarms atm has nigger this, nigger that somewhere in either their post history or signatures, so that's another good spot to go if they get bored and want to rant about chinese men and crypto-jews.

No. 81453

Remember years ago like around 2020 when burritomin locked /ot/ for a week because of how bad it was getting? and yet even then, /ot/ was still WAY more tolerable then compared to now kek

No. 81456

>>81452
The bong thread is going to go down south too as much as they are foaming at the mouth about immigrants atm some of these comments are giving /pol/

No. 81468

This is how a moid posts:
>>>/ot/2117287
I suspect this is a raid.

No. 81471

>>81468
we should honestly just ban that olympic boxer discussion bc it causes people to go full retard

No. 81601

>>81453
seller's remorse

No. 81696

>>81468
I do, too. Threads five and six in that series are riddled with rabid moids & TRAs.

No. 82057

I think the increase in anons who keep telling their nigels about this site are part of the problem.

No. 82379

Not sure if I'm just unlucky, but I've noticed that anons have been prone to start infights way more often than they used to.
Wonder what's causing it.

No. 82389

I can't help but wonder if there's been a mass exodus of the sane, rational LC users. It feels like that in the last two months, the site has been filling up with more and more insane, unhinged women. It's hard to have a real conversation/debate without someone flipping out.

No. 82431

/ot/ is genuinely so boring now. If it's not infighting it's baiting fir infights. It's like because dumbassshit was autosaged now people can't really get their "shitpost without contribution" urge out so they just post like it's Twitter or some other social media and subsequently there's no real discussion outside of incredibly annoying racebait or what have you.

No. 82433

Can the retarded infight in Art Salt be dealt with? Also I'm so sick of unrelated infights in the thread why the fuck are going in the thread about ART to fucking fight?

No. 82443

>>82431
>>82433
I know it's summer so of course summerfags will be running rampant, but I'm convinced the shitting up of /ot/ is due to a handful of retards. Purposefully going into each thread, stirring up shit, then just sitting back and soaking in all the attention.

No. 82444

>>82443
First ayrt, and I totally agree. Not trying to be schizo but a lot of the infights/bait have the same kind of essence and tone to it, I wouldn't be surprised if really was a group retard effort.

No. 82445

>>82389
“Women”

No. 82446

>>82389
Don't be naive enough to believe its women.

No. 82506

Should all lovercase typing anons be reported for not integrating?

No. 82511

OPEN PHOTOSHOPPERS #8

because some faggot decided to make a aniejoy thread without permission and the thread for #8 was locked because it was made too early

No. 82512

>>82506
Nah, some farmhands even type lowercase

No. 82514

>>82389
>the site has been filling up with more and more insane, unhinged women
It's not women, it's scrotes kek. They've posted about at least 7 raids in the past month on 4ch. They're realizing that moderation here is defunct, since VPNs and mobile-posting are still allowed. Basically, a scrote that pays $5 for a VPN can spend the entire month here baiting, infighting, etc., and the farmhands can't do anything about it. It's so insane because 90% of users don't use a VPN, but admin would rather suck up to the 10% that do use one, even though it's pretty obvious the majority of infights and baits are coming from the same people that just switch their VPNs whenever they're banned.

Just BTW, a lot of rational sane anons stop using this site heavily in summer. Summerfags are a bane on this site just as much as baiting scrotes. During the rest of the year, I post a lot more, but in summer I dial it back because I know how summerfags ruin discussion.

No. 82521

>>82514
I agree about vpns tbh I'd accept being banned from posting as a mobile poster if we can prevent lolcow from degrading further into a cesspit of moid trolls like crystal cafe. some posters might bloviate about how all 3 middle eastern women that browse lc couldn't post (and then they would dogpile and diagnose any middle eastern poster as secretly pakichan until she left anyway kek)
being without vpns and mobile data posting would not be an issue for a majority of anons, but it would be for a majority of faggot males trying to worm their way into lc. like if you HAVE to post to lolcow while working at your 7/11 job you need to get your priorities in order. just browse on your phone and post any posts at home. its not that hard.

No. 82534

>>82521
>just browse on your phone and post any posts at home. its not that hard.
That's my thought too. It's just annoying because 90% of users suffer for the 10% of posters that use VPNs, even though a good half of that 10% use VPNs solely to bait and evade bans. I use a VPN myself, but even I can see that VPNs need to get banned. Without the VPN ban, the farmhands are essentially without moderation tools. It's crazy too, because all it does is double or triple their workload.

No. 82535

>>82389
It wouldn’t surprise me. I remember there being a spike of “I’ve been a farmer for years and I can’t deal with these aggressive newfags” posts in the last few months (anecdotally, I might be wrong. But I find announcing-your-departure posts annoying, so I remember a few) content has definitely dried up in /snow/, it’s like only a handful of farmers actually follow the cows.

No. 82538

>>82514
The thing is, banning VPNs didn't do anything to help 4chan. In fact, people still use VPNs there.

No. 82541

File: 1724603284949.jpg (58.93 KB, 640x480, 1000039873.jpg)

Day one of asking for a sign of life from admin.

No. 82543

>>82538
Nobody said anything about 4ch this isn't about 4ch it's about LC

No. 82558

>>82535
>But I find announcing-your-departure posts annoying, so I remember a few)
how do you feel about the graduation thread?

No. 82581

File: 1724683495441.jpg (38.58 KB, 634x684, 1000039874.jpg)

>>82541
Day two of asking for a sign of life from admin.

No. 82641

File: 1724768972343.gif (1.54 MB, 220x269, 1000040085.gif)

>>82581
Day three of asking for a sign of life from admin.

No. 82642

>>82641
love these kitty-cow posts

No. 82651

>>82641
You are going to run out of images before zhe shows signs of life

No. 82705

Can the admins and mods agree on what is and isn't K-pop when you ban someone? I agree with not speaking about K-pop. But why are some nonnas banned for posting images of hot women/men who happen to be idols? It used to be tolerated. There is a difference between sharing picture of a hot guy who happens to be an idol and shitting a thread with K-pop talk.

No. 82718

File: 1724856398945.jpg (33.41 KB, 480x360, 1000040083.jpg)

>>82641
Day four of asking for a sign of life from admin.

No. 82816

File: 1724941270568.jpg (86.42 KB, 600x804, 1000040644.jpg)

>>82718
Day five of asking for a sign of life from admin.

No. 82818

>>82816
if I was her I probably wouldn't answer you, it would set a bad precedent. nice pics though.

No. 82820

i think one of the good things mods are doing now is banning the source of an infight, e.g. the person who threw stones in the first place. not everyone needs to know you think x thing is retarded or read your take on why it’s bad, fuck off

No. 82822


No. 82849

>>82816
love these pics

No. 83831

Do you think farmhands don't close 2X because then the anons on there would swarm the site and make it unbearable for a month or two? Maybe they should redirect usual posters from the BP thread to a fake version of the site so they can self-flagellate with AI chatbots

No. 83980

Does /snow/ rule 3.2 count if the family member picture that’s being posted has been posted to the cow’s public accounts already? For example if a cow posts a picture of them with their sibling on Twitter is it ok to post the whole photo or do you have to crop the sibling out?

No. 83984

Why are most of Laur's self-posts in the LJ thread getting deleted? They should be left for a reveal.

No. 83985

>>83831
Nah. It was originally created as containment because those anons are worse than shaytards about their addiction. Obviously, it hasn't worked very well. So now it's just one more monkey on the farm's back.

No. 83994

why are emojis banned? Not saying they shouldn't be, just curious why it's been a rule. been a farmer for 5+ years now and wondering about it, is it just another way to maintain anonymity? or is it to do with the code of the site? or something else

No. 83995

can the ugly ass trap posts on the fandom at least be spoilered(and I know for a fact they are being posted by some baiting pedo-troon)

No. 84029

We finally got a catalog update holy fuck. Cerbmin must have realized how much they love us and missed us when we were away ♥

No. 84046

>>84029
i love that the catalog finally matches the style i have set. 2 hours ago i could feel my retinas burning while looking at the pure white catalog.

No. 84057

love the new catalog on mobile! much easier on the eyes

No. 84094

Wait you can't delete a post even if you put in the password (for post deletion) thing???

No. 84103

oh my gosh the new catalog!!! I love it!

No. 84114

Catalog update so good. I’m so happy.
>>84094
You only have 30 min to delete IIRC.

No. 84137

Love that the themes finally affect the catalog especially as a dark mode user, site loads extremely fast, filter function is a great idea etc etc everything is super good thank you so much Cerbmin!

No. 84243

File: 1727030914534.jpeg (333.92 KB, 1170x1375, IMG_4673.jpeg)

Why did this get redtexted for bait? I literally just described what the comments said
>>/ot/2175345

No. 84245

>>84243
>why wypipo do ____?
>how am I baiting????
just go back to tiktok

No. 84247

>>84245
But I posted it in that thread because I don’t understand their perspective, I wasn’t saying they’re right. I’m also not black and wasn’t part of their conversation. You don’t need to be so aggressive. Let the mods respond next time, thank you.

No. 84322

File: 1727223301436.png (55.6 KB, 1793x141, le epic trollll exdee.png)

So this is why the vent threads keep getting worse…

No. 84413

Sorry if this is the wrong thread but how are the admin/mods/jannies holding up right now?

No. 84560

Is it just me or is /meta/ overused now? I don't remember it being like this before, but it's like anons post everything here. Like every single ban (even if it's a really short one) or report. Does anyone else who's been here 5+ years feel this way?

No. 84563

>>84560
I agree, I've been a farmer since 2016 and the place has gotten a lot whinier. Instead of reporting and moving on, anons are just crying over how __ posted in a thread and needs to be banned. Calling out CP, trannies and moids posting is a good thing but to come here whining over how there's a shitposter in a thread is comical. It's like a child crying for its mommy.

No. 84575

>>84563
Tbf sometimes mods don't see the reports right away or it takes too long

No. 84583

when you guys go shopping for jannies do you purposely hire the biggest dipshits out there?

No. 84587

>>84560
I'm assuming out userbase keeps growing and this reflects even on meta.

No. 84653

>>84563
It's the influx of newgen Twitter/TikTok users that have no idea the original purpose of lolcow and how imageboards are used. Retarded gen alpha and zoomers can't handle not stating their opinion or god forbid, lurking for a couple days to understand the culture. It is why the Skirby thread, despite it being open for months now, is consistently red-texted and the quality of the posts never improves.

No. 84732

>make a joke at mod
>post gets deleted
You guys are sticks in the mud, lighten up farmhands

No. 84958

File: 1728828524483.jpg (438.49 KB, 1866x1337, 1000018390.jpg)

what's with the weird bible spam lately? (these were all posted outside the religion threads for context). i know most of them get deleted but i'm curious if anyone knows where they're coming from

No. 84965

>>84958
a single schizophrenic individual having an episode

No. 85003

is the lazy bitch thread the new dumbass shit?

No. 85048


No. 85092

CP main page

No. 85100

>>65391
im shocked there isnt an adamthewoo thread

No. 85103

>>85100
you should make one on /snow/ anon, I hadn't heard of him but he seems milky

No. 85105

>>85103
there's really nothing that interesting on him. he's just another funny looking, middle aged white trash retard who runs around, terrorizes people with his camera, and refuses to grow up.

No. 85233

i think i saw a cp promo on the main page but i have no idea, it was a suggestive pic of a girl who looked possibly underage with text “best pics and videos” and then a “justpaste” link below. super freaked out but it looks like its already gone?

No. 85237

Wtf is up with the bp thread? I don't even use 2x but sometimes I click a photo from the main page and it brings me to that thread and it's the most incomprehensible shit I've ever read in my life. How did that even happen?

No. 85238

>>85237
incompetent moderation ig

No. 85240

>>85237
For some reason mods insist on keeping the thread open even though it just keeps attracting personalityfags and schizos and deranged troons to the site, the majority of which come from Reddit or some discord server that they cant help but constantly mention. The damage is already done tbh at this point and now they just freely roam other boards.

No. 85241

>>85240
They came from twitter not reddit. It's a couple of twitterfag

No. 85242

>>85240
>>85241
neither of you are correct except if you're talking about nullfag

No. 85243

There was no Twitter, Reddit or Discord exodus to LC. It started catching on right after /2X/ posts were clogging up the frontpage from the infighting that filled up an entire thread in 1 day. I believe that some people latched onto it and started bringing it to /ot/. One of them tried forming groups on social media which they linked in the thread, but they all died.

No. 85244

>they came from twitter!
>they came from reddit!
>its a group of discord users!
what does this mean? like people think they saw something about lolcow on their respective app, and then came here?

No. 85246

>>85244
There actually was a Reddit comment from one of them recommending the thread. But I doubt that's what resulted in the surge of this sentiment in /ot/. They didn't just start flooding in from other social media; most of the ones on /ot/ were already using LC. For example, the posters that helped in shitting up the Tinfoil thread. Most of them are lurkers than active posters in the BP thread. Still, I think the thread should've been shut down a long time ago.

No. 85250

>>85246
Nta but I think anons were wondering how that very specific spergy personalityfag got there, not just the general BP sentiment

No. 85251

Sorry for not saging I learned how now.

No. 85252

>>85251
Which posts were yours

No. 85253

>>85252
No pictures please, I am anonymous.

No. 85254

>>85253
Were you this person
>>85246

No. 85255

>>85254
No, it was a ban from a week or two ago, I just dropped in to say sorry.

No. 85256

>>85255
On behalf of Lolcow I forgive you.

No. 85257

>>85244
it's referring to the type of people not necessarily where they saw the site mentioned. twitterfags for instance are the sjw political protrans snowflake runoff from tumblr. users who don't know how imageboards work or how to act on them appropriately and integrate.

No. 85288

File: 1729760928730.jpg (23.74 KB, 488x470, 1729286011920413.jpg)

its just cringe and embarrassing how "errmm you're soo unintergrated" posts are allowed to fly when there's no indication of the posts these people are replying to are even unintegrated or newfaggy. these schizos aren't being punished for shitting up the board with their constant low iq spam WAH WAH INTEGRATE STOP DISAGREEING WITH ME STOP TYPING DIFFERENTLY. i'm seeing this constantly and even got called a newfag myself a while ago despite browsing since 2018. either start punishing this with bans or make it clear you support infighting.

No. 85289

>>85250
She came from twitter

No. 85292

We need a new complaints thread but until we get it I’m putting this here. Why did you just lock the attractive women you like to fuck thread because of the same baiter(s) that have been running wild in all the female attraction /g/ threads for 2 days? Do your jobs and moderate instead of closing beloved threads for no fucking reason.

No. 85293

>>85292
>do your jobs and moderate
tall ask from them m8

No. 85294

>>85288
You're just obnoxious.

No. 85296

>>85294
Why, because she's right and that hit a nerve? Look within nona.

No. 85297

>>85296
No, I genuinely think her posting style is obnoxious and that's why she's attracting negative attention. She thinks people are just using it as an excuse but really, she's just annoying.

No. 85298

>>85297
I don't know how you can gauge her posting style off of one post? Her using caps to describe someone else's behaviour doesn't really count to me. Besides, you're literally proving her point by being bothered that she types differently than you. It's odd anon.

No. 85299

Can a farmhand crack down on the skirbese/fat/deathfat retard in the skirby thread? They don't add anything of value to the thread and are very identifiable. They infight with posters constantly.

No. 85461

Does anyone remember a lolcow from around 2010 - 2014 with a name that starts with L, she was tumblr famous for an alt, creepy dark style. Some photos include her wearing antlers in a circle of candles, occult things, wearing black contacts or white contacts.

When she was 15ish she lost a lot of weight, there was a photo of her being larger with red hair at some fair or campground that she liked to use as before/after.

There was a relatively famous pic of her at a dinner booth where she was really thin. I think she got into some drama for selling things and not fulfilling orders hence stealing.

No. 85464

Is there a reason why there is no (you) here? I'm not requesting it as a feature, just curious.

No. 85466

No matter how many times I’m permabanned I will always come back like Lazarus. Mods should just pack it in and go find a new hobby at this point.(USER HAS BEEN PUT OUT TO PASTURE)

No. 85473

Why are the posts in the amerifag thread getting deleted? Europeans shouldn’t even be allowed to post if they’re just going to bait. I said that Europeans pay for healthcare through their taxes, and she said they don’t and that their healthcare is completely free, I don’t get why my post was the one that got deleted. I also posted actual statistics for the other things mentioned and the mods just deleted it all kek(you are ban evading so your posts were deleted)

No. 85474

>>85473
i'm not in that thread but that's not the case for every country. you're thinking of canada.

No. 85484

>>85481
your mother’s ccs will be used to buy one hundred nendoroids delivered to the cum dungeon you call a basement and the beating you will receive will be tantalizing

No. 85490


No. 85675

Twice I've been banned and told to sage my shit. What the does that mean? How does one do it?

No. 85676


No. 85677

>>85675
if your post doesn't contain any milk then it needs to be saged. you do this by typing sage into the e-mail field. saging keeps threads from being bumped to the top of the catalog with non-contributions

No. 85678

>>85675
This influx of ttfags is getting exhausting

No. 85679

File: 1730721687284.png (15.86 KB, 443x106, sage.png)

>>85677

I will sage now. Have I done it correctly?
Milk is gossip, right?

No. 85680

>>85679
Yes. Milk is basically what farmers use instead of "tea/gossip".

No. 85681

>>85675
>>85679
I can't believe someone can be this new. the evil side of me wishes that nobody answered so this anon could get banned a third time kek

No. 85686

>>85681
especially since it explains how to do so in the rules…

No. 85724

File: 1730832475850.jpeg (344.03 KB, 1242x487, IMG_7145.jpeg)

Now that Cerbmin confirmed that VPN-posting can be banned, what threads do you think should be limited to non-VPN posting?

I think Unpopular Opinions for sure, a few threads on /g/ (the ones regarding sex), and the Taylor thread on /w/. I'm excited that Cerbmin finally found out a way to get rid of the baiters and the social undesirables. Finally the retards can be defeated and exiled properly.

No. 85725

>>85724
i completely agree with your suggestions anon.

No. 85727

>>85724
The entire /meta/ board should have a VPN-posting ban. I'll never forget all the retardation that happened last Hellweek.

No. 85743

>>85724
Honestly wondering how much they have shelled out for this? Accurate VPN detection APIs are not cheap at all, and from the look of it, it's worked in the Amerifag thread because it went from KAMALA IS A SEX WORKER I LOVE TRUMP to just normal posts basically immediately.

In terms of needing VPN bans, I definitely think:
Unpopular Opinions/Vent/Ugly Man Psyop/Amerifag threads from /ot/
Black Girl General in /g/
The entire of /2X/ and /meta/
Radfem thread in /snow/
Taylor thread in /w/

No. 85746

File: 1730846182869.png (131.8 KB, 370x654, img-2024-11-05-22-35-53.png)

>>85724
They did also say this so I guess not fully ready yet, but I'm SO FUCKING GLAD the mod team got it working in time for the election. Anyone who has tried using the Amerifag thread for the last few days/weeks knows what I mean. The difference since makes me wish the entire site could be VPN free like genuinely fuck privacy idgaf, you know the soyjak party website bans VPNs and proxies? Those scrotes are on there posting the most fucked up shit VPN free but the anons here won't a-log scrotes if they aren't behind over 9000 boxxys?

No. 85750

Been seeing a lot of "!!!" and all caps lately and the mods are letting them slide. are we allowed to do that now or it depends on the context?

No. 85752

File: 1730869082382.png (15.33 KB, 670x77, 582936.png)

I didn't know you could do this, seems pretty helpful in my opinion

No. 85777

>>85724
I agree but I doubt they will implement this, because the mods also use VPNs.

No. 85780

>>85724
>what threads do you think should be limited to non-VPN posting?
None. Unless you actively want to kill the site by letting it die a slow death, like other irrelevant image boards.

No. 85781

>>85743
>The entire of /2X/
Spotted the resident tranny.

No. 85782

>>85724
Seconding unpopular opinions. Such an easy fix to make that thread half-usable

No. 85783

Can we autoban soyjacks and kiwi slurs like cunt?

No. 85789

>>85781
nta but anon probably means the blackpill thread mainly, which is already overran with trannies and personalityfags. also as a vpn user i have accidentally encountered many ban pages from the spergs there so one of them definitely evades by using that (usually under german, canadian, and netherland ips)

No. 85795

accusing posters of coming from twitter should be treated like scrotefoiling. a seasoned IB user knows to call someone a newfag

No. 85798

>>85795
We've always accused others of being twitterfags before and if I'm honest the word newfag feels like something a newfag would say.

No. 85801

>>85795
newfags and crossposters are different.

No. 85824

This thread is a copy of existing threads: >>>/m/430315

No. 85894

Just a survey/quick poll:
1. How many of you rely on bumped threads (aka first page) of milk boards to get updates on cows?
2. How many of you use the hide saged posts for this thread option?

No. 85895

>>85894
why are you asking

No. 85896

>>85895
Personal reasons.

No. 85903

File: 1731179167317.jpg (102.28 KB, 720x923, IMG_20241109_200250.jpg)

I just got this randomly wtf kek

No. 85904

>>85903
Justice was finally served. Do the crime pay the time.

No. 85955

Is there an art advice thread? I swore there was one but I can't find it. I have a drawing I really need help with

No. 85972

I hope scrotes and trannies lurking and posting here get caught and booted asap. I'm sensing that there are some but idk I'm scared that I might be wrong if I call them out

No. 85973

File: 1731514421170.gif (33.81 KB, 257x100, picasion.com_jhSW.gif)

>>85972
How many times does it need to be said?

No. 85974

>>85973
Only works if vpn bans are sidewide.

No. 85975

Why did my new thread get locked

No. 85976

>>85972
>but idk I'm scared that I might be wrong if I call them out
>scared on an anonymous imageboard
>>85975
post it and lets find out why

No. 85980

>>85979
It’s the lolcow emergency thread in /g/

No. 86097

The increase in kpop posting throughout the site, especially in /g/ is so annoying. Even the original kpopfags from /m/ weren't this bad. They're proving everyone right that the ban truly is justified.



Delete Post [ ]
[Return] [Catalog]
[ Rules ] [ ot / g / m ] [ pt / snow / w ] [ meta ] [ Server Status ]