File: 1722451925634.jpeg (54.62 KB, 626x626, IMG_4807.jpeg)
No. 81342
>>81339defensive nigelhavers are part of the infight problem lol.
still we should get rid of bp and unpop opinions. these threads act like great big autism magnets for baiters and aggro retards
No. 81358
File: 1722486537398.png (400.46 KB, 654x1072, lolcow.farm.png)
If mods won’t lock the bp thread, can you please take 2X off the front page like other hidden boards? The front page has been like this for days, and I don’t care about bpchan or whatever retardation is occurring in that thread. Having it constantly clogging the front page is just going to attract more spergs, not contain them at a safe distance.
No. 81363
>>81358Nope! ♥
>>81362Shut the fuck up you cant even get someone to go out for a drink with you, fat bastard
(infighting) No. 81389
>>81385There was some issues in the thread but it was nothing that went beyond report and ignore. When it went wrong was when an easily trolled retard walked into the thread and started writing unhinged walls of text about pigs, blowjobs, whores and getting fucked on all fours. This brought negative attention to the thread as non-bp anons came to observe the schizo.
Myself and several other anons tried to explain to her why she was getting trolled and why she needed to integrate. We all got accused of being trolls and sexually harassing her over text on an image board.
No. 81394
The
Ricecel General belongs on /snow/, not on the off-topic board:
>>>/ot/2109232 No. 81412
>>81411idk whi's who tbh. there's some retard also psoting olympics shit avout how evil jkr is in /snow/ so we have at least one pro troon retard running wild.
i hate that the olympics thread got ruined by infighting, there's so much stuff ti discuss at the games.
No. 81413
>>81412Those are two separate things. Having opinions about JKR is
valid, but going on about a biological woman being a man just because you're an ignorant dumbass isn't the same. JKR is a dumbass in this aspect too.
>Pro troon retardAnd you wanted to complain about being called a cult? Anon, there's a whole bunch of farmers who aren't obsessed about trannies or who don't care at all. This is not a
TERF website.
No. 81415
>>81413i didn't participate in the infight and i dont' think troonshit has its place in the olympics ghread at all. i'm talking about the autist posting all over snow about the olympics with special mention of much they hate jkr. Whatever you think of the issue someine's clearly trying to drag in the infight across threads.
>blah blah you guys are a cultman i miss when being a
terf on here didn't attract the angry normos. sad!
No. 81418
>>81413you're right and you should say it
>>81415>man i miss when being a terf on here didn't attract the angry normos.i miss when we didn't have a bunch of radfem twitterfags shitting up our boards by trying to make everything about trannies and scrotes. sad! good thing other anons are finally pushing back against it. enjoy your containment board while it lasts.
No. 81426
>>81423>she thinks tradthots, conservatives, and chuds, the loudest anti-troon voices in the media, support troonsliterally where did i say any of that?
not all anti-trans ppl are gender critical.
gender critical isn't just about troons, it means feminism critical of gender ideology but also sex sterotypes and gender roles.
trads insist on women following antiquated gender roles, which is the opposite of being critical of gender. learn what the words you use mean.
>>81418never been on twitter lol
idk what terves did to you, call your nigel fat or what, but it's pretty retarded to come to a woman-only ib that openly has a no males policy and get mad that it attracts
terf types
No. 81427
>>81426>not all anti-trans ppl are gender criticalso you're a newfag to both lolcow and radical feminism on top of all of this, epic.
>everyone sick of "terves" derailing threads left and right on this drama board for closing in on half a decade is either a picke me or a bitter troon!!absolutely epic
No. 81432
>>81427if you can't disagree with ppl without calling them newfags or putting words in their mouth you're definitely part of the infight problem that's shiting up lc
but yeah sure it's alllll the terfs fault
No. 81440
File: 1722565012589.png (258.92 KB, 696x630, Screenshot 2024-08-01 211255.p…)
Why is this thread allowed to exist? The very essence of the thread attracts racebaiting.
No. 81450
>>81448>The thread isn't about AsiansYes, it is. A thread that's asking for Asian incels is a thread that's asking for incelish Asians. They are the same. Even though the thread targets only a subset of Asians, it still targets only Asians. And this trespasses the rule.
>inb4 the rule refers to threads targeting the race in generalThe spirit of the rule is to forbid racism and racebaiting, against the female, and against the male. Now, if you view the posts in the thread, you will see that nearly all the posts are some kind of racist statement. What, will you say the thread just coincidentally has racebaiting? The very essence of the thread topic attracts racism. Therefore you see how the thread violates the spirit of the rule.
>they just happen to be AsianIn real life, they just happen to be Asian. In a thread that specifically requests and requires a peculiar race, they do not just accidentally, coincidentally, by chance and fortune, happen to be Asian. In the thread, they don't "happen to be" Asian any more than they "happen to be" incels.
No. 81463
>>81460Yeah, it should be on /snow/. I think that would minimize racebaiting as well, since cow board farmhands tend to be much more likely to ban from what I can tell. Also, I feel like /ot/ attracts a certain type of sperg
/pol/ rapefugees that will take a mile when you give them an inch.
No. 81464
>>81455>There's an African hoteps thread in /snow/That shouldn't be allowed either, really. Half the posts in that thread have red texts.
>>81458>The thread is not about Asian people>It's about a specific subset of Asian peopleIt's still only about Asian people, and still specifically targets a certain race.
>If anons are racebaiting, report the postsTreat the disease, not the symptom. 99% of the posts in the thread is racist bullshit. Clearly the thread itself is a racist thread.
>>81460>>81463It shouldn't be on /snow/ either, and that wouldn't stop the racebaiting. Moving the thread instead of closing it, is like beating a dead horse instead of burying it. The very substance of the thread will cause racebait, and that can never be changed.
No. 81470
>>81469you probably did it too often
or just got unlucky bc your post was reported when others weren't
No. 81472
This anon with no braincells keeps coming back
>>>/ot/2117449 Talk about having XY when you're raging this hard. I doubt that mock will hit it's target.
No. 81474
File: 1722632960220.jpg (24.08 KB, 735x629, 1000027176.jpg)
>>81473Yeah was about to post about it to, i know i should have reported it but i dont wanna look at it. Dont know if it has been removed yet so just posting an image in the hope it is not on the frontpage anymore
No. 81476
>>81473>>81474We removed it right away, please always report them! It helps us remove it quickly and we apologize to any farmers unfortunately running into it.
>>81475Without going into detail, we do.
No. 81477
File: 1722644615777.jpg (274.61 KB, 1080x1711, IMG_20240803_001447.jpg)
>>>/w/333286 new level of mod's retardation. The post is a literal joke. Learn to read before you ban, shit heads. Mods think they are stand up comedians with their unfunny jokes in bans but when farmers post a joke they get a ban. For nitpicking. Lmao
Admin should add passing IQ and reading comprehension tests to mod qualification criteria.
No. 81483
>>81482Ngl the anon in that thread is being a nitpicking retard but
>>81477 is pretty funny and clearly a joke
No. 81490
File: 1722649804152.jpeg (138.15 KB, 593x647, IMG_0515.jpeg)
>>81486>Posting jokes seems unwiseIs this Xi Jinping‘s China?
No. 81500
The unhinged Taylorfag is back
>>>/w/333348 I bet it's the same whole milk poster too. Why can't anons in that thread just be normal? Taylor has nothing going on that warrants this many posts that aren't milk. I can't find a single real milk post in all her last 3 threads. Anons complained she was painting Easter Eggs 2 weeks early because that's not allowed even though that's a basic childhood spring activity. How are they going to call other users braindead, but post this crap? I'm all for looking into making a Retired Dollie thread.
No. 81502
File: 1722667248962.jpeg (40.19 KB, 639x480, images - 2024-07-30T122022.087…)
Farmhands I beseech you to deal with whatever the fuck is going on in the gender ideology hate thread
No. 81507
>>81493lmao then ban the next post as nitpicking, not the joke. if jannie wants to be an overachiever in an anonymous forum, she can, but she should use at least a little bit of logic when handing out nitpicky bans.
and what happened to the rule about banning mindless reporters? this seems like a good example of abusing the report button. but instead of banning the retard that can't read, mod joined into the stupidity.
No. 81508
>>81507(nta) I agree with you. The next post is boring, but it's not even about her drinking milk (no one cares), it's about her posting in response to comments asking about her dairy-free phase. I don't think that's even nitpicking anything (I'm nta), it's just uninteresting.
In any case, there's no reason to ban the "fanservice" poster over a harmless joke about LC. If any cow had posted something about "keeping up with milk," it would have been posted in their thread.
No. 81517
File: 1722696669403.jpg (99.43 KB, 950x310, Solaisawhorekek.jpg)
Double post, but you cannot talk about anything in the Taylor R thread without this poster chimping out. They are very recognizable when you say anything that isn't outright attacking or demeaning the cow. Mods need to keep banning the shitposts because her thread has no reason to be active with so many posts. If anons can't post updates unsaged, then stop posting imo. That means she is milkless.
No. 81522
File: 1722699858490.png (241.59 KB, 720x576, 1000031558.png)
>>81516I haven't posted in Taylor's thread recently and I'm not ban-evading. You are frothing about someone having a different opinion than you do, and now tinfoiling that I'm every anon you disagree with while accusing me of breaking the rules of lc. Is it your personal crusade to infight any time certain cows are mentioned? Hide the thread or don't read the posts, you are not the thread and opinion police. I've never ban-evaded on lc btw.
>>81517Want to explain your filename?
No. 81532
>>81529>>81531How is trashing radfems and accusing them of being 'right wing' in a tranny-hate thread even allowed? What's next? Allowing moids to post their dick pics?
>>>/ot/2117171>>>/ot/2119454>>>/ot/2117241>>>/ot/2117408>>>/ot/2119294>>>/ot/2119394>>>/ot/2119306>>>/ot/2119323>>>/ot/2119357>>>/ot/2119371These tourists need to be thread-banned and told to use their own containment zone for radfem hate. So fucking transparent (no pun intended).
No. 81535
Now the Gender Ideology Hate thread is being derailed by some retarded racebait.
>>81534Go cry about it in another thread.
No. 81539
>>81536I didn't know that being a radfem meant being a transvestigator. I learn new things every day.
The new radfem slogan should be "I love transvestigating biological women"
(integrate) No. 81550
>>81541It's definitely like this, it's clear some anons have a stake in continuing the argument bc they see it as slam dunk against radfems and a way to get the gc thread locked. somd ppl are making blatantly pro-troon posts like listed in
>>81532>>81545some people want to have their own non olympic discussions in the gc thread tho, they juyst get drowned out by the spergs. at this point mods need to act to stop the retardation, it's either a containment thread or a topic bans. locking the thread wont do shit when ppl have been trying to drag the infight across multiple threads.
No. 81556
>>81549a templock is just ginna give the pro-troons what they want and penalise the reasonable peoole trying to have a reasonable gc discussion outside of this infight. the whole issue is about intersex ppl, it isn't even about trannyism or gender ideology, it should never have been moved into the gc thread in the first place.
i agree with you that people on both sides are acting like retards but there's clearly some bad faith actors in there. bans don't do much either. a containment thread coukd at least make ot so that no one but the angry spergs has to look at 30,000 posts of circular arguments about some boxer who isn't even trans.
No. 81562
>>81558As
>>81561 has said, there's already threads like this. Feel free to make a thread like this on /2X/ if you feel there are none that fit the category you're saying. We don't want /ot/ and /g/ filled with GC threads as that is not the intended purpose of those boards.
No. 81563
>>81562ok and how about finally making a containment thread for the boxing retards so that the gc thread can be used for its actual purpose?
we get it you gate gc discussion but maybe if you actually moderated 2x and the gc thread they'd be usable enough that gc users wouldn't spill over to other threads.
No. 81583
>>81580Nah I like the chunnibyo energy
>>81579Thank you for being so attentive farmhands, it's greatly appreciated
No. 81586
File: 1722757110677.jpg (162.51 KB, 1306x684, Untitled.jpg)
I'm 99% sure the Gender Ideology Hate thread going downhill is actually mods shitposting with each other. Otherwise they would have deleted this race bait crap right away. Really makes you think why they won't.
No. 81591
>>81582Containment threads haven't worked for years. Whole containment
boards don't work. Look at the start of this thread, the manhate anons are still getting
triggered they can't control the board. The troon-obsessed anons turn up in every thread and derail with their obsession.
This shit should have stayed banned but it's too late now.
No. 81595
>>81586>>81594yeah they're deliberately letting the thread go to shit at this point. people keep messaging them about it and they dgaf.
im convinced they're just gonna use it as a pretext to lock or autosage the gc thread.
they clearly don't like gc posters or any kind of feminist discussion. 2x is barely moderated and generally unusable as well.
the mods have some ideas about what kind of user they wnat on this board, dumbass shitposters got culled and now it's the
terf posters. clearly having baiters and roghtoid spergs all over /ot/ is less of an issue for them.
No. 81597
File: 1722790231235.png (7.82 KB, 735x109, schizoposting.png)
>>81595At this point the venn diagram of the """
terf""" posters and right wing poltards is a circle.
No. 81598
>>81595exactly
>>81597and here's the playbook
No. 81603
File: 1722792746268.png (143.11 KB, 1087x545, lighthearted fun no longer all…)
Why is it that a thread just poking light hearted fun at some of our deeply retarded posts gets locked, but the same infights happen in Unpopular Opinions daily and you seem to not care? Come on mod. Pull the plug out of your ass.
No. 81613
>>81612do you know the difference between a
cow and a funny screenshot…? cows are people who you regularly keep up with for the purpose of farming their milk, and sharing it with other nonnas. Lolcow User Cringe was just posting random anons (who we have no realistic way of keeping up with, because they’re all anonymous) who say vulgar, disgusting, or just flat out shameful posts. I recommend reading through it because yeah it’s gross as hell, but it is also funny as fuck KEKK.
No. 81616
File: 1722795327253.jpg (89.76 KB, 1080x536, IMG_20240804_201108.jpg)
Just checked out of curiosity and it's a few days old but the Olympic thread has been linked in 4chan's tranny board.
No. 81619
File: 1722798956985.png (158.66 KB, 1077x512, briton.png)
>>81616Reminder that all the scrote infighting and baiting you see comes from the same retards spending their days and nights on 4chan replying or internalizing porn memes as if they're serious
No. 81622
>>81603I don't get how farmhands have time to do this yet do nothing about the olympic and blackpill thread. The cringe caps thread didn't even have infighting unlike
some other threads
No. 81625
File: 1722802626098.jpeg (490.04 KB, 750x962, IMG_2048.jpeg)
>>81624>baseless troon allegationsYup, this is totally a fellow woman!
(bringing infights across threads) No. 81633
>>81627in sope cases the threads arenn't an issue just one particular topic. the gc thread normally has actual discussions it's the boxing bullshit that attracts baiters
otoh a thread like unpopular opinions attracts infights 24/7/365 no matter the topic
No. 81640
>>81637Exactly, I don't understand why the thread has to exist. There's nothing really else to it besides "I hate dogs/cats xyz." Dogs I can understand a little more due to their size and attacks on people/children/other animals, but cats is downright crazy, yet both are filled with someone users fantasizing over them dying. I see it gets redtext, but what is the point of the thread outside of using the normal "Things I Hate" thread? What's next, bird hate thread? Rodent hate thread? Honestly they would be
valid in these contexts, but it comes down to why even have them to begin with.
No. 81643
File: 1722821062323.jpeg (492.22 KB, 1242x918, IMG_5652.jpeg)
>>81642Was Britbong thread always this bad?? I remember when Elizabeth died, I was posting about it and went into the Britbong thread and I didn't see as much poltard shit as I do now. Now whenever I open the thread they aren't even talking about the UK they are just reeing about Muslims and Indians. It's like it's not even a thread for the UK it's just a thread for British Racists.
No. 81659
>>81632After one dog hate regular (who also spammed dog gore) was outed as some psycho 40+ year old moid from reddit I've viewed those animal hate threads just as scrote centrals. Being violent against animals, especially dogs and cats which have been domesticated to be companions to humans, is 100% malecoded behavior whether we like it or not.
>>81650Mods could honestly do three things to alleviate this problem.
1. Shut down 2X entirely. The only active threads are the Blackpill threads (very obvious scrotes) and the Islam hate thread which is basically just an even more radicalized version of the UK thread people bring up here
>>81643 . The actually insightful threads discussing female-specific issues receive replies maybe once or twice a month.
2. Containment threads work for petty problems like fujosperging because in the end it was just maybe 2 or 3 obsessed posters who constantly brought them up everywhere. They don't work for race- or trannysperging because they bring in loads of newfags from other sites who refuse to integrate and only come for the politics, and most of them use VPNs so you can't even ban them. This is exactly why 2X was locked to begin with.
3. Lock threads when days-long infights happen. There's no sense in moderating a thread that goes nowhere and abscesses. It's a waste of resources. Just lock it up.
No. 81660
File: 1722851962887.png (5.73 KB, 368x103, badart.png)
>>81659Wrong. The pink pill thread and GC ones are somewhat active too. Not everyone you disagree with is a man. How you saw this poster as a 2X lurker over the more obvious explanation of a trad woman or moid saying lesbian bad is odd. Since when have GC/BPs thought gay people are all going to hell?
No. 81664
>>81660But blackpillers ARE moids, wasn't that already stated for numerous times? This screencap is from the Blackpill thread by the way.
>>81597 The amount of misogynist garbage they spew is absolutely written by scrote hands, they just call it "blackpill feminism" to get around it.
No. 81673
File: 1722875338375.png (1.1 MB, 1920x1080, photo-collage.png.png)
the ban evading poltard posting random far right tweets in the britbong thread is at it again. you can tell it's the same person bc they don't even change file names
No. 81697
File: 1722898624071.png (34.14 KB, 1004x251, bjchan.png)
No. 81736
File: 1722955639433.png (27.06 KB, 300x100, 1676925802744.png)
>>81729lmao where did you come from? ywnbaw has been used unironically here for years, it's on some site banners even
>>81733it's th same argument being rehearsed over and over "it's man" nuh huh that's a woman" for days on end, it attracts TRAs and tourists, and it drowns out all other discussion. it's not even about gender ideology bc it's about legitimate intersex disorders, not troonshit.
No. 81740
File: 1722957915356.jpeg (136.24 KB, 695x657, IMG_6073.jpeg)
>>81736It’s about gender ideology because there are discussions around “feminists” who have dumb gender stereotypes they are buying into, and people are calling Imane a man even though all signs point to Imane having been perceived and treated as female their whole life with female genitalia. Meanwhile the defending side has both honest feminists and retarded tranny lovers. Both sides have some
valid worries about how gender ideology creates and affects situations like these.
(dragging infights to /meta/) No. 81742
>>81740idc how
valid they are, bothh sides have been having repetitive circular arguments for days and shitting up every thread they're in. it's high time there was a containment thread.
No. 81747
File: 1722967321474.jpg (10.02 KB, 250x203, 73c058edb2db9c6c0ed697e410d538…)
We really, really need another hell week
No. 81761
File: 1722982274039.png (350.66 KB, 800x650, ban_VPN-troon.png)
>>81750>inorganic shitposting and infighting on /ot/>suspicious complaints about GC and terfs ruining the site on /meta/>we must ban VPNs to solve this issueIt keeps happening
No. 81766
>>81761>>81750>>81751These blanket bans are only being suggested in the first place because farmhands are being way too lenient (or lazy) when it comes to infight bait. For most of this year, people have been getting away with all kinds of racebait, homophobia, and politisperging. These retards need to stop being given one or two hour bans, and the threads where they often post (country threads, gender ideology, BP, black girl thread, etc.) need to be monitored closedly. It's obvious that these repeat-offenders are either moids looking to cause conflict, or women so mentally ill that they're as detrimental to the site as a moid would be.
I'm still holding out hope that the TRAs and tradthots shitting everything up are just summerfags who will dissipate when September rolls around. But I sort of doubt it.
No. 81767
File: 1722988081786.png (421.19 KB, 800x650, vpn.png)
>>81761This is like the 6th thread that this image has been posted in, and we never really get a clear idea why you're so against the VPN ban suggestion. 90% of posts on here made last Hellweek (which was 2 weeks) were made without VPNs, the other 10% were. It's kind of obvious that all those shitposting and infighting anons are the same anons that regularly ban evade - they've even admitted to it and bragged about it in the past. It's always the same line too, "if we ban VPNs I won't be able to talk about troons," which obviously isn't the case if the other 90% of anons can do it just fine. It's not "inorganic shitposting and infighting" if it's been going on for the last 5 months with a very clear pattern. It's not 2014 anymore, the moderation tools that were useful then aren't as useful now. If VPN bans or range bans are something that can't be done because of technical limitations, it would be great to at least get some confirmation on that from cerbmin.
No. 81768
>>81761yeah there's def some troon-adjacent posters camping in here atm. you see a lot of posts dunking on terfs in particular
>>81766yeah the homophobia and migrant sperging have been especially bad. they really need to hire new jannies to cover yuro hours on /ot/ and tighten up moderation overall
No. 81769
>>81767It's a pattern that seems to repeat every few months. There's infighting on /ot/, shit gets flung on /meta/ over who is responsible and then there's calls to ban VPNs.
If VPNs were causing major moderation issues, they would be banned, some VPN providers and ranges already are blocked. It used to be possible to post on LC using tor. It was contributing to the CP spam problem, so it was blocked. Admin can see what IPs are posting here and if they are VPN IPs or not. The majority of ban evaders use mobile data or have a dynamic IP.
No. 81771
>>81769AYRT, I agree with you, I just wish the farmhands or cerbmin were just more up-front about the challenges that this website faces. Like, it wouldn't be so hard to say "oh, most of the problems come from mobile data," or "oh, most VPN users are doing this" ect ect. I guess I'm just frustrated by the recent lack of communication, especially considering we were promised some changes and overhauls last post-Hellweek thread. I just get defensive because I feel very deeply that it IS the same problem anons again and again, but you're right, we don't know if it's mobile data abuse or VPN abuse. For context, I use a VPN too but if they were causing problems on a wide-scale I'd still want them to figure out how to mediate it. You're right though about the pattern, I wish I paid more attention to it in the last few months because I wouldn't mind seeing how the bait has changed and which threads become targeted. The GC thread on /ot/ is just the latest to become the designated "bait and infight" thread, until the Imane General was made. It's just frustrating seeing so much shitposts and infights all the time!
No. 81782
>>81761you're so transparently a rightoid baiter larping as a radfem
>>81766i agree
No. 81787
File: 1723057121343.jpeg (76.82 KB, 720x761, 0D45A90E-0380-4794-B335-3AFD09…)
Can you guys get a hold of the infighting and bait already?
No. 81790
>>81784Nta but you're aware admins are the ones who'd hand over information in the first place in case police would ever give a shit about this place besides cp? (which they don't lets be for real. I'm from Germany and police here made similar public stunts for years, but never arrested thousands of people because they dared to post "trannies are ugly men" on an anonymous drama website)
>In that time Cerbmin is the third admin that has refused to blanket ban VPNs. Burritomin didn't ban VPNs when Elaine was raiding the site and Shaymin never banned VPNs when the site was getting spammed with CPWhich explains the current state of the website. Bans are completely useless if evasion is as easy as a few clicks. Staff could monitor lolcow every second and it would still be useless because everyone can just jump on a free vpn with a few clicks. Several of our most spergy posters unashamedly admitted to using vpns too, not mobile data.
No. 81792
>>81790>UIPs - 8005>VPN IPs - 1377>percent of posters using a VPN - 17.20%Source
>>>/meta/71238Less than 20% of posters are using VPNs, yet you are claiming that they are biggest problem on the site? No previous admin has singled out all VPN users as being a moderation issue.
>everyone can just jump on a free vpn with a few clicksAdmins can ban VPN providers and IP ranges. Previous admins have done this and I suspect Cerbmin has also done this as stated here
>>81775.
Free VPNs and VPN IP ranges that are used to ban evade and post spam should be banned. Blocking paid VPN services used by legitimate posters should not. There is no reason to ban all VPNs, when the solution to the problem already exists and is already implemented. The one downside of this, is that it is reactive. Admins do not know what VPNs need to be blocked, until someone has used that VPN in a malicious manner.
No. 81793
>>81792Yes? It doesn't have to be a majority to be ruining multiple boards. What else is supposed to be the biggest problem besides the very people who get banned and don't stop(because they can just evade)?
Besides, opera and tor aren't the only, or even the most popular vpns. Phone users probably use the app ones.
>Free VPNs and VPN IP ranges that are used to ban evade and post spam should be banned. I agree with that too, at least they have to pay money to shit up the board then. There's a list somewhere on github with free vpn IPs, if I remember correctly it was even provided for imageboards. So admin's wouldn't have to pick and choose either.
No. 81797
Shit redtext this is actually a troon abusing Chinese editing apps
>>>/snow/2022698Here's the proof
>>>/snow/2023137 No. 81817
File: 1723140540275.jpeg (253.91 KB, 648x420, IMG_2131.jpeg)
free my nonny she didn’t do anything wrong, it’s somehow bait but nobody replied to it because she was just posting in context of the thread just like everybody else. if you state anything the “wrong” way you just get redtexted
No. 81834
>>81830>childrearing talk should also be kept to its containment threadEven the mere mention of children can summon the "PiV sex is inviting rape and childrearing bad" anons. I haven't seen any conversation specifically mentioning childrearing that leads to that anon appearing. It's the mere mention of someone being pregnant (in the vent thread of all places).
>anons should still be able to express their opinionsYes, but the problem is when having children is equated with allowing yourself to get raped because that means you had PiV sex with a moid.
I say all of this as a staunch childfree anon.
>>81833>if there's a back and forth between anons about whether pregnancy is good or bad and it shits up the thread, they should both be banned, not just one opinion.Yeah, but that's not happening from what I'm seeing. It's the "babymaker" anon screeching at any anon who might make a slight reference to the fact she happens to have a kid or is pregnant in threads where it isn't derailing to mention that.
No. 81853
File: 1723183941612.jpg (38.18 KB, 636x424, nl6nlu1q09ux.jpg)
>>81852The pregnancy fight is basically lolcows version of picrel.
No. 81901
File: 1723290597546.png (5.9 KB, 467x100, strong and independant feminis…)
>>81900Yup. They're not even trying to hide it anymore.
No. 81903
File: 1723299216053.png (247.85 KB, 706x398, 1671335304172.png)
pedophile moid in the love after porn thread
No. 81908
can the prepping thread
>>>/ot/1572306 also have "climate change" also in it's title, considering half the thread is mostly talking about climate change related issues
No. 81912
File: 1723334423853.jpg (231.75 KB, 1179x1005, tumblr_716e02b55537192e9e41d38…)
>>81900I'm not even sure what they should do at this point. On the one hand, locking it would make the retard moids feel like they "won," and they might break containment. On the other, I worry that the thread is attracting those kinds of retards to the site at a time when we're already having a serious issue with right-wing tourists.
No. 81931
Infight in confessions thread
>>>/ot/2110705Might be bj-chan since the bp thread is currently active as well
No. 81943
>>81941Seconded
also do something about the racebaiter sperging about koreans in /ot/ pls
No. 81957
File: 1723563932342.jpeg (330.34 KB, 1640x612, IMG_0639.jpeg)
Did it warrant a red text if I was responding to someone asking why Venus envied Mikan/Taylors life and it circled back around to Venus wanting to be a sugar baby like them? Not trying to be obtuse, I thought it was she, it was semi relevant to what was asked
No. 81960
File: 1723586044902.jpeg (349.96 KB, 828x738, IMG_1005.jpeg)
>>81959She went on PULL to wk herself when the account was discovered and confirmed it was hers. She said she didn’t go through with it so it’s still a tinfoil but it’s also something she could’ve said to save face and not admit she did indeed do sex work.
No. 81963
>>81962(bj chan)
I have not been on lc in a long time and just genuinely curious how depraved posts like those are allowed here
No. 81964
>>81957Kek, that wasn't even tinfoil I vividly remember this post
>>81960 back when it happened. Sure, redtext for derailing but at least get the lore correct. That's something I've noticed about this bunch of farmhands, a lack of sassy quips that ring true and a tendency to make incorrect statements. You used to be able to rely for the most part if a farmhand had given a redtext what was contained within was generally true based on evidence. Now it seems they just write whatever without giving it a second thought.
No. 81971
File: 1723669008649.jpg (26.82 KB, 265x374, Ore_no_imouto_novel_v1_cover.j…)
An anon was wrongfully redtexted in the fujo thread. The image they posted wasn't actually shota, it was a shitpost edit of picrel.
No. 81978
File: 1723685045343.jpg (213.68 KB, 1440x914, Screenshot_20240815_041916_Sam…)
This is happening again. Any other anons encountered this?
No. 81981
File: 1723688835431.png (104.04 KB, 2568x348, Screenshot 2024-08-14 at 8.25.…)
>>81973Wtf the retard admitted she shooped it hoping Jill will see it and seethe. Is this a teenager? What in retardation?
No. 81985
>>81981Anons who post long ass novels, dumb advices or shitty edits in the hope that the cow will read them are so cringe.
Reddit-tier retardation.
No. 82001
How're you going to redtext about imane when the cow themselves posted about imane? She recently posted about Trump too, so is discussing that derailing as well? Be realistic with bans when it's on topic of what a cow discusses. Anons pointed out you should take the imane talk to /ot/ to avoid the tranny derailers, but apparently not that's bad? Do you expect anons to ignore the post? If it's an issue, the post itself should be redtext so that no one brings up imane in the thread at all. It traps anons into being banned if they reply to thr Imane or Trump posts that
are from Addy.
Addys imane post
>>>/w/334012Banned post about imane
>>>/w/334022 No. 82003
There's an infighting anon in the Pixielocks thread calling others schizo etc.
>>81998You're taking things too personally if you think "please don't say someone is a groper without proof" is being a tumblrfag
No. 82008
>>81998Just because you have a mean girls attitude straight out of tiktok doesn't mean it's right to call someone Jillian is using for her sob stories to make her fake mental illness sound more legit, a groper. It doesn't make anyone a tumblrina to call out this behavior in your post. You stick out like a sore thumb.
>>82005>Why don't you try assimilating to the website you are on.Nice deflection
No. 82013
>>82012A tinfoil that has been expressed repeatedly by other anons, even in the sane thread.
Moralfag.
No. 82014
>>82011>>82013Why are you taking this so personally? Take a breather
nonny.
No. 82022
>>82020>>82021Now you're being schizo, acting this paranoid and treating a thread like it will somehow
discourage Jill's delusions is just as delusional. Very politely, hop off. Jill is never going to get better. She doesn't need her thread for validation she is literally surrounded top to bottom by wishy washy enablers 24/7.
>calling people schizo makes you look d-dumb!!! Okay lol
>>82019Been here at least a year before the first Shayna thread and subsequent banning of Shayna as a topic for discussion.
No. 82047
>>82045>they defend the misconception that pedos are simply attracted to kid body typesthats what part of pedophilia is retard. are you really going to say aswell that "loli" is totally a body type and not a attraction to little girls?
>i feel like a lot of these anti-anime anons are the main problem with infighting about any anime since they do it in other threads as well.youre really not helping the stereotype that anime culture is largely pedophilic when you shotashits sperg out after rightfully being banned for their vile shit. you can like anime and not be a pedo you know?
(infighting) No. 82062
File: 1723777120990.png (2.63 MB, 1006x1699, arena antics.png)
>>82059There are a handful of obsessive anti-fujo anons who just can't let it go (one of the constantly accuses everyone of "shitting on" this and "shitting on" that) and then a bunch of fujos who like to stir the pot because they get a kick out of it. It basically just boils down to women scolding each other either for being too horny or for being too puritanical, and nothing productive ever happens. They treat it like team sports, it's so bizarre.
No. 82064
>>82059It's a combination of two things.
Anti-fujo newfags don't understand the origins of LC and can't handle seeing someone else enjoy something they don't.
Fujo newfags don't understand that yaoi goes in the yaoi thread and can't handle seeing someone who doesn't enjoy something that they do.
Both types of poster ruin yaoi discussion on LC.
No. 82069
>>82059Very amusing to see fujos act like
victims once again when that infighting started with a fujo shitting on a himejo anon and continued to be about how much they hate f/f shippers. Oh but we conveniently forgot that part and you guys are the poor bullied nonnies, right?
No. 82092
>>82074>>82070Nta but the more autistic fujo posters definitely spergout about any women that like F/F must be men/trannies because F/F is only ever for men (even over shit like utena and F/F made specifically for women). Eg. just recently in the fandom thread
>>>/ot/2136235 , and comes up all the time
>>>/ot/1677624 . The fandom thread is definitely lolcows tumblr. Even normal fujo anons have a problem with the more deranged ones.
No. 82096
File: 1723852479918.jpg (18.91 KB, 302x362, 39d6afdcf9f8a2133521c7bee36845…)
I just accidentally reported like 3 posts on /g/ for unsaged off-topic because I mixed up the tabs and thought I was on /snow/, can mod-sama forgive me? Please don't ban me for being stupid
No. 82113
>>82084The 1100 post notification is for the next thread maker to start compiling milk and links and stuff for the new thread. It can take awhile to make a new thread so a heads up is nice. The 1200 notification is when it is time to
post the new thread.
No. 82116
File: 1723882178480.png (113.12 KB, 604x267, Screenshot 2024-08-17 010816.p…)
cat hate thread is still extremely creepy. why does it exist?
No. 82130
>>82128This is my issue with it. It specifies domesticated animals, animals that aren't usually known to attack people, but there are instances of it happening. Moreso with dogs. Cats are mishandled all the time and they show when they don't want to be touched, but people will stick mess with a trashing-tailed kitty. Dogs a lot of the time won't make a noise and will just lunge.
If anything, they should close and an overall "animals I hate" should be made, but anyone saying they should die or be killed should be banned. That's not a-logging a person, but it's fucked up to see users saying animals need to be mass murdered.
No. 82140
>>82134It's a dumb idea either way, there's zero difference if there's one general or two threads. It doesn't even change anything about what that anon is complaining about (the 1-2 very recognizable posters who go OTT) either. I feel like those anons get
triggered everytime they see the thread titles and then either come on here to demand bans for things they don't like or get into the threads to start infights. I have several cats myself and clicking the (-) takes me one second.
No. 82142
>>82134how about we just don't have animal hate threads in general because we seem to get psychotic zoosadists typing out their fantasies in them
>>82140but like… why do we need them? why are there threads devoted to hating common pets? wtf does that have to do with lolcow and what productive, fun, or funny converation does that cause? it has nothing to do with drama or the internet.
No. 82152
>>82151i meant that most threads have nothing to do with drama or the internet, or lolcow in general, not just those.
>Farmhands lock threads all the time that provoke infighting. very rarely. they still let unpopular opinions and the fandom/fujo threads go on for some reason
No. 82167
>>82166On catalogue it's even easier to just ignore since you don't even see any posts.
>>82162>a lot of the dog/cat hate threads is just sadist fantasies.I'm starting to think this is some kind of psyop get people to check out the threads because everytime someone says that, almost all posts in the threads are just discussion and criticism besides that one recognizable poster.
No. 82168
Why is this thread still not locked?
>>>/ot/2138490It's a duplicate of other running threads and is nothing but fujo vs. anti-fujo infighting AGAIN. Some schizos just can't live if nobody replies to their bait - you need to put a stop to that.
No. 82169
>>82168I agree this is just the antifujo thread all over again
it always starts when that troon comes back it almost was on topic at one point. its better to delete it altogether since there's nothing new that isn't in the antifujo thread
No. 82172
File: 1723992188978.jpg (529.97 KB, 1080x1834, Screenshot_20240818_074157_Chr…)
Nta but this post is in reply to an anon who claims taylor can't talk about premenopause because apparently she's not old enough. The other 2 are details though. The middle one is from the anon who constantly nitpicks the thread.
No. 82180
>>82179The wedding hasn't even happened. The relationship with Uma
did. One makes sense to speculate about because it was an integral piece of milk that spawned the current DID LARP and the other hasn't even happened yet.
No. 82185
>>82183Thus containment. I'll make one later
>>82172Thank you for freeing anon from jail. I don't think correcting anons, especially in that thread, should be banned. The vendettafags are on some heavy drugs considering the shit they post. "Women don't have this in their 30s!!! She's a liar!!!!" Unhinged retards. Istg.
No. 82191
File: 1724005343330.jpeg (419.67 KB, 828x1039, IMG_5020.jpeg)
>>82189thx farmhand-san
also the racebaiter who shat up the brit thread spamming screencaps of anti-immigration tweets is trying it again in the eurofag thread
No. 82213
>>81057>>81059I'm gonna bring this up again after seeing this ban in the last bechdel test thread.
>>>/ot/2141205So can you please finally tell us why these bans happen when nowhere in the thread rules does it say "no shitposting" or anything like that? Literally THE ONLY RULE is don't mention men. If you're going to keep doing this would you at least add a mod note to the OP or something?
Also how come you keep ignoring these?
>>79968>>80445 No. 82221
>>82220honestly those threads are increasingly full of tumblr-tier moralfaggotry. fandom drama barely gets discussed even though it's milky, instead they create their own fandom drama sperging over whether you're morally allowed to like fictional shit. the male v female characters thread is more of the same retardation.
honestly, between the moralfags and the poltards /ot/ is really going to shit
No. 82222
File: 1724062307142.png (9.17 KB, 814x59, 4.2.png)
>>82213>So can you please finally tell us why these bans happen when nowhere in the thread rules does it say "no shitposting" or anything like that?It's a global rule
No. 82223
File: 1724073175069.jpg (188.91 KB, 926x491, Literally what.jpg)
Why did this cop me an ELEVEN hour ban? I said the CATS were raggedy fat asses, because they are raggedy fat asses. Jill's thread is genuinely getting the brunt of the shit moderation of this site because how the fuck have the rules gotten so oowoo soft? We can't call those cats "raggedy" or fat? I would understand an ELEVEN HOUR ban if I said I wanted to kill Jill and her cats, but I don't.
It's genuinely very retarded what will cop a ban in Jill's thread. What fucking rule did I even break? None, because the mod that banned me just said "calm down". Because the janny didn't like the tone I was using in my jokepost. Holy shit.
The admins need to get rid of the /w/ janny. Or whoever is handing out retarded bans in Jill's thread. They're literally picking who to ban based on how they feel.
No. 82227
File: 1724074673283.jpg (270.08 KB, 894x820, I did retard.jpg)
>>82223KEKKKM the tranny janny told me to take it to meta when I DID. And they still didn't tell me what rule I fucking broke in the first place to earn an 11+ HOUR BAN. FOR CALLING CATS FAT INBRED RETARDS. I didn't even call
Jill a fat inbred retard. I called the cats fat inbred retards. This site is fucking cooked. No mods read this shit, they don't care.
Lolcow was better when shaymin forgot to pay the bills.
No. 82240
>>82239why does it even matter. you’re evading, post in peace.
t. evader posting in peace
No. 82242
Holy kek I actually feel bad for jannies if this
>>82239 is the level of autism they have to deal with on the regular
No. 82267
>>82266Samefag if it's allowed I can create an anonymous survey to see if anons would like a specific thread to vent about their issues with the site culture. It seems many anons have problems with the site culture changes.
I see no reason to not allow such a thread considering there are other threads in /ot/ that obviously belong on the other boards. If anons don't like it, they can simply hide the thread.
(ban evasion) No. 82291
>>82290Well thanks for admitting it at least. But to be clear, I'm not talking about anyone complaining about moderation in /ot/. I'm referencing this ban
>>>/ot/2141205 . I know it's an "old" post but I've seen similar bans these last few months.
No. 82306
Will
>>79968>>80445ever get answered? Like that gets locked but not the male vs female characters thread? I feel like staff allows the latter out of spite because they know most anons dislike it (besides the tumblr twitter fandom infighters).
No. 82310
>>82309ntayrt and nta in either thread, but this kind of nonnafoiling is retarded. If that's the same anon, people post across threads, so what. Anon in Opinions thread is disagreeing about something, not infighting.
I think "hi cow" is a good rule but it's kind of weirdly enforced. I always thought that it was meant to be overt "is this kiki?! omg this has to be Venus!" posts and not mild suspicion about whether Kiki still posts here to defend her sister. Since, you know, she actually did that.
I also want to remind the mods - regarding "tinfoil" - your own rule states that "tinfoiling with no basis to a claim." There are things that LC as a community figured out way before anyone else on the internet, and that's because of circumstantial proof and smart anons using their powers of deduction. As an example of bannable tinfoiling, I'd say the yakuza tinfoil in Dakota's thread counts as that. Zero basis for that, just some fanfic. But saying a cow has ED behaviors when she posts about weight loss and eats weird shit all the time is hardly "tinfoiling with no basis to a claim." There have been a bunch of other "tinfoil" redtexts lately that just seem wrong to me. Sometimes there's a huge amount of circumstantial evidence that contradicts the cow's own lies.
No. 82316
File: 1724151168355.jpg (167.34 KB, 1080x613, b.jpg)
Can we get a /b/? Mentioned in the last Bechdel thread.
No. 82318
File: 1724160945704.jpg (116.69 KB, 600x600, e6f2-130a-4e45-8d80-53ebc6ddd3…)
>>82265I don't really see the point especially since it's in /w/ and the janny said we should take it to /ot/. I also think it's a stupid idea and will get dry extremely soon, maybe an alt wedding general thread on /ot/ would work better? This just makes it very confusing whether or not certain posts are allowed on Jill's thread, at least maybe clarify what can cause anons to get a ban (rainbow suit nonna was done dirty) because otherwise you'll kill the only remaining active thread on /w/
No. 82342
>>82340You seem not to know what is and isn't disordered.
>where does it say restrictive diet people with disordered eating don't announce it to the world unless they want to stop
>we don't have proofthere is plenty of evidence she's preoccupied with her body/weight/eating
>Substitutions aren't restrictions hell yeah they are
>we don't have all her mealstrue of anyone on the internet
>she's eating, she goes out to restaurants so do ppl with EDs
>That doesn't sound like cutting carbs.Read the recipe for the chicken and find the carb, anon. There's no breading.
idk what you get out of caping here
(bringing infights to /meta/) No. 82345
File: 1724191794927.jpg (442.23 KB, 1372x1215, s-l1600~2.jpg)
/meta/ has the best milk
No. 82347
>>82343Not really. Anons in the thread posted multiple recipes where she substitutes rice with cauliflower rice "for extra fiber", pasta with chickpea pasta "for extra protein", makes "healthy" chocolate mousse with freaking tofu "for extra protein", uses cottage cheese in sauces instead of cream etc. etc.
It's all easy to find in the thread and it's been going on for a while.
No. 82361
File: 1724211480444.gif (859.79 KB, 220x220, lol.gif)
>>82357>arguing about mac and cheeseanon, i wish you were lying, but i know you aren't. i'm not even sure i want to know what people could even be mad about over macaroni and cheese…is it the baked vs creamy camp again or europoors who've only ever tasted kraft making hot takes about "it's just cheese!" to work up americans? i'm surprised we haven't had a hygiene olympics yet.
No. 82368
>>82362>indian racebaitI haven't seen anyone talks shit about Indian women though, it's all about how their scrotes are awful because of their extremely misogynistic culture.
I really feel for Indian women, personally.
No. 82375
File: 1724258957112.jpeg (Spoiler Image,54.12 KB, 809x835, birdballs.jpeg)
Why do bird balls have to be spoilered now?
No. 82405
File: 1724302216721.png (130.98 KB, 2564x308, Screenshot 2024-08-21 at 10.48…)
>>82402Nta but she's just repeating what the farmhand said the side thread was for. Either way, the person posting the shoes posted actual milk and didn't deserve the ban
No. 82414
File: 1724336219379.jpg (366.66 KB, 1042x1256, 1000010974.jpg)
>>82413Anon, you seriously don't have to be so combative and hostile. That was a reasonable question because in picrel you can see that the description implies that there will be tinfoiling. Nobody was infighting, nobody was outright disagreeing with eachother, but the /w/ farmhand decided to issue a redtext for something that you would have clearly recalled if you were following Jill's thread for more than like 2 or 3 threads, which most people have at this point unless they're VERY new. I'm not trying to argue here, I'm just genuinely curious as to why one post deserved a redtext asking for spoonfeeding.
No. 82418
>>82417In what world would the tinfoil about the marriage lasting belong in Jill's general thread?
If the tinfoils have to be based on literal, actual reality, with proof provided, why isn't that in the description? Tinfoils are wacky theories, the tinfoil thread in /ot/ does not state to make sure to include actual, literal proof of their wacky theories. The post about how long their marriage lasting and how there were
probable problems behind the scenes
prior to the engagement is literally just reasonable speculation because we all know how Jill is and how she was raised. It's reasonable to conclude there
might have been issues prior to the proposal because anons were already speculating that she was going insane because there was no engagement yet.
No. 82421
I knew that making two Jillian threads would come with this kind of trouble, I tried to warn you.
>>82417For the love of god just lurk more.
No. 82422
>>82419>no proof of a messed up relationshipAnon, Steve has been encouraging Jill's DID LARP, and Jill has been pretty much a NEET for years smoking weed and drinking alcohol. This is not a healthy relationship even if both parties are happy with each other and in love. It's not a "reach" to conclude that their relationship probably won't last for a few more years. They're still young adults.
>A tweet is t proof when people like those.thinga because they are also empathetic or have been through it, doesn't mean definitely it's because of steve. That's a reach.I have no idea what you're trying to say here but anons have been speculating that Jill has been tard-raging for a while because Steve hadn't proposed yet. I just don't know why there has to be proof for anything in a speculative tinfoil thread when the anons in said thread are literally just saying what they think would happen. I have absolutely no clue why it even matters in the first place and why anons have suddenly gotten really combative and bordering white-knight territory with regards to Jill. She's spoiled and jealous through and through, I think it's well within reason to speculate that Jill passive aggressively orchestrated the proposal in the first place. It's such a non-issue that I really struggle to understand why it matters, but that's my opinion I guess.
No. 82430
>>82429I still don't understand why my post is deserving of such hostility because I'm not even trying to infight. Also I'm not even arguing against separate threads, the containment thread was first proposed as a fanfiction thread in an offhanded colloquial sense, not literal fanfiction. Tinfoiling is in the description because there is an implication that anons will be tinfoiling about the wedding. I still don't understand what the big deal is or why you are so upset. Speculation on
how the engagement happened is related to the wedding. I don't even know how much clearer I can make it so you can understand what I'm saying.
No. 82440
>>82439See this
>>82438, the BJD community and the fashion doll community are largely separate entities, it would be like if Pokémon and Digimon shared a thread because they're both about evolving monsters who fight each other.
No. 82449
>>82448>tiny little subsetAnon it's genuinely two separate hobbies with two separate cultures. They might overlap but the culture and history is completely different between them, and I have tried contributing multiple times in the past. This anon
>>82442 is right, they are two very different atmospheres and it's not very fair to ask such a dichotomy to share one space. There should be a thread for BJD collectors/customizers and fashion doll collectors/customizers. This is generally how the two hobbies interact irl so I don't see the problem with having two separate threads focused on the two topics respectively.
BJD autists and fashion doll autists are not the same.
No. 82453
File: 1724383354771.jpeg (70.77 KB, 735x414, IMG_0759.jpeg)
cp on front page bump
No. 82456
>>82429>Again, this wasn't an issue with jvlog vs chrisxsharla threads being separated until retards who actually tinfoil ruined it all and now we have no threads>>82420>We had a Chris and sharla thread containment and a jvlog thread and anons can't handle a seperate jill thread? There was no Chris & Sharla containment thread.
>>>/w/225033Locked for being a shit thread.
No. 82465
>>>/ot/2150178Holy shit mods please ban this obvious schizo moid from baiting and ruining /ot/
>women don't care about solving rapeIt could not be more obvious, please ban these tards.
No. 82468
>>82352>>82447Seth MacFarlane stuff
can be funny, like I get why it got popular and I've laughed at it before, but it's a bit meh to see such normie stuff here especially so much lately. I hope we don't get any banners
No. 82475
>>82466No way those are women pulling out the "strap is modeled after penis!!" argument to attack a lesbian. Either it's schizos, moids, or trolls making these posts. I don't even care about the debate itself, It's just annoying seeing it clog up the amerifags thread.
>>82474I'm gay and as much as I don't care about (and am annoyed by) women's nigels I also hate it when threads go to shit because of a retarded ban evading BP troller. I see how they bring their bait in this thread too kek, it's how you know they're attention-whore trolls.
No. 82481
File: 1724454557017.jpg (1.76 MB, 3840x2160, 20240824_020802.jpg)
The ban is expired now but it's kinda stupid that my post got redtexted when the thread OP says animals are ok, while the picture with male animals didn't get redtexted anyways. This gets banned but the retard baiting about Poor Things doesn't kek.
No. 82488
>>82487some people are using the discussion as infight bait, which coincidentally happens every time poor thungs gets brought up.
infighting and baiting is tiresome and the bechdel thread really isn't the right place for that specific discussion anyway.
No. 82491
File: 1724488581940.png (9.2 KB, 361x96, ot-Ugly-Man-Psyop-Discussion-T…)
>>82489He's not even hiding it anymore
No. 82496
>>82494Anon
>>82495 is right. Pretty sure it's just bait and to a lesser capacity people looking for an outlet for the frustrations which is unfortunately other anons. I learnt my lesson the one time I posted, never again kek.
No. 82497
File: 1724498529728.jpg (148.89 KB, 720x1238, IMG_20240824_142117.jpg)
There's a tranny in unpopular opinions
No. 82507
File: 1724536878088.jpeg (450.57 KB, 828x1043, IMG_5097.jpeg)
the ridiculous photoshoppers threads really bring in the most retarded newfags
No. 82509
File: 1724543147224.jpg (110.67 KB, 917x356, Retard take it to meta.jpg)
So tired of anons sperging out in the threads about what user is who, assuming everyone is a supposed whiteknight too. These users keep shitting up the Taylor thread constantly with these accusations. Please long ban them. The thread is already suffering as is, we don't need anons baiting like this. They can take it to meta or report wks instead of trying to point them out and hide before text spoilers like newfags
No. 82529
File: 1724560594733.png (49.25 KB, 1533x684, Skirby 3rd person retard.png)
I'm begging you to just keep banning the skirbyfag. They reply to themselves in the 3rd person, they think they own threads. There is no fucking way this poster is over 18 with how they obsessively compare every thot they post to skirby and literally skirby is a nobody. Claiming all sorts of tinfoil without proof at all and then getting mad when anons call them out. They have been spamming some ugly dude in the photoshop thread and it's not even new shops and now the thread is filled with the second to last posts being the skirbyfag
>>>/snow/2029426. We don't need every single fucking photo of his ugly photoshopped face. It's shopped, everyone knows it is. This is the same repetitive posting that forced this anon to make a skirby thread because anons were tired of them ruining the photoshop thread, but we don't need a thread for every single person who does shop that they stumble upon either. Like please. This is ridiculous and we know they reply to themselves, we've seen it before and they are so obvious because they won't shut up about their precious skirby. Anon needs to get a grip and shut up and stop shitting up so many threads with their posts and claiming anons need to give credit to them. What a weird thing to even demand on lolcow.
No. 82549
File: 1724610750200.jpg (410.69 KB, 1290x2293, 456981587_18448747069030812_69…)
Please make a new addyharajuku thread
No. 82572
>>82569Me too! I just want an answer. Past 2 weeks have been HORRID after 10PM. Literally insane that if you're awake at 7-8AM and you're on the catalog page, you can actually SEE the post numbers in each thread go down in real time as idi/ot/ farmhand wakes up and starts doing her job. My only question is if she is so overwhelmed by the amount of work WHY don't they open farmhand applications so that the workload can be shared more effectively between persons in different timezones?
>>82567They did ban me for spam, but luckily I have a VPN so I can just click a button and in less than a second I am unbanned again. This is also another problem with the moderation of the website that needs to be addressed.
(ban evasion) No. 82578
File: 1724678538547.png (847.91 KB, 2432x1372, kinkshaming thread.png)
Are we letting sensitive newfags bend the rules of a thread to their whims now? That stupid rule wasnt in the last two thread. Its always the bitches that get off to choking and corpses that end up being the most sensitive. Imagine if a fujo hijacked the fujocoomer thread to put a rule saying you cant crosspost from the fujo thread, hell would break lose.
No. 82582
File: 1724688383935.png (35.23 KB, 1800x534, underage retard.png)
You will never convince me that the skirby poster is not underage. They even went back to edit their 'newds' because they realized it sounded too juvenile and gave them away. Also the way they claim threads belong to them and they need credit?
Honestly think you should lock their skirby thread, ban skirby posting, and ban/deete their posts when they are the poster. They keep infighting and shitting all the threads they enter. Not to mention obvious cowtipping and I'm not just saying because of the file names. skirby poster knows it's a throwaway when anons weren't even mentioning or caring if it was. They added all this extra info that no one cares about or asked about. Anons already suspected this with tiktoks involving skirby being posted too.
No. 82583
>>82582Yeah, I wonder what their post history looks like.
I just ignore/hide the thread now. Depending on how autistic they are they'll likely lose interest when it doesn't get attention because the posts are annoying/unintegrated and the cow (skirby) is boring.
No. 82587
File: 1724693442535.png (137.81 KB, 500x250, 2953807424697.PNG)
Why do I get banned for personalityfagging while bpchan and ntyfag get to roam free?
No. 82592
>>82589Watch out anon! Some covert farmhand will add in a rule change in the MTF thread that says something like "REMEMBER: soyjaks are NOT BANNED" like here
>>82578 so they don't have to enforce any rules and they can go back to minimodding like crazy and ban anons who dare attempt to be sarcastic in response to another anon in some milkless cow thread.
No. 82595
>>82594Wish that was true, check the femdom thread. Inb4
>Ohh it's just regular NON sissy hypno!!please, it's the same retarded tranny shit. gtfo with those DeviantArt tier fetishes, you're not gonna hypnotize a man to be your perfect lil bimbo with a YouTube video
No. 82602
>>82601I don't think it's random farmers I genuinely think it's undercover farmhands or something.
>>82600Still no sign of life from admin.
No. 82609
>>82607>I'm sick of all the hundreds of milkless threads that are full of nothing but nitpicking some random e-whores Instagram story. I don't give a fuck. I agree but it's always been an unspoken rule that lolcor is full of woman hating anachans, pickmes and female misogynists who would rather write paragraphs about a woman's nasolabial folds or obsessively analyze and tear apart her instagram story than make fun of moids.
Half the time I think the angry vendetta flameposting in the porn or photoshop whores threads is women who have caught their boyfriends watching her porn and now have a hateboner towards her. We really don't need more onlyfans whore threads with their porn screenshots, none of them are especially milky besides people like Shayna and Skirby.
No. 82610
>>82573All you're doing by rehashing unhinged scrote 4chan posts is just normalizing their ideas, spreading hate and giving their stupid opinions/unhinged thinkpieces more attention and credence than they deserve. Nobody needs to see
>reasons why I hate women>reasons why I hate brown people>reasons why I hate Jewsthreads regurgitated on here, we already know these unhinged hateful freaks exist and 99% of the population avoids them and their idiotic drivel for that reason. Stop acting like these losers opinions or takes even matter, you're just spreading it around.
No. 82613
>>82578As the anon who made the 3rd kinkshaming thread I added that in because we already have “Lolcow’s own screencaps” for de/g/en shaming
>>>/ot/2072706 if so many nonnas want that part removed from the OP then go right ahead farmhands/admins it’s not big deal to me lol
No. 82615
>>82607Big reason as to why I think women on here talk shit about trannies so much over any other moid, because we can't have threads dedicated to making fun of degen schizo moids without them being shut down. Trannies are the closest to 4chan moids we can get. I'm tired of /pol/fags infiltrating this site too, they need to be promptly bullied. There's so many posts on here that are just "the /pol/tards were right the entire time!!" that are obviously said /pol/fags trying to psyop us lol.
>>82612>>82609The random bpdemon e-whore threads are soooooo boring. Nothing special or new about them, but it's so obvious that they're made by women who hate other woomen so it's not really new. I remember daniel larson's thread, it was sort of inactive but it was funny making fun of a disgusting moid with people who defended him getting blasted. As I said earlier it's why I think trannies are so talked about on here, they're milky as fuck. No boring nitpicking, just pure milk
No. 82619
>>82617I know, I complained about it above
>>82589, that's still a failing on jannies part considering they even locked the thread with the Chris Tyson pic and left the scrotey soylitas one up. And nonas getting redtexted for derailing/blogposting is also retarded, reading nonas analysis on tranny psychology or personal anecdotes of irl troons is one of my favorite things from the MFT threads.
No. 82623
>>82621I think it would be more interesting to how many
>male cows>female cows>mtf cows>ftm cows there are, you rarely see a cow born male that still calls themself male and you rarely see a cow born female that’s gone ftm, the only noteworthy ones I can think of are Kalvin Garrah (who almost had a thread but got locked so I don’t count Kalvin) and Pixyteri (who’s a pretty big cow but there’s not many other ftm cows like Pixy)
No. 82658
>>82644that shit belongs on fucking reddit or 4chan. not here.
>>82656no. her comments are deleted for a reason.
No. 82667
>>82656Laur regularly spams word salad, dox spams various innocent unrelated people, spams gore/gross content, and makes the thread unusable on the regular due to the insane amounts of unhinged spam. We delete these the moment we see them, so most farmers miss the complete schizo meltdown that happens weekly, but I'm sure some have seen these posts. As well, we discourage selfposting and personalityfagging in general. So for now, we will be deleting her posts.
>>82666Essentially this. We always delete massive schizo spam posting on other threads as well (Dasha's thread for example).
No. 82673
>>82633kek there's really retards arguing that porn needs to be posted on lolcow now
why not just change the url to cowhub and post constant screenshots of shayna and aniejoy's cunts for the moid lurkers to enjoy
pathetic
No. 82691
>>82687Okay. Not like people can't find this content elsewhere.
>>82685There are generals for them. Idk why they arent used. Not every cow need their own thread.
>>82680I wouldn't trust someone complaining like this to be a moderator.
No. 82697
>>82687the site will more likely just die off naturally for reasons like server bills or management issues which seems to be the main recurring theme we have with the admins. most people don't want to run this site for various reasons like being exposed to cp, gore, and harassment/doxxing threats, so the pool of capable admins is quite small. that's part of the reason why things have gotten so bad here lately. eventually there isn't going to be anyone who is willing to manage it and deal with all the stress that comes with running the boards unless it gets sold out like what happened to 4chan. a lot of admins have talked about how expensive it has become to run this place and the abundant issues with the backend so on top of finding someone who can deal with cp and weirdos attempting to doxx them, they also have to be willing to work on the site code. i know years back one of the older admins contemplated allowing advertising but it's hard to find sponsors that'll run on an imageboard other than porn and ccp datamining bullshit.
>because the internet has become absolutely saturated with lolcows.i actually think it's the opposite. it's hard to find actual lolcows in the wild. people like chris-chan, cyraxx, raven, kota, pixy, idk cows like either aren't online anymore or don't get as much attention as they used to. i do think the internet is overly saturated though with annoying attention seekers, but they're not weird the same way that chris-chan was weird.
No. 82706
File: 1724845212690.jpg (26.45 KB, 861x517, IMG_0828.jpg)
sorry but how did this post break rules in any way? the pic i posted wasnt even porn or had pussy/tits showing on it
No. 82720
>>82716it was a drawing of two women, and the asshole wasnt even showing. if sight of female anatomy
triggers then you shouldnt use the lesbian threads at all. the husbandofag thread would be more fitting for you though.
No. 82726
File: 1724862519667.png (Spoiler Image,566.34 KB, 1092x611, g.png)
>>82723you make it sound like I posted deranged fetish porn when there is far worse shit posted by straight/bihet anons where they literally have their hairy bulges out and actual fetish porn that you let slide because you jerk off to it yourself. again, as ive said before, if seeing women in mildly sexual contexts bothers you, then hide the lesbian thread
No. 82727
>>82715Never used that site.
>>82717I’m talking about how these people view women who are feminists, dummy
>>82719Nobody wants to be a mod for this shit heap, don’t blame them but I also don’t sympathize kek
>>82721>birthrates are getting lowerTrad-chan we told you not to post like that here
No. 82728
File: 1724865256463.png (608.99 KB, 1200x1200, pJxo8HAHdzuwMu7Z6JJ8YKMcb7-lrW…)
>>82727I'm not a trad-anon, the trad-anons are saying boomerisms like "if a woman fraternizes with a man, getting raped is her fault". If you really give a shit, donate to organizations that educate and provide birth control to women in Bangladesh which has the highest birth rate in the world currently. This is a link for RHSTEP, Reproductive Health Services, Training, and Education Program:
https://rhstep.org/.
No. 82729
>>82726Oh you mean people are posting horny pictures in the horny husbando thread?! Call the police! Meanwhile, posting a moidshit hentai image of a young girl fingering a man’s hairy butthole is perfectly appropriate to post randomly without context in the lesbian general thread.
-/g/‘s resident genius, yuripedo
No. 82731
>>82729spoilers exist for sensitive asexual retards like you btw.
>man’s hairy buttholeare you implying women cant have hairy assholes…? should it be squeaky clean shaved to be acceptable for you? not very radfem of you
nonnie…
>/g/‘s resident genius, yuripedoi doubt yuripedo would be caping for bpdchans kek. get your facts straight, not everyone is the same anon, retarded schizo
No. 82732
>>>/w/335108How the fuck is this a tinfoil? It's literally a creator she linked under her reel and half of the said creator's content is about weight loss and dieting.
Mods keep baning every single post that documents her ana behaviour. I'm very curious to know why. And this is not the first instance.
Or was it for the sarcastic bit about learning Hindi? Lmao
No. 82736
>>82728at some point parthenogenesis will become possible and then we can have a world with only women.
>>82732Most of the redtext on Taylor's thread makes zero sense. It's always the same 1-2 anons in here reeing until their mod or sock bans whatever they don't like. Once I got 3 contemporaneous BS bans in threads on different boards just because they couldn't find a good reason to ban the post the person wanted banned.
If the particular anon(s) start an infight, they never get banned, only the people who correct/respond do. If they don't like your opinion, however nicely worded it is, you get banned for nitpicking, infighting, baiting, or derailing. The only opinions allowed are praise or insane defense of their favorite /w/ cows. They love mentioning belle delphine, jvloggers, sharla, chris, dakota, and nicole. They made the containment thread and pretended like the sharla/chris containment thread didn't get locked by the mods as soon as it was created. Even then, they blame nonas instead of the mods for doing it.
It's ludicrous that the mods and admin let one or two people shit up so many threads and abuse reports to this extent. This isn't a fanclub for cows and no one is forcing you to read any threads here. In fact, I doubt that the anon(s) doing this even use the boards aside from defending their cows and minimodding any thread where nonas have a different opinion.
No. 82739
File: 1724871867991.png (73.49 KB, 512x512, full.png)
>>82733>Where have we heard that one before… kek. You must be genuinely retarded to think that works. There’s only one person that goes around spamming hentai and lolii almost want to believe this is satire by how ridiculous this sounds, the girls in that drawing didnt even look loli at all kek
>unrelated to the discussion in the lesbian thread.okay we get it, you hate fun, anime and female sexuality. i recommend you to check out facebook lgbbtv groups, they would definitely be more suitable for you than an imageboard with that mindset
No. 82744
File: 1724874396276.png (14.45 KB, 136x136, 2770-pompombutt.png)
>>82743not really. at that angle you cant actually see her butthole, its only the shape of her ass that is visible. if it was at an angle similar to the picrel then id agree
No. 82749
File: 1724875828773.png (19.25 KB, 580x129, spam ban.png)
>>82735Still spamming thisStill unanswered.
In response to picrel, farmhands you must realize by now that bans have no effect on a certain portion of the userbase because VPNs exist. It doesn't matter how long the ban is for, because it can be circumvented very easily. This is another issue with moderation that should be addressed.
>>82737I meant European +2. 10pm EST = 5AM in Finland. So by time midnight EST roles around, it would be 7AM in Finland so they'd have a morning shift. There are lots of Finnish anons. Why can't admin find farmhands that are NEETs and that are awake all hours of day or night anyway?
Why should we be happy with reduced moderation (or even moderation blackouts) for more than half the day? Why can't cerbmin spend 1 minute to confirm that he's alive? Why all this denial and pretending like nothing is wrong?
(ban evasion) No. 82755
>>82753you can go back to talking about dicks in any of the other threads
nonnie. the lesbian thread is not the only one that exists on this site
No. 82756
>>82750I don't blame them for not reading every post in this thread because anons take advantage of the fact that bans are rare in /meta/ to use it as an avenue for infighting and bait. Half the posts in this thread have nothing to do with the site in terms of suggestions or complaints.
But even this is an example of why there needs to be a re-evaluation of how the site is run. If these threads have become a cesspit because of the constant derailment, then why aren't the procedures updated so that more redtexts are issued here for off-topic posts? Why was I redtexted for asking a
valid question, meanwhile anons itt can infight all day and night without consequence?
No. 82760
File: 1724878175162.jpg (102.56 KB, 1080x621, Owow.jpg)
>>82749Mods are retarded, I got banned for reporting another anon baiting. Didn't even get a reason, either. Somebody must be butthurt today
No. 82767
File: 1724878962452.jpg (97.52 KB, 1080x438, Owowowow.jpg)
>>82761I reported this post but got banned as a result, didn't get a red text at all
>>82764Your concerns really need to be addressed, every night there's back to back bait threads being posted without any sort of moderation it's only a matter of time before we get raided
No. 82775
>>82774I've noticed since these threads have stopped being made by admin directly, the quality of posts itt have been declining and the rate of infighting and baiting has grown.
I can agree with the original stance that "oh, we don't ban in /meta/ for transparency reasons" but now we have huge slap-fights like the one going on currently that really do warrant redtexts and bans. It's especially annoying because I think this thread in particular is really important for the health of the website in general, and if this thread is full of bait and irrelevant posts, it makes it harder to discern real complaints and suggestions from shit.
No. 82777
>>82776 Nonnas who are smart and go and google it themselves. Yes, the cow is into it, but that's all we need to know. Bothering to post information about it in general and then discussions happening based off that as a topic are derailing. Its not about the cow anymore and about anons talking about this crap instead.
How has derailing, nitpicking, and tinfoiling become uncommon knowledge in the past 5 years?
I think admin and the mod team need to think about reorganizing some of these boards and threads. There's a lot of threads that are unnecessary and bring certain users. No. 82778
File: 1724883903757.png (242.82 KB, 850x657, responses tallied.png)
>>82775Samefag, just to correct myself:
>I've noticed since these threads have stopped being made by admin directlyI should have said since the last hellweek. I thought that before hellweek, the complaints and suggestions thread were usually made by admin or farmhands but I must have been imagining things (maybe mandmella effect? kek). Only a few threads were made by them.
I wanted to see how often farmhands and admin posted in these threads, so I went back through all the threads and ctrl+f'ed for "
farmhand" and " admin" and tallied the results, which can be seen in picrel. I wrote the thread number, and then the amount of responses by farmhand, and then in brackets the amount of responses by admin (if there were any). I just thought it'd be interesting to see how often staff respond to users in these threads. I didn't take into consideration the content of their posts, or to whom they were replying to (if they were replying), I just tallied the total number of posts that were made by them.
I was surprised by how few times the staff has posted in these threads. I had a rose tinted impression that in the past, farmhands and admin had responded more than they do now.
It was interesting going back through all the different threads. Even if you just look at threads before #22, you can tell that the quality of these threads has gone down a lot since those.
I'm beginning to sense that these threads are now seen by staff as just containment threads for autists to sperg about their bans or to infight with other anons free of consequence, instead of being threads based on actual substantial complaints or suggestions.
No. 82779
>>82774meta is supposed to be a cesspool. deal with it.
>>82777>How has derailing, nitpicking, and tinfoiling become uncommon knowledge in the past 5 years?this is whats really ruining the site, this last wave of bullshit started with covid. people complain the /w/ janny is ban happy, but these were always bannable offenses. they don't fucking contribute ANYTHING to the thread. it brings weirdos and newfags taking retarded tinfoils as truth. I seriously suspect they're tiktards because they have zero critical thinking skills.
No. 82780
File: 1724884103308.png (17.98 KB, 349x117, antiadmin.png)
>>82778Samefag again just to say kek I didn't know doing pound pound was a way to spoiler text, I always did it the square bracket way. Just to clarify, I did search for "pound sign pound sign farmhand" and "pound sign pound sign admin" not just "farmhand" or "admin." The funniest thing I saw was someone pretending to be admin and getting banned for it.
No. 82787
>>82773>Isn't this thread supposed to function as a way for users and staff to communicate with one another, in an open forum sort of way?Silly
nonnie, it was designed to corral all users with complaints into one thread that farmhands can then just hide. Kek.
No. 82789
>>82775They ban in meta pretty often now. Don't forget that movie thread anon got permabanned last summer for posting in meta. And now they allow certain anons to basically personalityfag and start infights here. Only the nonas responding to it will get banned.
>>82779Admin needs to clarify the definition of these words then, because speculation and normal discussion is no longer even tolerated in many threads. If the janny were at least consistent and would ban the anons who start infights or post retarded ad hominems and non-con wk posts, then it would at least seem less biased. I'd rather read anons speculating than have some rule that everything a cow says is automatically the truth. Tinfoil is speculation without any foundation at all, it's batshit crazy crap, not normal use of powers of deduction.
>>82777I also think talking about cow threads being 'necessary' or not is pretty weird. There isn't a finite amount of resources. Don't like a thread? Don't read it. It's silly to expect an entire imageboard to change because you don't like some thread or you personally like the cow. I don't get why this is hard, there are so many threads I think are boring or nitpicky or mean; I just don't read them or get involved.
It just seems like you want to minimod what anyone talks about - why? Genuine question, do you like any thread on LC? What's a "good" cow thread to you?
No. 82797
>>82782do you also scream in horror when seeing a womans body irl. i doubt you even ever got pussy if body hair
triggers tf out of you