File: 1724889033261.png (1018.7 KB, 2000x1456, 4B62A499-F859-4FEA-8EF8-87A47B…)
No. 82824
File: 1724958705381.png (56.11 KB, 941x331, Screenshot 2024-08-29.png)
Why do you still allow this
No. 82831
>>82829wrong
>>82828since when is there a racist, there's only 2 nullfags, one being the pedo.
No. 82834
>>82832they didn't come from twitter
>>82833seriously, who is the racist that you're inventing right now
No. 83332
File: 1726071497630.png (637.8 KB, 573x504, E981FB1F-8A5B-4096-9943-C4CCA6…)
Can we please implement a rule that encourages newfags to lurk? I know spoonfeeding is discouraged in the cow boards but reading newfag questions about basic board information gives me a headache
No. 83529
File: 1726096042465.jpg (225.25 KB, 1220x575, 256418426.jpg)
Can I request a dark purple lolcor style like picrel? I need this so badly.
No. 83638
File: 1726212254869.png (29.03 KB, 885x481, newfag mods.png)
do you guys hire illiterate jannies? is it like some form of community service to give speds a purpose? i am glad they got rid of my retarded ban but next time maybe make jannies take a reading comprehension test before hiring them.
No. 83665
>>83655>than it may as well be renamed a "trigger warning" the absolute state of lolcow and the irony of typing
trigger warning unironically when its redtexted. Maybe stop phoneposting you dont need to be glued to everywhere you go.
No. 83672
>>83670if you wanna be feisty, it's cringier to set aside specific time to "be alone~" to scroll the farms. for some of us, the only time for something as silly as catching up on cows is while travelling, at work in between tasks, or when at home with a partner or roommate who may walk by? idk why you guys always get so combative and autistic whenever this is brought up. the days when there was a dedicated "computer room" are behind us and not everyone still lives at home with mommy and daddy. if the spoilers aren't to protect us from shame then they're essentially Twitter TWs: to protect your feelings from the scary images.
raids aren't the same because it's not like someone's going to continue casually scrolling during that; don't be retarded.
thanks for helping illustrate why a poll would be the most impartial way to see how the user ase actually feels about this though, cheers
No. 83681
File: 1726238781044.jpg (56.79 KB, 834x300, 1000021986.jpg)
Since when did you have to sage on /m/?
No. 83693
File: 1726241438398.png (367.08 KB, 828x1792, IMG_5371.png)
How is it banworthy derailing when people were ostensibly discussing bl manga/manhua/manhwa in the bl thread?
No. 83720
>>83708i just pointed at the description of the thread
>However you can complain about the fanbase of the cow or the people who dislike the cow here.so cope
No. 83732
File: 1726263747014.jpg (347.84 KB, 680x680, 1467998748873.jpg)
>>83724I tried to report it and accidentally downloaded it.
No. 83735
File: 1726266063948.png (169.79 KB, 1600x1200, 47ED40A4-E74A-48F4-BECA-974669…)
>>83685>alright that one I feel the need to justify kekif you feel the need to justify something on the internet to a bunch of anonymous randos, perhaps you should reevaluate your internet habits.
No. 83739
>>83731I don't know
nonnie, something that doesn't look like a picture a moid would jerk off to maybe. Something cow-related (I mean an actual cow kek) would be cute I guess
No. 83745
File: 1726275131548.jpg (198.95 KB, 1080x1366, What.jpg)
Oh shit lolcow is back, thanks mods. Having said that how is this ban evading if the mods simply deleted my posts, I never changed ip's. A permaban for this is ridiculous when I was never warned.
No. 83747
File: 1726280116387.jpg (11.98 KB, 256x250, 8b1a3a4c6115015a63b02422659f1b…)
cp spam on m
No. 83750
File: 1726282658037.gif (703.67 KB, 220x220, IMG_4619.gif)
Anti-abortion retards trying it in the amerifag thread again
No. 83763
>>83743its fucking retarded. its not lc nor anyone's fault but them selves they have a retarded idea of what women can and cannot do.
theres nothing sexual about the pic. go back to twitter newfags or lurk moar.
No. 83817
>>83816Well if it changes it needs to be funny
and Pixyteri related
No. 83824
File: 1726355775366.png (105.6 KB, 300x100, 0DB5F63D-D34A-4C44-A3F9-16C1D7…)
Lazy AI art as a banner? Really?
No. 83827
>>83826kek, I think I see seven
I hate AI
No. 83829
>>83813I'm glad youre comfortable admitting you like people to kill themselves over internet bullshit. just don't think anyone has to cater to it.
>I use it everywhere barring twitterThe state of LC.
>>83816After covid doesnt count. and its still nonissue. nice "oldfag" card.
No. 83830
>>83829I'm
>>83816 and I have no idea what you're trying to say to me, especially with regard to covid. If the pic doesn't change, I'm not going to bitch about it, but even oldfags aren't a homogenous group so I agreed with the airt.
No. 83840
It's confirmed, even in the OP, that this dude is not related to Addy, never was, never will be, doesn't live with her, doesn't live near her.. Anons have places to talk about troons in /snow/ and /ot/ that aren't forcing users to talk about them in threads that aren't about them.
I'm tired of seeing his ugly fucking cartoon-ass face posted in Addy's thread. Juicy is a MtF. Putting updates and takes about him in her thread makes no fucking sense.
>>>/w/335544 No. 83842
>>83824If it stays somebody needs to add the
(ai outside of containment) redtext
No. 83848
>>83843Anon if you're from the Addy thread you absolutely have to see the hypocrisy of her crying about Vocaloids being shipped (who don't have canon ages anyways because they're fucking voicebanks) and Hetalia while posting loli amputee fetish art. If anons were whinging all the time about vapours then yeah it's annoying but this is in response to something.
>>83845The animal hate threads should be moved to /sty/ or something at the least if they won't be locked.
No. 83859
>>83857Not a
fan, nonna. It just sucks that there's so much nitpicking and reaching and anyone who tries to talk about anything else in the thread gets met with broken records of anons who can't shut up about her being a hypocrite for 2 seconds even when it isn't even on topic at the moment.
No. 83870
>>83763>theres nothing sexual about the pickek are you sure you should be calling others out on being newfags
nonnie? this muh sekrit club shit is retarded anyway. keep the picture or not I don't care but saying shit like "there's nothing sexual about it" and "let women do things" (the most twitterbrained take on this entire thread) is mentally challenged behavior. it looks moidy and coomerish because that's why that picture was taken in the first place. surely you can find a way to defend the use of this picture without denying the obvious.
No. 83880
>>83867just because its been happening for years doesnt make right nor productive. infighting should not extend to whining to the mods like 1.) theyll give a fuck and 2.) theyll do anything.
the mods are busy sifting through reports and getting rid of gore, cp, etc. that supercedes whiny anons.
No. 83897
File: 1726457265516.jpg (15.73 KB, 250x335, 1705339622300.jpg)
Cp on m again
No. 83902
File: 1726472769042.jpeg (95.04 KB, 1125x542, IMG_6052.jpeg)
This isn’t a serious complaint but I find it funny I caught a blog for speaking hypothetically when I don’t even have a partner, I just find it insane of Jillian to use her online handle for her irl wedding.
No. 83914
>>83913NTA I agree with you but I also think that
>>83902 is not really a blogpost. I guess the farmhand could have banned it for being non-contributory or redtexted it like "no one cares".
No. 83919
>>83898Get these faggots outta here. It didn't seem to do much last time but I want another hell week.
>>83918It's the zoomie invasion
No. 83921
>>83920The point is, because this is a gossip board
first and foremost, a-logging is not allowed and will not be allowed for the foreseeable future.
No. 83928
>>83898Samefag, am glad to see this stuff getting cleaned up today. Thank you, farmhands!
>>83927That thread is always infight central, just as likely to be someone baiting for replies as it is a scrote.
No. 83941
File: 1726589822781.jpeg (130.41 KB, 662x540, 2DBA9BE3-69B9-4BA7-97CD-0CF99F…)
why is image uploading broken
No. 83942
>>>/snow/2032872Holier than thou & "y'all can't behave" moral showdown happening all day.
Also, please consider redtexting "y'all"
No. 83943
>>83942just because youre in a fight with some anons doesnt you can come crying to the mods. just report.
Idk if you started the "idgaf about kaya's cat" thing or not, but a touchy topic like that is obviously going to ruffle a few feathers….
No. 83949
>>83943Nta, but fuck off with this "you're not allowed to report in this thread because you should just use the report function". Anons have used this thread for years, even before covid, to bring things to the mod staff that is active and might not see reports right away if someone on that specific board isn't around. It screams newfag to not realize how stupid it sounds to minimod /meta/ when not even the farmhands moderate it half the time because they don't give a fuck if people bring complaints [as is in the title of the thread] here.
This honestly just feels like anons don't want farmhands to see reports quickly by bringing them here. If you aren't even using /meta/ for a complaint, you're infighting or minimodding by telling someone they can't use this thread for that.
No. 83964
File: 1726614985577.png (50.28 KB, 512x203, script.png)
>>83961They don't contain anything dangerous, but they cause alerts to be
triggered that just say whatever number is in the script (picrel)
>>83962yes
No. 83966
Seems like it could be this sort of thing
https://www.hackerone.com/knowledge-center/how-xss-payloads-work-code-examples-preventing-themThey're probably testing if it can work now with the popup. Redirecting the page and modifying posts are possible to come after.
No. 83968
File: 1726616011160.png (47.43 KB, 275x175, 1657046619.png)
>>83966why can't these miserable trannies just leave us alone
No. 83969
>>83966for now i think people just shouldn't go on the catalog since that's where it's
triggered, doesnt seem to happen anywhere else
No. 83971
File: 1726620338391.jpeg (273.91 KB, 600x800, A98E3500-5889-42CF-98E4-482D6C…)
>>83964I know this is my anxiety kicking in but is the site gonna have to be shit down again to deal with this shit? make no mistake I would wholeheartedly agree with that, but who tf is doing this
No. 83977
File: 1726624722842.jpg (54.58 KB, 816x537, GWfxsl-aoAImCKm.jpg)
cp in /m/
No. 83979
File: 1726625019192.jpg (35.91 KB, 541x542, pepe.JPG)
Please stop the cp spams on /m/
No. 83989
>>83987Her public meltdowns, her mental illness as she’s constantly on and off, attention seeking behavior, shitty self-reporting interviews, shit history with her label, horrible hive mind fanbase, also just because you list the milk doesn’t make it less milky. You listed like multiple things and went “this is all people talk about”. that’s because people find that milky, most people hate her because she’s fake gay so of course that’s going to be talked about a lot. If she’s talked about to the point in celebrities where people are complaining 24/7 then she gets her own thread, that’s what happens most of the time. Again, if you don’t find it milky don’t read it. Infighters are annoying to me too but for a celebrity she’s very milky. you should’ve seen how bad the skirby thread was if you think chappell’s thread is bad. I’m not gonna argue no more though, i’m just gonna post her milk
No. 83999
File: 1726680223249.jpg (42.33 KB, 954x694, Tumblr_l_846139467536438.jpg)
>>83745Mods are so damn lazy just fix the issue
No. 84016
File: 1726705615973.jpeg (88.91 KB, 668x290, IMG_2555.jpeg)
they’re just banning people for any arbitrary reason now kek
No. 84019
File: 1726712352049.png (309.54 KB, 1919x918, Screenshot 2024-09-18 211751.p…)
Love the catalog dark mode update but you guys need to do something about this.
No. 84032
File: 1726713274441.png (631.63 KB, 2634x1360, dude why.png)
>>84030Nta but what do you mean hard refresh? Like, restart our browsers? Because I've been refreshing and it's still stuck on this for me
No. 84035
File: 1726713704385.jpeg (697.58 KB, 1170x1981, IMG_4894.jpeg)
>>84034NTAYRT but I hard refreshed and it still looks like this on my browser…this is really not great kek..the search bar was a good update
for the retarded zoomers who don’t know how to control + F but this makes it so hard to scroll like normal
No. 84037
File: 1726713889240.png (1.16 MB, 1672x1101, img-2024-09-19-03-44-41.png)
>>84035Are you sure you did it right? It looks like this for me after doing shift + F5 like the update post said
No. 84040
File: 1726715457426.gif (72.73 KB, 249x246, 1623307755231.gif)
>jungle and keekweek now apply to board catalogs
>hellweek theme added
This is great
No. 84043
File: 1726716162880.jpg (550.71 KB, 1079x2165, Screenshot_20240919-132017_Chr…)
>>84037NTA but that's what it look on mobile even after refreshing, it's not super great but it looks way better on pc
No. 84048
File: 1726717890607.jpg (1.93 MB, 1179x1977, aftermath.jpg)
>>84042>>84043I'm
>>84020 and it still looked like that even after clearing my cache and cookies, so I tried using a different browser and I still ended up with the same result. After updating my software (I forgot to do it) I now have picrel.
No. 84049
File: 1726718325588.jpg (1.43 MB, 2694x2234, wwww.jpg)
wwweeeeeeee
No. 84051
>>84043We've purged the cache in Cloudflare just in case this was stopping browsers from getting the latest assets. If you're still seeing a glitchy catalog, please try hard refreshing again.
The correct layout should be 2 or 3 columns on mobile devices depending on viewport size, and 3+ columns on desktop.
No. 84058
>>84056if you're on a laptop
nonnie you might need to press an fn key as well to make F5 work
No. 84060
>>84058ok now it refreshed, but still looks like
>>84032. however i realized this seems to be a problem on Brave, on Chrome it looks normal
No. 84062
File: 1726724960671.jpg (6.77 KB, 230x244, 1724650741280.jpg)
>>84060samefag i finally got it, just had to use the ctrl+shift+r method (i just assumed the key combos would work first kek)
>>84061ty
nonny No. 84065
I like the search bar for catalog, thank you for putting it in
>>84016Oh that's me kek. That's literally the first time I've ever been banned for minimodding, I've told many people to stop spacing their posts out before too and never been reported/banned for it. I think the anon I was telling that to got offended over it and reported me, which is fair I guess, someone else reported her for not integrating and she also got banned kek. I'm not mad about it but I think its a bit funny nobody has ever reported me for that before though? Wasn't even trying to belittle her or anything, her posts were standing out like a sore thumb.
No. 84106
>>84100Those posters only assume stereotypes for the disorders too. Whats the point when there is no middle ground discussion and everything has to be because of some
manic reason.
No. 84108
File: 1726808138426.jpeg (113.43 KB, 662x815, IMG_6051.jpeg)
which one of you trannies keeps redtexting me. is it the one i called an obese nigelfag. did i hit too close to home you bitch.(ban evasion )
No. 84121
>>84120i’m not rancefag
>>84119i feel i slight sympathy towards anna. i feel as if i would have ended up the same as her if i were born retarded.
No. 84124
File: 1726864970190.jpg (416.12 KB, 680x823, 14367355439629083.jpg)
No. 84142
File: 1726887739766.png (2.62 MB, 869x2128, Screenshot 2024-09-20.png)
>>84141What? These don’t look sexual.
No. 84144
File: 1726888274931.jpg (190.96 KB, 683x956, 37aba419a703b6296876e810f565df…)
>>84143Ntayrt, but I'm the one who generated them and they aren't supposed to be Loli, it's based off these pictures
No. 84164
>>84138SFW discussions of anime with underaged characters are allowed, as well as SFW images that aren't obviously meant to be titillating. Sexualized art of minor characters is only allowed if it pertains to milk and it must be spoilered. Anon that generated the pictures in this post
>>84142 isn't a lolicon judging by her post history and the AI happened to spew out a loli-adjacent style which the anon seemed to be unaware of. It's still sfw though and not ban worthy.
What you're doing in this thread is pure concern trolling so I would encourage other anons to not reply and let the millionth baity loli/shota discussion to rest.
No. 84165
File: 1726898271444.png (149.83 KB, 755x431, not even shota lel.png)
>>84164What's sexualized about this? because there are tons of examples where you seem to fling the ban hammer towards sfw shota or even not shota like pic rel, but touhou lolifags are allowed an entire thread to post about their loli game.
No. 84168
File: 1726915653452.png (132.36 KB, 492x371, shotashit.png)
>>84164NTA but why was this redtexted then in the fujo thread? It's not SFW or sexualized. I don't like shota shit either but there seems to be a clear double standard.
No. 84170
File: 1726916914099.jpg (23.66 KB, 400x400, lesigh.jpg)
>>84168>female based website>can't post sfw shota I hate this timeline
No. 84180
File: 1726936137936.png (46.01 KB, 2687x161, rentfree.png)
mods, this person keeps posting the same comment and deleting it afterwards in the Unpopular Opinions thread
No. 84212
File: 1726974361770.png (1.23 MB, 2490x832, shipoasting.png)
Is retarded shitposting off autosage now? I don't wanna add to the thread until I know I won't be penalized for shitting it up kek
No. 84216
File: 1726981468759.jpeg (539.21 KB, 1290x1600, IMG_6067.jpeg)
you still actually believe i’m joking… lol(ban evasion)
No. 84236
File: 1727023844817.png (503.36 KB, 1170x1741, reddie teddie.png)
Kek these corrections getting redtexted made me giggle
No. 84252
>>84246I don’t wanna drag this out but, gypsy isn’t really a race or ethnicity
nonny, it’s more of a culture/lifestyle. There are gypsies from all kinds of races (brazilian gypsies, irish gypsies, australian gypsies, etc) however they do share the Romani language
No. 84266
File: 1727083953580.png (245.29 KB, 1356x880, img-2024-09-23-10-32-15.png)
>>84252Anon you are retarded. Irish Travellers get called "gypsies" but they are not Romani at all. They speak English or Shelta depending on their pikey power level.
Romani gypsies, which is what 99% of people mean when they say "gypsies" are a distinc ethnic group, this information is easily accessible please learn to Google
No. 84276
>>84272This has been done, thank you for letting us know.
>>84262The main problem with that thread is that none of the people who browse or post ever report anything (except for the absolute worst posts e.g. the gore that was deleted recently). We ban every time something rulebreaking is reported, but that rarely happens. If you want the thread to improve, please report rulebreaking posts.
No. 84280
File: 1727112376457.jpg (235.45 KB, 1080x1066, 1000007576.jpg)
CP on the front page
No. 84296
File: 1727138478837.png (183.57 KB, 849x713, 332445.PNG)
This really isn't so much a complaint as it is an observation and warning. The farmhands are keeping on top of the current shitposting in the Onision thread with multiple bans. But I have a feeling this is just one or two people purposefully arguing in hopes of getting the thread locked. I suspect they want the thread shut down because Onision and Kai are having their first zoom meeting court hearing this Thursday on the 26th and do not want the milk to flow.
No. 84314
File: 1727191469438.jpg (560.54 KB, 1080x1666, 1000007477.jpg)
I think it's weird to allow vendetta threads like this to exist. Anon is even posting her baby when there is no reason to.
No. 84327
Can a mod ban or delete this post clogging up the photoshop thread?
>>>/snow/2038341 full copy/paste OP from an existing thread because the retarded Anijoy/Skirby idiots are fighting over who gets their own thread and who didn't and how dare you copy MY OP.
Anon made it clear that they and their friends are using the site to fuck around, clearly like anons said this is underage behavior. Anijoy and skirby thread should be closed and they should all go to ethot or photoshop. Why allow these users to make threads where they fight each other over who can post content where?
No. 84329
File: 1727280787190.jpg (30.59 KB, 640x428, sheiss.jpg)
Hi,
The mod of the Onision thread picks fights with people, then deletes responses she doesn't like and ban people.
Thought you might wanna know.(ban evading retard)
No. 84332
>>84331(I'm not a mod, obv) it's not allowed as far as I'm aware. report it if you see it. If it doesn't get banned or removed, bring it here.
the other form is occasionally allowed for lyrics or memes but it's hit or miss from what I've seen as to whether it's banned
No. 84336
File: 1727308720648.jpg (59.81 KB, 392x500, 3508439399_fab030ceed.jpg)
>>84332Anons have been saying nigga for years with varied results. Depending on whether you're using it colloquially or to race bait is the difference between a ban or not. This meme is alive and well, but I wouldn't be surprised if the delicate nature of the current userbase changes that very soon and it becomes outright banable.
No. 84337
>>84333>Has anyone else noticed a lot more anons complaining about ‘not being allowed’ to criticize judaism?No. I have only seen a request to make a Pro Jewish thread.
>>84336This. Its not new here.
No. 84343
>>84331why the fuck would you even wanna use a word like that? whats wrong with you?!
doubt you'd use that word in real life, especially not when theres black people around.
No. 84353
File: 1727374582308.png (369.01 KB, 705x848, 1000034609.png)
nta who posted this but there's nothing nitpicking about this post, it's a grey nursery. Anon's entitled to say that. Are we allowed to talk about how she decorated the nursery or the video anon posted? I'd appreciate an answer. Why leave up non-con posts about weddings and then red-text the nursery post, some of us have been waiting 2.5 years to see how she decorated it.
>>>/w/336212 No. 84387
>>84353is this the taylor r thread? you guys always complain and nitpick for the sake of, its painfully obvious. she belongs on PULL where fags there nitpick to hell and back. but then again /w/ is where pullfags go
>>84384ifs the entitlement for me and expecting an instant response. go put your phone down I or browse another website, I promise its not a big deal.
No. 84389
>>84387hide the thread. there's nothing being nitpicked in that post. PULL has been dead since 2021, you can get over it.
Why is it allowed to say something is cute but not that something looks bad? The thread is moderated like shit, wks abuse reports and the mod just obeys?
No. 84395
>>84392Ah, here comes the classic 'I hate the thread about my favorite cow, lock itttt!!!!' post after the moderation is called out.
No one mentioned shameful, terrible parenting, wtf you're talking about in the first place? Anons just pointed out it's ugly and boring and not something that warranted a three year delay to reveal. Stop putting words into people's mouth to make your petty reports sound reasonable.
No. 84399
>>84395That's been a lolcow thing to do for years. Not sure where you've been. There's a bunch of threads that have had to prove there is milk to have them reopened. No one is saying ban the discussion, but that must be what you read.
In all seriousness, that thread brings some of the worst posters to /w/.
No. 84411
>>84409Ah, right, another classic - calling whoever disagrees with you a newfag because you have nothing else to back your point.
I'm not the one who's constantly whining about a thread I dislike and demanding that mommy locks it. Don't like, don't read. It wasn't even bumped to the top so what's your problem,
nonnie?
No. 84422
File: 1727477233499.png (Spoiler Image,282.27 KB, 797x376, Screenshot_243.png)
>>84419why was i banned for this when posters prior to me have posted traps/cross dressers and
not been banned? i don't see how it isn't bl as it's
>tagged as bl>drawn by a female artist >isn't nearly as girly as some traps posted in that very thread are, it's literally just a guy with long hair No. 84425
File: 1727478484041.png (Spoiler Image,3.67 MB, 1451x2048, 1727477371653.png)
>>84422like this is just a few posts above mine and nobody bitched about it, plus the character on the right literally has small breasts. stop playing attack dog to whiny babies please
No. 84434
>>84430not sure what you're talking about but
https://x.com/adey236/status/1667683066192572418/photo/2 it's a very skinny twink. she draws a lot of them and they're all recognizably male
No. 84435
File: 1727499115402.jpeg (805.12 KB, 1290x976, IMG_4673.jpeg)
Spent some time at the crystal cafe during the downtime. I really enjoy the colors they have, especially this Autumn one. Please bring some of that here. I also like the option to just check off sage when replying to a post. Newfags might utilize it more as well.
No. 84442
>>84441(also not any of the above anons)
I agree. We need legible themes and more dark options. I usually end up using hellweek for mobile because it's the only one that is tolerable at night. The purple one is unusable. A dark autumn one would be appreciated, as would a legible non-hellweek dark theme.
No. 84444
>>84443Do you have to sage in that /ot/ thread?
I'd like to see both sides of that infight banned. It's pretty retarded that one side can post a giant list of links, followed up with ad hominem attacks, and not get banned. I'm not the anon on the other side getting banned, and at least a couple of her bans were deserved, but if you want to stop an infight, you redtext both sides contributing and continuing it, especially all the "ur so dumb" and "you can't read" non-con replies. This is not rocket science.
No. 84501
File: 1727701914937.png (82.37 KB, 737x285, 1000034787.png)
Why do mods allow endless tinfoiling and derailing as long as it's wking the cow? It's obvious one or two people are shitting up the thread.
>>>/w/336247 (defends cow from hyperbolic joke)
>>>/w/336261 "probably"
>>>/w/336273 "probably"
>>>/w/336325 (wking)
>>>/w/336369 (ESL wking. no, actual poor families in HK do not have helpers)
>>>/w/336397 "ur all just jelly and poor" "everyone can afford to hire someone for a few hours" - no, they can't, and it's complete derail anyway
I've reported some of these and the /w/ just ignores the reports. What do these posts contribute to the thread? Why is it ok to bait by insulting other anons?
No. 84504
>>84501Shut up already about this thread. You should all be banned. I love how no one from that thread can bring complaints to meta or else they will get attacked by tayloranons but the tayloranons come here to accuse everyone of wking. I'd say lock the thread but that
triggers posters like you kek what happened to "use the report function"
No. 84516
File: 1727716976093.jpg (372.35 KB, 1080x1518, old ban from 08.30.jpg)
>>84501Exactly. Thank you for compiling all wk sperges into one.
Now contrast this to mods handing out an instant ban in the same thread. Hypocrisy at it's finest. How come banning posts criticising the cow takes less than 15 minutes, but wks can sperge for days and no reports work?
No. 84517
>>84504So wk-chan camps in the meta as much as she camps in the thread, lmao? Hi, there! I see you couldn't wait to beg mods to lock the thread again? So predictable. Shit up the thread, wait for a complaint in the meta, then pretend to be a bystander that is fed up with the thread lmao
We don't bring complaints because it's as useless as the report button. As you can see from the post you quoted. But every now and then wks get too ambitious and cross the lines like the "You're poor and jealous unlike Taylor"- chan who still hasn't grabbed a ban despite the blatant wking.
No. 84522
>>84520I did appeal my ban, thats not the point. i'm also already unbanned, its just the principle of the thing. why does only one side (in this case, me) get banned, when its two people arguing and fighting?
iow: why do the rules only apply to me, and not them?
thats my question. you guys should look in to it, i see other people wonder about that too
No. 84529
File: 1727725714898.png (27.92 KB, 1772x180, mnk.png)
Mods, why is this considered racebait but not
>>>/g/434399 or
>>>/g/434398 ?
Is it because I said the tiktok anon could also be white? Or can you say whatever you want as long as you call them "
POC women"? Come on, kek
No. 84532
>>84504ayrt
I haven't posted in that thread in more than a month, probably longer. My issue is with the moderation. I see a couple redtexts were added, thanks to the mod who took my post seriously.
>>84520I posted the one about the nursery here. That wasn't my post or ban. I haven't been banned. I asked here to find out if we're even allowed to discuss the nursery and then just said fuck it and went on with life.
No. 84533
File: 1727728766273.jpeg (340.79 KB, 1448x2048, EB392220-4494-4865-80D3-3A42D4…)
so is shota banned or not? are sfw images okay? i keep getting conflicting opinions
No. 84535
>>84164They said here
>>84533 sfw Loli/shota is allowed
No. 84538
>>84522Mod needs to go through and ban this post for wking too.
>>>/w/336416 is reiterating the exact thing the other redtexts said.
No. 84545
>>84544It's the same weird
femcel seething over women of other races trying to take her men or whatever.
No. 84566
File: 1727748089708.png (30.35 KB, 956x392, lnbvcvkkjh.png)
>>84564shut down lolcow again
No. 84578
File: 1727772856731.png (435.4 KB, 1080x1516, Screenshot_20241001-105247~2.p…)
Why the fuck is the simple mention of kpop prohibited? This happened in the celebrity thread, it's not like I sperged out about some kpop celebrity and it was on fucking topic and even saged.
Should I have said "that music genre that shall not be named"?
No. 84596
File: 1727927450920.jpg (399.49 KB, 916x1100, 1000018213.jpg)
Reddit bans because ONE paragraph space? Please tell your jannies to control their autism better, thanks.
No. 84605
>>84604Not a newfag.
Why are newfags larping so hard and pretending things like /s and having ONE paragraph space is twitter/reddit when both have been here forever? Just accuse me of being a tumblrina too cause why not.
No. 84609
>>84605if someone dislikes what you posted they’ll nitpick it and pretend it’s breaking rules that it wasn’t. on /meta/ you can check older threads made by farmhands (when they were competent) and admins where they regularly typed
just like this
because it’s just a fucking paragraph break and reddit didn’t invent those. anyway
No. 84614
>>84598Show us the ban page saying it was only due to spacing. That spacing wouldn't have flagged anything, that's normal on here. Like
>>84613 it was because of the /s
No. 84628
>>84627It's already bannable, I think what happens is that as
>>84625 admitted: most newfags dont bother reporting. Even many oldfags don't bother either
No. 84633
>>84630Wasn't the Lana thread made by lanafags last time they were shitting up celebricows and were told to go back? Of course it's dead, there's only so much gushing you can do about her muh sugardaddy and cocaine lyrics. They only come out of the sewers to wk her when shes being discussed elsewhere.
>>84631That was like an hour ago, nobody's currently arguing about anything because the retards locked up the thread. And of course none of the Lana wking newfags claiming to be oldfags who've made dozens of threads bothered to make a new one either.
No. 84636
>>84628As an oldfag who reports 99% of the infights/sperging/bait I see: I gave up on celebricows, the state of that thread is cancerous. I only read the posts with caps because they're usually the ones containing milk.
>>84634The thread always evolves into this when certain celebrities get brought up, but I feel like there's a massive influx of newfags from tiktok wanting to shit talk without getting cancelled on there.
I've been mainly using r/fauxmoi for the past few months to get my celebrity gossip, most of the stuff on celebricows is just reposts from there and you don't usually get endless fights because people are scared to get downvoted lol. It's like people come here just to be retarded
No. 84638
>>84636good points all around, i think i'll have to bite the bullet and use reddit for celeb gossip because you're absolutely right about what you said. i don't blame you for giving up reporting stuff in celebricows, it would be way too time consuming to try and report every post, and that place has been more of a cesspool in particular lately
>you don't usually get endless fights because people are scared to get downvoted lol.kek makes sense
No. 84651
File: 1728061770944.png (115.5 KB, 1464x356, ai poast.png)
I know there's a ban on AI images outside containment, but is that also true for written posts? This is obviously written by AI and imo should be banned as well.
No. 84664
File: 1728091003801.jpeg (63.96 KB, 550x808, 5F3A341E-687F-488B-ACDF-EA4B77…)
CP IN /M/
No. 84673
>>84672For one, you're not supposed to bump threads asking for milk on a cow, that's non-contribution right there. Two, you can't even link posts right, so you're anewfag.
The spoonfeed request sounds about right.
No. 84684
File: 1728177007639.png (1.52 MB, 1083x1395, Screenshot 2024-10-05.png)
So we aren’t allowed to post sfw south park bl but this shit is allowed. Ok.
No. 84687
File: 1728191037179.gif (21.66 KB, 1024x1024, 1683384015860.gif)
Cp in the cow thread on m
No. 84698
File: 1728238654475.png (32.69 KB, 1843x225, anons were right.png)
Thank you for this update in the Taylor thread. Maybe all these stupid food and "She's lying about ads!" posts will stop shitting up the thread.
No. 84701
>>84698Maybe instead of writing a big vague paragraph in the thread, the "mods" would like to actually define what nitpicking and tinfoiling without basis to a claim is.
The truth is that Taylor's thread is moderated in a biased way and overmoderated compared to other /w/ threads. The mods could consider banning the wk spergs along with all this other shit that apparently means so much.
She is lying about ads, and her content includes food content. The hair post deserved a ban but I see no reason to further kill discussion in this thread.
No. 84705
>>84701I wouldn't say a thing if mods were at least a bit fair when handing out bans. It took them DAYS and numerous complaints to finally ban the blatant wking but saged posts critising Taylor get bans within hours if not minutes (as it turns out). Hypocrisy at its finest.
Good point about no definition of nitpicking. We've been asking them to define what that means so many times over the past year or so, but they always ignore it.
Discussing the content she posts is not a nitpick. Calling our her constant promotion of pseudoscientific bullshit is not nitpicking. Documenting her unhealthy relationship with food is not nitpicking. But so many posts about the aforementioned grabbed a ban on numerous occasions.
Hell, even jokes have been banned. How is that fair and being "lenient"? And they go and claim "we have been lax and unclear about banning for nitpicking" when 80% of the thread is banned as such lmao What a joke.
No. 84707
File: 1728264168860.jpeg (200.44 KB, 816x1456, IMG_2216.jpeg)
cp on front page
No. 84711
>>84709There's been one for a while now anytime the series is mentioned it's bizarre, I used a reaction pic long before the new Touhou thread was made and got ripped apart for it lol
Like sorry guess I missed the memo there's a list of lolcow approved series to enjoy
No. 84718
File: 1728313716483.jpeg (1.85 MB, 3628x4000, 4C1AA12B-72F9-40F4-984C-3D643F…)
>>84711yeah farmers are really retarded about anything deemed moid bait. i wish we could hide posts (i think that would solve most issues that derive from complainerfags complaining about the Bad Content) but that feels like too much to ask
No. 84741
>>84738It's still up to mods whether to hand out bans after a report has been made, so ultimately they're the bigger retards for banning people over something that was confirmed ages ago
>>84739Yeah, lurk through her thread. She's been tweeting about doing meth for at least 6 days
No. 84744
>>84742Are you mad that no one agrees with you in that thread? You had multiple anons call you out for being wrong about nursing students not doing any needlework according to your personal timeline of when she should be learning it. Yes, within a few weeks of signing up, a lot of students are doing IVs. If you can't even use Google, don't come to meta to blame other users for you being the retard here. My take is from personal experience,
nonnie.
No. 84746
>>84744no i think
EVERYONE in that conversation should get banned because it's pointless derailing. moo isn't in any program so who cares about the specifics of what it is in reality. this same kind of autistic shit happens in other threads and it serves no purpose. i know a big proponent of autism is OCPD behavior, but it's not necessary to be right about something irrelevant.
No. 84766
>>84745The problem is : most of them aren't farmers. Just a bunch of discordfags and redditards on a morale crusade, messing up with the milk because ~muh feefees~
I hate them and wish they were permaban already.
No. 84770
File: 1728425762490.jpeg (42.31 KB, 500x500, D1AFC6C0-63F1-4F9A-8486-3BAA05…)
>>84766its annoying that it took them this long to realize what a pos venus is. instead of dealing with it like sane person, they go full
triggered retard and made us lose a lot of milk.
No. 84771
>>84770I honestly don't get why her meth sperging
triggered them this much, shouldn't this have happened ages ago when she started camwhoring, trolling, suicide baiting and attention seeking? It's not like this is anything new but she suddenly mocks a discord mods mom and all hell breaks loose amongst fagelics
No. 84780
File: 1728478327014.png (834.83 KB, 731x1370, 1000035231.png)
not my post. Who is writing these redtexts? Because nowhere in the above note does it mention ads. I don't care that much but what is repetitive about pointing out her weird obsession with shilling shit? She never used to be like this.
So where's the line, then? She's a influencer who posted 15 story ads about a first class airport lounge. Can we mention this, or is mentioning it alone "nitpicking"?
No. 84791
>>84782The bit about the ad was not even the main topic of discussion though. It was mentioned in the passing when pointing out her need to relax and get a massage at a premium lounge after a preventable mishap. Mod chose to focus on it though, god knows why, and red texted as such. Now who's nitpicking here?
What? Are we not allowed to point out the absurdity of her and Tom's poor planning skills and the resulting ridiculous lamenting about her "stressful" life?
No. 84792
File: 1728506082796.png (1.76 KB, 442x42, donations.PNG)
when/why did we stop accepting donations?
not my redtext, just curious
No. 84796
>>84795ntyrt but it's for the simple reason of the thread being killed in real time. it's this anon today, it could be me tomorrow. complaining about unfair bans is one of the purposes of this thread. wks are also very annoying but they are rarely banned or banned only after multiple complaints here because simply reporting only works for "nitpicking" and "tinfoiling". point?
p.s. no mod has given an explanation about post deletion that happened in the thread. that too was brushed under the rug and ignored. we stayed silent and it obviously was a mistake. now mod can ban left and right and center if she doesn't like a post while nitpicking words out of a whole paragraph as a reason and pretending to be forced to do it by the evil, unruly farmers.
No. 84799
File: 1728515548178.png (200.21 KB, 1181x854, Screenshot 2024-10-09 180717.p…)
Something is wrong with this thread
>>>/m/422348. When you scroll the board, the preview of the thread shows up normally with all replies, but when you click on the thread itself the replies disappear. Please look into it.
No. 84804
File: 1728525450768.jpeg (264.32 KB, 828x603, IMG_5622.jpeg)
some faggot is still trying to start shit in the post your art thread
No. 84809
>>84808It's the femboy sperg that mods asked us to report when he comes back. They selfpost and then complain about all criticisms they get every fucking time they come here to post. They want advice and then fight about the advice. Here is a farmhand calling out this poster previously
>>>/m/371474Recently possible posts by femboyfag:
>>>/m/422582>>>/m/422579>>>/m/403363>>>/m/401681All of these come after anons give crits. Then you have these in the older thread with the same type of art style poster beginning for tips and then throwing a fucking fit about said tips and using the same 'crab' variations as insults towards anons:
>>>/m/371288>>>/m/370815>>>/m/357348>>>/m/371103 [its the same, non-improved art style]
No. 84820
File: 1728589385655.png (Spoiler Image,191.9 KB, 553x377, gross.png)
>>84684Literally no one is stopping you from posting South Park yaoi. There's a bunch of it in the BL pics thread. The only rule is that it shouldn't be porn or blatantly horny.
>>84685Anons haven't posted any pictures of "little boys touching each other." The characters are drawn like teenagers or adults in the art I've seen posted in /m/. The showrunners themselves sexualize the characters more than nonas here do (picrel, one of many, many examples.) The standard should be how the characters are drawn in the individual piece of fanart. If they look like shots, ban. If they look like adults or older teenagers, it should be fine regardless of the characters' canon ages. Just my take.
No. 84842
>>84829This should be added to the rules/info if it is a new policy.
>>84830>>84831Hasn't happened to me recently but has definitely happened in the past. Someone else replying to one of my posts awhile ago also got inexplicably banned for samefagging.
No. 84843
>>84842nta, I believe I was mistaken for the cat pee girl a couple of years ago, I was banned for ban-evading when I hadn't been breaking any rules period, and I've also been banned for being a moid while a moid was sharting all over the board, presumably ban-evading
I suspect that having to guess who's using a vpn and who isn't, isn't an exact science
No. 84845
>>84836>critiques should only be if the poster solicits for it?how/why the fuck are you on an anonymous imageboard.
>>84844post proof or shut up sounds you got mad over arguing over retarded shit
No. 84846
>>84845Nope, I am not, I am online all day though.
Check out the unpopular opinions thread right now for a good example, while multiple posts have been reported in this extensive derail, only two posts have been banned, same side, the thread has been allowed to derail
No. 84851
>>84850I made a post in the retarded bans thread about a dumb comeback that a farmhand tried to make to me (banned me and accused me of being incorrect about
the current year, of all things…) and whenever I tried to post about it in retarded bans it was only met with another ban kek. instead of lifting the wrongful ban, they just doubled down on their own idiocity.
No. 84857
>>84853they seriously need to do something because her self-posting is not as entertaining when cows are EXPOSED for self-posting either by the mods or for essentially subtweeting lc(creepshow art, lilee, micky, pixie, just to name a few)
I say either lock for autosage
>>84846>I am online all day though.is this why you care too much about unpopular opinions? the cesspool of lc where people are constantly flinging shit at each other? admitting youre terminally online isnt a flex, its a concern.
No. 84868
>>84866tl;dr:
if there is a janny actively engaged in a thread (banning in real time), and only one side is getting banned even though both are breaking rules, it becomes clear that certain rule violations/violators are being intentionally ignored
if, then, no other janny ever comes back later to clean up the rest, that indicates that certain reports were disregarded (deleted), as no one else saw them
No. 84869
>>84867yep. so many posts got deleted so you can't see the original reveal itself, but here's where the discussion started
>>>/meta/76097and admin's posts about it
>>>/meta/76228>>>/meta/76234this was the thread where it occurred, but again the post (and many others) is deleted
>>>/ot/1982414 No. 84871
>>84869Fuck this explains a lot ty
nonnie.
No. 84879
File: 1728738785773.jpg (503.74 KB, 1080x2400, Screenshot_2024-10-12-15-12-27…)
Why foes my lolcor look like this like I posted some cp or something what the hell
No. 84892
>>84891Easily, by caping for men. Follow the chain
>>84869 kek
No. 84896
>>84895it’s not like moderating lc is some big honor kek i would never want to do it
>>84894damn if this is true it makes that hellweek post all the kekkier
No. 84912
>>84911>not even Ritard or pakichan has one.Ritard has a thread and pakichan is featured in the antifujo cows thread, newfag
>>84910It's not about her having a recognizable style, she's a personalityfag. Personalityfags cannot announce themselves and post in recognizable styles.
No. 84915
>>84912Every anon who has posted more than once in the art thread is a personalityfag by that definition. Unless an anon is actively attempting to differentiate themselves from other posters to stand out, they're not personalityfagging. No, posting art that's recognizable or repeatedly posting about a specific topic is not personalityfagging as long as it's done in the proper thread.
The problem with personalityfagging is how it defeats the point of anonymous imageboards. This is a small imageboard with a few frequent posters and some of these posters will inevitably have identifiable quirks in their posts. The anons who become obsessed with larping as detectives, vigorously trying to point out these quirks and identify certain posters, treating them like minor celebrities even when the posters themselves aren't baiting it are as big of a problem in perpetuating personalityfag culture as personalityfags themselves. We need an update to the rules about personalityfags to help newfags finally grasp this.
No. 84918
>>84916NTA. And derailing a thread to make fanfiction about how rancefag and NTYfag should be in a "yuri relationship" helps combat her how exactly? I didn't even know who NTYfag was
because I'm not retarded enough to use the threads that make up her habitat until people started constantly derail art threads pointing her out. The only thing I saw was the Hamas gijinka which was retarded, but that and everything else people reee about doesn't really make her that insane and crazy of a cow that must be talked about any chance you get. Retarded and annoying, yeah, but also easily ignorable if you have any level of self awareness.
No. 84920
What it comes down to is
>personalityfagging bad>trying to turn active posters into personalityfags also bad and spits in the face of the concept of anonymous imageboards in the same wayPersonalityfags like rancefag and pakichan are notorious because they aren't just regular posters with recognizable quirks: they are terminal rule breakers who revel in the attention their personalityfag statuses brings them. They are real personalityfags and they deserve to stay permabanned. Autists like kirbyfag, while very recognizable, aren't intentionally causing a scene but they attract the attention of detectivefags who make it one and then demand whoever they think is their culprit to be banned. In the art thread, the detectivefag derailed the thread for 4 hours sperging about ntyfag as no one replied to her but herself. Personalityfagging is a two way street, if it wasn't for anons like this it wouldn't be as big of a problem as it is currently.
>>84916>NTYfag has been banned several times>Admins even told her to stop avatarfagging and personalityfagging before>insane spergouts calling everyone rancefag when they say anything negative about their art.>source(s): just trust me broAs you sit here evading your own permaban once again to sperg about this. Unhinged.
No. 84926
>>84923>>84920>>84916>>84912>>84910You guys have been at this nonstop for
two days at minimum and it started over a freaking pinup of an anime boy in a thong. LET IT GO.
No. 84934
File: 1728778313450.jpg (63.98 KB, 850x400, 1586226917783.jpg)
>>84925dumbass shit posters decided to camp in the unpopular opinions thread and constantly derail it to try and force cerbmin to take the dumbass shit thread off autosage.
No. 84939
File: 1728788746228.png (Spoiler Image,601.87 KB, 1076x1913, 1000103776.png)
>>84934will you people ever accept that unpopular opinions has always been like that. always. and it was honestly worse than dumbass shit ever was and deserves the same treatment.
>>84907nah
No. 84969
>>84968You don't need a vpn to ban evade, sometimes it's as simple as resetting your router and clearing your cookies. Vpns are basic internet security, not tools only ban evaders use and banning them would be a difficult feat farmhands wouldn't be able to pull off.
Encourage anons to stop replying to ban evading schizos and delete their posts to demotivate them. Farmers are retarded and pathetically easy to bait, fix that.
No. 84993
File: 1728934367538.gif (11.69 MB, 600x681, unlock the door...gif)
can we take it off autosage now
No. 84995
Can mods please ban the whiteknight that's in the new Micky thread? Not sure why there on their high horse about being wrong but they shit up the previous thread with their nonsense and I don't want anyone dealing with it in the new thread.
>>84994>Also the new thread has no updated OP and was made despite no new OP photo too.It was decided awhile ago that pic was set to be her thread pic for future threads and her OP is updated only slightly because she hasn't changed much between threads. You'd be better off reading the threads than complaining about a nothing sandwich here.
No. 85006
>>84959you wouldnt be asking this question if you knew about anonymous imageboard work in 2024.
>>84960this isnt a chatroom, go back to discord faggot. fucking retard is legit asking to turn lc into a chatroom when theres already a fucking appfor that. the abolute state of lc right now.
>>84966no we can tell you retards are coming from apps and are younger because you think you desrve an immidiate response to retardation.
No. 85009
>>85006"this isn't a chat room this isn't a chat room this isn't a chat room" the admin said it once during hellweek and you boot lickers have been repeating it like a broken record since. You're so pointlessly aggressive, you lack any self awareness and don't get that your attitude and behaviour are why this site is shit. You pretend to be an oldfag but act like an overly aggressive newfag who thinks imageboard "culture" is being a rude sperg. We're here to make fun of
cows not each other. Your immaturity makes it almost impossible to post on /ot/ because you come at every post with the thirst of an a-log. You're pathetic, you're the reason this place sucks ass.
No. 85033
File: 1729033055710.png (194.1 KB, 360x360, literally.png)
>>85019Jesus kek did Miss Trunchbull write this post? It's so over the top that it has to be parody or bait.
No. 85037
File: 1729043788323.jpeg (77.09 KB, 626x222, IMG_2817.jpeg)
Screenshotted this for reference but where are these scrotes coming from? Which one of you 4chan nigel-kittens keep posting this website on there? Stop that jfc
No. 85044
File: 1729062692506.png (139.33 KB, 925x699, Screenshot 2024-10-16 030307.p…)
What the fuck is going on in the western animation cows thread? Pissing and moaning about representation is not milky. If these idiots want to cry about the W.I.T.C.H. redesigns can't they do it in /ot/ or /m/?
No. 85052
File: 1729094775478.png (287.21 KB, 703x706, 1000035574.png)
not my post, but how is this nitpicking? It's just facts. We can't hate on a moid who 100% deserves it?
No. 85093
whatever is happening in the "get it off your chest" thread looks insane, i feel like the thread should be temporarily locked. it's insanity in there. i have no idea what's going on and i don't want to
>>85083kek
No. 85096
>>85093A user came in and said that apparently the schizo posts are from two psychos who are making fun of a rape
victim??
No. 85113
File: 1729205872432.png (3.68 KB, 423x72, Screenshot 2024-10-18 005725.p…)
can we PLEASE get a refresh button at the bottom of every thread like on 4chan and similar sites? it doesn't refresh the entire page like F5, it just refreshes any new posts to appear.
No. 85134
>>85130if that
triggers you then get off lc and go back to wherever you came from. holy fuck youre sensitive
No. 85149
Can a farmhand consider making an announcement in the moidtakes thread on /ot/
>>>/ot/2195213 that if you can't read the moidtakes without getting
triggered and arguing with them, just hide the thread… I think the OP image was too
triggering this time lol
No. 85150
>>85140seriously its getting annoying. whether its because someone suspects her to be posting here, or calls her a tryhard, or don’t believe her antics (like doing drugs or drama with moids) etc theres at least one anon always defensive about it and its a little weird.
then there were the times of not sage’ing her selfies. I don’t think it was a newfag who doesnt know how to sage. I think they were deliberately not sage’d to bump up her thread.
its no secret some cows lurk and/or post here but the degree with empath is weird. I really think auto-sageing is something that should be done.
No. 85154
>>85130I personally am THRILLED we have gotten rid of most of the milky / funny banners in favour of banners about moids and troons. Takes me back to when I was under 18 and had to click No on a bunch of websites.
We should definitely replace the rest of the banners to make sure there's always something saying Go away! and then they will.
No. 85155
>>85150That thread definitely needs to be autosaged, I explained why I think it should be on autosage and some retarded was like "why when she is going to escalate again" like
1. It would hopefully discourage her from bumping her own thread
2. How the fuck do you, random anon that's totally not her, know when she's going to escalate again?
No. 85160
>>85158this. it's not "porny moid humor" that we created, it's to showcase the stupid shit
she made. anon probably hates the cow boards if she thinks that's the worst that's on here.
No. 85161
>>85160Also the assumption a lot of farmers, meaning women, don't like cheap humor about dicks and boobs and toilet humor is a really stupid take. There's plenty of us who find these things funny, so it's not even moid humor. It's just humor. For us on this site, PT sucking off a corndog because she thinks it's sexy and just looks so awkward and staged is our cheap humor. It's not even nudity. It's almost like taking an SNL skit cap and throwing it into a banner.
I feel the like porkchop one had a better argument because it was a porn clip of someone rubbing their upper thigh/ass suggestively. That you
would see on a porn site pop-up, tbh with the caption on the ass and all.
No. 85174
the vent thread is dogshit right now, why is nona getting snarky comments about her vent to want a different body type when the thread OP literally says not to do that?
the thread is being reduced to rude, unhelpful replies
>>85173weak b8
No. 85188
>>85156anon, this is not the christian forums. some of us are not that bothered by sex, lewd jokes, poopy pee pee kind of humor. not all of us want to live in some puritanical hugbox for our entire lives. you act like this gif is some hardcore gangbang squirt porn. i have seen way, way worse lurking on the internet. i’m also sure you’ve seen plenty worse lurking on twitter, instagram, mastodon, etc and knowing how hypocritical a lot of you are, you’re probably wanking to some nasty furry guro or whatever in your own time anyway. i don’t want to be rude or mean since a lot of you thrive off of being
victims but this board has been normified enough and turned into an annoying white feminist shithole with a bunch of immature little girls running around bitching all day about men or terrorizing other anons who don’t conform to your beliefs and opinions about women. you can’t have an opinion here anymore unless you conform to the nazi fifth wave feminist hypocrites, can’t have fun on /ot/ without being piled on by a bunch of hateful, low iq, low vibrational demons or dumbass little mouth breathing kids. and i call you guys demons because that’s what most of you are, a bunch of demonic pieces of shit. it’s depressing coming here and seeing how this board has basically turned into reddit/facebook. all the best posters are gone, and all the new “cows” people keep posting are just lame social media stars, not actual weirdos. it’s just not the same anymore and it never will be.
No. 85191
>>85188Worse than reddit or facebook because you'll have anons screech at you for posting stuff completely innocuous that doesn't even go against the le based
femcel stance some of the new crop of yersinia petis infected anons have. Normies aren't going to freak out at you for some of the stuff anons are freaking out about in the vent thread for example.
At least on reddit you know posting certain things will make the users start sperging at you but here it's like a Russian roulette of what will make a thread unusable for a day because aggro anons keep jumping on it. It's getting exhausting.
No. 85197
File: 1729515735895.jpeg (110.8 KB, 749x843, 54A1440A-B68E-4C30-8B37-B5EB95…)
>>85188lc really feels like twitter nowadays i agree. it even has the same buzzwords, anything posters don’t like is pedophilic and fetishizing and misogynistic instead of transphobic. and you have posters (namely fujos) who can’t just admit to liking gay porn it has to be some feminist slay. all very cringe, i only come here to troll or out of habit
(ban evading personalityfag) No. 85208
>>85206Ntyfag.
>>85207 She has a vendetta against rancefag since they’re from the same discord.
No. 85212
I really think farmhands need to rethink posting in the Real Opinions thread for the cows on /ot/. A lot of posts are specifically made to target other users within the threads the cows belong to rather than discussing people off the site and the cow themselves. It seems like a really easy way to attack other users rather than even talk about your real opinion on the cow. It's been a little more frequent and I feel the OP should adjust this too. The argument is always "Well these posters are fans of the cow" when that's the weakest argument ever when you turn around and instead go after users rather than the people outside of lolcow who are supporting the cow or are fans of the cow.
This whole post here
>If you’re still following a cow like Shayna or Luna after all these years, at this point it says more about you than them. How do people not get bored of the constant pussy sperging?Is calling out users and not a bit even about the cow. That really defeats the purpose of the thread.
Here are some other examples I noticed doing this same thing:
>>>/ot/2212734 [calling anons you don't like the posting style of as being newfags, not a cow opinion at all]
>>>/ot/2211698 [talk about an anon's shitpost of their pussy, not a cow opinion]
>>>/ot/2208204 [say anons need to stop saying cows need surgery, not an opinion on a cow technically, but a critique on the anons who say this]
>>>/ot/2201054 [Just shitting on anons who dox shayna, not a opinion about a cow, but a chance to shit on users]
Isn't there some lolcow caps thread all these mentions could go in to instead if the anons just cap what they are talking about? This feels almost like a GIOYC, but lolcow focused.
No. 85217
File: 1729540423783.png (23.76 KB, 627x215, 1729538206550.png)
Which one of you was this?
No. 85220
>>85217Cattiness and moralfagging is an issue but the nerve to get on your high moral horse on 4chan kek.
>women are cruel4chan's culture is basically CP and polfaggotry
No. 85226
>>85223then stay on CC. I legit don't understand the logic of complaining that one imageboard isnt like the other. you need to announce your online habits to a bunch of randos.
>>85217a faggot so terminally online they go on imageboard to complain about the other. no one gives a fuck.
No. 85235
>>85222i hate when anons say this because not only is it comparing apples to oranges, but you're basically saying "don't worry, we're not at
their level so we can be shitty". stop.
No. 85239
>>85236we can, that's what i am saying. anon isn't though. she's saying we're bad
BUT, the but is excusing behavior here. i hate women in our spaces acting out more than men on sites i don't visit because i have to interact with the posters here who are ruining the site while being part of our space. when men do it it's par for the course.
No. 85258
File: 1729650245731.jpeg (88.78 KB, 1086x512, IMG_6966.jpeg)
Has anyone ever complained about this banner of Judith being a moid painting rather than the Artemisia Gentileschi version?
No. 85272
>>85270I agree
Came here to complain about the American thread. Farmhands please stop the retarded euro/us infighting