File: 1683862848620.jpeg (356.37 KB, 1994x1329, flower crown cow.jpeg)
No. 57081
>>57080This topic is ridiculous.
Forgot the posts, samefag isn't quoting every post they make, but is trying to continue the pedo discussion and blames anons for being okay with "strangers talking to kids". It's such a bait topic. They might as well be yelling "WHITEKNIGHT" as usual, but due to a ban a few days ago, anon isn't.
>>>/w/296542>>>/w/296497>>>/w/296486>>>/w/296472 No. 57102
File: 1683915180827.jpg (453.06 KB, 1074x3310, HK98mdB.jpg)
Can a mod please make a new radfem cows thread? Phemoids milk is getting spilt and she is tweaking put.
No. 57137
>>56798There's an obvious bias towards Chris and Sharla. I don't know why anons keep denying it. Anons flipped out because someone said that another jvloggers vanlife vid was better than Sharla's.
>>55155>>55231 >>55259An anon also tinfoiled that the thread is full of small jvloggers that are salty
>>55234And as this anon said
>>55263 >>55271 whenever there's any criticism of Chris, the anon is accused of being a salty jvlogger.
No. 57141
>>57139Hello and welcome to /meta/, that is actually primarily what this board is for actually. When you think rules are broken and you have already reported in the past without anything happening you link the comments here.
So unless you can actually point out how the rules aren't broken in those comments don't come here to white knight yourself.
No. 57143
File: 1683934986581.png (39.57 KB, 863x682, Screenshot_20230513-014112.png)
It's kind of weird to see the alleged cow poster or fake cow poster get banned for not sageing, and then the poster below them get banned for "hi cow." Is it hi cow when the person who posted actually claims to be the cow (as was the case here)? Why not ban for bait taking if that's what the actual offense is (allegedly)?
No. 57197
can a mod please ban the infighters in jvlog? posts like these do nothing for discussion
>>>/w/296705>>>/w/296569these are samefagging:
>>>/w/296625>>>/w/296626and these
>>>/w/296550>>>/w/296552possibly
>>>/w/296553 No. 57217
>>57214In the first couple I cited clear infighting, where nothing other than insults were lobbed at some anon.
I didn't see any stats, link the post so people know what you are talking about.
No. 57250
File: 1684002992341.jpg (133.3 KB, 1080x1532, Screenshot_20230513_113709_Chr…)
>>57197Nice shitposting bc you're mad
No. 57268
>>57260"sjws"
cringe
wtf is wrong with you
No. 57271
>>57269I think people just hate Pearl and find her actions retarded and borderline creepy in general. That's relevant to the thread and nothing to get all upset about. unless you have some reason to get angry on behalf of someone calling herself "Oriental Pearl" and pretending she's hot shit wherever she goes.
If anything this outrage about some points anons made is far more derailing than people saying Pearl behaves shittily. Because she does.
No. 57338
Hi farmers!
Farmhand applications are still open, if you want to support LC we encourage you to take a look (or a second look) at the application. It is linked at the top of this page. Once we have enough farmhands onboarded, Hellweek will be upon us. General reminder: a post not being redtexted doesn’t necessarily mean that no ban was issued. The poll results are 70.06% to restrict and 29.94% to not restrict.
The new rule regarding shota and loli is "Discussion and images should only be permitted if it is related to milk, and NSFW images must be heavily censored. All images must be spoilered." This will be added to the rules once exact wording has being agreed on between staff.>>56628>>56630>>56412>>56416>>56630>>56637>>56685It’s easy to simplify things down to “just moderate the infighting” and I understand why it seems like the best solution. We are hoping that by setting rules for shota/loli that bans will be more consistent as our stance will be clear, and bans can happen before the inevitable infighting and discourse begins.
>>56650Many such posts have been reported with “shota” as the reason. Hence, the need we saw to define a clear rule.
>>56447This poll was made and the rule is up for discussion because we have no rules specifically for shota or loli. The topic is controversial, all it takes is a recent scroll through /meta/ to see this (see
>>56440, kek).
>Why do it here?I don’t know. But we need a way to approach anons who do post shota here, hence the poll.
>>56676 >>56666>>56702>>56674>>56726>>56956Staff has come up with a general consensus of shota (and loli) as a specific art style within anime that focuses on prepubescence and is often sexual/pedophilic in nature. Minor characters in anime are common because minors are a large demographic for anime, so images of Naruto (13) and Inuyasha (14) will not be banned because they do not fit the definition of being illustrated in a way that sexualizes prepubescence. That being said, we can only define a term down so far. At some point it gets so muddy it’s not worth discussing anymore, and bans must be decided on a case-by-case basis. This poll gives us a blanket rule that will apply to most posts.
>>56668Yes, banning of certain topics has been a problem in the past, i.e. pinkpill, manhate, 2X, even Shayna was banned at some point. Imo, loli/shota is not comparable to those topics. However, going forward we will be cautious about banning topics outright.
>>56621Results from this poll will not negate other site rules. Spam is not allowed, and won’t be allowed after the poll ends, regardless of results. From the poll’s description as well: “In all cases any discussion and/or imagery must be on topic or it will be bannable. Any images featuring extreme content will always be bannable and will most likely result in a permanent ban (e.g. gore, bestiality, torture, distress)”
>>56307Please see definitions as outlined by the poll: “ Not loli/shota: anime images of minors that are not sexual and/or romantic.”
>>56351 also explains it well.
>>56349CP is deleted as quickly as possible with a small team running lc. Decide yourself whether loli is too offensive for your sensitive eyes.
>>56442>>56459As has been mentioned, we are a small team. The line between derailing and discussion can get muddy, but we are doing our best! Since anons have asked for site statistics, here are the stats for the last 30 days (rounded down):
>Page views: 10.5m >Total posts: 59k (including deleted posts) >Unique poster IPs: 16.5k >Unique poster devices: 11k Note that the numbers above do not represent the actual number of unique posters. The real number will be lower, as every session with a VPN will count as a new IP/device, and some farmers will obviously use multiple devices (e.g. PC and phone).
>>56444Blaine has very little pull on social media, having 41 followers and little interaction. As of May 11, this tweet has been unpinned from his profile and has 160 views, 1 retweet and 3 likes. Again, we watched the poll numbers and determined the poll was not compromised.
>>56380>>56394>>56300>>56364See
>>56625>>56642Kiwi bunker has been locked. Further kiwi threads will be locked. If kiwifags would like to use LC, they need to integrate and not announce themselves.
>>56994>>56996I understand that it’s possible for staff to shitpost and unban themselves and such, but if this even happens at all, it does NOT happen often, and we do occasionally check moderation logs ourselves to see what's been done, but you can't expect us to fully do this every single time. We get 120-140 reports every 14-16 hours, and with the team as small as us, and this being a completely volunteer thing from everyone, it's an extremely unreasonable ask.
>>57018Yes.
>>56847That was not a ban issued by an admin. It was incorrect and the staff who issued it has been informed.
>>56973We have plans to amend the rules to be more specific about things that have become issues on the farm. Staff deletes posts extremely sparingly and is usually done for users with no real post history who are trolling or spamming. Some deleted posts are deleted by the user, which they can do within 30 minutes of posting. What do you mean by feedback?
>Banning with no redrext also signals to other anons that the content is acceptable to post, so I think implementing a policy of redtexting when possible would be best.This is fine, but constant redtext makes a thread look unwelcoming and can put off some users. For hellweek, we will redtext every ban so we can get user feedback. I understand what you mean, and sometimes when issuing bans we do get the same posts reported because the post wasn’t redtexted. I’d like to hear farmers’ feedback about what they think about redtext!
>>56806>I am just begging mods to read these threads, check post histories, and get a proper understanding of what's really going on here because I don't believe they do.We would love to do this, and do it when we are able. Our current issue is that we:
>Have a small staff>Receive 120-140 reports per 24hrs with over 50% of those including vague or blank reasons for the reports>"infighting" as report reason begs a 15 minute investigation into the thread of origin>"moid" "tranny" reasons with no context in the post also beg a thorough investigation>Continue to receive reports and the one or two of us fielding them have to decide whether we will thoroughly investigate each one like we want to, or whether we should quickly issue bans for things that seem obvious.For the amount of reports we get, it’s so much more time efficient for the reporter to give a thorough reason when reporting, or come to meta and give us a quick run down of what’s been happening. I really appreciate farmers who complain with linked posts and an explanation of why they think a ban is warranted! This isn’t necessary for things like sage bans, but is endlessly helpful when there are recurring bad actors in threads that I’m just not familiar with
No. 57387
File: 1684122160944.jpg (71.96 KB, 736x736, yea.jpg)
Soo.. ever think about raising the age limit to 20+?
No. 57389
File: 1684122626904.png (36.78 KB, 422x271, tumblr_inline_p5tey9gqz71t9e2z…)
>>57388Nta. You're the immature one.
(Blaine again) No. 57406
File: 1684126798415.png (18.76 KB, 1226x366, 1651762805627.png)
Please add how to embed youtube shorts to the info page.
No. 57409
File: 1684127785353.jpg (60.78 KB, 619x826, Screenshot_20230514_221606_Chr…)
>>57389blaine, you're so obvious when you post kek fuck off tranny
No. 57413
>>57411>>57412I think someone or a group wants the thread locked because they have an agenda (like a friendship or parasocial relationship with one of the main subjects). They are shitposting and trying to make the whole thread terrible in order that mods lock it. So while it's currently an awful thread, imho it's better to focus on moderating it & banning the morons shitting it up vs. shutting down a thread that actually has had recent milk in it. Anytime people are clamoring for a thread to be locked, I find it suspicious tbh. Personally if a thread is boring or annoying, I just stop reading it. I can't understand insisting it get locked or censored unless there's some personal reason, you know? Belle's thread has been locked, and it sets a dubious precedent, but in that case the moid infestation was also high. I don't see any reason to lock other threads based on what happened there.
I'm not saying this bc I think the two posts I'm replying to have an agenda (I don't think that), just because the prospect of locking the thread was brought up earlier. Like no, dumping all jvloggers into a general YT thread is dumb. Just like dumping Lili, whose whole schtick is being "uwu model injured in Japan" and who is surrounded by jvloggers raising tens of thousands of dollars for her, into a dead munchie thread makes no sense either. Actually since we don't know if she's munching, it's also a bit weird. I do think she's being disingenuous and collecting a huge amount of money for surgery/treatments she may never have any intention of getting. She belongs more with jvloggers than with general munchies imho.
No. 57418
>>57413I am someone who wants the thread locked but for the reasons I said, I don’t have an agenda nor am I conspiring with other people.
I don’t have a vendetta or a parasocial relationship with any of them.
The thread has been taken over by reddit/Twitter users, pure and simple.
Let’s be 100% honest here, the only vloggers people mention are Chris and Sharla and whoever they associate with. Everyone else only gets a post if something happens (Micaela pregnancy for example, and now potentially the munchie stuff).
I agree that the thread has become more of shitposting chat room, it never used to be like that. I understand things are allowed to change, and I think the fact that the thread is titled ex jvloggers is part of the problem. That and people seem to think that threads can’t lay dormant until something actually happens (again, probably down to the fact everyone is from Reddit)
Something needs to change, that is for sure.
No. 57436
>>57413>>57418If we were from reddit, there would be real whiteknighting. Not derailing about noses and, like mods redtexting, not constantly samefagging with the same spergout posts nitpicking them. Fans don't nitpick the way the thread does lol The logic just isn't there that it's from reddit. Someone goes to reddit and spams the thread with their takes which dont even matter to the thread because we don't need other sute opinions on shit, might as well have bedn posting PULL and KF takes too which anons don't because it's fucking stupid to bring up a different.
I've seen the pattern. It's not whiteknights or stans or fans. Anons just want to shitpost, they enjoy the infighting and derailing, and it's worse every time one of them can't manipulate the OP with stupid shit.
No. 57457
>>57448 you're right.
I think we should just close /w/ all together and /pt/, they are dead catalogs. and most /snow/ threads too because none of them are milky and they all reek of autism. It's all just nitpicking and stale milk, nothing that really justifies having all these threads and catalogs for the mods to maintain. Because who is
really milky these days? Not most cows on this site that's for sure just endless nitpicking and vendetta posting
No. 57458
>>57457Yeah
nonny and while we're at it let's just close the whole site. Good idea.
No. 57460
Ban evading sperg complaining that they can't shitpost
>>>/w/297024 bc mods are so eenie-meanie.
No. 57468
File: 1684228005845.png (50.4 KB, 474x453, Die moid.png)
>>57467
No. 57484
>>56287>Could you link some of her posts so I can take a look?Late as fuck and I think she might already be banned for now, but here's some more obvious recent examples
>>>/ot/1578813>>>/ot/1579143>>>/ot/1579146>>>/ot/1579149>>>/ot/1579171>>>/ot/1579172>>>/ot/1579199>>>/ot/1579417>>>/ot/1579419>>>/ot/1579420>>>/ot/1579433>>>/ot/1579437Basically look out for anyone typing like a deranged boomer.
No. 57485
Just to ask again, is the mod sure this isn't someone not even using a VPN but maybe samefagging by going into different wifi cell ranges?
>>>/w/297081With the amount of bans, there's no way this is continuously new people.
No. 57509
>>57507>>57508haha nice try. There's been jvlog milk despite a group trying to drown it out with shitposts. Mikan is a salty bitch, why shouldn't she get discussed? Kota's thread is a legacy and it's not going anywhere. Stop trying to control what other people discuss provided it is within the rules of the site. "no milk" for more than a year, lmao! So what would be milk to you?
The current shitposters need bans. The thread should not get locked because deranged stans want to spam.
No. 57513
>>57436There clearly is a group of anons who came from Chris's subreddit or the guru gossip jvlogger thread and there's a clear bias.
>>57137 It's's why there have been posts like this
>>>/w/250468 >>>/w/250489 This has been going on since thread 12 when anons got real upset over a brief discussion of Sharla's association with norm.
>>57507The archaeological and bald and bankrupt shit was milky. Didn't Sharla also start an onlyfans?
No. 57522
>>57512I know you’re going to nitpick my response so all I’m going to say is that general discussion/your opinion on recent social media updates is not milk. Continued discussion of these sorts of topics
always leads to infighting and derailing. Just because you don’t like them doesn’t mean every single little thing they do is worth a lengthy discussion.
The thread, hell even most of /w, was never like this. Recent bans for non contribution are totally justified, if you want to sperg over Sharla’s nose or solas social media updates then go do that on Reddit?
No. 57525
File: 1684336622544.jpg (60.23 KB, 1053x818, Fvn3uQWXsBQYN2n.jpg)
Please make a porn dumping board already. That'll be a life changer.(scrote)
No. 57533
>>57526Lolcow was mentioned in Chris's subreddit so obviously some of them were lurking here.
>>>/w/197615Others migrated after that because they couldn't discuss the dating shit in the subreddit and it seems like some ended up staying. It's why whenever someone says that another jvloggers vids are better than Chris's, or there is any criticism at all of Chris, anons flip out over it. You can see the same shit in the subreddit.
No. 57534
>>57522ayrt. I don't care and haven't posted about any of those things and it's pretty rich to preemptively assume I'm going to "nitpick" your response.
>general discussion/your opinion on recent social media updatesisn't that usually saged, meaning "not milk"?
The jvlogger thread isn't my cup of tea but I see the way people are trying to get it locked & worry that is going to affect other threads. Sharla's sexy pics = milk. Sola sperging about revenge = milk. Lily raising 75k with jvloggers but boohoo still not enough = milk. Sharla & Chris fucking up their dating timeline to hide the beginning? Also milk.
No. 57535
>>57531(samefag)
I also agree with this, it's ridiculous tbh
No. 57536
>>57533 Mentioning it doesn't bring this type of shitposting, we would've seen it years ago too, not just this past year. It's a copout, the same way anons say "Well this is Pearl's MO" because they think they can get away with it by doing so. That's what makes it bait. Blaming another site or the cow themselves because of the tinfoil and planted look of it doesn't help the thread at all and it's tinfoil.
We know already that we have anons who use /w/, like the porn-addicted anons who kept editing Belle's photos and Venus's and desperately looking for their nudes to edit, that this isn't fan behavior. There are legit shitposters on /w/. Anons who constantly screencap other websites and Twitters as if they matter to the thread at all what other places are discussing need to go outside or maybe just go to those other sites in general. We don't need to discuss men's takes on women Chris are dating. Anons only bring up Reddit to talk about "What the fans are saying" as if everyone from the subreddit is even a fan to begin with. Milk needs to come from the cows, not from what other anons on another site are saying.
The fact that not wanting to derail about Chris's weight repeatedly makes you a fan is absolutely unhinged.
No. 57543
>>57536It doesn't bring shitposting but it does bring whiteknighting which is what I was referring to.
See this post
>>57137 and all the posts linked in that post.
No. 57549
>>57534I’m not denying those topics you mention were milky. Let me use Mikans nose job as an example; the surgery itself, not particularly milky. Her usual bratty responses again not particularly milky but it is general snowflakery from her and a genuine update from a jvlogger. Notice how the conversation happened and then people
moved on and it didn’t escalate into hell?
The thread could be locked temporarily or autosaged until the weird obsessed Chris and sharla spergs get bored and find somewhere else.
I hope that makes sense?
No. 57555
>>57547Thats another bad excuse. When they are the only ones being talked about for almost 7 threads straight because anons were being autistic about cups and plane engines. That's why the focus was on them. The focus is still mainly on them. Anons are just now shitposting about Pearl and Daub now because it's disruptive like comparing Chris and Daub which isn't even a discussion, it's a term of preference on who you watch because everywhere they both cover are tourist spots.
>>57549I was just thinking this last night. Milk: Bring it up, discuss, done. Anons alerted when Mikan got her splits removed and all and had a little talk and then a sperg comes in about Sharla because everything, like I said above, goes back to anons shitposting regarding Sharla and Chris and then deflect the posting as
ThEy MuSt Be FrOM RedDit when they never are.
Unforunately, I don't think locking it temp will do anything or autosaging it. Anons will just spam until the thread reaches max. To be honest, there is not much milk at all from any of them. If anons have to keep bringing up old milk to justify the lack of current milk, then it is no longer new milk and doesn't warrant discussion like the anon who keeps attempting to bring up the archeological stuff for some reason, attempting to use lolcow as their own personal army and then throws tanrums and calls everyone whiteknights when they don't get what they want. Then comes the shitposting and spam and chatroom like discussion.
Surely people see the pattern. Mods probably see the pattern. If it is never new milk, and the newest milk you have is just ragging on the old milk, I say lock the thread and force everyone somewhere else to discuss YouTubers. Really check the quality over the past year and a half just like Belle and see if it's worth it.
No. 57567
File: 1684376557303.png (8.23 KB, 1308x185, cow.PNG)
I have a small suggestion, that hopefully wouldn't be hard to incorporate. On our search page, can it please highlight the number of which page you're on? Sometimes it's hard to tell which page you're on.
No. 57576
>>57569Yes they are.
>>>/w/295000 They moved on from sperging about the ex to shitposting about other stuff like pearl and Sharla's nose.
No. 57578
>>57577All I'm saying is that the shitposters and whiteknights are all the same group. One of them is easy to spot as they keep linking the thread when they post.
>>>/w/294704 >>>/w/294847 Stop derailing with reddit caps when that's not what was in that post or this one
>>57561 No. 57580
>>57572Here’s why I don’t think it was her, there is a weirdo who has been shitposting in that thread for a long time. They will adopt whatever persona to cause infighting for whatever reason. Just off the top of my head, there was one who kept saying Tkyoham was great but it didn’t get much attention so that stopped. Then there was the trust me sis type posts, overly critical of Sharla/Chris’s appearance, in the poopy/sharlas nose/Edgar, posting as if they were a cow (norm, pearl, and whoever else)
I realise that is vague without caps but I don’t have time to go through and grab them.
There just seems to be a pattern; the thread goes quiet so in comes the unsaged namefag, lots of redtext/arguing, in comes the poopy posts. Someone brings up something but the thread is quiet, derailing by pretending to be the cow in question.
I used to think it was someone who knows them but I’m beginning to think it’s just a resident spammer who camps /w/
No. 57588
>>57586You're looking at it wrong. She's not "posting" she
posted once, and then fucked off. Nobody is saying some anon was repeatedly LARPing as Alyssa. She probably heard there was shit being talked and showed up to see what it was about, said her thing, and bounced. There's no other posts that sound like that and there's no other posts suggesting it's her. I don't think it's a stretch at all to accept that she just jumped on and basically told nonnies to go fuck themselves.
No. 57596
>>57592you're a fascist. you can't prove it either was or was not her. I hope you get banned for being a fascist. nobody is hi cowing. it's very clear (if you'd followed the convo in the thread) that that post came out of nowhere and was totally different than anything else around it, and it was un-saged. use your tiny brain
nonnie.
(unbridled autism) No. 57598
There's random shota sperging (from both sides) in the Husbando matchmaking thread, I just reported a bunch of those posts.
For context, the infighting started here
>>>/m/297178 in response to an anon who did nothing but say "cool design but I'm not comfortable having an underage husbando"
>>>/m/297175 which didn't mention shota in any way and it's just a personal preference.
No. 57616
>>57608Well, there is a difference between 2 posts from someone and however long Kiki got away with it. Kikis time was way before vpns so it was easier to detect.
I refuse to believe any of them care about lolcow, I mean look at the state of the thread - it’s all baseless garbage with a dash of infighting and shitposting.
If anything they will enjoy the extra traffic their socials get.
No. 57626
>>57624ok then
well her name is Alyssa not Pearl, and she posted in the Jvlog thread to defend some bullshit about her face, that's literally all that happened and it happened once and it's insane the level of derailing and infighting anons are pouring into denialism
No. 57628
File: 1684563758545.png (86.19 KB, 864x1696, Screenshot_20230518-152153.png)
>>57626whenever Oriental Pearl is brought up in jvloggers (about 1-2x a year), it is always followed by brief WKing about her language abilities and her appearance. This time it really blew up but you can search lc for previous mentions and see posts saying how her languages are so impressive and how there's nothing wrong with her teeth, etc. Also the thing about her filming kids has been an annual topic, anons reeing over how it should have been brought up a year ago forgot that it was in fact brought up a year ago.
>>>/w/207877I don't really know or care if she's posting, I just see some weird patterns when she is brought up. Um, one person defending Pearl also used the same language to defend Bald (if someone is 17 years and 364 days old, are they a child??):
>>>/w/268634 Same language used about the kids Pearl was photographing:
>>>/w/296423 (nevermind that those kids were easily under the age of 9)
No. 57632
>>57628I dunno anon, that image looks exactly like every conversation about any cow in that thread. The ‘wk’ posts just sound like disagreement rather than wking.
Like for example, the conversation about sharlas nose, Chris’s weight, etc etc.
No. 57642
>>57640Maybe that was a bad example, but regardless of how weird they are you could say one of the comments is on par with >her language abilities are genuinely amazing tbh.
I think people nitpick Sharla over the stupidest things and absolutely cannot understand the obsession over her and Chris - does that make me a wk?
No. 57643
>>57642it doesnt make you a wk but it's weird to not understand the obsession with them, they're two of the top jvloggers for the last ten years who cheated on their partners to start a relationship that they hid for years and took great pains to lie about and cover up.
if that's not the definition of milk then I don't know what is.
No. 57644
>>57640Multiple anons were shitposting about noses.
>>57643Nta, but the obsession has evolved in to only shitposts and nitpicks regarding them
No. 57651
>>57650i've seen exactly zero evidence of this.
>>57648derail about sharla's nose is perfect example of what you're saying. Focus wasn't on her, shitposters made it about her. I agree with your post btw.
No. 57653
>>57651Nta, but I also agree that Lily was off and also wasn't cheated on. She was crazy to make a statement that was false, so she deleted it asap like a coward and had no follow-up proof or anything to back it up.
Anyway, let's stop bringing up old milk like the anon who keeps baiting by bringing up Bald every chance they get and when they get told to fuck off about their bait, suddenly you're a whiteknight and you're from Reddit.
Reddit and whiteknight accusations posts need to be reported at this point.
No. 57654
>>57653She said she got confirmation of something she suspected for years. No, she couldn't prove it - it was more circumstantial but all the information adds up in her favor, not C&S. She deleted it because she didn't want all their fans on her back (said it explicitly) and also a friend on Twitter openly tweeted to her that the backlash might not be worth any further exposure. That's not false anything and she wasn't a coward for rethinking posting about it.
I find takes like yours almost without humanity. You've never known someone who was cheated on betrayed in some way? It is common knowledge that there sometimes isn't a smoking gun in these situations, but a pile of little clues that add up.
No. 57655
Some of the Jvlog anons have moved to the Taylor thread. Someone keeps posting really weak discussions about the most mundane and unmilky things possible. I know saged stuff doesn't have to be milk, but are threads no longer required to have any sort of milk to have a discussion and have results to nitpicking about what goes in a salad and complaining that someone asked their family to notice a haircut or the fact they got their teeth cleaned? Come on, at least post things to discuss. This is just low effort, random social media posts which is rule:
>7.3 Milkless social media statuses and imagesBeing saged shouldn't keep it from needing to be milky even a little bit, not just nitpicks anons want to make based on their own shitposts
>>>/w/297421 All she did was get her bangs cut and ran around seeing if her baby or Tom noticed, anon's claim of this being a desperate attempt to be noticed by Taylor makes no sense, it's her family, there's no milk here
>>>/w/297422A whole post about her getting her teeth whitened, really? Again, no milk. Anons just want to post photos they think are stupid and it just shits up the thread.
>>>/w/297389Anon posted this to complain that Taylor is following the Kardashians or something all because the kid is using a printed out toy credit card and she made a joke about how 'she's just like mommy'. Again, posted with a fake milk caption for whatever fuck reason. It's getting to a point where it feels like anons are just filling the thread. They did this in the Jvlog one too with posts just like these.
>>>/w/295677Posting because anon didn't like her adding a 'y' to describe food and now it's been allowed for anons to just shitpost about anything she makes. We don't need to see anon be autistic about the way food is described. Post it when it's burnt or something to actually laugh at even.
>>>/w/297225>>>/w/297270 No. 57659
>>57658"creaming herself"
HAHAHAHAHAAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAA
that's like the funniest thing EVER
No. 57660
>>57650What points to her being batshit insane? The accusation tweet points to her being bitter af but it doesn't make her crazy. If your bf dumps you almost immediately after spending two months traveling with someone that they're clearly attracted to then it's understandable that you would have suspicions. Half the comments on those JAJ vids were about if they were a couple or banging.
Anons did try to make her look bad by lying about her being friends with sola and saying that sola dropped her. Anons also lied about a gofundme scam and said that she attacked Sharla. No proof for either of those. Also no proof of people unfollowing her after the tweet. Anons also lied multiple times that they broke up before JAJ despite clear proof that it was afterwards.
No. 57666
>>57661She was there for almost the entire trip and the whole crew was clearly staying at the same hotels and hanging out so yeah it counts as traveling together.
>>57665I just said it was reasonable to be suspicious. That's it.
No. 57679
>>57678The Belle thread was shit was shit with stalking her friends to post unmilky and sometimes edited photos, someone was editing her stuff in general (and Venus's), anons couldn't move on from old milk and kept bringing it up when anons would mention she's not milky anymore just because of porn photos.
Just nitpicking porn isn't fun. If anons want to act like scrotes over non-milky things, they can fuck off to Reddit. Anons even attempted to edit even normal photos.
Next that should go is Jvlog if you idiots can't stop derailing about old milk like the Bald retard who is desperate to get anons into their Chris Alpha Male tinfoil army.
No. 57691
>>57690it's more infighting than
>>>/w/297536because it's directly attacking another anon for expressing an opinion, grow up and stop trying to stir shit
nonnie it's a bad look
No. 57692
>>57691Are you okay? I didn’t attack anyone, I simply said it’s posts like yours that make me want the mods to lock the thread.. quit baiting and gaslighting people.
I made second post, but I didn’t make the first one fyi.
No. 57696
Can we just ban the samefagging/ip hopping anon
>>>/w/297544It's so obvious they keep ban evading
No. 57697
File: 1684698811073.gif (1.2 KB, 23x18, emot-allears.gif)
Thank you kindly to whomever lifted my mysterious, baseless permaban. Idk if someone specifically did this or if it happened as a result of some other sweeping changes on the site but I appreciate it. Even though I know better now than to use my native IP kek
No. 57700
>>57694FYI anon this was my only post
>>57690, the other one wasn’t me. I am not the resident shitposter, I’m not IP hopping and I wasn’t part of the conversation. I just happened to read the thread and made my comment.
I’m not going to argue the ban I received (it’s over, not evading) but can mods just look back at conversations before throwing the ban hammer?
You can see my only comment was >>291608, and I moved on to post about Mikan and said no more. The reason I replied like I did is because (as you will see from my post history) I have mentioned locking the thread.
No. 57708
>>57707Oh, so it was you who complained? Look, if you’re gonna report me and reee about it on /w/
and here, I’m sorry but you have got to be confident who you are accusing. Stop trying to stir shit
nonny, it’s not a good look kek.
No. 57714
>>57713the passwords arent working.
they were providing milk.
in other threads people who dont know how to sage etc are not banned if they are providing milk. same shit here.
shayna threads already get derailed too fucking much as it is and nonas stalking a random lolcow user would not be funny or enterteining just derailing bs! stop saying it would be funny or milky to leave the pic up, it woudln't, it would only derail the retarded thread more as it is
No. 57719
Hi cow, tinfoil, reeeing about bans again. A mod should check, one of these is most likely ban evading a lengthy ban.
>>>/w/297740 (same bs hi cowing as the fake pearl poster)
>>>/w/297738>>>/w/297736 No. 57737
Sorry to nitpick but how come the anons in the gyaru thread get to indulge in their y'all-ing and w-ing without getting banned for refusing to integrate ? I know there are lots of anons who have a distinct way of writing, but some girls in that thread truly stick out like a sore thumb.
>>57724Maybe we could expand the spicy straight thread to include them ? Since they have the same obsession with a group of people that they aren't actually a part of…
No. 57740
Hi farmers! We are interviewing new staff and still taking farmhand applications. To date, we have received about 30 responses, and have narrowed those down to 11 legitimate responses. We have also created an official newfag label for posts! When you click on it, it will take you to lolcow.farm/info. I will attach it at the bottom of this post.
Rancefag’s nudes have been floating around, please report them so we can continue to remove them. Although she posted them of her own free will, she seems unwell so we would like to keep them off the site as we feel like she will surely regret posting them here. Update: she said posted them during a manic episode.
>>57345 I understand your grievances. This whole shota/loli rule creation and polling process has been a learning process for us and, despite the clamor and stress it’s brought farmers and staff, I feel like we have gained a lot of insight into what farmers want from us. As far as the fujo thread goes, I will personally keep a closer eye on it.
>>57346 >>57348 >>57416 Sorry for the confusion, both the kiwi bunker and kiwi thread in /snow/ have been locked. The kiwi thread in snow was locked because it attracted Blaine and Elaine, and was continuously a place for Elaine’s nudes to be posted.
>>57422 explains it well.
>>57369 /g/ is a haven for all sorts of female fantasies and sex discussion. I haven’t personally seen much dd/lg discussion on the farm, the culture seems pretty hostile towards it. “Do not post pornography” still applies.
>>57400 >>57401 >>57405 Proposed redtexts: cringe, sus, femcel, it’s giving, y'all, ma'am, yikes, anti(s), proship(per)(s). As a southern anon, y'all is most contentious to me.
What do farmers think about the new redtext?
>
>57404 Manhate seems more inline with 2X’s culture, but farmers are welcome to vent about their grievances with males in the vent threads. /int/ was closed years ago due to lack of activity. If we see an increase in interest in international cows on /snow/ then /int/ returning could be a possibility.
>>57474 We try to delete as few things as possible for the sake of transparency. Our current protocol is to only delete spam, CP, double posts within threads, and posts by males that are clearly seeking attention so they don't get the satisfaction (unless the posts and replies are funny enough to be worth keeping). One exception to this rule was the Sharla nosefag in /w/ the other day. Which spam threads are you referring to?
>>57487 >>57489 >>57494 >>57496 >>57556 >>57518 >>57548 >>57550 >>57552 >>57553 >>57556 >>57560 >>57579 We will consider putting “change spoiler image” up for a vote, it may have to wait until Nucow.
>>57524 Money from Ko-fi goes to admin to subsidize the cost of running the server. Obviously, this means we have updated the deposit information. Currently our server bill is about $250 USD due monthly. We have received a $6 donation, $5 after Ko-fi took their cut, from Ko-fi in the time we have been admin and it was spent on the server bill (meaning whoever paid it that month paid $245 USD).
>>57571 >>57587 >>57594 Threads may be considered dead when there haven’t been any posts in some weeks/months, or there hasn’t been any milk in weeks/months. Bumping a dead thread with new milk is not considered necro - so if you have new milk to contribute, feel free to bump the thread rather than make a whole new thread.
>>57601 The tradthot thread kept us very busy the other day kek
>>57448 I get the sentiment here, but milk is subjective. When I’m not familiar with a certain cow, and I see that nothing has been posted for weeks until some unsaged update, I have to make the decision to either ban because “no milk” or just let the slow thread continue to be a slow thread until it dies. Locking threads because there’s no milk seems a little too helicopter-mod to me, if farmers want to continue to discuss a cow, why cut them off? The Belle thread is an exception here because of how many reports it generated. When every post is ban-worthy, we may as well lock the thread.
>>57462 /w/ will remain separate from /snow/. We are open to input from farmers.
>>57492 The Nigel posters in Shayna’s thread have been banned due to blogging.
>>57505 Double posting has been an issue in the past, but yes, it seems to have gotten worse. Lolcow is running on old software (like 7 years old with no updates or patches old) so when we fix something, something else may break. We hope Nucow will be our solution as it’s being custom built by one of the admins.
>>57513 >>57436 >>57412 >>57534 >>57522 >>57555 I’m personally keeping an eye on the J-vloggerz thread for WKs and derailers, but I don’t know all of the lore
and the thread is a pain in the ass >>57531 >>57535 Will you post the example? Usually the initial derailer continues to reply, so we just redtext their most recent post rather than redtexting multiple posts.
>>57537 The problem with checking an IP and then claiming a cow is selfposting is that anyone with a VPN can change their location to Japan and then post “as a Jvlogger.”
>>57567 >>57721The search page has been updated to highlight the page you are on when browsing results, auto-sorts results newest to oldest, the theme mimics the default lolcow theme more, and you can now filter search results by board. You’re welcome, anon ♥
>>57604 Hellweek will come when we have onboarded the new staff. We’re currently conducting interviews.
We strongly encourage more farmers to fill out the farmhand application, even if they only have a few minutes a day to mod or check for spam/CP. >>57609 USER HAS BEEN PUT OUT TO PASTURE is our default redtext for a ban of any length. Redtext is optional, so a post without redtext may have still received a ban. In other words, every post with redtext has received a ban (temporary or permanent).
>>57655 Taylor’s thread is notoriously stale. If farmers really want to discuss her getting her teeth whitened, making salad, or cutting her bangs, fine. There is literally nothing else going on in that thread.
>>57677 Posts to /shay/ will no longer appear on the front page, neither in the images nor posts sections.
>>57737I'll go have a look, but like another farmer said, not all bans are redtexted.
No. 57745
>>57740Sorry but I was reading the info over and just realized this is here
>If you've made a typo or want to correct any part of your comment, copy the text, delete it, and re-post it. Do not double-post to correct yourself.Kek, does anyone even follow this rule.
Anyway, I will riot if y'all gets redtexted. My country heart would not be able to take it.
No. 57760
File: 1684894793858.jpg (104.22 KB, 1080x891, Screenshot_20230523_192022_Chr…)
Infighting between what looks like a samefag and probably one of the same anons who keep derailing about their bans. This thread won't ever stay on topic.
No. 57764
>>57762the same police anon reported a legitimate milky graphic showing data proving abroad in japan's failing channel as "tinfoil"
she's drunk on on a power trip for some reason, she needs to take her meds
No. 57772
File: 1684905391875.png (41.8 KB, 1110x202, Screen Shot 2023-05-23 at 11.0…)
>complain about retard shit
>no one agrees
>make retarded jumps through hoops to arguee shayna was doxxed, even type "assshually doxxing is illegal" like an absolute sped, act like yearbook photos of shayna should be deleted because "underageee" when these type of photos are completely allowed of any other cow
>reply to yourself in the same typing style days later because you are still fuming
>post your retard doxx bait
i know shayfags are kinda dumb but you guys don't actually believe its a kiwifag right… like it is very obviously the autisitic mini mod talking to herself… its very obvious reading her. posting here to avoid derailing shaynas
No. 57792
>>57740Thanks for the update. In relation to Taylor’s thread being stale and farmers chatting about whatever.. could the same be applied to the jvlogger thread? If it’s universal that anything (within reason) goes you might get less whinging from me about the state of the thread kek.
I’d be interested to see how things go, but as it is arguably already the AIJ subreddit extension I can imagine it’ll be about only that and nothing else.
Just thinking out loud here too before everyone shouts at me lol.
No. 57804
>>57801I wonder if you'll ever realize what makes your posts so clockable.
How do you know it's never any of them? But you believed it when someone posted as Lily, right?
No. 57805
>>57804Regarding the cows posting according to admin:
>The problem with checking an IP and then claiming a cow is selfposting is that anyone with a VPN can change their location to Japan and then post “as a Jvlogger.” Hardly anyanon believed it was Lily. I also don't believe the old /snow/ threads had the cows either.
No. 57817
File: 1684972615676.png (178.24 KB, 1411x2048, glownigger.png)
whoever reported this is a retard and should be banned for retardation
>>>/ot/1586410(racebaiting) No. 57825
>>57824"trannies get the rope" can be read two ways, such as:
1. A command for trannies to acquire a rope
2. A rallying cry to hang trannies in an execution
So the post was red texted for a lack of clarity
No. 57826
File: 1684981056581.jpeg (212.18 KB, 940x2088, IMG_4245.jpeg)
How is this racebaiting??
No. 57879
Misogynistic insults and threats plus infighting in the vent thread
>>>/ot/1587060The amount of Kiwi scrotes that have invaded that thread should be dealt with somehow. I've seen several anons get away with dogpiling and being very misogynistic in this particular thread. Worst case scenario it may have to be temp locked
No. 57888
File: 1685042831869.jpg (30.02 KB, 456x399, 3ea58e7777633e234caf8b4a6b48fe…)
CP ON FRONT PAGE
No. 57931
File: 1685058075597.png (15.95 KB, 700x630, BD837AC9-889C-434A-B6D2-ECBC51…)
I think the gaijin gyaru thread should be locked since it’s just zoomer twittertards flinging shit at each other.
No. 57932
This poster got a ban for allegedly posting an emoji, but what I see is a parenthetical phrase followed by a colon:
>>>/w/298009Unless the emoji got removed, but I highly doubt that. Are you farmhands using some automatic filter to ban this or only reports? Because of all the useful filters LC could have, this one seems pretty dumb. I can't imagine anyone in the jvlogger thread is a Bronwyn-lover so it would surprise me if anyone cared to report that post.
All in all, nona (not me obv) copped an unfair ban for an emoji she didn't post
No. 57937
>>57932Anon that's a fucking emoji that the anon snuck in
>for anyone who doesnt wanna waste 7 minutes (yes only 7… does she not know how vlogs work nowadays?): it's 3 minutes That is not the start of a list to need to add : We have so many shitposters in the thread and they do these small things on purpose. Maybe anon should learn how to type without adding in a hidden emoji with the excuse of it being an accident due to typing form. Anon can reread and learn how to properly use a : then. The way anons demand answers for other anon's bans makes it seem like it's the same anons. Over the years I've rarely seen anons complain to this extent over banned posts that weren't even theirs.
No. 57943
there's nothing wrong with posting this and asking about automatic bans
triggered by a filter. I don't care how long anon's ban was. I want to know if a mod manually put it in or not.
>>57937 Get help. Also emojis written backwards like this aren't the norm in English.
>That is not the start of a list to need to add :Holy fuck, not you instructing us how to write in the English language! lmfao anon, stay in your lane.
No. 57967
>>57957any non smooth brained person can clearly see that's not intended to be an emoji, it is a parentheses followed by a colon. The parentheses is containing a description of the 7 minutes and the colon is indicating the time of 3 minutes.
If the parentheses and the phrase they contain were not there, it would read:
for anyone who doesn't wanna waste 7 minutes: it's 3 minutes
anyone who thinks that was an emoji probably had a mom who breast fed them after drinking bleach
No. 57971
File: 1685067598322.jpg (79.75 KB, 720x740, 1685047677232.jpg)
>>57963How am I mad, wtf? I just put in my opinion on the discussion. You actually seem like the upset one, and I could even say the same thing about you. Why be so upset if you're not the janny who handed out the ban?
>that an anon made a spelling mistakeIt doesn't look like a spelling mistake, she was explaining the video. Not to mention someone also got a similar ban in /ot/. It would've only taken that janny an extra 5 seconds to read the sentence with the colon. It's not a big deal or a huge mistake but they should be more careful and read the context. That's all I'm saying.
No. 57977
File: 1685068041776.png (7.75 KB, 482x298, Screen Shot 2023-05-25 at 7.25…)
Not to mention the fact that when I first saw that red text I was like WTF is that supposed to be anyway, because the emoji is BACKWARDS you fucking absolute imbecile mod whoever banned that. Are you honestly a total mental dumpster fire? Nobody writes emojis in that direction ffs. Even the red text looks as stupid as your idiot brain who banned it.
If it was a frowning emoji it would look like :(
and the red text would look like (:() not ():) you complete and total void of brain cells.
No. 57986
>>57977to be fair, in Russia and parts of Eastern Europe iirc the emojis are written in the opposite direction. It's still one of the most retarded bans I've seen on here in forever. Now we have a mod incapable of reading or skimming posts to verify a report? Fantastic.
>>57980I'm sure you'd love if jvlog were locked, parasocial weirdo.
No. 58021
>>58020the red text literally said the ban was for a-logging
and if we can't tell trannies to die on lc then what?
No. 58038
>>58035men have been banned here for years, and tims, axewound or no, are no different from any other men. in fact, they're even more fucked up than the average man.
no one on earth gives a fuck about ftms. they're a self-hating joke class and them using female only imageboards in secret reaffirms that kek.
No. 58040
>>58031MtF troons were born with a phallus, you obtuse faggot.
An intersex XY person who didn't develop any male anatomy due to a rare genetic mutation (as was the case of an anon who posted about it in the MtF thread) is allowed here because that person has always looked and been treated as female since she was in the womb. TIMs are just regular males, unlike intersex people they are not special cases, whether they've chopped off their dick or not.
>>58035There are only a couple of female-only imageboards. We like it here because we like imageboards and some of us won't even touch social media with a ten foot pole. There are so many troon-only and -inclusive websites on the internet where they will often invade any conversation held by women and make it about themselves or their fetishes, and we are not allowed to call them out on it because troonphobia is the worst possible crime you could commit in this day and age.
Also I don't see what's so wrong about having more female-only spaces online, women are not a monolith and we don't all want to use the same communities to talk about the same shit, because we all have different interests, preferences and opinions, that's why we use this imageboard instead of whatever those online communities you mentioned are.
No. 58051
>>58043A FTM is still a Tranny, so stop saying kill all Trannies
Tranny: Transsexual, a FTM is a Transsexual
No. 58052
>>58051Nta but someone can say say kill trannies and
also think that tifs can post here. They just probably won't have a good time here though
No. 58062
>>58051kill all tranies. ftm included. cope seethe and bind
>>58043why are ftm allowed tho? they're clearly shitting up the place, look at the tif personalityfag spewing TRA shit all over
No. 58066
Hi! TIFchan here. I didn't break the rules hence why I wasn't banned. I backed off when told and the situation is over. Plus I'd prefer if mods cracked down on misogyny towards TIFs like what
>>58062 said. I don't really care about if any of you hate trannies? It comes with the territory, and you do you. But consistency is a virtue and if it's misogynistic to say those things about any woman who isn't a TIF, it should not fly for TIFs either. I apologize about causing an uproar, though.
No. 58072
>>58067afaik previous personalityfags have been banned under global rule #4 (stay anon). announcing yoirself or making your posts obvious goes against the principle of anonymity.
can't wait to see that whiny entitled aiden get perma'd lmao
>>58071agreed. all trannies afe insufferable attention whores anyway. nothing of value would be lost
No. 58096
>>58035I actually agree that according to the rules, you are correct. And that also only says they cannot announce themselves. I think the rules should be more explicit that no males or tims allowed, though obviously there’s no real way to enforce that (other than banning users that out themselves).
Kinda related but I don’t think TRAs, libfems, tradthots etc should be banned (don’t know if they are rn but many users seems to think they should be). I don’t agree with them but this is not a radfem site with a political agenda, even if most users are radfem-adjacent.
No. 58102
File: 1685173315514.jpg (41 KB, 617x579, Screenshot_20230527-124039_Sam…)
Can I ask why was I banned four days ago?( I just noticed this now kek I don't stay on lolcow 24/7) I thought you were supposed to bump threads when there's cp on the front page?
No. 58131
>>58129Kek "fursona"
But yeah I think that mods should check the IPs (and cookies etc.) in that thread.
No. 58177
>>58176the one sperging isn't the one pointing out that the book is simply not carried on amazon in the US, it's the samefag constantly posting that the book is the TOP OF THE LIST and A HUGE SUCCESS and ALL THE ORDERS ARE FROM THE USA (though it's not available for purchase on Amazon in the US)
THAT is the sperging anon
No. 58180
>>58178a "success" kek that's hilarious
a "success" literally nobody has heard of
No. 58186
File: 1685255177070.jpg (100.13 KB, 854x862, MODSARESTUPID.jpg)
No. 58189
>>58187This.
Someone is off their meds in love with Chris and typical WK behavior. Mods need to show up asap in that thread, it needs to be detonated immediately.
No. 58190
>>58188your samefagging is off the chain
nonnie, why do you love Chris Broad so much kek
No. 58191
>>58188Nobody but you "finds him a success" kek
Clearly.
No. 58216
>>58213>There's no proof that it's bait.kek wtf now bait needs to be proven that its bait? step off
nonnie you're drunk.
No. 58233
>>58230Because, as you know, people are trying to trash it and have been doing so for over a year now. They want their tinfoils to be true and the farmers want to be able to shitpost anything they want. The same problem as the Belle thread, but apparently that was all
redditors too, when it isn't. It's normal farmers who keep wanting to shit up the thread because for one: They like fucking with the mods, and two: they have fun with the infighting it brings.
No. 58235
>>58234And another bait post, good job anon. I hope mods start banning the spergs who bring up invisible whiteknights and redditors. This is like how the anons in Belle's thread used the excuse of "Well she edits her own photos" when it was anons literally fucking with it and got the thread shut down because of it. It's not external fuckery.
>>58231Keep ban evading, it's fun to report you.
No. 58241
>>>/w/298419more attempted doxxing from some absolute fucking tinfoil retard.
mods are just what like off in the corner jilling off or something? flicking their beans when they should be working? get back to work you sluts.
No. 58249
>>58248oh no oh wow a one day ban. however will you survive
you probably copped it by being annoying, rule #4 is there for a reason
No. 58254
>>58239Agree. I wish the Jvloggers retards stayed in their containment space and stopped shitting up every "complaints and suggestions" threads with their nitpicking.
I don't know if it's one autist samefagging or if everyone participating in that boring thread is insane but they're at it for months now.
Report and move on, it's not that hard.
Inb4 "WK ! Redittors!" I don't frequent these threads so don't come at me No. 58264
File: 1685393358863.jpg (161.68 KB, 900x675, 1672961209061.jpg)
Farmhands, can you please give out more bans for personalityfagging? It's so tiring to see. if they want to be unique they should use twitter or whatever instead of an anonymous imageboard.
I come back from a few month's break and wg has graduated from being known to just a few nonas who somewhat cared about her drama to being known all across lolcow as another personalityfag. Jfc. I should have never wasted my time giving her advice. She apologizes and promises to change but the truth is she will never change. Get used to her redardation nonas, because unless someone takes her phone she's going to be here for a while and will never integrate
No. 58274
I feel so bad for the mods, but anon is spamming year old comments, some we've had before, and using it to bump the jvlog thread.
>>>/w/298569The mods who know about this thread might want to make the argument to admin that the thread maybe shouldn't come back. It's exactly in the same boat as the Belle thread and we've had IP hopping redtexts before showing some of the same anons are using this thread the same way: Just shitposting and filling up as many threads as possible.
No. 58284
>>58281(I’m not the anon you’re speaking to)
Sola didn’t say anything about the show so it’s literally got nothing to do with anything, hence the ban.
Milk has got to be specifically about the cow in question, I.e cow says/does something - not this show depicts Eastern European women as hostesses.
If anything it’s moid level analysis. And a blogpost at best. Maybe lurk more
No. 58286
>>58281I couldn't agree more with you, anon. We've always had discussions about cows' activities and interests. That person just reports everything, and some mod is just taking it all in, I guess. Next they'll be in here reeeing about how mods are infallible - is it any wonder why we sometimes suspect a mod has a clear bias in /w/?
If jvloggers is locked, what does that say about our website? We've given in to outside people trying to derail and shut down discussion. It is also unconscionable that we don't have a jvlogger thread on the /WEEB/ section of the website, I can't believe people don't get this.
No. 58289
>>58286>our websiteYou sound like a newfag.
Talking about a cows interests is one thing but she never specified that show being an interest, ergo off topic derail.
This is an imageboard, not PULL.
No. 58293
>>58292Samefag but LET JVLOG BE A SHITPOSTING THREAD then everyone can STFU about everything.
Think about it - Jvloggers are dumb, boring, and irrelevant anyway and rarely produce milk. Seriously who are the REEEEEEEing anons who get apoplectic about literally anything and everything that isn't groundbreaking shocking milk? Those anons are the problem. FUck them. Let it just be a shitposting absurdity thread.
No. 58299
>>58296Yes it's a containment board for weebs and their adjacent autists to discuss cows; cosplay or japan cows that
arent snow or pt material. Newfag? Speak for yourself.
No. 58307
>>58291PULL was a forum that was popular for these types of conversations, hence my saying this is an imageboard, not PULL.
No one refers to lolcow as ‘our’ anything, just go back to Reddit, and
>>58293 too.
No. 58310
>>58309I’m not them but they sound like English isn’t their first language. The point about anons making up shit when there’s no milk is absolutely
valid. Some people do have weird vendettas.. maybe they meant farmers with vendettas against each other?
Honestly if I was admin I’d nuke /w/ and be done with it
No. 58313
>>58307I don't use either of those sites. I guess calling each other
nonny and banding together against troons and moids is also "reddit" behavior? I'm sorry you don't have anon friends on here, a lot of us do by participating in certain threads. Maybe examine why you seem to hate the idea of a sisterhood on lolcow.
No. 58315
File: 1685471134214.jpg (47.85 KB, 640x632, bun4b82cc_7510296f_640.jpg)
CP spam on /snow/
No. 58325
>>58313Anon.. I didn’t say that stop twisting my words.
Although I am cracked up over the thought of a /w/ sisterhood. I’m not sure the point of lolcow is to band together against moids/troons rather a place to be without them. Maybe you mean a 2x sisterhood??
No. 58333
>>58326You take lolcow so seriously like it's not a gossip site to talk about d list online celeb personalities kek. And pointing that out doesn't make me a vendetta poster. Again, you're taking lolcow too seriously . You're not a mod so your opinion of what is and isn't milk is subjective, that's why you come here to cry and stomp your feet about it to the moderators in meta foe days on end until you get your way. Now I'm not saying the quality of /w/ threads are amazing, because it's a containment board for autistic weebs and has always been shit since its inception, but you can't deny that many threads have been heavily policed recently for no reason, some threads you can't even discuss the cow at all while others are allowed to go unchecked for the same things or worse. What really needs to stop is the painfully obvious bait posting and whiteknighting by someone (or a small group) who camp out on that board and really really seem to unironically love and sympathize for some cows on w. You don't see this type of iron clad milk policing on other boards which is what makes talking about the cows fun. Some threads on w are not allowed to flow organically meanwhile absolute whiteknights and bait posters are allowed to shit up and fill up the threads in an obvious attempt to max them out, lock them, or bury milk. The wk here is acting like this is a serious place for reporting on cows, and we could LOSE OUR CREDIBILITY GIRLS!!!!! Look around anon, this is a gossip image board. We literally host over a hundred austistic shayna Clifford threads stop clutching your pearls and unclench your asshole. And I'm not saying shit posting should be the only thing allowed but not every single post is going to be super serious milk, people are allowed to have (saged) discussions about the cows too. I don't understand why you or the mod team want to alienate the already dwindling user base. Go to another website to discuss cows? OK most people left already anyways, leaving this place to fill up with teenage zoomers that use tiktok censorship and lingo all over the site, not understanding the history or the culture of the board (go see for yourself , go look at the quality "milk" that's been posted on w for years it's always been a shitty board full of boring shit about lackluster cows) I can think of a handful of cow threads this whiteknight would, by their standards, consider full of vendetta posting nitpicking and tinfoiling (according to you) that go back yeeeaaarrrrs (Taylor, Kota, Venus, Miki moon, Lori etc) it's just the nature of that board. People are allowed to have discussions about the cows and that's a hill I'm willing to die on. The issue is the unchecked bait posting and whiteknighting over there. Any old users that stuck around after Christmas have brought up the
problematic /w/ wk camper periodically but, still, they are allowed to derail and bait and infight and whiteknight particular cows there for some reason.
No. 58336
>>>/snow/1837365 had no post history other than this post, leading us to decide it was likely some male with a fart fetish.
>>>/snow/1833721 was a judgement call, that
nonnie needed to take a break. Other anons in the thread seemed to agree. It was not a permaban, so she'll be back.
The nudes posted by /shay/ users have been deleted and we will continue to delete nudes posted by users, nobody here wants to see that and whoever is posting their nudes to lolcow needs to go outside.
We've decided to lock the jvloggerz thread for lack of milk, the amount of reports we receive from it, and sheer amount of tinfoiling, nitpicking and infighting it creates. If there is actual milk it can be reopened in the future.
No. 58341
>>58336We did it girls! We got it locked!
Congratulations and thank you!
Signed, Sincerely,
Sharla, Sola, Chris, Norm, Bronwyn, Mikan, TkyoHam, Taytay, Emma, Aki, Connor, John Daub, and all the other grateful JVloggers!
No. 58344
>>58341Some of them like Aki and Connor still have the Trash Taste thread so it's not like they're completely safe.
>>58343LOL
No. 58345
>>58343Are you fucking serious? Jesus, maybe choose another gossip site? Reddit? Norms DMs?
Mods I can’t thank you enough, you did the right thing.
No. 58346
>>58343Go to the youtube thread. Please don't post the jvlog stuff to the other /w/ threads. Those threads are slow, the cows aren't as milky, dropping jvlog stuff in them will just get those locked too. You /w/ spergs need to chillout.
Also norms comments aren't really interesting. We know he fights with commentirs, we don't need a constant play-by-play every time he does it.
No. 58347
>>58343I agree with this anon
>>58346Also please put them into a collage.
No. 58355
>>58353>If they were milky they would've had a thread alreadywhat is this retarded logic kek…. by this logic no threads would ever happen and there wouldn't be lolcow to begin with
your brain malfunctioned
No. 58367
>>58351Second this.
>>58353NTA, but Jake Adelstein is more milky than the vast majority of cows on lolcow. Fake memoir, fake articles, fake sources, prostitutes, lawsuits, messy divorce with cheating, recent popular HBO drama based on his life that's trying to step away from him, shows up wherever he's criticized on social media to attack critics. He's not a vlogger. He's considered to be an expert on Japan by western media and writes articles for major publications on the country, which makes him more /w/ material than anyone else there, although he also fits in /snow/.
>>58356No, he's been brought up because Chris has repeatedly recommended his book to his fans, and a tinfoiling anon was claiming Sola was a consultant for the TV drama based on his life and that it was an accurate portrayal of the water trade for foreign women when the almost everything in the book it was based on, including the murder case about the foreign hostess, turned out to be fake.
No. 58395
>>58388I think the ones claiming we can't be
abusive are the abusers and they're trying to shift the blame onto outside factors. They're also almost always GC, so they make people with genuine concerns over trannies look absolutely insane. Which honestly, isn't surprising. If you care so much about controlling other people, to the point you wish death on all who disagree you're either in a cult, suffer from untreated Cluster B, or an abuser yourself. So are we really shocked so many extremist radfems end up beating their girlfriends then saying it's impossible due to being a real woman? It's the same projections trannies do and I wish other lesbians didn't act so haughty when a portion of us are no better than a good chunk of troons.
No. 58401
>>58400Kirbyfag is likeable. I agree that the dumbass shit thread was very severely derailed and is now unreadable for non-husbandofags and something
should be done, but personality fagging itself is not explicitly against the rules. If they link their personality to real life information or online handles, and explicitly confirm it,
that's breaking the rules, not personalityfagging itself.
No. 58405
File: 1685629690392.png (334.15 KB, 456x431, 1622153529857.png)
Cp spammer in /pt/
No. 58408
>>58401personalityfaggibg defeats the putpose of anonymity and it falls under rule #4. and it's goddamn annoying, they always derail threads ith their autism and make everything abiut themsleves. kirbyfag has nice art or xhatever but she always announces that it's her, she might as well be namefagging.
also there's a billion husbandofagging threads in /m/ and /g/, it's annoying when people feel entitled to derail non specific threads wheb they already have their dedicated ones.
No. 58414
>>58413Who fucking cares oh my god, take your disgusting fetishes to your tumblr porn blogs
Why are rancefag etc banned but not kirbyfag?? Why do the rules not apply to her
No. 58424
>>58423*pussy lore
Only dong sometimes
No. 58443
>>58439Yes and? If they're posted to a discord server with multiple people that can see it, nothing can stop them for saving the file and reposting it. There's no secret rule that states you're not allowed to share whatever is posted in a discord server.
Speaking of which, what discord server was it even? Some LC offshoot that appeared during Shaymin drama?
No. 58454
>>58452>>58443Im assuming this isn't about the lori thread in w which had a revenge porn redtext due to an anon admitting this to the personal photo. Mods don't know when something is "public". Anons will say discord server, but we don't know that to be true. Revenge porn is against the law like cp. If it can't be reverse image checked, maybe don't post nudes as they aren't 'leaked' otherwise. Not the same as posting to twitter or a porn site like fapello.
.
No. 58456
File: 1685714024926.png (90.41 KB, 1437x672, ew.PNG)
Isn't this an update?
No. 58468
>>58467I think Western Vocaloid should be moved to /snow/ at this point. It's not even weeb stuff at this point. Vocaloid is too mainstream in the west and the western community is chock full of /snow/ tier cows. The only one worthy of /w/ at this point is Akiglancy, but she had her first bit of milk in
years a few days ago.
No. 58477
>>58475I won't be surprised when belle gets manic and starts posting again, so inevitably someone here decides to start talking about belle in the cam girls thread (a thread she was shoe horned in, and never belonged in the first place since it's about pumpy sabrina and a handful of others in
that circle) it will be a problem even though the discussion was suposedly moved there. People will complain because she doesn't belong there. Also, why was she moved to snow of all places if she's such a low value cow anyways? The whole handling of it was strange. Even here in meta any time someone rings her up it's a problem
No. 58478
>>58471Lmaoo, yet another
triggered libfem mad that someone said her scrote is ugly
No. 58479
>>58477Honestly, the Belle situation was weird, and I do get the point about Shayna's thread being fairly similar. I do think Shayna specifically is milkier because she often responds to shit and creates drama, like her dogpiling on that faggy guy with the hairy shoulders she did a b/g scene with now that he is being cancelled.
however I also agree that the best solution to the Belle thread was probably to just lock it. It was always full of WKs, nitpicks, scrotes begging for free content, that crazy edit anon (whatever their motivation was they were fucking nuts) and just loads of tinfoil about the very nature of /w/ and the mod there, which would spill over onto real /meta/ often too. I see it as not that she isn't
milky, necessarily, but that her thread was just retarded and beyond salvation. She could be discussed in costhots, OF hoes, even probably Youtuber general. If her thread wasn't so full of deranged nonnies and pornsick scrotes, it would still exist. I definitely reported a lot of posts in her thread for being retarded (like the pedopanderer apologist who camped there) and I'm sure I wasn't alone. They even cited the report queue being so full of Belle shit as a reason to close it. I think sometimes a thread gets shut down NOT because of a lack of milk necessarily, but because it becomes such a nuisance to deal with.
No. 58483
>>58481But why is her discussion being moved to snow? She needs to be on the shitty weeb containment board where she came from. This is only going to fill up another thread and it's report queue. How will moving her discussion to snow stop the millions and gazillions of belle reports the mods have to absolutely suffer through day and night?
>>58479Belle is also engaging in shitty content with other sex workers that gets posted (most recently being an awkward threesome with some blonde porn star) yet that was shut down immedietly as scrote posting free porn?? however for some reason 100+ threads of shaynas shitty porn escapades are allowed? You talk about belles tinfoilers like shayna hasnt had the titspergs and vaginaspergs, the titspergs are tinfoiling about her recovery right now kek.And again you call the anons who talk about belle deranged, like we don't have 100+ threads on shayna and a /shay/ containment board; a low tier sex worker that hardly anyone outside of lolcow knows… Yet majority of teens and adults know who belle delphine is, to the point of her having a slew of belle skin walkers.
No. 58485
>>58483I get it anon, but like I said, sometimes a thread is untenable not because of the lack of milk or whatever, but because it just fills the report queue and makes more mod work than it is worth. Agree or disagree but that is basically the reason they gave for locking Belle's thread. It was generating too many reports, pretty much the same as jvlog. Shay threads may be retarded
but I bet they get less reports because anons don' infight in them nearly as much. Everyone agrees Shay is a disgusting fat retard kek
No. 58490
>>57943>>57932The word filter we have prevents the post from being made at all and is used to counteract spam. Any ban you see is manual.
>>57826That was a mistake, sorry anon. The ban has been removed.
>>57744Due to Taylor’s history, we will keep her thread open. Sitewide rules still apply.
>>57879The post you tagged was from a female poster frustrated about the personalityfagging going on in /ot/. Continue to report misogynistic comments, staff have been notified to keep an eye out for Kiwi scrotes in vent.
>>57790>>57791Bans have been issued.
>>57786Innocent post history. Do you have links to namefagging posts from 4chan that contain this image?
>>57742We just reviewed applications yesterday so we’ll be reaching out today or tomorrow! Leaving a Discord is not required.
>>58380Please report these posts, they fall under our derailing and potentially infighting rules.
>>58400>>58418Personalityfagging is usually benign, but it can get out of hand. Derailing is still against the rules. We’ll consider a different approach during Hellweek.
>>58420Hellweek incoming! Dates will be announced…soon. Sorry it’s taking so long. We are just getting our new staff ready.
>>58280Post-Leftcows is on thread 42, which is active as of today. There was a Post-Leftcows OP that was shit and so was deleted.
>>57931>>57989>>58466We’ll consider closing Gaijin Gyarus, but it doesn’t generate nearly as many reports as jvlog or Belle’s threads. We’re open to feedback on this.
>>58107Would you please email the gifs that failed to resize to administration@lolcow.farm? We tried uploading a few gifs on the site and met no issues.
No. 58505
There's a scrote who literally admitted it himself in the Vent thread. This is him: >>>/ot/1595497
He quickly deleted his previous post after a couple dumbasses kindly let him know he's not allowed to post, someone posted a screenshot of it though:
>>>/ot/1595501 No. 58512
>>58497god please stop with your ip-hopping ban evading nitpicking shitpost tinfoils. anons would praise the goddesses of lolcow never to read one of your aggressive word salad posts again. If you hate it here so much, leave. Your claims are baseless and just because you screamed and reeed until the jvlogger thread got locked doesn't mean you are some hero of LC. You. are. the. problem.
And you are honestly probably the source of most baseless reports in /w/.
No. 58515
File: 1685777777714.jpeg (96.23 KB, 1125x964, IMG_4347.jpeg)
I love this kek
No. 58542
File: 1685808438685.jpeg (114.28 KB, 734x1243, 330154DB-C3DB-4FD6-9965-D65AD5…)
>>58458This pic hasn’t been posted before, so I was curious about the redtext. All her leaked OF content is her wearing the same outfits she posts in instagram, so the pics may look similar, but different content / different platform. Granted, Lori is an old cow and the milk is stale, but it’s still new content and thus should not be saged?
Checking my understanding more than anything.
No. 58545
>>58478Neither of those things apply to me. I am, however, fed up of the femcels here and the way they insist on intimidating and browbeating other women into joining their ranks as if their limited world view is the be-all-end-all ultimate truth. It's not healthy and it's not going to effectively fight the patriarchy if we're living day to day snapping at each other like paranoid, rabid dogs, suspicious of everyone except those in our cultivated little hivemind packs which allow for no nuance or individuality, lashing out with teeth gnashing at all in our path. Being terribly nasty isn't going to effectively sway anyone to the cause, albeit misery does love company. It seems to work on those without a backbone or those whom are eager to please some anonymous keyboard stacies whom they'll never have a meaningful interaction with, after which they move on to aggressive/doomer posturing in other threads because of a desire to appease others here which, woman or not, is not very feminist in any context imo. Although again, if they want to keep that to certain boards, that's up to them. I just think it has no place coming out of the blue when uncalled for. I.e., someone saying they're happy with their hetero relationship and another coming out of the woodwork to try and convert them to taking the blackpill. Let people find it on their own and decide, at least.
No. 58550
>>58548ntayrt but i think she means this
https://lolcow.farm/2X/res/11172.html#15351the abuse rates have been debunked in the lesbian threads on /g/ too
No. 58555
>>58550Funnily enough, I believed those statistics because of an admitted serial rapist on Radblr taking pride in raping two women also on Radblr, repeatedly, in a relationship. I apologize for not looking further into it, but the point still stands that that's a major problem, albeit not as talked about.
Also speaking of troons, Trumpkun is shitting up unpopular opinions >>>/ot/1596257 because another anon brought up trannies.
No. 58570
File: 1685871350973.png (117.26 KB, 595x872, c.png)
>>58569as I posted this in the other thread, are you really gonan argue this doesn't look like a child.
No. 58580
File: 1685901166161.png (32.41 KB, 275x274, 1660121175637.png)
I just saw cp. Idk which board because I saw it on the homepage. Please be careful, and if you see it report it.
No. 58595
File: 1685938521450.jpg (55.9 KB, 1080x506, Screenshot_20230604_211411_Twi…)
>>58592Even the twitter anon is being told that they need therapy in their attempts to force milk.
Mods/Admin, we know this twitter user is a poster, they've already self posted several times. The whole thread is basically compromised. Anon is even tagging their tweets with #revengeporn
No. 58602
File: 1685978164630.jpg (242.34 KB, 1080x1835, Screenshot_20230605_081407_Twi…)
>>58595Wanted to add that this farmer has been attempting to dox them and now keeps on going about how they used 4chan behind the scenes to track a vpn as if they are a mod and can check random IPs?? Anon thinks they are some hacker, really up the aisle with the cup sperging anons and probably one of them tbh.
Anon, I'm sure you're reading this, but if you have to try to find where they live just to post it, that is doxxing. Using the area around them and then posting addresses, that's doxxing on your part. Just existing isn't the cow doxxing themselves. Honestly hope Jvlog never comes back.
No. 58603
File: 1685978395369.jpg (103.04 KB, 1080x711, Screenshot_20230605_081850_Twi…)
>>58602Also saying they can track a VPN is so embarrassing. This is the "milk" that anon is trying to pass off as real milk. Just a quick breakdown so mods can see its not worth having the thread back.
No. 58606
Why is Amanda's thread still on autoage? Admin says here
>>56287 that it was taken off autosage but it hasn't been yet.
No. 58608
>>58592dear god in heaven, can jvlog anons just
stop fucking talking about it, why has /meta/ became the jvlog thread? The subject is closed. No more complaining, period, don't talk about what is or isn't milk here, it's dumb. Let the mods decide. Keep the twitter shit on Twitter. Who are you all arguing with now, the
thread is locked. I never want to read about jvloggers again!
No. 58637
File: 1686135905163.jpg (32.83 KB, 509x339, 1651860239724.jpg)
CP in /pt/
No. 58655
File: 1686190763809.jpg (73.55 KB, 1080x584, Poopyanon.jpg)
>>58633Because the poopy anons keep interacting for milk and the thread will never come back at this rate, literally can clock them
No. 58660
File: 1686229187294.png (18.67 KB, 712x625, 1656543986293.png)
Moid in pride thread and other threads talking about nigger poop and lesbian pedophiles (projecting his fetishes)
No. 58699
File: 1686330840063.jpg (123.39 KB, 1139x1080, 1656146768106.jpg)
Cp in vtuber thread
No. 58745
>>58729The word whiteknight is overused yeah but there was definitely a bunch of Chris and Sharla fans in the jvlog thread. It's not about having a different opinion, that thread was rampant with double standards and it was clear that some anons didn't like there being any negative discussion about them. Claiming that a cows old milk is fake facts and exaggerated and that a discussion about their association with shitty people is vendetta posting, and saying that a cow didn't lie to their fans about not knowing the shitty nature of a person that they hung out with and helped despite being warned about it multiple times, was whiteknighting.
>>58743Same. That thread became an absolute mess.
No. 58755
>>58745just strictly on levels of mass delusion and denial of actual facts,
Chris & Sharla fans = Trump supporters
(derailing) No. 58774
File: 1686681547466.jpg (50.7 KB, 750x500, 2023ultras.jpg)
since there's nowhere else to put this now(ok?)
No. 58779
File: 1686707835933.png (108.73 KB, 1080x545, Screenshot_20230614-025148.png)
>>58774The exact same image that's on the jewel women's center website kek.
No. 58783
>>58779weird, why is Sharla's ultrasound on that random website?
Congrats to Sharla btw
No. 58789
File: 1686719912998.jpeg (39.98 KB, 750x492, CA5B650A-394A-42FD-8CA3-4BABCC…)
>>58788totally normal and civil disagreement right there huh?
No. 58813
File: 1686851087266.png (48.7 KB, 1375x369, Screenshot.png)
Why was nonna rejected from farmhand applications, I mean I don't know what details she gave but she sounds passionate
No. 58824
File: 1686941323672.png (6.3 KB, 586x129, _ot_ - Vent Thread #178.png)
This isn't my ban but wtf? First we can't tell trannies to die, now this. We have to be nice to fucking pedos, the absolute bottom of the barrel scum of all things?
No. 58849
>>58844Ken is a sleazy, greasy old scrotoid with gross kinks but there's no proof of him being a pedo besides what's Venus wrote on Insta (and we know she lies a lot…Guys! I jumped in front of a bus uwu)
Also, there's no such thing as shared custody in Japan and we don't even know if he really has children or not so it's just tinfoil and speculations at this point.
The Manaki/Ken WK is annoying af, I agree, but it's better to not engage with them at all and report their posts instead of shitting up the thread with more derailing/infighting. Just my two cents, nonna, not trying to antagonize you.
No. 58853
>>58844I understand the sensitive subject but please remember that venus lies a lot about a lot of things like her claiming mana was
abusive/groped girls/pedo. Until we have 100% proof that so and so is a pedo don't blindly believe whatever venus says. So with that in mind, please stop rehashing 'is he or is he not' discussions as it's not new and just shitting up the thread. Various oldfag nonas have different opinions on it and that is fine. Just accept it and move on.
>>58849basically this. Over the top wking of mana/ken is reportable and we'll do what we can. But having a different opinion on it is fine as long as you don't continue to derail/infight.
>>58850Not really. Japanese culture is very different in 'call outs' and 'cancelling' and 'defending' things than NA. A lot of people would rather ignore it and sweep it under the rug and pretend it was never said at all. I feel like even non weeb nonas know that the culture is very anti-confrontational.
No. 58858
File: 1687135185709.gif (1.15 MB, 498x498, pls.gif)
Can there be a new rule or something to only have fujo discussion on the designated threads? (fujo thread in /m/ fujo cringe in /ot/ and the ftm thread on /snow/)
>inb4 "b-but the fujo thread it's not a containment thread!" and "fujos are degenerates reeeeeeee"
I mean there's always arguments across all the boards and threads to discuss fujoism and how it's gross/based when no one really cares. except the spergs who are obsessed with defending/shitting on yaoi.
Also kind of not related to the previous stuff but we also need anons to be banned from threads that are dedicated to shit on something if they derail and sperg about others opinions, if you're in a thread about, idk shitting on beans there's always some dumbass discussion
>green beans are fucking gross
>noOOOooO! why are you saying that they're sooo nutritious and tasty, i like them and you're stupid!
i swear anons can't contain their autism to defend, explain and whiteknight their favorite anything in unrelated threads or threads to shit on the things they like, it's annoying.
lolcow is more fun when people don't sperg over yaoi, trannys, whiteknigting and take moid bait
No. 58867
>>58853I don't even read Venus's threads anymore but Manaki started dating Venus when she was 17 and married her when she was 18. Manaki was 23(?) when they started dating. It's not proof of him being a pedophile but he had been interested in her from a much younger age, and she acted like a child. It's not the best look for him. She admitted lying about him groping girls as a joke, and how should we know about whether he abused her or not? Venus is no angel but I think overdefending Manaki is also dumb. Especially if the point is to defend Ken, who never denied what Venus said about him and his child, and Venus never took it back either.
just my (polite) two cents: going overboard in demanding proof for things is going to kill discussion and the board itself. Even when anons have posted proof in the past, it's often ridiculed or WKed into oblivion and then reported as derailing. There has to be some grey area for speculation as well. Ken deserves no protection or mercy IMHO, he's a fucking creep.
No. 58868
>>58867You know what is going to kill the board? Baseless accusations and conspiracies. Tinfoil theories are against the rules.
Of course people ask for proof. You bring up some very serious accusations. And not to mention that if we spread lies, Venus and her fans will dismiss the "haters" as just a bunch of liars.
No. 58870
>>58867My issue is that you can't even criticize Manaki, Margo, or Ken without someone chiming in to try to start an infight by defending any of the 3. Anons need to stop defending them. Literally the only
victim in the thread is Venus out of the 4 of them all, but that also doesn't negate the shit she has done which anons think other anons are trying to do. Everyone can be shitty. Also I agree with you on the not denying thing. Ken flipped out about other things and said she was a liar, but never, ever this, even years later. You'd think he'd defending not being a pedo over the other posts about Venus he's made.
No. 58907
Why was
>>>/m/303739 banned? Didn't the mods say when they brought back the /m/ threads that we were allowed to bump old threads from before the /m/ purge? Or is the problem that she didn't bump with content? Others have revived old threads with contributions and they weren't banned
No. 58944
>>58920>>58923I thought it was it's not supposed to be just a hornyposting thread but also discussion of his work (movies therefore media)? At least that's how it seems to be with the driverfag, danofag, madsfag etc threads.
Also I hate how 2D husbandofagging is still staying in /g/ instead of relocating back to /m/. The original /m/ husbando threads were free for all, no matter how horny or chaste or how casual or how dedicated and didn't have that much retarded infighting. I think when this one /g/ thread fills up the husbandofags should move back to /m/ permanently.
No. 58948
there is some weirdo in the lolita thread referring to an adult male pedo as "her" and defending his pedophilia as being a harmless kink
>>>/w/301295 and another one getting mad over people hating pedo troons and saying it's twansphobia
>>>/w/301270 No. 58964
>>58956Maybe it's just me being a paranoid idiot but it seems that the jvloggers retards brought their autism to the Venus thread + the same blogging WK that keep coming back over and over for months (the femboi porn anon and/or that romanian autist)
But the new farmhands are doing great imo, nonnas just have to learn to not take the bait and report quietly.
No. 58966
>>58964Whiteknighting the men and margo in that thread is more of an issue imo. Also nitpicking and writing a whole paragraph about how much you think Venus is ugly [not saying it's
you specifically before you sperg out], is not helpful to the thread and is nitpicking.
No. 58969
>>58966All I'm saying is : report the spergs for nitpicking/derailing/WKing and move on, don't shit up the thread any further with pointless arguments.
Ignore the retards, don't go full retard yourself (general) trying to change their mind.
No. 58979
>>58956there's a few people refusing to just report and move on and continue responding to infighting/derailing. The unfortunate case of summerfags shitting up threads. We're on it so please continue to report.
>>58974what particular post are you referring to? It's context based but if it delves too much into your personal blog especially accompanied with armchairing/medfagging, farmhands tend to ban. There's also always ways to provide your specific context without it coming off as your personal anecdote. In the end, it's always better to just not talk about yourself or your experiences as
>>58976 said.
No. 59017
>>59014She literally has almost no milk. She's seriously not worth a new thread. Put her in the jfash thread, that's all she does anyway. Nitpicking her hair style isn't worth a new thread. If she was constantly milky, but she didn't do anything repeatedly that's new.
>>>/w/16207She fits just fine here bc of her slow ass milk. Anons need to realize that all these old cows really aren't as milky as they were when they were 16.
No. 59027
>>59024Seems that the ManaKen WK is back from his well deserved ban break. Probably the same "you ebil feminazi manhaters, porn is so empowering you pearl clutcher terves" scrote that keep coming back for months, shitting up every thread with their autistic essays.
I made my report duty and I know our new farmhands will take care of it (they're doing great btw), I just wish summerfags/newfags didn't take the bait anytime he shows up.
No. 59043
Using a whole post just to complain about anons you don't like isn't very contributory.
>>>/w/301849 This is just another way to infight. This happens in the Venus thread too and it just shits up the thread.
No. 59108
>>>/g/338329unsaged spam and infight baiting
also the intense fixation on lesbians and commitment to shitting up the thread reeks like moid
No. 59151
File: 1688241719178.png (259.25 KB, 2508x1040, 1579311420377.png)
can the /w/ jannys calm it with the red text for a bit? there's literally 8 red texts visible on page 1 right now
and new people coming to spill milk get plastered with the huge newfag image making them less likely to return
not to mention smooth brain redtext like picrel
No. 59178
Could a mod confirm this is one of the Taylor thread, anons?
>>>/w/302399 Almost the same response any time anons get called out for their saged spam.
Stop using lolcow as an archive when its not even interesting posts.
No. 59212
>>59211its hellweek retard, maybe try integrating instead of crying that low quality posts are getting the reckoning they deserve. we need this.
the board culture has always been hostile to people who refuse to learn and integrate. back in my day we told these retards to lurk more and that was that. it would be a death knell if we let that go because gen Z can't stand not being coddled
No. 59216
>>59212>the board culture has always been hostile to people who refuse to learn and integrate. back in my day we told these retards to lurk more and that was that. it would be a death knell if we let that go because gen Z can't stand not being coddledoh fuck off with your fake oldfag reminiscing. imageboards have never been good and have always been full of dumb posts. the mods just didn't highlight every single one. people in the thread would call them dumb and then ignore them. even previous hellweeks were never this bad and this one has only just begun. the site is supposed to be somewhere people can come and enjoy laughing at cows, not get scolded by the mods constantly
and it started before hellweek, retard
>>59151 No. 59217
>>59212>>59216It is true that the board's culture has degraded over the last three years, so I wouldn't be surprised if there is more redtexting than previous Hellweeks. It is also true that many of the jannies are newfags and probably a few who have never been around for the last Hellweek.
In defense of the /w/ jannie though that board is probably the shittiest cow board on the entire site.
No. 59220
>>59217>In defense of the /w/ jannie though that board is probably the shittiest cow board on the entire site.agree with this as I think making /w/ was a mistake. the foreigner in japan community is very small so half the posts end up being vendettas. grouping all the threads together to make it easier to vendetta post was not a good idea.
I’m not completely against redtexting but a lot of it these days seems excessive and nitpicky
No. 59221
>>59220/w/ is good for segregating those vendetta-fags and the weirdo Venus sperg from the rest of the site.
I think those redtexts in
>>59151 were
valid since you're generally supposed to screenshot an image of whatever website rather than linking it (or post the screenshot and link in the same post)
No. 59222
>>59220/w/ is good for segregating those vendetta-fags and the weirdo Venus sperg from the rest of the site.
I think those redtexts in
>>59151 were
valid since you're generally supposed to screenshot an image of whatever website rather than linking it (or post the screenshot and link in the same post)
No. 59223
>>59221a screencap makes sense if it’s milk or something that might be deleted but not everything needs a screencap. people are able to visit outside sites. imageboards have never assumed otherwise and most have fewer images per thread than lolcow (excluding image dumps).
in that case in particular, no one needs a screencap of an offtopic wiki page
No. 59225
>>59223I agree with this anon. I mean, at this point I've accepted that it's just part of lc culture, but I've always thought it's retarded to ban people for not screencapping
everything they link, even if it's for informational purposes or sharing a download link or something that has nothing to do with milk or drama.
Also I read that someone got banned for posting a pic and sharing a YouTube link without embedding in the same post which is just ridiculous. She chose to use a pic instead of a YouTube video as the attached media, why is that bannable?
No. 59249
Anons really using hellweek to see how many bans they can get
>>>/w/302590 can't stay on topic to save their lives.
No. 59257
File: 1688419096577.png (34.26 KB, 919x467, stupidban.png)
How did I get banned for this? Regular anons cannot see post history. Only posts I reported as male was someone posting "I hate tranny haters" and someone who posted a picture of astolfo in the images thread, not a reaction image but a regular pic. That doesn't seem unfounded/frivolous to me. Did I report a shitposting farmhand?
No. 59264
>>59216I agree it's been going on long before hellweek. The newfag mods seem high on authority. You're right lolcow is supposed to be a place where people can enjoy laughing at cows but it seems like the mods want to discourage posting all together for the most part and are being very strict for an online gossip board of all things. Go read some threads from 6 years ago and you'll see for yourself just how ridiculous this round of (obvious newfag) mods have been acting, making everyone walk on eggshells on a
gossip board . The numbers keep going down, they are killing the site since christmas. It will be interesting to see how many users left since last month when the stats come out on the 10th (user base has been on a downward trend for months now, not surprising when they treat their users like this)
No. 59273
>>59264> Go read some threads from 6 years ago and you'll see for yourself just how ridiculous this round of (obvious newfag) mods have been actingexactly! threads would have newfags from time to time, dumb jokes, some offtopic discussion, etc but unless someone reported them, they just got told to stop by other farmers and then ignored or a spinoff thread made. red text was always fun to see as it rarely appeared. now it feels like the mods constantly patrol everything looking for things to red text
by all means give bans if something is reported as disrupting a thread but a lot of threads only have a small number of regular farmers. if they are fine with a couple of offtopic posts then what does it matter? it's not a formal cow archive that can only allow top level posting
probably the worst example of this change is when someone close to a cow comes to spill fresh milk and gets red text or banned for not saging or for using a name or whatever. this never happened in old threads. especially dumb as using the name field to identify a user answering questions is correct imageboard etiquette. and fresh milk flowing not being worth a thread bump makes no sense
No. 59278
>>59274>The rules don't get to change because you want to be able to shitpost and reply "nice find". nice strawman
>Nothing different has happened besides the influx of anons misunderstanding you can do whatever. Been here side 2015 and the moderation is pretty much the same, just more obvious redtexts.take a look at this thread:
>>>/ot/48754 whole bunch of doxxing, namefagging and obvious vendetta posting but still allowed to continue. huge difference in moderation standards
and use your mod trip code next time or at least try to integrate better
No. 59280
>>59230>This is an imageboardOut of all the imageboards that existed before and after, literally only lolcow forces you to post an image when sharing a link for any reason. "Imageboard" doesn't mean you are
required to post an image all the time, it just means you are able to attach images to your posts, as opposed to textboards. The way I understand it, it became a rule to post a screencap with links because of milk archival reasons, in case someone deleted their social media posts or profile. That makes sense, but it has nothing to do with this place being an imageboard, and in my and others' opinion, it shouldn't be enforced in off-topic boards unless the context is milk.
No. 59287
>>59280I honestly like the imageboard rule because if you just post a link, most likely no one is going to want to click it to see what you're talking about. Also it's an easy way to see who's new because newfags in threads like the celebcow thread do it all the time. And idk about anyone else, but I'm always wary of clicking random links people post on here.
>>59264I did think it was weird to start hellweek so soon after recruiting new mods but I didn't wanna say anything .
No. 59299
Gtfo this anon
>>59291is in the hellweek thread asking to make complaints about mods in the /meta/ complaints thread a bannable offense. That's no how lolcow works. The state of this site
No. 59301
>>59280If I'm browsing an imageboard, I won't feel like clicking on an outside link every 30 seconds to see something. Just take a screenshot, it both contributes to archiving
and people don't have to click away. It's especially annoying now that all websites require logins to see their content.
No. 59322
What with the Taylor thread always getting upload, never bumped? Is it still the same anons trying to post whatever nitpicks they can? We got blogposting too which had nothing to do with the photo attatched.
>>>/w/302665 Screams jealously when Taylor mentioned nothing about this in the photo and anon wants to be sad they had bills but Taylor doesn't which she still does, so not even sure what they are going on about..
No. 59394
Throwing a toddler sized tantrum over blocking out subjects under 16.
>>>/w/302766Ngl, this honestly makes me think anons purposely have been trying to post the kid any chance they can.
No. 59400
>>59394stop trying to infight and tinfoil over one braindead post. Report and move on. The kid is all over her IG, it's fine to block/censor his image on here, but no one is deliberately posting her kid for nefarious reasons. That is ridiculous.
Why are you sitting in the thread trying to infight and then coming here to complain to mommy instead of reporting whatever you have an issue with?
No. 59406
File: 1688588490044.jpeg (184.37 KB, 720x738, post.jpeg)
Not my ban, but why did this post get banned for "not milk" when it was saged? If the rules in the celebcow thread are going to be so strict, just move it back to /snow/. Not sure if I should post this here or the hellweek thread.
No. 59409
>>59406Samefag but if anything that post should've been banned for shitty formatting.
Anyway to add to my post, I think discussing old milk or things that aren't really milk should be fine as long as it's saged. Just as an example, I remember in one of the earlier threads we talked about Angelina Jolie talking shit in forums about Brad and Jennifer back in 2014. I guess now that would be a bannable offense because it's old even though it was interesting, funny, and milky (even if old)?
No. 59413
>>59408But again, just move it to /snow/ then. /Ot/ is meant for more relaxed discussion with less rules so obviously some anons may think it's fine to post stuff that's old or not milk. Imo, jannies banning people for undefined rules (like the whole reddit spacing thing that was discussed) just seems to be a reoccurring issue.
>>59410I agree that it's not milk, but the ban also said "old milk", so…
No. 59414
>>59413Samefag
>Imo, jannies banning people for undefined rulesOr like banning people for not knowing that they have to sage in celebcow.
No. 59547
File: 1688701042441.gif (2.98 MB, 406x406, shibainu.gif)
male spamming nikocado nudes in /ot/ bumping off front page
No. 59550
File: 1688701307728.jpeg (366.96 KB, 828x734, IMG_4547.jpeg)
bump, why do trannies think engaging in uniquely male behavior is some kind of gotcha
No. 59585
File: 1688756409272.gif (1.07 MB, 540x360, cat01.gif)
cp in /m/ and /snow/ bumping off front page
No. 59587
File: 1688756483930.jpeg (266.8 KB, 1125x992, 5CC14DCC-AD1B-485D-9EBC-F57CB3…)
CP in snow. Bump
No. 59653
>>59648I went to go see if rancefag was but I can't see it? Do you think this because of this post
>>>/ot/1628897 . If so, you realise avatarfagging and husbandofagging are different right? And the anon in the pic didn't specify rancefag, but implied anyone who had a husbando was racist/homophobic which is full on retard behaviour and absolutely belongs in the cringe thread.
No. 59669
File: 1688951512564.png (Spoiler Image,3.91 MB, 1585x13158, lolcow-farm-ot-res-1628970.png)
>>59653Nta it's deleted like the other anon said, but if you want pre-deleted proof..
No. 59726
Is there a reason why the Lorena thread has constant allowed namefagging, with no images, making anons assume all this from said poster is true or even the real poster? What's with the massive influx of "trust me" storytelling and personal cow experiences on /w/ specifically lately? Just seems like someone pretending to know the cow in yet another thread.
There's no way all these cows have people coming here so frequently to tell "stories"
>>>/w/303044 No. 59754
Anons are going to get the Venus thread shut down or locked if they can't stay on topic and throwing constant conspiracies around. Typing in Venus's name doesn't suddenly make a dead cow on topic.
>>>/w/303141>>>/w/303136>>>/w/303081 [already banned due to not sagig though]
This is all it's been for days. An anons was trying to make the thread all about the dead cow for a while too. The farmhand is doing awesome, but it seems anons are refusing to stop derailing about the cow and it comes with massive and constant tinfoiling about her being alive and Venus is in cahoots or other shit.
No. 59755
File: 1689124695868.png (34.47 KB, 633x560, 1-1.png)
Can the mods stop with the retarded "reddit spacing" bans? Their new faggitory is showing hard. Look up a bunch of old 4chan screenshots from before the 4chan to Reddit invasion happened (2012). Lots of line spaces to make things easier to read.
Picrel is from fucking 2004 and has "reddit spacing". Reddit wasn't created until TEN FUCKING YEARS LATER!!!!!!!!!!!1
Not using line breaks has only ever been a thing with greentext or multiple replies e.g.
>123
>quote
>456
>quote
>story
>story
>story
Banning for spacing every line is even more retarded as that's not even how Reddit spacing works. It's only a thing between paragraphs on Reddit. Are the mods 12 that they don't understand imageboards or reddit? Underage b& summerfags
If the mods keep nitpicking the userbase with retarded made up rules the site is going to die.
No. 59758
>>59756It's one fucking line break between sentences that I got banned for. By all means ban someone with 10 breaks but accusing anyone of "reddit posting" for using the enter key is beyond retarded
or at least come up with a better name for it
No. 59764
>>59753holy shit, why can't people say they didn't like something? Again, the post in question with a ban was
>>>/w/303108 and the photo was posted to show her linking the color and promoting the brand. There was no mockery of her face, no nitpicking another anon's opinion, no "pretending" to care about it being sponsored - the post just shows the PR and says it doesn't look good. This post was singled out for a ban exactly why? Because it offended someone who likes her lip color?
This is getting absolutely ridiculous. Disagreeing without being shitty isn't nitpicking, especially given that it was an ongoing topic of conversation.
No. 59766
File: 1689127110949.png (105.5 KB, 1215x474, 111.png)
>>59763>to 2004 4chan with emojisThey're not fucking emojis you retard. lrn2read. Dumb fucking strawman argument anyway.
picrel from the rules states to adhere to board culture, meaning culture in general which has always come from 2chan via 4chan. "Reddit posting" has always been part of imageboard culture. It's not even part of lolcow culture to ban it and only became a thing like a year ago.
"Reddit posting"
>2014>>>/ot/1109>2015>>>/ot/137880>>>/ot/7502>>>/ot/9491>>>/ot/4957>>>/ot/157120>>>/ot/15985 No. 59767
File: 1689127276757.jpg (34.71 KB, 300x317, 300px-NoFunAllowed.jpg)
>>59764This site is only for academically recording milk now anon. No personal thoughts or fun allowed.
No. 59768
>>59766Not every imageboard is the same, anon. This was already decided during Hellweek. You can go to
>>>/meta/59152 to read the post regarding how it's going to be handled, ultimately it's up to mods individually, but so far I've seen anons purposely trying to post that way to try to see what they get away with as far as extra spacing goes. You're comparing lolcow to other boards when you probably shouldn't.
No. 59770
>>59768>You're comparing lolcow to other boards when you probably shouldn't.How fucking difficult is this to understand? Lolcow rules state to adhere to imageboard culture in general. This came from 2chan but most English users know it from 4chan. You can't talk about imageboard culture without mentioning either of these.
>>>/meta/59277>a lot of times people do this, too, as a form of attention seekingOh yes, all the attention some extra line breaks gets you. Mod autism showing hard if they are
triggered over the smallest indication of writing style. Same as
>>59764 the mods want the site to be sterile and joyless.
No. 59776
>>59775>>59773>We have our own rules.Wow, this site is worse than I thought if the users are sucking up to the mods to the point of larping
>I'm sorry you are having trouble understanding.Now this is real Reddit posting. No wonder you love mods, I bet you mod a subreddit with 100 users, don't you.
No. 59780
>>59778>>59779I'd say your tinfoils are hilariously retarded, but then you'd call me a mod and only add that as proof of your persecution complex. You're clearly new as seen in
>>59776 so if you hate it here then gtfo you are shitting up this thread for no damn reason. The reason you are getting a lot of replies is not because there's one person very invested, but because everyone who passes by is like "wow, this person is retarded." Inb4
>that's what a MOD would say!kek
No. 59788
File: 1689146825440.jpeg (131.97 KB, 1179x376, IMG_3074.jpeg)
>>59784>>59785Omegachan dot cc and 3ch dot one as well. An 3ch moid mentioned our tradthot thread in a post a couple days ago. Omegachan (formerly lucky-something, I think it was luckyboards? dot xyz has participated in raids in the past and has been mentioned on both 3ch and here on lolcow so I guess they're somehow involved too. Idk about 4chan since I haven't been there recently but it's possible lolcow could have been mentioned there too
No. 59791
>>59789yes, it's not trolling it's like some fetish thing. he is a mentally handicapped self-admitted misogynistic neet scrote with a tight butthole fetish. he has infinite free time (due to being hobbyless plus unemployed) which he uses to spam every imageboard he comes across about his anal fetish - he will sometimes post pictures of buttholes he gets off to on top of his other anorectal tl;dr spam. whenever he notices any of his posts got removed it
triggers his tard rage and causes him to spam again. he's been doing the same thing ban evading across tons of altchans for many years.
>>59788I checked archives for /pol/ and /r9k/ and lolcow has been mentioned on both quite a bit recently as a place to find "
femcels" so expect more scrotes coming here to shit the place up
>>59790kek
No. 59796
>>59768I've posted that way a few times since anons started sperging about it because it's fucking hilarious. Getting pissy about a line break because omg reddit is peak autism.
Remember the good old days when nitpick bs was against the rules? Now it's becoming the rules instead. Just awesome.
No. 59805
File: 1689209123982.jpg (56.53 KB, 500x500, 1684977001452.jpg)
>>59804there's race baiting again too