File: 1610063460260.jpg (101.31 KB, 850x476, 1549754396510.jpg)
No. 19020
Please post all general issues and complaints here. If you want mods to do something, or have some issue with or suggestion for site content, you should use this thread.
>>>/meta/6821 should only be used for technical issues and suggestions (can't load site, site slow, bugs, site feature requests). This thread is for non-technical issues.
If you use the thread to infight or instigate arguments you'll be banned from /meta/. If you come here to make a complaint that could have been handled with a report you will be ignored. No. 19028
File: 1610097650789.png (101.22 KB, 737x775, banned lolcow azealia.png)
Not a complaint but a question. This was obv last month but just wanted to understand why I was banned for "thinly veiled bait" I mean, what was the bait here i'm honestly confused? Not complaining about the ban just wanna know so I dont make the mistake again.
Also this post was saged so not sure why the admin said this is not new like no shit thats why i saged this? I posted this in the celebcow thread which is where the azealia stuff is so what did i do wrong?
No. 19034
>>19029Who tf asked you? Are you a mod/admin?
>>19031>No fun allowed.>>19030Seconded.
No. 19037
>>19033Apples to oranges.
And it's a fucking celebrity milk thread ffs, not a sperg board
No. 19045
File: 1610349206295.png (56.81 KB, 240x240, ysJeS399.png)
Can we also have another friend finder thread on /g/ please-do-not-infight-over-discord-drama-edition?
No. 19050
>>19049Agreed with this ot thread would be nice again especially with bans from reddit for discussion.
Agree with other anons about the spergfest in celebcow. It is a nitpick lana orbiter fest, her being fat isn't milk. Her having a weird album cover isn't milk. Talking about her shoes/ hair change isn't milk. Its derail from actual milk. There just seems to be a hyperfocus on some celebs so when actual milk gets posted it gets left in the dust.
(Also everything Azaelia Banks says being posted isn't inherently milk because shes just unhinged it just becomes her normal. Wait until something good comes up like her calling out a predator or acting more insane than normal.)
>>19045Im also down for friend finder.
No. 19056
File: 1610448027268.png (141.82 KB, 828x562, trannyjanny.png)
Not my ban, but purge your fucking tranny jannies. We are all really sick of these nonsense bans in the mtf thread that are obviously given out by a farmhand with a certain agenda.
"Blahblahblah I interview everyone in a phonecall I am sure all my mods are female!". Well. At least one slipped through the cracks, asked their roommate to do the call for them or whatever the fuck, but you need to do a purge.
No. 19057
>>19056Agree, the bans in the thread are completely erratic and handed out arbitrarily. Someone might get banned for an identical post multiple other anons wrote without bans. Someone explaining a SRS surgical procedure gets banned for medfagging even when it's on topic. Someone commenting on a lunatic cow's delusion gets banned for blogposting. Someone calling a tranny crazy gets banned for armchairing. A person documenting their real life experience with a lunatic troon gets banned for blogposting even though it's on topic and amusing milk to everyone. It makes no sense. I'm glad at least that planned parenthood anon ranting about the troon psychiatric grooming kids didn't get banned. You get away with more noncontributing posts in cow threads that are about nitpicking camgirl genitals.
The anon in this screenshot wasn't even talking about "her" as a singular person, it was obviously more in the tone of a "women don't have to put on makeup to be women" generalization. I often wonder if the janny monitoring the thread is ESL and simply doesn't understand the nuances of used language or just lacks reading comprehension.
No. 19058
File: 1610460154333.jpg (316.42 KB, 1080x1166, banned for cringe crimes.jpg)
>>19056>>19057I guess I got banned for it being cringe. That's subjective but okay. at least don't call it blogposting because I clearly wasn't, obviously I wasn't responding on a personal level but making a comment on the fact that actual women don't need to look like clowns to feel validated as women (even if you don't agree with that, ban reason was a bit retarded regardless).
Yeah probably ESL janny, kek
No. 19060
>>19058Jesus, the janny who issued this ban really had the need to write both that AND the redtext? Now
that's cringe. Are all your mods really over 18, Admin?
No. 19061
>>19056How do you think this is some kind of agenda. What /snow/ thread would this not be considered blogposting in?
>>19057You get banned for medfagging even if it’s on topic in any thread. Like in leftcows people got redtexted for ‘medfagging’ about pregnancy because one of the cows is suspected to be pregnant. Mods enforcing the normal site rules to the ftm thread is not evidence some special agenda against you. Do people not realise it isn’t an /ot/ thread?
No. 19063
>>19061Momokun's thread in /pt/ is nothing but medfagging about her body and plastic surgery procedures and there are nowhere near as many redtexts and bans, if any.
>>19062The Belle thread deserved its bans for the extensive samefagging and mentally ill spergery. It doesn't really work as an example of shitty moderation.
No. 19067
>>19058The only way this wasn't handed out by a tranny-janny is if the farmhand did not even look at the context of the post. Either way they are doing a terrible job. Everyone can look at it in context seen in
>>19056 and realize how it was meant and that it wasn't a blogpost.
Whoever handed out this ban should have their fucking ban history looked at by admin. I will bet my ass that almost all of their bans will be ridiculously strict bans like this in the mtf thread. BIG THINK.
No. 19072
>>19063If you want increased moderation you guys
need to report posts more
No. 19081
>>19070Anon wasn't responsing on a personal level but speaking for "CIS women" who the tranny in the original post anon was replying to was making fun of for not wearing a full face of make-up every day. Maybe you don't understand nuiance or context, but most of us had no issue understanding what she meant. Blogposting is "Yes so I have PCOS myself and the doctor told me I shoudln't eat carbs, which is why I think it is stupid that lolcow is eating carbs. I already lost 10 pounds cause I don't eat carbs anymore."
Go dilate, tranny janny.
No. 19085
>>19084so can we permaban the person constantly asking for a thread on their online bully or whatever? tazmah or however the fuck they're spelling it.
they keep posting links to their tiktok in /PT/ and spamming the possible cow thread.
No. 19090
>>19087I started noticing that sperg trying to derail back when Rag Reynolds and Onision's old forums were mentioned a few threads ago, that seemed to
trigger them for some reason. Someone's upsetti spaghetti.
No. 19093
File: 1610566921291.jpg (120.46 KB, 903x793, lolcow ban 2021.01.12.jpg)
>>19056>>19058I caught a two day ban for calling out that ridiculous redtext. there were 4+ other anons who also called out tranny janny on that one post, I wonder if we're all banned
No. 19101
File: 1610630278928.png (11.55 KB, 1810x82, lol.png)
Did you really issue me a ban for tinfoiling about a celeb IN the celeb thread right after they do something super milky (sperg on social media)? The fuck is the point of the thread then?
There is absolutely nothing against the rules in my post. I did not nitpick. I did not infight, no one had an issue with my post, yet I get a ban with the reason being "sperg". What kind of newfags are being made farmhands if that is considered sperging? We can't discuss celebs having drug issues anymore?
No. 19108
File: 1610661778323.jpg (80.96 KB, 765x224, Screenshot_20210115-090108_Chr…)
>>19106You're dumb, picrel.
No. 19114
More of a question than a complaint, but is there any reason why
>>>/m/84480 was locked?
No. 19121
>>19093Reign in your fucking tranny janny, we are all sick of it. Whatever mod is responsible for the bullshit bans in mtf needs to go.
>>19095we have complained about this issue like 500 times in meta and nothing is done. The moderation on this site is god-awful. Scrotes run wild in June's, Belle's and the VTuber thread, but actual women get banned for the most stupid bullshit reasons.
I like this site because it's the only place free of scrotes who constantly thirstpost and bring their porn everywhere. It's nice to talk to other women who are internet weirdos. But you are making this place miserable by giving trannies positions of power over us.
No. 19122
File: 1610707977012.png (244.18 KB, 640x1136, 45D384E5-FA83-41C8-81C5-D691A3…)
>>19020Why are mods banning people for posts that are not there’s? I didn’t even write this 2 year old post that I just got banned for. Tranny Janny has lost their marbles.
No. 19124
File: 1610708521619.jpeg (283.42 KB, 640x993, 974FB6CE-ADAE-45BD-B7C4-23994C…)
>>19121They jus banned me for a post I didn’t even make, right after I posted on the mtf thread and said something about PP.
No. 19130
File: 1610720442976.png (463.79 KB, 919x2721, Gene.png)
Just to confirm with jannies, this fucking loser has more sock accounts than Onision.
>>>/pt/806820 No. 19144
>>19140The Onision thread died when he started doing OF. Because nobody wants to see that, most of us stopped following the thread.
The only ones left there were weirdly personally invested people, and it completely changed the tone of discussion.
I've come back to take a peek after the docu was released, but the thread has turned to total shit and I noped out.
It's going to be put back on autosage soon I reckon.
No. 19150
>>19146Agree with autosage. It could also help with the fact that newfriends from Twitter are finding their way here looking for more discussion on the documentary.
Reporting posts didn't help because once red text showed up they just starting crying about that in-thread and now admittedly I'm part of the problem for arguing back.
No. 19155
>>19152You wouldn't be banned for any of the posts in the shitpost thread though? Idk where you got that from. Basic rules still apply, like no infighting, baiting, and all that good stuff. It was nuked before because mods thought it was too close to the dumbass shit thread, but there's a difference.
>Why the fuck would farmers need an ~*awww comfy uwu so quirky desu*~ thread?…it's just shitposts. When you see a shitpost outside the shitpost thread, do you think it's "omgee so quirky!" or is it just a retarded and mildly to very funny post?
No. 19156
>>19155NTA but you actually would get banned for a lot of stuff in that thread. An example would be the
terf stuff + nazi furry stuff
No. 19157
>>19156Nta but I can personally tell you that you do get banned for some of that stuff (not redtexted though). It probably depends on which farmhand is deciding to enforce it.
>>19152 The mods and admin decided to let it come back for a reason. Plenty of anons have vocalized that they're able to decide when their posts belong in the shitpost thread versus the dumbass posts one. If you were to get banned for a post that could be made in the shitpost thread in a different thread, it's because it doesn't follow the thread rules/topic, not because the shitpost thread posters are being coddled. You're saying that you can get away with things in the shitpost thread that you couldn't elsewhere, so if you think that's the case, then just report whichever posts you feel are breaking the rules. Respectfully, that doesn't mean the whole thread needs to go.
No. 19158
>>19156>You wouldn't be banned for any of the posts in the shitpost thread though?was poor wording on my part. I didn't mean you wouldn't get banned for
anything in that thread, I just meant I feel like most of the posts are regular shitposts that wouldn't be offensive. But yeah, I'm sure occasionally some shit pops up that would def get you banned. Idk anything about furry nazis and I haven't seen much
terf sperging come up in there, but if the nazi stuff was an actual shitpost, I'm sure it would have been fine. Just a few days ago some anons were making posts about Hitler x Miku Hatsune and afaik they never got banned for it.
No. 19160
>>19159Came here for this very reason.
Also a few anons aggressively derail the thread (Lkb, her sexual activity, her latest bf, her latest assaut). Could a mod ban every single one, please?
No. 19161
>>19159>>19160I think it will be best to delete all recent unsaged posts because that farmer
doesn't sage deliberately. They really think their shitposting is important and should be kept in the thread just to upset Louise (that's why they always type her full name, for google engine), while in reality nothing they post is relevant and LKB isn't the subject, nobody cares if she got fucked recently or not. They keep sperging like that every time LKB is mentioned. That's clearly vendetta posting and hence must be deleted.
No. 19173
>>19171I’m not saying I like her (idek who she is), but I’ve been following the thread since day 1 even before when she decided to spam here
I still don’t know who the fuck she is. Not minimodding and I don’t care if the thread gets locked or not but she’s like the white mickey moon except less attractive and with even less followers.
No. 19183
>>19182This. Until he fucks one of his underage fans, gets catfished, or has a narc rage on stream, he's bland as fuck and it comes across as some anons having a massive hate boner for someone who's literally the male equivalent of lily pichu. You can't even mention this inthread without said anons going:
>REEEEE CORPSE HUSBAND STAN STFU YOU ARE LITERALLY CONDONING THE ACTIONS OF PEDO SCROTES REEEEEEMaking terrible music, being an ugly as sin narc scrote, and having cringe fans
isn't milk.
No. 19185
what's with so many unsaged sperg posts in the MTF thread? a lot of them seem to be done by the same person too. did mods hear us complain about unfair redtexts and just decided to flat out not moderate the thread anymore?
>>19181agreed. the thread is a mess and all the "hi nina"s and "stop wk" sound retarded
No. 19186
Vendetta anon is back spamming the nicole davis thread with nitpicking bullshit, all unsaged, and already samefagging their posts.
>>>/w/95156Can a farmhand just go through with it and lock this girls thread already? It's just the same ip hopping anon sperging about "heres a mid video instagram photo and i think she looks stupid" type stuff all over again.
No. 19188
File: 1611277558959.jpeg (273.34 KB, 1125x737, screenshot.jpeg)
holy fucking shit do something with the Nina/erin thread its a mess. it needs to be either autosaged or locked
No. 19198
>>19020AYO mods where the fuck you at, cp has been up in pt for literally 45 minutes!
(also can someone please reply to this when it’s gone, really don’t wanna see that again)
No. 19202
>>19198It's gone
The cp is gone yall
No. 19206
>>19205Time for you to dilate
I'm sure the thread was reported dozens of times, any active mod should have gotten an alert to the reports even if was outside their jurisdiction
No. 19210
Can a mod please force this vendetta back into the costhot thread? Nothing about her is milky and is just one anon nitpicking word for word posts of this chick just to extend discussion with themselves to try to have milk.
>>>/w/133862She made an onlyfans. Still nothing she had done is milk. She isnt scamming even if anon is offended and demands she is, she didnt fake her break-ins even when IP-hopping anon asspatted themselves for posting 'PRoOf'. There is hiding threads and then there is letting a vendetta thread still go on when multiple mods pointed out its a vendetta.
No. 19211
>>19207>>19205NTA, but wanting the mods of a site you frequent to deal with CP just as fast as they deal with tranny sperging doesn't makes you a radical feminist, lmao. Maybe CP staying up for hour(s) is normal in whatever scrote-infested community you come from, but literally no one wants that here.
You're not a mod, and you admit it's not your problem, so what exactly is your point with these posts? What do you hope to gain? Stop starting infights and bitching about “the TERFs” under the guise of defending the mods when people are rightfully appalled at this kind of thing.
No. 19213
>>19212There should be multiple mods watching out for this kind of thing, or allow mods of specific boards and threads to delete files for this exact reason.
They also don't need to be online all day, it's called a basic schedule. If that doesn't make sense to you, maybe you're the one that needs to go outside, or just get a job.
>No one is approving of CP. Then don't sperg at people for being disgusted by it.
No. 19216
Anyway just to make an actual suggestion (which hopefully will be taken seriously), I agree with this anon who said to
>allowance for mods of specific boards and threads to delete files globally for this exact reason.I know a lot of the mods (especially in noncow boards) are new, but maybe the older ones that manage multiple boards can be in charge of deleting cp/gore threads all across the site? I know it's still not that simple cause if
>>19209 is true, they still may not see the reports even if they can delete it. Maybe we can have a separate option to report for cp so all farmhands can see it? I've never been a mod so idk how the whole thing works, but I hope a fix is found quickly. I don't think this is a recurring issue (from when cp was posted in the past) so hopefully it's just a one-time slip up.
No. 19220
File: 1611300896027.jpg (350.12 KB, 1080x1379, Screenshot_20210121-233442_Chr…)
>>19219And I guarantee if a mod looks in to it, this is actually the same anon, but hopping. This thread had always been the samefag. Especially when the sperg posting starts.
No. 19221
>>19211>>19213Not that this makes it any better, but it was up for 45-60 minutes
actually and I definitely would expect periods of time like that where there wouldn't be a single mod online.
Even with scheduling, if there are only a certain number of mods in different time zones, with different board permissions, with a certain time of day scheduled, there will most definitely be times when a certain board could go unmoderated. It's rare but definitely possible, maybe they needed to take a shit or had something urgent to take care of. I'm sure other mods did what they could. Anyways, I truly don't think taking the piss out on the mods is the right choice here.
No. 19224
I'm sorry for anyone who had to see the abuse material posted today, please realize that this is much more common than it seems. There have been many days where we are forced to sit on threads for hours just to delete gore, or abuse material. If you use the site on a regular basis you may notice that there are irregular threads or posts from time to time but they're usually dealt with swiftly. I can admit this will vary on different boards so as a precaution I will add more moderation to /pt/.
>>19222Discord mods are not site mods, if I'm online they might alert me but if I'm not the best bet is /meta/ or the report system.
The last thing I will say is that we have lives outside of volunteering to maintain this community. We don't get paid to read hours of petty reports or to delete disgusting material nobody wants to see 365 days a year.
No. 19229
>>19225Ignore spam reporting? If a mod red flags a post its because the anons are stupid, not because of spam reports. It's been necro'd and already 2 red text bans. What more do you need to see it's a shit thread ? Lol the whole thread is an anon being mad when people say anything even slightly nice and screams WK bc of it. Yeah, that's definitely milk.
Can a mod close a 3rd thread if it opens and force her to the costhot thread? Starting an OF isnt sustainable milk.
No. 19231
>>19229"saying something slightly nice" is not the same as the blatant spergy WK that happens.
Redtexts/bans represent reports, Mods aren't reading threads and figuring out context. It's hella suspicious when sperging that happens on every other thread gets overly redtexted in particular cow threads, and coincidentally it happens on threads with crazy WK arguing with anyone who posts
valid critique.
This happens in the Nina Bell thread as well, and in the past Nina has been outed for selfposting.
No. 19239
>>19238Bringing up old milk without relevancy, like the anon in moo and Lori's threads, trying to reforce cow colliding by making accounts on instagram to spam Lori about Moo from YEARS ago. Anons right now suck. W is filled with the same "X did this now… BUT REMEMBER 6 YEARS AGO THAT BREAK IN!!!" and then fucking half the thread fills up. Old milk without relevancy should be reported for 'old milk' and mods already deal with it.
Just remember
>>19224 they aren't here 24/7
No. 19250
File: 1611475600384.jpeg (181.29 KB, 930x354, 43D4F509-A6C0-4DC3-8ED9-F75403…)
The mtf thread is completely unreadable. People are just using it as a GC general thread and posting random news about trans issues, their personal blogposts, constant medfagging and political derailing and it’s also full of racebait. Pretty much every post there breaks some kind of site rule. The majority of posts are just random reddit screenshots and tweets with 2 likes, not actual cows with a presence and documented history. If there’s going to be an mtf thread in /snow/ it should be used to discuss actual cows who meet the criteria for a /snow/ thread who fall under the mtf umbrella and not just as a GC general thread with some random posts from literal who’s that would be better suited for the personal lolcow thread. I don’t get why normal site rules seemingly dont apply to that thread.
No. 19252
I urge can someone to please delete or edit the doxxes of completely unrelated people and their families done by 8kun/alt-chan scrotes in the animecore thread in /w/ already?
The ones I saw a couple of weeks ago weren't cases like the doxx in CreepshowSM's thread which was practically public information but got removed regardless, most recent doxxes I spotted on /w/ as a whole are not information that can be found anywhere on public or private social media and are generally distant relatives who aren't involved according to quickly running through the pasted doxx in multiple search engines.
It doesn't just directly affect who is doxxed here either because from what I recall in /ot/ or /g/ there is a lot of farmers who have PTSD over being stalked by skeevy men for years and they probably don't wanna relive that, just a tip since jannies are busy being triggerhappy on the b&nhammer the second someone mentions pronouns.
I know moral policing is frowned upon but WHY take the legal risks of keeping up doxxes up of rape
victims' family members and r9k scrotes giving egirls legitimate death threats?
No laughs or milk can come out of that and I don't get how it doesn't click in admins and jannies heads that it's specifically whats attracting men with endless terabytes of vile cp. it's a matter of time until a tragedy comes from this constant lack of moderation if you take a look at what happened with similar communities.
it seems the new standards for the site guidelines are that being a girl on the internet is a "history of bizarre behavior", yet aloggers keep using databreaches to manually attempt to bruteforce their way into irrelevant flakes accounts and anyone they know and flex about it on twitter and that isn't seen as way more autistic?
>>19224Admin if the child pornography, snuff and violent rape threats you are willingly giving a platform is making your feelings hurt a little which is why you never do shit around here then just delete the whole site already.
How do you not realize even cringey costhots don't usually deserve that illegal graphic shit flung at them on all platforms all 365 days of a year without the ability to take a break when you were perfectly aware you would see offensive shit by signing up as an admin?
scrotes raiding /w/ were sending animal abuse photos to minors on instagram ffs.
if you don't get paid to read hours of petty reports then why are you doing this at all? You're not enjoying it and you're not getting paid??? so why?
It's a public website no one is holding a gun to your head to read reports! Anyone can go make their own chan hellscape with better copypasted coding and moderation than this using wikihow! if the reports aren't being read aren't… the users also volunteering to help you guys by reporting?
you should just disengage and look after your physical and mental health instead of cowering from your own creation.
>>19239seconding this and also
it seems a lot more server efficient to dump
most of /w/ in the personal cow or costhot thread.
(USER HAS BEEN PUT OUT TO PASTURE) No. 19256
>>19255Something being a general thread doesn’t mean it doesn’t have to meet the site rules or you can just post any random person vaguely related as if it’s milk. They still should at least be a cow in some way and the majority of the posts itt don’t meet that (some do and are horrorcows like you said but a
lot don’t. Tradthots, leftcows, alt cows, the e-girl thread and other general threads at least follow specific cows or oneshot cows who are introduced are actually milky.
>I'd prefer to read intelligible GC discussion analyzing the cow behaviorOk but it doesn’t matter what you’d personally prefer. It’s not a GC thread and it says clearly in the thread description that GC derailing isn’t allowed yet that seems to be the majority of the thread content. It’s a thread for mtf cows and currently a lot of the posts are just blogposts or people posting screenshots of news about trans issues and discussing that or wider gc topics which is not the point of the thread, it’s not meant to just be used as a replacement for the general GC thread which was closed for a reason and if that’s what you want why not go to Crystal cafe or asherahsgarden or something which actually have threads specifically for that instead of constantly derailing what is meant to be a cow thread on a gossip website.
No. 19260
>>19258We do?
It's the husbando thread
No. 19267
>>19264Yes exactly. It’s supposed to be
milky content. Not “I have found a twitter user @rando123 who has a selfie wearing programmer socks and here’s how I feel about it” or “I saw a Real Life Trans person on bumble” or “here is my dissertation about my feeling on the equality act”
No. 19270
>>19269>>19267>>19268Hard agree. There's lots of trans cows but that focus was entirely lost. Definitely lost their bite. It's best if anons decide who is the most milky/fun to watch and just dedicate specific threads. MtF/FtM/enby threads should stay but just auto-sage otherwise the
terf nonnies will shit up the new threads with their "oh muh god reddit tranny asked for pussy advice"
No. 19274
>>19273No, you're trying to mini-mod with your own draconian interpretation of the rules, and convince the mods to take it on as if they don't already pay special attention to the thread and keep it on track.
You're better off starting your own thread somewhere else at this rate.
No. 19277
File: 1611529347518.jpg (80.31 KB, 1011x306, 69841351.jpg)
>>19250>>19254that's the point of having a "general" thread, none of the individuals alone are milky enough to warrant their own thread. "all subjects" is referring to all subjects of THREADS but way to take it out of context. the MtF general thread is more akin to personal lolcows
>>19256>>19275>GC derailing, not allowed>cow thread on a gossip websitewhat part of laughing at people for being MtF do you think is not gender critical? KEK. it's true though there's been a lot of ot unsaged non-milk GC sperging lately and that's not what the thread is for. focus on the cows
No. 19278
>>19277The fact that one anon said they "hope" people who derail and nitpick get bans is funny because they literally already do.
Proof that they don't even lurk the threads they shout the loudest about.
No. 19281
>>19279The funny thing is, if the same behavior that goes on in the MtF and FtM threads were to happen in the egirl, leftcow, or tradthot threads, anons would be quick to call someone out for vendetta posting, selfposting, or not bringing any actual milk. The anons in the trans threads never even stop to think whether "trutrans" people are laughing along with them
unless they announce themselves, but somehow it's an assumption in other general threads that a lot of the anons there belong to the group that's getting talked about. Now they're mad farmhands are cracking down on the literal rules and behaviors that get you chewed out in other general threads. But no, it's all "muh censorship" and "oh, there
must be a trans mod that slipped through the cracks."
No. 19282
File: 1611531101989.jpg (290.13 KB, 848x1205, Screenshot_20210125_003121.jpg)
What website have you guys been using that every single saged post needs to be milk? Just hide the mtf thread if it hurts your fee fees ffs
No. 19284
>>19279I agree that it shouldn't just be ANY tranny or GC blogposts. but if some troon is broadcasting their foolish, milky degeneracy online, should they be DQ'd just for not having enough followers/online presence? no
>>19282since when is the promotion of pedophilic erotica by troons (to the point where it has to be addressed in their FAQ kek) not milky??
>>19283nta but how is this derailing?
No. 19294
File: 1611538478301.png (628.45 KB, 1251x1565, pedophilia is good actually.pn…)
My respect for the mods nosediving when they redtext people for criticizing pedophiles
No. 19300
>>19294Wait, how is that post GC/PP sperging? Someone on the "neutral" side of all this explain.
What sets it apart from literally any other commentary about a mentally ill person on /snow/?
No. 19301
>>19299>>19300don't you know opposing pedophilia is pink pill
TERF shit??
No. 19303
>>19295There are no males on the moderation team, none of you actually know how I verify my staff and I plan to keep it that way, but it's cute that you genuinely think voice verification is solid.
This is the gossip site first and foremost, it isn't my job to create a hugbox where you can call any differing voices or opinions males or trannies to soothe your ego. Nobody gets a pass to continuously blogpost, derail, armchair, and medfag in any other thread. Anons are not even posting about cows but products and news events as if we don't know they're trying to find a loophole through the rules.
>The containment board was closed down last year, there's just an inactive imageboard also run by a male.Not my problem. If you sincerely believe there is some agenda here I don't see why you can't move on to other sites.
No. 19306
File: 1611539867900.jpg (57.95 KB, 1200x525, EN01QBfXsAAaZ6z.jpg)
>>19304The fuck? So, if we were to call this person a pedophile, it's "GC/PP rhetoric" and against the rules? Before you answer, I encourage you to read Aggy's thread in /snow/.
Is pic related the logic the mods are now unironically going by?
No. 19307
>>19306Anon wasn't even referring to a trans woman, they were calling the trans teenager's
dad a pedophile for designing an underwear range inspired by their teenager's genitals. So it's not gc/pp rhetoric to call out a cis male for hyperfocusing on a child's genitals, to the point of calling a female-looking genital a "dainty dune" like how is anyone trying to defend this.
No. 19308
>>19296crystal.cafe has a
terf thread and gc/pp discussion is permitted
No. 19311
>>19308Crystal.cafe is known for being a trans board iirc, why would they have a
terf thread if not to farm ips? Maybe I am uninformed, but most people used to say this about crystal.cafe.
No. 19321
File: 1611542027436.jpg (23.33 KB, 824x103, dilate.jpg)
>>19281>The anons in the trans threads never even stop to think whether "trutrans" people are laughing along with them Anon are you lost? We don't take "trutrans" mtfs lurking into consideration because they are explicitly not wanted here. Anachans, fakebois, lefthots and any other category posting in their own threads are different from males because we specifically don't want males here. Ironic that you talk about rules when you seem to have no idea where you are. We don't cater to any male of any gender identity for any reason. We know there are plenty of men "laughing along with us" in other threads too, yet those men don't come here to bitch and moan about "literal rules" (go back to reddit with that shit btw) whenever someone says something mean about men in those threads, because they aren't too autistic to understand where they are
No. 19325
>>19322NTA but looking at the thread OP that was
originally written by the mods:
>This thread concerns with male-to-female (mtf) snowflake behaviour. This entails individual events, trends, and characters that do not deserve their own thread. Rules of /snow/ apply on this thread, thus blogging about your hate of mtf with no context and autistic spergfests are banned. This means this is a thread for mtf related milk without the autistic ragefests and fights over disagreements over terms.>You may discuss gender critical subjects if it relates to milk. Once again, while your autistic tangents are milky to read, they're not actual milk.So, I'm not seeing how a tranny's dad blatantly showing off his pedophilia for the world to see is not considered an individual event, or MtF-related milk.
GC subjects are also allowed if they're related to milk, but since someone upthread was sperging and basically saying GC isn't allowed, period, can we get a breakdown of what it means for something to be "related to milk"? No one derail or strawman with the "you terfs are always blah blah blah AG CC peeepee you will never be a woman". Just explain.
No. 19335
>>19325Yeah, I'm not sure what the issue was. The MtF thread is an effective containment thread and there is no infighting within it.
Idk what milk the OP of this discussion was looking for, but it was effective bait if they wanted to restrict the thread now that it's autosaged. There hasn't been any GC sperging or problems with the MtF and FtM threads for a really long time until now. They said the thread is "completely unreadable." If OP is a regular farmer, it's weird that they're starting to complain about it now when it's been so active and the content hasn't changed much for the past 2-3 threads.
No. 19337
>>19320In what way was this samefagging? Am I admin now? The only other post I made in this thread was to say people should use VPNs.
Does samefagging just mean posting in a thread more than once now, even if you're talking to different people? What kind of newfags are running this place?
No. 19341
>>19250>>19337You posted two times 3 minutes apart instead of including everything in one post kek. The ban hammer is coming down with a vengeance tonight.
>>19339A request for admin - since the MtF thread was going so smoothly for weeks until
>>19250 posted, could you look into their post history to see if they are new to the site? I can understand the complaint if they are an active user, but if not it's extremely suspicious they're complaining about something that's been working well.
No. 19342
>>19341>>19339I mean considering the posts upthread from days ago when anons were talking about getting banned for blogposting and sperging, I don't think it's been working well for you guys at all lmao. Idk why you are acting like one anon changed the opinion of the mod team and the admin. That post and the others that were telling the gc/radfem anons to stop acting like they're exempt from site rules is probably why admin finally decided to do that.
Autosaging a thread isn't a big deal anyway. The containment board just needs to be brought back so anons can stop acting like the people who run this site are trying to silence and attack them.
No. 19346
>>19345There is an entire site where you can sperg away all day but anons still choose to come here and expect to get a pass on the rules
Rent free
No. 19347
>>19344Do you use image boards? “Samefag” is traditionally a term for deceptive posting, aka impersonating other people or pretending to be multiple, especially to fraudulently win an argument. Whoever wrote that definition to include “making multiple posts back to back and being annoying” was a definite newfag. That only really applies if the person is clearly doing it to spam or bump a thread (often their own thread), and since my posts were saged and this is a sticky anyway, it’s moot. I’m not surprised at this, since admin said the mods were mostly her close friends some time ago, but it’s still cringy to see in action.
>>19341Honestly, it only really makes sense to include everything in one post if it’s about the same topic, like now kek. What’s more annoying than having short, separate posts about different topics is when someone makes one massive post replying to multiple people about subjects that aren’t relevant to each other. It’s very “I’m used to forums and want to claim every single thing I say just in case”. Might as well have forced namefagging while we’re at it.
No. 19353
>>19351Awh, maybe admin will let you suck his mexican girlcock if you keep it up!
>follow the rulesThe posters in the MtF thread WERE following the rules. Read the OP. The mod team is blatantly showing their bias by obsessively redtexting every other post in that thread.
This is what happens when someone who opposes what the majority of a community wants becomes admin and ruins everything.
(Ban evading pitbull sperg) No. 19354
File: 1611552319103.jpeg (117.25 KB, 1020x731, 1607442374987.jpeg)
only providing more proof trannies ruin everything
No. 19360
File: 1611561087614.png (84.16 KB, 651x343, d5e3bc33937bea4df3a4969d18d572…)
Seriously, I have no idea why any of these are verboten.
Half the "not milk" posts are about dads lusting over their feminized underage sons. Hell, is plain old honposting banned too now? If you're not going to let us talk about trannyism, or let us laugh at ugly hons, what is the thread supposed to even have?
No. 19361
>>19294kek we've lost girlies. it's over
i don't even post in the tranny threads but damn admin has zero shame at all kek. hope you get the tranny husband of your dreams admin chan
No. 19362
I thought there was just a lack of farmhands to deal with the derailment and infighting of the Onision thread but someone had the time to red text
>>>/snow/818120 as tinfoil, when it's not. The post is labelled 2/6 because it's a series of screenshots showing that it's actually onision. 1/6 is a shot from footage of the sock account scrolling while being logged into onision's account ffs.
The fake invoices that weren't even on-topic weren't red texted.
If you want to ban me for tinfoil, here's one for free: Discordfags have infiltrated the mod team and as big simps for that pedo Kai they've also fucked with the trans threads.
No. 19365
>>19303You don't even know who your own friends are, let alone your mod team. You got some snakes snitching on you btw.
Admin is feeling very suicidal and upset because we keep calling her out over the trannies, she might be acting like a big tuff dog in here, but her mods basically have to convince her to keep the site up at all cause she keeps crying and shitting herself cause people criticize her about how she runs the site. Also that gay man who owned the site for a while is still involved cause admin can't code and fix shit so she needs a man to help her. Very sad.
Maybe clean up your tranny mods and along with it your friends who are talking shit about you behind your back.
No. 19366
>>19360I mean, this is pretty milky. I used to defend the mods/jannies over accusations of one of them being a
triggered tranny but seeing the kinds of things being redtexed and banned on here I cannot blame anons who think this, especially when other stuff that really should have been redtexed/banned hasn't.
No. 19368
Sasuga admin-san, didn't think
terf-chans could be pushed even further but, here we are.
>>19364pp/gc sperges are basically this site's equivalent of /pol/fags however, it's ridiculous that tranny threads get all this attention from mods meanwhile moderation in other parts of the board are severly lacking or practically non-existant.
No. 19370
>>19367It that was a pretty humorous image and caption, I have to admit, but I generally agree the thread shouldn't be spammed with posts like that, but I don't think that even really happened. The biggest problem the thread had was newfags sperging about peaktransing.
Also I'd argue that just a troon image can be more than just an image of an "ugly lefty". They're funny because they believe they look like bio women, not just posting selfies with their "I vote sticker", but often are in explicit fetish gear with awful filters.
I'd rather see variety in a general thread than it just becoming 5 daily screenshots of the shit Kevin Gibes tweets.
No. 19379
would admin consider adding a line about generals to the rules so autists like this
>>19250 stop crying about muh rules?
No. 19381
>>19376>The point of the thread is to laugh at ugly troonsThe point of the thread is to post about cows that fall under the mtf umbrella and drama happening within that group, not just posting pictures of any literal who tranny on reddit
I can’t tell if people are being insincere with their confusion because I truly don’t get how people are so unclear about what is allowed and acting like they ‘just aren’t allowed to post anything!!!’ It’s the same rules and expectations as any /snow/ general thread or just any /snow/ thread at all. The thread should be used to post about drama from milky mtf individuals. Posts about random events or news that are not related to any actual mtf cows but just are just to do with transgender issues generally is obviously not relevant in an mtf cow thread. Literally every other general thread seems to understand this and follow the rules.
No. 19389
>>19385Yes exactly, about the cows of topic (as in public figures with a prior history of cowish behaviour) not random people with no followers presented with no context and no milk outside of being ugly. But I agree nitpicking is a general problem in cow threads.
>>19383No one said anything about ‘specific’ cows, just that the people posted should actually be cows in some way. They are still expected to have a history of being a cow and have some public presence even if they are not milky enough for their own thread. You say lurk more but if you were to actually look at the way literally any of the other general threads function compared to the mtf one it would be very clear what the problems with the thread are and how out of step it is with the rest of the site.
No. 19390
>>19383from the mod's disclaimer
>This thread concerns with male-to-female (mtf) snowflake behaviour. This entails individual events, trends, and characters that do not deserve their own thread.>This means this is a thread for mtf related milk without the autistic ragefests and fights over disagreements over terms.>You may discuss gender critical subjects if it relates to milk.Show me where it says we may only discuss individual cows
No. 19391
>>19389>>19389>>19387>nitpicking>that picture>incomprehensible babble about raids or some other infighting shitAdmin, when do we get a /tttt/ board? Or some some crispy trans cutie thread on /ot/? Maybe that's the solution.
>>19389You're just making up your own rules at this point and only apply them to one thread. Who do you expect us to post in a GENERAL? How are we supposed to post anyone with history if we aren't allowed to post 'randos'?
No. 19401
>>19395>muh rulesdude just drop that already, it's transparent that you don't care about the rules (which are these
>>19390 btw) and have a problem with the mtf thread because you personally don't like its contents. Guess what, there's threads I don't like, on people and communities I'm a fan of; I don't come here to bitch and moan that they hurt my fee fees though, I just hide them and moved the fuck on. If you are a "trutrans" who thinks they should be able to "laugh along with us" do yourself a favor and stop reading those threads, make your own mtf lolcow thread on /lgbt/ where you can discuss the "bad" trannies on your own terms if you want, but don't come here and expect us to censor ourselves to spare your feelings
No. 19403
>>19390Nta but your milk, if that's what you want to call it has been sandwiched between blogposts, derailing, and GC rants for the past week. You even have anons like
>>>/snow/1140939 who
apologize for blogposting and then proceed to do it anyway. Just because you sage doesn't mean it isn't against the rules? How do you explain the sudden influx of rule breaking? Why don't you get that? Notice how posts like
>>>/snow/1141013 and
>>>/snow/1140984 aren't redtexted because farmhands acknowledge that its milk based on a MtF who has a history? Anons in that thread had a whole conversation the other day providing resources to Posie Parker/Kelly Jay and other UK feminists/radfems which clearly isn't directly related to MtF's>>19401
, but you already know that. Do you consider "
terf memes" milk? Because those get posted a lot in there too. You guys want special treatment because this is one of the only spaces you get to talk about this topic freely. We get it. Still doesn't mean rule breaking is free game.
>>19401I'm the anon who made the post itt about "trutrans" because it's literally a critique that's been made about trans people on this site. I wasn't implying that I myself am trans. Why would a trans person out themselves in this thread of all things? Especially when things were going "their way" ?The precedence for that has literally been grand gestures of "ok guys, I have to admit I'm trans before I post here," not "idk guys…there might be one in this very thread
nudge *nudge." You guys completely steamrolled the point I was trying to make which is that MtF's are infiltrating biological women's spaces, but fail to see the irony that you're likely posting with them in that thread.
No. 19405
>>19402My point is that it does not break the rules
>>19403The blogposting deserves to be redtexted as
>>19370 pointed out, the problem is when mods start redtexting posts for no good reason like
>>19282
>aren't redtexted because farmhands acknowledge that its milk based on a MtF who has a historythat's not a rule for the mtf thread anon, and it never has been. It's not special treatment, it's just the nature of the community. Different threads are different, are you really to autistic to understand this? Again these:
>This thread concerns with male-to-female (mtf) snowflake behaviour. This entails individual events, trends, and characters that do not deserve their own thread.are the criteria for the mtf general.
>Anons in that thread had a whole conversation the other day providing resources to Posie Parker/Kelly Jay and other UK feminists/radfems which clearly isn't directly related to MtF's>>19401then redtext those anons, not random posts like they did yesterday. And every thread has memes about the subject every once in a while, its not that deep anon why do you hate fun?
No. 19406
>>19401>The anons in the trans threads never even stop to think whether "trutrans" people are laughing along with them unless they announce themselves, but somehow it's an assumption in other general threads that a lot of the anons there belong to the group that's getting talked about. This should be a reminder to anons, if they ever question whether there are trannies deliberately poisoning the well here. It's an entire demographic of ugly men who are disproportionately engrossed with the internet.
They have all the money, free time and mental illness in the world to vandalize websites, spam reports and post in bad faith until anyone who doesn't have 3000+ posts on Reddit finds the place completely inhospitable.
No. 19407
>>19402They told you to hide the thread because it's the content that obviously bothers you and not the rule breaking, or else you'd actually reply to the points they are making.
>>19403I agree that the blog posting and complaining about general political topics without a connection to the cow is against the rules, but the problem is that one can basically paint anything one doesn't like as "derailing" or "gc rants" even if it's just natural discussion connected to the cow. And a history of a cow in general threads usually builds up after them getting mentioned several times, which is hard if simply pointing out their delusional views, takes, looks and posts is considered "gc sperging" or "derailmemt" as soon as it sounds transphobic.
No. 19409
>>19365>You don't even know who your own friends are, let alone your mod team. You got some snakes snitching on you btw.Please share the milk.
Also why does admin keep the site? It seems like she absolutely hates it. Anytime they post it's always a complaing. All they ever do is whine. Do we know if it's being
forced upon them to "run" the site? I'd hate to hear about admin being locked in a basement, made to admin a site they don't care about.
No. 19410
>>19409I'm mad over all the tranny protection too, but why do you want the site to get killed completely?
..Also what if the admin IS being held hostage and the wave of redtext bans is a cry for help?
No. 19411
>>19409Basically Admin is crying about this very issue that's being discussed right now every day and wants to shut down the site and the farmhands have to try to convince her to keep it up.
Also the server is run by a gay man (who was the previous admin). Admin isn't doing anything cause she doesn't know how to fix issues. That's why things are constantly broken.
No. 19412
File: 1611584749337.jpg (109.9 KB, 640x480, af4.jpg)
they fucking locked the mtf thread ahahahahhahaha
No. 19413
>>19411Why doesn't she just give the site to someone else? There's been a whole bunch of admins, isn't there a single woman who would be interested in running a female-only gossip imageboard?
Also, I think it's funny how some anons bring up the other board being created by a male, even though this one was, too. Plus it's kind of an open secret that he never stopped being involved with this place.
No. 19415
>>19365This sounds like this biggest lie I've ever heard holy shit.
This is an image board site. If this were real milk, you would've posted it kek
I'm not even defending admin but if you come with heat, post proof instead of this shit that sounds like a 14 year old boy made it up
No. 19418
>>19417How? "You've got snitches on you" I guess we're all supposed to believe that huh? Okay, admin sounds like she wants to give up the site. What does that have to do with crying and shitting herself? That just sounds like bullshit if we don't actually have proof. "she's so scared, shaking in her boots, btw a man still runs this site! BOO!"
Sounds like a made-up story just to scare people/make people less reluctant respect admin. If there are actually "snitches", I'm gonna need proof of that milk just like any other thing on this site before it's believed. Using all of this pitchfork crowd shit to say stuff like that isn't gonna cut it.
No. 19421
>>19418Why would anyone be surprised that an admin who's struggled with emotional/mental health issues that literally scarred her would have flare-ups while running the site, especially since she's claimed that she and the mods are often up for hours just cleaning up gore and CP? Why
wouldn't she be crying? It would even explain the erratic bans and curt replies.
Former mods have previously admitted that Ian's still around, too, so that part I definitely believe.
No. 19426
>>19424I’ve only been on lc for so long I don’t know shit about cc
What’s the stitch
Cant be worse than LC
No. 19428
>>19426There's lots of scrote shitposters and LARPers who want to convince female anons to become tradthots. Also, obvious trannies.
But at least there's pink pill and GC threads there. It's kind of a weird mix, because you can say men are subhumans in one thread, then you go to the next thread to post about normal things, but 30% of the replies will be really obvious men from /pol/, or the front page will be some stupid obvious scrote shit like "How do you cope with rape trauma?" with a picture of Taylor Swift attached.
No. 19429
>>19428How is that any of CC mods and the Admins fault though
Last time I was on there they handled the mass raid of channer scrotes well and even the posters did
Also it’s not a farfetch thing that you know not every woman is monolith.
No. 19430
>>19422I'm radfem but good fucking riddance. Who let the 16 year olds on this site to begin with?
I won't lie, the only people I've seen behave this way are men and little boys that can't have their way. Like this is twitter troon level of demanding things and acting out like children.
Please leave, the site will be better without you.
>inb4 your not real GC you don't sit around and nitpick trannies all day1!!!!!!!! your not even mad that you the thred was shut down!!!!!!!Wow, I can't laugh at trannies in dresses with receding hairlines all day whatever will I do…. and I know some anons aren't going to believe me and call me a tranny but think about it: meltdowns because you can't post """milk""" on some random tranny wearing a onesie is so fucking embarrassing. I'm willing to bet most people chipping into this chimpout aren't even radfem/terfs, they just want to join the chaos and again, that shit's embarrassing. It's a website. Exit the site and go somewhere else if you don't like how it's ran.
No. 19433
>>19432Ok
You’ve been hard carrying admins poor handling of the thread while shitting on every anon that’s mad about it for hours now
Settle down
Yes it’s not LC or CC’s fault that there are scrotes on both their boards but it’s more about how the mods handle it
Hard to get it through your skull?
LC allows males and trannies to run their site while trying to build up a facade that their care so much about their holy XX chromosomes image board
While CC atleast bans scrotes from ever ban evading and etc
Also no trannies
I wonder which one is more sane to be a female poster in
No. 19436
>>19429I'm not saying it's anyone's fault, I'm just giving a clear view of what the site is like. High concentration of scrotes and really obvious LARPers. Also, pick-mes who run there just to take screencaps to show their /r9k/ boyfriends.
Lolcow has more actual women and less bait, but there are some people who want to ruin that. I don't know the solution. If CC's mods were more diligent in banning /pol/ baiters and scrotes, it'd be better. They can't seem to find the balance between allowing a range of women's opinions, and letting really obvious males shit up the place with retarded takes we've all seen in their autistic charts.
No. 19444
>>19430Lmao you're obviously not a radfem. And you're right, neither am I and probably a lot of other mtf anons, we just like making fun of trannies like we would any other lolcows, because they're hilarious and their delusional behavior is hilarious
>meltdowns because you can't post """milk""" on some random tranny wearing a onesie is so fucking embarrassing.It's literally the other way around, you're the ones who came here crying that we laugh at them, but that's not even the point here, if the only posts that got redtexted were ones like
>>19360 we wouldn't care
No. 19459
>>19453I think most didn't even have the time to notice. Also please stop metafagging in the general, returning anons, or we'll get the red pen treatment again.
Although it'd still be nice to know what exactly is allowed in to be posted, since there was no official answer.
No. 19462
File: 1611593662878.jpg (50.92 KB, 736x708, 0a41df74d4e2adadb63f2a070dd035…)
Thank you
No. 19464
File: 1611593811057.jpg (7.98 KB, 247x204, 4495f1a4-80e1-4a66-a216-e366e9…)
>>19460 That's the nature of these sites in general. I mean, look at KF. Going by that logic, don't put anyone tech-savvy either, right?
No. 19465
>>19464It's not bootlicking to try and rationalize why someone wouldn't want a subject talked about on the site but I guess if I'm not with you and being a childish crybaby, I'm against you and a tranny jammy right?
Stay classy.
No. 19466
>>19460>>19463It's just men/incels in general being
triggered over the sheer existence of a possible women dominated website, as you can tell by the frequent spam of disgusting shit. It will always be like that, so why submit to them and never have anything nice or fun ever?
No. 19469
>>19460You do realize that no amount of begging and self-censorship will ever make scrotes not want to destroy any female-oriented site, right? She can ban all man hate, all tranny hate, any conversation that doesn't have to do with how to be a good pick-me or handmaiden, and they'll still get angry that we dared to have a female space in the first place.
They won't be happy until the "Don't announce your phallus" rule is removed, we have official male mods to "keep things balanced", and this site just becomes 4chan, Reddit or Kiwi Farm v2.
No. 19480
File: 1611601121625.jpg (5.13 KB, 311x162, i_aint_reading_all_that.jpg)
women be talkin
No. 19482
File: 1611605805587.jpg (1.14 MB, 3264x1836, pt2021_01_25_15_15_30.jpg)
Mods just suck lately.
No. 19492
File: 1611608950015.jpeg (302.72 KB, 1242x669, 2C6E9B47-87C9-42A7-928F-515647…)
>>19489It doesn’t. Those posts aren’t what they were originally banned for, they were already permabanned for some reason they won’t disclose (probably because they deserved it). These posts were banned for ban evasion. You know, because they were permabanned and continued to post anyway.
No. 19493
>>19487nta, do you think that post warranted a permaban?
>>19488for fuck's sake stop sperging about "following the rules", we all know it's not the real problem you have with the mtf thread. Anons itt have pretty much unanimously conceded that there were rule-breaking posts (just like in any other thread) that deserved to get redtexted, we're arguing that not all the redtexts were deserved and that the mods' feedback about it has been confusing and inconsistent, but you won't listen
No. 19495
>>19488no, but women are. you know, the female ones? the mtf thread is easily ignorable by "other women" if they don't like it, just like every other thread on the site. even on autosage people get assblasted about its existence. the rules are very much enforced in that thread if you hadn't noticed the ridiculous amount of
triggered redtext. what counts as milk to the mod changes by the day, so how are we supposed to know what's allowed? people are banned for every little thing and there aren't clear rules. it's a general thread, so people talk about general things to do with that topic. obviously.
>>19493this
No. 19496
>>19495Yes and other female women don't want to read endless blogposts in a /cow/ thread. I've not seen one single person itt complain about its existence, people are rightly complain about the quality of it. the "ridiculous" amount of redtext is a result of the fact that literally almost every post in the thread technically breaks some kind of rule or doesn't meet the requirements for /snow/, the low quality of posting in that thread is what's disproportionate to the rest of the site not the redtext, which if you look at it in terms of the ratio of retarded post to redtext is about what you see in other threads. The rules aren't different to any other /snow/ thread so I don't get what's so confusing.
>it's a general thread, so people talk about general things to do with that topic. General just means it's not centred on one single individual cow, but multiple cows in some group. Blogposts about your conservative values or whatever in the tradthots thread would be just as undesirable even though it's related to the 'general' topic.
No. 19497
>>19496>General just means it's not centred on one single individual cow, but multiple cows in some group.No it doesn't, it means this (in the mods' words!):
>This thread concerns with male-to-female (mtf) snowflake behaviour. This entails individual events, trends, and characters that do not deserve their own threadglad we could clear that up
No. 19506
>>19483>>19488Anons were answering to
>>19460 . At least read the conversation before you continue shitstirring.
No. 19507
File: 1611618275715.png (5.13 KB, 495x127, youcantbanme im based.png)
Seems like a stupid reason to ban me to be honest.
No. 19511
File: 1611629641981.jpeg (59.48 KB, 814x388, 08C7E0B5-430F-4211-B0BA-EA6B90…)
Well mods, better ban literally every single non milk yet still saged mildly non serious post ever. Tranny janny or just an inconsistent angry autist? Been posting here for over 2 years now and never had this happen so I’d say newfag banhappy mods need to learn not me kek. Like I said though, if every post suddenly has to be not only saged but also milk and no more retarded/lighthearted quips and whatnot, why not issue an announcement? Retards.
No. 19521
>>19511Interesting how this anon got banned for 2 hrs and I got banned for six for
>>19507 in the shitpost thread.
Yes, I'm still salty. I demand reparations mods.
No. 19534
>Leave LC for a while>Come back and the MTF thread is nuked because of the same bullshit reason the GC threads were I'll show myself out, you guys have fun nitpicking camgirl pussies until the admin has a meltdown and closes the site or hands it over to some KF tranny. I never believed that the MTF thread was here to stay anyway since they obviously want this talk off the site, I was just preparing for the inevitable and having fun while it lasted.
>>19411Makes a lot of sense now. Admin I got money and I'm a web programmer with a non-axe wound vagina, if you want to get the site off your hands I'd be interested. Unless you want this
>>19392 to be your new userbase.
No. 19536
I feel like a lot of anons are being purposefully obtuse about the MTF thread. There WAS a lot of blog posting and spergy GC rants unrelated to any of the milk or even unrelated to any of the troon selfies or reddit posts or whatever. Can we just admit that? There is also at least one anon in the thread who has never saged a single post, even if it’s like some two word reply not adding anything to the conversation, despite the fact that there has been a couple of bans with red text telling them to sage/read the rules. Also a lot of general spergs that freak out and detail the thread for 20 posts anytime anything is redtexted even if it’s pretty justified.
However I don’t think anybody really had an issue with the fact that a lot of the troons posted weren’t like super big figures or super milky. It seemed like everybody was fine with the “low quality” reddit posts, and tweets and stuff that were posted. There’s a few trannies that have been posted for a while and are minor cows/milky, but also a lot of other random one-off posts/people, but I feel like those fit the rules given in the thread description. There should be some standards, like not posting some screenshot of some post that didn’t even get any replies or has like 1 like on twitter. It should be an established post/tweet that actually got support in the troon community in general, not just some random troon sperg that other troons dont even associate/agree with.
Not sure what we’re allowed to post now, but I support continuing to ban spergs/gc rants with no context/people not saging anything that’s not like an actual screenshot of a trannypost or milk, and stuff like that. But I think the kinda general/casual tranny posts should be accepted, people shouldn’t have to be like super established, milky figures to be posted. That’s my suggestion for the thread anyway.
No. 19538
>>19534>>19411So we're supposed to believe this tinfoil that ian is still involved with the site but we still get 504 errors
At least keep the narrative consistent
>>19536The thread did sometimes have a few derails into gc topics but it wasn't that bad until the jew conspiracies started popping up
No. 19540
>>19530>onion threadOnly the spergiest of anons and kiwifarmers go into his thread now, pre-hanson fiasco he was pretty much done yt wise and discussion was always the same points repeated:
>he's old>he's a degenerate >he's a nobodyEtc. Etc. I'd rather he get downgraded to /snow/ if spergchans can't relax themselves tbh.
No. 19541
>>19540It's true, there hasn't been new milk in ages. You can't have a good thread with stale milk.
Idk about moving it back to snow though, he's still a "legacy cow" which is why it belongs in /pt/ imo
No. 19542
>>19536>Can we just admit that? >>19416>>19405>>19407>However I don’t think anybody really had an issue with the fact that a lot of the troons posted weren’t like super big figures or super milky. […] but I feel like those fit the rules given in the thread description. >There should be some standards, like not posting some screenshot of some post that didn’t even get any replies or has like 1 like on twitter. It should be an established post/tweet that actually got support in the troon community in general, not just some random troon sperg that other troons dont even associate/agree with. So what now?
If the troon milky and entertaining, it's milky no matter how many likes or attention it has. I don't get the purpose of this other than ease the mind of lurking troons.
No. 19548
>>19411>>19365Youre full of shit and probably a butthurt scrote larping to cause fake flag drama. I stay away from these usually but I have browsed since day #1.
1) Previous admin was a woman. She was a few times on the previous discord on voice. The admin before that too was a few times on voice on discord. Both were women. The admin before that as well was on voice at least once, also woman.
2) Ian wasnt gay, anyone who knows anything about him and the drama surrounding him knows this.
3) Ian's dox is out there for anyone who cares to look hard enough, since doxxing is forbidden; lets sput it in a simple way; say its physically IMPOSSIBLE for him to be even involved with lolcow right now without some serious magic and bending of reality.
No. 19550
>>19482>>19489Your permaban is not for criticising moderation, but for ban evasion. But let me refresh your memory, your original permaban is for the following reasons;
>nitpicking belle delphine to autistic levels; including a 400 word mini essay on her vagina and multiple picture collages of her "robust vulva">continuing to post even more about belles "sexually mature vagina" after getting told by mods to please stop the spam about belles "huge labia minora">general spam where you bring up belle delphine on random threads>constantly accusing and reporting people for being whiteknights for disagreeing with you on these hot takes>constantly accusing people of being belle delphine or her simpsI did a quick count, you have brought up her vagina 22 (twenty two) times within the past two weeks in your post history. Unfortunately, these are only the most recent antics of your quality content post history…
No. 19567
File: 1611706997692.png (69.12 KB, 1504x368, Screenshot_2021-01-26 lolcow f…)
Reminder that Onionfarms is not run by Josh (Anti-Josh, actually) and is female-friendly. If the admin goes full-retard and shuts down the farms, I guess its another place to go.
No. 19584
>>19579LOLno
>>19580Idk anything about him
>>19581I brought it up because there are discord screenshots of her complaining about how she hates the (supposedly) “white, rich girl” userbase of lolcow. She’s just embarrassing and obviously taking out her mental problems on lc.
No. 19585
File: 1611712372652.png (110.35 KB, 940x801, juicy.png)
>>19574You really think a retard who lies about getting his servers back up on his own is better? Juicy simps GTFO
No. 19599
File: 1611740422294.gif (850.56 KB, 360x244, 9976588832.gif)
Please Nuke the CP thread
No. 19606
File: 1611740732959.jpg (40 KB, 500x776, wowe.jpg)
SOMEONE REMOVE THE GODDAMN CP
i feel so fucking bad for those girls
No. 19620
>>19614it's 4:51 am right now. I know not everyone is in
Am*rica but there has got to be some mods in that timezone. That anal avengers threads took like 20-30 to get locked 2 hours ago though, so idk. I didn't think it was that big of a deal the first time, but we need more farmhands or something. The whole site needs to be shutdown like what happened with /ot/
No. 19628
>>19624I've been browsing for 3 (or 4?) years, and I have not seen any cp until today. Cp was posted 2 days ago though according to other anons. I think we're just getting "raided" or whatever it would be called. It's just some nasty scrote trying to ruin our time
my tinfoil is kf is behind this. the timing is funny imo. I think usually farmhands are supposed to be good at removing these kinds of things? But cp is not common here
No. 19632
>>19629I don't think so, but tbh, this post
>>19567makes me suspicious for some reason . I wouldn't be surprised if someone from there is trying to stir up more shit cause they know the situation that's going on with gc/MTF anons. It's just my stupid tinfoil anyway.
No. 19639
Please stop giving the waste of space scrote any notion of his existence in the future, I know it's hard to imagine to actually be this much of a pathetic creature but this is exactly what he wants and the point of this besides wanting to scare away posters.
>>19605>>19612>>19609Pretty sure farmhands have more info on him than just IP if LC is like any other imageboard.
No. 19640
File: 1611746469909.jpg (385.34 KB, 1080x1311, IMG_20210127_121908.jpg)
is coming to threads to whine about their existence a bannable offense in /m as well or does it truly only apply to /ot?
No. 19642
File: 1611752548648.png (230.16 KB, 478x315, hotwheels homegym.png)
Josh boy, you wont find a wife from enticing farmers to get stalked by you. Reminder to all the newfags who might be naive. Josh has tried to shit up and then buy out lolcow from every single admin. He is genuinely butthurt he doesnt own lolcow.farm and has ranted about it several times. It sure is a big coincidence that everytime theres some spergeouts, Josh boy shows up pretending to be a whiteknight. It's almost like he would meddle in the affairs of other sites and is running an autistic ops to try and get his greasy cum and nacho stained tiny hands on the site.
If you think current admin is bad, I'm sure you'll just love having a pedo rapist trad male who has fled from his mom's basement to several shit-tier countries like the Philippines and some eastern european shithole in order to continue getting away with his online bullshittery, and all his internet projects have failed except for KF which is the most out-of-the-box thing he's tried to run and even there he's not respected. He's also conveniently looking for a wife to impregnate and is convinced she will only be found within his userbase, so have fun with your post history being combed for waifu material points. If you want him to be your dear leader so badly, go to him and beg him to finally go through with the idea of offering farmers a lolcow alternative. I'm sure it'll be a fantastic environment.
The great leader Joshua Conner Moon stealing source code and money from a wheelchair bound severely disabled midget. Or, maybe the time he got doxxed and he hid in his basement and tried to get his mum to fist fight the cow who showed up to beat his ass. Or the time he actually got his ass beat.
Oh wait! Josh, tell us about the shell company you have in the USA and the ukrainian servers. How about your several failed companies you tried to set up and get cheap labor for from the third world! How about the "I will never give police user information" thing, how did that work out?
I am sure you all will love Joshua, he absolutely LOVES females posting on his little forum! To the point where he's known for stalking them and that was before he announced he was looking for a wife from his userbase! He has nothing but time on his hand to help you ladies out, afterall he is a neet. He won't even waste his godly time on such things as showering and cooking, as his diet consists of fast food and a gallon of soda daily. As an extra FREE bonus; If any of you have rape fetishes and a fantasy of getting raped, Joshua's farm is the perfect place for you, because he too has a kink for it!
>I remember after he found out my last name, he said that he'd show up to my house while I was at school, shoot my dad, and wait for me to get home. Then he'd subdue me, cut off each individual digit with a knife heated in hot grease so that it'd cauterize as it cut and I wouldn't bleed out. Then he'd cut off my clitoris and my labia, and then rape my ass until I shat myself. Then he'd just leave me to starve to death or something once all my appendages and my genitals were sliced off and he'd beaten me sufficiently.
Now if any of you wonderful ladies have recognised what a lovely man he is, I am sure he would be more than happy to help every single one of you out. God speed to every single one of you! You will need it!
picture related, the disabled midget joshua ripped off and abused.
No. 19644
>>19642Oh ok I take this
>>19574 back wtf. I remember reading his ED page a while back but I wasn’t sure what and what not to believe.
No. 19645
File: 1611770410491.png (1.27 MB, 1500x2079, jewshie.png)
>>19642>>19644Someone actually made an updated thread on Josh a few weeks ago:
https://www.onionfarms.com/threads/joshua-conner-null-moon-the-blockland-days.621/Its decades-old drama, but its pretty enlightening on how little he's changed over the years. If that fat scrote somehow miraculously succeeded in his CP spamming, it would inevitably drive away everyone here and the board would die just like his other projects 16chan and 9chan.
No. 19647
File: 1611774945159.jpg (267.44 KB, 1080x1124, Screenshot_20210127-111408_Chr…)
>>19539Can a mod fix this already? I put a ticket in about appealing. Im blacklisted due to GC spergs and havent been ban evading. I have to use lite due because a farmhand said theyd try to get me off the blacklist because of an accident trying to mass ban people.
No. 19648
>>19646lol stop false flagging Josh. You've had your eye on this place for years and you haven't been very secret about it:
>>>/meta/17512 >>>/meta/1254I just checked Onionfarms, and I saw nothing about "raids" or lolcow.farm. On the contrary, it looks like their chief hotpocket has made it bannable.
No. 19650
File: 1611775149991.png (101.86 KB, 1988x228, Screen Shot 2021-01-27 at 1.10…)
>>19587yeah you're right. everyone is a fat tranny janny and you totally didn't break the explicitly stated rules of the thread by posting an unfunny nitpick. do the shay anons ever wonder why their thread will never be upgraded to PT? Do they ever wonder why they run through threads so quickly? a good 75% of the posts on there are retarded "haha shayna so fat that she probably ate her gym clothes lol jk!! but what if she did? wouldn't that be funny guys."
No. 19651
>>19648Sure. Which one are you? SIGSEV? Or that albino guy with the freckles? You have been spamming your shitty little Kiwifarm-imitation site everywhere and posts like this
>>19567 are not fucking subtle. You can't tell, cause you have autism. But no woman wants to go over to Onionfarms to hang out with a bunch of scrotes that were banned from KF for making too many sock-accounts.
Just fuck off.
No. 19656
>>19648Actually you're probably Vex over on the Onionfarms, the one who has been spamming Null's discord, his streams and all over KF. Really autistic hateboner you got there, buddy.
"H-Hey girls, don't you all totally hate Null just like us? Wouldn't it be funny if you came over and posted on the Onionfarms teehee? Especially with all that CP that's beeing spammed here… that was totally Null doing it! See you over on Onionfarms! We love women and TERFS!"
No. 19661
>>>/ot/724232I was banned for telling this anon that I want to fart on their face
I think banning me was ok but why are horrible posts like that even allowed
No. 19677
>>19676No? Preventing people from derailing and fighting about stupid shit is not making /ot/ a hugbox. If you want to infight then do it, but you know you're going to catch a ban. The whole site doesn't have to be nuked and certain things don't have to be banned just cause you want to act like a retard. Just block the website like what
>>19673 said.
No. 19680
>>19624It's a formula at this point.
>Suddenly someone starts, out of fucking nowhere, bitching about the "GCspergs" and how "terfs" need to be banned because they know it's a hot, divisive topic they can use to stir the userbase>Aggressive shitflinging starts, admin has another meltdown and starts suppressing discussion regarding troons more because she can't deal with the pressure>Josh comes in trying to get his slimy hands on the farms again, is giddy with glee seeing the "lolcow civil war">CP starts being spammed, obvious KF ops going on trying to make the admin/mod team buckle and hand over the site I'm just waiting for the inevitable at this point. I wish we had an alternative to migrate to before the site is shut down, CC is filled with male larpers and AG is a no fun allowed normie zone.
No. 19681
>>19680You realize there was already stuff going on in /meta/ before this anon
>>19250 came in, right? There was already issues going on with the mtf thread because the anons there were breaking rules and discussing it in this thread. It didn't come out of no where
No. 19682
>>19680Based
>>19681Irrelevant
No. 19684
>>19680It usually didn't end in cp though.
>>19683See
>>19549 No. 19688
>>19686 >users /off-topic and /girl talk/ attractWhat "kind of users" do you mean?
And we also had a similar survey a year ago, including this whole discussion for at least 2 meta threads.
No. 19692
File: 1611867797979.png (208.55 KB, 640x649, yhxmtkdjq5541.png)
>>19672While I don't post in /ot/ or /g/ anymore myself since I believe it went downhill after the closing pp and gc, at least ot is a far fasteroving board than snow and especially pt. Clearly it's popular. Maybe you
>>19686 can be more explicit regarding the type of users you don't like there?
No. 19703
>>19688Ntayrt but, all the spergier anons seem to originate from /ot/.
I personally wouldn't mind purging the anons who do nothing but spend their day on /ot/ race-baiting, infighting, force unfunny memes (adam driver anon, borzoi anon, pitbull sperg etc.) and whine/blogpost about their shitty lives while admitting they don't ever even check the other drama boards anymore. I'd also argue the bathroom sperges and de/g/enerates also end up being pretty bad too.
In general /ot/ makes people misconstrue this site as an alternative to mainstream SM or like what CC wanted to be, a female-only space to talk about a variety of interests. Lolcow is a drama board first and foremost, that just happens to have an exclusively female userbase. I feel like /ot/ users forget that, especially when they imploded over it's brief shutdown.
No. 19708
>>19687We do have cc like you said. I think having an /ot/ board on a drama site is just never going to go well and it would maybe be better if they were two separate things. Idk I just really don’t think anything remotely of value would be lost if /ot/ closed & think the new server would be a good time to revisit it
>>19688I agree with
>>19703, I think the general vibe of /g/ and /ot/ is quite immature. Like I think they attract a lot of underage users, users who come here just to pick fights with people (which is harder to do in cow threads), moralfags, weird political spergs, and just people who just generally don’t get the point of the site etc and I feel like it spills over to cow threads.
No. 19709
>>19708Personally don't really mind if /ot/,/g/,and/m/ moved to a new server and rebrand?
But I think majority of the use is for the nonlolcow board right now.
No. 19713
File: 1611950355380.png (20.79 KB, 725x462, Sin título.png)
Really? Is this the hill lolcow will die on?
Defending predators dressed in their daughter's clothes and calling themselves "better than women"?
You know this website used to have a gender critical board, right, mods?
Why do you want to suck on tranny dick this hard?
No. 19715
>>19703>>19708I don't understand the constant tries to cause some artifical "x board users" userbase divide as if the majority isn't crossboarding and lurking on all boards fluently. This isn't 4chan. There was a demand for it and a good amount of blogposting can be redirected this way if it's something anons want to talk about. No one forces you to visit them if you don't like it or don't see a use for a place for us to talk without scrotes shitting it up 24/7. And I could point out the examples of bad behaviour you named on almost every pt & snow thread for every year and would probably find more than on /ot/. Though I agree that admitting to using LC only for non-drama boards is shitty and a waste, even though I don't know how these users were supposed to find LC if they didn't initially search for drama (I'd say the artist alley threads but they are more about gossip than /ot/). I'd understand the complaint if it was out of fear of snow or pt dying. But then again, the off topic boards keep users on the site to occassionally check even if their favorite cows are inactive or went dry instead of leaving LC and completely forgetting it.
And I still don't get how /g/ is an issue in any way. In fact I'd say the underage and fight picking is ten times worse on drama boards with the tone being more vitious due to the subject matter and which has always has been.
>In general /ot/ makes people misconstrue this site as an alternative to mainstream SM or like what CC wanted to be,When I see links to LC from SM, it's exclusively to the drama boards. Including specific youtuber threads that attract new imageboard-foreign users like flies. When a "girl chan" is talked about, CC always gets mentioned first and often alone and I think it's great this way because it keeps scrotes and trannys on there instead here.
>a female-only space to talk about a variety of interests.And what is bad about it? Why can't we be both?
No. 19716
>>19715>And I could point out the examples of bad behaviour you named on almost every pt & snow thread for every year and would probably find more than on /ot/. This. /snow/ is like 90% petty nitpicking and tinfoiling, /w/ is more like /w/endetta with weebthots trying to trash talk competition. Look at those Belle Delphine and Nicole spergs for example. Most of the garbage user base came here via a cowtip i.e. gossip threads and bled to the /ot/ threads, I don't understand where people got this idea of some cancerous user base only inhabiting /ot/ and ruining the whole site this way.
It's almost like there's a conducted gay psyop to erase offtopic boards to make the female userbase migrate to another site for such discussion and make the admin give up the keys. But of course this would never happen, right? It's not like the admin already admitted before that some KF tranny was attempting to buy the site from her during one of these repetitive, formulaic /meta/ infights.
No. 19721
>>19719God who cares. 4chan users don't use all boards either.
Getting rid of /ot/ /g/ and /m/ is very fucking retarded. I'm saying this as someone who also checks the drama boards regurlarly.
>>19715What is SM? First time I hear about it.
No. 19722
>>19716My tinfoil is that it's the same anon as
>>17148 and
>>17159 who also alludes to "a new board for all the fun people that are not welcomed here"(aka women who talk about their lives?).
>>19719Those survey questions were formulated weirdly (especially for 2x) and there were also people who simply weren't interested in the fun-question mentioned cows, weren't around for the outings (personally I've been here since the creation and only knew about Kiki) or missed out on them.
Nevermind the other board related questions point more to there being a crossover.
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSf5PbEsi4RhoxPoXUfpBGBEGx75XE11UShQjIKvFPFMkBDTNw/viewanalytics
>why would not having /ot/ make the site userbase any less female orientedI highly advice you to look at the oldest threads. It's probably easier for men to slip through if they didn't out their autism on /ot/. I think this anon is also talking about the kiwifarm's admin shilling and trying to get us to get booted to/post on whatever new shitty project he's planning.
No. 19725
>>19719>muh surveyYou mean the survey that had misleading questions about "your favourite cow outing" or something stupid like that?
>why would not having /ot/ make the site userbase any less female oriented and why would removing /ot/ make admin more likely to “give up the keys”?A lot of cow threads already have scrotes begging for cow nudes and slapping their dicks around. Removing offtopic boards (/ot/, /g/ and /m/) would drive the userbase to another site because they
want a space for women to discuss various mundane things anonymously, so they would go where they could. Say, maybe a place that's been shilled here over and over again? That's
totally female friendly and not at all run by a male admin?
And after the userbase would migrate to other sites permanently they wouldn't come back, so the site would diminish. Threads in /pt/ are already very stale compared to their glory days and /snow/ isn't much better. Even the Lolcow awards were all focused on generic camgirl slapfights nobody outside of sex work twitter or horny scrotes gives a shit about. The people who used to keep legitimate drama threads alive already went to other, more lively places to do just that but some of them remained in Lolcow to have offtopic discussions with other women.
So killing off the offtopic boards would cause the rest of the site to slowly die or at least become even slower than it is now, as the active users would keep alternative communities as their sources for drama and then move on to whichever other site for offtopic discussion. And that's when the site is either shut down completely or given away due to the lack of interest. The admin and the mod team are reacting just according to the plan of the party responsible.
No. 19728
>>19726Fair point, but it's a nice outlook on what happens if decisions are made that a big part of the userbase doesn't want which leads them to leave despite liking drama threads.
>>19727Yeah, I too love them daily posts per thread about random onlyfans thot's nudes and their vaginas and the actual hostility and racebaiting that 4chan scrotes seem to bring who still don't have their eceleb places on their own imageboard so they shit up the ones here.
No. 19729
>>19727All right. But I honestly can't stand how anons here can just out themselves as people who don't actually care about the state and future of the site or all the factors playing into it gradually soiling the userbase or have discussion over it other than screeching "UR NOT REAL LAHLCAWH POSTERS WE DONT WANT UR KIND HERE!!!!!!!!" over and over again
and the mod team will look at a retarded post like this and think "Say, this anon has a fair point!".
Admin, stop bullying your userbase and put on your big girl pants. If you really hate this site and are feeling suicidal over moderating it and bitch about the "short shelf life of Lolcow admins", then you need to give it away before it eats you alive. You and your mod team are taking all of these attacks way too personally and having literal catfights with your userbase and it's not healthy.
No. 19732
>>19729Anon those posts are several months old..
At this point I'd rather admin would burry any grudges and consider actual data instead of the extremely vocal handfull of people in here (you know, a place that regulary gets raided) than her leaving the site to whoever comes next and might even be worse.
No. 19737
>>19729People who gatekeep lolcow users are so stupid lmao
Like, what are you gatekeeping? Shayna's nudes? Bpd sob stories? Husbando threads? Come on it's not that deep lol
No. 19743
File: 1611965592572.jpg (22.59 KB, 500x281, f333090b91b9b565f09ccdbb7ca0d1…)
>>19703>force unfunny memes (adam driver anon,We have a thread going pretty well for a small IB and enjoy talking among ourselves greatly, but keep on whining about forced memes kek. We really don't need the attention of nondriverfags, but somehow you guys keep on mentioning us and AD in /ot long after we transitioned to our own corner of lolcow.
Accept that the userbase has many more different interests than just cows and as long as they are not against the rules, it's all good. Doesn't mean it's fOrCiNg A mEmE just cause you don't get it. Until /ot, /m and /g get nuked (if it ever happens), you got to deal with it.
No. 19746
>>19743NTA and I'm pro /ot/ but don't act like it wasn't just two retards spamming AD and then other people joining in because people were vocally against the same avatarfagging dweebs.
Asking "can this be a meme now??" is a forced meme, no matter how many people "like it".
You guys only made your own thread because you got tired of being banned for a forced meme
really not trying to be a tinfoil bitch but really in my experience only trannies do shit like this No. 19747
>>19746Anon, The thread is made because it derail another thread in /ot/.
Seriously don't need to be upset. Just accept it people has diffrent hobby and interest
No. 19761
File: 1612008364666.png (165.68 KB, 1200x695, TylerTheCreator-CyberBullying_…)
Lmao at the people whining to close the non drama boards because some people only use those now.
You don't even interact with each other, assuming you don't post there either. (why would you want a board closed you use regularly?)
No. 19769
>>19765I agree with the rest of your post but
>they allow a broad amount of topics and subjects to be discussed and documented So does lolcow? If anyone wanted to bring a kf cow to lc they could do that. It's /snow/ users that want the camgirl threads, not cause we're not allowed to talk about anyone else
No. 19770
>>19768It's funny how gc talk from several different anons all in agreement doesn't get complained about in the non-mtf threads. It's almost like someone is sitting in that mtf thread waiting to bitch about it for some reason or another.
I won't point out the other threads where based terfposting takes place for obvious reasons.
No. 19773
>>19770But when it happens in /ot/ it
does get banned.
No. 19777
>>19776It's not deleted, what do you mean? Heres a link to it
>>>/ot/723869 It's probably just you that's having an issue with accessing the threads
No. 19780
>>19779Sorry in an idiot at linking cross threads
There is literal scizo mental illness? Trolling? Some lunatic thread in snow. Literally 1 post per minute in the last hour
No. 19784
>>19783I agree how does someone literally type 100 posts in 60 mins so fast, at those lengths
Fucking astonding
No. 19799
>>19797I think the reason there’s mostly threads about women is because most of the users themselves are women and are therefore interested in content related to/made by other women. I hate this growing thing of people politicising and moralising the site now as a ‘woman’s space’ as if it’s a rape shelter or something or that drama is ‘woman hating’. If you feel so emotional at the concept of laughing at cows why even use the site? The idea /ot/ should be kept to remind us ‘women can get along’ and as a break from ‘woman hating’ on
lolcow is ridiculous and so infantilising. I feel like people have totally lost sight of what the point of lolcow is and there are so many moralfags now. Like in the Sam thread there were literally people like ‘you’re laughing at a mentally ill person’ like do the users of this site literally not know what a lolcow is?
No. 19811
I really don't wanna participate on these pointless annoying board wars. I think mods keep boards for a reason.
However I'll say this, /w/ is a mixed bag between inactive threads, nitpicking threads, and actually interesting threads. I'm a regular on /w/ and this is my overall view of the board:
>Interesting threads:
Pixielocks: she's becoming a hardcore munchie and is steadily hinting at making nsfw content in the future. A lot of anons have recently pointed out how she might belong on /snow/ more because she barely has anything to do with jfashion anymore
Digibro: Famous anituber turned troon. His kiwifarms thread is very active and he does drugs as he does hrt. His current saga is truly something, not to mention his exgf is fucking nuts.
Lori: She goes between being interesting and not being so interesting, was recently called out by momokun because her ex Kevin wants to commit sudoku.
>Nitpicky threads
Micky Moon: honesly I think she's a cow for a reason. She's a narcissist that thinks highly of herself and says very infuriating stuff on a daily basis, plus she contradicts herself a lot all the time. She has some sort of narcissist cycle, victim->ethot->someone calls her out->victim again. But her thread is always flooding with whiteknits or nitpicks, all the anons interested in her probably left.
Venus: It's painfully obvious how many scrotes that call her ugly, haggard, manipulative etc are in the thread. I'm not a venus defender because I know she has done wrong, but I know she has no real malicious intent and is incredibly mentally ill and unstable, she just needs help. It gets tiring, it's like trying to laugh at "girl, interrupted", not that fun to do imo.
Belle Delphine: This thread reeks of scrotes that don't get what they want from her and ethots that want to be like her. There's a reason why it was put on autosage. I get it, she's a big cow, but the thread itself is annoying to even go through.
Now my theory here is that anons from /snow/ and /pt/ just don't keep up with the /w/ board at all so things are inactive and boring. It's like a feedback loop.
No. 19813
>>19805Treating your opinions as fact is.
>>19806So retarded board wars. If you want that so bad, why not stay on 4chan with boards that actually have different interests? Also who is "we"?
No. 19814
>>19811>I'm not a venus defender because I know she has done wrong, but I know she has no real malicious intent and is incredibly mentally ill and unstable, she just needs help. It gets tiring, it's like trying to laugh at "girl, interrupted", not that fun to do imo.You
are a Venus defender. I don't even read her thread but honestly it doesn't matter if someone has malicious intent or not, a cow is a cow if she shows off her embarrassing behavior in public. What do you think about all the other cows with mental illnesses?
No. 19819
>>19815kek love you too
>>19817That's not what you do, you voice your wish of deletion while treating your assumptions about board posters as facts. And can you stop strawmanning already? No one even says any of the stuff you keep putting in quotes.
No. 19821
File: 1612119417306.png (358.98 KB, 631x794, 1_AoNhQM3qSwM0H62rxelKWg.png)
i got a ban and an integrate redtext for typing two words in a post like picrel. it was just a couple of hours long ban, so not a problem for me personally, but it highlights how extremely inconsistent and random the moderation is considering that anons post like that literally all the time. it's not an emoji or anything. never seen anyone banned for that reason before.
No. 19824
>>19811>she's a cow for a reason>she's a big cow, but the thread itself is annoying to even go through.This is how I feel too. All of the cows are milky and have threads for a reason but the milk is hidden. Nasolabial fold anons keep coming out full force to drown out the good stuff.
It's kind of a difficult problem to solve though. I think most of them are finding the board through searching the cows and admin can't really stop that, so I don't know how it would be solved. Bans can't really help because it's one out, one in with the nutjobs. I guess it's just one of those things where you have to ignore and scroll.
>>19821I think the inconsistent moderation is down to inconsistent reporting from other anons. I've posted some shit that probably deserved a ban but, because I was in a chill corner of lolcow, I never got banned. Then I've been banned for a couple of hours for petty and minor things, but only when I've posted in threads where everybody was infighting or somebody had taken person offence.
No. 19826
>>19821I recently got permabanned for advertising
But somehow I also got banned for advertising again and the ban was just some hours long?
>>19824I think the only way to solve this is to move some /w/ threads to /snow/, anons in the Jillian thread are waiting for this to happen
No. 19827
>>19826Advertising has been against the global rules for a while though. It doesn't have anything to do with
terf sites
No. 19830
>>19826How many times are people going to come into this thread, explicitly explain exactly why they got banned and which rule they broke, so they clearly know full well what the reason was, but then be like “I’m also a
terf so I guess it was because the tranny janny hates terfs”. Like are you doing it on purpose to try and create some kind of
victim narrative or do you genuinely not see the cognitive dissonance?
No. 19857
File: 1612201240800.jpg (28.78 KB, 611x152, i4JZ740.jpg)
Has the Manson thread been autosaged?
7 women finally named him today. A ton of milk is incoming.
UPD. I can see it was autosaged
>>19377 Please undo, anons are fine and well behaved now.
No. 19863
>>19862no, i know there have been other times and unfortunately i was there for those, too. just wanted to say what i thought about it, and how poorly admin and mods handled it. it’s a bad look and they fucked it up, and there is no good excuse, period. the site has been a mess lately and it could have been something to point to, a sign to users who are thinking the places is a mess—i.e. ‘hey, look, we know things are kind of crazy, but we take the important stuff very seriously and we get on top of it.’ but they didn’t. they can’t even do that.
this ~is the complaint/suggestions thread, btw. i’m not ot, or trying to be an asshole. i’m also done.
No. 19865
>>19859>>19861>>19862>>19863so like what do you suggest. should we crowdfund a bat signal? this is a volunteer job and people set boundaries for when they're going to be able to help clean up the site. I don't check my work email on the weekends because I have other responsibilities and priorities. you can't fault anyone for a 1-hour lapse in moderation on one board.
it was deeply disturbing and i don't blame anyone for being upset about being exposed to that image. lolcow has always been a target of degenerate scrotes and that will not change. if it bothers you that mods can't be on call 24/7 then maybe you should leave and go to r/muacirclejerk or facebook groups
No. 19867
>>19863I don't know if you read my statement about this incident
>>19224 but nobody on staff condones what happened. I do have global mods and I also have people who only moderate certain boards, the problem was really that we don't have as many /pt/ moderators since the janitors were still training, and nobody with permissions saw the reports until the 40 minute mark. Since then I've added more moderation to the board. If you read up the thread you can see that the exact same images were posted again a few days later and were immediately removed.
No. 19872
>>19869>We don’t need lolcow to be more popular or have more traffic How does saying "Non-cow boards don't need to be deleted" the same as saying "Lolcow needs to be more popular"? Also, if anything it's /snow/ that drives in more newfags. The only thing in the non-milk boards that brought new users was the now defunct kpop threads.
>I rarely see them redtexted so it just continues.No redtext =/= no ban
>which was disbanded for a reason, why is it back?Because it's different from the dumbass shit thread. You guys act like shitposting on an imageboard is a crime.
No. 19876
>>19874There an
abusive ex thread in /g/ I think?
No. 19889
>>19880Bless you for trying anon but this has been dragging on for ages. FHs being allergic to redtext has been a problem for ages. Even "hellweek" is more like "pissweak" now.
Anyhow I know it's mUh BoArD cUlTuRe by is thee any real reason why all the no1curr cancer and vendetta threads in pt don't just get deleted? Or not locking all the ancient threads that will never get new milk, just spam that surfaces them? Same problem in snow but less noticeable.
No. 19891
File: 1612291364824.jpg (237.44 KB, 1047x964, Screenshot_20210202-104024_Chr…)
Did the mods even read the previous post about calling anons salties and roasties which is what this was referring to,not belles fucking vagina? Jfc. Roastie IS a term used for fat as it isn't JUST an internet term. This is a really retarded ban. I'll take it as its short, but REALLY? The upthread post says NOTHING about her vagina and all about how she is making money while anons defend she isn't making money which is just retarded thinking to begin with. Its like generation language is policed too if the internet deams one thing means one thing only.
No. 19892
File: 1612291487045.jpg (214.01 KB, 1080x528, Screenshot_20210202-104429_Chr…)
>>19891I guess I could see this as infighting, but anons always call other anons out of the reaches they pull without it being called infighting, but the roasties thing is retarded to read this as vagina when I meant fat. Sensitive as fuck.
No. 19902
File: 1612347210133.jpg (273.23 KB, 1080x1538, IMG_20210203_111129.jpg)
are you guys retarded? heart is the one emoji allowed on lolcow, it's literally been coded into the imageboard. the code for it is # < 3 (without spaces obviously).
I'm sure it's mentioned somewhere in the lolcow formatting rules
No. 19909
>>19907Literally the only person that would post this here would have to be a driverfag. I absolutely was the number one person against that shit and I couldn't care less that they have their own thread.
You guys love to be such drama fags. Nobody cares anymore about your stupid shit.
No. 19915
>>19909I think it's the person who found out about AD thread through celebricows.
>>19913Wtf do you complain about a thread that you can hide?
Love your assumption that driverfags aren't regular lolcow users when you don't even know why the thread was created and just discovered that it exists.
How about you continue ignoring /m like you did before and let people enjoy themself?
No. 19918
>>19912Once again, mods are not sitting and staring at the screen, refreshing and looking for cp to delete.
There will be times when no mod is online, even in the right timezone, why is that so difficult for users to understand.
No. 19921
>>19919 You’re right. I’m just ready for them to either have a containment thread for their inane nitpicking or for them to stop blog posting their tinfoil hate. We get it you don’t like him, we don’t like him either.
But I also get the mods are busy. I was just frustrated.
No. 19935
>>19925bitch this is my 5th or 6th year here. I am posting from time to time about my weirdo interests but only AD (and collecting toys, but I'm not op of that thread) have caught on enough for a thread to take off.
Just hide the thread and stop bitching, we made it so people like you would stop whining about seeing AD in /OT. Fair enough but I don't get why retards like you still complain when we keep to our thread and play nicely.
I'm not complaining about the Timothy thread (good luck girls), or femdom or BL etc. I just ignore them and let anons have their fun. I recommend you to get that stick out of your ass and do the same.
Another anon complained in celebricows about 'having to watch mentally ill driverfags pretend he isn't ugly' and I can't help but ask her and everyone else like this: bitch, then why are you watching??? Are you jealous we have an active thread with actual discussion or what?
No. 19936
>>19925forgot to add
>Why am Adam Driver thread when we don’t even have a k poop general anymore?because we don't cause trouble, infight etc? As far as I am aware, k-pop was banned due to being inflamatory and bringing in twitterfags. I never read
those threads so correct me if I am wrong.
>Where were they in 2019 and before? Bullshit. Giving them a “containment thread” implies that he is an exception to the general rule we’ve had since what, 2014 about fanposting?Okay show me where it's written in the rules that you cannot currently have a thread like that. A few years ago there was no /m and the board was quite different (emojis were in use or considered, absolutely wild). I was only frequenting /pt and /snow back then, but I see why a fan thread would be out of place in those or maybe even /ot. I don't know why would it be a problem now, when there are various niche interests threads.
No. 19940
>>19925Yeah, I am also a driversperg and I've been here since 2015. Times of only /pt/ and /b/.
Hide the thread.
By the way, there was
52 kpop threads, including the criticals (as it started) until it became general. I used to lurk those threads because I like gossip and they were nuked last year simply because it attracted too many twitter minors that would just sperg and be general newfags. If the content itself was the problem, there wouldn't be fucking 52 threads on the subject.
>>19938Thirding the captcha. It's kinda of annoying but it's not a big deal, 4chan has it
No. 19944
>>19921No, I understand your frustration anon. I think rite-aid lilypichu has all the ingredients to be a cow, but just hasn't done anything milky
yet. All the impatient "anons" screeching about how he's an uggo fatty-kun that smells like piss while writing novels about how much they hate him are giving me a headache. The shitposts last thread really sealed the deal for me that most of them are either underage or just twitterfags who can't contain their autism.
No. 19946
>>19940Seconding this, I've been lurking since 2015, possibly earlier, and I love the adam driver shit. It's funny.
If you don't like it then hide the thread.
No. 19948
>>1993790% of people are cows then
>>19942good luck harvesting us when we are anonymous (and most likely boring irl kek). Anyway it's all good if you enjoy the AD thread from the perspective of a cow watcher, just don't shit it up with infighting and bait. And if AD
triggers you, just hide it.
No. 19950
>>19811>Venus>I know she has no real malicious intentWe can only go by evidence, not by what you think you know about her.
From what we've seen:
>she grifts small businesses by not paying their invoices and dodging them after she gets what she wants because she's broke and lives off meager simpbucks>openly plans social media comebacks and never follows through>cites mental illness as excuses whenever she is called out for any behavior (you call Pixielocks a "munchie" for citing her issues with mental illness on social media, but at least Pixielocks actually follows through with an upload schedule despite having considerably less viewership support than Venus so, yeah, your bias is showing)>shoops her pictures into laughably alien proportions while claiming they're true and honest depictions of herselfShe never gets better, and if she doesn't belong there then neither does Pixielocks or Lori.
>Belle Delphine>reeks of scrotes that don't get what they want from herWhat are you talking about? Even if the thread was solely to document the public porn she's resorted to in order to make money because everyone's actually a secret scrotie, she's still given scrotes exactly what they've wanted from her all along. The porn. The puss. Everything.
The reason why her thread is so interesting is because people like you were defending her a year ago saying how she could indefinitely make bank selling scrotes non-lewd catfish photos of herself. Well, look at her now, going to porn because the people manufacturing her e-girl image and hype noticed that the money started to dwindle as she became older and older news. That's the thing about making your money off male audiences as a woman: They will always want more and when you finally show off the goods, you're washed up & old news.
If anything she belongs there as an example. Yeah, the nitpicking is stupid and an autosage is warranted at times, but the overall story is an absolute horrorshow.
No. 19955
>>19948I don’t think AD posting is a bad thing, why you gotta be so defensive over it?
I just think having different fan threads would be fun because true cows would come out and identify themselves like the cows they are.
No. 19957
>>19955Sorry kind anon, I misunderstood you. I'm used to some farmers being hostile toward driverfags, even when we keep to our containment.
Wouldn't mind seeing cows, though hopefully not newfags. Somehow doubt that AD twitter/reddit stans would like to post here tho.
No. 19976
>>19975i think the belle thread is the biggest shitshow on this site but you don't know wtf you're talking about.
This girl swore off porn and mocked girls for doing it a few years ago. Then she meets some 2/10 fat boy on the internet that pretends to be a photographer and she's showing more and more until she's making double pen porn with the lard sack.
And yes, she very much is "shocking" on purpose, but she also spergs the fuck out everytime people take issue with her being "shocking". She's a complete retard. Moo also makes bank and that doesn't make her any less of a cow.
Her and her bf will be done soon and when they do the wretle over the brand is going to be top kek
just keep the thread on autosage and ban the retards
No. 19978
File: 1612504733165.png (27.74 KB, 742x568, cow.png)
who is the cow? why dont we do this with cows that selfpost and defend themselves? Like mickey and her whiteknights
No. 19979
>>19977We have a language thread,
>>>/ot/569079 bumped it for you if you wanna post there
No. 19982
File: 1612532944154.png (33.65 KB, 1839x239, Capture.PNG)
Can this shit be taken care of? Because its not even the first time its happened. You'll see people doing it in Moo's thread and other places. Its like some people missed the memo that this is a fucking gossip website. Cows/flakes getting called out by non-farmers through non-lc means isn't cowtipping. Especially when they've already been well known for two whole decades like Lori has. Policing people in threads because you think that they should have some catty bitch etiquette a la your way stifles discussions, causes infighting sperg shit, minimizes the actions of thread subjects, and derails threads.
This isn't PULL. This retarded shit isn't necessary or welcome.
No. 19987
Thread is bumped with non saged, non-imageboard posting vendetta bullshit again. Wheres the mod to fullfill that vendetta closure they promised if this vendetta-chan kept coming back. They even tried the new cosplay thread already to try to bypass her thread to skip bans (got one anyway thankfully). Im not about to hide athread that constantly breaks rules when it should be reported and farmhand has said before that non milk is a closure reason.
Its BEEN not milk since they mentioned it still.
https://lite.lolcow.farm/w/res/95156.htmlhttps://lite.lolcow.farm/w/res/95156.html No. 19989
File: 1612544313170.jpeg (802.18 KB, 1166x1735, 276FFB34-C6AE-4224-9191-4E1C4E…)
Could farmhands release the post history of the person who posted the screenshot in leftcows? People in the thread won’t shut up about if she was framed or not. One anon admitted to making it up for drama
No. 19991
File: 1612549817544.jpeg (85.79 KB, 1147x248, 89E9370C-F135-4226-9234-99C636…)
If any farmhands aren’t too busy would it be possible to get a post in the leftcows thread like in the Manson thread? It’s been posted about by a bunch of people on twitter and for the last three days keeps attracting people just posting unsaged racebait and political derailing
No. 20009
>>19995Can a mod put Belle back on autosage
>>>/w/134956 Usagi might want to be autosaged as someone keeps selfposting and asspatting themselves
>>>/w/136891 No. 20010
>>20009The milk just started flowing, why are you trying to lock the Lori Lewd thread after two posts? They'll just keep getting banned. A bunch of people are going to be looking for this thread after the exposed video was made about her
Are you the same WK from earlier or too dumb to realize you're assisting a cow in burying their own milk?
No. 20016
>>20013A tranny fashion thread would be interesting. It would help the muh cows posters like
>>20014 who think that these men dressing like anime girls or middle aged men dressing like 8 year old girls isn't milky enough.
I doubt it would ever happen though.
No. 20018
File: 1612613661949.jpg (52.41 KB, 500x500, integrate omg.jpg)
>>20008I feel like celebricows is doing what the kpop threads used to do, they both attract a bunch of nitpicky newfags from twitter
Some of the stuff posted there is fine (Chrissy Teigen's 13k wine meltdown was pretty milky imo) but you really have to skim past the infighting and constant uninteresting AB/Lana/Grimes updates
I wish AB would at least be contained in another thread, that might help a bit
No. 20024
File: 1612642348139.jpeg (387.54 KB, 1429x672, E9D275BF-E9E8-41DD-8D15-AC0431…)
>>20023>>20022Like this isn’t even milk. We don’t need every post she does posted just to have all captions and the following ones just be nitpicking. I’m not hiding a thread just because you want to ignore rules because ‘BuT iTs A GossIp FoRuM”. Can’t enjoy any threads with you minute nitpicking retards constantly filling everything up with useless self posting, cowtipping, and ‘I heard..’ without sage. What about any of that is a good thread to read?
No. 20030
>>20027Calm down anon. You sperg in here and the thread about boohoo tan on reported the thread to meta, which further derails. You’re not helping. More reason to sage it. No one is saying to nuke it.
That photo with a salty nitpick caption isn’t milk. What’s the milk? Honestly please tell me aside from bashing her outfit and looks. What is the DRAMA in that photo. These are useless fucking posts.
No. 20035
>>20033ntayrt but who fucking cares if rtg is the one who picks the story up? awareness is awareness. we all know she's a flake herself, but that doesn't automatically mean that another video on lori and her bullshit is somehow invalid.
its pretty reasonable for people to be suspicious of you, because like other anons have stated its been five whole ass threads and only in this one has someone just begun to get uppity. technically, someone (was it you, anon?) was uppity in the last one by claiming that folderfag was 'obsessive with a vendetta on Lori uwu' and it was still only ONE person.
people have explained things to you countless times and threads die organically on this site. you're seriously under no obligation to visit Lori's thread, so why keep chimping out? because i'm not seeing a benefit for anybody here except the cows in question if such a thing were to happen.
No. 20047
why was my thread,
>>>/w/136984 locked? w is a cosplay general, and the subject of the thread met the requirements of a thread.
No. 20049
>>20036Anon, the self posters inevitably get banned or run out. I'm not talking about them. My post was addressing why someone wants a thread to be shut down so badly conveniently after a cow is beginning to receive comeuppance.
If you're not that anon and you're not bringing a sufficient rebuttal to what I was talking about then be on your way.
No. 20059
File: 1612763733398.png (41.66 KB, 183x181, its not hard fucker.PNG)
>>20057Faggot I don't know who you think everyone is, but I never replied to the bird anon with anything. I scrolled past it. And, I know what the sage means. The point is that threads which are placed on auto sage die faster and its incredibly convenient, as others have said before, that there's suddenly an influx of "anons" who have a problem with the Lori thread and want it swept to the side.
You retards don't fucking get and yet screech at everyone else despite the fact that we're not coming into your respective haunts and demanding they be auto saged or telling everyone that their milk isn't milk.
What part about not clicking on a thread or hiding it do you not get?
No. 20064
screenshots have been posted that suggest someone in the LC discord has been cooming over nazis and cowtipping/causing twitter drama by convincing people they’re babivampire (or maybe they are babivampire, dunno). screenshots/info in these threads
>>>/snow/1155445>>>/ot/733216sorry if this isn’t a problem for here! just thought farmhands might want to know and we can’t report this potential cowtipping the normal way
No. 20073
>>20071I'm also curious why farmhands closed it.
It's the LC discord server. If you don't want your weird nazi shit to get out, maybe kick those racist users.
No. 20077
>>20074Well then that's the discord mods fault. Those users were already talking about and doing the shit they were doing before that thread was created. As long as no one cowtips it shouldn't be an issue
>normal conversations when every autist is acting trying to get into the next screenshot.What? if they want to have a normal convo they can do that no issue. It's the weird shit they say (on their own) that farmers want to screenshot
No. 20082
File: 1612850790490.png (275.13 KB, 709x593, 1.png)
Not complaining about the ban, I just wanna know why is it marked as a shit thread? I thought it would be fun and stuff. I'm curious and want to know, not complaining
No. 20094
>>20092…and with no more ot, the mods assigned to ot can help clean up the dumpster fire that is snow and w, retard
>>20090ot is fucking cringe and the entire site is falling apart
No. 20095
>>20094>/ot/ is cringe and the entire site is falling appart!!!>older lolcow was better!!!Yeah, the stupid contrarians that think this gotta go, this bad complaint was also a thing 5 years ago on your "golden era of lolcow"
Check this out.
>>>/ot/8251If you go all the way down in the catalogue, you will find very retarded threads with lack of moderation. There's literally a tread that says "do you like traps?" and shit like that. It was even worse back then and literal scrotes -not the "scrote sounding" anons you're so afraid of- roamed free and nobody said anything to them.
Is this the shit you want? Do you preffer real cancer and shit threads to people just talking about their problems? There's more moderation and organization now than ever. Stop trying to paint /ot/ and the non drama boards as bad, admins are not going to suddenly close them because a salty anon said so.
No. 20098
>>20094>/ot/ is cringeand the rest of the boards are not? They're full of pulltards, e-girls critizicing other sluts, stupid nitpicking and lack of good milk. Threads are full anons that sound like broken records and make the same vendetta-sounding posts over and over. Maybe put yourself out to pasture for a while so you calm down?
>>20097If you don't like the threads hide them, it's easy as shit. Why would anyone be this stupid as to not hide threads they don't like?
No. 20107
>>20106I've seen (rule 7) and (/ot/ rule 7) several times before, newfag.
What's your point in this anyway?
No. 20109
>>20094I think saying that the entire site is falling apart is kinda dramatic, the moderation is a bit all over the place but nuking the non-drama boards would kill the site
>>20107nta but she was saying that people itt are getting banned for disobeying rule 7 more than in any other thread. Learn to read
No. 20110
>>20109I read, retard. She said "as far as
redtexting" goes. I have seen threads that have that many redtexts, newfag.
No. 20112
>>20109sage for samefag but that being said, the lc discord thread
does have bunch of people (who are obviously the gals on the discord server) complaining about the thread, so I understand why there's a push for bans over /ot/'s rule 7
>>20110newsflash: not everyone who disagrees with you is a newfag/retard. Expand your vocabulary past that pls, it's getting repetitive
No. 20114
>>20100your rabid posting isnt doing a good job proving otherwise
>>20101I know it might be hard to believe, but there's multiple anons who want to close /ot/
No. 20115
>>20114Not either of those anons, but I still have not heard a
valid reason for closing /ot/ other than, "I don't like it". Even the argument of attracting new users does not work because /snow/ and at one point /m/ attracts a lot more newfags than /ot/ and to say otherwise is delusional.
No. 20122
>>20121It's pretty obvious they're desperate to censor all of the /ot/ discussion to get rid of wrongthink. My solid tinfoil theory is that people want to cowtip and link drama threads to their friends but don't want to be associated "with that
terf/swerf/"femcel" website".
No. 20128
File: 1613026749041.png (26.06 KB, 500x460, i-deliberatley-entered-a-threa…)
>>20116Yeah, and so does /w/, and so does /mlp/, /lgbt/, /vt/ and many others. Yet they stay. Give me ONE
valid reason why /ot/ should close instead of just bitching about it "because it sucks". Things like "it's full of newfags, twitterfags, pullfags" etc don't count because the dramaboards are full of them and it's worse than in /ot/. If you don't like the board, then fuck, don't click on it. If you don't want to hid the thread then simply fuck off. Moderation is fine, you just hate shit for no reason other than you like being an edgy contrarian. Even if something is cringe, well, what does it have to do with you? Close your eyes and get away from the computer. This is not the only website for drama out there.
No. 20133
>>20132>I get it’s /ot/ but that doesn’t mean you can do whatever you want because of the type of board it is.Bans are handed out frequently in that board. I seriously do not get why a shitpost thread is so controversial on an imageboard. Anons in the shitpost thread do get banned when they actually break rules.
The reason the more blogpost-y threads like the vent thread are banned on boards like /snow/ is because those are
milk boards. When you're in a snow thread you're looking to hear about the cow's life, not about the posters. It's a pretty clear distinction, /ot/ is called /ot/for a reason.
>Mods won’t so taking it seriously is retardedWho said I am? I'm literally just responding to the conversation in this thread. If I'm taking it seriously, then so are you and literally everyone else who posted.
No. 20135
>>20131Nobody is saying that if
you, the apparent center of the universe, hides a thread for your own convenience because you hate /ot/ threads, anons will suddenly go apeshit and start breaking rules just because. The option to hide threads is so
you don't have to interact with them. Imagine thinking you're so important
Like, what are you even trying to imply here?
No. 20136
>>20132Then stop complaining about wanting to nuke /ot/.
>Take the jab and roll with it.Same goes for you.
No. 20147
The Manson thread is swarming with pizzagate levels of tinfoil now and the attention it’s attracted isn’t doing it any favors as far as evidence or content goes. I think I’ve seen someone say before that it should be on autosage and I agree, at least for a while. It’s getting out of hand.
>>20146This is a thread for suggestions and complaints. Anons weren’t asking
you about your opinions, they were petitioning farmhands and admin.
No. 20152
>>20101This. Also pretty sure it's two, one anon making vaguely funny vendetta-sounding shitpost and one autist yelling this whole thread about the rurus and larping as an oldfag.
>>20125>>20138Holy shit is he still at it? Maybe just give him one thread after all where he can spam in until he gets bored.
No. 20174
File: 1613211473683.jpg (94.89 KB, 600x796, eed.jpg)
/ot/ = best board
haters gonna hate
No. 20187
>>20186This. She's actually talking about her private life for once (and mentions that she got abused as a teen which would be worthy of discussion even if it were a lie) and yet all they want to post is… look at her feet. look at her nose. haha look at this 4 year old comment from my PULL archives
just close the thread tbh.
No. 20191
>>20188The raids are usually one day. This is almost ever day and getting worse. Just because something was worse once 6 years ago doesn't take away from this. I don't care really about excuses. I'm sure other anons don't either. We want captchas. We don't want to see CP.
>>20190Any plans to combat this as it isore frequent than I've ever seen before? Maybe a captcha as other anons have posted about a lot up thread? I wouldn't join that messy discord. Maybe other anons could that. Maybe fill us in on who you suspect is raiding us. I assume it's being done under a vpn since they keep coming back.
No. 20208
>>20190Isn't it always between 10am - 14am Europe time? At least that's what I noticed. It's always the same picture too, maybe there is a way to get it blocked from being posted together with the text? I know on 4chan that's possible for images who have a history of being spammed regardless of filename, it then shows "failed to upload".
>>20191>We want captchas. I don't, to be honest. Especially not the google ones and changing our whole posting system for one scrote with a bot is also not that great.
No. 20210
>>20208Eurofag here, the cp/gore sometimes gets posted around noon and other times at like 2 in the morning.
The gore from today got posted at 4:30AM for example
>>20201People are posting here about the gore and cp because it's become a major problem and those pictures get posted almost everyday. I'm down for captcha, at least for a few weeks/months.
No. 20211
>>20210It's not a bot at all. Yesterday gore posting is just proof. Captcha won't help shit because it's not like they spam it. They just post once a minute in several threads. There is only a 30 second wait time for flood prevention. A bot would spam everything at once but that's not the case.
As for the cp, users say it's the same image and some random link. I never see it but if it's only one post, why would we call it a bot? It's not hard to quickly make posts on lolcow.
Captcha won't do anything to fix the issue.
No. 20213
>>20185I thank god everyday that I've only see 2 gore pictures and I only saw like 15% of a Bianca Delvin pictures before i ran to Meta.
I've never seen CP here, but because it's been happening a lot, I'm going to make sure I have Meta Open so I can make sure I never fucking see that shit.
No. 20214
>>20212it sucks but just consider not coming to the site for a few days until things calm down. doubtful youll miss out on much and its a better alternative if you guys are truly this shaken up.
i agree with other anon, its not a bot and captcha wont do a lick of good.
No. 20216
>>20215Id rather anons come here to complain about this than fill half the thread with justifications for why the Nicole thread in /w/ is 'milky' to keep active when it's not or the Belle vagsperg defenders saying why discussing loli is important sooOOOoo much.
Reporting and complaining about the gore and actual CP is more important to post here and spam for attention. I dont get why anon is so mad and only wants reports, not to try to get mods attentions by mentioning it here.
Ngl thats sus as fuck
No. 20218
>>20188NTA but
>agYou mean the site that's been down for weeks and was mostly composed of farmers who complained about the same problems being discussed in here? The CP and raids obviously come from pedo scrotes/trannies from 4chan/KF/Vtuber thread who are mad that they didn't get to take over. The Vtuber thread especially has a lot of crossover with /jp/ on 4chan, which is like 99% pedophiles.
No. 20224
>>20222That's the thing. You can get device banned so everythibg is flipped, it bypasses VPN as it targets your device, but ONLY the browsing youve used on the device, so if you use different service, like Safari instead of a device block through Chrome, you can still access and post from the 'banned' devuce. Lite mode then has other rules as it disrupts the blocked device ban and you're able to reuse the original browser again.
There is honestly ways to ban, but so many more ways to bypass. This doesn't even include someone owning multiple devices, VPNs.. The admin has their hands tied but it's possible someone who lurks and I feel posting, seeing whens a good time based around complaints and mod activity. Honestly feels like the baiter in Belle's thread whos obsessed with vag and loli probably is in on it.
No. 20225
File: 1613328654014.jpg (239.43 KB, 1080x853, Screenshot_20210214-104758_Dis…)
>>20190>>19224Choose one, tell yoyr mod team to get on the same page..
You cant tell us to report to discord, then discord says this, but then another mod says DONT go to Discord.
Where the hell are we supposed to alert mods asap if mods apparently only have 1 person connecting them, to alert everyone if CP and Gore is posted, but that person flips between saying yes alert and then no, don't alert. How does that make sense?
No. 20228
>>20225There's still gore up and this is a fucking meta thread there is no good way to alert them lmao. Also,
>server mods are not site modsIsn't yokaipussy a farmhand here?
No. 20233
>>20232To add, i think they do this as MO to make sure mods wont be active. If they aren't redtexting, the anon sees it as their chance. Its so predictable and yet mids cant see it? Ive mentioned absolutely they arent active 24/7, most might be out today bc of the holiday, but this is why redtexting EVERYTHING should be prioritized right now. Instead you leave up 7 posts back to back of one samefag anon nitpicking shave bumps on Belle's vagina but redtext the post that wasnt her, but a look-alike.
Make that fucking make sense. Whoever mods W selectively redtexts and unsages pages. This invites these people. Same with OT. At this point, Id say a farmhand is larping and feeding downtimes to scrotes.
No. 20245
>>20188I doubt asheras garden has anything to do in this situation, they're harmless. it's mostly incels, troons and weird angry people doing this
They probably want this site to go down because of muh cyberbullying
No. 20248
>>20245This. Hell most anon's don't wanna intergrate over there because they don't really encourage the more chan-esque posting style here. Seriously doubt the evil terfs are hopping onto their slow board coordinating different ways to piss off the userbase here.
>>20246>implying half the userbase don't still visit/lurk the rotting corpse that is 4chanHonestly, I'm more shocked that there's some nasty ass neet dedicated enough to keep doing this shit on the regular. Really hope farmhands are at least reporting the CP to proper authorities.
No. 20256
>>19056This, I've noticed it in some of the regular threads, too.
Someone is really sperging out if you mention troons in any thread that isn't one specific thread.
No. 20258
>>20255>>20257At least I know farmhands read this thread bc Kiki's was unlocked within 15 mins of my post.
That doesn't help the tin foil though. Imagine if Kiki was same enough to pretend to be normal farmer for long enough to get FH status lolol.
No. 20271
>>20269Sorry, I keep posting with horrible spelling mistakes. Here's the post you replied to, fixed
>>20267The website has improved by farmhands curbing off-topic gc talk. A year or less ago you couldn't even thirstpost about men (you know, like a healthy normal heterosexual) because "ew scrotes reeeee"! GC love to police other people's talk, but don't want any such rules to apply to them.
No. 20278
>>20277Imagine posting this when you have a history of promoting furry/pedobait sites like LotusBBS on here. Fuck off.
>>20273Sure but not all of them will make it into the mix. I'll add whichever ones were most requested.
No. 20279
>>20278Based admin.
Should we all post our requests in the banner thread so you know which ones everyone wants added? Or is there gonna be a poll or some point? I don’t wanna spam the thread with my opinions but it would be nice to vote on them somehow.
No. 20280
Request for the vtuber general thread in /m/ to be shut down or autosaged
>>>/m/114280Because the /w/ thread is autosaged, It invites scrotes and vendetta posters from other language communities to post in /m/.
Idk why 2d cute anime girls are attracting men to this site, but it’s disgusting
No. 20299
>>20297I came here to say this too.
Mods come pick me up I'm scared. Where did all the threads go?
No. 20309
File: 1613508412650.png (666.58 KB, 1440x1432, Screenshot_20210216-204404~2.p…)
>>20307>>20303Extreme tinfoil but this just got posted in /snow/, the insta accounts in Russian. Someone's deleting posts written in Russian, starting threads in /ot/ in Russian, and mainly shitting up ana threads? Ok
No. 20313
>>20311omg yes. it goes in m but I'd love one!
make a nice collage image for thread pic of all the best shows!
No. 20319
>>20316It's alright anon. My 'tism flares up whenever newfags format their posts like this:
">>20316 yeah anon blah blah blah"
No. 20324
>>20320>>20321I really liked the thread and was sad I cannot post in it because it's already been closed!
It would be a nice way to track my autism cycles
No. 20325
>>20324>>20320>>20321Not trying to tinfoil but are you just samefagging?
I only ask because of the style of posting and unsaged posts at that…
No. 20328
>>20324>>20327>>20321>>20320How many times are you going to ask?
The /ot/ board is shit and brings in posters like this anon to the site who seem to have some autistic dependency on threads.
No. 20329
>>20328My first time asking this.
>ot is shitBoohoo.
No. 20330
>>20327Agreed
t. literal autist
No. 20336
>>20312>>20313>>20317I made it here: >>128522
Sorry if it's not the best. Ive never made a thread before.
No. 20351
>>20346Just because it's not a video doesn't mean it's not porn. There's a picture that's basically a photo taken out of a gif of a guy getting jerked off from the back, balls/asshole out and everything.
You're being pretty contradictory right now. "thread is for deviants" "vanilla women like me". Pick one? It's porn and I'm sure all the weak soyboys that stumble across the site love the thread.
No. 20352
>>20351Idgaf about what soyboys do.
I'm talking about these
>>20343 kinds of images that have been posted lately, which are vanilla and don't belong in the thread no matter how much I like seeing them, because the thread is for a femdom kink. Got it now?
No. 20354
>>20335Watch them be lock in a few months for lack of posting.
>>20334Your redundant threads are not real alternatives.
No. 20372
>>20367>>20368Twitterfags have ruined the thread. With their constant WK sperging, non-saged replies and emoji use.
Anons are just trying to talk about her in peace. People who have CLEARLY not read the old threads making claims that aren’t true.
Can the anons who don’t like what’s being said in the Nina thread, just stop reading if I it bothers you to the point of wanting the thread locked every damn day. You are so annoying honestly.
No. 20386
File: 1613940501751.png (35.02 KB, 698x516, ban.PNG)
This isn't even me at all, lmao. And i got banned for? using the same browser the other person uses? im so confused, i don't even remember posting on that day since i had an appointment and couldn't even visit lolcow. And our grammar is diff too, english isn't even my native language and i don't have that much of a big vocabulary.
No. 20387
>>20386It's just a banned IP, it happens.
>weIt makes me think that they're all sitting in a groupchat talking shit about the users lol.
No. 20388
>>20383What thread? I’m a huge fan of analrectalviolence
nonny.
No. 20394
>>20393How are they a confirmed scrote? And what they’re saying is true analrectal violence does condition people to be aroused by pain, they’re just saying it in a very schizophrenic way which is funny. Then when they’re banned it makes it even funnier. This will be my final comment on the matter but I await your replies
Also speak of the analrectal devil, guess who’s just made a new thread in /ot
No. 20406
>>20404Second that. Anons keep derailing with either repetitive comments or non contributory takes/memes…some seem to be so obviously clueless as to what lolcow is altogether.
More red text wouldn't hurt. That needs to be locked up for a while also, perhaps.
No. 20407
>>20404>>20406Second that too.
Cow tipping, fangirling over Manson, fangirling over
victims, ridiculous fan art, silly speculations, pointless infighting with no relation to the subject. If newfags can't learn what lolcow is and integrate, the thread should probably have a break.
>That needs to be locked up for a while also, perhaps. No. 20419
Please for the love of all that's holy delete the CP on /snow/. I've made two fucking reports.
>>20418I'm interested about this as well.
No. 20420
>>20418the issue with this is that it could lead to so much mass-reporting from wk’s. i could see it turning into a mess within a day.
i genuinely think mods just need to step up about the CP and gore - this is the first time i’ve seen the CP but i’ve seen the gore so many times by now i can remember the picture. they let it sit there for hours and seemingly do the bare minimum when it comes to deleting/banning. there’s absolutely zero transparency and it seems as though there’s very little going on to proactively stop it from happening.
No. 20441
>>20424It’s a kind of good idea, but then retards would be reporting retarded shit making people open the spoilers thinking It’s yet another harmless picture spoilered 40keks, and getting their day ruined by gore and CP.
it would be nice if it was some sort of locked spoiler though, so no one can open the picture until the deletion or acceptance of the picture is done by a mod.
It could be tiresome or maybe too complex, but it’s just an idea.