File: 1743845746877.jpg (422.55 KB, 1920x1240, thumb-1920-881044.jpg)
No. 92424
File: 1743848229792.png (33.11 KB, 1795x106, 64432.png)
>>92423
>Im not attracted to men btw
No. 92448
>>92445>IVF/Surrogacy thread should re-opened, the hidden board is too small and shares too many of the same opinions on it. the discussions were also not just related to surrogacy, but also to the concepts of gene alteration, which aren't completely negativeIVF/pregnancy talk belongs on /g/ anyway. Actually /2X/ has not one but TWO surrogacy threads:
https://lolcow.farm/2X/res/22845.htmlhttps://lolcow.farm/2X/res/24356.html
>too many of the same opinions on itI mean, what kind of 'opinion variety' do you expect from a thread discussing slavery?
No. 92450
File: 1743867231509.jpeg (229.42 KB, 505x495, IMG_0305.jpeg)
What is the symbol next to the reply count?
No. 92451
File: 1743867366001.jpg (88.84 KB, 829x248, 1.jpg)
Why is VPN posting blocked in the AI thread? My typing was all for nothing.
>>>/ot/2472968Never gonna happen because most barriers to entry are legislative (therefore artificial) and enacted to protect the profits of the group that is benefiting from them. You can see it in action in every type of work, from truck drivers (very special driving license, which you can only get after a fucktonne of medical tests and a long, pricey course) to lawyers (law school + tests + patronage system) and craftsmen (do you have a license to be able to install that gas stove?). It's a very moid-y (because it appeals to their parasitic nature), patriarchal system - moids will never ever change it.
https://im-an-economist.blogspot.com/2015/04/rent-seeking-explained-removing.html No. 92452
File: 1743867426825.png (1.83 MB, 1170x2532, IMG_5024.png)
Whats up with the badges?
No. 92465
File: 1743869329062.jpg (25.25 KB, 1042x188, kf.jpg)
I wanted to post it to the Moidtakes thread - can somebody do it on my behalf now?
No. 92467
>>92461Dumbass shit
is a shitposting thread
No. 92470
>>92413I'm sorry, but I'm not seeing what you're talking about… I check out that thread when it gets bumped and I see anons getting responses about their ADHD all the time. I don't respond to the posts frequently because for some reason ADHD anons are weird about stimulants, one of the only proven treatments for their disorder, and I don't want to have a conversation about the definition of drug abuse and dependency for the millionth time.
They are in the thread together because they have significant overlap and high rates of comorbidity. The treatment plans and coping skills that work for one often work for the other as well. Be the change you want to see in the world and respond to those anons you say are being ignored.
>>92412>ADHD anons act more autistic than the actual autistsCorrect.
>>92443And you still haven't taken the hint, hm?
No. 92474
>>92470Ntayrt, I’m not an autist but an ADHD anon and I don’t understand why we share a thread either. I don’t relate to autists much like how
>>92446 doesn’t relate to me, which is to be expected considering they’re different disorders. Maybe if we primarily talked about late diagnosis, tiktok fakers, and sex differences in the presentation of symptoms and age of diagnosis. But that comes up seldomly in the grand scheme of things.
>They are in the thread together because they have significant overlap and high rates of comorbidity. The treatment plans and coping skills that work for one often work for the other as well.You could make that argument about many mental disorders or topics that have separate threads though. OCD, ED, and gender dysphoria have similar thought patterns, comorbidity, and treatment but they have separate threads. The Pet Loss and general Grief and Loss Thread are separate. If those are all allowed why isn’t an ADHD thread allowed?
No. 92475
>>92473>the tinfoil threadThere's no reason to lift the van from that thread, though. They're a
valid reason to lift it from the UK thread. The only reason you'd want the tinfoil lifted is because you personally want it that way. That thread will devolve into the worst sperging possible if it's lifted
No. 92477
Sorry to bother you mods, but could you please edit the thread title for
>>>/w/346681 to:
>Pixielocks (Jillian Vessey) #81 "Deadnamed! At the Fashion Show"I messed up on by putting the thread number inside the quotation marks and since there's already posts I don't want to delete to remake. I know it's a minor error but it's gonna bother me for the next month or however long the thread lasts.
Thank you in advance!
No. 92480
Mods can you please remove reported posts related to minors and the replies or redact the photos and username handles so discussion of them stops. Redtext isn’t enough. The farmers on the jirai thread are retarded and keep talking about the 15 y/o minor posted
>>>/w/346514 despite it being redtexted
>>>/w/346515 >>>/w/346560
>>>/w/346658 I reported the posts yesterday but it still continues. We shouldn’t have children’s usernames and photos left posted on here, let alone talking shit about them.
No. 92484
File: 1743902254941.png (32.06 KB, 778x507, wtf.png)
What does this mean. Please, I want to post so badly in Jill's thread no one is posting anything milky and I have a few things I want to post and I was able to post a mp4 just fine earlier, what happened??
No. 92485
File: 1743926881168.jpg (6.81 KB, 295x80, 45654.jpg)
Where is the racebait?
No. 92499
File: 1743975577253.png (198.75 KB, 900x757, desperation.png)
>>92498she genuinely thinks the thread is her own personal chatroom
No. 92500
>>92491>>92496>>92499>>92498That entire thread is just
>hi cowthe thread
No. 92502
>>92501No response?
>>92478>>92475>>92474>>92446>>92443A lot of anons agree we should have separate threads and there have been no arguments as to why we shouldn't besides "sometimes people can have both." And if that's a
valid argument then obviously we should combine the OCD, BPD, eating disorder, anxiety, etc threads into the autism thread because ALL of those can be comorbid.
No. 92506
File: 1743992341328.png (791.84 KB, 896x924, 1704891369992.png)
>>92503Moids Stay in Your Lane Challenge: Impossible
No. 92512
File: 1744030635474.png (584.75 KB, 1366x1622, Screenshot 2025-04-07 at 08.54…)
>>92508https://archive.is/VAsk6It's mostly about Ovarit shutting down and it's full of the usual mumbo jumbo about
femcels etc. I felt nothing reading it, maybe he needs to study his subject more or something because I'm not sure what he's banging on about
No. 92515
>>92502When the current ADHD/Autism thread fills up, just create the next thread to be just Autism and ask farmhands to unlock the ADHD thread. The Grimes & Elon threads were separated
after the last combined thread filled up. Farmhands probably aren’t going to lock a long-running thread that’s still being used, and there’s no need for a bajillion redundant threads.
No. 92519
File: 1744050062019.png (14.65 KB, 856x315, 2025-04-07.png)
cannot post without getting this message
No. 92536
File: 1744177103853.jpg (6.57 KB, 254x79, 6.jpg)
Please hire normal mods and not some attentionwhores who instigate fights and encourage bait instead of cleaning. Thanks.
https://lolcow.farm/2X/res/17556.html#39091 No. 92543
>>92534Kek the one with the actual dog got deleted. Presumably by a
based janny and not the artist since it was up for at least an hour or so.
No. 92545
File: 1744191711706.jpg (55.19 KB, 1239x234, can.jpg)
Canadian mod can't stop being retardedly Canadian.
No. 92547
File: 1744195172843.jpg (180.2 KB, 1080x1048, imgonline-com-ua-twotoone-Auvv…)
>>92532Jannies, please lock the thread or at least move it to /sty/ like it should have been long ago, because what the actual fuck. This shit is fucking disgusting. Note how if you check the replies in the thread, there isn't a single one calling her out for it either, they're all positive in some way. The luigifags are literally just degenerate cows.
No. 92565
File: 1744243415972.png (45.03 KB, 544x399, moo, bitch.png)
>>92547These people are not from around here
No. 92566
>>92565Yeah, the energy of the threads has shifted a lot over the past few days. There's definitely people trying to fuck up the threads especially that one anon who edits art
nonny's drawings into ultra-degen versions like the dog fucking and the penis ripping edits. Plus, the baiting has escalated like never before.
No. 92573
>>92568>just get over the lonely women stanning himNice try, but that's not the problem and you know it. Most users did not have a problem with the previous celebrity containment threads because those weren't full of newfag spergs straight out of Reddit (etc.) who couldn't integrate, who requested and drew gore and bestiality porn, and who constantly a-logged random women that those celebrities had any contact with out of jealousy. There were many anons who hated the Luigifags at the beginning, but now that the threads have truly gone to shit, more and more people are starting to see that general as a nuisance. I was also okay with it at first, but now it's beyond saving.
>its peak internet cultureThat doesn't mean the thread deserves to exist in its current state on this site. Internet raids, pedoshit and gore spam are also "peak internet culture", I guess we should start allowing those too!
No. 92575
File: 1744276183097.png (111.97 KB, 340x218, that's a thumbnail.png)
>>92573Adding to my own post, even their current OP may show how new some of them are. The OP pic is a thumbnail. This is a newfag thing I've seen
a lot in several threads (not just the Luigi threads) in the past few months. I don't remember it being a common occurence a couple of years ago.
No. 92581
File: 1744304412629.jpg (9.7 KB, 452x92, vpn.jpg)
>>92558Were they supposed to be unbanned? I haven't noticed anything.
No. 92585
File: 1744306967076.jpg (78.23 KB, 1071x1038, cheneyque.jpg)
Moooooooooooods impregnate the /pol/fag in the reddit hate thread
No. 92589
File: 1744309370704.jpg (30.9 KB, 527x545, ffb3db746564d18eb9ca820266e7c5…)
>>92573>>92568It's a weird situation and personally i understand both sides, there's not enough woman-only boards and the ones who exist are poorly moderated and not active as lolcow is, so the Luigiwives despite not fitting in with the rest of the userbase or the culture of lolcow made their place in here, it's the same with the incestfags and furfags making their containment threads despite being seen as degenerates who would be lolcows themselves, weird women have nowhere to go without trannies and scrotes except here.
No. 92603
>>92600>>92601just discuss it in the hidden board. I kind of hate how nobody uses the hidden board just because some schizos shit up certain threads. there's a RW thread there. More lax on the immigration discussion unless you're spamming slurs or some shit. If you guys did get banned for any specific messages though, I'm curious, what did the messages contain?
>>92547just send them to /sty/. I don't get why it has to stay in /g/ when you'll see some retarded shit on the front page all the time. they'll know where to go.
No. 92605
>>92603I'm
>>92600 , I think I got banned once for "racebaiting" in relation to UK migrants, but aside from that I tend to stay out of it. No point in posting things that I know I'll get banned for, I don't have much interest in arguing with other nonas anyway. I usually just stay out of /ot/ as a whole nowadays.
No. 92606
>>92605Racebaiting bans seen to only work one way, you can hate yt all you want and it's fine.
I've been banned with no reason given so I don't know what it was for.
No. 92609
>>92606This is such a lie, both types get banned but only one side acts like a
victim about it every time
No. 92614
File: 1744363691048.jpg (9.32 KB, 494x98, 54.jpg)
Nonas got banned for posting sarcasm without indicating it's sarcasm, so I don't know what the mod is about.
No. 92631
File: 1744401258505.jpeg (38.1 KB, 270x350, IMG_0377.jpeg)
I don’t want to be someone who whines in meta but the Veronica wking in the RW Wellness cows thread in /snow/ has gotten so fucking annoying. It’s been over 24 hours of “actually it’s totally normal to afford a central london flat with no job at 32.” Before they were insisting that a photo of one her where her body parts turned into a VeggieTales character is completely unaltered. It’s wking and derailing at this point not to mention the ad homs from that side. They clearly don’t even contribute to the thread otherwise.
Also, I’m assuming the tradthots thread is fair game again, since farmhands let the RW wellness cows thread turn into tradthots 2.0. The thread was originally supposed to be for like crunchy mom/RJK Jr/carnivore cringe type stuff. I even reported the detail early on and got ignored, so guessing it’s fine to bring it back. Could the old tradthots thread be unlocked? I think splitting them again would help. Not sure if the VPN poll results allow for ad hoc VPN bans for threads in boards other than /ot/, but putting a restriction on previously banned threads is totally reasonable.
No. 92635
>>92634It's fine to talk about migrants/immigrants. It's just sperging about specific ethnicities/races of immigrants that'll get you banned because it's racebait.
>>92633They literally have a thread dedicated to that kind of sperging in the hidden board too kek
No. 92641
>>92636This is why I find puzzling about current admin. They ran with all the retarded rules she put in place, like no K-pop (because she personally didn’t like it) or
TW race mention (because she was a butthurt SJW with a chip on her shoulder) without maybe considering that they can change rules. No, they just inherited them. So weird.
that is of course assuming burrito isn’t still here lmao No. 92645
>>92642I basically forget shaymin existed because she was barely there, but yes you are correct I meant burrito
>>92643Yeah they are making actual changes for better or for worse, and they did let us have ump and gender hate. It’s more the inheritance of old rules. They (or their coding slave) is making actual changes to the website itself so that’s also good.
No. 92654
File: 1744478763381.jpg (328.8 KB, 1080x2022, 1000005883.jpg)
unpopular opinions buggin on mobile for anyone else? seems contained to this one thread for me
No. 92655
File: 1744483563477.png (6.26 KB, 256x85, lc.png)
>>92654I think you've hidden saged posts, at the top of the thread. Click on the "show saged posts" link.
No. 92663
The butthurt moid is back in the RW thread:
>>>/snow/2107749Could you ban VPNs there?
No. 92668
>>92657your answer is here
>>92547 the lolcow thread on kf is more active than usual with fairly frequent updates on the "weegee" thread. And given the attention that's drawing to the site I'm a mite concerned.
No. 92697
>>92683WTF
Why is the Admin vendetta posting and doxing an Internet personality? The Admin itself is breaking the site's rules! So encouraging personalityfags is an okay thing to do for everyone? Noted for future use.
No. 92713
File: 1744648991245.png (163.88 KB, 565x541, 1532991825669.png)
>>92709I remember having a field day
on/a/ with similar tech. It's garbage, but at least laughs could be had.
No. 92715
File: 1744649369252.jpg (313.91 KB, 2000x1998, 1706974909266.jpg)
>>92711
>/2X/
>/int/
>/shay/
>/manure/
>/cream/
>/verify/
No. 92718
File: 1744649636244.png (553.55 KB, 578x800, 1575108349309.png)
>>92714So you want the site to lose more users, because you're paranoid about CP? I don't think image boards (or anything anonymous) are for you. This ain't twitter, insta or any other sterile social media site run by big corpos. If you don't fit it, don't force yourself, but also don't force others to baby you.
No. 92738
File: 1744696437440.jpg (32.23 KB, 689x293, y.jpg)
>>92690>>92688You can still make it. Some VPNs still remain banned.
No. 92745
File: 1744727393820.jpg (37.86 KB, 435x411, penis slaves.jpg)
I think Farmhands are either clinically retarded or pretending to be.
https://lolcow.farm/2X/res/22610.html No. 92758
>>92744If someone would like to make a general 4chan thread regarding the recent events, you're welcome to make one on /ot/. Please make sure to write out a good summary if you do. Thanks!
>>92755With regard to the 4chan hack and how it could impact lolcow, 4chan used a completely different board software, operating system and server architecture, so the specific exploits that were used don't apply to this site. Our server is also updated much more frequently (once a month), whereas it seems from what has been leaked that 4chan's server had not been updated in multiple years
No. 92761
>>92758There is already 4chan discussion in the tech thread:
>>>/ot/1060419and in the 4chan cap thread:
>>>/m/127246No need to make a new one.
No. 92768
File: 1744767885006.jpeg (1.28 MB, 3057x2998, A1406870-52C7-4F7E-89E7-E0C1AE…)
>>92709Idk if i'll get banned for posting her account has been deleted anyway and it's been years but I remember dming shaymin about this when there was a troon posting cp on snow nonstop it was getting left up for hours and telling her to try and use some inbuilt cloudflare option. Then we switched admins and I don't think anything ever got done about it, I'd be curious to understand why an option like this doesn't work? Cause this is actually serious so people want to know at least they're trying to do something to prevent it, not attacking anyone or the prior admin just trying to understand what logistical obstacles are there for why they haven't done this
No. 92769
>>92768Probably cause they’re tech illiterate, we could also at least have a media pending approval like other image boards but that’s not happening either.
Also
>lynxchan Shaymin=burrito
triggers vindicated
No. 92770
File: 1744773576537.png (379.12 KB, 598x579, 59825943.png)
i wonder if veronica has ever self-posted in
>>>/snow/2093745. she has posted several things that make it clear she reads the thread including addressing the OP when the thread was first created (lost the screenshot). there are several other signs, just one example is her upgrading her shopify layout after it was brought up. if she’s indirectly responding on x, it seems likely that she would post in the thread.
No. 92771
>>92770Are you
>>92631 ? If you are I'm guessing you'll call me a wk for disagreeing with you just like I was one of the anons disagreeing with you in the thread and you brought it here, but did you consider the possibility that there are people on x also pointing out the outfit? I just think people hi cow too easily. Sure maybe she's seen the thread, even if lc has been relatively slow recently to the point multiple anons have pointed it out even with the 4chan hack. It's not exactly rare for a cow to lurk and respond on socials. But I just think you're trying to vindicate yourself about the wking by tinfoiling about her lurking or selfposting and I'm just letting you know not everyone disagreeing with you is wking a cow or the cow herself
No. 92789
>>92787Seems like an anon was drafting a new OP for the tradthot thread
>>92788Seconding
No. 92792
>>92790>>92791>the other threads are either too specific and have shit ops or are in boards that shouldnt(/g/ seriously?)Let me share the OP’s of the Money, money, money thread and the /biz/ thread, shall I:
>A thread for the discussion of personal finances.
>give and seek advice>celebrate financial accomplishments or luck>share what you've been doing to save or make more money>discuss investments
>A thread for all things related to money, such as investing, budgeting, the economy, business ideas, and currencies. They’re essentially the same threads. Any conversation we can have in your 4chan /biz/ thread, we can have in the Personal Finances thread. Threads related to investments and money are slow in general because most lolcow users don’t come to lolcow to talk about their personal investments, their savings, their business ideas, etc. Bottomline, it’s a duplicate thread that we don’t need. I’d appreciate hearing what admins thoughts are on replacing Personal Finances with a thread of the exact same topic. I also think it’s interesting you’re trying to claim that our original threads have shitty OP’s, when personal finances threadscript is a little more thorough than the /biz/ sentence, mind you they’re basically the same.
No. 92795
>>92794nrayrt what’s confusing about the personal finances op? you have to be a literal retard to be confused by the writeup
> It also had a shitty ''pwease no boolly'' rule.are you talking about the “don’t derail by infighting about how poor/rich anons might be” line?
No. 92801
I'm back with the suggestion to ban vpns here
>>>/snow/2093745. Some "anons" are saying that women don't deserve rights.
No. 92835
File: 1745017896521.png (199.74 KB, 2039x417, whut.PNG)
>30 year old crone
>mannish
is picrel kind of weird or am i overreacting, nonas?
No. 92850
File: 1745059951333.jpg (33.56 KB, 688x254, 865876.jpg)
Are VPNs still banned or not?
No. 92852
File: 1745077625140.jpg (26.42 KB, 471x233, 5474.jpg)
Why are the posters in the Western Animation Industry Cows thread never banned for going off-topic, despite users from other threads getting a ban for the same or less? Why can't they post in the dedicated /m/ threads?
>>92851There should be an option to report mods.
No. 92855
File: 1745095649299.jpg (43.35 KB, 700x341, saywhat.jpg)
How do I feel about this, nonas?
No. 92856
File: 1745096399269.jpg (85.86 KB, 887x328, cow.jpg)
>>92725>Cows can be talked about outside of /snow/, retard.Mods disagree. Try mentioning Yuripedo or Rancefag ANYWHERE on the site and see how fast you get banned. Feeding bj-chan in the Blackpill thread is forbidden as well. Just admit that you're getting special protection from a team of Farmhands that break the rules, because this place is their circlejerk discord.
Rules for thee but not for me etc.
No. 92857
Again. We are in /ot/. Anon's post was on topic for the current discussions in Artist Salt: social media engagement (relating to art), genderbends, and gendies in fandom (and how that affects artists and their art). She wasn't derailing, and there should not be "no1currs"/blogpost bans on /ot/, with the exception of celebricows (because it runs on the same rules as cow boards).
>>>/ot/2492923How are admins going to pin an announcement
>Read the rules and usage info before posting.but their own moderator team isn't aware of the rules?
This is either a newfag janny or vendetta banning.
No. 92866
>>92865Thank you, farmhand.
I understand not every ban is from the same janny, but would you be able to explain why
>>92847 was banned?
It is now over a day old so I'm sure her ban has expired. However, this post is similar to the post that just had its ban reversed. Anon was also replying to a question, continuing the discussion.
No. 92868
>>92867Of course, I understand. I don't imagine moderating lc is the easiest of tasks.
Thanks again for the corrections and your candor.
No. 92874
It can't just be me but lately there are posts in /m/ and /ot/ that definitely read like anons from 4chan trying to post here. The moid humor
>>>/m/485177, bumping super dead threads
>>>/m/485172, referring to gross shit on other chan websites
>>>/m/484880. Not saying they are moids but there's this underlying scrote energy
No. 92875
>>92874Agreed, like posts like >>>/ot/2493959 and
>>>/ot/2494121 (referencing some shitty /tv/ meme) just feel out of place even if they're technically not breaking any rules
No. 92881
File: 1745199782752.png (1.16 MB, 1014x1416, 0e1f3294c53843a68dd68e22706970…)
cp in /m/
No. 92890
File: 1745234647991.png (542.54 KB, 895x1416, 1000035692.png)
Why was this obvious saged shitpost of anon repeating what that pilleager guy said redtexted? It's really not that serious
No. 92915
File: 1745368327937.jpg (67.84 KB, 882x326, Screenshot_20250422_182808_Fir…)
>>92907>>92908What makes you think mods aren't in it either given that they are ultimately the ones who do the banning? Seeing something like this get banned is pretty suspicious when posts like "KAM" get a pass. Either mods are also handmaidens, moids, or really just that retarded.
No. 92940
File: 1745448075786.png (629.94 KB, 1440x2648, Screenshot_20250423-183924_Chr…)
Discussion about jirai fashion isn't derailing are you guys insane?
No. 92942
>>92937The retarded is screaming "WHITENIGHT!!!!" currently in the thread, the same retard who claims everyone is a fangelic. They hate anons discussing Venus in depth. They need to be permabanned.
>>92940Anons were nitpicking about it ffs all because one person said they aren't 100% focusing on jirai designs/colors. Yes, bannable
No. 92947
File: 1745483707894.webp (70.32 KB, 960x650, ut874mqzthle1.webp)
Suggestion to make announcing that you've saged your post bannable for newfaggotry
No. 92948
>>92947people announce they saged their post? kek
love the picture, where is it from?
No. 92949
>>92942I like how you get mad at everyone calling you all fangelics and then think that everyone who is tired of the obsessive WKing is the same person. I don't derail and infight in that thread because I'm not a retarded newfag like you. Jannies won't permaban me because I didn't do anything wrong, retard, nice try though. Both sides are doing it, the fangelics and the retards screaming WK and needlessly derailing the thread.
>>92937You refuse to acknowledge the double standard in her thread. Can you imagine if someone derailed, writing paragraphs on paragraphs about how Shayna or Luna are fucked up and never had a chance because of their parents? They would get called a retard and get a ban for derailing/armchairing, yet ONLY in Venus thread are you allowed to literal essays on how she never had a chance. Who cares? It's not milk.
No. 92952
File: 1745495617634.jpg (62.57 KB, 784x536, fixing-a-macintosh-18.3.jpg)
>>92948Yeah I saw it on 4 different posts this morning. The photo is by Phillip Greenspun and the model is Eve Andersson! This archive is the only place I've found with more images from the shoot:
https://web.archive.org/web/20090924033106/http://philip.greenspun.com/images/pcd3559>>92950It's not needed on cow boards imo, the posters who justify/announce it in the body of their post do not understand how sageing works
No. 92958
File: 1745506456059.jpg (86.64 KB, 736x1002, dfde18509d884de52b24006584d812…)
What's up with all the tifs and troons on the /smallweb/ thread
No. 92963
>>92949Why is no one posting proof of whiteknighting? Lol, you sound crazy and sound like you just don't want discussion, and only posts being allowed are ones saying directly "Venus is insane and unhinged and should be in jail". Discussing Venus doesn't make anyone a fan. It's called lolcow for a reason. maybe you need to integrate becuase you don't seem to understand the basics of discussing a cow. This is how it comes off:
>new people to thread want to discuss Venus and oldfags discuss with them because they know more lore>venus isn't posting anything in days and already people commented what they wanted about it>anons begin discussing margo and how venus was failed by her>"STOP YOU CANT TALK ABOUT THAT WE TALKED ABOUT THAT YEARS AGO SHUT THE FUCK UP MOVE ON ALREADY AND GROW UP VENUS IS A BAD PERSON STOP DEFENDING HER!!!!!!!"That's how you sound, nonna.
No. 92964
We got 2 J-music threads right now and it's messy. Can the two be merged somehow? Or should we just figure out which to use officially now?
>>>/m/193738 temp thread from the massacre
>>>/m/14863 this one is older
No. 92971
>>92969At least one post you quoted wasn't me, mod junior.
And for the record I am unaware about Venus infight in /ot/ and am not posting in that.
No. 92981
File: 1745590128511.png (596.97 KB, 1080x719, IMG_6985.png)
Farmhands, please consider changing the threadpic for
>>>/m/486120. The threadpic is so fucking ugly, it makes me want to kms. Look, I even made a transparent Amanda Nunes pic you can use! Please mods, I’m a humble UFC fan, but I refuse to use a thread with such an ugly threadpic. OP couldn’t even crop her image. Please.
No. 92990
File: 1745642756177.jpg (165.67 KB, 1080x1044, 1000157507.jpg)
So I've never used an VPN until a few days ago when I noticed that if I don't use it, I literally can't post anywhere. I get some error that's like "error 500" whenever I try to post without a VPN, but when I enable it I can post like usual, this is on boards like /g/ and if I try to post with a VPN on the protected threads, I get another type of message that's just a pop-up saying I can't post on the thread because I'm using a VPN.
So, I tried disabling the VPN to post on a protected thread, but I get the same error 500 message, it's weird.
No. 93010
Is there a way to merge
>>>/m/193738 and
>>>/m/14863 ? The 2nd one was made during the /m/assacre but both get bumped since anons dont know which to use
No. 93015
File: 1745708049363.jpg (1.17 MB, 933x2762, 1000006936.jpg)
Why do you allow obvious fake ragebait "acksually women are worse" shit like this on this website? Retards like this need to be banned and all the anons who believe it too. There needs to be more moderation on trolling.
No. 93016
File: 1745708125955.jpg (392.43 KB, 932x1116, 1000006938.jpg)
Again with the unintegrated posting. The vent thread is full of posts like this. This website is going to shit.
No. 93037
>>93035Who cares. At least it wasn't
Posted
Like
This
No. 93038
Some sperg going on a tangent about posters in the cosplay thread, kind of baiting an infight imo.
>>>/w/347645 they can report suspected whiteknighting and move on instead of shitting up the thread about it. If anons keep posting not very milk material, you're going to get not very milky replies. Honestly sounds like Kinpatsu's ex again who's pissed she isn't being shat on hard enough. He keeps complaining about these invisible defenders every time kinpatsu is posted so it sounds like him again.
No. 93039
File: 1745769103069.png (735.15 KB, 1787x1875, Screenshot 2025-04-27 at 09-46…)
>>93035No, it's not. You haven't been to any other imageboards, have you.
No one used to care about this kind of spacing either here on LC (pic related) or on other imageboards that are full of oldfags. Long posts deserve proper spacing so they're comfortably readable and not an illegible block of text like
>>93015 No. 93057
>>93016This is a normal way of spacing while talking about something though. This isn't the same.
As something like.
This at all. Which is a bigger issue.
No. 93062
File: 1745816828065.jpg (33.17 KB, 420x302, 747685.jpg)
Some room-temperature IQ Farmhands you have here. Embarrassing.
No. 93116
File: 1745943435006.png (691.12 KB, 1080x1124, badartisbadart.png)
Why did I get banned for this when picrel is bad art?? Vendetta? Artist probably uses LC and reported me kek also spam?? Seriously? It's not exactly spam when the character is from a currently popular cartoon atm so bad fanart of her has been posted already in that thread but still.
No. 93140
Can we unlock the Anisa thread, or better yet, create a joint Anisa/Idubbbz thread?
>>>/snow/751795 Creator Clash 3 is turning out to be an absolute shitshow, and we’ve been discussing it a lot in the YouTuber General thread, but I think it deserves its own thread.
No. 93165
>>93164Then link the post next time. Mods haven't answered the weirdo crying about this the last four times she brought it up in this thread. Take no for an answer and integrate.
>>93050I agree with you, especially when anons use it as a term ("uwu kawaii slop" for example), but unfortunately it did originate as an emoji. Like, I also think there are instances it shouldn't be banned, but I understand why mods are holding the line on the rule.
No. 93175
>>93174Reporting users is a 'complaint'. It's
valid to post about it in here unless you're worried about farmhands having a direct line to where a rule might be being broken.
No. 93179
File: 1746197619107.jpg (95.37 KB, 824x239, 1000019646.jpg)
Here's the evil scrote post anon wants someone banned over. The political threads are full of thin skinned retards that run here as soon as they see something they don't like. The amerifag one is worst because it's full of TDS infected anons who shit up the thread instead of using the actual trump hate thread and get assblasted when they're called out for it.
No. 93183
File: 1746202036843.jpeg (444.19 KB, 950x1217, IMG_1863.jpeg)
>>93179Obviously this is what I was referring to, but you knew that.
No. 93186
File: 1746207232130.jpeg (574.04 KB, 1284x2544, IMG_1912.jpeg)
why is there a mod in taylor r's thread choosing to respond to reports from an unhappy anon instead of ignoring them? since when is criticism and a different opinion "infighting"? ove seen worse example of real infighting on lc.
No. 93188
>>93186because
nonnie(s) resorted to personal attacks that add nothing to the thread
there are posts that also express a 'different opinion' but weren't banned. why not screen cap them too?
No. 93192
>>93189The first post is saying that women who voted for Trump are retarded and any woman that votes for Farage is the same. Thinking that a woman who voted for someone that you don't like is a retard is a perfectly acceptable opinion. Conflating American politics with British politics is the worst thing in this post.
The post replying to the first post and was banned is adding to that opinion.
>You kind of deserve to lose your rights if you're like this, ngl.This post is saying women that vote for Trump or Farage deserve to lose their rights because they are voting to have their rights taken away.
The infight started several posts before and was a misunderstanding. Some posters can't tell the difference between thinking something is going to happen and wanting to something to happen.
No. 93193
File: 1746221142145.jpeg (166.58 KB, 651x490, IMG_1014.jpeg)
I wish there was a “lolcow’s own caps” thread but for actual lolcow caps. Like a milk hall of fame
No. 93205
>>93199Me giving my opinion is not ‘mini-modding’, I haven’t told any specific anons that they can’t post their complaints here, I’m simply making my own complaint about the state of the thread.
Personally I don’t see why anons need to post here whenever they report an anon that disagreed with them, because I don’t think they should be reporting them at all. I don’t see why-in this specific instance-they need farmhands to see their reports faster, because someone disagreeing with you is not ban worthy in the first place. It makes sense for things like when child porn is posted, because that’s horrible and the sooner it’s taken care of the better, it’s just that petty squabbles aren’t important and it won’t kill them to wait. I understand the point of the thread and how it’s been used, I just think that those anons are the ones that don’t understand the point of the thread and are misusing it because they are incapable of handling it when other anons have different opinions.
No. 93213
>>>/w/347990Not this anon but are jannies actually factually checking the reports or just lazily going along with parroting whatever the report says on to the redtext? The thread is jirai
general, the person posted is someone clearly in the jirai com, why would you take it to a completely irrelevant thread none of the farmers give a fuck about because some other minimod retard’s report said so? Stop being lazy and fact check the reports. Splitting hairs causes threads to die and farmers to lose track of what’s happening as not everyone has 900 tabs on every thread on this site open and only follow ones they have interest in, and I doubt farmers want jiraifags shitting up their fav threads either. The jiraifags should be contained in one place.
No. 93216
File: 1746299632286.jpg (11.91 KB, 342x342, ta.jpg)
>>93206i don't know she's even referring to because the complaints about "squabbles" itt are infighting, baiting, and white-knighting, which have always been bannable offenses. cerbmin made it clear that intentionally posting inflammatory shit will get you banned. this thread is better for when you want the farmhands to review multiple posts in a thread, it's better than just individually reporting the posts since they don't look at context and only the posts in the queue.
No. 93220
File: 1746306156215.jpeg (700.24 KB, 1796x3349, A753FBD7-847B-4BE0-88BD-2587D6…)
I ate the first ban because it was retarded (mods could’ve just censored it) but not a huge deal. The shota character was semi-exposed. The second just shows that the /w/ mods are newfags and/or don’t know how to do their job. This is a jirai cow. Maybe bother to read the posts you’re banning next time before blindly believing a cow’s whiteknights and their reports.
No. 93226
>>93220The autistic wk minimodding needs banning
>This person only wears jirai Monday-Saturday and their pyjamas aren’t jirai so they shouldn’t be posted here>I don’t think her posting shotacon is milk because she hasn’t traveled to Japan and hung out with the Toyoko kidsIt’s fucking annoying farmertards nitpicking milk and setting their own criteria for cows to police the threads and causing infights
No. 93234
File: 1746334372694.jpg (39.85 KB, 450x254, 180875625727.jpg)
>>93231"minor disagreements" and it's actually just hours long bait. interesting how you conveniently ignored the points mentioned in other posts regarding these "disagreements" too and still refuse to give examples
No. 93236
>>93218Exactly because anons aren't coming here just for posts about someone not liking something. They ususally add context about it that they think a farmhand would need to know because sometimes a simple report doesn't have enough information to make a clear decision. This is when you have anons complaining that they got banned wrongfully because a mod lacked context.
>>93226Can you link the post that says that shotacon is no big deal? I saw someone mention how she doesn't count as jirai because she doesn' focus her lifestyle around it, but no one was grandstanding for shotacon.
>>93233They rarely ban in /meta/, newfag. That's not a flex.
No. 93262
Can a farmhand explain why this ban happened?
>>>/m/489865Why is anon getting a no1currs ban on /m/ of all places? She's talking about bad gendie short comics that she hates in the bad short comics thread, so she isn't even off-topic. Come on.
No. 93273
>>93270Nta but /g/ isn't any noticeably different than before, (besides the one thread that already has a vpn ban) idk why the whole board would need it? There's not that many recent posts in general, much less bait posts
t. d/g/en regular
No. 93290
>>93288also a great idea
>>93289i thought that they would be too retarded to find it, but maybe that’s just wishful thinking on my part
No. 93291
>>93290they'll find it, but it'll be more difficult and not all of them will be that dedicated
>>93288/igi/ would be based but please no alog bans, they need to let us
correct him again.
No. 93296
>>93290Someone itt already said /sty/ and if one is clever enough to find it they all will
>>93291An entire board for him is an even worse idea and would attract more tourists, hidden or not, I do not understand the reasoning here except you want a fan club that already exists offsite
No. 93298
>>93296I’m the anon that suggested a hidden Luigi board, and I genuinely don’t think newfags/tourists are adept enough to navigate to a hidden board on an ib. You overestimate them, nonna. Some might come, sure, but they’ll have their segregated sanctuary like the Shaynafags had when their /snow/ threads got to be too much. Another benefit is that there could be multiple threads there, such as one for photo dumps, one for tinfoiling, one for the court case, etc. which would make Luigi threads more readable. Lastly, I’m pretty sure mods can make hidden board posts not show up on the front page.
Not to give myself asspats here, but the more I think it through, the more into this idea I am. Cerbmin, feel free to hmu for more brilliant ideas xx
No. 93300
>>93299nta, but
I’m going to miss ridiculing that chimp with the og nonas. I don’t want the tourists to win with their baiting. if only they got permabanned
No. 93305
>>93301>Unpopular opinion still being baited onIt's the bait thread, of course baiters are gonna bait in there. Atp it's not even the baiters' fault anymore, it's the retards that continuously respond to them and give them attention instead of ignoring them and reporting their posts.
The current Unpopular Opinions thread has less than 1k posts and it's been around for 10 days. Before the VPN ban, there was a new thread almost every 36 hours. I think the VPN ban is doing its job.
No. 93311
>>93304There is but they’ve become overzealous and anything too controversial/against the status quo is called bait now. And before anyone accuses me I don’t mean on the topic of race.
>>93308Why is that good.
No. 93312
>>93264Kek real
>>93270Any site where you can post anonymously will always have some amount of trolls. Trying to get rid of it entirely will just make lc slower than it already is. And there are still moids and baiting in /ot/ anyway so
No. 93321
I don't understand why redtexts for infighting and complaining have disappeared now.
>>>/w/348200 pretty sure that was red-texted
>>>/w/348301 this one definitely was
>>>/w/348345 infight bait and/or replying to idiotic bait
>>>/w/348375 this should be red-texted for trying to spark an infight. It's the same person as
>>>/w/348200If you shut this shit down, the thread will be mostly fine. Note that I'm not arguing everything else is a-ok, but it's just counter-productive to allow infighting, repetitive insults, and whining about farmers and farmhands in a cow thread. The anons who don't think she's interesting should hide the thread. And the farmhands should moderate it in a fair way according to the rules of LC. Repetitive comments include
complaining about the thread and moderation in the thread. It's very clear that a couple people want the thread locked. One is identifiable by their repeated grammatical blunders. We don't need repetitive stan posts in 5 different LC threads and it doesn't belong in the cow's thread at all.
No. 93323
File: 1746541582859.jpg (39.26 KB, 454x675, 1000002279.jpg)
Anyway I cant post on the vent thread because of the vpn ban so ill post this in here. I hate how faggots steal/stole masculine womens culture like supermodel aesthetic/culture. Maybe culture isnt the right word but you got what im saying. Fatties has been deemed and accepted as the classical universal female beauty. Around 80s 90s we had a moment where we appreciated women who were unconventionally beautiful. Im not talking about anorexic looking models. I know its a petty thing to vent about but the hate the society and everyone have for us isnt something I can wrap my mind around. Masculine women cant have their own thing without some vindictive bitch stealing or shitting on it. I hate when people say those models were manly/androgynous. Like ffs if youre not a blob with bland features youre clearly 'androgynous'. I want these faggots to die from ass cancer. Why effeminate men are appreaicated and its seen as their "thing" when they stole it from women (theyre bad at it too) but if any women who is masculine as them would do the same they would get called "tranny".(off-topic)
No. 93326
>>93321>They don't agree with me>IT'S ALL BAIT!!!!!Seriously, go outside. One post is mine and it had a reversed redtext because anons are allowed to discuss Taylor's thread location and contents for the next thread, that's not derailing. You tagged random people and claimed they are the same too kek If anons can talk about thread pics, anons can talk about thread location and contents for the next thread all threads allow towards the end. Thats not a form of infighting either. It got appealed, so deal with it.
I do suggest farmhands look into giving her to /snow/ though. She isn't a weeb anymore and doesn't do weeb things. Just living in China doesn't make her /w/ quality anymore and she only does lifestyle and food now. That's far from what /w/ is about. Other cows have had that happen too. She doesn't deserve a /pt/ spot. Her holistic posts are very mommyvlogger worthy for that board. It would help the fact she had extremely slow milk like Dakota too, but anons find dumb things to nitpick to keep the thread moving like "her kid was kicked out of his room… This is abuse". Forcing the milk doesn't make it milk. It wasn't even funny. It made the poster look dumb as hell.
No. 93327
I don’t like the /snow/ jannies. multiple times they don’t give a shit if something is off topic, even when it’s breaking the rules. They also took down some porn spam one of which I don’t think one of it should have been removed but they didn’t take down the exact same fucking porn spam from days prior when I reported it.
>>>/snow/2114227, just 2 examples. The moderation quality declined. If you’re loosening the moderation standards you should tell us.
No. 93332
>>93327What's weird is they're pretty prompt and fair in the threads I like to visit, but when I come to /meta/ there are complaints about errors in judgement I've never seen before.
I do agree with you, and I think we have a VPN ban for the first time ever because mods and moderation have been scaled down big time. Admin/mod team needed a way to cut down what they felt was an overwhelming flood because of anons constantly barking up their asses about why their dumb niche website doesn't have 24/7 human moderation on a scale Facebook and Twitter don't even deploy. It's why there was a poll option to apply it to boards that don't need it, instead of applying VPN bans to the threads with the worst offenders and forgoing the poll completely.
Not to mention suddenly declaring the winning poll option was actually the losing one because of the REAL numbers kekkkkBut if you complain about stuff like /ot/'s sharp drop in activity because of the VPN ban, you immediately get a bunch of dorks calling you a ban evader for saying you think an active website is good kek
No. 93352
>>93321you must be the oversensitive faggot from taylor r's thread. holy shit now I'm convinced you don't have a life.
>>93327maybe the /snow/ and /w/ jannies should switch places for a month kek, it'd be interesting to see the results
(infighting) No. 93354
File: 1746616212863.jpg (790.13 KB, 890x2276, 1000035452.jpg)
Mods, can you at least take a look at what is happening before assuming bait?
>>>/m/490809 is an almost personalityfag who routinely tries to sell her "money made the devs evil and put burqas on all characters" conspiracy theory in the nukani thread and does her best to dampen the excitement of anyone trying to discuss the game (
>>>/m/417595 ,
>>>/m/437521 ,
>>>/m/472890 ). Previously she seemed to spend her time in other threads seething over "suitslop" and "burqas" on the LADS otome boys, too.
Around the time of her last post on the nukani thread, "someone" went on an identical spergout on the official public discord server. Banning immediately for pointing that out while never banning her for shitting up the thread is kinda
sus, what's with this biased treatment?
No. 93375
>>93350Just checked this out, it's full of retarded scrotes calling women abusers for not wanting their husbands to watch porn and defending literal CP and labelling the concerned mothers histrionic…for being upset with the Feds raiding her house for CSAM.
We need a thread on lolcow that focuses on the retarded, insufferable AuDHD Mums who let their kids watch cocomelon for 14 hours and collect every type of benefit known to man to waste on louis vuitton and fags.
No. 93392
>>93388If you do any kind of research, nowhere in the world are small tits considered a sign of fertility. So yes, anon is spreading wrong information as well as saying japan doesn't have a drinking culture.
At least try to be less obvious.
No. 93394
File: 1746657718617.png (48.57 KB, 329x302, IMG_2352.png)
Can you remove the thread on /g about the faggot killing another faggot please?
No. 93403
>>93402See, I'm definitely retarded, but I'm also not going to go through all the effort just to post on one board on lc, you know? Of course the trolls and annoying /pol/fags are going to do all this extra work to bait and shit up the site, they are obsessed with being cancerous fags. But I can just go on /snow/ or /m/ to pass my 20 minute breaks and chat with nonas.
Yeah it sucks I can't answer stupid questions or reply to anons' vents anymore, but if admin wants to filter out normal anons instead of being smarter about applying moderation, that's on them.
No. 93411
>>93359Imagine expressing an opinion that infighting and insults contribute to shitting up a thread, and then getting dogpiled for saying that in /meta/. I didn't even report those posts until I saw they were magically no longer considered infighting and derailing. They are repetitive and useless in terms of discussion.
>>93326I said two posts were the same person and that is obvious to anyone who can read. She has collabed with Kimono Mom and visits Japan still, I don't understand why she should be in /snow/ again (which is where she used to be).
No. 93412
File: 1746686251362.png (769.12 KB, 1013x1164, emoticon substitute.png)
>>93402>>93403From the start I was telling you that the admin didn't set their mind on banning VPNs because of bad posters shitting up threads. Better moderation was never the intention behind the ban, yet some of you ate it up like the naive sheep you are. You'll never get a chance to vote to rescind it, so just be careful with the decisions you make in the future.
No. 93413
>>93412Why are you acting like the VPN ban is our fault. I voted against it and for all you know, so did the other anons complaining itt. You aren't even the only anon with your opinion, stop taking potshots at us and jerk your ego somewhere else.
>you'll never get a vote to rescind itBold of you to call "some" anons naive sheep when you believe the poll was legitimate and not admin using it for plausible deniability (see: "the real numbers say users WANT a VPN ban!!" cope).
No. 93448
File: 1746816337877.jpeg (26.21 KB, 230x219, 0131A5A0-2D6B-4B53-B9CC-1C08C8…)
>>93447
Here.
No. 93449
>>93448My favorite thing about her and other adjacent blackpill or tif posters is they slide in here pretending to be sooo sweet and timid
>Anyone relates?>I'm sad :/>I know this isn't my personal venting space but I'm so desperate for acknowledgementBut will instantly follow up with "you're all nothing but disgusting whores" and "shut up cocksucking swine bitch" if anyone disagrees or flags them for breaking site rules. The entitlement of abusing the people you demand emotional support from is astounding.
No. 93452
File: 1746817890215.jpeg (160.88 KB, 1170x470, IMG_1030.jpeg)
>>93449i’m pretty sure it isn’t BJ chan, someone is copying and pasting her reddit posts (you can look on her reddit) and spamming them. retarded how she treats herself like some influencer but whatever
No. 93453
>>93451I feel like we should petition mods/admin to clean out /2X/ and ban dysphoria posting. I posted my grievances with the latter on /ot/, but to put it shortly, it only encourages people who view women as subhuman to post here. And I don't think we need to expose the userbase to the abuse that inevitably follows, even if you and I check out because it's so repetitive kek. At the very least, isn't there a way to implement an automatic ban if someone tries to post a certain phrase or sequence of words?
>>93452What's funny is she was retarded enough to sperg out so often in the first place, making these posts indistinguishable from how she normally behaves. She brought it on herself.
No. 93456
>>93449It's so disingenuous, the fact that they do it out in the open, in threads that they know have a lot of activity from women who aren't autistic TIFs, outside of their containment thread on the hidden board, means that they are doing it on purpose to start an infight. I don't care whether they're genuine BPfag TIFs or if they're just BJchan copycat trolls, but I agree with
>>93453 that dysphoria shit in the vein of "I hate being female because being female is being a submissive whore" or doomposting (real or fake) about random social media posts from women in fucked up relationships, these posters should be banned. And those posts should be deleted (as well as the posts from sane people replying to them, imo), not just redtexted, because as their posts get attention, they will keep coming back for more and will never get bored.
>>93453>At the very least, isn't there a way to implement an automatic ban if someone tries to post a certain phrase or sequence of words?On CC, there used to be a word that would get you permabanned for including it in your post (I think it was "pathetic"; a leftover from one time they had to deal with a spammer). And on here, I've accidentally gotten VPN IPs permabanned just for trying to post a screencap of a funny reply to one of anorectal-kun's threads. The
trigger was his copypasta which was included in the screencap. If they can permaban you based on text in your pic, they can definitely permaban the blackpill tards based on text strings.
No. 93457
>>93454I feel like it's an actual TIF considering the "women are NPCs" post and the fact she's shilling /v/ so hard
>>>/m/492197 (imagine posting a screenshot containing lolishit AND circling it to prove that men are…better and less degenerate than women?? Kek)
No. 93465
>>93452The fact that she posts every fucking day and yet
still doesn't see that she's the problem. She does this habitually. No matter what response she gets, she still does it. She's completely deluded and obsessed with this pessimistic hypersexual worldview to the point where it's almost like a fetish. Actual porn actresses are less obsessed with sex than her. She actively looks up sex content as a braindead "reinforcement" of her schizophrenic delusion.
Of course, she's also posted lies on Reddit that someone told her that she should be euthanized for "not wanting to give blowjobs". That might be what pisses me off most. She acts all innocent on platforms where her post history is public.
No. 93466
File: 1746833742067.jpg (84.23 KB, 809x481, thanks-mods.jpg)
What is with this ban?
>>>/ot/2518386She's posting about an artist and art style she doesn't like in ARTIST SALT, a thread on /ot/. She should still be banned for her unintegrated typing style, but how is this a wrong thread ban?
And why is picrel not banned? Off-topic, noncontributing chatspam slop is allowed, but complaining about art styles you hate isn't?
No. 93479
>>93476iirc they started doing frequent custom bans to make the reason for the ban more transparent. there are loads of anons, even now, who still play dumb in /meta/ and go “why did i get banned for saying all jews should die??!?”
i do miss the generic “(USER HAS BEEN PUT OUT TO PASTURE)” though it was funny to read that under some posts kek
No. 93483
>>93411>visits japan Once every 4 years.
>kimono momYou can't be serious. Is the milk so thin you need to try and add stuff that rarely happens to it? That's hardly a reason to keep her in /w/. She's a lifestyle mommy vlogger now. Nothing she does is /w/ worthy. She's not a weeb, doesn't try to be a weeb, doesn't talk about anything anime or kawaii related.. it's okay if she's moved to a more appropriate thread. You already use /snow/ anyway.
No. 93495
File: 1747022237197.png (18.3 MB, 9000x4800, Husbando easter doodle board F…)
Farmhands, I just made the new husbando thread
>>>/g/550238 but made a mistake when editing the image and forgot an anon's doodle. Could you please change the OP pic for this fixed version?
No. 93498
>>93491No, she streams it in her Discord server. She'll log into one of the Roblox games and start talking about how she's the
victim of online bullying to get people to friend her so that she can message them and start sperging about bp content and tell them how to troll on lolcow.
No. 93502
>>93498Lmfao how fucking pathetic kek.
>>93501Are you bjchan's simp who goes around the site defending her? You're just as pathetic as she is. BTW she has her discord posted on her reddit account.
No. 93516
File: 1747095957007.jpeg (984.11 KB, 1064x2248, IMG_2684.jpeg)
I know the weegee thread is a shitshow but talking about Diddy’s case in there is OT. They share the same lawyer so that’s why he’s discussed but updates on Diddy’s trial don’t belong there.
No. 93520
>>93519It's two possibilities, the first is that whatever was uploaded is spam or offensive content, and it gets deleted by mods or filtered. Second is they're bumping the thread and then deleting the rule-breaking post to avoid catching a ban.
The third innocent possibility is that someone is posting something by mistake and deleting, but the thread is already bumped. It's happening too often for this to be the case.Either way it's annoying as shit, you're not wrong.
No. 93573
Why aren't mods banning this for derailing and infight bait?
>>>/ot/2522763>>>/ot/2522794>>>/ot/2523148This is the fucking "lolcow's funny caps" thread, not the "bitch and cry about threads you don't like" thread. Enough.
No. 93577
File: 1747230646312.jpg (265.38 KB, 936x683, 1000008080.jpg)
How is this blackpill outside of containtment? You let tradthot rethoric like women not waiting for marriage are whores and deserved to be used, that it's better being a housewive than a wageslave derail a thread for a whole day with no banning in sight and that one "i'm always beside my husband so i see his phone all the time" retard that posts the same shit over and over again also doesn't get banned but i make one post saying males are stronger than women and suddenly i'm bjchan? This is like the new role reversal of the word pickme, where being hyper feminine coquette tradthot is the epitome of female empowerment and any women who diverts from the standard or criticizes it is acksually the real pickme.
No. 93581
File: 1747237405221.png (Spoiler Image,904.5 KB, 736x736, image.png)
I'm asking in good faith: If I photoshop a woman to have a male body, then can s/he go in male attractions? I don't think the female attraction thread is the place for straight women.
No. 93583
>>93582Thanks for the ban, I appreciate it. Unfortunately
>>>/ot/2523564>>>/ot/2523574I'd like to request/suggest 24 hour bans for anybody who can't take a fucking hint and keeps bumping the thread to infight over retarded internet bullshit. I'm sure it's newfags who can't fucking control themselves, but at this point the amount of posts sperging out over that thread is utterly deranged.
No. 93585
>>93584>innocuous postsAnons have been screeching for over 20 hours now about how icky and gross they find the rpf thread in the fucking lolcow caps thread. It's annoying, it's off-topic, it doesn't belong in the thread, and the /ot/ farmhands are notoriously absent even on the best of days.
This website gives you the ability to hide threads for a reason, stop making your inability to click a button everyone else's problem.
No. 93591
File: 1747257634122.png (25.43 KB, 796x117, jesus christ.png)
Can the mods chill the fuck out with the redtexts? What did this anon do to deserve a ban? Is talking about astrology in any capacity now ban-worthy? It's a saged joke. Seriously you need to get a grip and start using your brain (if you have one) when you read reports instead of trusting the autists that live to report any joke.
No. 93593
>>93586>>93588You're on a website that has rules for where and how to post. Following those rules isn't le cringe gay, letting the mods know when the rules aren't being enforced is what this thread is for. It doesn't matter who posted what or how unfunny someone thinks the screencaps are, anons still need to follow site rules.
You're also in a thread called "complaints and suggestions", there will be complaints and also suggestions in here. I suggest avoiding this thread as well if you don't want to see that.
No. 93595
>>93593>You're on a website that has rules for where and how to postNowhere in the rules does it say that expressing the opinion that the caps posted in the funny caps thread aren't funny is a bannable offense.
>You're also in a thread called "complaints and suggestions", there will be complaints and also suggestions in here. I suggest avoiding this thread as well if you don't want to see that.There will also be discussion of the complaints and suggestions made in the "Complaints and Suggestions" thread. This is what is happening right now.
No. 93596
>>93595Okay, but there are rules on derailing and off-topic posting, which is why those posts ended up being banned for derailing? And I don't care if there's discussion in this thread, I'm letting you know that it's weird to complain about people "policing" threads when they use this thread as it is typically used.
I'm going to stop responding now because atp I think you two the ones who have been going around complaining about rpf in like 3 different threads on /ot/ and are asshurt about getting posted in here. This is a weird hill to die on.
No. 93599
>>93598Everyone hates it.
It's even worse when you know the history of the image. It's an image taken from an album of revenge porn leaked onto the darkweb. The person in the image is a mentally-challenged Cajun woman with severe psychiatric problems that was blackmailed into producing lewd content through intimidation and mental abuse. The original sociopathic admin of Lolcow thought the situation was "funny," so he made the spoiler image one of the most psychologically distressing photos that the woman was forced to take. Lots of admins have tried to change the spoiler image, but it's locked beneath 5 layers of advanced coding and it's password protected by an encryption key that only the original admin knows, so unfortunately we whenever you see the spoiler image you're actually looking at revenge porn of a mentally-disabled person. Sad.
No. 93603
>>93599ffs now I hate it way more than I casually assumed was possible.
Also I'm gonna troonfoil that's a scrote above saying kek, kek.
(scrotefoiling) No. 93622
>>93616the red texting in the second rpf thread has convinced me they really
do want to shut down conversation, multiple contributors red texted for what amounts to tone policing. you can get a ban for sarcasm these days. i want to believe its just some report-happy assholes and that mods aren't doing anything out of malice
No. 93636
>>93633Just shut up about it already. Every thread it's the same song and dance and i'm sick of it. Someone says "progress I guess" and you get
triggered and lose it. Arguing about her hair of all things, absolutely inane. "her hair is naturally curly" "no it's not! MOOOODDSSS THEY'RE WKING AGAIN!" like it's not that fuckin serious, goddamn. Who fucking cares.
No. 93639
File: 1747342937994.png (7.77 KB, 461x95, spoonfeeding.png)
This isn't my post, but wtf kind of newfag farmhand added this redtext? Asking for media recommendations in /m/ is not spoonfeeding. Spoonfeeding is specifically when someone asks about milk in cow threads that has already been posted. I've never seen someone be banned in /m/ for asking for fic/manga/anime recommendations before, this is absurd.
No. 93641
Why was this anon banned for not saging when posting fresh milk?
>>>/snow/2117767These are new images from her latest photoshoot.
No. 93646
File: 1747346529775.png (259.69 KB, 1440x802, Screenshot_20250515_175906.png)
this kind of thread moderation is killing the site. jannies need to stop being so disingenuous when shutting down derailing. allowing someone to essentially argue shit take and then act like it was both sides is not how the site is meant to be ran.
No. 93653
>>93652I'm not a TiF, nor have I ever been one, and I despise that word. It refers very directly to female genitals, which is your tell that it was coined by profoundly misogynistic moids on 4chan. A year ago, no one here was saying it, but a bunch of newfags from KF and refugees from 4c have flooded in here, and they say it constantly. I'd be similarly repulsed if I saw an anon using the term "slampig" to refer to a woman. "Hon" is not a problem, because the insult is directed at males.
Normalizing the use of "pooner" here is going to make the TiFs threads more attractive to TiMs. We don't want that.
No. 93654
File: 1747350637813.png (45.22 KB, 1094x136, 4 years ago.png)
>>93653I have no idea why you are not capitalizing the middle "i" but anyway,
>A year ago, no one here was saying itNo, people have been saying it here long before last year. IIRC one of the earliest TIF threads was even called "pooner version" or something like that.
It's okay if you don't like the word, but just because you don't like it doesn't mean everyone that uses it is from 4ch or a kiwifag or whichever other boogeyman. Derailing the TIF thread about it and complaining about it on /meta/ is childish.
No. 93659
>>93654NTA but you don't have to capitalize the middle letter. There's been more than one argument about this in the gender ideology threads. It's fine. It doesn't matter, and more than one anon says TiF/TiM.
>>93657But weren't the "pooner comics" banned at some point? I remember anons getting redtexted for uploading them.
>>93658You know, it's okay if you get banned. Everyone who has been on this site at length has been banned. Take it on the chin and post better next time.
No. 93664
>>93662>waah pickme is a misogynistic slur"Pickme" and "NLOG" are not misogynistic, because the terms exist to criticize women with internalized misogyny. "Pickmes" are women who denigrate themselves for men, thereby enabling harmful male behavior, and NLOGs are actively hostile to other women. And in any case, I'd rather personally be called a retarded bitch than watch women who purport to be GC feminists unironically use a misogynistic term coined my TiMs for the express purpose of insulting female bodies specifically. "Pooner" is, in my mind, no different from misogynistic gay men saying that a woman is "serving cunt." Stop adopting misogynistic fagspeak and trannyspeak. Like I said, it makes the TiF threads
more appealing to the kind of nasty TiMs we're trying to keep
away from the site.
>>93654>I have no idea why you are not capitalizing the middle "i"I feel like some newfag asks this at least once a month these days. You do not capitalize a component word in an acronym if it is hyphenated. Look it up.
No. 93665
File: 1747357740764.jpg (57.6 KB, 581x455, Screenshot_20250513-114625_Chr…)
>>93659>But weren't the "pooner comics" banned at some pointYeah, two years ago
No. 93666
>>93664Calling me a newfag when you didn't even know that pooner was a term used before last year is wild. I'd say maybe 10% of anons use lowercase and 90% use uppercase - the point being that it really doesn't help anonymize you.
The meanings of NLOG and pickme have shifted so far from their original meanings and it enables them to be used in misogynistic ways. Anons use those terms anyway.
>watch women who purport to be GC feminists unironically use a misogynistic termThis really isn't a feminist website, it never was and it never will be. It's the unfortunate reality.
>Like I said, it makes the TiF threads more appealing to the kind of nasty TiMs we're trying to keep away from the site.It really doesn't though. TIMs are gonna laugh at women regardless. TIMs dont even really use the TIF thread, but it's an open secret at this point that TIFs infest it, particularly TIFs from Tumblr.
You're really not the word police. Having a meltie over "pooner" as if it matter to anyone except TIFs is retarded. Are we gonna start to redtext bitch, cunt, and slut too because those are misogynistic terms? Are we gonna autoban them? No, we aren't. Use your brain for a minute.
No. 93668
>>93649>>93651IIRC 4chan TIFs who LARP as incels and believe they're better than other TIFs also use that term constantly. At least, according to some posters in an old TIF thread.
>>93667You don't need to give the scrote attention (yes, not even by posting about it here), just report and ignore. The shit will be cleaned up.
No. 93670
>>93666yeah it's sort of an all or nothing thing for me. I don't like pooner because I find it kind of cringeworthy; it's just not as elegant as retard or fag. But to ban its use feels like a double standard. That being said, conspiratorially-minded individuals may be concerned about the following, potentially related facts:
>recent increase in usage of "pooner" – not novel, but more common>rising defence of HSTS over AGP men ("the good ones", which as we know is a source of discourse amongst MTFs themselves)>objections to TTD/hostile reactions to transgender people posting on this website (beginning on the /snow/ MTF thread which then migrated to /ot/)>perhaps most damningly, the fact the FTM/MTF threads have been linked on /tttt/MTFs have developed advanced techniques for slowly transforming even the most niche internet spaces to suit their needs. They are ecologically adapted to cyberspace through the power of weaponised autism and the most stubborn
victim complexes known to man. I'm just a tad worried.
No. 93671
>>93669I was addressing the overall thought that farmhands "don't know what they're doing in that thread", not just the spoonfeeding ban.
To me, the farmhands in there have been doing a great job. It's overrun with unintegrated newfags shitting up the thread with nothingposts and infighting, who also can't stop themselves from sperging out on other anons. Not to mention they love the thread but can't seem to lurk because there is a higher rate of reposts than in other threads.
Someone upthread mentioned "spoonfeeding" only applies to cow boards, which is not true. I have seen spoonfeeding bans in all of the non-cow boards (the "exception" may be /meta/, but any bans of that nature probably get absorbed into a general "newfag" ban).
Given the context of the rest of the thread, I'm okay with this spoonfeeding ban. Of course other anons may not agree with me, that's fine.
No. 93674
>>93673Sure? I understand you're being passive-aggressive to make a point, but you can report whatever you want and the farmhands will decide if it merits a ban. There have been many times where farmhands decided not to issue a ban for a post I reported. I don't understand where this idea of "farmhands will ban anything you report!!!" comes from when they issue bans for spam reporting.
>>93672No, we've recently had another wave. /snow/ and /ot/ seem to be bearing the brunt of it, and they're leaking into /m/.
No. 93676
>>93636>just shut up about it alreadyNo. Cow threads aren't your fanpages. Your comments are the ones that do not belong and if you would shut up there would be no argument in the first place.
Note you can't even refute what I said about how fangirling in other cow threads catches bans because you're a disingenuous puke.
No. 93682
File: 1747379240896.gif (1.69 MB, 498x279, chris-chan-off-the-internet.gi…)
>>93677The threats about shutting down the evil lolcor are sending me
No. 93690
>>93687Just wanted to say thank you to the mods for cleaning up the gore quickly. They were really onto it.
>>93688maybe for the best since it seems like she really enjoys the attention and was
still mad about "chimp-out" being used from last time's thread incident kek.
No. 93697
File: 1747407808382.png (5.63 KB, 546x115, error.png)
i keep getting this error when trying to post a brand new screenshot onto the funny lolcow caps thread
No. 93699
Heads up, there's two threads for Unpopular Opinions 183 right now.
Could you lock
>>>/ot/2525309 since it's breaking the thread theme and has a low-effort OP? Thanks.
No. 93700
File: 1747414770039.png (13.6 KB, 562x222, Screenshot 2025-05-16 at 21-57…)
why are mods siding with TRAs that think ethel cain looks in any way feminine?? wtf, who cares if you call tranny apologists retards
No. 93705
>>93695>I wasn't even among the farmers debating your report happy ass over goddamn hair of all thingsYet here
you are replying to
me. I'm also not the one reporting because I'm not a meek snitch, and not the only one you've "debated" because your behavior is retarded and annoying to everyone. The thread is not a debate, go away and let people have their dumb commentary on cows. We don't need faggots like you waxing poetic about an unwashed alky's "hair type" as the reason it looks like shit.
No. 93709
>>93705I have made it clear that I
am not among the ones debating her hair at all you absolute mong. You lack reading comprehension which isn't surprising. Not once did I say the criticisms against her hair were a problem, I said that whining about a difference in opinion and calling it WKing was retarded. End of.
No. 93716
>>93714NTA but the same thing happened with that Vergil anon's posts from the husbando thread kek, a bunch of people in the caps thread were reeeeing that her posts were so over the top and rapey. I remember how one anon said she's funny (and like, that's the point? They're retarded horny OTT shitposts in the designated thread), but some Regina George wannabe replied to her "oh honey… we're laughing at you, not with you" even though at least half of the replies were in fact laughing
with her. Well then, can't post this because it's unfunny tumblr humor, can't post that because it's too tryhard and cringey, what the fuck are anons supposed to post then? We don't all have the sense of humor, what we find funny is not always going to overlap.
>>93699>low-effort OPNo. The old Unpopular Opinions threads had that same OP. The OP with the insulting (and, frankly, bait-y) comments and that one "Bait & Infight central" pic is a much more recent thing. Besides, there's nothing "high-effort" about the newer, intentionally provocative OP, it's just insulting posters and giving them more fuel to infight.
>>>/ot/2416006 this "OP theme" started only 2 months ago
No. 93742
File: 1747487707760.png (15.72 KB, 1858x140, really_retarded_ban.png)
What the fuck is going on with the nonsense bans in the Shayna thread?
First someone was banned for posting milk without using 下げ when that is how the cow boards have worked since the site was created and now someone has been banned for for derailing when they were talking about Shayna in the Shayna thread. It was a reply to an ongoing conversation. That is not derailing.
I'm not normally someone who whines about bans but this is straight up fucking retarded.
No. 93750
File: 1747507664769.jpg (87.46 KB, 684x328, Untitled.jpg)
what the actual fuck are you talking about? that's not what avatarfagging is. people post images of the same characters all the time to add to a thread while also having a discussion. please understand what these terms mean before banning for them.
No. 93756
>>93751someone on this site really hates submas and reported for "avatarfagging" for simply posting submas before and i assume either the mod also hates submas or they just didn't read the thread at all.
>>93754>>93755you cannot stop anons from posting characters you don't like by getting them banned. fucking autist.
No. 93757
>>93755Personalityfagging is a specific thing where someone is being attention seeking in the thread they aren’t going to ban someone who is otherwise peacefully contributing to the conversation for the same amount of time as a personalityfag
>>93756I never fucking replied to your post about the Pokémon shit retard that was about the other anon‘s problem
No. 93759
>>93757Not really. I've seen people being banned for personalityfagging even if they're not trying to get attention. Being extremely recognizable in any way is personalityfagging to me. If I see a post and I can immediately tell who the poster is, then that's a personalityfag.
>>93758The way moderation is going, at a certain point posting any images ever will be ban-worthy. Same with posting sentence fragments or using a colon or putting the 'u' in color.
No. 93765
File: 1747517508588.jpeg (413.54 KB, 828x801, IMG_8908.jpeg)
>>93750maybe stop shitting up the thread with these two retards. trainfags regularly spam the threads and it's exhausting.
it's fucking annoying to open up the pokemon thread and see shit like picrel, just take it to the retarded husbandoposting thread or make your own train autism containment thread already.
No. 93766
File: 1747517938170.png (449.56 KB, 654x772, Screenshot 2025-05-17 143807.p…)
>>93765there's at least 5 submas enjoyers and you can't stop us from posting about pokemon things in the pokemon thread, autist. you gonna report the n and ghetsis enjoyers too?
No. 93771
File: 1747523489051.jpg (158.95 KB, 1080x854, Screenshot_20250517_171014.jpg)
I'm not the poster but this was in the shay threay, literally discussing the topic being posted about. How the hell is it derailing?
No. 93772
>>93771My bad, missed
>>93742They're on point though, someone's gone full retard lately on that thread
No. 93775
>>93732They don't have any proof of it being a selfpost, don't let them lie to you. They've done it in multiple threads in /snow/ for several months now with zero proof and that wouldve never been allowed in the past because its lying. They aren't outing post history (a process that requires permission anyway) they are deliberately misleading because they think it's funny and they've never had to follow the rules. Jannies are cows.
>mods and jannys God I hate when newfags try to tardsplain at me
No. 93778
>>93760>rancefag and pakichan and bj-chan and other anons who are so recognizable they have a nameNot only that but when they show up, they make sure to let everyone know by using their favorite avatar or catchphrases while basically screaming "HEY GUYS IT'S ME, THAT ONE POSTER X-CHAN", they blog alot, and they respond to other anons who call them by their unique nicknames, as if they were more important. On 4chan sometimes this used to be called "thread celebrity" in general threads for certain topics. I feel this is a different form of rule-breaking from what the greentext poster is doing.
>>93750>>93758Ngl I can tell you apart from the other submasfags just by the way you never capitalize anything and your general behavior. I can tell there's around 3-5 submasfags in total because they post often enough and write long enough posts for other people to recognize them. People posting Azumarill pictures aren't distinguishable from one another in the least because they only write one sentence at most. Btw I do not think you're personalityfagging, I just think you happen to be recognizable among the other submas posters, probably accidentally. If you intentionally attach a picture of the same character or with the same theme in all or most of your posts on the site, you are avatarfagging, but I can't know whether you do that or not because I'm not a farmhand.
No. 93780
File: 1747540382160.png (61.18 KB, 473x171, Untitled.png)
>>93778all i did ITT on that day was post a response with another submas pic after the first one i posted. i was reported and banned for that. other people ITT post a character or a pokemon and reply with the same character/mon. according to the retard's definition that is personalityfagging. it's not. they're just butthurt. no one posts submas outside the pkmn thread or incest thread. if you can tell me apart it's because this sped reported me for the exact same thing before and tried to do it to others. and btw sometimes i'm on my phone which auto-capitalizes so i've certainly posted without you knowing it was me lol
>>93779no one is doing that in the pokemon thread. that reporting anon is a gigantic autist who wants to control what characters are being posted. someone even said that they don't care about submas but were hoping that they'd be the next threadpic to piss that specific anon off. that anon is the only one whining about this and continually refusing to make any contributions to the pokemon thread besides complaining and reporting. again, that's more similar to personalityfagging than any submas poster because they're instantly recognizable.
No. 93781
>>93750Except this is exactly what avatarfagging is? When all of your posts in the thread have an attached recognizable character to it, it becomes avatarfagging. When you add said character as a reaction image to all of your posts, even when your posts have nothing to do with said character. I don't even post in the pokemon thread and I know about this poster just from scrolling by.
t.used to avatarfag in some /vg/ general over a decade ago
No. 93783
>>93775Is something wrong? Mods, admin, jannies, farmhands, I’m talking about how
all of them are capable of seeing our post histories, locations, etc. I wasn’t trying to make it sound like I was talking about them as if they’re all one entity.
No. 93787
>>93780>that anon is the only one whining about this and continually refusing to make any contributions to the pokemon thread besides complaining and reporting.and how would you know?
btw the big difference between, say, the ghetsisfags and you is the amount of seething
No. 93792
>>93779That's true, but us regular posters can't know if that anon is actually avatarfagging, i.e. attaching a pic of the same characters in every single one of her posts, as opposed to just when it's appropriate. I think it's likely that she doesn't always post SubMas pics in the Pokemon thread, but imo her posting habits do border on avatarfagging sometimes.
>>93784NTA and I don't hate the characters, but please. That anon didn't say anything that would suggest she's a "SubMas hater", she was just supporting the idea that you're avatarfagging based on her own experience.
And what she's saying is in fact possible. For example, I'm not a Genshinfag, but sometimes I'll happen to read a bit of the posts in that thread as I scroll down the /m/ index, and that's how I find out about that general's resident husbandofags. Maybe recognizing anons that easily is a skill that's learned by us who used to post all day long in 4chan generals rife with avatarfags and other personalityfags. But here's the thing: if
you've been singled out multiple times already, by
multiple people (both Pokemon thread posters and random passersby), it's neither a coincidence nor just one paranoid anon who hates your faves and is obsessed with you. That's just you being easy to recognize and not realizing it, or denying it.
No. 93793
File: 1747553663421.png (178.76 KB, 622x473, 1000027022.png)
>>93762I think she still posts in the 'post your art' thread sometimes, but usually spoilers her images (most likely to avoid situations like what's going on ITT)
>>93792>But here's the thing: if you've been singled out multiple times already, by multiple people (both Pokemon thread posters and random passersby), it's neither a coincidence nor just one paranoid anon who hates your faves and is obsessed with you. That's just you being easy to recognize and not realizing it, or denying it.NTA but that's not always true, some anons try to apply personalities to things that are already common (pic is just an example). As far as I know there seems to be several anons posting those train guys rather than just one.
No. 93798
>>93784I just browse lc a lot, idk who or what submas is kek. I recognize the character because he reminds me of raidou and it catches my eye how he's constantly being posted.
Don't take things so personally, I was talking completely neutrally about the term avatarfagging. Fyi there's always been threads on lc where avatarfagging was encouraged, like the very various husbando threads, but if the anons in the pokemon thread don't like you avatarfagging then that's the culture of the thread.
No. 93812
>>93796So why don't we just ban the thread then? Why do you want it moved to a hidden board instead of just outright banned? If it's still allowed, we'll still have newfags coming in from Twitter, they'll still refuse to integrate, they'll still infight and vendettapost. Moving them to a hidden board will accomplish nothing, banning the topic at large will accomplish everything.
Anybody else ever notice that stupid people like to think that they're smarter than everyone else? So they try to trick us? But it's so see-through and obvious that nobody is fooled? Yeah, we all know that you want the thread moved to /sty/ because you're a retarded Italian apeman fan and you don't like the autosage on /g/. You want it moved because then you can post all about him without having farmers see it. You want it to be moved to /sty/ because then you can keep your thread and you can keep posting about him and it can be your new "Luigiboard." We all know this. It's very obvious. You're not tricking anyone.
All Luigifags should be banned from this site permanently. Anyone that has ever brought up Luigi once in a positive light should be banned, doxxed, and reported to the relevant authorities immediately.
No. 93816
>>93813My Lyme disease is already in remission so I don't get your point.
>>93815It's unbelievable that posting about Jimen or whoever the hell will get you banned for a week but endlessly raving for months about gurgling with Luigi's warm piss is A-OK. Newfags will still find the thread because they're coming here for that thread specifically, and the link to that thread will get shared easily.
No. 93817
File: 1747597141308.png (165.75 KB, 708x701, IMG_2285.png)
>post picture
>the anons ITT rage and continue to not contribute
Great imageboard. Can we demote the farmhands who also hate a character and will ban people based on that
No. 93825
>>93795>>93800>>93814>4 different people agree that you're husbandofagging outside of containment too much>everyone who points out the obvious is an obsessed submas haydurrkek
>>93819NTA but I don't know, maybe they're actually trying to follow good posting etiquette to avoid avatarfagging on /m/? Even in the husbando threads you have people who are too afraid to namedrop their husbandos and becoming "avatarfags" even though that's considered acceptable there. A little bit of restraint can go a long way.
No. 93826
>>93822No?
>>93825I have doubts anyone cares this much about those stupid characters, someone last thread even wanted the OP to be Submas just to make you mad.
No. 93830
>>93826>someone last thread even wanted the OP to be Submas just to make you mad>youOnce again, not everyone who is just stating objective facts is a "hater". I don't hate the characters. Not dicksucking the train autists 24/7 ≠ being
triggered by their presence. Finding one of the submasfags a bit annoying ≠ hating submas.
No. 93833
File: 1747613533930.jpeg (753.43 KB, 3464x3464, w.JPEG)
/w/ farmhands will hand out the most retarded bans and then won’t ban unintegrated twitterfags. You can’t even go into the cow boards without zoomer xitter users making themselves extremely obvious or reddit snark page users announcing themselves. Lolcow is dead.
No. 93841
>>93838Those Japanese swimsuits are worn by minors in grade school, and common sense dictates that if someone's posting a lot of CP and lolisho then other sexual stuff they post that looks like a minor is highly likely to be a minor. I guess the CP raids here aren't proven because no one gave specific titles or the names of
victims in a film? Secondly, yes, there are gifs of Japanese little girls being groped or in other compromising positions, I scrolled past as fast as I could because I didn't want to see worse. If you're going to keep going "nuh uh! There's no proof!" and inadvertently defending Poppy of all people with no intention to seek out the proof before you or use common sense then I don't know what to tell you.
No. 93857
>>93856Because /w/ posters have brainworms where if you don't agree you're a "whiteknight" or defending the cow. They don't actually know what those words mean. Not having an opinion? Whiteknighting. Being neutral? Whiteknighting. Not shitting on the cow in your post atm? Whitknight.
It really needs to be bannable to accuse anons of Whiteknighting.
No. 93867
>>93858I came here to witness their spergout after seeing the ban in the Pokémon thread kek
>They really seem to get a kick out of cramming their husbandos in people's faces after anons ask them to stopI'd say ">inb4 they accuse the other husbandofags of doing the same" but it already happened lol. The other husbandofags keep it relatively low-key and when there's a sudden increase in specific pokéboy posting it's usually a one-off thing when multiple anons post about the same character/s (the ojisan posting last thread, for instance), or they just post pics without saying anything at all. On the other hand, the trainfags regularly post and sperg about their husbandos and act like everyone else loves them except for their boogeyman, but thankfully some of them have been posting more in the incest and husbando containment threads lately.
I have a feeling that whoever reported that trainfag did so because said trainfag reacted in an overly hostile way for seemingly no reason (the reason is that Emmet & Ingo weren't being praised as the best and most popular characters, not even being insulted) and then apologized for her reaction, both while posting pics of the train autists. Then, the reporting user might've seen this as an opportunity to get her banned, because just posting the twins isn't enough for a ban. If their husbandoposting didn't come with that obnoxious behavior I doubt anyone would care this much.
Kek at the anon(s) tinfoiling that this is "not following board culture" and part of a big conspiracy to kill the off-topic boards. It's all cope and fake concern for the state of the site, they just don't want to admit that they can be annoying as fuck to several other farmers.
No. 93870
File: 1747701479813.jpg (388.99 KB, 1079x976, 1000063737.jpg)
Seriously, how fucking autistic and retarded can you mods be? No, this doesn not belong in gender ideology hate thread and no, it was fully on topic. Quit being an autistic redditor about what is and isn't allowed on the MTF thread. I didn't start a discussion out of nowhere, I commented about a tranny posted there. We're allowed to comment on how much we hate the TIMs posted there and why.
No. 93884
File: 1747734413219.jpg (852.78 KB, 2846x2880, 1000008293.jpg)
>"assigned job as a mother"
>"fantasizing about infant murder" in relation to abortion
Woman's wellbeing > child. I know it's the unpopular opinions thread, but are you seriously going to allow tradfags like this on the site? religious tradfags and people who actually care about women will never get along. The more you allow these retards here the more they will keep shitting up the website and attracting newfags who can't integrate. You need to start banning any rethoric like picrel and all the other anons who entertain this shit for hours.
No. 93890
>>93869>taylorfagshm, ok, what's going on, let me check
>one post redtexted kek
hope someone is paying you anon
No. 93898
>>93893>>93894I know it does almost nothing but admitting to or announcing intentions to spread this site and attract more retards deserves a permaban.
>>93886Agreed. Remove these and the luigi threads pronto to make this place as inhospitable and unattractive to these sorts of retards as possible. Nothing of value would be lost. They can make their own discord or communities elsewhere, lc is not the place for it.
No. 93912
>>93900The luigifagging was sort of cute in the beginning, then it spiraled unchecked and became a metastasizing cancer.
>>93911KEK. Right? We're all samefag "jealous lesbians and trannies" here.
No. 93913
>>93911hey, don't bring lesbians into it. luigi is cute and did a good thing. i do think it should be moved to /sty/ though, it would be fun to put that board to use.
>>>/snow/938194>I unlocked this thread because because there was supposedly new milk. All I see is nitpicking a twitch thot's boob job. This brings me to my next question, would anyone give a fuck if she wasn't dating idubbbz? I've decided to lock this thread again because anisia does not even meet one of the snow thread creation criteria. The only thing this girl has is her fame by association, and she doesn't even display bizarre behavior. 5yrs later we are in the exact same situation. Please lock this shit thread. The title literally calls her "idubbbz girlfriend" before it mentions her name because that's the only interesting/remotely milky thing about her.
No. 93943
Someone has either posted her own titties in
>>>/g/85292 or it's some creepy scrote using stolen pictures for engagement
No. 93945
>>93942You're not keeping up. My initial complaint was anons who aren't conservative being instantly banned while conservative/borderline/pol/ are hardly banned.
So you don't want historical sites burned down, most people don't. But it isn't a hyperliberal stance understand why people who are descendants of the enslaved who built the plantation will celebrate a couple of greedy rich people burning down a psuedo-slave resort for insurance money.
No. 93953
File: 1747772427121.jpg (753.02 KB, 1179x2276, weegee.jpg)
>>93950It’s even worse than usual right now. Time for sty.
No. 93962
>>93961How are you hearing about it everywhere on lolcow to the point of such frothy seething when
I don't go in that thread and the only mention of the retard I ever see are from seething anti-Luigichans.
No. 93975
File: 1747817001749.gif (2.68 MB, 498x373, ronald.gif)
>>93900Every time someone calls him "Lolcow's husband" it raises my blood pressure. Hate when retards purport to speak for the whole site
No. 93983
>>93978Nta but shouldn't the fact that this isn't a porn site be
more of a reason to lock it? Especially considering what the thread pic is and someone already posted her own nudes there
No. 93984
File: 1747833942214.jpeg (468.84 KB, 1214x2961, luigifags.JPEG)
I ventured into a very small portion of the last luigi thread for evidence of the high quality posting nonnas want to defend here. These are the bright minds that will revive the site!
No. 93993
>>93989Jesus you’re so retarded. The entire point is that it’s filled with baiting retards.
>”Let’s keep the baiting retard thread up and tell people that are sick of baiting retards to just hide it when it consistently leaks out of containment!” Luigi thread defenders also fail to account that it’s not just 1 or 2 anons complaining about this. I didn’t post the rape fanfic image, I would’ve included it in the other image edits if I had. There’s numerous anons tired of this. What does their behavior contribute to this site other than shitting it up? Can you even tell me or are you just here to defend your nigel while claiming you never use the thread?
No. 94002
>>93999this is what i pray for every god damn day. allah knows my sorrows. inshallah the two threads are locked soon.
>>93989yeah it's all bait. so why isn't it redtexted then? why do the gay scrotes get special allowances to bait and infight?
No. 94017
>>94013are we on the same site? every week someone here posts themselves, or uncensored porn of any kind, this isn't something groundbreaking or even urgent
>>94015you can also ask your god jannies to see if i have posted there, and it will be revealed that i haven't
No. 94027
>>94023Part of it is that Luigi spaces are by and large incredibly strict about what people can talk about (most have rules like no implying guilt, no “thirsting” beyond saying he’s cute, no talking about his family, friends or acquaintances, no connecting healthcare reform to him…) and lolcow is not. The other half of it is that they want a place to gossip about the minor cows in the fandom (and it is a fandom). If the so called Luigi “communities” on reddit, twitter and even discord weren’t such puritanical hellholes it would take some attention off this site.
It makes sense to lock it until his next appearance in June and if it has to be banned then so be it. There’s nothing new to talk about except occasional court documents and letters he sends.
No. 94033
>>94027>no talking about his family, friends or acquaintancesThat is a
rule site wide for cows.
No. 94035
>>94028I guess it was convenience since there was already a thread here.
>>94029He’s cute and people don’t care about his fat scrote
victim.
No. 94040
>>94036Nobody on LC finds those photos, they're sourced by an archive group outside of LC. But anyway, like the nonnies said right now the thread serves as a space for people to
almost freely talk about the Luigiverse and that's why it's attractive.
No. 94042
File: 1747852298644.jpeg (679.64 KB, 2489x1046, faggots for luigi.jpeg)
>>94041>Lazy fags>Fags>Gay scrotes>ScrotesCan we finally talk about this? Or am I gonna be hit with a scrotefoiling ban? Either way, isn't it obvious by now that the majority of the people talking about Luigi Mangione online (not just on Lolcow, but online as a whole) are either faggots or gay trans-identified males? Everywhere you go on the web, it's mostly moids talking about Luigi Mangione. They talk about him on fetish sites, on forums dedicated to gay sex, on gay furry websites too. There's a dedicated thread to him on 4chan's gay porn board. There are entire Telegram groups and Discord servers dedicated to faggots "gooning" (prolonged masturbation) to Luigi Mangione. It's very obvious, even as an outsider, that scrotes are the driving force behind the Luigi Mangione "fandom" (as one anon itt put it).
Why am I to believe that the Luigi thread here is any different than other places online? If every online venue dedicated to Luigi is at least 75% gay moids… what are the odds that there are 0 gay moids in the thread for him here? Especially when the exact same phrases, the exact same themes, the exact same rhetoric, the exact same "thirstposts," etc., that you see elsewhere are also posted in the thread? We can all admit that the Celebricows thread on /ot/ is the faggot hub of /ot/, why can't we admit that the Luigi thread is the faggot hub of /g/? Why are we allowing scrotes on Lolcow? Why are we all supposed to pretend that it's not scrotes in that thread? Why is that thread not banned yet?
No. 94050
File: 1747853070301.jpeg (292.84 KB, 596x748, IMG_9224.jpeg)
Is this allowed
No. 94067
>>94066this anon said it was site wide kek
>>94033 and Luigi isn’t officially a cow either
No. 94069
>>94066Luigi committed an infamous crime; his family and friends have been talked to by the media, and some of his friends went out of their way to talk to the media too. It would be flat out retarded to ban the thread for posting pictures of his family and friends when, at this point, they are widely known among the people even with a superficial interest of the crime. It's a totally different scenario than say Shayna's thread getting banned back when she was just started to get threads because anons posted a picture of her step-sister, because her step-sister is not related to a public figure of such notoriety and to my knowledge, Shayna never posted her step-sister to any of her accounts. Anons are throwing shit at the wall and trying to see what sticks. They claim the Luigi thread is producing such a level of retarded newfags that it's completely unavoidable and irritating but the worst I see is an anon obviously hailing from another site due to syntax, but it's also summertime. We
always get retarded newfags in the summer. It's always been a thing. I don't know why everyone is choosing to forget this. Also 4chan closed down recently before coming back online so we'll get stray fags and trannies from that, too. The worst the Luigi thread has done has been flood the front page and produce some handmaiden newfags that get sniffed out like a drop of blood 50 meters away from a shark and get dogpiled for it. Moderation has also seemingly been very slow and torturous.
No. 94071
File: 1747856787336.jpg (646.77 KB, 1179x1426, IMG_2165.jpg)
>>94068seems to be allowed, and that makes sense since it’s not a global or /g/ rule.
No. 94095
>>94093Nobody cares for your boogeyman.
>>94074is a tranny?
No. 94103
>>94069His thread has been full of newfags since April though. Guess they arrived early for spring?
>>94100>We are always looking for staff.Pfft yeah that's why you had applications closed for ages until just now
No. 94106
>>94101The admins have already updated the recent threads with the message:
>This thread is a mess. Obvious tourists will be permanently banned with no further warnings. If the rulebreaking continues we will ban these threads entirely. Report rulebreaking posts.In other words, this is the final warning. If things don't improve, the threads will be removed altogether. There's no need to keep responding here about it, an official update has already been posted. That said, anyone is free to voice their complaints here if they want.
>>94104There is literally an admin updates thread, and when required the admins do respond in specific threads. Applications have never been closed, and anyone was always welcome to apply/email if they wanted to. Just because it wasn't on the banner doesn't mean they closed applications.
No. 94110
>>94106>this is the final warningOkay where were the other warnings? Why did it take more than half a year for you to decide to make this the 'final warning' hm? Too little too late, always.
>The admins have already updated the recent threads with the message:Why did you need the "admins" to do that? Why couldn't one of you have done that? Are the "admins" such micromanagers? Or are you lot just unable to do the job that you applied for?
>the admins do respond in specific threadsI can count the amount of times the "admins" have posted on this site this year with my fingers. Trying to tell us that these "admins" are communicative as if we don't use the site ourselves is low IQ behavior.
>Applications have never been closedKEK you're acting like people haven't been asking about this for months and you're just now choosing to reply… because? Did one of the jannies finally find a nigel and decide to leave the IB behind, so now you need an extra set of hands? Bigger question: do the "admins" actually ACCEPT any applications?
No. 94111
>>94110previous warning:
>>>/g/540809>This thread has devolved into unintegrated non-farmers who refuse to follow the rules and have now made it into a complete cesspit. Due to this, we are setting this thread and all future ones to auto sage, and if the thread's quality continues to go down the shitter further, it will be removed from /g/ completely.cerbadmin previously commented in thread about a Luigi-related cow here
>>>/g/526162 No. 94113
>>94111you really want to remind everyone that cerbmin casually doxed some random woman on LC, despite that not being allowed even for cows? I mean, that's a choice.
Out of all the things cerbmin could have commented on, that's the autism she posted. Fascinating.
No. 94114
>>94112we posted at the same time, but agree, the post you linked deserves a serious reply.
I'd also like to know why
>>93483 presumes to know what boards nonas use.