File: 1695537491382.jpg (50.53 KB, 540x394, majoras mask cows.jpg)
No. 63746
I wouldn't be surprised if this is the same constantly unsaging sperg
>>>/w/308727 They can't integrate
No. 63794
>>63790Nah, there was plenty of milk, and there was always some self-posting and whining about who/what got posted, even in the early threads. It's just that recently the brigading from Twitter/Kiwifarm right-wingers gpt bad and they either weren't banned or not banned long enough.
The most egregious example is that @theantiherokate schizo who shit up the last two threads with her fascoid anime villain rants. Mod didn't even ban her AFAICT. Just ban the rightoids/racebaiters/derailers on sight and the threads would be fine.
No. 63801
File: 1696050213290.jpeg (620.62 KB, 1170x971, IMG_5110.jpeg)
We lose the tradwives threads due to infighting, now we’re losing post-leftcows for the exact same bullshit. Where am I supposed to post this picture of Dasha looking like the crypt keeper
No. 63820
there's an insufferable autist having an hours long meltdown in the /m/ transwashing thread
>>>/m/324512 derailing and infighting all because they don't like the character in the op photo.
No. 63844
File: 1696238554099.gif (1.12 MB, 498x392, _.gif)
cp in /ot/ bumping off front page
No. 63911
Request for the gardening thread in /g/
>>>/g/209934 to be moved to /ot/. It's not a girl talk topic in any way and it sees little traffic. I'm hoping by having it moved to /ot/ it'll get more traffic..
No. 63914
The GIOYC thread mostly just consists of schizo autists replying to eachother, or one autist larping or what the fuck ever.
>>>/ot/1715904>>>/ot/1715884>>>/ot/1715915>>>/ot1715942>>>/ot/1715958All of these are replying to the posts above it, including direct reference to the posts. It's just passive aggressively breaking the rules and it's spergy and annoying.
No. 63942
Am I retarded or is this redtext just confusing
>>>/pt/920412 the anon should've saged their shit but what is the complaint that needs to go in /meta/ I'm not getting it?
No. 63960
>>63947So is this the sperg from meta?
>>>/pt/920465 because it sounds like it
No. 63970
>>63969He's still going at it 5 hours later, I think my post really hit a nerve with him. He started sperging out after I made a post there saying I recoiled at a bad picture of my boyfriend, he's now attacking random anons who are taking the bait thinking they're me and calling them an ugly incel loser who would never deserve a good looking man.
He's telling "me" (I stopped replying hours ago) to "take care of my looks" even though I literally said I do put a lot of effort into them and I just wish my boyfriend would too. But asking that is very offensive to moids and deserves a full spergout on multiple /g/ threads kek.
No. 63977
File: 1696721484365.jpg (347.74 KB, 980x1734, IMG_20231008_012906.jpg)
>>63970Holy shit 10 hours later and still obsessed with me. He's creepy as hell, is this that fucking troon?
I never felt unsafe on lolcow before like this, what the hell
No. 64015
File: 1696813113011.png (16.53 KB, 591x518, 1344793938320177.png)
>>64014There are seriously dedicated trolls in that thread who play obtuse so often no one can even entertain a discussion, and it's been that way for years. I'm not even interested in her thread personally, it's just glaringly obvious every time I scroll past especially when they're trying to rewrite events that are documented up thread. It seems like they're trying to get it locked instead of just reporting what they consider infighting/nitpicks or hiding the thread. Typical kek, I hope farmhands don't fold every time some retard suggests they censor a part of the site they don't like. Picrel.
No. 64024
>>64014>>64015I'm glad I'm not alone in seeing that as bait. It's so retarded.
>>64018It's clear Kiki isn't posting, this is another stupid tactic that isn't even funny. Enjoy your hi cow ban.
No. 64030
>>64023Not true, I'm EA and got banned for calling someone not-east-asian
I even said there's nothing wrong with not being asian lol
No. 64032
I get anons don't want to own up to their own redtexts but the venus/taylor/dakota/kiki thing is getting really old when anons keep insisting the same cows are posters in other threads. This is even happening in here
>>64018 I'm not sure what the brain damage some users have, but it's annoying as hell to see the same anons (most likely) keep tinfoiling in the threads about it.
>>>/w/309461 No. 64055
Trying to make milk out of this content is really really dragging the thread down
>>>/w/309482 she forgot a holiday and anon tinfoils she doesn't talk to her family because of that. This is just nitpicking. Probably one of the ban evading anons too.
No. 64062
File: 1696922221051.png (62.13 KB, 969x259, shaytards on crack.png)
>>64060They've gone full shaytarded.
No. 64068
>>64067Also that thread is boring as fuck and I feel like I have deja vu everytime I enter it.
It’s always the same excuse to spam porn screenshots. ‘Omg shayna just tweeted about wanting a sugardaddy and shoved something up her ass again for the 87383847th time, everyone look at these shots of her gross butthole!’ Over and over every single day. Nobody cares.
No. 64081
File: 1696929117898.png (12.55 KB, 1185x96, anon got real mad kek.png)
>>64060>>64062what more evidence do we need that shayna's thread needs to be locked. agree with maybe timing them out for 3 months or something because they're literally just spite posting at this point cause they're butthurt.
No. 64092
File: 1696935644489.png (110.29 KB, 352x396, 1513987876868.png)
>>64089>locking the threads of one of the biggest and most popular cows on the siteShayna is won lolcow of the year twice, has nearly 150 threads and an entire dedicated to her. Her threads aren't going anywhere.
No. 64095
File: 1696937248508.jpeg (165.9 KB, 1234x2067, 1686332351027.jpeg)
>>64094Lardy Fattel is the biggest bitch on /snow/. Stay deluded.
No. 64104
File: 1696952386639.gif (36.37 KB, 566x41, hFV6.gif)
>>64101>>64097This is extremely obvious as inorganic posting. If you think the mods are dumb enough to fall for this, when it's a known tactic that cows use to shut down their threads, then you are fucking retarded.
No. 64106
>>64105Well, well, well, what have we here another fat twitter whore (most likely burger) shitting up the place with her bpd twatter faggotry. You picked the wrong night to fuck around, asshole. I've just texted the /snow/ mod (we're friends irl) about this thread, so she'll be here shortly to deal with the matter, and most likely hand out some sorely needed bans. i'm also going to report and sage the thread (for safe measure), as well as alert the other moderators in the lolcow discord channel. and just in case you wanna try and pull a fast one, i'm screen shotting the entire thread for additional proof and e-mailing admin about the matter personally. i'm tired of you stupid fucking dick eaters pressing out whatever lolrandom mentally ill whore shit you want on a fucking radfem site. it's time for you assholes to get a reality check, because this shit won't fly for much longer. prepare your anus, you 500 pound pile of shit. your days are fucking numbered.
No. 64109
>>64106Wanted to add that any actions taken now after this
i know the farmhand bit will end up in the farmhand being immediately removed from the mod team, you know that? This is just like saying that if posts get deleted then the mod is a tranny. I can't comprehend the secondhand-embarrassment everyone feels for you and how you'll feel in maybe 4-5 more years looking back at the stuff you typed out in your late 20s.
No. 64111
>>64107I come here to be among women like me. The misandrists, the radfems, the SWERFS, the TERFs, the gender critical, the lesbians, the
femcels, the weeb's with husbandos (and by that, I refer to the dakimakura-owning, husbando-loving dirt of society with posters of 2D anime men all over the walls. The girl who spends all her money on a better computer and multiple anime figures of her husbando to litter her walls and shelves).
I do not come here to listen to how you suck coomer dick.
I do not come here to listen to your whining about selling your OF for less than the price of a happy meal.
I do not come here to DM or otherwise 'chat' with you.
I do not come here to listen to your disgusting drivel about how you spend time everyday shitting in diapers and eating your own mayochup.
If I wanted any of that shit, I'd go to twitter or fetlife.
No, I come here to read about how much anon loves her husbando.
I come here to see TERFs posting their manifesto.
I come here to watch radfems justify the existence of killing all men.
I come here to view pt threads where I can rip apart a fat woman close to 40 for wearing closplay.
I've already done as best as I possibly can to filter shit out. I've got the lolcow filter, I can hide individual posts, I can hide threads, and various other annoyances taken care of, but it doesn't help nowadays.
If I wanted to whores, I'd go somewhere else.
But you do not understand this desire, and so will respond with "uwu~ OMG FEMINISTS" or some other nonsense rather than actually argue for your staying here.
Fucking twitter whores.
No. 64124
>>64118this is just incredibly false information. you're going off on tangent over your right to discuss a side character when NO ONE was questioning your right to do it. people were posting all kind of irrelevant shit ATTEMPTING to find more info and were asked to take it to /shay/ because it was overtaking the shayna thread when it was about to close (they were literally posting a ton of random pics from his twitter or cats and shit guessing geolocation based on items in the background). nonas have never shitted up the thread that bad with non-info and not called out for it. There have always been people telling nonas to stop derailing unless relevant to shayna. the people derailing were literally agreeing that the discussion should be moved to /shay/ but they started a huge infight because they have some emotional baggage that makes them super
triggered by "someone telling us what to do!". Like just read the thread, they were purposely shitting up and saying they were purposely doing it because they were mad a nona asked them to move the discussion to where it was more appropriate. and a ton of other nonas in the thread have agreed now that it should have been contained there. people were saying come back when you actually figure out who he is so we can discuss, but it wasn't enough because some random nona reminded you of your mother or something. you fed a troll and told him exactly what would piss you off most, and then act surprised when they use the info to successfully piss you off. shayna threads could use a temp lockdown so this whole drama can cool down but i dont think any mods even work here anymore. It's been over 24 hours and no response to the Shayna drama.
No. 64154
>>64147To prove they are racebait. Not hard to figure out. Some posts need to be made examples of in certain threads. It's not harming you to see it redtexted lol
>>64153You could post links.
No. 64158
>>64147Transparency of moderation, visibility moderation and to show what isn't acceptable.
>>64153Report them for infighting and then ignore it.
No. 64189
Why did this poster in the unpopular opinions thread get banned?
>>>/ot/1724256 I've seen far more provocative opinions on here than this flight of fancy. It's a dumb thread in /ot/, and no one was fighting about the opinion.
No. 64194
This saged post broke no rules
>>>/w/309543Not my post but you can correct a person about what is/isn't current milk without redtext banning them. Meanwhile someone just sits in the thread and capes for Taylor, never cops a gd ban.
No. 64195
>>64189It's bait.
>>64194But that poster just wanted to talk about what we already know of Taylor and it has been disscussed multiple times in various threads, hench rancid milk.
>inb4 if it been disscusses before why shouldn't we disscuss it againIt's the foundation of what makes Taylor a cow and you can easily just go back and read the previous threads. Taylor is now a rich mommy vlogger with a biracial baby and whatever her old fart of an husband does something usefull for once or how out of touch they both are. She isn't a discount Kota doll anymore.
No. 64201
>>64194Stop bringing up old milk because Taylor has absolutely no milk anymore. Just waiting on the bait post about mods to get a ban too since every time there's a redtext you idiots complain in meta. It's not managed more than others when every redtext is basically begged for considering posters like that, and probably you, can't move on from old milk and just nitpick the hell out if everything she does. At some point its okay to put a cow out to pasture. Especially when its come down to complaining about her cooking looking like dog food and her bangs being cut and then flipping out when anons did censor her baby. None of this is even lolcow behavior either,just unhinged anons who have a vendetta.
Heres the bait post about mods that redtexted anon posted after getting slapped with rancid milk. Half the thread is anons baiting mods like this after they get their bans
>>>/w/309667>No, because the mods love their precious tay tay and white knight for her here. Seriously this thread is managed more than any other thread on /w despite other threads being more or less the same No. 64205
>>64199>Old milkwhat made Taylor a cow
>Rancid milkLet's talk about old milk that made Taylor a cow even though everyone should know this and has already been talked about in her previous threads multiple times
>New milkWhat continues Taylor status as a cow
>No milkNo cow
No. 64222
>>64195Here's another beat-to-death horse, complaining about formula for babies again for the millionth time.
>>>/w/309721 I honestly don't think they understand what old milk means.
No. 64230
>>64216Entirety of /w/ is filled with twitterfags obsessed with pedos/pedopandering to the point that it reads as hyperbole (but unfortunately isn't). If you tell them to touch grass they'll screech that you must be a pedo/lolicon because that's the only way someone would think they're on a delusional tangent.
>>64222Anon, that post is fine you're coming off as obsessive. Formula isn't at all nutritionally necessary for toddlers, she is quite literally shilling for the brand. You may want to hide the thread.
No. 64257
Anon going on about Jews for no reason in the Art thread as an insult
>>>/ot/1727101 Unhinged scrotes
No. 64282
why didn't you ban this poster for a-logging?
>>>/ot/1727090 or did you and it just wast red-texted?
No. 64361
>>63684Mods in the Shay thread have been using redtext as a way to make their personal posts more visible instead just banning rule violators. Anything that doesn't align with a certain janny's personal thoughts gets slapped with a redtext instead of them responding to it with that same thought, like a normal human. Half of the posters are being "reprimanded" for the conversation they're having because it doesn't align with one janny's opinion. They seem unable to self-reflect & read the room to realize that they're powertripping & using redtext to amplify their own opinion (that no one agrees with).
It remind me of that one mod who would ban all discussion of Shayna's implant/poland syndrome because she didn't personally agree.
Bans are for gore, cp and egregious spam. That's it. Take your shitty opinion redtext sass bans & shove them up your ass.
No. 64367
>>64361Newfag, mods have always been snarky with redtexts even back in 2015. Not sure why an anon user thinks that they can get away with posting anything they think is milk when it doesn't follow posting rules. There's no power tripping and you won't even link to posts you're talking about because anons will call you out on your personal vendetta against mods. Most anons appeal or ignore it and wait. However, even if they gave a normal ban like 'nitpicking' you would still come here to complain even when it's against /snow/ rules. Also derailing about something because it's loosely related to the topic doesn't make it on topic. Like posting her friend Kiki when posts have nothing to do about her. She's not the subject of the thread and there's no reason to post her individual crap. There's a thot thread for that.
Anons are derailing on purpose and using the thread as a vendetta to try and doxx and then going after her ex's current girlfriend and trying to post her stuff or her friends just because they think they are on topic due to knowing her. That's unhinged. None of that is on topic. You're missing you're usual phrase of
but this is a gossip site. What you're looking for is 4chan for that stuff. You don't get to decide that only gore, cp, and spam gets moderated.
>It remind me of that one mod who would ban all discussion of Shayna's implant/poland syndrome because she didn't personally agree.Yeah because you guys would nitpick it and spam random photos of her tits, zoomed in and everything. Titnitpicking is even banned in Moo's thread. This isn't even a new moderation.
No. 64397
File: 1697676061944.jpg (75.24 KB, 934x311, ES&DYC.jpg)
Which retarded backwoods inbred janitor banned me for this innocuous-ass post? And why did they feel the need to leave the "(sperg)"? The fuck? Genuinely, are they retarded? There are far spergier posts made every hour on lolcow and yet this incredibly normie post of mine gets me banned? I was literally agreeing with what the anon I replied to was saying. Literally what the fuck? You have people in that containment zone of a thread using stale facebook gifs for every reply but noooo I get banned. Seriously some tranny behavior from that fugly stank janitor.
No. 64399
>>64398Are you a newfag or something? There was an anon in the vent thread saying she wanted to be called slapped around and called a stupid slut and she wasn't banned even though there is a horny thread in /g/ for that shit, and I get banned because I said I'd kill myself if my last name was Gooch?
Sorry, what fucking year is it? That isn't a-logging, retard. God the fucking retards on this site.
No. 64401
>>64400You really are retarded. I brought it up because that post was worse than my stupid little reply. All horny shit belongs in the designated threads. A smart anon would have said "I'm very sexually frustrated and it sucks" or something, not "I want to be held down and fucked and beaten and spit on" like, okay? What is the fucking vent? That's not a fucking vent.
ANYWAY I shpuld not have been banned. Fuck you janny.
No. 64414
>>64397Anon, I want to show solidarity because that is fucking hilarious but the ban was fair enough.
Anyhow, have some chamomile tea or something.
No. 64428
File: 1697737164876.gif (1.24 MB, 229x195, 9877.gif)
>>64427…Ok time to ban half the posts in the vent threads then
No. 64498
File: 1697905779894.jpeg (868.33 KB, 1290x1768, IMG_2185.jpeg)
>>64496There is a mod redtexting shit like this but not stopping anything
No. 64542
>>64529>>64540how the fuck do you know if anyone is ban evading? Is this you?
>>>/w/310501 Because that is infighting and derailing.
No. 64580
>>64564It's the weird britbong normies from the anachan threads, that's why their posts are so particular.
>>64558Kek there are probably like 4 jannies for this entire site, of course the moids and schizoposters are going to proliferate. At this point as long as you can pass the voice test and aren't obviously a newfag you could very easily become a moderator. They've had that posting for new farmhands since like February
No. 64586
File: 1698133465084.png (533.17 KB, 863x1540, Screenshot_20231024-090019.png)
There's no reason to redtext the person contributing content and not ban the infighter
No. 64598
>>64594I want to say late spring. late may? Enough has happened with this board since the summer that I would now feel uncomfortable performing this job, especially if it could open me up to doxing and unnecessary retarded drama. I no longer trust that even basic anonymity among the mods/jannies/admin would be respected. (Obviously I expected a voice interview and stuff like that, but I don't need this shit bleeding into my real-life career.)
I dislike that the tradthots and post-leftcows threads got locked and I would not be surprised if more threads got locked for sketchy reasons, or if all of /w/ got shut. Whatever agenda is already in place is not going to be stopped by a single new mod, I'm afraid. I offered to mod in more than one language btw, and I'm not an idiot who has never been a mod online before.
No. 64621
>>64600Kek they definitely didn't fill what they needed because the posting for new farmhands is still up and moderation on this site is still shitty. I'm telling you all, if you were around about 5+ years ago, the difference is like night and day. Everything seems so hands off nowadays, and the amount of baiting/trolling that goes on even in the cow threads is out of control. I think the admins are just too unavailable to properly manage the site, and I don't blame them entirely.
They also can check your post history with a VPN, but only if you also leave your cookies behind too. If you're using private browsing + VPN, delete cookies regularly, or somehow post on multiple devices, then there is no way to definitively track down who is who. They don't collect very much information at all.
No. 64635
Can we get a mod to remove these kids from /w/ because anons are tinfoil they are being sexualized when nothing about the page or the photos are sexualized. It's weird to have them up there with that tinfoil. It's really gross anons are posting kids and attributing it to sex work when that's not what's happening.
>>>/w/310546All tinfoil regarding children needs to be banned. It's so unhinged and absolutely scrotal even to have that line of thinking and then to post people under 16.
No. 64638
>>64632report and do not reply, then. What is so hard about that for you? There are now more posts in /meta/ reeeeeing that someone made a stupid saged post in her thread than there are recent posts in the thread. Just ignore it if it's dumb, stop running to mommy over anything you don't like. Why does "do not reply to bait" not apply to you?
>>64636>>64637>the report is not working then maybe your pocket mod is absent, busy, or doesn't care? When /meta/ posts are made about how infighting or WK posts aren't banned, you scream about how mods don't care and everyone's wrong. Maybe they don't care about your crusade of reporting every post in the thread? just a thought.
>leave the kid alonestop pearl clutching, no one said anything negative about her child. It's a bait post about Taylor. Ignore. Go outside.
No. 64652
File: 1698340719618.gif (394.64 KB, 120x161, 1379808hta9kktgts.gif)
cp in pt
No. 64667
File: 1698423197779.jpg (474.9 KB, 1080x1358, Screenshot_20231027_091253_Chr…)
Kek i love that the mods went back and double checked before giving the sperg redtext this morning. How is anyone defending this thread with these posts
No. 64674
doublepost, but:
>>64666>>64667>>64668>>64669four posts about a slow over-moderated thread in the span of 15 minutes, all using repetitive language. It's ridiculous.
(Tinfoil IP-hopping nitpicking infighting derailing sperg retard ban evading yet again) No. 64677
>>64673I did you a favor because I'm nice
>>>/meta/59143 It's not hard to follow lolcow posting rules
No. 64707
>>64697Who would it be advertising it to?!
It's just polite to warn other farmers.
No. 64720
>>64719NTA but
>>64705 is right. I think that it is still a considerate thing to warn others, but spammers normally are looking for a reaction. The best protocol is to continue posting as normal
No. 64733
File: 1698607875268.jpg (87.97 KB, 664x768, 1396789563767.jpg)
>>64725I'm not against bumping threads but it needs to be done in a more subtle manner that doesn't give an obvious reaction to the spammer. Just bump a thread with thread relevant content. We need to bring back the mantra of don't feed the troll.
No. 64747
>>64745I think telling farmers not to use /meta/ to alert farmhands about concerns seems like mini-modding.
>>64734 was just letting the thread know in case it is, or could be, a concern of the admin or farmhands.
No. 64750
File: 1698626016078.jpeg (82.82 KB, 640x633, 68B51F02-BAD2-4AAD-B82E-26B0B0…)
>>64749It’s not. But my IP is permanently banned when connected to my wifi. I don’t know what I did because I wasn’t given a reason as to why. I was trying to make a post in the /m/ vtuber thread about a cover song and this happened. Can mods help?
No. 64760
>>64754Don't feed the troll, don't respond to spammers, don't take the bait, etc. is one of the oldest morals of the internet. I'm not over thinking anything, I'm posting what has already been established as common sense.
>>64756Posting cute pictures of animals is especially retarded during a raid because all that's going to happen is that spammer will start posting images of dead animals or animal abuse.
No. 64767
Please do something about the Blaire White thread
>>>/snow/1643629Its nothing but nitpicking on his appearance, and it turned the entire thread to shit.
No. 64775
Racebait moid thread
>>>/ot/1745521Would it be possible to tempban those who didn't report and ignore
No. 64796
I ask again:
please, Please, PLEASE do something about the Blaire White thread
>>>/snow/1643629Its nothing but nitpicking on his appearance, and it turned the entire thread to shit.
No. 64801
>>64797Just clean it up and let people know again about the nitpicking rule. I dunno if you are a moderator but is it really up to me to tell you how things work? Not trying to be a bitch here, but yeah, please fix it.
And if you don't feel like it give me temp janitor status and i'll make that thread spring clean.
No. 64830
File: 1698889295447.png (185.81 KB, 665x401, example.PNG)
I know it's the dumbass shit thread, but are posts like this really what we need to see, especially without a spoiler. Not everyone wants to look or hear about yaoi all the time, and the spamming of it is really annoying
No. 64838
File: 1698946103190.png (6.08 KB, 899x63, post.PNG)
So now you're just going to have anons racebaiting about jews and muslims everywhere else in /ot/. Jannies, the whole point of the thread was that it is a CONTAINMENT thread for the infights that were happening in multiple threads about Israel/Palestine. The Ukraine/Russia threads also had a lot of bullshit but were never locked if I remember correctly. Not sure what changed in such a short amount of time.
No. 64840
>>64839It's not about reporting, it's about keeping it contained somewhere. Imo, having anons racebaiting about Israelis/Palestinians in multiple other threads is not going to be better than having it contained in just one thread. And when anons were infighting about this stuff in other threads it did get reported.
>You're jumping to conclusions that it's okay? What?
No. 64852
File: 1698967102904.jpg (464.76 KB, 1080x1526, Base.jpg)
Based mod, thank you. Taylor just isn't milky anymore and trying to force it isn't even lulzy.
No. 64856
File: 1698972594752.jpg (335.62 KB, 1080x881, You blind.jpg)
>>64848Double post, but do you not check the actual thread? Anons get called out for nitpicking him all the time.
No. 64858
>>64856it's not as bad as other threads
>>64852a lot of cows aren't very milky anymore, yet people nitpick about them and don't get banned like in other threads. are you the mod?
No. 64878
>>64841There’s no point trying to have a political thread or discussion about the conflict because there’s no real freedom of speech on the board and and post that’s too spicy or any take that’s too extreme of center will just get you a redtext and ban and self-righteous moralfagging replies.
Twitter and reddit are unironically more pro free speech than here, lolcow is the worst place to discuss politics, it’s pointless, and the rules here are very strict. If you wanna discuss it just go elsewhere.
No. 64880
>>64840The reality is anons are probably going to continue race sperging in dozens of other threads and just making the jannies job harder. A containment thread was the best bet.
Frankly I’m sick of so many threads getting locked constantly as of late, the only thread I really checked often on this board was the tradthots thread because it was so milky and the cows in that thread are genuine pieces of shit actively working to get womens rights taken away, are child abusers, pedos, enablers of
abusive scrotes etc.
Now all of /snow/ is just endless nitpicks about Kathy’s beak, Jared’s arms, and Shayna’s fupa. The board went from actually discussing serious shit to just endless annoying nitpicks about cows appearances that have been said a billion times before.
No. 64897
You guys have always been ban happy which, sure whatever i'm fine with it. but I think that even you guys will agree that this ban is fucking stupid:
>>>/pt/921630I wasn't even trying to be clever. That thread had been closed and I wondered why it was re-opened, since there was nothing noteworthy new in that thread.
I don't even expect you to do anything, I just wanted to share with you how fucking stupid that ban is.
No. 64898
File: 1699055011140.jpg (77.02 KB, 720x349, Screenshot_20231104-074101.jpg)
I diligently try to post caps if I can lol. But I definiely did this time.
>>>/ot/1749417 No. 64901
doubleposting to say I am not
>>64899 , we just posted at exactly the same time lel
No. 64903
>>64896I should clarify I don't mind mild pictures, but pictures like
>>64830 are a bit too much to be posted without spoilers outside of their containment threads. Maybe if they tone it down a bit or spoiler those then idc.
No. 64918
The Unpopular Opinions thread #100
>>>/ot/1752250 is filled with nothing but retarded shit-flinging about which men from what country are more attractive.
I hate to say it, but I think the unpopular opinions thread should be temporarily locked, it is absolutely infested with newfags and the infighting is out of control. The thread constantly gets derailed for hours and farmhands don’t seen to care.
No. 64937
File: 1699221769420.jpg (33.27 KB, 602x339, main-qimg-6f8532751ceb198802a5…)
>>64936of course, let me go get the manager for you.
No. 64945
File: 1699232388363.png (120.18 KB, 656x342, 48909KollOd.PNG)
>>64944Agreed. Mods clearly don't care because they're allowing them to talk like this when multiple people in the thread have complained about it.
No. 64946
>>64944>>64945There have been people complaining about a yaoi avatarfag since almost a week ago
>>64821. Tinfoil, but i think trannyhands is behind this, it lines up with /ot/ as a whole turning into a shithole every time he appears, he has been at it for a while now
No. 64955
File: 1699281312222.jpeg (451.69 KB, 1179x1324, IMG_5295.jpeg)
>>64952What’s the milk? All I’ve noticed is Matt Christman posting from the hospital, probably high as shit from painkillers
No. 65001
>>65000>>64971>>64980Or you can just hide threads/scroll past topics you don't like instead of sperging out and derailing them.
In fact, we should have this as a board rule or just a rule for meta complains.
No. 65002
File: 1699435461490.jpg (662.67 KB, 3195x2400, 20231108_101953-COLLAGE.jpg)
It's wrong for mods to lie, even through redtext. The first post is mine - 3 days ban for bumping her thread about an event she attended. Whatever. The subsequent post, marked "samefag" is not my post. I have never used a VPN. So either a "mistake" or deliberate lie by the mod.
No. 65006
File: 1699436154814.jpg (276.73 KB, 2400x3195, 20231108_102703-COLLAGE.jpg)
>>65002doublepost to post another image
I screenshot my ban message at 16h26. Since I was writing a post on another board at the time, this was probably a little delayed. Conveniently, a familiar poster comes in the thread at 16h15 to defend the cow again.
So I'd like admin to state definitively if their mods are posting in cow threads copiously without their tripcodes. I think this is a reasonable thing to ask the admin of this site. Not whether they post at all, but whether they post
copiously without tripcodes in cow threads. This is a question, not "tinfoil" or whatever. Thanks.
No. 65010
>>65007Avatarfagging means one person uses the file upload function like an avatar, using a character to make themselves recognizable on an anonymous imageboard. Multiple people posting images and topics you dislike is not avatarfagging. Just like lighthearted shitposting in the dumbass shit thread is not derailing. The one who spergs out and starts insulting posters for it is the one derailing.
>there exist more relevant onesFunny how this does not seem to apply for the antifujo thread, antiyume thread or the second dumbass shit thread which was entirely made so you don't have to see or read about any 2D moids.
>>65008What?
No. 65012
>>65010>Funny how this does not seem to apply for the antifujo thread, antiyume threadThe anti-yume thread isn't even open, but also anons keep saying this as if the anti-fujo anons have been spamming the thread with anti-fujo shit without reason. Anti-fujos (I don't think it's even anti-fujo anons, there are anons who don't care about fujos who also said the spam was irritating) have only been posting there because of the fujo anons spamming their stuff there for hours every thread, this has been going on for a while at this point. If they were doing what the fujo anons were doing (randomly bringing up fujos to sperg and spam about them for hours everyday in every Dumbass shit thread, and infighting) everyone would rightfully tell them to stfu.
Also, even with the bechdel test thread that still doesn't mean anons can just shit up the dumbass shit thread. Nta.
No. 65014
>>65012>I don't think it's even anti-fujo anonsI just looked into the antifujo thread and within the last posts is complaining about the dumbass shit thread but okay. Spamming can be annoying but it can also be dumbass shit in lighter doses. But in this case they only doubled down on it after the militant antifujo anon played the fun police in that thread for weeks. So you could use the "they didn't do it without a reason" both ways. It's still a shit argument in the end, fujo anons should stop baiting the antifujo (not talking about the anons who are annoyed by spam, but that one anon who can't stop sperging about tifs and pornsickness everytime she sees two 2d moids in a picture) and the antifujo anon should take a chill pill and learn to ignore things she dislikes or take her own advice and stick to the threads where it's not infighting.
I don't like certain breeds of cats, do you see me aggressively sperging out about animal cruelty and insulting anons everytime they're posted as images? No.
No. 65016
>>65014So what? That really doesn't mean anything anon. Of course it's going to be posted in the fujo cringe thread because it's fujos, but that doesn't mean that everyone who complained about what's happening in that thread hate fujos or even use the fujo cringe thread. Some of us were just annoyed at seeing the same shit getting spammed in the thread repeatedly. And also it's not even just one anon who complained about the spam.
>Spamming can be annoying but it can also be dumbass shit in lighter dosesThis isn't "lighter doses" though. Anons have been spamming for a while.
Anyway, you can say to just ignore it but you cannot blame anyone for noticing and being annoyed if someone keeps spamming the same thread over and over with their stuff when there's already a thread for it. It doesn't mean they just hate fujos or that it's just one fujo-hater.
No. 65019
>>65002>>65006It is tinfoil that you assume the posters are mods just because you can't post decent quality and get called out for it. Probably repetitively, highly doubt you're not one of the few constantly banned ones because non-milk tinfoil posts like that have been heavily moderated in that thread for a year and only spergs keep at it, probably going to get it locked because of it. It's also not believable you don't use a VPN, but, moving mobile hotspots, connecting to different cafes, leaving the house and using wifi.. these all change your IP. VPN or not, its still very obvious to catch samefags due to other info dropped by your IPs, so if that info matches up, you're obviously samefagging.
Maybe take a break from that thread, anon. Especially since your post was terrible to being with. Read the room in the thread, posts like yours aren't good, especially with Tom tinfoil attatched. Posting non-milk social media posts is against the rules. The facebook thing isn't milky, especially if it's all assuming she talked about nothing. No one wants to derail the thread just to tinfoil about why she's there. Now if we knew what she talked about, that could be a good discussion.
No. 65020
File: 1699461940505.jpg (97.84 KB, 955x272, For anon who keeps getting ban…)
>>65019Dropped pic, my bad, just in case you haven't read the rules
No. 65021
>>65019I didn't get any ban page for samefagging because I didn't samefag. That's categorically not my post. Given where I live, it's probably not even in the same geographical region. I don't use a VPN.
I didn't ask for commentary on my ban or how often I post (not much recently). I asked a question based on timing.
>Now if we knew what she talked about, that could be a good discussion.That's why I posted the screenshot I grabbed, to see if anyone had information. Not all speculation is tinfoil btw.
No. 65025
>>65024Farmhands will sometimes redtext posts without adding in another ban. It was either the /meta/ farmhand or the admin who mentioned that a while ago. So, even if you didn't get a ban for it, it might still be true that you were samefagging for all other anons know. This isn't the first time anons have tried blaming it all on mods and mods are allowed to be posters, it's not like they are only allowed to moderate and not interact with threads, but nothing in the Taylor R threads seems like they are masquerading as normal posters.
>>65006Also, this post is mine, about social media presence. It's not whiteknighting to point out she has a successful social media platform on Meta's Instagram.
No. 65029
File: 1699475215357.png (129.24 KB, 863x768, Screenshot_20231108-212340.png)
doublepost. it's about a different issue.
Why are these obviously vendetta posts tinfoiling and using scrote language about Yuhan and her child not being banned?
>>>/w/311227 I've reported it several times.
>>>/w/311948 Reported just now. No. 65031
>>65026Theyre either minors or extremely young, /ot/ has become a haven for actual retards. They do not post in any threads about anything besides their special interests. Yes, it's odd that suddenly only the threads that are allowed shitposting are the only ones moving at all while everything else is extremely slow. They have no interest in integration, they want to change the site entirely. All they do is attract more spergs. They even try to adopt imageboard speak but try to use it in such a clunky, unnatural way while alogging anons who have posted here for ages and claiming we need to just get over it.
We are accommodating to
them, and all it does is showcase the lack of moderation and current indifference for what happens to LC as a whole. It's dead kek.
No. 65038
>>65013This is my main issue. It's mostly just 3 people and you can always tell it's them because they post about the same things.
>twisted wonderland>kaworu x shinji>baraThey go in cycles. One of them even went into the fujo cringe thread and posted the same 9/11 image they posted in the dumbass shit thread. They're doing this on purpose
No. 65041
>>65036>>65039Is this why you've been infighting in almost every thread in the past days? Because you think if you sperg out enough the board that
triggers you gets closed?
No. 65044
File: 1699521942657.png (15.17 KB, 2461x122, i will get the police and the …)
>>65042what are you going to do? call the cyber police?
No. 65051
>>65049newfag rushed to make a new thread at 1100 posts. old thread isn't maxed our yet so peolle are still posting in it
>>65048give it up lol. your antifujo autism crusade is shitting /ot/ up more than any yaoi ever did
No. 65053
>>65050Women are allowed to hate other women. We are
not in a sisterhood with pork addicted attention-starved zoomers
No. 65057
>>65052you're right, it was all the evil yaoi poster fault and certainly not that of the sperg postign screeds about how yaoi is illegal indecent exposure and calling everyone fat
don't people realise that by sperging about muh ebil foojos you'll just attract more people posting yaoi just to piss you off?
No. 65059
>>65057They have been spamming yaoi for several threads now, are you really surprised someone finally sperged out about it and is calling them names? It’s annoying as fuck
>use the bechdel thread!Someone got banned for posting spongebob what the fuck am I supposed to do there
>>65058>not being addicted to porn makes you a retard well then gimme my drool bib, I’m queen of the tards
No. 65066
>>65063>>65064If there are containment threads for all the celebrity husbandofags, monster fuckers, etc, why are fujos the only ones that are allowed to run wild over the entire site?
>what do you gain from coming to a female autist infested board that has female autist hobbies and interestsmaybe, just maybe, not all female autists are into yaoi. Crazy idea
No. 65075
File: 1699526418071.png (47.13 KB, 2461x452, insanity.png)
>>65074she's fucking batshit insane
No. 65076
Okay well fujos are legitimately retarded, it’s like talking to a wall. Enjoy sitting in your crusty underwear
>>65073I didn’t do any of that you fucking imbecile, I avoid ot for a few days because of them, and every time I come back they’re still yaoi posting. Fuck off dipshit
No. 65096
>>65094They also don't redtext every post that belongs to the same poster.
>How do you know the rules about reporting posts, are those written somewhere?Anons have complained about getting banned for 'abusing the report system' before and mods have mentioned its because you don't need to report the same post multiple times. Once is enough.
No. 65099
File: 1699555353187.jpg (9.11 KB, 380x385, 1656793226234.jpg)
why did tranny janny bend down to cyberpolice chan sperging, you know the people actually fucking derrailing the threads? they literally have an entire fucking thread to talk about the food they ate and other boring mundane shit why does the only place on the internet for women not overrun by trannies and normalfags had to be invaded by mumsnet refugees?
No. 65113
>>65112You are sitting in a thread meant for complaints about the site
>>65108I agree. But they refuse to use the fujo shitposting thread for whatever reason because they want it to be in /ot/. They should just rename that thread to that since it's what they're mostly using
No. 65115
>>65104>anons bitch and moan>with your several reports [when you're only supposed to report once - twice at most the same post]>Anons have complained about getting banned for 'abusing the report system'>spamming the report systemhm yeah, nothing hostile at all coming from your nitpicking my reports of misogynistic scrote posting and insinuating I abused the report system. Give it a rest.
>My god, anon, go outside. You're reading posts in your head in an aggressive tone for some reason. There's no arguing even going on.Sure.
No. 65177
File: 1699635922747.jpg (29.5 KB, 550x458, mDKgpds.jpg)
>>65079>as shrimple as thatI don't know if I'm just retarded but I've been cackling at this for like 15 minutes KEK 'cause wtf
No. 65216
>>65202You're
valid but it summons them and they never shut the fuck up, they like all forms of attention because their real lives are such low-stim. Just post regular and ignore, we don't need to keep it up.
No. 65224
>>65222pretty sure you just made a typo
nonnie, they have replied to me on that email. post a screenshot of the error message
No. 65231
>>65227Samefag I just realized I may have used the wrong word, I don't mean redtexted like it should result in a ban. I just meant like the text could be made red like
nonnie and
femcel, but fair enough if that's not realistic or necessary I just thought that might be fitting
No. 65247
>>65245Oh i agree, i just dont understand why that particular anon is so spiteful against that particular actress, even getting
triggered when anons are saying they like her body. I just don't get it
No. 65251
>>65241makes sense, only an insecure teen boy would get so
triggered of women posting and discussing hot men and call people fat/ugly thinkig it's a gotcha moment kek
No. 65264
>>65262It's porn of people with gigantic bugs you nasty cunt, it doesn't matter.
>>65263He posts porn for hours for attention because even 4ch has better moderation than this. Thanks for letting us be exposed to thus faggot and his retarded fetishes so he can feel le epic memetroll poggers and harass women in the process. /ot/ is basically just him jerking off all night.
No. 65274
>>65271Samefag
>>65272, not to mention it's obvious you are the retard spammer since you complain about the same shit every time (minimodding, every complaint is anti-x, every one complaining is the same person). You're a retard.
No. 65275
File: 1699772780297.jpg (31.13 KB, 640x561, 798deaa4ac171d494ab1c04bc9bae2…)
Blaine and the antifujo sperg are shitting up the funposting thread.
No. 65276
>>65275*and/or
I noticed both might as well be the same person because both do the obnoxious replying-to-the-same-post-1000-times samefagging.
No. 65279
Please ban the moid already this is a shitshow he's posting porn again
>>65275The funposting thread shouldn't even exist, you created it to post porn when you got banned out of everything
No. 65283
>>65279>>65281>fujos shouldn't be in the dulbass shit theead, the should make their own thread!!!>separate thread gets made>this thread is an abomination, close it!!!!transparent
ueah the porn is fucking gross but it inly gets oosted when moralfags come shit up the thread, funny how that happens
No. 65285
File: 1699806606668.jpg (76.94 KB, 600x632, 69271812685668742.jpg)
>>65280When will you realize that people only posted porn to
trigger moids like the finnfag and you? Say its moids and troons posting sweet pool sylvanian figures all you want, you sound batshit metakarening over a thread literally called "the funpost thread."
Mods know these anons aren't him, everyone whos familiar with his posting style knows they aren't him, and the posters actually using the thread as it was intended know they aren't him either because these "spammers" are talking to eachother about video games and BL vns as they post their meat men, so I don't know who you think you're fooling. You bitched and bitched to get fujos banned from dumbass shit, they made their own thread, then you followed them there to bitch some more and surprise, they started trolling you again when your one job was to hide the thread. Hide the thread. You're obsessed, go twist your rosary in the antifujo thread and leave the rest of us alone. You're ruining /ot/ with nonstop fighting, baseless moid/troon accusations when you sound more like one than any of the accused, and minimodding.
No. 65288
>>65285Finnfag said that he's not from Finland and doesn't know where this comes from
>>>/ot/1767813. I don't know if he lies, but it basically reads "yes, i'm a moid".
No. 65290
>>65288Also this
>>>/ot/1768082. They're saying themselves they're scrotes. It's crawling.
No. 65291
>>65288Then *fakefinfag. He was extremely pissy about any BL being posted at all and then started saying "fujos are proof women aren't funny" again kek. The mask always slips, he can't go 5 minutes without resorting to saying women smell like fish, we're fat, we're undesirable, and whatever else. Once he and the other fag I just replied to are banned, no one will get baited into posting porn anymore as they didn't before those two came in sperging. The real reason the one crying that we all "ruined muh glorious /ot/" (that's already been a dumpster fire since 2018) refuses to hide the fujo thread is because the thread they chased everyone out of is a fraction as active now kek.
>>65290He's also the one sperging about the AI girl Cillian Murphy? Is that who trannyhands is then? I'm lost there, I never read much celebricows or unpopular opinions because someones always fighting about dumb shit in there.
No. 65295
>>65292I saw that, it was supposed to be them discussing where to go because that finn board is being paywalled but idk what it really says since I don't speak finnish. The guy angry about the sylvanian meat figure was a newfag and very esl so i think its at least someone from there given the timing.
>>65293>leak>in the dumbass shit thread>as if it deserved to be banned from there in the first placeFirst of all, kek. Are you talking about days ago when one of the spergs brought up fujos first outside the antifujo containment thread, once again prodding fujos to troll a shitpost-friendly thread? Have anything from last night when posters were actually active? The fun thread is 3 days old btw. And I don't know what fuji infight you're on about, but simple BL and anime boy reaction pictures are never going to be totally hellbanned outside one or two threads on a weeb imageboard, and if you think the existence of a fujo thread means they should you're in for some disappointment.
No. 65297
File: 1699814651873.jpg (25.43 KB, 501x501, 1699780231664.jpg)
>>65296Then what about this
No. 65302
>>65298Samefag but also jannies themselves said they were going to ban BL/yaoi in that thread as they felt people were using it to bait. I'm talking about that specific thread so I really don't know what you even mean with this. Also there were a few times after the funposting thread was made where fujoposters came back to argue in the dumbass shit thread. There were a few times were someone mentioned them first, but there were also a few instances of them coming back on their own after the thread had already moved away from the topic.
>BL and anime boy reaction pictures are never going to be totally hellbanned outside one or two threads on a weeb imageboard, and if you think the existence of a fujo thread means they should you're in for some disappointment. I never said they should be banned, btw.
No. 65305
File: 1699829664473.png (1.23 MB, 2030x950, dimessquareelderabuse.png)
Can leftcows please be opened. Kaitlin Phillips is elderabusing Wallace Shawn and Deborah Eisenberg in person by having Dasha participate in a dinner party reading of the latter's play.
No. 65310
>>65306finposting isn't a yaoi-exclusive thread, it's an anything-goes thread. just like dumbass shit was supposed to be before the moralfags threw a fit.
we get it, you're so
triggered by fujos you'll keep whinging unless they get barred from lc altogether but that's not going to happen. cope
No. 65311
>>65309>>65310You need to calm down, I was just asking not everyone is out to get you
>it's an anything-goes thread. just like dumbass shit was supposed to be before the moralfags threw a fitWhat can you post there that you couldn't post in the dumbass shit thread without going against the site's rules?
>you're so triggered by fujos you'll keep whinging unless they get barred from lc altogether but that's not going to happenI don't mind fujos and they've always been here at LC with 0 problems, so nobody is trying anything, I just don't understand the need for so many threads when we already got reduced activity nowadays
No. 65317
>>65311>>65306Just ignore it, the thread will probably be locked once this whole thing blows over since it's a duplicate thread, if they do it now it would cause more issues. This entire situation is just the current thing baiters are using to cause problems on the site.
>>65314Pretty sure this was in reply to my post, I was reposting. I didn't ask jannies to ban anyone nor am I begging them to shut down any thread. Thank you for proving my point though anon.
No. 65320
>>65312>cute men/yaoi So you agree? It's literally just a reactionary thread to post your anime boys? Kek
>>65317>the thread will probably be locked once this whole thing blows over since it's a duplicate thread, if they do it now it would cause more issuesI wasn't aware this was the strategy to deal with baiters, thanks for explaining. I hope that baiter gets tired of samefagging and leaves soon
No. 65330
File: 1699892939909.jpeg (989.74 KB, 1170x2311, IMG_9204.jpeg)
>>63684The farmhand in charge of the Shayna thread sucks at it. Can an admin review their work? Whenever moderation is actually needed they’re never around, and when they do show up its just tell people they can no longer talk in the thread. They’re sucking all the fun out of the threads and many nonas agree and example in picrel was especially egregious.
No. 65338
>>65337no matter how hard you seethe, a female-dominated weeb imageboard is always going to attract fujos,husbandofags and the like. if you're
triggered by animu porn this place isn't for you.
go join a rosary or facebook mom page instead of trying to change the entire baord culture to suit your particular taste
No. 65350
>>65345Its related to the thread its being posted in because it was created specifically in response to it being banned from the dumbass shit thread. It isn't being posted anywhere else. Chill.
>>65348>>65347>>65346You're samefagging hard to try and get that containment thread locked. No one is posting bare asses or crazy amputee porn. I don't understand why it makes you so angry and why your response to that anger is not to just hide the thread. Mods can see your IP.
No. 65356
File: 1699918488958.jpg (Spoiler Image,487.93 KB, 1330x886, Wtf.jpg)
Please do something about this, this crap was at the front page, this site is looking like a shithole
No. 65357
File: 1699918696776.jpg (Spoiler Image,270.76 KB, 665x1080, 333343.jpg)
>>65356Also this, no spoiler so everyone got to see it at the front too
No. 65358
>>65352And it is, its just one sperg who spends all day trying to get fujos banned from the site forever insisting its not.
>>65353Then hide the thread and you won't have to see it anymore. They're staying in their own threads on /ot/ and /m/. If the lack of activity in the other thread is what's keeping you from hiding the fun one, that isn't only caused by more non-fujo/yume posters being drawn to the more active thread, but because these enthusiastic fujoposters and husbandofags are capable of talking about other things and made up a lot of the activity in that thread. Too bad. You have the bechdel thread and the now moidfree dumbass shit thread, try to make it more active.
If you hang out on the front page long enough you'll see shay's vag and tits 10x per day but you don't see anyone demanding her thread locked. Transparent.
No. 65362
>>65360Why do you hang out on the front page all the time? Honest question. See
>If you hang out on the front page long enough you'll see shay's vag and tits 10x per day but you don't see anyone demanding her thread locked.You have to rush there to cap the posts
you probably made yourself to post here as evidence for why all fujos should be hellbanned. You aren't avoiding anything, you're watching it like a hawk kek. Read the global rules and /ot/ rules and show me where some fully clothed amputee guy warrants a thread locking. All I see are
> /ot/ rule 6. Don’t report a post simply because you disagree with it, not everyone who disagrees is a man>/ot/ rule 7. Don’t go into a thread to complain about the exact same thread. Hide threads you don’t want to see and take topic complaints to /meta/.The ass sports poster was ree'd at by everyone there for posting 3DPD, mods can feel free to spoiler those.
No. 65366
>>65362>Why do you hang out on the front page all the time? I don't hangout there, but I know nonnas and any lurker from other boards could stumble upon those pics by simply joining the site. That's why you should spoiler those, is inappropriate and rude to users around the site who don't want to see that kind of stuff
>show me where some fully clothed amputee guy warrants a thread lockingI don't think your thread should get locked so stop saying I posted those awful pics to get it nuked, just put spoilers so the whole site doesn't see it
No. 65374
>>65373Again, it's on the info page which is basically an extension of the rules but I honestly wasn't even speaking about the literal rules page. Everyone knows if you post something un-spoilered you'll get banned even if it's not explicitly said on that specific page. I just don't get the whole drama around anons alerting the jannies as if some posts should be exempt from that.
>report, wait for a mod to take care if itThat's what those anons were doing though above though.
>>65340 >>65356 >>65346.
>>65347 No. 65376
>>65375right? the rugby pucs are c'early nonsexual nudity. can't believe people were clutching their pearls over these
no one should be browisng lc at work anyway
No. 65378
>>65377dunno who you think i a but i havennt caught a ban. i just dinnt see what teh difference is between the rugby ass pic and the daddy's little porkchop banner.
sorry but i find it annoying that peoole single out one specific autosaged thread when rules about nudity (again i'm Ot tlking about actual porn, just nudity) are inconsistent and we're on a 18+ site anyway
No. 65480
>>65474just wait it out? im asking why the
new thread got autosaged almost immediately
there weren't any inappropriate posts
No. 65493
15 year old Ryleigh Nikki K white knighting here
>>>/w/312495 again.
Please just permaban her in a "gentle-like manner" since she's too stupid to grasp what an imageboard is, internet safety and what her idols names are.
No. 65497
>>65493She back at posting again.
>>>/w/312513If this was any other imageboard she would have been doxxed and harassed already, which doesn't help that she's serving all of her info on a silver platter.
No. 65505
there's a lot of infighting about jacksfilms and sssniperwolf in this /ot/ thread
>>>/ot/1539480I reported some of the worst posts the other day. We're not meant to be infighting there, even though some nonas try to instigate it if anyone posts about /w/ threads. Anyway, the ones posting insults about blow-up dolls and accusing nonas of being men are the worst imho, that's not even about the cows or topic of the thread
>>>/ot/1772151>>>/ot/1772162 No. 65509
>>65493Retard back again
>>>/w/312544 along with continuing her behaviour of being obtuse and self righteous.
No. 65519
Wrangle the infighting anon
>>>/ot/1775408 accusing anons of wanting to fuck a moid is stupid as hell
No. 65553
Anon revived the tech cow thread
>>>/ot/603913 in /ot/ would it be possible for the thread be moved to /snow/?
No. 65653
>>65643Half of the shit you said aren't even bait. Of course people treat men and women who are dressed better good. Of course having disproportionately big noses make men and women unattractive.
Though I agree that rest are baits but unpopular opinion thread has always been baity.
No. 65691
File: 1700608837703.png (165.46 KB, 858x951, Screenshot_20231122-001239.png)
/w/ mod banning people for discussion in Dakota's thread, wtf? Neither of these posts are mine btw. They are not against the rules and these red texts just make the mod look unhinged. Last I checked there was no rule that the posts in a thread need to entertain a mod in order not to cop a ban. Same is true in some other threads, you know which ones I mean. Give it a rest, janny.
No. 65695
>>65694I'll be frank, it feels like one or two people want to red text every new post in a slow thread about a cow who has been here since the farms began. If a thread is boring, don't read it. There's no need to cover it in red ink.
But if you're the mod, post here with your tag.
No. 65696
>>65695If these aren't your bans, then who cares? No one comes and complains this much about a thread with bans like this unless they have a stake in it. Might not be your bans, but you seem to not grasp that these types of posts don't add anything of value to the threads. None of it is discussion and it is, as the farmhand labeled them,
getting old. Maybe move on and ignore the posts that don't add anything to the thread and contribute something that would. If you aren't posting like those two idiots, then you don't even need to worry. If you have something good to discuss that isn't repetitive, please add to the thread. You're clawing tooth and nail for posters who aren't even you. Either you're a newfag or you don't follow rules properly to get why these users got bans. Nothing about this is a farmhand abusing power and maybe don't go around accusing anons of being them as a last-ditch effort at bait.
No. 65722
>>>/snow/1911324can mods start deleting posts like this? the thread was locked (understandably so) and was recently reopened but the diarrhea resonsible for the lock is still present.
I couldn't give less of a fuck about anybody involved in this conflict but reading regurgitated propaganda from retards like this is why I no longer use social media, it's embarrassing to have to read this shit here.
No. 65769
File: 1700712501708.png (7.4 KB, 1160x115, Wrong redtext.png)
I think you banned the wrong anon?
No. 65775
>>65771Here:
>>>/ot/1784014, but they got rid of the redtext by now.
>>65774Thank you, moders.
No. 65803
Why am I being accused of samefagging? The post I replied to
>>65693Isn’t even my post?
No. 65806
>>65803And now the ‘samefagging’ accusation redtext on my post here
>>65802For replying to
>>65693 (who is not me)
Got removed. Fuck is going on? I hope that genuine mistake on the farmhands part…
No. 65821
File: 1700752224526.png (382.05 KB, 863x1034, Screenshot_20231123-090943.png)
>>65816doublepost bc I needed to grab a link.
totally false
>>>/ot/1757692ban for "redditspacing" in the reddit hate thread. Post mocks troons.
No. 65824
File: 1700752626423.png (64.72 KB, 863x265, Screenshot_20231123-091614.png)
>>>/snow/1929940Redtext should just be for not sageing.
No. 65825
File: 1700753077685.png (149.67 KB, 863x575, Screenshot_20231106-205428.png)
I screenshot this one on 6 Nov but not sure of the thread. Should just be banned for not sageing. It's not even a real blogpost. So yes nonas do get banned for spacing. I didn't make these posts, I'm just interested in what gets banned.
No. 65833
>>65831Probably because most moids roam around reddit, so when there is spacing mimicking it, it can be a sign. Seems to now be one integration tactic and if that keeps scrotes away, good. Anons just need to not post like that. If they do it by accident they could also just delete their post and fix it.
>>65832Probably because I'm lurking? You replied just as fast, so not sure what your point is.
No. 65853
>>65835From vice article
>Documents turned over to New York investigators reveal that 4chan signed an agreement to pay the manager of 4chans moderation, RapeApe, $3,000 a month for their services in 2015. By May 2022, that fee had risen to $4,400 a month. 50K a year is about average e-glowie salary lol.
All imageboards are run by glowie moids but they pretend to hire random female farmers as janitors and mods, then nonas get confused when they don’t receive replies for their applications. Jfl. Wake up people.
No. 65857
File: 1700764817478.jpg (44.01 KB, 320x510, cow.jpg)
can we have html snowflakes falling for holidays this year? pleeeaseee
No. 65858
>>65831It's banned because it's obnoxious and a sign of newfaggotry. The problem is that what exactly reddit spacing is hasn't been well defined. There's a lot of confusion over what is appropriate post formatting for readability and grammar and what is reddit spacing.
Personally I take reddit spacing to be badly formatted posts that have a sentence on each line. This is different from using paragraphs which is correct grammer and has been standard on forums and imageboards for decades. This post uses two paragraphs and is not reddit spacing for example.
No. 65870
>>65865I didn't post any of them but nice try. I also am not the only person you are talking to in this thread. Yeah, I'm just so retarded, replying to (correctly) state that people still get banned for spacing. despite
>>65816>No one got banned for spacing recently and the ones who did, did it on purpose and it was obvious they were posting that way after meta discussions during hellweek.Totally false. There's your facts.
Anyway, I see that the space after the post number is mentioned in the hellweek post. So that's the definition, and nothing else. I'm fine with that if that's the definition of a spacing violation.
No. 65922
>>65861>All imageboards are honeypots.And gangstalk-chan is here as well, pretending to be an oldfag.
Change it to /mental/ at this point.
No. 65960
File: 1700853574326.png (233.71 KB, 645x430, discord dot farm.png)
what the fuck is this ''dont post memes in #general'' discord mod tier redtext. Are you going to start redtexting every person that talks about food or makes a vent or talks about music or anime now.
No. 65965
>>65960honestly they should but I'm sure it would take way too much time.
there's nothing particularly dumbass about movie 3x3s, they're incredibly dry content unless you are a movie buff or just want to circlejerk about movies and they take up a ton of space in a thread
No. 65975
>>65967I mean a bunch of movie 3x3s is just spam in a random thread on /ot/. there's a whole board for media. nonas who are into movies and want to discuss movies and rank eachother's taste in movies go to the movie thread, or go to grid thread or whatever if you just like making grids. it's not about saving space it's about not having everything be a clusterfuck, there are different threads for a reason. jesus didn't we just fucking go through this with the yaoi, it's not like movies or grids are banned or there's no space for it, just go to the fucking
entire board and thread for that
No. 65979
>>65977I saw them get red texted.
>>65974Maybe no one reported them, whatever.
>>65976Me too.
No. 65980
>>65978No the roach posting is appropriate. The movie 3x3 could have fit in too if it was just nine pictures of
Leprechaun 5: In the Hood or something else dumb but it was just a regular sincere movie grid
No. 65982
>>65980what about
>>>/ot/1786413 there is a crafts thread on /m/.
this belongs in the stupid question thread
>>>/ot/1784083belongs in the mundane thread, not dumb enough
>>>/ot/1784308lolita fashion thread on m
>>>/ot/1784723interior thread >>A/ot/1784892
could go on all day
No. 65984
>>65975>>65976>>65979Anons are really trying to get other anons banned for using the dumbass shit thread as it's always been used. And I bet these posters contribute nothing to the site. This site is going down the drain, and mods are allowing it.
Watching this site change so much in real time sucks. It's just not what it used to be. I see why so many anons have been leaving, it's easier to just let it go than try to combat the changing culture.
No. 65989
>>65986I can't believe schizos are still going about this rent free after trying to peddle the Ashley is admin tinfoil and desperately insisting that it was a one man show moderating the entire site. Everytime nothing sticks and everyone moves on they come up with something more outrageous than before. I applaud the admins for ignoring these roaches.
If anyone has ever been personally targeted and harassed by these types you should know that they frequently lie about their degrees, employment, and popularity to make themselves seem better than the average farmer despite their bipolar meltdowns. When they're not shitting up the site and buying cheap dresses on AliExpress they're dedicating their time and efforts to shitty love live tributes. What a miserable existence to have this woman's knitting forum live rent free in your heads after you wished for it's downfall.
No. 65994
>>65992I'm the stickposter, everyone was arguing and thats why I posted sticks and since it was a dumbass thread I thought it fit lol. I got banned for that which I even said was fair enough.
I havent minimodded or asked for anyone else to be banned, I guess you've misjudged who that person is.
I'm also not whoever the underage chick is you're talking about.
No. 65999
>>65997I think I posted it in funposting or a similar thread also, but not on other normal threads.
I think shes just schizoing over it, my bad I really didnt mean to cause an issue.
Like I said I accepted the ban because its fair enough I didnt mean to avatarfag I was just being silly
No. 66050
>>66018It’s not an admin doing that, it’s one of the mods. And yes he’s definitely a moid. And the same moid for sure, because yes he gets suuuuper
triggered by everything you mentioned here.
No. 66064
Can anything ever be done about the low quality posting like
>>>/ot/1788157and
>>>/ot/1788171Understandably I got a ban for calling an anon a moid recently, but why are posters who act no different than some middle schooler discovering /b/ and slurs getting a pass.
No. 66068
>>66064It's the dumbass shit thread, one where you would expect low quality posts, no?
Also
>slurs getting a passgo back
No. 66087
>>66067Actually I'm one of the anons who was in the moid thread
only because rape manifesto was being posted which is insane. I'm an oldfag and generally don't give a fuck, in fact the sanctimonious minimodding happening lately makes me want to abandon ship altogether, it feels like I'm talking to actual minors and it's uncomfortable. A bitch is currently crying over a spoilered gif of a woman in boxing gloves using a scrotum as a punching bag, lolcow is dead.
No. 66088
someone is posting gross moid porn on /ot/. since you were so anal about changing banners and banning fujos for a figure you better get rid of this shit too
>>>/ot/1788745>>>/ot/1788748its literal fucking CBT porn, it's not funny and it feels like a moid posting his stash.
No. 66090
>>66088Seriously, this is ridiculous. One nonna already clocked him before with his femdom fetish
>>65636. This
>>>/ot/1788835 in particular strikes as bad acting.
No. 66100
>>66095The discussion does out quickly. This isn't derailing the thread and the ones who have been are getting redtexts. Just ignore her political shit then, anon, but it's extremely on topic to comment about her hypocrisy every time she does it, especially when anons relate it back to previous posts saying the opposite of what she currently says.
So what's the problem, exactly?
No. 66104
>>66100>>66095Samefag, but this post however, should be banned. This is a rant where 2/3rds has nothing to with moo and its absolutely wrong info. Anon is a retard to equate all Muslims as a singular entity regardless of where they live.
Religion isn't a race.
>>>/pt/923515 No. 66105
File: 1701028463203.jpg (321.42 KB, 1080x1494, Screenshot_20231126_115452_Chr…)
Screencap infighting in venus thread, clearly our infighting /w/ spergs never learn
No. 66113
File: 1701101044506.png (44.42 KB, 739x348, ban.png)
Why exactly was this anon banned in /ot/'s things you hate thread?
No. 66135
Someone needs to get this anon to stop unsaging all their images in their image dumps. I can't find it right now, but this was a rule where the first and last only go unsaged. They refuse to integrate and keep posting unsaged without images too.
>>>/w/313594 They also keep hi cowing at the cow's friends, assuming posters not agreeing about cp are them.
>>>/snow/640522 This is a mod explaining that rule
No. 66151
File: 1701211711881.png (455.06 KB, 918x1699, Screenshot_20231128-224707.png)
this faggot in the pro ana scumbags thread is so annoying, it's been months and they still aren't gone? why can nothing be done on this site re:ban evading
No. 66164
File: 1701288999432.png (32.51 KB, 1872x246, 11.png)
For some reason, I posted (>>>/m/338740) a bad comic in the "Bad Short Comics" thread (>>>/m/314190) and someone deleted it, but I didn't get banned or an explanation as to why the post was deleted. I don't get it.
Was I reported for "racebaiting"? Because there was context to the post, ffs.
No. 66180
>>66179To be fair, terms like "serving cunt" are and maybe that's what
nonnie meant? Sassy aave that twitter gays and faghags love to use. It's obnoxious.
No. 66182
>>66175I've never personalityfagged, you deserve to be banned for coming in here to whinge about literally nothing every five seconds you dumb bitch.
>>66180Cunt has been used on LC the entirety of LC and im actually going to start using it just because some precious, easily
triggered newfag is angry about it. God they need to permaban the screeching minimod.
No. 66186
>>66185You are genuinely psychotic, you're aware you have to be of age to post here, right?
>p-please mods SAVE MENo actual anon does this except for you and your sperging.
No. 66209
File: 1701380911698.png (41.71 KB, 1021x479, kjhgvfcxdsfghjnk.png)
What the fuck is this for? The retard didn't even give me a reason
No. 66210
File: 1701384272387.png (43.04 KB, 1027x493, kjhgfdesftyguhjkl.png)
>>66209>ban appeal deniedOh fuck you retarded janny, I'm assuming they don't have a legitimate reason to ban me seeing how there was no reason given. This site has gotten so retarded lately ffs
No. 66220
>>66215>>>/snow/1935725I checked the bpd thread, is that you? you said you got banned for wking colours…
>I've gotten so many bans for dumb shit like that I have an entire folder filled with screenshots of all my ban notices kek>I've been trying to quit this site for a while. It's mean but it's fun to post about cows, my usual hangout is the scumbags thread and ot>I've recognized your posts before and I agree with a lot of what you say>But anyway it's been nice talking to you again, I really relate to you >I'm rooting for both us to find some semblance of peace and happinessso… which cow are you? 7 years of post history you say? can't wait
No. 66221
Derailing in the consoom thread
>>>/ot/1796141 . For fuck sake spergs, I just want to consoom the consoom thread in peace.
No. 66223
>>66197Hellweek won't help as long as offenders can easily ban evade. At this point the only thing that could save us would be banning vpns or making device-id/useragent/internet provider/etc based bans.
>>66176I and many nonnas have been saying this for at least two years. I always report the very obvious ones too, but it doesn't seem to help. By now it's too late anyway, they already nested here like parasites.
No. 66226
Triggered scrote retard
>>>/ot/1796163 ban evading >>>/ot/1796212 and baiting calling anons rapists for not hating shitty romance novels.
No. 66272
>>66270You are superrrr weird, you keep responding to yourself non-stop. You are trying to say thing in fiction=/=thing in real life, which sounds like what lolicons use to justify their child pornography. You cant expect everyone else to agree with you, specially since fiction does reflect in reality. If you agree that loli is cp, then why are you so angry when people say that the ''romance'' in those books is
abusive? rules for thee but not for me it seems
No. 66273
>>66272Not all dumb romance novels are of
abusive men and what is being categorized as '
abusive' is just cringey alpha shit
>>>/m/339262 No. 66275
>>66273People are obviously criticizing the
abusive books, not all romance books.
>>66274No one is saying you are pedo/rapist, you made that up yourself. You use the same arguments pedo moids use when they defend loli ''uh ackshually women write loli too so that mean its okay!''. You cant expect to give such a bad argument and not get called out on it. No one would have cared if you liked your weird abuse YA novels where a kkk member falls in love with you if you didnt jump to defend it every single time like a rabid dog and accuse anyone who doesnt like that type of shit of being a moid.