File: 1701503382446.jpeg (124.08 KB, 900x506, 7BA2049A-B641-4E71-8B13-42A4F7…)
No. 66307
File: 1701559428048.png (62.64 KB, 2769x451, brain damaged tourist.png)
Mods please explain this ban, how is finding doxxing some random person's address creepy being a "brain damaged tourist"? What's the point of a "stalking thread" anyway besides being an unhinged psycho breaching peoples' privacy and why is it allowed up?
No. 66308
File: 1701560248430.png (198.8 KB, 1800x1578, ca1.png)
>>66307Because youʼve been acting like picrel.
No. 66309
so I think there's this racebait going on in the current fakeboi thread, like it's not the usual race discussion and feels more like something out of r/aznidnetity
>>>/snow/1936782>>>/snow/1936870>>>/snow/1936883The comments are speaking about how black women are seen as less feminine and how white people are afraid of them and that's why they aren't dated, it feels like a very obvious racebait trolling
No. 66316
Shayna’s latest thread
>>>/snow/1937016 was obviously created by a troll. It starts with
>>CURRENTLY FLYING TO ARUBA. Beware of severe silicone water pollution due to giant tiddy implants if she falls in the ocean.And in the summary it states
> Alcoholic troon freak with infected tits No. 66333
>>66332He loves bashing Asian women and claiming theyre all racist and all hate black women and are out to get them. He’s making up larps now about a racist Asian mom racially abusing his imaginary black sister. Just trying to sow seeds of hate between
woc. Pathetic. Honestly.
No. 66334
>>66331This is an imageboard. If anons don't know how to post screenshots with links, they don't belong here. No one said to screenshot the entire doc. Anons said post caps in general, not the entirety of it. No one likes clicking out on links all the time and it's
valid some anons don't trust links. Acting like this is some new request for the site as a whole screams newfag.
No. 66338
File: 1701702820591.png (12.78 KB, 1291x139, Screenshot.png)
So I think nonna here was maybe a little extreme near the end but it was related to the discussion and clearly still a joke, I don't think she should have been banned for this.
No. 66356
>>66355I feel bad that you've never gone to university and gotten a degree of any worth, so you spend all of your time on lolcow acting condescending toward other anons for making
minor complaints over dumb shit because that's the only way you'll feel intelligent or accomplished.
If you want to act stuck-up and infight like a retard, go ahead. I already said it wasn't that deep, so let it go.
No. 66369
Since it's clear there's a good chunk of vendetta in this thread, can we get the anons, going forward, who complain about WKs and derail about "Oh micky is posting here!!!" redtexts? It's non-contributory in the thread and they know they are doing it to insult posters they don't agree with and try to infight. There's no whiteknighting going on in the thread and unless anons are going to stop being cowards, there's no point in vague posting that random posters are the cow.
>>>/w/279002 It's just shitting up the thread.
No. 66370
This retard won't stop ban evading and posting unsaged hour by hour updates about the cow
>>>/w/314451 they are literally using the thread to vocalize the air coming out of their own ass
No. 66372
File: 1701897935967.jpg (156.91 KB, 1080x1164, Screenshot_20231206-221342_Duc…)
I think should mods to stop giving warnings to nonas who put paragraphs their posts.
First of all, it's not something that goes against the rules like using emotes, and secondly, it's simply not reddit spacing and implying it is such is ignorant of imageboard culture.
Excuse me the cringe cap from urban dictionary but it immediately explains what reddit spacing is. It was all born from 4chan moids who could clock newfags from reddit due to how they formatted their posts.
Either make regular spacing against the rules and give us an explanation why it's not allowed here or stop spreading lies about imageboard culture. No imageboard ever complained about regular spacing in posts. Reddit spacing is its own thing and has a very recognizable formatting pattern.
No. 66378
>>66372I think redditspacing bans are fine. Maybe the farmhands just need to have a consensus of what it is first, so regular paragraphs aren’t banned. Paragraphs aren’t the issue right? It’s the double spacing (cause if I’m correct you have to put loads of spaces on Reddit for it to become a seperate paragraph) between almost each sentence like this:
Blah blah blah… Blah? Blah.
Blah blah.
Blah blah blah.
When it instead should be:
Blah blah blah.
Blah blah blah blah blah.
No. 66384
>>66372paragraphs are not the problem. redditors are a cancer on any site they infiltrate and they make a big deal about writing in these wacky, pseudo-narrative styles since they all think they're intellectuals and "good" writers. plus, they've been bullied by other redditors into writing this way so they don't really pay attention to how awkward and noticeable their posts are. the thing is, no one wants redditors on their websites. absolutely no one. mainly because they astroturf and are really bad about trying to change a platform's culture to suit their preferences than adapting/contributing to the current culture (them trying to colonize lemmy is a good example of this). and imageboards have, in the past, typically followed the old rules of the internet, one of which was assimilate your fucking ass or leave. it isn't that hard, but normies can't handle being told to rein in their autism because in their fucking minds, they WANT people to know that they're crossposting on other platforms since they think it makes them look "cool" (ugh).
look at what happened to 4chan once all the reddit npcs flocked over there - other than a few holdout boards it's turned into the same tired memes that have been regurgitated a million times over since god knows when and news article spam. do you all want that to happen here, too? a bunch of them managed to come here in 2020 when reddit started cracking down on "hate" subs like r/kotakuinaction and r/drama - it was awful and unironically one of the worst eras on the board imho. all their whining, passive aggressive bullshit, policing other people's opinions, trying to one up everyone for imaginary karma points, all the while also acting incredibly snobby like their farts don't stink. not to mention the casual racism and aggression they brought, especially if you dared to criticize them for being what they know they are: a bunch of boring fucking white people.
No. 66390
>>66385Nah, all those redtexts are
valid. Anon is a newfag using the site only for their own personal army, admitted it, can't link, post, reply, integrate, sage, and samefag and ban evades repetatively. I hope the thread gets autosaged and it'll be all their fault.
Not a single post has come from a whiteknight and if you really think calling out the absurdity that anons, including the doc op, keep pushing that
a child deserves her cp to be posted to 4chan, then you all need to be banned. That's not what whiteknighting is and its really telling that those anons think cp revenge posting is okay because its micky. That's fucked up.
No. 66394
>>66390There’s definitely some white knighting going on in the thread, and it was definitely an attempt to derail. Based on the screenshots from her Twitter, Micky is lurking the thread and probably white knighting herself. Though I do agree that some of the anons on there are sick in the head for blaming her for her own grooming, I’m surprised none of the WK posts have been red texted? When it’s likely Micky herself.
Let me know if I’m misunderstanding this.
No. 66401
File: 1701993110556.jpg (76.28 KB, 587x689, Capture.JPG)
I know the thread was retarded but could the Sam Hyde thread be unlocked? I think there is some good milk incoming
No. 66404
File: 1701999040492.jpg (29.45 KB, 473x595, 1.jpg)
>>66402Is lolcow getting more mainstream? I was shocked to see that is has 2.2million monthly visits. I always thought this was the kind of website that would be too weird to tell people about…
No. 66410
Male in tradthot thread reeing about
femcels for shitting on tradscrotes
>>>/snow/1939729 No. 66412
>>66409We are talking about women here, so unless they would use a strap-on with an animal, then we're talking about them getting a male animal to fuck them or giving oral to a male animal. You seem pretty knowledgeable on this subject, so let me know how often you get hard proof of a woman committing bestiality unless someone is filming it and posting it. So by your logic, unless we see one of them do sexual things with an animal, it's tinfoil to say they seem to be "into bestiality"? Come on. You've come into a thread for a cow you barely seem to know to minimod and tell regular posters what to do ("don't discuss Countess here," "animal dildos aren't milky"). It's clearly not the thread for you, so why don't you close the tab?
Farmhands, please ban the infighters:
>>>/w/314550>>>/w/314667>>>/w/314671These comments add nothing to the thread no matter what your opinion on the rest of it is. No one posting is or is acting underage.
No. 66422
>>66418Yes, it is tinfoil. Same way DDLG people aren't in to kids. Not everything sexual has an equal equivalent to actual degeneracy.
Let me say it in terms you might grasp: all MAPs most definitely are in to lolicon, but not all lolicon consumers are MAPs. There's adjacent shit, but most people know right from wrong. It's tinfoil to assume because she has animal@,
the girlfriend, not even Stef that this is about, likes fucking animals. There's no merit to that, no proof, just anons mad that women buy and use animal, alien, tentacle.. etc dildos. If someone is white and they buy a black dildo,are you going to tinfoil its due to wanting legit raceplay? Are they racist? You sound stupid.
No. 66426
>>66425spend any time on tumblr and youll see how many of the ddlg moids groomed girls. no one can research men with a fetish that only exists online and its prevalence to pedophilia but anyone can tell you that a kink revolving around playing a father and a daughter that fucks has pedophilic udnertones.
Not surprised anons(aka probably larping trannies) who want to fuck dogs also like father daughter shit.
No. 66432
>>66422>Let me say it in terms you might grasp: all MAPs most definitely are in to lolicon, but not all lolicon consumers are MAPs. LMAO wow, you fully have degen brain rot or you're really being autistic about your degen labelling/categorizing. I'm not gonna call the police on furfags or lolicons but it's still disgusting, they don't deserve their own special safe pervert category. You are doing too much mental gymnastics for them; furfags are just zoophiles with magical beastiality fantasies and lolicons are weeaboo MAPs.
If her whole fantasy fetish revolves around being a magic animal and dressing up like a magic animal and then animal dildos come in to the picture it's not wrong for famers to see that and comment stuff like
ew gross, it's like they want to fuck animals.
No. 66444
>>66442Honestly I didn’t even want to get into that part because it seemed like racebait distraction tactics. And this nona
>>66436 made a point I also thought of but didn’t want to get into about pedo sex dolls. Like honestly yeah it’s not a crime but it’s still nasty and I don’t have to trust the freaks who are into it, sorry.
No. 66447
>>66443so? redtext means nothing because the actual infighting wasn't even banned, like
>>>/w/314671 That shit stays, but nonnies who are disgusted by the open degeneracy of two furries get banned because…why? No reason, not one real reason given for pissing in new milk an anon brought to the thread. No one accused them of doing something irl
yet. This
nonny mentioned old threads and the weird crap Stefany used to write about her animals. She didn't tinfoil, she referenced old threads.
>>>/w/314647All this says a lot about the farmhand who redtexted these nonnies. Why is the farmhand fucking with one of the few good /w/ threads? Why. Stefanons historically don't cause any issues for moderation and you know that.
No. 66452
File: 1702111408655.jpg (132.75 KB, 897x484, Screenshot_20231209_034028_Fir…)
Since when is asking for a recap on a long ass video considered spoonfeeding? That's been a pretty normal thing iirc.
No. 66453
>>66448i think anons are only saying that stuff because they have paraphilias themselves(pedophilia, bestiality, etc) and want to feel better about not having done anything to the real thing(animals or kids) yet. They think its okay to like drawn child porn(shotaposters) long as they dont touch real kids or liking dog penis shaped dildos while you have your own dog and choosing to opt out for the toy instead of raping the animal.
I doubt these anons are women though. This site gets posted on r9k and soc too much for there to not be lurking males
No. 66462
File: 1702148514434.png (251.29 KB, 1080x1044, 1000008354.png)
Can we get the Sam Hyde thread unlocked? Channing is going to be interviewed on MATI today talking about all of the accusations against Sam.
No. 66466
File: 1702158469364.png (24.53 KB, 1226x219, 1.png)
>>66401>>66462Makes you think
No. 66470
>>66452Jannies don't know what "spoonfeeding" means. I got banned for "spoonfeeding" once because I asked a user to provide evidence of an accusation they made in one of the cow threads. inb4
>its bc ur a newfag!!!!!1!1!I've been following the thread since the 1st or 2nd
No. 66475
File: 1702172874524.png (53.07 KB, 300x100, lolcow for boomers.png)
Seriously? I know banners have been a contentious issue previously but what the fuck.
No. 66479
>>66384This is fucking amazing. And I don't mean that as a compliment. You channeled the energy of 10 redditors to bitch about them.
and
>casual racismon lolcow.farm? GASP.
Nevermind the redditors, you tumblr tards who felt hardcore browsing /b/ and now act hard like this are the real cancer.
No. 66488
>>66344Late but I thought so too, it's written like fiction. Also seems like they are playing different characters in the thread, both op and the supposed 80 year old writing about their partners (I promise you pensioners have better things to do than post about thots and drama queens on an imageboard)
There are a couple of brief replies that seem genuine, but the lengthy ones are pure fiction imo
No. 66536
>>66526>>66515Thank you to the farmhand who handled this. Moo doesn't advertise where her studio is for a reason and anons posting the whereabouts is pretty fucked up. There's talking about a cow and then there is being so obsessively unhinged that you try to showcase, online, where the cow could be at any time. Also the night time photo alone was proof enough an anon was trying to post where the studio was and not for the sake of milk. I don't think anons realize that doing shit like this puts the site in jeopardy. It's one thing if Moo had the address somewhere listed, but she doesn't for safety reasons. Some anons just really hate cows to the point of trying to get them harmed by posting locations. It's so fucked up. Public business or not, if the person isn't going out of their way to promote a location, it
can still be doxing. Anons are really using the SniperWolf logic to justify posting.
No. 66538
>>66475whats wrong with it? it's cute… agree with
>>66537 though
No. 66539
>>66475facebook humor cringe
>ironicallystill cringe
No. 66548
>>66540Hard agree, that thread has turned into a a cartoon review thread rather than a place to discuss animation cows. It’s especially annoying because we have a thread on /m/ purely for talking about cartoons, I know that they allow general discussion of cartoons in that thread because it’s the most active animation thread, but it’s really overshadowing the actual milk and I think that rule should be changed and anons to be encouraged to use the /m/ thread instead.
I’m also sick of the anons that keep bringing up anime despite it being the
western animation cows thread, we also have threads on /m/ where they can talk about anime and manga to their hearts’ content.
No. 66554
>>66527Did you reply to the wrong thing? The original post replied to was
>>66472 , a post about some thread a newfag made about a moid they didn't like/bothering them asking anons to attack the stranger scrote on behalf of them and their friend group and had only a couple of posts from the threads creator in it. It had nothing to do with infighting or calling anyone trannies. If you assume it was a thread about infighting or whatever, I assume you and
>>66476 didn't realise the post was about a different thread than whatever the one you guys assumed.
No. 66573
>>66560Oh and btw, the reason my posts never get redtexted in /g/ is because the farmhand knows I’m very obviously a woman and can see all my post history that confirms it. Both you and the lesbian thread sperg were rightfully redtexted and banned.
I’m sorry you get redtexted constantly because the farmhands clearly clock you as male and recognize your posts as the trannys. Sucks for you. That’s the last I’m saying on the matter.
No. 66580
>>66550I have not made one single post in that trashfire, it was obviously all bait and infighting.
>>66551kek no but at the time I posted that complaint there has been some visible moderation but then a weird derail into mangasperging which made it obvious at a glance the thread was still fucked. I admit I am extremely irritated lately at the way newfags don't understand what a thread topic is and constantly post off-topic and seemingly never get banned, and if you
booly them they cry minimod/trannyjanny like the little faggots they are. They all need to INTEGRATE and LURK MOAR.
No. 66591
>>66586yep i like how cringe it is
>>66587I'm a zoomer that loves it, maybe I'm an old soul.
>>66590Every female imageboard gets spammed that, lolcow used to have a ton too but since moderation has been good it's been a non-issue for a while.
No. 66601
>>66599NTA and my post in this conversation.
Anonymous image board moderation will always be shit due to the nature of anonymous image boards. Moderation is considerably better on LC than other image boards and has improved since Shaymin. The fact the CP, gore and dicks aren't being constantly spammed is a very visible indication that moderation has improved. This is not bootlicking or kissing ass, it's an observation of reality.
No. 66611
File: 1702458059211.jpg (31.93 KB, 909x125, Screenshot_20231213_120141.jpg)
Thanks for banning the samefagging spammer
No. 66613
>>66612You're a braindead mongoloid if you think I'm someone from crystal cafe staff because I made some basic criticism.
>blaming lolcow for moid spamthe moids are lolcow you burger boiling bitch. Also learn how to speak english holy shit that was aids to read
No. 66620
>>66619No one but you brought up being a part of the cc staff. Please go back to your own tranny site.
Insulting random anons wont get admin to notice you or your child porn and male ridden website which you for some reason prefer
No. 66622
File: 1702482980379.jpg (253.41 KB, 781x704, Screenshot_20231213_185245.jpg)
>>66619NTA but calm down retarded bitch. You went on crystal cafe to talk negatively about lolcow mod team after no one replied to your retarded request on here. When no one paid attention to your ragebait on crystal cafe either you came back to infight here like a butthurt retard. You're so fucking stupid for expecting someone to randomly give away a program they spent so much time developing. Just do it yourself and help crystal cafe team, you obviously have the freetime.
No. 66633
>>66630nta but is it
>a program they spent so much time developingor just something simple that shaymin and oldmin never did?
No. 66637
>>66635oh ok, so this anon doesn't know what it is then
>>>/meta/66622 (where I got the greentext from)
thanks for clarifying!
No. 66642
>>66601>better than No
>improved since shayminYou could let Blaine do the modding for a day and it wouldn't be any worse.
>not seeing anythingIt could mean any number of things, like the people doing it moving on or getting busted.
So yeah, it is kissing ass because it shows bias all the way.
No. 66653
>>66652He sometimes accuses anons of being him to create confusion, now I don't know if
>>66650 is the tranny itself but it wouldn't surprise me.
No. 66675
File: 1702548667843.jpg (158.86 KB, 1080x813, IMG_20231214_230402.jpg)
What exactly am I supposed to be complaining about here? This ban is completely retarded and nonsensical. Where in the site rules is anything relevant to this dogshit? Can a farmhand explain this shit? This is the worst ban I've seen since some newfag farmhand accidently banned uwu because they thought it counted as an emoticon kek.
>>66670I made that post and I'm not a moid but it seems that it really hit a nerve. Calling others male when they've said and done nothing moid like should be grounds for a ban if I got under your skin that much with my view on pregnancy, catty spiteful anon. Why not try to offer up a counter argument or opinion on anything said instead of saying "everything I don't like is male". Not everything you disagree with is male, Infact you chimping out over my take on pregnancy, as a woman is a pretty clear indicator of that. "Muh illiterate moid". Denial and mental retardation.
No. 66678
>>66677I've been using this site for years. Do you actually get answers in this thread or just retards mini modding.
>>66676The ban expired genius
No. 66688
>>66682I've been using this site for years. If you're going to minimod shitly can you do so in a helpful way.
>>66683Still seetheing and trying catty female socialized antagonism I see. Rent-free.
No. 66704
>>66675Theres two people shitting up the tradthots thread, one is the Android Raptor kiwisperg, and the other is the racist troon. The tranny is more clockable as he’s simping for Eva, bashing brown + Asian women and accusing them of being jealous of white women, calling women cunts and bangmaids etc. Android Raptor is the one who’s always sperging about ‘Career Stacies’, derailing with pseudoscience, bashing motherhood and moms etc.
They’re both annoying and part of why these threads keep getting locked. Although obviously troon is worse.
No. 66705
File: 1702604860295.jpg (60.73 KB, 488x488, eng.jpg)
I'd like to report a massive retard who thinks everyone is ban evading
>>66703 No. 66706
File: 1702605193981.jpg (580.37 KB, 1989x1947, takecaution.jpg)
I fully expect a ban and I don't give a shit. I just want to make it clear that there are some paranoid retards, or maybe it's just this one
>>66703, who accuse me of ban evasion.
1. not evading
2. "food sperg" is not a rule
3. you
femcel losers spend more time arguing over what isn't milk than you do just enjoying it. you may as well just kick yourselves in the kid shitter if you can't appreciate the few people left you bother to contrib.
buh-bye.
(USER HAS BEEN PUT OUT TO PASTURE) No. 66707
>>66702Proving
>>66653 right.
No. 66713
>>66711Accusing anons of being
femcels is a dead giveaway to who posts in that thread and why it's always redtexted to hell and back. Absolutely don't believe they rarely post. Probably a VPN user. Farmhands have said it's like the same idiots constantly for months.
No. 66718
The unhinged tinfoiler is going schizo in the Stef thread again
>>>/w/315283. Guess their ban just expired today
No. 66720
File: 1702634178035.jpg (94.28 KB, 975x715, IMG_20231215_065433_939.jpg)
This sperg whining about "female socialization" and writing paragraphs-long screeds sperging about mothers on the tradthot thread goes free but the people calling him out all get the redtext, and two days after the fact to boot? Lmao @ the "omg farmhands rule!1!1!" options on the lolcow awards form, you've had a whole ass man on your team hawking that thread for months
No. 66730
>>66724lolcow culture has been overrun by retarded normies lacking in self awareness and they sucked all the fun out of it. it's all juvenile shit which it always was but now it's covered in this thin layer of "morality" and an attempt at understanding politics, psychology and society. suffice to say that people in these circles are not equipped or experienced enough to have anything but irritating conversations when you put those in the mix.
tl;dr lolcow is changing because the internet has changed. nothing of value was lost by focusing more on the off topic aspect of this site which is both more milky and more interesting than essayposts written by gay lsafags about some tiktok mom
No. 66732
>>66690I didn't spam genius. I'm not the samefagger or the other anon who also complained and the farmhand taking a stab in the dark assuming I was fucked up. I didn't post multiple times. But thank you for finally giving an answer of some sort though it was like drawing blood from a rock.
>>66691>Yeah because antagonizing the websites volunteers and admin is a good thing to do Wtf are you talking about? Am I holding a gun to anyone's head? This thread is supposed to be for complaints, bootlicker. Not blindly licking farmhands asses. I'm asking a question not hunting down anyone.
>>66720Seethe. I made literally one opinionated post that hit a nerve that you keep recycling kek, truly rent free. Continue to rub your two brain cells together and accuse everyone who doesn't agree with you of being a moid. Once again I invite you to have an actual discussion instead of sperging cattily across threads.
>>66724I disagree. Being offended by anti male shit is a truly bizarre hand maiden take. Also in what world is tumblr known for its cut throat discussion of moid rape statistics and shitting on trannies? There's no doubt that the site has changed over time but so has the reality of being a woman now and the prevalence of male violence.
No. 66739
File: 1702700693119.jpg (75.09 KB, 1116x228, XMRDnQt.jpg)
Not my post but how is this racebait? For context the anon was responding to someone asking where (country) a cow had come from. I've seen users say "nip" and get away without being redtexted (admittedly it's not that common but I've seen anons say it more than once)
No. 66747
File: 1702767561381.png (21.21 KB, 512x513, smile-icon.png)
>>66744Aw come on
nonnie, lighten up
No. 66749
Can you please ban the racebait in Yuhan's thread, or do you only do it for white women? What the fuck.
>>>/w/315395>she found another old white man with an asian preference.>>>/w/315379>some guys are specifically into Asian women. I could definitely see a 40+ man who isn't great looking but has a bit of money being into her. >>>/w/315434>most hapas end up wrought with mental health issues, hapa children are more likely to be diagnosed with a severe mental illness than fully asian kids.You ban every other discussion but let this shitty racebait and misogyny go unchecked? Why don't reports work on this thread, admin? Why does someone always need to bring it here to get even the bare minimum done, but god forbid we insult a furry?
No. 66750
>>66745No influx. This is the new normal. Last Hellweek was barely noticeable anyway.
>>66749Anon, take your personal problems to therapy. The third one should cop a redtext but the first two are ordinary conversation.
No. 66753
>>66749Sometimes racism against asians doesnt get banned. If you said same thing for black or white women you'd definitely get a ban. Probably because mod team doesn't have an asian member, retarded farmhand once banned an anon for racebait for making fun of French peoples accent but I guess Asians dont matter
Moderation has been good but the things staff consider racebait are retarded. You could call an asian woman a whore chasing white men, no ban. Call a Russian or French woman a whore chasing x race man, banned right away.
No. 66761
File: 1702801988422.jpg (Spoiler Image,90.86 KB, 720x576, Screenshot_20231217_193304_Bra…)
>>66760It's not a half Asian specific thing but a half anything thing. Maybe that anon could have been more specific.
No. 66763
>>66762They are stated as facts. There is zero proof of who she's dating. You are unhinged for allowing the double standard.
>>66761it's medfagging to say her kid will probably have mental illness because he's mixed.
>>66760it's all racebait shit and anyone can see that. mods here care only if a white woman's baby or partner gets shit on. At least be consistent across threads if you're on some high horse about what constitutes milk and nitpicking here. What about Yuhan/Yumi is milk right now? Learn to integrate with your fucked up quotation marks around her actual name.
No. 66765
>>66760wtf is yuhan?
>>66763Kind of true unfortunately. I also dont think you can racebait against ethnicities but somehow saying yiu find French or slavs unattractive will get you banned while anons can call an asian womans baby disabled for being asian and mixed.
No. 66768
>>66764You going to derail in the thread about it some more? Are the whiteknights in the thread with is right now? None of you have any idea what whiteknighting is.
>>66765Anons making comments about babies is always 100% unhinged
No. 66773
>>66772wtf, the derailers in taylor's thread are not descrininating against the kid for his ethnicity, but for his dad being old(ish). still stupid and very unhinged, but race is never the reason they tinfoil about the kid's imaginary disabilities/illnesses.
there are, however, a bunch of braindead anons who show up every now and then only to sing odes to the baby's cuteness and future superior looks.
both parties are equally unhinged and creepy.
No. 66780
>>66776ntayrt but you're exaggerating a ton, no one ever said Levi would have mental issues or needed a helmet.
Anyway my question is why the mod still chose to ban one single poster in Yumi's thread and leave up blatant tinfoil like
>>>/w/315395 and shit about how mixed kids have mental illness
>>>/w/315434It's insane to argue this site has such high standards about milk and discussion while letting that thread get filled with gross shit about how she's a "white cock queen" and a "morally degenerate parent." All while she barely posts anything. The thread is never ever moderated until someone comes here to complain after reporting things, sometimes after days. Why is it like that?
I'm sure Yumi's vendetta posters will come in to reee and posture, but there's nothing bad about a cow growing up and making better decisions, like keeping her life more private for the good of her child. I hope she continues to piss you all off by doing so.
No. 66802
>>66801totally agreed. nothing wrong with picspam threads but they get bumped so often the discussion threads always get buried.
i wish there was a separate board as well because /ot/ is too much of a mess and would bury the media discussion threads too.
No. 66804
I feel like anons need to prove dakota has milk if her thread is to be active and not locked. Legacy or not, this cow is so dry and anons only use it to complain that they should be allowed to shitpost. Her thread is a shitposting nightmare for a year, nitpicking her haircuts and face.
>>>/w/315643 then you have repetitive farmhand complaining and accusing posters of being the cow and getting them banned.
No. 66805
File: 1703004868092.jpg (497.58 KB, 1080x1835, 1000004939.jpg)
>>66804Like damn and then you scroll up and it's all "her head shape is funny she's totally not a model". Just repetitive boring back and forth with no new milk to back anything up.
No. 66826
File: 1703083108011.jpg (110.65 KB, 937x470, 1000018923.jpg)
Why tf was this redtexted. There's no need for a damn image for what I said.
No. 66832
File: 1703091319943.png (436.81 KB, 1337x1125, Screenshot.png)
as much as I dislike Megha, I feel a troon made these comments, I don't know why the tradthot thread attracts so many of them.
No. 66837
>>66831Hard agree. These reddit refugees are obnoxious af and now use the thread like a live chat.
>Maggot wiped her Instagram? Waaah Peenus must be dead !!1> How unusual ! We must ask for a wellness check asap !It's not the first time Mommy Dearest wiped her account for attention or because she's caught in some hobo dramas (remember the deportation saga ?)
Plus, Peenus being silent for a prolonged period of time is a classic phase of her cycle.
Newfags, I swear.
No. 66840
>>66836No, just caps of anyone on twitter calling her out or saying they aren't going now because of it or what Isshicon did. There's 100% ways to cap. That's why it got a redtext. Just sounds like anons being lazy and chalking it up to "Other anons will believe there's a good amount of people who are doing what I'm saying, no merit needed" It's lazy as hell. Also how the hell is it going to be personal unless you're on twitter and posting your own tweets about it? We already know there's an anon who is using the thread to promote their own doc that uses twitter. Unless you're that cow, there's nothing to worry about. Twitter is public and because of that, everyone posting on it can be publicly posted to lolcow too. Blocking out names is also a cop-out since it's public.
So why would it be "too personal"? Because probably hardly anyone is actually saying anything because the community doesn't give a fuck.
No. 66847
>>66842That's literally all you had to do from the beginning. Also don't complain about personal info if you're never going to post about personal info. No one asked you to even out yourself, so whining about giving yourself away is pointless. Just post public posts like every other normal anon here. Unless you allude to a post being yours, no one is even going to know either. Being all secretive and whatnot just makes you an easy target.
At least finally you posted caps
>>>/w/315753 Don't know why posting caps was so hard and acting like it's impossible. Doesn't matter if it was posted to their Instagram. Post any caps next time.
No. 66848
Why do the farmhands not ban and redtext the obvious racebait in this thread?
>>>/w/315707>>>/w/315759all the older racebait posts are unredtexted too. Can a farmhand actually reply about why this is being allowed?
No. 66851
>>66824T.
Triggered white moid with an Asian gf
No. 66858
>>66849>>66851Imagine being called a moid or a supporter of child abuse for reporting racebait on this site.
There's literally no reason not to redtext absolute shit like these two replies, and the stuff in Yumi's thread. It's not whiteknighting to find off-topic racism disgusting. There's no indication anyone, let alone Yumi, is abusing her child. This shit is so sick to put in that thread and it should not get quiet bans.
No. 66862
>>66860Nta but she's one of the few cows who doesn't have drama, never did. Just anons taking shit from the get-go. Also if you find this calling, you're the problem. Anons tinfoiling about haffu babies being retarded and
always getting failures as parents are fucking stupid.
No. 66869
>>66864Honestly what you just described sounds like drama/milk to me. Sure, maybe she's boring now and there's retards shitting up her thread but it sure sounds like she had a quality arc there.
>>66868Anon, I mean this in the nicest of ways, but you shouldn't put much stock in what people say to you on an imageboard.
No. 66877
Taylorfag admitting to posting old milk just to try to antagonizing other users
>>>/w/315885 Seems like a snide way to infight too
No. 66878
File: 1703176845683.jpg (485.14 KB, 1080x1781, 1000004961.jpg)
>>66869If all anons can do is talk about old milk to keep a cow milky, then they are no longer milky. Past or not. This though is out of hand and I know it's some female farmer which makes this more embarrassing. /w/ has a big vendetta problem.
No. 66879
>>66866This site was founded on mocking a retard, shut up
>>66878At this point you're just shitting up the thread trying to tell people which cows they should be allowed to talk about
No. 66882
>>66879That's not what all those redtexts are insinuating.
>trying to tell people which cows they should be allowed to talk aboutNone of that is happening and those posts are all shitposts that have nothing to do with the cow and all about anons just wanting to say outrageous shit. If you're going to post generalizations like these, you should be banned. This isn't milk and it's trying to force it by getting other anons to agree with the worst takes possible that aren't even true.
No. 66885
>>66884Don't twist my words, I'm referring to you complaining that threads aren't "milky enough" to be posted in
>anons need to prove Dakota has milk>no new milk>no longer milky>few cows who doesn't have drama>Thread so dryNot to mention these posts have multiple lies
No. 66900
>>66898Maybe, they're even discussing lolcow in the latest shitpost thread
https://heolkek.cafe/ot/thread/510313.htmlThe progression is probably
>Kpop banned on lc, make choachan (now heolkek)>Kpop twitter and tiktok finds choa>Choa goes from lc culture to kpop twit culture>Choa anons discover lolcow and start making threads No. 66903
>>66900We don't care about choad , this is lolcow.
>>66889>there can't possibly be more than one person who thinks these asian nitpicks about yumi are terrible shitposting takesYou're telling in yourself. There's more than a handful of anons who have come here to report that thread
No. 66919
File: 1703265836624.png (Spoiler Image,1.25 MB, 2824x1760, Screenshot 2023-12-22 at 12.20…)
Is the /g/ mod dead? This scrotepost has been up for hours
>>>/g/367269 It's obviously a man using a dildo in his ass. I don't have to explain why that doesn't belong in the thread. The thread has never been used that way either, it wouldn't be ok to post porn clips and ask "how it this possible" even if it was a vagina and you could prove to me the poster was female.
No. 66921
File: 1703266545147.png (701.76 KB, 1000x1000, farm.png)
>>66919Doing hard volunteer work for free sucks.
No. 66928
>>66927There is specific lingo and phrases that twitter/tiktok newfags use and examples have been named plenty of times. Allowing it here encourages those newfags to not lurk and adapt and turns this place into the same shitholes they came from. If you were an oldfag, I wouldn't have to explain the concept of board culture to you and it wouldn't offend you.
>It's not killing lolcow culture.>Eventually, we will all stop using the site So what now? If no one uses this site, it's dead. If you want lolcow to be like an anonymous twitter/tiktok so bad, why not just go there with a throwaway account?
No. 66931
>>66928Did you miss the whole migration part? Lol Your specifically nitpicked a part and left out the other. Also I never said I wanted it to be an anon twitter/tiktok. It's stupid to base lingo, internet lingo to be exact, on whether someone is banned or not. It's throwing rocks and hoping one hits because maybe that one user was from tiktok. Either way, how else do you think this place even has a userbase? most anons mass post things from tiktok or twitter, so what exactly then makes you only a lolcow user? Grow up. They can learn to integrate when they break actual rules, but
assuming users based on lingo just shows you're willingly to not let the site grow and retain new users for when the old ones leave. There's a reason why slang and lingo evolve. Sorry you feel that level of
old to act like a grandma sitting on a porch yelling at the kids to get off their grass.
No. 66933
>>66931Wow the oldfag larp disappeared really quickly. You are exactly the kind of poster this site could do without, so there's no use in explaining to you why banning your twitter zoomer shit would benefit lolcow, since that's what you want and consider "growth". If all the actual farmers leave without being able to pass on what lolcow makes lolcow and the newfags who bring culture from other sites never bother to fit in, what do you think becomes of lolcow? It becomes the exact same thing farmers and imageboard users in general tried to escape from in the first place.
If staff would have listened to farmers and strictly punished this when the issue first arose, we wouldn't even have this conversation so I can't even blame you.
No. 66934
>>66931Wow you definitely sound like the kind of insufferable person we don't want here. I honestly don't understand how so many anons spend time bringing garbage from Twitter or TikTok here, but you are part of the problem.
>>66933 is correct.
No. 66944
moid thread
>>>/g/367449another moid in friend finder
>>>/g/367457 No. 66952
>>66946Mods must be busy with family for the holidays.
Whenever mods get back from Christmas dinner I suggest that everyone who replied in this >>>/g/367449 thread should also please be banned for taking the bait. It’s so obviously bait, they should report and ignore. Newfags need to stop replying.
No. 66953
>>66952Stacy Farmhands are getting railed at the weekend while we
femcel farmers rot on this board.
No. 66955
>>66954I think it would be natural to update the redtexted words now. Sometimes it's annoying and disrespectful to be discussing a crime and then see
victim in redtext. Like what other word would be appropriate to use?
Valid has many normal uses. Stuff like that. I can't remember what other words seem outdated now.
delulu should be redtexted, I forgot which others. But maybe stick to slang with no actual serious uses. just my opinion obviously.
Regarding farmhands taking a break for Christmas, this has been parroted in meta for more than a week. idk about you people but I had courses and work until today, so it's pretty interesting that every farmhand is awol for nebulous holidays during a time when lots of people (including moid baiters) have time to shitpost.
No. 66958
>>66931Verbiage and posting style screams zoomer larping
>simultaneously using grow up and grandma as in insult>italicsI swear you fags think coming across the technical help thread makes you qualified for the larp, but it actually makes you stand out more.
No. 66971
File: 1703384169685.jpg (487.83 KB, 1080x1145, 1000004987.jpg)
This twitter poster is trying to make the micky thread their personal archive with personal takes. They need to leave, they can't following saging etiquette when image dumping even. It's so clear they are a newfag and they keep repeating the same "of she not causing drama right now.. BUT IN THE PAST SHE HURT PEOPLE!!!" Fuck off with your old ass vendetta milk. Either let a cow move on so we get fresh milk, or at least don't be so damn obvious that you're samefagging constantly about her.
No. 66975
>>66973wlw and mlm is used a lot of weeb threads for comic and anime discussion. Why are you all so thin skinned? These aren't
trigger words.
No. 66980
>>66977Not even a
twittard. Just find it hilarious some of you are wanting completely normal internet slang to be micromanaged. The only thing they micromanage is the censoring anons who type out stuff such as p*rn. That's completely newfag material, but most of you post twitter caps and tumble caps, yet aren't from those spaces? I've been posting since the 5th Moo thread. I'm just not getting my panties in bunch over what anons say, but apparently having a different opinion really grinds anons' gears.
No. 66988
>>66975>wlw and mlm is used a lot of weeb threadsThe artist thread filled to the brim with twitterfags, yes.
>>66986Good luck trying to get that into her head, she wants to be a perma newfag apparently. Also with the retarded italics again.
No. 66996
File: 1703444321832.gif (21.66 KB, 1024x1024, 1683384015860.gif)
Soyjack raid in ot
No. 67002
File: 1703460855416.jpeg (697.7 KB, 1170x1919, ED0CC9B6-D06B-4989-8DB0-328C7F…)
I would love to work with other nonas to identify items on the interpol websites, as I know there are plenty of other sleuth/investigative anons— especially from other countries who may know more. I’m not sure which thread or board this would belong to, though. Here is one of the websites that I’m referencing, by the way:
https://www.europol.europa.eu/stopchildabuse would this be something other farmers are open to?
No. 67022
File: 1703579149394.png (39.63 KB, 1004x160, Screenshot.png)
>>67021please, the whole thread is bait. I wish /g/ had the same message pinned as /m/ does.
No. 67025
File: 1703590981861.png (8.17 KB, 681x80, tradthottery.png)
Please ban trad thots. Also Merry Christmas to the northern hemisphere!
>>67002Wtf is up with the glowie image name? Its like a bank account number kek.
No. 67038
>>67022Then why the fuck is the black girl problems one allowed to exist? It's the BLM mentality all over again: "Everyone is created equal, except for black people."
Seriously, I don't get why that thread gets a free pass when shit like >>369109 is allowed to be posted. It's bad enough that the entire world has to treat women like shit, but now I get to have the privilege of watching what black women write about me? Women I've never even met before? And they just assume shit about me because of my skin color? I truly don't understand why this is allowed to continue. I thought we were all on here to be able to speak our minds as WOMEN. None of this "divide and conquer" bullshit with races and whatnot.
No. 67041
newfag is back
>>>/w/316422>>>/w/316426Apparently, it's milky because she
might turn around and complain about men. They really don't know how to integrate or how to post milk.
No. 67046
>>67044A black person talking about how they experience systemic racism isn't the same as talking about someone's race specifically unlike how this retard acts
>>67045. Yeah, you're just throwing rocks and hoping something hits at this point.
No. 67053
>>67051Check
>>>/w/315707 Mods do handle the race discussion in other threads. It won't matter is anons don't report the posts though, so when you see it, report it.
No. 67065
>>67041Adding: newfag is just posting random porn of the cow. The samefagging is off the charts too and anon won't sage non-milk image dumps too.
>>>/w/316443 can mods do a better job of not allowing them to ban evade? Not to mention their attempt at infighting over meta reports in the thread.
No. 67095
>>67094this is the
schizo troon, right? nobody else is this obsessed
No. 67110
>>67109Yep. Blame me for threads I don't even visit. Sounds about right lol. If you're going to complain about a "No men allowed" sign hanging on the hangout door, then maybe you don't need to be here. That's the point. We already have incel threads for a reason. There's no reason to dumb it down to make sure you mean
virgin men in discussion. Most virgin men that old are incels.
No. 67115
File: 1703792154568.png (456.84 KB, 500x500, based on racist pol pasta btw.…)
I genuinely dont understand why i got banned over using imageboard lingo on an imageboard. This fucking board uses ''incel/r9k/4chan'' terms all the fucking time. Just to give some examples
>pic relbased off a /pol/ racist copypasta about black people
>basedmostly tied to 4chan culture
>kekalso tied to 4chan culture
>moidmale version of femoid, an incel term
>chad/stacy/beckyincel terminology
>cope/seethe/dilate4chan terminology
>manletused by incels
>normies/normalfagalso strongly tied to 4chan culture
>cuckstrongly tied to 4chan culture
>xfag4chan culture
So i want the mods to explain to me why all of the above are allowed but suddenly ''wizard'', which has also been used a lot here by women, is wrong? .Dont get me started on how everyone here uses faggot/tranny which would get you witch-hunted everywhere else but on anon imageboards.
It annoys me how current mods love to power trip. They will ban someone over something that's board culture like it's nothing just because they got pissed over it, even if the post doesnt break any rules, but then defend disgusting shit stirrer misogynistic '''women''' like
>>66808 . That anon that said lc moderation is starting to resemble a discord server is so fucking right. The roidpig pasta alone has like a bajillion incel/chan terms yet mods seemed very eagerly to nominate it for best post of the year. Since my thread got banned i hope mods start banning every user that uses all of the above terms, since its also imageboard lingo and that's banned and moidshit by newfag mods.
No. 67120
>>67116we use ''incel'' lingo all the time. Mods better ban everyone using stacy/becky/chad then. Wizard isnt even incel lingo, it existed way before all the incel shit and they just appropiated it.
>>67117its just a meme its honestly not that deep
>>67118again whats scrotey about imagebooard lingo? we use it all the time
>>67119it's just a joke, anons call themselves stacies all the time here.
No. 67124
File: 1703794368402.jpg (247.35 KB, 1000x799, complete copy.jpg)
>>67122who cares? for a radfem anti troon site you guys sometimes seem to apply the same logic to things by making everything gendered. I can be a female wizard for all i care because its a made up fantasy term and i think it sounds cool as shit.
No. 67132
>>67131Wizard is used to refer to men, which would imply posters here are men. I think that's all there is to it. We use many 4chan terms because /cgl/ is the origin of this place, but many terms used to refer to ourselves have obviously been adapted to the female userbase.
As such we won't use femoid to refer to women despite it being a 4chan/incel term but we will use moid to refer to men. If you came in here and started calling women femoids you'd probably also get a ban because it makes you sound like a man, I think the mods applied the same logic to your usage of wizard. Had you turned it into a female form of the word I don't think you would have gotten banned but idk I don't make the rules around here so maybe I'm wrong.
No. 67134
>>67133The truth is regular posters also contribute to policing the language on lc and in upholding and maintaining board culture, by doing reports and voicing their disdain in threads. Whenever a new term appears that hasn't been used much before people will talk about it, wizard clearly wasn't liked by many. I assume you got reported enough times by people that didn't like the term that you used and farmhands took it into consideration.
I think that wizard doesn't translate into our board culture well because it's simply a male term, while -fag became more of a suffix to be attached to other words while losing its original meaning. When I say newfag I don't mean new gay person (derogatory) but when I hear wizard I hear "30+ year old male virign". Anyway lc isn't a mirror image of 4chan despite it originating there, we use a lot of similar words but we also have our own culture so some terms won't make it over. Simple as.
No. 67145
>>67142There's no "correct term" for a meme, but as a teacher of etymology, it's so annoying to read this whole conversation. The conventional gendering of nouns includes
witch / warlock
sorceress / sorcerer
These don't need to be considered prescriptive anyway. A woman can be a sorcerer, excessive use of gendered endings is something we should stop and not propagate, as they used to be considered pejorative and diminutive (authoress, poetess, etc.).
Wizard has to my knowledge no "feminine" counterpart. It's not any more inherently "masculine" than "coward" or "drunkard."
No. 67147
>>67140if you don't habitually sage like an autist no matter where you are then you are not a real 1. also you know you can reply to multiple comments in one post right?
>>67141you are technically correct. i deleted (before you had even replied) because i was embarrassed. this is a pathetic and depressing topic to have an opinion about. why are you still so mad kekek
No. 67166
>>67165whats the point of hell week anymore, mods let obvious larping troons and gay scrotes run free
spreading their AIDs and make excuses for them nowadays
No. 67168
File: 1703881185572.png (236.29 KB, 500x500, uh ok.png)
So, I've been keeping tabs on this guy before, and I want to spread his glory for everyone here in this thread. But I don't really know where to go, could someone point me in the right direction? Thank you.
No. 67172
>>67169It's bad now because it's been Christmas and I'm guessing that the farmhands have been spending time with friends and family.
I do agree with
>>67165 that a New Year's hell week is needed to get the newfags shitting up the site to either integrate or fuck off.
No. 67178
File: 1703896519400.jpg (33.29 KB, 552x452, ae852f222fcf2997706cb0c25938c3…)
Idk if admin can answer this but i'm curious about how long the bans for people who bait and infight are? i know there's vpn usage but sometimes it feels like the same retard can't stop shitting up threads that are otherwise ok
No. 67179
File: 1703905447970.jpg (38.64 KB, 563x505, 1651781148461.jpg)
Farmhand(s) really have been on it the past few days, thank you.
No. 67180
>>67107That blackpiller is a literal incel male that's been ban evading for years at this point. He admitted and called other anons retarded femoids, spammed 2X with weird porn and such but admin still believes its a woman. Probably because he probably posted some shitty bait in relationship thread or something along with his usual misogynistic oral sex fanfictions he posts on other boards.
No woman spends hours writing fanfictions about blowjobs if she thinks blowjobs aren't her thing, it's obviously a guy that gets off on writing about how it's humiliating for women to get fucked and any woman not staying a virgin for incels like him is a retarded "cockwhore"
No. 67181
>>67171You can still vote for it if you like. The announcement remains.
Vote now for the winners of the 2023 Lolcow Awards!
No. 67221
>>67217You're the same racist slav retard that's been racebaiting for a week about the same topic, give it a rest. I'm white and slavs aren't even considered white or European by most Europeans so that makes your obsession with having a whites only thread even more pointless when you probably are more mixed than an average American, lmao.
Also I'm sure you're the same slav retard that said it's normal for your bf to get hard when you cry and then went on to bait about it for one whole week when anons disagreed with you back then. Get help, you're obviously very very mentally ill.
No. 67236
>>67120>Mods better ban everyone using stacy/becky/chad thenNTAYRT but unironically yes. I wish, one can dream. The idea of a virgin thread is great and I hope it will stoke some decent discussion I'm also surprised its never been made before, but I hate the attachment of moid terms like "wizard". Even "virgin" is a retarded "untarnished by a moid" term. "Sorceress" is a decent alternative. However the original meaning of virgin meant a woman not owned by or ever married to a man. I see it as the antithesis of a handmaiden. The original meaning is incredibly based so it would be great if virgin could be reclaimed, but lets be honest its not going to when its current day meaning is based around being humiliated and dehumanized and coping about a made up concept of something nonexistent being "taken" from you by a rape ape.
>>67217>Why doesn't a made up race baiting term for a demographic that's over represented to the point of being considered the default woman and the least discriminated of all women have a thread for problems?Kek. Whiteness is not a central tenet that unifies people nor a point of commonality outside of maybe needing sunscreen lel and that's a discussion more suitable for the skin care thread. What weak /pol/ tier race sperging. If you're looking for your community check out your countries general. Cultural identity is shared between the anglosphere and lowland western Europe not "whites", hence Aussie general, Netherlands general, German general, U.S general etc. There's a place for people of those cultures broadly and you'd likely fit the bill there muh white race solidarity chan.
No. 67240
>>67222>>67226They should all be locked. Let in twitter fags and in a couple years the cow boards will all be locked because they're too mean to the mentally ill or something
>>67236>white people don't realPeople sure know who white people are when they want to blame them for things or tell them to shut up but ok. Everything you listed is multiracial at this point. America gen is not the place to complain about getting harrassed by black men for being a becky.
Actually by your own dumb dumb logic the other race threads shouldn't exist because people should just stick to their own cultures. What do third gen korean-americans have in common with singaporeans? Nigerian immigrants with AA? Argentinians with mexican-americans? That they're the same race? Well native germans are the same race as 8th gen white americans lmao
No. 67243
File: 1704043514111.jpeg (216.84 KB, 1024x1024, IMG_9181.jpeg)
hello mods! while you ban the annoying racesperg making weird "x girl problems" threads can you put me and other anon in first linked reply to pasture? have a happy new year xoxo
>>>/ot/1835123>>>/ot/1835131 No. 67269
>>67240>Everything you listed is multiracial at this point. Is that a problem with you race bait chan?
>America gen is not the place to complain about getting harrassed by black men for being a becky.>for being a beckyKeep your scrote pokemon ranking terminology out of here and go back. If you mean women being harassed by black men take that to /2X/ pink pill or the nation based thread or unironically maybe the American thread if it's regionally based kek. Some anons might share the same experience.
>Actually by your own dumb dumb logic the other race threads shouldn't exist because people should just stick to their own cultures. They're not "race threads" you retard they're nation based threads in those nations fluent languages aka culture; something you claimed to care about in your previous post.
>What do third gen korean-americans have in common with singaporeans? Nothing because those are seperate countries with seperate ethnic groups of people and seperate cultures, are all Asians the same to you? racebaiting strawman. You're the one arguing for a amalgamated pointless "white thread", not me.
>Nigerian immigrants with AA? Argentinians with mexican-americans? That they're the same race?No. Theres a Brazil general though I think but I don't see your race sperging point.
>Well native germans are the same race as 8th gen white americans lmaoNo. White Americans are European Americans with a distinct culture that is American but if you're 8th generation you're pretty far removed from that extant culture generally and culturally and have a more broadly regionally based American culture that has been shaped by settler influences aka you're German-American, Italian American etc. Germans are anyone in Germany who has been raised in, lives in and has been shaped by a distinct culture that is Germanic. If you don't believe me you're welcome to post in the German general but I hope you can read and write in German. Dutch people and lowlands people of like Luxembourg have more in common with Germans, yanks don't. Especially 8th generation lel. But oh no evil multiculturalism leading to delicious food exports like hamburgers and chicken parmesan, and good music like jazz and funk. Your race sperging is dated and boring moid retardation circa 2016.
No. 67276
>>67269Do you not know about these threads?
>>>/g/367662>>>/g/363824>>>/g/366897You have no argument and can't even follow a conversation logically, damn it must be hard to be so stupid
No. 67281
can you ban this obvious baiting retard?
>>>/ot/1836276it's so obvious it hurts
No. 67284
File: 1704149075446.jpeg (309.46 KB, 1061x560, IMG_7210.jpeg)
Can we discuss the state of Unpopular Opinions? It has turned into The Baiting Thread. Maybe just a ban on replying in the thread if you really want to preserve the right of the theoretical women with bad takes who definitely aren’t baiting moids being mouthbreathingly retarded. Picrel exhibit A. if this isn’t bannable as bait what is? If it isn’t bait I don’t want to be on the same website as anyone with such a braindead idea in the head, they must be underage if this is a real woman/girl’s actual opinion. How much education are we expected to give someone this stupid if it’s a real nona and not a baiting moid? She can’t sit with us.
No. 67308
File: 1704183756721.jpg (292.65 KB, 913x923, Screenshot_20240102_112004.jpg)
>>67305Samefag, adding pictures of "her" posting her ban post(when "she" got banned for saying a man can jerk off to his gf crying about her fathers death) which mentions how "she" had previously said fathers raping their female children is a-okay.
This isn't a white woman wanting a thread to discuss her issues, it's severely mentally ill nazi incel.
No. 67320
>>67310Yeah but he also likes to larp as Afghan, East Asian and black women. Not that unusual behavior for a creepy bi white scrote, many trannies and gay guys like to larp as
woc.
No. 67322
>>67317Okay:
Misogyny from leftist men
Sexual abuse and misogyny specifically on the basis of being a “white whore” and being pressured not to report it by the government (see rotherham, cronulla riots etc)
Getting your life ruined over slander (bike girl)
The assumption that you or your family benefitted from slavery (this one is mostly American)
You can say these “aren’t actual problems” and I guess that’s subjective but even if it was a “whining about first world problems” thread that’s not a reason for it not to exist. As others have said it’s more about the hypocrisy, either ANY mention of race is against the rules or update the rules that it’s okay for some.
No. 67329
/w/ mod continues to cherrypick and protect certain cows vs others
>>>/w/316934So nonmilk discussion is just fine in Stef's thread and telling people to hide the thread if they don't like it. But god forbid you have nonmilk discussions in Yumi or Taylor's thread as you'll get banned immediately. Hypocritical bs
No. 67331
File: 1704230172295.png (16.55 KB, 1324x239, posts.PNG)
I wasn't even gonna complain about it, but since mods said to take it here…
The irony of banning someone for blogposting in /ot/ but then calling me a newfag. /ot/ is literally blogpost central and blogposting isn't against the rules there. That's kinda the whole point of boards like /ot/ and /g/. INB4 "but it was in the celebricows thread!", it doesn't matter. If that thread goes by /snow/ rules, then just move it back to /snow/ instead of expecting anons to know which rules apply there and which don't. Jannies have never told us it's against the rules in that thread before, so I just didn't understand why it's suddenly happening. They just keep giving out nonsensical bans, meanwhile the unpopular opinions thread is allowed to be a trashfire.
No. 67335
If anon has to find issues in non-milk posting, then why even post at all? This newfag won't take the hint, every post of theirs is derailing and complaining about imaginary whiteknights, and Micky's post has nothing to do with anons personal opinion.
>>>/w/316901 we already know shes a bad person. At least post when she is and not add in that context every non-milk post from the cow. Its so repetative and its shitting up the thread.
No. 67337
File: 1704238656755.jpeg (129.56 KB, 701x1141, IMG_9926.jpeg)
>>67331posting shit that's not relevant to the thread has always been frowned upon even in /ot/.
your nigel story has nothing to do with celebricows. you have a zillion other threads to talk about yourself.
No. 67338
>>67331It’s global rule 4.
>All users are expected to contribute in a constructive way and are discouraged from posting low quality commentsThere are a million banned “I showed this to my boyfriend” posts on all boards. No one cares about your boyfriend.
No. 67339
>>67338In that case, like 80% of the posts in /ot/ should be
>There are a million banned “I showed this to my boyfriend” posts on all boards. This is not true for /ot/.
No. 67348
>>67343See
>>67331 exposing the one pedophilic rapist neonazi slav moid that's been wanting a "white girls" thread although for the most of the history slavs haven't been considered neither white nor actually European. The slav neonazi tard is retarded because even Hitler himself hated slavs and prefered asians which are one of the groups slav racists choose to mock.
All in all we could have a European thread(which we coincidentally DO have!) but neonazi retards don't feel welcome there because the neonazis only want to be able to racebait, not actually talk about their problems
No. 67350
>>67324Why would you be insecure over a pedophiles preferences? And the men in those scenes usually look ugly as fuck and I don't know any cosplayer girls who actually cared for those ugly mens opinions.
>>67310Idk their real identity.
>>67336This but he's still pretending he wasn't super obvious and defending himself on different vpns. He obviously was the one attacking other threads and he definitely is the one that got banned for pedophilic baits in the past. Imagine being a neonazi and thinking you have superior knowledge in genetics only to have dreams to rape your daughter. He's genuinely retarded.
No. 67354
>>67348Thank you for gracing us with the n-word pass. Whatever hitler says must be true as well, you are so right.
I don't even understand why you'd bring up the past views on slavs and how they were discriminated while somehow making it sound like a gotcha against slavs kek. Christ this is so cringe, please go back to twitter.
No. 67362
>>67357>>67359Your ban was incorrect and has been lifted. You were caught in the crossfire of the actual samefagger making a post every 20 minutes trying to change the subject, including in ways that were worded very similarly to what you posted. Your ban was made too hastily and was a mistake. We've spoken to the farmhand who made it about their mistake and we've reviewed the other bans made in the same period, fortunately yours was the only one that was misattributed.
And to be clear, any official post history reveals are made after thorough analysis by admins and not by farmhands.
No. 67365
File: 1704287567123.png (44.7 KB, 734x697, ShareX_JQFdTbyotX.png)
Someone accuses me of being a troon because I disagreed with them and not even 5 minutes later a 3 days old post gets me banned. Really makes you think.
Also how in the world is this racebait.
No. 67375
File: 1704291692816.gif (422.37 KB, 220x256, brain damage.gif)
>>67369I'm the person who posted the ban image, in what world is me complaining about a man from a certain religion(!) not treating women like human beings racebait. In the confessions thread of all places.
>>67373Latest Consoomerism thread kek
To be fair I can see why some posters thought the person I had posted was a troon, but some anons are extremely
trigger-happy to accuse others of being trannies or twitterfags.
>>67374Not an argument. This is /meta/, where else was I supposed to discuss this.
No. 67377
>>67365I fail to see how this is racebait. Muslim males hate women, that's a fact? They disrespect
nonnie and her mom.
Nonnie lightly trolls them compared to the disrespect they showed her. How did rebelling against an incredibly disgusting pedo moid religion turn into racebait? The fact that
nonnie may or may not be a retard falling for troon shit should have nothing to do with this.
No. 67378
>>67376All I did was post a couple of interesting photos without knowing the gender of the poster (besides what anons on /fa/ were parroting), and afterwards I even included an archived thread that discusses the 'controvery' so that others can come to their own conclusions.
What's with the aggressiveness for such a non-issue.
>>67377Thanks for concisely putting into words what was bothering me about the ban, nonna.
No. 67383
File: 1704294398996.png (14.76 KB, 849x152, Rule 6.png)
>>67380Islam is a religion and not a race. Also picrel
No. 67385
File: 1704299621603.jpg (1022.77 KB, 2048x2048, 20240102_232551.jpg)
We have a "post like a moid" thread, but how about a "post like a tumblrina" thread? Also we should get rid of any moid or tif admins. Self-accepting woman or nothing
No. 67392
>>67377this post. Mentioning that the moid is a conservative Muslim is the entire background to her confession about trolling him, since he won't talk to a woman alone. Not racebait in the slightest, and what does banning a 3-day-old post do for an /ot/ thread anyway? Fucking weird.
>>67384quite a leap to conclusions unless you are being sarcastic. Surely you also know that certain interpretations of Islam (like Salafism and Wahhabism) are more prominent in regions like the Middle East.
No. 67407
>>67397I just said I see antisemitism and islamaphobia much more than I see Christian hate. I think all three of those are poor attempts to bait/infight most of the time and that's why it should be banned as a topic
>>67402It's mostly brown people racebaiting and claiming how they're totally better than other brown people. Pakichan and indiachan are two regular posters. pakichan being the one that said she wanted to be a bangmaid to a neonazi and indiachan saying mothers who have sons(even if it's an accident baby) deserve to get raped by their sons prove those threads only attract schizoid inbreds
No. 67408
>>67361This person tells you about something they saw specifically affect white women around them and that's your response? Your response makes no sense because you can just say the same thing about so much of what is brought up in the other race threads
>>67365>>67366>Mention that muslim moid refuses to talk to you for being a woman>Banned for racebaitPOC jannies selectively applying the racebait rule based on how they feel that day is exactly one reason why there needs to be a white girl thread
No. 67421
File: 1704407904559.png (5.96 KB, 807x113, z.PNG)
I'm not this anon, but what's the point of saging on a pinned post? I know sage rules are enforced more on cow boards, but it's literally always going to be the first thread you see there so it's not like it's unnecessarily bumping anything.
No. 67427
>>67426It doesn't work like that. Threads like that can be posted with the best of intentions and it will end up the same way. Think about where you are.
On the other hand, the worst threads have been allowed to take over elsewhere so why not some racebait. The burgers obviously can't live without it.
No. 67429
>>67426I genuinely think all race-based discussion threads should be banned, including the black girl problems thread.
1. It invites bad faith users/trolling and infighting
2. It toes the very fine line between normal conversation and racebait
3. This is an anonymous imageboard, no one should/needs to know what race you are
The consequences are obvious even in this thread. When you let one group make a thread, the others will start to complain and think they are being treated unfairly; approve those threads and you'll get infighting, or reject them and you'll get infighting still. Race threads need to be unequivocally prohibited. There are plenty of alternative websites to have these conversations about race-based problems, but lolcow is not one of them.
No. 67432
>>67429Agreed
>>67431Threads about living in a country/written in a different language are not the same as race containment threads
No. 67433
>>67429but the black girl thread has been going well. point 3 is just bizarre,
because it's an anonymous imageboard no one will know what race you are. and then, should all identity-based discussions be taken down? banning threads that are going smoothly just because they could go wrong doesn't sit right with me.
the thread should have been better moderated, anyone who tries to come into an identity thread like "X GROUP DOESN'T HAVE ANY ISSUES" should be given a warning to hide the thread. instead the janny just let infighting rage on.
No. 67436
>>67433>the black girl thread has been going wellThis thread begs to differ.
>then, should all identity-based discussions be taken down?The especially important difference is that racebait is explicitly banned, so any (insert ethnicity here) threads should be prohibited accordingly. These sorts of threads invite arguing and baiting as I had earlier addressed. And anonymity only goes as far as you're willing to carry it. As soon as you start bread crumbing pieces of your actual identity (or make your posts obvious and distinguishable) then the name "Anonymous" starts to mean much less.
>the thread should have been better moderatedWishful thinking. There are hardly enough jannies to moderate the board as is; I don't believe that the farmhands should be devoting their time and energy to one specific thread that is an obvious magnet for trolls and goes back to what I had written under the previous greentext about the nature of these threads being very open to infighting. It would be better to ban them completely, especially when there are dozens of other threads on this board that are in need of more thorough moderation.
No. 67442
>>67440if black people want to talk to each other, why canʼt white people want to talk to each other too?
black people can use regional threads too, black americans in the america thread, black africans in the africa thread and so on.
No. 67446
>>67441You do realize that you have been speaking with multiple anons, right? I've only made two posts (not including this one) regarding this topic, and they were only within the last day. I don't visit the black girl thread or /g/, so its continued existence doesn't ~upset~ me as you are assuming. I simply suggested that it would be easier to completely ban the race threads (
all of them, I did not single out the black girl thread alone), and stand by that belief. Simple as.
>Everyone used to be fine with race threads until some newfag decided they're evil ane should be banned for racebaitFirst race thread (black girl thread) was made in 2021.
You're the newfag. Racebait has been against the rules since lolcow's inception. I remember all of the shitty infighting racebait threads (among others) were shoved into a defunct board called /sty/ because they were
shitty.
>I doubt the anons promoting for the deletion of black girls problems thread are even women.Not everyone who disagrees with you is a troon. This is a gossip board first and foremost.
No. 67447
>>67442You didnt even answer my question which is what besides racebait would you discuss there?
>>67443White Americans have European ancestry so you're wrong.
No. 67448
>>67446See
>>67308This is the moid larping as a slav woman for ages and some other stuff he said.
No. 67451
>>67449You admit you don't have any other reasons than to racebait and try to use this as an excuse to shut down two relatively active threads anons use. I'm white too but cmon, you sound retarded with how you just started obsessing over threads that existed since forever.
Take your own advice and hide threads that other groups of women use if they upset you so much you had to spend hours complaining in meta. You're really pathetic.
No. 67454
>>67452Yet protests against those two threads started two weeks or so ago, right at the same time some /pol/fag tier obviously male baited in them and got mad when no one took his posts seriously. Really makes you think, doesn't it?
I'm not a tumblrfag, didn't even mention my race until recently when anon made a retarded joke about how I assume white womens problems are all about starbucks cups.
Which btw is something only a chronically online millenial would say, no one associates Starbucks with basic white bitches anymore or uses tumblr, this isn't 2010. Not everything has to be about you lost millenial.
No. 67459
>>674581. That post was sarcastic.
2. I don’t want those threads banned, I want the rules applied equally.
3. Leftist male misogyny and government misogyny as well as crimes against “white whores” come to mind.
No. 67465
File: 1704566883297.jpg (426.16 KB, 913x1194, Screenshot_20240106_214718.jpg)
>>67463Also can you ban the derailer that posted her own pictures and keeps calling everyone "fat amerilards"
No. 67479
Idk why jannies don't cleanup the shitshow at
>>>/pt/917506 or the mods take over. It has become a boomer vent thread with low quality shit like old screenshots w their bitchfest of the same complaints. Batshit boomers be on the prowl over there. Time to retire the nonmilk discussions.
No. 67491
>>67480Totally wrong. Caucasian is a stolen term as
>>67483 said. Nazis stole it from actual Caucasians.
Racebaiters never know anything about race
No. 67492
>>67489Yes. There's huge variance within one "race". Sub-Saharan Africa is a good example, yet all Sub-Saharan Africans are considered black. Personally I think grouping people into races purely on skin colour is retarded but it is what is.
>>67491You're thinking of Aryan.
Caucasians also speak Indo-European languages just like native Europeans. If you want another example are the people living in the Ural Mountains white?
No. 67496
>>67487I'm literally a medfag and sorry but science and biology just does separate people into races. People of a different race have different set of common diseases and show different symptoms. Have different body that evolved to thrive in different climate. Yes there is interindividual variability but it's nothing compared to interracial variability. What you're writing is some terminally online humanities student ramble that's not based in biological reality but instead on social history of humans. There definitely are biological races.
>race is a social construct defined by phenotypical similaritiesAnd guess what a phenotype is? It's an expression of a genome. People with similar phenotype have similar genes unless they are some wild variation that just ended up looking similar. When it comes to things like skin or hair color, genomes aren't that variable so usually the people are just genetically similar.
No. 67500
Retards that have been banned have returned to do the exact same thing immediately once again
>>>/snow/1951911 ,
>>>/snow/1951879 showing nothing has been learned kek. Truly, where is the lurking and learning? Hellweek when?
No. 67506
>>67440White Americans are genetically european but not culturally or nationally. We are diaspora. There have been multiple posts in this thread on what people would discuss and you ignore them all
>>67441You're not even fine with white women having a thread because you're so threatened by us. The black girl thread was dead until a couple months ago and the asian and latina threads are new. Nobody wanted to deal with complaining about the black thread back then because it didn't seem worth it. No one wants these half assed race rules anymore
At this point we're all just arguing with one farmhand who hates white women. We should just make our own space online, sick of being told to shut up by bitter
poc and their white handmaidens
No. 67520
File: 1704687783686.jpeg (128.44 KB, 640x786, IMG_7362.jpeg)
>>67518Don’t even worry about it. I had to bring my eyes back to it three or four times before I saw that “un”. My brain was autocompleting it without actually reading it. Kinda felt like that trick where you scramble the middle letters of words but the brain still reads them.
No. 67529
>>67496>wordswordswords im retardedBiology and race are separate, that's a fact. Everything you wrote besides
>Phenotype is an expression of genomeis wrong and reads like you spent 20 seconds on Google to anyone with an actual background in biological sciences. LARPing as a medfag doesn't make you right. I wish you terminally-online self-hating caucasoids would get it together and stop kowtowing to europoors like they will ever accept you. They don't even accept each other KEK
No. 67530
File: 1704732295164.jpeg (81.21 KB, 933x933, IMG_9702.jpeg)
Can we get a hellweek? Please? It feels like the site is catering to newfags who don’t lurk. Are we low on jannies or something? Just a timeline would be nice.
No. 67531
>>67441>>67507>>67529I'm pretty sure it's literally one autistic racist moid or troon obsessed with pitting women against eachother, calling himself a medfag, malding at the mods for days for locking his bait thread, etc. I don't think it's a coincidence that every time he rears his ugly head in here, either the black, asian or latina thread gets some bad bait or moid sperging.
This is also why he can't conceive any actual white women finding him retarded, and insists anyone who disagrees with him must be le threatened
poc. Tranny mindset is thinking he has the right to speak for any group of women because he wants to chop his dick off.
No. 67533
Mods clear up the retarded boomers at
>>>/pt/917506. Keeps getting bumped to main pg so we all have to be annoyed with boomerwhine, about 4 yr old bullshit that is dried up. Low quality batshit theories, bumped on to main, is annoying. Non-milk threads need to be retired or not bumped.
No. 67544
We need mods to stop allowing
>>>/pt/917506 to be bumped to main page. You got a bunch of obsessed redditors w old screenshots causing an influx of shitposting & fucking up the place. The don't read mentality is not the answer, non-milk w old images is interfering with current posts. Cleanup the place jannies.
No. 67553
File: 1704816525114.gif (1.74 MB, 480x294, db75c4031f609e2e4117d3b2b1325b…)
cp and gore on front page bump
No. 67556
File: 1704817402792.png (122.75 KB, 514x424, 1698376756174.png)
More spam from useless moids as usual. Here is a bump.
No. 67576
>>67573Seconding
>>67572>>67574I'm tired of the unreadable dumbass shit thread too, but mods aren't going to ban all the newfags. This is why the no1curr thread was a good idea, can it be back please? The dolls wasn't all that was discussed, there were other interesting topics in there.
No. 67579
>>67576So contribute to that thread to create discussions you want and keep reporting posts and complaining in /meta/ so mods will ban the newfags there. You can't just make entirely new threads that have the same purpose as other thread just because you don't like the anons in another thread. And what's stopping those anons you don't like from using the no1curr thread? When they come and use that thread are you going to make a new thread that's exactly the same thing just with a different title again?
I'm just tired of this weird thing anons (probably newfags) are trying to do where they make threads that are just "this is the dumbass shit thread, but these anons are not allowed here!"
No. 67580
File: 1704838547922.jpg (72.63 KB, 922x637, why2.jpg)
Can mods lock one of these? Newfags keep making double threads. It also happened with the Vent thread.
No. 67582
sloppy front page shitfest, old screenshots from twittertards
>>>/pt/917506 who keep bumping shit thread to main page. Low on jannies lets these tards vent their old shit fucking it up for the rest of us.
No. 67587
>>67562this, it was really cool
>>67568yeah lets spam m with one single subject a single anon in this niche board likes instead of a thread for losts of tastes that's actually active…how genious
No. 67595
File: 1704860735982.jpg (294.41 KB, 1280x1582, ahem.jpg)
Move celebricows back to /snow/
No. 67599
File: 1704865060916.png (397.88 KB, 1476x1114, lolocw dot farm.png)
>>67598Joshua Moon is the guy who co-owns lolcow, he’s mostly known for his work with Kiwi Farms but even if he isn’t active on this website; he still owns the actual domain title. You can’t find that registration on google because it is private, but there is instrumental documentation which appoints Joshua as the responsible party for the lolcow LLC. Someone once tried to make a thread about him on here, and obviously it was immediately nuked >>/pt/788176
No. 67605
>>67604…dissolution would mean that the website is inactive. And we can all obviously tell that the website is still running. also
>it doesn’t matter if a man or woman is running the site kek go back to your discord server. If you think it’s appropriate for a female centric space to have a male domain owner then that exposes you for exactly what you are.
No. 67609
>>67608Sure he does, anon, and no one here believes you or cares, so what is your point?
>proof says he's not"BUT HE DEFINITELY IS!!!!"
Uh huh.
No. 67610
>>67609>i-it says dissolution!The website is still running, retard. If he’s not the owner, but he just magically for some reason has the website domain registration ready to send out to his constituents whenever they request it, then tell me - who do you think is? And if you really think it’s not him, then why would he be
randomly appointed as the responsible party for the website in the early court documents during Scott v Moon? Are you just choosing to avoid the multiple pieces of evidence that’s available just via public record?
No. 67619
>>67599>>67617So no, he's not in charge or co-owner at all currently because there is no proof about it. Cool, this was a waste of time and I hope other nonnas read all this to learn not to waste their time also. Good luck in a few months trying this again.
You said
>Joshua Moon is the guy who co-owns lolcowSo now you have to prove he wasn't co-owning it, so what is it? Does his lore change depending on what anons call you out on?
No. 67629
>>67625That's not the same anon, kek. Don't be a pussy and show the entire email exchange. Go ahead. For all we know, you only asked about lolcow. he says to basically fuck off nicely.
>>67623Right? An LLC doesn't even specifically mean this lolcow considering it's a term in general and looking up lolcow LLC doesn't even reroute to lolcow and instead routes to a thread about this Joshua guy, again, which is shut down. It's just the samefag anon who keeps going back and forth between meta threads every few months and brings up with "MEN ARE IN CHARGE OF LOLCOW" headcanon he's made.
No. 67632
>>67630Then what's your argument? You can't stay consistent, you keep changing your story.
No1currs, scrote.
No. 67637
>>67635You're a scrote, 100%. You won't show all the emails. This is all some dumb headcanon you have. All you have are insults when called out. You have year old begging scraps which are incredibly blurry for some reason and timestamps on the email is purposely removed. And this was all given to you through an email where the person tells you they don't even know you or this supposed third party. Why would they send you real proof of anything?
A Lolcow LLC doesn't mean Lolcow.farm.
>owner of lolcow>I didn’t feel comfortable emailing him personally, so a third party did this on my behalf.Wow, you sure did everything to make sure you were right. A Google search kek Literally nothing posted has come from you directly. Post the rest of the emails this third party sent, then. Surely this third party sent you the entire email log. Also post that these were emails attachments with timestamps and not just throwing into the image with the email.
No. 67638
File: 1704871751038.gif (386.25 KB, 128x128, 099.gif)
after seeing that one post in the dumbass shit thread…is all of this retardation just because that awful celebricows thread got locked or because the racebait got banned? like why suddenly bring up this repeated theory now once the mods actually start doing their job right?
No. 67648
>>67647I'm not an anon who has written before in this thread, so I'm not shoveling anything.
same post has both
>Don't be a pussy and
>he says to basically fuck off nicely. He also in no way tells the person to fuck off. In fact he wrote to let him know if an announcement will be made (about what exactly, idk).
When you act weirdly ragey and throw a tantrum, things that may not be true start to look like they have some truth to them. And if you're a farmhand, you should be using your tripcode.
No. 67652
>>67648No, you've posted before. This tinfoil only comes once every few months and it's always the same type, same terrible non-proof proof, and the same aversion to answering questions anons have when they point out how terrible everything about the OP is. Still a scrote and still won't show proof. I don't know why mods don't ban obvious moids in /meta/ when it's against site rules globally.
>>67650Oh, I know. they will probably try this in the other meta thread in a few days too. Always male boogeyman owning the website. Don't forget the fake cookies tracker they posted before and the ads blocked bs kek.
No. 67653
>>67648Just to be clear,
you wrote him now or a third party did? At least keep your story straight. I highly doubt he reached out to you personally. Show the emails.
No. 67656
>>67654>>67655Insulting anon for not posting proof isn't overreacting. Women can use terms used to degrade them by men against men, anon. It's called reclaiming. I bet if I said "gay" you'd only focus on the sexual aspect of the term and "happy". Pussy can also mean being a little bitch, coward, yellowbelly if you really want a better term.
You're also not fooling anyone that you aren't the poster.
No. 67659
>>67658You're coming off
aggressive, anon.
No. 67660
File: 1704878562345.gif (63.02 KB, 300x100, 25.gif)
How did we fall so far so fast?
This banner (and several other new ones) would have been mocked into oblivion just a couple of years ago.
No. 67661
>>67660There's a banner thread to post complaints about banners in
>>>/meta/54709Also what do you even mean? It's just a basic kawaii banner. Did you prefer the porn ones that weren't even censored?
No. 67667
File: 1704889734682.jpg (105.24 KB, 1280x1097, IMG_20240110_052327_657.jpg)
>>67666I meant her anti-psychotics…
>>67663>>67665Oh mb, I thought the only person scrotefoiling was the person who thinks registering an llc is the same as owning a domain. Getting kinda confusing. Anyway I don't think llc-chan is a moid.
That also isn't the email that Moon uses, I mean, sure he could also use a protonmail account. But why?
The llc is now registered in florida, too. So no telling how old the caps were. There's also no evidence that "sirfoxy" (lol) asked him "hey do you own lolcow.farm".
No. 67672
>>67666It's definitely the tranny again
>>67667This still proves nothing kek What the fuck story are you trying to pull?
No. 67680
>>67655Will you add any variation of “worthless c
nt” or “stupid whore” to your list? I always know it’s a kiwi moid stuck in the early aughts on the other end when encountering those phrases.
No. 67685
File: 1704999539355.png (159.7 KB, 934x533, grammar nazi.png)
Thank you mods! Nitpicking typing mistakes is so low on the bar of something a cow does when everyone does it. I don't know why anons keep filling the thread with "oopsies she can't spell or talk to her husband because language" spergs keep coming from, but it's not milk, never was milk, and just comes off as anons wanting to be dicks for the hell of it. Some cows are no longer cows and Taylor is one of them. Grasping at the thinnest straws and then complaining she doesn't post as much as if that's milk.
No. 67697
>>67691Yeah that's fucked up. There's a lot of cows that farmers post photos of that have children. Regardless of milk around the child, children should be blurred out or not posted at all.
Admin needs to weigh in on this because the rules do not specify this. If onisions victims had to be blurred, why are we allowing anons to post toddlers and teens on other parts of the site just because adult cows are their family? Taylor R thread is a good example. In fact anons got mad when another anon did censor the child. Admitting that you want to see a photo of a child, regardless of sexual intent, is kind of weird. They can just go to their original pages if they want to see the kids so bad.
All children under 16, regardless of parent, friends… anything, should be banned and removed. It's such an easy rule to follow.
No. 67700
Are we just at the point where saged non-milk discussions are not allowed on /w/ at all?
>>>/w/317456 Every fucking thread has a bunch of bans for saged non-milk recently. I'm not the person posting it but goddamn this janny is killing the whole board. Let us have saged discussions.
No. 67704
>>67701I don't personally want to discuss it but it wasn't worth a ban. It's related to the cow and saged, so not against the rules. Janny is killing threads once lots of anons start having saged, on-topic, but not-milk discussions (see yumi, stef, taylor). The whole board is more stagnant than it ever has been bc of this. Let us talk as long as it's on-topic and not bumping, like goddamn… there's no actual rule against it.
>>67702It's never been ultra active but has some of my fave cows so I'm partial. I was rereading a few of my fave old threads and the moderation was minimal, only for stuff that explicitly broke rules. It was so much more fun when we could actually talk about the cow. Other boards get to.
No. 67705
>>67696lurk more, no one is going to spoonfeed you. The cow herself admitted she has said this wrong her entire life, it's on her big bad grrrlboss website even. It's an example of her being an airhead, why do you care if we laugh about it?
>>67697'anons' didn't complain, one single person complained, and then it was over. Get a grip and stop trying to get the thread locked.
No. 67723
File: 1705128577554.jpeg (962.43 KB, 932x2041, IMG_5334.jpeg)
Can we ban this larping, derailing tranny from the tradthot thread? “She” has been screeching about a perfectly normal woman’s “cankles” for days on end in the name of feminism.
No. 67726
File: 1705131131206.jpg (122.87 KB, 917x613, Screenshot_20240113_103240.jpg)
The racebaiter that's been begging for deletion of black and asian threads is in 2X and he's saying a brown model is uglier than a white inbred incel male. If this isn't proof enough for anons to believe it's a mentally ill neonazi man I don't know what is.
No. 67727
File: 1705131265800.jpeg (226.97 KB, 998x560, IMG_5335.jpeg)
>>67724So why is that not a moid but this is?
No. 67728
>>67723kek anon these
>>>/snow/1953847 are definitely cankles, belonging to this undisputably overweight woman
>>>/snow/1954183>>67727are you serious? it's clearly sexualized plus the negging like it's exactly how many of them talk
No. 67731
>>67730KEK No you don’t. You guys have no idea what you’re doing. Moids and trannies and even CP posters reguarly evade bans whereas other posters get permabanned for no reason or banned because someone accused them of being a moid. How is
>>67727A moid but
>>67723Isn’t?
No. 67736
File: 1705167250964.jpeg (136.63 KB, 828x321, IMG_2110.jpeg)
can we get pest control to handle the tradthot and /pol/tards posting bait all over /ot/ thx
No. 67742
Trump-chan (I'm pretty sure it's her) is spamming celebricows with her own posts from months ago.
Recent post
>>>/ot/1852573Celebricows #77
>>>/ot/1535020She also spams the threads relentlessly with non milk posts.
No. 67743
File: 1705191689364.jpg (62.19 KB, 640x423, fcfeac106e70accbed4f120cf8fc24…)
I don't know about other anons but I think the drama threads of /ot/ are attracting too many tourists and newfags. It's making the other threads hard to use too. There's enough drama threads on /ot/ and /m/ combined to make a new board for media related drama. Also, no hate to husbandofags, but wouldn't their thread fit better on /m/?
No. 67747
I'm also going to add that the art salt threads feels more like a piece of 4chan's /ic/ board and has been mentioned there multiple times for there to not be a correlation
>>67744The newest one is red texted but not locked, the old one got filled out
>>67745Agreed
No. 67753
>>67742>Trump-chan>HerPretty sure he's a gay scrotoid (a lot of them are shitting up the celebricows thread and now the rest of /ot, sperging about dicks, "twinks" and women's look)
I hate them so fucking much.
No. 67783
>>67760The consoom thread has been ruined by toy and now figure sperging.
>>67776Seconding. It’s been over a day now. Please say something mod or lock the thread
No. 67787
can a mod edit the industry cow OP
>>>/snow/1955417 to paste my recap
>>>/snow/1955445 I am so tired of retarded lazy newfags making threads without an inch of effort and shitting on board culture
No. 67798
Was going to reply to the farmhand post here
>>>/g/373717 but thought it might make more sense to post here instead. Would it be okay if someone just made a dedicated sister thread to the husbando thread in /g/? I think the problem is that we don't have a waifu thread except for the one in /m/ (which isn't for hornyposting/shitposting) and the genderbending husbandos thread (which allows female characters, but still is not a waifu thread). We could also make a strawpoll to see what the users there would prefer, but it seems the husbandofags want a thread exclusively for fictional men, and I certainly wouldn't mind a thread exclusively for fictional women.
No. 67807
>>67798A real waifu sister thread to the husbando thread would be nice but I'm worried that the farmhands would think it was a duplicate, because of that weird genderbend husbando thread exists. But hopefully they will hear us out.
>>67802It has already been explained to you, newfag, that female characters were allowed from the start and that live action husbandos are okay.
>>67801I agree it does make sense to have separate threads but some of us are bi you know.
No. 67825
>>67822Calm down nonette, I was just trying to help. Just an idea to keep the thread around despite the "no subjects under 16" rule.
I'm not reading them that much but most of the Mommy vloggers kind of threads censors the kids faces (the crunchy Alice one comes to mind, correct me if I'm wrong)
No. 67826
File: 1705429788604.png (902.97 KB, 878x1858, Screenshot_20240116-183036.png)
>>67822>The thread will focus entirely on how fucked up the parents are.But will it? There is already multiple posts mocking the children, pic rel
No. 67854
File: 1705545167060.png (19.87 KB, 256x256, kk pondering.png)
I got redtexted for not saging when what I posted was technically milk (the ban has since expired). Is it now a rule that you have to sage ANY post without a image or an embedded video? I gave a reason for why I didn't embed the video, and even if I had, it would broken by now anyway because the cow DFE'd.
I just want to be clear: is it now a global rule that any pure-text post must be saged regardless of content? I'm fine with that, but it should be communicated better. I've been using this site for over six years and this is news to me.