File: 1631739642899.jpg (725.39 KB, 3024x4032, 4isnvvwfz3i41.jpg)
No. 26568
File: 1631777279910.gif (378.08 KB, 500x255, BC267EF3-9F86-40A3-A0A3-29AC47…)
>>26566>>26567Ugh, I hate that I’ve ran across this deplorable shit multiple times now. Almost feels like I need to check /meta/ before browsing the other boards at this point. Goes without saying that it’s still up.
No. 26581
>>26580plus the last time it was moved there the nitpicking was basically the same as now, it was just
>she fatfor 50 posts about lana and billie. it won't really make a difference.
No. 26585
>>26562So are we supposed to adhere and report according to rules on the rule page, or according to that one post admin made that few have seen and will soon forget? Because the latter isn't going to work.
If you're gonna change the rules, change the rules.
No. 26588
File: 1631865199511.jpg (9.39 KB, 690x56, Screenshot 2021-09-17 005223.j…)
>>26586>>26587There is a search function. It only shows up at the bottom of certain pages tho. Far right in picrel. Also you can hit ctrl+f and enter your search term on any webpage!
No. 26590
>>26588samefag, thelink in pic above directs to here:
https://cse.google.com/cse?cx=015039435983255579989:ewpleqypgn0It's probably the same as adding 'site:lolcow.farm' to your google search.
No. 26601
>>26600They strike me as a 4chan scrote, even the obvious posting replying to themselves. Though it being another retarded "ex"camgirl like they're claiming isn't out of the realm of possibility, they're really pushing those details in excess which makes it read like a lie. Their word choices/terminology and ability to quickly ban evade makes it seem more likely, too.
Low IQ and mental illness - not even once.
No. 26737
Could some moderation be done in the jvlogger thread?
>>>/w/166355Thread has been dead but suddenly someone keeps bumping the thread with “hot tea” about Chris, but it’s just insane tinfoil with no receipts. Reads like PULLtard speculation and moralfagging.
No. 26742
>>26555Threads that have been inactive in over a year should be deleted automatically unless the cow has multiple threads
Continuation is important but after a year it’s fairly obvious if someone has learnt their lesson or not. Just a thought.
No. 26744
>>26743>>26743>your thread is not going to be deleted, ElaineUr so edgy holding things against teenagers online! How do I be you.
Let’s face it, threads will be deleted because all it takes is to call in about a PIPEDA violation.
No. 26756
I came here to say this
>>26754 >>26755 as well.
Mods should put them in autosage or lock them. It's been happening for almost (?) two weeks.
No. 26766
File: 1632075561682.png (121.74 KB, 1269x617, snow necromancer.png)
Can Arabic be neatly translated like this?
>>26763Based.
No. 26770
>>26766I doubt that whoever wrote that speaks Arabic. Firstly, it’s formal Arabic, which is only used in newspapers, TV news, and some books. Basically “official” stuff. It’s not commonly used by people on the internet unless they’re 1) old or 2) officials. It’s also way too neat, and the person used the literal meaning of predator, which doesn’t fit the overall context.
Plus the verb isn’t written correctly. In Arabic, verbs are conjugated according to the pronouns of who you’re speaking to/about, sort of like in German. Instead of using a neutral pronoun or a female single/plural pronoun to conjugate the verb, they used a single male pronoun one, as if they’re talking to a man. This often happens when you translate something from English to Arabic on Google translate, as English verbs aren’t conjugated according to gender.
Probably wrote it in English and then translated it to Arabic since it was on top of the list. Lazy too.
t. I speak multiple languages and have been learning Arabic for years.
No. 26786
>>26770Thanks for the analysis
nonny!
No. 26788
File: 1632089539726.jpg (710.9 KB, 1400x1400, tunedin-logo.jpg)
I appreciate your continued presence here, admin-sama
No. 26812
File: 1632104056560.jpeg (234.96 KB, 1242x1121, 03F56FA0-9192-43C4-BADD-E33D89…)
Elaine be like
>t-they host gore and cp on lolcow.farm!
Elaine as well
>spams gore and cp on lolcow.farm
I don’t know if I should roll my eyes or kek.
No. 26825
File: 1632106415889.gif (1.9 MB, 300x279, kots.gif)
>>26823Thank god. Just wanted to make sure no other anons had to see that autsim.
No. 26866
>>26856Actually people frequently reject shit OPs like that one and make new ones. It's very clearly not condusive to interesting discussion and contains no usable summary of milk. 100 posts wasted already just from infighting and people saying the thread is shit, plus not even a unique OP image to differentiate it from past threads.
OP clearly rushed it to try and force their own nonsense "linear" narrative e.g.
you have to agree with me, OP is clearly also the obsessed user with a VPN who has been repeatedly banned from meta for sperging about the thread existing.
Mikan's thread appears to be a selfpost that backfired imo, this is a sperg spergin' both in the OP and blatantly samefaggin' in the replies, in summary we need a new thread.
No. 26870
>>26869Where does
>>26854 mention her name? I was just wondering if it’s allowed tbh
No. 26874
>>26871Let them know in
>>>/meta/6821 , but that sounds like a good idea
No. 26946
File: 1632265937288.png (72.97 KB, 540x960, Screenshot_20210922-003843.png)
wtf
Since I've never broken any rules, I believe this is because someone thinks I'm that kid.
Do mods not go over post history and just ban anyone on any stupid report? Or are mods also lunatic paranoics?
Either way, it's not ok.
My ip is dynamic and it's no big deal, but again, this is not ok.
No. 26964
Thx farmhands.
>>26961>on /m/Now that's just low. /m/ is so comfy…
No. 26980
File: 1632335688354.jpeg (314.38 KB, 584x940, E37C7CC3-9147-49F5-B1FC-253E2E…)
How much you want to bet the person who admitted to hating black people, called me a baboon, and claimed that calling black people the n-word is revolutionary and big brained got banned for racebait as well? Highly doubt it.
No. 27053
someone is spamming TJ kirk all over /pt/, /ot/ and possibly other boards
>>26964man.. I really thought /m/ was safe
No. 27103
>>27102The borzois Adam diver and pitbull where fine but sonic
triggers me bc of Chris Chans recent escapade and I just have bad vibes towards sonic or sonic lovers in general
No. 27128
Proof that there was another version of vent thread 88
>>>/ot/904837There was already a vent thread 88 that already reached past 1200 posts, now can you jannies please delete or lock the one with that ugly comic book girl?
No. 27146
Can a farmhand tell the spergs in /w/ to move on from old milk already and to stop reposting old milk, just to keep going on and on and on about cheating that was discussed since thread 2 and anons keep making autistic collages to bring it back up again, as if this isn't thread 5 and it's stale milk at this point. I'm so tired of seeing "Back in 2017 and 2020, she might've cheated and here's my timestamped and cropped out high school collage to go with it."
>>>/w/175075There can be milk with this thread, but not even anons just won't let old milk be old and stop reposting the same thing over and over again when there isn't any new milk. Nuke the thread or autosage it.
No. 27157
>>26555I’m gonna say this once and once only. Even if CP is being spammed by scrotes, y’all need to start holding the admin & mod team here accountable. It doesn’t matter who’s spamming it. This doesn’t happen on other sites like KF, Instagram, etc… because there are things instated to stop it happening. You can get angry and seethe at the scrotes posting it all you want, but you fail to realise that as soon as cp is posted here, this site has been responsible for hosting Child Pornography. Even if it was accidental. There is no excuse for behaviour like this, if the moderation team really can’t implement features that prevent this from happening, I, alongside, hopefully a few of you girls, will stop using this site. I don’t care if the content is deleted or not. I don’t feel comfortable posting on a site where there’s nothing to stop weirdos posting naked kids. Unacceptable.
No. 27163
>>27162captcha codes like the ones used in 4chan.
Users who want to evade would have to purchase premium
No. 27169
File: 1633168773649.jpeg (338.27 KB, 542x1017, 4A2F6C65-7B2D-4893-86CC-DBA20A…)
I got banned for a post I didn’t make, mod nonnies. No big deal and I didn’t even notice the ban before it expired but I’m just letting you know.
No. 27174
>>27173it’s not a glitch, it’s what
>>27171 said
it’s a recycled IP
No. 27183
>>27157>yallgonna ignore that
>but you fail to realise that as soon as cp is posted here, this site has been responsible for hosting Child Pornography.not how the law works lol
No. 27185
>>27180God I can't even imagine if a whole WordPress was dedicated to me, I'd be screaming and crying and begging for the all merciful Elaine to please take it down! My entire future, decimated, just like that…
Horrifying. Who knows how admin will go on
No. 27191
Mods, this retard
>>27107 is now hopping board to board, posting this chick, trying to get the vendetta rolling again. Can we just outright ban them at this point? It's so obvious its a vendetta and I'm tired of going to other boards aside from /w/ and seeing the same autist reposting the same photos too.
>>>/ot/929053 At least they are in /ot/, but letting them spam there too kind of makes you guys okay with her coming back to /w/, again later like they always do, and derails without posting milk about her again.
No. 27192
File: 1633275240211.png (164.54 KB, 1809x304, thank you.png)
>>27191IDK if this was done before my post or not, probably should've refreshed, but thank you. This vendetta poster has a serious headcase with no milk aside from how much she thinks she's fat.
No. 27208
File: 1633364688321.jpg (58.08 KB, 364x486, accessory.jpg)
>>27206I was thinking about it the other day. It's weird that we can have a dog hate thread but not a man hate thread.
No. 27232
>>27230Because they encouraged an extremist userbase who leaked out into every other thread and we don't have the moderation power to constrain that. I've always felt indifference towards the threads existence, but even I started to get annoyed at how many unrelated threads would derail to manhate sperg. It's the same reason anachan threads had to be removed for a time.
Even as someone who enjoys skimming the mtf threads when I'm bored (which, let's be honest, are often like mini manhate 2.0), the amount of users who have over time got it in their heads lolcow is some kind of extreme feminist refuge is annoying. It was and always has been a subset of the old /CGL/ after catty bitch gossip got banned by mootles and imho battle of the sexes has nothing to do with catty bitch gossip. The honest to God reason people started saying "scrotes" on LC was as a satirical comeback against being called "roasties" on 4chan (where LC
originated from), and like all things it's evolved into some retard thing where people who take it too seriously didn't lurk moar and thought they were at home. Now we can't have nice things because those retards can't contain their spazz enmasse.
No. 27233
>>27232you're an intellectual
nonnie. obv ntayrt but it really does attract tumblr/twitfag
terf types who cannot shut the fuck up about their opinions literally ever, and they'll start sharting it into every single thread they can fit it into, even if the original topic was about something else entirely. there's been moments where I've agreed with something one of these types is saying re: troons or males, but the fact that they've brought it up out of nowhere in a totally unrelated conversation on a completely random thread pisses me off that much I still get annoyed. it's absolutely tedious as it is already, so encouraging it will only make it even worse. plus, like you said, if you want to go on about hating men, just go to the MTF thread kek
No. 27234
>>27233>there's been moments where I've agreed with something one of these types is saying re: troons or males, but the fact that they've brought it up out of nowhere in a totally unrelated conversation on a completely random thread pisses me off that much I still get annoyed.110% this.
Though maybe to a lesser extent, the influx of those same users weirdly extreme PC idealogies often starts to shit up other threads too. In true ironic fashion (despite that mtf thread is like mini man hate), I can promise you the amount of users doing things like commenting >"she*"
>"he*">sex work is real work>racist diatribe disguised as equality Etc. increases with their infl1ux, as well.
It's truly unfortunate, but it's the way it is and presently not having manhate threads is the "lesser evil".
No. 27240
>>27232I just don't get why we can't have a female only space, and
not talk about men? Like, there are other avenues that cater to terfs: (spinster/ovarit/saidit/crystal cafe/
kiwifarm's troon threads etc.)
but
terf anons will still stomp their feet and whine about how they don't want to leave because some of those sites won't let them insult trannies in the same way you're allowed to here, or because they're too lazy to integrate to those sites' userbases.
No. 27241
>>27235The point is those threads existing attract loud tards to this site who do not stick to their containment thread and we don't have the moderation power to keep them in check. It's the lesser evil to remove it and snuff out the stragglers. This isn't the first or only topic that has had to be banned, and as someone whose been here since day one I can attest to how this does help and how much of a problem it was.
If you want manhate threads, then, should this site find a new admin and survive, apply to be a moderator. If we had enough moderators onboard to handle that level of tard shit, maybe admin could reconsider. This really isn't that hard of a concept to wrap your head around, I don't know why some of you act like it's a personal vendetta against yourselves when the decision comes purely from preventing mass retardation. I sincerely feel like a lot of you must not have been around for the lawless landslide of shit that the admin before this one let the site shift into. It's still never fully recovered.
No. 27242
>>27240>I just don't get why we can't have a female only space, and not talk about men?Impossible, you would have to ban all the male cow and hot guy threads too. Good luck with that.
I get the problems with the manhate threads. At the same time, there are threads where we can hate on all sorts of things here, including dogs. So it feels off that scrotes are somehow protected from being hated on.
No. 27245
File: 1633507878046.jpg (79.03 KB, 884x526, 1628950968385.jpg)
>>27240crystal cafe has a bunch of larping trannies/males though
>I just don't get why we can't have a female only space, and not talk about menmy main issue is that farmers are very hard on women's looks most of the time, if you have a problem with that it's "moralfagging" but if you say something negative about men you either get banned or bombarded with "omg stop sperging u sound like an incel come on we're better than that" or just straight up whining about how not all men are bad. if we can't shit on men then they need to be stricter about how much you can shit on women.
No. 27246
>>27245>they need to be stricter about how much you can shit on womenayrt if repeated nitpicks on superficial shit that people aren't able to control like age or their looks: Looking at all the costhot and e-thot threads where they get filled up with nothing but comments on how ugly or fat they are and how
no man should have sex with them were a bannable offense, I wouldn't mind because it clogs up threads and gives minor cows a ridiculously high thread count.
No. 27247
>>27245You can shit on men, though… When those men are specific cows/flakes or otherwise a group that offers some kind of gossipy content. Do you not read any of the male cows threads? Do you think everyone here thinks Onision looks like Zac Efron?
It's a completely different comparison to say it the way you have. People get banned and told off when their sperg against female cows gets too outlandish or nitpicky, too.
No. 27249
>>27244>that specific topic brings in a specific kind of people who every time, without fail, shit up the rest of the site no matter what the topic isI have a hard time believing this, can you give me any specific examples? I've only been using this site since the end of 2018 so maybe I'm wrong but the /snow/ threads I follow haven't really changed or been "shitted up" any less than they were before the manhate thread got banned, even lurking older threads from before I used this website weren't getting shit up with irrelevant man hating. it would make sense to me if they didn't want a manhate thread because it would attract more trolls/spammers, I respect that but I wish they would just say it.
>>27247I don't follow the onion thread, yes they shit on men to a certain extent but they don't nitpick as much. half of shayna's thread is just calling her obese and other insults, yet jannies threatened to lock/autosage the blaire white thread multiple times for merely saying he looked like a dude. the RTG thread is FULL of people saying she looks like a man and the jannies haven't stepped in once. there is a clear bias.
No. 27250
>>27247>people get banned and told off when their sperg against female cows gets too outlandish or nitpickyEh, moo, bella delphine (before she got thread locked), weenus (no idea if she's still auto-saged), lori (recently when that one reddit anon dropped her OF pics), the e-girl general (where they'd all selfpost anyways), even in Kathy/Katherine whatever's, heather sparkles (whom I'm convinced is just filled with her old friends posting about her) and ana-chan general would beg to differ.
>>27248Yeah, because it's one of those things that's hard to moderate for. So you end up getting shit like certain people or things being banned topics as a compromise, like all the lainey makeup sperges being banned from onion threads when it wasn't just filled with schizos and kiwifarmers.
No. 27258
File: 1633529960064.jpeg (65.62 KB, 750x531, 1633181422244.jpeg)
>>27232congratulations, your and other "anon's" bitching about a single innocent thread to the point it got banned, now made /ot/ manhate general, effectively only furthering the fact that men are trash.
No. 27260
>>27256>>27257Yes, lots of topics can bring in shitty users or bring out shitty takes. But not every topic will do so to such an uncontrolled extent that it warrants banning, and once it does then admin/team deal with it as they do.
>>27258You're being intentionally obtuse and shifting blame. Anons bitching is not what got it banned; excessive, off topic derailing outside of containment got it banned.
And regardless of what you want to believe, I have personally noticed the difference since it's been gone. Is it still a problem? Yes. Will bringing back the thread solve that problem? No, it'll just take us back to recruiting the same line of retards who started this - probably the same ones who stuck around and still contribute to it as an issue presently. LC was never meant to be your diary to QQ, just because you came at a time where this was at an out of controlled height doesn't mean you're entitled to it now.
No. 27266
Can we lock/delete the dreams thread made by the sonic avatarfag
>>>/ot/931700 so we can make one wth a better threadpic?
Enough of the sonic autist already
No. 27276
>>26555>>27274Honk the planet
#LULZ
No. 27280
File: 1633656689988.jpg (127.25 KB, 1053x547, SmartSelect_20211007-213107_Ch…)
>>27279Mentally ill whore can't even remember her own threats. Yikessss.
No. 27282
File: 1633657049760.jpeg (154.76 KB, 1125x879, 1627377477325.jpeg)
>>27281>maybe I'm just eckstra gewd at spec opbitch can't even tell who is and isn't admin. KEK I'm just a regular anon, I thought you knew who was and wasn't admin posting??? embarrassing
No. 27287
File: 1633659891473.jpeg (258.8 KB, 828x1002, 117943A1-CE14-4A73-8A4A-A3AE7A…)
>>27279you mean this one elaine? 8 whole followers, impressive
No. 27293
>>27274It's not and to be honest, I think a lot of actual female farmers ignore it. When I have visited, it's massive scrote vibes aside from the mods which I've spoken to before in DMs. Not to mention the spergs who come here to post the Discord as if anything they have to say matters and is milk when it isn't.
I think it's better off dead and saves yourself a coded link on the site.
No. 27298
>>27297I did? You're missing the point. I don't know why you are arguing about my opinion on why admin shouldn't bother with discord anymore. Good for you for liking it?
Can a farmhand tell me if this is the supposed Elaine retard?
No. 27299
>>27298Nah, Elaine still can't figure out how to sage. That, there's a genuinely random retard. There's a lot of them who frequent meta for some reason, all equally as annoying, lacking in reading comprehension and critical thinking skills.
So, in that sense…
I guess there's a lil Elaine in all of us.
No. 27300
>>26555>>27299Hi Ines.
I would like to offer a proposal of us getting a joint podcast together. I really think this would do wonders for the internet. Would you join me in my mission and be the Ethan to my Null? Thanks!
No. 27305
File: 1633701015083.jpeg (329.94 KB, 1170x613, 9E2EF4DE-4C2C-4111-8761-5EA916…)
>>27304she’s literally being investigated,
nonny No. 27313
>>26555Let me make something very clear. No one who is attacking this site cares about their threads on here. We care about the children on here who have suffered due to this website. None of us cows give a shit about a few fat women being catty online. If I could I’d direct you all to the threads that are openly on minors where people have shared their nudes. The thing is, sometimes the farmhands do ban people for creating threads on minors, banning the person who created the thread doesn’t erase the content meaning there is still content on minors even if the person who created it can’t access the site. People need to stop bringing up our threads as if that’s is why we are attacking Ines. We are attacking Ines because of the child pornography and revenge Porn on this website. None of our nudes have been shared, this is entirely out of anger of what young girls have to go through. If Ines was as much of a feminist as she portrays, she wouldn’t expose young girls online for everyone to see. Even if they’ve posted that content themselves first, there is no tangible excuse for using their stupidity against them and subjecting them to years of exposure, embarrassment and sexual exploitation. The backhanded “take your meds” comments should really be redirected to Ines and her buddies who openly have threads of 15 year olds on here (stated as 15 in the OPs btw) where their nudes have been shared multiple times. When will you get it through your heads that no one cares if the person shared their nudes first? This is a retarded excuse to
victim blame and gaslight people. Holding minors accountable for sending or posting nudes when 75% of American kids are doing that, is beyond disgusting. It’s stupid of these people, but this site is taking advantage of people who clearly lacked parental guidance, internet guidance or who made stupid mistakes. If you are openly defending a woman and a site that distribute cp & revenge Porn, we literally couldn’t give less of a fuck about your irrelevant opinion. To those asking for proof, I’m not posting cp, I suggest you comb through the threads and take a look because it’s not subtle and extremely in your face. I get that there’s a more kosher, gossip side to things, but even if you aren’t the people sending other’s nudes around, you are still using a site and abetting a site that does. I’m only using this site right now in hope some of you won’t be so cucked and blind sighted to this issue, it’s starting to look delusional. We have
victim statements and evidence of everything stated, we don’t owe you proof, proof will be given to you when the police take action. We aren’t your personal army and we aren’t here to give you evidence against Ines or LCF. Take it or leave it but personally I wouldn’t add to a site full of cp. My best friend was found by a scrote via this site, sexually assaulted and attacked for months after her nudes were shared. No justice no peace.
(USER HAS BEEN PUT OUT TO PASTURE) No. 27323
>>27322I’m secretly hoping the
DeathEaters hacker collective Elaine’s working with is just a couple of anons sending her bogus info like Ana L Beads.
No. 27332
>>27331I hope she realizes that creating false
investigations for the supposed FBI, can cause her to get arrested. Good job, Elaine.
No. 27336
File: 1633798579182.jpeg (65.44 KB, 610x404, 70ACDBD7-5081-4280-A115-927DF5…)
>>27332Elaine the pain is back
No. 27340
>>27335She's just so stupid and doesn't understand website protocols and thinks that a poster is the same as the website hosting CP and doing nothing about it. They do report posts to the FBI and farmhands and admin alike have stated this for years. She might as well report Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram as a whole too while she's at it withher logic. I don't go to her threads, but her attempts at naming admin, falseifying to the FBI about hosting, and doxx attempts, honestly feels like admin should report her to the FBI instead. Is love to see the milk and I hope she knows that if she is the CP spammer and gore poster, even switching computers and changing IPs, doesn't clear personal online searches. They can catch predators easy because these dumbasses think incognito mode and onion can magically
hide everything.
No. 27375
File: 1633981915155.jpg (85.68 KB, 1200x675, copium.jpg)
>>27372Or maybe people that need a containment thread for their rabid hatred of an animal are fucking psychos.
Inb4 heckin doggo lover. I'm not that fond of dogs myself, just not mentally unstable enough to post about how much I hate them all day. No. 27379
File: 1633985798688.jpeg (39.42 KB, 640x480, A9A7BCC8-7B3B-4BFF-8B76-E52D3A…)
WHERE GO BEAUTIFUL MTF THREAD?
No. 27393
File: 1634040712254.jpg (179.12 KB, 844x1116, r6292hla2kn21.jpg)
>>27392oh no, i hope youre okay
nonny No. 27397
>>27394Need the dog love thread locked until things have calmed, it's obviously the one being targeted. It's probably been the dog lovers posting in the dog hate thread being volatile to anons hating dogs and having their own thread to vent. I would say the militant dog love thread anons
triggered this response because they wouldn't let anons have their dog hate thread in peace.
No. 27399
>>27393thanks for cute cat pic
nonny>>27394i like dogs well enough because they're cute, but i can understand why someone who doesn't like them would get annoyed by some dog people and want to complain. the problem is that dog hate threads tend to only attract the most unhinged of fucks instead of the people who just dislike them and are normal about it. i think a containment thread could be fine, but it can sometimes exacerbate the quarrelling between people.
>>27397if you need to post dog gore and go on a 10 reply sperg because some people are annoying in a thread, you need to seek help. i think it's mostly just that one moid who rages about dogs posting, even the dog hate thread thinks hes nutty.
No. 27402
>>27398You're just
triggered because there's actual people who exist that don't like dogs and you're a dog lover. You want to control and shutdown a thread where dogs and dog lovers are rightly ridiculed and scrutinised because you don't like it. Not liking dogs is
valid, hating dogs is
valid and anons should have their thread to vent about it. Otherwise if the dog hate thread is shutdown, the dog love thread should be shutdown too and taken away from the dog lovers. Seems only fair to me.
No. 27403
>>27402anon, it's because posting about animals you think are cute is normal, but needing to spend all day posting about how much you hate mutts is a sign of psycho behavior. it's a just a dog. honestly i think it's fine to complain about dogs so in theory the thread is alright, it's just that the people it attracts in actuality are often unhinged.
and for the record, i'm a cat person.
No. 27404
>>27401The dog hate thread is necessary. Obviously it is since it's proven quite popular with anons and is being used and is active. Anons hate dogs and want to vent about it and so they should have their dog hate thread. And I blame you crazy dog lovers. You went into that dog hate thread and started infighting because you just couldn't let anons have their dog hate thread in peace. Dog lovers are trying everything to get that dog hate thread locked. They instigate fights in the thread and I wouldn't be surprised if it it was one of them behind the infamous sperg posts anons are talking about rn.
If you're getting dead dogs posted in your dog love thread, serves you right tbh.
No. 27412
>>27410Just go back to 4chan and post your seething hatred towards dogs there, anons are bitching about your dumbass thread since it got created, and it was created because you retards wouldn’t stop talking about how much you hate dogs unprovoked.
You idiots talk a lot about
>muh w-we hate the owners n-not the animalsBut you already got 2 threads talking about shit that the animals can’t control.
No. 27414
File: 1634045032870.jpeg (426.75 KB, 1242x2126, 515576E1-8669-4E75-BB7C-C4D5AA…)
>JustMentallySaneThings
No. 27420
File: 1634045231772.jpg (88.08 KB, 614x588, eyebleach.jpg)
hope everyones ok
No. 27424
>>27422Can mods just permaban the psycho spamming the same picture of a dead dog?
Imagine being so unhinged that this is how you spend your morning…
No. 27430
>>27399If you dislike dogs and are normal about it, you don't need an entire thread to sperg how much you hate dogs with other unhinged individuals. Doesn't check out.
I don't care for cats and irl catfags shoving photos of their furbabies in your face can be annoying as fuck, but I don't need a cat hate thread
No. 27433
File: 1634048374320.jpg (106.74 KB, 1080x774, 382727262738383.jpg)
>>27423The dog sperg's typing style looks EXACTLY like this faggot from reddit. I had a hunch so I did a Google search. That thread really does attract some weird people.
No. 27436
>>27402>>27404I feel like mentioning that the first dog love thread had doghaters sperging in it instead of ignoring a thread they dislike so yeah, apparently people loving dogs is insufferable to some and only dog hate should be allowed on the farms. So dogfags aren't really the (only) ones trying to control the narrative.
At the same time I wouldn't be surprised if the gore poster was either a dog hater OR an unhinged individual posting about killing both cats and dogs, to rile up both sides.
No. 27439
File: 1634049209317.png (361.81 KB, 1600x886, Screenshot 2021-10-12 103236.p…)
>>27433This person posts nothing but dog hate and transvestigation videos under the username "Holo Hoax" on YouTube. They don't ever seem to post their own voice. They've been at this for 4 years
This is getting disturbing
No. 27443
File: 1634049767774.png (24.86 KB, 1085x187, dg.png)
>>27433definitely the same person. imagine being so unhinged about dogs someone can track you down across multiple websites.
digging through this man's post history and he seems desperately unwell. he's also convinced literally every famous woman (no exaggeration, he says he thinks every female celeb and govt official) is a troon.
someone should post this guy in the personal lolcow thread.
>>27438then there's no point in stating what normal people think, is there?
No. 27445
>>27441I always knew the a-logging dog hate sperg was a scrotoid, glad to know my intuition works
>>27442Kek I wonder if it's the same unhinged person who periodically comes in to the MTF thread to shill whatever female celebrity as a tranny
No. 27448
File: 1634051183911.jpg (324.69 KB, 1080x1772, 3827262894837262.jpg)
>>27445Lmfao this is a post from his Minds account that was linked on the YT. The doghate sperg is a confirmed man.
https://www.minds.com/thetruthphd/ No. 27449
>>27440Calm tf down twinkie, I was using the TiM stuff as an example to show how retarded the public is that asking them their opinion on anything and taking it seriously is redundant because the average person is an idiot anyway. How does it make sense to care about what idiots think? Why should anyone follow the example an idiot identifies and agrees with? And you missed the point I was trying to make earlier with this dog problem. I was saying the dog lovers coming into the dog hate thread causing havoc brought attention to themselves as a suitable target to troll because of how reactionary they are. They took the dog hate thread very poorly and were sperging out over it. Then shortly after a dog love thread is made and images of dead dogs are spammed. Now why the dog love thread? I think its because the dog lovers drawn attention to themselves with their reactions seen in the dog hate thread and they were seen as fair game for trolling. It's all cause and effect. It's just the same when moids come here and anons respond to them they keep coming back for the reaction but if they're ignored they die off.
>>27443What is normal? Define "normal." What dies the normal person think, hm? Normal means many things to different people and "normal" people think sex work is normal, misogyny is normal (to scrotes and pickmes), ebephilia is normal (to scrotes and pickmes), kinks and BDSM is normal to the majority that youre labelled a kinkshamer if youre against it. So yeah I say there's no value in the average, normal person's opinion because they're stupid and deviant themselves. Hating dogs at least makes sense and there are very
valid reasons behind it. Hating dogs is actually based as fuck and dog haters shouldn't be demonised.
(USER HAS BEEN PUT OUT TO PASTURE) No. 27450
File: 1634051515812.png (19.63 KB, 1606x238, Screenshot 2021-10-12 111021.p…)
>>27448>raised my son completely by myself […] He's 19 now.A middle-aged man who comes here to post dog hate, call women bitches for being disgusted at his mental illness, who talks on Reddit about wanting to assault women for having dogs.
I don't want to hear about misogyny from dog hate spergs ever again. This shit is horrible
No. 27453
File: 1634051759071.png (96.08 KB, 1140x522, Screenshot 2021-10-12 111437.p…)
>>27451Samefag, but the dog hate posters were literally calling this violent, mentally ill man "based" and praising him in that thread he originally posted that one rant
>>27452Like clockwork. I thought the thread was just shit before, but this shit is cancer. I don't know why I didn't guess that it was full of moids from the start
No. 27454
>>27449jesus christ, you are so unhinged. nobody here is going to disagree with you that sex work is exploitative and men who like BDSM should be gulaged.
i frankly don't give a single shit if you hate dogs. i really don't care. i'm neutral on them. i think needing to post a dozen replies full of gore because a few people were mildly annoying, makes you an unhinged freak. you don't have to be a dog lover to think posting incessant gore makes you deranged.
you're defending a moid who thinks every woman with any amount of fame ever is a troon. please stop trying to derail by bringing up tranny shit when you're defending a delusional misogynist.
you're so up your own ass it's hilarious. normal people defend trannies REEEE which is why i will defend an insane, sexist moid.
No. 27457
File: 1634052125008.png (44.72 KB, 745x196, smellymutts.png)
>>27419From the H3H3/Trisha thread
No. 27469
>>27467>>27466Sorry, I was meant to reply to the reactionary "omg I knew everyone in the doghate thread is a moid please never talk to me again!!" anon. Just ignore his schizo bait and move on instead of sperging about how much the thread
triggers you for literal days now.
No. 27472
>>27468anon please keep posting about how much you hate scrotes and pickmes while defending an anti abortion moid who gets online to talk about women being mutt loving bitches and call normal women undercover trannies.
is your head so genuinely thick you think someone can't not care if you hate dogs if they also think posting gore makes you deranged? is everything alright up there?
i actually think there must be something wrong up there if you're doubling down after seeing this man's post history and the homepage full of gore. you're a retard.
No. 27480
>>27479You can ctrl+F "CP" or "gore" whenever you check it, that way you don't have to read every post
>the true opinions about cow thread and the funny lolcow posts thread This is neither of those things
No. 27481
>>27479Didn't you say the dog gore was deserved?
This is not a true opinion on a cow or a funny lolcow post, retard.
No. 27501
>>27499i repeat:
>>27497and dog gore has been posted before the doglovers thread was even made, stop reaching.
No. 27503
File: 1634058020047.jpg (227.72 KB, 680x615, 1479591597189.jpg)
No threads should be closed because of one moid with a psychotic episode, don't be retarded.
No. 27507
File: 1634058671457.png (9.91 KB, 1292x70, smelly mutt.png)
>>27457From the first dog hate thread. If it's him, he's definitely been here since the very first thread and probably tried the same thing in the first dog love thread too
His son would've still been a teenager back then (he's 19 now, according to another cap anon posted). I guess he has more time to do what brings him joy
No. 27509
File: 1634059713359.png (56.07 KB, 1189x125, psychotic dog hating anon.png)
>>27507Hold on, the first dog love thread
>>>/ot/301081 was locked, but the dog hate thread remained open? Three years later, we have the same complaints from the dog hate spergs.
No. 27545
>>27544I don't have all the answers but this is what I'm assuming:
this website is already inherently manhate anyway. as for kpop, they had their chance and ruined it. So it's not allowed. It was never initially banned, just became banned when they proved they couldn't keep it contained.
Dogspergs will probably also end up ruining their chances too. So far, I've only seem them sperging in their proper places. The occasional spergs that do talk about it (like in unpopular opinions) do get banned. The other places I've seen them sperg: screencap thread (which makes sense because there are screencaps of the doghate thread) and /meta/ which also makes sense.
No. 27551
>>27550>Where does the doghate leak out to?Nta but the threads
>>27545 mentioned and shayna's thread
No. 27553
>>27551>unpopular opinion threadOnly thing I could find is a dog anon starting it with complaining/carrying the previous infighting about dog hate (and an opinion that isn't even unpopular) and then immediately after the complaining about the dog hate thread, as I mentioned.
>>>/ot/936559
>screencap threadShort mention from 3 months ago of Shayna's dog being ugly and one anon who was screencapped saying in one post that they hate dogs but no further sperging or anything.
The actual sperging began with a screencap of someone infighting about cats in the dog hate thread and getting banned for it and someone defending the post/themselves.
>>>/ot/934854And of course, 3 posts in it turned out to be a thinly veiled infighting attempt about the existence of the dog hate thread again.
>>>/ot/934945>>>/ot/934947I haven't read Shayna's thread for a while, but if they said anything beyond "her dog is ugly lol" (which isn't dog hate) and go too off-topic, it is fair game and can be reported.
And yeah, let's not give the retarded scrote any further attention.
No. 27558
>>27556Started off as already autistic infighting bait about some posting drama of very specific posters of shayna's thread.
>>>/ot/926777And the post you quoted was already after the infighting started with, again, the same complaining about posters of the thread
>>>/ot/926830My point is that I can't go to several /ot/ threads and write "the posters of the vent thread are all retarded/schizos/pathetic etc I hate the thread!" and when said posters reply to me, get upset and run to /meta/ complaining that they leak everywhere and that their thread should be closed because of that.
It makes more sense to just hide the thread that upsets me.
No. 27561
File: 1634228845726.jpg (165.88 KB, 750x1000, flat.jpg)
>>27560>are now trying Sadly it's been going on for a while now
No. 27566
>>27564Nta but it was a thread on lainchan. Some anon linked it the last time we discussed the issue.
>>>/ot/897652I thought it was bots too, since the formular of link+advertising text are just like spambots, but in some instances they bump their own threads and then deleted their bump posts.
No. 27617
>>27604The mods discarded this site months ago. We’re on our own now
nonnie.
No. 27621
>>27620>blame everyone for the derailing but themselvesThis time it wasn't the anti-anime sperg, what actually began the derail was this weeb
>>>/snow/1349741, which people casually replied with their own views, but then two pretentious weebs got
triggered by one post and further derailed that thread defending their favorite 2D media, writing paragraphs how no one understands art but them.
Not replying to obvious bait or autism is the bare minimum, specially now that tradthot-chan and /pol/ tourists are straight up astroturfing that thread. Just report and move on.
No. 27625
insane amounts of racebait in pro ana thread rn
>>27624it’s not just you, it’s been really noticeable on pretty much every single board. pretty sure it’s just moids baiting, but people on here keep falling for it which just keeps encouraging it
No. 27655
File: 1634802937070.jpeg (255.56 KB, 828x1620, 351B120D-184B-4C00-BB5F-F6014D…)
Can this thread please please please be autosaged? There is zero milk and every month it gets pushed because of some vandettachan nobody cares about
No. 27656
File: 1634820331091.jpeg (358.33 KB, 1280x1254, 41EC5C9C-44D8-4F63-9D4A-B7E0B2…)
Can someone kindly make a second Grimes thread, please?
No. 27659
File: 1634825728547.jpg (26.41 KB, 1080x726, 1615251239319.jpg)
Activate the Basic Attention Token thing already! Let me give you my BATs!
No. 27797
Can a mod do something about the ban evading fag who keeps posting in the vlogger thread with nothing, ever, to back up with shitty sharla and chris tinfoil? Multiple anons are tired of that shit clogging up the thread.
>>>/w/178960 They keep coming back and pretending they are a different anon, but it's still the same narrative, so it's clear it's the same fucking person.
No. 27800
>>27799Agreed. Another one just popped up.
Just leave the eurofag thread.
No. 27802
>>27799>>27800I white guilt getting to you, anons? Why so butthurt?
Please open them back
No. 27838
>>27837Fucking crybaby that you’re
triggered over a thread and can ignore it.
No. 27906
File: 1635708109213.jpeg (115.99 KB, 648x596, 85FE7DD9-21AF-47A8-8A8D-FAF66E…)
>>27905they have no real definitive way to vet jannies because it’s incredibly easy to fake your voice and obviously your appearance so it’s pretty much 80% possible that a lot of the current mods are actively working against this website because they’re scrotes. no self-respecting black woman would ever mod for this place because they’re all at LSA kek
(Elaine) No. 27915
File: 1635725115507.jpg (209.74 KB, 1080x1235, 38272672848373.jpg)
Can the tranny fucking jannies practice better discernment and stop handing out bans over trivial shit? There is no logical reason why it would be necessary for me to screencap a search tool on a non-cow thread.
No. 27918
>>27916new mods should be oldfags
>>27917did you get out of your janny mode just to tell them that kek? go back to letting cp stay on /ot/ for hours y’all suck ass
No. 27934
>>27933That wasn't what you complained about, you were shitting on jannies not being fast enough in deleting vile things. My suggestion was to do something against that then.
>How about you do it if you’re so mod defensive????
I appreciate jannies who do the work and I' mglad there's someome willing to do it at all.
No. 27950
>>27944Dick smells nasty and cum is
toxic waste
No. 27968
>>27966No, and you're retarded.
Posters are being so fucking annoying and shitting up this place recently, what gives?
No. 27970
New Elaine thread
>>>/snow/1360109, pls unpin the old one.
No. 27988
>>27985>there is nowhere else a thread like this would have at least 1% of a chance of working out without it getting derailed to fuck.Threads like that always have derailing, infighting, and baiting, what are you talking about? It's what happened with the Twitter Journalists, Asian Incels, and LSA threads. Threads that focus on race are typically banned/locked
because they cause derailing and infighting. There's not even a 1% chance that thread won't have it.
No. 27989
>>27974>>27978I don't see the problem but it will be prone to racebait so we'll keep a closer eye and rely on others' reports. You could also just use a general thread.
Recent News A new discord server has been created by a farmhand willing to manage it in her own time. A permanent invite code can be found at the navigation bar, access is open and public but private channels are reserved for verified users and ko-fi donors. Anons are also free to make a new friend finder thread but bringing offtopic server drama onto the site will be discouraged. The matrix will continue to remain as a fallback.
In the meantime you're encouraged to discuss your nominations for this year's cow awards. Reflect on your favorite husbandos and happenings.
https://discord.gg/yAERedhZVp No. 27995
>>27989Cool! Would love a new friend finder thread.
Since I don't have a discord account on hand - how does one get verified? Voice verification? Show your hand?
No. 28051
File: 1636391413762.jpg (55.33 KB, 848x480, 1634928677191.jpg)
>>28035>supposedly donated but doesn't want the site to continue Nice try Elaine.
No. 28067
>>28066We think this is talking about us
We like that you guessed our preferred pronouns, the majestic plural
No. 28093
>>28090cringe. No female and I mean NO FEMALE has ever threatened to post a pussy pic here.
Reeks of moid.
No. 28095
File: 1636680257623.jpg (32.53 KB, 379x309, unnamed.jpg)
* If a man had let an arable field to a(nother) man for cultivation, but he did not cultivate it, turning it into a wasteland, he shall measure out three kur of barley per iku of field. (29)
* If a man stealthily cultivates the field of another man and he raises a complaint, this is however to be rejected, and this man will lose his expenses.
* If a slave escapes from the city limits, and someone returns him, the owner shall pay two shekels to the one who returned him.
* If a man is accused of sorcery [translation disputed], he must undergo ordeal by water; if he is proven innocent, his accuser must pay 3 shekels.
No. 28100
>>28099Because it's not at all possible that women of other ethnicities frequent this board, even when lsa users have admitted to posting and lurking here on their own forum.
What I don't understand are anons like you who don't seem to grasp that all men are shit and we should be allowed to point out each culture's specific scrotery without some neuro-chan alleging that dissent means white supremacy.
No. 28101
>>28100This. I'm sick and tired of cows being off limits because someone got
triggered by seeing two anons disagree with each other.
No. 28103
>>28102You were literally told why some people were posted: They work for Caitlin's organization and have zero licensure or experience in the field of funeral directing yet expect asspats and compensation. The fact that it's been a day and everyone else moved on and you're STILL upset about this, enough to run over here and try to act as if you have some kind of moral high ground on a fucking GOSSIP SITE, shows that you don't understand where you are. Doxxing people isn't posting someone's public social media, especially public figures, you're a fucking retard.
It is absolutely not every rando and you know this, so don't lie to the farmhands and other anons when they can check the thread for themselves and see the faculty list. You're wking people and you're pissed off, so you can fuck off.
No. 28116
>>28114theres no racebait in it as far as i can see, this person
>>28109 is probably a butthurt hotep
No. 28119
File: 1636760238416.png (81.43 KB, 1847x526, 2021-11-12.png)
>>28107>>28109>>28112A farmhand already said that this thread was okay to have so long as anons reported actual racebaiting, so I don't know what your problem is.
No. 28122
>>28121Because your penis needs an electron microscope to be visible to the human eye
Aye mods clean ot please and thank you
No. 28136
File: 1636916550423.jpg (17.64 KB, 1280x174, photo_2021-11-14_19-54-29.jpg)
I don't know where else to post this but the user Spooky Bones on KF tried to change his/her name to Regina. They're heavily involved in Elaine Miller's gay retard shit so I assume this is some sort of ploy they were hoping to set up unnoticed. Just a head's up.
No. 28160
File: 1637101931943.png (13.44 KB, 1302x115, scree.png)
Can anons like this in Shay's thread be dealt bans more? Its infighting and derailing, there's not even a reason why this anon to have replied to another with their opinion unless they felt personally slighted. Whether its the rotund camwhores or farmers themselves, shay threads have too much of this perpetual pms shit.
No. 28169
File: 1637180642566.png (99.38 KB, 285x150, 2021-11-17 12_23_29-Window.png)
cp is being spammed again ugh
No. 28171
File: 1637181310243.jpeg (89.19 KB, 828x917, E4E95ED5-9F77-4B4D-8F8A-95C466…)
cp in the venus thread
No. 28175
File: 1637181783080.jpeg (118.98 KB, 742x729, E429D4B5-45E3-4390-9DB7-539435…)
cp is back in the venus thread
No. 28180
File: 1637209695585.png (46.71 KB, 1174x284, poopoo.png)
Mods please ban this lengthy discussion of religion in the tinfoil thread, it's derailing and fucking boring tbh
No. 28193
File: 1637282164750.jpg (63.4 KB, 275x268, 1610257852163.jpg)
>>28192moid started posting porn in /ot/
No. 28205
File: 1637317548538.jpeg (315.36 KB, 828x807, A7FD81ED-8659-425F-874A-680945…)
Jannies please free free me. This is a test to see if I’m still banned, therefore sage. But if you happen to see this. I did nothing wrong. Please free ya girl.
No. 28230
File: 1637422293961.jpeg (36.79 KB, 622x707, EE171F51-E7B6-4B39-96EB-E2EC69…)
came to post about moids spamming porn but. well!
No. 28294
>>28285>>28286>>28287Samefriend originated from 4chan, are you all very new?
Nta but I personally don't like to use fag since this is supposed to be a non-scrote board and thus fag free.
No. 28299
File: 1637497953834.jpg (106.78 KB, 933x382, Screenshot_20211121-133018_Sam…)
Nta who was handed that ban obviously, but I wonder something:
Do we have to sage even when the thread is on autosage mode?
No. 28455
Admin could you pin the movie night thread on /ot/? Anons are trying to organize a stream on cytube.
>>28447Also this, she'll only get milkier from now on.
No. 28460
File: 1637947056892.jpeg (33.31 KB, 540x386, 1635892741125.jpeg)
>>28458>Elaine lied again and said something retardedso its a day that ends in "y" im assuming?
No. 28464
File: 1638017829544.jpg (Spoiler Image,155.83 KB, 862x1086, Screenshot_20211127_135558.jpg)
these things are ugly as fuck and should be banned
No. 28467
>>28466because
nonnie originated from tumblr with anonymous asks
No. 28472
>>28467I literally just noticed them being redtexted. Thanks for the context! Weirdly enough, didn't experience those on tumblr.
>>28468Nope, I am not one (though I may have some knowledge gaps, as I never went on 4chan).
No. 28479
>>28478I also feel like the redtext hasn't been updated in a while, farmers using
nonnie are unlikely to be from tumblr now. Redtexting words like
victim in /ot/ and in threads about actual
victims of crime just looks out of place.
No. 28499
File: 1638204995296.png (83.55 KB, 388x138, ew.png)
To add to the whole "spoiler image is lewd" thing, I also really really hate this banner. It is NSFW, the whole ass is out and is being suggestively caressed with a disgusting catchphrase on the side. I have no context to what lolcow this is, so it just looks like porn to me. It makes me so uncomfortable every time I see it. The one with the girls who has her tits out as well.
No. 28501
>>28500To add to this
>Those permabans are honestly probably best because it lessens their chance of finding an unblocked IP address when hopping from IP to IP in order to spam/raid.Yes, it also actively prevents anyone else from using those IPs. Basically you are letting a sperg block all VPN users who share the same IP range from posting as well.
>It slows them down, because unless they feel like waiting a day for admin to remove the permaban, they'll just move on and possibly get tired of finding blocked IPs.It doesn't tho. And just make the ban fucking 1-2 weeks long. That's all I'm asking. I am sure they will be bored by that time and then other people are free to use the IPs again. Making the bans PERMANENT, means you are PERMANENTLY blocking people from using them that have done absolutely nothing. It is just completely retarded and pointless. I am so tired of appealing these every day, I shouldn't have to.
No. 28509
>>28481Late to the party but maybe we could replace the spoiler image with a more SFW PT pose?
I don't want our Queen to be erased either.
No. 28524
File: 1638411424784.gif (938.14 KB, 400x225, 1632142210369.gif)
can this site please get a search bar for the catalog? ctrl+f is not enough.
No. 28578
>>28572There's massive fuckery going on in that thread (the constant WKing is very suspicious imo)
I know that farmhands have a lot on their plate rn but I'd really like a post reveal.
>>28573Idk about the Manson thread but Admin told us during Townhall that making a new Annie Abrahams one was OK. But I don't know if she's still milky these days.
No. 28582
File: 1638960113244.jpg (42.04 KB, 656x90, Screenshot_20211208-112751_Sam…)
>>28581Even the mental gymnastic that some anons are doing to defend her lies?
I don't know, maybe I'm wrong but I always thought there were something suspicious going on in her threads, that's why I'd like to see a post reveal.
Also, we don't have to take a side in this little cripple fight, we're here to point and laughs. Sure, you can love a "cow" documented here (I'm very fond of PT and Abby Brown myself) but you don't have to act like a retard to do so. Who cares about these edtwt sperg? LC isn't Lucinda personal army.
No. 28597
File: 1639311557277.png (104.69 KB, 388x142, ew.png)
PLEASE get rid of this banner, it is so fucking disgusting. Feel like I am on a porn site.
No. 28603
>>28593i came here to ask about that as well. that person legit bumps the thread every single day and brags about constant ban evasion. i cant stand it.
>>28597yes! that girl hasnt been relevant to anything in many years now, so its not funny anymore and its just gross.
No. 28615
File: 1639590987354.jpg (333.43 KB, 1668x1745, MunchieSamefagUwU.jpg)
>>28611>>28612>>28613The Munchie Queen keeps WK herself in every thread, it's fucking obvious.
Post-reveal please!
No. 28616
>>28604Yeah it doesn't really happen in /snow/ or /pt/ but god forbid you say something on /w/ and "several" anons will materialize despite the thread not having been bumped to bitch you out. Even if it's an extremely slow thread, of which most of them tend to be. Several posts within the same hour of that girl being asked about and that's somehow not wking and totally not suspicious at all.
>>28609I've seen anons get banned for it in other threads like the Caitlin Doughty thread because her rabid fat goff stans didn't take kindly to their qween being talked about. It also falls under derailing.
No. 28618
>>28613Yeah, I gave up because of that. There's really no point in posting in the thread if it doesn't get some moderation. Some cases don't even try to fit in anymore, either. If I wanted to talk to retarded twitter teens, I would go there.
>>28615I think it's several people besides just herself. There's the anon who calls everything vendetta, the anon who goes on about "seething twitter fattys" at every second post(who might be the same as the first one), the anon with the weird spacing when she quotes, the one who spams stupid OTT insults to get a counter reaction and the """anon""" who always instantly seems to remember every single miniscule tweet and curious cat answer Lucinda has ever made no matter how long ago so she can "correct" details, make up excuses or claim "we just don't know for sure" whenever an anon starts questioning the lies.
No. 28620
>>28619Every time some anon makes a
valid post about her, 2 days later the same annoying person has a sperg fest calling us junkies and fatties and its so boring and you cant catch up on the thread
No. 28621
>>28618I’m convinced that the only reason the wks like Luc is because they see her as body goals. Even though I’m pretty sure that if she’s willing to shoop her pupils and eye bags, she’s capable of shooping her waist. But I can’t say that in the thread because then I’ll just be a fatty Ambrose stan. Also, I love how the wks will say Lucinda is anti- pro-ana yet the
rhinoceros unicorn posts daily body checks.
No. 28634
can we get an IP reveal in the acidburnbaby thread?
>>>/snow/209739it's reaching spergchan levels of insane
No. 28644
>>26555Porn posted on /ot by
triggered scrote.
No. 28655
File: 1639971417758.png (625.87 KB, 505x584, 1636752105359.png)
the faggot who was spamming the cry thread is now spamming a different cry thread. please put this loser out of its misery.
No. 28660
>>28659Making mods and other users angry, especially people like this
>>>/snow/1334726I already achieved it, judging from the salty ban messages and comments about me here.
Fun fact, this post here
>>>/snow/1337092 from 2 months ago, in response to the post I linked above, was also me!
No. 28663
>>28661No, I don't think that's it. What good does getting attention here does to me? We're all anonymous, you don't know who I am, I don't know who you are, and nobody really cares.
If nobody had replied or banned me with assblasted messages (like the one I got just before posting this, some mod told me to "die"), I'd still be happily doing this, satisfied in knowing some sperglord out there, who's way too concerned with the sanctity of the rules of the venerable lolcow imageboard, is losing it because someone is using the board incorrectly and they are powerless to stop it. Attention is entirely optional.
No. 28668
>>28667I'm not that person who was told to sage. I actually haven't been told to sage yet, I've only been told to stop, to fuck off, and to commit suicide so far.
Also, outside of that one-time post two months ago, it hasn't been months on end yet, it's only been two weeks. I'm down to continue for months on end though. And c'mon, this takes me like 2 minutes to do each time, more than worth it.
Btw, this person here
>>>/snow/1367322 who was the first to post "bump" is actually not me either. I don't know who that is, but two weeks later when I came to check that thread, I thought it was hilarious that someone did this here where people sperg out about saging so much, so I decided to keep going. The next "bump" two weeks later and most subsequent ones were me (a few times other people besides me joined in, but most were me).
No. 28677
>>28674Mods, after two weeks of being unable to ban me in /snow/, surely you have learned that it won't work.
The ban reason this time was "scrote", how cute. I prefer when it's "kys" or "die".
>>28676Well, all of the cry threads are now locked or auto-saged, so at least there's that. I even had to choose a new thread to bump now.
No. 28682
>>28676for some reason, it always has taken literal months if not a year to add new banners. I'm not even talking about the time inbetween they being added and them showing up. Just hanging here sadly, waiting for an upload.
Removing a banner is same issue lol
No. 28687
>>28683its the cry person who comes to meta to brag about being autistic. i dont think the luna thread should be autosaged cause she does stuff occasionally and we cant just keep letting this idiot choose what threads get to die and which ones dont. its getting ridiculous.
>>28686you know if youre gonna be on this website everyday at every hour you could also just use it normally? like a normal person? you even stalk the meta thread which most spammers dont even know exist. if you love this place so much you could just try not being retarded.
No. 28688
>>28687But I am using it normally, anon.
Isn't this site for bullying people who are easily exploited? That's exactly what I'm doing.
(not today, Satan) No. 28692
>>28691she is a cow and deserves to be discussed. now, the sperg who fights in that thread every day has been going on for weeks now. i think mods probably are preparing to out her. wouldnt be the first time. i think thats why they havent said much about this, when its pretty obvious who this sperg person is.
it would be a very nice xmas /snow/ miracle. i hope they do it soon.
No. 28696
File: 1640114572199.png (22.54 KB, 695x416, yes.png)
Is this seriously what it takes to get a perma-ban that was rejected on appeal? Not the infighting or anything else that goes on here? Also wtf is hamchan?
I really hope the jannies have had a huge turnover because whoever was doing it before was a sensitive fucking child. What kind of jannie gets insultd enough over a post like that they start flinging insults? Did we just fire all the PPL mods after the site shut down? Absolutely pathetic.
No. 28715
>>28714It seems that several cows are taking advantage of the fact that the mod team is reduced due to the admin shift (Hello, Lucinda!)
I hope there will be plenty of post history revelations as soon as the team is more stable (by the way, can we still apply to become a janny/farmhand? How many are missing?)
P.S : Merry XMAS a little bit in advance Admin-Sama, Farmhands and Farmers. Love you all, you crazy bitches.
No. 28718
would mods consider exposing this guy's post history?
>>>/ot/1003987 he's a man who contacted a farmer pretending to be a woman, emotionally and psychologically abused her and doxed her with the intent of ruining her life. he says he's been posting here for years
No. 28724
>>28722it still bumps the thread, even if the post is deleted
just lock it, then he can't bump anymore
No. 28730
>>28718Same guy this anon refers to to be clear, he's a real manipulative piece of work and you could see him fakeposting as a woman to try and derail, while also posting as himself, doling out long-winded groomer advice in real time in the same thread.
He deserves a lifetime ban but is clearly using a VPN. Man needs to log off forever.
No. 28733
File: 1640478729588.jpg (Spoiler Image,66.22 KB, 700x699, aVlRK3QQ_700w_0.jpg)
Greetings nonas. I see that the "we should be less mean to men" hoes are Thriving™ rn. This thread was an amusing read.
It's been a while, but some things remain the same. Like how that one ballistic moid who posts here is very obviously an elder muh lenial/borderline gen X r/kotakuinaction updooter. It's evident from his lingo alone - the "assblasted", the "it was my privilege" and other 2014 anti sjw tumbler bangers, the pitiful preoccupation with denying that he's hurt, the boomer memes, the instant meltdown whenever someone suggests that he's obviously from a ratings based non-anonymous website because he either fucked up a sage, replied with some hello fellow teenage foids cringe or committed some other chinese nasolabial fold forum faux pas. I see he's done insisting that he's a woman though, so he's got that going for him.
All I'm saying is, this is less about being a 35+ decrepit sack of autism sperm spending all his time on a website for zoomer girls, and more about the new lolcow we're going to get whenever his identity becomes known. Merry Christmas!
No. 28735
Maybe I’m just a suspicious person but I’ve been getting a really strong feeling from the latest altcows thread
>>>/snow/1384689 ever since the breakup that Jake monroe has been wking himself. It’s possible there’s just some zoomer fans but when I see posts just listing out various things he allegedly bought his ex gf that don’t look like common knowledge (like paying for her personal trainer, among other stuff), or talking about her like they actually know her in person, it sets off some alarm bells. I don’t want to go through the thread spam reporting a dozen posts on just a weird feeling, but if anyone has some spare time (and I’m right lol) it could be a good reveal.
No. 28758
>>28750Agreed, I don’t know who the sperg is but it’s probably tkyoham or norm (purely for the obsession with Sharla).
Autosage would def get rid of that.
No. 28777
>>28776I dont agree with this. Bump anon is a spammer that has been doing this shit for weeks. Threads have been put into autosage cause of him. It only feeds his ego and he just looks for a different thread to bump.
He literally comes here to brag about how he gets to control which cows get to live or die on this website. Its not fair to the rest of the users that a retard moid picks and choose what threads to kill. If we keep doing what he wants he will continue spamming like he has for weeks now.
No. 28786
File: 1641034954107.jpeg (185.38 KB, 828x1459, E6D9D154-B72D-4DFC-A5B7-833B68…)
Please put the Kittyphina thread on autosage there is regularly a vandetta chan posting it’s literally nothing else anymore
No. 28796
>>28795ew, read the rules.
can we get the dead threads in snow (that keep getting necro'd) autosaged?
No. 28808
>>28806thats… not what /pt/ is for… /pt/ was made to discuss legendary or iconic cows to this website like onision or PixyTeri (who the board was named after). it has 0 to do with discussion of randoms in music or movies.
maybe understand the website before trying to mini mod tbh.