I’m the anon you’ve been talking to, and I just want to say >>361961
is not me, so great job continuing to confidently assume shit about me. Like I already said, you are continuing to not read my original posts, since, just for example, you say>regular women have hips you know!
When I EXPLICITLY said I LIKED female hips in >>361652
. do you have reading comprehension issues, genuinely? Or are just incapable of absorbing information that runs contrary to your theory?
You coming at me like I’m some straight weasel trying to infiltrate bi and lesbian communities or something is bizarre and speaks to your own personal hang ups since I never claimed to belong to those groups. Like wtf? >If you're trying to imply that you're a wlw, then you haven't done a good job, given these contradictions.
FUCKING DUH. Oh my god. I never was, and the contradictions were the point, all I was ever saying from the start is what you say here>a strict attraction to androgynes is very unusual.
Yes, it is, and I know it! Hence my posts! Holy crap. Talk about missing the point.
And calling me juvenile for having an uncommon sexuality and speaking about it casually on a Mongolian basket weaving form… ok. Wow. I’m gonna have to say right back at you, frankly.
Anyway, above all I wanted to defend my honor against samefagging accusations, the most important thing, kek.(calm down)